Upload
allison-carr
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ICS-FORTH September 10, The FRBR - CRM Harmonization Library and Museum Information Documentation tasks of museums and libraries overlap. Museum and library information has complex interrelations. Museum and library information overlaps, and otherwise is different. Museums and libraries can learn from each others methodology. Research needs an integrated view on museum and library information There was no common conceptual model or machine-readable language to integrate rich museum and library information. DC is a good format, but often too simple. MARC is detailed, but used only by libraries. There are the models of FRBR, FRAD, CIDOC CRM.
Citation preview
1ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
Modelling Intellectual Processes: The object-orient FRBR Model
Martin Doerr
Gothenburg, SwedenSeptember 12, 2006
Corrections made 25 January 2008
Center for Cultural Informatics Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas
CIDOC 2007
2ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM) is a core ontology aiming to integrate cultural heritage information.
The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) is a core ER model to integrate library information.
Libraries document literature in order to facilitate access to it. Museum objects are referred to and published in literature. Literature
describes the museum objects, their context and theories about and related to them. Literature describes subjects that are exemplified or illustrated by museum objects.
Museum documentation classifies and describes museum objects, their context and relevance. It refers to literature. Museums produce regularly literature. Libraries may also produce literature.
Libraries may document and curate rare objects as museums do.
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization Library and Museum Information
3ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization Library and Museum Information
Documentation tasks of museums and libraries overlap.
Museum and library information has complex interrelations. Museum and library information overlaps, and otherwise is different.
Museums and libraries can learn from each others methodology.
Research needs an integrated view on museum and library information
There was no common conceptual model or machine-readable language to integrate rich museum and library information. DC is a good format, but often too simple. MARC is detailed, but used only by libraries. There are the models of FRBR, FRAD, CIDOC CRM.
4ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization The Harmonization Project
Formation in 2003 of the International Working Group on FRBR/CIDOC CRM Harmonisation:
A collaboration of CIDOC CRM-SIG and the IFLA FRBR Review Group.
To express the IFLA FRBR model with the concepts, ontological methodology and notation conventions provided by the CIDOC CRM.
To facilitate the integration, mediation and interchange of bibliographic and museum information.
After 7 meetings, a first complete draft of “FRBROO” for public comment. Definition available as text in the format of the CRM.
Other forms: A comprehensive text with all related CRM definitions and complete mappings FRBRER to FRBROO, OWL/RDF files, VISIO graphics.
Work continues with FRAR (Functional Requirements for Authority Records)
5ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization CRM
The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM) developed since 1996 by CIDOC / ISO TC46, ISO 21127 by 2006 a core ontology aiming to integrate cultural heritage information
Innovations:
centre descriptions not around the things, but around the events that connect people, material and immaterial things in space-time.
explicit description of the discourse on relations between identifiers and the identified.
typologies modeled both as classification means and as objects of the cultural-historical discourse.
Lacks: a model of intellectual work
6ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization FRBR
The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR)
developed 1992-1997 by IFLA, now being complemented by the Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD)
A core ER model to integrate library objects by content relation Might result in a new library practice
Innovations:
Definition of stages/ abstraction levels of intellectual products: Work, Expression, Manifestation, Item.
Clusters publications and items around the notion of derivation and common conceptual origin across stages / abstraction levels.
Lacks: any explicit notion of the processes behind. Partially ambiguous definitions (overgeneralization).
7ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization FRBR : Abstraction Levels
Work
Expression
Manifestation
Item
has part
is realized through(is a realization of)
has part
is embodied in(is the embodiment of )
has part
is exemplified by(exemplifies )
has part
has a complementhas a successorhas a summaryhas a supplementhas a transformationhas adaptationhas an imitation
“a distinct intellectual or artistic creation…there is no single material object one can point to as the work...”
