ICC Sharing Session (19 October 2016)

I am a social scientist. What IP can I apply from my work?

Khairul Kamarudin

UTM Razak School

IP application (Copyright)

for Kundasang Project –

Cascading GeoHazard

What is IP? (Source: ICC UTM)

Intellectual Property (Harta Intelek)

Intellectual Property refer to creation of the minds:

inventions, literary and artistic works, and symbols,

names and images used in commerce

Adalah hasil ciptaan minda; rekacipta, karya sastera dan

seni dan simbol, nama dan imej yang digunakan dalam

perdagangan

Source: MyIPO

Paten (Patent) Pembaharuan Utiliti (Utility Innovation)

Reka Bentuk Perindustrian (Industrial Design)

Cap Dagangan (Trademark) ™

Hakcipta (Copyright)

Categories of IP (Source: ICC UTM)

Petunjuk Geografi (Geographical Indication)

Reka Bentuk Susun Atur Litar Bersepadu (Layout

Design of an Integrated Circuit) Maklumat Perdagangan/Maklumat yang Tidak Diketahui (Trade

Secret/Undisclosed Information)

Hmmmm….

protection of logos and brand names

protection for technical inventions

protection of aesthetic design

protection of electronic circuitry design

protection of artistic endeavors

protection of geographical names

(Source: ICC UTM)

Smart eh!

In my case, I am a social

scientist. What IP can I apply

from my work?

Waduuuhhh….!

I am a social scientist, how can I apply for an IP?

Paten (Patent)

Pembaharuan Utiliti (Utility Innovation)

Reka Bentuk Perindustrian (Industrial Design)

Cap Dagangan (Trademark ™ )

Hakcipta (Copyright)

Petunjuk Geografi (Geographical Indication)

Reka Bentuk Susun Atur Litar Bersepadu (Layout Design of an

Integrated Circuit)

Maklumat Perdagangan/Maklumat yang Tidak Diketahui (Trade

Secret/Undisclosed Information)

• Questionnaire• Conceptual diagrams/

Frameworks• Interview questions

• Conference logo• Special event organise

regularly• Research consortium

In my case, I am a social

scientist. How can I apply

an IP for my work?

Research

proposal +

research

team

submit

proposal

and Doa

Get a

research

grant (or in

my case,

become a

member for

research

grants)

Cascading Geo-Hazard in

Sabah (rezeki) – 2 research

grants lead by Dr Khamarrul

(RM104,200 + RM90,000)

Technical/engineering people,

not a social scientist

FRGS 2015 – unsuccessful (PI)

FRGS 2016 – unsuccessful (PI)

LRGS 2016 IPK UMT- unsuccessful (M)

EG 2015 – successful (PI)

Establish

conceptual

framework +

methodology

Identify survey

instrument:

questionnaire-guided

interview

Constructing

questionnaire

pilot

survey

correction/

revision/

improve

finalise

questionnaire

IDEAL

IP

ApplicationFieldwork

(Socio-economic

impact of natural

disasters to rural

communities in

Kundasang)IP

Application

On-site improvement

INPUT

OUTPUT

Project reports

Bahasa version

English version

Conference papers (2)

Rural Action Plan (3)

16 Days

Workshop by ICC UTM

20 April 2016

25 Sept 2015 Sabah

Feb 2016

• 100% online application via: www.icc.utm.my/to/innocomms/

• Need to fill in information related to your research (e.g. title of

research and justification for using that particular survey

instrument (questionnaire)

• Select your assessor

• Attach your questionnaire (in MS Word/PDF format)

• Select source of funding (i.e. from which research grant)

• Submit and wait (or do something else while waiting)

MISS IT!

© 2016 Universiti Teknologi Malaysia – All Rights Reserved

Applying for an IP – step by step guidance (based on my experience) www.icc.utm.my/to/innocomms/

Dekan

THIS QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY FORM INTENDED TOGATHER INFORMATION RELATED TO SOCIO-ECONOMICIMPACTS TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES DERIVED FROM MULTI-HAZARD AND DISASTER EVENTS (PARTICULARLY THE 6.0RICHER SCALE EARTHQUAKE) WHICH OCCURRED INKUNDASANG REGION IN SABAH IN JULY 2015. THE SURVEYFORM WAS APPLIED DURING THE HOUSEHOLD SURVEYAND FIELD STUDY CONDUCTED IN NOVEMBER 2015.

