Upload
mrnewbs
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
1/73
Statistical Analysis, Data Collection and Processin Shadowed boxes are links to resources
Stephen Taylor. IBDP Biology Excel Statbook. From http://i-biology.net/ia/statexcel Last u
What do you
Compare the means of two sample population
Plot the change in a variable over time (the '5
Determine if there is a correlation between tw
Learn about error bars and variability in Biolog
Plot changes 'before and after' a condition is c
Compare outcomes to expected data (Chi-squa
Quick guide to tables and graphs (DCP)
More calculations for% differe
magnifica
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
2/73
and Excel
Links:
Front Page
i-Biology.net
pdated 27 Sept 2011 A Creative Commons work by
.....under one experimental condition
..under two (or more) experimental conditions
5'
y
anged
red test)
monohybrid cross
dihybrid cross
codominant cross
polygenic cross
..where individual trials are repeated
Learn more about the t- t-test practice
"5x5" means 5 increments of the IV over 5 times, with 5 repeats
ce vs %
tions & scales
Yeast population growth
http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
3/73
Stephen Taylor
http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
4/73
Variability and Error Bars in Biology Data sho
The mean is a
Data show va
We could use
Standard de
34% of data f
If a calculated
95% of all dat
Consider this
repeat
Population A
Population B
Image from:
Population A
Calculate mea
Click on the c
Change the ra
When descri
Error barsYou could use
The top grap
The bottom gThis is useful i
The larger the
Where there i
We can test t
Further usefu
Click4Biology
Error Bars
Error Bars in B
Can we tell how significant the difference is from the overlap in the error bars
repeat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Population A 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
Population B 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviatio
DV (unit, uncertainty)
68%
95%
Pop A
(n=10)
Pop B
(n=10)
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
MeanValueofthe
DependentVariable
Comparing the means of Population A andPopulation B. Error bars show standard deviation.
Pop A
(n=10)
Pop B
(n=10)
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
MeanValueofthe
DependentVariable
Comparing the means of Population A andPopulation B. Error bars show 95% confidence.
le
Comparing the means of Populations A and B.
(Error bars represent 95% confidence)
http://click4biology.info/c4b/1/stat1.htmhttp://www.graphpad.com/articles/errorbars.htmhttp://jcb.rupress.org/content/177/1/7.full.pdf+htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviationhttp://jcb.rupress.org/content/177/1/7.full.pdf+htmlhttp://www.graphpad.com/articles/errorbars.htmhttp://click4biology.info/c4b/1/stat1.htm7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
5/73
In the default data here, you can a small overlap, but significant difference.
What happens as the datasets become more similar or more different?
Population A
(n=10)
Population B
(n=10)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
.
Meanvalueofdependentvaria
(unit,
)
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
6/73
variability.
measure of the central tendency of a set of data. It useful, but not by itself.
iability - this is how spread the data are around the mean.
the range of the data (max - min values) to show variability, but this is skewed by outliers.
iation (sd) is a very useful tool in descriptive statistics.
ll one sd above and one sd below the mean. Therefore 68% of all data fall within 1sd of the mean.
value for the sd is large, it suggests a lot of variability in the data. If it is small, there is less variability.
a fall within 2sd of the mean. We can use this for 95% confidence limits.
set of raw data:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 mean
1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 6.0 7.0 6.0 3.2
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.2
has a higher mean than Population B. Population A shows greater variability in the data.
n with the formula "=AVERAGE(data)" Calculate sd with the formula "=STDEV"
Calculate 95% confidence with the formula
lls to see the formula. "=CONFIDENCE.NORM(0.05, sd, sample size)"
w data in the table to see what heppens.
bing data, include the standard deviation as an indictor of variability.
are a graphical representation of the variability of a set of data. Go torange, sd, standard error or 95% confidence on the error bars. to practice
uses sd for the error bars. You can see a clear difference in variability.
raph shows 95% confidence.n determining the significance of a difference between the means.
overlap between 95%CI error bars, the larger the value of P (see t-test). A small overlap might still be a
s no overlap in 95%CI error bars, the difference is very likely to be significant.
ese deductions further by carrying out a t-test Link:
l resources:
by John Burrell Thanks also to Dave Ferguson here at Canadian Academy.
by GraphPad.com
iology by the Journal of Cell Biology (pdf well worth reading) A Creative
9 10 mean stdev 95% CI
3.0 4.0 2.5 1.08 0.67
1.0 2.0 1.6 0.52 0.32
The error bars here represent 95%CI.
Manipulate the data and see what happens to:
- The overlap of The error bars
DV (unit, uncertainty)
t-test resources
Links:
Front Page
Notice that the
population is labe
i-Biology.n
http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
7/73
- The value of P (t-test)
H0 = "There is no significant difference between population A and B"
P = 0.029
If P < 0.05 then REJECT H0
There is a significant difference.
If P > 0.05 then ACCEPT the H0
There is no significant difference.
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
8/73
sd 5% confidence
2.3 1.4
0.4 0.3
setting up error bars.
significant difference.
ommons work by Stephen Taylor
sample size of each
led on th graph (n=10)
et
"Comparing Means"
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
9/73
Comparing two population means.
repeat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Population A
Population B
This graph is set up for you to play with.
