Upload
phammien
View
221
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
How to reduce energy consumption in pharma environment trough HVAC optimization
Case study :
Dead Band Control of Relative HumidityLuc Willem, 17/06/2009
GSK Bio Objectives
Reduce operational Global Warming Potential (GWP) and energy consumption per unit sales from 2006 baseline
Reduce 20%
2010
Reduce 45%
20151334GJ/£million
1253 -6.1%Q4 2008
2006
1067
734
GSK Bio Energy Consumption
All Bio Sites :
2008 GSKBio Consumption : 812,158 MWh
41,000,000 € spent
Energy Cost Breakdown in Pharma Industry
Energy cost breakdown - pharma
humidification / de-humidification, 8%
ventilation, 30%
process, 6%lighting, 15%compressed air, 4%
pumps, 6%
cooling, 26%
hot water, 3%
miscellaneous , 2%
HVAC ~ 65 % of total energy consumption !
HVAC = best candidate for energy saving projects
Project : Dead Band Control of Relative Humidity
Scope : extend the control interval for relative humidity in clean rooms
Grade D, C, B + unclassified
Today, the window is non existent : saving will beimmense
Yes, but what are the GMP requirements for sterileproducts facilities ?
Regulatory – Guidances
No formal GMP requirements in EU GMP (annex 1) or in FDA APG 2004 :
Only recommended limits for microbial contamination
Rule of thumb for the relative humidity in aseptic cleanroom :
> 30% to control static electricity < 60% to control rust, organism growth and personal from sweating
GSKBIO revised global specifications (unless local laws)- 30 – 60 % RH for grade C / D (before setpoint = 50%)- 30 – 50 % RH for grade A / B (before setpoint = 40%)- 30 – 65 % RH for non-classified areas
Typical GSKBio HVAC configuration
RH sensor
Cooling coils Post heating Steam humidifier
Before – 1/2
Current Situation : same value of RH setpoint for the PID controls of humidifier and cooling coils
Humidifier valve
Cooling coilvalve
RH
Fixed setpoint
50 % for grade D/C
(example)
Before – 2/2
40% RH constant
% humidifier
% coolingvalve
Proposed Modification
Proposal : differentiate RH setpoints for humidifer and cooling coil, but still within the accepted limits
Dead band Less chilled / glycol water consumption in summer (de-humidification)
Reduced post heating need
Less steamconsumption in winter for humidification
Setpoint for cooling coil
58%
Setpoint for humidifier 35 %RH
(example)
Belgium Climate Case Study
Thermodynamical simulations using monthly averageclimate data (done internally) :
10,000 m3/H air handling systemGrade C or DChilled water 7 – 12°CHumidification with black steam 3 barg
50% RH (fixed) 40 – 58 % RH (dead-band)NB : 40% RH min = RGPT (social law)
2 cases :Mixing system (20% fresh air)100 % Outside Air
Results of Simulation
Ex : 20% fresh air system
Fixed setpoint (50% RH)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
KW
SteamCoolingPost Heating
Dead Band 40 - 58 %RH
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct NovK
W
SteamCoolingPost Heating
Expected Gains – Belgium Climate
Changing RH levels at fixed 20°C , 10.000 m3/H, grade C/D, 20% fresh air
010 00020 00030 00040 00050 00060 00070 00080 00090 000
100 000110 000120 000
RHH = 50 RHL = 50 RHH = 58 RHL = 40
kwH
/ ye
ar Re-heatingCooling and de-humidificationHumidification black steam
NB : kwH cooling and kwH humidification = thermal demand (do not include Chiller COP and boiler efficiency)
Expected Gains – Belgium Climate
Changing RH level at fixed °C, 10.000 m3/H, grade C/D, 100% fresh air
010 00020 00030 00040 00050 00060 00070 00080 00090 000
100 000110 000
RHH = 50 RHL = 50 RHH = 58 RHL = 40
kwH
per
yea
r
Re-heatingCooling and de-humidificationHumidification black steam
NB : kwH cooling and kwH humidification = thermal demand (do not include Chiller COP and boiler efficiency)
Expected Gains – Belgium Climate
Benefit for 10.000 m3/H, grade C/D, 20% fresh air :
3600 € / year (~ 22 € / m2 / year)
Benefit for 10.000 m3/H, grade C/D, 100% fresh air :
5500 € / year (~ 34 € / m2 / year)
Expected Gains – Belgium ClimateWavre + Rixensart + Gemboux :
~ 32.000 m2 of grade C/D area
32.000 x 22 € / m2 / year :
~ 704.000 € / year benefit for all BelgiumSites
=
~ 2 % of overall Bio energy consumption
Investment Cost
BMS modification :If setpoints are distincts and available at administrator levellevel 0 € !If setpoints are no available at supervision level, software modification is needed 1200 €
Validation cost :Rooms to be re-validated in temperature and RH4 hours T / RH monitoring with portable probe = 110 €/room
Payback – Belgium Climate
One AHU of 50.000 m3/H grade C with 6 rooms, PX + Desigo, 20% fresh air :
- 1200 € for modification of BMS by Siemens
- 6 x 110 € for T/RH re-qualification = 660 €
- 140 € contingencies
- TOTAL investment : 2000 €
- benefit : 18000 €/year
PAYBACK = 1 month !
Other GSK Bio Sites
Greater benefits are expected in our facilties whereclimate is more adverse than in Belgium !
Singapore (only de-humidification) Climate data :
Average mean temp : 27,5°CAverage dewpoint : 24°C = 18,8 gr/Kg !!
Example of Make-up AHU, grade C/D, 100% O.A., 10.000 m3/HIf setpoint of cooling coil = 9,2°C = 7,25 gr/kg (= 20°C/50%)
Chilled water consumption : 154 kWPost heating need : 19 kW (heat loads excluded)
If setpoint of cooling coil = 11,5 °C = 8,42 gr/Kg (= 20°C/58%)Chilled water consumption : 120 kWPost-heating need : 14 kW
SAVING = 272.000 kWH chilled water + 40.000 kWH steam per year for 10.000 m3/H of fresh air (MAHU)
Dresden (mainly humidification)Climate data :
Average dewpoint always < 7.6 gr/kg humidification mainly
Dresden = mainly 100% O.A. systems with SEW recovery
Example of fresh air system, grade C/D, 100% O.A., 10.000 m3/H :
If the humidifier setpoint is fixed at 40%RH instead of 50 %RH (at20°C), i.e. 5,78 instead of 7,25 gr/kg, the expected saving is 122 tons of steam per year for 10.000 m3/H of fresf air
Conclusions
Quick Win modification !
Extrapolation to all GSK Bio Sites = saving of 3-4 % of overall energy cost (1,5 M€ saving per year)
Pharma industry very conservative group need to convince QA and Validation
Modification of acceptance criteria in validation file may be hard sometimes …
Remark : GSKBio BMS is not validated; this helpsmaking such control system modification