Hypersensitive Dentin pdates edition€¦ · a thin, poorly calcified (or absent) smear layer. This smear layer is composed of a deposit of salivary proteins, debris from dentifrices,

Author ProfilesCatherine D. Saylor BSDH, MS, earned her Bachelor’s Degree in Dental Hygiene and MS degree in Dental Hygiene Education from UMKC – School of Dentistry. Ms. Saylor is a clinical assistant professor at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Dentistry in the Department of Periodontics. She is a member of the American Dental Hygienists’ Association, Sigma Phi Alpha, and the American Dental Education Association.

Pamela R. Overman BSDH, MS, EdD, earned her Bachelor’s Degree in Dental Hygiene from UMKC – School of Dentistry, an MS Degree from UMKC School of Graduate Studies, and a doctoral degree in educational policy and leadership at the University of Kansas. Dr. Overman is a Professor and the Associate Dean of Academic Affairs at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Dentistry. She is a member of the American Dental Hygien-ists’ Association, Sigma Phi Alpha, and the American Dental Education Association.

Author DisclosuresCatherine D. Saylor and Pamela R. Overman have no commercial ties with the sponsors or the providers of the unrestricted educational grant for this course.

Educational Objectives:Upon completion of this educational activity the participant will be able to:1. List and describe the anatomical

features of dentin that predispose it to dentinal hypersensitivity;

2. List and describe the etiological factors in dentinal hypersensitivity;

3. List and describe the prevalence and most common sites for dentinal hypersensitivity;

4. List and describe the home and in-office options for the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity.

Publication date: Feb. 2011Review Date: May 2014, June 2017Expiration date: May 2020

AbstractDentinal hypersensitivity is characterized by a short, sharp pain in response to stimuli. Dentinal hypersensitiv-ity, which is more commonly seen in adults in the 20-40 year old age group, has several etiological factors. Gingival recession and enamel loss both contribute to the prevalence of this condition, resulting in the exposure of dentin. Dentinal hypersensitivity is believed to occur due to the movement of fluid within the dentinal tubules occuring in response to thermal, chemical, tactile and evaporative stimuli, in accordance with Brännström’s Hydrodynamic Theory. Treatment options include in-office procedures and home use products that are aimed at occluding the dentinal tubules or preventing neural transmission, thereby blocking the pain response.

Supplement to PennWell Publications

Go Green, Go Online to take your course

This educational activity was made possible through an unrestricted educational grant by Dentsply. This course was written for dentists, dental hygienists and assistants, from novice to skilled. Educational Methods: This course is a self-instructional journal and web activity. Provider Disclosure: PennWell does not have a leadership position or a commercial interest in any products or services discussed or shared in this educational activity nor with the commercial supporter. No manufacturer or third party has had any input into the development of course content.Requirements for Successful Completion: To obtain 3 CE credits for this educational activity you must pay the required fee, review the material, complete the course evaluation and obtain a score of at least 70%.CE Planner Disclosure: Heather Hodges, CE Coordinator does not have a leadership or commercial interest with products or services discussed in this educational activity. Heather can be reached at [email protected] Disclaimer: Completing a single continuing education course does not provide enough information to result in the participant being an expert in the field related to the course topic. It is a combination of many educational courses and clinical experience that allows the participant to develop skills and expertise.Image Authenticity Statement: The images in this educational activity have not been altered.Scientific Integrity Statement: Information shared in this CE course is developed from clinical research and represents the most current information available from evidence based dentistry. Known Benefits and Limitations of the Data: The information presented in this educational activity is derived from the data and information contained in reference section. The research data is extensive and provides direct benefit to the patient and improvements in oral health. Registration: The cost of this CE course is $59.00 for 3 CE credits. Cancellation/Refund Policy: Any participant who is not 100% satisfied with this course can request a full refund by contacting PennWell in writing.

PennWell designates this activity for 3 continuing educational credits.

Dental Board of California: Provider 4527, course registration number CA# 03-4527-15163“This course meets the Dental Board of California’s requirements for 3 units of continuing education.”

The PennWell Corporation is designated as an Approved PACE Program Provider by the Academy of General Dentistry. The formal continuing dental education programs of this program provider are accepted by the AGD for Fellowship, Mastership and membership maintenance credit. Approval does not imply acceptance by a state or provincial board of dentistry or AGD endorsement. The current term of approval extends from (11/1/2015) to (10/31/2019) Provider ID# 320452.

INSTANT EXAM CODE 15163

Earn

3 CE creditsThis course was

written for dentists, dental hygienists,

and assistants.

Hypersensitive Dentin Updates (2nd edition)A Peer-Reviewed Publication Written by Catherine D. Saylor BSDH, MS and Pamela R. Overman BSDH, MS, EdD Recertified by Ian Shuman, DDS, MAGD, AFAAID

2 www.DentalAcademyOfCE.com

Educational ObjectivesUpon completion of this educational activity, the participant will be able to:1. List and describe the anatomical features of dentin that

predispose it to dentinal hypersensitivity;2. List and describe the etiological factors in dentinal hypersen-

sitivity;3. List and describe the prevalence and most common sites for

dentinal hypersensitivity;4. List and describe the home and in-office options for the

treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity.

AbstractDentinal hypersensitivity is characterized by a short, sharp pain in response to stimuli. Dentinal hypersensitivity, which is more commonly seen in adults in the 20- to 40-year-old age group, has several etiological factors. Gingival recession and enamel loss both contribute to the prevalence of this condition, resulting in the ex-posure of dentin. Dentinal hypersensitivity is believed to occur due to the movement of fluid within the dentinal tubules occurring in response to thermal, chemical, tactile, and evaporative stimuli, in accordance with Brännström’s hydrodynamic theory. Treatment options include in-office procedures and home-use products that are aimed at occluding the dentinal tubules or preventing neural transmission, thereby blocking the pain response.

