124
I I I I I - Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD. Consultant Historical Arcaeologist with Wayn€ Johnson, BA(Hons) for Church of the Four Square Gospe 1 February, 1991. HALL EXCAVATION

I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I

I I

-

Q994.41

BAI

Q994.411

BAI

)

\

HOMESTEAo··

GEORGES

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

REPORT

Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD. Consultant Historical Arcaeologist

with Wayn€ Johnson, BA(Hons)

for Church of the Four Square Gospe 1

February, 1991.

HALL

EXCAVATION

Page 2: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I

Ur~lil~l~i~~~~~~il~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~i~ 000019846

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

First and foremost I must thank Colin Giddens, his staff and the members of the Church of the Four Square Gospel who not only financed this excavation but gave their time shovelling dirt in the middle of an unforeseen heat wave to ensure that the excavation could succeed.

Secondly, my thanks for the professional assistance, also freely given, by Wendy Thorp, Consultant Historical Archaeologist, who had carried out the initial assessment and survey but who, due to other commitments, was unable to proceed to the excavation stage. The excavation strategy was basically hers based on her knowledge of the . sit.e.

Next, my thanks to Lisa Newell who provided all the assistance, information and advice we have come to expect from the Heritage and Conservation Branch of the NSW Department of Planning.

My thanks also to Wayne Johnson who acted as Site Supervisor but who also assisted in the interpretation of the excavated material. Mr Johnson toiled in the heat to ensure that the excavation was completed on time.

Last but by no means 1 east, I thank the vo 1 unteers. I can only hope that they do not consider that all archaeological excavations take place in temperatures exceeding 36 degrees Celsius.

Damaris Bairstow Feb ruary, 1991 .

Page 3: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING UBRARY.

CONTENTS

Acknowledgements

Contents

1. I nt roduct ion . ................. ~~ .................... 1 1.1 Statement of Significance ..................... 1 1.2 Legal Responsibility & Professional Ethics .... 1

1.2.1 Legal Responsibility of the Owner ... 1 1.2.2 Professional Ethics ................. 2

1.3 Prior Research ................................. 2 1 . 4 Format of Report ............................... 3

2. Recommendations . .............. ., ........•........... 4

2. Archaeological Methodology .......................... 7 2.1 Archaeological Survey ......................... 7 2.2 Aims of the Excavation ........................ 7 2.3 Time Constraints .............................. 9 2.4 Archaeological Methodology .................... 9

2.4.1 Field Procedures .................... 9 2.4.2 Laboratory Methods ................. 12

2.5 The Excavation Team .......................... 14

4. Historical Background ............................. 15

5. Summary of Resu 1 ts ................................ 16

6. The Excavation .................................... 34 6.1 Area 1 ....................................... 34 6.2 Area 2 ........................................ 41

References ............................................. 4 7

List of figures ....................................... i i i List of Appendices ..................................... iv

Page 4: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

List of figures

1. Survey plan showing sites of excavated footings in relation to the historic house ........ 5

2. Plan showing location of archaeological sites as located by Thorp, 1990 ......................... 8

3. Area 1 Unit 022, part of the east footings of the servants' quarters ........................ 17

4. Area 1 Quadrats J-Q 18-20. The laundry/ bakehouse with fireplaces and flues (Unit 025) and evidence of the later raised floor (Units 032 and 033) ..................................... 19

5. Area 2 showing brick footings (Unit 214) flagstones (Unit 216) and stratigraphic Units 201, 202, 203, 211 and 212 ................. 20

6. Area 1 Quadrats F-H 13-17. Stone footings (Unit 028) linking east and west brick buildings and the cement sill (Unit 034) evidencing the change to the entrance ............ 22

7. Area 1. Sandstone flagged path (Unit 030) ....... .. 22 8. Area 1. Sandstone spoon drain (Unit 031) .......... 23 9. Area 2 showing brick and stone footings

(Units 214 and 21 8) .............................. 2 3 10. Small finds from Area 1 Unit 008 .................. 26 11. Grindley polychrome transfer-printed plate

(Unit 207 Bagnum 73 DBID 855 ..................... 29 12. Area 1: plan of the excavation .................... 32 13. Area 2: plan of the excavation .................... 33 14. Sketch plan of Area 1 excavation .................. 35 15. Area 1 Trench II with north-south wall (Unit 22

before extension of the excavated area ........... 37 16. Area 1 Matrix of excavated units .................. 40 17. Sketch plan of Area 2 excavation .................. 42 18. Area 2. West face of extended excavation

showing stratigraphic units ...................... 44 19. Area 2 Matrix of excavated units .................. 46

Page 5: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

List of Appendices

1. List of stratigraphic units 2. Statistical analyses 3. List of manufacturers' marks 4. Guide to the artefact database 5. Artefact catalogue 6. Photographic record of artefacts 1. Artefact box and unit list 8. List of display items 9. List of archival records

iv

Page 6: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I II

I II

I I I I I I I

1. INTRODUCTION

"The Homestead" is Classified by the National Trust,

1 isted in the Register of the National Estate and is

subject to a Permanent Conservation Order under the NSW

Heritage Act. The House (1837) is the oldest to survive

in the area and is associated with the family of Captain

George Johnston of the Roy a 1 Marines, a man of

considerable importance in our history. The Conservation

Order extends to the grounds as well as the house because

the land embraces the historic garden and the sites of

former outbuildings.

Although the names of the land-owners are known from Land

Titles records and the genealogy of the Johnston family

is documented, there is no written or graphic record of

the comp 1 ex which once comprises "The Homestead" or how

the 1 and was deve 1 oped and used. The on 1 y source for

this knowledge was through archaeo 1 ogy. For this reason

archaeological investigation was a justifiable forerunner

to site redevelopment.

1 . 2. 1 Legal Responsibility of the OWner.

The NSW Heritage Act requires any owner cf a site of

heritage significance to have investigated

archaeologically any significant deposit which w i 11 or

could be disturbed by or in the course of site

Page 7: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Xntr~dluct'iCJOn

redevelopment. Under the NSW Heritage Act protection is

afforded only to deposits over fifty years old. It is not incumbent upon an owner to excavation for the purpose interesting the results may be.

finance archaeological of research however

1.2.2 Professional Ethics.

Whilst the responsibilities of the historical archaeologist are not defined by law,

professional ethics dictate that he comply with the

provisions of the Australia ICOMOS Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cu1tura1 Significance (the Surra Charter)

while, where excavation is undertaken,

the archaeologist must submit to the Heritage Council of New South Wales a proper research design

in order to obtain an Excavation Permit and thereafter must satisfy all conditions on which that Permit is granted.

In addition, the Procedural Guidelines for Historical Archaeological Sites presently in the course of preparation make it incumbent upon the archaeologist

to recognise the legitimate objectives and restrictions of the deve 1 oper and the costs to the developer of archaeological investigation and

to minimise costs and delays while avoiding unnecessary costs and delays.

Cost must te kept in mind in determining archaeological strategy and time limits.

A conservation study of Georges Hall Homestead was undertaken by Noel Bell, Ridley Smith & Partners, Architects. This embraced the results of considerable archival research.

2

Page 8: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Pursuant to recommendations contained in the Conservation

Study, an archaeological assessment was made by Wendy

Thorp, Heritage Consultant and Historical Archaeologist.

Ms Thorp consulted all remaining archival sources.

These reports were made available before the start of

excavation. Thus no further historical research was

necessary. The Excavation Director is gratefu 1 to the

authors of these reports.

Part 1 of this report contains a brief introduction to

the excavation.

Part 2 sets out recommendations arising from the

excavation results.

Part 3 explores the aims of the excavation and the

methodological approach adopted to achieve those aims.

Part 4 gives a resume of

undertaken by the consultant

consultant.

the historical

architects and

research

heritage

Part 5 is a summary of the results of the excavation.

Part 6 supplies details of the excavation.

Archival information, statistical analyses and details of

the artefacts on which this report is based are set out

in a series of appendices.

Page 9: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I•

2- RECOMMENDATIONS

The excavation disclosed a sandstone flagged path and the

footings of an unrecorded outbuilding (Figure 1, Area 1)

neither of which is directly impacted by the construction

of the church to the south of the block but whicr are in

part affected by landscape proposals. The historic house

is to be restored and made available for public

inspection. Whi 1st of a date later than that of the

house, the path and outbu i 1 ding were integra 1 to the

occupation and use of the house in the third decade of

the nineteenth century. To display these features in a

manner commensurate with modern site usage would add to

the interest of the historic site as a whole. The bulk

of the excavation work was performed by members of the

Church who thereby acquired an interest in the outcome of

their labour. For these reasons, the following

recommendations are made:

1. That the path is left exposed and incorporated into the garden landscape.

2. That the plan of the outbuilding is outlined on the surface to become

the event of any a landscape feature to be avoided in

change to the 1 andscape or e.xcavat ion for service connections.

3. That removal of the pepper

sector of the historic footings

there be no attempt to interfere

tree

be

with

growing in the south

by cutting -and that

its roots.

4. That the watching brief recommended

the Archaeological Survey (Thorp 1990b)

the owners and that a professional

called in only if building excavation

in Sectron 1 of

be undertaken by

archaeologist be

reveals structural features

exceeding

or deposits

the yield

containing

of the

artefacts in a quantity

site in general (i.e. , a

4

Page 10: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

FIGURE 1 Survey plan showing sites of excavated

footings in relation to the historic house.

THE HOMESTEAD

AREA 1

0 AREA 2

Scale 1:500

~rges Ha."'lll Hc:Mnestea.d "1990 5

Page 11: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I

II I I I I II I I I I I

"dump"). In either event excavation should cease in that area pending professional archaeological inspection and

advice.

In addition to the foregoing it is recommended:

5. That upon demolition of the south timber-framed

annex and before any 1 andscap i ng in that sector of the

site, an archaeologist inspect with a view to determining the significance of relics adjacent to the house recorded

by Thorp during the archaeological survey (Thorp 1990b

Sites 10 and 11, see Figure 2). If of heritage value,

these sites should not be impacted.

6

Page 12: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

3- ARCHAEOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY

The first step was an archaeological survey to

determine whether there was any visible evidence of

former structures or use. This was done by Wendy Thorp

who identified two major features and an associated brick

scatter (1, 2, 5 & 6, Figure 2, Thorp 1990b Figure 1)

where excavation was justified.

subject of this excavation.

These features are the

2-2 A'iiiiS o-r th- Exca.V"at-ton

,r- 1 {} r-..0

The

discover

aim of any archaeological

how people lived in the past. excavation is to

This involves the recovery of two sorts of evidence:

* structural the kind of buildings that were

lived or worked in and the relationship between those buildings.

* artefactual ceramics, glass, bone and shell, toys, buttons and persona 1 i terns that were 1 ost or

thrown away as indicators of the way of 1 i fe of

those who occupied those bu i 1 dings. Artefacts can also help to identify the nature and use of

structures.

The two spheres of evidence are considered interdependent and interactive. The sites se 1 ectad as a resu 1 t of the archaeological survey were excavated accordingly.

The extent to which an owner is obliged to sponsor

archaeological excavation depends on the extent to which

the archaeological resource wi 11 be impacted by any

proposed development. Of the two excavation areas, one (Area 2, Site 6) was on the site of the future church the construction of which could disturb extensively the

~ • _ _ ___ Gec> ___ r _s_ - _s __ H_ a._ -._ ... ~H~~--a.-t_-_-_d "'I 990 7

Page 13: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Arc:ha~ "1 og1 ca. "I .._thodo"l <>aY

Figure 2 from Thorp 1990b

Plan showing the location of archaeological sites In relation to the isting structures I

The overlay demonstrates the impact of the church development n these sites1

Scale 1:500

• ®

I

KEY

Site 1: In situ sandstone foundations

.. '

Site 3: Concrete pad

Site 4: Depressions indicating orchard t

Site 5: Drain or path

Site 6: In situ foundations

Site 7: Tr ~?r----------- - -;i~; (h I I

L- ---

~' .. \ :

\

I Site 9: tulvert and trench

I

0

I I

I I

I I

c r---

L---

c=

0

'

0 0 0

8

Page 14: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I II

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

archaeological evidence. Hence detailed excavation of

this area was warranted. The other (Area 1, Sites 1, 2

and 5) was affected on 1 y by 1 andscape proposa 1 s. When

the excavation here established the survival of walls,

footings and occupation deposits of a building covering

some 200 square metres and uncovered also an associated a

stone flagged path, the landscape plan was varied to

accommodate the historic remains. Thus, with the consent

of the Heritage and Conservation Branch of the Department

of Planning, the aim here was reduced to determination of

the nature and extent of the features to be conserved.

On the basis of professional employment of

* an excavation director

* a site supervisor and

* a part-time archaeological assistant who would

be primarily responsible for artefact

processing but who would also be available for

excavation

and up to 25 volunteers, three weeks had been assessed by

the Heritage Consultant is association with a

representative of the Heritage and Conservation Branch of

the Department of Planning as adequate for the excavation

and artefact processing. Due to external circumstances

the professional team was reduced to two and the number

of volunteers to an average of six per day. This

necessitated a reappraisal of the excavation method

proposed by Thorp in Part 7. 0 of the annexure to the

application for the excavation permit.

2 - 4 Arc:ha.eo "I og 1 c:a. '1 Meot.hodo '1 ogy

2. 4. 1 Field Procedure.

Thorp proposed two in it i a 1 open area excavations using

the surface foundations as reference points. This

9

Page 15: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I il l1 I I I I

concept was fo 11 owed in pri nci p 1 e but not in deta i 1. In both areas the surface features were used as the basic reference points but determination of the appropriate archaeological method was deferred until those features had been more fully exposed. This approach allowed the

archaeological evidence to dictate the excavation method instead of imposing a preconceived method upon the site. In genera 1 terms this meant moving from the known into the unknown. Such an approach was considered the best means of deploying the limited personnel available.

The first step was to remove the grass covering the visible structural features. This was carried out under the surveillance of the Excavation Director and Site Supervisor. The artefacts ensure that no material of discarded inadvertently.

revea 1 ed were inspected heritage significance

to was

In Area 1, which contained Sites 1, 2 and 5, initial deturfing covered an area of over 1 x 22 metres, that is, the full extent of Site 1 which proved to be a flagstone path adjacent to which was evidence of a substantial structure. Excavation started with a minimal area which was then extended as required for interpretation. Excavation was geared initially to recovery of structural evidence. Once the p 1 an of the structure was revea 1 ed, sample areas within the structure and in each room of the structure were excavated in depth to recover occupation evidence in the form of artefacts. The samples were of a size to be statistically valid (Pat Garrow, Garrow & Associates Inc., communication).

Atlanta, Georgia, USA, personal

In Area 2, on the other hand, the two features recorded as Site 6 could be embraced within an area of 2 x 2 metres. Thus from the outset excavation of Area 2 proceeded in depth with full artefact recovery. The initial excavation was extended to virgin soil but

revealed structural anomalies by virtue of which the 2 x

10

Page 16: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II

I I I I

2 metre excavation was extended a metre south. In the extension, stratigraphic units which had been fully sampled and interpreted as having little heritage significance were discarded. Upon completion of the 2 x 3 metre excavation the structural units revealed were traced to provide the building plan.

Excavation and analysis of the excavated data were seen as interdependent and interactive. Thus whenever possible the artefacts were sorted and inventoried concurrently with the excavation.

Details of the excavation are contained in Part 6 of this report.

Regardless of the precise excavation method adopted, the excavation of both areas proceeded in traditional layers, each layer being removed before penetration of the layer

beneath. For ease of interpretation the stratigraphic layers were assigned sequential Unit numbers in order of discovery. To differentiate between the two excavatio~ areas, the units numbers for Area 1 commenced with 001

while those in Area 2 began at 201. Structural features and interfaces were also assigned Unit numbers but the assignment was deferred until either

removal of the feature or

the end of the excavation. This system was designed to simplify field and laborator~

procedures for the inexperienced volunteers.

All structural features and stratigraphic units were photographed twice on Kodak Ektachrome 200 AS~

professional colour slide film and once on Kodak TMAX 400

ASA professional black-and-white film.

Demo 1 it ion deposits were removed by mattock and shove 1 . Occupation units were excavated by hand trowelling. Samples were taken in which case each bucket of material excavated was weighed before discarding so that the

Ge~rges Ha~~ Homestead ~990

Page 17: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

artefact yield proportionate to the deposit could be

calculated.

Location, type, colour (Munsell), pH factor and content

was recorded for each stratigraphic unit as was the manner of excavation. These details are set out in

Appendix 1.

All artefacts other than brick or, for demolition units, plaster, were placed in trays identified by Unit and, where appropriate, by sample within the Unit. The artefacts remained in their trays until laboratory processing. At the end of each day the artefacts were washed and 1 eft overnight to dry. The trays were then stacked according to Unit. Each day a check was made as to completed units. Artefact sorting and cataloguing could then commence.

2.4.2 Laboratory Methods

Laboratory processing, like field procedures, was determined by the 1 ega 1 res pons i bi 1 i ty of the owner and the professional responsibility of the archaeologist (see Part 1.2). Thus the catalogue of material recovered from units which, by structural or artefactual evidence, could be dated clearly to being within the last fifty years was less detailed than that for earlier material. Subject to

this, artefacts from each unit or·, where appropriate, unit by sample, were sorted into material, function, sub­function and decoration according to predetermined categories (see Appendix 4, Guide to the Artefact Database). Groups of identical artefacts were bagged

together. Each artefact bag was numbered consecutively according to provenance. The contents of each bag were

counted and weighed, the weights being recorded to the nearest tenth of a gramme. The b.ag numbers, contents, number and weight were noted on Artefact Inventory sheets and subsequently entered as computer data. The computer

12

Page 18: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

database used was a variation of the MINARK Scientific Database System.

The artefacts were then regrouped in three categories: 1. Discarded- which included

* material identified as coming from recent deposits outside the protection of the NSW Heritage Act. For this the recorded data was considered sufficient without retention of the artefacts.

* unidentifiable bone fragments and rusted iron particles whose function was indeterminable.

* bone, shell, architectural fragments and bottle glass found in

items, most iron bulk (other than

necks and bases) where statistical quantification is generally considered sufficient for future comparative analysis without retention of the material itself. 2. Display - whole or almost whole items whose display to the visiting public was likely to add interest in the historic precinct. These items were labelled individually according to provenance and artefact number, each was photographed to complete the archival record and both display and photograph number entered on the Artefact Inventory sh•'3ets and thence into the computer database. (For a list of display items see Appendix 8.) 3. Retained - artef.acts not selected for display or culled which had been recovered from deposits of heritage significance. The bags containing these artefacts were grouped according to provenance, placed as a group into

larger bags and boxed in standard archive boxes. The box numbers were entered on to the Artefact Inventory sheets and thence into the computer database so that the location of any artefact can be retrieved.

Diagnostic artefact including all ceramic basemarks were photographed on Kodak TMAX 400 ASA professional black­and-white film. The film and frame numbers were recorded

on the Inventory sheet~ and thence on to the database.

To permit an A4 print out suitable for inclusion in this

13

Page 19: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

---

report, inscriptions (base marks etc.) and notes (which include cross-reference to the photographic record) must be omitted. Appendix 3 comprises a list of oeramic base marks, bottle manufacturer's marks and other datable inscriptions while a 1 ist of the artefacts photographed makes up Appendix 6.

2-5 The Excavat1on Tea.

Ms Thorp being unable to proceed to excavation stage, this part of the investigation was directed by Damaris Bairstow who was responsible also for artefact processing and this report. Mr Wayne Johnson acted as Site Supervisor during the excavation, was responsible for the final site plans and also assisted in artefact identification.

The professional archaeologists were assisted by volunteer members of the Church of the Four Square Gospel. Without their assistance this undertaking would not have been possible.

14

Page 20: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

4- HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

The documentary history of the site has already been

recorded (Bell, Noel, Ridley Smith & Partners 1990, Thorp

1990a). It is not proposed to reiterate in full.

However Thorp (1990a 8-12, 1990b 8) "defined eight phases of occupation and use ... These were:

Phase I : 1798-1837 Development of the Estate Phase II: 1837-1866 Construction Phase III: 1866-1915 Later Johnston Family Occupation Phase IV: 1915-1923 Short Term Ownership and Subdivision Phase V: 1923-1947 The Bean Family Occupation Phase VI: 1947-1954 The Glen Occupation Phase VII: 1954-1988 The After Care Association Phase VIII:1988-1990 The Church of the Four Square Gospel (Thorp 1990b:6)

These phases formed the basis for interpretation of the archaeological evidence.

It is to be noted that Phases VI-VIII inclusive, being

1 ess than fifty years o 1 d, fa 11 outside the protection afforded by the NSW Heritage Act.

Page 21: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

5- SUMMARY OF RESULTS

The prime reason for this excavation was the almost total

lack of documentary evidence of changing use and

occupation of the site during the 19th and early 20th

centuries. The excavation revealed some of these

changes, blJt the site's hi story as interpreted from the

excavated resource is more of an hypothesis requiring

further proof than it is conclusive. The archaeological

evidence is circumstantial and it is limited for the

early Johnston period to structural information. Very

1 itt 1 e direct occupation evidence was recovered and what

there was dated from the late 19th to early 20th

centuries. Nevertheless it is possible to attribute

structural changes and artefactual remains to the

occupation phases defined by Thorp (1990b:6).

PHASE I: 1798-1837 Development of the Estate.

No information was gained as to the deve 1 opment of the property between the original Crown Grant and the

construction of The Homestead. This was not surprising

given the fragi 1 ity of archaeological evidence for

pastoral pursuits and the fact that the excavation was

limited to areas of later disturbance.

PHASE II: 1837-1H66 Construction. Structural evide1ce suggested that this occupation phase embraced two distinct periods.

PHASE IIA: c.1837 The Homestead was built in 1837. Given the status of the

Johnston family and the requirements of the times, there

would have been built in association with the main house a detached kitchen

servant's quarters

stable~ and coach-house

1fi

Page 22: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I

II

external privy and, probably

a well.

These structures have not been located. It is likely

that a 11 but the we 11 were built of timber. Neither of

the areas excavated yielded brick datable to the 1830s in

a quantity commensurate with brick outbuildings while the

excavation established that some of these buildings were

replaced in brick about twenty years later. However, the

excavation revealed no direct evidence, structural or

artefactual, which could be attributed to this period.

PHASE liB: 1850s to 1866.

In the 1850s the three buildings subjected to

archaeological investigation were erected. Two of the

buildings were south-east of the house (Area 1, Units 022

and 025) divided both from the house and from each other

by passageways (Figures 3 and 12). The building closest

FIGURE3 Unit 022, east footings of servant s' quarters from the ~south. The west face bore traces of plaste·· indicating that that face was internal. No plaster adhered to the east face. Scale in ·~50111111. intervals.

