Home [] files/NASC... · Web view2 Units – STRONGARM, RIGHT(PN:32391043-2) These items have not been manufactured previously. These components are to support development and testing

REQUEST FOR WHITE PAPERS (RWP)

RWP Number

N00421-20-9-0004

RWP Title:

AH-1Z Cockpit Mapping Robot Support Assembly Manufacturing Process

White Papers Due Date/Time

January 9, 2020/ 4 PM EST

Submit White Papers To

[email protected]

Notes:

Please advise CMG as soon as possible via email to [email protected] if your organization intends to submit a White Paper to CMG in response to this RWP.

Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division

Other Transaction Agreement

Statement of Need (SON)

Title of Requirement: AH-1Z Cockpit Mapping Robot Support Assembly Manufacturing Process

Project Number: N00421-20-9-0004

Estimated Prototype Price: $20K

Estimated Delivery Date of Prototype: Sixty (60) days after project award

Project Security Classification: UNLIMITED

Minimum Acceptable Data Rights: UNLIMITED

Problem Statement:

· This effort is for the prototyping of a manufacturing process which results in the successful production of: 2 Units – HARMONIZATION PLATE, ASSEMBLY (PN: 3239AS1035-1)

· 2 Units – STRONGARM, LEFT (PN: 3239AS1043-1)

· 2 Units – STRONGARM, RIGHT(PN:32391043-2)

These items have not been manufactured previously. These components are to support development and testing efforts related to the Cockpit Mapping Robot (CMR) system of the H-1 Helicopter program. The components are required to mount the Cockpit Mapping Robot into the forward and aft seats within the AH-1Z aircraft such that the electromagnetic field present in the cockpit can be measured by the robot. The electromagnetic field must be measured both in the forward and aft seats.

Desired Objective:

The requirements for this effort shall be the prototyping of the manufacturing process involved in the fabrication of equipment outlined above. This process shall result in the fabrication of the equipment as it is outlined in the technical data package, while also providing input which minimizes cost and lead time, ensuring the bill of materials is readily available and reproducible. In the case of this requirement, the prototype is the manufacturing process itself; however, in order to demonstrate success of the prototype manufacturing process, the vendor will be required to produce two units each of the aforementioned assemblies. Verification testing will be conducted on the units in order to determine the success of the manufacturing process.

During the manufacture of these units, the Government would also like to identify improvements to the design and drawing package to increase effectivity and manufacturability of these units. Any input which reduces cost, lead time, and clarity of the drawing package would be value added to increase the overall producibility of these items. These drawing improvements should be communicated on a rolling basis throughout the development of the manufacturing process to capture the improvements as they are identified.

Enclosed Material:

· Drawing Package for HARMONIZATION PLATE, ASSEMBLY

· Drawing Package for STRONGARM, LEFT

· Drawing Package for STRONGARM, RIGHT

Minimum capability requirements of the Prototype:

The manufacturing process developed under this effort must ensure that these adapters are compliant with the approved technical data package, such that they will integrate seamlessly in the CMR. The Government requires: (a) delivery of all documentation associated with the manufacturing process, with unlimited data rights (in the form of updates to the technical data package), and (b) delivery of two (2) units of HARMONIZATION PLATE, ASSEMBLY (PN: 3239AS1035-1) and two each (2) units of STRONGARM, LEFT (PN:32391043-1) and STRONGARM, RIGHT (PN:32391043-2) that were manufactured using the prototype process. Once delivered, the Government will perform internal verification testing to ensure the units are compliant with the technical data package requirements; ultimately, this testing will determine the success of the manufacturing process. No contractor support is required for the testing efforts.

Manufacturing process documentation (in the form of updates to the technical data package) will be delivered on a continuous basis throughout the project, and the manufactured units shall be shipped directly to the following upon completion:

Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division

H-1 Support Equipment Team

Joint Base MDL, NJ 08733

Evaluation Factors for White Papers:

The Government will conduct an evaluation of all eligible WPs submitted in response to this RWP based on an integrated assessment of the following:

· Degree to which the technical solution meets or exceeds the requirements of the Statement of Need.

