1
Prevalence of entanglements were centered in Monterey Bay and many strands were near freshwater river inlets or major haul outs (i.e. San Lorenzo River, Salinas River, Monterey Harbor, Santa Cruz Harbor) Promoting Circle hooks vs. Octopus hooks circle hooks reduce mortality for fish and ingestion for pinnipeds (Prince et al 2002) Photography Campaigns and Public Outreach TMMC’s education program promotes simple solutions for the general public such as responsible disposal of trash, i.e. cutting packing straps or bands. Previous efforts to expose imagery of entangled animals proved effective in reducing marine debris. Identification of pinnipeds entangled in marine debris on the central California coast Geno DeRango - Stranding Coordinator 1 , Romy Sidelsky 1 , Dr. Shawn Johnson DVM, MPVM Director of Veterinary Science 1 1 The Marine Mammal Center 2000 Bunker Road Sausalito, CA 94965 INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS The Marine Mammal Center (TMMC) is compromised of trained rescue personnel and veterinarians who have been responding to pinnipeds entangled in marine debris throughout northern and central California since 1975. Approximately 10-15% of our patients strand annually due to human-related injuries or interactions, and many of these interactions are a result of marine debris. TMMC’s rescue range consists of all counties between Mendocino and San Luis Obispo, which includes the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. The most common patients admitted to TMMC for a variety of illnesses are California sea lions (approx. 55%), northern elephant seals (approx. 25%), and harbor seals (approx. 15%). However, California sea lions are the large majority of fisheries interactions patients at approximately 85% (Figure 2). The Marine Mammal Center's Stranding Department is currently tracking commonalities associated with gear types that afflict these animals and the spatial distribution of strandings related to gear types. 6, 1% 221, 45% 184, 38% 20, 4% 23, 5% 33, 7% Figure 3. Fisheries Gear Categories, All Species 1975-2013 Crab Pot Gear Fishing Hook, Lure or Line Combination Monofilament Netting Nylon Netting Entanglement Scar (unknown source) Packing strap 7, 2% 20, 4% 20, 4% 43, 9% 110, 23% 191, 40% 87, 18% Fisheries Interactions by County, 1975-2013 Sonoma Marin San Francisco San Mateo Santa Cruz Monterey San Luis Obispo GEAR IDENTIFICATION Table 1. CSL ES HS NFS GFS Total Crab Pot Gear 5 1 0 0 0 6 Fishing Hook, Lure or Line Combination 198 4 15 3 1 221 Monofilament Netting 172 4 4 1 3 184 Nylon Netting 13 2 0 1 4 20 Entanglement Scar (unknown source) 18 2 2 0 1 23 Packing strap 16 22 0 0 0 33 0 5 10 15 20 25 Sabiki Hook Octopus Hook Bait Holder UNK Treble Hook Finesse Wide Gap Salmon Hook Fly Fishing Hook Circle Hook FW Worm Hook Lead Jig Head Weighted Hook Siwash Hook Shark Hook Number of individual hooks Figure 4. Hook Type Figure 5. Hook Water Type and Purpose Strictly Freshwater Strictly Saltwater Can Be Used In Either Hook anatomy and distinguishing features, i.e. string, foiling and beading, were used to identify hook type based on Jann’s Netcraft Hook Sizing Chart (below). Once a hook was identified, location on the body where hooks were embedded and mortality of the entanglement were calculated. Octopus Hooks - Saltwater/Freshwater, but common for bass fishing -Live bait fishing -Known for durability and strength -70% Mortality Rate, 56% embedded in mouth or esophagus Sabiki Rig Hooks -Saltwater, ttypically fished off boat, jetties, piers -Mackerel, herring, smelt -6-10 hooks, inches apart -28% Mortality Rate, 60% embedded in flippers METHODS Gear collected from entangled pinnipeds was categorized according to gear type (hooks, line, plastic debris, etc.) and entered into a Filemaker 12 database for statistical analysis. Hook type was