1
Hydrology and Biogeochemistry of Three Alpine Proglacial Environments Resulting From Recent Glacier Retreat BRUCKNER, Monica Z.¹*, Skidmore, Mark L.¹, and Bond, Jeff² ¹Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, 59717, ²Yukon Geological Survey, Whitehorse, YT, Canada *[email protected] OVERVIEW AND SIGNIFICANCE SITE DESCRIPTION CARBON AND ION DYNAMICS AND BIOTA Beginning of discharge data LO ELS Air Temperature vs. Area-Normalized Discharge -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 20-Jun 30-Jun 10-Jul 20-Jul 30-Jul 9-Aug Date Air Temperature (ºC) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Beginning of discharge data (UWL) Lake Primary Productivity 0 1 2 3 4 20-Jun 30-Jun 10-Jul 20-Jul 30-Jul 9-Aug Date Primary Production (μg C L -1 d -1 ) Dissolved Organic Carbon 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 DOC (ppm) Bacterial Cell Count 0.0E+00 4.0E+03 8.0E+03 1.2E+04 Number of Cells (ml -1 ) HYDROLOGY AND WEATHER Calcium 0 100 200 300 Bicarbonate 0 40 80 120 160 1-Jul 6-Jul 11-Jul 16-Jul 21-Jul 26-Jul 31-Jul 5-Aug 10-Aug Date Concentration (μeq L -1 ) Sulfate 0 20 40 60 80 Nitrate 0 2 4 6 8 Climate-induced deglaciation is occurring worldwide - what is the consequence of this retreat in high alpine headwater catchments with regard to the formation of different proglacial environments? Headwater catchments are crucial to examining the effects of climate change and deglaciation as they are the first in a chain of variables that affect downstream chemistry and hydrology. High alpine environments, especially those in remote areas, are excellent indicators for climate change, as they are sensitive environments and few anthropogenic factors directly affect them. This study compares the hydrology, biology, and hydrochemistry for three adjacent and unique outlet streams draining a small glacier in a remote, high alpine catchment in south-central Yukon Territories, Canada. One stream flows directly from the glacier, a second stream has a longer flow path from its source with high degree of contact with the medial moraine, and a third stream drains a proglacial lake. The three proglacial environments have similar bedrock geology, weather, and source waters for the contributing areas, which provides an ideal environment for the comparison of hydrology, biology, and carbon and nutrient dynamics for these distinct headwater systems. [NO 3 - ] higher in ELS than LO and UWL for most of season, possibly due to microbial utilization in the lake (LO) and within snowpack (UWL). Ca 2+ and bicarbonate are the dominant ions in the catchment. [SO 4 2- ], [Ca 2+ ], & [bicarbonate] increase in UWL on 1 Aug. & 10 Aug., possibly due to increased supply of reactive sediments from medial moraine. I II III Three periods in the DOC record: I: DOC utilized until depletion II: DOC depleted III: Rebound in DOC Decline in lake productivity 24 June-10 July at 0.5-1.5 m depth possibly due to photoinhibition from high solar irradiance 1 . Bacterial cells increase in LO & decrease in ELS, potentially indicating a viable and growing population of biota in the lake. SUMMARY Concentration (μeq L -1 ) Concentration (μeq L -1 ) Concentration (μeq L -1 ) WATER TEMPERATURE The presence of a lake in the catchment results in water storage which increases meltwater temperatures by 0.5-1°C, which may promote biotic growth within lake and LO; increasing bacterial biomass in LO and lower [NO 3 - ] than the ELS potentially indicate a viable microbial community forming in the lake as the field season progresses. The UWL has greater access to & thus transports medial morainal sediments leading to high [SSC] and greater sediment export, whereas a portion of SSC & POC are deposited in the lake before being exported via the LO. Primary productivity rates in the young Wheaton proglacial lake are consistent with those in an older oligotrophic high Arctic lake in Svalbard 2 and 15 sub-Arctic lakes in northern Sweden 3 . References Cited: 1 Vinebrooke, R.D., Leavi�, P.R. (1996) Effects of ultraviolet radiation on periphyton in an alpine lake. Limnology and Oceanography: v. 41, pp. 1035-1040. 