· Evaluation of the potential impacts of the data rights assertions.

· Evaluation of significant nontraditional or one-third (1/3) cost share, if applicable.

· Evaluation of proposed ROM price against government funding profile.

· Experience with Military and Naval systems manufacturing.

White paper responses shall be limited to 10 pages.

******* Only Government personnel will evaluate the White Papers. *********

Production: Because the prototype is a process, rather than a tangible end item, no possibility of full rate production exists, within the meaning of 10 U.S.C. §2371b(f).

WHITE PAPER INSTRUCTIONS

Overview

An RWP is issued by CMG to solicit White Papers from consortium members that detail their proposed technology solutions to address the challenges outlined in the corresponding Government Statement of Need (SON).

CMG members can submit White Papers individually, or collaborate via a team. CMG will work with each interested member to ensure that government expectations are met and statutory compliance is maintained. Draft White Papers must be submitted to CMG by the member deadline specified in this RWP for review for completeness and compliance. Upon completion of that review, the White Papers will be forwarded to the Government by CMG.

CMG members solely are responsible for all expenses associated with responding to this RWP. White Papers shall conform to the White Paper Template and adhere to the formatting instructions.

Non-traditional Defense Contractor Participation or Cost-Share Commitment

Each Prototype Project awarded under an Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) must meet at least one of the following conditions:

There is at least one Non-traditional Defense Contractor (NDC), small business or nonprofit research institution participating to a significant extent in the Prototype Project, or

At least one-third of the total cost of the Prototype Project is to be paid out of funds provided by parties to the transaction other than the Federal Government.

What is an NDC?

An NDC is an entity that is not currently performing and has not performed, for at least one year preceding the issuance of a prototype project solicitation, any contract or subcontract for the DoD that is subject to full coverage under the FAR-based Cost Accounting Standards (“CAS”). Full CAS coverage is required typically for contracts greater than $50 million. Firm-fixed price contracts and contracts with small businesses are exempt from all CAS requirements regardless of dollar value.

How Does an Entity Determine if it is an NDC?

A review of an entity’s DoD cost-plus contracts and subcontracts on which it has performed during the previous year will aid in determining NDC status. If none of the contracts or subcontracts was subject to full CAS coverage, then the entity is an NDC. OTA awards do not impact NDC status, as CAS does not apply to OTAs.

Are Small Businesses Automatically Considered NDCs?

Yes. Since contracts and subcontracts with small businesses are exempt from all CAS requirements, small businesses are deemed NDCs under OT Authority. An entity is considered a small business based upon its applicable North American Industry Classification System (“NAICS”) designation (as described at 13 C.F.R. §121.201) for the specific nature of the work being proposed.

Are Nonprofit Research Institutions Considered NDCs?

The 2018 NDAA made Nonprofit Research Institutions essentially the same as NDCs with respect to OT Authority.

Can a Subsidiary or a Division of a Corporation Qualify as an NDC?

Yes. Provided the definition of an NDC is met, the entity can be at the prime level, team members, sub-awardees, lower-tier vendors or intra-company business units, including a subsidiary or division of a Traditional Defense Contractor.

Regarding NDC Participation, What does “Significant” Mean?

Significant participation is determined on a project basis and is based on the importance of the NDC contribution to the overall execution or outcome of the proposed project. OT Authority statute does not prescribe a monetary threshold or percentage value to justify significance. Examples of “significant” participation are:

Supplying a new key technology or product, or unique capability;

Causing a material and quantifiable reduction in the project cost or schedule;

Causing a measurable increase in the performance of the prototype;

Accomplishing a significant amount of the effort;

Value-added analysis not based on percentage of project work or value.

How does a Traditional Defense Contractor Satisfy the Cost-sharing Requirement?

If the member responding to an RWP is a Traditional Defense Contractor and there is no significant participation by an NDC in the project, the Traditional Defense Contractor is required to expend resources on the project amounting to one-third of the project cost. Cost-sharing does not involve funds paid directly to the Government. There are two types of cost-sharing:

Cash—outlays of funds to perform under the project for labor, materials, new equipment or subcontractor effort; sources can include new IR&D funds, profit or fee from another contract, and overhead or capital equipment expense pool;

In-Kind—reasonable value of equipment, materials or other property used in performance under the project.

