Upload
joanna-skinner
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
How can the World Bank help?
eSAR Discussion Series
P P P s & e G o v e r n m e n t
Mark DutzRandeep SudanAndi DervishiStefan Haid
What should a good PPP include?
• What are PPPs – Mark Dutz• The IFC Perspective – Andi Dervishi• Various Case Studies – Randeep Sudan• Case Study US Portals – Stefan Haid
Agenda
eSAR Discussion Series
What are PPPs?
Conventional procurement
PPP continuum
Full Privatization
Government responsiblefor inv., operation & risks
Service contracts: pub.inv., pvt.operation of discrete tasks
Private Sector Participation (PSP) models
Management and affermage (O&M) contracts:pub.inv, pvt. Operation & Maintenance of system
DBO contracts: pub.inv., pvt.Design, Build & Operation
BOT & full concession (DBFO) contracts: pvt.Design, Build (construct and/or rehabilitate),Finance & Operate/maintain
increased risk transfer to private sector
What are PPPs?
eSAR Discussion Series
Privately-owned assets,publicly regulated w/ licenses specifying rights & obligations of private parties & State
Public ownership of assets, services via a range of MT/LT contractual arrangements w/ varying level of risk transfer
Why are PPPs desirable?
• Risk transfer to private sector – Commercial know-how & managerial skills – Best-practice technologies & innovation
• Enhanced government accountability• Entrepreneurship & local enterprise development• Private finance
– Government payments can be leveraged by citizen user fees and/or government cost savings
What are the benefits of PPPs?
Result: Faster deployment of better services
eSAR Discussion Series
What should a good PPP include?
Contractual arrangement should be based on:
1. Substantial risk transfer– allocation of risks to parties best able to
manage them 2. Quality of service & output specification
– focus on services associated with procured assets
3. Performance-related rewards– payment only if performance standards met
4. M&E plan over life of contract– achievement of whole-life performance
What are the ingredients of a good PPP?
eSAR Discussion Series
What are the steps?
eSAR Discussion Series
Project Preparation
Service Provider Selection
Contract Management
1. Service Need
(Output specs over time)
2. Option Appraisal
(Report on options)
3. Business Case
(affrdblty./public interest)
4. Project Dev.
(team, PSC, plan)
5. Bid Preparation
(EOI/ Short listing, RFP)
6. Bid Evaluation
(prf. bidder, value for $)
7. Final Negotiation
(sign contract, finc. close)
8. Contract Mgmt.
(construction, commissioning,
monitoring,dispute settlement,
continuing communications
Project/ Funding Approval
Bid Doc Approval
Project Finalization Review
What are pre-requisites for good PPPs?
Clear policy and legal frameworks– Rationale for use of PPPs & legal powers to contract out services– Dispute resolution procedures– Oversight of fiscal costs
Oversight procedures providing checks & balances1) Project preparation – business case & value-for-money2) Provider selection – guidelines for pre-qualification & tender3) Contract management – M&E, performance-linked
payments/penalties
Support functions1) Information dissemination – data, networking, training2) Guidance – model contracts, tools, case studies3) Catalytic functions – political/advisory support, funding
What are the pre-requisites?
eSAR Discussion Series
Needed: Transparency, Competition, Monitoring, Empowered Public
• Rules to maximize transparency and competition– balance innovation stimulus with value-for-money – give private sector a framework within which to prepare
proposals
• Options to reward valid intellectual property– purchase concept and then award thru competitive bidding– offer proponent pre-defined advantage in a competitive bidding
process:
Special Example:Unsolicited Proposals
eSAR Discussion Series
bonus system (e.g. the original offer is selected as long as it falls within a stipulated percentage of the best offer, within 10% of the lowest offer)
Swiss challenge system (third parties allowed to make better offers, ‘challenges’ for project during designated period, with proponent then given right to counter-match superior offers)
What can we do?
AAA: – Analysis of government’s ability to identify, procure and
manage PPPs.
TA: – Drafting/implementing policies & regulations– Building institutions– Training– Building support among stakeholders
What can we do?
eSAR Discussion Series
What can we do?
Financing support:– Providing IFC advisory or financing services for transactions– Supporting PPP preparation via project development
funds– Funding PPPs via loans/credits where subsidies to
complement user fees justified (e.g. OBA)– Providing financing beyond tenor available in capital
markets– Providing credit enhancements to mitigate govt.
performance risks (e.g. Partial Risk Guarantees, MIGA Investment Guarantees)
What can we do? cont’d
eSAR Discussion Series
The IFC Perspective:The Government Efficiency Curve
eSAR Discussion Series
Today’sGov’t
Pre-PrivatizationGovernment
CoreGov’t
1960 - 2000 Today Next 10-15 years
Size of G
overnm
ents
Governm
ent Efficiency
Today’sGov’t
Pre-PrivatizationGovernment
CoreGov’t
1960 - 2000 Today Next 10-15 years
Size of G
overnm
ents
Governm
ent Efficiency
Pre-privatizatio
n governmen
t
Today’s Govt.
Core Govt
.
The IFC Perspective:Natural Outsourcing Path
eSAR Discussion Series
Infrastructure Provision and ManagementInfrastructure Provision and Management
CitizenCitizen CompanyCompany LandLand VehicleVehicle LegalLegal
TaxationTaxationProcur.Procur.
OtherOther
PolicyPolicy
Legis.Legis.
Reg.Reg. Enfor.Enfor.
ElectoralElectoral
ServicesServices
Natu
ral O
uts
ou
rcin
g P
ath
Judic.Judic.
Infrastructure Provision and ManagementInfrastructure Provision and Management
CitizenCitizen CompanyCompany LandLand VehicleVehicle LegalLegal
TaxationTaxationProcur.Procur.
OtherOther
PolicyPolicy
Legis.Legis.
Reg.Reg. Enfor.Enfor.
ElectoralElectoral
ServicesServices
Natu
ral O
uts
ou
rcin
g P
ath
Natu
ral O
uts
ou
rcin
g P
ath
Judic.Judic.
Case Study:GCNet (Ghana Community Network)
Trade facilitation system• Partners:
– Equity $5.3 million– Customs, Excise and Preventive Services (20%)– SGS Switzerland and 3 other partners (80%)
• Fee: – 0.4% ad valorem on imports
• Results:– 49% increase in revenues in first 18 months– Clearance times at international airport reduced from 6 days to
under 4 hours
www.ghanatradenet.com
eSAR Discussion Series
Case Study:Andhra Pradesh Broadband Project
eSAR Discussion Series
• Connecting 23 districts, 1127 mandals and 21,000 villages with 80,000 kms of fiber
• Bandwidth from 100 Mbps to 10 Gbps• Investment of $90 million by private sector• Consortium consists of fiber optic manufacturer,
Cable television provider, Railtel, VoIP company, ISP among others
• Government contribution towards equity $5.7 million
• Free right of way permissions• Government as anchor client
Case Study:e-Procurement Projects
eSAR Discussion Series
• South Korea– Investment of ~$80 million in the Government e-
Procurement System (GePS)– Savings of $2.8 billion annually
• India (Andhra Pradesh)– Partnership with Commerce One– Investment by private sector partner ~$1 million– Payments by bidders– Substantial savings to departments– Issues: software in escrow account
Case Study:e-Government Portal Typology
eSAR Discussion Series
Component/Model
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Development Public Private Private Private
Operation Public Public Private Private
Funding Public Public Public Private
© Stefan Haid
Case Study:Categorization of the 50 US State Portals
eSAR Discussion Series© Stefan Haid
Case Study:Portal Type 4 - Utah
eSAR Discussion Series© Stefan Haid
•PPP: Utah Interactive •Rankings: Top 5•Development: Private•Operation: Private•Funding: Private•Est. Cost: 5m+2m p/a•Business Model: Transaction fees on eServices•Commentary: An ideal self-funding eGov portal
Case Study:Characterization of Portal Type 4
eSAR Discussion Series
• Makes maximum use of private sector potential
• Latest technology transfer due to private investment
• Little to no tax money is spent on the eGov portal
• Reinvestment budget
• Makes maximum use of private sector potential
• Latest technology transfer due to private investment
• Little to no tax money is spent on the eGov portal
• Reinvestment budget
• High transaction costs due to PPP with private firm
• Limited control for state• Discontinuity if private
firm leaves PPP prematurely
• Allocative distortions if transaction fee is too high
• High transaction costs due to PPP with private firm
• Limited control for state• Discontinuity if private
firm leaves PPP prematurely
• Allocative distortions if transaction fee is too high
AdvantagesAdvantages DisadvantagesDisadvantages
© Stefan Haid
Case Study:Lessons from US Portals
eSAR Discussion Series
• Private sector companies can provide...– industry expertise to develop and operate portals.– sufficiently trained and qualified human resources.– enough money to finance an entire eGov portal.
• Private sector companies need...– a viable business case with an attractive ROI.– sources of revenue like online transaction fees.– government guarantees and transparent regulation.– a long-term relationship with their public partners.
© Stefan Haid
What should a good PPP include?
• KPMG: Public Private Partnerships/Private Finance Initiatives: An Introductory Perspective: http://www.kpmg.com.hk/en/virtual_library/Property_Infrastructure/Public_Private_Partnership.pdf
• Green Paper on Public Private Partnerships and Community Law on Public Contracts and Concessions (European Union): http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/gpr/2004/com2004_0327en01.pdf
• Using Hybrid Funding Strategies to Support the State of Arizona (Development of Portal):
http://www-1.ibm.com/services/us/imc/pdf/g510-1678-01-wheres-the-money-hybrid-funding.pdf
• National Association of State Chief Information Officers: Innovative Funding for Innovative State IT: New Trends and Approaches for State IT Funding, Version 2.0., November 2003.
• www.gpoba.org
• www.ppiaf.org
For More Information
eSAR Discussion Series