35
Hogup Cave, Utah: comparative pollen analysis of human coprolites and cave fill Item type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Kelso, Gerald Kay, 1937- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Downloaded 26-Mar-2018 18:27:20 Link to item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/318683

HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

  • Upload
    ngotruc

  • View
    233

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

Hogup Cave, Utah: comparative pollen analysis of humancoprolites and cave fill

Item type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic)

Authors Kelso, Gerald Kay, 1937-

Publisher The University of Arizona.

Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to thismaterial is made possible by the University Libraries,University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproductionor presentation (such as public display or performance) ofprotected items is prohibited except with permission of theauthor.

Downloaded 26-Mar-2018 18:27:20

Link to item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/318683

Page 2: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS

OF HUMAN COPROLITES. AND CAVE FILL

' . by <

Gerald Ke K elso

A T hesis Subm itted to th e F a c u lty o f th e

DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY

I n P a r t i a l F u lf i l lm e n t o f th e R equirem ents . For th e Degree o f

MASTER OF ARTS

", In th e G raduate C ollege

■ the UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

1 9 7 1

Page 3: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

'STATEMENT BY AUTHOR

T his t h e s i s has been subm itted in p a r t i a l f u l f i l lm e n t o f req u irem en ts f o r an advanced degree a t The U n iv e rs ity o f A rizona and i s d e p o s ited in th e U n iv e rs ity L ib ra ry to be made a v a i la b le to borrow ers under r u le s of th e L ib ra ry »

B r ie f q u o ta tio n s from th i s th e s i s a re a llo w ab le w ith o u t s p e c ia l p e rm iss io n , provided th a t a c c u ra te acknowledgment o f source i s made« R equests fo r p e rm ission f o r extended q u o ta tio n from o r re p ro d u c tio n of t h i s m anuscrip t in whole o r in p a r t may be g ran ted by th e head of th e m ajor departm ent o r th e Dean o f th e G raduate C ollege when in h is judgment th e proposed use o f th e m a te r ia l i s in th e i n t e r e s t s o f sch o la rsh ip * In a l l o th e r in s ta n c e s , however, perm ission must be o b ta in ed from th e a u th o r .

SIGNED

APPROVAL BY THESIS.DIRECTOR

This th e s i s has been approved on th e d a te shown below:

WILLIAM A, I0NGACRE A sso c ia te P ro fe s so r o f A nthropology

Date

Page 4: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

PREFACE

. Ho gup. Cave j, a two chamber lim e s to n e s o lu tio n cav ern lo c a te d

n e a r the so u th w este rn end o f th e Hogup M ountains in n o r th e rn Utah*

was excavated by Dr e C. M elvin A ikens under th e a u sp ic e s of th e

U n iv e rs ity o f Utah d u rin g th e summers o f 196? and 1968„ The e x cav a to rs

hoped to tak e in to c o n s id e ra tio n changing p a t te r n s o f c u l t u r a l eco logy

as w e ll as exam ining s e v e ra l problems o f lo c a l c u l tu r e h i s to r y $ con­

se q u e n tly a. w idely c r o s s - d i s c ip l in a r y approach was adopted in exam ining

th e m a te r ia ls recovered® A n a ly sis o f b ird rem ains was undertaken by

P„ ¥«, Par male e w h ile th e ' rem ains of o th e r fau n a were s tu d ie d by S. D.

C u rra n t, Ke Ts H arper and Ge M." A lder in v e s t ig a te d th e m acroscopic

p la n t rem ains from the cave f i l l and th e human c o p r o l i te s found in th e

cave were examined f o r m a c ro fo s s ils by G. Fry® C ooperation between

th e v a r io u s in v e s t ig a to r s was q u i te c lo se and a l l r e s u l t s w i l l be

p u b lish ed as appendices to th e s i t e report®

S ix tee n d i s t in c t " n a tu r a l , l a y e r s were uncovered in Hogup Cave

and from th e se Dr® Aikens was ab le to i s o l a t e fo u r su c c e ss iv e c u l tu r a l

p a t t e r n s e U n it 1 , in c o rp o ra tin g s t r a t a 1 through 8 , d a te s by ra d io ­

carbon from 6h00 B0C0 to 12$0 B«C. and c lo s e ly resem bles th e D ese rt

C u ltu re as o r ig in a l ly d e sc rib e d by Jen n in g s and Norbeck (1955). U n it

2 (1250 B„Ce~AeDe liOO) i s composed o f s t r a t a 9 , 10 and 11 and i s a

c o n tin u a tio n o f th e p rev ious p a t te rn b u t w ith a s t r i k i n g d e c lin e in

th e number and v a r ie ty o f a r t i f a c t s and a s h i f t away from the

- i i i

Page 5: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

u t i l i z a t i o n o f w ild seed fo o d s , D eers mountain, sheep and r a b b i t s a re

re p la ce d by a n te lo p e and , to a c e r ta in e x te n t , by B ison a s th e p rim ary

game anim als and w ater fow l d isa p p e a r from th e reco rd e n t i r e l y . U nit

3 (AID, U00-I350) in c o rp o ra te s th e m a te r ia ls from a v a r ia n t of th e

Fremont C u ltu re recovered in 12 , 13 and I t , w hile U n it t (A,D, 135>0-

1850) encompasses le v e ls 1$ and 16 and re p re s e n ts in te rm itte n t Shoshoni

o ccu p a tio n ,

I would l ik e to ex p ress a p p re c ia t io n to D r, W illiam A, Longaere,

D r, A rth u r J , J e l in e k and D r, P e te r J . M ehringer f o r g ra c io u s ly con­

s e n tin g to se rv e on my th e s i s com m ittee, to D r, P e te r J . M ehringer f o r

h is generously ex tended guidance and a s s is ta n c e in u n d e rta k in g th i s

s tu d y , to .Dr, C, M elvin A !kens, D r, K im ball T, H arper, Mr,. James B,

King, Mr, Gary Fry f o r comments on th e m a n u sc rip t, D r, P, S , M artin

f o r use of th e counts from c o p r b l i te s GL% and GL3 , and Mrs, K atherine

G o tte s fe ld f o r h e r e f f o r t s in d r a f t in g th e d iagram s,

II HO GUP CAVE, UTAH: Com parative P o llen A n a ly sis o f Human

C o p ro lite s and Cave F i l l " i s C o n tr ib u tio n No, 202, Program in

Geochronology, U n iv e rs ity .of A rizona ,

Page 6: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

. TABLE OF CONTENTS ; ’ ' '

' ■ ■ ■ ■ : - / .

■ "LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS « o . „ . ;• ; . . ' . ■ . Vi .'' V

ABSTRACT 0 o # » * « fl * e * * a a o @ * o o o e o o e o . e. v i A.

1 . INTRODUCTION . » . . . , . . . . . .. » . . . . . . . , 1 ':

2» IDENTIFICATION, EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS., . . . . . . . . . . 3

3 . THE POLLEN RECORD FROM THE CAVE FILL . . . . . .' . « . 6

THE POLLEN RECORD FROM THE COPROLITES . . . . . . . . . . . 11

5® THE DANGER CAVE COPROLITES - . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .• . . 1 7

6 ® SUI'4MARY AND CONCLUSIONS . ‘ ........................ ....................... 20

LIST OF REFERENCES ' . . . ' V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2h

v.