Put some sets of raw data in the table.
See what happens to the means.
What happens to the sd?
The error bars represent 95% confidence.
Are your data significantly different?
The t-test can be used as a significance test.
We set a confidence limit of 95%.OR: the probability of the difference being
due to chance (P) is 0.05 or less.
Here's how to present it:
T-test:
H0 = There is no significant difference between population A and population B.
df = (total sample size minus 2)
TTEST = ###### Formula =TTEST (PopARawData:PopBRawData, 2, 2)
Analysis If P > 0.05, accept H0 (less than 95% confident that differences are not due to ch
If P < 0.05, reject H0 (more than 95% confident that differences are not due to c
I reject / accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion: There is / is not a significant difference between population A and population B.
Can we tell how significant the difference is from the overlap in the error bars
repeat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Population A 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0Population B 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
The erro
Manipul
- The ov
- The val
DV (unit, uncertainty)
DV (unit, uncertainty)
Population A
(n= )0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Meanvalueofdependentvariable
(unit,
)
Descriptive title which makes clear
investigation. (Error bars represe
3.0
3.5
variable
Comparing the means of Populations A and B.
(Error bars represent 95% confidence)
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
10/73
H0 = "Th
P =
If P < 0.
There is
If P > 0.
There is
In the default data here, you can a small overlap, but significant difference.
What happens as the datasets become more similar or more different?
Population A
(n=10)
Population B
(n=10)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Meanvalueofdependen
(unit,
)
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
11/73
Standard deviation (sd)is used in descriptive statistics.
mean stdev 95% confidence It is a measure of the spread (variability) of most of the data.
#DIV/0! ###### #DIV/0! 34% of data falls above (1sd) and 34% below (1sd) the mean.
#DIV/0! ###### #DIV/0! Therefore 68% of all data falls within 1 sd of the mean.
95% Confidence (95% CI): confidence in the m (link)
We can plot this 95% confidence on error bars on graphs.
If error bars do not overlap, the sets of data are likely to be significant
When setting 95% confidence:
Select =CONFIDENCE.NORM as a function
Alpha is 0.05 (95% confidence)
STDEV select the STDEV cell
Size = number of samples for that value
Quick guide to setting up error bars in Excel:Click on the data points, then Chart Layout, Error bars
Select Error Bars Options, Custom, Select Value
For positive error bar, highlight all '95% confidence' cells.
Do the same for the negative error bar.
Delete horizontal error bars if they are produced.
Click here
to find out more about the t-test.
ance) A Creative Commons work by Stephen Taylor
hance)
Thanks to Dave Ferguson for help on this one!
mean stdev 95% CI
2.5 1.08 0.671.6 0.52 0.32
r bars here represent 95%CI.
ate the data and see what happens to:
erlap of The error bars
lue of P (t-test)
Links:
Front Pagei-Biology.net
"T-test"
Population B
(n= )
the purpose of the
t 95% confidence)
http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
12/73
ere is no significant difference between population A and B"
0.029
5 then REJECT H0
a significant difference.
5 then ACCEPT the H0
no significant difference.
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
13/73
ly different.
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
14/73
The t-testThe t-test tests the significance of the difference between two means.
You need to know how to apply the t-test in two ways.
1. By using a calculated value of t and comparing it to a critical value on the t-table (exam).
2. By using Excel on your dataset (for lab reports)
repeat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 mean stdev
Population A 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 5.4 2.88
Population B 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.5 1.43
Always start by stating the null hypothesis. H0 = "There is no significant difference between population A
This is always the same.
Now test it.
Quick Excel Method t-Table method (for exa
Use the formula "=TTEST(array1, array2, tails, type)" 18
tails = 2, type = 2 P= 0.05
P is calculated directly. 2.10
P= 0.08
92.22 % Calculated value of t= 1.87
(From
State the Conclusion:
IfP < 0.05 then REJECT the null hypothesis. Ift > c.v. then REJECT the null
There is a significant difference between A and B. There is a signifi
IfP > 0.05 then ACCEPT the null hypothesis. Ift < c.v. then ACCEPT the null
There is no significant difference between A and B. There is no signi
A Creative Commons work by Stephen Tay
repeat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 mean stdev
Population A 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 2.5 1.08
Population B 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.6 0.52
The error bars here rep
Manipulate the data an
- The overlap of The err
- The value of P (t-test)
H0 = "There is no signifi
P = ####
DV (unit, uncertainty)
DV (unit, uncertainty)
Degrees of freedom =
Critical value (c.v.) of t =
http://www.graphpad.c
Confidence=
Links: Front Page i-Biology.net
Conditions
- Two popu
- At least fi
In Biology,
(P < 0.05) l
Population A
(n=10)
Population B1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
ofdependentvariable
(unit,
)
Comparing the means of Populations A and B.
(Error bars represent 95% confidence)
http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/ttest1.cfmhttp://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/ttest1.cfm7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
15/73
If P < 0.05 then REJECT
There is a significant dif
If P > 0.05 then ACCEPT
There is no significant d
In the default data here, you can a small overlap, but significant difference.
What happens as the datasets become more similar or more different?
0.0
0.5
1.0
.