THIS SURVEY FORM CONTAINS 40 QUESTIONS WHICH WAS DIVIDED INTO THREE MAJOR SECTIONS NAMELY (1) PROFILE OFRESPONDENT; (2) RESPONDENT'S PERCEPTION REGARDING LOCAL HAZARD AND DISASTER AND; (3) STRATEGIES/MITIGATION EFFORTSTAKEN IN FACING THE DISASTER.

(SECTION 1: PROFILE OF RESPONDENT) - CONSISTS OF 10 QUESTIONS. SOME BASIC INFORMATION WILL BE GATHERED INCLUDINGGENDER, RACE, RELIGION, AGE CATEGORY, MARITAL STATUS, LEVEL OF EDUCATION, TYPES OF JOBS (BEFORE AND AFTER THEDISASTER), ORIGIN, INFORMATION ON HOUSEHOLD AND MONTHLY HOUSEHOLD INCOME (BEFORE AND AFTER THE DISASTER)s.

(SECTION 2: RESPONDENT'S PERCEPTION REGARDING LOCAL DISASTER). THIS SECTION INTENDED TO GET INFORMATION ONRESPONDENTS' KNOWLEDGE AND AWARENESS TOWARDS LOCAL EVENTS RELATED TO DISASTER INCLUDING KNOWLEDGE ON TYPESOF NATURAL/MAN-MADE DISASTER, POSSIBLE CAUSES OF DISASTER, TYPES IN LOSS EXPERIENCED (ECONOMICALLY, SOCIALLY ANDECOLOGICALLY), LEVEL OF SERIOUSNESS FROM THE LOSS, INTENTION OF MOVE OUT FROM THE DISASTER PRONE AREA, ACCESS TOINFORMATION (DURING AND AFTER THE DISASTER) AND ENGAGEMENT IN DECISION-MAKING PROCESS.

(SECTION 3: STRATEGIES/MITIGATION). THIS SECTION SHOULD GATHER RELEVANT INFORMATION ON RESPONDENTS' READINESS ANDPREPAREDNESS TOWARDS DISASTER MITIGATION EFFORTS. QUESTIONS INCLUDED IN THIS SECTION SUCH AS, RESPONDENTSINVOLVEMENT IN TRAINING, IDENTIFICATION OF EARLY SIGN OF DISASTER, EARLY WARNING SYSTEM, MONITORING OF DISASTER-PRONE AREA, MAPPING OF DISASTER-PRONE AREA, ESTABLISHMENT OF TASK FORCE AT COMMUNITY LEVEL, STRATEGIES TAKEN FORDISASTER MITIGATION BY THE COMMUNITY, INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AID, LEVEL OF DEPENDENCY ON EXTERNAL AND GOVERNMENTAID, RATING OF SERVICES PROVIDED BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES DURING AND AFTER THE DISASTER, SPIRIT OF TOGETHERNESSAMONG MEMBERS OF COMMUNITY, POSSIBLE BARRIERS AND CHALLENGES IN COMMUNITY RE-DEVELOPMENT PROCESS ANDRESPONDENT'S ASPIRATION FOR THE FUTURE.

PDF FORMAT

No need to fill in “Prior Art” for Copy Right application

THE UNPRECEDENTED 6.0 RICHER SCALE OF EARTHQUAKE

THAT STRIKE KUNDASANG SABAH IN JULY 2015 HAVE AFFECTED

THE LIVELIHOOD OF AGRICULTURE RURAL COMMUNITIES LIVING

NEAR TO THE MOUNT OF KINABALU BADLY. SINCE THEN, THERE

IS NO PROPER STUDY BEEN CONDUCTED TO ASSESS/TO

MEASURE THE SOSIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF DISASTER

(EARTHQUAKE AND LANDSLIDES) ESPECIALLY ON THE

LIVELIHOOD ON LOCAL COMMUNITIES IN THE AREA. EVEN

THOUGH THERE WAS A NOTION ABOUT LOSS OF FARMLAND AND

DECLINE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME AMONG RURAL DWELLERS

DUE TO THE DISASTER, STILL NO CONCRETE EVIDENCE AND

DATA WAS COLLECTED AND PRESENTED TO SUPPORT THIS

NOTION. THEREFORE, IN NOVEMBER 2015 (5 MONTHS AFTER

THE EARTHQUAKE), A RESEARCH ON RESILIENCE COMMUNITYIN DISASTER-PROVE REGION HAS BEEN CARRIED OUT.