White Paper Format

The White Paper (WP) template is provided as an attachment to this RWP. The following formatting requirements apply:

Times New Roman 10 (or larger), single-spaced, single-sided, 8.5 by 11 inches

Smaller type may be used in figures and tables, but must be clearly legible

Margins on all sides (top, bottom, left and right) should be at least 1 inch

Refer to the SON for the requirement specific page limit. The page limit excludes the White Paper Cover Sheet and Affirmation of Business Status Certification(s)

WPs shall include a cover sheet, not counted toward the page limit, that includes:

· Prototype Project Title

· Primary point of contact, secondary point of contact, and FSO, if applicable, including name, address, phone, and e-mail contact information

· Total Solution Rough-Order-of-Magnitude price

Shaded text in the White Paper Template indicates areas for entry of information by the member. Shading should be removed before submittal of the White Paper.

DO NOT SUBMIT ANY CLASSIFIED INFORMATION

Technical Requirements

Each WP shall contain the following information:

Background and Benefits of Proposed Solution

Technical Approach, including clearly defined prototype solution

Schedule and Deliverables

Participants, including description of contributions and significance of each

Data Rights Assertions: Identify any intellectual property, patents and inventions involved in the proposed solution and associated restrictions on Government use of that intellectual property, patents, and inventions. The following information shall be presented for all assertions:

· Technical data, computer software or patent to be furnished with restriction

· Basis for assertion

· Asserted rights category

· Name of entity asserting restrictions

If no restrictions are applied, insert “None” in each column.

Data Rights Withholding: Identify any technical data or software involved in the proposed solution that shall NOT be delivered for Government use. The following information shall be presented:

· Technical data and computer software being withheld

· Name of entity owning the technical data and computer software

If no restrictions are applied, state No Withholding.

Cost Section Requirements

The Government will be considering affordability in making its source selection decision; therefore, the White Paper shall contain cost information as requested in the table in Section 6.0 of the White Paper Template.

Evaluation Criteria

The Government will conduct an evaluation of all eligible WPs submitted in response to this RWP based on criteria identified within the SON.

Basis for Selection

It is the Government’s intention to select, negotiate and fund Prototype Projects from the submitted WP(s). The WP selection will be conducted in accordance with the Government’s procedures and the evaluation criteria identified herein. The Government will make a determination whether to:

Select the WP(s), or some portion of the WP(s), and/or

Retain the WP(s) in a library for potential future requirements in accordance with the terms of the OTA.

The WP selection decision will be provided to CMG, and the Government will issue a Request for Proposal(s) to CMG for the selected WP(s).

Affirmation of Business Status Certification

Each participant proposed in the WP shall complete the Business Status Certification which is provided as an attachment to this RWP.

These certifications shall be included as an attachment to the WP and will not count toward the page limit.

Export Control

Research findings and technology developments arising from the resulting RWP may constitute a significant enhancement to the national defense and to the economic vitality of the United States. As such, in the conduct of all work under the subsequent PPA(s), the recipient will comply strictly with the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (22 CFR 120-130), the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (DoD 5220.22-M) and the Department of Commerce Export Regulation (15 CFR 730-774).

N0021-20-9-0004

Points of Contact

Questions regarding White Paper procedures should be directed to the CMG Contract Management Office, 540-937-6300 or via email to [email protected].

WHITE PAPER TEMPLATE

RWP Number

Insert RWP Number from Request for White Papers (RWP) cover page

Proposed Project Title

Insert Title from RWP cover page

Submittal Date

To be completed by Consortium

Submitted By

Insert Consortium Member name

Facility CAGE Code

Insert Facility CAGE Code

Consortium Member Point of Contact (POC)*

*Note: POCs shall be from the prime member’s corporation, please do not insert contact information for subcontractor participants.

