Holwerda, D._sprünge in Die Tiefen Heraklits_1978 [Marcovich, Miroslav_Gnomon, 54, 7_1982_691-692]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Holwerda, D._sprünge in Die Tiefen Heraklits_1978 [Marcovich, Miroslav_Gnomon, 54, 7_1982_691-692]

    1/3

    Sprünge in die Tiefen Heraklits by D. HolwerdaReview by: Miroslav MarcovichGnomon, 54. Bd., H. 7 (1982), pp. 691-692Published by: Verlag C.H.BeckStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27688220 .Accessed: 20/02/2015 22:58

    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

    .JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

    .

    Verlag C.H.Beck is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Gnomon.

    http://www.jstor.org

    This content downloaded from 1 32.248.9.8 on Fri, 20 Feb 201 5 22:58:03 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=vchbhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/27688220?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/stable/27688220?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=vchb

  • 8/9/2019 Holwerda, D._sprünge in Die Tiefen Heraklits_1978 [Marcovich, Miroslav_Gnomon, 54, 7_1982_691-692]

    2/3

    M. Marcovich :Hol wer da, Spr?nge in die Tiefen Herak lits 691

    D. Holwerda: Spr?nge in die Tiefen

    Heraklits. Groningen: Bouma 1978.138 S. 50 hfl.

    The author's intention was to apply tex

    tual criticism to some Heraclitean fragments: ?Was ich hier vorlege ist eine

    Reihe von Einzeluntersuchungen. Die

    Folge ist ziemlich willk?rlich. Das

    Schwergewicht liegt auf dem philologischen Aspekt der behandelten Texte

    . . .

    Das Gesamtbild des Philosophen Hera

    klit neu zu entwerfen war nicht meine

    Absicht? (Vorwort).The result of the book is, however, a

    totally rewritten Heraclitus. After em

    ploying heavy scholarly artillery, the

    author was able to offer a bizarre text of

    Heraclitus, more obscure than the extant

    one. Through wild emendations and vio

    lent alterations of the transmitted text,

    the author has succeeded in leaving be

    hind Heinrich Gomperz (Diels' nemesis)and others. Here are a few samples of the

    new techne.

    B 84ab (56ab M): MeTa?aXXov ?varca?

    ?Toa and KafiaTO? ?

  • 8/9/2019 Holwerda, D._sprünge in Die Tiefen Heraklits_1978 [Marcovich, Miroslav_Gnomon, 54, 7_1982_691-692]

    3/3

    692M. Marcovich: Hol wer da, Spr?nge in die Tiefen Heraklits

    Tr?vTa elvai, for in his commentary he in

    terprets ev as &eo; Sixaio? or SiQ^toupyo?,whom Noetus (according to Hippolytus)identified (elvat) with 7i?vTa, to 7t5cv, xxiaic,or xoapio? (cf. M. M. in Texte und Un

    tersuchungen 92, 1966, 255-264). To leave

    apart Philo's allusion to B 50, 'HpaxXetTe?ou S6?,r?q ?Ta?po? . . . ?v t? tcolv . . .

    elaaycov {Leg. aile g. III. 7).B 18 (u M) : 'E?v [ir? eXicTjTat. ?v?X7ua

    Tov, o?x s?eupTjasi, ?ve?epeuv7]Tov e?v xal

    ?iuopov. On the ground of the fact that theearliest extant examples of an dcvex

    compoundare from ca. 425 B. C., the

    author believes that ave?epe?vrjTov cannot

    go back to Heraclitus (1-4). He prefersto engage in heavy surgery instead while

    reading: . . . o?x e?eup-yjcrei ?v e^epeuvyjT?v[e?v] xal a7Topov. ?man soll also auch das

    Unzug?ngliche durchsuchen? (2). Per

    ?spera ad atra: (1) Future tense with ?vis outside Homer a rara avis (K?hner

    Gerth I, 209). (2) The position of ?v isunusual (one would expect: o?x ?v ??eu

    pyjaei), and cannot be explained by a

    chiastic structure (?v balancing ??v).(3) The asyndeton is not welcome (?mansoil also . . .?). (4) The adverbial adjective ??epeuvY)TOv is not likely for Heraclitus' style: he uses /pv) (5 times), Set or

    ??i?v ?