Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ICE-SHEET INTERACTION WITH A CABLE-MOORED PLATFORM
by
Wilfrid A Nixon and Robert Ettema
Submitted to
Hitachi Zosen Corporation Osaka Japan Mobil Research and Development Corporation Dallas Texas
Minerals Management Service Washington DC
HR Limited Distribution Report No
Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research The University of Iowa
Iowa City Iowa 52242-1585
December 1987
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES
I INTRODUCTION A Scope of the Study B Practical Aspects C Previous Work
I I EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull A Test Facilities
1 HR ice towing tank 2 The test platform 3 Instrumentation 4 Calibration of transducers bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
B Model Ice c Preliminary Tests bull bullbullbullbullbull middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotbullmiddotmiddotmiddotbullbullmiddot D Test Procedures bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
III PRESENTATION OF RESULTS bullbullbullbull A Raw Data bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bullbull B 11
Fixed11
Platform bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull c 11 Moored 11 Platform bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbull D Qualitative Data
VI DISCUSS ION A Observations
1 Modes of ice fracture 2 Platform motion bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 Ice subduction
B Ice Thickness Effects c Ice Velocity Effects D Mooring Stiffness Effects E Dynamic Response
1 Moored platform dynamic response bullbullbullbullbullbull 2 Fixed platform dynamic response
v CONCLUSIONS bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull REFERENCES TABLES bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull FIGURES middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotbullmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotbullbullbullbullbullmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotbullbullmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotbullbullbullbullmiddotmiddotmiddotbullbullbullbullmiddotmiddotmiddotbullbullbullmiddot
ABSTRACT
Fourty-two tests of a model cable moored platform have been conducted in
IIHR ice towing tank facility In each test a sheet of urea doped ice with
thickness from 20-40mm and bending strength between 25 and 40kPa was driven
past the model platform The platform was tested in two modes Fixed in
which no deflection of the platform was allowed and moored in which the
platform could surge heave and pitch against restoring forces provided by
buoyancy (for heave and pitch) and a leaf spring (for surge)
The observed behavior indicated that for both moored and fixed platform
geometries the forces on the plataform increased with increasing ice thickshy
ness The fixed plataform experienced increasing forces as the ice impact
velocity increased but for the moored platform any such response was masked by
resonance effects The critical frequency in this regard was the breaking
frequency of the ice for the heave and pitch forces on the moored platform
However the surge force power spectrum was dominated by the natural frequency
of the platform
A most interesting result of the study is that the mooring forces on the
plataform appear to experience a minimum with respect to the stiffness of the
mooring system Such a result has obvious practical implications and will be
investigated further
i i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank Dr M Matsuishi of Hitachi Zosen Corporation
Dr R Johnson of Mobil Research and Development Corporation and Mr C Smith
of US Minerals Management Service for their guidance in conduct of this
project Additionally the authors wish to thank Mr s Iwata of Hitachi
Zosen Corporation for assisting in conduct of the experiment
i i i
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
l Conical Platform Similar to 11Kulluk11 bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
2 The Model Platform
3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
4 Towing Tank Carriage
5 Detailed Drawing of Model Platformbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
7 Details of Mooring Harness bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bull bullbull
8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restraining Device bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
9 Yne Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platformbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 20mm) Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 40rnm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 20mm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 40mm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 20mm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
ii
23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity= 002ms
Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity= 002ms
Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity = 002ms
Strength = 25kPa
29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa ~
31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength= 40kPa
33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPa
34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= 002ms Strength= 25kPa
35 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= 020ms Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platformbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
39 Comparison of uSkirtsu for Model and Kullukbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
40 Depiction of Forces Acting on the Ice Sheet bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
41 Surge Force vs lK8 (Inverse of Mooring Stiffness)
42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P301 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
iii
44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and e test P303 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and e test P304 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P301F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P303F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P304F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbull
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and ttKulluk bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
2 Calibration Coefficients for Transducers bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
3 Ice Sheet Data
4 Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
5 Summary of Fixed Platform Results bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
6 Summary of Moored Platform Results
7 Platform Dynamic Response
v
I INTRODUCTION
Drilling for oil in relatively deep ice-covered or ice-infested waters
poses a number of problems not least of which ls the provision of a stable
platform from which drilling activities can be conducted A cable-moored
platform of conical hull shape provides such stability and experience with
one platform 11Kulluk (see eg Hnatiuk and iJright 1984) in the Beaufort
Sea Figure I shows the hull shape and mooring configuration of a model
floating conical platform similar to 11Kulluk 11 This model was used in all
the experiments described herein
While nKulluk operated with success in the Beaufort Sea there remain to
be answered a number of concerns for the designers and operators of such
floating platforms Obviously of importance are the forces displacements and
accelerations (the dynamic response) of the platform as it encounters a vari shy
ety of different lee types (ice sheets ice floe fields rubble ice large
individual floes etc) Knowledge of the dynamic response envelope of a
platform will enable decisions regarding emergency movement of the platform
(due to unacceptable ice conditions) to be made more effectively avoiding
unnecessary downtime and also unsafe operations Another area of concern is
the problem caused by ice underriding the platform and potentially damaging
the drill string Indeed this latter event may be a more important factor in
determining safe operation than the ice forces Also of importance is the
effect of mooring system stiffness on the dynamic response of a platform
This may even allow some tuningu of platform dynamic response to be made
according to prevailing lee condition
A Scope of Study
The principle objectives of the study were to determine the effects of
mooring system stiffness ice sheet thickness ice sheet strength and ice
sheet velocities on the forces and motions (accelerations and displacements)
that a conical platform would encounter while amidst a large moving ice
sheet
To meet these objectives model tests were conducted at IIHRs ice towing
tank using a 15-meter-diameter (at the load waterline) test platform The
model platform shown in figure 2 was approximately a 145-scale replica of
I
the hull of the existing platform Kulluk However it did not exactly
replicate Kulluk as it was somewhat simpler in hull form and Kulluk sfl
mooring system was not simulated exactly
The ice sheets were grown and tempered to the required thicknesses and
strengths by means of tbe methods described below After tempering the
sheets were pushed against the platform by the tank carriage
The results obtained from tbe tests are compared with the performance
criteria for the cable mooring system of the platform degKulluk
B Practical Aspects
A cable-moored platform of the type shown ln figure 1 is obviously only
one of a number of design concepts under consideration for operation in ice
covered waters No single platform ls ideal for all Arctic drilling sites
and the most suitable platform type is determined by typically the water
depth and the ice conditions at the drilling sites Frederking (1984) reviews
the various platform concepts
Cable-moored platforms appear best suited to water depths between 20-60
meters Kulluk was designed to withstand ice floes of 1 to 1 Sm thickness
of annual ice In worse ice conditions it is to be towed from the drill
site Additional protection was to be provided by ice-breaking ships acting
as escort (Huatink and Wright 1984 Loh and Stamberg 1984)
C Previous Work
A detailed review of previous work both practical and theoretical
concerning ice forces against inclined planes and conical structures is given
by Matsuishi and Ettema (l 985a) The interested reader is referred to this
report
Relatively few tests have been performed on models of cable-moored strucshy
tures Frederklng and Schwarz (1982) conducted a series of tests investigatshy
ing the ice-breaking performance of a downward breaking cone For some tests
the cone was restrained from moving while in other tests it was allowed to
oscillate both vertically and horizontally The oscillating cone experienced
a horizontal force only two-thirds of that measured for the restrained cone
2
gt1atsuishi and Ettema (1985ab) conducted tests on the model platform used
in the present study to investigate the dynamic behavior of the platform when
impacted by floes of annual ice and when in a field of mushy ice They made
measurements both with the platform fixed and with it moored As in this
series of tests mooring system stiffness was modelled using a leaf spring
(see Section II below) Among the results they obtained were
I That mooring force platform mot ions and accelerations increased with
increasing floe diameter but asymptotically approached a constant value
when floe diameter exceeding platform waterline diameter
2 That mooring forces increased wlth increasing speed of ice floe impact
3 That when impacted by mushy ice the moored platform experienced a force 11 11that increased monotonically as a prow developed around the leading
edge of the platform Once the prow had reached an equilibrium size
the ice loads remained steady
4 In mushy ice the mooring forces were linearly proportional to the thickshy
ness of the ice rubble layer
It is intended that this study should build on the work of Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985ab)
II EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
A Test Facilities
1 IIHRs ice towing tank
All experiments were conducted using IIHRs ice towing tank which is 20m
long Sm wide and 13m deep Figure 3 shows the layout of the tank and cold
room within which it is housed Depending on the external ambient tempershy
ature the cold room has a cooling capacity between 15 and 20kw allowing an
ice sheet to grow at a rate of 15 to 20mm per hour
A motorized carriage (shown in figure 4) was used to push the ice sheets
against the model platform The carriage is driven by a variable velocity
DC motor and can move at velocities between 0001 to l 50ms Velocity is
accurately measured by means of a wheel carrying a circular array of regularly
3
spaced holes which is mounted on the drive shaft of the motor A light
shines on one side of the wheel and as a hole passes the light ls detected
on the other side of the wheel by a photo detector The number of pulses
detected per second is linearly proportional to the carriage velocity
2 The test platform
The test platform is similar but not exactly identical in form to the
existing cable-moored platform Kulluk A scale of I 45 can be used to the
relate the test platform to Kulluk Table I lists the principal dimension
of both Kulluk and the test platform A detailed drawing of the test platshy
form is given in figure 5
As discussed by Matsuishi and Et tema (l 985a) a floating cable-moored
platform can be considered to be affected by three linear restoring forces or
moments
(a) A horizontal mooring force arising from the spring stiffness of the
00model Three values of spring stiffness were used in these tests K8
=
I 7kNm 05kNm The latter two stiffnesses were obtained by means of leaf
springs in the mooring harness
(b) A vertical foundation reaction force opposing heave motion due to
buoyancy Kn = 173kNm
(c) A foundation reaction moment opposing pitch motion again due to
buoyancy kp = 35lkNmdegree
3 Instrumentation
The platform was instrumented in two different ways (a) for Ks being
non-infinite (ie the platform was moored) and (b) for K infinite (the8
platform was fixed)
When urnoored the platform was connected to an instrument beam by way of
a linear mooring harness and a load cell (see figure 5) The mooring harness
comprised a pair of elastic leaf springs (to provide K ) a spline bearing8
stroke bearings and universal bearings as shown in figure 7 The harness
simulated accurately the motion of a floating moored platform Horizontal
mooring force was measured using a 490-Newton NISHO DENKI LMC-3502-50 load
cell which connected the mooring harness to the instrument beam Yawing and
4
swaying of the moored platform were restricted by two vertical rods located at
the fore and aft of the platform (see figure 8) The lOmm diameter rods were
constrained to slide in 10Smm wide slots (see figure 9) Thus the moored
platform had three degrees of freedom for motion heave pitch and surge
Heave and pitch motions were measured by means of two linear voltage
displacement transducers (LVDT s) which sensed the vertical motion of the
platform at two positions fore and aft The LVDTs were excited using 12
volts with a full stroke range of 015m
Vertical and horizontal accelerations of the moored platform were meashy
sured with three 2g(196ms-2) KYOWA ASQ-2BL accelerometers
The fixed platform (K = 00 ) was connected directly to a load cell which 8
was in turn bolted to the instrument beam (see figure 10) The horizontal
and vertical forces and the pitching moment experiences by the fixed platform
were measured using a 196-Newton and 98-Newton-meter NISHO DENKI LMC-4107-20
load cell
The locations of the measuring sensors and the positive directions of
recorded data are shown in figure 11 The output voltages from the measuring
sensors were scanned with a digital voltmeter The digitized data were sershy
ially transmitted to IIHRs HP-IOOOE computer system and there stored on
disc The data acquisition band width was 120Hz though each channel was
sampled at a rate of either 7 or lOHz
4 Calibration of transducers
For each of the data-logging transducers the zero level and sensitivity
were determined before each test
Each of the load cells and accelerometers had their output voltage v
measured for an amplifier-created calibration strain s bull The sensitivity S c
of each transducer was evaluated as
S = (ve )C (1) c
where C is a predetermined ratio of strain to the force or acceleration expershy
ienced by the transducer
5
Sensitivities of the LVDTs were evaluated by measuring the voltage
change for a given displacement of the transducer rod
The sensitivity of the carriage velocity measurement was determined by
correlating the output voltage with the mean carriage velocity as measured
with a length scale and stop watch Calibration coefficients are listed in
table 2
B Model Ice
Ice sheets were grown from a O 7~~ by weight urea solution by the wet
seeding procedure described in detail by Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a)
Sheets were grown to three nominal thicknesses (20 30 and 40mm) After
seeding had occurred the cold room was adjusted for maximum cooling rate
until the ice sheet had grown to 85 of the desired thickness At that time
the room temperature was raised to allow the ice sheet to temper (ie to
weaken)
The flexural strength f and the flexural modulus of elasticity Efgt
were monitored during the warm-up period until af attained a prescribed value
(25kPa or 40kPa) The load F to fail a cantilever beam of length pound width b
and thickness h in downwards flexure was used to estimate af
(2)
Two to three cantilever beams were tested at several locations around the ice
sheet in order to obtain a representative mean value of af at intervals as the
sheet weakened
The flexural elastic modulus Ef was determined by measuring the increshy
ment o of the vertical deflection of the ice sheete due to small increments of
a point load ~P applied at the center-point of the ice sheet Thus
2o188( 1-v )
(3)2
Pwgh
where v = Poissons ratio for ice (taken to be 03) P = density of urea w
solution (= 1000 kgm3 ) and g =gravitational acceleration (= 98lms-2 ) The
data associated with each ice sheet are given in table 3
6
C Preliminary Tests
A number of tests were conducted to determine natural frequencies and the
logarithmic decrement of the moored platform surge heave and pitch oscillashy
tions both in open water and in ice conditions The results are tabulated in
table 4 Openwater tests had been conducted previously by Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985a) who had concluded that additional hydrodynamic forces due to
movement of the push blade used for driving ice sheets were negligibly
small The coefficient of friction between the platform and the ice was
measured using a range of normal pressures
D Test Procedures
A total of 42 tests were conducted 15 using the fixed platform 7 using
the moored platform with Ks = 1 7kNm and 20 using the moored platform with
Ks= OSkNm For each test series the ice sheet was pushed with a constant
velocity against the platform by the carriage The velocities used were 002
004 01 and 02ms The relationships between model and prototype values of
ice sheet speeds are given in figure 12 while the relationships between
forces and moments for model and prototype are shown ln figure 13
III PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
A Data
Individual time series from the tests are presented in a separate addenshy
dum to this report (Examples of time series are shown in Appendix 1) The
data obtained from the digital voltmeter were converted from voltages into
2engineering values (N for force ms- for acceleration mm for heave deshy
grees for pitch) by means of a simple computer program The time histories
were also analyzed to give the temporal mean the standard deviation about
that mean and the maximum and minimum values for each signal Table 5 gives
the results for the fixed platform tests and table 6 for the moored
platform tests
7
B Fixed Platform
Figures 14 through 17 show the effect on horizontal force of velocity
Note that as in all graphs of results the mean force and the mean plus two
standard deviations are plotted (following the practice of Matsuishi and
Ettema 985a) It can be seen that horizontal surge force increases with
velocity Similar trends are observed for vertical (heave) force (figures 18
through 21) and pitch moment (figures 22 through 25) Horizontal force
vertical force and the magnitude of the pitching moment all increase with
increasing ice thickness (see figures 26 through 28) The effect of ice
strength is less clear but would appear lo indicate that both forces and the
pitching moment increase with ice increasing strength
C Moored Platform
Figures 29 through 33 show the variation of horizontal (surge) force with
velocity for the moored platform The mean surge force appears to increase
with velocity though not always monotonically There is a possibility of a
minimum force at some intermediate velocity This minimum is more evident if
one considers the variation of the mean force plus two standard deviations
with ice velocity This is discussed further in Section IV below Figures 34
through 36 show the effect of ice thickness on mooring force mooring force
clearly increases with increasing lee thickness Note however that for the
40 mm ice thickness Ks = 1 7 kNm while for all other thicknesses Ks = 05
kNm
D Qualitative Data
As well as collecting time series of loads displacements and accelershy
ations visual data was also gathered An underwater video viewing the
underside of the model platform was taken for each test significant ice
underride occurred in all cases which is cause for concern since underridlng
ice may foul drill string or mooring lines Above water videos were also
taken of each test After each test any ice lodged under the platform was
collected and photographed (see as an example figure 37)
8
IV DISCUSSION
A Observations
A number of qualitative observations can be made with regard to ice and
platform behavior during the tests
Modes of ice fracture
As expected ice fractured circumferentially as it thrust against the
platform (see figure 38) After downward flexure had produce a circumferenshy
tial crack ice segments were further broken by radial cracks The resulting
lee pieces were then shored down the hull and clearing from beneath it
occurred in one of three ways They were either swept past the sides or
under the bottom of the platform or it rotated back under the oncoming ice
sheet The last clearing mechanism leading to the formation of a ridge or
collar of broken ice that ringed the platform and significantly affected the
ice loads it experienced
2 Platform motion
The platform amidst a moving ice sheet showed a fairly regular though
also stochastic motion The platform would pitch up at the point of impact
and heave while being shoved backwards After a certain amount of motion it
would lurch or surge forward rapidly only to be shoved backwards again
Numerous smaller motions were superposed on this long term surge behavior
This behavior ls discussed further in Section E below
3 Ice subduction
A major concern in any floating drilling structure is to avoid broken ice
moving under the structure and fouling the drill string In a cable moored
system such as Kulluk a further concern ls added that of avoiding fouling
of moored cables Considerable ice under flow was observed in the tests conshy
ducted for this study being most prevalent in thick ice conditions Somewhat
different behavior could be expected for the Kulluk platform because of
differences in a hull shape particularly of the hull skirt (see figure
39) Thus while Kulluk would experience less ice underflow than the model
9
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES
I INTRODUCTION A Scope of the Study B Practical Aspects C Previous Work
I I EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull A Test Facilities
1 HR ice towing tank 2 The test platform 3 Instrumentation 4 Calibration of transducers bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
B Model Ice c Preliminary Tests bull bullbullbullbullbull middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotbullmiddotmiddotmiddotbullbullmiddot D Test Procedures bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
III PRESENTATION OF RESULTS bullbullbullbull A Raw Data bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bullbull B 11
Fixed11
Platform bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull c 11 Moored 11 Platform bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbull bullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbull D Qualitative Data
VI DISCUSS ION A Observations
1 Modes of ice fracture 2 Platform motion bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull 3 Ice subduction
B Ice Thickness Effects c Ice Velocity Effects D Mooring Stiffness Effects E Dynamic Response
1 Moored platform dynamic response bullbullbullbullbullbull 2 Fixed platform dynamic response
v CONCLUSIONS bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull REFERENCES TABLES bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull FIGURES middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotbullmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotbullbullbullbullbullmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotbullbullmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotbullbullbullbullmiddotmiddotmiddotbullbullbullbullmiddotmiddotmiddotbullbullbullmiddot
ABSTRACT
Fourty-two tests of a model cable moored platform have been conducted in
IIHR ice towing tank facility In each test a sheet of urea doped ice with
thickness from 20-40mm and bending strength between 25 and 40kPa was driven
past the model platform The platform was tested in two modes Fixed in
which no deflection of the platform was allowed and moored in which the
platform could surge heave and pitch against restoring forces provided by
buoyancy (for heave and pitch) and a leaf spring (for surge)
The observed behavior indicated that for both moored and fixed platform
geometries the forces on the plataform increased with increasing ice thickshy
ness The fixed plataform experienced increasing forces as the ice impact
velocity increased but for the moored platform any such response was masked by
resonance effects The critical frequency in this regard was the breaking
frequency of the ice for the heave and pitch forces on the moored platform
However the surge force power spectrum was dominated by the natural frequency
of the platform
A most interesting result of the study is that the mooring forces on the
plataform appear to experience a minimum with respect to the stiffness of the
mooring system Such a result has obvious practical implications and will be
investigated further
i i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank Dr M Matsuishi of Hitachi Zosen Corporation
Dr R Johnson of Mobil Research and Development Corporation and Mr C Smith
of US Minerals Management Service for their guidance in conduct of this
project Additionally the authors wish to thank Mr s Iwata of Hitachi
Zosen Corporation for assisting in conduct of the experiment
i i i
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
l Conical Platform Similar to 11Kulluk11 bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
2 The Model Platform
3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
4 Towing Tank Carriage
5 Detailed Drawing of Model Platformbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
7 Details of Mooring Harness bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bull bullbull
8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restraining Device bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
9 Yne Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platformbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 20mm) Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 40rnm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 20mm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 40mm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 20mm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
ii
23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity= 002ms
Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity= 002ms
Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity = 002ms
Strength = 25kPa
29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa ~
31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength= 40kPa
33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPa
34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= 002ms Strength= 25kPa
35 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= 020ms Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platformbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
39 Comparison of uSkirtsu for Model and Kullukbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
40 Depiction of Forces Acting on the Ice Sheet bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
41 Surge Force vs lK8 (Inverse of Mooring Stiffness)
42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P301 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
iii
44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and e test P303 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and e test P304 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P301F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P303F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P304F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbull
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and ttKulluk bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
2 Calibration Coefficients for Transducers bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
3 Ice Sheet Data
4 Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
5 Summary of Fixed Platform Results bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
6 Summary of Moored Platform Results
7 Platform Dynamic Response
v
I INTRODUCTION
Drilling for oil in relatively deep ice-covered or ice-infested waters
poses a number of problems not least of which ls the provision of a stable
platform from which drilling activities can be conducted A cable-moored
platform of conical hull shape provides such stability and experience with
one platform 11Kulluk (see eg Hnatiuk and iJright 1984) in the Beaufort
Sea Figure I shows the hull shape and mooring configuration of a model
floating conical platform similar to 11Kulluk 11 This model was used in all
the experiments described herein
While nKulluk operated with success in the Beaufort Sea there remain to
be answered a number of concerns for the designers and operators of such
floating platforms Obviously of importance are the forces displacements and
accelerations (the dynamic response) of the platform as it encounters a vari shy
ety of different lee types (ice sheets ice floe fields rubble ice large
individual floes etc) Knowledge of the dynamic response envelope of a
platform will enable decisions regarding emergency movement of the platform
(due to unacceptable ice conditions) to be made more effectively avoiding
unnecessary downtime and also unsafe operations Another area of concern is
the problem caused by ice underriding the platform and potentially damaging
the drill string Indeed this latter event may be a more important factor in
determining safe operation than the ice forces Also of importance is the
effect of mooring system stiffness on the dynamic response of a platform
This may even allow some tuningu of platform dynamic response to be made
according to prevailing lee condition
A Scope of Study
The principle objectives of the study were to determine the effects of
mooring system stiffness ice sheet thickness ice sheet strength and ice
sheet velocities on the forces and motions (accelerations and displacements)
that a conical platform would encounter while amidst a large moving ice
sheet
To meet these objectives model tests were conducted at IIHRs ice towing
tank using a 15-meter-diameter (at the load waterline) test platform The
model platform shown in figure 2 was approximately a 145-scale replica of
I
the hull of the existing platform Kulluk However it did not exactly
replicate Kulluk as it was somewhat simpler in hull form and Kulluk sfl
mooring system was not simulated exactly
The ice sheets were grown and tempered to the required thicknesses and
strengths by means of tbe methods described below After tempering the
sheets were pushed against the platform by the tank carriage
The results obtained from tbe tests are compared with the performance
criteria for the cable mooring system of the platform degKulluk
B Practical Aspects
A cable-moored platform of the type shown ln figure 1 is obviously only
one of a number of design concepts under consideration for operation in ice
covered waters No single platform ls ideal for all Arctic drilling sites
and the most suitable platform type is determined by typically the water
depth and the ice conditions at the drilling sites Frederking (1984) reviews
the various platform concepts
Cable-moored platforms appear best suited to water depths between 20-60
meters Kulluk was designed to withstand ice floes of 1 to 1 Sm thickness
of annual ice In worse ice conditions it is to be towed from the drill
site Additional protection was to be provided by ice-breaking ships acting
as escort (Huatink and Wright 1984 Loh and Stamberg 1984)
C Previous Work
A detailed review of previous work both practical and theoretical
concerning ice forces against inclined planes and conical structures is given
by Matsuishi and Ettema (l 985a) The interested reader is referred to this
report
Relatively few tests have been performed on models of cable-moored strucshy
tures Frederklng and Schwarz (1982) conducted a series of tests investigatshy
ing the ice-breaking performance of a downward breaking cone For some tests
the cone was restrained from moving while in other tests it was allowed to
oscillate both vertically and horizontally The oscillating cone experienced
a horizontal force only two-thirds of that measured for the restrained cone
2
gt1atsuishi and Ettema (1985ab) conducted tests on the model platform used
in the present study to investigate the dynamic behavior of the platform when
impacted by floes of annual ice and when in a field of mushy ice They made
measurements both with the platform fixed and with it moored As in this
series of tests mooring system stiffness was modelled using a leaf spring
(see Section II below) Among the results they obtained were
I That mooring force platform mot ions and accelerations increased with
increasing floe diameter but asymptotically approached a constant value
when floe diameter exceeding platform waterline diameter
2 That mooring forces increased wlth increasing speed of ice floe impact
3 That when impacted by mushy ice the moored platform experienced a force 11 11that increased monotonically as a prow developed around the leading
edge of the platform Once the prow had reached an equilibrium size
the ice loads remained steady
4 In mushy ice the mooring forces were linearly proportional to the thickshy
ness of the ice rubble layer
It is intended that this study should build on the work of Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985ab)
II EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
A Test Facilities
1 IIHRs ice towing tank
All experiments were conducted using IIHRs ice towing tank which is 20m
long Sm wide and 13m deep Figure 3 shows the layout of the tank and cold
room within which it is housed Depending on the external ambient tempershy
ature the cold room has a cooling capacity between 15 and 20kw allowing an
ice sheet to grow at a rate of 15 to 20mm per hour
A motorized carriage (shown in figure 4) was used to push the ice sheets
against the model platform The carriage is driven by a variable velocity
DC motor and can move at velocities between 0001 to l 50ms Velocity is
accurately measured by means of a wheel carrying a circular array of regularly
3
spaced holes which is mounted on the drive shaft of the motor A light
shines on one side of the wheel and as a hole passes the light ls detected
on the other side of the wheel by a photo detector The number of pulses
detected per second is linearly proportional to the carriage velocity
2 The test platform
The test platform is similar but not exactly identical in form to the
existing cable-moored platform Kulluk A scale of I 45 can be used to the
relate the test platform to Kulluk Table I lists the principal dimension
of both Kulluk and the test platform A detailed drawing of the test platshy
form is given in figure 5
As discussed by Matsuishi and Et tema (l 985a) a floating cable-moored
platform can be considered to be affected by three linear restoring forces or
moments
(a) A horizontal mooring force arising from the spring stiffness of the
00model Three values of spring stiffness were used in these tests K8
=
I 7kNm 05kNm The latter two stiffnesses were obtained by means of leaf
springs in the mooring harness
(b) A vertical foundation reaction force opposing heave motion due to
buoyancy Kn = 173kNm
(c) A foundation reaction moment opposing pitch motion again due to
buoyancy kp = 35lkNmdegree
3 Instrumentation
The platform was instrumented in two different ways (a) for Ks being
non-infinite (ie the platform was moored) and (b) for K infinite (the8
platform was fixed)
When urnoored the platform was connected to an instrument beam by way of
a linear mooring harness and a load cell (see figure 5) The mooring harness
comprised a pair of elastic leaf springs (to provide K ) a spline bearing8
stroke bearings and universal bearings as shown in figure 7 The harness
simulated accurately the motion of a floating moored platform Horizontal
mooring force was measured using a 490-Newton NISHO DENKI LMC-3502-50 load
cell which connected the mooring harness to the instrument beam Yawing and
4
swaying of the moored platform were restricted by two vertical rods located at
the fore and aft of the platform (see figure 8) The lOmm diameter rods were
constrained to slide in 10Smm wide slots (see figure 9) Thus the moored
platform had three degrees of freedom for motion heave pitch and surge
Heave and pitch motions were measured by means of two linear voltage
displacement transducers (LVDT s) which sensed the vertical motion of the
platform at two positions fore and aft The LVDTs were excited using 12
volts with a full stroke range of 015m
Vertical and horizontal accelerations of the moored platform were meashy
sured with three 2g(196ms-2) KYOWA ASQ-2BL accelerometers
The fixed platform (K = 00 ) was connected directly to a load cell which 8
was in turn bolted to the instrument beam (see figure 10) The horizontal
and vertical forces and the pitching moment experiences by the fixed platform
were measured using a 196-Newton and 98-Newton-meter NISHO DENKI LMC-4107-20
load cell
The locations of the measuring sensors and the positive directions of
recorded data are shown in figure 11 The output voltages from the measuring
sensors were scanned with a digital voltmeter The digitized data were sershy
ially transmitted to IIHRs HP-IOOOE computer system and there stored on
disc The data acquisition band width was 120Hz though each channel was
sampled at a rate of either 7 or lOHz
4 Calibration of transducers
For each of the data-logging transducers the zero level and sensitivity
were determined before each test
Each of the load cells and accelerometers had their output voltage v
measured for an amplifier-created calibration strain s bull The sensitivity S c
of each transducer was evaluated as
S = (ve )C (1) c
where C is a predetermined ratio of strain to the force or acceleration expershy
ienced by the transducer
5
Sensitivities of the LVDTs were evaluated by measuring the voltage
change for a given displacement of the transducer rod
The sensitivity of the carriage velocity measurement was determined by
correlating the output voltage with the mean carriage velocity as measured
with a length scale and stop watch Calibration coefficients are listed in
table 2
B Model Ice
Ice sheets were grown from a O 7~~ by weight urea solution by the wet
seeding procedure described in detail by Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a)
Sheets were grown to three nominal thicknesses (20 30 and 40mm) After
seeding had occurred the cold room was adjusted for maximum cooling rate
until the ice sheet had grown to 85 of the desired thickness At that time
the room temperature was raised to allow the ice sheet to temper (ie to
weaken)
The flexural strength f and the flexural modulus of elasticity Efgt
were monitored during the warm-up period until af attained a prescribed value
(25kPa or 40kPa) The load F to fail a cantilever beam of length pound width b
and thickness h in downwards flexure was used to estimate af
(2)
Two to three cantilever beams were tested at several locations around the ice
sheet in order to obtain a representative mean value of af at intervals as the
sheet weakened
The flexural elastic modulus Ef was determined by measuring the increshy
ment o of the vertical deflection of the ice sheete due to small increments of
a point load ~P applied at the center-point of the ice sheet Thus
2o188( 1-v )
(3)2
Pwgh
where v = Poissons ratio for ice (taken to be 03) P = density of urea w
solution (= 1000 kgm3 ) and g =gravitational acceleration (= 98lms-2 ) The
data associated with each ice sheet are given in table 3
6
C Preliminary Tests
A number of tests were conducted to determine natural frequencies and the
logarithmic decrement of the moored platform surge heave and pitch oscillashy
tions both in open water and in ice conditions The results are tabulated in
table 4 Openwater tests had been conducted previously by Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985a) who had concluded that additional hydrodynamic forces due to
movement of the push blade used for driving ice sheets were negligibly
small The coefficient of friction between the platform and the ice was
measured using a range of normal pressures
D Test Procedures
A total of 42 tests were conducted 15 using the fixed platform 7 using
the moored platform with Ks = 1 7kNm and 20 using the moored platform with
Ks= OSkNm For each test series the ice sheet was pushed with a constant
velocity against the platform by the carriage The velocities used were 002
004 01 and 02ms The relationships between model and prototype values of
ice sheet speeds are given in figure 12 while the relationships between
forces and moments for model and prototype are shown ln figure 13
III PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
A Data
Individual time series from the tests are presented in a separate addenshy
dum to this report (Examples of time series are shown in Appendix 1) The
data obtained from the digital voltmeter were converted from voltages into
2engineering values (N for force ms- for acceleration mm for heave deshy
grees for pitch) by means of a simple computer program The time histories
were also analyzed to give the temporal mean the standard deviation about
that mean and the maximum and minimum values for each signal Table 5 gives
the results for the fixed platform tests and table 6 for the moored
platform tests
7
B Fixed Platform
Figures 14 through 17 show the effect on horizontal force of velocity
Note that as in all graphs of results the mean force and the mean plus two
standard deviations are plotted (following the practice of Matsuishi and
Ettema 985a) It can be seen that horizontal surge force increases with
velocity Similar trends are observed for vertical (heave) force (figures 18
through 21) and pitch moment (figures 22 through 25) Horizontal force
vertical force and the magnitude of the pitching moment all increase with
increasing ice thickness (see figures 26 through 28) The effect of ice
strength is less clear but would appear lo indicate that both forces and the
pitching moment increase with ice increasing strength
C Moored Platform
Figures 29 through 33 show the variation of horizontal (surge) force with
velocity for the moored platform The mean surge force appears to increase
with velocity though not always monotonically There is a possibility of a
minimum force at some intermediate velocity This minimum is more evident if
one considers the variation of the mean force plus two standard deviations
with ice velocity This is discussed further in Section IV below Figures 34
through 36 show the effect of ice thickness on mooring force mooring force
clearly increases with increasing lee thickness Note however that for the
40 mm ice thickness Ks = 1 7 kNm while for all other thicknesses Ks = 05
kNm
D Qualitative Data
As well as collecting time series of loads displacements and accelershy
ations visual data was also gathered An underwater video viewing the
underside of the model platform was taken for each test significant ice
underride occurred in all cases which is cause for concern since underridlng
ice may foul drill string or mooring lines Above water videos were also
taken of each test After each test any ice lodged under the platform was
collected and photographed (see as an example figure 37)
8
IV DISCUSSION
A Observations
A number of qualitative observations can be made with regard to ice and
platform behavior during the tests
Modes of ice fracture
As expected ice fractured circumferentially as it thrust against the
platform (see figure 38) After downward flexure had produce a circumferenshy
tial crack ice segments were further broken by radial cracks The resulting
lee pieces were then shored down the hull and clearing from beneath it
occurred in one of three ways They were either swept past the sides or
under the bottom of the platform or it rotated back under the oncoming ice
sheet The last clearing mechanism leading to the formation of a ridge or
collar of broken ice that ringed the platform and significantly affected the
ice loads it experienced
2 Platform motion
The platform amidst a moving ice sheet showed a fairly regular though
also stochastic motion The platform would pitch up at the point of impact
and heave while being shoved backwards After a certain amount of motion it
would lurch or surge forward rapidly only to be shoved backwards again
Numerous smaller motions were superposed on this long term surge behavior
This behavior ls discussed further in Section E below
3 Ice subduction
A major concern in any floating drilling structure is to avoid broken ice
moving under the structure and fouling the drill string In a cable moored
system such as Kulluk a further concern ls added that of avoiding fouling
of moored cables Considerable ice under flow was observed in the tests conshy
ducted for this study being most prevalent in thick ice conditions Somewhat
different behavior could be expected for the Kulluk platform because of
differences in a hull shape particularly of the hull skirt (see figure
39) Thus while Kulluk would experience less ice underflow than the model
9
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
ABSTRACT
Fourty-two tests of a model cable moored platform have been conducted in
IIHR ice towing tank facility In each test a sheet of urea doped ice with
thickness from 20-40mm and bending strength between 25 and 40kPa was driven
past the model platform The platform was tested in two modes Fixed in
which no deflection of the platform was allowed and moored in which the
platform could surge heave and pitch against restoring forces provided by
buoyancy (for heave and pitch) and a leaf spring (for surge)
The observed behavior indicated that for both moored and fixed platform
geometries the forces on the plataform increased with increasing ice thickshy
ness The fixed plataform experienced increasing forces as the ice impact
velocity increased but for the moored platform any such response was masked by
resonance effects The critical frequency in this regard was the breaking
frequency of the ice for the heave and pitch forces on the moored platform
However the surge force power spectrum was dominated by the natural frequency
of the platform
A most interesting result of the study is that the mooring forces on the
plataform appear to experience a minimum with respect to the stiffness of the
mooring system Such a result has obvious practical implications and will be
investigated further
i i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank Dr M Matsuishi of Hitachi Zosen Corporation
Dr R Johnson of Mobil Research and Development Corporation and Mr C Smith
of US Minerals Management Service for their guidance in conduct of this
project Additionally the authors wish to thank Mr s Iwata of Hitachi
Zosen Corporation for assisting in conduct of the experiment
i i i
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
l Conical Platform Similar to 11Kulluk11 bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
2 The Model Platform
3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
4 Towing Tank Carriage
5 Detailed Drawing of Model Platformbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
7 Details of Mooring Harness bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bull bullbull
8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restraining Device bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
9 Yne Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platformbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 20mm) Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 40rnm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 20mm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 40mm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 20mm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
ii
23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity= 002ms
Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity= 002ms
Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity = 002ms
Strength = 25kPa
29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa ~
31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength= 40kPa
33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPa
34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= 002ms Strength= 25kPa
35 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= 020ms Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platformbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
39 Comparison of uSkirtsu for Model and Kullukbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
40 Depiction of Forces Acting on the Ice Sheet bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
41 Surge Force vs lK8 (Inverse of Mooring Stiffness)
42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P301 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
iii
44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and e test P303 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and e test P304 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P301F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P303F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P304F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbull
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and ttKulluk bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
2 Calibration Coefficients for Transducers bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
3 Ice Sheet Data
4 Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
5 Summary of Fixed Platform Results bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
6 Summary of Moored Platform Results
7 Platform Dynamic Response
v
I INTRODUCTION
Drilling for oil in relatively deep ice-covered or ice-infested waters
poses a number of problems not least of which ls the provision of a stable
platform from which drilling activities can be conducted A cable-moored
platform of conical hull shape provides such stability and experience with
one platform 11Kulluk (see eg Hnatiuk and iJright 1984) in the Beaufort
Sea Figure I shows the hull shape and mooring configuration of a model
floating conical platform similar to 11Kulluk 11 This model was used in all
the experiments described herein
While nKulluk operated with success in the Beaufort Sea there remain to
be answered a number of concerns for the designers and operators of such
floating platforms Obviously of importance are the forces displacements and
accelerations (the dynamic response) of the platform as it encounters a vari shy
ety of different lee types (ice sheets ice floe fields rubble ice large
individual floes etc) Knowledge of the dynamic response envelope of a
platform will enable decisions regarding emergency movement of the platform
(due to unacceptable ice conditions) to be made more effectively avoiding
unnecessary downtime and also unsafe operations Another area of concern is
the problem caused by ice underriding the platform and potentially damaging
the drill string Indeed this latter event may be a more important factor in
determining safe operation than the ice forces Also of importance is the
effect of mooring system stiffness on the dynamic response of a platform
This may even allow some tuningu of platform dynamic response to be made
according to prevailing lee condition
A Scope of Study
The principle objectives of the study were to determine the effects of
mooring system stiffness ice sheet thickness ice sheet strength and ice
sheet velocities on the forces and motions (accelerations and displacements)
that a conical platform would encounter while amidst a large moving ice
sheet
To meet these objectives model tests were conducted at IIHRs ice towing
tank using a 15-meter-diameter (at the load waterline) test platform The
model platform shown in figure 2 was approximately a 145-scale replica of
I
the hull of the existing platform Kulluk However it did not exactly
replicate Kulluk as it was somewhat simpler in hull form and Kulluk sfl
mooring system was not simulated exactly
The ice sheets were grown and tempered to the required thicknesses and
strengths by means of tbe methods described below After tempering the
sheets were pushed against the platform by the tank carriage
The results obtained from tbe tests are compared with the performance
criteria for the cable mooring system of the platform degKulluk
B Practical Aspects
A cable-moored platform of the type shown ln figure 1 is obviously only
one of a number of design concepts under consideration for operation in ice
covered waters No single platform ls ideal for all Arctic drilling sites
and the most suitable platform type is determined by typically the water
depth and the ice conditions at the drilling sites Frederking (1984) reviews
the various platform concepts
Cable-moored platforms appear best suited to water depths between 20-60
meters Kulluk was designed to withstand ice floes of 1 to 1 Sm thickness
of annual ice In worse ice conditions it is to be towed from the drill
site Additional protection was to be provided by ice-breaking ships acting
as escort (Huatink and Wright 1984 Loh and Stamberg 1984)
C Previous Work
A detailed review of previous work both practical and theoretical
concerning ice forces against inclined planes and conical structures is given
by Matsuishi and Ettema (l 985a) The interested reader is referred to this
report
Relatively few tests have been performed on models of cable-moored strucshy
tures Frederklng and Schwarz (1982) conducted a series of tests investigatshy
ing the ice-breaking performance of a downward breaking cone For some tests
the cone was restrained from moving while in other tests it was allowed to
oscillate both vertically and horizontally The oscillating cone experienced
a horizontal force only two-thirds of that measured for the restrained cone
2
gt1atsuishi and Ettema (1985ab) conducted tests on the model platform used
in the present study to investigate the dynamic behavior of the platform when
impacted by floes of annual ice and when in a field of mushy ice They made
measurements both with the platform fixed and with it moored As in this
series of tests mooring system stiffness was modelled using a leaf spring
(see Section II below) Among the results they obtained were
I That mooring force platform mot ions and accelerations increased with
increasing floe diameter but asymptotically approached a constant value
when floe diameter exceeding platform waterline diameter
2 That mooring forces increased wlth increasing speed of ice floe impact
3 That when impacted by mushy ice the moored platform experienced a force 11 11that increased monotonically as a prow developed around the leading
edge of the platform Once the prow had reached an equilibrium size
the ice loads remained steady
4 In mushy ice the mooring forces were linearly proportional to the thickshy
ness of the ice rubble layer
It is intended that this study should build on the work of Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985ab)
II EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
A Test Facilities
1 IIHRs ice towing tank
All experiments were conducted using IIHRs ice towing tank which is 20m
long Sm wide and 13m deep Figure 3 shows the layout of the tank and cold
room within which it is housed Depending on the external ambient tempershy
ature the cold room has a cooling capacity between 15 and 20kw allowing an
ice sheet to grow at a rate of 15 to 20mm per hour
A motorized carriage (shown in figure 4) was used to push the ice sheets
against the model platform The carriage is driven by a variable velocity
DC motor and can move at velocities between 0001 to l 50ms Velocity is
accurately measured by means of a wheel carrying a circular array of regularly
3
spaced holes which is mounted on the drive shaft of the motor A light
shines on one side of the wheel and as a hole passes the light ls detected
on the other side of the wheel by a photo detector The number of pulses
detected per second is linearly proportional to the carriage velocity
2 The test platform
The test platform is similar but not exactly identical in form to the
existing cable-moored platform Kulluk A scale of I 45 can be used to the
relate the test platform to Kulluk Table I lists the principal dimension
of both Kulluk and the test platform A detailed drawing of the test platshy
form is given in figure 5
As discussed by Matsuishi and Et tema (l 985a) a floating cable-moored
platform can be considered to be affected by three linear restoring forces or
moments
(a) A horizontal mooring force arising from the spring stiffness of the
00model Three values of spring stiffness were used in these tests K8
=
I 7kNm 05kNm The latter two stiffnesses were obtained by means of leaf
springs in the mooring harness
(b) A vertical foundation reaction force opposing heave motion due to
buoyancy Kn = 173kNm
(c) A foundation reaction moment opposing pitch motion again due to
buoyancy kp = 35lkNmdegree
3 Instrumentation
The platform was instrumented in two different ways (a) for Ks being
non-infinite (ie the platform was moored) and (b) for K infinite (the8
platform was fixed)
When urnoored the platform was connected to an instrument beam by way of
a linear mooring harness and a load cell (see figure 5) The mooring harness
comprised a pair of elastic leaf springs (to provide K ) a spline bearing8
stroke bearings and universal bearings as shown in figure 7 The harness
simulated accurately the motion of a floating moored platform Horizontal
mooring force was measured using a 490-Newton NISHO DENKI LMC-3502-50 load
cell which connected the mooring harness to the instrument beam Yawing and
4
swaying of the moored platform were restricted by two vertical rods located at
the fore and aft of the platform (see figure 8) The lOmm diameter rods were
constrained to slide in 10Smm wide slots (see figure 9) Thus the moored
platform had three degrees of freedom for motion heave pitch and surge
Heave and pitch motions were measured by means of two linear voltage
displacement transducers (LVDT s) which sensed the vertical motion of the
platform at two positions fore and aft The LVDTs were excited using 12
volts with a full stroke range of 015m
Vertical and horizontal accelerations of the moored platform were meashy
sured with three 2g(196ms-2) KYOWA ASQ-2BL accelerometers
The fixed platform (K = 00 ) was connected directly to a load cell which 8
was in turn bolted to the instrument beam (see figure 10) The horizontal
and vertical forces and the pitching moment experiences by the fixed platform
were measured using a 196-Newton and 98-Newton-meter NISHO DENKI LMC-4107-20
load cell
The locations of the measuring sensors and the positive directions of
recorded data are shown in figure 11 The output voltages from the measuring
sensors were scanned with a digital voltmeter The digitized data were sershy
ially transmitted to IIHRs HP-IOOOE computer system and there stored on
disc The data acquisition band width was 120Hz though each channel was
sampled at a rate of either 7 or lOHz
4 Calibration of transducers
For each of the data-logging transducers the zero level and sensitivity
were determined before each test
Each of the load cells and accelerometers had their output voltage v
measured for an amplifier-created calibration strain s bull The sensitivity S c
of each transducer was evaluated as
S = (ve )C (1) c
where C is a predetermined ratio of strain to the force or acceleration expershy
ienced by the transducer
5
Sensitivities of the LVDTs were evaluated by measuring the voltage
change for a given displacement of the transducer rod
The sensitivity of the carriage velocity measurement was determined by
correlating the output voltage with the mean carriage velocity as measured
with a length scale and stop watch Calibration coefficients are listed in
table 2
B Model Ice
Ice sheets were grown from a O 7~~ by weight urea solution by the wet
seeding procedure described in detail by Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a)
Sheets were grown to three nominal thicknesses (20 30 and 40mm) After
seeding had occurred the cold room was adjusted for maximum cooling rate
until the ice sheet had grown to 85 of the desired thickness At that time
the room temperature was raised to allow the ice sheet to temper (ie to
weaken)
The flexural strength f and the flexural modulus of elasticity Efgt
were monitored during the warm-up period until af attained a prescribed value
(25kPa or 40kPa) The load F to fail a cantilever beam of length pound width b
and thickness h in downwards flexure was used to estimate af
(2)
Two to three cantilever beams were tested at several locations around the ice
sheet in order to obtain a representative mean value of af at intervals as the
sheet weakened
The flexural elastic modulus Ef was determined by measuring the increshy
ment o of the vertical deflection of the ice sheete due to small increments of
a point load ~P applied at the center-point of the ice sheet Thus
2o188( 1-v )
(3)2
Pwgh
where v = Poissons ratio for ice (taken to be 03) P = density of urea w
solution (= 1000 kgm3 ) and g =gravitational acceleration (= 98lms-2 ) The
data associated with each ice sheet are given in table 3
6
C Preliminary Tests
A number of tests were conducted to determine natural frequencies and the
logarithmic decrement of the moored platform surge heave and pitch oscillashy
tions both in open water and in ice conditions The results are tabulated in
table 4 Openwater tests had been conducted previously by Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985a) who had concluded that additional hydrodynamic forces due to
movement of the push blade used for driving ice sheets were negligibly
small The coefficient of friction between the platform and the ice was
measured using a range of normal pressures
D Test Procedures
A total of 42 tests were conducted 15 using the fixed platform 7 using
the moored platform with Ks = 1 7kNm and 20 using the moored platform with
Ks= OSkNm For each test series the ice sheet was pushed with a constant
velocity against the platform by the carriage The velocities used were 002
004 01 and 02ms The relationships between model and prototype values of
ice sheet speeds are given in figure 12 while the relationships between
forces and moments for model and prototype are shown ln figure 13
III PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
A Data
Individual time series from the tests are presented in a separate addenshy
dum to this report (Examples of time series are shown in Appendix 1) The
data obtained from the digital voltmeter were converted from voltages into
2engineering values (N for force ms- for acceleration mm for heave deshy
grees for pitch) by means of a simple computer program The time histories
were also analyzed to give the temporal mean the standard deviation about
that mean and the maximum and minimum values for each signal Table 5 gives
the results for the fixed platform tests and table 6 for the moored
platform tests
7
B Fixed Platform
Figures 14 through 17 show the effect on horizontal force of velocity
Note that as in all graphs of results the mean force and the mean plus two
standard deviations are plotted (following the practice of Matsuishi and
Ettema 985a) It can be seen that horizontal surge force increases with
velocity Similar trends are observed for vertical (heave) force (figures 18
through 21) and pitch moment (figures 22 through 25) Horizontal force
vertical force and the magnitude of the pitching moment all increase with
increasing ice thickness (see figures 26 through 28) The effect of ice
strength is less clear but would appear lo indicate that both forces and the
pitching moment increase with ice increasing strength
C Moored Platform
Figures 29 through 33 show the variation of horizontal (surge) force with
velocity for the moored platform The mean surge force appears to increase
with velocity though not always monotonically There is a possibility of a
minimum force at some intermediate velocity This minimum is more evident if
one considers the variation of the mean force plus two standard deviations
with ice velocity This is discussed further in Section IV below Figures 34
through 36 show the effect of ice thickness on mooring force mooring force
clearly increases with increasing lee thickness Note however that for the
40 mm ice thickness Ks = 1 7 kNm while for all other thicknesses Ks = 05
kNm
D Qualitative Data
As well as collecting time series of loads displacements and accelershy
ations visual data was also gathered An underwater video viewing the
underside of the model platform was taken for each test significant ice
underride occurred in all cases which is cause for concern since underridlng
ice may foul drill string or mooring lines Above water videos were also
taken of each test After each test any ice lodged under the platform was
collected and photographed (see as an example figure 37)
8
IV DISCUSSION
A Observations
A number of qualitative observations can be made with regard to ice and
platform behavior during the tests
Modes of ice fracture
As expected ice fractured circumferentially as it thrust against the
platform (see figure 38) After downward flexure had produce a circumferenshy
tial crack ice segments were further broken by radial cracks The resulting
lee pieces were then shored down the hull and clearing from beneath it
occurred in one of three ways They were either swept past the sides or
under the bottom of the platform or it rotated back under the oncoming ice
sheet The last clearing mechanism leading to the formation of a ridge or
collar of broken ice that ringed the platform and significantly affected the
ice loads it experienced
2 Platform motion
The platform amidst a moving ice sheet showed a fairly regular though
also stochastic motion The platform would pitch up at the point of impact
and heave while being shoved backwards After a certain amount of motion it
would lurch or surge forward rapidly only to be shoved backwards again
Numerous smaller motions were superposed on this long term surge behavior
This behavior ls discussed further in Section E below
3 Ice subduction
A major concern in any floating drilling structure is to avoid broken ice
moving under the structure and fouling the drill string In a cable moored
system such as Kulluk a further concern ls added that of avoiding fouling
of moored cables Considerable ice under flow was observed in the tests conshy
ducted for this study being most prevalent in thick ice conditions Somewhat
different behavior could be expected for the Kulluk platform because of
differences in a hull shape particularly of the hull skirt (see figure
39) Thus while Kulluk would experience less ice underflow than the model
9
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank Dr M Matsuishi of Hitachi Zosen Corporation
Dr R Johnson of Mobil Research and Development Corporation and Mr C Smith
of US Minerals Management Service for their guidance in conduct of this
project Additionally the authors wish to thank Mr s Iwata of Hitachi
Zosen Corporation for assisting in conduct of the experiment
i i i
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
l Conical Platform Similar to 11Kulluk11 bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
2 The Model Platform
3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
4 Towing Tank Carriage
5 Detailed Drawing of Model Platformbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
7 Details of Mooring Harness bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bull bullbull
8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restraining Device bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
9 Yne Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platformbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 20mm) Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 40rnm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 20mm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 40mm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 20mm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
ii
23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity= 002ms
Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity= 002ms
Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity = 002ms
Strength = 25kPa
29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa ~
31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength= 40kPa
33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPa
34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= 002ms Strength= 25kPa
35 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= 020ms Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platformbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
39 Comparison of uSkirtsu for Model and Kullukbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
40 Depiction of Forces Acting on the Ice Sheet bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
41 Surge Force vs lK8 (Inverse of Mooring Stiffness)
42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P301 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
iii
44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and e test P303 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and e test P304 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P301F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P303F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P304F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbull
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and ttKulluk bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
2 Calibration Coefficients for Transducers bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
3 Ice Sheet Data
4 Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
5 Summary of Fixed Platform Results bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
6 Summary of Moored Platform Results
7 Platform Dynamic Response
v
I INTRODUCTION
Drilling for oil in relatively deep ice-covered or ice-infested waters
poses a number of problems not least of which ls the provision of a stable
platform from which drilling activities can be conducted A cable-moored
platform of conical hull shape provides such stability and experience with
one platform 11Kulluk (see eg Hnatiuk and iJright 1984) in the Beaufort
Sea Figure I shows the hull shape and mooring configuration of a model
floating conical platform similar to 11Kulluk 11 This model was used in all
the experiments described herein
While nKulluk operated with success in the Beaufort Sea there remain to
be answered a number of concerns for the designers and operators of such
floating platforms Obviously of importance are the forces displacements and
accelerations (the dynamic response) of the platform as it encounters a vari shy
ety of different lee types (ice sheets ice floe fields rubble ice large
individual floes etc) Knowledge of the dynamic response envelope of a
platform will enable decisions regarding emergency movement of the platform
(due to unacceptable ice conditions) to be made more effectively avoiding
unnecessary downtime and also unsafe operations Another area of concern is
the problem caused by ice underriding the platform and potentially damaging
the drill string Indeed this latter event may be a more important factor in
determining safe operation than the ice forces Also of importance is the
effect of mooring system stiffness on the dynamic response of a platform
This may even allow some tuningu of platform dynamic response to be made
according to prevailing lee condition
A Scope of Study
The principle objectives of the study were to determine the effects of
mooring system stiffness ice sheet thickness ice sheet strength and ice
sheet velocities on the forces and motions (accelerations and displacements)
that a conical platform would encounter while amidst a large moving ice
sheet
To meet these objectives model tests were conducted at IIHRs ice towing
tank using a 15-meter-diameter (at the load waterline) test platform The
model platform shown in figure 2 was approximately a 145-scale replica of
I
the hull of the existing platform Kulluk However it did not exactly
replicate Kulluk as it was somewhat simpler in hull form and Kulluk sfl
mooring system was not simulated exactly
The ice sheets were grown and tempered to the required thicknesses and
strengths by means of tbe methods described below After tempering the
sheets were pushed against the platform by the tank carriage
The results obtained from tbe tests are compared with the performance
criteria for the cable mooring system of the platform degKulluk
B Practical Aspects
A cable-moored platform of the type shown ln figure 1 is obviously only
one of a number of design concepts under consideration for operation in ice
covered waters No single platform ls ideal for all Arctic drilling sites
and the most suitable platform type is determined by typically the water
depth and the ice conditions at the drilling sites Frederking (1984) reviews
the various platform concepts
Cable-moored platforms appear best suited to water depths between 20-60
meters Kulluk was designed to withstand ice floes of 1 to 1 Sm thickness
of annual ice In worse ice conditions it is to be towed from the drill
site Additional protection was to be provided by ice-breaking ships acting
as escort (Huatink and Wright 1984 Loh and Stamberg 1984)
C Previous Work
A detailed review of previous work both practical and theoretical
concerning ice forces against inclined planes and conical structures is given
by Matsuishi and Ettema (l 985a) The interested reader is referred to this
report
Relatively few tests have been performed on models of cable-moored strucshy
tures Frederklng and Schwarz (1982) conducted a series of tests investigatshy
ing the ice-breaking performance of a downward breaking cone For some tests
the cone was restrained from moving while in other tests it was allowed to
oscillate both vertically and horizontally The oscillating cone experienced
a horizontal force only two-thirds of that measured for the restrained cone
2
gt1atsuishi and Ettema (1985ab) conducted tests on the model platform used
in the present study to investigate the dynamic behavior of the platform when
impacted by floes of annual ice and when in a field of mushy ice They made
measurements both with the platform fixed and with it moored As in this
series of tests mooring system stiffness was modelled using a leaf spring
(see Section II below) Among the results they obtained were
I That mooring force platform mot ions and accelerations increased with
increasing floe diameter but asymptotically approached a constant value
when floe diameter exceeding platform waterline diameter
2 That mooring forces increased wlth increasing speed of ice floe impact
3 That when impacted by mushy ice the moored platform experienced a force 11 11that increased monotonically as a prow developed around the leading
edge of the platform Once the prow had reached an equilibrium size
the ice loads remained steady
4 In mushy ice the mooring forces were linearly proportional to the thickshy
ness of the ice rubble layer
It is intended that this study should build on the work of Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985ab)
II EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
A Test Facilities
1 IIHRs ice towing tank
All experiments were conducted using IIHRs ice towing tank which is 20m
long Sm wide and 13m deep Figure 3 shows the layout of the tank and cold
room within which it is housed Depending on the external ambient tempershy
ature the cold room has a cooling capacity between 15 and 20kw allowing an
ice sheet to grow at a rate of 15 to 20mm per hour
A motorized carriage (shown in figure 4) was used to push the ice sheets
against the model platform The carriage is driven by a variable velocity
DC motor and can move at velocities between 0001 to l 50ms Velocity is
accurately measured by means of a wheel carrying a circular array of regularly
3
spaced holes which is mounted on the drive shaft of the motor A light
shines on one side of the wheel and as a hole passes the light ls detected
on the other side of the wheel by a photo detector The number of pulses
detected per second is linearly proportional to the carriage velocity
2 The test platform
The test platform is similar but not exactly identical in form to the
existing cable-moored platform Kulluk A scale of I 45 can be used to the
relate the test platform to Kulluk Table I lists the principal dimension
of both Kulluk and the test platform A detailed drawing of the test platshy
form is given in figure 5
As discussed by Matsuishi and Et tema (l 985a) a floating cable-moored
platform can be considered to be affected by three linear restoring forces or
moments
(a) A horizontal mooring force arising from the spring stiffness of the
00model Three values of spring stiffness were used in these tests K8
=
I 7kNm 05kNm The latter two stiffnesses were obtained by means of leaf
springs in the mooring harness
(b) A vertical foundation reaction force opposing heave motion due to
buoyancy Kn = 173kNm
(c) A foundation reaction moment opposing pitch motion again due to
buoyancy kp = 35lkNmdegree
3 Instrumentation
The platform was instrumented in two different ways (a) for Ks being
non-infinite (ie the platform was moored) and (b) for K infinite (the8
platform was fixed)
When urnoored the platform was connected to an instrument beam by way of
a linear mooring harness and a load cell (see figure 5) The mooring harness
comprised a pair of elastic leaf springs (to provide K ) a spline bearing8
stroke bearings and universal bearings as shown in figure 7 The harness
simulated accurately the motion of a floating moored platform Horizontal
mooring force was measured using a 490-Newton NISHO DENKI LMC-3502-50 load
cell which connected the mooring harness to the instrument beam Yawing and
4
swaying of the moored platform were restricted by two vertical rods located at
the fore and aft of the platform (see figure 8) The lOmm diameter rods were
constrained to slide in 10Smm wide slots (see figure 9) Thus the moored
platform had three degrees of freedom for motion heave pitch and surge
Heave and pitch motions were measured by means of two linear voltage
displacement transducers (LVDT s) which sensed the vertical motion of the
platform at two positions fore and aft The LVDTs were excited using 12
volts with a full stroke range of 015m
Vertical and horizontal accelerations of the moored platform were meashy
sured with three 2g(196ms-2) KYOWA ASQ-2BL accelerometers
The fixed platform (K = 00 ) was connected directly to a load cell which 8
was in turn bolted to the instrument beam (see figure 10) The horizontal
and vertical forces and the pitching moment experiences by the fixed platform
were measured using a 196-Newton and 98-Newton-meter NISHO DENKI LMC-4107-20
load cell
The locations of the measuring sensors and the positive directions of
recorded data are shown in figure 11 The output voltages from the measuring
sensors were scanned with a digital voltmeter The digitized data were sershy
ially transmitted to IIHRs HP-IOOOE computer system and there stored on
disc The data acquisition band width was 120Hz though each channel was
sampled at a rate of either 7 or lOHz
4 Calibration of transducers
For each of the data-logging transducers the zero level and sensitivity
were determined before each test
Each of the load cells and accelerometers had their output voltage v
measured for an amplifier-created calibration strain s bull The sensitivity S c
of each transducer was evaluated as
S = (ve )C (1) c
where C is a predetermined ratio of strain to the force or acceleration expershy
ienced by the transducer
5
Sensitivities of the LVDTs were evaluated by measuring the voltage
change for a given displacement of the transducer rod
The sensitivity of the carriage velocity measurement was determined by
correlating the output voltage with the mean carriage velocity as measured
with a length scale and stop watch Calibration coefficients are listed in
table 2
B Model Ice
Ice sheets were grown from a O 7~~ by weight urea solution by the wet
seeding procedure described in detail by Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a)
Sheets were grown to three nominal thicknesses (20 30 and 40mm) After
seeding had occurred the cold room was adjusted for maximum cooling rate
until the ice sheet had grown to 85 of the desired thickness At that time
the room temperature was raised to allow the ice sheet to temper (ie to
weaken)
The flexural strength f and the flexural modulus of elasticity Efgt
were monitored during the warm-up period until af attained a prescribed value
(25kPa or 40kPa) The load F to fail a cantilever beam of length pound width b
and thickness h in downwards flexure was used to estimate af
(2)
Two to three cantilever beams were tested at several locations around the ice
sheet in order to obtain a representative mean value of af at intervals as the
sheet weakened
The flexural elastic modulus Ef was determined by measuring the increshy
ment o of the vertical deflection of the ice sheete due to small increments of
a point load ~P applied at the center-point of the ice sheet Thus
2o188( 1-v )
(3)2
Pwgh
where v = Poissons ratio for ice (taken to be 03) P = density of urea w
solution (= 1000 kgm3 ) and g =gravitational acceleration (= 98lms-2 ) The
data associated with each ice sheet are given in table 3
6
C Preliminary Tests
A number of tests were conducted to determine natural frequencies and the
logarithmic decrement of the moored platform surge heave and pitch oscillashy
tions both in open water and in ice conditions The results are tabulated in
table 4 Openwater tests had been conducted previously by Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985a) who had concluded that additional hydrodynamic forces due to
movement of the push blade used for driving ice sheets were negligibly
small The coefficient of friction between the platform and the ice was
measured using a range of normal pressures
D Test Procedures
A total of 42 tests were conducted 15 using the fixed platform 7 using
the moored platform with Ks = 1 7kNm and 20 using the moored platform with
Ks= OSkNm For each test series the ice sheet was pushed with a constant
velocity against the platform by the carriage The velocities used were 002
004 01 and 02ms The relationships between model and prototype values of
ice sheet speeds are given in figure 12 while the relationships between
forces and moments for model and prototype are shown ln figure 13
III PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
A Data
Individual time series from the tests are presented in a separate addenshy
dum to this report (Examples of time series are shown in Appendix 1) The
data obtained from the digital voltmeter were converted from voltages into
2engineering values (N for force ms- for acceleration mm for heave deshy
grees for pitch) by means of a simple computer program The time histories
were also analyzed to give the temporal mean the standard deviation about
that mean and the maximum and minimum values for each signal Table 5 gives
the results for the fixed platform tests and table 6 for the moored
platform tests
7
B Fixed Platform
Figures 14 through 17 show the effect on horizontal force of velocity
Note that as in all graphs of results the mean force and the mean plus two
standard deviations are plotted (following the practice of Matsuishi and
Ettema 985a) It can be seen that horizontal surge force increases with
velocity Similar trends are observed for vertical (heave) force (figures 18
through 21) and pitch moment (figures 22 through 25) Horizontal force
vertical force and the magnitude of the pitching moment all increase with
increasing ice thickness (see figures 26 through 28) The effect of ice
strength is less clear but would appear lo indicate that both forces and the
pitching moment increase with ice increasing strength
C Moored Platform
Figures 29 through 33 show the variation of horizontal (surge) force with
velocity for the moored platform The mean surge force appears to increase
with velocity though not always monotonically There is a possibility of a
minimum force at some intermediate velocity This minimum is more evident if
one considers the variation of the mean force plus two standard deviations
with ice velocity This is discussed further in Section IV below Figures 34
through 36 show the effect of ice thickness on mooring force mooring force
clearly increases with increasing lee thickness Note however that for the
40 mm ice thickness Ks = 1 7 kNm while for all other thicknesses Ks = 05
kNm
D Qualitative Data
As well as collecting time series of loads displacements and accelershy
ations visual data was also gathered An underwater video viewing the
underside of the model platform was taken for each test significant ice
underride occurred in all cases which is cause for concern since underridlng
ice may foul drill string or mooring lines Above water videos were also
taken of each test After each test any ice lodged under the platform was
collected and photographed (see as an example figure 37)
8
IV DISCUSSION
A Observations
A number of qualitative observations can be made with regard to ice and
platform behavior during the tests
Modes of ice fracture
As expected ice fractured circumferentially as it thrust against the
platform (see figure 38) After downward flexure had produce a circumferenshy
tial crack ice segments were further broken by radial cracks The resulting
lee pieces were then shored down the hull and clearing from beneath it
occurred in one of three ways They were either swept past the sides or
under the bottom of the platform or it rotated back under the oncoming ice
sheet The last clearing mechanism leading to the formation of a ridge or
collar of broken ice that ringed the platform and significantly affected the
ice loads it experienced
2 Platform motion
The platform amidst a moving ice sheet showed a fairly regular though
also stochastic motion The platform would pitch up at the point of impact
and heave while being shoved backwards After a certain amount of motion it
would lurch or surge forward rapidly only to be shoved backwards again
Numerous smaller motions were superposed on this long term surge behavior
This behavior ls discussed further in Section E below
3 Ice subduction
A major concern in any floating drilling structure is to avoid broken ice
moving under the structure and fouling the drill string In a cable moored
system such as Kulluk a further concern ls added that of avoiding fouling
of moored cables Considerable ice under flow was observed in the tests conshy
ducted for this study being most prevalent in thick ice conditions Somewhat
different behavior could be expected for the Kulluk platform because of
differences in a hull shape particularly of the hull skirt (see figure
39) Thus while Kulluk would experience less ice underflow than the model
9
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
l Conical Platform Similar to 11Kulluk11 bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
2 The Model Platform
3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
4 Towing Tank Carriage
5 Detailed Drawing of Model Platformbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
7 Details of Mooring Harness bullbullbullbullbull bullbull bull bullbull
8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restraining Device bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
9 Yne Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platformbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 20mm) Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 40rnm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 20mm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 40mm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 20mm Strength= 25kPabullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
ii
23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity= 002ms
Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity= 002ms
Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity = 002ms
Strength = 25kPa
29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa ~
31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength= 40kPa
33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPa
34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= 002ms Strength= 25kPa
35 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= 020ms Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platformbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
39 Comparison of uSkirtsu for Model and Kullukbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
40 Depiction of Forces Acting on the Ice Sheet bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
41 Surge Force vs lK8 (Inverse of Mooring Stiffness)
42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P301 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
iii
44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and e test P303 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and e test P304 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P301F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P303F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P304F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbull
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and ttKulluk bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
2 Calibration Coefficients for Transducers bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
3 Ice Sheet Data
4 Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
5 Summary of Fixed Platform Results bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
6 Summary of Moored Platform Results
7 Platform Dynamic Response
v
I INTRODUCTION
Drilling for oil in relatively deep ice-covered or ice-infested waters
poses a number of problems not least of which ls the provision of a stable
platform from which drilling activities can be conducted A cable-moored
platform of conical hull shape provides such stability and experience with
one platform 11Kulluk (see eg Hnatiuk and iJright 1984) in the Beaufort
Sea Figure I shows the hull shape and mooring configuration of a model
floating conical platform similar to 11Kulluk 11 This model was used in all
the experiments described herein
While nKulluk operated with success in the Beaufort Sea there remain to
be answered a number of concerns for the designers and operators of such
floating platforms Obviously of importance are the forces displacements and
accelerations (the dynamic response) of the platform as it encounters a vari shy
ety of different lee types (ice sheets ice floe fields rubble ice large
individual floes etc) Knowledge of the dynamic response envelope of a
platform will enable decisions regarding emergency movement of the platform
(due to unacceptable ice conditions) to be made more effectively avoiding
unnecessary downtime and also unsafe operations Another area of concern is
the problem caused by ice underriding the platform and potentially damaging
the drill string Indeed this latter event may be a more important factor in
determining safe operation than the ice forces Also of importance is the
effect of mooring system stiffness on the dynamic response of a platform
This may even allow some tuningu of platform dynamic response to be made
according to prevailing lee condition
A Scope of Study
The principle objectives of the study were to determine the effects of
mooring system stiffness ice sheet thickness ice sheet strength and ice
sheet velocities on the forces and motions (accelerations and displacements)
that a conical platform would encounter while amidst a large moving ice
sheet
To meet these objectives model tests were conducted at IIHRs ice towing
tank using a 15-meter-diameter (at the load waterline) test platform The
model platform shown in figure 2 was approximately a 145-scale replica of
I
the hull of the existing platform Kulluk However it did not exactly
replicate Kulluk as it was somewhat simpler in hull form and Kulluk sfl
mooring system was not simulated exactly
The ice sheets were grown and tempered to the required thicknesses and
strengths by means of tbe methods described below After tempering the
sheets were pushed against the platform by the tank carriage
The results obtained from tbe tests are compared with the performance
criteria for the cable mooring system of the platform degKulluk
B Practical Aspects
A cable-moored platform of the type shown ln figure 1 is obviously only
one of a number of design concepts under consideration for operation in ice
covered waters No single platform ls ideal for all Arctic drilling sites
and the most suitable platform type is determined by typically the water
depth and the ice conditions at the drilling sites Frederking (1984) reviews
the various platform concepts
Cable-moored platforms appear best suited to water depths between 20-60
meters Kulluk was designed to withstand ice floes of 1 to 1 Sm thickness
of annual ice In worse ice conditions it is to be towed from the drill
site Additional protection was to be provided by ice-breaking ships acting
as escort (Huatink and Wright 1984 Loh and Stamberg 1984)
C Previous Work
A detailed review of previous work both practical and theoretical
concerning ice forces against inclined planes and conical structures is given
by Matsuishi and Ettema (l 985a) The interested reader is referred to this
report
Relatively few tests have been performed on models of cable-moored strucshy
tures Frederklng and Schwarz (1982) conducted a series of tests investigatshy
ing the ice-breaking performance of a downward breaking cone For some tests
the cone was restrained from moving while in other tests it was allowed to
oscillate both vertically and horizontally The oscillating cone experienced
a horizontal force only two-thirds of that measured for the restrained cone
2
gt1atsuishi and Ettema (1985ab) conducted tests on the model platform used
in the present study to investigate the dynamic behavior of the platform when
impacted by floes of annual ice and when in a field of mushy ice They made
measurements both with the platform fixed and with it moored As in this
series of tests mooring system stiffness was modelled using a leaf spring
(see Section II below) Among the results they obtained were
I That mooring force platform mot ions and accelerations increased with
increasing floe diameter but asymptotically approached a constant value
when floe diameter exceeding platform waterline diameter
2 That mooring forces increased wlth increasing speed of ice floe impact
3 That when impacted by mushy ice the moored platform experienced a force 11 11that increased monotonically as a prow developed around the leading
edge of the platform Once the prow had reached an equilibrium size
the ice loads remained steady
4 In mushy ice the mooring forces were linearly proportional to the thickshy
ness of the ice rubble layer
It is intended that this study should build on the work of Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985ab)
II EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
A Test Facilities
1 IIHRs ice towing tank
All experiments were conducted using IIHRs ice towing tank which is 20m
long Sm wide and 13m deep Figure 3 shows the layout of the tank and cold
room within which it is housed Depending on the external ambient tempershy
ature the cold room has a cooling capacity between 15 and 20kw allowing an
ice sheet to grow at a rate of 15 to 20mm per hour
A motorized carriage (shown in figure 4) was used to push the ice sheets
against the model platform The carriage is driven by a variable velocity
DC motor and can move at velocities between 0001 to l 50ms Velocity is
accurately measured by means of a wheel carrying a circular array of regularly
3
spaced holes which is mounted on the drive shaft of the motor A light
shines on one side of the wheel and as a hole passes the light ls detected
on the other side of the wheel by a photo detector The number of pulses
detected per second is linearly proportional to the carriage velocity
2 The test platform
The test platform is similar but not exactly identical in form to the
existing cable-moored platform Kulluk A scale of I 45 can be used to the
relate the test platform to Kulluk Table I lists the principal dimension
of both Kulluk and the test platform A detailed drawing of the test platshy
form is given in figure 5
As discussed by Matsuishi and Et tema (l 985a) a floating cable-moored
platform can be considered to be affected by three linear restoring forces or
moments
(a) A horizontal mooring force arising from the spring stiffness of the
00model Three values of spring stiffness were used in these tests K8
=
I 7kNm 05kNm The latter two stiffnesses were obtained by means of leaf
springs in the mooring harness
(b) A vertical foundation reaction force opposing heave motion due to
buoyancy Kn = 173kNm
(c) A foundation reaction moment opposing pitch motion again due to
buoyancy kp = 35lkNmdegree
3 Instrumentation
The platform was instrumented in two different ways (a) for Ks being
non-infinite (ie the platform was moored) and (b) for K infinite (the8
platform was fixed)
When urnoored the platform was connected to an instrument beam by way of
a linear mooring harness and a load cell (see figure 5) The mooring harness
comprised a pair of elastic leaf springs (to provide K ) a spline bearing8
stroke bearings and universal bearings as shown in figure 7 The harness
simulated accurately the motion of a floating moored platform Horizontal
mooring force was measured using a 490-Newton NISHO DENKI LMC-3502-50 load
cell which connected the mooring harness to the instrument beam Yawing and
4
swaying of the moored platform were restricted by two vertical rods located at
the fore and aft of the platform (see figure 8) The lOmm diameter rods were
constrained to slide in 10Smm wide slots (see figure 9) Thus the moored
platform had three degrees of freedom for motion heave pitch and surge
Heave and pitch motions were measured by means of two linear voltage
displacement transducers (LVDT s) which sensed the vertical motion of the
platform at two positions fore and aft The LVDTs were excited using 12
volts with a full stroke range of 015m
Vertical and horizontal accelerations of the moored platform were meashy
sured with three 2g(196ms-2) KYOWA ASQ-2BL accelerometers
The fixed platform (K = 00 ) was connected directly to a load cell which 8
was in turn bolted to the instrument beam (see figure 10) The horizontal
and vertical forces and the pitching moment experiences by the fixed platform
were measured using a 196-Newton and 98-Newton-meter NISHO DENKI LMC-4107-20
load cell
The locations of the measuring sensors and the positive directions of
recorded data are shown in figure 11 The output voltages from the measuring
sensors were scanned with a digital voltmeter The digitized data were sershy
ially transmitted to IIHRs HP-IOOOE computer system and there stored on
disc The data acquisition band width was 120Hz though each channel was
sampled at a rate of either 7 or lOHz
4 Calibration of transducers
For each of the data-logging transducers the zero level and sensitivity
were determined before each test
Each of the load cells and accelerometers had their output voltage v
measured for an amplifier-created calibration strain s bull The sensitivity S c
of each transducer was evaluated as
S = (ve )C (1) c
where C is a predetermined ratio of strain to the force or acceleration expershy
ienced by the transducer
5
Sensitivities of the LVDTs were evaluated by measuring the voltage
change for a given displacement of the transducer rod
The sensitivity of the carriage velocity measurement was determined by
correlating the output voltage with the mean carriage velocity as measured
with a length scale and stop watch Calibration coefficients are listed in
table 2
B Model Ice
Ice sheets were grown from a O 7~~ by weight urea solution by the wet
seeding procedure described in detail by Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a)
Sheets were grown to three nominal thicknesses (20 30 and 40mm) After
seeding had occurred the cold room was adjusted for maximum cooling rate
until the ice sheet had grown to 85 of the desired thickness At that time
the room temperature was raised to allow the ice sheet to temper (ie to
weaken)
The flexural strength f and the flexural modulus of elasticity Efgt
were monitored during the warm-up period until af attained a prescribed value
(25kPa or 40kPa) The load F to fail a cantilever beam of length pound width b
and thickness h in downwards flexure was used to estimate af
(2)
Two to three cantilever beams were tested at several locations around the ice
sheet in order to obtain a representative mean value of af at intervals as the
sheet weakened
The flexural elastic modulus Ef was determined by measuring the increshy
ment o of the vertical deflection of the ice sheete due to small increments of
a point load ~P applied at the center-point of the ice sheet Thus
2o188( 1-v )
(3)2
Pwgh
where v = Poissons ratio for ice (taken to be 03) P = density of urea w
solution (= 1000 kgm3 ) and g =gravitational acceleration (= 98lms-2 ) The
data associated with each ice sheet are given in table 3
6
C Preliminary Tests
A number of tests were conducted to determine natural frequencies and the
logarithmic decrement of the moored platform surge heave and pitch oscillashy
tions both in open water and in ice conditions The results are tabulated in
table 4 Openwater tests had been conducted previously by Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985a) who had concluded that additional hydrodynamic forces due to
movement of the push blade used for driving ice sheets were negligibly
small The coefficient of friction between the platform and the ice was
measured using a range of normal pressures
D Test Procedures
A total of 42 tests were conducted 15 using the fixed platform 7 using
the moored platform with Ks = 1 7kNm and 20 using the moored platform with
Ks= OSkNm For each test series the ice sheet was pushed with a constant
velocity against the platform by the carriage The velocities used were 002
004 01 and 02ms The relationships between model and prototype values of
ice sheet speeds are given in figure 12 while the relationships between
forces and moments for model and prototype are shown ln figure 13
III PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
A Data
Individual time series from the tests are presented in a separate addenshy
dum to this report (Examples of time series are shown in Appendix 1) The
data obtained from the digital voltmeter were converted from voltages into
2engineering values (N for force ms- for acceleration mm for heave deshy
grees for pitch) by means of a simple computer program The time histories
were also analyzed to give the temporal mean the standard deviation about
that mean and the maximum and minimum values for each signal Table 5 gives
the results for the fixed platform tests and table 6 for the moored
platform tests
7
B Fixed Platform
Figures 14 through 17 show the effect on horizontal force of velocity
Note that as in all graphs of results the mean force and the mean plus two
standard deviations are plotted (following the practice of Matsuishi and
Ettema 985a) It can be seen that horizontal surge force increases with
velocity Similar trends are observed for vertical (heave) force (figures 18
through 21) and pitch moment (figures 22 through 25) Horizontal force
vertical force and the magnitude of the pitching moment all increase with
increasing ice thickness (see figures 26 through 28) The effect of ice
strength is less clear but would appear lo indicate that both forces and the
pitching moment increase with ice increasing strength
C Moored Platform
Figures 29 through 33 show the variation of horizontal (surge) force with
velocity for the moored platform The mean surge force appears to increase
with velocity though not always monotonically There is a possibility of a
minimum force at some intermediate velocity This minimum is more evident if
one considers the variation of the mean force plus two standard deviations
with ice velocity This is discussed further in Section IV below Figures 34
through 36 show the effect of ice thickness on mooring force mooring force
clearly increases with increasing lee thickness Note however that for the
40 mm ice thickness Ks = 1 7 kNm while for all other thicknesses Ks = 05
kNm
D Qualitative Data
As well as collecting time series of loads displacements and accelershy
ations visual data was also gathered An underwater video viewing the
underside of the model platform was taken for each test significant ice
underride occurred in all cases which is cause for concern since underridlng
ice may foul drill string or mooring lines Above water videos were also
taken of each test After each test any ice lodged under the platform was
collected and photographed (see as an example figure 37)
8
IV DISCUSSION
A Observations
A number of qualitative observations can be made with regard to ice and
platform behavior during the tests
Modes of ice fracture
As expected ice fractured circumferentially as it thrust against the
platform (see figure 38) After downward flexure had produce a circumferenshy
tial crack ice segments were further broken by radial cracks The resulting
lee pieces were then shored down the hull and clearing from beneath it
occurred in one of three ways They were either swept past the sides or
under the bottom of the platform or it rotated back under the oncoming ice
sheet The last clearing mechanism leading to the formation of a ridge or
collar of broken ice that ringed the platform and significantly affected the
ice loads it experienced
2 Platform motion
The platform amidst a moving ice sheet showed a fairly regular though
also stochastic motion The platform would pitch up at the point of impact
and heave while being shoved backwards After a certain amount of motion it
would lurch or surge forward rapidly only to be shoved backwards again
Numerous smaller motions were superposed on this long term surge behavior
This behavior ls discussed further in Section E below
3 Ice subduction
A major concern in any floating drilling structure is to avoid broken ice
moving under the structure and fouling the drill string In a cable moored
system such as Kulluk a further concern ls added that of avoiding fouling
of moored cables Considerable ice under flow was observed in the tests conshy
ducted for this study being most prevalent in thick ice conditions Somewhat
different behavior could be expected for the Kulluk platform because of
differences in a hull shape particularly of the hull skirt (see figure
39) Thus while Kulluk would experience less ice underflow than the model
9
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity= 002ms
Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity= 002ms
Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness Velocity = 002ms
Strength = 25kPa
29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa ~
31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength= 40kPa
33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness= 30mm Strength= 40kPa
34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= 002ms Strength= 25kPa
35 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength = 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= 020ms Strength= 25kPa bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platformbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
39 Comparison of uSkirtsu for Model and Kullukbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
40 Depiction of Forces Acting on the Ice Sheet bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
41 Surge Force vs lK8 (Inverse of Mooring Stiffness)
42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P301 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
iii
44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and e test P303 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and e test P304 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P301F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P303F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P304F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbull
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and ttKulluk bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
2 Calibration Coefficients for Transducers bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
3 Ice Sheet Data
4 Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
5 Summary of Fixed Platform Results bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
6 Summary of Moored Platform Results
7 Platform Dynamic Response
v
I INTRODUCTION
Drilling for oil in relatively deep ice-covered or ice-infested waters
poses a number of problems not least of which ls the provision of a stable
platform from which drilling activities can be conducted A cable-moored
platform of conical hull shape provides such stability and experience with
one platform 11Kulluk (see eg Hnatiuk and iJright 1984) in the Beaufort
Sea Figure I shows the hull shape and mooring configuration of a model
floating conical platform similar to 11Kulluk 11 This model was used in all
the experiments described herein
While nKulluk operated with success in the Beaufort Sea there remain to
be answered a number of concerns for the designers and operators of such
floating platforms Obviously of importance are the forces displacements and
accelerations (the dynamic response) of the platform as it encounters a vari shy
ety of different lee types (ice sheets ice floe fields rubble ice large
individual floes etc) Knowledge of the dynamic response envelope of a
platform will enable decisions regarding emergency movement of the platform
(due to unacceptable ice conditions) to be made more effectively avoiding
unnecessary downtime and also unsafe operations Another area of concern is
the problem caused by ice underriding the platform and potentially damaging
the drill string Indeed this latter event may be a more important factor in
determining safe operation than the ice forces Also of importance is the
effect of mooring system stiffness on the dynamic response of a platform
This may even allow some tuningu of platform dynamic response to be made
according to prevailing lee condition
A Scope of Study
The principle objectives of the study were to determine the effects of
mooring system stiffness ice sheet thickness ice sheet strength and ice
sheet velocities on the forces and motions (accelerations and displacements)
that a conical platform would encounter while amidst a large moving ice
sheet
To meet these objectives model tests were conducted at IIHRs ice towing
tank using a 15-meter-diameter (at the load waterline) test platform The
model platform shown in figure 2 was approximately a 145-scale replica of
I
the hull of the existing platform Kulluk However it did not exactly
replicate Kulluk as it was somewhat simpler in hull form and Kulluk sfl
mooring system was not simulated exactly
The ice sheets were grown and tempered to the required thicknesses and
strengths by means of tbe methods described below After tempering the
sheets were pushed against the platform by the tank carriage
The results obtained from tbe tests are compared with the performance
criteria for the cable mooring system of the platform degKulluk
B Practical Aspects
A cable-moored platform of the type shown ln figure 1 is obviously only
one of a number of design concepts under consideration for operation in ice
covered waters No single platform ls ideal for all Arctic drilling sites
and the most suitable platform type is determined by typically the water
depth and the ice conditions at the drilling sites Frederking (1984) reviews
the various platform concepts
Cable-moored platforms appear best suited to water depths between 20-60
meters Kulluk was designed to withstand ice floes of 1 to 1 Sm thickness
of annual ice In worse ice conditions it is to be towed from the drill
site Additional protection was to be provided by ice-breaking ships acting
as escort (Huatink and Wright 1984 Loh and Stamberg 1984)
C Previous Work
A detailed review of previous work both practical and theoretical
concerning ice forces against inclined planes and conical structures is given
by Matsuishi and Ettema (l 985a) The interested reader is referred to this
report
Relatively few tests have been performed on models of cable-moored strucshy
tures Frederklng and Schwarz (1982) conducted a series of tests investigatshy
ing the ice-breaking performance of a downward breaking cone For some tests
the cone was restrained from moving while in other tests it was allowed to
oscillate both vertically and horizontally The oscillating cone experienced
a horizontal force only two-thirds of that measured for the restrained cone
2
gt1atsuishi and Ettema (1985ab) conducted tests on the model platform used
in the present study to investigate the dynamic behavior of the platform when
impacted by floes of annual ice and when in a field of mushy ice They made
measurements both with the platform fixed and with it moored As in this
series of tests mooring system stiffness was modelled using a leaf spring
(see Section II below) Among the results they obtained were
I That mooring force platform mot ions and accelerations increased with
increasing floe diameter but asymptotically approached a constant value
when floe diameter exceeding platform waterline diameter
2 That mooring forces increased wlth increasing speed of ice floe impact
3 That when impacted by mushy ice the moored platform experienced a force 11 11that increased monotonically as a prow developed around the leading
edge of the platform Once the prow had reached an equilibrium size
the ice loads remained steady
4 In mushy ice the mooring forces were linearly proportional to the thickshy
ness of the ice rubble layer
It is intended that this study should build on the work of Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985ab)
II EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
A Test Facilities
1 IIHRs ice towing tank
All experiments were conducted using IIHRs ice towing tank which is 20m
long Sm wide and 13m deep Figure 3 shows the layout of the tank and cold
room within which it is housed Depending on the external ambient tempershy
ature the cold room has a cooling capacity between 15 and 20kw allowing an
ice sheet to grow at a rate of 15 to 20mm per hour
A motorized carriage (shown in figure 4) was used to push the ice sheets
against the model platform The carriage is driven by a variable velocity
DC motor and can move at velocities between 0001 to l 50ms Velocity is
accurately measured by means of a wheel carrying a circular array of regularly
3
spaced holes which is mounted on the drive shaft of the motor A light
shines on one side of the wheel and as a hole passes the light ls detected
on the other side of the wheel by a photo detector The number of pulses
detected per second is linearly proportional to the carriage velocity
2 The test platform
The test platform is similar but not exactly identical in form to the
existing cable-moored platform Kulluk A scale of I 45 can be used to the
relate the test platform to Kulluk Table I lists the principal dimension
of both Kulluk and the test platform A detailed drawing of the test platshy
form is given in figure 5
As discussed by Matsuishi and Et tema (l 985a) a floating cable-moored
platform can be considered to be affected by three linear restoring forces or
moments
(a) A horizontal mooring force arising from the spring stiffness of the
00model Three values of spring stiffness were used in these tests K8
=
I 7kNm 05kNm The latter two stiffnesses were obtained by means of leaf
springs in the mooring harness
(b) A vertical foundation reaction force opposing heave motion due to
buoyancy Kn = 173kNm
(c) A foundation reaction moment opposing pitch motion again due to
buoyancy kp = 35lkNmdegree
3 Instrumentation
The platform was instrumented in two different ways (a) for Ks being
non-infinite (ie the platform was moored) and (b) for K infinite (the8
platform was fixed)
When urnoored the platform was connected to an instrument beam by way of
a linear mooring harness and a load cell (see figure 5) The mooring harness
comprised a pair of elastic leaf springs (to provide K ) a spline bearing8
stroke bearings and universal bearings as shown in figure 7 The harness
simulated accurately the motion of a floating moored platform Horizontal
mooring force was measured using a 490-Newton NISHO DENKI LMC-3502-50 load
cell which connected the mooring harness to the instrument beam Yawing and
4
swaying of the moored platform were restricted by two vertical rods located at
the fore and aft of the platform (see figure 8) The lOmm diameter rods were
constrained to slide in 10Smm wide slots (see figure 9) Thus the moored
platform had three degrees of freedom for motion heave pitch and surge
Heave and pitch motions were measured by means of two linear voltage
displacement transducers (LVDT s) which sensed the vertical motion of the
platform at two positions fore and aft The LVDTs were excited using 12
volts with a full stroke range of 015m
Vertical and horizontal accelerations of the moored platform were meashy
sured with three 2g(196ms-2) KYOWA ASQ-2BL accelerometers
The fixed platform (K = 00 ) was connected directly to a load cell which 8
was in turn bolted to the instrument beam (see figure 10) The horizontal
and vertical forces and the pitching moment experiences by the fixed platform
were measured using a 196-Newton and 98-Newton-meter NISHO DENKI LMC-4107-20
load cell
The locations of the measuring sensors and the positive directions of
recorded data are shown in figure 11 The output voltages from the measuring
sensors were scanned with a digital voltmeter The digitized data were sershy
ially transmitted to IIHRs HP-IOOOE computer system and there stored on
disc The data acquisition band width was 120Hz though each channel was
sampled at a rate of either 7 or lOHz
4 Calibration of transducers
For each of the data-logging transducers the zero level and sensitivity
were determined before each test
Each of the load cells and accelerometers had their output voltage v
measured for an amplifier-created calibration strain s bull The sensitivity S c
of each transducer was evaluated as
S = (ve )C (1) c
where C is a predetermined ratio of strain to the force or acceleration expershy
ienced by the transducer
5
Sensitivities of the LVDTs were evaluated by measuring the voltage
change for a given displacement of the transducer rod
The sensitivity of the carriage velocity measurement was determined by
correlating the output voltage with the mean carriage velocity as measured
with a length scale and stop watch Calibration coefficients are listed in
table 2
B Model Ice
Ice sheets were grown from a O 7~~ by weight urea solution by the wet
seeding procedure described in detail by Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a)
Sheets were grown to three nominal thicknesses (20 30 and 40mm) After
seeding had occurred the cold room was adjusted for maximum cooling rate
until the ice sheet had grown to 85 of the desired thickness At that time
the room temperature was raised to allow the ice sheet to temper (ie to
weaken)
The flexural strength f and the flexural modulus of elasticity Efgt
were monitored during the warm-up period until af attained a prescribed value
(25kPa or 40kPa) The load F to fail a cantilever beam of length pound width b
and thickness h in downwards flexure was used to estimate af
(2)
Two to three cantilever beams were tested at several locations around the ice
sheet in order to obtain a representative mean value of af at intervals as the
sheet weakened
The flexural elastic modulus Ef was determined by measuring the increshy
ment o of the vertical deflection of the ice sheete due to small increments of
a point load ~P applied at the center-point of the ice sheet Thus
2o188( 1-v )
(3)2
Pwgh
where v = Poissons ratio for ice (taken to be 03) P = density of urea w
solution (= 1000 kgm3 ) and g =gravitational acceleration (= 98lms-2 ) The
data associated with each ice sheet are given in table 3
6
C Preliminary Tests
A number of tests were conducted to determine natural frequencies and the
logarithmic decrement of the moored platform surge heave and pitch oscillashy
tions both in open water and in ice conditions The results are tabulated in
table 4 Openwater tests had been conducted previously by Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985a) who had concluded that additional hydrodynamic forces due to
movement of the push blade used for driving ice sheets were negligibly
small The coefficient of friction between the platform and the ice was
measured using a range of normal pressures
D Test Procedures
A total of 42 tests were conducted 15 using the fixed platform 7 using
the moored platform with Ks = 1 7kNm and 20 using the moored platform with
Ks= OSkNm For each test series the ice sheet was pushed with a constant
velocity against the platform by the carriage The velocities used were 002
004 01 and 02ms The relationships between model and prototype values of
ice sheet speeds are given in figure 12 while the relationships between
forces and moments for model and prototype are shown ln figure 13
III PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
A Data
Individual time series from the tests are presented in a separate addenshy
dum to this report (Examples of time series are shown in Appendix 1) The
data obtained from the digital voltmeter were converted from voltages into
2engineering values (N for force ms- for acceleration mm for heave deshy
grees for pitch) by means of a simple computer program The time histories
were also analyzed to give the temporal mean the standard deviation about
that mean and the maximum and minimum values for each signal Table 5 gives
the results for the fixed platform tests and table 6 for the moored
platform tests
7
B Fixed Platform
Figures 14 through 17 show the effect on horizontal force of velocity
Note that as in all graphs of results the mean force and the mean plus two
standard deviations are plotted (following the practice of Matsuishi and
Ettema 985a) It can be seen that horizontal surge force increases with
velocity Similar trends are observed for vertical (heave) force (figures 18
through 21) and pitch moment (figures 22 through 25) Horizontal force
vertical force and the magnitude of the pitching moment all increase with
increasing ice thickness (see figures 26 through 28) The effect of ice
strength is less clear but would appear lo indicate that both forces and the
pitching moment increase with ice increasing strength
C Moored Platform
Figures 29 through 33 show the variation of horizontal (surge) force with
velocity for the moored platform The mean surge force appears to increase
with velocity though not always monotonically There is a possibility of a
minimum force at some intermediate velocity This minimum is more evident if
one considers the variation of the mean force plus two standard deviations
with ice velocity This is discussed further in Section IV below Figures 34
through 36 show the effect of ice thickness on mooring force mooring force
clearly increases with increasing lee thickness Note however that for the
40 mm ice thickness Ks = 1 7 kNm while for all other thicknesses Ks = 05
kNm
D Qualitative Data
As well as collecting time series of loads displacements and accelershy
ations visual data was also gathered An underwater video viewing the
underside of the model platform was taken for each test significant ice
underride occurred in all cases which is cause for concern since underridlng
ice may foul drill string or mooring lines Above water videos were also
taken of each test After each test any ice lodged under the platform was
collected and photographed (see as an example figure 37)
8
IV DISCUSSION
A Observations
A number of qualitative observations can be made with regard to ice and
platform behavior during the tests
Modes of ice fracture
As expected ice fractured circumferentially as it thrust against the
platform (see figure 38) After downward flexure had produce a circumferenshy
tial crack ice segments were further broken by radial cracks The resulting
lee pieces were then shored down the hull and clearing from beneath it
occurred in one of three ways They were either swept past the sides or
under the bottom of the platform or it rotated back under the oncoming ice
sheet The last clearing mechanism leading to the formation of a ridge or
collar of broken ice that ringed the platform and significantly affected the
ice loads it experienced
2 Platform motion
The platform amidst a moving ice sheet showed a fairly regular though
also stochastic motion The platform would pitch up at the point of impact
and heave while being shoved backwards After a certain amount of motion it
would lurch or surge forward rapidly only to be shoved backwards again
Numerous smaller motions were superposed on this long term surge behavior
This behavior ls discussed further in Section E below
3 Ice subduction
A major concern in any floating drilling structure is to avoid broken ice
moving under the structure and fouling the drill string In a cable moored
system such as Kulluk a further concern ls added that of avoiding fouling
of moored cables Considerable ice under flow was observed in the tests conshy
ducted for this study being most prevalent in thick ice conditions Somewhat
different behavior could be expected for the Kulluk platform because of
differences in a hull shape particularly of the hull skirt (see figure
39) Thus while Kulluk would experience less ice underflow than the model
9
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and e test P303 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and e test P304 (moored) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P301F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P303F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P304F (fixed) bullbullbullbullbullbull
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and ttKulluk bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
2 Calibration Coefficients for Transducers bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
3 Ice Sheet Data
4 Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
5 Summary of Fixed Platform Results bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
6 Summary of Moored Platform Results
7 Platform Dynamic Response
v
I INTRODUCTION
Drilling for oil in relatively deep ice-covered or ice-infested waters
poses a number of problems not least of which ls the provision of a stable
platform from which drilling activities can be conducted A cable-moored
platform of conical hull shape provides such stability and experience with
one platform 11Kulluk (see eg Hnatiuk and iJright 1984) in the Beaufort
Sea Figure I shows the hull shape and mooring configuration of a model
floating conical platform similar to 11Kulluk 11 This model was used in all
the experiments described herein
While nKulluk operated with success in the Beaufort Sea there remain to
be answered a number of concerns for the designers and operators of such
floating platforms Obviously of importance are the forces displacements and
accelerations (the dynamic response) of the platform as it encounters a vari shy
ety of different lee types (ice sheets ice floe fields rubble ice large
individual floes etc) Knowledge of the dynamic response envelope of a
platform will enable decisions regarding emergency movement of the platform
(due to unacceptable ice conditions) to be made more effectively avoiding
unnecessary downtime and also unsafe operations Another area of concern is
the problem caused by ice underriding the platform and potentially damaging
the drill string Indeed this latter event may be a more important factor in
determining safe operation than the ice forces Also of importance is the
effect of mooring system stiffness on the dynamic response of a platform
This may even allow some tuningu of platform dynamic response to be made
according to prevailing lee condition
A Scope of Study
The principle objectives of the study were to determine the effects of
mooring system stiffness ice sheet thickness ice sheet strength and ice
sheet velocities on the forces and motions (accelerations and displacements)
that a conical platform would encounter while amidst a large moving ice
sheet
To meet these objectives model tests were conducted at IIHRs ice towing
tank using a 15-meter-diameter (at the load waterline) test platform The
model platform shown in figure 2 was approximately a 145-scale replica of
I
the hull of the existing platform Kulluk However it did not exactly
replicate Kulluk as it was somewhat simpler in hull form and Kulluk sfl
mooring system was not simulated exactly
The ice sheets were grown and tempered to the required thicknesses and
strengths by means of tbe methods described below After tempering the
sheets were pushed against the platform by the tank carriage
The results obtained from tbe tests are compared with the performance
criteria for the cable mooring system of the platform degKulluk
B Practical Aspects
A cable-moored platform of the type shown ln figure 1 is obviously only
one of a number of design concepts under consideration for operation in ice
covered waters No single platform ls ideal for all Arctic drilling sites
and the most suitable platform type is determined by typically the water
depth and the ice conditions at the drilling sites Frederking (1984) reviews
the various platform concepts
Cable-moored platforms appear best suited to water depths between 20-60
meters Kulluk was designed to withstand ice floes of 1 to 1 Sm thickness
of annual ice In worse ice conditions it is to be towed from the drill
site Additional protection was to be provided by ice-breaking ships acting
as escort (Huatink and Wright 1984 Loh and Stamberg 1984)
C Previous Work
A detailed review of previous work both practical and theoretical
concerning ice forces against inclined planes and conical structures is given
by Matsuishi and Ettema (l 985a) The interested reader is referred to this
report
Relatively few tests have been performed on models of cable-moored strucshy
tures Frederklng and Schwarz (1982) conducted a series of tests investigatshy
ing the ice-breaking performance of a downward breaking cone For some tests
the cone was restrained from moving while in other tests it was allowed to
oscillate both vertically and horizontally The oscillating cone experienced
a horizontal force only two-thirds of that measured for the restrained cone
2
gt1atsuishi and Ettema (1985ab) conducted tests on the model platform used
in the present study to investigate the dynamic behavior of the platform when
impacted by floes of annual ice and when in a field of mushy ice They made
measurements both with the platform fixed and with it moored As in this
series of tests mooring system stiffness was modelled using a leaf spring
(see Section II below) Among the results they obtained were
I That mooring force platform mot ions and accelerations increased with
increasing floe diameter but asymptotically approached a constant value
when floe diameter exceeding platform waterline diameter
2 That mooring forces increased wlth increasing speed of ice floe impact
3 That when impacted by mushy ice the moored platform experienced a force 11 11that increased monotonically as a prow developed around the leading
edge of the platform Once the prow had reached an equilibrium size
the ice loads remained steady
4 In mushy ice the mooring forces were linearly proportional to the thickshy
ness of the ice rubble layer
It is intended that this study should build on the work of Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985ab)
II EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
A Test Facilities
1 IIHRs ice towing tank
All experiments were conducted using IIHRs ice towing tank which is 20m
long Sm wide and 13m deep Figure 3 shows the layout of the tank and cold
room within which it is housed Depending on the external ambient tempershy
ature the cold room has a cooling capacity between 15 and 20kw allowing an
ice sheet to grow at a rate of 15 to 20mm per hour
A motorized carriage (shown in figure 4) was used to push the ice sheets
against the model platform The carriage is driven by a variable velocity
DC motor and can move at velocities between 0001 to l 50ms Velocity is
accurately measured by means of a wheel carrying a circular array of regularly
3
spaced holes which is mounted on the drive shaft of the motor A light
shines on one side of the wheel and as a hole passes the light ls detected
on the other side of the wheel by a photo detector The number of pulses
detected per second is linearly proportional to the carriage velocity
2 The test platform
The test platform is similar but not exactly identical in form to the
existing cable-moored platform Kulluk A scale of I 45 can be used to the
relate the test platform to Kulluk Table I lists the principal dimension
of both Kulluk and the test platform A detailed drawing of the test platshy
form is given in figure 5
As discussed by Matsuishi and Et tema (l 985a) a floating cable-moored
platform can be considered to be affected by three linear restoring forces or
moments
(a) A horizontal mooring force arising from the spring stiffness of the
00model Three values of spring stiffness were used in these tests K8
=
I 7kNm 05kNm The latter two stiffnesses were obtained by means of leaf
springs in the mooring harness
(b) A vertical foundation reaction force opposing heave motion due to
buoyancy Kn = 173kNm
(c) A foundation reaction moment opposing pitch motion again due to
buoyancy kp = 35lkNmdegree
3 Instrumentation
The platform was instrumented in two different ways (a) for Ks being
non-infinite (ie the platform was moored) and (b) for K infinite (the8
platform was fixed)
When urnoored the platform was connected to an instrument beam by way of
a linear mooring harness and a load cell (see figure 5) The mooring harness
comprised a pair of elastic leaf springs (to provide K ) a spline bearing8
stroke bearings and universal bearings as shown in figure 7 The harness
simulated accurately the motion of a floating moored platform Horizontal
mooring force was measured using a 490-Newton NISHO DENKI LMC-3502-50 load
cell which connected the mooring harness to the instrument beam Yawing and
4
swaying of the moored platform were restricted by two vertical rods located at
the fore and aft of the platform (see figure 8) The lOmm diameter rods were
constrained to slide in 10Smm wide slots (see figure 9) Thus the moored
platform had three degrees of freedom for motion heave pitch and surge
Heave and pitch motions were measured by means of two linear voltage
displacement transducers (LVDT s) which sensed the vertical motion of the
platform at two positions fore and aft The LVDTs were excited using 12
volts with a full stroke range of 015m
Vertical and horizontal accelerations of the moored platform were meashy
sured with three 2g(196ms-2) KYOWA ASQ-2BL accelerometers
The fixed platform (K = 00 ) was connected directly to a load cell which 8
was in turn bolted to the instrument beam (see figure 10) The horizontal
and vertical forces and the pitching moment experiences by the fixed platform
were measured using a 196-Newton and 98-Newton-meter NISHO DENKI LMC-4107-20
load cell
The locations of the measuring sensors and the positive directions of
recorded data are shown in figure 11 The output voltages from the measuring
sensors were scanned with a digital voltmeter The digitized data were sershy
ially transmitted to IIHRs HP-IOOOE computer system and there stored on
disc The data acquisition band width was 120Hz though each channel was
sampled at a rate of either 7 or lOHz
4 Calibration of transducers
For each of the data-logging transducers the zero level and sensitivity
were determined before each test
Each of the load cells and accelerometers had their output voltage v
measured for an amplifier-created calibration strain s bull The sensitivity S c
of each transducer was evaluated as
S = (ve )C (1) c
where C is a predetermined ratio of strain to the force or acceleration expershy
ienced by the transducer
5
Sensitivities of the LVDTs were evaluated by measuring the voltage
change for a given displacement of the transducer rod
The sensitivity of the carriage velocity measurement was determined by
correlating the output voltage with the mean carriage velocity as measured
with a length scale and stop watch Calibration coefficients are listed in
table 2
B Model Ice
Ice sheets were grown from a O 7~~ by weight urea solution by the wet
seeding procedure described in detail by Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a)
Sheets were grown to three nominal thicknesses (20 30 and 40mm) After
seeding had occurred the cold room was adjusted for maximum cooling rate
until the ice sheet had grown to 85 of the desired thickness At that time
the room temperature was raised to allow the ice sheet to temper (ie to
weaken)
The flexural strength f and the flexural modulus of elasticity Efgt
were monitored during the warm-up period until af attained a prescribed value
(25kPa or 40kPa) The load F to fail a cantilever beam of length pound width b
and thickness h in downwards flexure was used to estimate af
(2)
Two to three cantilever beams were tested at several locations around the ice
sheet in order to obtain a representative mean value of af at intervals as the
sheet weakened
The flexural elastic modulus Ef was determined by measuring the increshy
ment o of the vertical deflection of the ice sheete due to small increments of
a point load ~P applied at the center-point of the ice sheet Thus
2o188( 1-v )
(3)2
Pwgh
where v = Poissons ratio for ice (taken to be 03) P = density of urea w
solution (= 1000 kgm3 ) and g =gravitational acceleration (= 98lms-2 ) The
data associated with each ice sheet are given in table 3
6
C Preliminary Tests
A number of tests were conducted to determine natural frequencies and the
logarithmic decrement of the moored platform surge heave and pitch oscillashy
tions both in open water and in ice conditions The results are tabulated in
table 4 Openwater tests had been conducted previously by Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985a) who had concluded that additional hydrodynamic forces due to
movement of the push blade used for driving ice sheets were negligibly
small The coefficient of friction between the platform and the ice was
measured using a range of normal pressures
D Test Procedures
A total of 42 tests were conducted 15 using the fixed platform 7 using
the moored platform with Ks = 1 7kNm and 20 using the moored platform with
Ks= OSkNm For each test series the ice sheet was pushed with a constant
velocity against the platform by the carriage The velocities used were 002
004 01 and 02ms The relationships between model and prototype values of
ice sheet speeds are given in figure 12 while the relationships between
forces and moments for model and prototype are shown ln figure 13
III PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
A Data
Individual time series from the tests are presented in a separate addenshy
dum to this report (Examples of time series are shown in Appendix 1) The
data obtained from the digital voltmeter were converted from voltages into
2engineering values (N for force ms- for acceleration mm for heave deshy
grees for pitch) by means of a simple computer program The time histories
were also analyzed to give the temporal mean the standard deviation about
that mean and the maximum and minimum values for each signal Table 5 gives
the results for the fixed platform tests and table 6 for the moored
platform tests
7
B Fixed Platform
Figures 14 through 17 show the effect on horizontal force of velocity
Note that as in all graphs of results the mean force and the mean plus two
standard deviations are plotted (following the practice of Matsuishi and
Ettema 985a) It can be seen that horizontal surge force increases with
velocity Similar trends are observed for vertical (heave) force (figures 18
through 21) and pitch moment (figures 22 through 25) Horizontal force
vertical force and the magnitude of the pitching moment all increase with
increasing ice thickness (see figures 26 through 28) The effect of ice
strength is less clear but would appear lo indicate that both forces and the
pitching moment increase with ice increasing strength
C Moored Platform
Figures 29 through 33 show the variation of horizontal (surge) force with
velocity for the moored platform The mean surge force appears to increase
with velocity though not always monotonically There is a possibility of a
minimum force at some intermediate velocity This minimum is more evident if
one considers the variation of the mean force plus two standard deviations
with ice velocity This is discussed further in Section IV below Figures 34
through 36 show the effect of ice thickness on mooring force mooring force
clearly increases with increasing lee thickness Note however that for the
40 mm ice thickness Ks = 1 7 kNm while for all other thicknesses Ks = 05
kNm
D Qualitative Data
As well as collecting time series of loads displacements and accelershy
ations visual data was also gathered An underwater video viewing the
underside of the model platform was taken for each test significant ice
underride occurred in all cases which is cause for concern since underridlng
ice may foul drill string or mooring lines Above water videos were also
taken of each test After each test any ice lodged under the platform was
collected and photographed (see as an example figure 37)
8
IV DISCUSSION
A Observations
A number of qualitative observations can be made with regard to ice and
platform behavior during the tests
Modes of ice fracture
As expected ice fractured circumferentially as it thrust against the
platform (see figure 38) After downward flexure had produce a circumferenshy
tial crack ice segments were further broken by radial cracks The resulting
lee pieces were then shored down the hull and clearing from beneath it
occurred in one of three ways They were either swept past the sides or
under the bottom of the platform or it rotated back under the oncoming ice
sheet The last clearing mechanism leading to the formation of a ridge or
collar of broken ice that ringed the platform and significantly affected the
ice loads it experienced
2 Platform motion
The platform amidst a moving ice sheet showed a fairly regular though
also stochastic motion The platform would pitch up at the point of impact
and heave while being shoved backwards After a certain amount of motion it
would lurch or surge forward rapidly only to be shoved backwards again
Numerous smaller motions were superposed on this long term surge behavior
This behavior ls discussed further in Section E below
3 Ice subduction
A major concern in any floating drilling structure is to avoid broken ice
moving under the structure and fouling the drill string In a cable moored
system such as Kulluk a further concern ls added that of avoiding fouling
of moored cables Considerable ice under flow was observed in the tests conshy
ducted for this study being most prevalent in thick ice conditions Somewhat
different behavior could be expected for the Kulluk platform because of
differences in a hull shape particularly of the hull skirt (see figure
39) Thus while Kulluk would experience less ice underflow than the model
9
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and ttKulluk bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
2 Calibration Coefficients for Transducers bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
3 Ice Sheet Data
4 Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
5 Summary of Fixed Platform Results bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
6 Summary of Moored Platform Results
7 Platform Dynamic Response
v
I INTRODUCTION
Drilling for oil in relatively deep ice-covered or ice-infested waters
poses a number of problems not least of which ls the provision of a stable
platform from which drilling activities can be conducted A cable-moored
platform of conical hull shape provides such stability and experience with
one platform 11Kulluk (see eg Hnatiuk and iJright 1984) in the Beaufort
Sea Figure I shows the hull shape and mooring configuration of a model
floating conical platform similar to 11Kulluk 11 This model was used in all
the experiments described herein
While nKulluk operated with success in the Beaufort Sea there remain to
be answered a number of concerns for the designers and operators of such
floating platforms Obviously of importance are the forces displacements and
accelerations (the dynamic response) of the platform as it encounters a vari shy
ety of different lee types (ice sheets ice floe fields rubble ice large
individual floes etc) Knowledge of the dynamic response envelope of a
platform will enable decisions regarding emergency movement of the platform
(due to unacceptable ice conditions) to be made more effectively avoiding
unnecessary downtime and also unsafe operations Another area of concern is
the problem caused by ice underriding the platform and potentially damaging
the drill string Indeed this latter event may be a more important factor in
determining safe operation than the ice forces Also of importance is the
effect of mooring system stiffness on the dynamic response of a platform
This may even allow some tuningu of platform dynamic response to be made
according to prevailing lee condition
A Scope of Study
The principle objectives of the study were to determine the effects of
mooring system stiffness ice sheet thickness ice sheet strength and ice
sheet velocities on the forces and motions (accelerations and displacements)
that a conical platform would encounter while amidst a large moving ice
sheet
To meet these objectives model tests were conducted at IIHRs ice towing
tank using a 15-meter-diameter (at the load waterline) test platform The
model platform shown in figure 2 was approximately a 145-scale replica of
I
the hull of the existing platform Kulluk However it did not exactly
replicate Kulluk as it was somewhat simpler in hull form and Kulluk sfl
mooring system was not simulated exactly
The ice sheets were grown and tempered to the required thicknesses and
strengths by means of tbe methods described below After tempering the
sheets were pushed against the platform by the tank carriage
The results obtained from tbe tests are compared with the performance
criteria for the cable mooring system of the platform degKulluk
B Practical Aspects
A cable-moored platform of the type shown ln figure 1 is obviously only
one of a number of design concepts under consideration for operation in ice
covered waters No single platform ls ideal for all Arctic drilling sites
and the most suitable platform type is determined by typically the water
depth and the ice conditions at the drilling sites Frederking (1984) reviews
the various platform concepts
Cable-moored platforms appear best suited to water depths between 20-60
meters Kulluk was designed to withstand ice floes of 1 to 1 Sm thickness
of annual ice In worse ice conditions it is to be towed from the drill
site Additional protection was to be provided by ice-breaking ships acting
as escort (Huatink and Wright 1984 Loh and Stamberg 1984)
C Previous Work
A detailed review of previous work both practical and theoretical
concerning ice forces against inclined planes and conical structures is given
by Matsuishi and Ettema (l 985a) The interested reader is referred to this
report
Relatively few tests have been performed on models of cable-moored strucshy
tures Frederklng and Schwarz (1982) conducted a series of tests investigatshy
ing the ice-breaking performance of a downward breaking cone For some tests
the cone was restrained from moving while in other tests it was allowed to
oscillate both vertically and horizontally The oscillating cone experienced
a horizontal force only two-thirds of that measured for the restrained cone
2
gt1atsuishi and Ettema (1985ab) conducted tests on the model platform used
in the present study to investigate the dynamic behavior of the platform when
impacted by floes of annual ice and when in a field of mushy ice They made
measurements both with the platform fixed and with it moored As in this
series of tests mooring system stiffness was modelled using a leaf spring
(see Section II below) Among the results they obtained were
I That mooring force platform mot ions and accelerations increased with
increasing floe diameter but asymptotically approached a constant value
when floe diameter exceeding platform waterline diameter
2 That mooring forces increased wlth increasing speed of ice floe impact
3 That when impacted by mushy ice the moored platform experienced a force 11 11that increased monotonically as a prow developed around the leading
edge of the platform Once the prow had reached an equilibrium size
the ice loads remained steady
4 In mushy ice the mooring forces were linearly proportional to the thickshy
ness of the ice rubble layer
It is intended that this study should build on the work of Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985ab)
II EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
A Test Facilities
1 IIHRs ice towing tank
All experiments were conducted using IIHRs ice towing tank which is 20m
long Sm wide and 13m deep Figure 3 shows the layout of the tank and cold
room within which it is housed Depending on the external ambient tempershy
ature the cold room has a cooling capacity between 15 and 20kw allowing an
ice sheet to grow at a rate of 15 to 20mm per hour
A motorized carriage (shown in figure 4) was used to push the ice sheets
against the model platform The carriage is driven by a variable velocity
DC motor and can move at velocities between 0001 to l 50ms Velocity is
accurately measured by means of a wheel carrying a circular array of regularly
3
spaced holes which is mounted on the drive shaft of the motor A light
shines on one side of the wheel and as a hole passes the light ls detected
on the other side of the wheel by a photo detector The number of pulses
detected per second is linearly proportional to the carriage velocity
2 The test platform
The test platform is similar but not exactly identical in form to the
existing cable-moored platform Kulluk A scale of I 45 can be used to the
relate the test platform to Kulluk Table I lists the principal dimension
of both Kulluk and the test platform A detailed drawing of the test platshy
form is given in figure 5
As discussed by Matsuishi and Et tema (l 985a) a floating cable-moored
platform can be considered to be affected by three linear restoring forces or
moments
(a) A horizontal mooring force arising from the spring stiffness of the
00model Three values of spring stiffness were used in these tests K8
=
I 7kNm 05kNm The latter two stiffnesses were obtained by means of leaf
springs in the mooring harness
(b) A vertical foundation reaction force opposing heave motion due to
buoyancy Kn = 173kNm
(c) A foundation reaction moment opposing pitch motion again due to
buoyancy kp = 35lkNmdegree
3 Instrumentation
The platform was instrumented in two different ways (a) for Ks being
non-infinite (ie the platform was moored) and (b) for K infinite (the8
platform was fixed)
When urnoored the platform was connected to an instrument beam by way of
a linear mooring harness and a load cell (see figure 5) The mooring harness
comprised a pair of elastic leaf springs (to provide K ) a spline bearing8
stroke bearings and universal bearings as shown in figure 7 The harness
simulated accurately the motion of a floating moored platform Horizontal
mooring force was measured using a 490-Newton NISHO DENKI LMC-3502-50 load
cell which connected the mooring harness to the instrument beam Yawing and
4
swaying of the moored platform were restricted by two vertical rods located at
the fore and aft of the platform (see figure 8) The lOmm diameter rods were
constrained to slide in 10Smm wide slots (see figure 9) Thus the moored
platform had three degrees of freedom for motion heave pitch and surge
Heave and pitch motions were measured by means of two linear voltage
displacement transducers (LVDT s) which sensed the vertical motion of the
platform at two positions fore and aft The LVDTs were excited using 12
volts with a full stroke range of 015m
Vertical and horizontal accelerations of the moored platform were meashy
sured with three 2g(196ms-2) KYOWA ASQ-2BL accelerometers
The fixed platform (K = 00 ) was connected directly to a load cell which 8
was in turn bolted to the instrument beam (see figure 10) The horizontal
and vertical forces and the pitching moment experiences by the fixed platform
were measured using a 196-Newton and 98-Newton-meter NISHO DENKI LMC-4107-20
load cell
The locations of the measuring sensors and the positive directions of
recorded data are shown in figure 11 The output voltages from the measuring
sensors were scanned with a digital voltmeter The digitized data were sershy
ially transmitted to IIHRs HP-IOOOE computer system and there stored on
disc The data acquisition band width was 120Hz though each channel was
sampled at a rate of either 7 or lOHz
4 Calibration of transducers
For each of the data-logging transducers the zero level and sensitivity
were determined before each test
Each of the load cells and accelerometers had their output voltage v
measured for an amplifier-created calibration strain s bull The sensitivity S c
of each transducer was evaluated as
S = (ve )C (1) c
where C is a predetermined ratio of strain to the force or acceleration expershy
ienced by the transducer
5
Sensitivities of the LVDTs were evaluated by measuring the voltage
change for a given displacement of the transducer rod
The sensitivity of the carriage velocity measurement was determined by
correlating the output voltage with the mean carriage velocity as measured
with a length scale and stop watch Calibration coefficients are listed in
table 2
B Model Ice
Ice sheets were grown from a O 7~~ by weight urea solution by the wet
seeding procedure described in detail by Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a)
Sheets were grown to three nominal thicknesses (20 30 and 40mm) After
seeding had occurred the cold room was adjusted for maximum cooling rate
until the ice sheet had grown to 85 of the desired thickness At that time
the room temperature was raised to allow the ice sheet to temper (ie to
weaken)
The flexural strength f and the flexural modulus of elasticity Efgt
were monitored during the warm-up period until af attained a prescribed value
(25kPa or 40kPa) The load F to fail a cantilever beam of length pound width b
and thickness h in downwards flexure was used to estimate af
(2)
Two to three cantilever beams were tested at several locations around the ice
sheet in order to obtain a representative mean value of af at intervals as the
sheet weakened
The flexural elastic modulus Ef was determined by measuring the increshy
ment o of the vertical deflection of the ice sheete due to small increments of
a point load ~P applied at the center-point of the ice sheet Thus
2o188( 1-v )
(3)2
Pwgh
where v = Poissons ratio for ice (taken to be 03) P = density of urea w
solution (= 1000 kgm3 ) and g =gravitational acceleration (= 98lms-2 ) The
data associated with each ice sheet are given in table 3
6
C Preliminary Tests
A number of tests were conducted to determine natural frequencies and the
logarithmic decrement of the moored platform surge heave and pitch oscillashy
tions both in open water and in ice conditions The results are tabulated in
table 4 Openwater tests had been conducted previously by Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985a) who had concluded that additional hydrodynamic forces due to
movement of the push blade used for driving ice sheets were negligibly
small The coefficient of friction between the platform and the ice was
measured using a range of normal pressures
D Test Procedures
A total of 42 tests were conducted 15 using the fixed platform 7 using
the moored platform with Ks = 1 7kNm and 20 using the moored platform with
Ks= OSkNm For each test series the ice sheet was pushed with a constant
velocity against the platform by the carriage The velocities used were 002
004 01 and 02ms The relationships between model and prototype values of
ice sheet speeds are given in figure 12 while the relationships between
forces and moments for model and prototype are shown ln figure 13
III PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
A Data
Individual time series from the tests are presented in a separate addenshy
dum to this report (Examples of time series are shown in Appendix 1) The
data obtained from the digital voltmeter were converted from voltages into
2engineering values (N for force ms- for acceleration mm for heave deshy
grees for pitch) by means of a simple computer program The time histories
were also analyzed to give the temporal mean the standard deviation about
that mean and the maximum and minimum values for each signal Table 5 gives
the results for the fixed platform tests and table 6 for the moored
platform tests
7
B Fixed Platform
Figures 14 through 17 show the effect on horizontal force of velocity
Note that as in all graphs of results the mean force and the mean plus two
standard deviations are plotted (following the practice of Matsuishi and
Ettema 985a) It can be seen that horizontal surge force increases with
velocity Similar trends are observed for vertical (heave) force (figures 18
through 21) and pitch moment (figures 22 through 25) Horizontal force
vertical force and the magnitude of the pitching moment all increase with
increasing ice thickness (see figures 26 through 28) The effect of ice
strength is less clear but would appear lo indicate that both forces and the
pitching moment increase with ice increasing strength
C Moored Platform
Figures 29 through 33 show the variation of horizontal (surge) force with
velocity for the moored platform The mean surge force appears to increase
with velocity though not always monotonically There is a possibility of a
minimum force at some intermediate velocity This minimum is more evident if
one considers the variation of the mean force plus two standard deviations
with ice velocity This is discussed further in Section IV below Figures 34
through 36 show the effect of ice thickness on mooring force mooring force
clearly increases with increasing lee thickness Note however that for the
40 mm ice thickness Ks = 1 7 kNm while for all other thicknesses Ks = 05
kNm
D Qualitative Data
As well as collecting time series of loads displacements and accelershy
ations visual data was also gathered An underwater video viewing the
underside of the model platform was taken for each test significant ice
underride occurred in all cases which is cause for concern since underridlng
ice may foul drill string or mooring lines Above water videos were also
taken of each test After each test any ice lodged under the platform was
collected and photographed (see as an example figure 37)
8
IV DISCUSSION
A Observations
A number of qualitative observations can be made with regard to ice and
platform behavior during the tests
Modes of ice fracture
As expected ice fractured circumferentially as it thrust against the
platform (see figure 38) After downward flexure had produce a circumferenshy
tial crack ice segments were further broken by radial cracks The resulting
lee pieces were then shored down the hull and clearing from beneath it
occurred in one of three ways They were either swept past the sides or
under the bottom of the platform or it rotated back under the oncoming ice
sheet The last clearing mechanism leading to the formation of a ridge or
collar of broken ice that ringed the platform and significantly affected the
ice loads it experienced
2 Platform motion
The platform amidst a moving ice sheet showed a fairly regular though
also stochastic motion The platform would pitch up at the point of impact
and heave while being shoved backwards After a certain amount of motion it
would lurch or surge forward rapidly only to be shoved backwards again
Numerous smaller motions were superposed on this long term surge behavior
This behavior ls discussed further in Section E below
3 Ice subduction
A major concern in any floating drilling structure is to avoid broken ice
moving under the structure and fouling the drill string In a cable moored
system such as Kulluk a further concern ls added that of avoiding fouling
of moored cables Considerable ice under flow was observed in the tests conshy
ducted for this study being most prevalent in thick ice conditions Somewhat
different behavior could be expected for the Kulluk platform because of
differences in a hull shape particularly of the hull skirt (see figure
39) Thus while Kulluk would experience less ice underflow than the model
9
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
I INTRODUCTION
Drilling for oil in relatively deep ice-covered or ice-infested waters
poses a number of problems not least of which ls the provision of a stable
platform from which drilling activities can be conducted A cable-moored
platform of conical hull shape provides such stability and experience with
one platform 11Kulluk (see eg Hnatiuk and iJright 1984) in the Beaufort
Sea Figure I shows the hull shape and mooring configuration of a model
floating conical platform similar to 11Kulluk 11 This model was used in all
the experiments described herein
While nKulluk operated with success in the Beaufort Sea there remain to
be answered a number of concerns for the designers and operators of such
floating platforms Obviously of importance are the forces displacements and
accelerations (the dynamic response) of the platform as it encounters a vari shy
ety of different lee types (ice sheets ice floe fields rubble ice large
individual floes etc) Knowledge of the dynamic response envelope of a
platform will enable decisions regarding emergency movement of the platform
(due to unacceptable ice conditions) to be made more effectively avoiding
unnecessary downtime and also unsafe operations Another area of concern is
the problem caused by ice underriding the platform and potentially damaging
the drill string Indeed this latter event may be a more important factor in
determining safe operation than the ice forces Also of importance is the
effect of mooring system stiffness on the dynamic response of a platform
This may even allow some tuningu of platform dynamic response to be made
according to prevailing lee condition
A Scope of Study
The principle objectives of the study were to determine the effects of
mooring system stiffness ice sheet thickness ice sheet strength and ice
sheet velocities on the forces and motions (accelerations and displacements)
that a conical platform would encounter while amidst a large moving ice
sheet
To meet these objectives model tests were conducted at IIHRs ice towing
tank using a 15-meter-diameter (at the load waterline) test platform The
model platform shown in figure 2 was approximately a 145-scale replica of
I
the hull of the existing platform Kulluk However it did not exactly
replicate Kulluk as it was somewhat simpler in hull form and Kulluk sfl
mooring system was not simulated exactly
The ice sheets were grown and tempered to the required thicknesses and
strengths by means of tbe methods described below After tempering the
sheets were pushed against the platform by the tank carriage
The results obtained from tbe tests are compared with the performance
criteria for the cable mooring system of the platform degKulluk
B Practical Aspects
A cable-moored platform of the type shown ln figure 1 is obviously only
one of a number of design concepts under consideration for operation in ice
covered waters No single platform ls ideal for all Arctic drilling sites
and the most suitable platform type is determined by typically the water
depth and the ice conditions at the drilling sites Frederking (1984) reviews
the various platform concepts
Cable-moored platforms appear best suited to water depths between 20-60
meters Kulluk was designed to withstand ice floes of 1 to 1 Sm thickness
of annual ice In worse ice conditions it is to be towed from the drill
site Additional protection was to be provided by ice-breaking ships acting
as escort (Huatink and Wright 1984 Loh and Stamberg 1984)
C Previous Work
A detailed review of previous work both practical and theoretical
concerning ice forces against inclined planes and conical structures is given
by Matsuishi and Ettema (l 985a) The interested reader is referred to this
report
Relatively few tests have been performed on models of cable-moored strucshy
tures Frederklng and Schwarz (1982) conducted a series of tests investigatshy
ing the ice-breaking performance of a downward breaking cone For some tests
the cone was restrained from moving while in other tests it was allowed to
oscillate both vertically and horizontally The oscillating cone experienced
a horizontal force only two-thirds of that measured for the restrained cone
2
gt1atsuishi and Ettema (1985ab) conducted tests on the model platform used
in the present study to investigate the dynamic behavior of the platform when
impacted by floes of annual ice and when in a field of mushy ice They made
measurements both with the platform fixed and with it moored As in this
series of tests mooring system stiffness was modelled using a leaf spring
(see Section II below) Among the results they obtained were
I That mooring force platform mot ions and accelerations increased with
increasing floe diameter but asymptotically approached a constant value
when floe diameter exceeding platform waterline diameter
2 That mooring forces increased wlth increasing speed of ice floe impact
3 That when impacted by mushy ice the moored platform experienced a force 11 11that increased monotonically as a prow developed around the leading
edge of the platform Once the prow had reached an equilibrium size
the ice loads remained steady
4 In mushy ice the mooring forces were linearly proportional to the thickshy
ness of the ice rubble layer
It is intended that this study should build on the work of Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985ab)
II EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
A Test Facilities
1 IIHRs ice towing tank
All experiments were conducted using IIHRs ice towing tank which is 20m
long Sm wide and 13m deep Figure 3 shows the layout of the tank and cold
room within which it is housed Depending on the external ambient tempershy
ature the cold room has a cooling capacity between 15 and 20kw allowing an
ice sheet to grow at a rate of 15 to 20mm per hour
A motorized carriage (shown in figure 4) was used to push the ice sheets
against the model platform The carriage is driven by a variable velocity
DC motor and can move at velocities between 0001 to l 50ms Velocity is
accurately measured by means of a wheel carrying a circular array of regularly
3
spaced holes which is mounted on the drive shaft of the motor A light
shines on one side of the wheel and as a hole passes the light ls detected
on the other side of the wheel by a photo detector The number of pulses
detected per second is linearly proportional to the carriage velocity
2 The test platform
The test platform is similar but not exactly identical in form to the
existing cable-moored platform Kulluk A scale of I 45 can be used to the
relate the test platform to Kulluk Table I lists the principal dimension
of both Kulluk and the test platform A detailed drawing of the test platshy
form is given in figure 5
As discussed by Matsuishi and Et tema (l 985a) a floating cable-moored
platform can be considered to be affected by three linear restoring forces or
moments
(a) A horizontal mooring force arising from the spring stiffness of the
00model Three values of spring stiffness were used in these tests K8
=
I 7kNm 05kNm The latter two stiffnesses were obtained by means of leaf
springs in the mooring harness
(b) A vertical foundation reaction force opposing heave motion due to
buoyancy Kn = 173kNm
(c) A foundation reaction moment opposing pitch motion again due to
buoyancy kp = 35lkNmdegree
3 Instrumentation
The platform was instrumented in two different ways (a) for Ks being
non-infinite (ie the platform was moored) and (b) for K infinite (the8
platform was fixed)
When urnoored the platform was connected to an instrument beam by way of
a linear mooring harness and a load cell (see figure 5) The mooring harness
comprised a pair of elastic leaf springs (to provide K ) a spline bearing8
stroke bearings and universal bearings as shown in figure 7 The harness
simulated accurately the motion of a floating moored platform Horizontal
mooring force was measured using a 490-Newton NISHO DENKI LMC-3502-50 load
cell which connected the mooring harness to the instrument beam Yawing and
4
swaying of the moored platform were restricted by two vertical rods located at
the fore and aft of the platform (see figure 8) The lOmm diameter rods were
constrained to slide in 10Smm wide slots (see figure 9) Thus the moored
platform had three degrees of freedom for motion heave pitch and surge
Heave and pitch motions were measured by means of two linear voltage
displacement transducers (LVDT s) which sensed the vertical motion of the
platform at two positions fore and aft The LVDTs were excited using 12
volts with a full stroke range of 015m
Vertical and horizontal accelerations of the moored platform were meashy
sured with three 2g(196ms-2) KYOWA ASQ-2BL accelerometers
The fixed platform (K = 00 ) was connected directly to a load cell which 8
was in turn bolted to the instrument beam (see figure 10) The horizontal
and vertical forces and the pitching moment experiences by the fixed platform
were measured using a 196-Newton and 98-Newton-meter NISHO DENKI LMC-4107-20
load cell
The locations of the measuring sensors and the positive directions of
recorded data are shown in figure 11 The output voltages from the measuring
sensors were scanned with a digital voltmeter The digitized data were sershy
ially transmitted to IIHRs HP-IOOOE computer system and there stored on
disc The data acquisition band width was 120Hz though each channel was
sampled at a rate of either 7 or lOHz
4 Calibration of transducers
For each of the data-logging transducers the zero level and sensitivity
were determined before each test
Each of the load cells and accelerometers had their output voltage v
measured for an amplifier-created calibration strain s bull The sensitivity S c
of each transducer was evaluated as
S = (ve )C (1) c
where C is a predetermined ratio of strain to the force or acceleration expershy
ienced by the transducer
5
Sensitivities of the LVDTs were evaluated by measuring the voltage
change for a given displacement of the transducer rod
The sensitivity of the carriage velocity measurement was determined by
correlating the output voltage with the mean carriage velocity as measured
with a length scale and stop watch Calibration coefficients are listed in
table 2
B Model Ice
Ice sheets were grown from a O 7~~ by weight urea solution by the wet
seeding procedure described in detail by Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a)
Sheets were grown to three nominal thicknesses (20 30 and 40mm) After
seeding had occurred the cold room was adjusted for maximum cooling rate
until the ice sheet had grown to 85 of the desired thickness At that time
the room temperature was raised to allow the ice sheet to temper (ie to
weaken)
The flexural strength f and the flexural modulus of elasticity Efgt
were monitored during the warm-up period until af attained a prescribed value
(25kPa or 40kPa) The load F to fail a cantilever beam of length pound width b
and thickness h in downwards flexure was used to estimate af
(2)
Two to three cantilever beams were tested at several locations around the ice
sheet in order to obtain a representative mean value of af at intervals as the
sheet weakened
The flexural elastic modulus Ef was determined by measuring the increshy
ment o of the vertical deflection of the ice sheete due to small increments of
a point load ~P applied at the center-point of the ice sheet Thus
2o188( 1-v )
(3)2
Pwgh
where v = Poissons ratio for ice (taken to be 03) P = density of urea w
solution (= 1000 kgm3 ) and g =gravitational acceleration (= 98lms-2 ) The
data associated with each ice sheet are given in table 3
6
C Preliminary Tests
A number of tests were conducted to determine natural frequencies and the
logarithmic decrement of the moored platform surge heave and pitch oscillashy
tions both in open water and in ice conditions The results are tabulated in
table 4 Openwater tests had been conducted previously by Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985a) who had concluded that additional hydrodynamic forces due to
movement of the push blade used for driving ice sheets were negligibly
small The coefficient of friction between the platform and the ice was
measured using a range of normal pressures
D Test Procedures
A total of 42 tests were conducted 15 using the fixed platform 7 using
the moored platform with Ks = 1 7kNm and 20 using the moored platform with
Ks= OSkNm For each test series the ice sheet was pushed with a constant
velocity against the platform by the carriage The velocities used were 002
004 01 and 02ms The relationships between model and prototype values of
ice sheet speeds are given in figure 12 while the relationships between
forces and moments for model and prototype are shown ln figure 13
III PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
A Data
Individual time series from the tests are presented in a separate addenshy
dum to this report (Examples of time series are shown in Appendix 1) The
data obtained from the digital voltmeter were converted from voltages into
2engineering values (N for force ms- for acceleration mm for heave deshy
grees for pitch) by means of a simple computer program The time histories
were also analyzed to give the temporal mean the standard deviation about
that mean and the maximum and minimum values for each signal Table 5 gives
the results for the fixed platform tests and table 6 for the moored
platform tests
7
B Fixed Platform
Figures 14 through 17 show the effect on horizontal force of velocity
Note that as in all graphs of results the mean force and the mean plus two
standard deviations are plotted (following the practice of Matsuishi and
Ettema 985a) It can be seen that horizontal surge force increases with
velocity Similar trends are observed for vertical (heave) force (figures 18
through 21) and pitch moment (figures 22 through 25) Horizontal force
vertical force and the magnitude of the pitching moment all increase with
increasing ice thickness (see figures 26 through 28) The effect of ice
strength is less clear but would appear lo indicate that both forces and the
pitching moment increase with ice increasing strength
C Moored Platform
Figures 29 through 33 show the variation of horizontal (surge) force with
velocity for the moored platform The mean surge force appears to increase
with velocity though not always monotonically There is a possibility of a
minimum force at some intermediate velocity This minimum is more evident if
one considers the variation of the mean force plus two standard deviations
with ice velocity This is discussed further in Section IV below Figures 34
through 36 show the effect of ice thickness on mooring force mooring force
clearly increases with increasing lee thickness Note however that for the
40 mm ice thickness Ks = 1 7 kNm while for all other thicknesses Ks = 05
kNm
D Qualitative Data
As well as collecting time series of loads displacements and accelershy
ations visual data was also gathered An underwater video viewing the
underside of the model platform was taken for each test significant ice
underride occurred in all cases which is cause for concern since underridlng
ice may foul drill string or mooring lines Above water videos were also
taken of each test After each test any ice lodged under the platform was
collected and photographed (see as an example figure 37)
8
IV DISCUSSION
A Observations
A number of qualitative observations can be made with regard to ice and
platform behavior during the tests
Modes of ice fracture
As expected ice fractured circumferentially as it thrust against the
platform (see figure 38) After downward flexure had produce a circumferenshy
tial crack ice segments were further broken by radial cracks The resulting
lee pieces were then shored down the hull and clearing from beneath it
occurred in one of three ways They were either swept past the sides or
under the bottom of the platform or it rotated back under the oncoming ice
sheet The last clearing mechanism leading to the formation of a ridge or
collar of broken ice that ringed the platform and significantly affected the
ice loads it experienced
2 Platform motion
The platform amidst a moving ice sheet showed a fairly regular though
also stochastic motion The platform would pitch up at the point of impact
and heave while being shoved backwards After a certain amount of motion it
would lurch or surge forward rapidly only to be shoved backwards again
Numerous smaller motions were superposed on this long term surge behavior
This behavior ls discussed further in Section E below
3 Ice subduction
A major concern in any floating drilling structure is to avoid broken ice
moving under the structure and fouling the drill string In a cable moored
system such as Kulluk a further concern ls added that of avoiding fouling
of moored cables Considerable ice under flow was observed in the tests conshy
ducted for this study being most prevalent in thick ice conditions Somewhat
different behavior could be expected for the Kulluk platform because of
differences in a hull shape particularly of the hull skirt (see figure
39) Thus while Kulluk would experience less ice underflow than the model
9
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
the hull of the existing platform Kulluk However it did not exactly
replicate Kulluk as it was somewhat simpler in hull form and Kulluk sfl
mooring system was not simulated exactly
The ice sheets were grown and tempered to the required thicknesses and
strengths by means of tbe methods described below After tempering the
sheets were pushed against the platform by the tank carriage
The results obtained from tbe tests are compared with the performance
criteria for the cable mooring system of the platform degKulluk
B Practical Aspects
A cable-moored platform of the type shown ln figure 1 is obviously only
one of a number of design concepts under consideration for operation in ice
covered waters No single platform ls ideal for all Arctic drilling sites
and the most suitable platform type is determined by typically the water
depth and the ice conditions at the drilling sites Frederking (1984) reviews
the various platform concepts
Cable-moored platforms appear best suited to water depths between 20-60
meters Kulluk was designed to withstand ice floes of 1 to 1 Sm thickness
of annual ice In worse ice conditions it is to be towed from the drill
site Additional protection was to be provided by ice-breaking ships acting
as escort (Huatink and Wright 1984 Loh and Stamberg 1984)
C Previous Work
A detailed review of previous work both practical and theoretical
concerning ice forces against inclined planes and conical structures is given
by Matsuishi and Ettema (l 985a) The interested reader is referred to this
report
Relatively few tests have been performed on models of cable-moored strucshy
tures Frederklng and Schwarz (1982) conducted a series of tests investigatshy
ing the ice-breaking performance of a downward breaking cone For some tests
the cone was restrained from moving while in other tests it was allowed to
oscillate both vertically and horizontally The oscillating cone experienced
a horizontal force only two-thirds of that measured for the restrained cone
2
gt1atsuishi and Ettema (1985ab) conducted tests on the model platform used
in the present study to investigate the dynamic behavior of the platform when
impacted by floes of annual ice and when in a field of mushy ice They made
measurements both with the platform fixed and with it moored As in this
series of tests mooring system stiffness was modelled using a leaf spring
(see Section II below) Among the results they obtained were
I That mooring force platform mot ions and accelerations increased with
increasing floe diameter but asymptotically approached a constant value
when floe diameter exceeding platform waterline diameter
2 That mooring forces increased wlth increasing speed of ice floe impact
3 That when impacted by mushy ice the moored platform experienced a force 11 11that increased monotonically as a prow developed around the leading
edge of the platform Once the prow had reached an equilibrium size
the ice loads remained steady
4 In mushy ice the mooring forces were linearly proportional to the thickshy
ness of the ice rubble layer
It is intended that this study should build on the work of Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985ab)
II EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
A Test Facilities
1 IIHRs ice towing tank
All experiments were conducted using IIHRs ice towing tank which is 20m
long Sm wide and 13m deep Figure 3 shows the layout of the tank and cold
room within which it is housed Depending on the external ambient tempershy
ature the cold room has a cooling capacity between 15 and 20kw allowing an
ice sheet to grow at a rate of 15 to 20mm per hour
A motorized carriage (shown in figure 4) was used to push the ice sheets
against the model platform The carriage is driven by a variable velocity
DC motor and can move at velocities between 0001 to l 50ms Velocity is
accurately measured by means of a wheel carrying a circular array of regularly
3
spaced holes which is mounted on the drive shaft of the motor A light
shines on one side of the wheel and as a hole passes the light ls detected
on the other side of the wheel by a photo detector The number of pulses
detected per second is linearly proportional to the carriage velocity
2 The test platform
The test platform is similar but not exactly identical in form to the
existing cable-moored platform Kulluk A scale of I 45 can be used to the
relate the test platform to Kulluk Table I lists the principal dimension
of both Kulluk and the test platform A detailed drawing of the test platshy
form is given in figure 5
As discussed by Matsuishi and Et tema (l 985a) a floating cable-moored
platform can be considered to be affected by three linear restoring forces or
moments
(a) A horizontal mooring force arising from the spring stiffness of the
00model Three values of spring stiffness were used in these tests K8
=
I 7kNm 05kNm The latter two stiffnesses were obtained by means of leaf
springs in the mooring harness
(b) A vertical foundation reaction force opposing heave motion due to
buoyancy Kn = 173kNm
(c) A foundation reaction moment opposing pitch motion again due to
buoyancy kp = 35lkNmdegree
3 Instrumentation
The platform was instrumented in two different ways (a) for Ks being
non-infinite (ie the platform was moored) and (b) for K infinite (the8
platform was fixed)
When urnoored the platform was connected to an instrument beam by way of
a linear mooring harness and a load cell (see figure 5) The mooring harness
comprised a pair of elastic leaf springs (to provide K ) a spline bearing8
stroke bearings and universal bearings as shown in figure 7 The harness
simulated accurately the motion of a floating moored platform Horizontal
mooring force was measured using a 490-Newton NISHO DENKI LMC-3502-50 load
cell which connected the mooring harness to the instrument beam Yawing and
4
swaying of the moored platform were restricted by two vertical rods located at
the fore and aft of the platform (see figure 8) The lOmm diameter rods were
constrained to slide in 10Smm wide slots (see figure 9) Thus the moored
platform had three degrees of freedom for motion heave pitch and surge
Heave and pitch motions were measured by means of two linear voltage
displacement transducers (LVDT s) which sensed the vertical motion of the
platform at two positions fore and aft The LVDTs were excited using 12
volts with a full stroke range of 015m
Vertical and horizontal accelerations of the moored platform were meashy
sured with three 2g(196ms-2) KYOWA ASQ-2BL accelerometers
The fixed platform (K = 00 ) was connected directly to a load cell which 8
was in turn bolted to the instrument beam (see figure 10) The horizontal
and vertical forces and the pitching moment experiences by the fixed platform
were measured using a 196-Newton and 98-Newton-meter NISHO DENKI LMC-4107-20
load cell
The locations of the measuring sensors and the positive directions of
recorded data are shown in figure 11 The output voltages from the measuring
sensors were scanned with a digital voltmeter The digitized data were sershy
ially transmitted to IIHRs HP-IOOOE computer system and there stored on
disc The data acquisition band width was 120Hz though each channel was
sampled at a rate of either 7 or lOHz
4 Calibration of transducers
For each of the data-logging transducers the zero level and sensitivity
were determined before each test
Each of the load cells and accelerometers had their output voltage v
measured for an amplifier-created calibration strain s bull The sensitivity S c
of each transducer was evaluated as
S = (ve )C (1) c
where C is a predetermined ratio of strain to the force or acceleration expershy
ienced by the transducer
5
Sensitivities of the LVDTs were evaluated by measuring the voltage
change for a given displacement of the transducer rod
The sensitivity of the carriage velocity measurement was determined by
correlating the output voltage with the mean carriage velocity as measured
with a length scale and stop watch Calibration coefficients are listed in
table 2
B Model Ice
Ice sheets were grown from a O 7~~ by weight urea solution by the wet
seeding procedure described in detail by Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a)
Sheets were grown to three nominal thicknesses (20 30 and 40mm) After
seeding had occurred the cold room was adjusted for maximum cooling rate
until the ice sheet had grown to 85 of the desired thickness At that time
the room temperature was raised to allow the ice sheet to temper (ie to
weaken)
The flexural strength f and the flexural modulus of elasticity Efgt
were monitored during the warm-up period until af attained a prescribed value
(25kPa or 40kPa) The load F to fail a cantilever beam of length pound width b
and thickness h in downwards flexure was used to estimate af
(2)
Two to three cantilever beams were tested at several locations around the ice
sheet in order to obtain a representative mean value of af at intervals as the
sheet weakened
The flexural elastic modulus Ef was determined by measuring the increshy
ment o of the vertical deflection of the ice sheete due to small increments of
a point load ~P applied at the center-point of the ice sheet Thus
2o188( 1-v )
(3)2
Pwgh
where v = Poissons ratio for ice (taken to be 03) P = density of urea w
solution (= 1000 kgm3 ) and g =gravitational acceleration (= 98lms-2 ) The
data associated with each ice sheet are given in table 3
6
C Preliminary Tests
A number of tests were conducted to determine natural frequencies and the
logarithmic decrement of the moored platform surge heave and pitch oscillashy
tions both in open water and in ice conditions The results are tabulated in
table 4 Openwater tests had been conducted previously by Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985a) who had concluded that additional hydrodynamic forces due to
movement of the push blade used for driving ice sheets were negligibly
small The coefficient of friction between the platform and the ice was
measured using a range of normal pressures
D Test Procedures
A total of 42 tests were conducted 15 using the fixed platform 7 using
the moored platform with Ks = 1 7kNm and 20 using the moored platform with
Ks= OSkNm For each test series the ice sheet was pushed with a constant
velocity against the platform by the carriage The velocities used were 002
004 01 and 02ms The relationships between model and prototype values of
ice sheet speeds are given in figure 12 while the relationships between
forces and moments for model and prototype are shown ln figure 13
III PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
A Data
Individual time series from the tests are presented in a separate addenshy
dum to this report (Examples of time series are shown in Appendix 1) The
data obtained from the digital voltmeter were converted from voltages into
2engineering values (N for force ms- for acceleration mm for heave deshy
grees for pitch) by means of a simple computer program The time histories
were also analyzed to give the temporal mean the standard deviation about
that mean and the maximum and minimum values for each signal Table 5 gives
the results for the fixed platform tests and table 6 for the moored
platform tests
7
B Fixed Platform
Figures 14 through 17 show the effect on horizontal force of velocity
Note that as in all graphs of results the mean force and the mean plus two
standard deviations are plotted (following the practice of Matsuishi and
Ettema 985a) It can be seen that horizontal surge force increases with
velocity Similar trends are observed for vertical (heave) force (figures 18
through 21) and pitch moment (figures 22 through 25) Horizontal force
vertical force and the magnitude of the pitching moment all increase with
increasing ice thickness (see figures 26 through 28) The effect of ice
strength is less clear but would appear lo indicate that both forces and the
pitching moment increase with ice increasing strength
C Moored Platform
Figures 29 through 33 show the variation of horizontal (surge) force with
velocity for the moored platform The mean surge force appears to increase
with velocity though not always monotonically There is a possibility of a
minimum force at some intermediate velocity This minimum is more evident if
one considers the variation of the mean force plus two standard deviations
with ice velocity This is discussed further in Section IV below Figures 34
through 36 show the effect of ice thickness on mooring force mooring force
clearly increases with increasing lee thickness Note however that for the
40 mm ice thickness Ks = 1 7 kNm while for all other thicknesses Ks = 05
kNm
D Qualitative Data
As well as collecting time series of loads displacements and accelershy
ations visual data was also gathered An underwater video viewing the
underside of the model platform was taken for each test significant ice
underride occurred in all cases which is cause for concern since underridlng
ice may foul drill string or mooring lines Above water videos were also
taken of each test After each test any ice lodged under the platform was
collected and photographed (see as an example figure 37)
8
IV DISCUSSION
A Observations
A number of qualitative observations can be made with regard to ice and
platform behavior during the tests
Modes of ice fracture
As expected ice fractured circumferentially as it thrust against the
platform (see figure 38) After downward flexure had produce a circumferenshy
tial crack ice segments were further broken by radial cracks The resulting
lee pieces were then shored down the hull and clearing from beneath it
occurred in one of three ways They were either swept past the sides or
under the bottom of the platform or it rotated back under the oncoming ice
sheet The last clearing mechanism leading to the formation of a ridge or
collar of broken ice that ringed the platform and significantly affected the
ice loads it experienced
2 Platform motion
The platform amidst a moving ice sheet showed a fairly regular though
also stochastic motion The platform would pitch up at the point of impact
and heave while being shoved backwards After a certain amount of motion it
would lurch or surge forward rapidly only to be shoved backwards again
Numerous smaller motions were superposed on this long term surge behavior
This behavior ls discussed further in Section E below
3 Ice subduction
A major concern in any floating drilling structure is to avoid broken ice
moving under the structure and fouling the drill string In a cable moored
system such as Kulluk a further concern ls added that of avoiding fouling
of moored cables Considerable ice under flow was observed in the tests conshy
ducted for this study being most prevalent in thick ice conditions Somewhat
different behavior could be expected for the Kulluk platform because of
differences in a hull shape particularly of the hull skirt (see figure
39) Thus while Kulluk would experience less ice underflow than the model
9
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
gt1atsuishi and Ettema (1985ab) conducted tests on the model platform used
in the present study to investigate the dynamic behavior of the platform when
impacted by floes of annual ice and when in a field of mushy ice They made
measurements both with the platform fixed and with it moored As in this
series of tests mooring system stiffness was modelled using a leaf spring
(see Section II below) Among the results they obtained were
I That mooring force platform mot ions and accelerations increased with
increasing floe diameter but asymptotically approached a constant value
when floe diameter exceeding platform waterline diameter
2 That mooring forces increased wlth increasing speed of ice floe impact
3 That when impacted by mushy ice the moored platform experienced a force 11 11that increased monotonically as a prow developed around the leading
edge of the platform Once the prow had reached an equilibrium size
the ice loads remained steady
4 In mushy ice the mooring forces were linearly proportional to the thickshy
ness of the ice rubble layer
It is intended that this study should build on the work of Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985ab)
II EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
A Test Facilities
1 IIHRs ice towing tank
All experiments were conducted using IIHRs ice towing tank which is 20m
long Sm wide and 13m deep Figure 3 shows the layout of the tank and cold
room within which it is housed Depending on the external ambient tempershy
ature the cold room has a cooling capacity between 15 and 20kw allowing an
ice sheet to grow at a rate of 15 to 20mm per hour
A motorized carriage (shown in figure 4) was used to push the ice sheets
against the model platform The carriage is driven by a variable velocity
DC motor and can move at velocities between 0001 to l 50ms Velocity is
accurately measured by means of a wheel carrying a circular array of regularly
3
spaced holes which is mounted on the drive shaft of the motor A light
shines on one side of the wheel and as a hole passes the light ls detected
on the other side of the wheel by a photo detector The number of pulses
detected per second is linearly proportional to the carriage velocity
2 The test platform
The test platform is similar but not exactly identical in form to the
existing cable-moored platform Kulluk A scale of I 45 can be used to the
relate the test platform to Kulluk Table I lists the principal dimension
of both Kulluk and the test platform A detailed drawing of the test platshy
form is given in figure 5
As discussed by Matsuishi and Et tema (l 985a) a floating cable-moored
platform can be considered to be affected by three linear restoring forces or
moments
(a) A horizontal mooring force arising from the spring stiffness of the
00model Three values of spring stiffness were used in these tests K8
=
I 7kNm 05kNm The latter two stiffnesses were obtained by means of leaf
springs in the mooring harness
(b) A vertical foundation reaction force opposing heave motion due to
buoyancy Kn = 173kNm
(c) A foundation reaction moment opposing pitch motion again due to
buoyancy kp = 35lkNmdegree
3 Instrumentation
The platform was instrumented in two different ways (a) for Ks being
non-infinite (ie the platform was moored) and (b) for K infinite (the8
platform was fixed)
When urnoored the platform was connected to an instrument beam by way of
a linear mooring harness and a load cell (see figure 5) The mooring harness
comprised a pair of elastic leaf springs (to provide K ) a spline bearing8
stroke bearings and universal bearings as shown in figure 7 The harness
simulated accurately the motion of a floating moored platform Horizontal
mooring force was measured using a 490-Newton NISHO DENKI LMC-3502-50 load
cell which connected the mooring harness to the instrument beam Yawing and
4
swaying of the moored platform were restricted by two vertical rods located at
the fore and aft of the platform (see figure 8) The lOmm diameter rods were
constrained to slide in 10Smm wide slots (see figure 9) Thus the moored
platform had three degrees of freedom for motion heave pitch and surge
Heave and pitch motions were measured by means of two linear voltage
displacement transducers (LVDT s) which sensed the vertical motion of the
platform at two positions fore and aft The LVDTs were excited using 12
volts with a full stroke range of 015m
Vertical and horizontal accelerations of the moored platform were meashy
sured with three 2g(196ms-2) KYOWA ASQ-2BL accelerometers
The fixed platform (K = 00 ) was connected directly to a load cell which 8
was in turn bolted to the instrument beam (see figure 10) The horizontal
and vertical forces and the pitching moment experiences by the fixed platform
were measured using a 196-Newton and 98-Newton-meter NISHO DENKI LMC-4107-20
load cell
The locations of the measuring sensors and the positive directions of
recorded data are shown in figure 11 The output voltages from the measuring
sensors were scanned with a digital voltmeter The digitized data were sershy
ially transmitted to IIHRs HP-IOOOE computer system and there stored on
disc The data acquisition band width was 120Hz though each channel was
sampled at a rate of either 7 or lOHz
4 Calibration of transducers
For each of the data-logging transducers the zero level and sensitivity
were determined before each test
Each of the load cells and accelerometers had their output voltage v
measured for an amplifier-created calibration strain s bull The sensitivity S c
of each transducer was evaluated as
S = (ve )C (1) c
where C is a predetermined ratio of strain to the force or acceleration expershy
ienced by the transducer
5
Sensitivities of the LVDTs were evaluated by measuring the voltage
change for a given displacement of the transducer rod
The sensitivity of the carriage velocity measurement was determined by
correlating the output voltage with the mean carriage velocity as measured
with a length scale and stop watch Calibration coefficients are listed in
table 2
B Model Ice
Ice sheets were grown from a O 7~~ by weight urea solution by the wet
seeding procedure described in detail by Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a)
Sheets were grown to three nominal thicknesses (20 30 and 40mm) After
seeding had occurred the cold room was adjusted for maximum cooling rate
until the ice sheet had grown to 85 of the desired thickness At that time
the room temperature was raised to allow the ice sheet to temper (ie to
weaken)
The flexural strength f and the flexural modulus of elasticity Efgt
were monitored during the warm-up period until af attained a prescribed value
(25kPa or 40kPa) The load F to fail a cantilever beam of length pound width b
and thickness h in downwards flexure was used to estimate af
(2)
Two to three cantilever beams were tested at several locations around the ice
sheet in order to obtain a representative mean value of af at intervals as the
sheet weakened
The flexural elastic modulus Ef was determined by measuring the increshy
ment o of the vertical deflection of the ice sheete due to small increments of
a point load ~P applied at the center-point of the ice sheet Thus
2o188( 1-v )
(3)2
Pwgh
where v = Poissons ratio for ice (taken to be 03) P = density of urea w
solution (= 1000 kgm3 ) and g =gravitational acceleration (= 98lms-2 ) The
data associated with each ice sheet are given in table 3
6
C Preliminary Tests
A number of tests were conducted to determine natural frequencies and the
logarithmic decrement of the moored platform surge heave and pitch oscillashy
tions both in open water and in ice conditions The results are tabulated in
table 4 Openwater tests had been conducted previously by Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985a) who had concluded that additional hydrodynamic forces due to
movement of the push blade used for driving ice sheets were negligibly
small The coefficient of friction between the platform and the ice was
measured using a range of normal pressures
D Test Procedures
A total of 42 tests were conducted 15 using the fixed platform 7 using
the moored platform with Ks = 1 7kNm and 20 using the moored platform with
Ks= OSkNm For each test series the ice sheet was pushed with a constant
velocity against the platform by the carriage The velocities used were 002
004 01 and 02ms The relationships between model and prototype values of
ice sheet speeds are given in figure 12 while the relationships between
forces and moments for model and prototype are shown ln figure 13
III PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
A Data
Individual time series from the tests are presented in a separate addenshy
dum to this report (Examples of time series are shown in Appendix 1) The
data obtained from the digital voltmeter were converted from voltages into
2engineering values (N for force ms- for acceleration mm for heave deshy
grees for pitch) by means of a simple computer program The time histories
were also analyzed to give the temporal mean the standard deviation about
that mean and the maximum and minimum values for each signal Table 5 gives
the results for the fixed platform tests and table 6 for the moored
platform tests
7
B Fixed Platform
Figures 14 through 17 show the effect on horizontal force of velocity
Note that as in all graphs of results the mean force and the mean plus two
standard deviations are plotted (following the practice of Matsuishi and
Ettema 985a) It can be seen that horizontal surge force increases with
velocity Similar trends are observed for vertical (heave) force (figures 18
through 21) and pitch moment (figures 22 through 25) Horizontal force
vertical force and the magnitude of the pitching moment all increase with
increasing ice thickness (see figures 26 through 28) The effect of ice
strength is less clear but would appear lo indicate that both forces and the
pitching moment increase with ice increasing strength
C Moored Platform
Figures 29 through 33 show the variation of horizontal (surge) force with
velocity for the moored platform The mean surge force appears to increase
with velocity though not always monotonically There is a possibility of a
minimum force at some intermediate velocity This minimum is more evident if
one considers the variation of the mean force plus two standard deviations
with ice velocity This is discussed further in Section IV below Figures 34
through 36 show the effect of ice thickness on mooring force mooring force
clearly increases with increasing lee thickness Note however that for the
40 mm ice thickness Ks = 1 7 kNm while for all other thicknesses Ks = 05
kNm
D Qualitative Data
As well as collecting time series of loads displacements and accelershy
ations visual data was also gathered An underwater video viewing the
underside of the model platform was taken for each test significant ice
underride occurred in all cases which is cause for concern since underridlng
ice may foul drill string or mooring lines Above water videos were also
taken of each test After each test any ice lodged under the platform was
collected and photographed (see as an example figure 37)
8
IV DISCUSSION
A Observations
A number of qualitative observations can be made with regard to ice and
platform behavior during the tests
Modes of ice fracture
As expected ice fractured circumferentially as it thrust against the
platform (see figure 38) After downward flexure had produce a circumferenshy
tial crack ice segments were further broken by radial cracks The resulting
lee pieces were then shored down the hull and clearing from beneath it
occurred in one of three ways They were either swept past the sides or
under the bottom of the platform or it rotated back under the oncoming ice
sheet The last clearing mechanism leading to the formation of a ridge or
collar of broken ice that ringed the platform and significantly affected the
ice loads it experienced
2 Platform motion
The platform amidst a moving ice sheet showed a fairly regular though
also stochastic motion The platform would pitch up at the point of impact
and heave while being shoved backwards After a certain amount of motion it
would lurch or surge forward rapidly only to be shoved backwards again
Numerous smaller motions were superposed on this long term surge behavior
This behavior ls discussed further in Section E below
3 Ice subduction
A major concern in any floating drilling structure is to avoid broken ice
moving under the structure and fouling the drill string In a cable moored
system such as Kulluk a further concern ls added that of avoiding fouling
of moored cables Considerable ice under flow was observed in the tests conshy
ducted for this study being most prevalent in thick ice conditions Somewhat
different behavior could be expected for the Kulluk platform because of
differences in a hull shape particularly of the hull skirt (see figure
39) Thus while Kulluk would experience less ice underflow than the model
9
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
spaced holes which is mounted on the drive shaft of the motor A light
shines on one side of the wheel and as a hole passes the light ls detected
on the other side of the wheel by a photo detector The number of pulses
detected per second is linearly proportional to the carriage velocity
2 The test platform
The test platform is similar but not exactly identical in form to the
existing cable-moored platform Kulluk A scale of I 45 can be used to the
relate the test platform to Kulluk Table I lists the principal dimension
of both Kulluk and the test platform A detailed drawing of the test platshy
form is given in figure 5
As discussed by Matsuishi and Et tema (l 985a) a floating cable-moored
platform can be considered to be affected by three linear restoring forces or
moments
(a) A horizontal mooring force arising from the spring stiffness of the
00model Three values of spring stiffness were used in these tests K8
=
I 7kNm 05kNm The latter two stiffnesses were obtained by means of leaf
springs in the mooring harness
(b) A vertical foundation reaction force opposing heave motion due to
buoyancy Kn = 173kNm
(c) A foundation reaction moment opposing pitch motion again due to
buoyancy kp = 35lkNmdegree
3 Instrumentation
The platform was instrumented in two different ways (a) for Ks being
non-infinite (ie the platform was moored) and (b) for K infinite (the8
platform was fixed)
When urnoored the platform was connected to an instrument beam by way of
a linear mooring harness and a load cell (see figure 5) The mooring harness
comprised a pair of elastic leaf springs (to provide K ) a spline bearing8
stroke bearings and universal bearings as shown in figure 7 The harness
simulated accurately the motion of a floating moored platform Horizontal
mooring force was measured using a 490-Newton NISHO DENKI LMC-3502-50 load
cell which connected the mooring harness to the instrument beam Yawing and
4
swaying of the moored platform were restricted by two vertical rods located at
the fore and aft of the platform (see figure 8) The lOmm diameter rods were
constrained to slide in 10Smm wide slots (see figure 9) Thus the moored
platform had three degrees of freedom for motion heave pitch and surge
Heave and pitch motions were measured by means of two linear voltage
displacement transducers (LVDT s) which sensed the vertical motion of the
platform at two positions fore and aft The LVDTs were excited using 12
volts with a full stroke range of 015m
Vertical and horizontal accelerations of the moored platform were meashy
sured with three 2g(196ms-2) KYOWA ASQ-2BL accelerometers
The fixed platform (K = 00 ) was connected directly to a load cell which 8
was in turn bolted to the instrument beam (see figure 10) The horizontal
and vertical forces and the pitching moment experiences by the fixed platform
were measured using a 196-Newton and 98-Newton-meter NISHO DENKI LMC-4107-20
load cell
The locations of the measuring sensors and the positive directions of
recorded data are shown in figure 11 The output voltages from the measuring
sensors were scanned with a digital voltmeter The digitized data were sershy
ially transmitted to IIHRs HP-IOOOE computer system and there stored on
disc The data acquisition band width was 120Hz though each channel was
sampled at a rate of either 7 or lOHz
4 Calibration of transducers
For each of the data-logging transducers the zero level and sensitivity
were determined before each test
Each of the load cells and accelerometers had their output voltage v
measured for an amplifier-created calibration strain s bull The sensitivity S c
of each transducer was evaluated as
S = (ve )C (1) c
where C is a predetermined ratio of strain to the force or acceleration expershy
ienced by the transducer
5
Sensitivities of the LVDTs were evaluated by measuring the voltage
change for a given displacement of the transducer rod
The sensitivity of the carriage velocity measurement was determined by
correlating the output voltage with the mean carriage velocity as measured
with a length scale and stop watch Calibration coefficients are listed in
table 2
B Model Ice
Ice sheets were grown from a O 7~~ by weight urea solution by the wet
seeding procedure described in detail by Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a)
Sheets were grown to three nominal thicknesses (20 30 and 40mm) After
seeding had occurred the cold room was adjusted for maximum cooling rate
until the ice sheet had grown to 85 of the desired thickness At that time
the room temperature was raised to allow the ice sheet to temper (ie to
weaken)
The flexural strength f and the flexural modulus of elasticity Efgt
were monitored during the warm-up period until af attained a prescribed value
(25kPa or 40kPa) The load F to fail a cantilever beam of length pound width b
and thickness h in downwards flexure was used to estimate af
(2)
Two to three cantilever beams were tested at several locations around the ice
sheet in order to obtain a representative mean value of af at intervals as the
sheet weakened
The flexural elastic modulus Ef was determined by measuring the increshy
ment o of the vertical deflection of the ice sheete due to small increments of
a point load ~P applied at the center-point of the ice sheet Thus
2o188( 1-v )
(3)2
Pwgh
where v = Poissons ratio for ice (taken to be 03) P = density of urea w
solution (= 1000 kgm3 ) and g =gravitational acceleration (= 98lms-2 ) The
data associated with each ice sheet are given in table 3
6
C Preliminary Tests
A number of tests were conducted to determine natural frequencies and the
logarithmic decrement of the moored platform surge heave and pitch oscillashy
tions both in open water and in ice conditions The results are tabulated in
table 4 Openwater tests had been conducted previously by Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985a) who had concluded that additional hydrodynamic forces due to
movement of the push blade used for driving ice sheets were negligibly
small The coefficient of friction between the platform and the ice was
measured using a range of normal pressures
D Test Procedures
A total of 42 tests were conducted 15 using the fixed platform 7 using
the moored platform with Ks = 1 7kNm and 20 using the moored platform with
Ks= OSkNm For each test series the ice sheet was pushed with a constant
velocity against the platform by the carriage The velocities used were 002
004 01 and 02ms The relationships between model and prototype values of
ice sheet speeds are given in figure 12 while the relationships between
forces and moments for model and prototype are shown ln figure 13
III PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
A Data
Individual time series from the tests are presented in a separate addenshy
dum to this report (Examples of time series are shown in Appendix 1) The
data obtained from the digital voltmeter were converted from voltages into
2engineering values (N for force ms- for acceleration mm for heave deshy
grees for pitch) by means of a simple computer program The time histories
were also analyzed to give the temporal mean the standard deviation about
that mean and the maximum and minimum values for each signal Table 5 gives
the results for the fixed platform tests and table 6 for the moored
platform tests
7
B Fixed Platform
Figures 14 through 17 show the effect on horizontal force of velocity
Note that as in all graphs of results the mean force and the mean plus two
standard deviations are plotted (following the practice of Matsuishi and
Ettema 985a) It can be seen that horizontal surge force increases with
velocity Similar trends are observed for vertical (heave) force (figures 18
through 21) and pitch moment (figures 22 through 25) Horizontal force
vertical force and the magnitude of the pitching moment all increase with
increasing ice thickness (see figures 26 through 28) The effect of ice
strength is less clear but would appear lo indicate that both forces and the
pitching moment increase with ice increasing strength
C Moored Platform
Figures 29 through 33 show the variation of horizontal (surge) force with
velocity for the moored platform The mean surge force appears to increase
with velocity though not always monotonically There is a possibility of a
minimum force at some intermediate velocity This minimum is more evident if
one considers the variation of the mean force plus two standard deviations
with ice velocity This is discussed further in Section IV below Figures 34
through 36 show the effect of ice thickness on mooring force mooring force
clearly increases with increasing lee thickness Note however that for the
40 mm ice thickness Ks = 1 7 kNm while for all other thicknesses Ks = 05
kNm
D Qualitative Data
As well as collecting time series of loads displacements and accelershy
ations visual data was also gathered An underwater video viewing the
underside of the model platform was taken for each test significant ice
underride occurred in all cases which is cause for concern since underridlng
ice may foul drill string or mooring lines Above water videos were also
taken of each test After each test any ice lodged under the platform was
collected and photographed (see as an example figure 37)
8
IV DISCUSSION
A Observations
A number of qualitative observations can be made with regard to ice and
platform behavior during the tests
Modes of ice fracture
As expected ice fractured circumferentially as it thrust against the
platform (see figure 38) After downward flexure had produce a circumferenshy
tial crack ice segments were further broken by radial cracks The resulting
lee pieces were then shored down the hull and clearing from beneath it
occurred in one of three ways They were either swept past the sides or
under the bottom of the platform or it rotated back under the oncoming ice
sheet The last clearing mechanism leading to the formation of a ridge or
collar of broken ice that ringed the platform and significantly affected the
ice loads it experienced
2 Platform motion
The platform amidst a moving ice sheet showed a fairly regular though
also stochastic motion The platform would pitch up at the point of impact
and heave while being shoved backwards After a certain amount of motion it
would lurch or surge forward rapidly only to be shoved backwards again
Numerous smaller motions were superposed on this long term surge behavior
This behavior ls discussed further in Section E below
3 Ice subduction
A major concern in any floating drilling structure is to avoid broken ice
moving under the structure and fouling the drill string In a cable moored
system such as Kulluk a further concern ls added that of avoiding fouling
of moored cables Considerable ice under flow was observed in the tests conshy
ducted for this study being most prevalent in thick ice conditions Somewhat
different behavior could be expected for the Kulluk platform because of
differences in a hull shape particularly of the hull skirt (see figure
39) Thus while Kulluk would experience less ice underflow than the model
9
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
swaying of the moored platform were restricted by two vertical rods located at
the fore and aft of the platform (see figure 8) The lOmm diameter rods were
constrained to slide in 10Smm wide slots (see figure 9) Thus the moored
platform had three degrees of freedom for motion heave pitch and surge
Heave and pitch motions were measured by means of two linear voltage
displacement transducers (LVDT s) which sensed the vertical motion of the
platform at two positions fore and aft The LVDTs were excited using 12
volts with a full stroke range of 015m
Vertical and horizontal accelerations of the moored platform were meashy
sured with three 2g(196ms-2) KYOWA ASQ-2BL accelerometers
The fixed platform (K = 00 ) was connected directly to a load cell which 8
was in turn bolted to the instrument beam (see figure 10) The horizontal
and vertical forces and the pitching moment experiences by the fixed platform
were measured using a 196-Newton and 98-Newton-meter NISHO DENKI LMC-4107-20
load cell
The locations of the measuring sensors and the positive directions of
recorded data are shown in figure 11 The output voltages from the measuring
sensors were scanned with a digital voltmeter The digitized data were sershy
ially transmitted to IIHRs HP-IOOOE computer system and there stored on
disc The data acquisition band width was 120Hz though each channel was
sampled at a rate of either 7 or lOHz
4 Calibration of transducers
For each of the data-logging transducers the zero level and sensitivity
were determined before each test
Each of the load cells and accelerometers had their output voltage v
measured for an amplifier-created calibration strain s bull The sensitivity S c
of each transducer was evaluated as
S = (ve )C (1) c
where C is a predetermined ratio of strain to the force or acceleration expershy
ienced by the transducer
5
Sensitivities of the LVDTs were evaluated by measuring the voltage
change for a given displacement of the transducer rod
The sensitivity of the carriage velocity measurement was determined by
correlating the output voltage with the mean carriage velocity as measured
with a length scale and stop watch Calibration coefficients are listed in
table 2
B Model Ice
Ice sheets were grown from a O 7~~ by weight urea solution by the wet
seeding procedure described in detail by Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a)
Sheets were grown to three nominal thicknesses (20 30 and 40mm) After
seeding had occurred the cold room was adjusted for maximum cooling rate
until the ice sheet had grown to 85 of the desired thickness At that time
the room temperature was raised to allow the ice sheet to temper (ie to
weaken)
The flexural strength f and the flexural modulus of elasticity Efgt
were monitored during the warm-up period until af attained a prescribed value
(25kPa or 40kPa) The load F to fail a cantilever beam of length pound width b
and thickness h in downwards flexure was used to estimate af
(2)
Two to three cantilever beams were tested at several locations around the ice
sheet in order to obtain a representative mean value of af at intervals as the
sheet weakened
The flexural elastic modulus Ef was determined by measuring the increshy
ment o of the vertical deflection of the ice sheete due to small increments of
a point load ~P applied at the center-point of the ice sheet Thus
2o188( 1-v )
(3)2
Pwgh
where v = Poissons ratio for ice (taken to be 03) P = density of urea w
solution (= 1000 kgm3 ) and g =gravitational acceleration (= 98lms-2 ) The
data associated with each ice sheet are given in table 3
6
C Preliminary Tests
A number of tests were conducted to determine natural frequencies and the
logarithmic decrement of the moored platform surge heave and pitch oscillashy
tions both in open water and in ice conditions The results are tabulated in
table 4 Openwater tests had been conducted previously by Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985a) who had concluded that additional hydrodynamic forces due to
movement of the push blade used for driving ice sheets were negligibly
small The coefficient of friction between the platform and the ice was
measured using a range of normal pressures
D Test Procedures
A total of 42 tests were conducted 15 using the fixed platform 7 using
the moored platform with Ks = 1 7kNm and 20 using the moored platform with
Ks= OSkNm For each test series the ice sheet was pushed with a constant
velocity against the platform by the carriage The velocities used were 002
004 01 and 02ms The relationships between model and prototype values of
ice sheet speeds are given in figure 12 while the relationships between
forces and moments for model and prototype are shown ln figure 13
III PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
A Data
Individual time series from the tests are presented in a separate addenshy
dum to this report (Examples of time series are shown in Appendix 1) The
data obtained from the digital voltmeter were converted from voltages into
2engineering values (N for force ms- for acceleration mm for heave deshy
grees for pitch) by means of a simple computer program The time histories
were also analyzed to give the temporal mean the standard deviation about
that mean and the maximum and minimum values for each signal Table 5 gives
the results for the fixed platform tests and table 6 for the moored
platform tests
7
B Fixed Platform
Figures 14 through 17 show the effect on horizontal force of velocity
Note that as in all graphs of results the mean force and the mean plus two
standard deviations are plotted (following the practice of Matsuishi and
Ettema 985a) It can be seen that horizontal surge force increases with
velocity Similar trends are observed for vertical (heave) force (figures 18
through 21) and pitch moment (figures 22 through 25) Horizontal force
vertical force and the magnitude of the pitching moment all increase with
increasing ice thickness (see figures 26 through 28) The effect of ice
strength is less clear but would appear lo indicate that both forces and the
pitching moment increase with ice increasing strength
C Moored Platform
Figures 29 through 33 show the variation of horizontal (surge) force with
velocity for the moored platform The mean surge force appears to increase
with velocity though not always monotonically There is a possibility of a
minimum force at some intermediate velocity This minimum is more evident if
one considers the variation of the mean force plus two standard deviations
with ice velocity This is discussed further in Section IV below Figures 34
through 36 show the effect of ice thickness on mooring force mooring force
clearly increases with increasing lee thickness Note however that for the
40 mm ice thickness Ks = 1 7 kNm while for all other thicknesses Ks = 05
kNm
D Qualitative Data
As well as collecting time series of loads displacements and accelershy
ations visual data was also gathered An underwater video viewing the
underside of the model platform was taken for each test significant ice
underride occurred in all cases which is cause for concern since underridlng
ice may foul drill string or mooring lines Above water videos were also
taken of each test After each test any ice lodged under the platform was
collected and photographed (see as an example figure 37)
8
IV DISCUSSION
A Observations
A number of qualitative observations can be made with regard to ice and
platform behavior during the tests
Modes of ice fracture
As expected ice fractured circumferentially as it thrust against the
platform (see figure 38) After downward flexure had produce a circumferenshy
tial crack ice segments were further broken by radial cracks The resulting
lee pieces were then shored down the hull and clearing from beneath it
occurred in one of three ways They were either swept past the sides or
under the bottom of the platform or it rotated back under the oncoming ice
sheet The last clearing mechanism leading to the formation of a ridge or
collar of broken ice that ringed the platform and significantly affected the
ice loads it experienced
2 Platform motion
The platform amidst a moving ice sheet showed a fairly regular though
also stochastic motion The platform would pitch up at the point of impact
and heave while being shoved backwards After a certain amount of motion it
would lurch or surge forward rapidly only to be shoved backwards again
Numerous smaller motions were superposed on this long term surge behavior
This behavior ls discussed further in Section E below
3 Ice subduction
A major concern in any floating drilling structure is to avoid broken ice
moving under the structure and fouling the drill string In a cable moored
system such as Kulluk a further concern ls added that of avoiding fouling
of moored cables Considerable ice under flow was observed in the tests conshy
ducted for this study being most prevalent in thick ice conditions Somewhat
different behavior could be expected for the Kulluk platform because of
differences in a hull shape particularly of the hull skirt (see figure
39) Thus while Kulluk would experience less ice underflow than the model
9
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Sensitivities of the LVDTs were evaluated by measuring the voltage
change for a given displacement of the transducer rod
The sensitivity of the carriage velocity measurement was determined by
correlating the output voltage with the mean carriage velocity as measured
with a length scale and stop watch Calibration coefficients are listed in
table 2
B Model Ice
Ice sheets were grown from a O 7~~ by weight urea solution by the wet
seeding procedure described in detail by Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a)
Sheets were grown to three nominal thicknesses (20 30 and 40mm) After
seeding had occurred the cold room was adjusted for maximum cooling rate
until the ice sheet had grown to 85 of the desired thickness At that time
the room temperature was raised to allow the ice sheet to temper (ie to
weaken)
The flexural strength f and the flexural modulus of elasticity Efgt
were monitored during the warm-up period until af attained a prescribed value
(25kPa or 40kPa) The load F to fail a cantilever beam of length pound width b
and thickness h in downwards flexure was used to estimate af
(2)
Two to three cantilever beams were tested at several locations around the ice
sheet in order to obtain a representative mean value of af at intervals as the
sheet weakened
The flexural elastic modulus Ef was determined by measuring the increshy
ment o of the vertical deflection of the ice sheete due to small increments of
a point load ~P applied at the center-point of the ice sheet Thus
2o188( 1-v )
(3)2
Pwgh
where v = Poissons ratio for ice (taken to be 03) P = density of urea w
solution (= 1000 kgm3 ) and g =gravitational acceleration (= 98lms-2 ) The
data associated with each ice sheet are given in table 3
6
C Preliminary Tests
A number of tests were conducted to determine natural frequencies and the
logarithmic decrement of the moored platform surge heave and pitch oscillashy
tions both in open water and in ice conditions The results are tabulated in
table 4 Openwater tests had been conducted previously by Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985a) who had concluded that additional hydrodynamic forces due to
movement of the push blade used for driving ice sheets were negligibly
small The coefficient of friction between the platform and the ice was
measured using a range of normal pressures
D Test Procedures
A total of 42 tests were conducted 15 using the fixed platform 7 using
the moored platform with Ks = 1 7kNm and 20 using the moored platform with
Ks= OSkNm For each test series the ice sheet was pushed with a constant
velocity against the platform by the carriage The velocities used were 002
004 01 and 02ms The relationships between model and prototype values of
ice sheet speeds are given in figure 12 while the relationships between
forces and moments for model and prototype are shown ln figure 13
III PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
A Data
Individual time series from the tests are presented in a separate addenshy
dum to this report (Examples of time series are shown in Appendix 1) The
data obtained from the digital voltmeter were converted from voltages into
2engineering values (N for force ms- for acceleration mm for heave deshy
grees for pitch) by means of a simple computer program The time histories
were also analyzed to give the temporal mean the standard deviation about
that mean and the maximum and minimum values for each signal Table 5 gives
the results for the fixed platform tests and table 6 for the moored
platform tests
7
B Fixed Platform
Figures 14 through 17 show the effect on horizontal force of velocity
Note that as in all graphs of results the mean force and the mean plus two
standard deviations are plotted (following the practice of Matsuishi and
Ettema 985a) It can be seen that horizontal surge force increases with
velocity Similar trends are observed for vertical (heave) force (figures 18
through 21) and pitch moment (figures 22 through 25) Horizontal force
vertical force and the magnitude of the pitching moment all increase with
increasing ice thickness (see figures 26 through 28) The effect of ice
strength is less clear but would appear lo indicate that both forces and the
pitching moment increase with ice increasing strength
C Moored Platform
Figures 29 through 33 show the variation of horizontal (surge) force with
velocity for the moored platform The mean surge force appears to increase
with velocity though not always monotonically There is a possibility of a
minimum force at some intermediate velocity This minimum is more evident if
one considers the variation of the mean force plus two standard deviations
with ice velocity This is discussed further in Section IV below Figures 34
through 36 show the effect of ice thickness on mooring force mooring force
clearly increases with increasing lee thickness Note however that for the
40 mm ice thickness Ks = 1 7 kNm while for all other thicknesses Ks = 05
kNm
D Qualitative Data
As well as collecting time series of loads displacements and accelershy
ations visual data was also gathered An underwater video viewing the
underside of the model platform was taken for each test significant ice
underride occurred in all cases which is cause for concern since underridlng
ice may foul drill string or mooring lines Above water videos were also
taken of each test After each test any ice lodged under the platform was
collected and photographed (see as an example figure 37)
8
IV DISCUSSION
A Observations
A number of qualitative observations can be made with regard to ice and
platform behavior during the tests
Modes of ice fracture
As expected ice fractured circumferentially as it thrust against the
platform (see figure 38) After downward flexure had produce a circumferenshy
tial crack ice segments were further broken by radial cracks The resulting
lee pieces were then shored down the hull and clearing from beneath it
occurred in one of three ways They were either swept past the sides or
under the bottom of the platform or it rotated back under the oncoming ice
sheet The last clearing mechanism leading to the formation of a ridge or
collar of broken ice that ringed the platform and significantly affected the
ice loads it experienced
2 Platform motion
The platform amidst a moving ice sheet showed a fairly regular though
also stochastic motion The platform would pitch up at the point of impact
and heave while being shoved backwards After a certain amount of motion it
would lurch or surge forward rapidly only to be shoved backwards again
Numerous smaller motions were superposed on this long term surge behavior
This behavior ls discussed further in Section E below
3 Ice subduction
A major concern in any floating drilling structure is to avoid broken ice
moving under the structure and fouling the drill string In a cable moored
system such as Kulluk a further concern ls added that of avoiding fouling
of moored cables Considerable ice under flow was observed in the tests conshy
ducted for this study being most prevalent in thick ice conditions Somewhat
different behavior could be expected for the Kulluk platform because of
differences in a hull shape particularly of the hull skirt (see figure
39) Thus while Kulluk would experience less ice underflow than the model
9
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
C Preliminary Tests
A number of tests were conducted to determine natural frequencies and the
logarithmic decrement of the moored platform surge heave and pitch oscillashy
tions both in open water and in ice conditions The results are tabulated in
table 4 Openwater tests had been conducted previously by Matsuishi and
Ettema (1985a) who had concluded that additional hydrodynamic forces due to
movement of the push blade used for driving ice sheets were negligibly
small The coefficient of friction between the platform and the ice was
measured using a range of normal pressures
D Test Procedures
A total of 42 tests were conducted 15 using the fixed platform 7 using
the moored platform with Ks = 1 7kNm and 20 using the moored platform with
Ks= OSkNm For each test series the ice sheet was pushed with a constant
velocity against the platform by the carriage The velocities used were 002
004 01 and 02ms The relationships between model and prototype values of
ice sheet speeds are given in figure 12 while the relationships between
forces and moments for model and prototype are shown ln figure 13
III PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
A Data
Individual time series from the tests are presented in a separate addenshy
dum to this report (Examples of time series are shown in Appendix 1) The
data obtained from the digital voltmeter were converted from voltages into
2engineering values (N for force ms- for acceleration mm for heave deshy
grees for pitch) by means of a simple computer program The time histories
were also analyzed to give the temporal mean the standard deviation about
that mean and the maximum and minimum values for each signal Table 5 gives
the results for the fixed platform tests and table 6 for the moored
platform tests
7
B Fixed Platform
Figures 14 through 17 show the effect on horizontal force of velocity
Note that as in all graphs of results the mean force and the mean plus two
standard deviations are plotted (following the practice of Matsuishi and
Ettema 985a) It can be seen that horizontal surge force increases with
velocity Similar trends are observed for vertical (heave) force (figures 18
through 21) and pitch moment (figures 22 through 25) Horizontal force
vertical force and the magnitude of the pitching moment all increase with
increasing ice thickness (see figures 26 through 28) The effect of ice
strength is less clear but would appear lo indicate that both forces and the
pitching moment increase with ice increasing strength
C Moored Platform
Figures 29 through 33 show the variation of horizontal (surge) force with
velocity for the moored platform The mean surge force appears to increase
with velocity though not always monotonically There is a possibility of a
minimum force at some intermediate velocity This minimum is more evident if
one considers the variation of the mean force plus two standard deviations
with ice velocity This is discussed further in Section IV below Figures 34
through 36 show the effect of ice thickness on mooring force mooring force
clearly increases with increasing lee thickness Note however that for the
40 mm ice thickness Ks = 1 7 kNm while for all other thicknesses Ks = 05
kNm
D Qualitative Data
As well as collecting time series of loads displacements and accelershy
ations visual data was also gathered An underwater video viewing the
underside of the model platform was taken for each test significant ice
underride occurred in all cases which is cause for concern since underridlng
ice may foul drill string or mooring lines Above water videos were also
taken of each test After each test any ice lodged under the platform was
collected and photographed (see as an example figure 37)
8
IV DISCUSSION
A Observations
A number of qualitative observations can be made with regard to ice and
platform behavior during the tests
Modes of ice fracture
As expected ice fractured circumferentially as it thrust against the
platform (see figure 38) After downward flexure had produce a circumferenshy
tial crack ice segments were further broken by radial cracks The resulting
lee pieces were then shored down the hull and clearing from beneath it
occurred in one of three ways They were either swept past the sides or
under the bottom of the platform or it rotated back under the oncoming ice
sheet The last clearing mechanism leading to the formation of a ridge or
collar of broken ice that ringed the platform and significantly affected the
ice loads it experienced
2 Platform motion
The platform amidst a moving ice sheet showed a fairly regular though
also stochastic motion The platform would pitch up at the point of impact
and heave while being shoved backwards After a certain amount of motion it
would lurch or surge forward rapidly only to be shoved backwards again
Numerous smaller motions were superposed on this long term surge behavior
This behavior ls discussed further in Section E below
3 Ice subduction
A major concern in any floating drilling structure is to avoid broken ice
moving under the structure and fouling the drill string In a cable moored
system such as Kulluk a further concern ls added that of avoiding fouling
of moored cables Considerable ice under flow was observed in the tests conshy
ducted for this study being most prevalent in thick ice conditions Somewhat
different behavior could be expected for the Kulluk platform because of
differences in a hull shape particularly of the hull skirt (see figure
39) Thus while Kulluk would experience less ice underflow than the model
9
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
B Fixed Platform
Figures 14 through 17 show the effect on horizontal force of velocity
Note that as in all graphs of results the mean force and the mean plus two
standard deviations are plotted (following the practice of Matsuishi and
Ettema 985a) It can be seen that horizontal surge force increases with
velocity Similar trends are observed for vertical (heave) force (figures 18
through 21) and pitch moment (figures 22 through 25) Horizontal force
vertical force and the magnitude of the pitching moment all increase with
increasing ice thickness (see figures 26 through 28) The effect of ice
strength is less clear but would appear lo indicate that both forces and the
pitching moment increase with ice increasing strength
C Moored Platform
Figures 29 through 33 show the variation of horizontal (surge) force with
velocity for the moored platform The mean surge force appears to increase
with velocity though not always monotonically There is a possibility of a
minimum force at some intermediate velocity This minimum is more evident if
one considers the variation of the mean force plus two standard deviations
with ice velocity This is discussed further in Section IV below Figures 34
through 36 show the effect of ice thickness on mooring force mooring force
clearly increases with increasing lee thickness Note however that for the
40 mm ice thickness Ks = 1 7 kNm while for all other thicknesses Ks = 05
kNm
D Qualitative Data
As well as collecting time series of loads displacements and accelershy
ations visual data was also gathered An underwater video viewing the
underside of the model platform was taken for each test significant ice
underride occurred in all cases which is cause for concern since underridlng
ice may foul drill string or mooring lines Above water videos were also
taken of each test After each test any ice lodged under the platform was
collected and photographed (see as an example figure 37)
8
IV DISCUSSION
A Observations
A number of qualitative observations can be made with regard to ice and
platform behavior during the tests
Modes of ice fracture
As expected ice fractured circumferentially as it thrust against the
platform (see figure 38) After downward flexure had produce a circumferenshy
tial crack ice segments were further broken by radial cracks The resulting
lee pieces were then shored down the hull and clearing from beneath it
occurred in one of three ways They were either swept past the sides or
under the bottom of the platform or it rotated back under the oncoming ice
sheet The last clearing mechanism leading to the formation of a ridge or
collar of broken ice that ringed the platform and significantly affected the
ice loads it experienced
2 Platform motion
The platform amidst a moving ice sheet showed a fairly regular though
also stochastic motion The platform would pitch up at the point of impact
and heave while being shoved backwards After a certain amount of motion it
would lurch or surge forward rapidly only to be shoved backwards again
Numerous smaller motions were superposed on this long term surge behavior
This behavior ls discussed further in Section E below
3 Ice subduction
A major concern in any floating drilling structure is to avoid broken ice
moving under the structure and fouling the drill string In a cable moored
system such as Kulluk a further concern ls added that of avoiding fouling
of moored cables Considerable ice under flow was observed in the tests conshy
ducted for this study being most prevalent in thick ice conditions Somewhat
different behavior could be expected for the Kulluk platform because of
differences in a hull shape particularly of the hull skirt (see figure
39) Thus while Kulluk would experience less ice underflow than the model
9
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
IV DISCUSSION
A Observations
A number of qualitative observations can be made with regard to ice and
platform behavior during the tests
Modes of ice fracture
As expected ice fractured circumferentially as it thrust against the
platform (see figure 38) After downward flexure had produce a circumferenshy
tial crack ice segments were further broken by radial cracks The resulting
lee pieces were then shored down the hull and clearing from beneath it
occurred in one of three ways They were either swept past the sides or
under the bottom of the platform or it rotated back under the oncoming ice
sheet The last clearing mechanism leading to the formation of a ridge or
collar of broken ice that ringed the platform and significantly affected the
ice loads it experienced
2 Platform motion
The platform amidst a moving ice sheet showed a fairly regular though
also stochastic motion The platform would pitch up at the point of impact
and heave while being shoved backwards After a certain amount of motion it
would lurch or surge forward rapidly only to be shoved backwards again
Numerous smaller motions were superposed on this long term surge behavior
This behavior ls discussed further in Section E below
3 Ice subduction
A major concern in any floating drilling structure is to avoid broken ice
moving under the structure and fouling the drill string In a cable moored
system such as Kulluk a further concern ls added that of avoiding fouling
of moored cables Considerable ice under flow was observed in the tests conshy
ducted for this study being most prevalent in thick ice conditions Somewhat
different behavior could be expected for the Kulluk platform because of
differences in a hull shape particularly of the hull skirt (see figure
39) Thus while Kulluk would experience less ice underflow than the model
9
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
platform it would experience higher forces since ice could jam in the
skirt 0 angle and crushing may occur in that region
B Ice Thickness Effects
As noted in Chapter III above for both the moored and the fixed
platform all measured parameters (surge force heave and pitch for the moorshy
ed platform surge force heave force and pitch moment for the 11 fixedn platshy
form) increased their mean and peak values monotonically with increasing ice
thickness This ls as to be expected since for a given ice strength the load
to break an ice sheet in downward bending increases In fact if one treats
an ice sheet as approximately a simple beam one has
= ( 4) y I
where o = the strength of the ice y = half the thickness of the ice sheet I
the second moment of inertia and M ls the breaking moment If we allow I
= bt 3 12 (where b = breadth and t = thickness of the simple beam) then we
have
2 0 bull bt
yM (5)
b
since y t2 The moment required to break the beam is given by
M = F2 ( 6)
where F is the resultant force due to the platform acting on the lee and i is
the appropriate moment arm (see figure 40) It is reasonable to assume that
i will be related to the characteristic length 2 which is generally taken c
(eg IARR 1980) as proportional to t 3 4bull Thus we might expect that
Fa tlZS (7)
However two factors should be considered First no account has been taken
of dynamic effects nor has the effect of the skirt on the platform been
considered Second the above analysis is simple and only a two-dimensional
10
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
approximation Ralston (1980) provides a three dimensional plasticity solushy
tion expressing the horizontal and vertical forces as second-order polynomial
functions of ice thickness while Enkvist (1983) suggests that the resistance
of the ice is directly proportional to the ice thickness Given the complexshy
ity of the platform geometry no simple relationship between forces and thickshy
ness should be expected but the upward curvature apparent in almost all of
figures 26 through 28 and 34 through 36 suggest a relationship of the form
(8)
where n gt I
C Ice Velocity Effects
For the fixed platform a general trend appears to be that both mean and
peak values of heave force surge force and pitch moment increase monotonishy
cally with increasing ice velocity In some cases however it appears that a
minimum in these parameters may occur at V ~ 005 ms as for ice thickness
30 mm and strength = 25 kPa for the fixed platform (figures 15 19 23) This
may be related to resonance and dynamic effects or could simply be the result
of scatter One would expect the forces to increase with lee velocity if as
was the case here the mode of ice failure remained the same (viz downward
fracture) through the range of velocities investigated because forces associshy
ated with flexural breaking and submergence of ice increase (see for example
Schul son 1987)
For the moored platform the situation is more complex as would be exshy
pected given the more dynamic nature of the experiments Thus although for
three cases (t = 40 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20 mm S = 40 kPa t = 30mm S = 40
kPa) the heave appears to increase monotonically with velocity this ls not
the case in the other two cases (t = 30 mm S = 25 kPa t = 20mm S = 25
kPa) Similar inconsistencies are apparent for the surge force and pitch
angle It appears that the stochastic nature of the ice fracture process
overrides any deterministic trends which might be occurring
11
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
D Mooring Stiffness Effects
Including the work of Matsuishi and Ettema (1985a) three tests have now
been performed for three mooring system stiffnesses (K = a 7 kNm os s
kNm) As figure 41 shows there appears to be a minimum of surge force as a
function of inverse mooring stiffness (lks) bull This is a very important reshy
sult particularly for the design engineer as it suggests that there may be
an optimum mooring stiffness which provides minimum loads and acCelerations on
the platform This result requires further investigation In particular it
is not clear precisely what factors contribute to this minimum Future expershy
iments are planned to elucidate this matter
E Dynamic Response
In order to determine the dominant frequencies of mooring loads platform
motions and the controlling failure modes of the ice as it moved against the
platform spectral analysis of time-histories was performed uslng a fast
fourier transform computer program The frequency spectrum for each test was
then compared with the calculated breaking frequency fb fb ls calculated by
divi ding the ice impact velocity V by the average length of broken pieces
lb thus
(9)
In order to highlight certain trends the following discussion will concentrate
on cross-cuts through the tests Four moored platform tests (all with ice
thickness = 30 mm and ice strength = 25 kPa) are considered with impact velocshy
ities ranging from 002 to 020 ms-1 Similarly four fixed-platform tests
are considered (see Table 7)
1 Moored platform dvnamic response
Figures 42 through 45 show the frequency power spectra for mooring force
(or surge displacement) Fx and pitch angle e for tests P301 through P304
Relevant data are listed in table 7 Figure 41 shows that for test P301 both
Fx and 8 exhibit a dominant peak at 2rrf = 07 which is approximately fb2
Mooring force also shows a peak at f = fb For P302 Fx shows a double peak
12
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
at 2rrf ~ 10 - 12 while e shows a peak at 2rrf ~ 20 which is associated with
fb The double peak in the mooring force spectrum appears to be associated
with the natural surge frequency of the platform fn 2rrf is approximately n
14 The mooring force peak is rather broad banded a trend which persists
for all data and is a result of the markedly stochastic nature of the ice
fracture process around the platform In test P303 there is a secondary peak
on the mooring force spectrum at 2Tif ~ 42 which corresponds to fb but again
the primary peak is associated with the natural frequency In the pitch
spectrum the primary peak is at 21ffb P304 continues this trend Again
surge is dominated by the platforms resonant frequency In the pitch specshy
trum three peaks are evident which correspond to fb3 fb4 and fb5 To
express this physically they represent vibrations associated with every third
fourth and fifth fracture process
The trend for the moored platform would thus appear to be as follows
When breaking frequency fb is less than the platforms natural frequency of
surge oscillation amidst ice pound the dominant frequency of mooring-force8
oscillation coincides with an integer fraction of fb usually fb2 Physicalshy
ly this means that the platform is shoved back by the ice which all the
white fails flexurally until mooring forces exceed imposed ice forces and the
platform surges forward to be shoved back once again
When fb equalled or exceeded fs the dominant frequency of mooring force
and platform surge was fs Physically the moored platform acted as if it
were a plucked violin string When released from a position of maximum surge
displacement mooring forces caused the platform to spring forward impacting
the onward thrusting ice sheet in a brief series of and breaking heavily
damped vibrations Pitcb oscillations of the platform occurred primarily at
the breaking frequency (or some fraction thereof) It should perhaps be noted
that there are a number of inaccuracies inherent in the frequency analysis
Data was gathered at 7 or 10 Hz thus higher frequencies than this are not
analyzed Similarly test length was at most 400 seconds so very low freshy
quency effects will not be captured Nonetheless it does seem clear that the
two major loading modes on the platform are the long term surge and the breakshy
ing of the ice
13
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
2 Fixed platform dynamic response
Figures 46 through 49 show the frequency power spectra for surge reshy
straining force (Fx) for tests P301F through P304F with associated data in
table 7 The spectra are more broad banded than for the moored platform
which is a result of the lack of degrees of freedom for the fixed platform
In a sense the fixed platform was unable to tune its responses to either the
forcing frequency or to a natural frequency of motion P301F shows a secondshy
ary peak at fb with the primary peak at fb2 In P302F there is a very broad
peak with the upper frequency corresponding to fb A similar situation is
evident for P303F The smaller higher frequency peak corresponds to fb and
the trailing peak may be associated with the clearing of rubble from around
the platform P304F show another double peak centered on fb2 In contrast
to the moored platform there is no long period surge peak This is to be
expected since the platform is fixed Again the breaking of the ice appears
to be an important feature in the ice fracture process
V CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were drawn from the study
1 When impacting the platform ice sheets fractured circumferentially
Significant amounts of broken ice passed under the platform especially
for the thicker ice sheets
2 For both moored and fixed platform tests surge force heave force and
pitch moment (or heave displacement and pitch angle for the moored
platform) increased monotonically with increasing ice thickness The
exact relationship between force and thickness is unclear because of
complexities in the interaction geometry but is of the form
nF a t
where n ) 1
3 The general trend for the fixed platform was for surge force heave
force and pitch moment to Increase monotonically with lee velocity The
14
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
few exceptions to this are probably due to scatter though resonance
effects cannot be dismissed
4 In contrast for the 0 moored 0 platform the effect of ice velocity on surge
force heave displacement and pitch angle is clearly compllicated by
resonance effects
5 The surge force experienced by the platform exhibits a minimum as stiff shy
ness decreases from infinity The minimum occurs at K ~ lKNm s
6 Fourier analysis of the time series show that for the fixed platform the
dominant frequency is the breaking frequency of the icefb or some whole
number fraction thereof
7 The moored platform also showed the breaking frequency or a fraction
thereof to be dominant for both heave and pitch However the surge
force power spectrum was dominated by the natural surge frequency of the
platform
15
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
REFERENCES
Enkvist E (1983) Level Ice Resistance VIIth Graduate School on Ships and
Structures in Ice Helsinki Chapter XV
Frederking R and Schwarz J (1982) Model Test of Ice Forces on Fixed and
Oscillating Cones Cold Regions Science and Technology Vol 6 PPbull 61shy
72
Frederking R (1984) Exploration and Production Concepts and Projects for
Arctic Offshore Proc IAHR Symposium on Ice Hamburg V 4 pp 387-411
Hnatiuk J and Wright BD (1984) Ice Management to Support the Kulluk
Drilling Vessel Proc 35th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society
of CIM Calgary Paper No 84-94 pp 333-365
Loh JKS and Stamberg JC ( 1984) New Generation Arctic Drilling System
Overview of First Years Performance Proc 16th Offshore Technology
Conference Houston Paper No 4797
Matsuishi M and Ettema R (1985a) The Dynamic Behavior of a Floating
Cable-Moored Platform Continuously Impacted by Ice Flows Iowa Institute
of Hydraulic Research IIHR Report No 294
Matsuishi M and Ettema R ( l 985b) Ice Loads and Motions Experienced by a
Floating Moored Platform in Mushy Ice Rubble Iowa Institute of Hydraulic
Research IIHR Report No 295
Ralston T (1980) Plastic Limit Analysis of Sheet Ice Loads on Conical
Structures Physics and Mechanics of Ice ed p Tryde IVTAM Symposium
Copenhagen PPbull 289-308
Working Group of the IAHR Section on Ice Problems (1980) Standardisation of
Testing Methods for Ice Properties J Hydraulic Research Vol 18 153shy
165
16
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Table 1
Principal Dimensions of the Test Platform and Kulluk
Diameter at deck level (m) 8 810
Diameter at load waterline (m) 1 5 675
Diameter at base line (m) 1334 600
Depth (m) 0334 155
Draft (m) 0 187 84
Displacement (m3) o 271 24700
Cone Angle (degree) 314 314
Test Platform Kulluk (l45 scale)
17
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Table 2
Calibration Coefficients for Test Transducer
Transducer Coefficient
Load Cell 1762 Nvolt Moored Platform LVDT Ill 127 mmvolt
LVDT 112 127 mmvolt
Surge Force 7 85 Nvolt Fixed Platform Heave Force 785 Nvolt
Pitch ~foment 7 85 Nvolt
18
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Table 3
Ice Sheet Data
Sheet No Thlckness Strength a Ela y y
(mm) (kPa)
P201 21 24 921 P202 21 25 1064 P203 20 27 881 P204 21 27 940 P301 28 26 435 P302 27 24 400 P303 28 26 220 P304A 28 25 150 P305 28 40 1453 P401 39 24 549 P301F 32 27 1443 P201F 21 24 4458 P302F 30 20 2100 P202F 20 25 4976 P203F 20 25 1569 P303F 30 20 1522 P304F 30 24 1171 P305F 30 39 780 P306F 30 40 1518 P307F 30 40 705 P308F 30 38 1418 P309F 30 41 1861 P401F 40 24 2131 P402F 39 24 1471 P403F 39 25 2207
19
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Table 4
Natural Periods and Logarithmic Decrements of Moored Platform
Surge Surge Heave Pitch Displacement Displacement Displacement Rotation (k 8 = 1 7 kNmXk
8 = O 5 kNm)
Natural Period (seconds)
T 300 450 141 1 17
Logarithmic Decrement 0
029 025 055
20
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Table 5
Test Thickness Velocity Strength 2cr F 2cr t-f 2crFH No (mm) (ms) kPa v p
P301F 29 002 25 4 74 390 569 394 -299 408 P302F 30 004 21 41 3 230 457 326 -318 328 P303F 30 01 24 485 274 335 526 -264 396 P304F 30 02 24 519 432 404 1050 -342 70 2
P305F 30 002 39 472 462 574 338 -331 35 0 P306F 30 004 38 494 330 681 342 -455 328 P307F 30 01 39 513 328 532 648 -398 485 P308F 30 02 38 77 8 694 29l 884 -418 480 P309F 30 02 41 807 754 85l 17 4 -650 1148
P401F 40 002 24 783 920 753 590 -391 620 P402F 39 01 24 870 714 672 958 -494 77 2 P403F 39 02 25 1022 1164 731 1730 -491 1248
P201F 21 002 24 186 107 242 18 1 -160 138 P202F 20 01 24 245 154 288 274 -218 180 P203F 21 02 25 390 318 379 784 -328 488
21
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Table 6
Moored Tests
Test Thickness Velocity Strength F 20 p 2a H 2o No (mm) (ms) (kPa)
P201 21 002 24 13 1 34 P202 21 004 25 21 l 128 -0201 0230 -1446 0876 P203 20 010 27 228 42 -0223 0176 -I 269 o 718 P204 21 020 27 286 1 6 -0162 0132 -0811 1 202
P301 28 002 26 26 6 200 -0285 022 -2001 09 P302 27 004 24 232 82 -0238 023 -I 399 092 P303 28 010 26 285 40 -0219 052 -1405 1 34 P304A 28 020 25 293 44 -0252 012 -1277 I 16 P305 28 002 40 270 204 -0207 026 -156 I 12
P205 19 002 40 275 234 -211 0188 -1514 799 P206 19 004 18 216 976 -0201 0162 -1413 576 P207 19 004 39 18l 189 -0248 o236 -1 664 bull 716 P208 205 010 41 372 494 -0339 0262 -2265 l166 P209 19 020 39 375 472 -0360 0148 -225 o 96
P306 30 004 40 710 456 P3010 28 002 36 508 518 -0 226 0334 -1616 165 P309 28 020 36 77 8 96 -0455 0412 -454 303 P308 28 010 36 727 134 -0423 0834 -387 438 P307 28 004 36 64l 322 -0250 0524 -2412 I 72
P371 37 002 28 1728 950 -0150 0690 -192 1 65 P403 40 002 24 1670 734 0060 I00 -242 368 P404 40 010 21 91 3 462 -0286 126 -305 238 P405 40 020 21 1243 554 -0382 I 28 -397 480 P406 40 002 22 574 628 -0364 040 -272 1 86 P407 40 002 20 478 334 -0395 036 -231 126 P408 40 010 20 870 534 -0374 1 26 -291 290
Thickness
20 mm - 4 at 25kPa 4 at 40kPa l at 18kPa 30 mm - 4 at 25kPa l at 2lkPa 6 at 40kPa 40 mm - 7 at 25kPa
22
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Table 7 Platform Dynamic Response
A cloored Platform f = 30mm s = 25kPa
surge pitch ltTest ii Velocity( mis) breaking length( mm) ~g 21ffb 21ffd 2n f
om dom
P301 002 110 018 1 13 07 07 P302 004 95 044 276 10-14 20 P303 010 120 083 522 08-14 45 P304 020 75 27 170 14 523832
B Fixed Platform f = 30mm s 25kPa
Velocity(ms) breaking length(mm) fb 21ffb 21ff dom
P301F P302F P303F P304F
002 004 010 020
155 120 115 100
013 033 087 20
082 207 547
126
055 21 42 60
23
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
--middot -middot~i-~- __
middot-middot middotshy -=~ shymiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddot
middotmiddotmiddot middot middotmiddot
Figure 1 Conical Platform Similar to Kulluk
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Figure 2 The Model Platform
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
COOLING rowrn
--middot - ---middot -middot-- -------- --- ------- -----i -~ ~~ PIP~~=NC~~-=~ -5-5 - ~ - _j PUMP ~~10 ~(OR PIT[ [
r----middot--middotmiddottmiddot--middotmiddot---middotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddot-middot------_______ ------- ---~------ middotmiddot--middot------ - ~- --I 12 1=axvxnz9middot~ poundmiddotCOLD ROOM WALLmiddot-gt ~---middotmiddot-------~~
=--~rjmiddotz t~ _ _~--~-~ ~~_~~~-~~~--~~-~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~)_~-~~~-~-~=~~----~-~~~-~~-~ ~ lUZ1-~ nz] ~middot~~ 1
1 ~JJ
_0 I
- -- I -middot-11shy
82
-~-
I EL 0 middotO UNE bull SUCTION LINE
=nJ c1 ~~~~~~~=~~~~=~ ===zm --middotmiddotSUCTION LfNEmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middot-middot 1 J l_lJ---- _
COLO AIR OUClS bull
-17FT7npry1117j==-- -middotmiddotmiddotmiddot- - -- __ middot-- --- ( -shy
- -$~-~~ -1-~7-~tradeirbull -rry77middot---middotr~--71-T~-~middotT7~-~- middot---rrn~1 ~-~--_- -~--
JI~~ lNii ~NK~ lfJ middot ~ I A I
iamp~middot (middotmiddotmiddotlmiddot~middot~ I- middotmiddot~ ii ~lW ~ ~cimiddoti~~tmiddot middotmiddotiampllltmiddotmiddot -~1~~~ =Jl ~middot 11 Ill]I
middotlbullIbull ipoundmiddotJh bull ~Et
~micro_--middot-middotcc1--rrt(+Jt 1ijTWf~Wf J-~ middot-4middotiln~iJJ4-4-~yenfl1fi~~-middot14n7tVmiddotWt~micro1-1 - ~~~~lt~LlL-Lgt middotmiddotmiddotmiddot7 ~1lLgtc7-~Lt~iili~hr
li ~~ FlJti A 2 1f --liM1t iV-
1-
ICE TOWING TANK EL+3-7 SPRAY PUMP MAIN FJ OIJR UOUID Cie bullbulllr middot-middot
-VENTS CARRIAGE
r-~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--nmiddotmiddot=middot=31
UNIT COOLER
L ==plusmnXL middot-middot ---middot7 middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot COMPRESSOR COOiANT WAT EH--- COMPflESSOfl RETtJflN Flow----shy
2 LINE
o 2 bull s a 10 12 11 1s n II 1111I 1J
0 I 2 3 4 SM iIbull==
SCALE
fl bullgtbullUbullbull o_gtJfillh _
- SOM -
er 32 M ELoorI it~J T=t~1
~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot-~ r~- f middot TV CAMERA ____ rJ
SECTION A-A
TO
UNIT COOLERS
~------
S
ICE TOWING TANK IOWA INSTITUTE OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IOWA
Figure 3 IIHR Ice Towing Tank Layout
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Tonk woli bullshy
lnslrnmenl Work boyIr rll 11
mbull -111 1l~ln ~I tr ~g u Variable speed n
OynomometeS i l~~middot drive ossen~~~IE
~middotjJlillllilllllllf11=1f 1]1~-~cckkJ-l--l-ill-1l-1111l-llllilllll--1lll=_Jil1
~----middotmiddotmiddot--middot~----middot ~~ _______ middot-~-~ Pion
I -r-i===c=======f======~-~-11
05m ======~=-~=========ii
~11 07rn-middotmiddotmiddot[t- + middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot---middot Front levolion
-rr+shyu 0 = ]
-------i
-E 0
7 3N
c (_
ltt
Figure 4 Towing Tank Carriage
c 0-0 gt 0)
w QJ
Cl
(I)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
___ _______I [-----------~~ _~ -_-~1
66
a344 -1- v -
j -J-L- LW L
278 50 I 101l_J_ __ __l __ BL
-middot 1334 ~
a= 3140
DISPLfCEtvEtJT0271 M 3
Figure 5 Detailed Drawing of Mode 1 Plat form
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
(_(~1 ~middot--Tl 1middotshy -r-~~-===~ T-J ~
j I
I
ltNSTRUMENf iE ~ AM
t--- ix A~OAO CELLNTfmiddotS
I I DEVICE1----~--==--- l- NAfYAW
~ I - ~~____ ] LATFORM
yen ---- ~ w ~v - I CE
STROKEUN bull - = V - IVERSAL BEARINGS i _shy
Figure 6 Instrumentation of Moored Platform
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
-- 1 rmiddotr-middot-middot-shyJ-~ Oeloil 1 t bullbull bullbull ~-
nbull bullbull middot= n- [-) - iE31-pound11E~yen=~s~~~ m~~tradebull-= r -v - middotmiddot- r~middot-rmiddotr~1~ AJ-middotshy0- - __ J
51 1pQlt_sectr
middot - J S 1middot ___Qme Shaft 1Jriiver ~()I_ ft1Qrig[ --- -=i~~ ~-~~~ ~1c --middotmiddot-1Jmiddot-middota middotmiddotmiddotmiddot IKO GE25GS
bull bull ----- Shofgt 5If Q~~-Jl~QLirig IKO SF08090- --- - ITD- 11 I - --shy- -- ~Po-~ 1 0 -shy Shof_~p_lJ -middot-middot -ii I)
iiplinl_ Beorin ~ _ _ ____J~~~11 Nut g eat gtRrmg11 Center Block
iRP_Q[j_
0 10 20cm LlLlllllllt 1-J
Figure 7 Details of Mooring Harness
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
---------- ------
-- - Can middot_El(]tt(Jrn Plate c - - ~- - ------- middot - _f1fClr~gj-iece_(Jnf1~ctir1g _Plate--~ ltflt
bull bull - _J~-~--Ltl_ Lltgteltl JI ==c-middot qff __ -JcJ-- ]shy
11 11 fltJrni -----11L~1~=~--- --shy
middottr-=~tlil ______itang c~~~ middotshy
Imiddotu
()
0 0
()
-f3_3 -e--e- middot CY 0
()
0 0 ()
0 UJJ11
10 20cm _J
Figure 8 Details of the Sway and Yaw Restralnlng Device
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
middotshy ~- middot41
ltmiddot~-- -shy
jtmiddot shy Jshy
~- -- ~ 1- if - - - - - - j - - ~--~ -~________~L---__
Figure 9 The Platform Showing Sway and Yaw Restraint
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
(FIXING FRAMEn n I I
middot ~ ~
u ~ L LOAD CELL
IbullmiddotI
Flgure 10 Instrumentation of Fixed Platform
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
F FORCE yx DISPLACEMENT
MMOMENT $=ROTATION
y middotACCELERATION
ICE z
(a) MOORED PLATFORM
L------------i-----FI t - 1-----1
CE
(b) FiXED Plt_ATFORM
Figure 11 Locations of Measurements and Positive Directions
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
00 04 08 12 16 20 (ktsl
PROTOTYPE SPEEJ D =67 mLW bull
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 x 10
-1 (ms)
MODEL SPEED DLW =lmbullJ
_J 4 O a ~0 2 x
FROUDE NUMBER v~
shy
Figure 12 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Ice Impact Speed
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 (MN)
PROTOTYPE DLW=675m
I I I I I I
0 40 80 120
MODEL
160 200 (N)
(a) FORCE
OL_ _L_ _L2__L__~4--L-~6--l---8-----~10 (GN middotm)
PROTOTYPE DLw=675m
I 0
I 4
I 8
I I I I 12
MODEL
I 16
I I 20 (N middotml
DLW=l5m
(b) MOMENT
Figure 13 Relationships Between Model and Prototype Forces
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
FiJed Platform Surge Force N Ice Velocity
eo Thlckriesz ~ ZO mm
I
1 St~1 = 25 kFa I
5(i - i i
I Surge Force0 4l) 1
1 I bullI I
~
1 = 20 8 J
0
1)(H) CiD5 010 )15 )_))
Ice Inpact Ylociy (mi3
Figure 14 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Fbed Platfonn Sm-ge Force YS Ice Velocity
100 I bullI I
1 bullI
30 -_ 1
bull i I bull
61) J- J I bull lt ~ _ ---
J-1 _ 41) i J
gta i ~ 1 ~
20 -I j 0------------------__ 000 005 1)10 il15 020
Ici Inrpact Velocity (mi)
shy
shy
Flgure 15 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Fied Patforn Zmge Force 73 Ice Velocity
31)0 --------------------- shyi
j
I I
bull 200 ~
El bull Sluse Force
bull SF iluz 2 ~D El
m 8
H~000 005 J~O os v v
Ice Impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 16 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
16l I bull bullI I
Ibull(bull1-) I bull 0 81) bull g
1 8
~ iil I
J(I 1
1
(I
El Cl ~c (i-middot-- _ ~--middot J)i
h1=- zr~Jbull-bullbull ~middot
l)00 005 010 015 020 J25 Ic~ Impact Velecity n13
lied Platform Surge Force T Ice Yelocity
shy
Figure 17 Fixed Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
i 1 -~o -t I ) l bull- I bull
I + - Igt -
bull J
-~ I I
~
1 )
000 ) JJ5 010 )25
Ice Impact Yelocity (mis)
Pixed Platforn Hean Force I Ice Yelocity
120
Figure 18 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
_ e -- 0 i
gt e
-
Fized Platform Heave Force vi Ice Yelocit]
16-(1
bull I I
121) 1
J I bull
bullso -1 l
+ I j
I Q
Q
40 1 I
o--~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--~~~~
I) 00 005 010 015 020 025 Ice lln11act Velocity (m13)
Figure 19 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
I TliAkw~~s JO mm
Stre~tli = 25 k1 bull 1z 2001 I) i bull s Heave Force-~ ~ - 1
I bull bull
gt 100 i 0I -- bull
I
0
000 oos 010 o5 nzo Ice Impact Velocity (mls)
Fired Platform Heavlt Fore is Ice Velocity
300
Figure 20 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
rjl) J - J
6 I bulli
~ bull bull ~ 100 ~ bull I bull I -
)
- trft ( middotmiddotfl f05 _
Fired Platform Heare Force~- Ice Velocity
i bull
shy
Ice Imyact Velocity mis)
Figure 21 Fixed Platform Vertical Force vs Ice Velocity
ThlrknP~~ = 30mm Stren~th = 40kPa
Hea~-e Force
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
-- - -
Fbed Platform Pitch Moment vi Ice Yeiocity
~oc -------------------- shyJ I
-middot
bull bull J 0 v
Q----------------------~
oo 1) 15 Ice Impact 7eiocity (Illi3)
Figure 22 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Filed Platform Pitch Moment 73 Ice Velocity
1middot0~o1 I I i bull e J _ 80 J - I= bull bull
= 1 I I --~
0
40
middot~ ~ l
I
e middot bull ~o bull1gt_ gt) _
lea impact Velocity (mis)
Figure 23 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Fied Patform Pitch Moment vi Ice Velocity
bull
bull bull
middotshy-o~-----------------)_CO
Ice Impact Velocty (ni
Figure 24 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
FiIerl Platform Pitch Moment VS Ice Yelociry
oo ~--------------------- I bull I t -s i --= lOU = 0 bull bull
t bull
(l05 011 015 bullJ20 Ice Impact Yelociry (mli)
shy
Figure 25 Fixed Platform Pitch Moments vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 40kPa
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Fied Platform Pitch Moment 173 Ice Thieme~
20~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1 I
100
I
-shy
bull
bull 20 shy
o a
Pied Platform Heave Force V3 Ice Thicbleii
140 bulli Igt _
Z 100 ~ bull
~ 13
80 1 -~ 60 -j bull-gt i 40 bull _-
4
J I
20 i)
)
He~ Force HF plus 2 SC1
shy
lbed Platform Surge Force vi Ice Tiricbleii
_ -) - - 00 l-
ba ~ I= 1~- I
bull i
0
bull
2) -middoti middot--
-) bull0 middotmiddotmiddot-
SF plus 2 srr
Figure 26 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = 002ms Strength = 25kPa
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Fbed Platform Heave Force n Ice Thicbless 200-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
bull
Heav~ Foxe + bull HF plus 2 SD
1 bull I
e bull +
ebullA s
i middot 10 )) o 0 middotmiddot
140 ~ I bull
120 1 _ = 10 j _ - shy~ bull
0
0 ~
~) J bull 1 J1) bull
~
J ))
-
0
D 10
Figure 27 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity = Qlgtms Strength = 25kPa
Fixed Platform Surge Force Ys lea ThiclJless
200 I J
shy
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
0
Fiied Platform Heave Force vi Ice Thickllels
~00 --------------------- shy
---- 200 I bull
j I
He~ve Force ) bullI bullbullgt I 100 i --
0 i) 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
Ice Thicme (mm)
Fiied Platform Sllige Force vi Ice Thickness
200---------------------~
-~ - - ~ bull
100 -
bullJ a
)
i) o ov
Ice Thickne~s (mm)
Pted Platform Pitch Momelt 3 Ic Tiliclne3s
200------------------------- St~~th =25 kP~i
1l~Jvcity J20 rru bull
-~-~ =
bulllGO I
bull
o o 30 ~(
Ice Thic1nels (lllln)
Figure 28 Forces and Moments vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
bull +
bull -]n1 - middottfshy= imiddotmiddot_ _bullbull
middotshy
n-------------------shy) _IJ( middot) t)S ) JO bullJ 15 bull) ~O _~5
Ice Impact 7 elocny (mlz)
Figure 29 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 20mm Strength = 25kPa
Moored Platfonn Surge Poree vs Ice Velocity
~o ------------------------
bull
0
bull
Moored Plauonn Pitch An1le 3 Ice Velocity
_ --------------------- bull
bull
03 bull a Pitch bullrile
bull
1)_) ---------------------shy
middot~Coeu )) 010 05 oo v
Ice Im11act Velocity (mi3
0 ------------------------
lt05 iJ10 )_ )20 Ice Impact ~lociry (m13)
Moored Platform Heare vs Ice Velocity
0 --------------------shy
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Moored PJltfonn Pitch Algle 73 Ice Velocity
1)8 --------------------- shy
bull ) _I) - ~ bulli I bull bull
~ -- (J4 ~ bull -
bull lt 3
) I
i) _
000 i)05 (110 i)20 ) _25
Ice Impact 7eiocity (mis)
Mooreti Pattorm Surge Force vz Ice Yelocity
5( ------------------- shy
-- bullbull-~ ~o
bull 3
~ 0 1
-bull bull v I -
~1 = I 11)
shy
shy
shy
Moored Platforn lieave vs Ice Velocit]
-~ ---------------------- shybull
j
bull
middot - middotbull
bullbull middot
)------------------shy) _)( )05 lt1 lO ls -1 n
------c~~Imnai_middottc7 elocuy (ml~)
Figure 30 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 30mm Strength = 25kPa
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
300 --------------------- shy
bull
bullbull
I i
lJO -i I I J
a
bull q ~
a
+
v
~
~ - bull -- bullbull
gt bull 4 I bull
~ - ~ - I
0
1JOO )05 00 1)5 (10 ~1 2~
Ice Impact 7eiocity (rrU~)
Figure 31 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity
Thickness = 40mm Strength = 25kPa
---------------------
Moored Patfonn Pitch Angle ltr lee Velocity
Fitch n~le
bull
0 G
- ~--------------------
000 OO 015 Ice Imlrut Velocity (mi
Moored Patfonn Sllrge Force TS Ice Velocity
--- 0
~ ~
el
Jj 00 i)1)5 025
Moored Platfonn Heave 73 Ice Velocity
10 I
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
~o ~ bull abull
bull iC middot ~~ (~-- t w -J_
G
0---------------------~ middote middot-_
Ic~ irnpact Yelocity (ID1-z
Moored Platform Have vs Ic2 Velocilt1
bull bull
)7 j
bulll_t)
1 bull 05 -_ bull
1l - bull bull J
~ 1)3 l -lt bull a c J
- shyOJJ
Ct JJ(l 005 010 015 020 02 Ice Impact YelDcity ml
Moored Platform Surge Force iS Ice Velocity
~o -----------------------shy
Moored Platform Pitch Angle 73 Ice Velocity
- bull- -middot~- ~ middotmiddot middot-shy- bull bull
= gt bull -qbull - bull ~ bull- -- _bull _ =
= ~
~
) 00
Flgure 32 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Veloclty _ __ -middot---L __ AlT_
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
bull ~
bull o - 8
a8 8 -~ middot-
~
8
~ U - ~~
Moored Platform Pitch Anile v Ice Velocity
1 10 -i
l bull l) 3- bull Pitch JJ1~le
G61 bullbull 0
3
) __) ------------------------ ) Jl) oos 010 ois o_~o
Ice impact Yelocity ml)
Moored Platform Surge Force vs Ice Yeiocity
2C---------------------~
bull gt -i
middot- I bull
shy
Moored Platform Heave vs_ Ice Velocity
middot) --------------------- shy
-- --- shy
+ -~ bull
= -)_1)0 )_05 JJ bullt )_~
Jee Impact T~oc11ylllsL
Figure 33 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Velocity - - - )(__ ----~t _ 1f11nshy-
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
--
ooreti atform Pitcl Angle ~- Ice Thicness
middot
--deg
~
~------------------------middot lgtloetv 002 rds bull
S~re~h = 5 F1
bullbull
bullbull iJJ
J
8
00 middotgtff0 10 bullV 30 40 so
Moored Patform Smge Furce 73 Ice ThicJnezi
GO----------------------- shy
bull
- -shy
--~-gt
bull ~ bull -
~ ~ t_ _ ~middot
1
bull 100 ~
bull bull
3
) --------------------~middot
- bull gt- ~middot~middot
Ice Thicbe~s (-mTl)
7 ----------------------- shy
bull
shy
lt) ---------------------- shy
o o middot1J -ii)
lee Tuicuesi (llllll)
Figure 34 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocitv = 002m~ SrrPncrrh = ~~o~
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle vi Ice Tiridnesi
bullbull
bull bull
bull
Ice Thiche~ (mm
160 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--- 7~1middoticicr =ij_10 m1
0
bull
6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
bull
bull bull - -middot- ~middot --- ---shy~-
bull
l ~-----------------
JI)
Figure 35 ~cored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Velocity= OlOms Strength= 25kPa
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
0 -~ - - bullbull t bull bull-- ~gt
u bullbull
0
)
~)
Moored Platform Pitch Angle VI Ice Thickne33
i i I j
bull
I Pitch ~41Z le
bull
bullbull 3 3
-
J 10 28 ~o
Moored Platform S~e Force TS Ice Thickness
lt_(1
Figure 36 Moored Platform Horizontal Force vs Ice Thickness
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Figure 37 Ice Trapped Underneath the Platform Shown after the Test
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
Figure 38 Circumferential Ice Fracture Around Platform
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
()
0
3 0 0 ro
r c--c i shy
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
T)
~
~
() r
-c c () re
ltgt ()
r
deg 0
r 11)
() 11) ()
r re 11)
fl ro le
-~
OJ -J
-t 0 ri ro
~-3 0 3 ro J -t shy
l 3
r c ~
~
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
80
-~OU-z ~
LL
Cl laquo deg 0 _j 40
i
middot -~ ~-~-
l
l 1
j f
~
-----~ I
---- Mean
H =28-3 mm
cr=25KPa 1l =002 ms-
v -------- - - -
20 L 0 l____~~~~_____jl
0 02 04 06 08 LO l2 l4 LS 20
1 MOORING S7IFNESS (mmN)
l shy
Figure 41 Surge Force vs 1K 9 (Inverse of ~oaring Stif~ness)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
02
[
1
L FCWRJR SFECTRAL i llee1ia3 i P301
s-se = v-ooa 1 i
~
01 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot
l i I i
I i 1 i i i i
~ I 1 i i i [ ~ i
I II Ar IO~CYT e 7 6 10
(HZ) 0 1 2 4 5
50 I 1
i FOURIER i -)L 1 lS86lZ31 bull P301 bull i - 1
40 bullazamiddot=middot v 0-02 =a s za =_ 1L I Ir ~ r I J
so
= ll i i igtlt [--1lill middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot- middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddot ~20
f- I ~
10 ~
0
~
i ~
L
0 5 6 7 9 bull u
_-r 7- Frequency (HZ)
-~a
~--
Figure 42 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P301 (moored)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
02
I FOURIJiR spiEcTLu ~ltALyensrs I l ie7 ol oa P302 ~i
H-27 = v-o04 mbull s-a4 Ka
Ill J r II r t 1
01 ~1 middot11middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot bullmiddotbull middotmiddot1middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddoti
- 1
1 [ ~vmiddot ~ 1 1 ~ j 1
1i [ ~ [ j ~ 1f 0dltI I gt--- bull
I
o gt bull bull bull
0 1 2 6 7 6 10
6 I ~
FOURIEH SFECRAL ANALYSIS 19870102 P302i lH-27 = v-004 ms s-z4 cp
J ~ ~ i
J4 ~ 1i1
- ~ i
I ~-
2 -l middotimiddot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middot- I 11 bull
tI 1
~middot 1 i 1 i
0
_
0 1 2 6 7 6 g
~ - (HZ)
_11 Frequency (HZ)
shy
Figure 43 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 6 test P302 (moored)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
015
0
r I
0
t i I
FotiRER SPECTRAL
ille70soo Psos
2-L l x Fr-equeney (HZ)
3 4 5
~uosrs s-ae Ca
6 7 a
I
J
10
i
FOURIeR SFECRAL AALYSIS[ 1 I
19870JOO 303i E-za lUtl v-oo s-za Ke
[ 2 lmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot1
t ~ I t i - I I
~ J J ~ -
Ii _
i
-shy
l -
1I
0 0 5 6 7 6 0
middot_-1 bull Frequency (HZ)
Figure 44 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and 8 test P303 (moored)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
002
IFltiURIER SFEC~ Al ~r~srs
t 1ile7oi_07 P304 = v-020 s-ao iagta
1 I L
1 i
001
r I 1 I middot~middot middot middot rV middot 2i vi
~I ~ bull ~__ bull j ) 0
0 2 5 8 7 8 10 Frequency (HZ)
shy
6 -rr~-----------c--~--r-c-----~~~----
L FOGRIER SPECTRAL bull--ltALYSIS
i 1870107 P304
v-020 ms= 1 1
4 irmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-1middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot ~
1 -
gtlt shy
2
l I
Jr middot middot middot middot middot 1 ~ A shy
l1 bull I middot r- )
v v 0 [
0 1 2 I I
3 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (HZ)
Figure 45 Frequency Power Spectra for Fx and G test P304 (moored)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
400 L ~ ~ FcrtRIER sFECTRAL -u-srs J
1~870l115 P30ll ~ J
fJ L~~~-~r~ l~-~~t-~~f~~ -~~-L l300 I- 1 I
~ I ~ i II i- r _ bull bull bull 1= 200 middot~middot bull middotlaquo bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull ~ bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull
~ - ~ I
1
l J
t lmiddotmiddot + middotmiddot~ i middott middotf ~ JI 100
i 1 I r- 1 vI bull bull bull bull bull 1 I ) j 1r 1(-- bull bull 1
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10
_ lt Frequency (HZ)
Figure 46 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 301F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
50
r 1 I
FQURIER SFECrRAJ AfALYSIS 1 l9870l bullHl P302F ~
40 middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~30~middotmiddotmiddotY0~4middot~bull middotmiddotmiddotf321lCamiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotJ[
30 tmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotmiddotlmiddotmiddotJ iJ ~iL i I I 1 -r
I j i
20 bullllj middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot=middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddoti jI I I Imiddot1
Ah J
QI I 11bullmiddotmiddotmiddot bull ~ C) bull = 0 i 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 iO
_r x Frecuency (HZ)
Figure 47 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test P302F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
40
- =-gtlt 20
0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9
Freq uency (HZ)
60
Figure 48 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 303F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)
40
so
20
0 0 1 6 7 a 10
(HZ)
Figure 49 Frequency Power Spectrum for Fx test 304F (fixed)