POC Name

POC Address

POC Phone

POC Email

Primary

Secondary

Proposed Project Total

$ Insert proposed project total, rounded to the nearest dollar

Less Cost Share

$ Insert amount if cost sharing applies or N/A

Total (Less Cost Share)

$ Insert amount after cost share deducted, rounded to the nearest dollar

Consortium Fee

$ Insert 3.8% Applied to Total Price per the OTA terms

Total ROM Cost

$ Insert Total Amount

Signed (electronic signature is acceptable)

X

SECTION 1.0Background AND BENEFITS OF PROPOSED SOLUTION

Describe the proposed solution, including how the Government’s requirements shown in the Statement of Need are being addressed. Provide a brief description of the “new” capability that will result.

SECTION 2.0TECHNICAL approach

Describe the design and detailed technical approach for achieving the proposed prototype solution. Clearly describe the proposed prototype and ensure that it is included as a deliverable in Section 3.0.

SECTION 2.1PROJECT TASKS

Describe the specific tasks required for project execution. If a phased/element approach is indicated in the Government Statement of Need, the tasks shall be detailed by phase/element.

SECTION 2.2RISKS

Describe the technical maturity of the proposed solution and its readiness to meet the Government’s requirements. Describe any technical, cost and schedule risks associated with achieving the proposed solution.

SECTION 2.3FACILITY/PERSONNEL CLEARANCE

The current personnel and facility(ies) level of [Consortium Member name]’s is [Insert classification level].

SECTION 3.0PROJECT SCHEDULE AND DELIVERABLES

Milestone

Deliverable

Estimated Delivery(Months after Award)

Insert list of milestones

Insert list of deliverables associated with each milestone (at a minimum, the proposed prototype and a final report must be included as deliverables)

Insert estimated lead time in terms of months after award for each milestone/deliverable.

The total proposed project duration is [Insert proposed period of performance in months] months from project award.

SECTION 4.0PARTICIPANTS

Participants (including Consortium Member)

Business Status(check one)

Participant Contribution andSignificance to Overall Project

Insert Consortium Member

|_| Traditional

|_| Non-traditional

|_| Nonprofit Research

Institution

Insert detailed, quantifiable description which addresses the following:

1. What specific tasks will this Participant be accomplishing for this project?

1. Why are these Participant's tasks significant to this project?*

1. How is this Participant uniquely qualified to provide these tasks for this project?

Insert separate row(s) for each additional participant. Delete row(s) as applicable if Consortium Member is the only participant.

|_| Traditional

|_| Non-traditional

|_| Nonprofit Research

Institution

Insert detailed, quantifiable description which addresses the following:

1. What specific tasks will this Participant be accomplishing for this project?

1. Why are these Participant's tasks significant to this project?*

1. How is this Participant uniquely qualified to provide these tasks for this project?

*Significance is defined as supplying a new key technology or product, accomplishing a significant amount of the effort, causing a material reduction in the cost or scheduling or causing an increase in the performance. Any vendor proposing labor costs must be listed as a participant.

SECTION 5.0DATA RIGHTS

Data Rights Assertions: All intellectual property, patents and inventions involved in the proposed solution and the associated restrictions on the Government’s use of that intellectual property, patents and inventions are presented in the table below. If no assertions are being made, state as such.

Data Rights Withholding: Identify any technical data or software involved in the proposed solution that shall NOT be delivered for Government use are presented in the table below. If none, state No Withholdings.

Technical Data/ Computer Software/ Patent to be Furnished with Restrictions or Withheld

Basis for Assertion or Withholding

Asserted Rights Category

Name of Entity Asserting Restrictions or Withholding

Identify the technical data/software/patent to be furnished with restriction or withheld (insert “None” if no restrictions apply)

Indicate whether development was exclusively or partially at private expense. If development was not at private expense, enter the specific reason for asserting that the Government’s right should be restricted

Insert asserted rights category (e.g., limited rights (data), restricted rights (software), government purpose rights, SBIR data rights or specifically negotiated license)

Insert corporation or individual

*If COTS licenses will be required, please list them here.