Page 7: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

LIST OP ILLUSTRATIONS

F igure ' Page

l e E xcavation p lan w ith lo c a t io n s o f p o lle n p r o f i l e s j Ho gup Gave,, U ban

29 P o llen counts from cave f i l l , P r o f i l e s I , I I , I I I ;Ho gup Gave, U tali oo . ® o o « o « » o o o o » » o o » o 7 ■

3<, P o llen counts from human c o p r o l i t e s , Ho gup Gave, Utah „ 12

Ua P o llen counts from human c o p r o l i t e s . Danger Gave", Utah * 18

Page 8: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

ABSTRACT'

P o lle n a n a ly s is o f Ul human c o p r o l i te s and 37 cave f i l l sam ples

from th re e p r o f i l e s in d ic a te s t h a t d u rin g d e p o s it io n o f s t r a t a 1

th rough 9 th e D e se rt C u ltu re b e a r in g occupants o f Hogup Cave r e l i e d

h e a v ily on Cheno-ams, a lth o u g h o c c a s io n a lly consuming o th e r p la n ts ,

and th a t th e r e a r o f th e cave was l e s s f r e q u e n tly used e a r ly in th e

o ccu p a tio n , A flu c tu a tio n in ju n ip e r , p ine and A rtem is ia f re q u e n c ie s

may e v e n tu a lly be r e l a t a b l e to c lim a tic e v e n ts .

In le v e l s 10 and 11 , d u rin g a p e rio d o f im poverished m a te r ia l

c u l tu r e w ith in th e cav e , a d ec rea se in th e c o p r o l i te Cheno-am c o n te n t ,

w ithou t a s h i f t to o th e r economic ty p e s , in d ic a te s a p o s s ib le g e n e ra l

d e c rea se in th e e x p lo i ta t io n o f v e g e ta l re s o u rc e s , A s im i la r , ro u g h ly

contem poraneous, ev en t occurs a t Danger Gave b u t w ith a com pensating

r i s e in th e r e p re s e n ta t io n o f o th e r economic p la n t s .

D uring the Fremont and Shoshoni o ccu pations o f s tra tu m 12 and

' above th e Gramineae and A rtem is ia became prom inent food so u rc e s , ■

w ith o u t f u r th e r encroachm ent on the Cheno-am r e p r e s e n ta t io n , im ply ing

a re su rg en ce in r e l ia n c e on p la n t fo o d s , and , p o s s ib ly , a le n g th e n in g .

o f th e occupation seaso n . The sudden r i s e o f B ison and g ra ss as m ajor

food re so u rc e s d u rin g t h i s period may in d ic a te some m o d if ic a tio n in

th e environm ent around Hogup Cave, ; ■

Page 9: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION '

The v a r ie ty and th e r e l a t i v e fre q u e n c ie s o f p o lle n d a ta

recovered ' from a rc h a e o lo g ic a l s i t e s a re h e a v ily in f lu e n c e d by human

s e l e c t i v i t y 3 and d is tu rb a n c e s o f th e n a tu r a l v e g e ta tio n of cave de­

p o s i ts a s the r e s u l t o f ro u tin e d a i ly a c t i v i t i e s can a ls o be a n t i c i ­

pated o P o llen re c o rd s ob ta ined from cave f i l l a r e , th e r e f o r e , l im ite d

in t h e i r p o te n t ia l f o r en v iro n m en ta l re c o n s tru c tio n ,. The problems

and p o te n t ia l s of a rc h a e o lo g ic a l palyno logy and the i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f

p o lle n re c o rd s from a r id N orth America a re d iscu ssed by M ehringer

(1 9 6 7 )® Some f lu c tu a t io n s in cave f i l l p o lle n f re q u e n c ie s w i l l i n v i t e

i n t e r p r e ta t io n as n a tu ra l phenomena, b u t w ith o u t re g io n a l p a leo e c o lo g -

i c a l com parative d a ta such in fe re n c e s a re s u b je c t to q u a lif ic a tio n ®

P o llen recovered from cave f i l l may prov ide u se fu l in fo rm a tio n con­

c e rn in g p la n t usage and s i t e fu n c tio n ; however, i t b e s t se rv e s as a

com parative fram ew ork.f d r more s p e c i f ic in v e s t ig a t io n , such as th e

a n a ly s is o f c o p ro lite s® . '

Each c o p r o l i te p ro v id es an is o la te d sample o f th e m a te r ia l

in g e s ted a t a p a r t i c u l a r p o in t in tim e and should p e rm it guarded con­

c lu s io n s con cern in g d i e t , s p e c ia l p la n t u t i l i z a t i o n and , e s p e c ia l ly •

when d e a lin g w ith peop les among whom s to ra g e tech n o lo g y was not w e ll

d eveloped , season o f deposition® Much o f t h i s in fo rm a tio n may be

1

Page 10: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

d eriv ed from th e s tu d y o f m a c ro fo s s i ls , b u t p o lle n a n a ly s is may p rov ide

ev idence f o r th e use -of p la n ts which were com ple te ly d ig e s te d or f o r

foods in which no p la n t t i s s u e was consumed (M artin and Sharrock

1961*)* A c o p r o l i te composed s o le ly o f ch a rred Typha p o lle n recovered

from Lovelock Gave, Nevada (Napton and K elso 1969) p ro v id es a good

example o f th e l a t t e r *

I t i s u n lik e ly t h a t th e fre q u e n c ie s o f . th e p o lle n ty p es noted

in c o p r o l i te s t r u l y r e p re s e n t th e r e l a t i v e p e rcen tag es o f th e p la n ts

e a te n « Some m ajor economic p la n ts produce very l i t t l e p o lle n and th e

r e p re s e n ta t io n o f even v e ry heavy p o l le n a to r s may be a f fe c te d by v a ry ­

in g methods o f food p re p a ra tio n ^ se a so n o f c o lle c tio n ^ and p o r tio n o f

th e p la n t s e le c te d fo r consum ption« These f a c to r s would have a

h e igh tened e f f e c t in a s i t e occupied on a sea so n a l b a s i s e P o lle n

a n a ly s i s s o f c o u rs e s p ro v id e s no ev idence fo r t h a t p a r t o f th e d ie t

n o t d e riv ed from p la n ts* Almost c e r t a in l y a p o r tio n o f th e n a tu r a l

p o lle n r a in and p o lle n r e f lo a te d through human d is tu rb a n c e of a s i t e

midden would be in a d v e r te n t ly swallowed and inc lu d ed in th e sp ec tra*

Modern e th n o b o ta n ic a l s tu d ie s p rov ide some u se fu l com parative m a te r ia l§

b u t when d e a lin g w ith tim e d ep ths as g re a t as those a t Hogup Gave,

such d a ta may n o t be un ifo rm ly a p p lic a b le th ro u g h o u t th e sequence*

Page 11: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

CHAPTER 2

IDENTIFICATIONs EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS

The in v e s t ig a t io n of p o lle n from Hogup Cave has invo lved th e

p ro c e ss in g and a n a ly s is o f i ll c o p r o l i t e s , id e n t i f i e d as p robab le

human fe c e s by Gary F ry ( in p r e s s ) 3 from s t r a t a 3 th rough 16 (see

F ig , 2 ) and 37 cave f i l l sam ples from th re e p r o f i l e s (F ig s , 1 and 2 ) 0

One c o p r o l i te co n ta in ed no p o lle n and th re e o th e rs were excluded from

th e s tu d y when F ry concluded th a t th e y were not o f human origins, No

meaning should be a tta c h e d to th e r e l a t i v e p o s i t io n s o f th e c o p r o l i te s

w ith in in d iv id u a l s t r a t a as shown in F ig u re 1 *. The arrangem ent th e re

r e f l e c t s only th e o rd e r of th e sample numbers a ss ig n ed by Fry and has

no c h ro n o lo g ic a l s ig n if ic a n c e . S t r a t a 11 and 13 were a b se n t from a l l

th re e p r o f i l e s .