2 Laybourn-Parry, J. and Marshall, W.A. (2003) Photosynthesis, mixotrophy, and microbial plankton dynamics in two high Arctic lakes during summer. Polar Biology: v. 26, pp. 517-524. 3 Karlsson, J., Honsson, A., and Jansson, M. (2005) Productivity of high-latitude lakes: climate effect inferred from altitude gradient. Global Change Biology: v. 11, pp. 710-715. Acknowledgements: Research funding provided by Yukon Geological Survey, Montana State University, VP Research, and American Alpine Club. Thanks to Galena Ackerman, Sco� Montross, & Shawn McGlynn from Montana State University and Jeff Bond, Carrie Labonte, Amber Church, and Erin from the Yukon Geological Survey, for all their help in making this project a success. Thanks also to Dr. Julia Foght, Dr. Martin Sharp, & Joel Barker from University of Alberta for advise, laboratory time, and equipment loan. Thank you to USGS Boulder Carbon laboratory for laboratory space, time and equipment. Thanks to Al VonFinster, Yukon Fisheries, for the boat loan, and to Karl Birkeland, USFS, for datalogger & temperature sensor loan. Thanks also to Delmar (helicopter pilot) for his humor and field transportation. Air temperature (ºC) ELS discharge (m 3 s -1 ) LO discharge (m 3 s -1 ) UWL stream discharge (m 3 s -1 ) Snow-ice transition Major precipitation event Overcast day(s) Clear day(s) L1: Lake surface ; L2: 1.5 m Lake depth ; L3: 5.0 m Lake depth ; LO: Lake Outlet ; ELS: East Lobe Stream ; UWL: Upper West Lobe Stream Photo 4: Snow (a) to ice (b) transition on lower lake lobe results in a decrease in albedo on the ice surface. Photo 2: The east lobe terminates directly into the ELS proglacial stream. Photo 1: (A) Sept. 1995 aerial photo of the Wheaton Glacier catchment with drainage areas delineated & streams outlined. Stream gauging stations (dots) for the (B) East Lobe Stream (ELS), (C) Upper West Lobe (UWL), & (D) Lake Outlet (LO) are shown. The air temperature monitoring station (E) was set up ~10 m N of the LO gauging station. Rebar pole height is ~1.5 m (B, C, D, E). Air temperature affects discharge with 0-3 hr. lag time; lag may be affected by albedo. UWL discharge is more flashy than ELS and LO discharge. Mean water temperatures were: 1.4°C, σ = 0.6 in the LO, 0.3°C, σ = 0.2 in the ELS, and 0.4°C, σ = 0.3 in the UWL. LO water temperature fluctuates the most, possibly due to 2 inputs: Meltwater flowing in direct current from glacier to LO Meltwater that has been warmed in lake prior to exiting via LO. Water Temperature 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 20-Jun 30-Jun 10-Jul 20-Jul 30-Jul 9-Aug Date Temperature (°C) LO ELS UWL SUSPENDED SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION Suspended Sediment 0 20 40 60 80 100 1-Jul 6-Jul 11-Jul 16-Jul 21-Jul 26-Jul 31-Jul 5-Aug 10-Aug Date Sediment (mg L -1 ) (Lake, LO, and ELS) 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 Sediment (mg L -1 ) (UWL) L1 L2 L3 LO ELS UWL [Suspended sediment] (SSC) in UWL is an order of magnitude higher than the LO and ELS. Some suspended sediment is deposited in the lake before being exported via the LO stream. SSC is not directly related to discharge in the ELS, LO, or UWL. Discharge (m 3 s -1 km -2 ) Strong Winds Photo 3: The west lobe terminates into a proglacial lake, which is drained via the LO stream. a) Lake lobe, 19 July b) Lake lobe, 29 July x B C D E Stream Confluence LO Camp UWL ELS Lake 230 m N A Whitehorse Study Site UWL Drainage Area 1.3 km 2 (0.8 km 2 glacier ice) ELS Drainage Area 1.9 km 2 (1.1 km 2 glacier ice) LO Drainage Area 0.6 km 2 (0.4 km 2 glacier ice) GC41A-0099 Particulate Organic Carbon 0 20 40 60 80 POC (mg L -1 )

