22
Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in Saskatchewan to Year End 2011 Chao Yang Yang, C. (2012): Hydrocarbon play ranking and production trends in Saskatchewan to Year End 2011; in Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Ministry of the Economy, Misc. Rep. 2012-4.1, Paper A-4, 22p. Abstract Hydrocarbon production from plays within Ordovician to Cretaceous strata in Saskatchewan has been statistically assessed to evaluate average per-well production, cumulative production, and overall production trends. This assessment, based on production to December 31, 2011, indicates that Mississippian Madison Group carbonates, Cretaceous Mannville and Viking sandstones, Jurassic Roseray and Upper Shaunavon strata, and Mississippian-Devonian Bakken reservoirs are the major oil producers in Saskatchewan. Cumulative oil production rankings indicate that Mississippian Midale reservoirs have produced the largest volume of oil in Saskatchewan. The Bakken play ranks first, based on monthly oil production for December 2011. The sharp increases in oil production from the Bakken, Viking, and Lower Shaunavon plays since 2008 reflect the successful application of horizontal well drilling and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing completion to tight oil plays. The Upper Cretaceous Milk River, Medicine Hat, and Belle Fourche (Second White Specks) formations are the major shallow-gas producers in Saskatchewan with a total production of 109 x 10 9 m 3 to December 31, 2011 or 43% of total gas production in the province. The Lower Cretaceous Mannville and Viking play has produced a total of 91.6 x 10 9 m 3 of associated and non-associated gas or 36% of total gas. The sub-Cretaceous oil plays in Saskatchewan have produced 51.6 x 10 9 m 3 of associated gas during oil production, accounting for 20% of the total gas production in the province. Keywords: statistical assessment, hydrocarbon plays, oil production, gas production, ranking, well count. 1. Introduction Historic hydrocarbon production to December 31, 2007 was statistically assessed to rank the major plays and identify highly prolific plays in southern Saskatchewan in Yang (2008). Since then, the successful application of horizontal well drilling and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing completions in tight reservoirs such as the Bakken, Lower Shaunavon, and Viking, has initiated a new era of oil production in Saskatchewan. The current study includes the entire province and production information has been updated to year end 2011. The impact of new drilling and completion technology on the production trends is assessed using historical and current production data. The number of wells producing from a given play in the month of December each year is used for the well count for that year. The number of wells that have produced oil or gas from a given play from initial production to the end of December 2011 is used for the total production-well count. The total oil or gas well count is a measure of industry drilling activity, but not a good measure for success. In this study, the average per-well production value is used as a measurement of success because it reflects reservoir quality and actual drainage area of the reservoir, and, therefore, points out the most prolific plays. The objectives of this study are: 1) to monitor hydrocarbon production trends for the major plays using historical production data; 2) to indicate the relationship between production and well count through the production history and pool development; 3) to investigate the impact on the production trends of water flooding, infill-drilling, horizontal well drilling, CO 2 enhanced oil recovery, and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing completion; and 4) to identify highly prolific plays in Saskatchewan. The results of this study will aid in the development of future petroleum exploration strategies in Saskatchewan.

Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in Saskatchewan to Year End 2011

Chao Yang

Yang, C. (2012): Hydrocarbon play ranking and production trends in Saskatchewan to Year End 2011; in Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Ministry of the Economy, Misc. Rep. 2012-4.1, Paper A-4, 22p.

Abstract Hydrocarbon production from plays within Ordovician to Cretaceous strata in Saskatchewan has been statistically assessed to evaluate average per-well production, cumulative production, and overall production trends.

This assessment, based on production to December 31, 2011, indicates that Mississippian Madison Group carbonates, Cretaceous Mannville and Viking sandstones, Jurassic Roseray and Upper Shaunavon strata, and Mississippian-Devonian Bakken reservoirs are the major oil producers in Saskatchewan. Cumulative oil production rankings indicate that Mississippian Midale reservoirs have produced the largest volume of oil in Saskatchewan.

The Bakken play ranks first, based on monthly oil production for December 2011. The sharp increases in oil production from the Bakken, Viking, and Lower Shaunavon plays since 2008 reflect the successful application of horizontal well drilling and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing completion to tight oil plays.

The Upper Cretaceous Milk River, Medicine Hat, and Belle Fourche (Second White Specks) formations are the major shallow-gas producers in Saskatchewan with a total production of 109 x 109 m3 to December 31, 2011 or 43% of total gas production in the province. The Lower Cretaceous Mannville and Viking play has produced a total of 91.6 x 109 m3 of associated and non-associated gas or 36% of total gas. The sub-Cretaceous oil plays in Saskatchewan have produced 51.6 x 109 m3 of associated gas during oil production, accounting for 20% of the total gas production in the province.

Keywords: statistical assessment, hydrocarbon plays, oil production, gas production, ranking, well count.

1. Introduction Historic hydrocarbon production to December 31, 2007 was statistically assessed to rank the major plays and identify highly prolific plays in southern Saskatchewan in Yang (2008). Since then, the successful application of horizontal well drilling and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing completions in tight reservoirs such as the Bakken, Lower Shaunavon, and Viking, has initiated a new era of oil production in Saskatchewan. The current study includes the entire province and production information has been updated to year end 2011. The impact of new drilling and completion technology on the production trends is assessed using historical and current production data.

The number of wells producing from a given play in the month of December each year is used for the well count for that year. The number of wells that have produced oil or gas from a given play from initial production to the end of December 2011 is used for the total production-well count. The total oil or gas well count is a measure of industry drilling activity, but not a good measure for success. In this study, the average per-well production value is used as a measurement of success because it reflects reservoir quality and actual drainage area of the reservoir, and, therefore, points out the most prolific plays.

The objectives of this study are: 1) to monitor hydrocarbon production trends for the major plays using historical production data; 2) to indicate the relationship between production and well count through the production history and pool development; 3) to investigate the impact on the production trends of water flooding, infill-drilling, horizontal well drilling, CO2 enhanced oil recovery, and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing completion; and 4) to identify highly prolific plays in Saskatchewan. The results of this study will aid in the development of future petroleum exploration strategies in Saskatchewan.

Page 2: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 2 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

2. Oil Plays in Saskatchewan Phanerozoic sedimentary rocks in Saskatchewan can be divided into two major successions. The Paleozoic sedimentary succession is characterized by passive-continental marginal deposits of basal clastics, followed by a thick sequence of platform carbonates and evaporites (Figure 1). The Mesozoic succession is dominated by shale, siltstone, and sandstone. The two successions are separated by a basin-wide unconformity.

Stratigraphic distribution of major hydrocarbon-producing plays in Saskatchewan is shown in Figure 1. Oil production from these plays has been ranked by cumulative production, current monthly production, and average per-well production. Data from the top 20 plays in each of these categories is illustrated in Figure 2. Table 1 provides a summary of production data from plays that have each produced more than 10 x 103 m3 of oil.

a) Silurian-Ordovician Plays

To the end of December 2011, 222 wells producing from Silurian-Ordovician plays in Interlake, Red River, and Winnipeg strata in southeastern Saskatchewan (Figure 3) produced a total of 4.2 x 106 m3 of oil (Figure 4A).

The Upper Ordovician Winnipeg Formation is composed of a lower unit dominated by porous quartzose sandstone, and an upper unit dominated by typically green waxy shale (Paterson, 1971; Kreis, 2004). The Winnipeg play has produced 95.9 x 103 m3 of oil (Table 1) from the lower sandstone unit in three wells in the Hartaven area (Tp. 10, Rge. 9W2), two wells in the Browning area (Tp. 6, Rge. 6W2), five wells from the Midale area (Tp. 6, Rge. 11W2), two wells from Huntoon area (Tp. 7, Rge. 10W2), and three other individual wells.

Upper Ordovician Red River strata (Yeoman and Herald formations) in southeastern Saskatchewan consist of three carbonate-evaporite sequences with burrowed, normal-marine carbonates at the base overlain by laminated carbonate mudstones which, in turn, are overlain by anhydrite (Kendall, 1976; Kreis and Haidl, 2004; Nimegeers and Haidl, 2004; Saskatchewan Ministry of Energy and Resources, 2012). Oil production is from dolomitized reservoirs in upper Yeoman and lower Herald strata; reservoir rocks commonly display burrowed textures, and variable amounts of vugs and fractures (Pu et al., 2003). The Red River play ranks 24th in total cumulative oil production (Table 1) with production of 4.1 x 106 m3, but ninth by the per-well average with a value of 20.2 x 103 m3 (Figure 2C). To December 2011, 201 wells have produced from the Red River play (Figure 4B), of which 78 are directional or horizontal wells drilled after 1995 following the discovery of the Midale Red River pool. The most prolific Red River producer is the NRK Minton 2Hz 191/11-26-003-21W2/00 horizontal well drilled in 2003 which has already produced 421 x 103 m3 of oil to December 2011.

The Silurian Interlake Formation is composed of: 1) a lower carbonate fossiliferous sequence characterized by basin-wide argillaceous marker beds; 2) a middle carbonate succession with marine fauna in several beds, and 3) an upper carbonate unit with vadose diagenetic features and no identified marine fauna (Kreis et al., 2004; Haidl et al., 2006). In 2002, the first Interlake oil was produced from the uppermost portion of the upper unit. Reservoir quality is primarily linked to fracture porosity (Larson et al., 2003; Haidl et al., 2006). The Silurian Interlake has produced 31.7 x 103 m3 of oil (Table 1) from four wells in the Bryant area (Tp. 5, Rge. 7W2) and one well in the Browning area (Tp. 6, Rge. 5W2).

b) Devonian Plays

The Devonian Winnipegosis, Birdbear, Duperow, Torquay, and Bakken-Torquay hydrocarbon plays have produced a total of 5 x 106 m3 of oil from 557 wells (Figure 5A). The oil well locations are shown in Figure 3.

In southeastern Saskatchewan, the Winnipegosis is subdivided into a lower unit of organic-rich, lime mudstone and dolomudstone deposited in an open-marine platform setting, and an upper unit with carbonate build-ups (Jones, 1965). Oil production is from upper Winnipegosis carbonate reservoirs. East of about Range 12W2, production is primarily from “pinnacle” reefs (Martindale et al., 1991) with some production from a laminated dolostone (Ratner laminites) lying between the build-ups (Saskatchewan Ministry of Energy and Resources, 2007). In the Minton area (Tp. 3, Rge. 21W2), production is from shoal deposits (Potter and St. Onge, 1991). Among all the Devonian plays, the Winnipegosis play has the highest total oil production (2.7 x 106 m3) and highest per-well average production (24.3 x 103 m3), ranking this play 26th in Saskatchewan by total oil production (Table 1) and fourth by per-well average production (Figure 2C). A total of 112 wells have produced oil from the Winnipegosis play, 28 of which are directional or horizontal wells. The highest per-well production is 144.2 x 103 m3 of oil from the Longview Macoun 121/16-23-004-09W2/00 well. The overall production started to decline in 1992 even though the well count continued to increase (Figure 5B). The high per-well average production and fast decline rate may be attributed to high reservoir permeability resulting from well developed vugs and fractures (Fu et al., 2006).

The Duperow Formation in southeastern Saskatchewan displays shallowing-upward, rhythmic sedimentation patterns characterized by sequences of bioclast-rich, normal-marine, subtidal to intertidal lithofacies grading upward

Page 3: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan G

eological Survey 3

Summ

ary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

Figure 1 – Stratigraphic chart for southwestern, southeastern, and west-central Saskatchewan showing major hydrocarbon-producing plays (as indicated in the legend) in various lithostratigraphic units in each area (modified from Saskatchewan Stratigraphic Correlation Chart, Saskatchewan Ministry of Energy and Resources, 2011a).