17

Page 23: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

to the house comprised servants' quarters and may have contained the kitchen, now lost. The other was probably

the 1 aundry but may a 1 so have been the bakery. A third

much smaller building (Area 2, Unit 214) was constructed

40 metres south of the house. This appears to have been

intended as a privy though it seems not to have been used

as such. The evidence for both date and suggested use is

circumstantial.

It is reasonable to date construction to the late 1850s.

The bricks in all three buildings can be recognised by

shape, manufacturing technique and their distinctive

leaf-shaped frog as having come from Parramatta where

they were made from the late 1840s until the 1870s. The earlier date is not preferred, partly because a life of

less than twenty years for the original outbuildings is

unreasonable even allowing for primitive timber

construction but mainly because of the financial and

labour problems of the time. In 1842 the banks crashed

and many of the pastoral elite crashed with them. The

Johnstons were lucky to hold on to their estates. It was

certainly not a time for building expansion especially

when the expansion was a luxury item in that it was

replacing simple but none-the-less existent structures.

In the 1850s the colony recovered financially due to the

discovery of gold. However, from 1852 until about 1857

it was virtually impossible to obtain servants or tradesmen because so many had rushed off to try their

luck on the gold fields. Such labour as was available would have been deployed in the essentials of pastoralism. The construction of better servants' quarters would not have been a priority above the

opportunity, after years of financial depression, of

making money out of the rising demand for meat and wool.

On the other hand a late, 1870s, date can be dismissed.

The series of structural alterations made to the

buildings before their demolition in 1915 evidence a

considerable life.

18

Page 24: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

That the buildings were respectively servants' quarters,

bakehouse/laundry and a privy is also conjectural and

based on c i rcumstant i a 1 evidence. No artef actua 1

evidence was recovered which can be dated to the ear 1 y

use of these structures. The 1 ater domestic assemb 1 age

recovered from the north-west building is commensurate

with its then use as servants' quarters. It is

reasonable to suppose, therefore, that the building was

built as such .. The main evidence for use comes from the

structural plan and location of the buildings (Figures 1

and 12). That nearest the house comprised a series of

small rooms such as were considered suitable for servants

in the middle years of the 19th century. In the absence

of an upper storey in the main house, servant's quarters

were usually located immediately behind the house. The

smaller structure contained a fireplace and flues in

keeping with a kitchen (Figure 4) but it not reasonable

FIGURE 4

Area 1 Quadrats J-Q 18-20 fr08 the south. Laundry/ bakehouse with fireplaces and flues. The peirs and cement of the raised floor can be seen at the bottOII. Scales in 250Mm. intervals.

Page 25: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

to suggest that the kitchen serving the main house would

be so far removed from and with little direct access to

the family dining room. That these were fireplaces is

clear from an associated ash deposit (unit 019). If not

the kitchen, another use must be found. The laundry or

possibly the bakehouse since bread was not served hot is

commensurate with both the structura 1 evidence and its

location.

The south building (Figure 13) was of strange

construction. The surviving footings showed that a metre

south of the entrance the floor dropped at an angle of

thirty degrees, the slope being paved with flagstones

(Figure 5). The whole building was only about 2 x 3

metres, little more than the size of the average country

; · ' ' !. !-

FIGURE 5. Area 2 from the north. The brick footings (Unit 214) are on the left and the flagstones (Unft 218) in the foreground. The stratigraphic units are clearly

defined- turf (Unit 201), topsoil (Unit 202), the deposit (Unit 203) above the deMOlition debris, the top of the 1915 dump (Unit 211) equating with the rubble and the bottom of the dump (Unit 212) below. Scales in 250...

intervals.

Georges Ha~~ HOMestead ~990 20

Page 26: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

privy. Since there was virtually no standing room south

of the f 1 agstones, they seem to have been intended for

drainage. Hence the suggested use that the building was

intended as a privy despite its structural abnormalities.

However, it appears not to have been used as such, the

use suggested by its 1 ater structura 1 form being

incompatible with sewerage disposal.

PHASE III: 1866-1915 Later Johnston Family Occupation.

As with the former period, the structural evidence allows

this occupation phase to be subdivided. Three distinct

stages can be discerned though exact dates for all cannot be s ggested.

PHASE IliA: c.1866.

The first structural alteration discernible in the

archaeological record is that the two south-east

buil d ings (Area 1) were joined to create an additional

room. The evidence for this is stone footings (Unit 028

Figure 6) topped with mortar bearing the imprints of

bricks which formed the superstructure At the same time

a flagged sandstone path was laid to the north (Unit 30

Figure 7) and the drainage of buildings and path improved

by the i nsta 11 at ion of a spoon drain at the east end of

the path, the north-east corner of the buildings (Unit 31

Figure 8). The alterations involved an attempt to rea 1 i gn the occupation area. The centra 1 section does not align with the brick outbuildings while the flagged

path does not align with the brick footings (Figure 12).

Since construction methods were identical, it is

reasonable to suppose that the extension to the privy (Area 2) dates to the same period. The south brick wall

of t1e privy was demolished and the building was extended

above stone footings over four metres south (Figure 9).

Whil s t conjectural, a date of about 1866 is suggested

because of the change in occupation due to the death of

2 1

Page 27: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I

I I I I I I I

II I I I

FIGURE 8. Area 1 Quadrats F-H 13-17 fra. the east. Stone footings (Unit 028) linking east and west buildings. The cement sill (Unit 034} evidencing the change of entrance to the bufldfng is seen centre right. Scales in 250... intervals.

.,

~rges Ha~~ HOMestead ~990

FIGURE 7.

Sandstonu flagged path (Unit 030) from the west. Scales ill 25011111. intervals

22

Page 28: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

FIGURE 9. Area 2 from the north. The brick footings (Unit 214) are itt the bottom and the ntone footings (Unit 218) at the top. Scales in 250111111. intervaln.

FIGURE 8. Spoon drain (Unit 031) from the west. Scale. in 250... intervals

23

Page 29: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

David Johnston. Modern behaviour and archaeological

evidence from Austral ian and American sites show that

structura 1 changes tend to occur with changes in

occupancy. There is, however, some evidence that the

alterations may have occurred earlier or, alternatively,

that the date suggested for the brick structures should be later.

A short section of brick footings west of the fireplaces

in Area 1 seems never to have carried a wall. This

suggests a change of p 1 an, and the change permitted the

construction of the stone footings. That the brick

building in Area 2 was not used for its original purpose,

assuming that purpose has been correctly interpreted,

also suggests a change of plan. This evidence leads to

the deduction that only a short time elapsed between the

brick and stone construction. On the other hand the two

cannot be contemporary. It is unreasonab 1 e to suppose

that both the adoption of different construction methods

and a rea 1 i gnment of occupation spaces occurred with no

time lag between.

The use of the newly constructed spaces is equally

conjectural. That of the southern structure is suggested

by its shape - a building two metres wide but eight

metres 1 ong with a one metre entrance thence descending

just over a metre to the rna in section, a room 2 x 6 metres. This is the form of external cool rooms which

survive in many parts of Australia and which date to the

period before refrigeration. They were used for the

storage of dairy products and for hanging meat. If the

new building was so used, it is inconceivable that its

forerunner, the 2 x 3 metre brick building had ever been used as a privy.

There is no artefactual evidence from either excavated

area which can be dated to this period though there is

some occupation debris which predates the next building

stage in Area 1. Two occupation units were located

24

Page 30: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

adjacent to the fireplaces and flues. Unfortunately, apart from decayed shell which appeared to have originated from elsewhere, only eleven artefacts were

recovered. None was datable other than that they were

commensurate with a late 19th century assemblage. The

most that can be said of them is that the family or its

servants drank beer and wine (3 bottle fragments), smoked

(1 clay pipe stem), ate meat (1 rib fragment of pork or

mutton) and that there may have been children (one marble

of early 19th century date).

PHASE IIIB: Late 19th century to 1914.

There is considerably more artefactual evidence for the

turn of the century and it can be dated with more

precision due to minor structural alterations.

The f 1 oor of the room north of the f i rep 1 aces in Area 1 was raised by fill (Unit 020) and by the construction of

stone piers (Unit 032). The. new floor was laid partly in

cement (Unit 033 Figure 4) which did not come into

genera 1 use unt i 1 the . end of the 19th century.

Alterations were also made outside the entrance to,

possibly the back door from, the fireplace area. A brick

garden edge (Unit 035) was laid down and the area between

it and the bu i 1 ding cemented (Unit 36). The bricks were

dry-pressed dating them to no earlier than the 1890s

At. about the same time the entrance to the central structure, that with the stone footings, was altered. A

concrete slab (Unit 034 Figure 6) was laid over the northern stone footings and the doorway shifted east.

Occupation evidence for these years comes from two units

located in the east rooms of the west brick building

(Units 008 and 009) and a fi 11 deposit (Unit 014). (Other

occupation floors and deposits [Units 011, 01:3 and 019]

can be dated to this period but they yielded no artefacts).

Page 31: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Statistical analysis of the material (see Appendix 2)

shows it as commensurate both with a 1 ate 19th century

date and with the use of the outbuildings for domestic

occupation. Just over 20% of the ceramics from Unit 014

was vitreous stoneware, a ceramic type which increased

cons i derab 1 y towards the end of the century. Of the

tot a 1 assemb 1 age, 60% on count and 7 4% by weight was

domestic material, the rest being ubiquitous

architectural debris. Apparently surprising if the

identification of the building as servants' quarters is

correct, is the amount of porcelain recovered (14% of the

ceramics by number, 13% by weight). Examination of the

material, however, reveals it as comprising the cheapest

variety of English bone china thick white cups

sometimes wi t h a gilt line- and Japanese export ware.

Of more interest are some of the smaller items. Unit 008

y i e 1 ded a cons i derab 1 e quantity of sewing i terns - pins,

hooks and eyes, buttons, a thimble - suggesting a sewing

FIGURE 10. Small finds from Area 1 Unit 008.

26

Page 32: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

room. Given the status of the Johnston family, the more mundane sewing jobs would have been performed by

servants.

Three horseshoes were found in Unit 14 but they form no part of a stab 1 e deposit. The unit comprised a dump of

material which originated elsewhere. The horseshoes were found in association with part of a cast iron domestic stove and a mass of household ceramics and glass. Furthermore, though worn the horseshoes were all different, indicative of collected items, possibly by a chi 1 d.

PHASE IIIC: c.1915 In 1915 the estate was sold and there followed a period of short term ownership and subdivision. The outbuildings excavated were demolished.

The evidence on which this is based is clear. Demolition rubble covered both areas and it contained occupation debris datable to this period and attributable only to established occupation. Though many of the artefacts were the products of manufacturers who continued in business after 1915, indeed some still operate, the style was early 20th century and quantity of material cannot be the debris of short term occupation. A 1 most 84 k i 1 os of domestic material was recovered.

It is clear from the individual assemblages that the material had been thrown away deliberately. Although some ceramic and glass types found in the occupation units were found a 1 so in the demo 1 it ion deposits, the proportion of artefact types was different. The bulk of the ceramics from both area was fine earthenware (by

number 82% in Area 1, 53% in Area 2). Vitreous stoneware dropped to 2% of the Area 1 assemblage by number and 1%

on weight while the percentage of vitreous stoneware in Area 2 was half that. Porcelain, almost all of it also comprising the cheap English and Japanese export wares

27

Page 33: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I II I I II I I I I I I I I I

found in the occupation units, dropped to 8% of the Area 1 ceramic assemblage but rose to a staggering 40% of the

ceramics from Area 2. On the basis of function, two­

thirds of the material from both areas was domestic.

Some of the glassware was of high quality comprising cut crystal tumblers and wine glasses, but gla:3s is easily

breakable. The quality of almost all of the ceramics was poor. Apart from the porce 1 a in referred to it was made

up of chamber pots, plain white or having simple

decorations, poorly applied hand painted or polychrome

floral tableware and a mass of mauve cable-patterned plates produced by firms such as Grindley Figure 10) and Wood & Son for popular consumption. Three matching sets

could be distinguished and matching sets are a hallmark of primary deposits, but the sets cannot reflect the true

social and economic position of the Johnstons who were

st i 11 substantia 1 1 andho 1 ders. What we have here is the stuff that nobody wanted. When the fami 1 y estate was

broken up the heirs retained the fine china but disposed

of the shoddy items.

PHASE IV: 1915-1923 Short term ownership and subdivision

The outbuildings had been demolished. Area 1 reverted to

grass while the Area 2 ruin was left as such. No

evidence structural or artefactual was recovered which could be attributed to this period.

PHASE V: 1923-1947 The Bean Family Occupation Surprisingly there was no archaeological e'Jidence which cou 1 d be d i rect 1 y attributed to the Beans despite their occupation of the site for two and a half decad~s. Some domestic debris dating from this period wa:3 located in

Area 2 but it was found in the same context as much later

material.

28

Page 34: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

FIGURE 11. Grindley polyctrome transfer-printed floral plate (Unit 207 Bagnum 73 DBID 855)

Footings for two tank stands at the south-east corner of

the house, bLd 1 t of ·:;one rete but using some stone and

brick demolition mate,rial (Unit 37) may date to the

29

Page 35: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

latter years of the Bean period but could equally be

dated to the next occupation phase.

PHASE VI: 1947-1954 The Glen Occupation.

The same observations apply to this occupation phase.

The Area 1 ruins had clearly grassed over but in Area 2

part of the old structure remained. This is clear from

the artefactual record of the next phase.

PHASE VII: 1954-1988 The After Care Association.

During this period Area 2 was used as a rubbish dump.

Four stratigraphic units can be dated to this phase. The

uppermost (Unit 203) is clearly the latest. It lay above

Units 204, 205 and 206 which were distinguished only by

their composition, Unit 204, which extended north to

south across the centre of the original 2 x 2 metre

excavation area, containing charcoal and .burnt bone

seemingly the result of burning on site to reduce the

dump. The artefact content of all four units was

similar. A beer bottle bearing a 1962 date recovered

from Unit 204 dates the whole deposit to the 1960s or

later. The artefacts recovered from these units were

catalogued (Appendix 5) but have not been analysed.

Also dating to this occupation phase is the concrete and

brick feature (Unit 220) which was included by Thorp in

Site 6 (Thorp 1990b:9). It abutted on to but in part lay

above the dump units referred to. The feature was

commensurate with footings for a strainer post. Slight

contours in the ground west and south of the feature

coupled with the levelled surface between suggest a

tennis court. The footings may have been associated with

such activity though there was no surviving indication

that it ever carried such a post.

PHASE VII: 1988-1990 Gospel.

The Church of the Four Square

It was the Church which commissioned this excavation and

the last two years must be mentioned for other reasons.

30

Page 36: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

The tanks at the south-east corner of the house were

pulled down and in 1989 a trench (Unit 038) two metres

deep was cut through Area 2 to form a storm water channel

aimed at reducing water penetration of the historic

house. The trench has destroyed all interpretable

archaeological evidence in the section affected.

this section is available for future service lines. Thus

31

Page 37: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I

FIGURE 12

AREA 1: PLAN OF THE EXCAVATION

;--- - --------:I

I

~ ~i5· .. -.. ~ -.. ~.----.

I

037 """o :: rr o~ ena~~

I I

I drain

lrc:<1ch

013 . I /

009

32

CJ bri< k

G stone

c cenuen t

<1/1 mortar

THE HOMESTEAD

GEORGES HALL

0 1 2 3 4 m

AREA 1

10

Page 38: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

FIGURE 13 AREA 2: PLAN OF THE EXCAVATION

011

' 008

THE HOMESTEAD GEORGES HALL

0 1 2 3 AREA 2

~ N

b brick 0/s stone

4m

33

Page 39: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

6- THE EXCAVATION

6. "1 Area "1

Excavation.

The surface features comprised:

Site 1: in situ sandstone interpreted during the archaeological survey as foundations (Thorp

1990b 9).

Site 2: a scatter of building materials to the south

Site 5: a drain or path south of Site 1, within the

area embraced by Site 2.

Sites 1 and 2 had been cut through to a depth of two

metres to create a storm water channel to divert flow

from the historic house.

Deturfing of Site 1 revealed it

f 1 agged path (Unit 030 Figure

excavation units see Appendix 1 )

a being a sandstone

7; for details of

extending at a s 1 i ght

diagonal from a point near the south-east corner of the

house. The flags were laid in three rows, two comprising

stones c.450mm. wide, the third, on the north side, being

made up of stones only c.200mm. wide, possibly an

extension to the original path. At its eastern end the

path was intersected by a sandstone spoon drain (Unit 031 Figure 8).

Work concentrated initially on the area east of the storm

water channel. The turf was removed from a strip the width of a shovel on each side of the path in order to

reveal any structural feature that might have abutted the

path. Laid brick and brick rubble were located to the

south. As a result of these discoveries:

1. a nominal 1-metre grid was imposed on the site as a

control to excavation (Figure 14). The grid took as its

base line the east (rear) wall of the house.

34

Page 40: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

FIGURE "14

A B c D E F

TRENCH

TRENCH 4

G H J

a g

K

TRENCH 2

The Ex~vat1~n

L M

TRENCH 3

I I I I ---· '

I ----·

. . ' : ' I I I l

l l

I I I

N p Q

35

Page 41: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

2. the south side of the path was deturfed (at the east

end to the 6. 5 metre mark, Quadrats G12-20, at the west

end to the 5. 5 metre mark ,Quadrats F6-12, commensurate

with the skew of the path to the house a 1 i gnment; see

Figure 14)). This and the adjoining path were designated

Trench I.

3. a trench one metre wide was 1 aid out between the

south side of the path and Site 5 (Trench II Quadrats G­

P12)

Excavation started in Trench II.

Immediately below the surface c.200mm. south of the path

and parallel to it was a section of concreted brick (Unit

034) adjacent to which, at a slightly lower level, was

part of a shell-lime mortared brick wall. Deturfing also

revealed brick rubble (Unit 006). The bricks were

machine pressed of a type that has been located in

Parramatta and which has been dated to c.1845-1880.

Removal of the rubble exposed a north-south brick wall

bonded into the east-west mortared brick wall (Unit 22

Figure 15). Mortar adhering to the west face of the wall

indicated that it had been above f 1 oor 1 eve 1 and that

part of that face was internal. The wall was traced to a

west partition wall four metres south and to its west

return at seven metres. There was no connection between

it and Site 5, a metre further south. Site 5 proved to

have no structural significance.

The north half of Trench II was widened 500mm. to define

the east face of the north-south wall. This extension

revealed laid sandstone (part of Unit 28) in line with

the brick partition wall. Meanwhile work proceeded in

the east end of Trench 1 where brick footings forming the

north-east corner of a building (part of Unit 25) were

exposed. These were in 1 i ne with the east end of the

path.

String lines were taken from the laid sandstone in Trench

II and the south-east return in Trench I and an

36

Page 42: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

FIGURE 15

Area 1 Quadrats F-P13 from the north. Trench II with north-south wall (Unit 22} before extension of the excavated area. Scale in 250mm. intervals.

exp 1 oratory trench (Trench I I I) sunk at the point where

the lines met at a right angle. This trench, initially

only x 1 metre exposed the south-east corner but

revealed also additional structural features which

necessitated an immediate extension of the trench north, south and west.

The extension revealed a complex of hearths and flues

commensurate with a kitchen or bakehouse. To the south,

brick flagging and a garden edge marked the extent of the

structure. In the north brick piers, fill and remnant

concrete slabs showed where a later floor had been laid (Figure 4)

At this stage it became clear that the structural remains

were cons i derab 1 y more extensive than had been expected.

As a result of discussion with the principals and their

37

Page 43: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

The Excavat1~

architect it was agreed that landscape proposals would be

changed to preclude any impact on the excavated features

which instead would become, so far as practicable,

features of the modern landscape. This undertaking haven

been given, it was no longer incumbent upon the

principals to excavate the structure in full.

Accordingly the aim of the excavation was reduced to

determining the nature and extent of the relic.

A trench was laid between Trenches II and III to reveal

the connection between the two features and Trench I was

extended further south to assist interpretation (see

Figures 12 and 14).

The west return of the wall in Trench II lay south of the

storm water channel. Accordingly a trench was sunk to

determine the extent of the south-west wall. The south­

west footings had been partly robbed out but the location

of the wall was clear. The north-west return was located

six metres south of the house, the west wa 11 of the

outbuilding being approximately in line with the east

(rear) wall of the original house (see Figure 1). The

evidence was that the structure or structures revealed

had been freestanding leaving a passageway a metre wide

between them and the house. The structures revea 1 ed,

therefore, had . no connection with the dressed sandstone

block identified by Thorp as Site 10 though they may be

re 1 a ted to the remnant sta; rs, Thorp's Site 11 (Thorp

1990b:10; see Figure 2)).

At a point three metres west of the Trench II footings a

north return had been located evidencing a partition

wa 11 . At the same time. excavation of Trench I west of

Trench II had uncovered the continuation of the east-west

brick footing and of a second north-south wall. A trench

x 1 metre was sunk at the point where the three

partition walls would connect. Partial connection was

revealed (Figures 12 and 14) evidencing a small south­

east room, but there was no apparent connection between

38

Page 44: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

The Exc-...a.vat 1 <Dr1l

this room and the north partition wall. It was clear,

however, that the feature had comprised a series of rooms

commensurate with living (servants') quarters.

Remnants of the flagged path survived west of the storm

water channel. Trench IV, an open area 4 x 3 metres, was

deturfed to reveal the extent of the path and any

surviving walls or footings. The flags north and west

had been robbed leaving no trace of their former presence

wh i 1 e the who 1 e of this area had been disturbed by the

construction of modern tank stands.

At the end of the excavation the structural features and

interfaces were assigned Unit numbers. The individual

matrix locations recorded at the time of excavation were

reassessed with regard to the structural units and a

Harris matrix of all units compiled (Figure 16). The

photographic record was completed and a plan of the

excavation drawn (Figure 12). Backfilling was deferred

until mechanical assistance was available.

Artefact Recovery.

The overburden consisted of virtually sterile sand apart

from occasional wire fragments and a single wire handle

indicative only of recent activity in a yard devoid of

structures. Hence no attempt was made to recover

artefacts from this matrix.

Rubble deposits were shifted by mattock and shovel. Few

artefacts were recovered. Since the method of excavation

might have been causing the loss of small items, a

statistical sample was taken by hand trowelling of one of

the rubble units (Unit 007). The percentage of artefacts

to unit weight was only 0.7% and half the artefact weight

was made up of fencing wire. Thus all rubble units when

encountered were removed quickly. Excavation of the fill

and occupation units beneath the rubble was by hand

trowelling and all artefacts were retained.

39

Page 45: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I il il I

I I I I I I I I II II II I

II II II II

I

F:I:OURE "liB.

40

Page 46: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

The Ex~va:t 1 c::.n

Trench III revealed a series of fill and occupation

deposits but they could not be deemed to be indicative of

use and occupation of the bu i 1 dings as a who 1 e. Hence

two 1 x 2 metre sample units were opened by hand in each

of two rooms indicated by the structural remains. The

material from the samples was quantified. While the

first of the sample units was productive, the second

y i e 1 ded no occupation evidence. The y i e 1 d of artefacts

which could be attributed to occupation was generally disappointing.

6-2 Area. 2

Site 6 was described as a small section of bricks in

concrete with a section of bricks laid in mortar close

by. The surface between the two dipped markedly leading to lush grass while wheel marks evidenced problems

gaining vehicular access. The reason for the dip was not

apparent. These features were embraced in whole or in

part within a 2 x 2 metre square, the initial excavation

area and one of sufficient size to provide a statistical

sample of artefacts. Deturfing and removal of the

immediate (disturbed) topsoil (Units 201 and 202) proceeded as in Area 1.

hand trowelling. Thereafter excavation was by

The mortared brick proved to be a footing which extended

along the north face of the trench to return south in the east and west sections of the excavated area (Figure 17).

The footings, the width of the average privy, did not

connect with the concreted brick in the south-west corner of the trench.

The feature had been used in the 1960s and possibly

earlier (1962 beer bottle & pre-1933 ceramics) as a dump

part of which (Unit 204) had been burnt. To the east and

west of the burnt section the deposits were more

compacted and contained brick and plaster demolition

41

Page 47: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II

F:XGURE ~7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

X y

42

Page 48: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

The Excavat1~n

rubble (Units 205 and 206). Most of this was fragmentary

but several bricks and brick fragments bore the same frog

as that on bricks found in Area 1 suggesting that the two

structures were contemporary.

The footings in the north half of the trench proved to be

of only four courses (370mm. deep; Figure 18) laid on

natural sand (Units 208 and 210). In the south half the

footings became deeper while the area between them had

been paved with sandstone f 1 ags which extended into the

south trench wall. The deposit above the flagstones

(Unit 207) was rich in artefacts of much greater age than

those in the surface deposits. In order both to identify

the structure and to obtain a better statistical artefact

sample, the trench was extended one metre south. This

was done quickly with no artefact recovery to a depth of

400mm. , a sufficient samp 1 e to this depth having been

obtained from the original trench.

The deposit in the extension of the same depth as Unit

207 proved to have been disturbed. The disturbance

seemed to be associated with the construction of the

cemented brick feature in the south-west corner of the

original excavation. To distinguish the artefacts from

those in the northern section, the deposit was numbered

Unit 211. This unit, which in section equated with

demo 1 it ion rubb 1 e, was excavated to the same depth as

Unit 207, after which the rubble ceased. The deposit

below became Unit 212 (Figures 5 and 19). Inspection of

the artefacts showed vi rtua 11 y no difference between the

material from these units and that from Unit 207. Hence

the dumping of the artefacts occurred at the same time as

the building was demolished.

Natural soil (Unit 213) was encountered a metre below the

surface at which point the brick footings ceased.

A statistically valid artefact sample having been

recovered, the structural features were traced quickly,

43

Page 49: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

FIGURE 18 . Area 2 . West face of excavation after extendsion Detail of stratigraphic units 201 (turf) 202 (topsoil) 203

(immediate subsoil with 1960s material) 211 (equating with rubble) on left of Unit 220 (brick and concrete footing) 207 (equating with brick footing) on the right, both comprising the top of the 1915 dump , 212 (below the rubble on left) representing the bottom of the 1915 dump . Scales in 250mm. intervals .

t.he only additional material collected being for display ptJrposes. work began on the east side.

Within millimetres of

footings were replaced the

by excavated area the

stone. Examination

brick

of the connection revealed that the south wall of the brick

st.ructu re had been demolished leaving a " robber ,. trench.

ThA demolition had been done with care to ensure that the

bricks in the east wall were not disturbed. This allowed the s-cone footings to be tied into the brickwork . The

stone footings were traced -co their we~t return, 4.25

metres sour.h . The south footings , also of s-cone, were

f o llowed to their north return which was in line with the west bri c k fo otings .

excavat.ed . The res t of t.hat wall was not

At the end of the e xcavat-ion the st-ructural features and

interfaces were assigned Unit nt.Jmbers. The individual

Ge~rges Ha~~ H~mestead ~990 44

Page 50: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

T""' Exca.vat1on

matrix locations recorded at the time of excavation were reassessed with regard to the structural units and a Harris matrix of all units compiled (Figure 20). The

photographic record was completed and a plan of the

excavation drawn (Figure 13). Backfilling was deferred until mechanical assistance was available.

Artefact Recovery.

Other than for those in the turf and the disturbed topsoil, all artefacts other than brick were retained for processing.

45

Page 51: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

F:J:GURE "19.

Area 2 Matr1x o~ excavated un1te.

Georges Ha~~ Homestead "1990 46

Page 52: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

.--------- --

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

APPENDIX 1

LIST OF STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS.

AREA ~ SKE'TCH PLAN OP QUADRATS

A B C D E f G H. J K L M N

I

I I I I

---• I ___ !

. ' I I 1 I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I

p Q

Page 53: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

Unit 001 Type:

location: Photographic Record:

Mono: Colour:

Treatment:

Unit 002 Type:

Description: location:

drain

Unit 003

Unit 004

Unit 005

Unit 006

Colour (Munsell): pH: Treatment:

Type: Description: location: Colour (Munsell): pH: Treatment:

Type: Description: location: Colour (Munsell): pH: Treatment:

Type: Description:

Location: Colour (Munsell): pH: Photographic Record:

Mono: Colour:

Treatment:

Type: Description:

location: Colour (Munsell): pH: Photographic Record:

Mono: Colour:

Treatment:

turf entire area

1 : 3 1:3-4 removed by shovel

soil dark brown sand east & west of storm water

10YR4/2 7 removed by shovel

fi 11 sand and clay east of storm water drain 5YR5/4 5 removed by shovel

soil dark brown sand east of 003 10YR4/2 7 removed by shovel

soil dark brown sand, same as 004 G-Q 12-13 10YR4/2 7

1 : 6 1 : 9-10 removed by hand, mattocks when necessary

fi 11 demolition rubble (c.1850-1880 Parramatta bricks) F-P 12-13 10YR5/8 8 1/2

1 : 6-7 1 : 9-12 removed by hand

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Page 54: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

! I I

Appenc:l1x "I &trat1graph1o Un1ta

Unit 007 Type: fill

Unit

Description: demolition rubble (similar to 006)

Location: F-H 13-20 Colour (Munsell): 10yr7/3 pH: 9 Photographic Record:

Mono: 1:20 Colour: 1:21-22

(Sample) Unit Weight: 432 000 (Sample) Artefact Weight: 3 001.4 (Sample) Artefact xage: 0.695 Treatment: sampled by hand trowel,

removed by pick & shovel

008 Type: fill Description: plaster & occupation debris location: F-K 12-13, west of 007 Colour (Munsell): 7.5YR5/6 pH: 8 1/2 Photographic Record:

Mono: 1:36 Colour: 2:22-23

(Sample) Unit Weight: 110 000 (Sample) Artefact Weight: 519.3 (Sample) Artefact xage: 0.47 Treatment: sampled by hand trowelling

Unit 009 Type: fi 11

Unit

Description: location: Colour (Munsell): pH: Photographic Record:

Mono: Colour:

Treatment:

010 Type: Description: location: Colour (Munsell): pH: Photographic Record:

Mono: Colour:

Treatment:

plaster & occupation debris l-N12, south of 008 7.5YR5/6 8 1/2

1:36 2:22-23 hand

fi 11 demolition debris K-P 18-20 10YR5/3 8

1 : 14 1:25-26 shovel

Page 55: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I

Unit 011 Type: fi 11

Unit

Description:

location: Colour (Munsell): pH: Photographic Record:

Mono: Colour:

Treatment:

sandy loam + occupation debris l-M 18-19 10YR4/3 7

1:32,34 2 : 1 4-1 5 , 1 8-1 9 hand trowelling

012 Type: fi 11

Unit

Description: location: Colour (Munsell): pH: Photographic Record:

Mono: Colour:

Treatment:

demolition debris l-P 12-17 10YR5/3 8

1:32,34 2 : 1 4-1 5 , 1 8-1 9 shovel

013 Type: fi 11

Unit

Description: location: Colour {Munsell): pH: Treatment:

mottled clay E 8-10 7.5YR5/8-10YR7/8 9 hand

014 Type: fi 11

Unit

Description: location: Colour (Munsell): pH: Photographic Record:

Mono: Colour:

Treatment:

rubbish dump J18 7.5YR4/2 8

1:32,34 2 : 1 4-1 5 , 1 8-1 9 hand trowelling

015 Type: fill Description: crushed shell location: L 16-17 Colour (Munsell): 2.5YR8/2 pH: 8 1/2 (Sample) Unit Weight: 225 000 {Sample) Artefact Weight: 160.0 (Sample) Artefact ~age: 0.07 Treatment: hand trowel

Page 56: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II II I

Unit 022 Type:

Description:

location: Photographic Record:

Mono: Colour:

Unit 023 Type:

Description:

location: Photographic Record:

Mono: Colour:

Treatment:

Unit 024 Type:

Unit

Description: location:

025 Type:

Unit

Description: location: Photographic Record:

Mono: Colour:

026 Type: Description:

location: Photographic Record:

Mono: Colour:

Unit 027 Type:

Unit

Description: location:

028 Type: Description:

location: Photographic Record:

Mono: Colour:

structure mortared brick footings (west building) E-P 9-13

1:9-10,36 1:15-18, 2:22-23

fi 11 robber trench (extension of 022) D-N 1-12

1 : 37' 4: 1-4 2:24-31 shovel & hand trowelling

negative interface cut for 022 & 023 D-P 1 13

structure mortared brick footings E-P 17-20

1 : 14, 21 , 34-6 1:25-26, 2:14-15,18-21

fi 11 robber trenches (extension of 025) J-M 16-20

1:32,34-35 2 : 1 4- 1 s , 1 a- 21

negative interface cut for 025 & 026 E-P 16-20

structure mortared sandstone footings {between east and west buildings) F-M 14-15

1 :33 2: 16-17

Page 57: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Unit 036

Unit 037

Type: Description: Location: Photographic

Mono: Colour:

Type: Description:

location: Photographic

Mono: Colour:

structure cement fill P-Q 18-19

Record: 1:32,35 2:.14-16,20-21

structure brick & concrete footings (tank stand) C-E 4-6

Record: 1 : 15 1:27-28

Page 58: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

Ap~nd1x "1

AREA 2

SKETCH PLAN OF QUADRATS

X

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Str-a.t1gr-a.ph1c Un1ts

y

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Page 59: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Unit 201 Type: turf

X-Y 1-8

Unit 201

Unit 203

Unit 204

Location: Photographic Record:

Mono: Colour:

Treatment:

Type: Description: location: Colour (Munsell): pH: Treatment:

Type: Description:

Location: Colour (Munsell): pH: Photographic Record:

1 : 1-2 1 : 1-2 shovel

soil dark brown sand X-Y 1-3 10yr4/2 8 shovel without recovery of artefacts

soil dark brown sand, same as 202 X-Y 1-2 10YR4/2 8

Mono: 1:5,8 Colour: 1:7-8,13-14

(Sample) Unit Weight: 369 000 (Sample) Artefact Weight: 10 145.7 (Sample) Artefact xage: 2.75 Treatment: hand trowelling

Type: Description: Location: Colour (Munsell): pH: Photographic Record:

fi 11 black sand X-Y 1-2 5YR3/2 7 1/2

Mono: 1:8 Colour: 1:13-14

(Sample) Unit Weight: 409 000 (Sample) Artefact Weight: 23 862.2 (Sample) Artefact Xage: 5.83

with charcoal

Treatment: hand trowelling

Page 60: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Unit 209 Type: fill

Description: greyish brown sand Location: X-Y 2 Colour (Munsell): 2YR6/2 pH: 7 1/2- 8 Photographic Record:

Mono: 1:17 Colour: 1:23-24

(Sample) Unit Weight: 9 000 (Sample) Artefact Weight: 468.9 (Sample) Artefact ~age: 5.2 Treatment: hand trowelling

Unit 210 Type: natural soil

Description: light brownish-grey sand Location: Y 1-2 Colour (Munsell): 10YR6/2 pH: 6 1/2- 7 Photographic Record:

Mono: 1:17 Colour: 1:33-34

(Sample) Unit Weight: 19 000 (Sample) Artefact Weight: 0 (Sample) Artefact ~age: 0.0 Treatment: hand trowelling

Unit 211 Type: fill

Unit

Description: dark grey-brown sand, equivalent to 207 in depth

Location: X-Y 3 Colour (Munsell): 7YR4/2 pH: 8 Photographic Record:

Mono: 1:26-30 Colour: 2:9-13

(Sample) Unit Weight: 264 000 (Sample) Artefact Weight: 5 341.6 (Sample) Artefact xage: 2.02 Treatment: hand trowelling

212 Type: fill Description: dark grey-brown sand

(equivalent to 211 -arbitrary level below 700mm.

Location: X-Y 3 Colour (Munsell): 5YR3/1 pH: 7 Photographic Record:

Mono: 1:26-30 Colour: 2:9-13

(Sample) Unit Weight: 355 000 (Sample) Artefact Weight: 5 062.0

Page 61: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

APPENDIX 2

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Unit 005 Mixed debris immediately sub-surface. Not analysed.

Units 006, 007, 010, 012, 016 & 017 Demolition Units

Ceramic Assenablage (excluding architectural ceramic)

On artefact m.111ber: Unit FEW FSW vsw PC OPC

No. %age No. %age No. %age No. %age No. %age

006 17 85.0 2 10.0 1 5.0 007 3 100.0 010 6 64.0 2 20.0 2 20.0 012 22 100.0 016 15 55.6 5 18.5 2 7.5 5 18.5 017 -... __

83 82.2 9 8.9 2 2.0 3 3.0 5 4.9

On artefact weight: Unit FEW FSW vsw PC OPC

Wgt. %age Wgt. %age Wgt. %age Wgt.%age Wgt.%age

006 169.6 82.8 30.3 14.8 5.0 2.4 007 14.7 100.0 010 75.9 76.1 10.0 10.0 13.8 13.9 012 137.8 100.0 016 280.8 32.8 476.4 55.6 10.0 1.2 89.1 10.4 0.11 -

678.8 61.7 516.7 39.3 13.8 1. 0 15.5 1. 2 89.1 6.8

Page 62: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

- --~-~~--

On artefact weight:

Unit 006 007 010 012 Wgt. ~age Wgt. ~age Wgt. ~age Wgt.

TW 200.5 8.0 62.9 4.0 98.8 3.2 137.8 KW 1332.7 53.3 115.3 7.3 174.6 5.6 252.3 H-H 69.5 2.8 51.5 3.2 1669. 1 53.4 127.0 ARCH 841.9 33.7 1263.4 79.6 1065.3 34.1 721.9 EQQQ 55.6 2.2 9~.3 5.9 ll6 .9 3.1 :1 :l.l

2500.2 100.0 1587.4 100.0 3124.7 100.0 1250.7

Unit 016 017 Wgt. ~age Wgt. ~age

TW 438.4 22.4 0.0 0.0 KW 756.9 38.7 14.0 - . -H-H 379.3 19.4 33.3 - . -ARCH 286.4 14.7 0.0 0.0 EQQQ 9~. :1 ~.~L Q.Q Q.Q

1955. 1 100.0 47.3 - . -

Total weight: Wgt. ~age

TW 938.4 9.0 KW 2645.8 25.3 H-H 2329.7 22.3 ARCH 4178.9 39.9 .EQQD 312.6 _ ____3_._.5.

10465.4 100.0

~age

11.0 20.2 10.2 57.7

Q I 9. 100.0

Page 63: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Appoenc:l1x 2

Units 006, 007, 010, 012, 016 & 017

Artefact Assemblage Analysis based on Function Medical, Clerical & Other Cultural included as Household

On artefact number: Unit 008 009 011 013

No. %age TW 30 27.0 KW 5 4.5 H-H 50 45.0 ARCH 16 14.4 EQ.QQ lQ 9.Q

111 99.9

Unit 014 No. %age

TW 49 14.3 KW 104 30.3 H-H 82 23.9 ARCH 80 23.3 EOOQ 28 8.2

343 100.0

Total number:

No. TW 79 KW 109 H-H 133 ARCH 244 fOOD._ 39

604

%age 13. 1 18.0 22.0 40.4

6 •.. 5. 100.0

No. %age No. %age No. %age 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 o.o 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.7 0 0.0 0 0.0

148 98.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 j Q.Z Q Q.Q Q _Q.....Q

150 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

019 No. %age

0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Q Q • ..Q 0 0.0

Page 64: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

i

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I : I ! I I II

Units 207, 209, 211 & 212 Dumped material.

Ceramic Assemblage (excluding

On artefact number: Unit 207 209

No. %age No. %age FEW 284 68.3 5 100.0 FSW 10 2.4 vsw 2 0.5 PC 67 16. 1 aec 53 12.1

416 100.0 5 100.0

On artefact weight: Unit 207 209

Wgt. %age Wgt. %age FEW 12636.7 78.2 439.3 100.0 FSW 615.0 3.8 vsw 31.6 0.2 PC 1398.9 8.7 aec 1~12.5 9 I 1

16154.7 100.0 439.3 100.0

Totals On artefact number:

No. %age FEW 313 53.0 FSW 34 5.8 vsw 6 1 . 0 PC 127 21.5 .oe.c. 111 .1..6... 6

591 100. 1

--- -~-- ~~~-

l

architectural ceramic)

211 212 No. %age No. ~age

57 73.1 223 64.1 1 1.3 23 6.6 3 3.8 1 0.3

14 18.0 46 13.2 3 3.6 55 15.6

78 100.0 348 100.0

211 212 Wgt. %age Wgt. %age

1250.8 66.4 10408.2 53.9 14.9 0.8 3876.1 20.1

130.1 6.9 15.7 0. 1 97.9 5.2 2026.1 10.5

39Q.3 2Q.1 291~.3 15.~ 1884.0 100.0 19302.4 100.0

On artefact weight:

Wght. %age 24735.0 65.5 4506.0 11.9

177.4 0.5 3522.9 9.3 ~639.1 12.6

37780.4 100.0

Page 65: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

II .

I I I I I I I

I• I

I

II

I I I I I I I I I

Page 66: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I ,I I

I II I II I I I I I I I I II

I I I I

II

APPENDIX 3

MANUFACTURER•s MARKS ETC-

J. & E. Atkinson, london, Perfllners 207:166 OBIO 948

Barrett & Co. , london & Jersey 212:219 OBID 1376

8eeth811's Glycerine & CUcUIIIber 207:161 DBID 943

Bovri 1 limited 014:21 DBID 296 014:31 OBID 306

Bridgwood Porcelane - S.Bridgwood & Son c.1852-1990 211:14 OBID 1086

The Burslem Pottery Co., England. c.1894-1933 203:11 DBID 469

Cast1emaine Brewery 014:24 DBID 299

: ' Cooper & Wood, Brewers, Portobe11o 212:109 DBID 1266

Davis, Chemists 212:222 DBIO 1379

W.Edwards & Co. Design registered 18.5.1882 016:9 OBIO 403

Wm. Fairbaims, 006:6 212:34 212:35 212:36 212:37 212:38

Cable DBID 22 DBID 1191 OOID 1192 OBID 1193 DBID 1194 OBID 1195

Fau1dings, Perfumers 203:44 OBID 499

Fe 11 ows, Chellli sts, St. John, New Brunswick 207:160 DBID 942

W.H.Grind1ey & Co., England, c.188Q-1990 207:65 DBID 847 207:66 DBID 848 207:73 DBID 855 211:5 DBID 1077

l I

Page 67: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I

I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

APPENDIX 4

GUIDE TO THE DATABASE.

ARTEFACT

The artefact catalogue is based on the artefact analysis database developed in the Centre for Historical Archaeology, University of Sydney, as a modification of the NINARK Archaeological Database System. It enables artefacts to be sorted and retrieved by provenance, material, function or decoration. It enables also retrieval of, for example, inscriptions and base marks.

The variables and sub-variables used to define material, function and decoration are to some extent pre-determined but the programme allows for refinement according to the requirements of each particular site. Thus the database used for "The Homestead" has been trimmed to the range of this artefact assemblage without extraneous descriptive categories.

The following is a guide to the abbreviations used in the catalogue:

UNIT

This is the number of the stratigraphic unit from which the artefacts were excavated.

The number is expressed as an integer. When written by hand on the bag labels it is surrounded by a circle

DBID

This is a running number inserted automatically by the computer database. It enables any group of artefacts to be compared with any other without reference to any of the database variables.

BAG

This column records the number of the artefact bag in which the artefact or group of identical artefacts is stored. The number is assigned consecutively from 1 in each unit.

The number is expressed as an integer. When written by hand and on artefact labels the number is written within a triangle.

l

Page 68: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I

!t

ApP4Bnd1 x 4

Most often used for stoneware drain pipes. Most often found with a mottled brown or grey salt glaze.

FINE STONEWARE FSW

High fired, dense body. The colour of the body varies enormously and is normally related to function. Utilitarian wares are usually cream to brown to grey.

Used for utilitarian wares such as ginger beer and stout bottles, jugs, storage jars which are usually salt glazed or clear glazed.

VITREOUS STONEWARE VSW

High fired, dense, vitrified body. The colour of the body ranges between white and bluish grey. The break has a finely textured, smooth, compact appearance. Vitreous stoneware will not adhere to the tongue.

Used for plates and other tablewares. Usually with a clear, hard glaze. Often decorated with underglaze transfer prints and or enamel over glaze painting and gilding.

Vitreous stoneware became more common in the late 19th and 20th centuries.

PORCELAIN PC

(Where English also referred to as bone china) High fired, very finely textured, hard translucent body. The colour ranging from cream-white to pure white. The break usually with a sharp edge, the colour even. Most of these pieces are finely potted. Used principally for table and decorative wares. Usua 11 y with a c 1 ear, hard g 1 aze. Often decorated with underglaze transfer prints and or enamel over glaze painting and gilding.