Hydrology and Biogeochemistry of Three Alpine Proglacial ... · UWL SUSPENDED SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION Suspended Sediment 0 20 40 60 80 100 l l g g Date Sediment (mg L-1) (Lake, LO,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Hydrology and Biogeochemistry of Three Alpine Proglacial ... · UWL SUSPENDED SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION Suspended Sediment 0 20 40 60 80 100 l l g g Date Sediment (mg L-1) (Lake, LO,

Hydrology and Biogeochemistry of Three Alpine Proglacial Environments Resulting From Recent Glacier Retreat BRUCKNER, Monica Z.¹*, Skidmore, Mark L.¹, and Bond, Jeff²

¹Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, 59717, ²Yukon Geological Survey, Whitehorse, YT, Canada *[email protected]

OVERVIEW AND SIGNIFICANCE

SITE DESCRIPTION

CARBON AND ION DYNAMICS AND BIOTA

Beginning ofdischarge data

LO

ELS

Air Temperature vs. Area-Normalized Discharge

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

20-J

un

30-J

un

10-J

ul

20-J

ul

30-J

ul

9-A

ug

Date

Air

Tem

pera

ture

(ºC

)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Beginning ofdischarge data (UWL)

Lake Primary Productivity

0

1

2

3

4

20-J

un

30-J

un

10-J

ul

20-J

ul

30-J

ul

9-Au

g

Date

Prim

ary

Prod

uctio

n (μ

g C

L-1d-1

)

Dissolved Organic Carbon

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

DOC

(ppm

)

Bacterial Cell Count

0.0E+00

4.0E+03

8.0E+03

1.2E+04

Num

ber o

f Cel

ls (m

l-1)

HYDROLOGY AND WEATHER

Calcium

0

100

200

300

Bicarbonate

0

40

80

120

160

1-Ju

l

6-Ju

l

11-J

ul

16-J

ul

21-J

ul

26-J

ul

31-J

ul

5-Au

g

10-A

ug

Date

Conc

entra

tion

(μeq

L-1)

Sulfate

0

20

40

60

80

Nitrate

0

2

4

6

8Climate-induced deglaciation is occurring worldwide - what is the consequence of this retreat in high alpine headwater catchments with regard to the formation of different proglacial environments?

Headwater catchments are crucial to examining the effects of climate change and deglaciation as they are the first in a chain of variables that affect downstream chemistry and hydrology.

High alpine environments, especially those in remote areas, are excellent indicators for climate change, as they are sensitive environments and few anthropogenic factors directly affect them.

This study compares the hydrology, biology, and hydrochemistry for three adjacentand unique outlet streams draining a small glacier in a remote, high alpine catchment in south-central Yukon Territories, Canada. One stream flows directly from the glacier,a second stream has a longer flow path from its source with high degree of contact with the medial moraine, and a third stream drains a proglacial lake.

The three proglacial environments have similar bedrock geology, weather, and sourcewaters for the contributing areas, which provides an ideal environment for the comparison of hydrology, biology, and carbon and nutrient dynamics for these distinct headwater systems.

[NO3-] higher in ELS than LO and UWL for

most of season, possibly due to microbial utilization in the lake (LO) and withinsnowpack (UWL).

Ca2+ and bicarbonate are the dominant ionsin the catchment.

[SO42-], [Ca2+], & [bicarbonate] increase in

UWL on 1 Aug. & 10 Aug., possibly due to increased supply of reactive sediments from medial moraine.

I II III

Three periods in the DOC record: I: DOC utilized until depletion II: DOC depleted III: Rebound in DOC

Decline in lake productivity 24 June-10 July at 0.5-1.5 m depth possibly due to photoinhibition from high solar irradiance1.

Bacterial cells increase in LO & decrease in ELS, potentially indicating a viable and growing population of biota in the lake.

SUMMARY

Conc

entra

tion

(μeq

L-1)

Conc

entra

tion

(μeq

L-1)

Conc

entra

tion

(μeq

L-1)

WATER TEMPERATURE

The presence of a lake in the catchment results in water storage which increases meltwater temperatures by 0.5-1°C, which may promote biotic growth within lake and LO; increasing bacterial biomass in LO and lower [NO3

-] than the ELS potentially indicate a viable microbial community forming in the lake as the field season progresses.

The UWL has greater access to & thus transports medial morainal sediments leading to high [SSC]and greater sediment export, whereas a portion of SSC & POC are deposited in the lake before beingexported via the LO.

Primary productivity rates in the young Wheaton proglacial lake are consistent with those in an older oligotrophic high Arctic lake in Svalbard2 and 15 sub-Arctic lakes in northern Sweden3.