UNCONFORMITIESOIL

GAS

MINEKIMBERLITE

?

?

?

?

?

2.6

+ + ++ + + + ++ + + + ++ +

+ +

GLACIAL DRIFT

SECOND WHITE SPECKS

MEDICINE HATFIRST WHITE SPECKLED SHALE

CARLILE

ALDERSON(MILK RIVER)

FOREMOST

OLDMAN

BE

LLY

RIV

ER

(JU

DIT

H R

IVE

R)

LEA PARK

?

?

FRENCHMAN

RAVENSCRAG

CYPRESS HILLS

SWIFT CURRENT

WOODMOUNTAIN

NIOBRARA

RIBSTONE CREEK

GLACIAL DRIFT

OLDMAN

BEARPAW

EASTEND

WHITEMUD

BATTLE

FRENCHMAN

RAVENSCRAG

SWIFT CURRENT

WOODMOUNTAIN

SOUTHEASTSASKATCHEWAN

RAVENSCRAG

FRENCHMAN

WHITEMUD

EASTEND

BEARPAW

BELLY RIVER (JUDITH RIVER)

LEA PARK

ALDERSON(MILK RIVER)

FIRST WHITE SPECKLED SHALE

CARLILE

SECOND WHITE SPECKS

BELLE FOURCHE

CO

LO

RA

DO

GR

OU

P

WOODMOUNTAIN

GLACIAL DRIFT

NIOBRARA

SOUTHWESTSASKATCHEWAN

SHAUNAVON

GRAVELBOURG

JOLI FOU

VIKING

FISH SCALES

BELLE FOURCHE

WESTGATECO

LO

RA

DO

GR

OU

PV

AN

GU

AR

D

ROSERAY

RUSH LAKE

MA

NN

VIL

LE

CA

NT

UA

R

ATLAS

DIMMOCK CREEK

McCLOUD

PENSE

RIERDON

MASEFIELD

UPPER WATROUS

SUCCESS S2

FISH SCALES

WESTGATE

JOLI FOU

NEWCASTLE

SHAUNAVON

GRAVELBOURG

RED JACKET

LOWER WATROUS

UPPER WATROUS

RIERDON

MASEFIELD

McCLOUD

PENSE

LOWERGRAVELBOURG

WEST-CENTRALSASKATCHEWAN

OLDMAN

LEA PARK

RIBSTONE CREEKEQUIVALENT

VICTORIA

ALDERSON(MILK RIVER)

SPINNEY HILL

CO

LO

RA

DO

GR

OU

P

SECOND WHITE SPECKS

CARLILE

JOLI FOU

VIKING

FISH SCALES

WESTGATE

BELLE FOURCHE

SUCCESS S2 (INSINGER)

BE

LLY

RIV

ER

NIOBRARA

ST. WALBURG

GENERAL PETROLEUMS

FIRST WHITE SPECKLED SHALE

MA

NN

VIL

LE

CA

NT

UA

R

MA

NN

VIL

LE

DINACUMMINGS

LLOYDMINSTER

REX

SPARKY

COLONY

McLAREN

WASECA

CANTUAR

PENSE

DIMMOCK CREEK

ATLAS

GLACIAL DRIFT

SUCCESS S2

VA

NG

UA

RD

CHARLES

MISSIONCANYON

LODGEPOLE

POPLAR

RATCLIFFE

MIDALE

TILSTON

SOURIS VALLEY

FROBISHER

ALIDAKISBEY

THREEFORKSGROUP

BAKKEN

BIG VALLEY

TORQUAY

BIRDBEAR

SASKATCHEWANGROUP DUPEROW

MANITOBAGROUP

ELKPOINT

GROUP

SOURIS RIVER

WINNIPEGOSIS

DAWSON BAY

st1 RED BED

INTERLAKE

STONY MOUNTAIN

DEADWOOD

MA

DIS

ON

GR

OU

P

BIG SNOWYGROUP KIBBEY

HERALDYEOMAN

PRECAMBRIAN

STONEWALL

DEADWOOD

RED RIVER

WINNIPEG

STONY MOUNTAIN

INTERLAKE

ELKPOINT

GROUP

MANITOBAGROUP

SOURIS RIVER

ASHERN

WINNIPEGOSIS

DAWSON BAY

ST1 RED BED

ND2 RED BED

PRAIRIEEVAPORITE

MEADOW LAKE

SASKATCHEWANGROUP DUPEROW

PRECAMBRIAN

STONEWALL

DEADWOOD

WINNIPEG

RED RIVER

STONY MOUNTAIN

INTERLAKE

MANITOBAGROUP

ELKPOINT

GROUP

SOURIS RIVER

SASKATCHEWANGROUP DUPEROW

BIRDBEAR

WINNIPEGOSIS

DAWSON BAY

ST1 RED BED

BAKKEN

STRATHALLEN

KILLDEER

PRECAMBRIAN

STONEWALL

BIG VALLEY

TORQUAY

THREEFORKSGROUP

MA

DIS

ON

GR

OU

P

SUCCESS S1 SUCCESS S1

LOWER WATROUS

WINNIPEG

SANDSTONE

SHALE

CARBONATE

EVAPORITE

GLACIAL DRIFT

PRECAMBRIAN

RED BEDS

EPOCHERA PERIOD

QUATERNARY

TE

RT

IAR

YC

RE

TA

CE

OU

S

UP

PE

R C

RE

TA

CE

OU

SLO

WE

RC

RE

TA

CE

OU

S

JU

RA

SS

IC

UP

PE

RJU

RA

SS

ICM

IDD

LE

JUR

AS

SIC

LOWERJURASSIC

TRIASSIC

PERMIAN

PENNSYLVANIAN

NE

OG

EN

EP

ALE

OG

EN

E

UPPERTRIASSIC

MIDDLETRIASSIC

LOWERTRIASSIC

MIS

SIS

SIP

PIA

N

UPPERDEVONIAN

DE

VO

NIA

N

MIDDLEDEVONIAN

LOWERDEVONIAN

SILURIAN

OR

DO

VIC

IAN

UPPERSILURIAN

LOWERSILURIAN

UPPERORDOVICIAN

MIDDLEORDOVICIAN

LOWERORDOVICIAN

MIDDLECAMBRIAN

CAMBRIAN

UPPERCAMBRIAN

PRECAMBRIAN

PLEISTOCENE

PLIOCENE

MIOCENE

OLIGOCENE

EOCENE

PALEOCENE

STAGE/AGE(Ma)

HOLOCENE

CENOMANIAN

TURONIAN

CONIACIAN

SANTONIAN

CAMPANIAN

MAASTRICHTIAN

ALBIAN

APTIAN

BARREMIAN

HAUTERIVIAN

VALANGINIAN

BERRIASIAN

TITHONIAN

KIMMERIDGIAN

OXFORDIAN

TOARCIANPLIENSBACHIANSINEMURIANHETTANGIAN

CALLOVIAN

BATHONIAN

BAJOCIAN

AALENIAN

RHAETIAN

NORIAN

CARNIAN

LADINIAN

ANISIAN

SCYTHIAN

CHESTERIAN

MERAMECIAN

OSAGIAN

KINDERHOOKIAN

FAMENNIAN

FRASNIAN

GIVETIAN

EIFELIAN

EMSIAN

PRAGIAN

LOCHKOVIAN

LUDFORDIAN

GORSTIAN

SHEINWOODIANTELYCHIAN

AERONIAN

RHUDDANIAN

HOMERIAN

GAMACHIAN

RICHMONDIAN

MAYSVILLIAN

EDENIAN

TRENTONIAN

BLACKRIVERIAN

CHAZYAN

DRESBACHIAN

TREMPEALEAUANFRANCONIAN

501

489

458

387

383

373

360

300

253

244

237

200

178

174

166

161

157

155

150

142

122

111

99

93

89

86

84

72

65

55

34

23

5.3

0.01

BIG

HO

RN

GR

OU

P

BIG

HO

RN

GR

OU

P

BIG

HO

RN

GR

OU

P

DALEJAN

418

424

443

447

CA

RB

ON

IFE

RO

US

MILK RIVER

351

334

314

329

394

CE

NO

ZO

ICM

ES

OZ

OIC

PA

LE

OZ

OIC

FLOTTEN LAKE

Helium

THREEFORKSGROUP

BAKKEN

BIG VALLEY

TORQUAY

BIRDBEAR

409

nd2 RED BED

PRAIRIEEVAPORITE

ND2 RED BED

PRAIRIEEVAPORITE

ASHERN ASHERN

Page 4: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan G

eological Survey 4

Summ

ary of Investigations 2012, Volum

e 1

Figure 2 – Top 20 Saskatchewan oil plays by: A) cumulative oil production to December 2011, B) monthly oil production in December 2011, and C) average per-well oil production to December 2011.

50 422

30 255

27 344

24 314

21 360

21 327

21 072

20 555

20 238

18 687

18 019

17 206

13 525

12 826

12 687

12 268

11 570

11 211

11 048

11 008

0 10 000 20 000 30 000 40 000 50 000

Roseray

Upper Shaunavon

Midale

Winnipegosis

Ratcliffe

Frobisher-Alida

Alida-Tilston

Alida

Red River

Dina

Basal Mannville

Red Jacket

Cantuar

Lower Watrous-Alida

Madison

Tilston

Frobisher

Waseca

Bakken

Tilston-Souris Valley

(Cubic Metres)

C) Average Per-well Production to End of 2011

(Million Cubic Metres)

A) Cumulative Oil Production to End of 2011

423 837.4

280 248.3

195 374.3

180 712.2

116 053.4

101 697.8

95 143.2

84 225.7

82 341.4

79 156.7

61 223.7

60 510.7

58 446.1

49 953.7

45 706.1

44 669.9

41 800.6

36 754.9

31 974.3

0 100 000 200 000 300 000 400 000 500 000

Bakken

Midale

Sparky

Waseca

Viking

Cummings

Frobisher

Frobisher-Alida

Roseray

Upper Shaunavon

Colony

General Petroleums

Shaunavon

Lloydminster

McLaren

Cummings/Dina

Tilston

Lower Shaunavon

Alida

(Cubic Metres)

B) Current Monthly Oil Production (December 2011)

Mannville(undifferentiated)

(undifferentiated)

44 806.0

190.4

69.8

66.4

65.9

57.8

57.6

57.0

43.1

33.2

21.5

17.6

17.0

16.4

15.3

13.8

13.0

12.7

11.8

11.4

10.1

0 50 100 150 200

Midale

Sparky

Roseray

Frobisher-Alida

Bakken

Waseca

Upper Shaunavon

Frobisher

Viking

Alida

Tilston

Mannville (undifferentiated)

General Petroleums

Lloydminster

McLaren

Cantuar

Cummings

Dina

Ratcliffe

Basal Mannville

Page 5: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 5 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

Table 1 – Cumulative oil production ranking by play to December 2011 in Saskatchewan (data source is Saskatchewan Ministry of the Economy).

