20
How do we infer phylogeny? “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1. Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

How do we infer phylogeny?

3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought:

1. Evolutionary systematics

1. Phenetics

1. Cladistics/phylogenetics

Page 2: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

1. Evolutionary systematics

-Arose during the Modern Synthesis of Evolution (Ernst Mayr, Theodosius Dobzhansky, G.G. Simpson)

-Tried to be synonymous with evolutionary biology & “Neo-Darwinism”

-Goal: Think of relationships among organisms as how Natural Selection made them.

-Very little (if any) methodology or “operationalism” Construct scenarios, but no formal system of theories.

-Difficult to formulate testable hypotheses.

Page 3: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

1. Evolutionary systematics

-Often only classifications, with little attempt to depict relationships as “trees” (phylogenies).

-”Trust the experts”

Page 4: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

2. Phenetics

-Emphasizes the overall similarity of PHENOtypes in grouping and classifying taxa.

-Maintains principles of Neo-Darwinism, but NO ESTIMATION OF PROCESSES.

-Largely methodological/operational. NO PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS.

-Uses any and all data, as long as it can be quantified.

-Resulting “trees” called “Phenograms.” Statements of SIMILARITY ONLY. Useful for summarizing resemblence

Page 5: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

2. Phenetics: “phenograms”

Page 6: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

3. Cladistics/phylogenetics (Hennig)

-Founded on principles of Operational Darwinism1. Darwinian Evolution= “Descent with modification”

2. Phylogeny is the result of evolution

3. Therefore, focus on derived MODIFICATIONS for evidence of phylogeny.

-Cladistics uses ONLY shared,derived features to infer phylogeny (Evolutionary Systematics & Phenetics use ALL features).

-Need to distinguish ANCESTRAL vs. DERIVED

Page 7: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

Terms & concepts used in phylogenetics/cladistics

CHARACTER: Heritable trait possessed by an organism; characters are usually described in terms of their states, for example: "hair present" vs. "hair absent," where "hair" is the character, and "present" and "absent" are its states.

Page 8: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

HOMOLOGY: Characters are considered homologous when they are inherited from a common ancestor which possessed that feature.

HOMOPLASY: A similar feature shared by two or more taxa that does not meet the criterion (or criteria) of homology. Homoplasiesgenerally arise via convergence.

CONVERGENCE: the independent (convergent) evolution of anatomical or functional similarity between unrelated or distantly related lineages or forms. The resulting similarities are only superficial, generally resulting from similar adaptation to similar environments and are NOT a result of common ancestry (and are therefore NOT homologies).

Terms & concepts used in phylogenetics/cladistics

Page 9: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

Bat

Bird

Pterosaur

humerus

humerus

humerus

Page 10: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

Anapsida Diapsida

SynapsidaSaurapsida

Turtles

Lizards & snakesCrocodilesDinosaurs & birds

Mammals &reptile-like mammals

Amniota -evolution of cleidoic (shelled) egg; ca. 350 mya

Amphibians

-ca. 320 mya

most recent common ancestor

Page 11: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

Terms & concepts used in phylogenetics/cladistics

APOMORPHY: a derived feature or character; derived from and differing from an ancestral (plesiomorphic) condition.

SYNAPOMORPHY: A shared, derived character (apomorphy) reflecting common ancestry used to group taxa. Hair is a synapomorphy of mammals.

Page 12: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

Terms & concepts used in phylogenetics/cladistics

PLESIOMORPHY: An ancestral or primitive character, often incorrectly used to group taxa.

SYMPLESIOMORPHY: A plesiomorphy shared by two or more taxa.

Page 13: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

REMEMBER

CHARACTER STATES are primitive or derived.

ORGANISMS are not!

Page 14: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

How do we identify “apomorphic” vs. “plesiomorphic”?

1.Fossil record

2.Ontogeny/embryologye.g., clavicles in deer

3.Outgroup comparison

Page 15: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

Parsimony Criterion

Parsimony: The “rule of simplicity.” Simply stated, according to the principle of Maximum Parsimony, accept the explanation requiring the fewest assumptions.

Parsimony is the fundamental assumption of traditional cladistics/phylogenetics.

Page 16: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

Parsimony Criterion

Parsimony: The “rule of simplicity.” Simply stated, according to the principle of Maximum Parsimony, accept the explanation requiring the fewest assumptions.

Parsimony is the fundamental assumption of traditional cladistics/phylogenetics.

Other criteria: Maximum likelihood; probabilisticcriteria (e.g., Bayesian posterior probabilities).

Page 17: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

Parsimony Criterion

In phylogenetics, we use the parsimony criterion to “optimize” (=minimize) the number of transitions (=steps) from one character state to another, for all characters, on every possible tree, and select the treeor trees that require the fewest number of steps (ad hoc hypotheses).

Page 18: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

How many possible trees?

Ingroup taxaNumber of trees

1 1

2 1

3 3

5 105

10 34,459,425

50 2.75292 x 1076

Page 19: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

Example

Human Monkey Mouse Outgroup

1. Dense fur: no yes yes yes

2. Bipedal: yes no no no

3. Computer: yes no no no

4. Clothes: yes no no no

5. Long tail: no yes yes yes

6. Enlarged brain:

yes yes no no

Page 20: How do we infer phylogeny? 3 “schools” of phylogenetic thought: 1.Evolutionary systematics 1.Phenetics 1.Cladistics/phylogenetics

“Nothing in biology makes sense exceptin the light of evolution.”

T. Dobzhansky

“Nothing in evolution makes sense exceptin the light of phylogeny.”

Society of Systematic Biologists