“the intellectual or artistic realization of a work in the form of alpha-numeric, musical, or choreographic
notation, sound, image, object, movement, etc”
“the physical embodiment of an expression of a work…all the physical objects that bear the same
characteristics……may be only a single physical exemplar…”
“a single exemplar of a manifestation...”
has a complementhas a successorhas a summaryhas a supplementhas a transformationhas adaptationhas an imitation
8ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization clarification of Work concepts
The substance of Work is concepts (the idea).
Only through the comprehension of the concepts derivation is possible.
Individual Work: A self-contained set of concepts (“completed”)
Complex Work: Continuation (possiblyby others), complements,
alternatives, translations ! Container Work: Incorporating
unaltered work. The Publisher’s work is a Work !
Serial Work: Coherent, open ended series/serials
F1 Work
F15 Complex WorkF14 Individual Work
R1 is logical successor of
(has successor)R2 is derivative of(has derivative)
F20 Performance Work
F21 Recording Work
F16 Container Work
F18 Serial Work
F17 Aggregation Work
R10 has member
(is member of)
E28 Conceptual Object
F19 Publication Work
9ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization clarification of Expression concepts
The substance of Expression is signs (the “text”).
An Expression can be “complete”.The kinds of signs/features that identify an Expression depend on the function.
Self-Contained ~: “Complete” – either according to author or unfinished.
Fragment ~: Any piece, in relation to the whole.
Publication ~: Text, layout, illustrations,…
F25 Performance Plan
F2 Expression
F22 Self Contained Expression
F26 Recording
F23 Expression Fragment
R15 has component (is component of)
R14 incorporates (is incorporated
in)
E73 Information Object
R15 is fragment of (has fragment)
F24 Publication Expression
10ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
F1 WorkF1 Work
F1 Work F1 Work
F14 Individual WorkF14 Individual Work
F15 Complex WorkF15 Complex Work
F22 Self-Contained ExpressionF22 Self-Contained ExpressionF22 Self-Contained ExpressionF22 Self-Contained Expression
F22 Self-Contained ExpressionF22 Self-Contained Expression
R3 is realized in(realises)
R10 has member(is member of)
F1 WorkF1 WorkF1 WorkF1 Work
F22 Self-Contained ExpressionF22 Self-Contained Expression
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization Work and Expression
Self-Contained Expression = Evidence of Individual Work
Complex Work = Coherent set of Individual Works (not “complex”)
R3 is realized in(realises)
R3 is realized in(realises)
11ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization clarification of Manifestation
concepts
Item Item
Manifestation Product Type is a class of like items (the publication)
An Item is single exemplar of a Manifestation Product Type.
ManifestationManifestationSingletonSingleton
F3 Manifestation Product TypeF3 Manifestation Product Type
An Manifestation Singleton is an “original”.It may be a feature (e.g. Inscription)
E55 TypeE55 Type
E24 Physical Man-Made StuffE24 Physical Man-Made StuffE84 Information CarrierE84 Information Carrier
immaterial
material
12ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization The “Externalization”, material /
immaterial
E28 E28 Conceptual Conceptual
ObjectObject
E84 E84 Information Information
CarrierCarrier
E24 E24 Physical Physical
Man-Made Man-Made ThingThing
E65 E65 CreationCreation
E12 E12 ProductionProduction
F28 Expression F28 Expression CreationCreation
F2 ExpressionF2 Expression
F22 Self Contained F22 Self Contained ExpressionExpression
F23 Expression F23 Expression FragmentFragment
F4 ManifestationF4 ManifestationSingletonSingleton
F14 Individual F14 Individual WorkWork
F15 Complex F15 Complex WorkWork
F1 WorkF1 Work
F5 ItemF5 Item
F3 Manifestation F3 Manifestation Production TypeProduction Type
