57
http://www.feenix.co.uk E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

http://www.feenix.co.uk

E-Learning Fundamentals

Prepared for

January 2004

Page 2: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Purpose of Meeting

• Provide a basic understanding of – e-learning, – its principles and – possible approaches

Page 3: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Agenda

• Introduction– FeeNix e-Learning background– ‘Qualified’ to talk about e-learning

and standards

• E-Learning background and definitions

– What is e-learning?• Definition• Physical and conceptual

components• Demo of a LMS and some content

• Quality Considerations– Maximising Impact and uptake– Typical Implementations

• Case studies • lessons learned

• Standards AICC and SCORM– History

• Why the standards are necessary– Certification and compliance

• Who is– Definitions and differences

• Pros,Cons and Gotchas• Mandatory and Optional data

elements– Things you need to know…

• LMS supplier• Content Supplier

– References

Page 4: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

http://www.feenix.co.uk

What is E-Learning

–Physical and conceptual components–Demo of a LMS and some content

Page 5: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

A definition of e-learning

• “Any learning, training or education that is facilitated by the use of well-know and proven computer technologies, specifically networks based on Internet technology.”– the learning content is stored on a web server– accessed via a browser and the TCP-IP

network protocol

Page 6: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Types of e-Learning

• ‘Blended’ learning is a combination of:– Face to Face - Classroom or sales calls– Materials - Books / videos / CDs / brochures– E-learning – On-line via Internet or Intranet

• Synchronous (Using collaboration tools)– Interactive on-line chat– Electronic whiteboards– Presentation delivery– Virtual Symposiums

• Asynchronous (Web-based version of CBT (CD-ROM)– E-learning, e-detailing– Most of the work done on e-learning standards is concerned

with asynchronous e-learning

Page 7: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

The Sector Split

• Corporate market– LMS – Learning Management Systems– Just in time learning

• Academic market– VLE – Virtual Learning Environment– Tutor contact time is important – collaboration tools– Qualifications are important– Links to funding councils

• LSC – Learning and Skills council

Page 8: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Physical E-Learning Components

• Courseware / Content– Sequential Lessons– Assessments (pre, post, embedded)

• LMS / ‘wrapper’– a suite of functionalities designed to deliver, track, report on and manage

learning content, student progress and student interactions.

• LCMS– Content creation, storage and organisation

• Collaboration Tools– Contact between learners and tutors

• Development/Authoring Tools– Specialised tools for producing e-learning content

Page 10: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Courseware 2

• Bespoke– External– 1 hour of content could

cost £20k depending on the interactivity and richness of the media

• Video• Audio• Games

Page 11: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Courseware 3

• Creating bespoke content internally– Content creation team:

• SME (subject matter expert)

• Instructional Designer

• Graphics designer

• Programmer

– Authoring Tools• Macromedia: Flash, Authorware,

Coursebuilder (dreamweaver); Toolbook II

• Lectora publisher, Trainer soft

• MM Breeze, Robopresenter, Impatica

Page 12: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Highly generalised LMS

Page 14: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Conceptual E-learning Components

• The Learning Object (LO)– Smallest chunk of content to

stand alone as a meaningful unit– Size is determined by the

authors• E.g. differences between Netg

and Knowledgepool

– In standards terms –smallest trackable unit

• E.g. one ‘assessment’ per LO– Re-useable is key

• smaller and focused• 20 minute maximum

Page 15: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Demo of LMS plus content

Students and Local administrators

WBT ManagerDatabase

WBT ManagerWeb Module

Database Server

Web Server

ODBC

ODBC

Training Manager

HTTP

Page 16: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

General Demo

• Log-on• Home page• Launch a lesson• Complete some learning• View the reports

Page 17: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

http://www.feenix.co.uk

E-Learning Standards

HistoryWhy the standards are necessary

Page 18: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Where when and who?

• Early 1980’s Aviation industry was the first to adopt CBT on a large scale – Sophisticated aircraft– Keeping personnel up-to-date– Safety– Records

• Why CBT?– Media –rich, interactive v printed manual– Additional assessment and data tracking– 24/7 availability– Just in time access to most up to date info

• Boeing, Airbus, McDonnell-Douglas ….– Proprietary hardware and software– High cost, records on multiple computers

Page 19: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

History continued

• 1988 Aviation Industry CBT Committee (AICC) was formed– International group – manufacturers, trainers (military, commercial and civilian)

government and regulatory, e-learning vendors and courseware developers– Hardware was ‘sorted’ first– 1993 – guideline for computer managed instruction interoperability– 1998 – web-based version

• 1991 – Gulf War– After war – US congress studies concluded that reserve forces needed improved

access to education and training– Funds went to National Guard for prototype e-learning classrooms and networks

• 1997 – Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative (ADL)– US Department of Defence Expanded this work and founded ADL– Publishing first specification of SCORM in 1999

• Other standards bodies were IMS and IEEE

Page 20: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Why Do We Need Standards?

• “..must be a common way – to start content, – for content to communicate with an LMS and – predefined data elements that are exchanged between an LMS

and content during its execution.” SCORM overview

• So that:– Mix and match content from multiple sources

• in-house• off-the-shelf

– Re-use content– Avoid proprietary systems– Future-proof e-learning investment

Page 21: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

http://www.feenix.co.uk

Definitions

Which StandardsWho is certified/compliant

Page 22: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Which Standards?

• AICC CMI Specification (AGR 010)– www.aicc.org– The Aviation Industry CBT Committee (AICC) has

developed a specification that allows courseware from multiple vendors to communicate with a single LMS. The AICC specification has been widely adopted outside the airline industry.

• ADL SCORM– www.adlnet.org– More recently the Advanced Distributed Learning

initiative (ADL) has developed the Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) specification to open e-learning standards to a wider audience. Much of SCORM is based on AICC but some components have been implemented differently.

Page 23: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

E-Learning Standards Evolution

Page 24: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Standards Certification

• AICC CMI Specification – Certification– self-test– Designed to the guidelines

• ADL SCORM – certification– self-test

Page 25: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Products that can be AICC-Certified

• LMS• LMS - Application Service Provider (ASP)• Assignable Unit (Lesson/LO)• WBT Courses - Collection of Learning Objects

within an AICC/LMS course structure• Courseware generation and assessment tools• Authoring Systems/Tools

Page 26: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Who is AICC Certified?Who is AICC Certified?(14)(14)

• WBT Manager*• TopClass • Docent• Saba3• Pathlore LMS• THINQ

• ConXerto Achieve (Hk)• DIDA GROUP S.p.A

(Italian)• Getronics S.p.A. • Miraenet Co., Ltd.

(Korean)• Samsung SDS • Mediopia • Plateau 4 LMS (US)• Maritz Learning (US)

Page 27: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Non-LMS AICC products

• Courseware– Skillsoft Corporation /Smartforce– SmartForce– Coastal Training Technology Corporation– ElementK

• Courseware Generation/Assessment Systems– Question Mark - Perception– CentraOne

• Authoring Tools– None

Page 28: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Who is SCORM Certified

• WebMentor Avilar Technologies, Inc. • Knowledge Centre Meridian Knowledge Solutions, Inc. • Semvra ACORDE Media, S.A. • Kontext Advanced Learning Lab, Ltd. • NetCampus21 Alex IT • Desire2Learn SCORM Component Desire2Learn Inc. • WebAula Corporate Zargon Computacao Ltda. aka Zargon & Poliedro e-Le • NEP (Next Education Platform) K1system co. Ltd. • Aspen Learning Management Server Click2learn • ANGEL CyberLearning Labs, Inc. • Crossroads Portable LMS and Packager ManTech Advanced Development

Group, Inc• SpeedLearn Miraenet Co. Ltd • KnowledgeWorkstechniques.org • Atlas ProBooz Allen Hamilton Inc. • In.Form@DIDAGROUP SPA 

Page 29: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Who is SCORM Certified

• Learn eXact GIUNTI Interactive Labs • e-Learning Management System Shinewave International

Inc. • TopClass WBT Systems • Pathlore LMS Pathlore Corporation • LearningTrackThe Learning Touch, LLC • WebCT Vista WebCT • Saba Learning Enterprise Saba Software • L5 DigitalThink • ACADEMUS Alternativa Virtual SL • CLIX IMC AG • Docent Enterprise Docent, Inc. • Blackboard Learning System Blackboard, Inc. 

Page 30: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Content ProvidersIntegrated with WBT Manager

Page 31: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

http://www.feenix.co.uk

Differences

Pros Cons and Gotchas

Page 32: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

What AICC and SCORM Do: Enable Interoperability

• How LMS launches learning object (or asset – SCORM only)

• How data is communicated between LMS and learning object

Learning Object

LMS

Page 33: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

What AICC and SCORM Do: Enable Interoperability

LMS A

Define a common format for packaging content to enable interchange between LMSs and LCMSs

LMS B

LCMS A LCMS B

Page 34: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Curricular Taxonomies

• SCORM– Content Aggregation

• A group of learning resources

– Sharable content object • SCORM’s LO

– Asset• E.g. Media – video, graphics

sound

• AICC– Course– Instructional Block– Assignable Unit (AU) -

Lesson• AICC’s LO

•Set of named hierarchical learning levels

Page 35: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

AICC/SCORM in ShortWhat’s the difference?

•AICC – CMI Specification •Two communication methods

•HACP (HTTP-based AICC CMI Protocol)•JavaScript API (application programming interface)

•Has had certification testing for LMS/content/tools since 1999•Doesn’t specify meta-data to describe LOs or course structures

•SCORM 1.2•JavaScript API only•Certification has only been available since 2003•Meta-data specification for LOs (optional)•Meta-data specification for content packaging

Page 36: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

SCORM

Page 37: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Descriptive Wrapper

Page 38: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

API & HACP

Page 39: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Pros Cons & Gotchas

Characteristics API HACPStandards compliance AICC, SCORM AICC

Certification available Yes, only just Yes

Track Record Shorter Longer

Robustness Good Better

Potential for growth More Less

Likelihood of significant changes to spec. More Less

Implementation base (LMS and courseware) Narrower Broader

Easy to use for courseware development Yes No

Potential problems with firewalls and browsers Yes No

Works with content on any server NO Yes

Fully compatible with HTML and JavaScript lesson Yes No

Page 40: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Firewall and security problems

• A significant number of LMS vendors implement the API as a Java applet that runs on the student browser. Java applets tend to be seen as a security risk and many firewalls block them entirely, some IT departments configure the browsers to disable support for Java.

• HACP does not have this problem.

Page 41: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Works with any content server?

• The “gotcha” for the API is the result of a built in security feature with Internet Explorer (IE). If:– your learning content is not in the same domain as your LMS

• some content providers suggest that the content stay on their own severs and your organisation’s LMS is just pointed to it

– the content uses API – the student is using an IE browser

• then no communication will take place.• Options:

– use HACP instead of API– Use Netscape – SCORM development committees have published a document

detailing some technical ‘work-arounds’ in Oct 2003

Page 42: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Fully compatible with HTML plus JavaScript content?

• The HACP “gotcha” is that two way communication is not possible with content created with HTML plus JavaScript because although JavaScript (the programming language built into most Web Browsers) can readily send data to the LMS in the required HACP format, it cannot receive the HACP messages that the LMS returns, so for example ‘booking marking’ it not possible.

Page 43: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

http://www.feenix.co.uk

Standards Data Model

CoreOptional

Page 44: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Core Data Model

• Student ID• Student name• Lesson location• Credit• Lesson Mode

• Lesson status• Path• Score• Time

The following data is sent to a lesson when it is launched. Similar The following data is sent to a lesson when it is launched. Similar data is returned to the LMS when the lesson completes.data is returned to the LMS when the lesson completes.

Note: SCORM has a slightly reduced data model overallNote: SCORM has a slightly reduced data model overall

Page 45: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Example 1: Student ID

• Definition: An identifier for the student that is unique within the LMS system.

• Direction of travel: LMS to lesson only– AICC HACP name: Student_ID– AICC API name: cmi.core.student_id– SCORM API name: cmi.core.student_id

Page 46: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Example 2: Lesson Location

• Definition: A mechanism for lessons to report the point at which the student exited, primarily to serve as a bookmark.

• Direction of travel: Lesson to LMS; LMS to lesson– AICC HACP name: Lesson_Location– AICC API name: cmi.core.lesson_location– SCORM API name: cmi.core.lesson_location

Page 47: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Optional Data Model Elements - Grouped

• Core– Mandatory plus lesson mode (browsing .reviewing)

• Comments– Brief free-form test comments: LMS can send comments from admin + LO can send

comments from the learner• Evaluation

– Used for evaluation the effectiveness of the LO – not included in the SCORM data set

• Objectives– Records scores and status info for identified learning objectives

• Student data– E.g. mastery score, time limit, action if time limit exceeded.– AICC also tracks info about multiple attempts

• Student demographics– Background info about the learner– Not included in the SCORM data set

• Student preferences– For presentation of LO, appearance, sound, language etc.

Page 48: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Example 1: Attempt Number

• Definition: This AICC-only element indicates the number of times a student has previously entered the lesson. The LMS initializes this value to "0" the first time the student enters the lesson and increments it on each subsequent entry. The lesson determines how, if at all, this value is used.

• Direction of travel: Lesson to LMS; LMS to lesson– AICC HACP name: Attempt_Number– AICC API name: cmi.student_data.attempt_number– SCORM API name: not supported

Page 49: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Example 2: Objective Status

• Definition: The student's current status in the objective. Objectives Status may be set to one of six defined values: Not Attempted, Browsed, Incomplete, Completed, Passed, or Failed.

• Direction of travel: LMS to lesson; lesson to LMS– AICC HACP name: Objectives_Status.n– AICC API name: cmi.objectives.n.status– SCORM API name: cmi.objectives.n.status

Page 50: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Demo of optional elements

• Tracking and Reports– Objectives– Interactive– Prerequisites– Completion requirements

Page 51: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Future - SCORM 1.3

• The introduction of simple sequencing. – LMSs will sequence learning activities at the time of delivery, based

upon • learner’s results • progress to date• behaviours specified externally to the learning content.

– Different sequencing behaviour can be applied to the same piece of content when it is used in different contexts.

• first step to truly individualized and adaptive learning delivery, • gives Instructional Designers the same level of sequencing control that was

typical in CBT (Computer Based Training).• All data elements will be mandatory for implementation by

LMSs. – This will simplify the selection of LMSs for purchasers and the

development of content that is intended to run in a variety of LMSs.

Page 52: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

http://www.feenix.co.uk

Things you need to know….

LMSContent

Page 53: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

LMS

• To what version is the LMS certified?– N.B certification only available to SCORM 1.2– Legacy support for SCORM 1.1?

• What data elements will be tracked by the LMS?– AICC

• Core• Optional

– Scorm• Core• Optional

• What is the cost of customisation of front end and reporting

Page 54: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Content Vendors

• What version of SCORM is the content compliant with?

• What data elements are being tracked currently• When is the data being sent?

– Exit– What if? Network connection is lost, computer crash, learner

forgets to exit and a time-out occurs.– How critical is the data e.g. score sent immediately, time not so

critical– Bookmarking? – How many database hits can you afford? – Server capacity

Page 55: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Up to Date Information

• AICC CMI Subcommittee (Hyde, J., chair) CMI Guidelines for Interoperability– Available at http://www.aicc.org

• Dodds,P., Ed., Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM): The SCORM Run-Time Environment, version 1.2– Available at http://www.adlnet.org

• Website to the book– http://www.elearning-standards.com

Page 56: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

E-Learning Standards Book

E-Learning Standards A Guide to Purchasing, Developing

and Deploying E-Learning Standards

By

Carol Fallon and Sharon Brown

St. Lucie PressPublished November 15th 2002

Page 57: Http:// E-Learning Fundamentals Prepared for January 2004

www.feenix.co.uk

Have we covered everything?

– E-learning background and definitions– Quality considerations

• Best Practise • Case studies • Lessons learned

– Standards AICC and SCORM– References