Meanvalue
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
16/73
90% 95% 98%
P 0.1 0.05 0.02
Increasing significance
DF 1 6.31 12.71 31.82
22.92 4.30 6.97
3 2.35 3.18 4.54
4 2.13 2.78 3.75
95% confidence 5 2.02 2.57 3.37
1.78 6 1.94 2.45 3.14
0.89 7 1.90 2.37 3.00
8 1.86 2.31 2.90
nd B" 9 1.83 2.26 2.82
10 1.81 2.23 2.76
11 1.80 2.20 2.72
mple data) 12 1.78 2.18 2.68
(total sample size minus 2) 13 1.77 2.16 2.65
14 1.76 2.15 2.63
15 1.75 2.13 2.60
16 1.75 2.12 2.58
(this is given to you in exams) 17 1.74 2.11 2.57
) 18 1.73 2.10 2.55
19 1.73 2.09 2.54
20 1.73 2.09 2.53
ypothesis. 21 1.72 2.08 2.52
cant difference between A and B. 22 1.72 2.07 2.51
23 1.71 2.07 2.50hypothesis. 24 1.71 2.06 2.49
ficant difference between A and B. 25 1.71 2.06 2.4926 1.71 2.06 2.48
lor There's more 27 1.70 2.05 2.47
28 1.70 2.05 2.47
29 1.70 2.05 2.46
30 1.70 2.04 2.46
95% CI 31 1.70 2.04 2.45
0.67 32 1.69 2.04 2.45
0.32 33 1.69 2.04 2.45
34 1.69 2.03 2.44
resent 95%CI. 35 1.69 2.03 2.44
d see what happens to: 36 1.69 2.03 2.43
or bars 37 1.69 2.03 2.43
38 1.69 2.02 2.43
39 1.69 2.02 2.43
ant difference between population A and B" 40 1.68 2.02 2.42
42 1.68 2.02 2.42
44 1.68 2.02 2.41
46 1.68 2.01 2.41
(n-2)
Confidence
om/quickcalcs/ttest1.cfm
for using the t-test:
lation means to compare
ve data points in each population
we usually work at the 95% confidence
level. This means that any differences
Notice that as P decreases,
Click here for some practice
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
17/73
H0 48 1.68 2.01 2.41
ference. 50 1.68 2.01 2.40
60 1.67 2.00 2.39
the H0 70 1.67 1.99 2.38
ifference. 80 1.66 1.99 2.37
90 1.66 1.99 2.37100 1.66 1.98 2.36
120 1.66 1.98 2.36
150 1.66 1.98 2.35
200 1.65 1.97 2.35
300 1.65 1.97 2.34
500 1.65 1.97 2.33
1.65 1.96 2.33
If your degrees of freedom lie
between values (e.g. 55 on this
table), then use the critical value of
the lower number (in this case 50).
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
18/73
99%
0.01
63.66
9.93
5.84
4.60
4.03
3.71
3.50
3.36
3.25
3.17
3.11
3.06
3.01
2.98
2.95
2.92
2.90
2.88
2.86
2.85
2.83
2.82
2.81
2.80
2.792.78
2.77
2.76
2.76
2.75
2.74
2.74
2.73
2.73
2.72
2.72
2.72
2.71
2.71
2.70
2.70
2.69
2.69
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
19/73
2.68
2.68
2.66
2.65
2.64
2.632.63
2.62
2.61
2.60
2.59
2.59
2.58
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
20/73
Practice with the t-testAlways start by stating the null hypothesis. H0 = "There is no significant difference betwee
1. Total sample size = 24. t = 2.33.
H0 = "There is no significant difference between population A and B"
Ift > c.v. then REJECT the null hypothesis. Conclusion:
There is a significant difference between A and B. t c.v. so I the null
There a significant difference bet
Ift < c.v. then ACCEPT the null hypothesis.
There is no significant difference between A and B.
2. An ecologist measures 23 leaves on the East side of a hedge and 32 on the West. The me
H0 = "There is no significant difference between population A and B"
Conclusion:
t c.v. so I the null hypothesis.
There a significant difference between the population means.
3. Rugby squad A has 22 players with a mean sprint time of 11.5s. Squad B has 20 players,
H0 = "There is no significant difference between population A and B"
Conclusion:
t c.v. so I the null hypothesis.
There a significant difference between the population means.
repeat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 mean stdev
Population A 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 2.5 1.08
Population B 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.6 0.52
The error bars here re
Manipulate the data a
- The overlap of The e
- The value of P (t-test
H0 = "There is no signi
P = ###
If P < 0.05 then REJEC
DV (unit, uncertainty)
Degrees of freedom = Critical value (c.v.) of t =
Degrees of freedom = Critical value (c.v.) of t =
Degrees of freedom = Critical value (c.v.) of t =
Population A
(n=10)
Population B
(n=10)1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
lueofdependentvariable
(unit,
)
Comparing the means of Populations A and B.
(Error bars represent 95% confidence)
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
21/73
There is a significant d
If P > 0.05 then ACCEP
There is no significant
In the default data here, you can a small overlap, but significant difference.
What happens as the datasets become more similar or more different?
0.0
0.5
1.0
Meanv
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
22/73
90% 95% 98%
n population A and B" P 0.1 0.05 0.02
Increasing significance
DF 1 6.31 12.71 31.82
22.92 4.30 6.97
3 2.35 3.18 4.54
4 2.13 2.78 3.75
5 2.02 2.57 3.37
l hypothesis. 6 1.94 2.45 3.14
een the population means. 7 1.90 2.37 3.00
8 1.86 2.31 2.90
9 1.83 2.26 2.82
10 1.81 2.23 2.76
ns are compared. "t" is calculated as 1.97. 11 1.80 2.20 2.72
12 1.78 2.18 2.68
131.77 2.16 2.65
14 1.76 2.15 2.63
15 1.75 2.13 2.60
16 1.75 2.12 2.58
17 1.74 2.11 2.57
18 1.73 2.10 2.55
ean time 9.3s. "t" is calculated as 2.10. 19 1.73 2.09 2.54
20 1.73 2.09 2.53
21 1.72 2.08 2.52
22 1.72 2.07 2.51
23 1.71 2.07 2.50
24 1.71 2.06 2.49A Creative Commons work by Stephen Taylor 25 1.71 2.06 2.49
26 1.71 2.06 2.48
27 1.70 2.05 2.47
28 1.70 2.05 2.47
95% CI 29 1.70 2.05 2.46
0.67 30 1.70 2.04 2.46
0.32 31 1.70 2.04 2.45
32 1.69 2.04 2.45
present 95%CI. 33 1.69 2.04 2.45
nd see what happens to: 34 1.69 2.03 2.44
ror bars 35 1.69 2.03 2.44
) 36 1.69 2.03 2.4337 1.69 2.03 2.43
icant difference between population A and B" 38 1.69 2.02 2.43
39 1.69 2.02 2.43
40 1.68 2.02 2.42
42 1.68 2.02 2.42
H0 44 1.68 2.02 2.41
Confidence
(n-2)
Links:
Front Page
i-Biology.net
http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
23/73
ifference. 46 1.68 2.01 2.41
48 1.68 2.01 2.41
T the H0 50 1.68 2.01 2.40
difference. 60 1.67 2.00 2.39
70 1.67 1.99 2.38
801.66 1.99 2.37
90 1.66 1.99 2.37
100 1.66 1.98 2.36
120 1.66 1.98 2.36
150 1.66 1.98 2.35
200 1.65 1.97 2.35
300 1.65 1.97 2.34
500 1.65 1.97 2.33
1.65 1.96 2.33
If your degrees of freedom lie
between values (e.g. 55 on this
table), then use the critical value of
the lower number (in this case 50).
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
24/73
99%
0.01
63.66
9.93
5.84
4.60
4.03
3.71
3.50
3.36
3.25
3.17
3.11
3.06
3.01
2.98
2.95
2.92
2.90
2.88
2.86
2.85
2.83
2.82
2.81
2.80
2.79
2.78
2.77
2.76
2.76
2.75
2.74
2.74
2.73
2.73
2.72
2.722.72
2.71
2.71
2.70
2.70
2.69
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
25/73
2.69
2.68
2.68
2.66
2.65
2.64
2.63
2.63
2.62
2.61
2.60
2.59
2.59
2.58
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
26/73
Data Processing and Presentation
Raw data table of tissue sample masses for populations A and B
repeat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 mean
Population A 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.1 1.5
Population B 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.0 2.3 4.3 2.2 2.2 2.0 3.1 2.5
Associated qualitatvie data:
Record observations with the raw data. You cannot get above 0 for DCP aspect 1 without this.
These observations could be referred to in the conclusion or evaluation.
Mass of tissue samples (g, 0.1g)
Population A
(n= )
Population B
(n= )
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Meanmassoftissuesamples(g,
0.1g
)
Comparing the mean tissue sample masses of Population A and
Population B (Error bars represent 95% confidence)
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
27/73
Raw data
Give the tables a title.
Always remember units and uncertainties.
stdev 95% confidence Mean should not got to more d.p. than the precision of the recording.
0.29 0.18 Make sure that all raw data and the means have consistent d.p.
0.70 0.43 This includes zeroes. (Format cell, number, dp)
STDEV and 95% confidence can have one extra d.p.
Do not allow tables to break across pages.
Processing data:
Explain what calculations were used and why.
If you used Excel, explain what functions were selected and why.
Give worked examples of any calculations you carried out yourself.
Where data sets are large, you will need to present processed data as a separate table.
Think about units and uncertainties of processed data carefully.
Presenting Processed DataTitles must be descriptive of the experiment.
You must state what the error bars represent.
Do not plot bar charts.
Trend lines, if used, should be plotted by you.
Error bars need to be for each data set. Include sample size where appropriate (n= )
Label axes clearly, with units and uncertainties.
Make good use of space.
Do not clutter the graph with unnecessary colours, lines or shading.
Ask yourself the question:
"Does my table or graph clearly and accurately represent the data?"
A Creative Commons work by Steph
Links:
Front Pagei-Biology.net
http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
28/73
en Taylor
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
29/73
Comparing two population means under different conditionsIn this example, lichen and moss populations were compared on the North and South sides of so
1st
quadrat
2nd
quadrat
3rd
quadrat
1st
quadrat
2nd
quadrat
3rd
quadrat
Moss 4 20 10 56 45 65
Lichen 100 84 100 12 32 12Moss 5 6 23 76 76 65
Lichen 87 65 54 23 12 23
Moss 12 13 14 76 87 65
Lichen 3 4 5 12 10 9
Moss 76 65 54 67 54 23
Lichen 3 6 5 3 6 5
Moss 76 87 78 87 76 67
Lichen 2 4 7 12 8 6
Sample sizes: 15 per side per type
Interpret the data and the graphs.
Which data are more variable? How do you know?
Which sets of data are most likely to be significantly different?
A Creative Commons work by Stephen Taylor
% Coverage of lichens and
mosses on trees (4%)
Northern direction Southern direction
Tree 1
Tree 2
Links:
Front Page
i-Biology.net
Tree 3
Tree 4
Tree 5
http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
30/73
e trees.
Processed Data
Mean Standard deviation 95% confidenceMosses 36.2 32.2 16.3
Lichen 33.1 40.4 20.4
Mosses 65.7 22.9 11.6
Lichen 11.6 8.2 4.2
% Coverage on trees (4%)
South Side
North Side
Moss, North
36.2 Lichen, North
33.1
Moss, South
65.7
Lichen, S
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
Mean%Coverageontree
s(
4%)
Comparing % coverage of moss and lichen populations on the Nort
South aspects of trees in Bandung, West Java. (Error bars represent
confidence)
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
31/73
uth
11.6
and
95%
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
32/73
A results table for population comparisons where membe
1 2 3 4 5 mean stdev 95% conf.
A1 ###### #DIV/0!
A2 ###### #DIV/0!
A3 ###### #DIV/0!
A4 ###### #DIV/0!
A5 ###### #DIV/0!
mean ###### ###### ###### ###### ######
stdev ###### ###### ###### ###### ######
95% confidence ###### ###### ###### ###### ######
population statistics:
mean = ###### stdev = ###### 95% confidence #DIV/0!
T-test:
H0 = There is no significant difference between population A and population B.
df =
TTEST =
Analysis If P>0.05, accept H0 (less than 95% confident that differences are not du
If P
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
33/73
s of each population are repeating trials
1 2 3 4 5 mean stdev 95% conf.
B1 ###### #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
B2 ###### #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
B3 ###### #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
B4 ###### #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
B5 ###### #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
mean ###### ###### ###### ###### ######
stdev ###### ###### ###### ###### ######
95% confidence ###### ###### ###### ###### ######
population statistics:
mean = ###### stdev = ###### 95% confidence= #DIV/0!
e to chance)
ue to chance)
B. A Creative Commons work by Ste
i-Biology.net
Population BDV unit ( smallest division)
Links:
Front Page
http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
34/73
hen Taylor
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
35/73
CorrelationsThese examples outline some different types of correlation.
See what happens to the correlation coefficient, the scatter plots and the best-fit lines when you change some raw data points.
Variable A 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 9.0
Variable B 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.9 3 3.1 3.4 3.6
Variable A 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 9.0
Variable B 5 2 7 9 6 7 8 3 2 10
Variable A 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 9.0Variable B 9 8 6 7 4 6 6 5 4 3
Correlation = 0.92
Correlation = -0.84
Correlation = 0.10
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0VariableB(units,uncertainties)
Variable A (units, uncertainties)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0VariableB(units,unce
rtainties)
Variable A (units, uncertainties)
4
6
8
10
units,uncertainties)
correlation = 0.92
correlation = 0.10 (no correlation)
correlation = -0.84
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
36/73
Variable A 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 9.0
Variable B 9 8 7 7 7 6 6 4 4 3Correlation = -1.00
0
2
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0VariableB
Variable A (units, uncertainties)
0
2
4
6
8
10
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0VariableB
(units,uncertatinies)
Variable A (units, uncertainties)
correlation = -1.00
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
37/73
Try it here:
Raw data points: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 mean sd
Variable A (units, ) #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Variable B (units, ) #DIV/0! #DIV/0!Remember, variable A and B must align! Mean and s.d. are just descriptive here.
Insert columns before the mean for extra data points.
Links:
More examples down here Front Page
i-Biology.net
A Creative Commons work by Stephen Taylor
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4
VariableB(units,)
Variable (units, )
A scatter plot to show the relationship between Variable A and Variable B
(Correlation = )
Remember: Correlation does not imply
http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
38/73
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
39/73
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
40/73
Before and AfterA 5 x 5 results table to produce a single scatter or line
IV Value ( (unit)) repeat start end difference % difference ( x%)
1 0 #DIV/0!
2 0 #DIV/0!3 0 #DIV/0!
4 0 #DIV/0!
5 0 #DIV/0!
1 0 #DIV/0!
2 0 #DIV/0!
3 0 #DIV/0!
4 0 #DIV/0!
5 0 #DIV/0!
1 0 #DIV/0!
2 0 #DIV/0!
3 0 #DIV/0!
4 0 #DIV/0!
5 0 #DIV/0!
1 0 #DIV/0!
2 0 #DIV/0!
3 0 #DIV/0!
4 0 #DIV/0!
5 0 #DIV/0!
1 0 #DIV/0!
2 0 #DIV/0!
3 0 #DIV/0!
4 0 #DIV/0!
5 0 #DIV/0!
recorded value ( (unit))
1
2
3
4
5
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
n%changeofdependentv
ariable
(unitsanduncertainties)
Investigating the effect of changing independent variabl
dependent variable of _____. Error bars represent
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
41/73
0.0
0.1
0 1 2 3
Mea
Independent variable (units and unce
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
42/73
mean ( x%) stdev 95% confidence Calculating % differences allows for comparisons b
where starting values may not be consistent.
For example, an increase of mass of 0.1g on a start
1g is much greater than the same increase on a sta
Calculating % difference:
end - start
start
Graph
Links:
Front Page
i-Biology.netA Creative Commons w
Add your own trend line.
Do not use the Excel lines.
Best fit and get between the error bars where poss
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
% difference = x 100
#DIV/0!
on the % change in
5% confidence.
http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
43/73
4 5 6
rtainties)
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
44/73
etween sets of data
ing mass of
rting mass of 5g.
rk by Stephen Taylor
ible.
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
45/73
Continuous variable: 5 increments, 5 repeats, changes over tiA 5 x 5 results table for time trials over 5 increments of the IV (raw data)
IV Value ( (unit)) Time ( (unit)) 1 2 3 4 5 Mean STDEV
1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
3 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
4 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
5 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
3 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
4 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
5 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!3 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
4 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
5 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
3 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
4 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
5 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
3 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
4 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
5 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Repeat Processe
4
5
3
1
2
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
endentvariable
uncertainties)
Investigating the effect of (IV) on (DV).
(Error bars represent 95% confidence.)
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
46/73
IV Value ( (unit)) Mean % change sd 95% CI Use axis formatting tools to sort th
1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! to fit the data and increments appr
2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
3 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
4 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
5 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0 1 2 3 4 5
Meanofde
(units
Independent Variable (units uncertainties)
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
47/73
e
This is the standard "5 x 5" investigation that can generate "sufficient, relevant data"
95% confidence As so much raw data is generated, processed data should be separated.
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0! Links:
#DIV/0! Front Pa
#DIV/0! i-Biology.
#DIV/0! Do more! A Creative
With such a rich data-set, we can 'lift out' values to see more trends.
Example: see the 'before-after' results for each increment of the dependent variable.
IV Value ( (unit)) Time ( (unit)) 1 2 3 41 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
% Change #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Mean % change #DIV/0! sd = #DIV/0! 95% CI
1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Data
Link to a completed example
Repeat
1
2
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0 1 2 3 4
Meano
fdependentvariable
(unitsu
ncertainties)
Time (units uncertainties)
Investigating the effect of (IV) on (DV) over ti(Error bars represent 95% confidence.)
1 2 3 4 5
http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
48/73
% Change #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Mean % change #DIV/0! sd = #DIV/0! 95% CI
1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
% Change #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Mean % change #DIV/0! sd = #DIV/0! 95% CI1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
% Change #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
m out Mean % change #DIV/0! sd = #DIV/0! 95% CI
opriately. 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Difference 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
% Change #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Mean % change #DIV/0! sd = #DIV/0! 95% CI
4
5
3
6
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
49/73
e
net
Commons work by Stephen Taylor
50.0
0.0
0.0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0.0
0.0
0.0
5 6
me.
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
50/73
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0.0
0.0
0.0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!0.0
0.0
0.0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0.0
0.0
0.0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
51/73
Continuous variable: 5 increments, 5 repeats, changes overA 5 x 5 results table for time trials over 5 increments of the IV (raw data)
CO2 production ( 0.5ml)
Temp ( 0.5oC) Time ( 1 sec) 1 2 3 4 5 Mean STDEV
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00
60 .1. 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.08
120 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.08
180 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.05
240 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.11
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00
60 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.07
120 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.09
180 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.11
240 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.15
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00
60 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.11120 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.16
180 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.13
240 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.12
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00
60 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.04
120 1.2 1.6 0.9 0.9 1.4 1.2 0.31
180 1.5 1.9 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.7 0.20
240 1.8 2.0 2.3 1.8 2.5 2.1 0.31
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00
60 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.09
120 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.08
180 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.09
240 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.11
30oC
40oC
50oC
Repeat Processe
10oC
20oC
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
52/73
time This is the standard "5 x 5" investigation that can generate "sufficient, rele
95% confidence
#NUM!
0.07
0.07
0.05
0.10
#NUM!
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.13
#NUM!
0.100.14
0.12
0.11
#NUM!
0.04
0.27
0.18
0.27
#NUM!
0.08 You need to edit axes and labels. Links:
0.07 Best fit should be done yourself. Front Page
0.08 In this case, I chose polynomials which fit. i-Biology.net
0.10 A Creative Common
Data
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0 60 120 180
Mean
ofdependentvariable
(unitsu
ncertainties)
Independent Variable (units uncertainties)
Investigating the effect of temperature on rate of photo
ofElodea, by measuring release of CO2 over tim
(Error bars represent 95% confidence.)
10oC 20oC 30oC 40oC 50oC
http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
53/73
ant data"
work by Stephen Taylor
240
ynthesis
.