IntroductionDentinal hypersensitivity can be a challenging condition for patients to describe and dental professionals to accurately diag-nose. It consists of short, sharp pain that occurs when a stimu-lus reaches exposed dentin. This stimulus is most commonly thermal (hot and/or cold), but can also be tactile, chemical, or evaporative. Typically, no other pathology can be found for the pain associated with dentinal hypersensitivity.1,2,3,4 Patients may or may not report this painful and often chronic condition to their dentist or dental hygienist, and when they do, they re-port experiencing short, sharp pain after a variety of stimuli.4,5 A definitive diagnosis of dentinal hypersensitivity can be chal-lenging, and practitioners must rule out other problems, such as caries, fractured or cracked teeth, defective restorations, oc-clusal trauma, or gingival conditions that could be the underly-ing cause of the dental pain a patient experiences.6,7

Dentin consists of an organic component containing colla-gen fibers in a matrix of collagenous proteins and an inorganic component containing hydroxyapatite crystals. Dentinal tu-bules run from the pulp to the outer dentinal surface and are easily identifiable on scanning electron microscopic images of cross-sections of dentin as either open or plugged dentinal tubules. The number of tubules varies and can be as many as 30,000 in a square millimeter of dentin. The dentinal tubules contain Tomes’ fibers, first described by Sir John Tomes in 1850, that extend into the dentinal tubules from the odonto-blasts that communicate with the pulp.8,9 Three types of nerve fibers (A-delta fibers, A-beta fibers, and C-fibers) are found

within the dentin. Hypersensitive dentin typically consists of large, numerous dentinal tubules open to the oral cavity and a thin, poorly calcified (or absent) smear layer. This smear layer is composed of a deposit of salivary proteins, debris from dentifrices, and other calcified matter that helps protect the ce-mentum and dentin.4 In normal dentin, the smear layer covers the openings of the dentinal tubules and reduces the risk that a stimulus for hypersensitivity reaches the dentinal tubules.4

Figure 1. SEM showing open dentinal tubules

Courtesy of Dr. Charles Cobb

Figure 2. Brännström’s Hydrodynamic Theory

Note the outward flow of fluid in response to stimuli, represented by the black arrows.

www.DentalAcademyOfCE.com 3

The mechanism by which the pain associated with den-tinal hypersensitivity is currently believed to occur is de-scribed by Brännström’s hydrodynamic theory. This theory states that stimuli (thermal, chemical, tactile, or evaporative) are transmitted to the pulp surface due to movement of fluid or semifluid within open dentinal tubules. Anatomically, the areas of the tubules closer to the pulp chamber are wider and the fluid movement away from the pulp activates the nerves associated with the odontoblasts at the end of the tubule, re-sulting in a pain response.10 The fluid movement stimulates the small, myelinated A-delta fibers, which then transmit to the brain and result in the sensation of well-localized, sharp pain that is associated with dentinal hypersensitivity.4,10

Etiology of dentinal hypersensitivity

Gingival recession and enamel lossGingival recession and enamel loss have multiple causes that result in cementum and/or dentin exposure. Exposed cementum due to gingival recession tends to be thin and thus easily abraded or eroded contributing to sensitivity.11

Gingival recession is more common as patients age.1 Some common causes of gingival recession include the anatomy of the labial plate of the alveolar bone, toothbrush abrasion, periodontal disease and surgery, poor oral hygiene, acute or chronic trauma, frenal attachments, and occlusal trauma.4

Gingival recession is more common as we age and has multiple etiologies that can

cause cementum and/or dentin to become exposed.

With respect to the anatomy of the labial plate, the alveolar bone may be thin, fenestrated, or even absent, and is a large fac-tor in causing recession. Tooth anatomy and tooth position may also affect the thickness of this labial plate of alveolar bone.4 Poor oral hygiene is another contributing factor for gingival recession. Plaque-induced gingivitis may progress to recession and attachment loss if inadequate plaque control continues. Toothbrushing techniques causing repeated gingival trauma can be a significant factor for gingival recession. The frequency, duration, and force of brushing all contribute to recession. Excessive force and improper technique may lead to gingival irritation that, over time, can also lead to recession.

Toothbrushing techniques causing repeated gingival trauma can be a significant

factor for gingival recession.

Figure 3. Localized gingival recession

Figure 4. Generalized attachment loss

Courtesy of Dr. Mabel Salas

Occlusal trauma and improper frenal attachments are two other factors that may contribute to recession and hy-persensitivity. A frenal pull that results in the tissue moving more toward the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) may result in recession. Occlusal trauma appears to be a risk factor for attachment loss in individuals with active periodontal disease since the occlusal forces may lead to further recession of the periodontally involved apparatus.12 Other less common causes of gingival recession include inadequate attached gingiva, periodontal surgery, aggressive scaling and root planing, excessive tooth cleaning and flossing, loss of gingival attachment due to specific pathologies, and loss of attachment during restorative procedures. These potential etiologies may lead to exposed root surfaces which are predisposed to den-tinal hypersensitivity.13,14 (Table 1)


Figure 5. Advanced frenal involvement


Table 1. Causes of gingival recession and attachment loss

Anatomy of the labial plate of the alveolar bone

Periodontal diseaseFrenum involvementToothbrush abrasionPoor oral hygieneInadequate attached gingivaPeriodontal surgeryIatrogenic loss during restorative proceduresAggressive scaling and root planingAcute or chronic traumaOcclusal trauma

Excessive oral hygiene

Figure 6. Advanced frenal involvement


Figure 7. Abrasion

Figure 8. Extensive loss of dentin, visible pulp chambers

Loss of enamel results in exposed dentin and therefore is associated with dentinal hypersensitivity. Attrition, abra-sion, erosion, and abfraction are conditions that affect tooth structure. (Table 2) Abrasion is the “loss of tooth structure by mechanical forces from a foreign element.”15 Once enamel is lost and/or recession is present, the exposed cementum and/or dentin are abraded, worn, and eroded more quickly than enamel due to their lower inorganic mineral content. Dentin abrades 25 times faster than enamel, and cementum abrades 35 times faster.4

Exposed cementum and/or dentin are readily abraded, compared to enamel.

Dentin abrades 25 times faster than enamel and cementum abrades

35 times faster.


Table 2. Risk factors for enamel loss

Abrasion

Attrition

Erosion

Abfraction

Erosion is the loss of tooth structure caused by acid based chemical dissolution of non-bacterial origin. It is one of the more common chronic conditions in children and adolescents and is common in adults of all ages. Only recently has this condition been recognized as a dental health problem.16,17,18 Erosion can be of intrinsic or extrinsic origin. Gastric acid regurgitation associated with medical conditions such as acid reflux disease and disorders such as bulimia results in intrinsic erosion. By far the most common causes of extrinsic erosion are dietary factors that contribute to a more acidic oral environment. Frequent consumption of carbonated, acidic drinks, fruit drinks, and fruit are the pri-mary causes. (Table 3) In general, the dissolution of enamel occurs at a pH below 5.0–5.7.19,20 Highly acidic foods and drinks remove enamel over time, exposing the dentin. They also have the ability to remove the smear layer, exposing dentinal tubules, thereby causing sensitivity and pain.20

Table 3. Common risk factors for erosion

Acid reflux disease

Bulimia

Frequent consumption of acidic drinks

Frequent consumption of acidic foods

Erosion may be a more important factor than abrasion in removing the smear layer or dentinal plugs, thereby causing dentinal hypersensitivity.21 In addition, once erosion has oc-curred, patients are more susceptible to subsequent abrasion, further exacerbating the loss of tooth structure and risk of den-tinal hypersensitivity.

Erosion may be a more important factor than abrasion in removing the smear layer

or dentinal plugs.

Prevalence of dentinal hypersensitivityDentinal hypersensitivity presents as early as the teen years and through old age, with higher incidences occurring in the 20- to 40-year-old age group. 22,23 There is a wide range in the reported prevalence of dentinal hypersensitivity, ranging from 4-98%, depending on the population group.

Hypersensitivity occurs most commonly in periodontal patients with a reported frequency of 60-98%, while 57% of the general population experiences hypersensitivity.20,24,25 The higher prevalence for this group of individuals may be attributed to root surface exposure from the periodontal dis-ease process and treatment. Between 9% and 23% of patients have reported root sensitivity before root planing, while after root planing approximately 55% of patients have re-ported experiencing dentinal hypersensitivity. This increase in sensitivity occurred for a one-to-three week period after the procedure and then gradually decreased over time.14,25 Over and above the removal of the superficial smear layer during scaling and root planing that can result in sensitiv-ity, aggressive scaling and root planing can remove layers of protective cementum and dentin, causing sensitivity.26,27 When cementum or dentin is exposed, these areas are more susceptible to caries, erosion, abrasion, and abfraction.28,29,30 Women are more prone to hypersensitivity, potentially due to a higher frequency of dental visits and more extensive oral hygiene than men.6,31

Hypersensitivity tends to be most prevalent on the buc-cal and cervical areas of the teeth.5,32,33 The most common sites are the cervical margins of the buccal and labial surfaces of teeth, with these sites accounting for 90% of sensitive sur-faces.34 These areas of normally thin enamel are a common site for recession. Canines and first premolars, followed by incisors, second premolars and molars are commonly affect-ed by recession. Patients with moderate to severe sensitivity tend to have gingival recession predominantly on one side of their mouth compared to the contralateral side.4

Ninety percent of sensitive surfaces are found at the cervical margins of the buccal and

labial surfaces of teeth.

DiagnosisA diagnosis of dentinal hypersensitivity can be a challenge for dental professionals since patients may not report it and it may not be obvious. A majority of patients do not deem it to be a severe oral health condition and may not seek treat-ment or even report this condition to their practitioner.35 Conversely, patients with exposed dentin may or may not experience sensitivity. Exposed dentin may also be present but inconspicuous. One study used scanning electron mi-croscopy (SEM) of dental impressions to study the micro-morphology of the bucco-cervical area of bicuspid teeth in dentally healthy young adults. Half the sites with gingival recession observed on the SEM were not evident clinically. The SEM also showed areas of gingival inflammation with root exposure and an absence of cementum without clinical evidence of abrasion.11


Patients with exposed dentin may or may not experience sensitivity.

Routine screening for this condition does not readily oc-cur and many other oral conditions may present with similar symptoms.4,26 Definitively excluding these oral conditions first will then lead to the diagnosis of dentinal hypersensi-tivity.36 Fractured teeth, dental caries, pulpal pathologies, or leaking, fractured, or failing restorations are conditions that present with similar signs and symptoms but require differ-ent treatment.4,5 Through the use of radiographs, conversa-tions with the patient, and a thorough clinical exam, the dental practitioner must first exclude these conditions and then establish a diagnosis of hypersensitivity. Clinical signs and symptoms include sensitivity or pain when a stimulus is applied (such as hot/cold/sweet/sour/touch), exposed dentin at the site of sensitivity, and in the absence of dental caries, fracture lines, or failing restorations.4,26 Reaching a diagnosis is a process of exclusion.

Patients may exhibit a variety of behaviors when receiv-ing dental care if they have experienced hypersensitivity over the years. They may have anxiety with a routine dental cleaning, and can be so anxious about pain that they avoid examinations and routine dental care in general.36,37 Dental professionals may need to provide patients with desensitiz-ers during treatment and postoperatively. Local anesthesia may be required for routine prophylaxis.22,36,38,39

Table 4. Differential diagnoses

Dental caries

Fractured teeth

Cracked teeth

Fractured restorations

Leaking restorations

Pulpal pathology

Management and treatment Educating the patient on the causes and management of den-tinal hypersensitivity is a primary goal for dental profession-als when creating a treatment plan for this condition. The first step is to identify the cause of the dentinal hypersensitivity. (Table 4) As listed above, there are multiple etiologies and once the main cause has been identified, education is the next step. (Table 5) This may entail behavior modifications, such as instructions on toothbrushing technique, using the correct type of bristled toothbrush, and avoid using excess toothpaste or repeated applications of toothpaste during brushing.27 Ed-ucation on the appropriate way to brush, floss, and use other interdental devices is necessary to avoid further loss of tooth structure and dentinal hypersensitivity. Other suggestions for

behavior modifications focus on dietary choices—avoiding carbonated beverages and acidic foods and drinks to reduce the risk of erosion, and avoiding excessively hot/cold bever-ages and food.

Table 5. Patient education

Causes of dentinal hypersensitivity

Instructions on toothbrushing technique and when to brush

Advice on toothbrush type—avoid medium and hard bristles

Advice on appropriate use of toothpaste

Advice on technique for interdental cleaning

Dietary advice

Hypersensitivity associated with tooth whitening

Patients should also be educated on when to brush, i.e., to avoid brushing immediately after ingesting acidic foods and drinks (or immediately after exposure to gastric acid). Instead, it is better to rinse with water and wait at least two to three hours before brushing.20 Patients may also need education on the effect of tooth whitening on the occurrence and severity of dentinal hypersensitivity. Tooth whitening can contribute to dentinal hypersensitivity by opening up the dentinal tubules during tooth whitening treatments. Patients who have sensitive teeth should have the sensitiv-ity addressed prior to tooth whitening and should also be given specific instructions regarding tooth whitening and the management of associated hypersensitivity.27

Patients should be educated to avoid brushing immediately after ingesting acidic foods and drinks.

Treatment optionsTreatment options for hypersensitivity include self-applied, at-home desensitizing agents and professional, in-office desensitizing procedures. These treatment options can be categorized into two groups by their modes of action.4,27,40,41 Agents used to occlude the dentinal tubules include oxalate compounds, strontium chloride, hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), and fluorides (including sil-ver diamine fluoride). Precipitates other than fluoride compounds that have been used to treat sensitivity include calcium phosphate compounds, calcium hydroxide, amorphous calcium phosphate, casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), and calcium sodium phosphosilicate. Recent approaches have focused on remineralizing tooth structure by increasing salivary calcium and phosphate levels as well an increasing the salivary pH, stimulating the formation of calcium phosphate or hydoxyapatite.42,43,44 Calcium phosphate compounds occlude the tubules by forming a calcium phosphate precipitate, while calcium hydroxide occludes the tubules and promotes peritubular dentin formation.45,46


Figure 9. Tubule occlusion

X X X X

Note the occlusion of the dentinal tubules, preventing the outward flow of fluid and subsequent stimulation of nerve fibers.