(m3) RankMidale 190 367 902 1 1953 6,962 27 344Sparky 69 834 789 2 1944 7,883 8 859Roseray 66 354 966 3 1952 1,316 50 422Frobisher-Alida 65 878 984 4 1953 3,089 21 327Bakken 57 780 131 5 1950 5,230 11 048Waseca 57 559 125 6 1949 5,134 11 211Upper Shaunavon 56 970 046 7 1953 1,883 30 255Frobisher 43 111 503 8 1954 3,726 11 570Viking 33 209 694 9 1952 9,647 3 442Alida 21 520 587 10 1954 1,047 20 555Tilston 17 567 078 11 1954 1,432 12 268Mannville (undifferentiated) 17 006 328 12 1946 2,565 6 630 General Petroleums 16 416 297 13 1947 1,869 8 783Lloydminster 15 303 771 14 1953 1,548 9 886McLaren 13 833 887 15 1948 2,174 6 363Cantuar (SW Sask only) 13 011 178 16 1952 962 13 525 Cummings 12 702 402 17 1965 1,312 9 682Dina 11 772 654 18 1965 630 18 687Ratcliffe 11 406 422 19 1953 534 21 360Basal Mannville 10 126 957 20 1951 562 18 019Tilston-Souris Valley 9 335 179 21 1956 848 11 008Red Jacket 6 675 829 22 1952 388 17 206 Colony 6 223 332 23 1961 656 9 487Red River 4 067 818 24 1958 201 20 238Shaunavon (undifferentiated) 3 653 812 25 1953 564 6 478Winnipegosis 2 723 135 26 1976 112 24 314Lower Watrous-Alida 2 257 327 27 1966 176 12 826Birdbear 1 502 227 28 1966 175 8 584Souris Valley 1 477 244 29 1957 310 4 735Madison (undifferentiated) 1 268 715 30 1966 100 12 687 Alida-Tilston 1 201 086 31 1980 57 21 072Success 983 677 32 1952 248 3 966Lower Shaunavon 972 326 33 1953 269 3 615Bakken-Torquay 515 053 34 2001 226 2 279 Lower Watrous 185 739 35 1971 48 3 870Duperow 163 105 36 1997 15 10 874Rex 138 103 37 1972 88 1 569Winnipeg 95 898 38 1998 15 5 994Gravelbourg 43 975 39 1971 9 4 886Torquay 40 415 40 2005 27 1 497Interlake 31 701 41 2002 5 6 340Kisbey 31 417 42 1994 7 4 488Total 845 321 816

Note: Plays that have produced less than 10 x 103 m3 of oil are not included in this table.

Average Per-well Oil

Production (m3)Total Number of

Oil WellsYear to Start Production

Cumulative Oil Production (to December 2011)

Play

Page 6: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 6 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

Figure 3 – Location of areas of oil production from seven major stratigraphic units in Saskatchewan. Note that Devonian production near the Saskatchewan-Manitoba boundary is from the Bakken-Torquay play.

into more restricted lime- and dolo-mudstone and evaporite (Cen and Salad Hersi, 2006; Dunn, 1975). Stromatoporoids and corals are common frame builders that form localized bank or mound structures (Kent, 1998). A total of only 15 wells produce from the Duperow play with a total production of 163.1 x 103 m3(Figure 5C). Eight of these wells are located in the Midale Duperow Pool (Tp. 7, Rge. 11W2) in southeastern Saskatchewan which was discovered in 1997. The first horizontal well, Longview Midale 91/04-02-007-11W2/00, drilled in 1998, is the top producer; it has produced 37.2 x 103 m3 of oil to the end of December 2011. In the Unity area (Tp. 42, Rge. 24W3) in west-central Saskatchewan, five horizontal wells have produced from the Duperow, beginning in 2010.

The Birdbear Formation is divided into lower carbonate and upper carbonate-anhydrite units in southeastern Saskatchewan (Nichols, 1970; Halabura, 1982); in west-central Saskatchewan, it is composed of a lower argillaceous carbonate member and an upper dolostone member (Kent, 1968; Yang and Kent, 2010; Saskatchewan Ministry of Energy and Resources, 2011b). Hydrocarbons are produced from the upper part of this formation in both the southeast and west-central areas (Figure 3). In total, the Birdbear has produced 1.5 x 106 m3 of oil from 175 production wells (Figure 5D), ranking 28th by cumulative oil production (Table 1).

The first recovery of Birdbear oil in southeastern Saskatchewan occurred in 1966 from dolostone in the Northrock Hummingbird 001/10-26-002-19W2/00 well in the Hummingbird Pool. This well has produced 254.3 x 103 m3 of oil up to December 2011. The second Birdbear oil discovery well in southeastern Saskatchewan was Northrock Kisbey 101/10-27-007-06W2/00 in the Kisbey Pool, drilled in 1968. To the end of December 2011, the Birdbear

Moose Jaw

North Battleford

Prince Albert

Melfort

Melville

Yorkton

Weyburn

Sask

atch

ewan

Albe

rta

Sask

atch

ewan

Man

itoba

RangeW2 W1

305152551525 1102030W3

Tow

nshi

p

50

45

1102030

1

10

20

1

10

20

30

40

50

60

Saskatoon

Regina

Swift Current

Lloydminster

LegendViking Mannville Triassic-Jurassic Mississippian Madison BakkenDevonianSilurian-Ordovician

0 50 100 150 km

0 50 100 Miles

5

15

25

35

45

55

5

15

55

Page 7: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 7 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

Figure 4 – The Silurian-Ordovician oil-production trends to December 2011 in Saskatchewan. A) The total production from the Red River, Winnipeg, and Interlake plays; and B) oil-production and well-count trends for the Red River play.

Formation in southeastern Saskatchewan has yielded in total of 1.1 million m3 oil from a total of 58 producing wells, of which 13 are horizontal wells. Among the total production, 84% are produced from wells in the Hummingbird and Kisbey pools. In this area, both the Duperow and Birdbear plays are controlled by the Williston Basin petroleum system.

In west-central Saskatchewan, Upper Devonian oil is associated with the Devonian “Nisku” petroleum system of the Alberta Basin. Heavy oil has been intermittently produced from the Birdbear since 1968. The recent successful application of horizontal technology in west-central Saskatchewan has sparked drilling in the Birdbear subcrop area where part of the Birdbear is truncated by the sub-Cretaceous unconformity (Yang and Kent, 2010; Saskatchewan Ministry of Energy and Resources, 2011b). This activity has resulted in a sharp increase of production from 2 m3/day in January 2007 to 770 m3/day in December 2011. The Birdbear in this area produced 366.1 x 103 m3 of oil to December 2011 (Saskatchewan Ministry of Energy and Resources, 2011b).

The Upper Devonian Torquay Formation consists of a series of repeating siltstone, breccia, and dolostone beds (Nickel, 2010). Dolostones and dolomitic siltstones in the Torquay are productive in an area along the Saskatchewan-Manitoba boundary where the Lower Bakken shale is absent and the

Torquay is directly overlain by the Middle Bakken making it impossible to assess the volume of oil attributable to each of the two reservoirs. A total of 515 x 103 m3 of oil has been produced from the Bakken-Torquay play in this area. In 2007, new Torquay oil was discovered in the Tableland region (Tp. 1, Rge. 10W2) where uppermost Torquay dolostone strata lie immediately below the Lower Bakken shale (Nickel, 2010). To December 2011, 27 wells have produced 40 x 103 m3 of oil from the Torquay in this region (Table 1); 21 of these wells are horizontal wells drilled since 2009. Despite the small volume of oil produced from the Torquay so far (Figure 5A), the rapid increase of production from 175 m3/day in January 2008 to 659 m3/day in December 2011, and the increase in the level of drilling activity targeting the Torquay Formation in recent years, indicate industry's strong interest in this play.

c) Mississippian Plays

Mississippian strata are cumulatively the most prolific oil-producing reservoirs in Saskatchewan with a total production of 423 x 106 m3of oil (Figure 6A) or about 50% of all oil produced in the province (Table 1). Except for a small fraction (587.9 x 103 m3) of oil produced from Madison pools in the southwestern Saskatchewan and 42.8 x

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0

50 000

100 000

150 000

200 000

250 000

300 000

350 000

400 000

1958

1965

1968

1971

1974

1977

1980

1983

1986

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

2010

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s Oil Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1958Cumulative Oil Production: 4.1 x 106 m3

Avg. Per-well Oil Production: 20 000 m3

Total Oil Wells: 201

Year

B) Red River Oil Production and Well Count

0

50 000

100 000

150 000

200 000

250 000

300 000

350 000

400 000

450 000

500 000

1958

1965

1968

1971

1974

1977

1980

1983

1986

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

2010

Cu

bic

Me

tre

sA) Total Silurian-Ordovician Oil Production

Interlake

Red River

Winnipeg

Cumulative Oil Production: 4.2 x 106 m3

Total Oil Wells: 222

Year

Page 8: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan G

eological Survey 8

Summ

ary of Investigations 2012, Volum

e 1

Figure 5 – Saskatchewan Devonian oil-production trends to end of December 2011. Note the wide range of vertical scales used on the graphs. A) Total Devonian oil-production trends, including production from the Torquay and Bakken-Torquay plays; B) oil-production and well-count trends for the Winnipegosis play; C) oil-production and well-count trends for the Duperow play; and D) oil-production and well-count trends for the Birdbear play.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0

20 000

40 000

60 000

80 000

100 000

120 000

140 000

160 000

180 000

200,000

220 000

240 000

260 000

1966

1969

1972

1975

1978

1981

1984

1987

1990

1993

1996

1999

2002

2005

2008

2011

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

B) Winnipegosis Oil Production and Well Count

Oil Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1976Cumulative Oil Production: 2.7 x106 m3

Avg. Per-well Oil Production: 24 313 m 3

Total Oil Wells: 112

Year

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0

50 000

100 000

150 000

200 000

250 000

1966

1969

1972

1975

1978

1981

1984

1987

1990

1993

1996

1999

2002

2005

2008

2011

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

D) Birdbear Oil Production and Well Count

Oil Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1966Cumulative Oil Production: 1.5 x 106 m3

Avg. Per-well Oil Production: 8 584 m3

Total Oil Wells: 175

Year

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0

5 000

10 000

15 000

20 000

25 000

30 000

35 000

40 000

1966

1969

1972

1975

1978

1981

1984

1987

1990

1993

1996

1999

2002

2005

2008

2011

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

C) Duperow Oil Production and Well Count

Oil Produced

Well CountW

ell

Co

un

t

Year

First Production Year: 1997Cumulative Oil Production: 163 x 103 m 3

Avg. Per-well Oil Production: 10 874 m3

Total Oil Wells: 15

0

50 000

100 000

150 000

200 000

250 000

300 000

350 000

400 000

1966

1968

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

A) Total Devonian Oil Production

BirdbearBakken-TorquayTorquayDuperowWinnipegosis

Cumulative Oil Production: 5 x 106 m3

Total Oil Wells: 557

Year

Page 9: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 9 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

Figure 6 – The Mississippian oil-production trends in Saskatchewan to December 2011. Note the wide range of vertical scales used on the graphs. A) Total Mississippian oil production; B) oil-production and well-count trends for the Bakken play; note that production from the Bakken-Torquay play is included as Devonian production (Figure 5A) and is not included here; C) oil-production and well-count trends for the Souris Valley play; D) oil-production and well-count trends for the Tilston play; E) oil-production and well-count trends for the Alida play; F) oil-production and well-count trends for the Frobisher play; G) oil-production and well-count trends for the Midale play; and H) oil-production and well-count trends for the Ratcliffe play. Note that whereas production from commingled plays (e.g., Frobisher-Alida) is included in the graph of total oil production (A), graphs are not provided for production from individual commingled plays. Also note that in (A), to achieve graphic clarity, productions from the Alida-Tilston and Tilston–Souris Valley plays have been combined.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

0

20 000

40 000

60,000

80 000

100 000

120 000

140 000

160 000

180 000

200 000

1953

1956

1959

1962

1965

1968

1971

1974

1977

1980

1983

1986

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

2010

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

C) Souris Valley Oil Production and Well Count

Oil Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1957Cumulative Oil Production: 1.5 x 106 m3