SECTION 6.0ROUGH ORDER OF MAGNITUDE (ROM) COST

Cost Share (if applicable) is proposed as follows:

Cash into Project: [Describe and quantify the proposed cash contribution(s) being made for use on the project, or insert N/A].

In-Kind Contributions: [Describe and quantify the proposed in-kind contribution(s) being made for use on the project, or insert N/A].

Cost Element

Total

Description/Comments

Prime Contractor Labor

$

Insert generic position titles, estimated rates and labor hours

Subcontractor/Consultant Labor

$

Insert generic position titles, estimated rates and labor hours. If more than one Subcontractor is listed, provide cost break-out by Subcontractor.

Material/Equipment

$

Insert list of proposed material/equipment

Other Direct Costs (ODC)

$

Describe proposed ODC (outside services, conference fees, software licenses, other fees/royalties, etc.)

Travel

$

Describe estimated travel (e.g., travel to customer site(s) for meetings, etc.)

Proposed Project Total

$

Sum of cost elements

Less Cost Share

$

Cost-share amount (if applicable)

Total (Less Cost Share)

$

Amount after cost share is deducted

Consortium Fee

$

3.8% Applied to Total Price per OTA terms

Total ROM Cost

$

To be confirmed by CMG

*Amounts should be presented in whole dollars only

Affirmation of Business Status Certification

Each participant shall complete a separate certification. These certifications will not count toward the page limit.

Participant Name

Proposed NAICS Code

Industry Size Standard (Small/Large)

DUNS No.

CAGE Code

Active SAM Registration

|_| Yes |_| No Expiration Date:

Address 1

Address 2

City/State/Zip

POC Name/Title

POC Phone/Email

Check one of the following boxes:

|_|Non-traditional Defense Contractor (NDC) — A Non-traditional Defense Contractor is an entity that is not currently performing and has not performed, for at least the one-year period preceding the issuance of this Request for White Papers by the Department of Defense, any contract or subcontract for the Department of Defense that is subject to full coverage under the cost accounting standards prescribed pursuant to Section 1502 of Title 41 of the U.S. Code and the regulations implementing such section.

All small businesses are considered NDCs. A small business is a business concern as defined under Section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632). To be considered a small business for the purposes of this RWP, a concern must qualify as a small business under the size standard for the proposed North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code, as described at 13 C.F.R. 121.201.

|_|Nonprofit Research Institution — means a nonprofit institution, as defined in 15 U.S.C. §3703, and includes federally funded research and development centers, as identified by the National Scientific Foundation in accordance with the Government-wide Federal Acquisition Regulation issued in accordance with 41 U.S.C. §1303(a)(1) (or any successor regulation thereto).

|_|Traditional Defense Contractor — A traditional defense contractor is an entity that does not meet the definition of a Non-traditional Defense Contractor (NDC) or a Nonprofit Research Institution.

This is to certify that the above is accurate, complete and current as of insert date for insert RWP number.

Signature (electronic signature is acceptable)

Date Signed

3239as1035.pdf

DSIZE DWG NO.CAGE CODE

SCALE EST WT SHEET

TITLE

REV

PER DOD-STD-2101.

DESIGNED FOR

CRITICAL TOMAJOR TOMINOR - ALL OTHER CHARACTERISTICS

D

C

B

A

D

C

B

A

12345678

12345678

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMANDPATUXENT RIVER, MD 20670

HARMONIZATION PLATEASSEMBLY

3239AS1030-1

30003 3239AS1035 -1:2 9.8 1 OF 1

CURRENT DESIGN ACTIVITY CAGE CODE 30003DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTERAIRCRAFT DIVISION

LAKEHURST, NJ 08733-5000

DRAWER RICHARD HENRY

DESIGNER RICHARD HENRY

CHECKER JOHN NEWCOMER

SUPV'R PAUL MCGUIRE

APPROVEDFOR RELEASE

CLASSIFICATION OF CHARACTERISTICS

ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS

UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED:* INTERPRET DRAWINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME Y14.100* REMOVE BURRS AND BREAK SHARP EDGES* TOLERANCES ON DIMENSIONS LOCATING BOLT HOLES AND FINISHED SURFACES SHALL NOT BE CUMULATIVE* DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES* ALL SHEETS ARE AT SAME REVISION LEVEL

PARTS LIST

QTY NEXT ASSEMBLYFINDNO.