Products that interfere with the transmission of the nerve impulse work by raising the extracellular potassium ion con-centrations and affecting polarization. When this is sustained for a period of time, nerve excitation is reduced and the nerve becomes less sensitive to the stimuli. Potassium nitrate is the most common agent used for this method.

Figure 10. Blocking neural transmission

Note the outward flow of fluid is still present in response to a stimu-lus; however, neural transmission in response to this is prevented by the presence of extracellular potassium.

In-office treatments for tubule occlusionProfessional treatments include varnishes and precipitates, primers containing glutaraldehyde and hydroxyethylmethacry-late (HEMA), and polymerizing agents.4,48 In severe cases where there is a loss of cervical tooth structure, restorations such as composite resin-based materials or restorations with glass iono-mer may be used and have been reported to effectively reduce dentinal hypersensitivity.4,47,48,49,50 There are several direct appli-cation products that work by occluding and sealing the dentinal tubules. Glutaraldehyde/HEMA-based agents have been found to significantly relieve hypersensitivity immediately after treat-ment, and reduce dentin permeability.51,52,53 Oxalate-based treat-ment is also effective and found to reduce dentin permeability.54 A third option, 5% sodium fluoride varnish (with optional use of diode lasers), is applied topically to occlude the dentinal tubules. Initially, this forms a barrier over the exposed dentin, and once the varnish has been removed, relief from hypersensitivity is obtained by calcium fluoride deposits that occlude the dentinal tubules. This is effective for up to six months.40,55 Laser therapy is now also used for the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity.55 Severe cases may require the use of resin or glass ionomer res-torations for deeper abrasive lesions. Grafting may be necessary to treat some cases of gingival recession. The World Health Or-ganization recommends that mild dentinal hypersensitivity be managed by less complex treatments, i.e., use of at home desen-sitizers, and that in-office treatment (and follow-up home care) be provided for more severe, recalcitrant cases and for patients who have ongoing moderate dentinal hypersensitivity.20

Periodontal patients without sensitivity prior to treatment may experience hypersensitivity following treatment due to scal-ing and root planing or other periodontal procedures that result in exposure of open dentinal tubules.14,26 Prophylaxis can also result in hypersensitive dentin. In these situations, it is ideal if the patient can receive in-office treatment, especially those with localized hypersensitivity.

There are several in-office products available for treating hy-persensitivity. The amino acid, arginine, a bicarbonate pH buffer and a calcium source in the form of calcium carbonate can be ap-plied with a low-speed handpiece. The relief of hypersensitivity may last for up to four weeks when used as the final polishing step during a professional cleaning.39,56,57,58 A prophylaxis paste con-taining bioactive glass is available that is indicated for immediate desensitization. It is used to desensitize exposed dentin during prophylaxis or to prevent hypersensitivity associated with pro-phylaxis and the removal of the smear layer, or post-procedurally following scaling and root planing. This bioactive glass contains calcium sodium phosphosilicate, marketed under the name No-vaMin®, and has been investigated for hypersensitivity relief.59,60 Calcium sodium phosphosilicate (CSPS) is an inorganic, amor-phous melt-derived glass compound that contains only calcium, sodium, phosphate, and silica. This ingredient has been incorpo-rated into oral healthcare products for the alleviation of dentinal hypersensitivity for nearly 10 years and can be found in a range of products including dentifrice and prophylaxis paste.60.61


In recent studies, NovaMin® has been shown to rapidly release calcium, sodium, and phosphorous ions which form a hydroxy apatite-like layer that is similar in composition to the minerals found in teeth and bones. These particles have the ability to adhere to the dentin surface and continue re-leasing calcium and phosphate ions once they are deposited onto the tooth surface.62 The crystalline hydroxycarbonate apatite-like layer that is precipitated relieves hypersensitivity through occlusion of the dentinal tubules63 and is also resis-tant to acid challenges. A 2013 study64 evaluated the ability of NovaMin® to reduce dentin hypersensitivity immediately after a single application following scaling and root planing and 28 days post-application. In this study, 2 NovaMin® con-taining prophy pastes were used, one containing fluoride, one without fluoride. The control prophy paste contained neither NovaMin® nor fluoride. Following scaling and root planing both NovaMin® containing prophy pastes resulted in signifi-cantly better dentinal hypersensitivity reduction compared to the control immediately and 28 days post-application. Furthermore, there was no statistical difference between the NovaMin® containing pastes with and without fluoride, demonstrating that fluoride was not the primary agent re-sponsible for the reduction in hypersensitivity. Prophy paste with NovaMin® is indicated for polishing procedures before and after scaling and root planing. Given that prophylaxis is typically the last step in a scaling and root planing procedure, and a routine treatment at recall, incorporating the desensitiz-ing agent into the prophylaxis paste saves an extra step and makes relief of hypersensitivity a simultaneous event, while still ensuring that stain is removed.

Home-use treatmentsMild, generalized dentinal hypersensitivity can usually be managed well with at-home treatment.65 Home-use treat-ments for dentinal hypersensitivity fall into two categories defined by their mechanism of action. At-home treatments for sensitivity relief are cost effective, safe, noninvasive, and simple to use. These at-home treatments come in a variety of applications including dentifrices, gels, or rinses, and are incorporated into the daily oral home-care regimen.

Home-use treatments interfering with neural transmission The most popular agent in over-the-counter dentifrices that affect neural transmission is 5% potassium nitrate, the concentration recognized by the FDA for this ingredient. Potassium ions work by penetrating the length of the den-tinal tubule and block the repolarization of the myelinated A-fibers. This increase in extracellular potassium allows for a sufficient concentration to depolarize the nerve fibers and does not allow repolarization to occur. As a result, neu-ral transmission will not occur following exposure to the stimulus and the patient will have no sensation of sensitivity or pain.4,66,67,68 For these dentifrices to work, frequent and

regular application is needed. These dentifrices have dem-onstrated a significant reduction in hypersensitivity within a two-week time frame when used twice daily to maintain a high level of extracellular potassium.4,69 There are a number of dentifrices containing 5% potassium nitrate, as well as fluoride ions for protection against caries. Potassium nitrate has also been used in whitening trays to relieve hypersensi-tivity between whitening treatments.70

Home-use treatments for tubule occlusionHome-use, over-the-counter desensitizing agents that oc-clude the dentinal tubules are found in toothpastes, gels, and mouth rinses. One of the primary active ingredients used in this manner is fluoride. Stannous fluoride (0.4%) in particular has a long history of use for relief of dentinal hy-persensitivity,71 and is found in dentifrices and gels, as well as at other concentrations in mouth rinses. When fluoride is applied to exposed dentin, precipitates form, which block the dentinal tubules. Long-term relief requires continued use of the product. Stannous fluoride dentifrices have been shown to relieve dentinal hypersensitivity in clinical tri-als.72 It has been reported that other fluoride dentifrices effectively relieve dentinal hypersensitivity by occluding the dentinal tubules, including prescription level 5,000ppm sodium fluoride dentifrice. Calcium and phosphate precipi-tates formed following use of dentifrices containing calcium and phosphate technologies have also been found to relieve hypersensitivity, including CPP-ACP, ACP, and calcium sodium phosphosilicate. Studies have been conducted on dentifrice formulations containing 5% and 7.5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate.62 The research has indicated that using calcium sodium phosphosilicate delivered by brushing twice daily with a dentifrice has a beneficial effect, reducing the sensitivity caused by exposed cervical dentin surfaces.73

Both concentrations of calcium sodium phosphosilicate (5% and 7.5%) demonstrated effective relief, and the 7.5% con-centration was even more favorable for relief compared to the 5% concentration.73

Figure 11. Patient with hypersensitive dentin and root caries

Courtesy of Dr. Keerthana Satheesh


ConclusionDentinal hypersensitivity can be a challenging condition for dental practitioners to diagnose and treat effectively. With the advancement in dental products, options for providing relief from pain and sensitivity are great and vary according to the severity of the condition. Dental practitioners should be more aware and proactively ask patients about sensitivity. With practitioners being more proactive with this condition, patients may not need to experience the pain associated with hypersensitivity and can receive treatment that provides relief from pain.

References1. Splieth CH, Tachou A. Epidemiology of dentin

hypersensitivity. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2013;17(Suppl 1):3-8.

2. West NX, Lussi A, Seong J, Hellwig E. Dentin hypersensitivity: pain mechanisms and aetiology of exposed cervical dentin. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2013;17(Suppl 1):9-19.

3. Schmidlin PR, Sahrmann P. Current management of dentin hypersensitivity. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2013;17(Suppl 1):55-59.

4. Martens LC. A decision tree for the management of exposed cervical dentin (ECD) and dentin hypersensitivity (DHS). Clinical Oral Investigations. 2013;17(Suppl 1):77-83.

5. Davari A, Ataei E, Assarzadeh H. Dentin hypersensitivity: etiology, diagnosis and treatment; a literature review. Journal of Dentistry. 2013;14(3):136-145.

6. Gernhardt CR. How valid and applicable are current diagnostic criteria and assessment methods for dentin hypersensitivity? An overview. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17 Suppl 1:S31-40.

7. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Haywood VB, Collins MC, Drisko CL. Dentin hypersensitivity; Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. Inside Dentistry. 2008; 4(Special Issue):I-35.

8. Johnson DC. Innervation of the dentin, predentin and pulp. J Dent Res. 1985; 64(Spec Issue):555-63.

9. Available at: http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/tomes’%20fiber

10. Chung G, Jung SJ, Oh SB. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of dental nociception. J Dent Res. 2013 Nov;92(11):948-55.

11. Bevenius J, Lindskog S, Hultenby K. The micromorphology in vivo of the buccocervical region of premolar teeth in young adults: a replica study by scanning electron microscopy. Acta Odontol Scand. 1994;52:323-34.

12. Davies SJ, Gray RJM, Linden GJ, James JA. Occlusal considerations in periodontics. Br Dent J. 2001;191:597-607.

13. Canakci CF, Canakci V. Pain experience by patients undergoing different periodontal therapies. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138:1563-73.

14. Gillam DG. Current diagnosis of dentin hypersensitivity in the dental office: an overview. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17 Suppl 1:S21-9.

15. Summit’s Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach. 4th edition. Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc. 2013.

16. Deery C, Wagner ML, Longbottom C, Simon R, Nugent ZJ. The prevalence of dental erosion in a United States and a United Kingdom sample of adolescents. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22(6):505-10.

17. Ganss C, Klimek J, Giese K. Dental erosion in children and adolescents—a cross-sectional and longitudinal investigation using study models. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001;29(4):264-71.

18. Dugmore CR, Rock WP. A multifactorial analysis of factors associated with dental erosion. Brit Dent J. 2004; 196(5):283–6.

19. Mandel L. Dental erosion due to wine consumption. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(1):71-5. Available at: http://www.jada.info/cgi/content/full/136/1/71.

20. Orchardson R, Gillam DG. Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:990-8.

21. Addy M, Hunter ML. Can tooth brushing damage your health? Effects on oral and dental tissues. Int Dent J. 2003;53 Suppl 3:177-86.

22. Idle M. The differential diagnosis of sensitive teeth. Dent Update. 1998;25:462-6.

23. Ailor JE Jr. Managing incomplete tooth fractures. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131:1158-74.

24. Chabanski MB, Gillam DG, Bulman IS, Newman HN. Clinical evaluation of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist periodontology department: a pilot study. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:666-72.

25. Von Troil B, Needleman E, Sanz M. A systematic review of the prevalence of root sensitivity following periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29 (Suppl 3):173-7.

26. Canadian Advisory Board on Dentin Hypersensitivity. Consensus-based recommendation for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69:221-6.

27. Drisko CH. Dentine hypersensitivity—dental hygiene and periodontal considerations. Int Dent J. 2002;52:385-93.

28. Piotrowski BT, Gillette WB, Hancock EB. Examining the prevalence and characteristics of abfraction-like cervical lesions in a population of I.S. veterans. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132:1694-701.

29. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanderle G. Stress induced cervical lesions. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 67:718-22.


30. Smith GBN, Knight JK. A comparison of patterns of tooth wear with the etiologic factors. Br Dent J. 1984;157:16-9.

31. Brännström M. Dentin sensitivity and aspiration of odontoblasts. J Am Dent Assoc. 1963; 66:366-70.

32. Jensen AI. Hypersensitivity controlled by iontophoresis: double blind clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc. 1964; 68:216-5.

33. Graf HE, Galasse R. Morbidity, prevalence and intra-oral distribution of hypersensitive teeth. J Dent Res. 1997; 56(Suppl):162.

34. Yoshizaki KT, Francisconi-Dos-Rios LF, Sobral MA, Aranha AC, Mendes FM, Scaramucci T. Clinical features and factors associated with non-carious cervical lesions and dentin hypersensitivity. J Oral Rehabil. 2016 Dec 14.

35. Gillam DG, Seo HS, Bulman JS, Newman HN. Perceptions of dentine hypersensitivity in a general practice population. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26:710-4.