determined based on measurements of various parts of the hook anatomy. Monofilament netting was measured based on line test, diameter and mesh area. Attempted were made to determine type of monofilament netting used, but proved difficult due to only having a small segment of the original netting. GEAR COLLECTION The Marine Mammal Center’s rescue personnel and veterinary staff collect gear from pinnipeds in a variety of ways. Remote sedation via dart gun is an option for large, alert and aggressive pinnipeds. Personnel are also trained to enter major haul-outs when animals are surrounded by conspecifics. Deeply embedded marine debris must also be surgically removed under anesthesia in a controlled hospital or field environment. Haul-out patterns are tracked for individual entangled animals until they become accessible for a rescue crew to disentangle. All gear is retained to be cataloged and classified later. REFERENCES Hanni, K.D., & Pyle, P. (2000). Entanglement of pinnipeds in synthetic materials at south-east Farallon Island, California, 1976-1998. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40 (12), 1076-1081. Harcourt, R., Aurioles, D. & Sanchez, J. (1994) Entanglement of California sea lions at Los Islotes, Baja California Sur, Mexico. Marine Mammal Science, 10, 122-125. Prince ED, Ortiz M, Venizelos A. 2002. A comparison of circle hook and "J" hook performance in recreational catch-and-release fisheries for billfish. American Fisheries Society Symposium 30:66-79. Stewart, B.S., & Yochem, P.K. (1987) Entanglement of pinnipeds in synthetic debris and fishing net and line fragments at San Nicolas and San Miguel Islands, California, 1978-1986. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 18, 336-339. Zavala-Gonzalez, A. & Mellink, E. (1997) Entanglement of California sea lions, Zalophus californianus californianus, in fishing gear in the central-northern part of the Gulf of California, Mexico. Fishery Bulletin, 95, 180-184. NOAA. (2012a). Marine Mammal Entanglement: Pinniped. Retrieved 21 April 2014 from http://www.fakr.noaa.gov/protectedresources/entanglement/whales.htm CSL, 442 ES, 36 HS, 31 NFS, 5 GFS, 9 Fisheries Interaction by Species, 1975-2013 CSL ES HS NFS GFS The most common patients afflicted by marine debris, from left to right: California sea lion, northern elephant seal, and harbor seal. Figure 1. Strand locations for pinnipeds afflicted by fisheries interactions. Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties, which compromise a large portion of the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, account for approximately 2/3 of cases with fisheries interactions. Figure 2. Number of patients admitted to TMMC with fisheries interactions broken down by species, n=523. CSL=California sea lions, ES=elephant seals, HS=harbor seals, NFS=northern fur seals, GFS=Guadalupe fur seals. California sea lions account for 85%. A California sea lion has a deeply embedded packing strap surgically removed under anesthesia (left) and a northern elephant seal is injected with sedatives (right) to assist with disentanglement due to the size and strength of the animal. Animals are routinely assessed for haul-out patterns in the Monterey Bay until they become accessible, such as a California sea lion (below ) on an offshore rock. Table 1 and Figure 3 above show frequency of gear type and the species affected. The most common entanglement seen for California sea lions are fishing hook (n=198) or monofilament line (n=172), while packing straps are most common for elephant seals (n=22). Figure 4 and 5 below show the frequency of hook type seen, Sabiki and octopus being the most common hook seen, with many of the hooks being freshwater use. The most prevalent monofilament netting entanglement was green, 80 lb test, .9mm diameter, and 10.5 cm x 10.5 cm mesh.

