I.H & I.I MONTGOMERY COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION ... › wp-content › uploads › ...West Irving and to replace the slate walkway at 23 West Irving with matching stone paving. Staff

I.H & I.I

MONTGOMERY COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION

STAFF REPORT

Address: 23 West Irving Street, Chevy Chase Meeting Date: 7/29/2020

16 Magnolia Parkway, Chevy Chase

Resource: Contributing Resources Report Date: 7/22/2020

Chevy Chase Village Historic District

Applicant: Mike Friedman Public Notice: 7/15/2020

(Clinton & Associates, Landscape Architect)

Review: HAWP Tax Credit: N/A

Case Number: 35/13-20X Staff: Dan Bruecherrt

35/13-20Y

PROPOSAL:

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the HPC approve the HAWP applications.

ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION:

SIGNIFICANCE: Contributing Resources within the Chevy Chase Village Historic District

STYLE: Colonial Revival

DATE: 1911 & 1914

Fig. 1: 23 West Irving (left) and 16 Magnolia Parkway have been the subject of previous HPC review.

1

I.H & I.I

BACKGROUND

On December 18, 2019, the HPC heard a preliminary consultation for work to the house at 23 West Irving

St.1 The proposal focused on architectural alterations to the house and only talked conceptually about

changes to the landscape/hardscape.

The HAWP for this work at 23 West Irving was approved at the June 24, 2020 HPC meeting.2

Both properties have the same owner who wishes to pursue one landscape and hardscape scheme. The

properties have separate tax IDs and addresses and so must be heard with two separate HAWP case

numbers.

PROPOSAL

The landscape/hardscape work proposed for the two properties will unify the design and visually connect

the two Contributing Resources.

The applicant proposes to undertake the following work at 16 Magnolia Pkwy.:

• Remove the existing stone terraces;

• Construct new natural stone terraces and walkways;

• Expand the parking court;

• Install a stone retaining wall; and

• Remove a total of six (6) trees. At 23 West Irving St. , the applicant proposes to:

• Remove the existing rear terrace;

• Construct a new natural stone terrace;

• Replace the existing walkway;

• Construct a retaining wall along the sidewalk;

• Remove and replace the existing fencing; and

• Remove a total of eleven (11) trees.

APPLICABLE GUIDELINES:

When reviewing alterations and new construction within the Chevy Chase Village Historic District

several documents are to be utilized as guidelines to assist the Commission in developing their decision.

These documents include the historic preservation review guidelines in the approved and adopted

amendment for the Chevy Chase Village Historic District (Guidelines), Montgomery County Code

Chapter 24A (Chapter 24A), and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation (Standards).

The pertinent information in these documents is outlined below.

The Guidelines break down specific projects into three levels of review – Lenient, Moderate and Strict

Scrutiny.

“Lenient Scrutiny” means that the emphasis of the review should be on issues of general

massing and scale, and compatibility with the surrounding streetscape, and should allow for a very liberal

interpretation of preservation rules. Most changes should be permitted unless there are major problems

1 The Staff Report for the December 28, 2019 Preliminary Consultation can be found here:

https://montgomeryplanning.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/II.A-23-West-Irving-Street-Chevy-Chase.pdf. 2 The Staff Report of the approved HAWP for 23 West Irving from June 24, 2020 can be found here:

https://montgomeryplanning.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/I.W-23-West-Irving-Street-Chevy-Chase.pdf.

2

https://montgomeryplanning.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/II.A-23-West-Irving-Street-Chevy-Chase.pdfhttps://montgomeryplanning.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/I.W-23-West-Irving-Street-Chevy-Chase.pdf

I.H & I.I

with massing, scale and compatibility.

“Moderate Scrutiny” involves a higher standard of review than “lenient scrutiny.” Besides

issues of massing, scale and compatibility, preserving the integrity of the resource is taken into account.

Alterations should be designed so that the altered structure still contributes to the district. Use of

compatible new materials, rather than the original building materials, should be permitted. Planned

changes should be compatible with the structure’s existing design, but should not be required to replicate

its architectural style.

“Strict Scrutiny” means that the planned changes should be reviewed to insure that the intergrity

of the significant exterior architectural or landscaping features and details is not compromised. However,

strict scrutiny should not be “strict in theory but fatal in fact” i.e. it does not mean that there can be no

changes but simply that the proposed changes should be reviewed with extra care.

The Guidelines state three basic policies that should be adhered to, including:

Preserving the integrity of the contributing structures in the district. Alterations to contributing structures

should be designed in such a way that the altered structure still contributes to the district.

Design review emphasis should be restricted to changes that will be visible from the front or side public

right-of-way, or that would be visible in the absence of vegetation or landscaping.

Alterations to the portion of a property that are not visible from the public right-of-way should be subject

to very lenient review. Most changes to rear of the properties should be approved as a matter of course.

The Guidelines that pertain to this project are as follows:

o Fences should be subject to moderate scrutiny if they are visible from the public right-of-way, lenient scrutiny if they are not.

o Lot coverage should be subject to strict scrutiny, in view of the critical importance of preserving the Village’s open park-like character.

o Tree removal should be subject to strict scrutiny and consistent with the Chevy Chase Village Urban Forest Ordinance.

Additional basic policies that should be adhered to include:

1. Preserving the integrity of the proposed Chevy Chase Village Historic District. Any alterations should, at a minimum, perpetuate the ability to perceive the sense of time and place portrayed by

the district.

2. Preserving the integrity of contributing structures in the district. Alterations to contributing structures should be designed in such a way that the altered structure still contributes to the

district.

3. Maintaining the variety of architectural styles and the tradition of architectural excellence. 4. Design review emphasis should be restricted to changes that will be visible from the front or side

public right-of-way, or that would be visible in the absence of vegetation or landscaping.

5. Alterations to the portion of a property that are not visible from the public right-of-way should be subject to a very lenient review. Most changes to the rear of the properties should be approved as

a matter of course.

Montgomery County Code; Chapter 24A-8

3

I.H & I.I

(a) The commission shall instruct the director to deny a permit if it finds, based on the evidence and information presented to or before the commission that the alteration for which the permit is

sought would be inappropriate, inconsistent with or detrimental to the preservation, enhancement

or ultimate protection of the historic site or historic resource within an historic district, and to the

purposes of this chapter.

(b) The commission shall instruct the director to issue a permit, or issue a permit subject to such conditions as are found to be necessary to insure conformity with the purposes and requirements

of this chapter, if it finds that:

(1) The proposal will not substantially alter the exterior features of an historic site or historic resource within an historic district; or

(2) The proposal is compatible in character and nature with the historical, archeological, architectural or cultural features of the historic site or the historic district in which an historic

resource is located and would not be detrimental thereto or to the achievement of the

purposes of this chapter; or

(c) It is not the intent of this chapter to limit new construction, alteration or repairs to any 1 period or architectural style.