ORIENTAL PORCELAIN OPC

High fired, fine 1 y textured, hard trans 1 ucent body. The colour ranging from greyish white to white, often with a faint blue-grey tinge. The break often with a course waxy texture, with sharp edges. The glaze often appears to be distinct from the body, unlike European porcelains.

Used principally for tablewares but also for toy tea sets and the exposed parts of dolls.

Most of the oriental porcelain found at "The Homestead" was Japanese export ware.

PIPE CLAY PIPE

Highly refined white earthenware without inclusions. Used for slip cast tobacco pipes.

Page 69: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I

I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Append'tx 4

LEATHER LEA

Includes all types of artefacts made from animal skin.

SHELL SHELL

Includes all types of animal shell.

B~E B~E

Frequently has a honeycombed texture inside. Found as food items or worked in forms such as buttons.

Bone may have been butchered, and thus show butchery marks. Bone may also be burnt white, sometimes with a grey interior.

WOOD WOOD

Most often buried wood appears black and crumbly and may show signs of a wood grain. The original use of the wood located could not be identified due to the small size of the fragments.

SEED SEED

FIBRE

Includes fruit stones.

FIBRE

Includes all artefacts made from vegetable or animal fibres.

PLASTER PLAST

Includes all pieces of plaster or plaster and mortar which include the 'set' or finishing coat. This normally has a flat surface and is whiter than mortar. The plaster surface may be painted or coloured.

MORTAR MORT

Includes all pieces of mortar without an attached skin of plaster. May be coarse to powdery in texture and of varying thickness. Usually contains inclusions such as shell fragments. Can be scratched or broken with the fingernail.

Most of the mortar found was "mud" mortar, that is, with little lime content to provide body. It crumbled to the touch. Hence its quantity is not fully represented in the artefact record.

Geoc>rges Ha. "1 "1 HC~~ae~ea.d "I 990

Page 70: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Ap~nc:t1x 4

FUNCT:J:ON

This column records the broad function group of the artefact, if determinable.

Function is selected from one of the following options:

UNIDENTIFIABLE UN-IDABLE

To be used where the function of the artefact could not be determined.

UNIDENTIFIED U-FIED

To be used where the function of the artefact could not be determined immediately, but may be identified in an alternative analysis and/or by an expert in the appropriate area.

TABLEWARE TW

Items used for food and drink when serving, eating and drinking.

The majority of tableware items were glass, fine earthenware, porcelain or vitreous stoneware. Knives, forks and spoons are also included.

KITCHENWARE KW

Items used in the preparation and/or storage of food and/or drink and include alcohol bottles. Kitchenware includes most glass and ceramic bottles.

MEDICAL MED

Items regarded as useful in maintaining health and treating illness e.g medicine and elixir bottles.

PERSONAL PER

Items which have a direct association with the body. e.g. clothing, personal adornments e.g. combs, beads and buttons.

HOUSEHOLD H-HOLD

Decorative and utilitarian items found throughout the house. e.g. lamps, vases and furnishing items.

This will include all household material not assigned to tableware or kitchenware as well as items such as bottles whose function cannot be attributed to a more specific category.

Page 71: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

------------------

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I

Appendl1x 4 Ou1dle to Databaee

TRANSPORT TRANS

Items relating to transportation of people and produce e.g carriage parts and horse shoes.

&UB-FUNCT:XON

This is a descriptive category dependent on material and gross function.

The sub-function of ceramics and glass, whether Kitchenware or Tableware, is by vessel type. Architectural items are described as are those falling into the gross functions of Personal, Other Cultural and so on,

The term is also used to describe animal and shell species.

The sub-function is chosen from the following:

UNIDENTIFIABLE UN-IDABLE

To be used where the function of the artefact cannot be determined.

UNIDENTIFIED U-FIEO

To be used where the function of the artefact cannot be determined immediately, but may be identified in an a 1 ternat i ve ana 1 ys is and/or by an expert in the appropriate area.

FLAT WARE/MATERIAL FLAT

A default category for sherds and metal which have no diagnostic features or are so small they cannot be assigned to a specific shape.

HOLLOW WARE/MATERIAL HOLL

A default category for curved or hollow fragments which have no diagnostic features or are so small they cannot be assigned to a specific shape.

Page 72: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Appenc:t1 x 4

EGG CUP E-CUP

Egg cups when they are clearly such and not small cups.

SAUCER SAUCER

Any saucer. Shards are distinguished by a distinct small well in the centre, and an upturned rim.

HANDLE HAND

Handle shards are distinguished by their shape. Unless they can be joined to a vessel or their decoration matched exactly they are bagged separately.

Handles include those of utensils which cannot be identified specifically as knives, forks or spoons.

KNOB KNOB

Knobs come in a wide variety of forms, and usually survive intact because of their shape. Unless they can be joined to a vessel or their decoration matched exactly they are bagged separately.

LID LID

Shards from lids are distinguished by their shape and, possibly, the presence of an internal ring lip.

The term includes internal lids found in items such as muffin dishes.

TUMBLER TUMB

Any part of a glass drinking vessel without a stem.

STEMMED GLASS GLASS

Any part of a glass drinking vessel with a stem.

KNIFE FORK SPOON

BOTTLE-WHOLE

KNIFE FORK SPOON

BOT-W

Bottles which are whole or so whole that the complete form is recognizable are assigned to this category.

The bottle can be of glass or ceramic and the term includes stoneware bung jars.

Page 73: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I

I

I I I I I II

I I I II II

I I II I I I I I I

Appenc::J1x 4 Ou1c::Je to Da:taba.ae

CHAMBER-POT C-POT

Sherds from chamber-pots are distinguished by their thickness, curved shape, the presence of an handle, and a characteristic wide flat rim.

PITCHER PITCHER

LAMP

Sherds from pitchers (large jugs) by the lip or by a waisted thickness. Otherwise they wi 11 be from bowls and chamber pots.

are distinguished shape and their indistinguishable

This description includes Household water jugs common on bedroom washstands before improvements to indoor plumbing.

LAMP

Includes both lamp glass and the metal parts of household lamps.

MARBLE MARBLE

Marbles include glass and ceramic marbles originally used as bot t.l e stoppers in which case the i r broad function is "Kitchenware" although they may later have been used as toys as well as those mRde fnr play. In the latter case the broad functinn is "Other Cultural".

PIPE BOWL PIPE-8

Any part of a tobacco pire bowl.

PIPE STEM PIPE-S

Any part of a toba~~n pipe stem.

COIN COIN TOY TOY

SHOE SUTTON 8EAO PIN

SHOE BUTTON BEAD PIN

HOOK HOOK

"Other Cultural" hooks are those used for clothing nr dressmaking.

EYE/EYELET EYE

"Other Cultural" eyes are those used for clothing or dressmaking. At "The Homestead" a small copper

Page 74: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

SPRING SPRING

Includes all types of spring.

HINGE HINGE

Includes all types of hinges.

LATCH LATCH

Includes all types of latches and latch plates for architectural locks.

KEY KEY

Includes all types of key for architectural (and household) locks. When described as "Kitchenware" key generally refers to one used for such as sardine tins.

WIRE WIRE

All wire.

The use of the wire can usually be determined from its material and gross function. Thus copper wire falling within the Architectural function is usually electrical wire; copper wire which is Household is usually for hanging pictures.

TILE TILE

By far the majority of tiles found at "The Homestead" were roofing tiles apparently identical to those on the house. These have been included in this category. A few other tiles were found (wall and floor) which can be distinguished as such because of their glazing and material.

HORSE SHOE

Animal derivation of bone

cow SHEEP PIG SHEEP/PIG RABBIT CHICKEN

Species of shell

COCKLE OYSTER

HORSE-S

c s p S/P RAB CH

coc OY

l

Page 75: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I

Append'IX 4

FLOW BLUE TRANSFER PRINT FL-BL-TP

Blue transfer print where the print has been deliberately smudged.

BLUE/GREY TRANSFER PRINT B/G-TP

Not clear blue. Transfer printed ware with the design in blue/grey. ·~ . ' ...

GREEN TRANSFER PRINT GR-TP

BROWN TRANSFER PRINT BR-TP

MAUVE TRANSFER PRINT MAU-TP

Transfer printed ware with the design in mauve. Mauve transfer printed ware was found extensively at "The Homestead" reflecting personal choice but also a 1 ate 19th century to early 20th century date for much of the ceramic assemblage.

DARK GREY TRANSFER PRINT DG-TP

Not black. Transfer printed ware with the design in dark grey.

BLACK TRANSFER PRINT BLK-TP

POLYCHROME TRANSFER PRINT POLY-TP

Transfer printed ware printed colours. Not to be confused with or a transfer print to which hand added.

in two or more hand painted ware painting has been

HANDPAINTED HP

Not transfer printed ware. Decoration is handpainted.

HANDPAINTED + GILT HP-G

Design is handpainted with added gilt.

TRANSFER PRINT + HANDPAINT TP-HP

Transfer printed ware that has part of the design filled with handpainting in one or more colours. The paint is often applied over the glaze.

TRANSFER PRINT + HANDPAINT + GILT TP-HP-G

Transfer printed ware that has part of the design filled with handpainting in one or more colours and gilt is added.

Page 76: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

:. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I

I

Append'lx 4

CLEAR CL

Completely colourless. Requires silica almost free of iron a flux and a stabiliser without noticeable impurities. Manganese was used as a decolourizer c1890-1916 and gives a purplish tint on prolonged exposure to ultraviolet 1 ight. Post 1916 selenium became the most common decolourizer.

GREEN TINT GR-T

Ostensibly clear glass containing impurities which give a slight green tint.

BLUE TINT BL-T

AQUA

Ostensibly clear glass containing impurities which give a slight blue tint, but the term is used to describe also pale blue bottles to distinguish them from "castor oil" blue.

AQUA

Glass containing impurities which give a definite blue-green colour.

AMETHYST AME

Clear glass where Manganese was used as a decolouriser c1890-1916 and has given a purplish tint as the result of prolonged exposure to ultraviolet light.

OLIVE OL

Includes a very broad range from light to dark olive and vi rtua 11 y b 1 ack. 01 i ve g 1 ass usua 11 y contains ferrous oxide. Commonly used for beer, gin and wine.

EMERALD GREEN EME

Not olive or green tint. Bright green and contains copper oxide.e.g. modern wine bottles.

BROWN BR

AMBER

Inc1 udes dark to 1 i ght brown. Brown glass contains carbon.

AMB

Not brown - the colour of modern beer bottles.

BLUE BL

Bright cobalt blue used late 18th and early 19th century for tableware such as salt dishes and decanters, medicine and cosmetic containers.

Georges Ha~~ HOMestead ~990

Page 77: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Append'fx 4 Glu 'I de to Datab~!!use

The following symbols are used in the transcriptions:

I indicates change of line

indicates incomplete word

? indicates unreadable character

NOTES

This column is used to record any pertinent information about the artefact not covered by the other descriptive variables.

NUMBER

This column records the number of items in each artefact bag.

WEIGHT

This column is used to record the weight of artefacts to the nearest 10th of a gram.

Page 78: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

APPENDIX 5

ARTEFACT CATALOGUE

Basemark Mauve cable patterned plate Unit 212 Bagnu. 35 0810 1192

Basemark mauve cable patterned plate Unit 212 Bagnum 39 0810 1196

Page 79: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

GHH Artefact Catalogue 1990

PC Weight

Id Bagnum Material Function Sub-Func Number Avweight A-box Display

--> UNIT = 5

REW FEW FEW FSW GL GL GL GL FE

10 10 FE 11 11 cu 12 12 SHELl i3 13 BONE 14 i4 BONE 15 15 PLASi 16 16 CEK

Variable: NUMBER WEIGHT

YARO

TW

TW

A-STRul:T Kw

Kw KW

u-FIEO A-STRUCT A-SiRiJ(:T o-tuL T PERS FOOD FOOO A-STRU(:T A-STRtJCT

Subtotal: 27.00

299.50

FEM BtH

Mean: 1.688

i8.719

14.2 1UO i .0 1.15 21.6 5.40 2.1 2.10 48.0 16.00 4, 0 uo 3 u 2.50 3 5.6 5. 60 4.0 UIO 5. i 5.70 5. 3 5.30 0. 5 0. 50 0.1 0.10 24' 0 24.00 2U 6.88 12 i. 4 127. 40

Running tot a i: 27.00

299.50

Descr-1

I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Page 80: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I GHH Artefact Catalogue 1990 CL

I Id Bagm Materia 1 Function Sub-Func Oescr-1 Descr-2 Nu11ber Weight Avweight A-Box --> UNIT : 6

I 17 1 REW YARD 8. 9 8.90 18 2 FEW TW PW u 4.70 19 3 FEW TW 8L -TP 6.6 6.60

I 20 4 FEW II 8L -TP 1.0 1. 00 21 5 FEW Tw BiG- TP 3. 6 3.60 22 6 m TW HAU- TP 43 . 7 10.92 23 7 FEW TW BAND 105.6 15.09

I 24 8 FEW TW BAND 1. 5 1.50 25 9 FEW Tw BAN [I u 2.90 26 10 FSW KW S-Gl 13.3 13.30

I 27 11 FSw r.w S-GL 17.0 11.00 28 12 FSW A-STRUCT PW 38.0 9.50 29 13 vsw A-NONST p~ 23.5 23.50

I 30 14 vsw U-FIEO PW 0. 3 0. 30 31 15 P(: TJ SL- TP 5.0 5.00 :32 16 PIPE 0-CuLT 2.3 2.30 33 1i Gl KW Cl 49.4 24.70

I 34 18 Gl KW Ol 44.5 44.50 35 19 GL ~-· AQ UA 180.8 36.16 36 20 Gl kw AQUA 44.3 22.15 3

I 37 21 GL KW AQUA lOU 100.20 3 38 22 GL KW AQUA 31. 1 31. 10 3 39 23 GL KW Cl 1.9 7.90 3

I 40 24 Gl Kw OL 61.1 61.70 41 25 Gl Kw OL 38.0 38.00 42 26 Gl Kw OL 2.4 2.40 4:3 21 GL KW OL 21, 1 i. 03

I 44 28 GL KW BR u 4.60 45 29 GL KW CL 10 94. 1 9.41 46 30 Gl 0 AQUA 8 83. 1 10.39

I 47 31 GL ~- CL 6 42,2 7.03 48 32 GL Kw OL 20 245.5 12.27 49 33 GL KW OL 2 24.6 12.30 50 34 GL kw AQUA 11 106.6 9.69

I 51 35 GL Kw GR-T 13 106.6 8.20 52 36 GL kk AQuA 13.7 1UO 5:3 37 Gl TW Cl 10.0 10.00

I 54 38 Gl Tw Cl 1U 1UO 55 39 Gl m 8l 6.5 6.50 56 40 GL HEO BL 5.6 5.80

I 57 41 GL MEO Bl 8 52.4 6.55 58 42 GL A-Nom CL 4 13.9 3. 47 :i 59 43 GL A-NONST GR-T 9 32.6 3. 62 60 44 FE A-STRUCT 1 28.8 28.80

I 61 45 FE A-STRUCT 1 42.8 6. 11 62 46 FE A-STRUCT 2 18. 1 9.05

I I I I

Page 81: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

6:3 4i 64 48 65 4~

66 50 67 51 68 52 69 53 70 54 7i 55 72 5t 73 5i 74 ~· ~ 75 5Y

76 6P 77 bl

Variable: NUMBER WEIGHT

FE FE Ft FE (:IJ

(:I)

HEi AL-0 SHELL BONE BO~t

BO~E

BONE PLASi HORT ~LATE

TRANS u-FIEO li-FifO YARD

ms PERS IJ-FiEO ms PEHS FOOD FOOD FOOD A-SiRIJ(:i HTRIJ(:i Cl ER

Subtot.a I : i78.00

2608.40

DATED ARTEFACTS

FE~

LB BI.IT BuT

Mean: ~.9i8

4~. 76i

DBID 22 Bagnum 6 A. Shaw, Cable:

55.4 21.70 3.7 3. iO 2.6 2.60 3 .) 1.85 2.2 2.20 0.7 0. iO 0. 6 0. 60 0. 9 0. 90 0.4 0. 40 48.4 4~. 411 4. 1 4. 10 3. 1 uo 660,3 220.10 12. i 2. 12 2.5 uo

Running total: 178.00

2608.40

Anthony Sha\v, 1860-1882

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Page 82: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I

Id Bagnum Material Function Sub-Func Number Weight Avweight A-box Display

--> UNIT = 7

i8 csw i9 GL 80 GL

81 GL 82 GL 83 GL 84 FE 85 (:IJ

86 9 CiJ 8i 10 SYNTH 88 ;; FE 89 12 FE 90 1j ~E

91 14 FE 92 15 SHELL 93 16 BONE Y4 11 PLAST

Variable: NUMBER WEIGHT

A-SiRUti Kw

Kw iw Tw A-HONST A-NONST PERS

T•

~-YARD A-mucT A-mun HTRUCT ORG-HF FOOD A-STRUO

Subtota l : 3:3.00

686. 50

DATED ARTEFACTS

AQUA (:L

OL CL CL

LB BljT

Mean: 1. 941

40. 382

54.4 54.40 ii.i 11.i0 15.1 15. iO 6i.2 3UO 34, 1 8. 52 1. 2 uo !OU 203.60 :i.O 3.00 i4,i 14.10 11 .9 i/.90

3 1(11.3 33.ii iO 3U U3

23.2 11,60 8U 86.90 1.1 1. 10 8.1 8.10 3.1 uo

Running tota l : 2:38. 00

:3594. 40

DBID 87 Bagnum 10 Summons & Graham , Parramatta, c.l910-1920

Descr-1 Des

Page 83: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

Number

Unit 107 = Sample Unit 007

GHH Artefact Catalogue 1990

Id Bagnum Material Function Sub-Func Weigh t Avweight A-bo x Di s play

--> UNIT = i07

95 FE-9b FEw 9i m 98 PiPE 9Y Gl 100 6 Gl 101 cu 102 METAL -0 10J S~Ell 1(1 4 10 BONE 105 11 BONE 106 12 SY NiH 10 i 13 FE 108 14 FE 109 15 FE 110 16 FE 111 1i FE 112 1f FE 113 19 FE 11 4 2ll FE 115 21 FE 116 n SHELL 11i 23 BONE 118 24 BONE 11 ~ 25 BONE 120 lb BONE 121 2i BONE

Variable: NUMBER WEIGHT

H-HOLD Tw ,_ o-t:Ul T

~ · PE~S ~ - ~OLD

0-CUl T PERS PERS h u-FIEO YA RD YA RD

YARD CR~FT

HTRl.lCT A- STRuCT A-STRu(:T u-HED UHOABLE FOOD FOOD FOOO FOOO FOOD FOOD

Subtota 1: 44.00

:300; . 40

DATED ARTEFACTS

BL -TP THP BL -TP

VERT RIB RiB T!B RIB

8Ui BuT 81Ji

BuT BIJT

Mean: 1. 6:3 0

i11 . i63

9. 4 9.40 4,8 4.811 0.5 0.50 2.6 :. ~o j, 4 j. 4(1 0.5 U5 25.5 25.50 14.0 14.011 0.4 0, 40 16.b 16. 60 u 8 . ~0

0.5 0.50 1563.9 1563.90 48,b 1'!. 15 ~3.0 b:i.OU

1 2i8.4 2iH. 40 11 40. i .J.iO 3 42.2 14, Oi 1 i68.l ibUU

1i . 0 1 i. uu 6.2 J. 1 (l 10.5 10.50 4U 42,80 10. y lUi! H ~ .'! 0 1£, i 12./1) 1 f :~ uo

Running tot. a 1: 282 .00

6595.80

DBID 102 Bagnum 8 1891 Half Crown

Descr-i

YES

I I I

De' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Page 84: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I

GHH Arr.ef act Cat a iogue 1990 Id 8agm "ate ria i Function Sub-Func Oescr-1 Descr-2 Nu11be.r weight A might A-Box

--> UNii : 8

I 122 1 FE• r• PW 6.4 6.40 3 1:n 2 FEw TW PW 1.6 1.60 3 124 FE• TW PW 12.3 12.30 3

I 125 FEW H-HO LO 8l-TP 30' 3 30.30 126 FEW TJ BAND 15 35.6 U7 127 OPC iW PW 1 18, 4 18' 40

I 128 GL Kw Cl 1 1U 11.90 129 GL ~- Ol 2 i.6 3.80 1 :31) GL Kw Ol 1 £U 24.9(1 1:31 10 GL KW GR-T 1 u uo

I 1:32 11 rJ L Tw Cl 2 23.5 iL15 1:33 1Z GL Tw (:L 1 1U 1.67 1:34 13 I]L TW CL 10' i iO . 70

I 1:35 14 GL l!-FfE[! CL 9U 18 ' i8 1:36 1 ~ GL 11 ERS ." 13' 5 13' 50 1::17 16 G~ PERS WH 0.1 0.35

I 1:38 17 GL PERS Bl~ 0' 9 0. 90 1:39 18 GL PERS 8LK 0' i 0.70 YES 140 19 GL PE RS BL u 0' 60 YES 141 ~0 GL HLIL i 8.2 uo

I 142 21 FE YA.RU 0.7 0.70 i 4:3 n FE HTRul:i 36.3 6.05 144 23 H A-NONST 0' 1 0.23

I 145 24 FE •-NO~ST 23.2 23.20 3 146 2: FE PERS ~. 4 ~. 4 0 j

147 !6 (:i_l HOLD 10' 5 3.50 148 ; i (:1,1 H-HOLO 2.0 0.40

I 149 2~ (:iJ H-HOLO 3 'l 3.30 150 29 Cu u-FIEO (1, 4 0. 40

i 5 i :lu Ct: ms 0' 1 0.05

I 152 :n (:·.1 PEP.S u uo YES 1 5:~ 32 (:1,1 ms 4, 4 4.40 YES 154 33 CiJ 0-(:tjl : 0. 4 0,40

I 155 J4 NETAL-0 0-('IJL T 0.4 0,20 156 j; MFAL-0 0-t.: Ul T u 0.60 157 :~ ~ METAL-0 0-CuL i 14 1 '2 0. 09 YES i51?. 3i ~ETH -0 PER2 O.b u. 60

I i59 .ie S~ELL !J-FI EO 0. 4 0.40 160 J9 SHELL PERS 0.7 0. iO 1ES itii 40 BONE ~ERS 0.6 0' 60 YES

I 162 41 BONE FOOD m BUT 1 i ':; lUO ; l):j &2 BONE FOOD RiB BuT 4' 9 U3 164 43 BONE FOOD 6' 1 1.5 ~

I 165 44 PlASi A-STRUCT 0' 6 0.60 166 4~ SLAH CLER 1 '~ 1. ~0 167 46 SiONE PERS 1.3 1.30 168 4/ ftl! rw BANO 5.0 5.00

I 169 '. PIPE 0- (:iJ~ T 3' 1 3' 111 • v

170 4 ~ GL PERS 1 '3 0' i:i 171 50 GL PERS 0' 1 0. 10

I 172 51 GL i- ~OLO 0, 4 0.20 17:3 '•) l;L H-HOLU <! , 8 0,95 174 :LJ FE HTRuCT 7.Y U i 175 54 Ct.' PERS ' J 1. 30

I 176 ;~ [:IJ IHIJLT J.6 3.60 YES

I

Page 85: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

177 56 178 57 179 58 180 59 181 60 182 61

Variable: NUMBER WEIGHT

METAL-0 METAL -0 METAL -0 LO BONE STONE

0-CIJL T 7 0.6 0.09 o-cuLT 1 0.3 0.30 PERS 1 0.6 0.60 A-STRUCT 1 35.9 35.90 FOOO 2 4.0 2.00 Q-CUl T 2 10.1 5.05 YES

Subtotal: Mean: Running total: i40.00 2.295 422.00 519.30 8.513 7115.10

Page 86: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

~----

I I

GHH Artefact Catalogue 1990

Id Bagnum Material Function Sub-Func Descr-1 Del Number Weight Avweight A-box Display

PC --> UNIT = 9 I 183 GL A-kONSi GK- i 138 35J.O 2.56

I 184 FE A-SiktJCi 10 3U 3.38 185 FE UN- IOABLE 2 u 2.b0 186 4 cu H-HOLD 7U iUO

I 18i 5 SHELL UN- IOABLE 0.5 U5 188 6 BONE FOOO BIJi 2' 1 2' 10 189 wooo liHDABL~ BIJR il '~ 0.20

Variable: Subtotal: Mean: Running total: I NUMBER 155.00 22. 143 577.00 WEIGHT 471.60 67.:371 7586.70 I

I I I I I I I I I I I I

Page 87: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I

GHH Artefact Catalogue 1990

Id Bagnum Material Function Sub-Func Descr-1 Des Number Weight Avweight A-box Display

I PC --> UNIT = 10

190 m mo 58.6 29.30 3

I 191 m iW Bl-TP 3.2 uo 3 192 FEW iW Sl-H 17.0 17.00 3 193 FEW TW Bl-iP 0,9 0. 90

I 194 m n BANO-G 2 53.1 26.55 195 FEW TW Gl 1 ~- · u 1. 70 196 m Ki Gt 1 3.9 uo

I 197 FSW TW LUS TRE 1 6.1 6. 10 198 9 vsw TW Pw 13.8 6. 90 199 1(1 GL Kw GR-T 9. 5 9. 50 200 11 Gl Kw B~ 9.1 9.10

I 201 12 Gl KW BR i 14.2 14.20 202 13 GL Ki BR 1 10.3 10.30 203 14 Gt Ki Ol 11 80.5 1.32

I 204 15 GL H-HOLO CL 1 1.2 1.20 205 16 Gl k-HOlO Cl 1 18.3 18.30 206. ii Gt H-HOLO 1 7.6 7.60 207 18 Gt Tw Ct 1 3.0 3. 00

I 208 19 Gt A-NONST GR-T 2 3.6 uo 209 20 FE H-HOLO 1 i3.1 73. tO 210 21 FE H-HOLO 1 469.7 469.70

I 211 22 FE H-HOLO 1099.2 1099.20 212 23 FE Kw 3i. 1 18.55 213 24 FE Kw 4,8 2.40

I 214 25 FE YARD 240.9 30.11 215 26 FE YARO 63.2 63.20 216 27 FE A-SiRUCi 12 94.5 1.S1 211 28 FE A-STRVCT 19.5 9. i5

I 218 29 FE A-STKUCi 145. 4 145 .40 219 30 FE A-STRUCi 80.5 80.50 220 3i FE HTRtJCT 129.5 64. i5

I 221 32 FE A-NONSi 13.1 13. 10 222 33 Clt A-NO~ST 1.8 i.80 223 34 cu HONSi 1.8 uo

I 224 35 (:u A-NONST 36.6 36.60 225 36 LO HiRUCi 49 U 497.20 m 37 MET Al-0 Kll 5.2 uo 22i 38 BONE FOOO VERT u uo

I 228 39 BONE FOOO TARS 12.0 6. 00 229 40 BONE FOOO PHAL 6.2 6.20 230 41 BONE FOOD TIB 21.5 2i.50

I 231 42 BONE FOOD LB BUT 25.2 8.40 232 43 BONE FOOD LB BUT 22.1 22.i0 233 44 BONE FOOD RIB BUT 20.4 20.40 234 45 BONE ORG-NF MAX 21.5 27.50

I 235 46 CEH A-SiRIJCi 4U 41.80

I Variable: Subtotal: Mean: Running total: NUMBER 85.00 1.848 662.00 WEIGHT :3514.90 76.411 1 11 01 . 60

I I

Page 88: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

UNIT 12 8agnu19 34 and 35 DBID 289-270 Military buttons ER VII Australian Commonwealth (1901-1910)

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Page 89: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I GHH Artefact Catalogue 1990

I Id Bagnum Material Function Sub-Func Descr-1 Des Number Weight Avweight A-box Display

I PC

--> UNIT = 12

236 FEW TW PW 1 1.9 1.90 • I 237 FEW TW BL-TP 1 19.3 19.30 4

238 3 m TW 8L-iP 1 9.2 9.20 4 239 4 FEW Tl Bl-TP 18 103.8 5.77 4

I 240 m TW POLHP 1 3.6 3.60 • w csw A-STRUCi 218.0 109.00 242 OPC O-CUli 7.3 7.30 YES

I 243 e Gl 0-CUL i Cl 45.5 45.50 244 9 Gl MED Cl 5.2 5. 20 4 245 10 Gl MEO Cl 0. 9 0. 90 4 246 11 GL u-FIED Cl 1.2 1.20 4

I 241 12 GL KW OL 45.3 15.10 l

248 13 Gl Kw AQUA 12. 1 6.05 4

w 14 Gl A-NONST GR-T 3 6.4 2.13 4

I 250 15 FE A-STRUCT 8 65.4 8.17 4

251 16 H A-STROCT 2 14.8 1.40 4 252 1i FE A-STRUCT 1 43 .1 43 .10 253 18 FE A-STRUCT 291.9 291.90

I 254 19 FE A-STRlJCi 34.2 34.20 255 20 FE A-STRUCT 48 .1 48.10 256 21 FE TRANS 218.2 218.20

I 257 22 FE H-HOLO 24.0 24.00 258 23 FE Kw 70.5 70.50 259 24 FE KW 1 16.5 18.50

I 260 25 FE Kw 26 98 .7 3.80 261 26 FE KW 7.2 2.40 262 27 FE 0-CiJL T 11 .7 11.i0 263 28 co H-HOLO 32.4 16.20

I 264 2~ cu u-FIED 2.9 2.90 265 30 cu U-FIED 1.2 1.20 266 31 cu u-FIEO 11. i 11.70

I 267 32 cu PERS 1U 7.15 YES 268 33 cu ms 5.4 5.40 YES

26~ 34 t:U PERS 21.4 9. 13 YES 270 35 cu PERS 5.3 5.30 1ES

I 271 36 SHELL PERS 0.2 0. 20 2i2 Ji SHELL FOOO 2.9 1.45 213 38 SHELL ORG-kF 3.2 3.20

I 214 39 BONE FOOO B-8 8. 8 uo 275 40 WOOD u-FIEO BiJR 2.2 2.20

I Variable: Subtotal: Mean: Running totai: NUMBER i04.00 2.600 766.00 WEIGHT i543.90 38.597 12645.50

I DATED ARTEFACTS

I DBID 269-70 Bagnums 34..--35 Mi.litary buttons ER VII Australian Collllnonwealth 19.01-1910

I I

Page 90: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I GHH Artefact Catalogue 1990

DeJ Id Bagnum Material Function Sub-Func Descr-1 Number Weight Avweight A-box Display

PC I --> UNIT = 14

276 FEW T. PW 1U 14 .90

I 27i FEW TW Pw 11. 1 3. iO 216 m Tw Pw 14.1 1.35 279 FEW Tr FL-BL-TP 19. i 19.70 280 m Tr HAU-TP 13.7 6.85 I 281 m Tw BLHP 31.9 31.90 282 m TJ BANO-G 151.9 16.88 283 FE• Tl BANO-G 1.6 1.60 I 284 FE~ Tw SWIRL 1.8 1, 80 285 10 FSW ~· GL 3:! 9i5.5 30 .48 286 11 FSW ~· GL 35.5 35.50

I 287 12 vsw ~-SiRiJ CT PW ~1.5 15.37 288 13 vsw HED BL~-TP 154. j 22. 10 289 14 vsw MEO Pw 121.3 121.30 YES 290 15 vsw iHIEO UG 4.:! 4.20 I :!91 16 vsw Tl Pw-G 102.3 14.61 292 ii p(: Tw PM-G 4 18:!.2 45.55 293 18 OP(: iw PW-G 11 40. 2 3.65

I 294 19 OPC Q-CtJL Pw :! 62.6 31.30 YES 295 20 OP(: 0-(:tiL Pw u 3.00 VES 296 21 GL r.J BR i 4. 8 i 4. 80 297 22 GL ~- OL 6 i. 9 3U5 I 298 23 GL ~· OL 8i. i 8i. iO 299 24 Gl r.J BR 1iU 59.40 300 25 GL ~·

(;L 76.5 16.50 I 301 26 Gl r.• GR-T 41,0 41 .00 302 2i GL K. GR-T 91.5 9i.50 303 28 GL ~- tJR-T u uo

I 304 28 GL ~· GR-T 12.3 12.30

305 30 GL i. BR 122.2 3o.55 306 31 GL Kw BR 25. 1 8.37 307 32 Gl H-HOLO BR 5.3 5. 311 I 308 33 Gl H-HOLO BH 84.2 16,84 309 34 GL H-HOLO GL 11.6 11.60 310 35 GL H-HOLO (:L J2.7 JUO I 311 36 Gl HOLD (;L 16. 7 16. i 0 m :li GL H-HOLO (:L u 7.20 313 38 GL H-HOLO (:L i. 6 7.60

I 314 j9 GL "EO BR 20.5 20.50 315 40 GL Kw BR 285.i 31.1 d

316 41 GL ~- OL 12.9 6.45 311 42 GL ~· CL 31.5 5.:l6 I 318 43 GL ~- GR- T 10 .6 11. ii 319 44 GL K~ ~QJ.iA ~1.0 1 (1, 50 320 45 GL H-HOLO GR-T 10.2 5. 10

I 321 46 GL HOLO CL 3U 5. 5~ 3:!2 4 i GL H-HOLD (:L , 2. 5 2.50 m 4~ GL H-HOLO CL 1:i.l 13' 10 324 49 GL H-HOLD WH 27 m.2 8.45 I J25 50 Gl Tw GL ~4. 4 14.0 i 326 51 GL PERS Gl 1,1 1.10 w 52 Gl PERS BL 0. 5 0. 50 I m 5j GL PERS BL u 0. ~(I 329 54 GL MED BL i,j 3.55 330 55 GL IJ-FIED (:L i.3 3.65

I

Page 91: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I 331 56 GL A-NONST Cl 2 2.1 1.35

332 51 GL A-NONST GR-T 20 104.6 5.23

I 333 58 cu H-HOlO 1 1i6.9 176.90 334 59 FE H-HOlD 1 268.6 268.60 335 60 FE TRANS 1 1030.1 1030.70

I 336 61 FE TRANS 1 399.2 399.20 337 62 FE TRANS 1 561.3 567.30 338 63 FE H-HOLD 1 4300.0 4300 .00 339 64 FE H-HOLD 8 289.3 36.16

I 340 65 FE H-HOLO 1 51.4 51.40 341 66 FE H-HOLD 3 86.2 28.73 342 67 FE H-HOLO 1 8.3 8.30

I 343 68 FE H-HOLO 4U 24.65 344 69 FE 0-CUL T 63.0 63.00 345 iO FE Q-CULT 64.i 32.35

I 346 i i H Kw 21 499.8 23.80 347 72 FE ~w i u 6.20 348 i3 ~E KW 2 15. i 7. 85 349 i4 FE YARD 11 586.9 53.35

I 350 75 FE A-STRUCT 2U 6.05 35i 76 FE A-STKii CT 14.0 14.00 :352 ii FE A-STRUCT 246.9 248.90

I 35:3 18 FE A-STRUCT 324.2 162.10 354 79 FE A-STRUCT 291.6 297.60 355 80 FE A-STRUCT 106.5 106.50

I :356 81 FE A-STRliC1 42,9 42.90 357 82 FE A-STRUCT 380.9 54.41 358 83 FE A-STRu CT m.o 117.00 359 84 FE A-STRuCT 440.0 220.00

I 360 85 FE A-NONST 198.7 198.10 36i 86 FE TRANS 310.2 310.20 362 87 FE iHIEO 4.6 4.60

I 363 88 FE UHD~BLE 18.9 9.45 364 89 cu A-NONST i 15.0 15.00 365 90 Cll A-NONST 2 2.3 1. 15 366 91 LO A-STRuCT 1i 529.7 j 1. 16

I 367 92 LD A-STRU(:T 55.9 55.90 368 93 HETAL-0 H-HOLO 6U 6UO 369 94 BONE FOOO SCAP 4i, 0 15.67

I :370 95 BONE FOOO HH 72.2 36 .10 371 96 BONE FOOO TIS 96.3 32.10 372 97 BONE FOOO RAO BIJT 2U 11.60

I 373 98 BONE FOOO LB SIJT 13.9 6.95 374 99 BONE FOOO LB BUT 101.3 101.30 375 100 BONE FOOO RIB BUT 91.7 30.51 376 101 BONE FOOO RIB BUT 23.8 1.93

I 377 102 BONE FOOO RiB BUT 29.5 7.37 :378 103 BONE FOOO BUT 9.5 2.36 :379 104 BONE FOOO 1.5 1.50

I :380 105 BONE ORG-NF HAN 67.8 22.60 38i 106 PLAST A-STRUCT 64,3 U 4 382 107 HORi A-STRUCT ~.0 1. 00 38:3 108 AL ~- 0.4 0. 40

I :384 109 AL Kw O . .l 0. j0 385 i 10 SHELL ORG-NF 1.8 O.QO :386 111 SHELL PERS 0.6 uo

I 387 1 i 2 SYNiH PERS 5.8 U3

I

Page 92: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

388 113 SYNTH

Variable: NUMBER WEIGHT

u-FIEO

Subtotal: 383.00

16405.50

DATED ARTEFACTS

Mean: 3.389

145. 181

0.2 0.20

Running total: 383.00

16405.50

DBID 298 Bagnum 23 Summons & Graham, Parramatta c.l910-1920

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Page 93: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

GHH Artefact Catalogue 1990

Id Bagnum Material Function Sub-Func Descr-1 Des Number Weight Avweight A-box Display

PC --> UNIT = 15

389 1 FEW H-HOLO PW 4.4 uo 390 2 Gl KW Ol · 104.3 104.30 39i 3 Gl A-NONST GR-T u uo 392 4 FE A-STRUCT 33.3 33.30 393 FE A-STRUCT 5. 5 2.75 394 STONE Q-CUL T 8.1 8.10 YES

Variable: Subtotal: Mean: Running total: NUMBER 7.00 1.167 1156.00 WEIGHT 160.00 26.667 29211.00

Page 94: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I GHH Artefact Catalogue 1990

Id Bagnum Material Function Sub-Func De.sc r-1 oel Number Weight Avweight A-box Display PC

--> UNIT = 16 I 395 FEW TW Pi 3.8 3.80 4 396 FEW Ti PW 11.8 11.80 4 I 391 3 FEi Tr Pw 48.5 48.50 4

398 FEW TW PW 6.8 2.21 399 FEW TW PH 14.1 14.10

I 400 FEW TW BL-TP 9.8 9.80 401 m Tw 8l-TP u 2.40 4 402 8 FEW TW GR- TP 5 .I 5.10 4 403 9 m TW MAU-TP 90.6 90,60 4 I 404 10 FEw TW SANO 84.9 28.30 4 405 11 FSw ~~ CANE 476.4 95.28 4 406 1! FSw YARO S-GL 59.0 59.00 4

I 40 i 13 PC TW 8AHO-G 8.1 uo 408 14 PG il Pw 2.4 2.40 409 15 OPe TW p. 10.4 10.40 410 16 OPC TW Pw 59.5 19.83 I 411 1i OPC iw HP 19.2 19.20 41 2 18 GL ~· Ol 38' i 38. iO 413 19 GL ~- OL 61.9 61.90 I 414 zo GL KW AQUA 8. 1 8.10 415 21 GL Kw AQIJA 22.5 22.50 416 22 GL kw OL u 9.90

I 41 1 23 GL KW OL 69.3 1. 70 418 24 GL Kl AQUA 19.5 6.50 419 25 GL KW GR-T 50.6 12.65 420 26 GL TW CL 1 '9 7. 90 4 I 421 27 Gl H-HOLO Cl 6.5 6.50 4 422 28 GL H-HOLO WH 2.6 2.60 4 423 29 GL MEO BL 180.5 160' 50 4

I 424 30 Gl m BL 48 .4 48.40 425 31 GL MEO SL 14 ' 3 14.30 426 32 GL MEO Bl 16. i 16 .1 0 427 33 GL HEO BL u uo I 428 34 GL HEO BL 0.4 0. 40 m 35 Gl A-NOHST GR- T 13.4 6. iO 4JO 36 Gl tJ-FIEO CL 18' 1 1M. 10 I 431 3i Gl TW CL 50. 1 16.70 432 38 FE YARD no 23.00 433 39 FE A-STRUCT 32.8 5 '47

I 434 40 FE A-STRUCT 9.6 uo 435 41 FE A-STRUCT u 4.60 436 42 FE A-STRUCT 39' i 39' 10 437 43 FE HONST 14.5 14.50 I 438 44 FE H-HOLO 1(12.9 25.12 439 45 (:ij ~-HOLD 0' 6 0' 60 440 46 cu PERS 1( 1 i. 05 I 441 4i LD A-STRi.l CT 11.i i1 ,ill 44 l 48 LD A-STRu t:/ 12' 1 1 {. iO 44:j 49 LEA (:RAFT u uo

I 444 50 BONE PERS 0. ~ O.JO 445 51 BONE FOOD vEKT BUT 94.1 94. 10 44b 52 PLAST A-STRIJ CT 85 .3 ~uo 44i 5:i HORT A-STRIJCT 2.i 0.90 I 448 5£ SLATE CL ER u 2' 10 449 55 u-FIEu 39.2 9.80

I -- -

Page 95: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Variable: NUMBER WEIGHT

Subtotal: 98.00

2112.40

DATED ARTEFACTS

Mean: 1.782

38.407

Running total: 1254.00

31323.40

DBID 403 Bagnum 9 W.Edwards, design registration mark 18 May 1882

DBID 415 Bagnum 21 Summons & Graham, Parramatta c . 1910-1920

Page 96: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

GHH Artefact Catalogue 1990

Id Bagnum Material Function Sub-Func Number Weight Avweight A-box Display

PC --> UNIT = 17

•5o GL KW OL 8.4 8.40 .51 GL ~~ GR-T 5.6 uo 4 452 Gl PERS (;L 1.8 1. 80 4 m cu PERS 0.8 0. 80 4 454 (;iJ H-HOLO 33.3 33.30 4

Variable: Subtotal: Mean: Running total: NUMBER 5.00 1.000 1259.00 WEIGHT 49.90 9.980 :31 :37:3. 30

GHH Artefact Catalogue 1990

Id Bagnum Material Function Sub-Func Number Weight Avweight A-box Display

PC --> UNIT = 20

455 1 PIPE 456 GL 45 7 GL 4 5~ 4 BONE

Variable: NUMBER WEIGHT

0-GIJL T

~ · KW

FOOO

Subtotal: 5.00

47.20

OL OL RIB

Mean: i. 250

1 1. 800

u 2.30 J2 . 7 J2.70 u 3. ?5 ~ • 7 5.70

Running total: 1264.00

:3; 420. 50

Descr-1

Descr-1

I D~

I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I

Page 97: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I

GHH Artefact Catalogue 1990 Id BagnuM Material Function Sub-Func Oescr-1 Oescr-2 Nu11ber Weight Avveight A-Box

-- > UNIT : 203

I 459 1 m 1ARO 1 7.4 uo 460 FEw Tw PW 2 13.0 6.50 461 m Tl p~ 1 1.0 1.00

I 462 m Tl PW 3 16.5 uo 46:3 5 m TW PW 11 21.0 2.45 464 6 FEW Tw PW 1 1.3 1.30 465 1 m TW PW 1 10.6 10.60

I 466 8 Hi TW GR-TP 1 21.4 21.40 467 9 FEW iW MAU-TP 1 24.5 24.50 468 10 m TW MAU- TP 3 49.8 16.60

I 469 11 m Tr BANO 13 255.4 19.65 470 12 m ~~ BANO 1 4.1 4.10 471 13 FEw Tw BANO-G 4.1 2.05

I 472 14 m Tw BANO-G 3.3 3. 30 47:3 15 ~E. TW HP 63.8 12.76 474 16 FEW TW HP 33.3 33.30 475 17 HI Tw SANO-G 3.1 3. 70

I 476 18 csw A-STRliCT S-Gl 584.1 194.70 477 19 csw A-STRUCT Gl 33 1418.8 42.99 478 20 csw ~-STRiiCT GL 11.5 11.50

I 479 21 FS' ~- GL 3.1 3. 10 480 22 vsw TW ~· 22 .8 22.80 481 23 p(: Tl HP 37.7 18.85

I 482 24 Gl KEO BR 11.6 11.60 483 25 Gl MEO Cl 35.2 35.20 484 26 GL KED CL 5.8 1. 16 485 27 GL H-HOLO Cl 11.9 11.90

I 486 28 GL H-HOLO CL 25.7 25.10 487 29 GL H-HOLD CL 24.0 24.00 488 30 GL H-HOLO Cl 2.6 2.60

I 489 31 GL MEO SR 12.3 12.30 490 32 GL HED SR 8. 3 4.15 491 33 GL MEO BR 4,/ 4. 70 492 34 GL ~· OL 45.6 45.60

I 49:3 35 GL K' CL 23.8 2UO 494 36 GL r,w AHS 38.4 38.40 495 3i GL KW GR-T 1U 15.80

I 496 38 GL ~w GR-T 10.5 10.50 497 39 GL Kw Cl 14.7 1¢.10 498 40 GL ,,. CL 2.3 2.30

I 499 41 GL kw CL 12.6 12.60 500 42 GL iW CL 1 19. 1 19 . 10 501 43 GL KW Cl 23 96.3 4. 19 502 •• GL HEO BR 8.4 2. 10

I 503 ·~ GL MEO BR 40.9 5.84 504 46 GL Kw AMB 69.8 34.90 505 41 GL ~w m 3.8 1.2i

I 506 48 GL ~-- GR-T 36.9 4,10 507 49 GL 0 OL 3 i.3 2.43 508 50 GL ~w CL 36 13(1.5 3.62

I 509 51 GL Tl (:L 119. 1 59.55 510 52 Gl TW Cl 10 63.2 6.32 5ii 53 GL H-HOLO CL 1. 6 0. 23 512 54 GL H-HOLO -~ 1.8 0. 60

I 513 55 GL A-NONST 18 25.2 1.40 514 56 Ft A-NONST 53.5 53.50

I

Page 98: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I 1 53.5 53.50

515 57 FE A-STRUCT 1 190.7 190.70

I 516 58 FE A-STRUCT 21 82.1 3.91 517 59 FE A-STRUCT 1 21.2 27.20 518 60 FE A-STRUCT 1 25.6 25.60 519 61 FE A-STRUCT 2 237.3 118.65 I 520 62 FE A-STRUCT 1 19.6 19.60 521 63 FE YARO 28 323.4 11.55 522 64 FE ~· 30 139.7 4.66 I 523 65 FE Kw 2 3.6 1. 80 524 66 FE Q-CULT 1 6.2 6.20 525 67 Ff UN- IOASLE 23. 1 2.57

I 526 68 cu HOLO 2.8 0. 56 527 69 METAL-0 H-HOLO 1.1 1.10 528 70 ~l ~- 1, 0 0. 50 529 71 AL Kw 31 5.4 0. 1 i I 530 72 AL ~· 0. 5 0. i7 53i 73 AL 0-CtiLT 5.2 1.i3 532 i4 mAL-O 0-CULT 23.7 1.90 I 533 i5 SHELL FOO[I 24.3 8.10 534 76 SHELL ORG-NF 0.5 0. 25 535 7i BONE ORG-NF TOOTH 1.6 1.60

I 536 78 BONE ORG-NF MAX i. 9 7.90 5:37 i9 BONE FOOD LB 15 299.4 19.96 538 80 BONE FOOO LB BIJT 5 63.4 12.b8 539 81 BONE FOOD RIB BUT 18 42 .6 2.37 I 540 82 BONE FOOD RIB 12 36.3 3.02 541 83 BONE FOOD TARS 4 17.1 4.27 542 84 BONE FOOD TARS BuR 1 4.1 4.10

I 543 85 BONE FOOD PHAL 6 26.7 4. 45 544 86 BONE FOOD VERT 17 120.2 I.Oi 545 87 BONE FOOD VERT 10 iii .3 1i. 73 546 88 BONE FOOD VERT BUT 9 12J.9 13.17 I 547 89 BONE FOOO RIB BUT 23 2:l5. 8 10.25 548 90 BONE FOOD RIB B-B 9. 1 9. 10 549 91 BONE FOOD RIB 21.7 10.85 I 550 92 BONE FOOD PHAL u uo 55i 93 BONE FOOO TB BUT 4 41,4 10. 35 552 94 BONE FOOD TB BiJT 1£ 52.J 4.36

I 55:3 95 BONE FOOD iB B-B 13. 1 Ui 554 96 BONE FOOD iB 33.2 5.53 555 9i BONE FOOD LB 5 9.4 1.88 556 98 BONE FOOD RIB j0 4U U :l I 557 9Y BONE FOOO 4 2.5 0. 63 558 100 BOkE FOOD 53 42,2 uo 559 101 BONE FOOD BUN 8 13 .I 1.71 I 560 10£ wooo IJ-FIEO BUR 10.8 2. 16 561 103 WOOD u-FIEO 25.6 6.40 562 104 SEED FOOO 1 0. 6 0. 60

I 56:3 105 FIBRE HIED 1 0. 5 0. 50 564 106 PLAST A-STRiJCT 91 1582.6 16.32 565 107 M.ORT A-STRUCT 59 1055. 1 1i. 88 566 108 MORT A-STRUCT 26 257 .l u~ I 567 109 CEM A-STRIJ(:T 6 44 ~. 9 iUS 568 110 m A-STRIJCT 2 53.5 26. i 5 569 111 FIBRO A-STRIJCT 12 13 4,4 "1 , 20

I 570 112 FIBRO A-STRIJCT l 15. 1 i.55 571 113 FIBRO A-STRIJCT 1i 106.~ UY 572 114 FIBRO A-STRIJCT 54 45.0 0. 83 57:3 115 CO~L H-HOL[l 4 63. i 15.92 I 574 116 CLiN~ H-HOLO 16 108.4 6. il 575 11i SYNTH H-HOLO 1. 8 0. 60 576 118 SYNTH ~-NONST 24.6 12.30 I

Page 99: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

----------- -

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

577 119 SYNTH NED 0.2 0.20 578 120 SYNTH H-HOLD 0.1 0.05 579 121 SYNTH H-HOLD 0.9 0.90 580 122 SYNTH U-HEO BUR u uo 581 123 SYNTH PERS 0.2 0.20 582 124 Gl PERS 0.0 0.00

Variable: Subtotal: Mean: Running total: NUMBER 961.00 7.750 -- 961.00 WEIGHT 10145.70 81.820 10145.70

DATED ,ARTEFACTS

DBrD 469 Ba,gnum_ 11 The Burs1em. Pottery Co. c,1894-1933

Page 100: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I -- > riNIT : 204 I 583 1 FEW Tl PI 4 90.3 22.57

584 FEW TW PW t 9.3 9.30 I 585 3 FEW TW PW t 4.5 4.50 586 4 m TW PW 3 22.0 7.33 587 m iW PHH8 t 1.9 1.90

I 588 m n P~-G t 3. t 3. tO 589 FEW TW GR- TP t 9.7 9. TO 590 8 FEW T• MAU- TP t8. 8 18.80 591 9 FEW TW TP-~P 4, 8 2.40 I 592 tO FEw iw TP-HP 28. 1 28. 10 59:3 11 m iW POLHP 103.4 34. 4i 594 12 FE• Tw BANO 1. 2 1.20 I 595 13 FEW iW BA~O 5. 5 5. 50 596 14 FEW TW BANO 3.2 uo 597 15 FEW TW BANO 15.0 15. 0(1

I 598 16 FEw TW BAHO 71.9 1 i. 13 599 1i FE• Tw HP 15. 1 1.55 600 18 m TW HP 13.6 13.60 601 19 FEW rw HP-G i. 8 0. 90 I 602 20 (:Sw A-SiRIJCT S-GL ! 48.4 24.20 60:3 2 i cs' A-STKIJ(:T 48 4027.6 8U1 604 22 vsw T• Pw t 10.5 10.50 I 605 23 GL ~· AHB 614. 614.20 606 24 GL ~w Cl m. 189. i 5 607 25 GL ~· CL 89. 6 89.60

I 608 26 GL m B~ 99. 1 99.10 609 21 GL MEO BR 62.2 62.20 6i0 28 GL 0-(:rjLT CL i j. 1 i3.10 6ii 29 GL 0-Cul T CL 9U 91.90 I 612 30 GL MEO BR 26.2 26.20 6i:3 31 GL MEO BR 45.9 22.95 6i4 32 GL MEO BR 55.5 55.50

I 615 3~ GL HEO BR 22 .1 22.10 6i6 34 GL HOLD CL 35. 5 35.50 6i7 35 GL Kw (:L 95.8 95.80 6i8 36 GL ~- CL 4!1.2 40.20 I 6i9 ~i GL ~- CL J. 5 3.50 620 3~ GL ~· BR 46 . 1 4 ~. 10 62i 39 CiL K.W BR 2U n.oo I 622 4U GL KW C' 18 .1 1 ~. 10 62:3 41 GL KW (:L 14 . i 14. ill 624 42 GL H-HO LD CL 21.9 2UO

I 625 4J GL 0-CIJLT GL 50.0 25.00 626 44 GL HEO SR 1.9 1.90 627 45 GL HEO BR 10.5 10.50 628 46 GL HEO BR 21 151.2 1. 49 I 629 4 i GL H-HOLO BR 1U 5.73 630 48 GL KW BR 12.0 12.00 6:31 49 GL ~· (:L 15.8 uo

I 6:32 5U GL ~-(:'_ 2 •. ~ uo

6:3:3 51 GL H-HOLD BL-T 41.4 11. S5 6:34 52 GL H-HOLD GR-T 1.5 1, 5(1 6:35 5~ GL H-HOLD CL i 4(1. 4 5. ii I 6:36 54 GL ~- CL 2 26. 1 13.05 6:37 55 GL K• CL b4 j:J6.\1 5. 25 6:38 5b GL ~· OL l 2U lJ.ou I 6:39 5 i GL ~· OL 1U. 5 10.50 640 5ij GL KW BR 2) :l O~. 5 11.24 64; 59 GL KW 8L 2 6.3 J. 15

I 642 60 GL ~· GR-T 5. 1 2.55

Page 101: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I 643 61 Gl KW Cl 1 12.6 12.60

I 644 62 GL KW Cl 1 3.9 3.90 645 63 GL TW Cl 11 15.0 1.36 646 64 GL TW Cl 8 31.1 3.89

I 647 65 GL TW CL 2 9.5 4.75 648 66 Gl TW CL 2 5.5 2' 75 649 67 GL A-NONST 11 19' 6 1.78 650 68 FE A-NONST 2 25.4 12.70

I 651 69 FE HONST 1 12.8 12.80 652 70 FE A-STRUCT 4 295 .4 73.85 653 71 FE A-STRUCT 1 224.6 224.60

I 654 72 FE A-STRUCT 23 237.9 10.34 655 i3 FE A-STRUCT 4 80.3 20.07 656 H FE A-STRuCT 1 10' 1 10' 70 657 75 FE YARD 27 157 '1 5.84

I 658 16 FE Kw 65 145.2 2.23 659 i1 FE Kw 1 47' 1 6.81 660 78 FE KW 3 11.4 5.80

I 66i 79 FE Kw 1 12.4 12.40 662 80 FE MEO 4 74.0 18.50 663 81 FE TW 1 4.3 uo

I 664 82 FE Q-CULT 1 0.3 0.30 665 83 cu H-HOLO 18 41.3 2.29 666 84 (;lj A-NONST 6 5.6 0' 93 667 85 lO HONST 8.9 8' 90

I 668 86 METAL -0 Q-CULT 76.0 15.20 669 87 Al Kw 28.3 28.30 670 88 Al KW 5 2.4 0. 48

I 671 89 Al o-cuu BUR 197 76.0 0. 39 672 90 FE UN- IOABLE 40 20i.5 5' 19 673 91 PAP Q-CULT iO 3.4 O.H 674 92 SHEll u-FHO 6 2.6 0. 43

I 675 93 BONE FOOD VERT 1i 143.3 8.43 676 94 BONE FOOD VERT BUT 21 107.6 3.99 677 95 BONE FOOD VERT BUT 54 946.0 11 '52

I 678 96 BONE FOOD VERT SUR 12 8i.6 1.30 679 97 BONE FOOD VERT 41 876.8 21.3~

680 98 BONE FOOD RIB BuT 84 1657.2 19.73

I 681 99 BONE FOOD RIB BUT 48 313.6 6.53 682 100 BONE FOOD RIB BUT 6 40.2 6.10 68:3 101 BONE FOOD RIB BUT 2 12.6 6.30 684 102 BONE FOOD RIB 41 118.0 2.88

I 685 103 BONE FOOD TS BUT 142.1 41.37 686 104 BONE FOOO TB BUT 83.0 1o.3i 687 i05 BONE FOOD ms 13 81.8 6.29

I 688 106 BONE FOOD m BltT 10 219.1 21.97 689 107 BONE FOOO LB BuT 7 111 '0 15 .86 690 108 BONE FOOD ~AD BUT 2 38' 2 19' 10

I 691 109 BONE FOOD PHAL 8 41.9 5.24 692 110 BONE FOOO IB BUT 14 93.6 6.69 693 111 BONE FOOD BUT 151 422.9 2.80 694 112 BONE FOOD BUR 91 2J2.2 2.55

I 695 113 BONE FOOD B-B 102 259' 1 2.55 696 114 BONE FOOU 18i 199.5 1. Oi 697 i 15 BONE ~000 e u 1.32

I 698 116 BONE FOOD 1 0.4 0. 40 699 11i BONE ORG-NF TOOTH 4 11. 9 2.91 700 118 WOOD o-FIEO 10 15. 4 1.54 701 119 SEED u-FIEO 0.3 0. 30

I 702 120 FIBRE A-NONST 6.3 uo 703 12 i FiBRE PERS 42.0 42.00 704 122 FIBRE IJ-FIEO 2. 1 2.10

I

Page 102: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

705 123 PlAST A-STRUCT 299 5025.4 16.81 706 124 MORT A-STRUCT 150 1954.7 13.03 707 125 CEM A-STRUCT 7 512.4 81.77 708 126 FIBRO A-STRUCT 10 49.6 4.96 709 127 FIBRO A-STRUCT 37 35.5 0. 96 710 128 SLATE A-STRUCT 1 31.3 31.30 711 129 CliNK H-HOLO 22 375.7 17.08 712 130 SYNTH A-NONST 1 8. 4 i.20 713 131 SiNTH H-HOLO 96.0 48.00 714 132 SYkTH H-HOLO 13.2 4.40 715 133 SYHTH H-HOLO 0. 5 0.13 716 134 SYNTH H-HOLO 0. 5 0.50 717 135 SYNTH H-HOLO 0. 6 0. 60 718 136 SYNTH HEn 0.1 0.10 719 137 SYNTH HEO 2. 7 2. 70 720 138 SYNTH HEO 5. 1 1. i 0 721 139 SiNTH PERS 8. 7 8.70 722 140 SYNTH PERS 0.1 0. iO 723 141 SYNTH 0-CULT 2.3 2.30 724 142 SYNTH U-FIEO BUR 7.6 3.80

Variable: Subtotai: Mean: Running totai: NUMBER 2229.00 15.697 2229.00 WEIGHT 2:3862.20 168.044 23862.20

DATED ARTEFACTS

DBID 583 Bagnum 1 Wood & Son, England Wood & Son c.l880-1990 "England" = 20th century

DBID 605 Bagnum 23 NSW Bottle Co., 1962

------

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Page 103: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I --> UNIT = 205

725 1 FEW TW PN 2 3.4 1.70

I 726 2 m TN BAND 3 50.4 16.80 727 3 FEW TN TP-HP 1 1.6 1.60 728 4 GL TW Cl 3 2. 6 0. 87

I 729 5 Gl TW WH 2 u 2.25 730 6 Gl H-HOLO WH 2 2.9 1.45 731 i GL H-HOLO CL 2 1.6 0,80 732 8 GL A-NONST 2 1.8 0.90

I 733 9 FE A-STRUCT 2 8. 9 4.45 734 10 FE KW 6 12.6 2.10 735 11 FE TW 1 42.8 42.80

I 736 12 FE Hi EO 3 i.5 uo 737 13 FE UN- IOA8LE i 18.7 2. 67 738 14 CU A-NONST 1 l.O 2.00

I 7:39 15 AL Q-CUL T 1 0.0 0.00 740 16 SHELL FOOO 2 i.4 3.70 741 1i BONE FOOD VERT 1 21.2 27.20 742 18 BONE FOOO VERT BUT 2 40 .3 20. 15

I 743 19 BONE FOOD RiB BuT 4 68.9 17.22 744 20 BONE FOOD RIB BUT 11.6 3. 87 745 21 BONE FOOD HH BUT 12.6 12.60

I 746 22 BONE FOOD m BUT 55.4 18' 4i 747 23 BONE FOOD TARS 8.1 8.10 748 24 BONE FOOD TB BUT 4 26.5 6' 62

I 749 25 BONE FOOD RiB 2 5.4 2' 70 750 26 BONE FOOD 15 iU 0. 99 751 27 BONE FOOD 1 1.1 1. 70 752 28 BONE ORG-NF TOOTH 18,1 4.52

I 753 29 wooo HiED 2.0 1. 00 754 30 PLAST HTRliCT 321 45 i2' 1 13.98 755 31 MORT A-STRUCT 139 1085 '3 7.81

I Variable: Subtotal: Mean: Running total:

I NUMBER 549.00 17.710 2778.00 WEIGHT 6124.70 197.57i 29986.90

I I I I I I I

Page 104: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

--> UNIT = 206

756 FEW TW 757 m TW 758 3 m TW 759 4 FEw H-HOLD 760 5 m TW 761 6 PC Tw 762 7 P(: TW 76:3 8 PC TW 764 9 PC TW 765 10 csw A-STRUCT 766 11 GL H-~OLO

767 12 GL TW

768 13 GL A-NONST 769 14 FE A-SiRUCT 770 15 FE liN -[DABLE 771 16 SHELL UN-IOABLE 772 11 BONE FOOD 77:3 18 BONE FOOO 774 19 BONE FOOD 775 20 BONE O~G-kF

776 21 BONE FOOD 777 22 BONE FOOO 778 23 BOkE FOOD 779 24 BONE ORG-NF 780 25 PLAST A-STRUCT 781 26 HO~T A-STRiiCT 782 27 CEH A-STRuCT

Variabie: Subtotai: NUMBER 125.00 WEIGHT 1616.90

PW PW PW-G Pw-G GR-TP Pw Pw-G Pw-G HP

CL CL

vERT VERT

HAN BiJT BUR B-B

TOOTH

Mean: 4. 6:30

59.885

44.6 14.87 2.0 2.00 5.1 5.10 16.1 16.10 236.6 236.60 34.1 H.10 12.5 6.25 14.6 14.60 14.6 1UO 48 .4 24.20 6.2 3. 10 8.0 2.67 19. 2 2. 13 4.5 4.50

4 8. 1 2.02 0.3 0.30 45.6 22.80

2 4,7 2.35 11 8.0 0.73

L6 1.60 11.2 3. 73 11. 1 1. 39 0. 9 0.45 6.3 6.30

32 449. 3 14.04 25 467.3 18.69 4 136.0 34.00

Running total: 2903.00

:31603.80

I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Page 105: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I --> UNIT = 207

I 783 1 m YARD 1 40.3 40.30 784 2 FEW TW PW 1 12.8 12.80

I 785 3 FEW TW PW 1 5.2 5. 20 786 4 FEW TW PW 1 14.0 1UO 787 FEW TW PW 1 3.0 3.00

I 788 6 FEW TW PW 2 54.3 27.15 789 7 FEW TW PW 2 62.5 31.25 790 8 m TW Pw 4 7U 18.57

I 791 9 FEW TW Pw 2 102.9 51.45 792 10 FEW TW PW 4 81.3 20.32 793 11 FEW TW PW 4 36.5 9.12 794 12 m TW PW 2 61.2 30.60

I 795 13 FEW Tw ~· 11.2 8. 60 796 14 m Tw p- 18.5 18.50 797 15 FEW TW PW 3. 1 3.10

I 798 16 m 1M PW 5.3 5.30 799 1i m ~~ PW 3.1 3.10 800 18 m TW Pw 0.9 0. 90 801 19 FEW TW PW 3.2 3.20

I 802 20 m Tw PW 3.2 3.20 803 21 FEW TW PW 65.4 65.40 804 22 FEW TW Pw 3.8 uo

I 805 23 FEW Tw Pw 20 47.1 2.35 806 24 FEW KW ~w iO 574.2 57,42 807 25 FEW H-HOLO Pw 1 3. 1 3.10

I 808 26 FE• H-HOLO PW 1 22.4 22 .40 809 2i FEW H-HOLO p~ 9.5 9.50 810 28 m TW PHMB i 47.3 24.55 811 29 m TW PHMB 18.0 18.00

I 812 30 m TW PHHB 16.7 16.70 81:3 31 FEW TW PHMB 5.4 5. 40 8i4 32 FEW TW PHNB 185.2 46.30

I 815 33 FEW TW PHMB 14 .4 14.40 816 34 m TW PHHB 58 . 1 19.37 817 35 m TW PH"B 30 .7 30 .70

I 818 36 FEW TW PHHB 27.9 2 7. 90 819 37 FEW H-HOLO PHHB 1 60 .2 60 .20 820 38 FEW H-HOLO PHHB 15 36U 24.44 821 39 FEw H-HOLO PH-EMB 2 226. 7 1iU5

I 822 40 FEW H-HOLO Pw-G-EHB 1 31.4 37.40 823 41 m H-HOLO Pw-G-EHB 28 1204.0 43 .00 824 42 FEW H-HOLO PW-G-E~B 1 3.4 3. 40

I 825 43 FEW H-HOLO FHL-TP 10 85 1. 6 85. 16 826 44 FEw Tw BL-TP 2 169.5 84.75 827 45 m TW Bl- TP 1 311.7 3 71.70 1 828 46 FEW Tw 8l-TP 1 26.7 26 .70

I 829 47 FEW TW 8L-TP 581.8 193 .93 830 48 m Tw 8l-TP 465.8 93 . 16 83i 49 m TW BL-TP 376.6 75.32

I 8:32 50 FEW TW BHP 255 .3 127.65 8:3:3 51 FEW TW BHP 12.8 6.40 8:34 ~·) m TW HAl)- TP 191. 1 24.64 ' c

I 835 53 FEW Tl MAO-TP 248 .i 49 . i 4

836 54 FEW Tl MAli- iP 147. 0 29 . 41) 8:37 55 FEW iW MAu-TP 144.3 144 .30 ~3:38 56 FEW Tw HAU- TP 44.9 £2.45

I 839 57 FEW TW BL-TP 3. 5 3.50 840 58 FEW Tw BL-IP 30.3 30 . JO • 841 59 FEW TW Bl- TP i .6 3. 80

I 842 60 m Tw B/G-TP 49.7 U1

Page 106: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I 843 61 FEW Tw 8/G-TP 8. 0 8' 00 844 62 m Tl GR-TP 65.0 21.67 I 845 63 FEW TW GR- TP 73' 1 2U7 846 64 m n GR- TP 19.4 9' 70 847 65 FEW Tl BR- TP 71.5 71.50

I 848 66 m TW BR-TP 110.6 110.60 849 61 m TW BR- TP u 4.50 850 68 m Tw H~U-TP 50.6 16.87 851 69 FEW Tw H4u-TP 3' 1 3. 10 I 852 10 FEW TW BLHP 340' 2 :i40.20 YES 853 7i m TW BLK-TP 420.4 84.08 854 12 m Tw BLHP 2.0 1. 00

I 855 13 FEW Tl POLY-TP 380. 1 190.05 856 74 FEw ,. POLY-TP 128.9 64,45 857 15 FEw iW THP 210.9 105. 45 858 16 FEW h TP-HP 280.5 10' 12 I 859 n FEw Tw TP-HP 210.2 42,04 860 18 m Tw TP-HP 106' 2 26.55 861 19 FEw T• TH~ IU 3UO I 862 ~0 FE• Tw TP-HP 155.9 IU5 86:3 81 FEW Tw THP lOU 33. n 864 82 m Tw TP-HP 282.6 282.60

I 865 8~ FEW Tw STAMP 10' 1 5.05 866 84 FEw h BAND 10~. i 26 '42 867 ~5 FEw Tw BAND 49U 83.32 868 ~6 FEw TW BMO j(J.2 185.60 I 869 81 FEW TW BA~O u 3.60 870 8~ FEw TW ~A~O 88.6 44, :)0 87i 89 FEw TW BANO bU 32. JO

I 872 9(1 FE• Tw BAND 6.5 2' 1 i 87:3 ~1 FE~ Tw BAND 65.i 32.85 874 92 Hr H-HOLO BAND 158.6 iUO 875 93 FEr HOLD p~ 59' 1 59.10 I 876 Y4 FEW H-HOLO iJ" bU 6UO v ES

877 95 FEw H-~OLO Pw 29.1 29. iO 878 96 FEw H~O BL~-TP .J9.! 39.20 YES I 879 91 esw A-STRI!t:T 4!1, J 4UO

880 y~ FSw ~· CANE J6 0. 7 60. i 2 88i ~9 FSw KW .iG 6. 0 6. 60

I 882 10(1 FSw ~· $-fil il.S 71 '60 88:~ 101 FS• !~ BRISTOL ~l.i 81.70 884 iO~ FS~ CLER S-GL 9~.4 94' 40 v tS 885 1Q:j vsw ,. iJ. 1J,(l 13.00 I 886 1ll4 vsw Tw ?w 18.6 1UO 887 1Qf, FEw Tw Pw m.~ 145,25 888 , Ob ii(: Tw Pw 1 J~. 2 9.10 I 889 lUi P(: Tw Pll 1 4.l.6 i5 '90 890 108 PC Tw PW 51.0 28.50 891 109 PC Tw Pw ;g. u IUO

I 892 110 p(: Tw Pw 11 'i 11.i0 893 111 PC TW ~. iO. 2 iO . 2tJ

894 11 2 PC T• Pw 12 . J 6' 15 895 1'.j PC Tw Pw u .uu I 896 114 PC Tw ~~-r] u uo 897 115 Pt: Tr Pw-G i 4. 4 lUU

898 1 1 b Pl' Tw ~W-l] i,(l i. QIJ

I 899 lli Pt Tw P~-G 4. ~ 4.60 900 118 PC Tw Pw-G 1U 6,40 90i 114 Pt: it ~H 5I . .I U,5i

902 120 ii( TW Pw-G 1' ., 1U0 I .,. • 'u

91):3 121 P(: ,. YP-G 5b.O 56.00 ~04 122 PC h BAN[I-(; 0' i O.iO 905 m PC Tw BAN[l-G 11.5 1i. 50 I 906 124 p(. Tw B~ND 51. 5 1U7 907 m PG T•

Page 107: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I

BAND 2 48.9 24.45 2 908 126 PC TW BAND 4 96.2 24.05 2 909 127 PC TW BAND 5 150.0 30.00 2 910 128 PC Tl HP 3 61.3 20.43 2

I 911 129 PC TW HP 3 59.9 19.97 2 912 130 PC n HP 4 78.8 19.70 2 913 131 PC TW HP 8 72.6 9.07 2

I 914 132 PC Q-CULT PW 1 12.8 12.80 YES 915 133 OPC TW PW 2 52. 1 26.05 2 916 134 OPC TW PW 1 119.4 119.40 2

I 917 m OPC Tl PW 4 54.2 13.55 2 918 136 OPC TW p~ 1 11.1 11.10 2 919 m OPC Tl PW 3 12.3 4.10 2 920 138 OP(: r• PW 2 10.3 5.15 2

I 921 139 OPC Tw PW 1 11.3 11.30 2 922 140 OPC TW PW 4 119.9 29.9i 2 92:3 141 OPC T' PW 5 19.6 3.92

I 924 142 OPC T• Pw-G 3 76.9 25.63 925 143 OPC TW PW-G 2 43.6 21.80 926 144 o~c TW PW-G 2 46.9 23.45 2

I 927 145 OPC TW PW-G 2 54.8 21.40 2 928 146 OPC TW Pw-G 3 331.2 112.40 2 929 14i OPC Tw Pw-G 11 180.5 16.41 2 9:30 148 OPC Tw Pw-G 2 139.4 69.i0

I 9:31 149 OPC H-HOLO GL 20.2 6. i3 932 150 OPC H-HOLD HP-G 162.8 81.40 933 151 GL KW OL 529 .5 529.50 YES

I 934 152 Gl ~- Ol 449 .4 449.40 YES 9:35 153 Gl Kw AQUA J90.6 390.60 YES 9:36 154 GL kW AQUA 232.5 232.50 YES

I 9:37 155 Gl KW AQUA 182.2 182.20 938 156 Gl KW AQUA 588.9 588.90 YES 939 15 i GL Kw AQUA 374.4 374.40 YES 940 158 GL ~W AQU~ 341.6 341.60

I 941 159 GL KW AQUA 234.4 234.40 YES 942 160 Gl HEO AOIJA 528.8 528.80 m 943 161 GL HEO CL 85.1 85. 10 YES

I 944 162 GL MEO E"E 53.4 53.40 YES 945 163 GL o-GUL T CL 110 .0 110.00 YES 946 164 GL 0-CULT. CL 91.5 9 i. 50 YES

I 947 165 GL Q-(:UL T CL 16.6 16.60 YES 948 166 GL 0-CULT Gl 90.8 90.80 YES 949 167 Gl 0-CiJL T AQLIA 7 4. 0 74.00 950 1b8 Gl Q-CIJL I BR 60,2 60.20

I 951 169 GL Q-Clll i CL 95.8 Y5.80 952 170 GL Q-l:UL T Cl 53.3 53.30 95:3 171 GL 0-CULT CL 60.0 60.00

I 954 1i2 Gl Kw 4QUA 404.9 404.90 955 113 GL KW AQijA 41.0 41.00 956 1/4 GL Kw AQUA 184 .7 184.70 957 m GL ~- CL 16.9 1UO

I 958 ii6 GL ~' CL 53.2 53.20 959 Iii GL u CL 18.2 9.10 960 liB GL o-cULT (;L 12.6 12.60

I 961 1i9 GL ~-HOLD AQUA 6U 61.60 962 180 Gt H-HOLD ~QI)A 29.4 14. 70 96:3 181 GL H-HOLD CL 4. 0 uo

I 964 18Z GL H-HOLO BL-i u 2.90 965 183 GL ~- BL-T 2.9 1. 45 966 184 Gl Kw AQijA 25 301. 1 12.04 967 185 Gl Kw Bl- T 1 3.4 3.40

I

Page 108: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I 968 186 GL ~- SR 1 2.3 2.30 I 969 187 Gl KW OL 11 53.3 4.85 970 188 Gl kW GR-T 14 3U 2.49 971 189 Gl KW Cl 42 107.1 2.55 I 972 190 Gl H-HOLO CL 6 39' 2 6.53 973 191 Gl Q-CUL T CL 1 11 '9 11 '90 974 192 GL ~· AQUA 1 8.7 8' 70

I I 975 193 Gl ~· AQIJA 1 89.3 89.30 976 194 GL r• CL 43.9 14.63 977 195 GL TW CL 28.2 4.70 978 196 GL n CL 31. 3 3.91 I 979 197 GL Tw CL 12.6 6.30 980 198 GL T• Cl 1U 17.80 981 199 GL TW (:L 1i. 9 17.90 I 982 200 GL iW CL 0.7 0.70 983 201 Gl TW Cl 5 28.5 5.70 984 202 GL i• Cl 16 20.7 1.29

I 985 203 GL Tw Cl 1~ 15.9 1.J2 986 204 GL ~- (:L 40 89.1 2.23 987 205 GL rw CL m.3 211.30 988 206 GL iW CL 158.4 158.40 I 989 207 GL iw Cl 114.2 87.10 990 208 GL i• CL 159.5 53.17 991 209 GL Tw CL 150.7 150. iO

I 992 210 Gl TW CL 195 .4 195.40 99:3 211 GL Tw CL 107.8 101.80 994 212 GL iW CL 26 181.3 U7

I 995 213 GL iW CL 6 19. i 3.28 996 214 GL i• CL 13 24.5 1.88 997 215 GL iw CL 1 2.7 2.70 998 216 GL iw CL 12 67.3 5. 61 I 999 217 GL ir CL 82. i 41.35 1000 218 GL iW CL 62.3 31.15 YES 1001 219 GL TW Cl 53.0 17.67

I 1002 220 GL Tw CL 33.7 33.70 100:3 221 GL Tw (:L 11.2 1i. 20 1004 m GL i• CL 5. 1 2.55 1005 223 GL Tw CL 32.2 10' 73 I 1006 22 4 GL Tw CL i.2 uo 1007 225 GL ,. CL • 3U 3UO 1008 m GL H-HOLD CL 11.5 11.50 I 1009 227 GL H-HOLD CL 4.2 4, 20 1010 m GL H-HOLD CL 1 5.5 5. 50 1011 229 GL H-HOLD CL 11 39.7 3. ti 1

I 1012 23U GL H-HOLD CL 1 13.6 1.94 1013 231 GL HOLD WH 34.5 uo 1014 m GL H-HOLD IH 31 10o.5 3.24 1015 233 Gl HOLD WH 21 55.4 2.64 I 1016 234 GL HONSi GR-T 42 298.2 i. 10 1017 235 GL A-NONST CL 34 134.3 :) . ~5 1018 236 Gl ms •H 3 1.3 (1, 4:l

I 1019 23i GL H-HOLO CL 10~.~ 52. 7 5 1020 238 STONE PERS 26. 1 5. 22 Y~S

1021 239 (:u ms u 0.50

I 1022 240 BONE PERS 1, 6 1, 60 102:3 241 SHELL HIED 0.4 0.20 1024 242 SLATE CLE~ 4.4 2.20 1025 243 STONE ~w iU 78.80 I 1026 244 SYNTH H-HOLD l 2.4 1.20 1027 245 FE kw 1 4i~. 5 418.50 YES

1028 w FE ~w 1H 1143.5 uo I

Page 109: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I

II I I I I I I I I II

I I I I I I I

1029 247 FE TW 3 11.2 3.73 1030 248 FE YARO 3 32.6 10 .87 1031 249 FE A·STRUCT 19 154.1 8.11 1032 250 FE A·STRUCT 1 320 .7 320.70 1033 251 FE u-FIEO 10 54 .0 5.40 1034 252 FE u-FiEO 1 23.4 23. 40 1035 253 FE HIEO 18 5U 3.29

Variable: Subtotal: Mean: Running total: NUMBER 1164.00 4.601 4067.00 WEIGHT 27716.40 109.551 59320.20

DATED ARTEFACTS

DBID 790, 810, 856 Bagnums 8, 28, 74 Wood & Son, England Wood & Son, c.l880~1990 "England" = 20th century

DBID 847, 848, 855 Bagnums 65, 66, 73 W.H.Grindley, England W.H.Grindley, c.l880-1990 "England" = 20th century

DBID 834 Bagnum 53 A.Shaw, Cable Anthony Shaw, 1860-1882

L.__ __________ ----

Page 110: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I Unit 227 = Unit 207 Bagnums 254-284

--> UNIT = 227 I 1036 54 FE u-FIEO 1 263.7 263.70

I 1037 55 FE UH- IOABLE 78 226.8 2. 91 1038 56 cu H-HOLO 1 22.7 22.70 1039 57 LD CRAFi 1 19.2 19.20

I 1040 58 ~ETAL-0 TW 1 4. 3 uo 1041 59 LEA PERS 5 40.7 8.14 1042 60 LEA u-FIEO 5.1 1.02 1043 61 SHELL UN- IOABLE 2.8 0. 56 I 1044 62 BOH FOOD vERT 24.i 6.11 1045 63 BONE FOOO VERT BUT 4 62.4 15.60 1046 64 BONE FOOO m BUT 5 79.0 15.80

I 1047 65 BONE FOOD RIB BUT 6 20' 2 3' 37 1048 66 BONE FOOD RIB BUT 9 13, 4 1.49 1049 67 BONE FOOD m 2 64.4 32.20

I 1050 68 BOM FOOD PHAL 3.4 3.40 105i 69 BONE FOOD iiB BUT 15' 0 15.00 i052 70 BONE FOOD LB BiJT 66.6 22.20 105:3 71 BONE FOOD TB BUT 12.0 6.00 I i054 72 BONE FOOO 1 '6 0' 32 1055 73 BONE FOOD t.9 1, 63 1056 7 4 BONE FOOD 1.3 i.30

I i057 75 BONE FOOD H 4.0 4.00 1058 7 6 BONE FOOO BUR 1.6 0.80 1059 7i BONE FOOD 5.5 1.38 1060 78 BONE OkG-NF HA~ 44,1 22.05 I i06i i9 ~000 HIED BUR 10.5 2.62 i062 80 PLAST A-STRUCT 346 5230.1 15. 12 i 06:3 ~i MORT A-STRiJCT 191 1817.6 9. 52

I 1064 82 CEM A-STRliCT 2 49.5 24.75 i065 83 csw HTRiJCT 30 1339.1 44.64 i066 84 GSw A-STRiJCT S-GL 2 n.o 38.50

I Variable: Subtotal: Mean: Running total:

NUMBER 727.00 23.452 4794.00 I WEIGHT 953:3.20 :307. 52:3 6885:3.40 -- ) UNIT = 209

I I I I I I I

Page 111: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

GHH Artefact Catalogue 1990 Id 8agnu11 Material Function Sub-Func Oescr-1 Descr-2 Nu11ber

-- > UNIT : 209

1067 1 FEW 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072

Variable: NUMBER WEIGHT

TW m FEW m GL FE

TW

TW

TW

A-NONST A-STRUCT

Subtotal: 7.00

468.90

PW BL -TP MAU- TP MAU- TP GR-T

Mean: 1.167

78.150

~eignt Avweignt A-Box

3. 9 3. 90 5.3 5.30 125.5 125.50 304.6 152.30 2.0 2.00 2i.6 27.60

Running total: 7.00

468.90

Page 112: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I --> UNIT = 211 I 1073 m YARD 1 51.3 51.30 1074 REI YARO 1 15.3 15.30 I 1075 FEW TW PW 1 21.3 21.30 3 1076 m TW PW 4 183.5 45.87 3 1077 m TW PW 22.5 22.50

I 1078 FEw ~~ PM 38.6 1.12 I 1079 7 FEW Tw p" 23.1 11.55

1080 m Tw 11.40 I

~ PW 11.4 1081 9 FEw Tw PW 21.3 2.37 I 1082 10 m H-HOLO PW 29.0 14.50 1083 1i FEW H-HOLO Pw 12U 64.90

I 1084 12 FEw H-HOLO Pw-G-EMB 29.5 14. 75 I 1085 13 FE• Tw PH 9.4 9.40 1086 14 FEw TW PW 8U 88.20 I 1087 15 FEw iW BL-TP 152 .0 76.00 1088 16 FE• h BL-TP 33.0 33' uo I 1089 1i FEw T• BL-TP 16.7 1 b. i 0 1090 1~ m T• Bl-TP 4U 42.30 1091 19 m TW 8L- TP 17.3 8.65 I 1092 20 FE~ Tw MAU-TP 58.0 1U3 ; 09:3 21 FEW iW MAU- TP 12.1 1l.l0 1094 22 FEW Tw BN-TP u uo

I 1095 23 FEJ Tw TP-HP 120.3 30.01 1096 24 FEw Tw TP-HP 41. 4 20.70 1097 25 FEW Tw TP-HP-G 1i.9 8.95 1098 26 FE~ , .. HP 31.6 31.60 I 1099 2; FEw h BANO 80.6 26.87 1 100 26 FEw Tw 8AH0 1.9 1. 90 1 101 29 FE• rw BANO 10.9 10.90 I 1102 30 m A-NONST GL 53.8 suo 1 103 31 vsw 0-!:uli Pw 6.3 6.30 ; ; 04 32 vsw H-HOLD PW-EHB 123.9 61.95

I 1105 33 FSW ~- GL 14.9 14.90 ; ; 06 34 PC ~~ Pw-G 13.3 13.30 ; ; 07 35 p(; TW P~-G 1.6 1.60 ; 108 36 p(: Tw P~-G 1U 3.45 I ; ; 09 37 p(: Tw HP 51.9 !US 1110 3~ P" " Tw HP 14,1 4. 70 ; 11 ; :J~ P(: TW B~ND ! . 6 1.30 I 1 112 4U P(: Tw BANO-G 0. 6 0.60 i 1 1:3 41 OP(: ~~ Pll .i~4. 4 1Y:UO j

1 1 14 4: OP(: h PH~B u uo 1 1 15 43 GL ~· OL 8. ,j 4. 15 I I

1 1; 6 44 GL ~w OL u uo 1117 45 GL Kw BR J. 5 3.50 1ii8 46 GL ~ .. GR-T 18 .7 3.74 I 1119 47 GL KW CL 11 25.8 2.~5

1120 48 GL Tw Ct 2 36. 1 1U5 ; ; 2; 49 GL Tw CL 6 16. ~ 2.75

I 1122 5U GL TW [:L 4. 1 1, 02 112:3 51 GL ,. (:L u 5' 7(1

; i 24 52 GL TW (:L 8.J 0.92 1; 25 ~ ·, GL iW CL u 4.JO I ; 126 54 GL r. CL 3.U 1. 00 ii27 55 GL ~~ CL 26.6 2b.60 ; ; 28 56 GL Tw ~l 5.J 5. 3U I 1129 57 GL i~ CL 2.5 2.50 ; ; :30 5~ GL H-HOLD CL 35. 4 1i.i0 ; 1:31 59 GL H-HOLO (:L 6. 6 1.65

I

Page 113: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I 1132 60 GL H-HOLD CL 1 2.5 2. 50 3

II 1133 61 GL H-HOLD WH 16 42.7 2. 61 3 1134 62 GL MED BL 1 5.6 5.60 3 1135 63 GL A-NONST GR-T 13 27.0 2.08 3 1136 64 GL A-NONST CL 4 11.3 4. 32

I I 1137 65 LEA PERS 1 1.2 1.20 1138 66 H KW 36 264.9 7.36 1139 6i FE YARD 12 300.4 25.03 1140 68 FE A-STRUCT 11 123.3 11.21

I 1141 69 FE A-STRUCT 1 221.5 221.50 1142 70 H A-STRUCT 1 61.3 61.30 1143 iO FE H-HOLO 1 178.1 178.10

I 1144 72 FE UN- IOABLE 7 i7 .2 11.03 1145 73 cu u-FIEO 1 1.3 1. 30 1146 14 AL KW 1 61.1 67. iO 1147 i5 SHELL FOOD 1 0.8 0.80

I i 148 i6 80NE FOOD RIB BUT 1 23.0 23.00 1149 i7 BONE FOOD RIB BUT 3 i.O 2.33 1150 78 BONE FOOO BUT 1 3.4 3.40

I 1151 79 BONE FOOO TARS 1 4.6 4.60 1152 80 BONE ORG-NF MAN 1 52.5 52.50 1153 81 wOOD u-FIEO SUR 2 4.2 2.10

I 1154 82 PLAST A-STRUCT 70 695.8 9.94 1155 83 MORT A-STRUCT 42 197.2 4.10 i 156 84 csw A-STRUCT 1 206.9 29.56 1 i 57 85 csw A-STRUCT S-GL 2 520.7 260.35

I Variable: Subtotal: Mean: Running total:

I NUMBER 375.00 4.412 5176.00 WEIGHT 5341.60 62.842 7466:3.90

I I

DATED ARTEFACTS

DBID 1076 Bagnum 4 Wood & Son, England Wood & Son, c.l880-1990

I ''England" = 20th century

DBID 1077 Bagnum 5 W.H.Grindley, England

I W.H.Grindley, c.l880-1990 "England" = 20th century

DBID 1086 Bagnum 14 Bridgwood Porcelane

I S.Bridgwood & Son, c.l852-1990 omission of country of origin = 19th century date

I I I I

Page 114: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I --> UNIT = 212 I 1158 FEW MEO PI 120.4 120.40 1159 FEW TW P• 142.2 47.40 4

I 1160 FEW TW PW 7.1 7.10 4 1161 FEW TW Pw 123.9 123.90 4 1162 FEw Tw Pw 130.9 130.90 4

I I 116:3 6 m Tw Pw 125.2 31.30 1164 FEw TW PW 106.2 35.40 1165 FEW TW Pw 35.4 35.40 I

1166 9 FEW r. PW t2o3 42o30 I I 1167 10 FEW TW Pw 28 0 1 14.05 1168 11 m Tw PW 34.7 17.35 1 i 69 12 FEW Tr Pw 13.2 13o20

I 1170 13 FEW H-HOLO PW 409 0 2 68 0 2(1 1171 14 m Tw p~ 16 90 0 2 5.64 1172 15 FEW TW Pw 14 50.7 3. 62 117:3 16 FEw h PHHB 2 151.6 15o80 I 1i74 11 ~EW 1W PHHB 160.4 160o40 4 1i75 18 FE• H-HOLO PI-G 312.5 62.50 1176 1~ FEw H-HOLO Pw-G-EHB 1 7.3 uo I 1177 20 FEW H-HOLO BL-TP 16 1111.4 69.84 1i78 21 FEw H-HOLO BL-TP 2 105.9 52.95 ii79 22 m Tw SHP 236.3 78. ii

I 1180 23 FEW Tw BL-TP 36 7 0 8 122.60 4 1181 24 FEW Tw BL-TP 85o 7 28.51 4 1182 25 FEw Tw SHP 1U 19o60 4 1 18:3 26 ~E• Tw BiG-TP 49,0 16. 3:l I 1184 27 FE' Tw HAIJ-TP 5 324.1 64 0 82 YES 1185 28 Hw h "AU- TP 8 172. 1 21.51 1186 29 FEI Tl H~U- TP 10 27804 27.84 I 1187 30 FEW rw HAll- TP 14.1 14 0 10 1188 31 FEW TW HAIJ-TP 205.5 41.10 1189 32 FEw Tw "AU- TP 181.1 45o42

I 1 190 33 FEw Tw HAU-TP 162.5 54. 1i 1191 34 m Tw MAU-TP 346 0 8 115 0 60 1 1 92 35 ~Ew Tw MAIJ- TP 554.3 21lo15 1193 j6 FE• Tw MAiJ-TP m.s 58.37 I ; ; 94 37 HI Tl HAU- TP 356o2 118 0 13 4 1195 :lH FEW a MA!J-TP 435o 0 217 0 50 YES 1196 39 FEI Tl HAIJ-TP 442 .9 221 0 45

I 1 197 4(1 HI h MAU- TP 234.0 58o50 1 198 41 ~Ew Tw ~AU- T P m ol 110 0 10 4

1 199 42 FE• Tl HA IJ - TP 165.J 41.32 1200 4:J FEW h m- TY 237 01 59.21 I 1201 44 FEW TW MAIJ- TP 190o8 38 0 16 4 1202 45 FEW rw M~U-TP 253o8 28.20 4 ; 20:3 46 FEW TW BLK- TP 49lo5 55.28 5 I 1204 47 m Tw BLHP 19 0 3 19o30 1205 48 FEW ~-HOLO B~HO 110 0 6 21.65 1206 4~ FEw Tw BANO 14:J. 1 2U5

I 1207 5(1 FEW rw BAHO 5404 18 0 1 J 1208 51 FEW ,, BAHO 15' ~ 15.911 1209 52 FE• Tw BA~D 41 0 q noY~

1210 5:J FEI Tw STAMP 8~0 1 n o02 I 1211 54 FEW h STAMP 121. j 40' 4:j

1212 55 FEW Tw S~RiG 126.0 21 0 1 (I 1 21:3 56 ~Ew TW SPRiG lOU JboOU

I 12i4 57 FSw ~· WE 107U '1Ub i215 58 ~sw ~· BRiSTOL 1(1 572 01 5 I o 21 1216 5Y FSW ~· S-GL 1 67504 6'5o40 1ES 1217 60 FSW ~· S-GL 525 0 1 525 0 10 YES I

Page 115: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I

1218 61 FSw KW S-GL 380.9 360.90 1219 62 vsw H-HOLO PW 15.7 15.70 1220 63 PC Tw PW 166.1 55.37 1221 64 PC TW PW 37. 1 12.37

I 1222 65 PC TW PW 40.1 40.70 5 1223 66 PC TW PW 106.1 35.31 5 1224 61 PC Ti PW 175.9 35. 18 5

I 1225 68 PC TW PW 69.0 69.00 1226 69 PC TJ PW 63.2 63.20 1227 10 PC Tw Pw 29.1 29. 10

I 1228 71 PC TW Pw-G 384.2 384.20 YES 1229 12 PC TW P~-G 152.3 76.15 1230 73 PC TW Pw-G u uo 12:31 i4 PC T- PH 16 i. 0 8o.50

I 1232 75 PC Tw PH 105.5 52.75 123:3 16 PC Tw PH 34.2 11.10 12:34 ii PC TW P~-1] 30.2 30.20

I 12:35 78 PC i' Pw-G 129.5 64.75 1236 i9 PC TW PW-G 94.1! 31.33 1237 80 PC Tw PW-G 91.2 91.20

I i238 81 p(: TW Pw 87.8 43.90

. . ~ 1239 82 PC TW PI 51.5 8.21 1240 83 PC iW BAND u uo i24i 84 PC TW BAND 1. 3 1.30 5

I 1242 85 OPC ik p~ 815.5 815.50 5 1243 86 OP (: ~~ PW 328.3 328.30 5 1244 81 OPC Tw Pw 100,9 20. 18

I 1245 88 OPC ,. Pw 110.9 65 .45 1246 89 OPC TW PW 1 49. 2 49.20 1247 90 OPC Tw p~ 15 111.2 i. 81 1248 91 OPC TW PW 112.3 31. d3

I 1249 92 OPC Tw PW. 35.1 35 . 10 1250 93 OPC TW PW 32.5 16.25 1251 94 OPC Tw Pw 8.2 8.20

I 1252 95 OP (: ,. Pw 1.4 1. 40 1253 96 OPC Tw PH 23U 2:i0.60 1254 9i OPe TW P~- G 215.1 2i5.70

I 1255 98 OPC Tw PW-G i3U 13 i.30 1256 99 OPC ,. P~- G i1U 116.90 1257 100 OPC TW Pw-G 236.8 11 8. 40 1258 101 OPC Tw PW-G i 10. 6 55.30

I 1259 102 OPC TW Pw-G 41.4 20.70 i260 103 OPC TW PW-G 48 .5 d8.50 i261 104 OPt Tw Pw-G 54 . 1 6.i6

I 1262 105 OPC lw HP u uo 1263 106 OPC Q-CULI 9. 6 9.60 1264 101 OPC 0-CULT 3.8 uo YES

I i265 108 GL Kr OL 113.9 11.i.90 YES i266 109 GL ~- OL 832.4 832. 40 YES 1267 110 Gl MEO Bl-T 161.2 161.20 YES 1268 111 GL Q-CIJLT CL 91.1 91.10 YES

I 1269 112 GL Q-CI_!l i CL 5U ~uo YES 1270 113 GL Hlil T (:L 1U 16.80 YES ; 271 114 GL 0-t iJL T CL 12.4 12.4(1 YES

I 1272 115 GL 0-(:UL T BL 12. J 12.30 YES 127:3 116 GL o-GUL T CL 35.5 J5.50 1274 117 GL 1)-(:UL T CL 22.8 22.80 1275 118 GL 0-CIJLI (:L 2U 22.30

I 1276 119 GL 0-CUL i CL 23.8 23.80 1277 120 GL 0-CUL T CL 23.4 7.80 1278 i 2 i GL Q-CULT CL 5.3 5.30

I 1279 m GL G-CULT CL 33 .9 33.90 1280 123 GL 0-CULT CL 46 . i 46,;0

Page 116: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I 1281 ·124 GL Q-CULT CL 1 33' 5 33 '50 I 1282 125 GL Q-CULT CL 34 95' 1 2.80 1283 126 GL ki OL 1 252.4 252' 40 1284 127 GL KW OL 1 544.6 544.60 I 1285 128 GL kw OL 1 549' 1 549' 10 1286 129 GL ~w OL 1 86.6 86.60 1287 130 GL Kw CL 42' 7 42' 10 I 1288 131 GL HEO AQiJA 135.6 6UO 1289 132 GL KW AQIJA 53.1 53.i0 1290 133 GL ~- AQUA 13' 5 13.50 1291 134 GL ~- OL 10/.6 101 '60 I 1292 135 GL ~· OL 26' 1 26.10 1293 136 GL h OL 5.6 5.60 1294 i37 GL kw CL 9.9 1.65 I 1295 138 GL K~ CL 35 134' 5 3.84 1296 139 GL KW OL 10 121.6 12' 1 b 1297 140 GL KW Ol 11 295.0 2U2

I 1298 141 GL KW BR 1 1i '9 1/ ,90 1299 142 GL KW AQUA 19 144,1 /,5ij 1300 143 GL u AQUA 1 15' 3 1UO 1:301 144 GL H-HOLD AQUA 15 54.0 3.60 I 1:302 145 GL H-HOLD GR-T 2 u i.95 1:30:3 14b GL m BL-T 21./ uo 1 :304 141 GL HE [! BL 3.3 uo I 1305 148 Gl kW AYIJA 12' 3 12' 30 1306 149 GL TW Cl 101 '5 101.50 1307 150 GL Tw CL i5.3 15.30

I i :308 151 GL Tw CL 9.8 uo 1:309 152 GL Tw CL 43.3 43,30 i3i0 153 GL Tw CL 31.0 J i '00 i311 154 GL iw CL 4.2 uo I 1 :3 i 2 i55 GL T• (:L 305.3 305.30 6 1313 156 GL h CL 209.0 209 '0(1 6 1314 151 GL TW (:L 202.1 202.70 b I 1:3 i 5 158 GL iW CL 142 '5 142 '50 1:316 159 GL h CL 266.6 88.87 1:317 160 Gl iW (:L 269.5 89 . S:l

I i :3 i 8 161 GL fw CL 12 57.i 4' 81 i:3 19 162 GL if (:l 4U 12. 42 i320 16:J GL 11 t:L 102. 1 20. 4:! 1:32 i 1b4 GL Tw Cl 7U 14' 1 ~ I 1:322 16 ~ GL Tw (t 31.3 U6 i:32 :3 1H lil T• (:L 20.7 1U,J5 i :324 167 GL T• l:L 19.3 9.65

I 1:325 168 GL iW CL 16' 6 16. 60 1326 1b9 GL Tw CL 15.9 5.30 1327 iiO GL Tw CL 10' 4 5.20 1328 171 Gl Tw (:l 36.0 uo I 1:329 172 GL Tw CL 11.9 11.90 ; :330 1i3 Gl T• t:L 4 29.6 1,40 1:3:31 174 GL Tw (:L 18 1U 0' 9~ I ;:3:32 1i f, GL iw (:L 6U '6' 6 7 1 :3:3:3 176 GL Tw (:L 21.:l 10' 65 13:34 1r GL fw (:L 12-d 1£.80

I i :3:35 17~ G~ Tw (:L 13' 4 13,4(! i3:36 1i9 GL H-HOlD (. L 16. 1 U5 1 :3:37 180 GL H-HOLD WH 34 8U ! '42 1:3:38 1~ GL A-NONST GR-T 3£ 123 ' 1 us I 1 :3:39 1~2 GL HOMST t~l 6 15 '9 2.65 1 :340 183 GL PEP.S -~ 1.4 0,35 1:341 184 BONE PERS 2.2 2.20 YES

I ; :342 1~:. wooo KW u 1, 30

Page 117: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I 1343 186 WOOD TW 1 8.4 8.40 YES

I 1344 187 SLATE CLER 1 1.8 1.80

1345 188 STONE PERS 2 4.5 2.25 1346 189 STONE PERS 2 3.2 1.60 YES

I 1347 190 SYNTH u-FIEO 4 2.5 0.63 6

1348 191 SYNTH u-FIEO 2 0.4 0.20 6 1349 192 SYNTH u-mo 1 0.4 0.40 6

I 1350 193 FE TW 1 11.1 11.10 6 1351 194 FE H-HOLO 1 7.3 uo 6 1352 195 FE H-HOLO 1 19.9 19.90 6 1353 196 FSW H-HOLO 1 645.7 645.70 6

I 1354 197 FE H-HOLO 49 424.7 8. 67 1355 198 FE KW 99 758.7 7.66 1356 199 H KW 1 100.6 100.60

I 1357 200 FE A-STRUCT 2 10.0 5.00 1358 201 H A-STRUCT 13 128 .4 9.88 1359 202 FE YARD 5 121.9 24.38

I 1360 203 FE YARO 23.6 u o 1361 204 H uN- iOABLE 79 126.3 1.60 1362 205 FE UN- IOABLE 69 213.5 3.09 1363 206 cu Q-CUL T 18 131.2 U9

I 1364 201 LE4 PERS 56 163.6 2.92 1365 208 LEA PERS 60.8 12 . 16 1366 209 LEA PERS 50.0 iUi

I 1367 210 LEA PERS 31.7 1o.5 i i368 2i1 LEA PERS 48 .1 24.05 1369 212 LEA PERS 32 .9 16.45 1370 213 LE~ PERS 38.6 38.60

I 1371 214 LEA PERS 43 ,4 43.40 1372 215 BONE FOOD RIB BIJT 45 .5 15 .1i 1:37:3 216 BONE FOOU LB BUT 71.2 71.20

I 1374 2ii WOOD u-FIEO BUR 4. 2 4.20 1375 218 wooo PERS 1.0 1.40 1376 219 Gl Kw AQIJA 46 i. 1 46 i. 10 YES

I 1377 220 Gl Kw AQuA 4~0.4 430. 40 m i378 22i GL KW Ol 1019.5 1019.50 HS 1379 22 2 Gl NED AQUA 83U 83UO 1380 223 GL 0-CUL T BR 18 .9 18.90

I i38i 224 GL o-cuu CL l4 . 2 24.20 s 1:382 225 GL HEO BL-T 11.5 11.50 6 1:38:3 m GL H-HOLD OL !38 .9 438. 90 6

I 1384 22/ GL KW OL 535.0 535 .00 6 1:385 m GL ~- AQUA 530. 1 530. 10 6 1386 229 GL KW OL 88.4 88.40 6

I 1387 m GL ~w OL 8~.5 69.50 6 1388 231 GL u AQUA 5 i. 1 51.10 6 1389 232 GL K~ CL 11.9 11.90 6 1390 233 Gl 0-CULT CL 16.2 16.20 6

I 1391 234 GL 0-CULT CL 3U 35.20 6 1392 235 GL 0-CULT CL 1.6 1.60 6 139:3 m GL Q-CULT CL u 6.90

I 1394 231 Gl KED BL-T 13.6 13.60 1395 238 G ~ u CL 10.4 5.20 1396 239 GL 0-CUL T CL 34.8 4. 35 ; :397 240 GL H-HOLO OL 15 i. 1 22 .44

I 1:398 241 GL ~~ OL Ji. 4 1 i . 40 1399 242 GL ~w OL u 3. 80 1400 w GL Kw AQUA 24 .i 12.35

I 1401 244 GL KW CL 24.0 3.43

I

Page 118: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

1402 2 4 ~ GL h (: [

140:3 !46 GL h Cl 1404 24i GL iW (:[

1405 248 GL Tw (:L i406 24Y GL Tw GL i407 250 GL iw CL 1408 25 1 GL Tw CL

1409 ~ 5 2 GL 1w CL i4i0 2 ~l.j GL Tw GL

Variable: Subtotal: Mean: NUMBER 1196 . 00 4. 7'!. 7 WEIGHT :34ti08 . 80 1:36 . 794

DATED ARTEFACTS

DBID 1196, 1197 Bagnums 39, 40 A.Shaw, Cable

u u o i 1 '8 11.95 24.1 12.05 1/.1 1 i. 10 10.1 10' 10 u 5.90 2U 4' 80 10' 6 1 !I , bO

69' 1 69' 10

Running tot. a i: 1) :372. (l(l

109272.70

Anthony Shaw, 1860-1882

I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Page 119: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I

II II I I I I I I

Unit 222

--> UNIT

1411 54 1412 55 1413 56 1414 57 1415 5~

1416 59 14i7 60

Variabie: NUMBER WEIGHT

=

= Unit 212 Bagnums 254-260

222

GL GL GL GL GL GL GL

TW

TW

iW iw H-HOLO H-HOLO A-NONST

Subtotai: 41.00

45:3.20

(;L (:L

CL CL WH BL GR-T

Mean: 5.857

64.74:3

6.8 uo 1.4 1. 40

1 44,4 44.40 1 10 .8 10.80 32 341.2 10.66

0. 8 uo 4i .8 1U5

Running totai: 641:3.00

109725.90

Page 120: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

.· .. ·.•.,,<·> ...

:I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I

APPENDIX 6

ARTEFACT PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD

Unit Bagnum

006

006

007

007

007S 008 008 008 008 008 008 008 008 008 010 010 012 012 012 012 012 014 014 014 014 014 014 015 016

017 203 204 207 207 207

207

207

207

6

10

9

10

13 18 19 31 32 36 39 40 55 61 21 22

7 32 33 34 35 58 59 60 61 62 63

6 9

4 11

1 2 8

28

43

52

62

Description

basemark mauve cable transfer print

'l'

manufacturer's mark salt-glazed stoneware bottle

maker's mark copper fork/spoon handle

maker's mark synthetic bottle stopper

shovel black glass button blue glass bead copper button copper locket pins shell button bone button thimble marble poker fire tongs doll's arm military badges military badges military buttons military button copper lamp iron horseshoe horseshoe horseshoe part of cast iron stove marble basemark mauve transfer printed

saucer maker's mark copper button basemark banded plate basemark plain white plate basemark plain white plate basemark plain white small plate basemark plain white, gilded &

embossed plate basemark flow blue transfer

printed large bowl basemark mauve transfer printed

cable plate basemark green transfer printed

saucer obverse of above

Roll Frame

3

3

3

3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 3

3 3 2 2 2 2

2

2

2

2 2

12

13

14

15 20 16 16 16 16 16 17 17 25 26 18 18 18 19 20 21 21 10 11 31 31 31 19 22

23 24

1 2 3 4

5

6

7

13 12

Page 121: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I

I

I I I I

II I I I I I I I

I I I I I

Unit 212 212 212

212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212

Bagnum 107 108 109

110 1 1 1 112 113 114 115 184 186 189 219 220 221

Appeondl1x 6 Phootooa <D'f'" Arteo'f'"~c:ta

Description Roll Frame Oriental porcelain doll's arm 4 7 olive glass gin bottle 3 34 olive glass beer bottle 3 35

3 36 blue tinted glass medicine bottle 3 37 clear glass bottle 4 7 clear glass bottle 4 8 clear glass bottle 4 10 clear glass bottle 4 10 blue glass bottle 4 10 bone comb fragment 4 1 1 decanter cork 4 12 jet drop earings 4 13 aqua glass patent bottle 4 19 aqua glass bottle 4 20 olive glass champagne bottle 4 21

Page 122: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

' .. , ·'· '",_. '· ..• ~ ' • '.: • .• ' •.•. ._ ' ~ • . . ...•. - '. ~·--.- ·-· ,; '·'· '• .. '• .• ' ·'· ~ .. -;; •• ~- \-..·~; .. \::>-'.\..:.~~~ \~.!o~:::.;..~ ... h~~\.~:.:-~1~~:..::~~·~, . ..: \~\- <

I II II APPENDIX 7

II ARTEFACT BOX AND UNIT LIST

Box 1 Unit 207 Bagnums 1-82

I Box 2 Unit 207 Bagnums 83-244 Box 3 Unit 005

Unit 006

I Unit 007 Unit 008 Unit 010 Unit 014

I Unit 209 Unit 211

Box 4 Unit 012

I Unit 016 Unit 017 Unit 020

I Unit 212 Bagnums 1-45

Box 5 Unit 212 Bagnums 46-148 Box 6 Unit 009

Unit 212 Bagnums 149-196

I Unit 005 Box 3

I Unit 006 Box 3 Unit 007 Box 3 Unit 008 Box 3 Unit 009 Box 6

I Unit 010 Box 3 Unit 012 Box 4 Unit 014 Box 3

I Unit 016 Box 4 Unit 017 Box 4 Unit 020 Box 4

I Unit 203 Not kept Unit 204 Not kept Unit 205 Not kept Unit 206 Not kept

I Unit 207 Box 1-2 Unit 209 Box 3 Unit 211 Box :3

I Unit 212 Box 4-6

I I

I I I

I

Page 123: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I

APPENDIX 8

I LIST OF DISPLAY ITEMS

I Unit 007 8agnum 10 0810 104 bone brush handle Unit 008 8agnum 18 0810 139 black glass button

I Unit 008 Bagnum 19 0810 140 blue glass bead Unit 008 8agnum 31 0810 152 copper button Unit 008 8agnum 32 0810 153 locket

I Unit 008 8agnum 36 0810 157 pins Unit 008 8agnum 39 0810 160 shell button Unit 008 8agnum 40 0810 161 bone button

I Unit 008 8agnum 55 0810 176 thimble Unit 008 8agnum 61 0810 182 marbles Unit 012 8agnum 7 0810 242 porcelain doll's arm Unit 012 8agnum 32 0810 267 military badges

I Unit 012 8agnum 33 0810 268 military badges Unit 012 8agnum 34 0810 269 military buttons Unit 012 8agnum 35 OEHO 270 military buttons

I Unit 014 8agnum 14 0810 289 ointment pot Unit 014 8agnum 19 0810 294 toy tea-cup Unit 014 8agnum 20 0810 295 toy plate Unit 015 8agnum 4 0810 394 marble

I Unit 207 8agnum 70 DBID 852 black transfer-printed bowl

Unit 207 Bagnum 94 0810 876 white FEW 1 id

I Unit 207 8agnum 96 OBID 878 Holloway's ointment pot Unit 207 Bagnum 102 DBID 884 salt-glazed stoneware

ink bottle

I Unit 207 8agnum 132 0810 914 German porcelain doll's

head Unit 207 Bagnum 151 0810 933 olive glass wine bottle Unit 207 Bagnum 152 OBIO 934 olive glass wine bottle

I Unit 207 Bagnum 153 D8ID 935 aqua pickle bottle Unit 207 8agnum 154 DBID 936 aqua glass bottle Unit 207 Bagnum 156 0810 938 aqua glass bottle

I Unit 207 Bagnum 157 08ID 939 aqua glass bottle Unit 207 8agnum 159 0810 941 aqua glass bottle Unit 207 Bagnum 160 DBID 942 aqua medicine bottle

I Unit 207 8agnum 161 0810 943 clear glass medicine

bottle Unit 207 8agnum 162 0810 944 emerald glass medicine

bottle

I Unit 207 8agnum 163 0810 945 clear glass perfume bottle

Unit 207 Bagnum 164 0810 946 clear glass perfume

I bottle

Unit 207 8agnum 165 0810 947 clear glass bottle Unit 207 8agnum 166 DBID 948 clear glass perfume

bottle

I Unit 207 8agnum 218 DBIO 1000 clear glass tumbler Unit 207 Bagnum 238 0810 1020 jet bracelet parts Unit 207 Bagnum 245 DBID 1027 saucepan

I Unit 212 8agnum 27 0810 1184 mauve transfer-printed plate

I G~rges Ha,, H~stead "'1990

Page 124: I GEORGES HALL Inswaol.library.usyd.edu.au/data/pdfs/22434_ID_Bairstow...I I I I I -Q994.41 BAI Q994.411 BAI ) \ HOMESTEAo·· GEORGES ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Damaris Bairstow, MA.,LLB.,PHD

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

APPENDIX 9

LIST OF ARCHIVAL RECORDS

One lever arch file containing:

Area 1 - Stratigraphic Unit Register Stratigraphic Records

Area 2 - Stratigraphic Unit Register Stratigraphic Records

Stratigraphic Quantification Records

Colour Photographic Record + 2 rolls x 36 slides

Monochrome Photographic Record + 3 rolls x 36/37

contact prints negatives

Artefact Inventory (original)