IDENTIFICATION OF PINNIPEDS ENTANGLED IN MARINE ......• Hook anatomy and distinguishing features, i.e. string, foiling and beading, were used to identify hook type based on Jann’s

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: IDENTIFICATION OF PINNIPEDS ENTANGLED IN MARINE ......• Hook anatomy and distinguishing features, i.e. string, foiling and beading, were used to identify hook type based on Jann’s

Printing:This poster is 48” wide by 36” high. It’s designed to be printed on a large

Customizing the Content:The placeholders in this formatted for you. placeholders to add text, or click an icon to add a table, chart, SmartArt graphic, picture or multimedia file.

Tfrom text, just click the Bullets button on the Home tab.

If you need more placeholders for titles, make a copy of what you need and drag it into place. PowerPoint’s Smart Guides will help you align it with everything else.

Want to use your own pictures instead of ours? No problem! Just rightChange Picture. Maintain the proportion of pictures as you resize by dragging a corner.

• Prevalence of entanglements were centered in Monterey Bay and many strands were near freshwater river inlets or major haul outs (i.e. San Lorenzo River, Salinas River, Monterey Harbor, Santa Cruz Harbor)

• Promoting Circle hooks vs. Octopus hooks – circle hooks

reduce mortality for fish and ingestion for pinnipeds (Prince et al 2002)

• Photography Campaigns and Public Outreach

TMMC’s education program promotes simple solutions for the general public such as responsible disposal of trash, i.e. cutting packing straps or bands. Previous efforts to expose imagery of entangled animals proved effective in reducing marine debris.

Identification of pinnipeds entangled in marine debris on the central California coast

Geno DeRango - Stranding Coordinator1, Romy Sidelsky 1, Dr. Shawn Johnson DVM, MPVM – Director of Veterinary Science1

1The Marine Mammal Center 2000 Bunker Road Sausalito, CA 94965

INTRODUCTION RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

• The Marine Mammal Center (TMMC) is compromised of trained rescue personnel and veterinarians who have been responding to pinnipeds entangled in marine debris throughout northern and central California since 1975. Approximately 10-15% of our patients strand annually due to human-related injuries or interactions, and many of these interactions are a result of marine debris. TMMC’s rescue range consists of all counties between Mendocino and San Luis Obispo, which includes the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary.

• The most common patients admitted to TMMC for a variety of illnesses are California sea lions (approx. 55%), northern elephant seals (approx. 25%), and harbor seals (approx. 15%). However, California sea lions are the large majority of fisheries interactions patients at approximately 85% (Figure 2). The Marine Mammal Center's Stranding Department is currently tracking commonalities associated with gear types that afflict these animals and the spatial distribution of strandings related to gear types.

6, 1%

221, 45%

184, 38%

20, 4%

23, 5%

33, 7%

Figure 3. Fisheries Gear Categories, All Species 1975-2013

Crab Pot Gear

Fishing Hook, Lure or Line Combination

Monofilament Netting

Nylon Netting

Entanglement Scar (unknown source)

Packing strap

7, 2% 20, 4% 20, 4%

43, 9%

110, 23%

191, 40%

87, 18%

Fisheries Interactions by County, 1975-2013

Sonoma

Marin

San Francisco

San Mateo

Santa Cruz

Monterey

San Luis Obispo

GEAR IDENTIFICATION

Table 1. CSL ES HS NFS GFS Total

Crab Pot Gear 5 1 0 0 0 6

Fishing Hook, Lure or Line Combination 198 4 15 3 1 221

Monofilament Netting 172 4 4 1 3 184

Nylon Netting 13 2 0 1 4 20

Entanglement Scar (unknown source) 18 2 2 0 1 23

Packing strap 16 22 0 0 0 33

0

5

10

15

20

25

Sab

iki H

oo

k

Oct

op

us

Ho

ok

Bai

t H

old

er

UN

K

Tre

ble

Ho

ok

Fin

esse

Wid

e G

ap

Salm

on

Ho

ok

Fly

Fis

hin

g H

oo

k

Cir

cle

Ho

ok

FW

Wo

rm H

oo

k

Lea

d J

ig H

ead

Wei

ghte

d H

oo

k

Siw

ash

Ho

ok

Shar

k H

oo

k

Nu

mb

er

of

ind

ivid

ua

l h

oo

ks

Figure 4. Hook Type Figure 5. Hook Water Type and Purpose

Strictly Freshwater

Strictly Saltwater

Can Be Used In Either

• Hook anatomy and distinguishing features, i.e. string, foiling and beading, were used to identify hook type based on Jann’s Netcraft Hook Sizing Chart (below).

• Once a hook was identified, location on the body where hooks were embedded and mortality of the entanglement were calculated.