The c o p ro l i te s were c a r e f u l ly c leaned by F ry and th e p o lle n

sam ples tak en from th e i n t e r i o r to avoid in c o rp o ra t in g su rfa c e contam i­

n a tio n in th e p o lle n c o tin ts . A n alysis .was conducted a t th e Geochron­

ology D epartm ent, U n iv e rs ity o f A rizona , and id e n t i f i c a t i o n o f .p o lle n

ty p es i s based on th e Geochronology Departm ent re fe re n c e c o l le c t io n .

P o llen e x t r a c t io n fo llow ed M ehringer (1967? 1 3 7 ), An i n i t i a l count

o f 200 g ra in s was fo llo w e d , where p o s s ib le , by a second count of 200 ,-

100 o r 5>0 g ra in s , depending upon th e d e n s i ty o f th e p o lle n on in d i ­

v id u a l s l i d e s . The dom inant ty p e , th e Cheno-ams, was excluded from

Page 12: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

IIOLIOO

94

•93

I0L80 92

90

f e e t

F igure 1 . E xcavation p lan w ith lo c a t io n s o f p o lle n p r o f i l e s ; Hogup Gave, Utah.

Page 13: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

5

th e second counts The term ino logy used in t h i s paper fo llo w s M ehringer

; (1967) excep t th a t th e term "Ambrosia” -ty p e has been s u b s t i tu te d f o r

V low-spine Com positae" an d . ,!h igh~sp ine Com positae” • has been re p la ce d

by " o th e r Com positaeo11

Page 14: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

CHAPTER 3

THE POLLEN .RECORD FROM THE CAVE FILL

The f i r s t coun ts from a l l th re e p r o f i l e s ? dom inated as th ey

were by th e Cheno-ams, p rov ide us w ith r e l a t i v e l y l i t t l e in form ation*

This was n o t unexpected , in view of th e la rg e amount o f A lle n ro lfe a

c h a f f co n ta in ed in th e f i l l (H arper and A ld e r, in p re ss )* The r e l a - •

l i v e l y low r e p re s e n ta t io n of th e Cheno-ams in th e d e ep e s t la y e r s o f

a l l th r e e p r o f i l e s (see Fig* 2) could be th e r e s u l t o f c l im a tic f l u c ­

tu a t io n s d u rin g th e e a r ly p a r t o f th e occu p a tio n b u t , w h ile the co u n ts

in d ic a te contem poraneous high f re q u e n c ie s o f Pinus and A rtem is ia

p o lle n , th e re does n o t seem to be c o n s is te n t ev idence t h a t en v iro n ­

m ental change i s d i r e c t l y re sp o n sib le * I t i s p o s s ib le , however, t h a t

A lle n ro lf e a h a b i ta t was r e s t r i c t e d a t t h a t tim e by a h igh la k e le v e l*

The un ifo rm ly high Cheno-am c o n te n t of P r o f i le I I above s tra tu m

it and th e la c k o f correspondence between th e Cbeno-am co un ts o f th e

o th e r two p r o f i l e s may im ply th a t human ag en ts were re s p o n s ib le f o r

v i r t u a l l y a l l o f th e Cheno-am p o lle n in th e f i l l samples* That the

e a r ly in h a b i ta n ts of the cave were l e s s dependent upon Cheno-ams o r

t h a t th e cave was l e s s f r e q u e n tly occupied d u ring t h i s tim e could be

e q u a lly v a lid e x p la n a tio n s » A lle n ro lfe a seed would n o t be a v a ila b le

f o r h a rv e s t u n t i l F a l l and i f th e cave were c u s to m arily in h a b ite d

d u rin g some o th e r tim e o f th e y e a r , th e Cheno-am p o lle n fre q u e n c ie s

Page 15: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

Figure 2* P o llen counts from cave f i l l . P r o f i l e s I , I I , I I I* Hogup Gave, U tah0

.The f i r s t count o f 200 g ra in s inc luded a l l ty p e s , b u t on ly th e Cheno-ams a re inc luded on th e diagram* A ll f re q u e n c ie s to th e l e f t o f th e Cheno-ams a re from second c o u n tse A ll second counts a re based o n .200 g ra in s ex cep t s tra tu m 8 , P r o f i le I , 50 g ra in s and s tra tu m lU , P r o f i le I I , .100 g ra in s e ■

Page 16: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

r

/ / / z/

«B »fleataaK eaC sssa BB1C FC32» esa9 beai BBCOB8 BB Bwn7 D Bft leasm BS ea pBBBEJB4 Baa pa 1lS B paa12 B Ba »

11 fiE221 1L

" ea 233 !fcssa pa tea tea(ECTi lEUa (ESI 5E3=SC -iaa E23

Compositoe

/ / ? # / / / / / j 7/ / f / $ i i i i i M l i i

to to SO «o «rI Ui-t-j-i-J pj-U

I raa »■snemnaa I ^r~r-Fxxsmm

TsnwrJCTTjEaa pr^^CTfKasrsaBgagtMErm

BDasEaaaccmHSCBCSKGBEapascKssaa

Bra y eizy.n iGwami

I @223 ■C8IZiraEB2BBEZHC5aiB3 ■B3Eragga is225cg

b Epmz)T2aztM=T:3aa«um encE==z:zc%=-2Zzai

B E 3 ® n 3 zmBeEmsaBOB*nB5C3aB3a Ksssrraajnzrrrsaaitn n ir t»j .^m'iiyirgyjan^e a u c r a s M i

■ 831

■ C5£2C2r-saca« ercK K K a

■ K s r m x e m ^ M a

| BZSCZEKSE?31asETB s-rrrrxna

• • BBacs-Km 'isssn

aEaEsssarsa I BEaxmacasasa

BKCEZ3Z2 Zaa ■saaEssEsna eaiBssiaxGiffle sssx&rjsa S K ^ r r a m IP.-'': ■■rrsa o • yi=>-.-.-a-rT.-q - r r ' - ra g a a

i Baaxrii-’Tsaa^ eassEaisssap b e je ;

F igure 2 , P o llen counts from cave f i l l . P r o f i le s I , I I , I I I ; Hogup Cave, Utah.

->3

Page 17: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

in f i l l sample's would be lo w er. The p ro g re ss iv e r i s e in th e re p re se n ­

ta t i o n o f the Gheno-ams in s tra tu m 1.3 - moving from th e d eeper p a r t o f

the cave ( P r o f i le I I ) toward th e e n tra n ce ( P r o f i le I I I ) p ro b ab ly i n d i ­

c a te s t h a t th e r e a r , o f the. cave was n o t so e x te n s iv e ly u t i l i z e d by th e

e a r l i e s t in h a b i ta n t s „

The second counts? w ith o u t which many o f th e 30 p o lle n ty pes

u l t im a te ly id e n t i f i e d would have gone u n d e tec te d , show some in te r e s t in g ,

though n o t d ra m a tic , t r e n d s . P r o f i le I I I i s p ro b ab ly most r e p re s e n ta ­

t iv e o f th e n a tu r a l p o lle n r a in as i t shows th e g r e a te s t r e g u la r i ty

in the changes in d ic a te d and i s c lo s e s t to bo th th e cave mouth and

w a ll . Here a n o tic e a b le r i s e in th e freq u en cy o f S areoba tus i s ex­

h ib i te d in s t r a t a 6 and 7 , as w e ll as a s l i g h t upward tre n d in th e p ine

and ju n ip e r c o u n ts . These l a s t two re a ch t h e i r h ig h e s t p o in ts in

s t r a t a 7 . and 8 r e s p e c t iv e ly . There a re h in ts o f s im i la r f lu c tu a t io n s

in th e counts from th e o th e r two p r o f i l e s , b u t none ap p ear to be

e x a c tly contem poraneous w ith those in P r o f i l e I I I and on ly one, th e

r i s e in S areobatus in P r o f i l e I I i s d i s t i n c t . No s im ila r in c re a se in

th e im p o rtan c e .o f S areo b a tu s m a c ro fo s s ils occurs in th e f i l l (H arper

and A ld e r, in p r e s s . Table 5 ) ® A f lu c tu a t io n in th e r e p re s e n ta t io n o f

A rtem is ia p o lle n ro u g h ly c o in c id e s w ith th e se changes, b u t may be a

fu n c tio n of c o n s t r a in t o f th e o th e r ty p es w ith in a f ix e d num erical

count r a th e r than in d ic a t in g tru e v a r ia t io n , in th e abundance of A rte ­

m is ia . S im ila r and ap p rox im ate ly contem poraneous o s c i l l a t i o n s in p ine

and A rte m is ia p o lle n fre q u e n c ie s have been reco rded from so u th e a s te rn

Idaho (B rig h t 1966: 2 5 ), b u t th e a v a i la b le com parative p a le o e c o lo g ic a l

Page 18: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

d a ta i s n o t r e a l l y s u f f i c i e n t to p e rm it f u r th e r i n t e r p r e ta t io n s o f t h i s

p o r tio n o f the Hogup Cave p o lle n r e c o rd 8

One tren d w ith in th e f i l l which seems to have undoubtable

v a l id i t y i s th e r i s e in th e frequency of g ra ss f i r s t reco rd ed in

s tra tu m 12 o f a l l th re e p r o f i l e s 0 T h is s ig n i f ic a n t tu rn in th e p o lle n

reco rd c o in c id e s w ith th e marked in c re a s e in th e im portance o f g ra ss

seed (P ry , in p re s s ) and p o lle n in th e c o p r o l i te s and a s h i f t toward

th e predominance o f B ison among th e fa u n a ! rem ains (C u rra n t, in p r e s s ) »

The p o s s i b i l i t y t h a t t h i s a l t e r a t i o n in th e s u b s is te n c e p a t te rn was

b rough t about by some m o d if ic a tio n in th e n a tu re o f th e re so u rc e s

a v a i la b le i s supported by th e r e g u la r c h a ra c te r o f the changes seen in

P r o f i le III® The unsym m etrieal g ra s s counts from th e upper s t r a t a o f

P r o f i l e s I and I I se rv e to em phasize th e human in f lu e n c e on p o lle n

f re q u e n c ie s from cave f i l l .

There a re a ls o s e v e ra l f e a tu re s which s tand o u t in th e second

coun ts from s p e c if ic le v e l s and p r o f i l e s which may im ply p la n t usage

r e s t r i c t e d to one p a r t o f th e cave d u rin g a l im ite d p erio d o f time®

These a re th e lit p e rc e n t Gyperaceae from s tra tu m 8 , P r o f i le I j th e 12

p e rc e n t Ambrosia-ty p e reco rded in s tra tu m 1U> P r o f i le I I ; th e 12 .5

p e rc e n t Rosaceae from s tra tu m 3> P r o f i le I I ; and th e 25 p e rc en t " o th e r

Compositae" found in s tra tu m U, P r o f i le I I I . H is to r ic groups found

many uses f o r th e d iv e rs e p la n ts whose p o lle n i s in c o rp o ra te d in th e se■ v : i

fo u r ty p es (Cham berlin 1911| Loud and H a rrin g to n 1929; Steward 1933).

The in h a b i ta n ts o f Hogup Cave u t i l i z e d a c e r t a in amount o f m oun ta in .

mahogany f o r th e m anufacture o f wooden a r t i f a c t s and th e occurrence

Page 19: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

• ■ - 10

o f Gyperaceae rhizom es in th e cave f i l l (H arper and A ld e r, in p re s s )

may in d ic a te t h a t a p o r tio n o f b u lru sh e s were e a te n » We have no

ev idence from th e f i l l i t s e l f as to th e n a tu re o f th e a c t i v i t i e s which

b ro u g h t about th e c o n c e n tra tio n s of th e o th e r two p o lle n ty p e s in th e

f i l l .

The g e n e ra lly h ig h e r p e rcen tag es of Ambrosia- ty p e th roughou t

P r o f i l e s I and I I I a re p robab ly th e r e s u l t o f th e g r e a te r e f f e c t o f

th e n a tu r a l p o lle n r a in c lo s e r to th e mouth o f th e cav ee This ex p lan a ­

t io n may a ls o ap p ly to th e s l i g h t l y g r e a te r r e l a t i v e freq u en cy o f g ra ss

p o lle n p re se n t in most la y e r s o f P r o f i l e !<, b u t i t i s n o t m irro red in

P r o f i le I I I . I t m ight be a t t r i b u t a b l e to the p ro c e ss in g o f g ra ss seed

in t h a t area,, b u t th e Gramineae a re n o t w e ll re p re se n te d in th e cop-

r o l i t e s from below s tra tu m 12. Some o th e r c u l tu r a l use f o r th e g ra sse s

may u n d e r lie th e se c o u n ts .

Page 20: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

CHAPTER U

THE POLIiEN RECORD FROM THE COPROLITES .

One need n o t be n e a r ly so c a u tio u s in a ss ig n in g c u l tu r a l

d e te rm in an ts to th e p o lle n in f e c a l sam ples, th u s the co u n ts from the

Hogup Cave c o p r o l i te s a re more in fo rm a tiv e th an th o se from th e f i l l s ,

From s t r a t a 3 th rough 9 a l l specim ens b u t one reach 60 p e rc e n t Cheno~

•.ams and most exceed 90 p e rc e n t (F ig , 3)« In th e s in g le t r u l y a b e r ra n t

s c a t , number 16 , s tra tu m 8 , the dom inant type i s sup p lan ted by p o lle n

a s s ig n a b le to th e genus Polygonum<, The morphology o f t h i s p o lle n i s

d i s t i n c t iv e b u t , in s p i t e o f a ttem p ts to match i t w ith p la n ts used by

the G osiu te (Cham berlin 1911s 3 7 7 ), i t could n o t be id e n t i f i e d as to

sp ec ie so For the p re s e n t , i t i s p robab ly b e s t to ap p ly th e d e s c r ip t iv e

l a b e l , Polygonum pensylvanicum - ty p e „

Two o th e r c o p r o l i t e s , number 11 , s tra tu m 8 and number 31,

s tra tu m 6 , d isp la y ed a Cheno-am c o n te n t n o tic e a b ly low er th an th o se

o f th e o th e r specim ens from th e d eep er p a r t o f th e d e p o s i t s . ' In num­

b e r 11 , th e d ec rea se to 66 p e rc e n t Cheno-ams seems to be due to th e

g re a te r amounts o f A m brosia-type and ”o th e r Com positae1* p re s e n t . The

a p p a ren t in c re a se in th e r e p re s e n ta t io n of. th e se two ty p e s could a ls o

be a fu n c tio n of the d ecrea se in A rtem is ia p o lle n in th e same co p ro -

l i t e . The low er p e rcen tag e o f Cheno-ams in number 31 i s accompanied

by 1(6 p e rc e n t A rtem is ia in th e second c o u n t, a f ig u re s l i g h t l y h ig h e r

11

Page 21: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

m19

»at

L . i E J — _ u ------- — r

F igure 3* P o llen counts from human c o p r o l i te s , Kogup Cave, Utah

The f i r s t count o f 200 g ra in s in c lu d es a l l ty p e s , b u t on ly th e Cheno-am percen tages a re inc luded in th e diagram . A ll freq u e n c ie s to the l e f t o f th e Cheno-ams a re second co u n ts . Numbers 3 , h, 6 , 3 , 9 , 10, ±5, 17, 19, 20, 26, 1*8, 50, and 5>3 were no t given second c o u n ts . F i f ty g ra in counts were ob ta ined from sam ples 1 , 2, 13, 21, and 6h w hile sam­p le s 5>, 11, 12 , l l i , 35 , 52, 60, and 69 had 100 g ra in co u n ts . 200 g ra in counts were p o ss ib le on sam ples 1 6 , 22, 23, 27, 29, 30, 31, 7h, and 75. Sample number 70, s tra tu m 10 d id n o t c o n ta in p o lle n .