(d) In the case of an application for work on an historic resource located within an historic district, the commission shall be lenient in its judgment of plans for structures of little historical or design

significance or for plans involving new construction, unless such plans would seriously impair the

historic or architectural value of surrounding historic resources or would impair the character of

the historic district. (Ord. No. 9-4, § 1; Ord. No. 11-59.)

Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation:

#2: The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive

materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be

avoided.

#9: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials,

features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated

from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and

massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment.

#10: New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if

removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would

be unimpaired.

STAFF DISCUSSION:

For the two properties, the applicant proposes to remove several trees, remove and construct new terraces,

expand hardscaping, construct a retaining wall, and install new fencing. Staff finds that the proposed

work is compatible with the historic resources and surrounding district and recommends the approval of

the two HAWPs.

Tree Removal

At 23 West Irving, the applicant proposes to remove a total of 11 trees. There are 6 Leyland Cypress,

four Gum trees, and an Ash. Most of these trees are at the side or the rear of the property and the largest

4

I.H & I.I

is only 10” (ten inches) d.b.h. At 16 Magnolia, the applicant proposes to remove a total of 6 trees: a

Maple, two cherry trees, and three Magnolias, the largest of which is 13” (thirteen inches) d.b.h.

In place of these 17 trees, the applicant proposes to plant at least 25 additional deciduous trees and several

additional evergreen trees.

Staff finds that none of the trees proposed for removal are significant, but they do add to the park-like

setting identified as a character-defining feature of the surrounding district. Staff finds that the most

significant trees on the properties will be maintained. Staff additionally finds that the proposed planting

will result in a net gain of both deciduous and evergreen trees on the site, introducing new trees that will

grow and preserve the district’s character. Staff recommends the HPC approve the tree removal and re-

planting.

Terrace Construction

The house at 23 West Irving has a slate patio in the rear of the house that projects slightly to the west and

a slate walkway along the eastern side of the house. 16 Magnolia has a large slate patio to the east of the

house an another off of the southwest corner of the house.

The applicant proposes to remove all of the slate patios. These features are not historic, so their removal

will not have an impact on the historic character of the houses or surrounding district and should be

approved.

The applicant proposes to pave a large area to the west of 16 Magnolia to the property boundary with 23

West Irving and to replace the slate walkway at 23 West Irving with matching stone paving. Staff finds

that while the amount of natural stone paving at 16 Magnolia is significant and will increase the paved lot

coverage, it appears to Staff that the total paving at the two properties will be reduced by the proposal.

The Design Guidelines require lot coverage to be reviewed under Strict Scrutiny to preserve the open

park-like setting of the District.

Because the grade slopes up from the street, the area of paving proposed at 16 Magnolia will not be

visible from the right-of-way and should be approved as a matter of course, per the Design Guidelines.

Additionally, Staff finds that the additional landscaping proposed will reinforce the park-like setting

character of the surrounding district and recommends approval of the new terrace.

Expanded Hardscaping

The applicant proposes expanding the existing concrete parking court at 16 Magnolia. The existing

parking court is accessed via a one-lane driveway off of Magnolia Ave., flanked by several trees. The

applicant proposes expanding the parking court an additional 13’ 6” (thirteen feet, six inches) westward,

toward the existing garage. Staff finds that this additional textured concrete will not have a substantial

impact on the character of the lot and is setback a significant distance from the right-of-way. Staff finds

the proposal is compatible with the character of the property and recommends the HPC approve the

expansion of the hardscape under 24A-8(b)(2) and the Design Guidelines.

Retaining Wall Construction

The front yard at 23 West Irving is all grass. The grade rises sharply from the sidewalk. The applicant

proposes to construct a retaining wall, with a maximum height of 3’ (three feet), setback from the

sidewalk by approximately 3’ (three feet). The materials and appearance of the proposed retaining wall at

23 West Irving will match the materials and construction to match the existing retaining wall at 16

Magnolia. Staff determined that the retaining wall at 16 Magnolia was approved by the HPC in January

2000.

In considering the appropriateness of the proposed retaining wall Staff considerers several elements: the

5

I.H & I.I

materials, placement, dimensions, and the fact that a previous composition of the HPC approved a wall of

the exact design and materials. First, Staff finds the rustic natural stone to be compatible with the subject

property and surrounding district. Second, the wall is set back from the edge of the sidewalk, so as to

retain a bit more of a sense of openness. Third, the 3’ height will not loom over pedestrians and aligns

with the front walk, making it no taller than necessary. And fourth, while HPC decisions do not set

precedent, the fact that a previous make-up of the HPC approved a retaining wall of the same materials

and design, almost twice as tall next door, leads Staff to conclude that the proposal is compatible with the

resource and surrounding district.

There is a second retaining wall proposed as part of this project. On the western edge of 16 Magnolia, the

applicant proposes to construct a retaining wall and set of stairs to connect the two properties. The

placement of this wall and stairs is such that it will not be visible from the public right-of-way which,

according to the Design Guidelines, should be approved as a matter of course.

Fencing and Arbor

The applicant proposes to enclose the rear of 23 West Irving in a 42” (forty-two inch) wood picket fence

on the west side of the house, which transitions into a 6’ (six foot tall) vertical wood board on board

privacy fence to enclose the property on the west and north property boundaries. To the east of the house,

the applicant proposes to install a 42” (forty-two inch) tall board on board trash enclosure. The materials,

designs, and dimensions are consistent with the HPC’s general fence guidance in historic districts. Staff

finds the proposed fencing appropriate and recommends approval of the fencing at 23 West Irving.

At 16 Magnolia, the applicant proposes to construct a section of 42’ (forty-two inch) wood board on

board fencing on the new retaining wall to match the fencing installing on the south retaining wall. Staff

finds this is an appropriate design and material and will only be minimally visible from the public right-

of-way. At the southwest edge of the stone paving area at 16 Magnolia, the applicant proposes to install a

wood and metal arbor. The arbor will have a painted metal frame with wood slats above. Staff finds that

garden structures, such as the one proposed in this HAWP, are found throughout the District; and that this

arbor will only be partially visible from an oblique angle in front of 23 West Irving. Staff finds that the

proposed fencing and arbor at 16 Magnolia are consistent with the character of the resource and the

surrounding district and recommends HPC approval.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the Commission approve the HAWP applications under the Criteria for Issuance

in Chapter 24A-8(b)(1), (2), and (d), having found that the proposal will not substantially alter the

exterior features of the historic resources and is compatible in character with the district and the purposes

of Chapter 24A;

and with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation #2;

and with the general condition that the applicant shall present the 3 permit sets of drawings, if

applicable, to Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) staff for review and stamping prior to

submission for the Montgomery County Department of Permitting Services (DPS) building permits;

and with the general condition that final project design details, not specifically delineated by the

Commission, shall be approved by HPC staff or brought back to the Commission as a revised HAWP

application at staff’s discretion;

and with the general condition that the applicant shall notify the Historic Preservation Staff if they

propose to make any alterations to the approved plans. Once the work is completed the applicant will

contact the staff person assigned to this application at 301-563-3400 or

6

I.H & I.I

[email protected] to schedule a follow-up site visit.

7

mailto:[email protected]

919289

8

Marc Elrich County Executive

Mitra Pedoeem Director

HISTORIC AREA WORK PERMIT APPLICATION Application Date: 7/8/2020

Application No: 919289 AP Type: HISTORIC

Customer No: 1378027

255 Rockville Pike, 2nd Floor · Rockville, MD 20850 · (240)777-0311 · (240)777-6256 TTY www.montgomerycountymd.gov/dps

DEPARTMENT OF PERMITTING SERVICES

Affidavit AcknowledgementThe Contractor is the Primary applicant authorized by the property owner

This application does not violate any covenants and deed restrictions Primary Applicant Information

Address 16 MAGNOLIA PKWY CHEVY CHASE, MD 20815Othercontact Clinton & Associates (Primary)

Historic Area Work Permit DetailsWork Type ADDScope ofWork

Demolition of existing and addition of new stone terraces and walkways. Addition of stone retaining walls, arbor, fencing and planting. Expansionof existing parking court.

11

CHEVY CHASE VILLAGE 5906 Connecticut Avenue Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815

Phone (301) 654-7300

Fax (301) 907-9721

[email protected] www.chevychasevillagemd.gov

BOARD OF MANAGERS

ELISSA A. LEONARD Chair

GARY CROCKETT Treasurer VILLAGE MANAGER

SHANA R. DAVIS-COOK ROBERT C. GOODWIN, JR. Vice Chair

NANCY E. WATTERS Assistant Treasurer LEGAL COUNSEL

SUELLEN M. FERGUSON DAVID L. WINSTEAD Secretary

LINDA J. WILLARD Board Member

RICHARD M. RUDA Assistant Secretary

Municipality Letter for

Proposed Construction Project

Subject Property: 16 Magnolia Parkway, Chevy Chase MD 20815

Property Owner: Michael and Adena Friedman

Project Manager/Contractor: Clinton & Associates/Sandra Clinton

Proposed Work: Landscaping and architectural changes, including

constructing new walls, patios, fences, plantings and

arbor

6/23/2020

Diane R. Schwartz Jones, Director

Department of Permitting Services of Montgomery County

255 Rockville Pike, 2nd floor

Rockville, MD 20850

Dear Ms. Jones,

This letter is to inform your department that the above homeowner/contractor has

notified Chevy Chase Village that he or she plans to apply for both county and

municipal permits for the above summarized construction project. Chevy Chase Village

will not issue any municipal building permit(s) for this proposed project until

Montgomery County has issued all necessary county permits and the applicant has

provided Chevy Chase Village with copies of county-approved and stamped plans. We

have advised the homeowner/contractor that a permit from Montgomery County does

not guarantee a permit from this municipality unless the project complies with all our

municipal rules and regulations.

If this homeowner/contractor later applies for an amended county permit, please do not

approve that application until you have received a Municipality Letter from us

indicating that the homeowner/contractor has notified us of that proposed amendment to

the permit.

If you have any questions about this proposed project and the municipal regulation of it

by Chevy Chase Village, do not hesitate to have your staff contact my office. The

Village Permitting Coordinator can be reached by phone at 301-654-7300 or by e-mail

at [email protected].

Sincerely,

Shana R. Davis-Cook

Manager, Chevy Chase Village

12

mailto:[email protected]://www.chevychasevillagemd.gov/mailto:[email protected]

3'-0"

MIN

.

07/08/2020 20001

5200 BALTIMORE AVENUE, SUITE 201

HYATTSVILLE, MARYLAND 20781

301.699.5600 WWW.CLINTON-LA.COM

© C

OP

YR

IG

HT

C

LIN

TO

N &

A

SSO

CIA

TE

S, P

C 2

02

0

MOCO HISTORIC

AREA WORK

PERMIT

S:\CAD\Residential\20001 - Adena And Mike Friedman\Working Files\WORKING SHEET FILES FOR REGULATORY SUBMISSIONS\Friedman - HPC SHEETS.dwg

N

SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

8'0 4'2' 16'

16 MAGNOLIA PKWY SITE PLAN

A

16

M

AG

NO

LIA

P

AR

KW

AY

CH

EV

Y C

HA

SE

, M

D 2

08

15

EX. CONDITIONS-

SURVEY

13

AutoCAD SHX Text5" MAP.


AutoCAD SHX Text10" ASH

AutoCAD SHX Text12" STUMP


AutoCAD SHX Text15" ELM




AutoCAD SHX Text6" CRAPE MYRTLE

AutoCAD SHX Text14" OAK

AutoCAD SHX Text12" HICK.


AutoCAD SHX Text5" SYC.

AutoCAD SHX Text4" SYC.

AutoCAD SHX Text20" BEE.

AutoCAD SHX Text32" HICK.

AutoCAD SHX Text47" POP.

AutoCAD SHX TextE

AutoCAD SHX Text7" DOG.

AutoCAD SHX Text5" DOG.



AutoCAD SHX Text5" TREE

AutoCAD SHX TextE


AutoCAD SHX Text17" POP.

AutoCAD SHX Text8" HOLLY

AutoCAD SHX Text3" MAP





AutoCAD SHX Text10" MAG.


AutoCAD SHX Text10" CHER.

AutoCAD SHX Text10" CHER.







AutoCAD SHX Text3" HOLLY TWIN



AutoCAD SHX TextS

AutoCAD SHX TextWV

AutoCAD SHX TextWV

AutoCAD SHX TextEX. BRICK WALK


AutoCAD SHX TextGM


AutoCAD SHX TextEX. CONC. HANDICAP RAMPS

AutoCAD SHX TextTW:341.83



AutoCAD SHX TextEX. CONC. WALK

AutoCAD SHX TextEX. STOP SIGN

AutoCAD SHX TextEX. INLET


AutoCAD SHX TextEX. STONE WALK

AutoCAD SHX TextEX. SLATE PATIO

AutoCAD SHX Text32


AutoCAD SHX TextEX. SLATE WALK

AutoCAD SHX TextEX. CONC. COLUMN

AutoCAD SHX TextEX. FOUNTAIN

AutoCAD SHX TextEX. STONE COLUMN




AutoCAD SHX TextEM

AutoCAD SHX TextEX. CONC. LANDING

AutoCAD SHX TextEX. CONC. LANDING



AutoCAD SHX TextSTORAGE LOCKER


AutoCAD SHX Text41x2















































































AutoCAD SHX Text342

AutoCAD SHX Text342

AutoCAD SHX Text336

AutoCAD SHX Text338

AutoCAD SHX Text342

AutoCAD SHX Text342

AutoCAD SHX Text342

AutoCAD SHX Text342

AutoCAD SHX Text340

AutoCAD SHX Text340

AutoCAD SHX TextEX. ELEC. OUTLET

AutoCAD SHX TextWM

AutoCAD SHX TextEX. STONE STEPS

















































AutoCAD SHX TextADENA AND MIKE FRIEDMAN

AutoCAD SHX TextDate

AutoCAD SHX TextSheet Number

AutoCAD SHX TextProject #

AutoCAD SHX TextSubmission

AutoCAD SHX TextRev


AutoCAD SHX TextDescription

AutoCAD SHX TextSheet Title

AutoCAD SHX TextStamp

AutoCAD SHX TextSURVEY

3'-0"

MIN

.

13'-6"

TYP.

07/08/2020 20001




© C

OP

YR

IG

HT

C

LIN

TO

N &

A

SSO

CIA

TE

S, P

C 2

02

0

MOCO HISTORIC

AREA WORK

PERMIT


SITE PLAN- 16

MAGNOLIA PKWY

M

A

G

N

O

L

I

A

P

A

R

K

W

A

Y

WEST IRVING STREET

16 MAGNOLIA

RESIDENCE

GARAGE/

STORAGE

EXISTING PARKING COURT

INFILL PLANTING TO ENHANCE

EXISTING PLANTING

INFILL PLANTING TO ENHANCE

EXISTING PLANTING

EXISTING STAIR AND RETAINING WALL

TO REMAIN

LAWN

VEGETABLE GARDEN BED

EXISTING STAIR

TO REMAIN

LAWN

PROPERTY LINE

PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE

PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREE

PROPOSED SHRUB

EXISTING TREE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPOSED WALL

PROPOSED STEPPING STONE

WALKWAY

LEGEND

EXISTING WALL

PROPOSED GROUND COVER

AND PERENNIAL PLANTING

BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE

EXISTING FRONT AND SIDE PORCH

AND STAIRS TO REMAIN

RELOCATED GENERATOR

EXTENSION OF EXISTING

PARKING COURT

A

L200B

NATURAL STONE PAVING

D

L201B

PERENNIAL AND

GROUND COVER PLANTING

D

L200B

FENCE TO MATCH EXISTING

42" HT. PICKET FENCE

C

L200B

STONE STAIR

A

L200B


A

L200B


EXISTING FENCE TO

REMAIN

B

L200B

STONE RETAINING WALL

E

L200B

METAL AND WOOD

ARBOR

D

L200B

FENCE TO MATCH EXISTING

42" HT. PICKET FENCE

EXISTING FENCING TO REMAIN

D

L201B

PERENNIAL AND


D

L201B

PERENNIAL AND


D

L201B

PERENNIAL AND


B

L201B

EVERGREEN TREE

PLANTING

C

L201B

SHRUB PLANTING

B

L201B

EVERGREEN TREE

PLANTING

B

L201B

EVERGREEN TREE

PLANTING

A

L201B

DECIDUOUS TREE

PLANTING

A

L201B

DECIDUOUS TREE

PLANTING

242.66

242.35

342.85

242.70

346.90

343.20

342.60

343.10

TS

342.80

TW

343.10

4R

BS

340.80

TW

343.10

BW

342.60

BW

342.90

TS

343.15

343.50

TW

344.25

TW

343.95

BS

342.65

1

R

342.00

343.00

342.60

342.85

342.70

342.25

342.50

342.20

342.30

341.80

342.40

343.00

342.50

343.80

346.80

342.00

335.90

341.20

341.40

341.20

342.40

338.75PROPOSED ELEVATION

EXISTING ELEVATION337.60

CONTINUATION OF EXISTING

STEPPING STONE PATH

B

L200B

STONE RETAINING WALL

TO MATCH EXISTING WALLS

N

SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

8'0 4'2' 16'

16 MAGNOLIA PKWY SITE PLAN

A

16

M

AG

NO

LIA

P

AR

KW

AY

CH

EV

Y C

HA

SE

, M

D 2

08

15

E

X

IS

T

IN

G

D

R

IV

E

W

A

Y

EXISTING PIERS AND

FENCING TO REMAIN

EXISTING STORAGE

LOCKER TO REMAIN

EXISTING BRICK SIDEWALK

TO REMAIN

EXISTING LAWN AND TREE

PLANTING STRIP TO REMAIN

A

L100B

EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED

TBR 1

TBR 2

TBR 3

TBR 4

TBR 5

TBR 6

DOWNSPOUT

1

R

STEP INDICATION (QNTY OF RISERS)

TBR 1

BUILT IN BENCH

14

EXISTING STONE RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN

3'-0"

MA

X.

NEW

RETAINING

WALL

RETAINING

WALL AT 23

WEST IRVING

(UNDER

SEPARATE

PERMIT)

07/08/2020 20001




© C

OP

YR

IG

HT

C

LIN

TO

N &

A

SSO

CIA

TE

S, P

C 2

02

0

MOCO HISTORIC

AREA WORK

PERMIT


SECTIONS &

ELEAVTIONS- 16

MAGNOLIA PKWY

16 MAGNOLIA PKWY WALL AND ARBOR ELEVATION (FROM WEST IRVING STREET)

A

16

M

AG

NO

LIA

P

AR

KW

AY

CH

EV

Y C

HA

SE

, M

D 2

08

15

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

4'0 2'1' 8'

D

L201B

PERENNIAL AND GROUND

COVER PLANTING

PROPERTY LINE

A

L201B

DECIDUOUS TREE

PLANTING

B

L201B

EVERGREEN TREE

PLANTING

B

L200B

STONE RETAINING

WALL TO MATCH

EXISTING WALL

EXISTING FENCE

TO REMAIN

F

L200B

WOOD AND METAL

ARBOR

EXISTING FENCE

TO REMAIN

15

07/08/2020 20001




© C

OP

YR

IG

HT

C

LIN

TO

N &

A

SSO

CIA

TE

S, P

C 2

02

0

MOCO HISTORIC

AREA WORK

PERMIT

S:\CAD\Residential\20001 - Adena And Mike Friedman\Working Files\WORKING SHEET FILES FOR REGULATORY SUBMISSIONS\Friedman - HPC SHEETS- DETAILS.dwg

16 MAGNOLIA

PKWY DETAILS


A1" = 1'-0"

STONE RETAINING WALL, TO MATCH EXISTING

B1" = 1'-0"

FENCING, TO MATCH EXISTING

DN.T.S.

STONE STAIR

C1" = 1'-0"

METAL AND WOOD ARBOR PRECEDENT IMAGES

EN.T.S.

1

12

2" DIA. SCH. 40 PVC PIPE FOR

WEEPHOLES, 8' O.C., RECESS

BACK 2" FROM FACE OF WALL.

LEAVE 1-1/4" GAP BETWEEN

STONES IN FACE OF WALL FOR

OUTFLOW.

COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO 95%

DENSITY

2" MAX. DIA. DRAINAGE

AGGREGATE CONTINUOUS ALONG

BACK OF WALL. WRAP IN FILTER

FABRIC (MIRAFI 140N) - OVERLAP

JOINTS

CARDEROCK STONE TO MATCH EXISTING

WALLS

TOP STONES NOT LESS THAN 6"

THICK RANGING FROM 12" TO 30"

IN LENGTH - FLUSH MORTAR

JOINTS ON TOP SURFACE

6"

2"

1'-2"

24"

PERENNIAL AND

GROUND COVER

PLANTING

3'-0"

MA

X.

1'-2"

EX STONE WALL

SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO 95%

CR 6 STONE AGGREGATE BASE

STONE DUST SETTING BED

1/8" SAND SWEPT JOINTS

2" TH. NATURAL STONE PAVER,

SIZES VARY

2"2"

4"






SIZES VARY

2"

4"

6"

CONCRETE FOOTING

2'-6" M

IN

.

FILL COMPACTED TO 95% UNDER ENTIRE

STAIR, FOOTINGS, AND SLAB

1

1

2

" TYP.

12" MIN.

12" MIN.

ADJACENT CONDITION, VARIES

#4 @ 12" O.C. EACH WAY (TYP.) AND

AT NOSE OF EACH STEP

2" THICK NATURAL STONE TREADS WITH THERMAL

FINISH AT EXPOSED EDGES. SET RISER AND TREAD

STONE IN 5/8" MORTAR SETTING BED.

6"

1'-2"

STONE CHEEK WALL BEHIND STAIR

HANDRAIL, AS REQUIRED, SEE SITE

PLAN FOR LOCATIONS

#4 DOWELS

@8" O.C. (TYP.)

CARDEROCK STONE RISER TO MATCH WALL

STONE; NO VISIBLE MORTAR JOINTS; MORTAR

COLOR SHALL MATCH STONE

TRAVERTINE PAVING GRANITE COBBLESTONE PAVING

EXISTING PICKET GATE

EXISTING PICKET FENCING

16

M

AG

NO

LIA

P

AR

KW

AY

CH

EV

Y C

HA

SE

, M

D 2

08

15

16

07/08/2020 20001




© C

OP

YR

IG

HT

C

LIN

TO

N &

A

SSO

CIA

TE

S, P

C 2

02

0

MOCO HISTORIC

AREA WORK

PERMIT


16 MAGNOLIA

PKWY DETAILS

DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING

A3/4" = 1'-0"

PERENNIAL AND GROUND COVER PLANTING

D1" = 1'-0"

EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING

B3/4" = 1'-0"

SHRUB PLANTING

C1" = 1'-0"

SEE PLANT LIST

FOR SPACING

PLAN - TRIANGULAR SPACING

NOT TO SCALE

1/2" O.C. DIMENSION

6" M

IN

.

PREPARED PLANTING SOIL, DEPTH AS

SPECIFIED, TAMP AND WATER WHEN

BACKFILLING AROUND PLANT

1" SHREDDED, COMPOSTED PINE BARK

MULCH. INSTALL PRIOR TO PLANT

INSTALLATION

PRIOR TO BACKFILLING, CUT "POT-BOUND"

ROOTS ON OUTSIDE; REMOVE 25%-50%

OF BARK MIXTURE ON ROOT BALL.

MIX REMOVED CONTAINER MATERIAL

WITH BACKFILL.

EDGE OF BED

PLANT

O.C. DIMENSION

O

.

C

.

D

I

M

E

N

S

I

O

N

6"

3X WIDTH OF ROOT BALL DIAMETER

FOR TREE WITH WIRE BASKET AROUND

ROOT BALL, CUT WIRE BASKET IN FOUR

PLACES & FOLD DOWN 12" INTO PLANTING

HOLE

TURN BACK TOP

1

3

OF BURLAP AWAY FROM

TOP OF ROOT BALL & CUT ROPE FROM TOP

OF BALL

2" COMPOSTED SHREDDED PINE BARK MULCH

REMOVE ANY MULCH IN CONTACT WITH THE

CROWN OF THE TREE

ORIENT THE SIDE OF TREE WHICH FACED

NORTH IN THE NURSERY TO FACE NORTH

IN PLANTING AREA

LOOP HOSE ABOVE FIRST SET OF BRANCHES

GUYING SYSTEM: (2) 2" X 2" HARDWOOD

STAKES PER TREE; 2 STRANDS GALVANIZED

WIRE TWISTED FOR SUPPORT; EYESCREW &

TURNBUCKLE;

1

2

" HOSE LOOPS AT TRUNK

PLACE

1

8

OF ROOT BALL ABOVE ADJACENT

FINISHED GRADE

FINISHED GRADE

PREPARED SOIL MIX AS SPECIFIED

REMOVE DEBRIS & EXCESS SOIL FROM TOP OF

ROOT BALL THAT MAY HAVE ACCUMULATED

WHEN BURLAPPED

UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE

PLANTING MOUND TO INHIBIT SETTLING

S

L

O

P

E

A

W

A

Y

TEMPORARY SAUCER AROUND TREE

6"

GALVANIZED

STEEL WIRE

ROOT BALL

TREE TRUNK

HARDWOOD

STAKE

TREE TRUNK

HARDWOOD STAKE

GALVANIZED STEEL WIRE

ROOT BALL

PLAN VIEW

TREES WITH WIRE BASKETS

AROUND THE ROOT BALL SHALL

HAVE THE WIRE CUT BACK & FOLDED

DOWN 12" INTO THE PLANTING

HOLE

CUT ROPE AND TURN BACK TOP

1/3 OF BURLAP AWAY FROM

ROOT BALL

BERM SOIL TO DRAIN AWAY

FROM TREE

1" COMPOSTED SHREDDED PINE

BARK MULCH

3 2"x4"x3' HARDWOOD STAKE

REMOVE DEBRIS AND EXCESS SOIL

FROM TOP OF ROOT BALL THAT

MAY HAVE ACCUMULATED WHEN

BURLAPPED


3 PIECES OF REINFORCED

RUBBER HOSE (1 PER WIRE),

BLACK OR DARK BROWN

DOUBLE STRAND OF 12 GUAGE

GALVANIZED WIRE TWISTED,

THREE PER TREE.

