18
Identifying Tsunami Deposits in the Field Using PXRF: Lhok Nga and Banda Aceh, Indonesia Peter Meleney Whitman College Dr. Susan E.H. Sakimoto University of Notre Dame Interdisciplinary Studies in Tsunami Impacts and Mitigation University of Notre Dame, Department of Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences

Identifying Tsunami Deposits in the Field Using PXRF: Lhok ...northernani.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Poster-HHXRF... · Identifying Tsunami Deposits in the Field Using PXRF: Lhok

  • Upload
    vankhue

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Identifying Tsunami Deposits inthe Field Using PXRF: Lhok Ngaand Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Peter MeleneyWhitman College

Dr. Susan E.H. SakimotoUniversity of Notre Dame

Interdisciplinary Studies in Tsunami Impacts and MitigationUniversity of Notre Dame, Department of Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences

Objective:To increase the accuracy oftsunami hazard mapping throughrapid field identification of tsunamideposits using a Portable X-RayFluorescence (PXRF) spectrometer.

Approach Identify the geochemical signs of

tsunami deposition Determine proper techniques for PXRF

analysis Use the PXRF to distinguish tsunami

deposits from other types of near-shoresedimentation

Why is this ResearchImportant?

Recurrence intervaldetermines hazard Detailed history leads

to better predictions Guides codes and

preparations

Used for many typesof geologicalphenomena

http://i.pbase.com/u13/minoltaman/large/38394818.horribledevastation.jpg

Problems with CurrentRecurrence Determination

Ways to findrecurrence: Historical record

Not statisticallysignificant

Tsunamiite beds Hard to recognize Only left by >5m

waves

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a5/Tsunami_by_hokusai_19th_century.jpg/800px-Tsunami_by_hokusai_19th_century.jpg

Problems with CurrentRecurrence Determination

Ways to findrecurrence: Historical record

Not statisticallysignificant

Tsunamiite beds Hard to recognize Only left by >5m

waves

http:http://geoscape.nrcan.gc.ca/nanaimo/images/tsunami hazard e.jpg

Why are Tsunami Depositshard to Identify in the Field?

Current practices Based entirely on

physical evidence Chemical results take

several days toprocess

Similar to storm surgedeposits

Not used Field results

geochemical signature

Photo courtesy Tamara Carley

Sediment Source Tsunamis involve

the entire watercolumn Sediment from

ocean bottom

Storm surgesinvolve top fewmeters Near-shore

sediment only

http://www.ga.gov.au/image_cache/GA9426.gifGingele et. al. 2001

Sediment Source

Banda Aceh Illite is verypotassium rich Ocean clay:

2.1-3.0 wt% K Terrestrial soil:

~0.02 wt% K

http://www.ga.gov.au/image_cache/GA9426.gifGingele et. al. 2001

Sediment Source

Banda Aceh Illite is verypotassium rich Ocean clay:

2.1-3.0 wt% K Terrestrial soil:

~0.02 wt% K

http://www.ga.gov.au/image_cache/GA9426.gifGingele et. al. 2001

Hypothesis: The clay fraction of tsunami deposits will havea significantly higher concentration of potassium thansurrounding sediments

Where to Find Tsunami Clay

http://whyfiles.org/shorties/168tsunami_warn/images/tsunami.jpgPhoto courtesy Tamara Carley

How can the PXRF Help? In-situ elemental

concentrations K in field: precise

to within 16 wt%

Bombards samplewith X-rays Elements have

characteristic X-ray spectra

http://www.amptek.com/pdf/xrf.pdf

Methods

Photo courtesy of Tamara Carley

Store for laboratory analysis (XRD, ICP-MS)

Re-analyze using the PXRF in the field

Wash through a seive to isolate the silt and clay sized fraction

Store for laboratory analysis (XRD, ICP-MS)

Re-analyze sample in the field using PXRF

Split sample into two equal portions of at least 25 g each

Collect 50 g of sample

In-situ analysis with PXRF

Expected Results

Washed and sieved samples will show betterresults Potassium is diagnostic

Ocean clay detectable at very low concentrations ~5 wt%

Conclusions Tsunamis pose a threat to coastal

communities around the world Many tsunami hazard models are

based on insufficient data The PXRF provides an important

tool for evaluating sediments inthe field Speed of test allows for sample

screening and selection

AcknowledgementsMade possible be a grant from theNational Sicence Foundation (EEC 05-52432)

Susan E.H. SakimotoTamara CarleyUniversity of Notre Dame

http://www.chemx.org/National%20Science%20Foundation%20(png)%20.pnghttp://www.nextgnetworks.net/i/NDUlogo.jpg

ReferencesCarley, Tamara. Mineralogical variation in paleoflood deposits in the Walla Walla Valley,

Washington: A case study for the development of Portable X-Ray FluorescenceSpectrometry (PXRF). Unpublished undergraduate thesis (2008).

Choowong, Montri, Naomi Murakoshi, Ken-ichiro Hisada, Punya Charusiri, ThasineeCharoentitirat, Vichai Chutakositkanon, Kruawan Jankaew, Pitsanupong Kanjanapayont,and Sumet Phantuwongraj. “2--4 Indian Ocean Tsunami Inflow and Outflow at Phyket,Thailand.” Marine Geology 248 (2008) 179-192.

Cuadros, Javier. “Modeling of Smectite Illitization in Burial Diagenesis Environments.”Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 70 (2006) 4181-4195.

Dawson, A. G., S. Shi, S. Dawson, T. Takahashi, and N. Shuto. “Coastal DedimentationAssociated with the June 2nd and 3rd, 1994 Tsunami in Rajegwesi, Java.” QuaternaryScience Reviews 15 (1996) 901-912.

Dawson, Alastair G., and Shaozhong Shi. “Tsunami Deposits.” Pure and Applied Geophysics157 (2000) 875-897.

Dawson, A. G., and Ian Stewart. “Tsunami Deposits in the Geological Record.” SedimentaryGeology 200 (2007) 166-183.

Dominey-Howes, Dale T. M., Geoff S. Humphreys, and Pal P. Hesse. “Tsunami andPalaeotsunami Depositional Signatures and their Potential value in Understanding the Late-Holocene Tsunami Record.” The Holocene 16,8 (2006) 1095-1107.

ReferencesGingele, F. X., Patrick D. Deckker, and Claus-Dieter Hillenbrand. “Clay Mineral Distribution in

surface sediments between Indonesia and NW Australia - Source and Transport by OceanCurrents.” Marine Geology 179 (2001) 135-146.

Goff, J., Chague-Goff, C., and Nichol, S. “Palaeotsunami Deposits: A New ZealandDerspective.” Sedimentary Geology 143 (2001) 1-6.

Kortekaas, A. and A. G. Dawson. “Distinguishing Tsunami and Storm Deposits: An Examplefrom Martinhal, SW Portugal.” Sedimentary Geology 200 (2007) 208-221.

Morton, Robert A., Guy Gelfenbaum, and Bruce E. Jaffe. “Physical Criteria for DistinguishingSandy Tsunami and Storm Deposits Using Modern Examples.” Sedimentary Geology 200(2007) 184-207.

Paris, R., F. Lavigne, P. Wassmer, and J. Sartohadi. “Coastal sedimentation associated with theDecember 26, 2006 tsunami in Lhok Nga, west Banda Aceh (Sumatra, Indonesia).” MarineGeology 238 (2006) 93-106.

Wijayananda, N. P. and D. S. Cronan. “The Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Marine Sedimentsfrom the Eastern Indian Ocean.” Marine Geology 117 (1994) 275-285.

Van den Bergh, G. D., W Boer, H. de Haas, Tj. C. E. van Weering, and R. van Wijhe. “ShallowMarine Tsunami Deposits in Teluk Banten (NW Java, Indonesia), Generated by the 1883Krakatau Eruption.” Marine Geology 197 (2003) 13-34

X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (XRF). Amptek Inc. Bedford, MA, 2002.<www.amptek.com/xrf.html>