Hrv>

Page 22: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

- ' 13

th an m ight be expected from th e A rtem is ia r e p re s e n ta t io n in th e fills

This could be th e r e s u l t o f a sim ple lo s s o f Cheno=ams. w ith th e r i s e> .

in Ar te m is ia a t t r i b u t a b l e to th e absence o f th e R osaceae from th e

count and th e low amount, o f ju n ip e r .p re s e n t , A number o f o th e r cop-

r o l i te .s c o n ta in n e a r ly as much. A rtem is ia b u t show no d e c lin e in th e

p e rcen tag e o f .Cheno-ams*

Second coun ts from s e v e ra l o th e r c o p r o l i te s a l s o h in t th a t

a d d i t io n a l p la n ts were used w hile s t r a t a 3 through 9 were b e in g de­

p o s ited * G o p ro lite number 1 , s tra tu m 3? co n ta in ed h ig h e r v a lu es than

m ight be expected o f J u n ip e ru s Ambrosia- ty p e , and Cyperaceae p o lle n

w hile c o p r o l i te number. 2 from th e same l e v e l co n ta ined 30 p e rc e n t R osa-

ceae® The f i r s t specim en, i f in d ic a t in g a n y th in g more th an a c c id e n ta l

in g e s t io n o f ju n ip e r p o l le n , su g g es ts t h a t th e occupants o f Hogup Cave,

l ik e th e l a t e r in h a b i ta n ts o f th e re g io n , on ly o c c a s io n a lly consumed

ju n ip e r p ro d u c ts ( Cham berlin 1911: 3 7 2 ). Ju n ip e r m a c ro fo s s ils were

p o o rly re p re se n te d in th e c o p r o l i te s (F ry , in p re s s ) and a t p re s e n t

th e t r e e s grow no c lo s e r than f iv e m iles from th e cave (H arper and

A ld e r, in p r e s s ) . The Cyperaceae coun t from specimen number 1 p re se n ts

a problem , s in c e members o f th i s fa m ily shed t h e i r p o lle n e a r l i e r th an

most o f th e p la n ts which f ig u re im p o r ta n tly a t Hogup Cave, Cyperaceae

p o lle n was p re s e n t in 16 o f th e 21 s c a ts from which second counts

could be ob ta in ed and th e a f f i n i t y o f t h i s fam ily f o r m arshy p laces

may in d ic a te t h a t th e p o lle n in th e c o p r o l i te s was d e riv e d from th e

d r in k in g w a te r . I t m ight a ls o su g g es t t h a t th e cave was o c c a s io n a lly

occupied in th e s p r in g or e a r ly Summer, when th e C yperaceae were in

bloom, b u t most o f th e se specim ens a re dominated by Cheno-ams,

Page 23: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

O ther -fea tu re s from below s tra tu m 10 which may in d ic a te i n c i ­

d e n ta l use o f p la n t re so u rc e s a re t h e , 1 8 .p e rc e n t Ambrosia-ty p e in

c o p r o l i te number 11,. the 57 p e rc e n t A rte m is ia in number 12 , and th e

61* p e rc e n t P in us in number l i u a l l from l e v e l 80 Of th e se th r e e , th e

heavy p ine c o n tr ib u t io n to c o p ro l i te number li* i s c e r t a in l y th e most

in te r e s t in g * U n fo rtu n a te ly , we have no c lu e as to th e sp e c ie s o f th e

p ine o r th e means by which i t was in g ested * H is to r ic G reat B asin

groups a tta c h e d g r e a t im portance to Pffion n u ts (Cham berlin 1911s 372;

Steward 1933 s 2 h l ) , b u t F ry ( in p re s s ) r e p o r ts no p ine - m a c ro fo sa ils

in any o f th e c o p r o l i t e s , w h ile H arper and A lder ( in p re s s ) in d ic a te

th a t a few Pi'non seed c o a ts and some b i t s o f wood encased in r e s in

c o n s t i tu te th e only ev idence fo r th e se t r e e s reco v ered from th e f i l l *

In any e v e n t, B ohrer (1969s 36) r e p o r ts t h a t pine p o lle n does n o t adhere

to th e seed* Consumption, under s p e c ia l c irc u m stan c es , o f some p ro d u c t

o f th e t r e e which would t r a p p o lle n m ight be in v o lv ed . P ine gum in _

b o i l in g w a te r was drunk m e d ic in a lly by th e G bsiu te .(C h am b erlin 1911s

3li.9)e In view o f th e n e a r ly 80 p e rc e n t Cheno-ams in th e f i r s t co u n t,

i t i s u n lik e ly t h a t th e p o lle n i t s e l f had been d e l ib e r a t e ly in g e s te d .

The p o lle n o f O p u n tia , whose pad fragm ents F ry ( i n p re s s )

in d ic a te s made up f iv e p e rc en t o f th e w eigh t o f m a c ro fo s s ils in copro ­

l i t e s d ep o sited d u rin g th i s p e r io d , i s ab sen t from th e e q u iv a le n t

p o lle n counts® O p u n tia , ■a zoophilous ty p e , i s n o t a heavy p o lle n a to r

and the buds o f th e sp e c ie s growing in th e v i c in i ty o f th e cave a re

d ry and n o t p a r t i c u l a r ly a p p e tiz in g , O puntia p o lle n was, however,

p re s e n t in s t r a t a 7 , P r o f i le I*

Page 24: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

Above s tra tu m 9 , the p o lle n reco rd from th e c o p r o l l te s shows ■

more d iv e r s i ty ^ both in th e ty p es and p e rcen tag es o f th e p o lle n prom i­

n en t in th e counts,, The Cheno~ams3 th o u g h s t i l l th e most im p o rtan t

ty p e s , become a minor e lem ent in th e number o f c o p r o l l te s and reach es

75 p e rc e n t in o n ly fo u r o f th e tw elve specim ens. I t appears p robab le

th a t th e change, in s t r a t a 10 and .11 a t l e a s t , i s p a r t i a l l y th e p ro ­

d u c t o f a sim ple d e c rea se in th e u t i l i z a t i o n , o f Cheno-ams* r a th e r th an

an o u tr ig h t s h i f t to o th e r p la n t re s o u rc e s . The f re q u e n c ie s in d ic a te d

f o r c o p r o l l te s 69 and 7h and th e s t e r i l i t y o f one a d d i t io n a l , un­

d iagram ed, s e a t from l e v e l 10 a ls o seem to p o in t to a g e n e ra l re d u c tio n

in th e use o f p la n ts as a food so u rc e .