THE QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY FORM (AS ATTACHED) HAS BEEN DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR

ASSESSING SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC STATUS OF RURAL COMMUNITY WHICH FACING THE DISASTER.

DURING THE FIELD STUDY, 93 RESPONDENTS FROM 5 VILLAGES WHAT BADLY AFFECTED BY THE

EARTHQUAKE IN KUNDASANG HAVE PARTICIPATE IN ANSWERING ALL THE QUESTIONS. DATA AND

INFORMATION WERE ANALYSE AND PRESENTED IN A FORM OF FINAL REPORT. UTILIZATION OF THIS

QUESTIONNAIRE PERMIT RESEARCHER TO GATHER QUANTITATIVE DATA AND INFORMATION VITAL

FOR THE STUDY. RESULTS FROM THE SURVEY WAS PRESENTED IN A FORM OF CHARTS THAT

DEMONSTRATE CHANGES IN TERMS OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME (BEFORE AND AFTER DISASTER),

TYPES OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND PHYSICAL LOSS TO THE COMMUNITIES AND RESPONDENTS'

PERCEPTION ON GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ROLE AND FUNCTION ESPECIALLY DURING AND AFTER

DISASTER. THESE INFORMATION IS CRUCIAL ESPECIALLY FOR LOCAL LEADERS (POLITICIANS), LOCAL

AUTHORITY IN RANAU, STATE GOVERNMENT AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES IN PLANNINGAND REDEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMUNITIES IN DISASTER-PRONE REGION.

Survey: 25 Nov 2015

02 Nov 2015

13 Nov 2015

Work backward

Approval by Prof Dr Sha’ri (assessor)

ICC-checking application

Approval by ICCApproval by ICC

16 days!@12 days excl. S&S &

letter

Example: Questionnaire for IP

application

Find collaborator:

• Collaborate with Dr Ubong Imang and her team from UMS• Local students/researchers – they speak same language + they

introduce us to potential respondents + they can translate answersgiven by respondents + they can talk about local news/issues whichcan reduce stress/seriousness of the interview (more relax session)

• Sharing information and receive good advice from local researchers be flexible and change of plan is normal during fieldwork

Utilisation of questionnaire (in a more controlled environment):

• RA (local/UMS students) assist respondents with difficulty in reading/writing

• FGD (formulation of Rural Action Plan/Pelan Tindakan Desa) – also another potential type for IP

Rural Action Plan (Special) for Disaster Risk Reduction

Household survey (Socio-economic impact) n=130

SESSION 2Briefing & Disaster

Awareness Exhibition

& Rural Action Plan,

25/11/2015

Tuan Haji FaiminKamin (DO Ranau)

Follow-up interviewIn-depth interview

Door-to-doorHouse-to-house

Sharing sessionQ&A

Improvement/pemurnian kerja

Impact Rating by CCIN-UTM 2016

Helping others (good model for UTMRS):

Multi-disciplinary research project UTM@Royal BelumDesigning “participant’s feedback form” for CCIN Grant – “Micro Hydro Turbine for Electricity Generation”PI: Dr Shamsul Sarip

Engineering-

based project

Social science contribution

(provide input - planning,

training, knowledge

transfer)

Potential for IP (CR)• As KPI of the project

Similar to Kundasangproject

Ubong Rozaimi

Hisyam

Aloi

FadzlinaKalsia

ShikinMarSyidah

CheSiti

Dr. Ubong Imang, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, UMS

Kalsia Matrin, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, UMS

Marlizah Yugam, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, UMS

Aloysious, Universiti Malaysia Sabah , UMS

Nur Fadzlina Aini M. Lehan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM

Siti Wan Syahidah Wan Ahmad, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM

Norashikin Hasan, LESTARI, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM

Che Siti Nor Koh Poh Lee, SEADPRI, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM

Dr. Rozaimi Che Hasan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM

Dr. Khamarrul Azahari Razak, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM