Upload
herlan-flores
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 ijaerv9n6spl_06.pdf
1/8
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research
ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 9, Number 6 (2014) pp. 655-662
Research India Publications
http://www.ripublication.com
Theoretical Analysis of Modified Refrigeration Cycle of a
Single Effect Lithium Bromide-Water Vapour Absorption
System Using Exhaust Gases of IC Engine
Raghvendra Kumar Singh1and Trinath Mahala
2
1
M. Tech (Automobile Engg.), Galgotias University, Greater Noida, U. P2Galgotias University, Greater Noida, U. P
Abstract:
As the utilization of automobiles is increasing, companies are launching their
improved vehicles to fulfill the needs of passengers. Air-conditioning is one of
the essential needs of passengers in vehicles. In an internal combustion engine,
55-60% of total energy of burnt fuels is waste, only 35-39% heat energy isconverted into useful work.
In road transport vapour compression refrigeration system is commonlyused for air conditioning purpose. In this system compressor extracts the
energy from engine, so engine has to do some extra work which results in
increase of fuel consumption.
In this research, LiBr-H2O vapour absorption system driven by exhaust
gases of the engine is used in the automobiles for air-conditioning purpose.
Because of this there is improvement in the engine efficiency and reduction inexhaust emission. The exhaust gases of the engine are used as a heat sources
in the generator thus it avoids the extraction of power from the engine. Forbetter improvement of COP LiBr-H2O vapour absorption cycle is modified. In
this modification, another heat exchanger between evaporator and generator is
incorporated. From the evaporator, 20% of mass of refrigerant flow to thegenerator through this heat exchanger. After this modification it is found that
the maximum COP is increased to 0. 9451 from 0. 7961. Maximum COP is
achieved when generator temperature is 81. 20C, condenser and absorber
temperature are 31. 7C and evaporator temperature is 8. 6C. The COP of the
system is improved by 18. 72%.
Nomenclature
COP coefficient of performance
a absorber
8/10/2019 ijaerv9n6spl_06.pdf
2/8
656 Raghvendra Kumar Singh and Trinath Mahala
Mws mass flow rate of weak solution
c condenser
X mass fraction of LiBr in solutiong generator
Cp1 specific heat of rich LiBr solutione evaporator
Cp2 specific heat of weak LiBr solution
i in
Q heat transfer rate
o out
Cpws specific heat of saturated steam
hn enthalpy at respective point from evaporator
Cpw specific heat of superheated steam represent sum of from generator
n represent state pointsm mass flow rate
Introduction:
Refrigeration and air-conditioning is the most important facility in human comfort in
the modern day. Due to some refrigerant deplete the ozone layer; the interest in
lithium bromide-H2O absorption refrigeration system has been growing. In his system
waste heat or sunlight can be used as energy source.
In automobiles the current air-conditioning system is based on vapourcompression refrigeration system. Due to extraction of the power from the engine bythe compressor, it affects the fuel economy. To improve fuel economy the vapour
absorption system can be used.
Eisa et al.[1]
did an experiment on LiBr-water absorption cooling system and
found that the COP of the system is increases with the increment in generator
temperature and COP is decreased as the condenser and absorber temperatures are
increased. Joudi and Lafta [2]conducted a study on LiBr-H2O cooling machine, for the
analysis of heat and mass transfer processes in the absorber using finite difference
analysis. They had shown that COP and cooling capacity is increased with sourcetemperature. Jason et al. [3]proposed a detailed solution procedure and validated and
shows that the performance of the system evaluated based on the circulation ratiowhich is measured of the system size and cost.
Vapour absorption system description:A systematic representation of simple single effect vapour absorption system is shown
in fig. 1. Vapour absorption consists 8 main components: a generator, a condenser, a
absorber, a evaporator, a pump, 2 throttle valves and a heat exchanger. The working
fluid is LiBr-H2O solution where LiBr used as absorbent and water is used asrefrigerant.
8/10/2019 ijaerv9n6spl_06.pdf
3/8
8/10/2019 ijaerv9n6spl_06.pdf
4/8
658 Raghvendra Kumar Singh and Trinath Mahala
Mass balance
mi = mo (1)
Material balance
moXi = meXo (2)
Energy balanceQ-W= moho-mihi (3)
Where are Q is the heat transfer rate and W is the work transfer rate.
Heat exchanger calculation
1= (T3-Ta) / (Tg-Ta) (4)
T5= Tg-Mws*Cp2* (T3-T2)/ (M4*Cp1) (5)2= (T12-T11)/ (T7-T11) (6)
T7p=T7-M11*Cpw* (T12-T11)/ (M7*Cpws) (7)
Where 1 and 2are the effectiveness of the heat exchanger-1 and heat exchanger-
2 respectively and specific heats of LiBr-H2O solutions are calculated[6]as:
Cp1=A0+A1. Xrich+ (B0+B1. Xrich). Tg (8)Cp2=A0+A1. Xweak+ (B0+B1. Xweak). Ta (9)
Where A0, A1, B0, B1 are constants and the value of these constants are
A0= 3. 462023A1=-2. 679895/100
B0= 1. 3499/1000
B1=-6. 55/10000000
The COP of the system is defined as
COP =
(Assumed pump work Wp= 0) (10)
Assumptions
The thermodynamic analysis presented here is based on these assumptions: The heat losses from the components of the system are negligible.
The refrigerant leaving the condenser and evaporator assumed to be saturated
condition.
Refrigerant leaving generator and absorber are in supersaturated in
equilibrium conditions at their respective temperature, pressure andconcentrations.
There is the negligible pump work.
There are no temperature losses during flow from one component to other.
8/10/2019 ijaerv9n6spl_06.pdf
5/8
8/10/2019 ijaerv9n6spl_06.pdf
6/8
660 Raghvendra Kumar Singh and Trinath Mahala
Effect of variation in absorber & condenser temperatureThe effect of the variation in the absorber & condenser temperatures on the COP is
illustrated in Fig. 3a & 3b. The increment in the absorber temperature, specificcirculation ratio is also increased which increases the generator heat duty and pump
work. The mass flow rate of refrigerant is assumed constant so evaporator load isconstant.
Fig. 3a
Fig. 3b
Fig. 3a Effect of absorber temperature on COP in single effect cycle and Fig. 3b effect
of absorber temperature on COP in modified cycle (Tg=80C, Ta=Tc, 1=0. 7 and
2=0. 1)
Effect of evaporator temperatureFig 4a and 4b show the effect of evaporator temperature on COP. The COP of both
systems increases with increase in evaporator temperature. Evaporator temperaturevaries 4C-10C at different generator and evaporator temperatures.
8/10/2019 ijaerv9n6spl_06.pdf
7/8
Theoretical Analysis of Modified Refrigeration Cycle 661
Fig. 4a
Fig. 4b
Fig. 4a Effect of evaporator temperature on COP in simple cycle and Fig. 4b effect of
absorber temperature on COP in modified cycle (Tg=80C, Ta=Tc, 1=0. 7 and 2=0.
1)
ConclusionsA computer program is developed to compare the performance of simple cycle and
modified refrigeration cycle of single effect vapour absorption system. The various
effects are in variation in absorber, condenser evaporator and generator temperature
on COP. It is shown that an increase in the generator temperature increases the COP
up to an optimum generator temperature. The COP of the modified cycle of single
effect vapour absorption system is nearly 18. 72% greater than simple cycle of LiBr-H2O vapour absorption system. The optimum value of COP is achieved at generator
temperature is 81. 20C, condenser and absorber temperature are 31. 7C and
evaporator temperature is 8. 6C. It is also shown that increase in evaporator
8/10/2019 ijaerv9n6spl_06.pdf
8/8
662 Raghvendra Kumar Singh and Trinath Mahala
temperature increases the COP while increase in absorber and condenser temperature
decreases the COP. The analysis of both cycles proves that the performance of the
modified cycle is higher than simple cycle of LiBr-H2O vapour absorption system.
References
[1] Eisa MAR, Diggory PJ, Holland FA. Experimental studies to determine the
effect of difference in absorber and condenser temperatures on the
performance of a water-lithium bromide absorption cooler. Energy Convers
Manag 1987; 27 (2): 253e9.
[2] Joudi KA, Lafta AH. Simulation of a simple absorption refrigeration system.
Energy Convers Manag 2001; 42 (13): 1575e605.[3] Jason Wonchala, Maxwell Hazledine, Kiari Goni Boulama. Solution
procedure and performance evaluation for a water LiBr absorptionrefrigeration machine. Energy 65 (2014): 272e284
[5] Y. Kaita. Thermodynamic analysis of lithium bromide-water solution at high
temperature. International journal of refrigeration 24 (2001) 374-390