3
Cases 1. Donald Kwok vs. Philippine Carpet Manufacturing Corporation, April 28, 2005  Kwok - EVP  Cash equivalents of unused leave credits  Applicable to Category 1 employees 2. Linton Commercial Co., Inc. vs. Hellera, October 10, 2007  Illegal reduction of work hours  Bureau of Working Conditions of the DOLE’s Bulletin  Financial loss   must be substantiated by evidence  Standards to justify retrenchment 3. Bisig Manggagawa sa Tryco vs. NLRC, October 15, 2008  Mere incidental inconvenience is insufficient to warrant a claim for constructive dismissal  Caloocan  Bulacan  Transfer to “paralyze” Union  MOA  compressed workweek scheme 4. Legend Hotel (Manila) vs. Hernani S. Realuyo, July 18, 2012  Pianist  Retrenchment  Less than 8-hours a day, 8hours- maximum provided in Labor Code 5. Hilario Rada vs. NLRC, January 9, 1992  Project v. Regular employees  Overtime pay 6. Lepanto Consolidated Mining Company vs. Lepanto Local Staff Union, August 20, 2008   Night shift differentials  Excluded in computing overtime pay 7. Auto Bus Transport Systems, Inc. vs. Antonio Bautista, Ma y 16, 2005  Bus driver  Paid on commission basis, 7% of total gross income per travel  Service Incentive Leave  Field Personnel 8. Sentinel Security Agency, Inc. vs. NLRC, September 3, 1998  Security guards  “Old”  Floating status

HW#6 Keywords

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

8/12/2019 HW#6 Keywords

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/hw6-keywords 1/3

Cases

1. Donald Kwok vs. Philippine Carpet Manufacturing Corporation, April 28, 2005

  Kwok - EVP

  Cash equivalents of unused leave credits  Applicable to Category 1 employees

2. Linton Commercial Co., Inc. vs. Hellera, October 10, 2007

  Illegal reduction of work hours

  Bureau of Working Conditions of the DOLE’s Bulletin

  Financial loss –  must be substantiated by evidence

  Standards to justify retrenchment

3. Bisig Manggagawa sa Tryco vs. NLRC, October 15, 2008

  Mere incidental inconvenience is insufficient to warrant a claim for constructive

dismissal  Caloocan Bulacan

  Transfer to “paralyze” Union 

  MOA compressed workweek scheme

4. Legend Hotel (Manila) vs. Hernani S. Realuyo, July 18, 2012

  Pianist

  Retrenchment

  Less than 8-hours a day, 8hours- maximum provided in Labor Code

5. Hilario Rada vs. NLRC, January 9, 1992

  Project v. Regular employees

  Overtime pay

6. Lepanto Consolidated Mining Company vs. Lepanto Local Staff Union, August 20,

2008

   Night shift differentials

  Excluded in computing overtime pay

7. Auto Bus Transport Systems, Inc. vs. Antonio Bautista, May 16, 2005

  Bus driver

 Paid on commission basis, 7% of total gross income per travel

  Service Incentive Leave

  Field Personnel

8. Sentinel Security Agency, Inc. vs. NLRC, September 3, 1998

  Security guards

  “Old” 

  Floating status

8/12/2019 HW#6 Keywords

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/hw6-keywords 2/3

  Illegally dismissed

  Hired new guards

   No legal transfer

  Indirect employees, employer, contractor (employees of contractor) serviceincentive leave

9. JPL Marketing Promotions vs. CA, NLRC, July 8, 2005

  Floating status

  Period not exceeding 6 months

  Severed their relations

   No separation pay

   Not illegally dismissed

  Separation pay –  compassionate justice, only when dismissed by employer

  13th

 month and service incentive leave –  yes

  Above minimum wage –  not equivalent to benefits

  Computation of 13 months and service leave benefit

10. National Waterworks and Sewerage Authority vs. NWSA Consolidated Union,August 31, 1964 –  4A Digest

  Undertime not offset by Overtime

  Differential pay (25% additional compensation) for Sunday included incomputing daily wage

  Daily wage of monthly salaried employees? Divide monthly salary by actualnumber of working hours/days

11. Stolt-Nielsen Marine Service vs. NLRC, July 11, 1996

 Seaman’s entitlement to overtime pay 

  Willful disobedience of employer’s lawful orders

   Not entitled to overtime pay

  Fixed overtime pay of 30% of basic salary per month  –  just a basis, notguaranteed

  Actual rendering of overtime work

12. Abduljuahid R. Pigcaulan vs. Security and Credit Investigation, January 16, 2012

  Security guard

  Service incentive benefits, holiday pay

  It is for the employer to prove payment of benefits under the law, not for the

employee to prove non-payment.

13. Cebu Institute of Technology vs. Hon. Blass Ople, December 18, 1987 –  4A Digest

  PD 451

  60% of the proceeds allocated for increase in salaries or wages of members offaculties

  Benefits (13th

 month, holiday pay)

8/12/2019 HW#6 Keywords

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/hw6-keywords 3/3

  Deemed included in salary increases paid out of the 60% allocation from tuitionfee increase

  BP 232 repealed PD 451

  CBA may allocated more than 60% of proceeds

14. CBTC Employees Union vs. The Honorable Jacobo C. Clave, January 7, 1986  Legal Holiday Pay

  “Every worker” 

  All monthly employees entitled to holiday pay

  Policy Instruction No. 9 void

15. Asian Transmission Corporation vs. The Hon. Court of Appeals, March 15, 2004

  Holiday pay (Double Holiday)

  200% whether worked or not

  Bulletin

  Signifcance of Holiday Pay

  Araw ng Kagitingan and Good Friday

  Art 94

  10 legal holidays

16. San Miguel Corporation vs. The Honorable Court of Appeals, January 30, 2002

 17. Trans-Asia Phils. Employees vs. NLRC, December 13, 1999

18. Producers Bank of the Philippines vs. NLRC, March 28, 2001

19. Leyte IV Electric Cooperative, Inc. vs. Layeco IV, October 19, 2007

20. Jose Rizal College vs. NLRC, December 1, 1987

21. The Chartered Bank Employees Association vs. Hon Blas F. Ople, August 28, 1985

22. Cezar Ondango vs. NLRC, June 10, 2004

23. PALEA vs. Philippine Air Lines, Inc., March 31, 1976