The S arcobatus c o n te n t of specim ens 69 and 75 i s d i f f i c u l t - t o

e x p la in . While th e a rc h a e o lo g ic a l re c o rd (Loud and H a rrin g to n 1929?

Jen n in g s 1957; H arper arid A ld e r, in p re s s ) in f e r s t h a t greasewood was

favo red as a raw m a te r ia l by th e p r e h is to r ic in h a b i ta n ts o f th e G reat

B asin , th e re seems to be l i t t l e d a ta b e a r in g on i t s use as a s u b s is ­

ten ce item by h i s t o r i c g roups. The Goeopa, n ear th e mouth o f th e

Colorado R iv e r, d id t r e a t a number o f i n t e r n a l i l l s w ith an o d ife ro u so ; .

co n co c tio n made from Sarco b a tu s b ark (K e lly , n . d . ) , I t i s q u ite

p o s s ib le th a t th e in h a b i ta n ts o f Hogup Gave had a use f o r t h i s p la n t

unknown to l a t e r peo p les and n o t reco rd ed by th e G reat "Basin e thno­

g ra p h e rs .

A rtem is ia and Gramineae p o lle n a re most s ig n i f i c a n t in th e

c o p r o l l te s from th e upper l a y e r s . A rte m is ia , which was a p p a re n tly .

consumed e a r l i e r a s w e ll , becomes th e s a l i e n t type in number 23,

Page 25: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

s tra tu m 12, and number 29, s tra tu m l5» In th re e o th e r s c a t s , numbers

21, 25 and 27 from s t r a t a 11, 13 and Lb, A rtem isia re a ch e s or exceeds

50 p e rc e n t o f th e second co u n t. The Ar te m is ia v a lu es in numbers 23

and 29 a re most l i k e l y th e r e s u l t o f in g e s t io n o f some p a r t o f th e '

p la n t d u rin g th e season o f flowering®

Gramineae, th e second p o lle n type to become prom inent in f e c a l '

sam ples from th e more shallow p a r t o f th e f i l l , was n o t a s ig n i f i c a n t

f a c to r in s c a ts recovered below s tra tu m 12. I t s p resence in s tra tu m

12 and above, however, d id no t have th e im pact which A rtem is ia had in

numbers 23 and 29. In f e c a l samples where th e second count was domi­

na ted by g ra s s , th e f i r s t counts co n ta in ed b8 to 58 p e rc e n t Cheno-ams0

The in c re a s in g im portance o f g ra ss in th e c o p r e l i te s and th e f i l l , ,

c o in c id in g as i t d id w ith th e sh a rp ly In c re a se d r e p r e s e n ta t io n o f

B ison in th e fa u n a l r e c o rd , p ro bab ly in d ic a te s u t i l i z a t i o n o f r e ­

sou rces p re v io u s ly n o t p re se n t in econom ically h a rv e s ta b le amounts«

Two o th e r ty p e s , Cyperaceae and Polygonum, a lso ap p ear to have been

s ig n i f i c a n t above s tra tu m 10, b u t on ly in in d iv id u a l specim ens.

Page 26: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

CHAPTER $

THE DANGER CAVE COPROLITES .

The p o lle n s p e c tra from th e Danger Cave c o p r o l i te s b e a r con­

s id e ra b le resem blance to th o se from Hogup Cave® The Cheno-ams a re

a g a in th e s in g le most im p o rtan t ty p e a dom inating th e f i r s t counts o f

a l l specim ens up th rough s tra tu m lu One a d d i t io n a l f e c a l sample from

s tra tu m 1 9 d a tin g e a r l i e r than the d e ep e s t la y e r s a t Hogup Cave was

e x tra c te d b u t co n ta in ed no pollen®

In s tra tu m 5 and th e su rfa c e specim ens5 th e r e l a t i v e freq u e n ­

c ie s o f th e Cheno-ams d ecrease b u t to a l e s s e r e x te n t th a n the

e q u iv a le n t c o p r o l i te s from Hogup Cave® This tu rn in th e p o lle n reco rd

seems to be s im i la r in n a tu re to t h a t which occu rred in s t r a t a 10 and

11 a t Hogup,, in t h a t i t appears to be more a. weakening in th e depend­

ence upon Cheno-ams than a s h i f t toward some o th e r s p e c i f ic p la n t .

re s o u rc e . At Danger Cave, however, th e lo s s o f Cheno-ams i s coun tered

by a g en e ra l r i s e in th e r e p re s e n ta t io n o f o th e r economic ty p e s . There

was a p p a re n tly no g e n e ra l d ec rea se in th e o v e r - a l l im portance o f p la n t

fo o d s . The sample in bo th case s i s sm all and th e se c o n c lu s io n s a r e ,

o f c o u rse , on3.y t e n t a t i v e .

G rass, in c o n t r a s t to i t s d i s t r i b u t io n a t Hogup, i s a f a i r l y

s ig n i f i c a n t component in th e second coun ts from s tra tu m 1 up th rough

s tra tu m 5 and was p ro b ab ly , c e r t a in l y in c o p r o l i te number 28, a

17

Page 27: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

Composftea

10 20 30 10 26 10 20 32I . I .J . 1 1...-L . II

10 20 36) ■ 1 , 1-J

10 20 30 43I i I i .. 1 )

r

/ / ,/ / /

. jj6 4 2 9 10 20 30 40 30 60 70 60 90 ICC

i l l I l . l l l I I I 1

fgrma

turn

rmmmmm mm i

rsa

- r.Figure h* P o llen coun ts from human c o p r o l i te s , Danger Cave, Utah.

B I

> ______rssEEssaaHa_

nascn^Tra^rarriagBai ~

igar- ae , T.::z-;zLL: irrrr^ai' I .yrrTrr'TTj-TOiai ,

|g g |»2 M M a M ig w j

0 20 40%L.o-1-x.J-,- 1-. 1

The f i r s t count o f 200 g ra in s inc luded a l l ty p e s , bu t only the Cheno-ams have been in ­cluded on th e diagram . A ll freq u e n c ie s to the l e f t o f th e Cheno-ams a re second co u n ts . Second counts were no t p o s s ib le on samples 8 , 13, GL1, GL5, 23, 2h, and 1*2. The p e r­cen tag es o f samples 12, 17, and 28 a re based on 50 g ra in s , w hile th e second count of sample 32 c o n s is te d o f 100 g ra in s . The second counts from sam ples 3U and 111 were com­posed o f 200 g ra in s . An a d d i t io n a l sam ple, no. U, s tra tu m 1 , did n o t c o n ta in p o lle n .