PLACE 1/8 OF ROOT

BALL ABOVE ADJACENT

FINISHED GRADE

FINISH GRADE

S

L

O

P

E

A

W

A

Y

12" MIN.

PREPARE PLANTING SOIL

SEE PLANTING PLANS AND

PLANT LIST FOR SPACING

NOTE: FOR CONTAINER STOCK,

PULL POTTING MIX AND ROOT MAT APART

TO DIRECT THE OUTER ROOTS INTO ADJACENT SOIL.

DO NOT LEAVE CIRCLING ROOTS AGAINST ROOT BALL

FINISH GRADE

PLACE TOP 1/8 OF ROOT BALL ABOVE FINISH GRADE

CUT ROPE FROM TOP OF ROOT BALL & TURN

BACK BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL

1" SHREDDED, COMPOSTED PINE BARK MULCH

PLANTING SOIL PREPARED AS SPECIFIED.

TAMP AND WATER WHEN BACKFILLING AROUND PLANT

16

M

AG

NO

LIA

P

AR

KW

AY

CH

EV

Y C

HA

SE

, M

D 2

08

15

17

919315

18

Marc Elrich County Executive

Mitra Pedoeem Director

HISTORIC AREA WORK PERMIT APPLICATION Application Date: 7/8/2020

Application No: 919315 AP Type: HISTORIC

Customer No: 1377824

255 Rockville Pike, 2nd Floor · Rockville, MD 20850 · (240)777-0311 · (240)777-6256 TTY www.montgomerycountymd.gov/dps

DEPARTMENT OF PERMITTING SERVICES

Affidavit AcknowledgementThe Contractor is the Primary applicant authorized by the property owner

This application does not violate any covenants and deed restrictions Primary Applicant Information

Address 23 W IRVING ST CHEVY CHASE, MD 20815Othercontact Clinton and Associates (Primary) Historic Area Work Permit DetailsWorkType

CONST

Scope ofWork

Add stone retaining wall in front yard. Remove existing rear yard terrace and side yard walkway and replace with new natural stone terrace andwalkway. Remove dissimilar, existing fencing and replace with fences that match in aesthetics.

21

07/08/2020 20001




© C

OP

YR

IG

HT

C

LIN

TO

N &

A

SSO

CIA

TE

S, P

C 2

02

0

MOCO HISTORIC

AREA WORK

PERMIT


EX. CONDITIONS-

SURVEY

N

SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

8'0 4'2' 16'

23 WEST IRVING EXISTING CONDITIONS

A

23

W

EST

IR

VIN

G ST

RE

ET

CH

EV

Y C

HA

SE

, M

D 2

08

15

22






AutoCAD SHX Text12" STUMP

AutoCAD SHX Text5" PINE




AutoCAD SHX Text8" GUM




AutoCAD SHX Text6" GUM MULTI







AutoCAD SHX TextGM

AutoCAD SHX TextEM


AutoCAD SHX TextEX. CONC. APRON

AutoCAD SHX TextEX. CONC./ BRICK WALK



AutoCAD SHX TextEX. COV'D PORCH

AutoCAD SHX TextEX. CONC. WALK



















































AutoCAD SHX Text332

AutoCAD SHX Text334

AutoCAD SHX Text336

AutoCAD SHX Text338

AutoCAD SHX Text338

AutoCAD SHX Text340

AutoCAD SHX Text340

AutoCAD SHX Text342

AutoCAD SHX Text342

AutoCAD SHX Text338

AutoCAD SHX Text336

AutoCAD SHX Text334

AutoCAD SHX TextEX. CONC./ BRICK STEPS

AutoCAD SHX TextEX. CONC./ BRICK STEPS



AutoCAD SHX Text24" BEE.









AutoCAD SHX TextADENA AND MIKE FRIEDMAN


AutoCAD SHX TextSheet Number

AutoCAD SHX TextProject #

AutoCAD SHX TextSubmission

AutoCAD SHX TextRev


AutoCAD SHX TextDescription

AutoCAD SHX TextSheet Title

AutoCAD SHX TextStamp

AutoCAD SHX TextSURVEY

CHEVY CHASE VILLAGE 5906 Connecticut Avenue Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815

Phone (301) 654-7300

Fax (301) 907-9721

[email protected] www.chevychasevillagemd.gov

BOARD OF MANAGERS

ELISSA A. LEONARD Chair

GARY CROCKETT Treasurer VILLAGE MANAGER

SHANA R. DAVIS-COOK ROBERT C. GOODWIN, JR. Vice Chair

NANCY E. WATTERS Assistant Treasurer LEGAL COUNSEL

SUELLEN M. FERGUSON DAVID L. WINSTEAD Secretary

LINDA J. WILLARD Board Member

RICHARD M. RUDA Assistant Secretary

Municipality Letter for

Proposed Construction Project

Subject Property: 23 West Irving Street, Chevy Chase MD 20815

Property Owner: Michael and Adena Friedman

Project Manager/Contractor: Clinton & Associates/Sandra Clinton

Proposed Work: Landscaping and architectural changes, including

constructing new walls, patios, fences and plantings

6/23/2020

Diane R. Schwartz Jones, Director

Department of Permitting Services of Montgomery County

255 Rockville Pike, 2nd floor

Rockville, MD 20850

Dear Ms. Jones,

This letter is to inform your department that the above homeowner/contractor has

notified Chevy Chase Village that he or she plans to apply for both county and

municipal permits for the above summarized construction project. Chevy Chase Village

will not issue any municipal building permit(s) for this proposed project until

Montgomery County has issued all necessary county permits and the applicant has

provided Chevy Chase Village with copies of county-approved and stamped plans. We

have advised the homeowner/contractor that a permit from Montgomery County does

not guarantee a permit from this municipality unless the project complies with all our

municipal rules and regulations.

If this homeowner/contractor later applies for an amended county permit, please do not

approve that application until you have received a Municipality Letter from us

indicating that the homeowner/contractor has notified us of that proposed amendment to

the permit.

If you have any questions about this proposed project and the municipal regulation of it

by Chevy Chase Village, do not hesitate to have your staff contact my office. The

Village Permitting Coordinator can be reached by phone at 301-654-7300 or by e-mail

at [email protected].

Sincerely,

Shana R. Davis-Cook

Manager, Chevy Chase Village

23

mailto:[email protected]://www.chevychasevillagemd.gov/mailto:[email protected]

3'-0

"

MIN

.

07/08/2020 20001




© C

OP

YR

IG

HT

C

LIN

TO

N &

A

SSO

CIA

TE

S, P

C 2

02

0

MOCO HISTORIC

AREA WORK

PERMIT


SITE PLAN- 23

WEST IRVING

N

SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

8'0 4'2' 16'

WEST IRVING STREET

23 WEST IRVING

RESIDENCE

SIDE PORCH

LAWN

LAWN

NEW STEPPING STONE

PATH

LAWN

LAWN

EXISTING STAIR, HANDRAILS

AND WALKWAY TO REMAIN

EXISTING STAIR, PORCH

AND HANDRAILS TO REMAIN

EXISTING SIDEWALK

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE

PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREE

PROPOSED SHRUB

EXISTING TREE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPOSED WALL

PROPOSED STEPPING STONE

WALKWAY

LEGEND

EXISTING WALL

PROPOSED GROUND COVER

AND PERENNIAL PLANTING

BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE

D

L200A

STONE STAIR

D

L200A

STONE STAIR

A

L200A


G

L200A

EVERGREEN TREE

PLANTING

F

L200A

DECIDUOUS TREE

PLANTING

E

L200A

NEW PERIMETER FENCE, 6'HT.-

VERTICAL BOARD ON BOARD

A

L200A


I

L200A

PERENNIAL AND


H

L200A

PERENNIAL AND


G

L200A

EVERGREEN TREE

PLANTING

I

L200A

PERENNIAL AND


H

L200A

SHRUB PLANTING

I

L200A

PERENNIAL AND


B

L200A

STONE RETAINING WALL, MATERIALS

AND CONSTRUCTION TO MATCH NEIGHBORING WALLS

AT 16 MAGNOLIA PKWY

E

L200A

TRASH ENCLOSURE FENCING, 42" HT.

VERTICAL BOARD ON BOARD

BS

340.80

TS

341.80

2R

BS

339.00

TS

340.00

TW

337.65

TW

337.65

TW

342.05

TW

340.50

BW

334.65

BW

334.65

TW

337.65

TW

337.65

TW

335.00

BW

332.00

BW

334.75

340.80

340.40

TS

340.50

BS

340.00

1

R

339.50

340.80

340.40

TW

341.14

TW

335.00

333.10

337.40

337.60

340.90

339.10

332.30

338.75PROPOSED ELEVATION

EXISTING ELEVATION337.60

A

L100A

23 WEST IRVING SITE PLAN

A

B

L1

00

A

C

L200A

STONE SEAT WALL

23

W

EST

IR

VIN

G ST

RE

ET

CH

EV

Y C

HA

SE

, M

D 2

08

15

B

L200A

STONE RETAINING WALL, MATERIALS

AND CONSTRUCTION TO MATCH NEIGHBORING WALLS

AT 16 MAGNOLIA PKWY

EXISTING LAWN AND TREE

STRIP PLANTING TO REMAIN

TBR 1

TBR 2

TBR 3

TBR 4

TBR 5

TBR 6

TBR 7

TBR 8

TBR 9

EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED

DOWNSPOUT

1

R

STEP INDICATION (QNTY OF RISERS)

TBR 1

TBR 10

TBR 11

E

L200A

NEW 42'HT. PICKET FENCE

24

PERENNIAL

AND GROUND

COVER

PLANTING

H/ L200A

NEW STONE RETAINING WALL,

MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION

TO MATCH NEIGHBORING WALL AT

16 MAGNOLIA PKWY

B/ L200A

EXISTING

STAIR

AND

HANDRAIL

TO

REMAIN

NEW STONE RETAINING WALL, MATERIALS

AND CONSTRUCTION TO MATCH

NEIGHBORING WALL AT 16 MAGNOLIA

PKWY

B/ L200A

STONE RETAINING

WALL AT 16

MAGNOLIA PKWY

(UNDER SEPARATE

PERMIT

3'-0

"

MA

X.

EXISTING

WALL

3'-0"

MAX

3'-0

"

MA

X.

07/08/2020 20001




© C

OP

YR

IG

HT

C

LIN

TO

N &

A

SSO

CIA

TE

S, P

C 2

02

0

MOCO HISTORIC

AREA WORK

PERMIT


FRONT WALL

ELEVATION- 23

WEST IRVING

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

4'0 2'1' 8'

23 WEST IRVING FRONT WALL ELEVATION

A

PROPERTY LINE

E

L200A

DECIDUOUS TREE

PLANTING

H

L200A


COVER PLANTING

EXISTING

SIDEWALK TO

REMAIN

23 WEST IRVING FRONT WALL SECTION

B SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

4'0 2'1' 8'

E

L200A

DECIDUOUS TREE

PLANTING

H

L200A


COVER PLANTING

B

L200A

NEW STONE RETAINING WALL

TO MATCH NEIGHBORING WALL

AT 16 MAGNOLIA PKWY

H

L200A


COVER PLANTING

EXISTING BRICK

WALKWAY TO REMAIN

EXISTING GRADE

23

W

EST

IR

VIN

G ST

RE

ET

CH

EV

Y C

HA

SE

, M

D 2

08

15

PROPERTY LINE

25

07/08/2020 20001




© C

OP

YR

IG

HT

C

LIN

TO

N &

A

SSO

CIA

TE

S, P

C 2

02

0

MOCO HISTORIC

AREA WORK

PERMIT


23 WEST IRVING

DETAILS


A1" = 1'-0"

STONE RETAINING WALL TO MATCH NEIGHBORING WALL AT 16 MAGNOLIA PKWY

B1" = 1'-0"

FENCING TO MATCH EXISTING, ADJACENT FENCE

EN.T.S.

STONE STAIR

D1" = 1'-0"

DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING

F3/4" = 1'-0"

EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING

G3/4" = 1'-0"

SHRUB PLANTING

H1" = 1'-0"

PERENNIAL AND GROUND COVER PLANTING

I1" = 1'-0"






SIZES VARY

2"2"

4"






SIZES VARY

2"

4"

6"

TRAVERTINE PAVING GRANITE COBBLESTONE PAVING

6"

3X WIDTH OF ROOT BALL DIAMETER

FOR TREE WITH WIRE BASKET AROUND

ROOT BALL, CUT WIRE BASKET IN FOUR

PLACES & FOLD DOWN 12" INTO PLANTING

HOLE

TURN BACK TOP

1

3

OF BURLAP AWAY FROM

TOP OF ROOT BALL & CUT ROPE FROM TOP

OF BALL

2" COMPOSTED SHREDDED PINE BARK MULCH

REMOVE ANY MULCH IN CONTACT WITH THE

CROWN OF THE TREE

ORIENT THE SIDE OF TREE WHICH FACED

NORTH IN THE NURSERY TO FACE NORTH

IN PLANTING AREA

LOOP HOSE ABOVE FIRST SET OF BRANCHES

GUYING SYSTEM: (2) 2" X 2" HARDWOOD

STAKES PER TREE; 2 STRANDS GALVANIZED

WIRE TWISTED FOR SUPPORT; EYESCREW &

TURNBUCKLE;

1

2

" HOSE LOOPS AT TRUNK

PLACE

1

8

OF ROOT BALL ABOVE ADJACENT

FINISHED GRADE

FINISHED GRADE

PREPARED SOIL MIX AS SPECIFIED

REMOVE DEBRIS & EXCESS SOIL FROM TOP OF

ROOT BALL THAT MAY HAVE ACCUMULATED

WHEN BURLAPPED


PLANTING MOUND TO INHIBIT SETTLING

S

L

O

P

E

A

W

A

Y

TEMPORARY SAUCER AROUND TREE

6"

GALVANIZED

STEEL WIRE

ROOT BALL

TREE TRUNK

HARDWOOD

STAKE

SEE PLANT LIST

FOR SPACING

PLAN - TRIANGULAR SPACING

NOT TO SCALE

1/2" O.C. DIMENSION

6" M

IN

.

PREPARED PLANTING SOIL, DEPTH AS

SPECIFIED, TAMP AND WATER WHEN

BACKFILLING AROUND PLANT

1" SHREDDED, COMPOSTED PINE BARK

MULCH. INSTALL PRIOR TO PLANT

INSTALLATION

PRIOR TO BACKFILLING, CUT "POT-BOUND"

ROOTS ON OUTSIDE; REMOVE 25%-50%

OF BARK MIXTURE ON ROOT BALL.

MIX REMOVED CONTAINER MATERIAL

WITH BACKFILL.

EDGE OF BED

PLANT

O.C. DIMENSION

O

.

C

.

D

I

M

E

N

S

I

O

N

TREE TRUNK

HARDWOOD STAKE

GALVANIZED STEEL WIRE

ROOT BALL

PLAN VIEW

TREES WITH WIRE BASKETS

AROUND THE ROOT BALL SHALL

HAVE THE WIRE CUT BACK & FOLDED

DOWN 12" INTO THE PLANTING

HOLE

CUT ROPE AND TURN BACK TOP

1/3 OF BURLAP AWAY FROM

ROOT BALL

BERM SOIL TO DRAIN AWAY

FROM TREE

1" COMPOSTED SHREDDED PINE

BARK MULCH

3 2"x4"x3' HARDWOOD STAKE

REMOVE DEBRIS AND EXCESS SOIL

FROM TOP OF ROOT BALL THAT

MAY HAVE ACCUMULATED WHEN

BURLAPPED


3 PIECES OF REINFORCED

RUBBER HOSE (1 PER WIRE),

BLACK OR DARK BROWN

DOUBLE STRAND OF 12 GUAGE

GALVANIZED WIRE TWISTED,

THREE PER TREE.

PLACE 1/8 OF ROOT

BALL ABOVE ADJACENT

FINISHED GRADE

FINISH GRADE

S

L

O

P

E

A

W

A

Y

12" MIN.

PREPARE PLANTING SOIL

SEE PLANTING PLANS AND

PLANT LIST FOR SPACING

NOTE: FOR CONTAINER STOCK,

PULL POTTING MIX AND ROOT MAT APART

TO DIRECT THE OUTER ROOTS INTO ADJACENT SOIL.

DO NOT LEAVE CIRCLING ROOTS AGAINST ROOT BALL

FINISH GRADE

PLACE TOP 1/8 OF ROOT BALL ABOVE FINISH GRADE

CUT ROPE FROM TOP OF ROOT BALL & TURN

BACK BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL

1" SHREDDED, COMPOSTED PINE BARK MULCH

PLANTING SOIL PREPARED AS SPECIFIED.

TAMP AND WATER WHEN BACKFILLING AROUND PLANT

EXISTING PICKET GATE

EXISTING PICKET FENCING EXISTING SCREEN BORDER FENCING

1

12

2" DIA. SCH. 40 PVC PIPE FOR

WEEPHOLES, 8' O.C., RECESS

BACK 2" FROM FACE OF WALL.

LEAVE 1-1/4" GAP BETWEEN

STONES IN FACE OF WALL FOR

OUTFLOW.

COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO 95%

DENSITY

2" MAX. DIA. DRAINAGE

AGGREGATE CONTINUOUS ALONG

BACK OF WALL. WRAP IN FILTER

FABRIC (MIRAFI 140N) - OVERLAP

JOINTS

CARDEROCK STONE TO MATCH EXISTING

WALLS

TOP STONES NOT LESS THAN 6"

THICK RANGING FROM 12" TO 30"

IN LENGTH - FLUSH MORTAR

JOINTS ON TOP SURFACE

6"

2"

1'-2"

24"

PERENNIAL AND

GROUND COVER

PLANTING

3'-0"

MA

X.

1'-2"

EX STONE WALL

STONE KNEE WALL

C1" = 1'-0"

STONE TO BE CARDEROCK STONE BLEND: ±60%

CARDEROCK PREMIUM SNAPPED VENEER, ±40%

CARDEROCK LARGE BROWN VENEER, CONTRACTOR TO

PROVIDE SAMPLE TO BE APPROVED BY CLIENT AND C&A

PRIOR TO INSTALLATION

UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE AT 98% COMPACTION

24" MIN.

BELOW

GRADE

ADJACENT

PAVING

18"

PLANTING

1'-0"

1'-6"

CONCRETE FOOTING

2'-6" M

IN

.

FILL COMPACTED TO 95% UNDER ENTIRE

STAIR, FOOTINGS, AND SLAB

1

1

2

" TYP.

12" MIN.

12" MIN.

ADJACENT CONDITION, VARIES

#4 @ 12" O.C. EACH WAY (TYP.) AND

AT NOSE OF EACH STEP

2" THICK NATURAL STONE TREADS WITH THERMAL

FINISH AT EXPOSED EDGES. SET RISER AND TREAD

STONE IN 5/8" MORTAR SETTING BED.

6"

1'-2"

STONE CHEEK WALL BEHIND STAIR

HANDRAIL, AS REQUIRED, SEE SITE

PLAN FOR LOCATIONS

#4 DOWELS

@8" O.C. (TYP.)

CARDEROCK STONE RISER TO MATCH WALL

STONE; NO VISIBLE MORTAR JOINTS; MORTAR

COLOR SHALL MATCH STONE

BLUESTONE PAVING

26

Documents

I.H & I.I MONTGOMERY COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION ... › wp-content › uploads › ...West Irving and to replace the slate walkway at 23 West Irving with matching stone paving. Staff