CAGE PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION MATERIAL SPECIFICATION UNIT WT.(LBS)

X 3239AS1030-1 1 30003 3239AS1035-1 HARMONIZATION PLATE , ASSEMBLY 9.8

1 3239AS1035-1 2 30003 1 3239AS1036-1 PLATE, HARMONIZATION ALM ALY 6061-T6 ASTM B221 9.34

3 3239AS1035-1 3 30003 1 3239AS1037-1 SPACER, BUTT ALM ALY 6061-T6 ASTM B221 0.03

1 3239AS1035-1 4 30003 1 3239AS1039-1 PLATE, CAPTIVATING ALM ALY 6061-T6 ASTM B221 0.17

6 3239AS1035-1 5 39428 2 91290A150 CAP SCREW, METRIC ALLOY STEEL 0.02

1 3239AS1035-1 6 56644 2 COM-M12T BEARING, SPHERICAL 0.13

3 3239AS1035-1 7 3 MA3279-206 HELICOIL, 6MM SS 0.00

2 3239AS1035-1 8 3 MA3279-159 HELICOIL, 8MM SS 0.01

A/R 3239AS1035-1 9 209741 LOCTITE, RED

APPROVAL AUTHORITY:

CAD PROG: CREO VER: 4.0

REVISIONSREV DESCRIPTION APPROVED

NOTES:1. PRESS INSTALL SPHERICAL BEARING, F/N 6, TO HARMONIZATION PLATE, F/N 2, AT ASSEMBLY AND CAPTIVATE USING F/N 42. INSTALL HELICOIL INSERTS, F/N 7 AND F/N 8, IAW MA1567B3. APPLY THREAD LOCKER, F/N 9, ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS DURING ASSEMBLY WHEN INSTALLING CAP SCREW, F/N 54. VENDORS LISTED ON THIS DRAWING FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS ARE A SUGGESTED SOURCE OF SUPPLY ONLY. OTHER VENDORS ARE ACCEPTABLE SO LONG AS THEIR ITEM QUALITY MATCH THOSE OF THE SUGGESTED SOURCES OF SUPPLY LISTED HEREON IN FORM, FIT, AND FUCNTION.5. PRESS INSTALL BUTT SPACER, F/N 3, INTO HARMONIZATION PLATE, F/N 2, AT ASSEMBLY

ASSEMBLY, HARMONIZATION PLATE

5

2

2

1

SECTION A-APRELIMINARY

2019/11/18

DISTRIBUTION AUTHORIZED TO U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND THEIR CONTRACTORS, ADMINISTRATION/ OPERATIONAL

USE 2019/11/18, OTHER REQUESTS FOR THIS DOCUMENT SHALL BE REFERRED TO COMMANDING OFFICER,

NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER, AIRCRAFT DIVISION, LAKEHURST, NJ 08733-5000

WARNING

THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS TECHNICAL DATA WHOSE EXPORT IS RESTRICTED BY THE ARMS EXPORT CONTROL

ACT (TITLE 22, U.S.C. SEC 2751 ET SEQ.) OR EXECUTIVE ORDER12470. VIOLATIONS OF THESE EXPORT LAWS ARE SUBJECT TO SEVERE CRIMINAL PENALTIES.

1

21

41

61

56

73

82

33

ENTER_DATE

ENTER_DATE

ENTER_DATE

ENTER_DATE

DECIMAL TOLERANCES: 3PL �#�.010 2PL �#�.02 ANGLES �#� .5�$�

CLASSIFICATION OF CHARACTERISTICS: PER DOD-STD-2101. FOR EACH FINISHED PART, CRITICAL AND MAJOR CHARACTERISTICS REQUIRE 100% INSPECTION.