Page 28: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

- . 1 9

d ie ta r y elem ent* The n o ta b le in ro ad upon th e Cheno-am re p re s e n ta t io n

which th e Gramineae made above s tra tu m 11 a t Hogup does n o t occur a t

Danger Cave3 b u t a t Lovelock Gave (Eaptpn and K elso 1969) g ra s s was an

im p o rtan t elem ent in two c o p r o l i te s dated c a . A„D0 750 and A^D, 1800*

U n fo rtu n a te ly th e two s c a ts p rocessed from th e su rfa c e c o l le c t io n a t

Danger Gave canno t be dated w ith any c e r t a in t y and i t can n o t be de­

term ined w hether no r i s e in th e consum ption o f g ra s s e s # com parable to

t h a t a t Hogup,, occu rred a t Danger Cave o r w hether th e reco rd sim ply

c lo sed b e fo re i t could be re g is te re d * •

Of th e o th e r ty p es im p o rtan t in th e second coun ts from Danger

Cave c o p r o l i t e s s t h r e e , S a rco b a tu s5 th e Rosaceae and Polygonum were

a ls o p re s e n t in s ig n i f i c a n t amounts in th e Hogup Gave specim ens. One,

" o th e r G om positae," though n o t prom inent in the Hogup c o p r o l i t e s , may

be co n sid ered on th e b a s is o f i t s r e p re s e n ta t io n in th e f i l l sample

. from s tra tu m U, P r o f i l e I I I , to have been an economic type a t th a t s i te *

The Polygonum p o lle n from the Danger Gave specim ens i s th e same d i s ­

t i n c t i v e v a r ie ty reco rd ed a t Hogup Gave * O n e .a d d itio n a l ty p e . Ephedra

n e v a d e n s is - ty p e , though re a c h in g on ly n in e p e rc en t o f th e second count .

from f e c a l sample 39 , may have s ig n if ic a n c e . A sp e c ie s -of Ephedr a

which produces a nevaden s i s -ty p e p o lle n was consumed in a " te a " form ,

p ro b ab ly fo r m e d ic in a l re a s o n s , by th e Owens V alley P a iu te s (Steward

1933: 2lt5)e A nother p o s s ib le source f o r th i s p o lle n i s th e r a th e r

la rg e seeds produced by Ephedra nev ad en sis i t s e l f . A good source o f

such seeds would be th e caches of kangaroo r a t s (K im ball T. H arper,

p e rso n a l com m unication). •

Page 29: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

CHAPTER 6

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

On th e b a s is o f p o lle n con ten t,, th e c o p r o l i te s recovered from

Hogup Cave f a l l in to th re e g ro u p in g s9 ro u g h ly e q u iv a le n t to D ese rt

C u ltu re s im poverished D e se rt C u ltu re , and Fremont and Shoshoni occu­

p a tio n s seen by Aikens and o th e rs ( in p r e s s ) . There i s no ap p aren t

c o n t r a s t betw een th e specim ens recovered from th e Fremont and Shoshoni

u n i t s . From s t r a t a 1 through 9 th e c o p r o l i te s a r e , w ith one ex cep tio n ,,

dom inated by Cheno-ams, su g g es tin g t h a t th e p la n ts in c o rp o ra te d in

t h a t ty p e , p robab ly A l le n r o lf e a , formed a m ajor p o r tio n o f th e v e g i ta l

d i e t e . T h is , to g e th e r w ith th e c o n s id e ra b le amount o f Cheno-am p o lle n

and A lle n ro lfe a c h a f f in th e f i l l and th e r e l a t i v e l y low re p re s e n ta ­

t io n of th e Cyperaceae and O pun tia , su g g es ts t h a t th e cave was occupied

o n ly .in th e F a ll* I t may have fu n c tio n ed a s an A lle n ro lfe a seed c o l ­

le c t io n s t a t i o n . A sm all v a r ie ty o f o th e r p o lle n ty p es a re so d i s ­

t r ib u te d in th e counts i s to im ply a t l e a s t O ccasional consum ption o f -

th e p la n ts , th e y re p re se n t*

The r e l a t i v e l y low amounts o f Cheno-am p o lle n in th e d eep es t .

la y e r s o f th e cave f i l l could co n ce iv ab ly be r e la te d t o some c l im a tic

c o n d itio n s n o t o p erab le when th e h ig h e r la y e r s were b e in g d e p o s ite d , -

b u t i t i s q u ite p robab le t h a t c u l t u r a l f a c to r s were in v o lv e d „ The

A rte m is ia coun t i s h ig h e r in s e v e ra l sam ples from th e low er l e v e l s .

Page 30: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

. : : : • : ■■■, ; . \ ; ' 21

b u t n o t s u f f i c i e n t ly to account f o r th e c o m p ara tiv e ly poor r e p re s e n ta ­

t io n o f th e Cheno-amse The most l i k e l y e x p la n a tio n i s t h a t a l e s s e r

q u a n t i ty o f th e p l a n t s p r o b a b l y A l le n ro lf e a , from which t h i s p o lle n

type i s d e riv ed was b ro u g h t in to th e cave d u rin g th e i n i t i a l segment

o f th e occupancyo The p ra c t ic e of h a rv e s t in g Cheno-ams in t h i s

v i c i n i t y may n o t as y e t have been w e ll e s ta b l is h e d f o r any number o f

c u l tu r a l re a so n s a I t i s a ls o p o s s ib le th a t th e lak e l e v e l was s u f f i ­

c i e n t ly high to e lim in a te much o f th e h a b i ta t n e c e ssa ry f o r A llen ro lfe a .

U n fo rtu n a te ly , no c o p r o l i te s were a v a i la b le from th e lo w est two s t r a t a ,

b u t the s in g le countable" specimen from s tra tu m 1 a t Danger Cave, d a tin g

e a r l i e r than th e f i r s t occu p a tio n a t Hogup Cave, was dom inated by

Cheno-ams0

. The ab ru p t change in the p o lle n c o n ten t o f th e c o p r o l i te s from

s t r a t a 10 and 11 i s n o t d u p lic a te d in th e f i l l sam ples and p robab ly

does n o t r e p re s e n t a c le a n break w ith the p rev io u s p a t te r n . The Cheno-

ams, though p re s e n t in much sm a lle r q u a n t i t ie s in th e c o p r o l i t e s , con­

t in u e to be th e s in g le most im p o rtan t ty p e . They were n o t rep laced

by any o th e r m ajor economic p lan t, and d u rin g t h i s tim e , which c o r re ­

sponds q u ite w e ll to th e p e rio d when th e cave was occupied by people

b e a r in g an im poverished form o f th e D e se rt C u ltu re (A ikens and o th e r s ,

in p r e s s ) , th e e x p lo i ta t io n o f p la n t re so u rc e s in g e n e ra l may have de­

c re a se d . The ro u g h ly contem poraneous change noted in th e Danger Cave’ •

c o p r o l i te s i s s im i la r in n a tu re , b u t n o t i d e n t i c a l . At t h a t l o c a l i t y

th e re i s a general, r i s e in t h e p o lle n fre q u e n c ie s o f s e v e r a l economic

p la n ts in s c a ts which c o n ta in l e s s e r amounts o f Cheno-ams.

Page 31: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

The causes o f th e s h i f t in th e p o lle n reco rd a t Hogup Cave and

th e im poverishm ent of the c u l tu r a l in v e n to ry d u rin g th e same p erio d

(Aikens. and o thers ,, in p re s s ) may be r e la te d to a change- in re so u rce

use' o r a v a i l a b i l i t y as suggested by th e d isap p ea ran ce o f W aterfowl

(P arm alee, in p re s s ) from the fa u n a l r e c o rd e U n fo rtu n a te ly , the p o lle n

coun ts from th e cave f i l l do no t p rov ide r e a d i ly d is t in g u is h a b le in d i ­

c a t io n s o f change in th e e c o lo g ic a l s i t u a t i o n . P r o f i le I I I , th e l e a s t

e r r a t i c o f the th re e colum ns, p ro v id es in i t s S arco b a t u s , p ine and

ju n ip e r f re q u e n c ie s a h in t t h a t some s o r t o f env ironm enta l f lu c tu a t io n

may have been in p ro g re ss d u rin g th e d e p o s it io n o f s t r a t a 6 , 7 and 8 .

This i s su p p o rted to a c e r ta in e x te n t by th e second co u n ts from P ro­

f i l e I I , a lth o u g h here th e changes seem to be s l i g h t l y l a te r - a n d , w ith

th e ex cep tio n o f th e Sarcobatus. cu rv e , c o n s id e ra b ly l e s s d i s t i n c t .