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
54/73
How does glucose concentration affect population growth ofSacch
Raw data: Cell counts from the hemacytometer
cells squares cells squares cells
0 10 16 9 16 9
24
48
72
96
0 16 16
24
48
7296
0 16 16
24
48
72
96
0 16 16
24
48
7296
0 16 16
24
48
72
96
Processed Data: Population estimates
1 2 3 4 5
0 400 360 360 400 480
24 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
48 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
72 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
96 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Glucose concentration
( 1gl-1
)
Population ( x 103
cells cm-3
)Time (
4h)
15
20
Time (
4h)
Glucose concentration
( 1gl-1)
Population 1 Population 2 Popul
0
5
Raw cel
0
10
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
55/73
0 0 0 0 0 0
24 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
48 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
72 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
96 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 0 0 0 0
24 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
48 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
72 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
96 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 0 0 0 0
24 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
48 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
72 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
96 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 0 0 0 0
24 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
48 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
72 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
96 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
5
10
15
20
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
56/73
aromyces cerevisiae ?
squares cells squares cells squares The red values
16 10 16 12 16 1 A dilution fact
1 If cells become
1
1 Associated Qu
1 Samples for 15
16 16 16 1 The dilution fa
1
1
11
16 16 16 1
1
1
1
1
16 16 16 1
1 Links:
1 Front P
1 i-Biolo2 A Creati
16 16 16 1
1
1
1
2
Processed Data: Graphing
Further ProcessingTurn this blank chart into a scatter plot ofme
Mean STDEV 95% CI Plot 95% CI as the error bars and for each seri
400 49.0 42.9 Include: a descriptive title, units an uncertaint
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
http://
lation 3 Population 4 Population 5
Link to data:
Dilution
Factor
"1 in ___"
l counts (1)
http://i-biology.net/http://wp.me/P7lr1-kNhttp://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
57/73
16 0.0 95% CI
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
16 0.0 95% CI
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
16 0.0 95% CI
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
16 0.0 95% CI
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
58/73
have been entered from the starting populations.
r of "none" is 1 in 1
too clustered to count, we need to dilute and factor.
alitative Data (observations)
gl-1
and 20gl-1
had to be diluted on day 5 as they were too clustered to count.
tor was 1 in 2 (5ml sample added to 5ml water, then re-sampled).
age
y.net ve Commons work by Stephen Taylor
an population over time, with 5 curves (concentrations). Model:
es, select an appropriate best-fit curve.
ies on the axes, clear points and lines and make good use of the space.
p.me/P7lr1-kN
5 x 5 example
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
59/73
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
60/73
Chi-Squared Test Calculator: Monohybrid Cr
Null hypothesis: there is no significant difference between observed and expected
Description Observed (O) Expected (E)
Phenotype 1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Phenotype 2* #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Sum: 0 #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0!
*clear cells if not needed#Write as a an integer, e.g. ( 3, 1) If
2< critical value, accept the
If2
> critical value, reject the n
Conclusion: I do/do do not accept the null hypothesis. My results do/ d
Sample size (N) =
predicted
ratio#
ratio as a
decimal
Collected data
These totals must equal N
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
61/73
ss (not multiple alleles)
esults .
(O - E) (O - E)2 D.F. $
0.1
(90%)
0.05
(95%)
0.01
(99%)
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 1 2.70554 3.84146 6.6349
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 2 4.60517 5.99146 9.21034
#DIV/0! $Degrees of freedom:number of phenotypes minus 1
null hypothesis
ull hypothesis
not fit the predicted ratio.
Links:
A Creative Commons work by Stephen Taylor
p(certainty)
Total (2
) =
Front Page
i-Biology.net
Calculating 2
(O - E)2
E
Critical Values table
http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
62/73
Chi-Squared Test Calculator: Dihybrid Crosse
Null hypothesis: there is no significant difference between observed and expected
Description Observed (O) Expected (E)
Phenotype 1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Phenotype 2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Phenotype 3* #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Phenotype 4* #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Sum: 0 #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0!
*clear cells if not needed
#Write as a an integer, e.g. (9, 3, 3, 1) If
2< critical value, accept the
If2
> critical value, reject the n
Conclusion: I do/do do not accept the null hypothesis. My results do/ d
Sample size (N) =
predicted
ratio#
ratio as a
decimal
Collected data
These totals must equal N
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
63/73
s & Linked Genes
esults .
(O - E) (O - E)2 D.F. $
0.1
(90%)
0.05
(95%)
0.01
(99%)
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 1 2.70554 3.84146 6.6349
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 2 4.60517 5.99146 9.21034
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 3 6.25139 7.81473 11.34487
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 4 7.77944 9.48773 13.2767
#DIV/0! $Degrees of freedom:
number of phenotypes minus 1
null hypothesis
ull hypothesis
not fit the predicted ratio.
Links:
A Creative Commons work by Stephen Taylor
p(certainty)
Total (
2
) =
Front Pagei-Biology.net
Calculating 2
(O - E)2
E
Critical Values table
http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
64/73
Chi-Squared Test Calculator: Codominant (M
Null hypothesis: there is no significant difference between observed and expected
Description Observed (O) Expected (E)
Phenotype 1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Phenotype 2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Phenotype 3* #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Phenotype 4* #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Sum: 0 #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0!
*clear cells if not needed
#Write as a an integer, e.g. (9, 3, 3, 1) If
2< critical value, accept the
If2
> critical value, reject the n
Conclusion: I do/do do not accept the null hypothesis. My results do/ d
Sample size (N) =
predicted
ratio#
ratio as a
decimal
Collected data
These totals must equal N
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
65/73
onohybrid)
esults .
(O - E) (O - E)2 D.F. $
0.1
(90%)
0.05
(95%)
0.01
(99%)
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 1 2.70554 3.84146 6.6349
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 2 4.60517 5.99146 9.21034
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 3 6.25139 7.81473 11.34487
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 4 7.77944 9.48773 13.2767
#DIV/0! $Degrees of freedom:
number of phenotypes minus 1
null hypothesis
ull hypothesis
not fit the predicted ratio.
Links:
Front Pagei-Biology.net
A Creative Commons work by Stephen Taylor
p(certainty)
Total (
2
) =
Calculating 2
(O - E)2
E
Critical Values table
http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
66/73
Chi-Squared Test Calculator: Polygenic or TriNull hypothesis: there is no significant difference between observed and expected
Description Observed (O) Expected (E)
Phenotype 1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Phenotype 2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Phenotype 3 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Phenotype 4 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Phenotype 5 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Phenotype 6 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Sum: 0 #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0!
*clear cells if not needed
#Write as a an integer, e.g. (9, 3, 3, 1) If
2< critical value, accept the
If2
> critical value, reject the n
Conclusion: I do/do do not accept the null hypothesis. My results do/ d
Sample size (N) =
predicted
ratio#
ratio as a
decimal
Collected data
These totals must equal N
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
67/73
hybrid Crossesesults .
(O - E) (O - E)2 D.F. $
0.1
(90%)
0.05
(95%)
0.01
(99%)
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 1 2.70554 3.84146 6.6349
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 2 4.60517 5.99146 9.21034
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 3 6.25139 7.81473 11.34487
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 4 7.77944 9.48773 13.2767
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 5 9.23636 11.0705 15.08627
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 6 10.6446 12.59159 16.81189
#DIV/0! $Degrees of freedom:number of phenotypes minus 1
null hypothesis
ull hypothesis
not fit the predicted ratio.
Links:
Front Pagei-Biology.net
A Creative Commons work by Stephen Taylor
p(certainty)
Total (2
) =
Calculating 2
(O - E)2
E
Critical Values table
http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
68/73
Percentage Difference vs Percentage Change When is the d
A = 0.50 If A is simply bein
B = 0.75 If A has become
% Difference: Simple Comparisons % Change:
difference
A or B
No negative values - the magnitude of the difference only is considered. Negative values a
Therefore two answers are acceptable.
0.75 - 0.50
0.50
OR
0.75 - 0.500.75
Change =riginal value:
Final value:% Change Calculator
1
2
Consider these two data points.
%
%
Click on the white cells to see the formula used
x 100 = 33
% Difference = x 100 % Change =
50x 100 = % Change =
% Change =
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
69/73
istinction between these important?
compared to B, we use one method.
(changed over time), we use another.
rder is important
(Final - original)
Original Value
re possible. Magnitude and 'direction' of the change are shown.
0.75 - 0.50
0.5
What if A = 0.75 ?and B = 0.50 ?
0.50 - 0.75
0.5
Links:
You need to adjust the d.p. to the Front Page
same degree of precision as the measurements. i-Biology.net
A Creative Commons work by
100.00 %
x 100
50 % (increase)
x100 = -33.3 % (decrease)
x100 =
http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
70/73
Stephen Taylor
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
71/73
Calculating Magnifications
You should be able to:
1. Calculate the linear magnification of an image when given a s
ruler length 2.5cm 25,000mscale bar 1m 1m
get to the same units
2. Calculate the actual size of an object when given the linear m"An image is magnified 5,000x. Calculate the actual size of an organelle meas
ruler length 2mm
magnification 5000
horrible notation
3. Calculate the actual size of an object when given a scale bar."A scale bar of 10m is 50mm on an image. Calculate the actual size of an or
scale bar length 50mm
object length 23mmx scaleActual size = = x 10m
=Magnification=
Actual size = = =.0004mm=
= =
7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
72/73
ale bar.
gnification.ured as 2mm on the image."
4 x 10-4
mm
0.4m nm m mm
400nm nm 1 1 x 10-3
1 x 10-6
nicer notations m 1 x 103 1 1 x 10-3
mm 1 x 106
1 x 103 1
m 1 x 109
1 x 106
1 x 103
km 1 x 1012
1 x 109
1 x 106
anelle measured as 23mm on the image."
Pick the most appropriate unit and notation to present
Proper scientific notation should have one integer bef
Links:
Front Pagei-Biology.net
A Creative Co
= 21.7m
is worth _____
These relationships are fa
Oneofthese
5,000 x magnification 1
http://i-biology.net/http://i-biology.net/7/31/2019 I-Biology Excel StatBook
73/73
m km cm
1 x 10-9
1 x 10-12
1 x 10-7
1 x 10-6 1 x 10-9 1 x 10 -4
1 x 10-3
1 x 10-6
1 x 10-1
1 1 x 10-3
1 x 102
1 x 103 1 1 x 10
5
your data.
re the decimal place.
mons work by Stephen Taylor
_ of one of these:
tors of 1000