CSI/CAI

PROCURING ACTIVITY TAKE NOTE (GOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES ONLY)TO ENSURE PROCURING ACTIVITY HAS THE LATEST DRAWING REVISIONS,SPECIFICATIONS, AND QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS, A TECHNICALDRAWING REVIEW (TDR)IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT. THE REQUEST FOR TDR SHALL BE FORWARDED VIA EMAIL TO TDRREI @NAVY.MIL. THE TDR WILL BE PROCESSED IN A MAXIMUM OF THIRTY (30) DAYS.

4.8.6.3

Sheet 1ViewsVIEW_TEMPLATE_1top_8right_9

ZonesA1

3239as1043.pdf


SCALE EST WT SHEET

TITLE

REV

PER DOD-STD-2101.

DESIGNED FOR


D

C

B

A

D

C

B

A

12345678

12345678



STRONGARMLEFT

3239AS1030-1

30003 3239AS1043 -1:2 3.8 1 OF 2







SUPV'R PAUL MCGUIRE

APPROVEDFOR RELEASE




PARTS LIST



X 3239AS1040-1 1 30003 3239AS1043-1 STRONGARM, LEFT ALM ALY 6061-T6 ASTM 13209/13221 3.8

X 3239AS1040-1 2 30003 3239AS1043-2 STRONGARM, RIGHT ALM ALY 6061-T6 ASTM 13209/13221

APPROVAL AUTHORITY:



ISOMETRIC VIEW FOR REFERENCE ONLY

STRONGARM, LEFT (SHOWN)

SCALE 1:1

PRELIMINARY

2019/11/18 DISTRIBUTION AUTHORIZED TO U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

AND THEIR CONTRACTORS, ADMINISTRATION/ OPERATIONAL USE 2019/11/18, OTHER REQUESTS FOR THIS

DOCUMENT SHALL BE REFERRED TO COMMANDING OFFICER,NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER,

AIRCRAFT DIVISION, LAKEHURST, NJ 08733-5000

WARNING



1

ENTER_DATE

ENTER_DATE

ENTER_DATE

ENTER_DATE



CSI/CAI


4.8.6.3


SHEET

REV

DSCALE EST WT

A

R.125

1.474

3.026

5.276

B

14.7�$�

.500

18.50

3.00

6.30�$�

15.60

2.00

.50

.50

9.30

7.30

1.00

.50

1.00

11X R.50

R1.00

2X THU.255+.006-.000

.250

4.000

�x� .5.250+.006-.000

.50

4.000

11.450

4X THRU.252+.006-.000

.250

�x� .5.250+.006-.000

7.526

.875

F/N A B

1 4.25 .620

2 4.00 .684

30003 3239AS1043 -1:2 3.8 2 OF 2


REVISIONSSEE SHEET ONE FOR APPROVAL INFORMATION

REV DESCRIPTION

VIEW ROTATED 14.7 DEGREES

STRONGARM, LEFT

STRONGARM, RIGHT

1

2

D

C

B

A

D

C

B

A

910111213141516

910111213141516

Sheet 1Viewsnew_view_8

ZonesA1

Sheet 2ViewsVIEW_TEMPLATE_1VIEW_TEMPLATE_2new_view_6

ZonesA1

3239as1039.pdf

CSIZE DWG NO.CAGE CODE

SCALE EST WT SHEET

TITLE

REV

PER DOD-STD-2101.

DESIGNED FOR


1.50

2.36

.135

.322

1.181+.005-.000

6X .180+.006-.000

6X .984

6X 60.0�$�

.200+.004-.000



PLATECAPTIVATING

3239AS1030-1

30003 3239AS1039 -1.5:1 0.2 1 OF 1







SUPV'R PAUL MCGUIRE

APPROVEDFOR RELEASE




PARTS LIST



X 3239AS1030-1 1 30003 3239AS1039-1 PLATE, CAPTIVATING ALM ALY 6061-T6 ASTM B221 0.2

APPROVAL AUTHORITY:



PLATE, CAPTIVATING

+.006-.000

.05 X 45�$�

SECTION A-A

1

ENTER_DATE

ENTER_DATE

ENTER_DATE

ENTER_DATE

PRELIMINARY

2019/11/18




WARNING




CSI/CAI



4.8.6.3

Sheet 1ViewsVIEW_TEMPLATE_1bottom_4

3239as1037.pdf

CSIZE DWG NO.CAGE CODE

SCALE EST WT SHEET

TITLE

REV

PER DOD-STD-2101.