A nother, c o n s id e ra b ly l e s s s u b t le , m o d if ic a tio n in th e p o lle n

reco rd from Hogup Gave seems to im ply a t l e a s t a p a r t i a l r e v e r s a l o f

th e d ie ta r y tre n d s seen in s t r a t a 10 and 11.® In s tra tu m 12 and above

th e Gheno-ams, w h ile n o t re g a in in g t h e i r predom inance, do n o t lo se

a d d i t io n a l ground and th e g ra s s e s , a re so u rce no t fo rm erly tapped f o r

nourishm en t, become prom inent in both th e c o p ro l i te and f i l l counts®

These f a c to r s , to g e th e r w ith th e ap p aren t e le v a tio n o f A rtem is ia to

th e p o s i t io n o f an im p o rtan t food so u rce , seem to im ply th a t v e g e ta l

p ro d u c ts com prised a l a r g e r segment o f th e d ie t than th e y did. d u rin g

d e p o s it io n o f s t r a t a 10 and. 11 . The preem inence o f A rte m is ia in

s e v e ra l c o p r o l i te s and th e c ircu m stan ce which f in d s g ra s s and th e

Cheno-ams c o n tr ib u t in g h e a v ily t o s e v e ra l o th e rs may mean th a t th e

Page 32: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

. : : ; : ' / : - : . - - . - -; : : . , " - : ■ : ' ' 23 .s e a s o n a l occu p a tio n o f th e cav e9 i f such was s t i l l th e c a se , began

e a r l i e r in th e y e a r and la s te d a t l e a s t u n t i l th e Cheno-ams were a v a i l ­

a b le f o r h a rv e s t . The com plete absence o f Zea Mays from th e p o lle n

reco rd appears to ru le o u t th e e x te n s io n o f a g r ic u l tu r e to th e v i c in i t y

o f Hogup Gave«,

The a b ru p t emergence of grass, p o lle n as an i n f l u e n t i a l e le m e n t'

in both th e f i l l and f e c a l sam ples«, coupled as i t i s w ith th e sudden ly

assumed prominence o f B ison in th e fa u n a ! record,, su g g es ts some modi­

f i c a t i o n in th e environm ent which made i t p o s s ib le to e x p lo i t re so u rce s

p re v io u s ly econom ica lly in s ig n i f i c a n t in th e en v iro n s o f th e cave .

C u ltu ra l f a c to r s could a ls o be in v o lv e d «

Page 33: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

LIST OF REFERENCES

-AIKENS, C» MELVIN, J.'-M. ADAVASIO, G. F. DALLEY, K. T. HARPER, 0. M.ALDER, S„ D. DIERANT, G. F. FRY, G. KELSO, P. W. PARMLEE, D, BALDWIN,W. G. HAAG, Ho’ C, CUTLER, KENT C. CONDIC, ALAN B, BLAXLAND and K. L.PETERSON

In Hogup Cave* U n iv e rs ity of-U tah A n th ro p o lo g ica l Papers No* P ress 93* S a l t Lake C ity I

BOHRER,. V. L i

1969 P aleoeco logy o f an A rch aeo lo g ica l S i te n e a r Snow flake,A rizona* MS*, Ph0D. D is s e r ta t io n , U n iv e rs ity o f A rizona, Tucson*

BRIGHT, R0 C.

1966 P o llen and Seed S tr a t ig ra p h y o f Swan Lake, S outhw estern Idaho ' I t s R e la tio n to R egional V e g e ta tio n a i H is to ry and to Lake

B on n ev ille H isto ry* Tebiwa, Vol. 9<, No* 2 , pp . l-ii.7» P o ca te llo *

CHAMBERLIN, R . V.

1911 E thnobotany o f th e G osiute* Memoirs , American A nthropolo- g i s t , V o la I I I , P a r t 5 , pp. 329^SoFI Menasha.

CURRANT, S. D.

In Faunal Remains as I n d ic a to r s of N eotherm al C lim ates a t „ P ress Hogup Gave* In Hogup Gave, Appendix 3 , C. M elvin Aikens

and o th e r s , U n iv e rs ity o f Utah A n th ro p o lo g ica l P a p e rs , No.93 o S a l t Lake C ity .'

FRY, G. F . . '

I n P r e h is to r i c D ie t a t Hogup Gave, U tah: As D eterm ined by th eP ress A nalysis o f C o p ro li te s , 1% Hogup Cave, Appendix It, C.

M elvin Aikens and o th e rs . U n iv e rs ity " o f Utah A n th ro p o lo g ica l P a p e rs , No. .93. S a l t Lake C ity .

2lt

Page 34: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

HARPER, Ka T. and Ga M„ ALDER

In The M acroscopic P la n t Remains o f th e D e p o sits o f Hogup Gave P ress Utah and T h e ir P a le o c lim a tic Im p lic a tio n s . In Hogup Cave,

Appendix 2 , C. M elvin A ikens and o t h e r s . . U n iv e rs ity of Utah A n th ro p o lo g ica l P a p e rs , No. 93. S a l t Lake C ity ,

JENNINGS, JESSE D. . -

1957 Danger Cave, U n iv e rs ity o f Utah A n th ro p o lo g ica l P ap ers ,No* 27® S a l t Lake City® """ ■ -

JENNINGS, JESSE D. and. EDWARD NORBECK

1955 G reat B asin P re h is to ry ; A Review. American A n tiq u ity ,Vol. 21, pp. 1 -1 1 , S a l t Lake C ity .

KELLI, WILLIAM H, ' .

n .d . U npublished re se a rc h n o te s on f i l e in the A rizona S ta te Museum L ib ra ry , U n iv e rs ity o f A rizo n a . Tucson.

LOUD, L. L, and M. R. HARRINGTON

1929 Lovelock Gave. U n iv e rs ity o f C a l i fo rn ia Pu b lic a t io n s in ' Am erican A rchaeology and E th n o lo g y , V ol. 257~No» 1 , -B erkeley .

MARTIN, P. S . a n d F , W, SHARROCK

196k P o llen A n a ly sis o f P r e h is to r ic Human F e c es ; A New Approach to E thnobotany, American A n tiq u i ty , V ol. 30 , No® 2 , pp. 168-80. S a l t Lake C ity . ™

MEHRINGER, PETER J . , JR.

1967 P o llen A n a ly sis of th e Tule S p rin g s A rea, Nevada, P i e i s to - . cene S tu d ie s on S outhern Nevada, Nevada S ta te Museum

A n th ro p o lo g ica l P a p e rs , No® 13, H, M» Wormington and D. E l l i s , e d i to r s , pp. 129-200. Carson C ity .

NAPTON, L. K. and 0 . KELSO ' ■

1969 P re lim in a ry P a ly n o lo g ic a l A n a ly sis o f C o p ro li te s fromLovelock Cave, Nevada. K roeber A n th ro p o lo g ica l S o c ie ty S p e c ia l P u b l ic a t io n s , No. 2 . U n iv e rs ity o f C a l i f o r n ia , B erkeley .

Page 35: HOGUP GAVE, UTAH: COMPARATIVE POLLEN ANALYSIS OF

26

PARKALSE, P. W.

In B irds from Hogup Cave. In tfogup Cave, Appendix 7 , C. M elvinP ress Aikens and o th e r s . U n iv e rs ity o f Utah A n th ro p o lo g ica l

P ap e rs , No. 93. S a l t Lake C ity .

STEWARD, JULIAN H.

1933 E thnography o f th e Owens V a lley P a iu te . U n iv e rs ity ofC a l ifo rn ia P u b lic a tio n s in American A rchaeology and Ethnology, V ol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. 223-2^0. B erkeley .