I Just Clicked To Say I Love You:

Rich Evaluations of Minimal Communication

Less Is MoreMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, UK

27 April 2005

Joseph ‘Jofish’ KayeCulturally Embedded Computing

Cornell Information Sciencejofish@cornell.edu

Intimate Objects

• Technological devices for couples to communicate

• Long distance relationships: lead users of communication technologies

• Intimacy: a popular topic for HCI design, but…

Kaye,J ‘J’ and Goulding, L. Intimate Objects. Proceedings of DIS 2004, ACM Press.

Intimacy in HCI

History of elegantly designed but ad-hoc interfaces for communicating intimacy in HCI; hard to evaluate

• Fields & Thresholds (Dunne & Raby DoP2 '94)• Feather, Scent & Shaker (Strong & Gaver CSCW'96)

• The Bed (Dodge CHI'97)• UbiComp'03 Workshop on Intimacy

www.intimateornot.org

• Digital Family Portrait (Mynatt et. al. CHI'01)• inTouch (Brave, Ishii, Dahley CSCW'98) • inStink, Honey I’m Home (Kaye '02, interactions '04)• ……

Minimal Intimate Objects

• How can we build technological objects that will allow us to study the communication of intimacy in HCI?

Minimal Intimate Objects

• What is intimacy, anyway? • How much bandwidth does it take to

sucessfully transmit intimacy?• How do we know when we’ve transmitted

it?• How can we understand when our users

think they’ve transmitted it?• How can we evaluate a system designed to

communicate something when we can’t even measure if it’s there or not?

• If only it was as easy as this:

How much does Ariel love Eric? Count the hearts!

Disney (1997) The Special Edition Little

Mermaid Coloring Book. Golden Books Publishing.

Answer: 19

Minimal Intimate Objects: PIO• PIO (Physical Intimate

Object):

• Computer built inside an Altoids mints container with a button and a large red LED

• Connected to partner via Internet

• When button is pushed, partner’s light glows bright red, then fades over time

• Based on Rabbit Semiconductor RCM37x0 platform + custom hardware; requires Ethernet, power

Minimal Intimate Objects: VIO• VIO (Virtual

Intimate Object):

• Software device represented as a small red circle in the taskbar of Window’s screen

• When circle is clicked, partner’s circle glows bright red, then fades over time.

• Kaye, Levitt, Nevins, Golden & Schmidt. Communicating Intimacy One Bit at a Time. Proceedings of CHI 2005, ACM Press.

Focus: VIO

• In this talk, and in the paper, we are focusing on the use of the VIO. Statistics are for couples using the VIO, not the PIO, unless explicitly stated.

• This is due to a combination of technical problems with the MinIOs (getting reliable network connections) and participant dropout.

Methodology: Server Data

• When a VIO is in use, it checks in with the server every ten seconds, which is logged, so we can tell if it’s running.

• The server logs every time a button is pressed.

• From this we can answer questions like “How many times a day did the local partner in couple 5 press the button? The remote partner?”

Methodology: Participants

• Participants– 10 couples in existing long-distance

relationships (n=20)•5 couples assigned to VIO (n=10)• 5 couples assigned to MinIO (n=10)

Methodology: Procedure• Procedure

– Initial screening for technology– Pre-test questionnaire– Daily Logbook for 7 days– Post-test questionnaire– Server logs of every use of IO

Daily Logbook Entries

• Daily repeating Likkert scale questions1. How close do you feel to your partner today?2. How satisfied do you feel by your relationship

today?3. How connected do you feel to your partner today?4. What impact do you think your frequency of use

of VIO had on your partner’s day?5. What is your overall attitude towards VIO today?6. What is your overall interest level in VIO today?7. How comfortable did you feel with VIO today?

• No aggregate statistically significant trends

Designing rich evaluationof minimal communication

• Subjects filled out a daily logbook• Designed…

– to be enchanting and compelling to use

– for rich feedback– to promote reflection by the user on

• the relationship• the technology• the study itself

Logbook Entries: Relationship

• Questions about relationship:– The color/song/TV show/season that

currently best represents my relationship is…

– If I were to do a dance about my relationship today, it would be a• Rumba Samba Tango

Waltz Swing

Logbook Entries: Relationship

– The color that currently best represents my relationship is…• Amber/yellow --> do I proceed w/ caution or

speed up to beat the red or slow down anticipating a step

• Purple - we have a more matured, aged relationship rather than a new, boundless one which would best be described by red. Purple is the more aged, ripened form of red.

• Yellow! Like a sun, like a summer. I often laugh with Sven especially in those days. Using Vio is really funny and interesting.

Logbook Entries: The IO

• Questions about the intimate object itself:– I would name my IO… my partner’s IO…– If I could change one thing about my IO it

would be…– If my IO made a sound it would be…– Draw a picture of your ideal IO– I generally used my IO when I was…– If I could change one thing about my IO it

would be

Logbook Entries: The IO

• If I could change one thing about my VIO it would be…– the fact that I can only use it when I'm on my

computer cuz if I'm home and want to use it I have to turn it on and if I'm out I have to keep track that I want to click it

– The lag time between click and reaction– Well I can see Vio only on the bar down, so I have

to see it looking down. It would be nice if Vio will be something you can move around your desktop and put it where you prefer to be.

– Have the red/pink color take longer to fade.

Logbook Entries: Study itself

• Questions about the study itself:– I think this research is really about…– Which of these is your favorite number?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

– I would name the people conducting this study

– Tell us a better way to do this study– Who have you told about this study?

Why?

Logbook Entries

• I think this research is really about…– Whether VIO promotes or enhances

intimacy for long-distance couples– people in relationships trying to connect

throughout the day without using or needing words.

– It is a new way for communication.– Creating computer dependency and

spreading and marketing it to the general public

Rich Stories from Minimal Data

• Did it make you feel closer to your partner?– I was surprised to see one morning that my

partner had actually turned on his computer just to push VIO and then turned it off again

– YES - We share this experience together, and we use VIO aware that from another part of the world someone was thinking to each other! When VIO became red I feel very happy, because I knew that my boyfriend was clicking on it. So this communication was in a instant.

Cross-referencing Results:Quantitative & Qualitative

• If my relationship were a season, it would be…

• 7/10 VIO subjects pick “summer”• 1/10, the most heavy user, picked

“spring”• 2/10, the couple with the lowest VIO

use, pick “fall” and “winter”

Observations

• Clicks are situated in a deep understanding of the couples’ shared relationship

• The first click of the morning– I’m awake!– Call me!

• vs. Clickwars– No! I love you more!

Numerical Results

1. Participants used it: on average a total of 14 to 168 times a day (average 35, SD 27, max > 700)

2. 75% reported VIO made them feel closer to their partner during the study.

3. 88% stated it became a regular part of their daily routine.

4. Many participants found it was an unobtrusive way to communicate while at work.

Rich evaluations for rich situations

• Inspired by cultural probes • Rich understanding of users’

experience with the device• Rich opportunities for reflection• Rich source of input for what to do

next, both for research and for the software.

Next…

• VIO 2.0– customizable sounds– open source client code, server

(sourceforge: intimateobj)– Mac client– situated software: sounds are configurable,

based on duration since last click• Disentangling software and evaluation:

doing evaluations without the software and software without the evalution…

Thanks to…

• Phoebe Sengers, Liz Goulding & CEmCom

• Collaborators Mariah K. Levitt, Jeff Nevins, Jessica Golden & Vanessa Schmidt

• Kirsten Boehner & Jeff Hancock• Bill Arms, Richard Calvi, Aakash Jain,

Vishal Desai, Shantanu Shah, Matt Feusner, Wei Guo, William Yip

• Kurt Schoenmaekers, Bill Buxton, Alex Taylor and Microsoft Research UK

Joseph ‘Jofish’ KayeCulturally Embedded Computing

Cornell Information Sciencejofish@cornell.edu

This talk at jofish.com/talks