Octopus Hooks - Saltwater/Freshwater, but common for bass fishing -Live bait fishing -Known for durability and strength -70% Mortality Rate, 56% embedded in mouth or esophagus

Sabiki Rig Hooks -Saltwater, ttypically fished off boat, jetties, piers -Mackerel, herring, smelt -6-10 hooks, inches apart -28% Mortality Rate, 60% embedded in flippers

METHODS • Gear collected from entangled pinnipeds was categorized according to gear type (hooks,

line, plastic debris, etc.) and entered into a Filemaker 12 database for statistical analysis.

• Hook type was determined based on measurements of various parts of the hook anatomy.

• Monofilament netting was measured based on line test, diameter and mesh area. Attempted were made to determine type of monofilament netting used, but proved difficult due to only having a small segment of the original netting.

GEAR COLLECTION The Marine Mammal Center’s rescue personnel and veterinary staff collect gear

from pinnipeds in a variety of ways. Remote sedation via dart gun is an option for large, alert and aggressive pinnipeds. Personnel are also trained to enter major haul-outs when animals are surrounded by conspecifics. Deeply embedded marine debris must also be surgically removed under anesthesia in a controlled hospital or field environment. Haul-out patterns are tracked for individual entangled animals until they become accessible for a rescue crew to disentangle. All gear is retained to be cataloged and classified later.

REFERENCES • Hanni, K.D., & Pyle, P. (2000). Entanglement of pinnipeds in synthetic materials at south-east Farallon Island, California, 1976-1998. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40 (12), 1076-1081.

• Harcourt, R., Aurioles, D. & Sanchez, J. (1994) Entanglement of California sea lions at Los Islotes, Baja California Sur, Mexico. Marine Mammal Science, 10, 122-125.

• Prince ED, Ortiz M, Venizelos A. 2002. A comparison of circle hook and "J" hook performance in recreational catch-and-release fisheries for billfish. American Fisheries Society Symposium 30:66-79.

• Stewart, B.S., & Yochem, P.K. (1987) Entanglement of pinnipeds in synthetic debris and fishing net and line fragments at San Nicolas and San Miguel Islands, California, 1978-1986. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 18, 336-339.

• Zavala-Gonzalez, A. & Mellink, E. (1997) Entanglement of California sea lions, Zalophus californianus californianus, in fishing gear in the central-northern part of the Gulf of California, Mexico. Fishery Bulletin, 95, 180-184.

• NOAA. (2012a). Marine Mammal Entanglement: Pinniped. Retrieved 21 April 2014 from http://www.fakr.noaa.gov/protectedresources/entanglement/whales.htm

CSL, 442

ES, 36

HS, 31

NFS, 5 GFS, 9

Fisheries Interaction by Species, 1975-2013

CSL

ES

HS

NFS

GFS

The most common patients afflicted by marine debris, from left to right: California sea lion, northern elephant seal, and harbor seal.

Figure 1. Strand locations for pinnipeds afflicted by fisheries interactions. Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties, which compromise a large portion of the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, account for approximately 2/3 of cases with fisheries interactions.

Figure 2. Number of patients admitted to TMMC with fisheries interactions broken down by species, n=523. CSL=California sea lions, ES=elephant seals, HS=harbor seals, NFS=northern fur seals, GFS=Guadalupe fur seals. California sea lions account for 85%.

A California sea lion has a deeply embedded packing strap surgically removed under anesthesia (left) and a northern elephant seal is injected with sedatives (right) to assist with disentanglement due to the size and strength of the animal. Animals are routinely assessed for haul-out patterns in the Monterey Bay until they become accessible, such as a California sea lion (below ) on an offshore rock.

Table 1 and Figure 3 above show frequency of gear type and the species affected. The most common entanglement seen for California sea lions are fishing hook (n=198) or monofilament line (n=172), while packing straps are most common for elephant seals (n=22). Figure 4 and 5 below show the frequency of hook type seen, Sabiki and octopus being the most common hook seen, with many of the hooks being freshwater use. The most prevalent monofilament netting entanglement was green, 80 lb test, .9mm diameter, and 10.5 cm x 10.5 cm mesh.