References Cited: 1Vinebrooke, R.D., Leavi�, P.R. (1996) Effects of ultraviolet radiation on periphyton in an alpine lake. Limnology and Oceanography: v. 41, pp. 1035-1040.2Laybourn-Parry, J. and Marshall, W.A. (2003) Photosynthesis, mixotrophy, and microbial plankton dynamics in two high Arctic lakes during summer. Polar Biology: v. 26, pp. 517-524. 3Karlsson, J., Honsson, A., and Jansson, M. (2005) Productivity of high-latitude lakes: climate effect inferred from altitude gradient. Global Change Biology: v. 11, pp. 710-715.

Acknowledgements: Research funding provided by Yukon Geological Survey, Montana State University, VP Research, and American Alpine Club. Thanks to Galena Ackerman, Sco� Montross, & Shawn McGlynn from Montana State University and Jeff Bond, Carrie Labonte, Amber Church, and Erin from the Yukon Geological Survey, for all their help in making this project a success. Thanks also to Dr. Julia Foght, Dr. Martin Sharp, & Joel Barker from University of Alberta for advise, laboratory time, and equipment loan. Thank you to USGS Boulder Carbon laboratory for laboratory space, time and equipment. Thanks to Al VonFinster, Yukon Fisheries, for the boat loan, and to Karl Birkeland, USFS, for datalogger & temperature sensor loan. Thanks also to Delmar (helicopter pilot) for his humor and field transportation.

Air temperature (ºC)ELS discharge (m3 s-1)LO discharge (m3 s-1)UWL stream discharge (m3 s-1)Snow-ice transitionMajor precipitation eventOvercast day(s)Clear day(s)

L1: Lake surface ; L2: 1.5 m Lake depth ; L3: 5.0 m Lake depth ; LO: Lake Outlet ; ELS: East Lobe Stream ; UWL: Upper West Lobe Stream

Photo 4: Snow (a) to ice (b) transition on lower lake lobe results in a decrease in albedo on the ice surface.

Photo 2: The east lobeterminates directly intothe ELS proglacial stream.

Photo 1: (A) Sept. 1995 aerial photo of the Wheaton Glacier catchment with drainage areas delineated & streams outlined. Stream gauging stations (dots) for the (B) East Lobe Stream (ELS), (C) Upper West Lobe (UWL), & (D) Lake Outlet (LO) are shown. The air temperature monitoring station (E) was set up ~10 m N of the LO gauging station. Rebar pole height is ~1.5 m(B, C, D, E).

Air temperature affects discharge with 0-3 hr. lag time; lag may be affected by albedo.

UWL discharge is more flashy than ELS and LO discharge.

Mean water temperatures were: 1.4°C, σ = 0.6 in the LO, 0.3°C, σ = 0.2 in the ELS, and 0.4°C, σ = 0.3 in the UWL.

LO water temperature fluctuates the most, possibly due to 2 inputs: Meltwater flowing in direct current from glacier to LO Meltwater that has been warmed in lake prior to exiting via LO.

Water Temperature

0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

20-J

un

30-J

un

10-J

ul

20-J

ul

30-J

ul

9-A

ug

Date

Tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

LOELSUWL

SUSPENDED SEDIMENT CONCENTRATIONSuspended Sediment

0

20

40

60

80

100

1-Ju

l

6-Ju

l

11-J

ul

16-J

ul

21-J

ul

26-J

ul

31-J

ul

5-A

ug

10-A

ug

Date

Sedi

men

t (m

g L-1

) (La

ke, L

O, a

nd E

LS)

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

Sedi

men

t (m

g L-1

) (U

WL)

L1L2L3LOELSUWL

[Suspended sediment] (SSC) in UWLis an order of magnitudehigher than the LO and ELS.

Some suspended sediment is deposited in the lake before beingexported via the LO stream.

SSC is not directly related todischarge in the ELS, LO, or UWL.

• •

Dis

char

ge (m

3 s-1km

-2)

Strong Winds

Photo 3: The west lobe terminates into a proglacial lake, which is drained via the LO stream.

••

a) Lake lobe, 19 July

b) Lake lobe, 29 July

•xx

B C D E

Stream Confluence

LO

Camp UWL

ELS

Lake

230 m N

A

WhitehorseStudy Site

UWL Drainage Area1.3 km2

(0.8 km2 glacier ice)

ELS Drainage Area1.9 km2

(1.1 km2 glacier ice)

LO Drainage Area

0.6 km2

(0.4 km2 glacier ice)

••

GC41A-0099

Particulate Organic Carbon

0

20

40

60

80

POC

(mg

L-1)