i A INSTITUTION California Polytechnic State Univ., San Lujs · FINAL REPORT. July 1, 1972. June 30, .1973. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES FOR WORK EXPERIENCEEPUCATION. Project #40-30569

DOtOMENT BESUIE

ED 124 749 95 CE 007 365

_AgFHCE;.

Tannpr, Kinsey i

TITLE Professdional Development Series for Work rIxpeLiienceEducation. Final Report.. A

INSTITUTION California Polytechnic State Univ., San LujsObispo.

SPONS AGENCY Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, D.Q.WORT NO- VT-102-876BUREAU NO 40-30569 B-3-230; -40-30569 EFO 39-73 .

PUB DATE 73NOTE 97p.

EDRS PRICE MF-$0.83'HC-$4.67 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS *Career Education; Course Descriptions; Graduate

Study; Higher Education; *Inservice C6urses;*Insetvice Teacher Education; Part;cipant _

Satisfaction; *Program EYaluaition; Uhd.her:-Improvement; -*Work Experience;' Workshops .4.

f4-....

% I.*;.

\ABSTRACTThe report summarizes a.project for conducting a

series of workshops and graduate level extension courses on workexperience education at various California locations. The purpose ofthe series was to increase the effectiveness of teaching fordisadvantaged and handicapped, update occupational coapetPncies,update administrative and supervisory skills, and'orientr.onvocational education personnel-to vocational education. A total of556 educators participated in the project, with 13? enrolled inworkshops, 210 in a fall series of courses, and 208 in a springseries. itpsults of a questipnnaire administered to participantsindicated a high degree of &cceptancd of the course. Presented in thereport are the project, director's summary, objectives, plannedparticipant selectich, and partidipant selection report. Appendix -escomprise the main body of the report, and, contain the following:geographical report cn participants, participant data summary form,the'project evaluatioti reports and subjective project evaluationreports for both the fall and spring series of courses, three:quarterly project report's (from July, 1972 to March, 1973), andresults of the subjective questionnaire ratings by'class. (RG)

**************#****:***************A************************************* ,Documents acquired by ERIC include many, informal unpublished* materials nct available from other sources. ERIC.makes every effort** to obtain the best copy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal *

* reproducibility are often encOuntered and this affects the quality *

* of the nicr'efiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available *

* via the ERIC Document Reproductibn Service (ED1kS). EDRS is not r=5 *

.* responsible for the quality of the original documeht. Reproductions ** suppliedby EDRS are the best that can be made from. the original.******************4*********************************t**********v*******

e.

APRs FESSIbNALDEVELOPMENTSERIES

ORWORK EXPERIENCE EDUCATION

rd

CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY

FINAL. REPORT 'JUNE -1978'

PREPARED BY:KINSEY TANNERPROJECT DIRECTOR

US °EPA, TIMENT OF HEALTH.EDUCATION WELFARENAT:ONAL INSTITUTE OF

EDUCATION"

TINS DOCUMENT HAS SEEN REPRO.DUCE° EXACTLY AS RECEnToFRomTHE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN.ATING IT POINTS OF VIEal OR OPINIONSSTATED 00 NOT NECESSARILY REPRE-SENT ocriciAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE OFEDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY

SAN LUIS OBliP0, CALIFORNIA 934076

. .

FINAL REPORT.

July 1, 1972 June 30, .1973

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES FOR WORK EXPERIENCEEPUCATION

Project #40-30569 EF0 39-73

An Education Professions Development Act Project.

AIM

0

41

and

Project #40-30569 B-3-230

A Vocational Education Section Part B Project

California Polytechnic State University

San Luis Obispo, California

Kinsey Tanner, Director

0.Distributed to:

Dr. James BecketE. David .Graf

Allan HolmesDr. Dale AndrewsDr, Howard BotoughsDr. Carl CumminsDr..Walter SchroederDr. Don MoritsRobert PooleTony Thele

v T V?

Tr

CONTENTS

. PROJECT DIRECTORS SUMMARY

II. OBJECTIVES AS STATED IN THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIESFOR WORK EXPErENCE EDUCATION

/III. PLANNED PARTICIPANT SELECTION

IV.

Page

1

2

PARTICIPANT SELECTION REPORT 5.

APPENDICES!

Geog aphical Report on, Participantsti

Partj.cipant Data Summary O.E. Form 7214

Project Evaluation Report - Fall, Series

S f,

b tine Project

Project Evaluation

SulI ective Project

QUarterly

Quirterly

Quarterly

'Subjective1

C

Evaluation Report - Fall Series

Report Spring Series .. ..... .

Evaluation Report - Spring. Series

Report - 7/1/72 to 9/30/72

Report=h7lr72-to 12/31/72;),

Report -'1/1/7i to 3/30/73

Ratings by Class,Questionnaire

I

1

I

I. PROJECT DIRECTORS SUMMARY '

0

Both the.stated objectives and time schedule for the project havebeen

met. All factors considered in evaluation indicate the spring quarterseries of classes was very successful. Both evaluation reports for the

spring series (Appendices E and F) show a high degree of acceptance bythe participants on the subjective questionnaire and an excellent grow7th

rate as indicated by pre- and post-test scores. (Fall series report as

Appendices C and D.) The total number of participants was 556. 'Whilethis is smaller than anticipated, the high percentage of the participantswho were .involved directly in Work Experience Education or other Vocational

Education programs more than make up for being slightly under the estimate

in the project. Perhaps most indicative was tfie response to the subjective

question, "Would you be interested in participating in future in-servicetraining programs of this type?" In the fall series 86 replied "yes"

while six answered."no." In the spring series 104 replied "yes" while six

replied "no." This indicates an extremely high degree of acceptance bythe participants and indicates excelent'teaphing on the part of theinstructors.

In addition to the POject Director, evaluation of the project war conductedby two project evaluatqls. Mr. Robert Poole of Los Altos, California, wasresponsible for development of pre- and post-tests for each course and

monitoring each of the classes in Northern California and reporting the

results. 1.1;6 Poole is retired coordiriatorof Work Experience Education ofSequoia Union High School District, and former ponsultant,,Work ExpeiienceEducation, State Department of Education. In addition helve past pres-ident of the California Association of Work Experience Educators and wasa California Association of Work, Experience Educators executive secretary.

Mr;Tony Thele of Torrance, California,was responsible for developing andadministering-a subjective,questionnaire, and compiling results. He was

responsible for monitoring classes held in Southern California. Mr. Thele

was coordinator of Work Experience Education in the Hanford Union HighSchool Dist -riot- former-Director of the Professional Development Seriesfor Work Experience Education, and is Director of Work aperience Education

and Placemdnt at El Camino College in Torrance.

Each class was observed during the operation by the evaluators and/or theDirector and a class visitation report was filed.

I would call attention, to question #1 on the subjective questionnaire forfall and spring quarter classes (Appendices D and F) which relates to-changes participant-6 plan to make tn their programs as a result of parti-

cipating in the Professional Development Series for Work Experience Educa-

tion. It would appear from these statements that the EPDA Series relatedvery strongly to the State Priorities of Vocational Education: (A) Increasing

effectiveness of teachini, for disadvantaged and handicapped; (B) Updating

of occupational competencies; (C) Updating administrative, and supervisoryskills; and) Orienting-non-VocAtional Education personnel to Vocational

Education. In the fall quarter classes_45% of the participants statedthat they had direct responsibility for disadvantaged and 23% statedresponsibility foT handicapped. During the spring quarter classes 54%indicated they had responsibility for disadvantaged and 337. had responsibility

for handicapped.

1

I. PROJECT DIRECTORS SUMMARY - (continued) rt

Broad geographical representation was obtained as evidenced in the geogra-phical analysis reported in Appendix A. 4

* 'As indicated in the fall evaluation report 87. of those enrolled' were admin-

,,istrators of Vocational Education programs. -In the spring series 77. reported

they were administratofs of Vocational Education programs.

All the courses contained information on Career Education: with emphasis cAnthe place of,Work Experience Education in Career Education.

The majority of the respondents indicated they would be making changes intheir program as a result of taking the course offered through theProfessional Development Series for Work Expaqence.Educatioh.

The 'quarterly reports for the series are also included as Appendices G, H,

and I.

Outstanding assistance has been given by California Polytechnic StateUniversity personnel, especially Dr.. Walter Schroeder, Head, EducationDepartment, and the faEulty and staff of the Education Department. Theservice of Den Morris and the Office of Continuing. Education have been

of tremendous-help during, thegntire yearyas has been the cooperation andperformance ,of the California Polytechnic State University Foundation officersand staff.

The staffs of the State Department of Educationand Regional Offices havecooperated to the kUllest in the operation of the project through the year.Aspecial mention should be given to Allan Holrdes, State Consultant, WorkExperience Education.

RespeCtfully submitted,

Kinsey Tanner, DirectorTeacher Education',

Work Experience EducationCalifornia Polytechnic State UniversityJune 29, 1973

II- OBJECTIVES AS STATED IN THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES FOR WORK,EXPERIENCE EDUCATION

N4

1. The description of objectives of the project as stated in the contractare as follows:

1.1 {Conduct a summer Workshop designed to familiarize edUcators withconcepts. of Career Education and their relationships with WorkExperience Education. '

1.2' Conduct a summer workshop designed to familiarize Work ExperienceEducation personnel with materials and methods for conductingreated' intruction classes.

1.3 Trlin eight instructors who will present to participants of themanagement courses, the strong philosophical' and educational reasonswhy goals.and objectives are needed for Work Experience Education

P.)

2

-r

T

'.II. OBJECTIVES AS STATED IN THE PROFESSIAIAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES POR WORK

EXPERUNCE EDUCATION

r'

1.4 Conduct'instructOr training woikihops to train teachers of the

courses the concepts of 'Career Education. - ,

1.5 Present ten (10) graduate level extension courses (five in theMlLand five in the spring) entitled "Work Experience Education -ImplementatiOe and "Work; Experience Education - Operational."These coursesto be offered,in five locationq throughout the

state. The 250students attending will earn 23/4 quarter Units of

graduate credit'for each class. (Twenty-five hours of instruction

per class.) .

1.6 Present eleven (11) graduateevel extensfon courses (five in tiefall and six in the'spring) entitled, "Work Experience Edudationr-Management" at eleven different locations for 300 participants.'

1- Participants will be selected from those who have previouslyattended the beginning courses and/or are responsible for admin-

istrative.functions. Participants will receive three quart@r

'units of credit. (Thirty hours of instruction.)

1.7 Present three (3) graduate level extension courses (one in thefall and tw We spring) entitled "Work Experience Education -

194In the Co nity College." These courses will be offered in

three locations throughout the state. The 75 patticipants selectedto Attend will earn three quarter units of graduate credit:

(Thirty hours of instruction.)

1.8 . Provide in all four courses a unit(s) in Career Education conceptsas they relate to Work Experience Education and to state andnational priority.

. The coursed offered are as follows:

Ed-E-581-05 - Work Exper ience Education-- Implementation; for firstand second, year -Work Experience EduCation coordinator; types of WorkExperience _Education -programs and-methods-of implementing a-Weitk-Experience Education program as a part of-the total curricul4m (no

prerequisite).t

Ed-E-581-06 - Work Experience Education -,Operation;, given in springto follow Ed-E-581 -05; labor codes, funding, public relations, related

instruction, education and adanistrative codes (prerequisite Ed-E-544or Ed-E-581-05-ort permission of instructor).

Ed-E-581-07 - Work Experience Education, - Management; fin. experienc ed

Work Experience Education coordinators and administrators; accountability,financing and management theories for Work Experience Education.

Ed-E-581-08 Work Experience Education - Community College; for WorkExperience Education coordinators and eooperative education-teachers atcommunity colleges; development and operation procedures for WorkExperience Education programs in the community colleges; accountability,education and administrative codes,.,State Plan for Vocational Education

in the commutity colleges.

3

fp

0

,

0 _ II'. OBJECTIVES AS STATED IN THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES FORWORKEXPERIENCE EDUCATI6N - (continued)

C S - ,

I I .. 3. The"time schedule for objectives of the.

project as stated in the.contract

are is f3ilowS..

3

4r

. :

1

1. Summer workshop (care Education) 6/26-30103

2. Planning meeting 7/15 -16

3. 'Summer workshop (Materials for Relaeed Instruction) 8/21-24

4. Extension course teacher planning session (1.7-.7) . 8/21-24-,5. Extension course teacher planning session . .8/21-24

- 6. Extension course teacher planning session (1.7-0_-,. . 8/28-30

7. Selection of participants ..17: 9/1=1

8. Courses to be offered (one night per week -8 weeks1.7-5)

9. Courses to be offered (one, night per week -ro weeks

10/2 -12/1

1.7-6, .1.7-7) t10/2-12/14

10. Planning and evaluation meeting (1.7-5) 12/911. Planning and evaluation meeting (1.7 -6), 1/6/73

12. _Planning and evaluation meeting (17-7) 1/13

13. Courses to be offered One night per week weeks.

1.7-5) : - r 2/12-4413

14. Courses to be offered (one-night per week -10 weeks1.7-6, 1.7-7)% 2/12-4/26

15. Evaluation meeting- with course 'intructors (I-7-5). . 4/2816. Evaluation meeting With course instructors (1.7-6). . 5/517. Evaluation meeting.with course instructors (1.1-7). 5/1218,. Evaluation report 1 5/28

III. PLANNED PARTICIPANT SELECTION

-.. - . 1-

1. The criteria for selection and the type of participants as_stated .in. ..theproject are as- "follows:

Participants will be selected frowthose educators that have demonstrated. knowledge and/or interest in Work Experience Education. Seletion of

teacher-trainers 'sill be conducted by the Project Director with assis-tance from the California State Consultant for Work. Experience Education4and the Head of the Education Department, California Polytechnic StateUniversity.

Those who will attend the in-service training programs will be selectedby county and school directors of Vocational Education, in the immediatearea being served by these courses.

745 persons will participate in the project. Participation will be as

follows:

1, 1'20 educators will attend%the slimmer workshopsat Cal.Poly, San -LuisObispo.

2. 250 new coordinators will be selected to attend the.in-serviceimplementatiOn and operational courses to be offered in Indio,Poffiona, Stockton, San Diego' and Los Angeies.

3. )00 coordinators, Vocational Education adMinistrators, counselors,

4

IIIt

I/ .0-

S pecial emphasis will be given to the selection of participants in

continuation education and special ; cation.. . .

,.

IV, PARTICIPANT SELECTION REPORT- .

. .

.

1. Total participants number 556. includedncruded 138 who enrolled in .

workshops as rep yted in the fall report. The fall series of courses

IIenrolled 210 iduditors. Participanes.enrolled in the spring seriesof courses numbered um.

__--

III. PLANNED PARTICIPANT SELECTION - (continued)

*. ..... I ,-

. . . . .. u

etc., will be selected to attend the in-service management courseoIfered in FresnoModesto, Sacramento,.Los Angeles, San Mateo, .

Marin County,Redding, San Diego, Long Beach, San Luis Obispo, andr . .

Salinas. 4 .

4. 75-community college coordinators and vocational personnel will beselected to attend the ia-service commtnity college course offered

. in San Mateo, Huntington Beach and Pa'sadena. .

.

e

1

Fall courses were.offered in the} following locations:

"Work Experience Education - Implenientation"

Ed -E- 581 -05 Enrollment 0

Indio 8

Selma. , OOOOOO 19

Los Angeles 11

'San Francisco 16

Sacramento

Total ° 70

"Work Experience Education - Management"Ed -E- 581 -07 Enrollment_,________

.Cupertino 16

Lafayette 11

Modesto 38

Salinas, 24West Covina lz

* Ventura 19

Total 1120

../

"Work Experience Education - Commihity College"Ed-E-581-08 Enrollment

Los Altos 11 -

Whittier 9

p.Total 20

0,

C.

* Course started" 11/1/72 and was completed 1/10/73

5

94'

_r

IV. PARTICIPANT SELECTION'REPORT - (Continued

, . .4

Spring courses were offered in the following.ldcations:

J

C

' "Work Experience Education - Operation"Enrollment Ed-E- 581 -06

.

1914

16

20

.

- Indio -,

SellaLos AngelesSan Francisco

.

Sacramento

'

, .

-Total/

.

.

77

, ,

"Work Experience FAucation 7 Management"Ed-E-581-07 Enrollment

%-''. t

. Torrance es 151

San Diego . . . 33

1-,Sacramento '13

San Francisco. 24

. 'Redding '20

** FresnO. :','N. 14

Total 120.

oe

"Work Experience Education Community College"

Ed-E-581-08 Enrollment

Hayward 12

0

,Total 12' ,

. ,

Many of the participants had:Part7time responsibilities in Work ExpeienCeEducation and otherVocational Education areas, therefore the percentages

reported total more than 100%. , . . ..

- The fall quarter class analysis by position was:

c;4,Jr Experience Education 6, Implementation"

67% were directly involved WithlWork Experience'Education37% were directly involved in Vocational-Education33% hope to move into Work ExperiencelEducation-

. .

"Work Experience Education - Management"

66% were directly,involved with Work Experience Education45% were directly involv9din Vocational Educition130% hope to moveinto-Work kxperience Education'

** Course started 3/6/73 (and was 'completed 5/8/73

6.

10

a

0

i

".4 K

IV. PARTICIPANT SELECTION REPORT '-.(contiRued).

, "Work Experience Education - Community College".

927. weredirectly.involved in Work Experien6e Education'35% were directly involved in Vocational Education, .,

t

d

The Spring quarter class analysis by position was:.

"Woik-ExperienceEducation Operation"

48% were directly involved with Wok Experienc e Education-667. were involved in Vocational Education as'teachets or

adminf.sttatorS. 19% hope to move into' Work Experienc e Education'

"Work Experience Education - -Management"

'30% were directly involved with WotkExperience Education657. were involved in Vocational Education asteachers.or

administrators.187. hope to move into.Wdr Experience Education

"Work Experience E ducation Community College",

637.. were directly involved with Work.gxperience Education55% were involved in Vocational Educatidp as teachers or

administrators.

'2,Q% of the participants were teachers or administrators in disciplines

11

other than Vocational 'Education.0

-

.

I.

.

0 -

I

.I

11

, .

LOCATION

INDIO.

0

A

'APPENDIX A.

.

GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN

FALL 1972-73 '

"woillExakris.ence Education - fmplementation"

tz.

