View
217
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Http://www.forestsoils.org/smc/
Nutrition Project Resources1) Christopher Licata graduated (almost)2) Brian Strahm added Fall, 20023) 3 new students Fall, 2003 supported from
CFR/Gessel/TA fellowships4) Weyerhaeuser adding postdoc for Fall River5) Two Journal articles, one book chapter
published; others prepared; presentations at professional meetings
6) External funding continued and increased
The role of logging residues in a coastal WashingtonDouglas-fir stand: nitrogen mineralization following
bole-only and total-tree harvesting
Christopher William Licata
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of therequirements for the degree of
Master of Science
University of Washington
2003
Program Authorized to Offer Degree: College of ForestResources
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
9/13/00-10/27/00 11/13/00-12/27/00 04/08/01-05/22/01 06/01/01-07/15/01
Field Trial Dates
Net
Nit
roge
n M
iner
aliz
ed
(kg
ha-1
45
days
-1)
Bole-only
Total-tree plus
Figure 4.6 Seasonal net nitrogen mineralization (kg N ha-1 45 days-1) in a coastal WashingtonDouglas-fir stand beginning one year after harvest in two levels of slash retention. Va lues are meansof 4 plots per treatment and time period (bars are 95% confidence intervals about the mean).
Fall River Long-term Site Productivity Study Side-by-side plots with/without vegetation control
Plot 22: BO weeded
Plot 23: BO non-weeded
Fall River LTSP StudyAge 3 Seedling Volume Index (cm^3) by
Treatment
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Treatment
Vol
ume
Inde
x (c
m^3
)
Series1a a a a b b b b
c c c c d
Paper “in press” for Soil Science Society of America Journal
Quantifying deep-soil and Coarse-Soil Fractions: avoiding sampling bias in estimating carbon in Pacific Northwest forest soils.
R.B. Harrison*, A.B. Adams, C. Licata, B. Flaming, G.W. Wagoner, P. Carpenter and E.D. Vance.
ABSTRACTForest soils of the Pacific Northwest are often deep and/or coarse-textured, which does not always lend itself to easy, unbiased sampling. Five methods commonly used in the PNW were compared for estimates of whole-soil C, including 1) large pit (0.5 m2) excavation, 2) dug pit with 54-mm hammer-core bulk-density sampling, 3) 31-mm soil push sampler, and 4) clod method. Two important regional forest soil series were studied: a loamy sand outwash soil (Indianola series) and a very gravelly sandy loam glacial outwash soil (Everett series). Coarse (>2mm) fragments associated with the soil samples were also collected, processed and analyzed for soil C. Extending soil sampling deeper than 15 cm increased soil C estimates by as much as 120%. The pit excavation method, which is by far the most labor-intensive and time consuming, was considered the "standard" by which other methods were compared, as it didn't contain any obvious biases. Soil core methods overestimated the <2mm soil fraction by forcing samples to be taken between large rocks. Although this is a clear bias, it is often accepted as the “best available method” due to the extreme time requirement of pit excavation. The 31-cm or 54-cm soil core methods often didn't work at all due to the high rock content of the soils. Including C analysis of the >2mm soil fraction increased soil C estimates by 170% for the Everett series soil (due to C contained in the rocks) but
did not substantially increase the estimate in the Indianola series soil.
Predicting the biomass of a high productivity even-aged mixed Douglas-fir/western hemlock plantation in the coastal Pacific Northwest: Accounting for bias introduced from using generalized predictive equations.
R.B. Harrisona,*,C.W. Licataa, B.L. Flaminga, T.A. Terryb, R. Meadeb, I.A. Guerrinic, B.D. Strahma, D. Xuea, A.B. Adamsa, M.R. Lolleya, A. Sidella, G.L. Wagonera, T. Breida, , D. Briggs, E.C. Turnblom, P. Carpentera and E.A. Vanced.