Avg. Per-well Oil Production: 4 765 m3

Total Oil Wells: 310

Year

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0

100 000

200 000

300 000

400 000

500 000

600 000

700 000

800 000

900 000

1 000 000

1953

1956

1959

1962

1965

1968

1971

1974

1977

1980

1983

1986

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

2010

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

D) Tilston Oil Production and Well Count

Oil Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1954Cumulative Oil Production: 17.6 x 106 m3

Avg. Per-well Oil Production: 12 268 m3

Total Oil Wells: 1,432

Year

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0

100 000

200 000

300 000

400 000

500 000

600 000

700 000

800 000

900 000

1 000 000

1953

1956

1959

1962

1965

1968

1971

1974

1977

1980

1983

1986

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

2010

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

E) Alida Oil Production and Well Count

Oil Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1954Cumulative Oil Production: 21.5 x 106 m3

Avg. Per-well Oil Production: 20 555 m3

Total Oil Wells: 1,047

Year

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

2,200

0

200 000

400 000

600 000

800 000

1 000 000

1 200 000

1 400 000

1 600 000

1953

1956

1959

1962

1965

1968

1971

1974

1977

1980

1983

1986

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

2010

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

F) Frobisher Oil Production and Well Count

Oil ProducedWell Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1954Cumulative Oil Production: 43.1 x 106 m3

Avg. Per-well Oil Production: 11 570 m3

Total Oil Wells: 3,726

Year

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0

50 000

100 000

150 000

200 000

250 000

300 000

350 000

400 000

1953

1956

1959

1962

1965

1968

1971

1974

1977

1980

1983

1986

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

2010

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

H) Ratcliffe Oil Production and Well Count

Oil Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1953Cumulative Oil Production: 11.4 x 106 m3

Avg. Per-well Oil Production: 21 360 m3

Total Oil Wells: 534

Year

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

0

1 000 000

2 000 000

3 000 000

4 000 000

5 000 000

6 000 000

7 000 000

1953

1956

1959

1962

1965

1968

1971

1974

1977

1980

1983

1986

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

2010

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

G) Midale Oil Production and Well Count

Oil Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1953Cumulative Oil Production: 190.4 x 106 m3

Avg. Per-well Oil Production: 27 344 m3

Total Oil Wells: 6,962

Year

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

0

1 000 000

2 000 000

3 000 000

4 000 000

5 000 000

19

50

19

53

19

56

19

59

19

62

19

65

19

68

19

71

19

74

19

77

19

80

19

83

19

86

19

89

19

92

19

95

19

98

20

01

20

04

20

07

20

10

Cu

bic

Me

tres

B) Bakken Oil Production and Well Count

Oil Produced

Well Count We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1950Cumulative Oil Production: 57.8 x 106 m3

Avg. Per-well Oil Production: 11 048 m3

Avg. Daily Oil Production in Dec. 2004: 3 900 m3/dayAvg. Daily Oil Production in Dec. 2011: 13 670 m3/dayTotal Oil Wells: 5,230

0

1 000 000

2 000 000

3 000 000

4 000 000

5 000 000

6 000 000

7 000 000

8 000 000

9 000 000

10 000 000

11 000 000

12 000 000

1953

1956

1959

1962

1965

1968

1971

1974

1977

1980

1983

1986

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

2010

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

A) Total Mississippian Oil Production

Ratcliffe

Midale

Frobisher

Frobisher-Alida

AlidaAlida-Tilston-Souris ValleyTilston

Souris Valley

Alida-Lower Watrous

Bakken

Year

Total Oil Production: 423 x106 m3

Total Oil Wells: 23,588

Year

Page 10: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 10 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

106 m3 of oil from the Bakken Formation in west-central Saskatchewan, all production is from southeastern Saskatchewan (Figure 3).

The Upper Devonian to Lower Mississippian Bakken Formation is subdivided into three members with a Middle Member of dolomitic siltstone and sandstone sandwiched between Lower and Upper members of black organic-rich shales (Kreis et al., 2006; Kohlruss and Nickel, 2009; Saskatchewan Ministry of Energy and Resources, 2010). Bakken oil is produced from the Middle Member in two widely separated areas, the southeast and west-central (Marsh et al., 2011; Nickel and Yang, 2011).

In southeastern Saskatchewan, oil has been produced from the porous and permeable sandstone of the Middle Member in the Rocanville, Weyburn, Roncott, and Hummingbird areas since 1956. The recent application of advanced horizontal drilling and large sand-fracture completions in the less permeable silty, argillaceous and very fine-grained sandstone and lower siltstone of the Middle Member has resulted in significant new Bakken production in other areas in southeastern Saskatchewan (Kreis et al., 2006; Kendall, 2008; Kohlruss and Nickel, 2009; Saskatchewan Ministry of Energy and Resources, 2010). Since the discovery well for the Viewfield North Bakken Pool (Bison Viewfield 111/08-06-008-08W2/00) in 2003, Bakken reservoirs have produced a total of 15 x 106 m3 of oil, 92% of which has been produced in the last seven years (2005 to 2011; Nickel and Yang, 2011). As of the end of December 2011, 2,521 wells have produced oil from the Bakken; 2,322 of them are horizontal wells of which 2,310 were drilled from 2005 to 2011. Bakken oil production has increased from 177 m3/day in January 2005 to 11 000 m3/day in December 2011. The Bakken Formation in southeastern Saskatchewan is currently considered to be one of North America’s hottest oil plays.

In west-central Saskatchewan, the Bakken Middle Member started producing heavy oil in 1950 and has produced a total of 42.8 x 106 m3 to the end of December 2011. The average daily oil production of 6.6 x 103 m3 reached its highest level in 1998 (Marsh et al., 2011).

In total, the Bakken has produced 57.8 x 106 m3 of oil from 5,230 production wells (Figure 6B; Table 1). The Bakken play ranks first by monthly production in the December 2011 (Figure 2B), but fifth place by total cumulative oil production (Figure 2A), and 19th by average per-well production (Figure 2C), because most wells drilled into the Bakken Formation in southeastern Saskatchewan are still in their initial production stage.

Strata of the Mississippian Madison Group are characterized by two styles of deposition – a lower progradational phase (Souris Valley, Tilston, and Alida beds) and an upper aggradational phase (Frobisher, Midale, Ratcliffe, and Poplar beds) (Kent and Kreis, 2001; Kent et al., 2004). In southeastern Saskatchewan, strata deposited during the latter phase consist of a series of shallowing- or brining-upward cycles in which porous reservoir rocks are commonly overlain by dense anhydrite units (Kent et al., 2004). Mississippian strata in the study area are progressively truncated to the north by the sub-Mesozoic unconformity (Fuzesy, 1983; Kent et al., 2004; Marsh and Heinemann, 2005; TGI Williston Basin Working Group, 2008; Nickel and Yang, 2011). The repeated occurrences of porous and non-porous layers, and truncation of layers at the sub-Mesozoic unconformity have formed multilayered hydrocarbon plays in these rocks (Kent et al., 1988; Nimegeers et al., 2006).

The Souris Valley play has cumulatively yielded 1.5 x 106 m3 of oil from 310 production wells (Figure 6C). Of the 78 Souris Valley horizontal production wells in southeastern Saskatchewan, 73 were drilled between 2005 and 2011, resulting in production growth from 38.5 m3/day in 2004 to 358 m3/day in 2011. It ranks 29th in total oil production (Table 1). The commingled production from the Tilston-Souris Valley plays is 9.3 x 106 m3 from 848 production wells, ranking 21st by cumulative production (Table 1), and 20th by per-well average production in Saskatchewan (Figure 2C).

The Tilston and Alida plays have very similar production and well-count trends over the years (Figure 6D and 6E). Commingled production from the Alida-Tilston play is impossible to allocate to the individual plays. Oil production from the Tilston, Alida, and Alida-Tilston plays and their rankings are shown in Figure 2. Since the first horizontal well (191/13-05-004-30W1/00) was drilled in the Alida play in October 1990, 82% of Alida production wells have been completed as horizontal wells. To December 2011, 534 horizontal wells have produced 9.3 x 106 m3 of oil, amounting to 43% of total Alida production. The first Tilston horizontal well 191/05-24-006-32W1/00 started production in 1992. To December 2011, 648 horizontal wells have been drilled to produce oil from the Tilston play, yielding total horizontal well production of 7.4 x 106 m3 or 42% of total Tilston production. Production from horizontal wells was largely responsible for the highest production peaks in the mid-1990s on the Alida and Tilston production trends in southern Saskatchewan (Figures 6D and 6E).

Since its initial discovery in 1954, the Frobisher play has cumulatively produced 43.1 x 106 m3 of oil from 3,726 production wells (Figure 6F). The number of Frobisher horizontal production wells increased from four in 1990 to 1,362 in 2011 with total oil production of 12.7 x 106 m3 or 30% of total Frobisher production. In areas where the contact between the Frobisher and Alida beds cannot be clearly identified, these units are combined as Frobisher-

Page 11: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 11 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

Alida. The Frobisher-Alida play has cumulatively produced 65.9 x 106 m3 of oil from 3,089 production wells. The ranking for Frobisher and Frobisher-Alida plays is illustrated in Figure 2.

In some areas, there is a sandstone interval (Kisbey Sandstone) between the Frobisher Beds and Alida Beds (Perras, 1990; Kent, 2007). Oil produced from this interval is included as Frobisher-Alida production except for seven wells that have produced 31.4 x 103 m3 of oil designated as Kisbey (Table 1).

The Midale play started commercial production in 1953 and the production peak was reached in 1966 (Figure 6G). Production declined from 1967 to 1981 with a very consistent well count. Production increments recur in the 1980s, the mid-1990s and after 2000 on the production trend, responding to infill vertical drilling, horizontal drilling, and the CO2 miscible flood in the Weyburn and Midale pools, respectively. To December 2011, the Midale play has produced 190 x 106 m3 of oil from a total of 6,962 production wells, ranking it first by total oil production (Figure 2A; Table 1), second by current production (Figure 2B), and third by average per-well production (Figure 2C). The Midale play alone has yielded about 23% of the total oil production in Saskatchewan.

The Ratcliffe production trend is shown in Figure 6H. The trend shows big production increments in the mid-1960s, between 1982 and 1987, and in 2010 and 2011. The first spike was largely attributed to the discoveries of the Flat Lake, Lake Alma, Freda Lake, Neptune, and Hummingbird Ratcliffe pools. The second spike resulted from infill drilling, as shown by the increasing oil well count during these years. In 2010 and 2011, 95 horizontal wells were drilled in the Ratcliffe play; these wells have produced 185 x 103 m3 of oil, resulting in the most recent production spike (Figure 6H). The Ratcliffe play has cumulatively produced 11.4 x 106 m3 of oil from 534 production wells, ranking it 19th by cumulative production (Figure 2A; Table 1) and fifth by average per-well production of 21.3 x 103 m3 (Figure 2C).

d) Triassic-Jurassic Plays

The Triassic Lower Watrous Formation unconformably overlies Carboniferous strata in southern Saskatchewan. It consists of red argillaceous sandstone interbedded with quartzose to anhydritic mudstone of terrestrial origin (Edwards et al., 1994). The fine-grained mudstone unit forms a regional and effective seal to hydrocarbon migration (Whittaker and Gilboy, 2003). Locally, dissolution of anhydrite that had infilled porosity in the underlying “altered zone” associated with the sub-Mesozoic unconformity has allowed oil to migrate upwards into the Lower Watrous sandstone reservoirs that are capped by argillaceous mudstones (Bates et al., 2007; Bates and Kendall, 2008). The Lower Watrous play has produced 185.7 x 103 m3 of oil from 48 wells in southeastern Saskatchewan (Table 1), mostly in the Carlyle area (Tp. 7 to 8, Rge. 1W2 to 3W2). Of the 48 wells, 37 are horizontal with oil production of 154.6 x 103 m3 from 1992 to 2011. When production from the Lower Watrous is commingled with production from the underlying Alida Beds, production from the Lower Watrous–Alida play is 2.3 x 106 m3 from 176 oil wells, ranking 27th by cumulative production (Table 1), and 14th by per-well average production in Saskatchewan (Figure 2C).