-/Ed-E-581-05

Indio. . 3

Rialto 1

Cailexico .2

EY Centro 1

La Qtfiata 1

SEEM

Fresno 9

Dinuba 2

Lemoore 1

Hanford' 1

Corcoran 1

Riverdale 1

Visalia 1

Tulare ' 2

LOS ANGELES

Los Angeles 5

Arcadia 1

Inglewood 1

Long Beach 1

. Moptebello . . . 1 asSan GabrielCarson

1

f.

LOCATION

. .

ENROLLED

SAN FRANCISCO./

San 'FranEiaco

MillbraePenngiove .

''..

5,

1

. 1

Pleasanton 1

Lafayette. .... . . iSan Rafael 1

Livermore. . 4 , 1

San Leandro 1

Richmond 1

Healdsburg . , . eSanta Rosa 1

Belmont. , 1

SACRAMENTO'

Sacramento ' 4

City Heights , . 1

Carmichael 1

Lodi 2

Elk Grove 2 °

Penryn.

1 1

Lincoln 2

Woodland 1 .

Dixon 1

t.

"

.

, APPENDIX A -.

GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN.

...,

. -

0

FALL 1972-73


LOCATION

Ed-E-581-07,

\\0CATION. # ENROLLED# ENROLLED

WEST COVINA

_Duarte

Colton. .

FullertonCovina

0

1

1"2

1.

- MODESTO

ModestoRipon

TracyOakdale

24

1

2

- 1

Laverne . ..... .'1 tis Denair. . . .1,

South Flaadeni. .Ceres 2

:San Dimas .... 1 Sonora

Orange .1 Tdrlock 1

West_Covina . . Manteca 1

Whittier.. . m60. . . . 1 Lds Banos 1

Glendora '1 Livingston 1

1'

.1..AFKVETTE VENTURA

Tairfield 3 Ventura 7

Alamo 1 Oxnard 1

Pleasant Hill . . . . I Oak View 1

Walnut Creek 1 Carpinteria 1

Vallejo 1 Santa Paula. 4

Napa ,

walnut Creek

1

1

Port Hueneme'Fillmore

1

1

Lafayette 1 Northridge 1

Antioch . . 1 Camarillo 2

..z

CUPERTINO

NewarkSanta Clara . . 1

San JoseSunnyvale 1

Palo Alto 1

San Mateo 1

Redwood City 1

.143

4.

(CONTINUED)

APPENDIX A


FALL 1972-73


Ed-E-581-07

LOCATION

SALINAS

# ENROLLED, .

Salinas . . 17

Santa Cruz 2

Monterey. . 1

San Mai-tin

Oakland 1

Gonzales 1Ben Lomond

1 4

1

.LOCATION

APPENDIX A


- FALL 1972-73

"Work Experience Education - Community College"

# ENROLLED

Ed -E- 581 -08

4.LOCATION 4 ENROLLED'

.LOS;ALTOS WHITTIER

San J6se 5

Los Gatos. 1

Saratoga 2

Sunnyvale 1

Foster Cit ,1

4g.

15

Walnut 1

WhittierAlhambraAlta LomaTorrance.Fullerton'la'Habra

.

2

1

1

1

APPENDIX A

GEOGRAPHICAL pRiAKDOWN

SPRING ,1972-73

"Work Experience Education --Operation"

Ed-E-581-06

LOCATION # ENROLLED . LOCATION # ENROLLED

INDIO SAN FRANCISCO

Calexico 2 Concord 3

Indio ... 6 Daly City 1

Lafayette 1

Livermore 1

SELMA Oakland 1

Pittsburg 1

Clovis 1 San Francisco . . . . '1

Fresno 11 San Leandro 1

Hanford 1 San Mateo .1

Latbn 1 Santa Rosa 1

Leriloore "1 Stockton 1

Reedley 1 Walnut Creek 1

Tulare. " . 2

SACRAMENTO

LOS ANGELES;Carmichael 3

Arcadia 1 City Heights .. 1

Camarillo 1 Dixon I

Hermosa Beach . . . 1 Fresno 1

Long Beach . 1. .

Lincoln 1

Montebello 1 1 , - Lodi 2

Rosemead, 1 Modesto .. . ,.. .. 1

San Gabriel 1 Orangevale 1

Sunland 1 Sacramento. . , . 7

Via Torrance 1)

Sutter Creek 1

LoS Angeles 5 Woodland 1

'16

APPENDIX A


SPRING 1971-71


Ed-E-581-07

LOCATION # ENROLLED

I-

LOCATION # ENROLLED

FRESNO

CaruthersChowchillaCoalingaFrt.sno

1

1

1

2

1

REDDING

_AndersonButte city.

CottonwoodDunsmuirHayfork

3

1

1

3

-

M a d e r a. . . . . .. . . 1 Lewiston I .

Modesto . . 4 Millville. ..Sanger. . - . . 1 ' Redding; 8

Tulare 1 Weavervillev4. , . 1

Visalia 1

SAN FRANCISCOSACRAMENTO

Alameda 1Davis, 1 Concord 1

Galt 1 Corte Madera` 1

Redding Kentfield. . . . 1

Sacramento 9 OaklandWoodland 1 Penngroye 1

Petuluma 1

Pleasanton, 1

SAN DIEGO San'Iranctsco 5

Fremont 1

Calexico 1 Alamo i 1

La Mesa 3 San Mateo 1

ElCajon . 2 Walnut Creek 1

Escondido 2 Woodside ' 1

Coronado 1 South San Francisco. . 1

La Jolla 1 San Leandro 1

Vista . . - 1 San Anselmo 1

San Diego 19 Berkeley 1

Chula Vita 2' San Rafael 1

].7

t

N

LOCATION

APPENDIX A


SPRING 1972-71

"WorkExperience Education - Management"'

Ed-.1-41417,

# ENROLLED

TORRANCE

Camarillot, El Segundo"

1

I ,

4

ti

,'.Huntington Beach. . . . 2_

Los Alamitos 1

Long Beach 1Reseda ,

1

: Santa Monica ' 1

San Pedro . .. . .. . -2,,

Torrance':: 3 .

Via Torrance... .

tiAfina Del Rey 1

ti

18

1

1

1

1

-LOCATION

APPENDIX A

GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN-

SPRING 1972-73


Ed-E-581-08

# ENROLLED

HAYWARD

Berkeley 1

Concord 14

Mont 1

Hayward 1

OaklancE 3

Pleasant Hill 1.

Redwood City 1

San Mateo 1

Walnut Creek 1

\

19

r

, 0

1

, 111

IR.-GEOGRAPHIC

APPENDIX B

DIPARTNEINT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION. AND WELFAREOFFICE OF EDUCATION

WASNINSTON. O.C. tlitu

PARTICIPANT DATA RIMMARY(Puts C, D, Ealucethus Pmfeisiees NvolopewmfAct

Title V. P.L.11632P, es Gaosseslett)

SUOGETPOUREAU NO. 111107S2APPROVAL. EXANES: 10/11/71

s. GE *RoJEcr NOISIER

a NAME OF SPONSORING INSTITUTION OR AGENCY

California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoS. STATE

California4. a. NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS TONE TRAINED IN THE

PROJECTh. NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS COVERED BY THIS SUMMARY

REPORT413

4

4*,

;

DATA ON

S. SEX 41 AGE.111

i Ws. 587. PARTICIPANTS BY WHETHER OR

NOT.THEY ARE VIETNAM ERAVETERANSa. under.25 13 4. 35-3. 75I - .. ..

a. Mals 302 h. 25-21 52 a.-4044 - 63' 4. SSSt 28 . ViOMM1t we vett/revs 32.b. retnal 102 c, 30-34 66 o. 4 5 4 1 58 1: 110 and .vi. 9 b. Not Viittnant ere veterans' 286_

.S. RACIAL OR ETHNIC AACKGROUND N. PARTICIPANTS BY WHETHER THEIR INCOMES ARE, OR

WERE BEFORE THEY ENROLLED IN THILPROJECT.BELOW THE POVERTY LINE.

_fa..Nsgro r bl..k 34 d. American Indian 414 timid, Wien 0. rt. ,Ovisettal 6, Is. II:lw wroth; fins' '9-s. lisiesn.Anialeavt 12 f. Other then the above 343 h. Nfbelvs wrath" fine 378

1

DISTRIBUTION OF PARTICIPANTS (by Jiato el somplymont prim I. Ala proMet),

a. Al-. b _ k. Gs. 0 v. Md. 1 ww N. J. 4 GIA c. 0 ay. Wm,. -

b. Alaska 1 ' 1.-ilimal1 v. Maas. al: N. N. 0 ape S. D. 0 es. Canal Zon4

it. Ads. 0 rn. Idaho 1:. \.... Welt. 0 is. N. Y.

,-..0 sq. Tenn. 0 bos. Guam

.

41. Ark. ""*0 n. Illinois 0 s. Illinii. '_ - she N. C. 0 se. Tomos 0 bb. Puerto Rico

o. Cal.: 390 ..z.cua..- -...Q V. Min. ., ii.14:-D. 0 as. Utah '0 he. VIrginIs

...

f.Ctolo. 0 p. lows 0 s. No. 0 01. Ohio st.-:Ifi: i...-

bd. Pacific Trait. ., Tnitoritra 0S. Onus. 0 K. Kansas 1 sa. Mont 0 , Gk. Okla. j .au. Va.

h. Dal. 0 r. ICY. 0 :k. N.M. ' Q al. Oreg. 0 ay. Wash: 1 belfpterlesia-Dap.

Scheel. V 1Y'I: D.'C. 0 s. La. 2 a.. Nevada 0 wat.-Pa. 0 .w. P. ifs. 0J. -Fla. 0 t. Mains 0 ad. N. H. 0" at. R. I. 0 an. Lee. 0 f. Persian -0

HIGHEST DEGREE EARNED

e. NONE S. R. S. DIPLOMA I e. _ .:.- 'MASTER**

- 0 .J 12 I 214 17/'ED. D.

'2f. PH. D.

, 2

IL OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND.

a. Currently employed (or atthin Om past S Tomeinnloye45 In the flirld of education

-.

407II: Never previously otnplo*d in the field If education

. by whether they were 'JD. Previously employed In the flirld of education, i

but not within the Pilot 3 yltars 41, toriPltiyad In ether ptotoesIs moulting an

academic degree 4 ' 8.. Noeor previously employed In ths thrld at

adoration

.

52. Holding an academie riogres but not "siting 03. Not holding an neadeadc degree 0

IS. TOTAL YEARS OF TEACHING OR OTHER EMPLOYMENT IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION

a. NONE

6

S. 1-4 YEARS

87c. 14 YEARS

113d. 1014`YEARS

80I. ISO, YEARS

53

t. 20 OR MORE

73

14. PRIMARY POSITION OR EMPLOYMENT STATUS A'T PRESENT, OR IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO PROJECT

ili INA PRESCHOOL. ELEMENTARY OR SECONDARY SCHOOL OR

SCHOOLS. OR 'LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCY

b. OTHERWISE EMPLOYED ,

ItToachst trainer (In Mali-tuition of highor education)

I. Toscani* 271 S. InittnactIonial molls (Neel. librarian")

2. Administrator 5131

6. Idlueatlan aide er pareptefesolona1

7. !di' nluntsor3

' 92. In:Stite educe agency

3. Nareducation position1

3. Supervise!4. Pupil personnel specialist 35 1. Other education position 40 4. Student

OE FOR/A.7214. WO REPLACES OE.PORM 7214. 4/$g, WHICH IS 0SOLETE.

20. 4

DATA ON SCHOOLS OF PARTICIPANTS .

(wort. paistntue M. :oat oJ tM fpfloolog firma (13. U. 17. 111. lfl.. flIo,j9c.,11d. seed 104) ugly the warbor parrleipanee who h... enCiseoolowl in now )4a, by the.watejary M teach How which heat Iteertbae goo nolueo of theiceehewie. Eschew yeenicIpsonte classified in nein Io)

IS. SCHOOL OR SYSTEM,Y CONTROL

111. Gaspe exvtt.s WITH-WHICH THE PARTICIPANTS' ASSIGNMENTS USUALLY RELATE

Proackhol 1 d. Jr. Hisn (7-0) 29 g. Eloa. See. 12a. Public 266

as.

b. - Cr 3 P: wr. W10 (10-12) 2373

A. PilitSce. Vocational 20b. Nonpublic

?"*"1 c. Elea 0(4) 2 f.Seccndery (7-12) 50 1; Adult Education

17. AREA, OF SERVICE og,scHool. OR SYSTEM WHERE EMPLOYED (predaminane choractrielk)

a. Rural or entail town. general population ior :j Urban - poverty area - 44b. Rural or smell town- poverty area 34C. Wirer general population 145

. Suburban

r57

1/1. STUDENT 1100Y OF SCHOOL (ot eckoe/e)IN TERMS OF THE PERCENT WHO COME FROM FAMILIES AT OR ELOW THE POVERTY LINE

... 0% 7 d. 20-211'7. 77 11. SO-39% 21 j. so-107. 2 ,.b. 1-9". 83 .. 30-39% 32 h. 00-497. k. C 100% 14

11. 10-19% 90, .1. 40411% 22 -1. 10-7117. 14

_ , 1

19. STUOEHT 00Y OF SCHOOL(.w schools) IN TERMS OF THE PERCENT WHO COME FROM SPECIFIED MINORITY RACIAL OR ETHNICSACKGROUNOS

. . .

t1A.- NEOR0.01 111.

. , .

S. PUERTO RICANC. MEXICAN-

AMERICAN0. AMERICAN INDIAN E. ORIENTAL

s. 0% 32 I 0% _152 i 0 12 .. 0%78 le. .°1-7.97.

27

b 1- ser. 215 /- 11. Pi% 108 ti: HP% 116 1 b. HI% 210 5 259P 10-197. 60 c. 10 111% 3 C. 10.49 86 ' 10-19% 9 C. 10-197. 39d. 26-297. 24 d. 20.297 2 A. 30-297.-- 7_9 d. 20-297. 3 d. 20-19% 6 -

30-397. 7 e. 70-39% 0 . 30-397 27 .. 3D-3^ - -0- e. 3039% 41. 4049% 8 i . co-49i 0 I. 40-9% ,e I . ,40-9% 0 r 40-497. 3

a- so-.99% 5 i 50-59 0 I 7059% 5 1 SO-S97. 1 1. 50-59% 1

11- 60 69 % 2 h. 60-49% 0 h.. G0-69% b. 110-497.- 0 ' 11-..404507.

.. ... 0ii-. 70-79: 0 1: 7079%

,I. 70-79% 2 r. 70-797 0 1. 70-79% I)

I eIt71197 3 i SO-119". 0 l SOS11% 10 *i S0-11117. 0 i possv. _O

ii' 90:100. 18 k. 9o- 1007. 0_._k. 1101007. 1 1101007. 0 k. 90-1007. ,

AREA OF SPECIALIZATION (If employed In an Institution et Maher 'Amelia)

30. PARTICIPANTS EMPLOYED ,04 INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION. THOSE PARTICIPANTS DISTRIBUTED IN THE FIRST

CATEGORY OF ITEM 14n. AS 'T'EACHER TRAINERS** - BY AREA 003PECiALiZATION

a. ARTS OR criFlut-FS Iw Ent.!,7!":::

96 3

TYPE OF POSITION FOR WHICH PARTICIPANTS ARE PREPARING

21.-ALL PARTICIPANTS Y WHETHER THIS PROJECT IS PREPARING THEM TO ENGAGE IN A DIFFERENT TYPE OF POSITION

N. v. Preparing for cure type of position as at present (es reported in Now 14)C 198

1

b..-skteparitia fur a different type of position (include teacher' who we preparing to fetich. dilletont eubject)

C. Partial( its in category b. above.by type or position being *pared for

88

-_-N..,-.1. Teethe,. (or aNdo(srione subject)

266. Educational aide or persprofesiional,

l'Adrnirustrator 0 7. School volunteerI.

.

i Sig+ervisor 44

,

S. Other educational poSitirin On chool). - 26

Ftrpil pelIonnel specialist.NNN

42

5

4"

9 Teadteettainer On an Inellluflon a highor education)

.

5

..5. Instructional inediaApedtiaist (including librarian

APPENDIX C

INTERIM.PROJEC11 EVALUATION REPORT

. .u

Project ;#40 -30569 -EFO 39-73

An Educational Professional Development Act Project

and'

Project #40 -30569 B-3-M0

A Vocational Education Section part B Project

Prepared By: R. W. Poole - -PrOjett EvaluatorJan. 10, 1973

.--Directed To : Kinsey Tanner.,- Project Director

22

1

I

1

k.

This report containsinformition describing the activities of theProfessional Development Series for Work Experience Education for

the Fall Semester_102.. The Fall program Summary includes:

'1.

1. Activities Related to State' Priorities

2. Actiiiities Related to'Courses offered

3. Selection of Participants

4. Evaluation of PretesU and Post Tests

5. ConclUsions

6. Subjective Evaluation

Activities Related to State Priorities

.0 f

1.1 Increasing Effectivness of Teaching for ,Disadvantaged and

Handlcaped. Forty -five percent of alpartinipants in-

extension courses were direCtly, associated with disadvantage'd

"dents.

awenty-three percent of all participants'in extension courseswere directly associated with handiCapped students.

t

1. 2 Updating Occupational Competencies-

Participants were selected from broad geographical locations

not served by other 'Professional development activities. These

locations were as}iollows:

Sacrarriento, Lafayette, San Francisco, Los Altos, San Jose

Modesto, Selma, Salinas, Ventura, West Covina, Whittie

and Indio.

1. 3 Updating Supervisory Skills , . ,Eightpercent of those enrolled in the courses were administrators

.1

of vocational programs.

. 23

II

2. Activities Related to Courses Offered .

2.1

Page 2

,

Five graduate level extension courses in Work Experience

Education Implementation were offered at:

Location TeacheSiViancisCo Sdvel

Sacramento' _Alvin dint

Selma Hyc inthi Johnson

Los Angeles Dwayne BrubEiker

Indio 'George Barich

St

2. 2 Six graduate level extensioncourses in Operation of Work

Ewerience Education Were offered at:

Location, Teacher. ,.

Lafayette Melford Brinkerhoff.San Jose.

Salinas

Modesto

Ventura

West-Covina

Elbert Garcia

Gordon Ray

IsIorvin.Spence

Leland Albee

Maurice Fldra

0

2. Two graduate level extension courses in Community College

Work.Experiece Education. were offered at:

4

Location Teacher

Los Altos' Verntk Gillrnore

Whittier Edward Muraski.

