Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
/ l d lIGJ/ERDF Regional development programmeIGJ/ERDF Regional development programmeIGJ/ERDF Regional development programme/ g p p gA t i 2014 2020 O i l tiAustria 2014‐2020: Ongoing evaluationAustria 2014‐2020: Ongoing evaluationAustria 2014 2020: Ongoing evaluation
Monitoring CommitteeMonitoring Committee
O i l ti P j t t tOngoing evaluation ∙ Project management team
W k P k 5 W k P k 7W k P k 3W k P k 2W k P k 1 W k P k 4 W k P k 8 W k P k 9W k P k 6 W k P kWork Package 5 Work Package 7Work Package 3Work Package 2Work Package 1 Work Package 4 Work Package 8 Work Package 9Work Package 6 Work Package Governance CommunicationCO2SMER&D&I Sustainable Art. 114 Reg. Continuous Horizontal 102
territorialg
(EU) 1303/2013 ReportingPrinciples Processterritorialand urban
(EU) 1303/2013 ReportingPrinciples Processand urban
development
ThematicThematicThematic Technical Evaluation of ContinuousThematic Evaluation SoundingFinal evaluationThematic Obj i 4
Thematic Obj i 2
Thematic Obj i 1
Technical A i
Evaluation of i i
Continuous Thematic Obj i
Evaluation ll
Sounding B d
Final evaluation Objective 4Objective 2Objective 1 Assistance communication progress reportsObjectives across all Boardsreport
strategy1, 4, 6, 8, 9 priority axes Ad‐hoc Supportgy, , , , p y pp
S d d i f h l i I l f k h ldScope and design of the evaluation Involvement of stakeholdersp g
Duration: 2019‐2023 Stakeholders are incorporated into the evaluation via soundingDuration: 2019 2023C ib i l i hi f k
Stakeholders are incorporated into the evaluation via sounding b d Contribution analysis as overarching framework: boardsy g
empirical revisiting of the factors underpinning the logical Composed of programme stakeholders experts and partners empirical revisiting of the factors underpinning the logical Composed of programme stakeholders, experts, and partnerschains of policy action Provide feedback to interim results presented and discussedchains of policy action
l ti f h i it i i di id ll ith t il dProvide feedback to interim results presented and discussedM t th ti k k evaluation of each priority axis individually with tailored Meet on three times per work package
qualitative and quantitative approachesqualitative and quantitative approaches generating short‐ and long‐term policy recommendationsg g g p y
The Contribution Analysis as a methodological framework Sounding boards to validate evaluation approaches and findingsThe Contribution Analysis as a methodological framework Sounding boards to validate evaluation approaches and findings
Desk review of specific objectives (SO) and ts
Addressed challenges1Desk review of specific objectives (SO) and
di j tInception Report ∙ Interim Report ∙ Final Reportpug
corresponding projectsp p p p
Inp
s
Theory of Change (ToC)2 Development of ToC on level of SO esTheory of Change (ToC)2 Development of ToC on level of SO
oc
ProgrammePro
Programme StakeholderC t t Prd
Assessment of the assumptions of the ToC:StakeholderContent Process
oar
Evidence assessment 3Assessment of the assumptions of the ToC: D t ll ti PartnersModeration ModerationB
o
Data collection Partners
E
Moderation Moderation
ng
Expertsdin
E i i l f T C i und
Overall assessment4Empirical assessment of ToC: varying
Sou
Overall assessment4qualitative/quantitative approach per SO
S
qualitative/quantitative approach per SO
F db k th d l D t d
ts
Potential re‐adjustment of ToC; answering Feedback on methodology ∙ Data access and sourcespu
Synthesis5Potential re adjustment of ToC; answering f l ti bj ti Validation of findings ∙ Validation of recommendationsu
tpyof evaluation objectives Validation of findings Validation of recommendations
O
f l f h lf h l ( ) Use of results of the evaluationState of the evaluation (May 2019) Use of results of the evaluationState of the evaluation (May 2019)
W k k St t P Short‐term: Results of the evaluation aid with the implemen‐
Work package Status Progress Short‐term: Results of the evaluation aid with the implemen‐
WP 1: R&D&I Plannedtation of the programme. In particular, the evaluation seeks to
WP 1: R&D&I Planned
WP 2 SME Interim report tation of the programme. In particular, the evaluation seeks to
id i t hi h l t it i d t iWP 2: SME Interim report
provide inputs which complement monitoring and steering WP 3: CO2 Evaluation
processesWP 4: Sustainable territorial and urban development Inception report
processes.WP 5: TA/Governance Final report
Long‐term: An important output of the evaluation are recommen‐/ p
WP 6: Horizontal Principles Evaluation Long term: An important output of the evaluation are recommen
d i f h dj f d h i i i li h
WP 6: Horizontal Principles Evaluation
WP 7 Communication Interim report dations for the adjustment of measures and their impacts in light WP 7: Communication Interim report j p g
of the programming of IJG/ERDF 2021 2027WP 8: Art. 114 Report Planned
of the programming of IJG/ERDF 2021‐2027. WP 9: Continuous Reporting Reports 2019
WP 10: Process Ongoing cooperationg g p
May 2019May 2019
Committed by: Managing authority at the Austrian Conference on Spatial Planning (ÖROK) ∙ [email protected] ∙ +43 1 535 34 44y g g y p g g
Authors: ÖIR GmbH ∙ convelop – cooperative knowledge design gmbh ∙ KMU Forschung Austria ∙ ÖAR GmbH ∙Authors: ÖIR GmbH convelop cooperative knowledge design gmbh KMU Forschung Austria ÖAR GmbH ÖGUT GmbH Spatial Foresight GmbHÖGUT GmbH ∙ Spatial Foresight GmbH
Programme: IGJ/ERDF (Austria) 2014‐2020 ∙ www.efre.gv.at
Type: Ongoing evaluationType: Ongoing evaluation