DESIGNED FOR


.79

.3937+.0000-.0006

.472

.36

x45�$�.04



SPACERBUTT

3239AS1030-1

30003 3239AS1037 -4:1 0.0 1 OF 1







SUPV'R PAUL MCGUIRE

APPROVEDFOR RELEASE




PARTS LIST



X 3239AS1035-1 1 30003 3239AS1037-1 SPACER, BUTT ALM ALY 6061-T6 ASTM B221 0.0

APPROVAL AUTHORITY:



SPACER, BUTT

NOTES:1. BREAK ALL SHARP EDGES .010 x45�$�.

.04 X 45�$�

1

ENTER_DATE

ENTER_DATE

ENTER_DATE

ENTER_DATE

PRELIMINARY

2019/11/18




WARNING




CSI/CAI



4.8.6.3

Sheet 1ViewsVIEW_TEMPLATE_1VIEW_TEMPLATE_2

3239as1036.pdf


SCALE EST WT SHEET

TITLE

REV

PER DOD-STD-2101.

DESIGNED FOR


D

C

B

A

D

C

B

A

12345678

12345678



PLATEHARMONIZATION

3239AS1030-1

30003 3239AS1036 -1:1.5 9.3 1 OF 2







SUPV'R PAUL MAGUIRE

APPROVEDFOR RELEASE




PARTS LIST



X 3239AS1035-1 1 30003 3239AS1036-1 PLATE, HARMONIZATION ALM ALY 6061-T6 ASTM B221 9.3

APPROVAL AUTHORITY:



PLATE, HARMONIZATION

ISOMETRIC VIEW FOR REFERENCE ONLY

NOTES:1. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, SURFACE ROUGHNESS SHALL BE .125 Ra MAX PER ASME B46.I.2. THREAD DIMENSIONS AND DESIGNATIONS SHALL BE INTERPRATED IAW FED-STD-H28 AND ASME Y14.6, RESPECTIVELY. ACCEPTABILITY OF SCREW THREADS SHALL BE IAW SYSTEM 21 OF FED-STD-H23120.3. MARKING SHALL BE ENGRAVED IAW SAE AS478-15B3. CHARACTERS SHALL BE A MIN OF 0.375 INCHES HIGH.4. LOCATE ENGRAVING ROUGHLY WHERE SHOWN.

PRELIMINARY

2019/11/18




WARNING



1

ENTER_DATE

ENTER_DATE

ENTER_DATE

ENTER_DATE



CSI/CAI


4.8.6.3


SHEET

REV

DSCALE EST WT

11.811

17.323

5.906

1.575

2X 15.158

5.1184X5.118

1.181+.001-.000

6X 60.0�$�

6X .984

.272+.004-.000

.472

3X THRU.3937+.0006-.0000

12.681

2X 3.390

2X 2.209

.984

2.756

1.811

8.350

30003 3239AS1036 -1:1.5 9.3 2 OF 2


REVISIONSSEE SHEET ONE FOR APPROVAL INFORMATION

REV DESCRIPTION

A

A

+.005-.000

4

DRILL FOR MA3279-159HELICAL INSERTPER SAE MA1567B 2X

DRILL FOR MA3279-206 HELICAL INSERTPER SAE MA1567B 3X

4X .197 X 45�$�6X M4x.7 ISO

3

SECTION A-A

D

C

B

A

D

C

B

A

910111213141516

910111213141516

Sheet 1Flag Notes�~��~�

Viewsnew_view_6

ZonesA1

Sheet 2Flag Notes�~��~�

Viewsnew_view_8top_11

ZonesA1

X

Documents

Home [] files/NASC... · Web view2 Units – STRONGARM, RIGHT(PN:32391043-2) These items have not been manufactured previously. These components are to support development and testing