2 4 ,

,/

0'0

t'ti Page ,3

2..4 t A unit ori,Career Education Was introducairito the course

content of a ll three levels. Also- members of the staff .of

The. State: Task Force for Career Education made presenta-.

tioris to participants... 1

Questions relating. to Career Education

Were inchded in the p'etests and post tests. %

. SeleCtion of Participant.1

The follovAng summary was prepared from the enrollment of

participant's reported to the evaluator.

,4

3.1 t,,-Enrollment data for five Implementation Classes.i

, Enrollment reported -. 60' . L..

. t,* . .

- t 4,

Seventy-eight percent of those entolnd had no prior EPDAcourses in Work Experience.Education.

4

3.2

* One pqint eight yercent completed EPDA courses in coordina- I.tion and/or administration of Work,Experiente EduCation.,

a

Sixty - seven percent of those enrolled were diiectly involvedin Work Experience Education.

Thirty-seven percent were involved in vocational eduaition asteachers or administrators.

Thirty-thre e.percenf;la n to move into some phase ofWor4.\kExperience Educatio. .1

Enrollment data for six;Managenient Classes

Enrollment reportedThirty-three percent of those enrolled had no p or EPDAclasses in,,Work Experience Edtication.

Sixty-eight percent completed EPDA courses in coordinationand/or administration of Work Experience Education.

,Sixty-six percent were presently involired inWork'Experien.ce.

Forty-five percent were teachers or administrators of vocationaleducation.

Thirty percent plan to move into some phase of Work ExperienceEducati N;

2.3

. t

3.3

Page 4

Enrollment data for two CominunitY-C,ollege Classes

Enrollment reported;

Seventy7two percent, of those enrolled had no prior EPDA, coursein Work -Experience Education

Twenty-eight percent completed EPDA courses in coordinationand /or administration of Work Experience Education.,

Eighty-nine percent were presently involved in 'Work ExperienceEduCation.

Fifty -six percentwere teachers or administrators of Vocational.

Education.

Seventeen percent _plan- to move into some phase or Work Experience,Education.

1.41.

4. ,Evaluation - summary of Pretest,,and ,post test ; I..

.° Results for Implementtion, Management and Community CollegeA 9 ..

.. Courses

4.1 IMPLEMgN-TATION. N-65

Average Average Average Percent 'Percent ofTeacher Pretest Score Post Test Score Increase Incre Perfect

,. ... . -..

, Barich 49. 57 55 . 5. 43 10.,26 85

Brubaker 45. 22 51.88 6. 14. 7266 80.

'hint 43. 36 ..

.52.14 . 8. 78 20.26 - 85

Johnson 48. 88 58. 47 9,..5,9._____ ____19.....61__:. 89..,

Soc'rel/ Mayo 48. 23 56.69 . 8.46 . 17.54 88"

TOTAL 47. 05 54. 84'. .7. 79 ll6`. 55I

26.f

11.

85

,

1

r.

4.2

Teacher

MANAGEMENT N-107

'Page

.

Percehtof _Perfect

Average Average .

Pretest'kore Post Test Score.-

IncreasePercentIncrease

Albee

Biinkerhoff

Flora-

Garci.a.

Ray

Spence

TOTAL

81.2

72-2

70671.45

-76.81

-

97. 9

'80.5 -

`8'9.'68-

82.20 ,

81.76

16.-7

8.3

15. 62

10:55

4. 95

, 20. 44

11.5

21. 09 .

. 16. 04

6.44

y

'92

76

90

77

. 77-7.--

82.475.25 86.4 .

I

11.2

.

15.10

4. 3 COMMUNITY COLLEGE N -116

PercentAverage Average Average PercentTeacher Pretest Score Post Test Score Increase Increase of Perfect

. JGilmore 86. 00 106.10 20.10 '23. 3/ , .91

Muraski 89.12 ,95. 62 6.5 7.29 83

TOTAL '87. 56 j 100. 86 13.3 15.18 87

4. 4 Average percentage of increase

All three, levels = 16 %Average percent of perfect score all levels = 85%

5. 'CONCLUSIONS

5. 1 Of the 209 particitants in the courses a high keriftentage (65%)

were directly involved in Work Eherience Education..

5. 2 Sixty-five percent were directly involved as teachers or

administrators of vocational education programs.

1

27

1

Page 6

5.3 Fifty-five percent of the enrollment,,including all th a levels,were taking an EPDA course for the first time. Forty-five

percent had a prior EPDA course.

5.4 Twenty-eight percent p- 'Jan to move into some phase of work

experience education at a future time.

5.5 The 209 actual enrollment falls short of the 300 anticipated,

however, the high percentage of enrollees directly involved

in work experience education and vocational education indicates

that the courses were relevant to participants needs.

5. 6 The'broaegeographical locatii.on of the courses throughout the

State provided professional development for coordinators in

outlying, areas not served by any other professional development

program.

5.7 Pretest and Post Test ,results indicate a satisfactory growth

factor of 16% and an average score of 85%.0

5. 8 The fact that 4570 of the participants had prior courses in work

experience education indicates that this is a continuing program

leading to unity in existing Wo

in California.

experience education programs

5. 9 Student evaluation results indicate that the course content was

relevant to their needs and that the courses met their stated

objectives.

2 8

a

1

APPENDIX D

6. SUBJEbTIVE EVALUATION

First Semester 1

, Subjective Questionnaire,

The-following information represents results of a subjective questionnaireadministered to the participants .of the Education Professions Development ActProject, "Professional Development Series for Work Experience Educators 1972-73."

Statements 'requesting a multiple choice response have been tallied and

separated according to the course which the respondent was enrolled In.

Statements requiring a short. answer response have been listed. Because of

the quantity of responses, a random sample was useJ and conclusions representing

all responses have been given.

This report follows the fordiat 0 the suojective questionnaire.

*HOWSUCCESSFUL WAS THE INSTRUCTOR IN MEETING THE OBJECTIVES OE THE COURSE?

Implement, Manademerit College

r, Excellent 25 . 52'

Satisfactory 13 : 21

Week. 0 0 0

WHAT CHANGES DO YOU ANTICIPATE MAKING IN YOUR WORK EXPERIENCE PROGRAMS AS

A RESULT OF THIS COURSE?I.

.comments:

Develop a program more closely geared to community needs.

Spend more time onAjob development.

Development of program around goals and objectives.

Check training agreiments thoroughly.

Motivating more students,to become interested In "more than one vocational

Area.

Make more employer contacts. .Jr '

The major change will be within' myself--more confidence.

Set up a program of related Instruction.

More related instruction.

New procedures for visitations.

EXpand exploratory to include ninth and tenth graders.

Reorganize and develop a more systematic pian for related instruction.

Expand In ail areas.

29

Subjective Questionnaire Page 2

Allow students not only to explore different vocational erecs, but also toevaluate his skills and personality traits.

'Spend more time in developing good work training stAtions--not Just acceptingany -type of Job.

IMY

I will attempt to develop better program for special education students.

This course has encouraged me to develop an exploratory program next year.

More Influence on .related instruction.

More on-the-job training in professional offices--exploratory. .

Spending more time in the com munity finding Jobs. Scheduling the exploratorystudents who are not working on rotating schedules.

Improve our system of evaluation for all three programs.

4 Conclusions:

As a result of the Professional Development Act course for workexperience education, the majority of the respondents indicated they wouldmake the following changes in their program:.

Development of related instruction programs..

Initiate or expand exploratory programs.

l

tructure their, programs to operate in closer relatiOnship to the goalsand objectives of work experience education.

2. WHICH TOPIC OR PORTION OF THE COURSE WAS MOST USEFUTO YOU? WHY?rt

Comments:

Oreer education because I am a counselor.

Ca'reer education was the most useful tome because of the way it tiestogether work experience with the rest of the school's curriculum.

StUll Bill- The course helped ma to better understand career education.

Leigs and regulations relating to work experience.

How to set up a five-year plan.

Laws.

DisOussing typical problems with colleagues. Writing plans.

Better understanding of laws and career education.'

30

Yi

.11 Subjective Questionnaire Page 3

Orientation to career education.

Project writing showed us how. and where to get funds.

Child labor laws - -we need to knoW what can legally be done.'

Understanding of career education and development of a district plan.

Child labor laws and the Stull Bill.

It was all valuable to me.

Regulations which govern work experience education.

Organization procedures.

VEA discussionfamiliarity with forms and usage.

Federal projects, career education, laws.

Budgeting and management systems.

Goals and objectives of work experience.

Concliuslons:

The most useful portion of the course to most participants was the

units of instruction involving:

Program funding.

Administrative and education codes.

DiscussiOn of the concepts of career education.

The district plan.

Child labor laws.

3. WHAT TOPIC OR PORTION OF THE COURSE WAS LEAST USEFUL TO YOU? WHY?

comments:

Goals and performance objectives.

Writing of objectives.

Financing.

DisCussions concerning management of programs:,

Discussion of career education.

The one nour used for PPOS.

31

Subjective questiOnnalt Page 4

Budgeting.

Budget classifications,

Objective writing.

Conclusions:

Veiy few of the participants answered this question. The sample of

comments Is so limited that the only conclusion to be drawn is that the

entire course content was relevant.

4. IDENTIFY ANY REDUNDANT SEGMENT OF THE COURSE IN RELATIOTO PREVIOUS TRAINING

OR EXPERIENCE.

Conclusions:

Only a felt of the participants identified redundant segmenti of the

course. Those who commented to this statement had attended the courses

offered lait year or during the summer at California Polytechnic State

University.

HOW COULD THE COURSE BE IMPROVED?

Comments:

Don't assume we know so much.

Its a.hard,course to improve. .

Better leadership and good plans;1 course of study to follow.

Spend more time on goals and objectives.

More time for in-depth instruction on laws and regulations.

More "doing activities".for the. class members.

More time spent onlegal aspects; using actual case studies.

Using more speakers and class` iscussion techniques.

Spend more time on career education.

Need more information on funding of programs.

Have. guests from business and industry to give their feelings on current

employment opportunities.

Limit the material to allow more time for'tareer education and laws.

32.4;

Subjective QuestionnairePage 5

Organize field trips to on -going programs.

-More time needed for related instruction ideas-and materials..

Conclusions:

The major conclusion drawn from the comments Is that more time needs

to be given to the same areas identified in Section 2;,specifically,

career education, laws, funding, related materials, and developing the

di-strict-plan.

6. WHICH TOPIC OR PORTION OF THE COURSE WOULD YOU DESIRE TO HAVE MORE IN-DEPTH

IN-SERVICE TRAINING? ALSO NOTE ANY AREA RELEVANT TO WORK EXPERIENCE

EDUCATION THAT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE COURSE IN WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE

MORE INFORMATION bR TRAINING.

COMlentS:

Laws and related instruction.

Related instruction activities.

Career education and how It fits into the total curriculum.

Development of good community. relations.

Cooperative education.

Special programs for handicapped students.

,N

Special education students - -how they fit into work experience education.

Goals and objectives for college programs.

Budgeting, reporting and funding of programs.

District. responsibilities. .

More on how to develovexploratory programs.

Writing of .Federal projects and plans.

Placement and communIty,contacts.

Operational proCedures.

Planning related instruction.

Program development.

More Information on development of five-year plan..

Presentations on each of the three types of work experience. Possibly'

presentations from example programs.

33

Subjective Questionnaire Page 6

Labor laws.

Organization of an advisory committee and how to work with them In developinga good community program.

Financing of programs.

We need a lot of_InformatIon on developing programsfor special students.

Conclusions:

Again, the,participants seem to be expressing a need for more time onthe specific areas of interest Indicated in previous conclusions. Two newareas where a strong need was indicated was Information on program develop-ment for special education and handicapped students, and selecting andusing the advisory committee.

7. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE OVERALL PRESENTATIONS OF THE INSTRUCTORS?

Implement Management College,Excellent 26 55 , 7

Satisfactory 11 18 ,1

Weak

8. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PRE AND POST TEST IN MEASURINGTHE IMPORTANT ELEMENTS OF THE COURSE?

`1207.21 Management Ccdlecle.Excellent 19 3Satisfalctory 20 33 .

Veak 5 17 0

9. HOW WOULD YO4 RATE THE INSTRUCTORS USE OF TIME DURING CLASS SESSIONS:LECTURE, INTERACTION, AUDIO-VISUAL, ETC.

. Implement -Manazment College,

Excellent 23 7Satisfactory 14 . 24 1

, Weak 0 . 1 0

,,IO. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE OVERALL FORMAT AND PLAN OF THE PROGRAM?

implement Management,Excellent 21 32

Satisfactory i3 36Weak 2 '' 10

34

College

2

0

'4

Subjective Questionnaire Paye 7

II11. PERSONALLY, HOW BENEFICIAL WAS THE INFORMATION YOU RECEIVED FROM THIS COURSE?

I.

II

, ..

II

Excellent

Implement Management21 36

College6

Satisfactory 1 321

, Weak I . 1 0

Results of Survey Questionnaire For Future Participation

l.)

WOULD YOU BE INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN FUTURE IN-SERVICE TRAINING

PROGRAMS OF THIS TYPE?

II ManagementManagement

- 33 *4b -. 7

College

Yes\Implement Management

II

No 2

/`

4 .0

II

2. SUGGESTIONS FOR SET-UP OF PROGRAM:

.

<

lepiTe_Intnt Management College

Same as this one 24 20 4IIWeekend workshops oli

_specific topics 8 32 4

Workshop meeting every. night -7,

IIfor one or two weeks 1 4 0

-V

1

TThele/au12-27-72

1

f.

4.

APPENDIX. E

PROJECT EVALUATION REPORT

FOR SPRING 1973

Project #40-30569 EFO -39-73

An Educational Professional Development Act Project

and

Project #40-30569 B-3-230'


Prepared By: R. V.\ Poole - Project Evaluator

\ May 25, 1973

Directed To: Kinsey t anzir Project Director

36

This ireport contains information describing the activitiesof the

Professional Development Series for Work'EXperience Education for

the Spring Semester'1973. The Spring program Summary includes:

1. Activities Related to State Priorities

2. Activities Related to Courses offered

3. Selection 'of Participants

4. Evaluation of Pretests and Post Tests

5. Conclusions

1. Activities Related to State Priorities

I 1. 1 Increasing Effectivness of Teaching for Disadvantaged.

.

and HandicaPed. Fifty Four percent of all participants

el in extension courses were directly associated with dis-

advantaged students.IThirty-three percent of all participants in extension

,. . .. .

courses were directly associated with handicapped students.

I . . .

1. 2 Updating Ocoupational Competencies

Participants were selected from broad geographical locations

not served by other professional development activities:.1, These locations were as follows:

1

Sacramento, San Francisco, Hayward, Redding, Fresno

Selma, Torrance, Indi:o and San Diego

1. 3 Updating Supervisory Skills

Seven percent of those enrolled in the courses were adminis-

trators of vocational programs.

37

"Page 2)

ct,

.4 -4

2. Activities Related td Courses Offered,. ..

..

..

2. 1 Five-graduate level extension courses in Operation of,. ,----.

Work Experience4Eddeitin.were offered at:. ,4 :**0 a ', )

'.

i

Location k Teacher.,

San Francisco William Sovel and James Mayo.

Sacramento '`` Alvin., Flint

Selma Hycintt4a JohnSon

Los Angeles Dwayne Brubaker

Indio Gebrge Batich

3.

(

2. 2 Six graduate level extension courses in Management of Work

Experience Education were offered at:

2. 3

44

LOcation Teacher.

Redding

San Francisco

Sacramento

Fresno

Torrance

San Diego

*.

John OlSen

Dennis Ragan

Jcit)ReynoldsNorviin Spencg

Donald'Averill

Robert Menke

.

One graduate level course in Community College Work

Experience Education was offered at:

Location TeaCher

Hayward Vern Gillmore

0

A

A

'goo90807060.

604030

to0

. 1 APPENbiX A'PRE7Esr- Pe$T TEST AVERA Ge. SCoRe5 FOR oPERATion

'Co. -E -58/ SPRING /973 173, 'PRE 123 POST

918

5.7

0

80 88 ems_

Tio 'BARICN BRUBAKER PUNT .JOHNSON MAY0-SOVEL. A ie6RAGE-Acel

oioo

fro

80

60

40

3020

10

0

4'4

PRETEST- POSTTEST AVERAGE: SCORES GOR AllAtiAE1WENrE*00=,...- 581-07 SPRING 1973

RTI'

g-84--- 5

V69

ii4

... ,

r/

V77 7:3

e -66 69

Pig

v1/1

0/------,

COMMUNITY COLLeGeEP'E-58I-8

/00 95908070

CO

50403020.40

(X0 614.1.-moge

Tz

4vER46e- 4L1- L EVel...S

39

NcREAEE

1

100

908070CO

604030

ro

.o

c

APPENDIX .APR47csr- POST. TE$T AVERAC-r.: SCORES FOR OPcSr:A#77;7;

AD.- E- 58/ snk"ING 1973: 4

8S 8399s .$3_,9z_... .L)V \

071 \

\100

.0,..0

91 .

BAR/CH BRUSAKeR FL/N AilAyGL5Ovel.: AvertA0E-41.1...

90'80

70

60- ! So

403o;.0

IC

_jv°

PPTTES4' PoST TES? AYEMAGE SCORES FOR nemflAcliiim7.go-6-561-07 4 SPRING /97,3 ,

.

0.

8 r-.1-795"---___.

:

7-7- , .r

0

,°

_0 G9

'---7/

00.-X--

AvERILL MEttKE or_sgN RAG AN REYNOLDS. .SPEcr AVERAGL.:' AL

comxciNfry COLLEGE-,472-E- ,sstiti- 8

loo 95

'8070Co

So46

2010

c.)

°RIM

79

AVERAGE %

40

L EV17:1-5

\

% INORE/4;G

%MI

1.

/cc

90E30

7060

40'.o;)

26to

APPENDIX APRETEST-! POST TES"- AVERAGE SCORES FOR OPERAT/Olv

CD.-E-581 SPRING /973 c=PRE ®=P09

% EIARICN BFILMAKER FUN .JOHNSON MAY0-.50VEL. AVEMAGE-Au-

.`

.7060

40

3:0

20IC

0

/0

PpETE57- POST TEST AVERAGE' $coR Es FOR ne/AnAocitieNTED-E- 597- 07 5 .117;RING /973

8-7 L'4 f3 1 84

_ 69

/--

7-7 r

i/

73 680-.7 M--6

o4A

/0

WIIP /o0iw 1 /

1 0,_

AAVERILL nifEnIKE OLSEN! RAG.41`7, REYNOLD.,' SPEi'iCC AVERAGE At

1

:

0/-?(F.

COMMUNITY COLLEGE-x420-ff - 5.a/-

/0090

807060504930ao

9

I

1

89

7/2

AVERAGE %, 4L1-1..EvELs

FINci; E/45E

Page 3

2. 4 A unit on Career Education was included in the course content

at all three levels. Questions relating to Career EducatiOn

were included in the Pretests' and post tests.

3. Selection of Participants

The following summary was prepared from the Registration Forms

of participants enrolled in the Extension Classes.

3. 1 Enrollment data for five Operation Classes.

Enrollment reported - 78

Forty-five percent of those enrolled had no prior EPDA courses

in Work Experience Education.

Fifty-five percentcompleted EFDA courses in Implementation

Coordination and/or Administration of Work Experience Education.

Fifty percent continued on into the Operation Classes from the

Implementation classes offered in the fall.

Forty-eight percent of those enrolled were directly involved in

Work Experience Education.

Sixty-six percent were involved in vocational education as teachers

or administrators.

Ninteen percent use the course content as background material

needed for performance of their present teaching assignment, and

plan to move Into Work Experience.

3. 2 Enrollment data for six Management Classes

Enrollment reported -119

Fifty -one percent of those enrolled had no prior EPDA classes in

Work ExperieRce Education.

4 2rA

Page 4

Fifty-eight percent completed EPDA courses in coordination,

implementation, or administration of Work Experience Education.

Thirty-three percent were presently involved in Work Experience.

Sixty-five percent were teachers or administrators of vocationaleducation.

Eighteen percent plan to move into some phase of Work Experience

Education.

3. 3 EnrollMent data for one COmmunity College glass

Enrollment reported - 11

Fifty-five percent of those enrolled had no prior EPDA course

in Work Experience Education.

Forty-five percent completed EPDA courses in coordination

and / or administration of Work Experience Education

Sixty-three percent were presently involved in Work Experience

Education.

Fifty-fille percent were teachers or administrato of Vocational

Education Program.

4. Evaluation Summary of Pretest and Post test

Results for Operation, Management and Community CollegeCourses (Also t see Appendix A)

4.1 OPERATION N-65

Percent ofPerfectTeacher

(ED-F 581-06)

Average Average Average PercentPretest Score Post test Score Increase Increase

Barich 43.50 58.88 15.38 35.34 91%

Brubaker 43.30 .. 55.15 11.85 27.36 85%

Flint 43.89 54.21 10.32 23.51 83%

Johnson 45.94 57.89 11.95 26.01 89%.

Mayo-Sovel 42.6t 5 7 . 15 14.49 33.96 88%.

TOTAL AVERAGE SCORE 87%143

IPage 5

IITeacher

Averill

I MenkeOlsen.

Ragan

Reynolds

ISpence

MANAGEMENT N-107

AveragePretest Score

(ED - E - 581 - 07)I.

Average AveragePost test Score Increase

PercentIncrease

Percent ofPerfect

71.16 81.30 11.02 15.48 77%

.69. 75 93t.03 23. 28 33.37 87%

70.15 89.35 19.20 27.36 84%

79.13 90.45 11.32 14.30 85%

78.27 95.90 17.63 22.52 90%

72.28 89.53 17.25 23.86 84%

TOTAL AVERAGE SCORE 85%

I .

.N COMMUNITY COLLEGE N-116(ED - E - 581 -.8)

I Average Average Average Percent Percent ofTeacher Pretest Score Post test Score Increase Increase Perfect

i GiUmore 91.91 110.33 18.42 20.04 95%

I .

4.4 Average Percentage of Increase for all three levels - 24%

IAverage Grade for all Courses - 89%

0 5. CONCLUSIONS

The following points are significant indicators of success of the project.

1 5.1 Forty-four percent of the total enrollment were practitionersin Work Experience Education

I5.2 Fifty-six percent of those enrolled were teacher's or administratorsof vocational education program in high schools and community

Icolleges.

4 4

Page 6

5.3 Fortyanine percent of the enrollment had no prior E. P.D. A.

course in Work Experience Education.

5.4 The holding power of the E. P. D. A. Classes in Work Experience

Education is demonstrated by 55% of those enrolled in the Spring

operation classes having continued on from the Fall classes.

5.5 Nineteen percent of those teaching in other disciplines plan to

move into Work Experience Education in the future:

5. 6 The location of courses at various points throughout the State

provided for- professional development of coordinators in areas

-not served by a similar program.A

5. 7 Pretest Post-test results indicate a satisfactory groWth factor

of 24% and an average post test score of 89%.

5.8 A high percentage of the enrollment in all three levels (51%)I

had continued on from a prior inservice extension course in

Work Experience Education. This indicates that this is acontinuing program which lends unity to Work Experience Education

throughout California.

5. 9 The results of the student subjeCtive evaluation indicate that the

courses provide relivency and that students were well satisfied

with the instructors presentations of the ..nurse content.

I

APPENDIX F

INTERIM. PROJECT EVALUATION REPORT

Subjective Questionnairea

Project #40-30569 EFO 39-73

An_Educational Profesiional Development Act Project

and

Project #40-30569 B-3-230


ftepated

ainected To:

A. L. Thele, Project EvaluatorMay 29, 1973

Kinsey Tanner, Project Director

46

1

SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION (Spring Semester)

Second SemesterSubjective Questionnaire

The following information represents results of a subjective questionnaireadministered to the participants of the Education Professions Development ActProject, Spring Semester 1973, "Professional Development Series for Work Expe.rience Educators 1972 -73."

Statements requesting a multiple choice response have been tallied andseparated according to the course which the respondent was enrolled in.

Statements requfring a short answer response have ben listed. Because of Ithe quantity of responses, a random sample was. used and conclusions representingall responses have been given.

This repoit follows the format of the subjective questionnaire.

HOW SUCCESSFUL WAS THE INSTRUCTOR IN MEETING THE OBJECTIVES OF THE COURSE?

Operational Management College

Excellent 62 94 4

Satisfactory 6 19 4.

Weak 0 0 0

1. WHAT CHANGES DO YOU ANTICIPATE MAKING IN YOUR WORK EXPERIENCE PROGRAMS AS

A RESULT OF THIS COURSE?

Commenta:

Work in developing our exploratory work experience program so that we can

involve more students.

Develop a legal vocational work experience program to confirm with State

and Federal laws.

Expand our general work experience program using such ideas as performanceobjectives and contracts.

Expand our'public relations program in th'escommunity.

We will attempt to develop an extensive exploratory program for our students,and expand on the general Wand vocational programs. J.

47

44,

I

1.

1

48

Subjective Questionnaire - Second Semester Page 2

An attempt will be made to involve elementary school students, particularly

the fifth and sixth grade levels in expiratory work experience.

We cannot make changes until we can convince district to expand the teacher

allotments for work experiCnce.

We will establish a cook and baker's program.

Reorganize our related instruction program.

Develop a more effective public relations program.

Develop standards and program procedures for'our program.

Will utilize the LAPS which was developed by the State Department.

Tighten procedures re%Ording enrollment and:labor codes.

Expand our vocational program.

Implement new methods .of related instruction.

Offer more meaningful related instruction.

Develop program according to established goals.

Expand our exploratory program.

Concentrate on developing a better in-plant vocational program.

Incorporating exploratory work experience in the science fields.

Conctu4ion4:

As a result of the Professional Development Act course for WorkExperience Education, the majority of respondents indicated they would

make the following changes in their programs:

Develop a more meaningful program for related instruction.

Expansion of exploratory programs.

Revise existing policies and procedures in relationship with existingState Education Codes and State and Federal Labor laws.

2. WHICH TOPIC OR PORTION OF THE COURSE WAS MOST USEFUL TO YOU? WHY?

Topics dealing with laws related to work experience education.

Exchanging of ideas.

Subjective Questionnaire - Second Semester Page 3

Labor laws.

Information on exploratory programs.

Budget.

Summer school programs.

Program management and finance.

Articulation with the lower grades.

Project writing.

Performance objectives.

The entire program was useful.

Career information.

Instructions on how to prepare and use LAPS.

Public relations and related instruction.

Information on how to write a State plan.

'Information on goals and objectives.

Career education.

Information about the Stull Bill.

PPBS.

Management of work experience education programs.

Instructional goals and objectives.

Conctu4Lon4:

The most useful portion of the course to most partidipants were the

units of instruction involving:t,

Concepts of career education.

Writing of performance objectives.

Developing district and State plans.,

State and Federal Labor laws.

4 9

-

`Subjective Questionnaire - Second Semester

3. WHAT TOPIC OR PORTION OF THE COURSE WAS LEAST. USEFUL TO YOU?, WHY?

Comments:

The Stull tilljwas.a waste of time. ,

Behavioral objectives.

1

Public relations.

Goals and objectives.

Conceptual design of work experience education.,

Learning activity packages.

Laws that do not apply.ti

Objectives-and funding of programs.a

funding of programs,

Objectives.

Organizational patterns.

Budgeting.

Conchaion6:\

.

The majority of those'responding to this'question were.

participantswho had attended previous EPDA courses, and workshops at Cal-Poly State

. University. From the remarks made by the participants, there seemed to,be an indication that the emphasis placed on goals and objectives should ,

be updated; and, that carefully prepared audio-visual techniques be usedin presenting these topics.

4. IDENTIFY ANY REDUNDANT SEGMENT OF THE 'COURSE IN RELATION TO.PREVIOUS TRAINING

OR.EXPERIENCE.

Comments: .

Unit 1 conceptual design was a review of previous experiende.

Work permits and public relations programs.

All I hear.at,these classes are labor laws, but I still need moreinformation qn them.

All the information was excellent and timely.

50

t3

, Subjective Questionnaire - Second Semester Page 5

Writing performance objectives.

Work permits---too much emphasis on accountability and PPBS.

Work permits.

Funding..

CO nctusio nA :

Very few participants indicated that the course was redundant. THeparticipants responding to this section indicated they had attendedprevious inservice courses and workshops where many of the same topics.

were discussed. The lack of responses under this section lead. to theconclusion that all aspects of this program were relevant to currentneeds.

HOW COULD THE COURSE BE IMPROVED?.

Comment4:

Separate the neophytes from those more experienced in work experience

edutation.

More time liven to class discussion.

Would like additional time built in for discussion of each others programs.

.Mor! time should be spent on budget and finance.

Don't

\know--greatas it was.

Allowihg teacher more.-freedom in program.

Excellent, as it is.

Provide mor'epririted reference materials.

Expand program\to includeive hours of instruction.,

More audio-visu&I\.and demonstrations.

More information on related instruction and,career education.

Using more speakers.\

Lot more ,information on, career education.

,

conetu,s4on.6:

The majority of participants indicated that they were very pleasedwith the program as it was presented. There were requests for additional

.1

s,

Oft

Subjective Questionnaire - Second Semester "rage 6

time for class interactions and discussions of local problems and programs.There seemed to be an interest in related instruction and materialsavailable,for related instruction programs.

6. WHICH TOPIC OR PORTION OF THE COURSE WOULD YQU DESIRE TO HAVE MORE IN-DEPTHINSERVICE TRAINING? ALSO NOTE ANY AREA RELEVANT TO WORK EXPERIENCE EDUCA-TION THAT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE COURSE IN WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE MORE

INFORMATION OR TRAINING?

Comments:

Methods of selling program to administration and public.

A.continuation of this course would be good.

A course designed to allow us to observe work experience students onvarious types of training stations.

More infOrmation is needed on preparing performance objectives-

Goals and objectives.

Career education.

Funding.

Budget and finance.

Related instruction.

More specific,infOrmatiton on how work experience programs operate incommunity city colleges and how they are different.from secondary programs.

Method of related instruction.

.

'Need more time on some of the areas that were covered!.

Financing.

.

Work experience programs.

ILaws. ,

Public relations on campus.

II

,

More emphasis on serving the needs of special educatiOnstudents.

II

Discussions on union problems.

i

.

,.

t

How to approach. employers.

Hoy to-evaluate a work experience program.. ,

5'2

1

Subjective Questionnaire - Second Semester

The impact of career education on work experiende education.

The use of advisor.; committees.

Page

Information on developing programs for special students,

Conetu4ion4:

A definite need was indicated for attention to be given in futurecourses to the handicapped and uther special edudation students. Anotherremark which prevailed throughout the answers to this statement was need .

for understanding:the responsibilities and use of advisory committees.Many pai.ficipants felt like the program which was offered was well struc-tured except more time was needed on areas involving funding of work

= werience education, methods of developing and implementing a publicrelations program, and general program operational procedures.

7., HOW WOULD-YOU RATE THE OVERALL PRESENTATIONS OF.THE INSTRUCTORS?

ssa ExcellentSatisfactoryWeak ,. ,

=

Operational Management' College61

. 7 .

0

8

23

0 .,

4

4

0:

8. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PRE AND POST TEST IN MEASURING'THEIMPORTANT ELEMENTS OF THE COURSE?

,..

. .0..

Operational. Management CollegeExcellent 23 26 .

.oSatisfactory 41 56

,

Weak . 4 27 0

9. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTORS USE OF TIME DURING cuss SESSIONS:.LECTURE,NTERACTIOR, AUDIO-VISUAL, ETC.

, Operational Management CollegeExcellent . 57 89 3 '

,. SatisfiActory 11 .20 5Weak t 0 0 0

10. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE OVERALL FORMAT AND PLAN OF THE'PROGRAM?

.Operational Management . CollegeExcellent 49 . -

3-...,....:1Satisfactory 18 30 5--__-.

Weak . 0 1 0.,.

--.

11. PERSONALLY, HOW BENEFICIAL WAS THE INFORMATION Y.O4'41ECEIVED FROM THIS COURSE?, ,1.

Operational .Management CollegeExcellent - 58

{. . 79 6Satisfactory '''' 9

.

29 2/

Weak 1 1 0

53

,14

,Subjective Questionnaire -"Second Semester .Page EL.

keauttzo6 Sunveui Queationnaiite For. Future rcucticiiclation

1. WOULD YOU BF INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN FUTURE INSERVICE TRAINING

PROGRAMS OF THIS TYPE?

\\Operational Management &legeYes t4

No .. \ 4 6 0.

.

2. SUGGESTIONS FOR SET-UP OF PROGRAM.

43ferational --Malement , 'Col 1 ege

Same as this one.

'48 8

Weekend workshops on , I

spedfic.topics 16. 28 0,

Workshop meeting every nightfor one or two weeks 1 , 3 ,A1

1.

1.

0 S,

TThele/au5/30/73

r .

\-f

. 5 4

err

1

S.

APPS IX G

QUARTERLY REPORT

July 1 - September 361 1972

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES FOR WORK EXPERIENCE EDUCATION .

Proje^t f40-30569EFO 39-73,

'Eadational Profesticnii.DevtiOpment Act Ptoject

0

o and

Project #40 -30569 B-3-230

A Vocational EdUcation Section Part B Project



c.f


Distributed to:

'Dr. James Becket

E. David GrafAllan HolmesDr. DaleAndrewsHoward BoroughsDr., Carl Cummins

Dr. Walter SchroederDr. Don Morris

Robert Poole.

5 5

I. PLANNING

1. The description_of'objectives of the project as stated in the contractare as follows:

1

This project is designed'to encompass eight basic objectives:

1.1. Conduct a summer workshop designed to familiarize educatorswith concepts of career education and their relationships withwork experience education.'

1.2. Conduct a summer workshop designed to familiarize workexperienceeducation personnel with materials'and methods for conductingrelated instruction classes.

1.3. ,Trainteight instructors who will present to participants of. themanagement courses, the strong philosophical and educationalreasons why goals and objectives are needed for work experienceeducation.

1.4. Conduct instructor training workshops to train teachers of thecourses the concepts of career education.

1.5. Present ten' (10) graduate level extension courses (5 in the falland 5 in the .spring) entitled "Work Experience Education-ImOlezientation" and "Work Experience Education-Operational."These courses to-be offered in five locations throughout the state..The 250 students attending will earn 2 quarter units of graduatecredit for each class. (Twenty-fiye hour6 of instruction perclass.)

. Present eleven (11) graduate level extension courses (5 in thefall and-6 in the spring). entitled, "Work Experience Education-Management" at eleven different locations for,300 participants.Participants will be-selected from those who. have previously,'attended the beginning courses and/or are.responsible foradministrative functions. Participants will receive three quarterunits of credit (Thirty hours of instruction.),

1.7. Present ta:ee (3) graduate level extension courses (1 in the fall .

and 2 in the spring) entitled, "Work Experience Education-In thei Community College." These arses will be offered in threelocations throughout the state. The 75 participants selectedto attend will earn three'quarter units of graduate credit.(Thirty hours of Instruction.)

1.8.' Provide in all four, courses a unit(sj in career education concepts1 /

as -they 're-ra-te to work experience education andto state and1\national educational priority.I

2. The courses offered are is follows:

Ed-E=581-05 - Work Experience Education-Implementation; for first and/second year work experience coordinators; types of work experience programs

and Methods of implementing a work experience program as a part of thetotal-curriculum (no prerequisite).

,

1.

/Ed -E {581 -06 - Work Experience Education-Operation; given in spring to/follbw Ed-E-581-05; labor codes, funding, public relations, related /instruction, education and administrative codes (prerequisite Ed-E-514or Ed-E-581-06 or permission of structor).

I

Ed-E-581-07 - Work Experience Education-Management; for experiencedcoordinators and administrators; accountability, financing and management

pt

theories for work experience education.

Ed-E-581-08 - Work Experience Education-Community College; for workexperience coordinators and cooperative education teachers at communitycolleges; development and operation procedures for work experienceprograms in the community colleges; accountability, education andadministrative codes, State Plan for Vocational Education in the communitycolleges.

3. The time schedule for objectives of the project as stated in the contractareas follows:

OBJECTIVES MET:

1. Summer workshop (Career' Education2.' Planning meeting3. Summer workshop (Materials for Related Instruction)4. Extension course teacher planning session (1.7-7)5. Extension course teacher planning session (1.7=5)6. Extension course teacher planning session (1.7-6)

OBJECTIVES IN PROGRESS:

7. Selection of participants"8. Courses to be offered (1 night per week -8 weeks

1.7-5)

9. Courses to be offered (1 night per week -10 weeks

1.7-7, 1.7-6) .

;OBJECTIVES PLANNED FOR:

10. Planning and evaluation meeting (1.7-5)11. Planning and evaluation meeting <1.7-6)12. Planning and evaluation meeting (1.7-7)13. Courses tO be offered (1 nig t per week -8 weeks

1.7-5)

14. Courses to be offered-(1 night per week -10 weeks1.7-6, 1.7-7) N

15. Evaluation meeting with course instructors (1.7-5)..16. Evaluation meeting with course instructors (1.7-6)..17. Evaluation meeting with course instructo'i i (1.7 -7)'..

18. 'Evaluation report

II. PARTICIPANT SELECTION

6/26-30/727/15-168/21-248/21-248/21-248/28-30

9/1-15

10/2 -12/1

10/2-12-14

12/91/6-731/13

2/12-4/13

2/12-4/264/285/55/12

5/28

1. The criteria for selection and the type of participants as stated in the

project are as follows:

Participants will be selected from those educators thaehavedemonstrated knowledge and/or interest in work experience education.Selection of teacher - trainers will be conducted by the project

director with assistance from the California State Consultant

57

for Work Experience Education and the head of the EducationDepartment, California Polytechnic State University.

Those who will attend the inservice training programs will be

selected by county and school directors of vocational educationin the immediate area being served by these courses.

745 persons will participate in the project. Participation

will be as follows:

1. 120 educators will attend the summer workshops at Cal Poly,

San Luis Obispo.

2. 250.new coordinators will be selected to attend the inserviceimplementation and operational, courses offered in Indio,

Pomona, Stockton, San Diego and Los Angeles.

3. 300 coordinators, vocational education administrators, counselors,

.offered in Fresno, Modesto, Sacramento, Los Angeles, San Mateo,etc. will be selected to attend the inservice management course

Marin County, Redding, San Diego, Long Beach, San Luis Obispo

and Salinas. L .

4. 75 community college coordinators and vocational personnel will

be selected to attend the inservice community college course

offered in San Mateo, Huntington, Beach and Pasadena.

Special emphasis will be given to the selection of participants in

continuation education and special education.

2. Applications received to date include only the participants in theCareer Education Workshop, June 26-30, and the WOrk Experience Education

Workshop, August 21-25, both held on the Cal Poly Campus in San Luis

Obispo.

65 people participated in the Career Education Workshop. By position,

the participant breakdown was:

22 Teachers17 Work Experience Education Personnel

11 Directors of Vocational Programs

r 8 Guidance Personnel2, College Teachers3 Secondary Administrators

2 Graduate Students

73 people participated in the Work Experience Education Workshop, August

21=25. By position, the participant breakdown was:

37 Work Experience Education Personnel

15 Teacherg11 Directors of Vocational Programs

4 Guidance Personnel4 Secondary Administrators`

2 Graduate Students

5a

I

The geographical breakdown of the Career Education Workshop was asfollows:

Centril Coast 17

Southern California 15San Francisco Bay Area 13

Central Valley 10Northern Valley 6

Southern California Desert 2

Northern Coast 2

65

The geographical breakdown of the Work Experience Education Workshopvas as follows:

San Francisco Bay Area 19Southern California . 18

Central Coast 12

Northern Valley 6

Southern California Desert 5Northern Coast 3

73

Data -on participant responsibility for disadvantaged and handicappedwas not available for this report.

III. OPERATION

1. Both the stated objectives and time schedule for the project have beenmet to date. The two summer workshops were completed, and judging fromevaluative data from the participants, were highly successful. Bothwere well attended and well received by the participants.. In spite ofnear 100 temperatures, the first and second days of the Work ExperienceEducation Workshop, attendance was excellent. The cooperation of the CalPoly Staff and Dr. Walter Schroeder, Head, Education Department, wa$'.excellent. The workshop agendas are included as appendix items A and B.The evaluative data is included as appendix items C and D.

2. During the quarter, instructors were contracted and sites were selectedfor the extension courses. Under the direction of the Project Director,the course of study outlines were developed for all four courses. Publicitybrochures were printed and distributed state wide to selected people.(See Appendix. E for brochure). Pre and post tests and subjective evaluationinstruments were developed by the project evaluators. Names and addressesof instructors and evaluators are attached in Appendix F. In addition tothe instructor's manuals, reference material for each course was collectedand compiled. The_instructor's training sessions were held at San LuisObispo in late August and the course manuals and reference materialsfurnished to them.

The fall schedule of classes will begin the week of October 2. Noparticipant data is available at this writing as enrollments wall

continue through October 6.

59

A change. was made in alias location from Stockton to Selma. This wasnecessary becau-se of difficulty in contracting. for a facility and to try

.

to fill a gsp in coverage of the stette. At this time, I see no otheTmajor changes or problems in meeting the objectives of the project.

60

100

41 0"1a.

g44

U 1

O 0

4i1.9 Wy

04.)

013

.444 4.a .1

mW

O0

0.0 LI

a.

a.

00.

0.4J

4J.0 1144

'0:109

0 0W

01.4

00-4

O 0 In W

-0

O",0

a0caW.

a.

00

gII

0 0O

GO

0$.4LI

'O

1.111

W04

4J0.

a00 0

00 0

O 4.144 0

LI 0 490 0C

Ug

CU

O .a

4p1 Q04to, $.

O g

00

C.)

U0 4.//-4.1

w

,.a 0 w

.34.3

0N

a43

kA w

,-.1p..10

4-1 4-1-

pd,o 0 Q

Z..../.

4J4J

r'lw

4.,4.,4

01 >4

O.4

A A

4 ...1c..)

4C1-1O

'.

C.)

r-I0 I",

MO"-I 0

C..)

0 .0C

a'0

01

4 a.. a

4..1

i.-1 0

M ..1LI

9-4

t..0

I

to-.1E

-9

01 at co,W

r.143

u0 0M

g0

0(..)

vii0

I-I1

4J44.)0r..-

"5 o 8t.:

0 .0..4

1.4..4

E-I

041

41.0

0...0or 0a

xit:o3 N

1.4

04J

kl,0

00

es1W

0 al.

'a..-1

41

" 4"741

g4; f;31

4. 1June 28

LP

N .

0 C14

Sra.

1-). o a.

0 z1-3:00

Dr. Patrick J. Weagraff

944 014

W 0 P

10

0P

ublic Services O

ccupations.3d

0)(44

11ca)

oC...)

O .0

Cr

43P

., CCurriculum Project

.c

0W

sei§. -g.0 u

State Department of Education

W1,

r-I

4.11

8`4

uII"

4/ WV

/ ;40 ..

0Current Curriculum Practices and

.i.,

c

4

o0 C4

43 Z0 0

0*1 0

4.1C

..)e

Activities in Career Education

.-1 ..-101

4.,G

x4..9

is3a.J

14C

O00

cn. V

al1" V

4- 0

Dr. Patrick J. Weagraff, Director of a

O ,..,

cle

o m

a I.-IC

/3as

E.

United States Office of Education

-0

>.

Project to develop nationally

u

ABOUT THE PROGRAM PRESENTATIONS

applicable guidelines for one of the

career education Clusteri, willpresemr

an over vier of current curriculum

IA-actives and "activities in career

education.

Participanel will be

proliided ouiterials describing the six

curriculum project's being conducted

across the United States as well as

the names of individuals to contact

for further information. A typical

"model" will be provided.

Samples of

career education curriculum materials

that local teachers and administrators

may expect in comingmonths will also

be distributed.

June 26

1:00

7Orientation and'introductidns,

Objectives of the workshop

2-5:00

Mr. Paul Peters, Director

Career Education

California State Department of

Education

'

Mr. Paul Peters,. Director of Career Ed-.

ucation, and members of the California'

State Career Education Task Force will

present information and materials:in

the following major areas:

1.

Concepts of Career Education for

2.

Status of Career Education in

California.

3. Task Force operation.

4.

Strategies for implementation of

Career Education 'in California.

June 27

1-5:00

Mr. Paul Peters, Director of Career Ed-

ucation, and members of the California

State Career Education Task Force will

continue with their presentation. Major

emphasis will alsozbe placed on the

national scope of Career Education.

0,U

VI

riw

41271

L;4.1

to0

0.611111.11

Z4C

1.4de

3-5:00

Mr. Harry Krell, Coordnaior. -

Work Experience Education

Covina Valley Unified School

District:

Work Experience Education is an

C1.7

Integral Part of Career Education-,,

Work Experience Educatioh assists

students in identifying tentative

career goals through selective

employment in the world of work.

It is recognized that the level of

achievement'ability, motivation,-

and goals of students vary in degree;

all studentsneed the Opportunity

to develop their unique vocational

potential.

The Covina Valley Unified

School District-has developed a

-

computer- assisted approach of

_selecting students who.have reached

the level of proficiency necessary

for placement in vocational training

sites within the community. .The

system of selecting and placing

students will.be discussed during

this session.

ai"Im

e NE

poi I=.

low

June 29

1-5:00

Mr. Robert A. Sampieri

Director of the Comprehensive

Career Education. Model

Los Angeles City Schools

As director of one of the six United

States Careet Education Models, Mr.

Sampieri will

direct'his presentation

to four major areas:

1.

Identification of goals and

objectives4

career education.

2.

Utilization of district personnel` :.

.to develop goals

and objectives

of career education.

3.

Format of an instructional unit

to accomplish goals and objectives

of career education.

'4.. 4.

Identifying strategiei of installing

and implementing the goals and

objectives of career educatiOn.

tOJune 30

1-5:00

Mr. Norvin Spence, Supervisor

Work Experience Education

Modesto City. Schools

w Mr. Spence will present the Modesto'

City Schools Career

Edudation Model

Project which involves thirty junior

high students and two teachers r-one---

in social stud esand--o.rT language

e student's selected thenine-

-week model as one of the thirty-six

choices of an.activity--seventy-five

minute mini-course-1)y 'career.

The

model.is organized around this

involvement of the student in acti-

vities that relate to three United

States Office of Education Occupational

Clusters in Community Service Careers.

CREDIT - Ed-647-01 CareerEdUcation

(1.5 units professional ciedi

WORKSHOP FEE - $20':00,

HOUSING - Excellent dormitories on the

campus at the following rates:

-- $5.00 per day - one per room

$4.00 per day - two per room

STEAK BARBECUE.? Tuesday evening,

June 27, 6:00 p.m. Poly Grove, $5.50

This is An event that no one should

miss!

PARKINt,PERMITS - Required of all

-

"

Vehicles on camptis:

Will be avail-

' able at the Registration Desk at

$1.00.foNthe Workshop.

WORKSHOP ROOM NUMBER - Science E27

._

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT:

'

ALLAN HOLMES

TONYTHELE

Workshop Coordinators

Education Department

California State .Polytechnic College

San Luis Obispo, CA'93401.

.W

O IM

O.

'1=

11!

1111

1IM

O IW

OIN

III=

1

0.4 0 0.1 0 101

"0

Po

P.-.0 r..

1-1

a)o

,.

oal

g'

I

CO

r 01L

sti

cl.

gcn

" o1

m

coe

til,ta

tr

4S

oo

Co.

kg:

cn,N

1rt

P.-.

.4n

ca4

a g

ge

rt

0.

to

OO.

0° t-

IP"

On

P.-

.cn

''411

33

NO

rt=

"cr

n"

8.)

Op.

-M tn a.

_o

OI.

-4

AI-

,O

ell

0'0

00

I.+

0C

M 3

0 0

n11

1,

ti O

V

.M

I 11

..,1

1111

1µ

ct,

CO

0

NR

.010144

w

1.4

0.c V

44ela 14el

k0w..-40%

V.-4 w.

1

..>

,>

, 410 0

nr./1.4

W00.-4

104.414"

Id40

Z S

i0

100

0 0O

.4.4

0a .

V0 V

A0 0

w or.

O 411

urO

CY

e(,

o-4

s, ....,a

g.. -

o0

0 li.0 V

'V

1.4

o a.

m o

c ce

o....4..l4w

4.1 0011 3

a:

44

a.

or44.1

..otMajor goals, program goals,

-0

0..1

V 0

14)4M 1.4

performance objectives, will be

g A

areviewed.

fA

.

4111.

WORKSHOP'PROGRAM AND SCHEDULE

Monday, August 21

.,

1:00

Enrollment, schedule', orientation,

objectives'& pre-test -

Staff

2:00

Provisions for related instruc-

_tion in California ,Administrative

14.m

4'

14C

Yi41

(Code, Title 5

Staff

0.4

44 44.O

0 .-.42:30

Break andsinteraction,

4.J

4-sco

co Rr4.1

O 0 th :41

3:00

Elements of related instruction-

A A

13

1.. Goals

.Spence

2. Economic trends

3. Reliedial .

10

..

w a

-a4

of1.9

4if

VI

)

m0

0ta

,

a0 c c

..4c

00

.0

3:45- Goals & objectives of work exper-

t°

00 tir

1444

coas

1arm, 5:00

ience education.-

Averill

O 0

O 0

0;44 0c1P

0)..-4O

VO

W .04./

O.-1411 'a

I.0 II

90Id

'a0 )

' 14IC

4.0 0ri.

a0

yr4.4

Ch

Va

r.1 liU

0C

P

.0C

P*

E-i

.4113

...1IA

W C

AC

u.0

>, .-4

CA

CO

= .-1

CO

Cd

0., 1

4 C0

.0a. 0.

r.1V

A 0

00

C1

.."/ 4 00

010

0cis

'4J

sr).0

.cn

4..)to

" vs'

roA

44 t;si413

1.-1..4 43

IiOi

it44 0

140 C

D.

P',

0, 0O

0C

Y

W.

a;11

C...)

; at'A

4.640 04 .

00

0C

l)0 rt

a0 ..4

V0

0.-4

00a -

0 ctO

4)C

rri 0

CY

04 1.4

CY

4.4;44 x

.-4W

/00

1.40

00W

mi

co0

'"0 cal

00

.0A

.2,

0so

se .0 ,1(11

aa

..4

0to

i 0 =i

-4C

i)1.1

F-4

.30

V44 ..4

bp

Zile

V '44 . Z

44.1

IS '00

04.1 0 ir-

0o 2

0 .4u

.co z

..c 0ux. 0

we E

N is.

rit

4.1C

O

I

W 1.1

Tuesday, August 22

r.1g

1:00

aa.

Techniques for individualized

instruction -

'Averill

1. Learning Activity Packages

2. Independent study

.3. Outside assignments

'4. Individual reports

2:30

Break and interaction.

3:00

Materials for individualizing

instruction -

Spence

Samples of LAPs which have been

'developed and refined will be

distributed to all participants.

4:00- DevglopMent of materials for

.5:00

individualized instruction-Averill,

Spence

Participants will be given an

opportunity to develop a LAP or

other materials which can be

'

used by4individual work exper-

ience education students.

Wednesday, August 23

1:00

Techniques for conducting group

instruction =

Spence

Role playing, simulation, games

socio-drama,'panel discussion,

lectures, etc.

2:30,


3:00

Materials for conducting group

instruction -

Averill

Samples of materials which have

been developed -for conducting

group instruction will be dis-,

tributed and discussed.

4:00- Development of materials for

QD

5:00

group instruction Activities.

6:00

Barbecue, Poly Grove.

Thursday, August 24

1:00

Sharinvreative.work - Averill,

Spence

Individual and group materials

developed during the previous

two days will be discussed.

2:30

The PPBS Cycle -

Averill

3:00


3:30

The PPBS Cost Data Sheet-Averill

Participants will be given infor-

_-mation on how to comply with

.PPBS insofar as program,costs

are concerned.

my

am

um mum um

MN

=II

4:39- Complete your own data sheet.

5:0N Each participant will get a

start toward preparing a cost

data sheet applicable to his

own program.

Friday, August 25

8:00

Patterns for summer work exper-

ience education -

Averill,

Spence

Various approaches to offering-

work experience education in

summer school will'be pre-

sented.

9:30

Projects 1972-73 -

Staff

10:00


10:30

Questions, problems, answers

and solutions -

Staff

Participants will have an

t,

opportunity xo raise specific

questions 61.pose problems con-.

cerning or relating to their

own work experience education

CZ:

program.

The staff will be

avaflable to provide .answers

and solutions.

11::30- Post test and certificates-Staff

12:00

WORKSHOP INSTRUCTORS

Donald Averill, Director of Career

Education, Huntington .Beach Unlop.

High School District. Past president

of California Association of Work

Experience Educators.

porvin Spence, Supervisor of WOrk

'Experience Education, Modesto'City

Schools.

President of California

- Association of Work Experience

Educators.

No

imm

Imo

0-

CREDIT - Ed-644-01Work Ekperience

Education (1.5 units of

professional credit)

WORKSHOP FEE - $20.00

HOUSING - Excellent residence halts on

the campus at the following

rates:

$5.00 per day - one per room

$4.00 per day - two per room

STEAK BARBECUE - Wednesday evening,

August 23, 6:00 p.m., Poly GroVe,"$5.50.

An event that no one should miss!__

PARKING PERMITS - Required of all

vehicles on campus. Available at

the Registration Desk for $1.00.

WORKSHOP ROOM NUMBER - Science E27

WORKSHOP CONSULTANT - Dr. Norman Eisen,

Director of Educational Services,

Whittier Union'Hiei School District

RESOURCE PERSON - Allan HoIMes,

State. Consultant for Work Experience

Education

fi

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION'QONTACT:

TONY THELE

Workshop Coordinator

Education Department

(8057546-2629)

California P4lytechnic State University

San Ltiis Obispo, CA93401

mum

mm

ies

.sm

e

C) 1 0. rr 0 rr

--

OD

(1)

"

a-

'111

rrrr

0-.

It

rr 0 rn is

C)

03 ?- 111 0 'N. O

CC

I03

0rr

rrit

'0ce

O0

0w

.IV

00 0

0

r8

al3

4cp

crn

t-,,,

Rt

1,,,,

,...

..P2

,9g

.u,

4:1

1

Pi1.

n0

IN

IC

IC

n03

03.

t,.0

0C

OI

? Pe

rrP

IG

.0-

104

Orr

,-'

CA

)10'

0rr

11I

Cr

.4".

V0-

3It

.m

`-4

4.1

0to

lM

0=

rr= 1.

4' 4

m rt

rr rrr

0 1111

ism

ma

sou

rn c 3Iii

Iin

-A: ETRost

Caltiornis liolycenthl.te State Duivtrs.t.trS.ut Lots 01;lepo. (7411.iforult.

CaP.):EK 1:110CA NON. volt:zr.tiO?June 26 10, 1971

tv14qatioh SuAmnr---Csr(ter Edvcttrion TAa!,, Forte Preumadtion. Jt.cs 25, 27

I I 1 Th." topic oe "CaretIrldi.ention" is timely end appraprints f6rF-1 1-0-1I 501 '.,.....1

a serkJhop 'of this type.-

I -,:t uo I

1 .-,-,2, This trat,fesshop to.t..1' (1) .-tart? rtthioved Us ptytioite, (2) st:tiewtaI .

..........1,

I I 8 ! 11-; 141,.

3J..........

., .. .it only tacdoTately, (3) hJe not achieved Its purv...3se.

In \-.,:- I., 3--k'

.

.1 I.,. ..(.:.:41k* i.,

..1/..T.hq) tOttir,c.ti for the i(zorkthol: (1) sags wt11 ort;:fra",'..t.,,:- In tt.,.17-1.fl of! I ' i 1 i IV5 171.1Vpf.,y,.*: apt'. At:: nigh CAexouth, (2) via. iFat. ',tit it 44c,,,,O.d hAve, .

..........,

1(It...,

I 291 110:,.

.... 3bemill orgurntzcatbvtlir, 0) VAS poorly ors.lftired,

, !

1C . -

-, ---I

.

4, 'fluhA dtirs(tol of the watItshopt (I) vas abott right., !2) =ri'. elInt.--1 1-1 vttv petw,d, (J) less tit4.4.1 14149 niNededq (.,124. 1 ni.. :

.2.1i i .) t .......:

*).

i...)3

1

i Th. Isefnednlc- of .-letts.-Itien utl: (1) tot.* LItht, si... Cc* ".0.000.1

-- (I) Jost .4tbo1/41t.ri3hc.

:II125.%....... ..*)

1-71

.-i--

1"-

;16;

lu this workshop, **well sts lit and tzs.0.1 grcitr)tligliSelous by ttto 'tar r,s1. u9z,4 : for-Lf.voly., (2) .....hat

I filei Vt1y, (3) .poor i.y.,

I I 1

' ....'"".. ----t,

1 381 . Isl.,,1

1. ''1%t, vorkbhop aetivittes %were gr.;utrstly: (.) stitule leg, (.") 111xndit: terms of thttir impiA.C. (3) borir.g.

1.4.' ,....4s

/ I

,.. i

1

I .

S. (eners,:t!%,. ct...! vorlcshop a4:t.tvi:.les oz.r.4!: ,l) most 4:1plul,

IC I t-'-'1--------"1-2I iiii'istu: k zi A lifIret 4 ii), .9itt: rofil:y he:!;41.11..

I

1...

65C.

fe

4

1

112SONNEL

2 3,

32 E

2 .3

Svaluittimajamr=glatridlcation Task Force ?mitigation-_------

Pass 2

9. Haw welldid the workshop participants contribute toward the'achievemiltn of the purpose of the work hop? (1) very well,(2).sorsighat well, 3) foorly. .

. . 1

10. How-do you rate the effectiveness of the workshop consultants ?((1) highly effective, (2) effective,. (3) not effective,

. .,

11. -What did 'you-like most *out-the-Task-Force puss-aim-tont

/116 AMP

12._ What did you like least about the Task Force presentation?

ti

66

a

111 Os. .11

YEN.//,; 11111111M

-

1 40

1

49

'3

:i s

E17 3

;11 [1

1 2 3

."12i rz]

\I -2' 3 4

3

11.1.2ILDI". 2 3

Fl")1 7 2 3

I0

Calioznia Polyw.lmic 14dversitir

let Luis Obispo, Gm]

aFSRIENCE HUVTATIVN WOkSHYJP

Ategus 71-75; %972

A, P11:1SE

ri

1, This workshop has: (:. c..errly schievedits purposs,(2) achieved it only modiwately, (3) hss.not achievedits purpose, .

2, The subject "Related InarlsctioWeis tively andtappeopriate'/for a workshop of this type.

Coamientel.

1111111111111M.

It. ACITICA

lob

wrawigsaws.....4.1.11000.11..=.=1111=1. 'me. agenda for this workshop: (1) was well organized in

teems of its puipose and Lts time elements, (2) was finebut it could have been ortonfted better, (3) was poorlyorganized,

'

2. Thi duration of the workshop: (1) was about right, (2) moretime vas. ieeded, (A). less Mae was needed.

3, the time.schedule-forthe workshop should be: (1) in the.norninv, (2) in the aftert.orpa,(3) duripg both marningsand afternoons with a ,"frce" day, (4) in the morning withspeceal events in the ofttrmlocs? (5) in the afternoons with*:Ipecial, events in the Worrino,

COOM401$1INOMAIMME/.1~1

,......11011. ONION OM111111111MI.,

C. ACT1AT/ES I.

le '23r. workshop activities were generally: (1) stimulat104..(2) mi4o1 in terms of their ?Impact, (3) boring..

1, i:prefer workshop activities that: (1) emphasize smalli,roup settings, (2) provide uore individualized /involvement,(3) emplint7f.. Icage group pr,Isenratioas,

.

&4WV.:0: ,, ,IMANNIMMOMmemiIMEMOr

,... l e . r w. ,Ot 0. Wfl 4,41 IMO MIMr..116AY

Olno.v1, MIMI% I. 11.0111 ..011/.... illow1.

.S.

'Cl

1

1

O

1. , Diu ideal physical faciliti T9 for this- workshop:

(3.) were abouL_right 4A we ha.: on li:rle mectiog molt

IYILJit adOrating rooms aviila'alf!, (2) 1 ?refer-a largeroom *rich tables to provide for small aroops in 'Of samelocation, (3) have all activie.tes ins theater type.' room,

() one large lecture room vi*.h smslle: rooms coot:I:talon:table for group activities.

CtAsoents:

.......**....,*

'N mud IIIKL

- ammo...nom.0

4

. , A .,

1. Blowoutd ybu rateithe presIntatioas by, Slienco And Aver0.1?

1 2 3

M1 2 3

011,,anizotion

De:1ivery

Al4propv.steness fortLis wori.fhop

14:weriai:s used ,

Poor

I rINN11...

Pair Good

Mai ml

1.2

Ent n 1 Lent

I

--;L

.2. W'' well did the workshop peer centers c,,ntrihme tat hc

'at 'tieven+ of the purpese 31 he ttrole..tilop? '(1) ve,lry wt,11,

eamokhat well, (3) poorly

'3. Map do ylu, rate the eftectipAless of the work,hop ,pro:viccra?

(highlT eliicEive, (2) effective, TJ) not a:'e4tve.*

MATEXALS

1. 71 el materibli Alstributed a: !his wo...411hop: (1) Jir".. o' value to me, (2) we may Hit sows; of the matt.A.!,t11 in

i 6 nr dist:let: (3) car plans ire a1rea41, sot. Cc WI itC4.

4tut! materials from thie wor WI op, (4) Greed can

hmIlly'vstt .

Cements,..m.mVma,mraso.*.mmwomlmwoommmmrmammlimvmlameomvvmo.l.m.w.e0m..mmmWmmAmemm.Vwlwm.,

V01 . ./-2-

68

P111141= "N. olomDe r11

r.

a

002 3 4

ert

G. vti.str..Ts

1. As a iecult of this worksho': (WI nyv have addltioaalinformation that will enable re to prm ide 210tdrelated instruction, (2) I nowainitiste R program ofquality related instiuction, (3) the workshop Will notaffect my program to- achy groat extent, (4). I now have the

ILformatIon I need to impro0 my'sehcols' program, but ,

Cc?Imentc:

2. Whet dietyou like most about: the Related InatructioaWeTI.6hop?

111 4444mmormarm hmi.44.4

VO:41144{. fa

3, Wt-It did you like twist aho:it the Relsti InsructlemWkIkchop?

IMMO.

Stri 1111411

4

J.

*

41.144 /11, 11111111111IMMINI.

.3-

, 69

I

I

51 V

INSTRUCTORS' ADDRESSES

AVERILL, Donald F.Direcpor,-Care'er Iducation

Huntington Beach Union High School District1092 -1 17th.Street-:

. I

Huntington Beach, CA 92648(714)!536-9331 ext. 239

; BARICHj , George W. /

Director, Work Experience EducationRedlands Unified School District33 West Lugonia AvenueP.O. Box 1008Redla'ds, CA 92373

I

.(714) 792-1178

BRINKERHOFF, Bud

I

CoOrdinator, Occupational:1 Education

Acalanes Union High Sch ol District;

1212 Pleasant Hill RoadLafayette, CA 94549(415)1935-2800

BRUBACER, Dwayne L.Superyisor) Work Experilence EducationLosAngeles City School450 N4 Grand Avenue, Rom H-236Los Angeles, CA 90054(213)687-4636-

FLINT,] Alvin

Seciallist, work Experien e EducationSan Juan Unified School Di trict3738 Walnut AvenueCarmichael, CA 95608(916) 484 -2176

FLORA, 1Iaurice R.

Coordinator, Work Experience ducationCharter Oak Unified'Ilqchool Di trict20240-C enega AvenueCharter Oak, CA 91722(213) 96-8331

GARCIA, lbert (Pinky)

-Coordin4or, Work ExperienceSequoia High SchOolBroadway and BrewsterRedwood dity, CA 94063(415)365-11871

Edu ationi

IJ

GILLMORE, Vern (Dr.)

liege of San Mateo17b0 West Hillsdale Blvd.San Mateo, CA 94402(415) 574-6422

MAYO, James B.Coordinator, WorkFremont-UniA0775

Experience Educationfied School District

Fremont Blvd.Fremont, CA 94538-

(415) 657-1865

MENKE, RobertDirector, Vocational EducationSan Diego City Schools4100 Normal Street.San Diego, CA 92103(714) 298-4681 ext. 489

MURASKI, EdwardDistrict CoordinatorRio Hondo Community College3600 Workman Mill RoadWhittier, CA 90608(213) 692-0921 ext. 241

OLSEN, JohnCoordinator, Work Experience EducationShasta Union High School District725 Cypress AvenueRedding, CA 96001(916) 241-3261

RAGAN, DenisRedwood High SchoolDoherty DriveLarkspur, CA 94939(415) 924-6200

RAY, GordonDirector of Vocational EducationSalinas Union High School431, West Alisal Street

Salinas, CA 93901(408) 422-4703

REYNOLDS, JackSacramento City Unified School District163:9 N Street

P.O. Box 2271Sacramento, CA 95810

71

-2-

SOVEL, WilliamSan Mateo Union High650 N. Delaware St.San Mateo, CA 94401(415)347-3031

Capuchino High SchoolSchool District 1501 Magnolia Dr.

San Bruno, CA 94066CALL HERE: (415) 588-4276

SPENCE, NorvinSupervisor, Work Experience Education426 Locust St.Modesto, CA 95351(209) 523 -1851

EVALUATORS:

POOLE, RobertP.O. Box 682Los Altos, CA 94022(415) 948-2768

THELE, TonyDirector, Work Experience Education & PlacementEl Camino College16007 Crenshaw Blvd.Via Torrance, CA 90506(213) 324-6631 ext. 265

72

P

APPENDIX H

QUARTERLY REPORT

October 1 - December 31, 1972-

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES FOR WORK EXPERIENCE EDUCATION

.

Project #40-30569 EFO 39-73r

An Education Professions Development Act:Project

and

Project #40-30569 B-3-230 .



.San Luis Obispo, California

4


Distributed to:.

.

1r. James BecketE. David Graf*

Allan }Wines'Dr. Dale AndrewsDr. Howard BoroughsDr. Carl CumminsDr. Walter-`SchroederDr. Don MorrisRobert Poole

,Tony Thele.

4'

,e0V

/

73

I. PLANNING

1. Theare

Th

1

description of objectives of the.project as stated in the contract

as follows:

is project is designed to encompass eight basic objectives:

.1. Conduct a summer workshopAgesigned to t'amiliarize educatorswith concepts of career edUcation and.their "relationships withWork experience education.

.

1.2. Conduct a summer workshop designed.to familiarize work experienceeducation personnel with materials and'methods for conductingrelated instruction classes.

1.3. Train eight instructors who will present to participants of themanagement courses, the strong philosophical and educationalreasons why goals ana objectives are needed for work experiqnce

education.

1.4. Conduct instructor training workshops to 'train teachers of the

courses the concepts of career education.1.5. Present ten (10) graduate-level extension courses (5 in the fall

and 5 in the spring) entitled "Work Experience Iducation -Implementation" and "Work Experience Education - Operational..Tnese courses to be offered in five locations throughout, the state.The 250 students attending will earn 22 quarter units of graduate

credit for each class. (Twenty -five hours of instruction per

class.)1.6. Present eleven (11) graduate level extension courses (5 in the

401 and 6 in the spring) entitled, "W. 'Experience Education -Aanogement" at.eleven dfTferent location for 300 participants.Pasticipants will be selected from those who have previouslyattended the beginning courses and/or are responsible for

administrative functions. Participants will recei'Ve three quarter

units of;credit. (Thirty hours of instrudtion.) -

1.7. Present Etiree (3) graduate level extension courses (1 in the falland 2 in the spring) entitled, "Work Experience Education - In the

Community Collo4." these courses will be'offered in threelocations} throughout the state. The 75 participants seledtedto attend will earn three quater units of graduate credit.(Thirty hours of instruction.)

1.8. ProVide in all four courses .a unit(s) in career education concepts,as they relate to work experience education and to state and .national educational priority.

2. The courses offered are as follow:

Ed-E-581-05 - Work Exfierierce Education - Implementation; for ,first and

second yar work experience coordinators; types of work experlence programsand methods of implementing ay work experience progiam as a Part of the

tot']. curriculum (no prerequisite). t

Ed -E- 581 -O.6 - Work Experiende iEducaion - Operation.; given in spring to

follow Ed-E-581-05; labor cellos, funding, public rg ations, relatedinstruction, education and administrative codes prerequisiee Ed -E -544

EdE\ -581-06 or permission'f instructor).

7 4

EdrE-581-07 - Work Experience Education - Management; for experiencedcoordinators and administrators; accountability, financing and managementtheories fof work experience education.'

Ed-E-581-08 - Work Experience Education - Community College; for workexpefience coordinators and cooperative education teachers at.commmnitycolleges'; development and operation procedures for work experienceprograms in the community colleges; accountability, education andadministrative codes, State Plan for Vocational Education in thercommunity

.colleges.

3. The time schedule for objectives of the prgject as stated in the contractare as follows:

OBJECTIVES MET:

1. Summer workshop (Career Education)2. Planning meeting3. Sumner workshop (Materials for Related Instruction).

6/26-30/727/15-16

8/21-24'4. Extension course'teacher planning session (1.7-7)... . 8/21-245. Extension course teacher planning session (1.7-5)... . 8/21-246. Extension course teacher planning session (1.7-6)... . 8/28-307. Selection of participants 9/1-158. Courses to be offered .(1 night per week -8 weeks

1.7-5) 10/2-12/19. Courses to be offered (1 night per week -10 weeks

1.7-7, 1.7 -6) 10/2-12/1410. Planning and evaluation meeting (1.7-5) 12/9

OBJECTIVES PLANNED FOR:

11. Planning.and evaluation meeting (1.7-6) 1/6/7312. Planning and evaluation meeting (1.7-7) 1/1313. Courses to be offered (1 night per week -8 weeks

1.7-5) 2/12-4/1314. Courses to be offered (1, night per week -10 weeks

1.7-6, 1.7-7) 2/12-4/2615. Evaluation meeting with course instructors (1.7-5) 4/2816. Evaluation meeting with course instructors (1.7-6) 5/5

17. Evaluation meeting with course instructors (1.7-7) 5/12

18. Evaluation report 5/28

PARTICIPANT SELECTION

1. The driteria for seledtion'and the type of participants as stated in theproject are as follows:

Participants will be selected from thoge educators that have demonstratedknowledge and/or interest in work-experience education. Selection ofteacher-trainers will be conducted by the project director with assistancefrom the California State Consultant for Work Experience Education, andthe head of the Education Department, California Polytechnic StateUniversity.

44.1

75

I

Those who will attend the in-service training programs will beselected by county and school directors of vocational education'in the immediate area being served by these courses.

745 persons will participate in the project. Participation will

be as follows:

1

1. 120 educators will attend the summer workshops at Cal Poly,

. San Luis Obispo.' ,

,

-

2. 250 new coordinators will be selected to attend the in-serviceimplementation and operational courses offered in Indio, Pomona,Stockton, San Diego and LosiAngeles.

3. 300 coordinatos, vocational education administrators, counselors

v etc. will be selected to attend the in-service management courseoffered\in Fresno, Modestdc Sacramento, 'Los Angeles, San%Mateo,Marin County, Redding, San Diego, Long Beach, San Luis Obispo

.

and Salinas..

4. 75 cotrnunity college coordinators and vocational personnel willbe selected to attend the in-service community college courseoffered in San-Mateo, Huntington Beach and Pasadena.

Special_emphasis will be given to the selection of participants incontinuation education and special education.

2. Total applications received to date include 138 who enrolled Sn workshopsas reported in the fall report. The fall series bf courses enrolled210 educatord.

Courses were offered in the following locations:

. "Work Experience Education - Implemedtatidh"Ed -E- 581 -05. Enrollment' /-

Indio 8

Selma 19

Los Angeles -11

San Francisco 16

Sacramento 16

1

"Work Experience Xducation - Management"-Ed-E-581-07 Enrollment

West Covina 12

Salinas 24

Modesto 38

Lafayette 11-San Jose 16

*Ventura 19

"Work Experience Education - Commdnity College"Ed-E-581-08,Enrollment

Los Altos 11

Whittier 9 .

(See appendix A for geographic breakdown of participants)

* Course.started 11/1/72, will bel complete 1/10/73

76

II1:4

II OPERATION

The breakdown by position was:

"Work Experience Education - Implementation"

67% were directly involved with Work Experience Education377. were directly involved in Vocational EdUcatiOn337. hope to move into Work Experience Education


.66% were directly involved with Work Experience Education45% were directly involved in Vocational Education30% hope to move iDto 'Work Experience Education

"Work Experience. Education - Community College"

92%1 were, directly involved with Work Experience Education357. were directly involved in Vocational Education

.

.01. The stated objectives and time schedule for the project have been met

to dat.e. All factors considered indicate the fall. series of classeswas very successful. 4Both interim evaluation reiiorts (included.asAppendices B & C) shaii a high caliber of instruction by the variousinstructors., The average ,post-test score was 85%, showing a gain of16.557° over the pre -test. Perhaps, most indicative of participantevaluation, 92% Of the subjective evaluations returned said theywould like to participate in future inservice programs. 010.

To date, 348 of the anticipated 745 participants have enrolled. Theenrollment in the fall series of classes smaller than expected.However, the high percentage (657) of the participants directly involvedin Work Experience Education indicates the courses were relevant to needs.

Publicity information fliers were printed and distributed for each classin the spring series. (Samples included as Appendix D.)

2. Planning and evaluation meetings will be held with all instructors andproject evaluators January 6, 1973 in Southern California and January 13,1973 in Northern California. At thgse meetings we will review 'esults ofthe fall series of classes and plan for the spring series which will startthe week of February 12, 1973; Enrollment and reference materials will bedistributed at the meetings.

With- carryover funds from 1971-72 we will be able to add two extra classes.A "Work Experience Education - Management" class has been arranged on theCal Poly Campus at San Luis Obispo with S. A. Price, Vocational Coordinatorof San Luis Coastal Unified as instructor.

?

1

As *usual, the cooperation and performance of the Cal Poly Staff has beenexcellent through the year.

77

1

II

1

1

1

1

I

'APPENDIX A


-"WorkiExperience Education - Imgementation"

Ed -E -581 -05

\ ,

LOCATION -- # ENROLLED

r . . '''

LOdATION

t

# ENROLLED

INDIO -

.

)

, SAN FRANCISCO

Indio 3 San Francisco 5

Rialto 1 .. Penngrove 1

Calexico . 2 $ Pleasanton 1

El Centro- 1 Lafayette 1

La Quidta 1 4San Rafael 1

Livermore 1

Belmonti

A.

SELMA San Leandtoil

1

A Richmond. .. 1 '4*

Fresno 9 Healdsburg 11

Dinuba .. 2 Santa Rosa. ,;: 1

'Lemoore 4 1

HanfordCorcoran

I

-1

1 _.,

SACRAMENTO :,!,4'.>

.

Riverdale 1

Visalia 1- Sacramdnto , 4

Tulare 2 City Heights 1

LOS ANGELES. -

Los Angeles.

Arcadia ,

InglewoodLong Beach.'

MontebelloSan GabrielCarson

Atmk

5

1

1

1

,1-

1

1 %

.*4

Carmichael '

Lodi , '2

Elk Grove 2

Penryn . 1.Lincoln 2

Woodland 1 i

Dixon 1

7 8(

e

'

1

1.

1

APPENDIX A - (Continued)

GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN- -----------

-"Work Experience EducatiOn

Ed-E-581-07

Management"

LOCATION\'

itENROLLED LOCATION -" # ENROLLED

WEST COVINA SALINAS

Duarte . 1 Salinas 17Colton 1 Santa Cruz 2

Fullerton 2 Monterey 1

Covina, 1 San Martin 1

Laverne 1 Oakland 1

South Pasadena . t 1 Gonzales' 1

San--Dimas 1. Ben Lomond 1

Orange' 1 .

West Covina "\...1 ,*

Glendora 1 WAYETTE

Fairfield 3

MODESTO. 1

, Alamo 1 .

..... P'easant .Hill 1

Modesto 24 , Walnut Creek. -1Ripon 1 '1 Vallejo .1

'Tracy 2 Napa l,1

Oakdale 1 Walnut Creek 1

Denair 1

Ceres 2 g .

Sonora 1 CUPERTIN0Turlock 1.

M4Aecd 1 Newark 1

Los Banos 1 Santa Clara l'

Livingston ' 1 San Jose 7

ivertank 1 . ,- Sunnyvale 1

' Palo Alto . 1

San Mateo 1

Redwood City 1

79

I.

044

ApPENDFIX-1= (Continued)


"Work Experience Education - Com4nity College"

Ed- E- 581 -08

LOCATION # ENROLLED LOCATION # ENROLLED

LOS ALTOS

San Jo se

Los Ga, tos

arat oga

unnyv ale

st er City_

5

1

2

1

-1_

WHITTIER

WalnutWhittier ,

AlhambraAlta 'Loma

TorranceFullertonLaHabra

, 1

1

1

2

1

1.

1

TO

40'

0

\\

80a

1.0

APPENDIX I

QUARTERLY REPORT

January 1, 1973 '....March 310973t .

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES FOR WORK EXPERIENCE EDUCATION

Project.#40-30569 EFO 39-73

An Education Professions Development Act Project

and

'Project #40-30569 B-3-230

.A Vocational Education Section Part B ltoject



'Kinsey Tanner, Director

Distributed to:

Dr. James BecketE. David GrafAllan HolmesDr. Dale AndrewsDr. Howard Boroughs ,

Dt. Carl CumminsDr. Walter,Schroeder

Dr. Don 1,ioiris

Robert PooleTony ThAe

81

I.. PLANNING

1. The deare a

This

1.

scription of objectives of the project,as stated in the contracts follows:

project is designed to encompass, eight basic objectives:

`Conduct a summer workshop designed to familiarize educatorswith concepts of Career Education and their relationships withWork Experience Education.

2 Conduct a summer workshop designed to familiarize Work ExperienceEducation personnel with'aterials and Methods for conducting'related instruction classes.

.3 Train_eight instructors who will present to participants of themanagement courses, the .strong philosophical and educationalreasons why goals and ,objectives are needed for Work ExperienceEducation.

1.4 Conduct instructor training workshops to train teachers of thecourses the concepts of Career Education.

1.5 Present ten (10) graduate level extension courses (5 in the; falland 5 in the spring) entitled "Work Experience Education -

Implementation" and "Work Experience Education - Operational."These courses to be offered in five locations throughout the stote.The 250 students 'attending will earn 23/4 quarter units of graduatscredit for each class. (Twenty -five hours of instruction perClass.)

1.6 Present eleven (11) graduate level extension courses (5 in the'fall andi6 in the spring)._entitled, "Work Experience Education -

Management" at eleven diffeient locations for 300 participants.Participants will be selected from those who have previouslyattended the begipping'courSes and/or are responsible foradministrative functions. Participants will receive three quarterunits of credit. (Thirty hours of instruction.)

1.7 Present three (3) graduate,level extension courses (1 in the falland.2 in the spring) entitled, "Work Experience Education - In theCommunity College." These courses will be offered in three locationsthroughout the state. The 75 participants selected to attend 4

will earn three quarter units.of gradudee credit.(Thirty hours of instruction.)

143 Provide in all four courses a unit(s) in Career. Education conceptsas they relate to Work Experience Education and to state andnational educational priority.

.

2. The courses offered are as follows:

Ed-E-581-05 -: Work Experience Education - Implementation; for first andsecond year Work Experience coOrdinators; types of Work Experienceprograms and methods of implementing a Work Experience program as apart of the total curriculum (no prerequisite).

Ed-E-581-06 - Work Experience Educat,ion - Operation; given in sihi g tofollow Ed-E-581-05; labor codes, funding, public relations, relate 'instruction, education and administrative codes, (prerequisite Ed-E-544or Ed-E-581-06 or permission of instructor).

- 82

'I.4

Ed-E-581-07 - Work Experience Education - Managem,..:r; fOr experiencedcoordinators and' administrators; accountability, financing and managementtheories for Work Experience Education.

tEd-E-581--U8 - Work Experience Education - Community College; for WorkExperience coodinators end cooperative education teachers at communitycolleges; development and operation procedures for Work Experienceprograms in the ccmmunity colleges; accountability, edOcation andadministrative,codes, State Plan for Vocational Education in the cokmunity

colleges.

3. The timetschedule forare cs follows:

OBJECTIVES MET;

objectives of the project as stated in the contract

1. Summer workshop Career Education)

2. '-'.;Planning -meeting

3. .Summer workshop (Materials for Related Instructidn)4. .'!'Extension course teacher planning session (1.7-7)

5. Extension- course teacher planning session (1.7-5) .

6. Extension course teacher planning session (1.7-6)

7. Selection of Participants8, Courses to be offered.(1, night per week -8 weeks

1.7-5)

9. Cour\ ses to be' offered (1 ntght pe k -10 weeks'

6/26-30/727/15-168/21-24

8/21-248/21-24

8/21-249/1-15

10/2-12/1

1.7-7, 1.7-6) 10/2-12/14

10. Planning and evaluation meeting (1. -5) 12/9

11. Planning and evaluation meeting 1/6/73

12. platoing ;and evaluation meeting (1.7-7) 1/13

'13. -Courses to be offered (L night pet week -8 weeks1:7-5) 2/12-4/1::

14.' Courses to be offered (1 night-per week -10 weeks1.7-6, 1.7 -7,)

iNikit"3-711t1ITTED-FOR:

2/12-4/26

.

15, Evaluation meeting with Course instructors (1.7-5). 4/28

Tfi. meeting with-cOttr.se instructors (1.7-6). 5/5

17. Evaluation meeting with course instructors'Evaluation (1.7-7). 5/12

18. Evaluation report 5/28

II. PARTICIPANT SELECTION

1. The criteria for selection and the type of participants as stated in the

project are as follows:

1

Participants will be selected from those educators that have demonstrated

knowledge and/o interest in Work Experience Education. Selection of

"teacher-trainers will be conducted by the project director with assistancefrom the California State Consultant for Work Experience Education and

the Head of the Education Department, California "2olyiechnic State

Univers'ity.

83

I

1

Those who will, attend the in-service taining programs will beselected by county and school dir'Ltors\of Vocational Educationin the immediate area being served by th se courses.

745 persons will participate in die projebe as follows:

1. 120 educators will attend the summer workshops at Cal Poly,San Luis Obispo. / 4

2. 250 new coordinators will be elected to attend the inserviceimplementation and operational courses offered in Indio, Pomona,Stockton, San Diego and Los Angeles.

3. 300 coordinators, Vocational Education administrators, counselorsetc. will*be selected to attend the inservice management courseoffered in Fresno, Modesto, Sacramento, Los Angeles, San Mateo,Marin County, Redding, San Diego, Long Beach, San Luis Obispoand Salinas.

4. 75 community college coordinators and vocational personnel willbe selected to attend the in-service community college courseoffered in San Mateo, Huntington Beach and Pasadena.

1pecial emphasis will, be sivento the-,selection of participants in

cbntinuation education and special education.

2. Total app4cations received to date include 138 the workshops and210 in the fall series as reported in previous reports.

Courses starting the weekOf February 12, 1973 are operative itthe following locations with enrollments shown for each location.

"Work Experience Education - Operation"Ed-E-581,06 Enrollment

. Participation will

J

3

Indio 10

Selna, 19

Los Angeles 14

San Francisco 16

Satramento 19

Total 78

"Work Expirience Education - Management"

* Started 3/6/73

td-E-581-07 Enrollment

*Fresno 14

Redding 20

Sacramento 15

San Diego .33

San.Francisco .24

14Torrance

Total 120

84

c

c

1 s

III. OPERATION

"Work Experience Education - .Community College"Ed-E-581-08 Enrollment

Hayward 13

Total 13

The stated objectives and time schedule as shown in the project have been

met to date.

Planning and evaluationmeetings were held January 6, 1973 in SouthernCalifornia and January 13, 1973 in Northern California., All instructorsmet with the director and the two project. evaluators. The interim evaluation

and subjective reports were presented by the, two evaluators. (See Quarterly

Report - October 1, n72 December 31, 1972.) On the basis of these reports,

some changes in the spring series werezmade.

Indications are the spring series of courses will be successful. All

instructors report very regular attendance by participants. This would

indicate a high degree of relevancy of the instruction. The classes

visited by the two evaluators and the.director evidence a high degree ofinterest and class participation..

With 348 participants reported in previous (reports and 211 participantsenrolled in the spring series the total, for the year will be 559 people.

Evaluative information is not available at the time of this report as the

spring series will not finish until late April. This data will:be included,

in the final report in June. (Participant Data Summary OE Form7214 is

included for the spring classes as Appendix 11.)

Evaluation meetings with the instructors and evaluators will be scheduled

for late April or early May. At these meetings we will review the courseoutlines, evaluation instruments and reference materials for possible

revision and' improvement for future use.

The cooperation and performance of the California Polytechnic StateUniversity staff has been outstanding through the entire project.

85

7 7,

ta

S

4

APPENDIX A


"Work Experience Education - Operation"

2

LOCATION # ENRWED

INDIO

Calexico 2

Indio 9

SELMA /I

Clovis 1

Fresno 2

:Hanford 1 '

Laton - 1

Lemoore 4 ' 1

Reedley 1

Tulare % 2

Visalia 1 1 -

LOS ANGELES

Arcadia 1

Camatilio 1

..../XerMosa Beach

Long Beach 1

Montebello 1,

RosemeadSan Gabriel .1

Sunland %

Via Torrance

1

Los Angeles6V4

. 5

I

Ed-E-581-06

lb

86

LOCATION

r

# ENROLLED

SAN FRANCISCO

Concord , 3

Daly City 1

Fremont 1

Lafayette 1Livermore. 1

O akland' 1

Pittsburg 1 "

San Francisco 1

San Leandr 1

San Mateo 1

Santa Rosa 1

Stoakton ' 1

Walnut Creek 1

SACRAMENTO

Carmichael 3

City Heights 1

Dixon,

Fresno.

11

. 1

Lincoln 1Lodi

.2 .

Modesto 1

Orangevale 1

Sacramento 7

Sutter Cieek I.

Woodland 1

a -r

LOCATION

FRESNO

[Cardthers,

ChowchillaCoalingaFresnoHanfordMaderaModestoSanger

Tulare-Visalia.

ti

APPENDIX A - (Continued)

.GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN


Ed-E-581-07

# ENROLLED-.

2

1

1

4

SACRAMENTONTO .

Davis 1

Galt 1

Redding` 1

Sacramento 9

Woodland 1.

SAN DIEGO

Calexico .1

La Mesa -.?,,

El. Caj9n 2'

Escondido i 2

Coronado 1

pa Jolla . 1

Vista . 1

San Diego 19

LOCATION # ENROLLED

REDDING

.

-AndersonButte City 1

-Cottonwood 1

punsmuir 1

Hayford 3

tewipton 1

111. Millville 1

`Redding .

-8

Weaverville 1

.SAN FRANCISCO

.. , .

,

.Alameda- - -

Berkeley1

1

'Concord,4.

1

.- Corte Madera 1

.Kentfield 1

Oakland . 2.

Pennerdye 1

Petaluma' 1

Pleasanton , 1

San Francisco 5

FreMOt 1Alamo .1

0 . San Rafael 1

San MateO. 1

;4alnut Creek v1

. Woodside 1

South San Francisco 1 --. , San Leandro 1, 1'

San Anselmo 1 Y

Chula Vista" 3 9 ,

A

81

APPENDIX A - (ContinOe4)

GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN '

"Work-Experience Education - Management" -,(Continued)

4

Cl

LOCATION'

t

Ed-E-581-07

# ENROLLED

TORRANCE

CamarilloEl SegundoHuntington BeachLos AlamitosLong'BeachMarina.Del ReyResedaSanta MonicaSan Pedro

TorranceVia Torrance

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

3

1

884

SP

APPENDIX A

GEOGRAPHICAL

(Continued)

BREAKDOWN


Ed -E- 581 -08

ATION # ENROLLED

ARD

11Be keley 1

CopcordFrvmont 1

'Halvard 1

011and 3

P1 asant'aill 1

S

J

4,

2

4'

I

0

44

1

1

1

1

AY11.110.1i B

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH., EDUCATION, ANO WELFAREOFFICE OF EDUCATION

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20202

PARTICIPANT DATA 'SUMMARY(Paris C, 1:0; and F, Education Professions Development Act

'Title V, P.1. 9-329, as emended)

BUDGET BUREAU NO. 11.140752APPROVAL EXPIRES: 10/31/71

1. OE PROJECT NUMBER

2 NAME OF SPONSORING INSTITUTION OR AGENCY

California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

3. STATE

California

4... NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS TO BE TRAINED IN THEPROJECT

b. HUMMER OR PARTICIPANTS COVERED BY THIS SUMMARYfREPORT .

' 207

DATA ON PARTICIPANTS

S. SEX 6. AGEIS

ii SO-54 32

7. PARTICIPANTS BY WHETHER ORNOT THEY ARE VIETNAM ERAVETERANSa. ender 25 4 d. 3549 38

a. Male 150 .25-23 26 .. 40-44 37 h. 55.53 16 a vitamim wei yetorons 18. b. Fornal 51 c, 30.34 25 f. ism 23 i. 110 and over 5 b. Not Vietnam era veterans 140

a. RACIAL OR ETHNIC BACKGROUND. .

S. PARTICIPANTS BY WHETHER THEIR INCOMES ARE. ORWERE BEFORE THEY ENROLLED IN THIS PROJECT..0BELOW THE POVERTY LINE

6. Below poverty lino 5

a. Negro air black 16 d. American Indian 4

4b. Puerto Rican 0 e. Oriental

. C. MordearrAmerican f. Other thank. above 169 b: Not below poverty line 187

10. GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF PARTICIPANTS (by Stale of employment prior fa his 'Weer)

a. Ala. 0 k, G. tr. Md. 1 MI. N. J. 0 as. s. C. 0 ay. Wyo. 0b. Alaska 1 I. Howell 0 iv. Maio. 0 al. N. M. 0 .P. S. D. 0 as. Canal Zone 0e. Ariz. 0 m. Idaho 1 w. Mich. 0 as. N. T. 0 . art. Teen. 0 be. Guam. 0d. Ark. - 0 n. Iliinela 0 c. Minn. , 0 ah. N. C. 0 ar. Tema. (yr bb. Puerto Rico 0a. Cal. 197 ..11;cum. 0 Y. Mies. 0 al. N. D. 0 ao. Utah 0 be. Virgin la. . 0f. Colo. 0 p. lows 0 c. m.. 0 61,ohic 1 ot. Vt. 0 bd. Pacific Trust

rtTerrorie 011. Conn. 0 si. Kansas 1 as. Mont 0 ak.Olda. 0 au. Va. 0h. Dot. 0 r. KY. 0 ob. Nebr. al. Oreg. iv. Walt. 1 be. Over Dep.

Schools 4

Tbf. Foreign0

1 0 .

I. D. C. 0 0.12' 00

ac. Nevada

ad. N. H.

00

am. Pa.

on. R. I.

00

ay.,. W..Vo. 0as. Wise.0J. Fla. 0 t. Mains ,

HIGHEST DEGREE EARNED_

a. NONE

0

b. A. S. OIPLOM A

4

e. BACHELOR'S 4. MASTER'S

85

12. OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND

f. PH: D.(

1

v.

a. Currently employed (or within the past S year,employed) In the field of education 200

4. Never prevIrrualy employed in the field of 'education

by whether they werer

b. Proviualy employed in the field of educetion.but not within the peat 5 y ears 4

I. toiptcyad In other profeaelona.roe uirtet e owacademic delve* ; I . 3

e. Navel pa tviouely employed in the field ofodUcatIon r 2

3..Holding on SCIlldrIC degree but not working 03. Not heir/An( an academe degree 0

IS. TOTAL YEARS. OF TEACHING OR OTHER EMPLOYMENT IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION

a. NONE b. 1-4 YEARS t. S9 YEARS d. 1014 YEARS a. 1515 YEARS f. 20 OR MORE

4 36 60 42 31

14. PRIMARY POSITION OR EMPLOYMENT STATUS AT PRESENT, OR IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO PROJECT

IN A PRESCHOOL. ELEMENTARY-OR SECONDARY SCHOOL OR

SCHOOLS. OR LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCY

b. OTHERWISE EMPLOYED

I. Teacher trainer (On Inset.Wien el hidher education)

1. teachart 140 S. Inetruational media (Incl. librarians) 02. Administrator . 6. Education aide or poraprofeasional 1. In State edue. agency

3. Supervisor 17. 7..3chool volunteer 0 Horeeducetron position

4. Student4. Pupil personnel aptelaliat 12 a. Other education position

OE FORA 72ri, 6/70 REPLACES OE FORM 7214. VIE WHICH IS OBSOLETE.

9

DATA ON SCHOOLS OF PARTICIPANTSA

(NOTE. Ettely(llute tato each al ow (o/funts Now. (11, 14.7. IL Ifs. 155. live.11111.1 1g.) dear the autallor of pilule/pants who here beer.

slootitete on item 14e. loy the category In meat now which beet direerlbee the nature of (hely school.. Eicher. prticlortel cieeellied in tier is' )

13. SCHOOL OR SYSTEM,

BY CONTR.:Pi.

16. GRADE LEVELS WITH WHICH THE PARTICIPANTS' ASSIGNMENTS USUALLY RELATE

a. Preschool 1 Jr. High (1-1) 20 g. et... 4. Sec.

a. Public 1760 1a. Nonpobtle

17. AREA OF SERVICE OF SCHOOL OR SYSTEM WHERE EMPLOYED (prdegnont Outwits lock)

b. K . Gr 3 0 . Sr. High (10-12) 119e. Elan (1C-4) I. Secondary (7-12) 50

h. PostSee. Vocational-1. Aillult EduestIon

9

8

p. Rural or small town- General population

a.-Rural or renal town. poverty are.

e. Uttar.- general population

48 Urban poverty eyes 20

1577

. Suburban 39

111. STUDENT BODY OF SCHOOL (or oehoodoIN TERMS OF THE PERCENT WHO COME FROMFAMILIES AT OR SE LOW THE POVERTY LINE I`s, o+. 5 d. 20-2111. 36 g. SO-59% 14 1 I. 10-19% : 1a. 1-97. 43 so-m. 10 11 fo-f 7 5 k. 1101007."a . 6 k

S. 10-197. 42 t. 40-497 15 I. 10-797.. A

19. STUDENT BODY OF SCHOOL(or choo/o)IN TERMS OF THE PERCENT WH &COME FROM SPECIFIED MINORITY RACIAL OR ETHNIC

ACKGROUNOS.,

'a. NEGRO OR SLACK S. PUERTO RICANC. MEXICAN-

AMERICAN.

..

0. AMERICAN INDIAN. E. ORIENTAL '

a. 07. 17 a. 0% 75 a. 0% 8 a. 0% 32ak. 017;7.

1.7

a. 1- 9% 98 b. 1-97. 49 b. 1-97. 76 k. 1-9% 104 119

C. 10-197. .14 e. 10-19% 1.

C. 10-197. 1 28 C. 10-19% e.. 1019% 16

c. 2071 11

5

d 2029%

e." 30-39%

2

0 L.I

d. 70-297.

ie. 30-39%

2

139-L

a. 20-29%

le. 30-397.3

0

d. 20-297.

i. 30-397.

a4_.._2 3

. 30 -397.

1. 40-49% 6 r. 40-49% 0 (. 40-497. 6 'y f. 40-49% 0 1...40 -49% 2

e. so-sq% 3 c So-s9'. 0 a. 30-597.- 3 g. 50 -397.

"

1

0

g. 50-397.

h. 60-69%00h. 60-69% 1 h. 60-69% 0 ' h. 60-697. 1- h. 60-69%

t 72-79-1 0 i, 70-79n 0 _t. 70-797. 2 70-797. 0 a. 70-797.

ts

I. 40 -697. 2 3. 6049% 0 l 110-1197.. 4 i 62-197. 0 ),... 8049%

k. 90-90-1007. ' 9 k. 90-100". 0 k. 90-1007. 01

It. 90-1007. 0 11. 90-100%..- I

AREA OF SPECIALIZATION (If employee In an IntItutIon ( Mehra? education)

W. PARTICIPANTS EMPLOYED IN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGWER EDUCATION - THOSE PARTICIPANTS DISTRIBUTED IN THE FIRST

CATEGORY OF 17c. lib. AS "TEACHER TRAINERS" - BY AREA OF S4PECIALIZATION

a. ARTS OR SCIENCES.

3

b. EDUCATION57

C. OTHER

3

"TYPE OF POSITION FOR WHICH PARTICIPANTS ARE PREPARIfiG.

21. ALL PARTICIPANTS BY WHETHER THIS PROJECT IS PREPARING THEM TO ENGAGE IN A DIFFERENT TYPE OF POSITION

1

1

1

1

1

a, Preparing leer %ease type of positiem as at present (a reported In NOM 11) 99

b. PrePatir.g for adi(ferer.t type of position (Include teachers who we promo/rig to te.sch different euh)oce) 42

c. Particumnts in category b. Above by type of positiiin being prepared for

IL Teecber (oro gettirene frub(ece).

..

25

..

4. Educational side or paraprofessional2

2 Administrator e

25 ,7. Seboot volunteer . 1--

14,

1 S§.11Nernsor I 19S. CiNier educational poSitler i On chooi)

4 Atpil personnei si*e..V.)ist 22 t,%. Teacher trainer fin ertInatItutIon of hlePaer education)

5. Instructi0nY1 melit3 Spec-11911st (Includltrf librarian)5

C

1

1

APPENDIX J

SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION.(Spring Semester)

Second Semester

Subjective Questionnaire

11.

The attached forms indicate the individual breakdown by instructor andcourse of the Subjective Evaluation administered to the participants of the1973-74 EPDA Project, Professional Development Series for Work ExperienceEducaticin. ,

-

The following questions and statements were given-to the participantsfor their responses: I

0 How successfUl was the instructor in meeting the objectives of the course?

7 How would you rate they overall presentations of the instructors?

8 How would you rate the effectiveness of the pre and post test in measuringthe important elements of the course?

9 How would you rate the instructors use of time during class sessions:lecture, interaction, audio-visual, etc.

10 How would you rate the 6.6111 format and plan of the program?

. 11 Personally, how beneficial, was the information you received from thiscourse?

RuuttA o 5 SuAvey Queztionna-i)te Fox Futwee. PaAtiapaAon

I1 Would You be interested in participatingin future inservice training

.

programs of this type?

. 2 Suggestion% for set-up of program.1

r

Same as this one. -,

Weekend workthops on specific'topics. .

Workshop meeting every night for one or two.weeks.,

TThele/au5-30-73Attachment

.4. 92

4

.1

Ase

%on

.als

. r -

tr.

asai

mas

me

owum

. me'

AIM

r61

111

'IN

ST

RU

CT

OR

S-

TO

TA

LS

Aeb

ee.,

ve/%

%?,

Men

keO

bsen

Rag

an -

Reg

naed

isS

penc

eM

anag

eine

rit

Excellent

aSatisfactory

Weak

.

a 6 c

'13 4 0

.

_7.,

-'

1 0.

.

26

-5

,

0

15

?

1 0

12 5 0

11 1 0

10 2 0

.

'94

.19 0'

Excellent

7Satisfactory

Weak

s,

a b c

-)

1.2 5 0

821 10

-

0.

16 6 0'

_14 .'3 . 0

.8.

3

w0

10 2 0

'.

89 23

,

0

Excel lent-,

8Satisfactory

Weak

.a b,

c

'4 9 4

.

.2

'

4-

1

9

13 8

4'

8 4

2 8.

T

'2 5 3

-

.3 9 0

%26

56

27

.Excellent

9Satisfacto-y

Weak

.-

b

15

.2 0

7 0!

%IV

-

23 7 0

14

.2 0

.

.

11 6

.0

.

9 2

i0

111 0

,

90

20 0

Excel lent

10

Satisfactory

Weak

/I.

a b

.

8 8 0

-

7 0'

0.

.

22,,,

7'''

1

151 0

.7

,..10 .0

7 4 0_

120 0

A78

30 .1

-Excellent

11

Satisfactory

' Weak

,.

a b

'{c

12 4

:0

7 0 0

21

10 0

12 0

10 6 1

6'

'5'

,lit

a,

.v

111 o

,

79 29 1`

-,

1Yes

ITO---

ea"'

"

14

,2_

,

Re/

Rd/

Zs

-

o6 S

uvey

7 0

Que

isti.

onna

de31

&

0

Fait

15 1

Fwtane.

'16

,1

.

alit-

Lapc

t:tilo

nl.

9 26

12 0

104 6

CM

+- .

2'

I" -l

.a

14. 2 0

----

.---

----

-

-5 1 0

' 23 4

, 0.--

/,10 7

.--

jo--

- --

--z-

-

8-

10 2--

-;"

-a

6 g i.

102 0

76"

-28-

-

3.

TThel ef/au

5/10/,`3-

0.11

.11.

10.1

=Pm

r.--

r--,

_---

---7

---

'..A

.11-

.'''..

1111

1.I

II

I'N

Wmos Imme mg mop me ems

mil

omme

-,-,

,--

I -I

V,S

,.7-

-R U

C T

O R

S.

TO

TA

LS

In.6

tAU

CO

ltT

OT

AL.

...

_^

-...:

&ve

tch

Bitu

bake

nE

ti.nt -

Jo k

vs o

n',

May

oSo

yaO

pmat

iona

tG

iZem

oite

Cot

4e.'.

'Exc

elle

nta

0,S

.-at

isfa

ctO

i-yb

Ilea

k.,

c

.-7

.1

t0

12 ' 00

,..

15,

1 0

4.1

7 2'..

0

11 2 0

624 4 0

A n. 4 0

Exc

elle

nt.

a.

7S

atis

fact

ory

.b-

t*af

.'c

-.

...

.6 .2

.'0

.12 O

r 0'

1.5 1 0.

172

''

0.

.11 2 0

617

-%1

6 2 0

6 ,2 0

- .

Exc

elle

nt'.

8ida

ta s

fa o

tory

b-W

eak

c,,.

2'

.5

,,1.

.

6,

6z.

0-.

4. 11.

1.

.5`1

2

_2

,_

6_7

0

23--

414

0 8. 0

0 8,..

,__0

Exc

ell.e

nt9.

&I-

US

faQ

.tory

.

Wea

k

4,.

I' 0 :.

'11\

a I.

-, ,-

0

14-

2.

,0

19-

0 -0

9 4.

0

67.

110

3 5 -0

3 -5 .0

..E

xcel

lent

4w

sS

atis

fact

ory

b'W

eak

c.

...d

.

4',

4 .0

lb i

e-

7'.-

0..-

s,

.12 4

-.

0-'

.

13.

5 0

103 0

.49

,18

".

_0

3 5 0,

'3P

5 0

Exe

611.

nt'.4

a

p 1

sfac

tory

b-W

c--

,,

4

-,

.

..'1

2:\_

0 -,

'0

13' 3 0

18-

1 0!

.11 I 1

589'

--.

1

6.

.2 0

6 2 0

1.

Yes

-;

,duo

- ...

:'6

..1

,A

....

.

elid

tzoi

'Sto

.vey

.

'.'12

-.

0

Que

.6,ti

.okm

ai.A

.e

13 3

I

190

Fon

.F

utw

c.e.

Pa4

i.e2p

atio

n13 0'

635

8 a.

----

-0

;..

- ..4

- *a

2'-

,b'

..

,;

I.

d-

'P

-.6

' -1-

....

.-- '1

"

8 4 0

\12

,'4

...0

145 0

.

8 2 3.

48 16 4

8 2 0

8 2 Q,

1

.APPENDIX J

SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION (Spring \Semester)

\

I

At.--'SeCond.Semester,.

Sujective'Quegtionnaire.. \

\

. ,

The attached forms indicate the individual- breakdown by instructor andcourse of the Subjective Evaluation administered to the participants of ,tile1973 -74 EPDA Project, Professional Development Series for Work ExperienceEducation: il

'

,

The following questions and statements were g iven to the participantsfor their responses:

1, \

0 How succeul was the instructor in meeting the objectives of the course?,

successful1

i

\

7 .How' would you rate the overall pres,entations of the instructors?

f

,.8' How would you rate the effectiveness of the pre and post test in measuringthe important elements of the course?

I

9 How wound you rate the instructors use of. time duringI

class sessions:lecture,interaction, audio - visual, etc.

.

;\ 1

10 How wouldlyou rata the overall format and plan of the program?/

1

/

1

,

11 Personal4, how beneficial was the information you received. from thiscourse? !

1 .

4

II

R lit t6 04 Su/my Q!..LaionnaiAe Fox Futute Paiqicipagan

1 'Womild you be interes ted in participatinOn future inService training_Oograms f this type?

2 .Suggestio s for set-up of program.1

Same a this one.4 Weaken workshops on specific topics.

'

Worksh p meeting every night f4. one or two wgelfs.

i.

, I

1IThele/au

--i 5-30-73

Attachment'

111

7

MI VIII

env

OMB NW 111111

me

sow

am

als

um

orlin

..

kiS7 : '.:CTORS

.TOTALS

Aeb.ep

__!t

n...

ti.,

Y,,:.:z-,!:

,2,s en

Ragan

-_

Reynotcts

Spen

ceManagement

.-Excellent

a.

-0

Satisfactory'

bc

:7---

Weak

13 4 0--- ----__

7.

:6

15

4.-.------

.11

10 2 0

.

94

19

.

0

-,>

- --;

,:.

00

" -)-1'.5-,-40.4-,., i..-....:

0

; -

1 0

Excellent

7Satisfactoi.

Weak

,

,...

a' b.

-c

12 5 0

Cif

71

116

010

t__.

0

._.0

14 3 0

.8 3 0

10 -.

.2 '0

89

.

23

'0

Excellent

a

8Satisfactory

,b

Weak

c-

9

.4

.C

.A

-a

13

.8

1:s. _.

a,

2 8 7

2 5

'3

.

'31 Y

'0

26

56

.27

Excellent

a

-9 Satisfactory

b

Weak

15-

2 0

i23-

/14

0,

i2

0%."

4 1.

i

11 5 0

90

_20 0

/9---

2 0

11 _1

.0

i EXcellent

a

10

Satisfactory

b_.

Weak

- .....

.

8 8 0

722

15

fsi

1 _

9_

_k

7,

7 01 _, .

7 4 0

12 -0 0

78

.

30 1

ExCellent

-a

11 Satisfactory

b

_Weak

-C

12 ,

4 0

.-.

-i

,-12-__.

0,

, ,{)

3n

._

00

10 6

6 5

-0

11

.1 0

79

29 1

Yes

No

_...

ReRtas

14 2

-,

-,--7.---------

oi Su..veif nut.,,s4,Len.tautir.-,-

.:tituu PaAticipation

73 1

115

g-

19

.-...,

0,

01

12

1

12 0

104 6

a

2.

b

-c

..

14 2 0

5 1 0

2

i

1

I10

86

t7

10 ------2

-t

1..

1.0 2 0

76

,

.28 3

e/au

5/30/73

e' e

r no

t em

s in

ow

as

No

on. a

s on

me

owl o

n Im

o an

sw

el

,1 N S- T R U'C T 0 R S

TOTALS

..

InAtuato/t.

TOTALS

Bakal%

8412baket

Wilt

'

John4on

'

Mayo

.

Sovet

Openationat1

Gitimoke

.,

Cottege

,.

Excellent

a,..,

'0

Satisfactory

bWeak -

c.

'7 '1 0

12

'

0 0

15 1 0

.

17 2 0

11 .2

,-0

62 6 0

4 4 0

4'

4

.0

Excellent'

a

7Satisfactory

1Weak

c,

6 2 0,

12-

.

0 0.

15 1 0

.

17 2 0

\

11 2 0

61

47

.

0

.

6 2

.0'

5.

2 0

ExcellOnt.

a

8,Satisfactory

b

Weak

'

c.

2-

5,

a.

.

.6 6 0

4

11

,

-1

5

12 2

0'

7 0

23

41

,4

0 8 0t

,0 8 0

.

Excellent

a9

Satisfactory

b' Weak

-.

c

4-

4'

0

11 1 0

14 2 0

iM

19 0 0

9 4 0

57

11 0

3 5 0

3.

5 0

Excellent

a10

Satisfattory

b.

Weak,

'c

=

4 4 0'

10 2 0

12 4

'

0

13 5'

0

10 3.

0'

49

1'

0

.3 5 0

3 5.

.0

.

Excellent

a

11

Satisfactory

b,

'

Weak

c

4 4- 0,'

,

12 0 0

13 3

'

0

18

'

1'

0

11

.

'

1 1

.58 9 1

6 2 0

,.6 2 0

1Yes

No

'6 2

.

Reiati oiS Stavey Quatibnnaike

12

.13

03

Fox

19

.

0.

Futtpte Patticipation

'

13 0

,

'

63 5

.

8 0

8 0

a.2

'

i i . !

'c

6.

1 1

8 '

4 0.

12 4.

.

0

14 5 0

8 2 'I

.

.

4816 4

8 2 0

i2 '

0

._......._

...-

........

TTI)ele/au

5/30/73

-