36. Panagakos F, Schiff T, Guignon A. Dentin hypersensitivity: Effective treatment with an in-office desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate. Am J Dent. 2009;22(Spec Issue):3A-7A.

37. Kumar PS, Leblebicioglu B. Pain control during nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2007;28:666-70.

38. Kleinberg I. Sensistat: a new saliva-based composition for simple and effective treatment of dentinal sensitivity pain. Dent Today. 2002;21:42-7.

39. Schiff T, Delgado E, Zhang YP, Cummins D, DeVizio W, Mateo LR. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of an in-office desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate in providing instant and lasting relief of dentin hypersensitivity. Am J Dent. 2009;22 (Spec Issue):8A-15A.

40. Petersson LG. The role of fluoride in the preventive management of dentin hypersensitivity and root caries. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17 Suppl 1:S63-71.

41. Al-Sabbagh M, Brown A, Thomas MV. In-office treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Dent Clin North Am. 2009; 53(1): 47-60.

42. LaTorre G, Greenspan DC. The role of ionic release from NovaMin® (calcium sodium phosphosilicate) in tubule occlusion: an exploratory in vitro study using radio-labeled isotopes. J Clin Dent. 2010; 21(Spec Iss):72-6.

43. Wefel JS. NovaMin: likely clinical success. Adv Dent Res. 2009; 21:83-6.

44. de Oliveira da Rosa WL, da Silva TM, Demarco FF, Piva E, da Silva AF. Could the application of bioactive molecules improve vital pulp therapy success? A systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016 Dec 20.

45. Gu H, Ling J, LeGeros JP, LeGeros RZ. Calcium

phosphate-based solutions promote dentin tubule occlusions less susceptible to acid dissolution. Am J Dent. 2011 Jun;24(3):169-75.

46. Geiger S, Matalon S, Blasbalg J, Tung M, Eichmiller FC. The clinical effect of amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) on root surface sensitivity. Oper Dent. 2003;28:496-500.

47. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Thomaidis S, Doukoudakis S. Clinical effectiveness of two agents on the treatment of tooth cervical hypersensitivity. Am J Dent. 2005; 18:291-5.

48. Freitas Sda S, Sousa LL, Moita Neto JM, Mendes RF, Prado RR. Dentin hypersensitivity treatment of non-carious cervical lesions—a single-blind, split-mouth study. Braz Oral Res. 2015;29:45.

49. Schmalz G, Hellwig F, Mausberg RF, Schneider H, Krause F, Haak R, Ziebolz D. Dentin protection of different desensitizing varnishes during stress simulation: an in vitro study. Oper Dent. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):E35-E43.

50. Pamir T, Dalgar H, Onal B. Clinical evaluation of three desensitizing agents in relieving dentin sensitivity. Oper Dent. 2007; 32:544-8.

51. Yu X, Liang B, Jin X, Fu B, Hannig M. Comparative in vivo study on the desensitizing efficacy of dentin desensitizers and one-bottle self-etching adhesives. Oper Dent. 2010 May-Jun;35(3):279-86.

52. Aranha AC, Pimenta LA, Marchi GM. Clinical evaluation of desensitizing treatments for cervical dentin hypersensitivity. Braz Oral Res. 2009 Jul-Sep;23(3):333-9.

53. Ishihata H, Kanehira M, Nagai T, Finger WJ, Shimauchi H, Komatsu M. Effect of desensitizing agents on dentin permeability. Am J Dent. 2009 Jun;22(3):143-6.

54. Corral C, Grez PV, Letelier M, Dos Campos EA, Dourado AL, Fernández GE. Effect of oxalic acid-based desensitizing agent on cervical restorations on hypersensitive teeth: a triple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2016 Fall;30(4):330-337.

55. Suri I, Singh P, Shakir QJ, Shetty A, Bapat R, Thakur R. A comparative evaluation to assess the efficacy of 5% sodium fluoride varnish and diode laser and their combined application in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016 May-Jun;20(3):307-14.

56. Kleinberg I. Sensistat: a new saliva-based composition for simple and effective treatment of dentinal sensitivity pain. Dent Today. 2002; 21:42-7.

57. Hamlin D, Phelan Williams E, Delgado E, et al. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate for the in-office relief of dentin hypersensitivity associated with


dental prophylaxis. Am J Dent. 2009; 22:16A-20A.58. Chen CL, Parolia A, Pau A, Celerino de Moraes Porto

IC. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of desensitizing agents in dentine tubule occlusion using scanning electron microscopy. Aust Dent J. 2015 Mar;60(1):65-72.

59. Kulal R, Jayanti I, Sambashivaiah S, Bilchodmath S. An in-vitro comparison of nano hydroxyapatite, NovaMin and Proargin desensitizing toothpastes - A SEM Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Oct;10(10):ZC51-ZC54.

60. Scott, R. NovaMin® Technology. J Clin Dent. 2010; 21(Spec Iss):59-60.

61. Greenspan, DC. NovaMin® and tooth sensitivity—an overview. J Clin Dent. 2010;21(Spec Iss):61-5.

62. Jennings DT, McKenzie KM, Greenspan DC, Clark AE. Quantitative analysis of tubule occlusion using NovaMin (sodium calcium phosphosilicate). J Dent Res. 2004; 83(Spec Iss A):2416.

63. Litkowski L et al. Pilot clinical and in vitro studies evaluating NovaMin® in desensitizing dentifrices. IADR. 1998;Abstract #747.

64. Neuhaus KW, Milleman JL, Milleman KR, Mongiello KA, Simonton TC, Clark CE, Proskin HM, Seemann R. Effectiveness of a calcium sodium phosphosilicate containing prophylaxis paste in reducing dentine hypersensitivity immediately and 4 weeks after a single application: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol 2013; .doi:10.1111/jcpe.12057.

65. Rajesh KS, Hedge S, Arun Kumar MS, Shetty DG. Evaluation of the efficacy of a 5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate (Novamin) containing dentifrice for the relief of dentinal hypersensitivity: a clinical study. Indian J Dent Res. 2012 May-Jun;23(3):363-7.

66. Markowitz K, Bilotto G, Kim S. Decreasing intradental nerve activity in the cat with potassium and divalent cations. Arch Oral Biol. 1991;36:1-7.

67. Peacock JM, Orchardson R. Effects of potassium ions on action potential conduction in A- and C-fibers of rat spinal nerves. J Dent Res. 1995;74:634-41.

68. Markowitz K, Kim S. The role of selected cations in the desensitization of intradental nerves Proc Fin Dent Soc. 1992; 88(Suppl 1):39-42.

69. Tavss EA, Fisher SW, Campbell S, Bonta Y, Darcy-Siegel J, et al. The scientific rationale and development of an optimized dentifrice for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. Am J Dent. 2004 Feb;17(1):61-70.

70. Haywood VB, Caughman WF, Frazier KB, Myers ML. Tray delivery of potassium nitrate-fluoride to reduce bleaching sensitivity. Quintessence Int. 2001;32(2):105-9.

71. Thrash WJ, Dodds MW, Jones DL. The effect of stannous fluoride on dentinal hypersensitivity. Int Dent J. 1994 Feb;44(1 Suppl 1):107-18.

72. Schiff T, He T, Sagel L, Baker R. Efficacy and safety of a novel stabilized stannous fluoride and sodium hexametaphosphate dentifrice for dentinal hypersensitivity. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 May 1;7(2):1-8.

73. Litkowski L, Greenspan DC. A clinical study of the effect of calcium sodium phosphosilicate on dentin hypersensitivity—proof of principle. J Clin Dent. 2010; 21(Spec Iss):77-81.

Author ProfilesCatherine D. Saylor, BSDH, MS, earned her bachelor’s degree in dental hygiene and MS degree in dental hygiene education from UMKC—School of Dentistry. Ms. Saylor is a clinical assistant professor at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Dentistry in the Department of

Periodontics. She is a member of the American Dental Hy-gienists’ Association, Sigma Phi Alpha, and the American Dental Education Association.

Pamela R. Overman, BSDH, MS, EdD, earned her bachelor’s degree in dental hy-giene from UMKC—School of Dentistry, an MS degree from UMKC School of Graduate Studies, and a doctoral degree in educational policy and leadership at the University of Kansas. Dr. Overman is a professor and

the associate dean of academic affairs at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Dentistry. She is a member of the American Dental Hygienists’ Association, Sigma Phi Alpha, and the American Dental Education Association.

Author DisclosuresCatherine D. Saylor and Pamela R. Overman have no commercial ties with the sponsors or the providers of the unre-stricted educational grant for this course.

Online CompletionUse this page to review the questions and answers. Return to www.DentalAcademyOfCE.com and sign in. If you have not previously purchased the program select it from the “Online Courses” listing and complete the online purchase. Once purchased the exam will be added to your Archives page where a Take Exam link will be provided. Click on the “Take Exam” link, complete all the program questions and submit your answers. An immediate grade report will be provided and upon receiving a passing grade your “Verification Form” will be provided immediately for viewing and/or printing. Verification Forms can be viewed and/or printed anytime in the future by returning to the site, sign in and return to your Archives Page.



Questions

1. Dentinal hypersensitivity:a. Consists of short, sharp pain in response to a stimulusb. May or may not be reportedc. Occurs when a stimulus reaches exposed dentind. All of the above

2. Dentin contains:a. Collagen fibersb. An inorganic componentc. Hydroxyapatite crystalsd. All of the above

3. Which of the following is the correct number of tubules there may be in a square millimeter of dentin?a. 10,000b. 20,000c. 30,000d. 40,000

4. Which of the following communicate with the pulp?a. Odontoblastsb. Tomes’ fibersc. Dentinal tubulesd. None of the above

5. Which of the following is a characteristic of hypersensitive dentin?a. Dentinal tubules open to the oral cavityb. Large and numerous dentinal tubulesc. A thin, poorly calcified (or absent) smear layerd. All of the above

6. The smear layer:a. Helps protect the cementum and dentinb. Covers the openings of the dentinal tubulesc. Reduces the risk that a stimulus for hypersensitivity

reaches the dentinal tubulesd. All of the above

7. The A-delta fibers:a. Are stimulated by fluid movement in the dentinal

tubules b. Transmit to the brainc. Are myelinatedd. All of the above

8. Which of the following is a common cause of gingival recession?a. Occlusal traumab. Frenum attachmentc. Periodontal diseased. All of the above

9. Gingival recession can be the result of the alveolar bone being:a. Fenestratedb. Thinc. Absentd. All of the above

10. Which of the following is a less common cause of gingival recession?a. Aggressive scaling and root planingb. Inadequate attached gingivac. Iatrogenic loss during restorative proceduresd. All of the above

11. Which of the following is one of the condi-tions that can result in enamel loss?a. Abrasionb. Attritionc. Erosiond. All of the above

12. Which of the following is correct regarding the rate of dentin and cementum abrasion respectively compared to enamel?a. 35 times; 25 timesb. 25 times; 45 times c. 25 times; 35 timesd. None of the above

13. Which of the following can result in erosion of intrinsic origin?a. Acid reflux diseaseb. Swimmingc. Bulimia d. a and c

14. Enamel demineralization occurs below a pH of:a. 3.0–3.7 b. 4.0–4.7c. 5.0–5.7d. 6.0–6.7

15. Higher incidence of dentinal hypersensitiv-ity occurs in which of the following age groups?a. 20- to 40-year-oldb. 30- to 40-year-oldc. 10- to 20-year-oldd. 40- to 60-year-old

16. Which of the following is correct regarding the prevalence of dentinal hypersensitivity cited in publications?a. Up to 78%b. Up to 88%c. Up to 98%d. None of the above

17. Which of the following is correct regarding the number of patient reports of dentinal hypersensitivity after scaling and root plan-ing compared to before?a. Fewerb. The same number of c. Mored. None of the above

18. Which of the following is correct regarding the most common sites for dentinal hypersensitivity on the buccal and labial surfaces of teeth?a. Incisal marginsb. Cervical marginsc. Midfaciald. a and b

19. Which of the following can present with signs and symptoms similar to those of dentinal hypersensitivity?a. Fractured teeth or restorationsb. Pulpal pathologiesc. Leaking or failing restorationsd. All of the above

20. Patients who have dentinal hypersensitivity may:a. Have anxiety with a routine dental cleaningb. Be so anxious about pain that they avoid examinations

and routine dental care in generalc. Request local anesthesia even for routine prophylaxisd. All of the above

21. Which of the following is a primary goal for dental professionals?

a. Educating the patient on the causes of dentinal hypersensitivity

b. Educating the patient on the management of dentinal hypersensitivity

c. Covering exposed dentin d. a and b

22. Behavior modification can include:a. Using proper oral hygiene techniquesb. Making sound dietary choicesc. Avoiding brushing after intake of acidic foods and

drinksd. All of the above

23. Strontium chloride:a. Prevents neural transmission of a stimulusb. Occludes the dentinal tubulesc. Is part of the normal smear layerd. a and c

24. Which of the following has been used to treat dentinal hypersensitivity?a. Fluorideb. Amorphous calcium phosphatec. Calcium sodium phosphosilicated. All of the above

25. Calcium hydroxide:a. Occludes the tubulesb. Precipitates calcium phosphatec. Promotes peritubular dentin formationd. a and c

26. Products that interfere with the transmis-sion of the nerve impulse work by raising:a. Extracellular sodium ion concentrationsb. Intracellular sodium ion concentrationsc. Intracellular potassium ion concentrationsd. Extracellular potassium ion concentrations

27. Glutaraldehyde/HEMA-based agents have been found to:a. Significantly relieve hypersensitivity immediately after

treatmentb. Significantly relieve hypersensitivity after six monthsc. Reduce dentin permeabilityd. All of the above

28. Restorations such as composite resins are used for which type of dentinal hypersensi-tivity cases?a. Mild casesb. All casesc. Severe cases d. None of the above

29. 5% sodium fluoride varnish:a. Initially forms a barrier over exposed dentinb. Occludes the dentinal tubules with calcium fluoride

depositsc. Is effective in treating dentinal hypersensitivityd. All of the above

30. Based on a hierarchical model from the World Health Organization, it has been recommended that mild and responsive dentinal hypersensitivity be managed by:a. Less complex treatmentsb. More complex treatmentsc. In-office treatments onlyd. None of the above


Notes

Notes


For IMMEDIATE results, go to www.DentalAcademyOfCE.com to take tests online.

INSTANT EXAM CODE 15163 Answer sheets can be faxed with credit card payment to

918-831-9804.

Payment of $59.00 is enclosed. (Checks and credit cards are accepted.)

If paying by credit card, please complete the following: MC Visa AmEx Discover

Acct. Number: ______________________________

Exp. Date: _____________________

Charges on your statement will show up as PennWell

AGD Code 010

ANSWER SHEET

Hypersensitive Dentin Updates (2nd edition)Name: Title: Specialty:

Address: E-mail:

City: State: ZIP: Country:

Telephone: Home ( ) Office ( )

Lic. Renewal Date: AGD Member ID:

Requirements for successful completion of the course and to obtain dental continuing education credits: 1) Read the entire course. 2) Complete all information above. 3) Complete answer sheets in either pen or pencil. 4) Mark only one answer for each question. 5) A score of 70% on this test will earn you 3 CE credits. 6) Complete the Course Evaluation below. 7) Make check payable to PennWell Corp. For Questions Call 800-633-1681


1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.

16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30.

If not taking online, mail completed answer sheet to PennWell Corp.

Attn: Dental Division, 1421 S. Sheridan Rd., Tulsa, OK, 74112

or fax to: 918-831-9804

HYP617RDH

Educational Objectives1. List and describe the anatomical features of dentin that predispose it to dentinal hypersensitivity;

2. List and describe the etiological factors in dentinal hypersensitivity;

3. List and describe the prevalence and most common sites for dentinal hypersensitivity;

4. List and describe the home and in-office options for the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity.

Course Evaluation1. Were the individual course objectives met? Objective #1: Yes No Objective #3: Yes No

Objective #2: Yes No Objective #4: Yes No

Please evaluate this course by responding to the following statements, using a scale of Excellent = 5 to Poor = 0.

2. To what extent were the course objectives accomplished overall? 5 4 3 2 1 0

3. Please rate your personal mastery of the course objectives. 5 4 3 2 1 0

4. How would you rate the objectives and educational methods? 5 4 3 2 1 0

5. How do you rate the author’s grasp of the topic? 5 4 3 2 1 0

6. Please rate the instructor’s effectiveness. 5 4 3 2 1 0

7. Was the overall administration of the course effective? 5 4 3 2 1 0

8. Please rate the usefulness and clinical applicability of this course. 5 4 3 2 1 0

9. Please rate the usefulness of the supplemental webliography. 5 4 3 2 1 0

10. Do you feel that the references were adequate? Yes No

11. Would you participate in a similar program on a different topic? Yes No

12. If any of the continuing education questions were unclear or ambiguous, please list them.

___________________________________________________________________

13. Was there any subject matter you found confusing? Please describe.

___________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________

14. How long did it take you to complete this course?

___________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________

15. What additional continuing dental education topics would you like to see?

___________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________

PLEASE PHOTOCOPY ANSWER SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL PARTICIPANTS.COURSE EVALUATION and PARTICIPANT FEEDBACK

We encourage participant feedback pertaining to all courses. Please be sure to complete the survey included with the course. Please e-mail all questions to: [email protected].

INSTRUCTIONSAll questions should have only one answer. Grading of this examination is done manually. Participants will receive confirmation of passing by receipt of a verification form. Verification of Participation forms will be mailed within two weeks after taking an examination.

COURSE CREDITS/COSTAll participants scoring at least 70% on the examination will receive a verification form verifying 3 CE credits. The formal continuing education program of this sponsor is accepted by the AGD for Fellowship/Mastership credit. Please contact PennWell for current term of acceptance. Participants are urged to contact their state dental boards for continuing education requirements. PennWell is a California Provider. The California Provider number is 4527. The cost for courses ranges from $20.00 to $110.00.

PROVIDER INFORMATIONPennWell is an ADA CERP Recognized Provider. ADA CERP is a service of the American Dental association to assist dental professionals in identifying quality providers of continuing dental education. ADA CERP does not approve or endorse individual courses or instructors, not does it imply acceptance of credit hours by boards of dentistry.

Concerns or complaints about a CE Provider may be directed to the provider or to ADA CERP ar www.ada.org/cotocerp/

The PennWell Corporation is designated as an Approved PACE Program Provider by the Academy of General Dentistry. The formal continuing dental education programs of this program provider are accepted by the AGD for Fellowship, Mastership and membership maintenance credit. Approval does not imply acceptance by a state or provincial board of dentistry or AGD endorsement. The current term of approval extends from (11/1/2015) to (10/31/2019) Provider ID# 320452

RECORD KEEPINGPennWell maintains records of your successful completion of any exam for a minimum of six years. Please contact our offices for a copy of your continuing education credits report. This report, which will list all credits earned to date, will be generated and mailed to you within five business days of receipt.

Completing a single continuing education course does not provide enough information to give the participant the feeling that s/he is an expert in the field related to the course topic. It is a combination of many educational courses and clinical experience that allows the participant to develop skills and expertise.

CANCELLATION/REFUND POLICYAny participant who is not 100% satisfied with this course can request a full refund by contacting PennWell in writing.

IMAGE AUTHENTICITYThe images provided and included in this course have not been altered.

© 2017 by the Academy of Dental Therapeutics and Stomatology, a division of PennWell

Customer Service 800-633-1681

Documents

Hypersensitive Dentin pdates edition€¦ · a thin, poorly calcified (or absent) smear layer. This smear layer is composed of a deposit of salivary proteins, debris from dentifrices,