Led by the Roseray and Upper Shaunavon plays, Jurassic strata in Saskatchewan have produced 135.7 x 106 m3 of oil (Figure 7A), about 16% of the overall production from Saskatchewan.

The Gravelbourg Formation has been informally subdivided into upper and lower members. The lower Gravelbourg is predominantly made up of carbonates, and the upper Gravelbourg mainly consists of siliciclastic deposits which grade into calcareous shales to the west (Blair and Bergman, 2002). Low-gravity oil in the Gravelbourg is the result of vertical seepage from the Mississippian reservoirs and has accumulated in fine quartz sandstone in the upper part of the lower member (Kent, 2001). The Jurassic Gravelbourg has produced 44 x 103 m3 of oil (Table 1) from six wells in the Red Jacket area (Tp. 13 to 14, Rge. 31W1 to 1W2) and three wells in the Cypress Lake South area (Tp. 5, Rge. 27W3).

The Shaunavon Formation is divided into two members in southwestern Saskatchewan. The Upper Shaunavon reservoir in southwestern Saskatchewan is predominantly made up of permeable, shallow-marine and shoreline, calcareous sandstones. Toward the east, lenticular quartzose sandstones, bioclastic arenites, dolostones and shales are dominant. The Lower Shaunavon Formation is generally comprised of homogeneous limestone and calcareous mudstone (Christopher, 1964; Marsh and Jensen, 2010; Grisak et al., 2011). Locally, oil has been produced from a fossiliferous-oolitic, vuggy-moldic, porous and low permeability reservoir at the topmost few metres of the lower member along the flanks of the paleosyncline that form the Shaunavon Oil Field Trend (Tp. 3 to 16, Rge. 16W3 to 20W3; Figure 3).

The Upper Shaunavon is a major oil producer in Saskatchewan (Figure 7B), ranking seventh by oil production of 57 x 106 m3 (Figure 2A; Table 1), 11th by currently production (Figure 2B), and second by the per-well average production of 30.3 x 103 m3 (Figure 2C); all production is from wells in southwestern Saskatchewan. The Dollard Upper Shaunavon Pool, discovered in 1953 by the 101/05-21-007-20W3/00 well, is the largest Upper Shaunavon pool and has cumulatively produced 16.2 x 106 m3 of oil to the end of December 2011, amounting to almost 29% of

Page 12: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 12 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

Figure 7 – The Jurassic oil-production trends to December 2011 in Saskatchewan. Note the wide range of vertical scales used on the graphs. A) Total Jurassic oil-production trends; the total Jurassic oil production of 135.7 x 106 m3 includes insignificant amounts of oil from the Lower Watrous, Gravelbourg, and Success formations which are not visible in the graph because of the small volumes involved; B) oil-production and well-count trends for the Upper Shaunavon play; C) oil-production and well-count trends for the Lower Shaunavon play; D) oil-production and well-count trends for the Shaunavon play; E) oil-production and well-count trends for the Red Jacket play; and F) oil-production and well-count trends for the Roseray play.

total Upper Shaunavon production. The Tide Water Dollard Crown 101/13-22-007-20W3/00 well has the highest single well production of 872.5 x 103 m3 of oil. The first horizontal well, 191/11-34-002-26W3/00, which started

0

50

100

150

200

0

50 000

100 000

150 000

200 000

250 000

300 000

1952

1955

1958

1961

1964

1967

1970

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

C) Lower Shaunavon Oil Production and Well Count

Oil Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1953Cumulative Oil Production: 1.0 x 106 m3

Avg. Per-well Oil Production: 3 615 m3

Total Oil Wells: 269

0

100

200

300

400

500

0

50 000

100 000

150 000

200 000

250 000

300 000

350 000

400 000

450 000

1952

1955

1958

1961

1964

1967

1970

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

D) Shaunavon Oil Production and Well Count

Oil Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1952Cumulative Oil Production: 3.7 x 106 m3

Avg. Per-well Oil Production: 6 478 m3

Total Oil Wells: 564

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

0

200 000

400 000

600 000

800 000

1 000 000

1 200 000

1 400 000

1 600000

1 800 000

2 000 000

2 200 000

1952

1955

1958

1961

1964

1967

1970

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

Cu

bic

Met

res

F) Roseray Oil Production and Well Count

Oil Produced

Well Count

Wel

l Co

un

t

First Production Year: 1952Cumulative Oil Production: 66.4 x 106 m3

Avg. Per-well Oil Production: 50 422 m3

Total Oil Wells: 1,316

Year

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0

50 000

100 000

150 000

200 000

250 000

300 000

350,000

400 000

450 000

1952

1955

1958

1961

1964

1967

1970

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

Cu

bic

Met

res

E) Red Jacket Oil Production and Well Count

Oil Produced

Well Count

Wel

l Co

un

t

First Production Year: 1952Cumulative Oil Production: 6.7 x 106 m3

Avg. Per-well Oil Production: 17 206 m3

Total Oil Wells: 388

Year

0

500 000

1 000 000

1 500 000

2 000 000

2 500 000

3 000 000

3 500 000

4 000 000

4 500 000

5 000 000

1952

1955

1958

1961

1964

1967

1970

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

Cu

bic

Me

tre

sA) Total Jurassic Oil Production

Roseray

Upper Shaunavon

Shaunavon

Red Jacket

Lower Shaunavon

Cumulative Oil Production: 135.7 x106 m3

Total Oil Wells: 4,741

Year

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

0

500 000

1 000 000

1 500 000

2 000 000

1952

1955

1958

1961

1964

1967

1970

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

B) Upper Shaunavon Oil Production and Well Count

Oil Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1952Cumulative Oil Production: 57 x 106 m3

Avg. Per-well Oil Production: 30 255 m3

Total Oil Wells: 1,883

Year

Avg. Daily Oil Production in 2007: 31 m3/dayAvg. Daily Oil Production in 2011: 786 m3/day

Page 13: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 13 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

production in 1991, has produced 221.8 x 103 m3 of oil to December 2011. Forty-one horizontal wells produce from the Upper Shaunavon.

The Lower Shaunavon play in southwestern Saskatchewan has produced 972.3 x 103 m3 of oil from 269 wells. Its oil production increased from 31 m3/day in 2007 to 786 m3/day in 2011 (Figure 7C). This rapid production growth can be attributed to successful application of horizontal drilling and staged hydraulic fracturing completions to the low permeability reservoirs. Commingled production from the Shaunavon play, when the Lower and Upper Shaunavon are not differentiated, is 3.7 x 106 m3 from 564 production wells (Figure 7D), ranking 25th by production (Table 1) and 14th by current production in Saskatchewan (Figure 2B).

The Middle Jurassic Red Jacket Formation in southeastern Saskatchewan, which is stratigraphically equivalent to the Upper Gravelbourg and Shaunavon formations in southwestern Saskatchewan, comprises a complex succession of sandstones, siltstones, mudstones, and minor carbonates (Kreis, 1991). Production from the Red Jacket play in southeastern Saskatchewan started in 1952, but became more significant in the mid-1980s with discoveries of the Red Jacket Red Jacket, Moosomin Red Jacket, and Coothill Red Jacket pools. The production reached its peak in 1998-99 (Figure 7E). Total oil production of 6.7 x 106 m3 and the per-well average production of 17.2 x 103 m3 of oil rank this play 22nd by cumulative production (Table 1) and 12th by per-well production (Figure 2C).

The Roseray Formation in southwestern Saskatchewan is composed primarily of sandstone clinothems lying between Ranges 21W2 and 20W3, from Townships 1 to 20 (Labelle, 1997). Ten clinobeds were identified by Christopher (1974). They offlap west to east and prograde eastward into the marlstones and shales of the Rierdon and Rush Lake formations (ibid.). The Roseray play is another major oil producer in Saskatchewan, ranking third by the total oil production of 66.4 x 106 m3 (Figure 7F; Figure 2A; Table 1), tenth by current production (Figure 2B) and first by the per-well average production of 50.4 x 103 m3 (Figure 2C); all production is from wells in southwestern Saskatchewan (Tp. 12 to 19, Rge. 14W3 to 19W3; Figure 3).

The Jura-Cretaceous Success Formation overlies rocks of Middle Devonian to Late Jurassic age on a low-relief erosion surface which sloped southward and southwestward off the Precambrian Shield. It is characterized by white and pale green kaolinitic quartzose sandstones and siltstones deposited in fluvial and lacustrine environments, with early marine conditions in the extreme south of the province (Christopher, 2003). Since 1952, the Success has produced 983.7 x 103 m3 of oil from 248 wells (Table 1), 203 of which are located in west-central Saskatchewan (Tp. 24 to 31, Rge. 23W3 to 29W3) and 45 are located in west of Swift Current (Tp. 15 and 16, Rge. 15W3 to 16W3).

e) Cretaceous Plays

The Lower Cretaceous Mannville Group hosts the oil sand deposits and the majority of heavy oil accumulations in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (Pemberton and James, 1997), as well as medium oil pools in southwestern Saskatchewan (Figure 3). The Mannville Group in Saskatchewan is a stratigraphically complex unit formed of fluvial to marine deposits (Christopher, 2003). The porous sandstones provide excellent reservoirs for hydrocarbon accumulation in Saskatchewan. The Mannville Group is the major Cretaceous oil producer in the province with cumulative oil production of 249 x 106 m3 from 25,646 wells in Saskatchewan or 29% of oil production in the province. The Sparky and Waseca members are the highest producers with oil production of 69.8 and 57.6 x 106 m3 (Table 1), accounting 8% and 7% of oil production in the province. They rank second and sixth by cumulative production (Figure 2A), and third and fourth by current production (Figure 2B), respectively. The highest production increment on the Mannville production trend since the early 1990s to the mid of 2000s is largely attributable to intensive horizontal well drilling and steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) and other enhanced oil recovery (EOR) projects during that period (Figure 8A). Advanced EOR technologies are playing more important roles in heavy oil production.

Another major Cretaceous play is the Viking Formation which is composed of interbedded fine grained sandstones and highly bioturbated muddy sandstones. Multiple sea-level rises and falls resulted in merging of regressive surfaces with transgressive surfaces and a complex internal stratigraphy (Reinson et al., 1994; Walz, 2007). The Viking ranks ninth by the total oil production of 33.2 x 106 m3 (Figure 2A; Table 1) and fifth by current production (Figure 2B); all production is from wells in west-central Saskatchewan (Figure 3). Among the total of 9,647 production wells, 865 horizontal wells with multi-stage hydraulic fracturing completions were drilled over the last three years, resulting in the surge of production since 2008 (Figure 8B).

3. Gas Plays in Saskatchewan Saskatchewan’s natural gas production includes non-associated gas produced in southwest and west-central Saskatchewan from Cretaceous reservoirs that do not contain significant quantities of crude oil, and associated gas that comes from crude oil wells as a by-product. The top 20 producers in each category are ranked in Figures 9A and 9B.

Page 14: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 14 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

Figure 8 – Oil-production and well-count trends to December 2011 for Cretaceous plays in Saskatchewan. A) Oil-production and well-count trends for the Mannville play, including oil from the Dina, Cummings, Lloydminster, Rex, General Petroleums, Sparky, Waseca, McLaren, and Colony members and the Cantuar and Pense formations, the Basal Mannville, and undifferentiated Mannville reservoirs (Table 1); and B) oil-production and well-count trends for the Viking play.

The current major monthly gas producers are the Milk River, Medicine Hat, Bakken, Viking, Mannville, and Midale plays (Figure 9C). Together, the top six plays have produced a total of 342 million m3 of gas, or 65% of gas production in Saskatchewan for December 2011.

The top ten non-associated gas producers by average per-well gas production are the Belle Fourche, Medicine Hat, Ribstone Creek, Milk River–Medicine Hat, Bearpaw, Bearpaw–Belly River, Milk River, Lea Park, Milk River–Medicine Hat–Belle Fourche, and Belly River plays (Figure 9D) of the Upper Cretaceous.

a) Cretaceous Gas Production

A total of 204.4 x 109 m3 of shallow gas is produced from Cretaceous strata in Saskatchewan (Figure 10A). The natural gas reservoirs in the Upper Cretaceous Milk River, Medicine Hat, and Belle Fourche (commonly referred to as the Second White Specks sandstone) are the major shallow non-associated gas producers. These plays are characterized by their shallow depths, interbedded source and reservoir rocks, low-permeability muddy sandstones, and immature, locally generated biogenic gas (Pederson, 2004; Yurkowski, 2006). The trapping mechanisms for the shallow-gas pools are highly variable. The

oldest of the three producers, the Belle Fourche Formation, is composed of very fine-grained, bioturbated muddy sandstones; it is unconformably overlain by offshore-marine mudstones that are characterized by coccoliths, fish debris, and shells (Second White Specks). The gas-bearing Medicine Hat Formation consists of at least three upward-coarsening, very fine-grained sandstone and siltstone successions, 3 to 11 m thick, deposited in a shallow-marine shelf. The youngest producer, the Milk River Formation (also known as the Alderson Member of the Lea Park Formation), includes shallowing-upward facies ranging from offshore sandstones and shales to shoreline sandstones, plus non-marine coastal-plain deposits (Gilboy, 1987, 1988; Pederson, 2004). The gas production trends of the Milk River, Medicine Hat, and Belle Fourche reservoirs are shown in Figures 10B to 10D. Gas production from the Mannville and Viking includes both non-associated shallow gas and associated gas from oil wells (Figures 10E and 10F).

In addition to the major shallow-gas plays, small volumes of gas are produced from Ribstone Creek (1.3 x 109 m3), Belly River (456.9 x 106 m3), Bearpaw (229.6 x 106 m3), Bearpaw–Belly River (169.9 x 106 m3), Fish Scales (29.4 x 106 m3), and Lea Park (4.8 x 106 m3) reservoirs.

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

0

200 000

400 000

600 000

800 000

1 000 000

1 200 000

1 400 000

19

52

19

55

19

58

19

61

19

64

19

67

19

70

19

73

19

76

19

79

19

82

19

85

19

88

19

91

19

94

19

97

20

00

20

03

20

06

20

09

Cu

bic

Me

ters

B) Viking Oil Production and Well Count

Oil Produced

Well CountW

ell

Co

un

t

First Production Year: 1952Total Oil Production: 33.2 x 106 m3

Oil Production in 2007: 1268 m3/dayOil Production in Dec. 2011: 2876 m3/dayTotal Oil Wells: 9,647

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

0

2 000 000

4 000 000

6 000 000

8 000 000

10 000 000

12 000 000

1944

1950

1955

1960

1965

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Cu

bic

Me

tre

sA) Mannville Oil Production and Well Count

Oil Produced

Well Count

Wel

l C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1944Cumulative Oil Production: 243.9 x 106 m3

Total Oil Wells: 25,380

14 000 000

Page 15: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 15 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

Figure 9 – Top 20 Saskatchewan gas plays by: A) cumulative shallow-gas production from Cretaceous reservoirs to end of December 2011, B) cumulative associated gas production from reservoirs below the Cretaceous to end of December 2011, C) monthly gas production in December 2011, and D) average per-well gas production to end of December 2011.

116 324

60 590

58 800

49 512

30 271

26 302

22 665

21 988

16 504

15 084

14 578

11 806

11 413

10 030

6 349

5 875

5 798

5 785

4 347

3 721

0 40 000 80 000 120 000 160 000

Milk River

Bakken

Viking

Midale

Colony

Sparky

Milk River-MedicineHat-Belle Fourche

Waseca

Frobisher

Frobisher-Alida

McLaren

Milk River-Belle Fourche

Cantuar

General Petroleums

Roseray

Lloydminster

Tilston

(Thousand Cubic Metres)

C) Current Monthly Gas Production (December 2011)

51.0

28.0

27.4

19.8

17.7

16.4

10.9

5.7

5.2

3.6

3.6

3.1

2.1

1.8

1.5

1.3

1.0

0.9

0.8

0.8

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Milk River

Milk River-Medicine Hat

Viking

Colony

Belle Fourche

Medicine Hat

McLaren

Sparky

Cantuar

Waseca

Cummings-Dina

Lloydminster

Milk River-MedicineHat-Belle Fourche

Ribstone Creek

Basal Mannville

Rex

Milk River-Belle Fourche

(Billion Cubic Metres)

A) Cumulative Shallow Gas Production from Cretaceous to end of 2011

7981

7799

7609

4952

4591

4356

4067

2401

2318

1944

1777

1394

980

929

310

187

117

49

40

6

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000

Medicine Hat

Ribstone Creek

Milk River-Medicine Hat

Bearpaw

Bearpaw-Belly River

Milk River

Lea Park

Milk River-MedicineHat-Belle Fourche

Belly River

Colorado

Milk River-Belle Fourche

Fish Scale

Medicine Hat-Belle Fourche

Upper Colorado

Upper Cretaceous- Lower ColoradoUpper Colorado-

Belle Fourche

Upper Cretaceous

Lower Colorado

Spinney Hill

(Thousand Cubic Metres)

14

9.8

8.6

6.1

4.0

2.2

2.1

0.8

0.8

0.5

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0 5 10 15

Midale

Bakken

Roseray

Frobisher-Alida

Frobisher

Upper Shaunavon

Alida

Success

Tilston

Deadwood

Winnipegosis

Ratcliffe

Tilston-Souris River

Red River

Lower Watrous-Alida

Shaunavon

Birdbear

Alida-Tilston

Duperow

(Billion Cubic Metres)

B) Cumulative Associated Gas Productionbelow Cretaceous to end of 2011

Belle Fourche

Belle Fourche

Lower Shaunavon

St. Walburg

D) Average Per-well Production to End of 2011

Mannville(undifferentiated)

Mannville(undifferentiated)

General Petroleums

(undifferentiated)

Medicine Hat

Page 16: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 16 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

Figure 10 – The shallow-gas production trends to end of December 2011 in Saskatchewan. Note the wide range of vertical scales used on the graphs. A) The total unconventional shallow-gas production trend; this graph does not show gas production from the Fish Scales and Lea Park formations because of the small volumes involved; B) the shallow-gas production and well-count trends for the Milk River play; C) the shallow-gas production and well-count trends for the Medicine Hat play; D) the shallow-gas production and well-count trends for Belle Fourche play; E) the shallow associated and non-associated gas production and well-count trends for the Mannville play; and F) the shallow associated and non-associated gas production and well-count trends for the Viking play.

b) Conventional Associated-gas Production from Sub-Cretaceous Strata

Many major oil plays in strata older than Cretaceous have produced large amounts of associated gas (50.7 x 109 m3) during oil production in Saskatchewan. Figure 11 shows production trends of the Bakken (Figure 11B), Roseray (Figure 11C), Frobisher (Figure 11D), Frobisher-Alida (Figure 11E), Midale (Figure 11F), and Upper Shaunavon (Figure 11A).

1958

1961

1964

1967

1970

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

Gas Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0

100 000

200 000

300 000

400 000

500 000

600 000

Th

ou

sa

nd

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

C) Medicine Hat Gas Production and Well Count

First Production Year: 1958Cumulative Gas Production: 11.0 x 109 m3

Avg. Per-well Gas Production: 7.8 x 106 m3

Total Gas Wells: 1,402

Year

0

400

800

1,200

1,600

2,000

0

300 000

600 000

900 000

1 200 000

1 500 000

1980

1983

1986

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

2010

Th

ou

sa

nd

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

D) Belle Fourche Gas Production and Well Count

Gas Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1980Cumulative Gas Production: 16.4 x 109 m3

Avg. Per-well Gas Production: 8.0 x 106 m3

Total Gas Wells: 2,056

Year

Year

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

0

500 000

1 000 000

1 500 000

2 000 000

2 500 000

3 000 000

3 500 000

1971

1974

1977

1980

1983

1986

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

2010

Th

ou

sa

nd

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

B) Milk River Gas Production and Well Count

Gas Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1971Cumulative Gas Production: 51.0 x 109 m3

Avg. Per-well Gas Production: 4.0 x 106 m3

Total Gas Wells: 12,530

0

100 000

200 000

300 000

400 000

500 000

600 000

700 000

800 000

1945

1948

1951

1954

1957

1960

1963

1966

1969

1972

1975

1978

1981

1984

1987

1990

1993

1996

1999

2002

2005

2008

2011

Th

ou

sa

nd

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

F) Viking Gas Production

Associated and Non-associated Gas Produced

First Production Year: 1945Cumulative Gas Production: 27.4 x 109 m3

Year

0

500 000

1 000 000

1 500 000

2 000 000

2 500 000

3 000 000

3 500 000

4 000 000

1935

1940

1945

1950

1955

1960

1965

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Th

ou

san

d C

ub

ic M

etre

s

E) Mannville Gas Production

Associated and Non-associated Gas Produced

First Production Year: 1935Cumulative Gas Production: 61.2 x 109 m3

Year

0

1 000 000

2 000 000

3 000 000

4 000 000

5 000 000

6 000 000

7 000 000

8 000 000

9 000 000

19

45

19

50

19

55

19

60

19

65

19

70

19

75

19

80

19

85

19

90

19

95

20

00

20

05

20

10

Th

ou

sa

nd

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

A) Total Shallow Gas Production

Ribstone Creek+Belly River+Bearpaw

Milk River

Medicine Hat

Belle Fourche

Commingled Milk River-Medicine Hat-Belle Fourche

Viking

Mannville

Year

Total Shallow Gas Production: 204.4 x 109 m3

Page 17: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 17 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

Figure 11 – The conventional associated-gas production trends to end of December 2011 in Saskatchewan. Note the wide range of vertical scales used on the graphs. A) The total conventional associated-gas production trend for the top six associated gas-producing plays; B) the associated-gas production and well-count trends for the Bakken play; C) the associated-gas production and well-count trends for the Roseray play; D) the associated-gas production and well-count trends for the Frobisher play; not including commingled production; E) the associated-gas production and well-count trends for the Frobisher-Alida play, when the production cannot be separated from each formation; and F) the associated-gas production and well-count trends for the Midale play. The recovery volume of injected CO2 in the Weyburn Midale Pool is deducted from gas production, but the impact of injected CO2 in the Midale Central Midale Pool (a pool to the east of the Weyburn Midale Pool also undergoing CO2 injection) is not determined currently.

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

0

100 000

200 000

300 000

400 000

500 000

600 000

700 000

1951

1954

1957

1960

1963

1966

1969

1972

1975

1978

1981

1984

1987

1990

1993

1996

1999

2002

2005

2008

2011

Th

ou

sa

nd

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

B) Bakken Gas Production and Well Count

Associated Gas Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1951Cumulative Gas Production: 9.8 x 109 m3

Year

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

2,200

0

20 000

40 000

60 000

80 000

100 000

120 000

140 000

160 000

1954

1957

1960

1963

1966

1969

1972

1975

1978

1981

1984

1987

1990

1993

1996

1999

2002

2005

2008

2011

Th

ou

sa

nd

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

D) Frobisher Gas Production and Well Count

Associated Gas Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1954Cumulative Gas Production: 4.0 x109 m 3

Year

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0

50 000

100 000

150 000

200 000

250 000

300 000

350 000

400 000

450 000

1952

1955

1958

1961

1964

1967

1970

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

Th

ou

sa

nd

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

C) Roseray Gas Production and Well Count

Gas Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1952Cumulative Gas Production: 8.6 x 109 m3

Year

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

0

20 000

40 000

60 000

80 000

100 000

120 000

140 000

160 000

180 000

200 000

1954

1957

1960

1963

1966

1969

1972

1975

1978

1981

1984

1987

1990

1993

1996

1999

2002

2005

2008

2011

Th

ou

sa

nd

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

E) Frobisher-Alida Gas Production and Well Count

Associated Gas Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1953Cumulative Gas Production: 6.0 x109 m 3

Year

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

0

100 000

200 000

300 000

400 000

500 000

600 000

700 000

800 000

900 000

1954

1957

1960

1963

1966

1969

1972

1975

1978

1981

1984

1987

1990

1993

1996

1999

2002

2005

2008

2011

Th

ou

sa

nd

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

F) Midale Gas Production and Well Count

Associated Gas Produced

Well Count

We

ll C

ou

nt

First Production Year: 1954Cumulative Gas Production: 14.0 x 109 m 3

Year

0

200 000

400 000

600 000

800 000

1 000 000

1 200 000

1 400 000

1952

1955

1958

1961

1964

1967

1970

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

Th

ou

sa

nd

Cu

bic

Me

tre

s

A) Major Associated Gas Production

Roseray

Upper Shauvanon

Midale

Frobisher

Frobisher-Alida

Bakken

First Production Year: 1952Cumulative Gas Production: 45.5 x 109 m3

Year

Page 18: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 18 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

4. Conclusions Mississippian Madison Group carbonates, and sandstones of Cretaceous Mannville and Viking, Jurassic Roseray and Upper Shaunavon plays, and Mississippian-Devonian Bakken in Saskatchewan have produced the largest volumes of oil to end of December 2011. The Upper Cretaceous Milk River, Medicine Hat, and Belle Fourche plays are the major unconventional shallow-gas producers; all are in southwestern Saskatchewan. The major oil producers are also the major associated-gas producers in Saskatchewan.

For most of the mature plays, hydrocarbon production and well count generally correlate well during the earlier stage of the production. Water flooding, infill-drilling, horizontal well drilling, and EOR technologies such as SAGD and CO2 miscible floods have had significant impacts on the production trends of mature plays. Appropriate application of these recovery technologies and other EOR methods will optimize recovery and prolong the life of hydrocarbon pools.

Most oil production in Saskatchewan has been from Madison Group (Mississippian) carbonates in southeastern Saskatchewan, cumulatively amounting to 365 x 106 m3 of medium and light oil or about 43% of oil production in the province. The Midale play alone has yielded about 190 million m3, about 23% of the total oil production from a total of 6,962 production wells.

Cretaceous sandstone reservoirs rank the second with a total oil production of 282 million m3 or 33% of oil production in the province from 35,298 production wells. The major oil producer from Cretaceous reservoirs is the Mannville plays in central west Saskatchewan, amounting to 249 million m3 of heavy oil from 25,646 production wells. The Sparky, Waseca, and Viking plays are highest producers with oil production of 70, 58, and 33 million m3 accounting for 8%, 7%, and 4%, respectively.

Led by the Roseray and Upper Shaunavon plays, the total Jurassic crude oil production in southwestern Saskatchewan has amounted to 135.7 million m3, about 16% of the overall production from Saskatchewan. It is interesting to note that Roseray and Upper Shaunavon production is from a total of only 1,316 and 1,883 producing wells, yielding the highest per-well average of 50.4 x 103 m3 and 30.3 x 103 m3, respectively.

Recent intensive horizontal drilling and multistage fracturing activities in southeastern Saskatchewan have resulted in light oil production booming from the Bakken (and Torquay) play which yielded a total production of 58 million m3 or 7% of total oil production.

Although a total of only 5 x 106 m3 of oil has been produced from the Devonian Winnipegosis, Birdbear and Duperow plays, the total well count of 302 is substantially lower than the other major plays. The recent application of horizontal technology on the Birdbear heavy oil reservoirs in west-central Saskatchewan has resulted in a sharp increase in average production from 38 m3/day in 2007 to 578 m3/day in 2011. This increase highlights the hydrocarbon potential of Devonian reservoirs in Saskatchewan.

The Red River play is the major Ordovician oil producer, having a total production of 4 x 106 m3 of oil and a per-well average of 20 x 103 m3, which rank 24th and ninth, respectively.

The Upper Cretaceous Belle Fourche, Medicine Hat, and Milk River formations are the major shallow-gas producers in Saskatchewan with a total production of 111 x 109 m3 or 43% of total gas production in the province. The Mannville and Viking produced both non-associated shallow gas from gas wells and associated gas from oil wells, amounting to 91.6 x 109 m3 of gas or 35% of gas production in the province.

The major Jurassic and Mississippian oil plays in Saskatchewan have produced a total of 50 x 109 m3 of associated gas during oil production, accounting for 20% of the total gas production in the province.

This statistical study cannot predict future drilling and production, but it does point out the production trends, effective recovery methods and the most prolific plays in Saskatchewan, which help highlight hotspots for future exploration.

5. Acknowledgments I am grateful to Petroleum and Natural Gas Division for providing the database which provided the raw data used in this contribution. My special thanks go to Fran Haidl and Melinda Yurkowski for editing this paper.

Page 19: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 19 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

6. References Bates, G. and Kendall, A. (2008): Understanding the origin of the sub-unconformity diagenetic caprock, in the

Mississippian of the Williston Basin, southeast Saskatchewan; CSPG Core Conference, Calgary, May 12 to 14, URL<http://www.cspg.org/documents/Conventions/Archives/Annual/2008/094.pdf>, accessed 11 Sept 2012.

Bates, G.L., Kendall, A.C., and Millar, I.L. (2007) Contemporaneous alteration of lower Watrous clastics and the sub-unconformity alteration zone in southeastern Saskatchewan: petrographic and geochemical evidence; in Summary of Investigations 2007, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2007-4.1, CD-ROM, Paper A-7, 10p.

Blair, M. and Bergman, K. (2002): Allostratigraphic analysis of the Middle Jurassic in southern Saskatchewan; CSPG abstract, Calgary, June 1 to 3, URL<http://www.cspg.org/documents/Conventions/Archives/Annual/ 2002/189S0124.PDF>, accessed 11Sept 2012.

Cen, X.C. and Salad Hersi, O. (2006): A revised lithostratigraphic framework and characteristics of the Upper Devonian Duperow Formation, southeastern Saskatchewan; in Summary of Investigations 2006, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2006-4.1, CD-ROM, Paper A-9, 17p.

Christopher, J.E. (1964): The Middle Jurassic Shaunavon Formation of Southwestern Saskatchewan; Sask. Dep. Miner. Resour., Rep. 95, 95p.

__________ (1974): The Upper Jurassic Vanguard and Lower Cretaceous Mannville Groups; Sask. Dep. Miner. Resour., Rep. 151, 349p.

__________ (2003): Jura-Cretaceous Success Formation and Lower Cretaceous Mannville Group of Saskatchewan; Sask. Industry Resources, Rep. 223, CD-ROM.

Dunn, C.E. (1975): The Upper Devonian Duperow Formation in Southern Saskatchewan; Sask. Dep. Miner. Resour., Sask. Geol. Surv., Rep. 179, 151p.

Edwards, D.E., Barclay, J.E., Gibson, D.W., Kvill, G.E., and Haltone, E. (1994) Triassic Strata of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin; in Mossop, G.D. and Shetson, I. (comps.), Geological Atlas of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, Can. Soc. Petrol. Geol./Alta. Resear. Counc., Calgary, URL <http://www.ags.gov. ab.ca/publications/wcsb_atlas/a_ch16/ch_16.html>, accessed 14 Sept 2012.

Fu, Q., Qing, H., and Bergman, K. (2006): Paleokarst in Middle Devonian Winnipegosis mud mounds, subsurface of south-central Saskatchewan, Canada; Bull. Can. Petrol. Geol., v54, p22-36.

Fuzesy, L.M. (1983): Correlation and Subcrops of the Mississippian Strata in Southeastern and South-Central, Saskatchewan; Sask Energy Mines, Rep. 51, 63p.

Gilboy, C.F. (1987): Aspects of the regional geological framework of the low-permeability shallow-gas reservoirs in Upper Cretaceous strata (Colorado and Montana groups), southwestern Saskatchewan; in Summary of Investigations 1987, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Misc. Rep. 87-4, p199-213.

________ (1988): Geology and natural gas production of the Upper Cretaceous Second White-Speckled Shale, southwestern Saskatchewan; in Summary of Investigations 1988, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Misc. Rep. 88-4, p183-195.

Grisak, W.I., Marsh, A., and Qing, H. (2011) Petrography of the Jurassic Lower Shaunavon Member reservoirs in the Leitchville/Bone Creek area of southwest Saskatchewan: preliminary results; in Summary of Investigations 2011, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Ministry and Resources, Misc. Rep. 2011-4.1, Paper A-4, 11p, URL <http://er.gov.sk.ca/adx/aspx/adxGetMedia.aspx?DocID=12166,12165,11458,11455,11228, 3385,5460,2936,Documents&MediaID=40547&Filename=A-4+Grisak+et+al.pdf>.

Haidl, F., Nimegeers, A., and Marsh, A. (2006): Stratigraphy and hydrocarbon potential of Silurian Interlake strata, southeastern Saskatchewan; in Gilboy, C.F. and Whittaker, S.G. (eds.), Saskatchewan and Northern Plains Oil & Gas Symposium 2006, Sask. Geol. Soc., Spec. Publ. No. 19, p74-91.

Halabura, S.P. (1982): Depositional environments of the Upper Devonian Birdbear formations, Saskatchewan; in Christopher, J.E. and Kaldi, J. (eds.), Fourth International Williston Basin Symposium, Sask. Geol. Soc., Spec. Publ. No. 6, p113-124.

Page 20: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 20 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

Jones, L. (1965): The Middle Devonian Winnipegosis Formation of Saskatchewan; Sask. Dep. Miner. Resour., Rep. 98, 101p.

Kendall, A.C. (1976): The Ordovician Carbonate Succession (Big Horn Group) of Southeastern Saskatchewan; Sask. Dep. Miner, Resour., Rep. 180, 185p.

Kendall, R. (2008) Microseismic monitoring of a multi-stage frac in the Bakken Formation, SE Saskatchewan. CSPG Abstract, Calgary, May 12 to 14, URL<http://www.cspg.org/documents/Conventions/Archives/ Annual/2008/279.pdf >, accessed 14 Sept 2012.

Kent, D.M. (1968): The Geology of the Upper Devonian Saskatchewan Group and Equivalent Rock in Western Saskatchewan and Adjacent Areas; Sask. Dep. Miner. Resour., Rep. 99, 224p.

_________ (1998): Diagenetically altered stromatoporoid banks; seals for dolomicrite reservoirs in Birdbear and Duperow rocks of southern Saskatchewan; in Kreis, L.K. (ed.), Eighth International Williston Basin Symposium, Sask. Geol. Soc., Core Workshop Vol. 8, p105-142.

_________ (2001): Mississippian Madison and Jurassic Gravelbourg low-gravity oil accumulations in southwestern Saskatchewan: examples of unconformity traps related to regional hydrodynamics, basement structure and local paleotopography; CSPG abstract, Calgary, June 18 to 22, URL<http://www.cspg.org/documents/Conventions/ Archives/Annual/2001/C-146.pdf>, accessed 14 Sept 2012.

__________ (2007): An enigmatic interval rich in sand-size quartz particles in the Mississippian of southeastern Saskatchewan: a possible solution to its origin based on sequence stratigraphic principles; in Summary of Investigations 2007, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2007-4.1, CD-ROM, Paper A-5, 16p.

Kent, D.M., Haidl, F.M., and MacEachern, J.A. (1988): Mississippian oil fields in the northern Williston Basin; in Goolsby, S. and Longman, N.W. (eds.), Occurrence and Petrophysical Properties of Carbonate Reservoirs in the Rocky Mountain Region, Rky. Mtn. Assoc. Geol., p381-417.

Kent, D.M. and Kreis, L.K. (2001): Mississippian Madison Formation low-gravity oilfields in southwestern Saskatchewan: examples of unconformity diagenesis controlling reservoir quality; in Summary of Investigations 2001, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Energy Mines, Misc. Rep. 2001-4.1, p46-55.

Kent, D.M., Thomas, P.L., and Heck, T. (2004): Geological mapping of Mississippian strata in southeastern Saskatchewan, northwestern North Dakota, and northeastern Montana (IEA Weyburn CO2 Monitoring and Storage Project); in Summary of Investigations 2004, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2004-4.1, CD-ROM, Paper A-7, 22p.

Kohlruss, D. and Nickel, E. (2009): Facies analysis of the Upper Devonian–Lower Mississippian Bakken Formation, southeastern Saskatchewan; in Summary of Investigations 2009, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Ministry of Energy and Resources, Misc. Rep. 2009-4.1, Paper A-6, 11p, URL <http://er.gov.sk.ca/adx/aspx/adxGetMedia.aspx?DocID=11859,11858,11458,11455,11228,3385,5460,2936,Documents&MediaID=36785&Filename=kohlruss_nickel.pdf>.

Kreis, L.K. (1991): Stratigraphy of the Jurassic System in the Wapella-Moosomin Area, Southeastern Saskatchewan; Sask. Energy Mines, Rep. 217, 90p.

__________ (2004): Geology of the Middle Ordovician Winnipeg Formation in Saskatchewan; Lower Paleozoic Map Series – Saskatchewan, Sask. Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2004-8, CD-ROM, Sheet 3 of 8.

Kreis, L.K., Costa, A.L., and Osadetz, K. (2006): Hydrocarbon potential of the Bakken and Torquay formations, southeastern Saskatchewan; in Gilboy, C.F. and Whittaker, S.G. (eds.), Saskatchewan and Northern Plains Oil & Gas Symposium 2006, Sask. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ. No. 19, p119-137.

Kreis, L.K. and Haidl, F.M. (2004): Geology of the Upper Ordovician Red River strata (Herald and Yeoman formations) in Saskatchewan; Lower Paleozoic Map Series – Saskatchewan, Sask. Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2004-8, CD-ROM, Sheet 7 of 8.

Kreis, L.K., Haidl, F.M., and Nimegeers, A.R. (2004): Geology of the Silurian Interlake Formation in Saskatchewan; Lower Paleozoic Map Series – Saskatchewan, Sask. Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2004-8, CD-ROM, Sheet 4 of 8.

Page 21: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 21 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

Labelle, D. (1997): Allostratigraphic analysis of the upper Jurassic (Callovian-Oxfordian) Roseray Formation southwestern Saskatchewan; unpubl. M.Sc. thesis, Univ. Regina, Regina, 119p.

Larson, B.W., Martindale, W., Nimegeers, A., and Haidl, F.M. (2003): Saskatchewan’s first Silurian oil producer: Nexen Bryant 7-4T-5-7W2; in Summary of Investigations 2003, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2003-4.1, CD-ROM, Paper A-4, 15p.

Marsh, A. and Jensen, G. (2010) Geology of the Jurassic Shaunavon Formation, southwestern Saskatchewan; GeoCanada 2010 Core Conference Abstract, May, 2010, Calgary, p103-110.

Marsh, A. and Heinemann, K (2005): Regional stratigraphic framework of western Saskatchewan – phase I, URL<http://ptrc.ca/+pub/document/WSP%20Final%20Report.pdf>, accessed 14 Sept 2012.

Marsh, A., Yang, C., and Kohlruss, D. (2011): Sub-Mesozoic unconformity subcrop map, west-central Saskatchewan; Sask. Ministry of Energy and Resources, Open File 2011-1, 1:350 000-scale map.

Martindale, W., Erkmen, U., Metcalfe, D., and Potts, E. (1991): Winnipegosis Buildups of the Hitchcock Area, southeastern Saskatchewan – a case study; in Christopher, J.E. and Haidl, F.M. (eds.), Sixth International Williston Basin Symposium, Sask. Geol. Soc., Spec. Publ. No. 11, p47-63.

Nichols, R.A.H. (1970): The Petrology and Economic Geology of the Upper Devonian Birdbear Formation in Southeastern Saskatchewan; Sask. Dep. Miner. Resour., Rep. 125, 93p.

Nickel, E. (2010): A review of Three Forks Group stratigraphy in southeastern Saskatchewan; in Summary of Investigations 2010, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Ministry of Energy and Resources, Misc. Rep. 2010-4.1, PaperA-5, 6p, URL <http://er.gov.sk.ca/adx/aspx/adxGetMedia.aspx?DocID=11859, 11858,11458,11455,11228,3385,5460,2936,Documents&MediaID=36785&Filename=kohlruss_nickel.pdf>.

Nickel, E. and Yang, C. (2011): Mississippian subcrop map and selected oil-production data, southeastern Saskatchewan; Sask. Ministry of Energy and Resources, Open File 2011-56, poster.

Nimegeers, A.R. and Haidl, F.M. (2004): Lower Paleozoic anhydrites in southeastern Saskatchewan: Townships 1 to 17, Ranges 1W2 to 24W2; in Summary of Investigations 2004, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2004-4.1, CD-ROM, Paper A-4, 18p.

Nimegeers, A.R., Kent, D., Marsh, A., and Nickel, E. (2006): Hydrocarbon trapping in Mississippian strata of southeastern Saskatchewan; in Gilboy, C.F. and Whittaker, S.G. (eds.), Saskatchewan and Northern Plains Oil & Gas Symposium 2006, Sask. Geol. Soc. Spec., Publ. No. 19, p165-172.

Paterson, D.F. (1971): The Stratigraphy of the Winnipeg Formation (Ordovician); Sask. Dep. Miner. Resour., Rep. 140, 57p.

Pedersen, P.K. (2004): Shallow gas research project in southwestern Saskatchewan: revised lithostratigraphy of the Colorado Group and reservoir architecture of the Belle Fourche and Second White Specks in the Senate Pool; in Summary of Investigations 2004, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2004-4.1, CD-ROM, Paper A-16, 15p.

Pemberton, S.G. and James, D.P. (1997): Petroleum Geology of the Cretaceous Mannville Group, Western Canada; CSPG Mem. 18, 486p.

Perras, G.L. (1990): Sedimentological and reservoir characteristics of the Frobisher-Alida beds, Lost Horde Hill Field, southeastern Saskatchewan; unpubl. M.Sc. thesis, Univ. Regina, Regina, 214p.

Potter, D. and St. Onge, A. (1991): Minton Pool, south-central Saskatchewan: a model for basement induced structural and stratigraphic relationships; in Christopher, J.E. and Haidl, F.M. (eds.), Sixth International Williston Basin Symposium, Sask. Geol. Soc., Spec. Publ., No. 11, p21-33.

Pu, R., Qing, H., Kent, D., and Urban, M. (2003): Pool characterization of Ordovician Midale field: implication for Red River play in northern Williston Basin, southern Saskatchewan, Canada; AAPG Bull., v87, p1699-1715.

Reinson, G.E., Warters, W.J., Cox, J., and Price, P.R. (1994) Cretaceous Viking Formation of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin; in Mossop, G.D. and Shetson, I. (comps.), Geological Atlas of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin; Can. Soc. Petrol. Geol./Alta. Resear. Counc., Calgary, URL<http://www.ags.gov.ab.ca/ publications/wcsb_atlas/a_ch21/ch_21.html>, accessed 14 Sept 2012.

Page 22: Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production Trends in … · 2019. 1. 8. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1 Hydrocarbon Play Ranking and Production

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 22 Summary of Investigations 2012, Volume 1

Saskatchewan Ministry of Energy and Resources (2007): The Ratner laminites: porous dolostone in an “inter-reef setting; Prospect Saskatchewan, Issue 5, URL<www.er.gov.sk.ca/prospectsask>, accessed 10 June 2012.

__________ (2010): Bakken revisited: facies analysis of North America’s most active oil play; Prospect Saskatchewan, Issue 6, URL<www.er.gov.sk.ca/prospectsask>, accessed 10 June 2012.

__________ (2011a): Saskatchewan Stratigraphic Correlation Chart; URL<http://www.ir.gov.sk.ca/stratchart>, accessed 17 July 2012.

__________ (2011b): Birdbear heavy oil: new potential in west-central Saskatchewan; Prospect Saskatchewan, Issue 7, URL<www.er.gov.sk.ca/prospectsask>, accessed 10 June 2012.

__________ (2012): Red River: drilling deeper for additional resources; Prospect Saskatchewan, Issue 8, URL<www.er.gov.sk.ca/prospectsask>, accessed 10 July 2012.

TGI Williston Basin Working Group (2008): Stratigraphic Map Series; Manitoba Science, Technology, Energy and Mines, Manitoba Geological Survey, Stratigraphic Map SM2008-MME-I, 1:1 000 000 scale, URL<www.WillistonTGI.com>, accessed 10 June 2012.

Walz, C. (2007): Sedimentologic, stratigraphic and diagenetic study of the Viking Formation, Bayhurst pool and surrounding areas, southwestern Saskatchewan, unpubl. M.Sc. thesis, Univ. Regina, Regina, 247p.

Whittaker, S. and Gilboy, C. (2003): IEA Weyburn CO2 monitoring and storage project: geoscience framework update; in Summary of Investigations 2003, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2003-4.1, CD-ROM, Paper A-7, 9p.

Yang, C. (2008): Hydrocarbon play ranking and production trends in southern Saskatchewan; in Summary of Investigations 2008, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Energy Resources, Misc. Rep. 2008-4.1, CD-ROM, Paper A-1, 21p.

Yang, C. and Kent, D. (2010) Preliminary study of the Birdbear reservoirs in west-central Saskatchewan; in Summary of Investigations 2010, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Ministry of Energy and Resources, Misc. Rep. 2010-4.1, CD-ROM, Paper A-6, 12p, URL <http://er.gov.sk.ca/adx/aspx/ adxGetMedia.aspx?DocID=11867,11866,11458,11455,11228,3385,5460,2936,Documents&MediaID=36831&Filename=A-6+Yang_Kent.pdf>.

Yurkowski, M. (2006): Shallow gas potential of Saskatchewan; Williston Basin Symposium, Minot, May 9, URL <https://www.dmr.nd.gov/ndgs/wbpc/pdf/2006%20talks/Melinda_Yurkowski.pdf>, accessed 14 September 2012.