F32 Carrier F32 Carrier Production Production
EventEventR19 created a realization of
R9 is realized
in
R18 created
R4 comprises carriers of
R7 is example of
R17 created
R28 produced (was produced
by)
13ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization Conception and “Externalization”
Work conception Expression creation
Work elaboration
produces a workproduces an idea Produces (simultaneously) an
Expression and a Manifestation-Singleton
F28 Expression Creation
F27 Work Conception
F1 Work
E39 Actor
E52 Time
E53 Place
F2 ExpressionF4 Manifestation Singleton
R16 initiated (was initiated by)
P14 carried out
by (performed)
P4 has time-span(is time-span of)P7…
R17 created(was created by)R18 created (was created by)
P4…
P7 took place at(witnessed)
P14 carried out by(performed)
R19 created a realisation of(was realised through)
time
14ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization Work and Expression – short-cuts
F15 Complex Work Walt Whitman’s Leaves of grass
F15 Complex WorkWalt Whitman’s Leaves of grass
“deathbed edition”
F14 Individual WorkAbstract content of translation Walt Whitman’s Leaves of grass
“deathbed edition” into French by Leon Bazalgette
F22 Self-Contained ExpressionText of the French translation of Walt Whitman’s
Leaves of grass “deathbed edition” by Leon Bazalgette
F28 Expression CreationTranslation Walt Whitman’s Leaves of grass
“deathbed edition” into French by Leon Bazalgette
R10 has member(is member of)
R10 has member(is member of)
R19B was realised through(created a realisation of)
R17 created(was created by)R3 is realized in
(realises)
R9 is realised in(realises)
15ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization Container Work – What is the
Expression?
The Container Work adds Expression:may cause Work with empty expression!
The collected expressions are integral part of the container
F16 Container Work
Additional Expression
Expression of Work X
Expression of Work Y
F16 Container Work & F14 Individual Work
<Additional Expr.>
Expression of Work X
Expression of Work Y
Overall Expression
R3 is realized in(realises)
R3 is realized in(realises)
inconsistent consistent
Work X
Work X
R3 is realised in(realises)
R14 is Incorporated in
R3 is realised in(realises)
16ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization Publication Work - An Identity Crisis
Publisher’s Level
F14 Individual Work
F22 Self-Contained Expression
F19 Publication Work
F24 Publication Expression
F32 Carrier Production Event
F5 Item
F4 Manifestation Singleton
F15 Complex Work
“Oliver Twist” Idea
“Oliver Twist” Completed
“Oliver Twist” Text
“Oliver Twist” Manuscript
“Oliver Twist” Publication Concept
“Oliver Twist”Publication content
“Oliver Twist” Publication
“Oliver Twist”Printing
“Oliver Twist” 20th Book
R3 is realized in(realises)
R3 is realized in(realises)
CLR5 should carry(should be carried by)
R7 is example of(has example)
R41 produced
(was produced by
R27 used as source material
(was used by)
R10 has member(is member of)
Author’s Level
F30 Publication Event
“Oliver Twist” published!R24 created(was created
through)
R26 produced
things of type
(was produced by)
R14 incorporates(is incorporated in)
P128 carries(is carried by)
F3 Manifestation-Product Type
R23 created a realization of (was realized through)
17ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
ISBN:960-86830-0-9
F5 Item
E19 Physical Object F3 Manifestation Product Type
E60 Number
CLP57 should have number of parts(should be number of parts of)
P57 has number of parts
Individual copies
Inherits from E19 Physical Object:P57 has number of parts
2
CPL57 should have number of parts
(should be number of parts of)
P57 has number of parts
“R7 is example of” = instances
R7 is e
xample
of
(has e
xample
)
Items are seen as instances of a particular Manifestation Product Type.
This is simulated by property R7
1 3 …2 n
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization Manifestation Product Type - a Metaclass !
E55 Type
instances
Metaclasses
particulars
18ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization Equivalence Physical - Electronic
Publishing Physical Publishing
Electronic Publishing
F24 Publication Expression
F32 Carrier Production Event F5 Item
CLR5 should carry(should be carried by)
R7 is example of(has example)
R27B was used by (used as source material)
F30 Publication Event
“Result of an industrial process”
R28 produced(was produced by)
R26 produced things of type(was produced by)
makes accessible: “how to produce”
“copy on localcarrier”
R24 created(was created through)
R6 carries (is carried by)
E29 Design or Procedure
P16B was used for
P94B was created by
makes accessible: “how to download”
F3 Manifestation-Product Type
F24 Publication Expression
F32 Carrier Production Event F5 Item
R27B was used by (used as source material)
F30 Publication Event
R28 produced(was produced by)
R24 created(was created through)
R6 carries (is carried by)
E29 Design or Procedure
P16B was used for
P94B was created by
19ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization Reproduction
F33 Reproduction Event
E84 Information CarrierE84 Information Carrier
E12 Production
R30 reproduced (was reproduced by)
R29 reproduced (was reproduced by)
“In general, the copy will have different attributes from the original…F33 Reproduction Event and F32 Carrier Production Event are not declared as disjoint…”
20ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM HarmonizationHow to identify Work?
F37 Representative Expression Assignment
F1 Work
F2 Expression
F3 Manifestation Product Type
F4 Manifestation-Singleton
F41 Representative Manifestation Assignment
R42 has representative manifestation-singleton( is representative manifestation singleton for)*
R41 has representative manifestation product type(is representative manifestation product type for)
F44 Bibliographic Agency
R43 carried out
by(performed)
R50 assign to(was assigned
by)
R49 assigned
(was assigned
by)
R44 carried out
by(performed)
R51 assigned
(was assigned
by)
R48 assigned to
(was assigned
by)
R53 assigned(was assigned by)
R4 comprises carriers of(carriers provided by)
F22 Self-ContainedExpression
F23 Expression Fragment
R15 is fragment of(has fragment)
E39 ActorE13 AttributeAssignment
*R42 has representative manifestation-singleton( is representative manifestation singleton for) isa sub property of P128 carries (is carried by) F15 Complex Work
R3 is realised in (realises)
R40 has representative expression (is representative expression of)
21ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM HarmonizationLibrary identifiers have structuring rules
F12 Name = E41 Appellation
F13 Identifier
F40 Identifier Assignment
F43 Identifier Rule
R47 used constituent(was used in)
E1 CRM EntityP1is identified by(identified)
R8 consists of(forms part of)
R46 assigned(was assigned by)
R52B used rule (was the rule used in)
R45 assigned to(was assigned by)
22ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
E7 Activity
E13 Attribute Assignment
E65 Creation
E11 Modification
F42 Representative Expression Assignment
F41 Representative Manifestation Assignment
F40 Identifier Assignment
F30 Publication Event
E12 Production
E15 Identifier Assignment
F28 Expression Creation
F32 Reproduction Event
F33 Carrier production Event
The FRBR - CRM HarmonizationSummary of new Activity Concepts
F27 Work Conception
E83 Type Creation
23ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization Results summary
Topics solved:
— Explicit modeling of the processes behind FRBR attributes.
— The substance of Work, Expression and Manifestation
— Conception of a Work. What is its identity, its parts? Can a work be continued by other persons? Can it contain other Work, and in which sense?
— Expression fragments, parts, aggregates and collections: criteria of completeness, containment, reuse and intellectual contribution.
— What is the contribution and product of the publisher.
— What is the first realization of a work in a symbolic form? What is the role of a manuscript, of a digital file, a written diskette in that process?
— The equivalence of electronic and material publishing.
24ICS-FORTH September 10, 2006
The FRBR - CRM Harmonization Conclusions
The combined model CRM – FRBROO:
Is a coherent model of museum and library conceptualization On one side enriches the CIDOC CRM with notions of the stages of
intellections creation and refines its model of identifiers and the associated discourse.
On the other side, it makes available to FRBR the general model of historical events of the CRM.
clarifies and makes explicit many notions more vaguely specified in FRBR
Further work:
FRAD (Authority Data),
modeling equivalence with performing arts.
SEE: http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr