42

IL producers justifiably proud of their

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: IL producers justifiably proud of their
Page 2: IL producers justifiably proud of their

IL producers justifiably proud of their food systems

Page 3: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Livestock systems

Page 4: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Shabonna, IL ca. 1960

Page 5: IL producers justifiably proud of their

…ca. 2000

Page 6: IL producers justifiably proud of their

1960’s: Slotted flooring

Page 7: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Livestock + crops= good combination

Page 8: IL producers justifiably proud of their

“Sustainable Ag”

Page 9: IL producers justifiably proud of their
Page 10: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Nutrient management incentive recognized by industry

Page 11: IL producers justifiably proud of their

U of I Extension tours early

liquid manure systems, Illinois,

early 1960’s

Page 12: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Before flotation tires

and GPS…

Page 13: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Manure storage size reflects industry consolidation

Page 14: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Manure and wastewater application systems

Page 15: IL producers justifiably proud of their

How livestock industry uses nutrient management planning to reduce

nonpoint source pollution 0 What NMP can do for an operation

0 What NMP can do for the environment

Page 16: IL producers justifiably proud of their

What does a Nutrient Management Plan do for a livestock operation?

0 Recognizes and improves fertilizer use of principle plant nutrients and micronutrients in manure

0 Protects environment, especially water quality

0 Provides a structured base for discussion of management practices between the producer and other interested parties

Page 18: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Plan, Performance, and Protection

0 The Plan tells about your operation and what you expect to do

0 The Performance is the record of what you did. This includes annual updates.

Page 19: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Page

Plan, Performance, and Protection

0 The Protection is thinking through how to respond to emergencies

0 All acceptable manure nutrient management plans have these features! (And the CNMP† has others).

†NRCS Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan

Page 20: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Step 2.

General facility

info

Step 3.

Facility/

production

area info

Step 4.

Manure

storage

info

Step 6.

Fields info

Step 11.

Manure storage

and

stormwater

inspection

Step 5.

Manure

sampling

records

Step 6.

Field

inspection

records

Step 7. Manure

lease agreements

Step 8.

Proven yields

Step 14. Emergency response plan

Step 1.

Collect your

information

and begin

PL

AN

P

ER

FO

RM

AN

CE

PROTECTION

Page 1 of 2

Page 21: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Step 12.

Records of

manure

application

Step 10.

Planned field

application

summary

Step 13.

Manure

application

equipment

calibration

Step 14. Emergency response plan

Step 9.

Crop rotation

plan Deliver finished plan

Current records

PE

RF

OR

MA

NC

E

PROTECTION

PL

AN

Page 2 of 2

Page 22: IL producers justifiably proud of their

What are the challenges to implementing nutrient management plans?

0 Logistical and technical

0 Regulatory

0 Educational

Speed v. rate chart

Maps

Technology

Page 23: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Nutrient management planning: Why, who cares, etc.

0 State and national regulations

0 Federal Clean Water Act, Federal EPA and CAFO regulation

0 IL EPA Title 35 Subtitle E, Agriculture Related Pollution, Parts 501, 502, 506, 560, 570, & 580

0 Livestock Management Facilities Act and Rules Waste Management Plan section 8 IAC Code 900

0 Federal incentive program requirement

0 Environmental Quality Incentives Program

Page 24: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Nutrient management planning: Why, who cares, etc.

0 Facility size based

0 Generally, all “large† operations” are required to have a formal nutrient management plan

0 UI Extension advises all livestock operations to make and maintain a plan, with the same basic structure as used for “large”

†There are at least three different agency definitions of “large” livestock operations in Illinois.

Page 25: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Nutrient management planning: Why, who cares, etc.

0 Ag stormwater exemption requirement

0 Protection is provided for those operating under a recognized nutrient management plan

Page 26: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Nutrient management planning: Why, who cares, etc.

0 Federal EPA CAFO Rules CFR 122.23 e). (1) For unpermitted Large CAFOs, a precipitation-related discharge of manure, litter, or process wastewater from land areas under the control of a CAFO shall be considered an agricultural stormwater discharge only where the manure, litter, or process wastewater has been land applied in accordance with site-specific nutrient management practices that ensure appropriate agricultural utilization of the nutrients in the manure, litter, or process wastewater, as specified in § 122.42(e)(1)(vi) through (ix).

Page 27: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Nutrient management planning: Why, who cares, etc.

0 (2) Unpermitted Large CAFOs must maintain documentation specified in § 122.42(e)(1)(ix) either on site or at a nearby office, or otherwise make such documentation readily available to the Director or Regional Administrator upon request.

Page 28: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Regulatory and practical arenas: Disparity?

0 Setbacks and how to protect them

0 Conflict between application rate constraints:

0 nitrogen and phosphorus “agronomic rates”

0 conservation compliance

Page 29: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Regulatory and practical arenas: Disparity?

0 Manure application timing and methods, and being a good neighbor (contrast with commercial fertilizer applications)

Page 30: IL producers justifiably proud of their

How livestock producers avoid nonpoint source pollution: Good planning

Page 31: IL producers justifiably proud of their

How livestock producers avoid nonpoint source pollution: Good technology

Page 32: IL producers justifiably proud of their

How livestock producers avoid nonpoint source pollution: Good operation

Page 33: IL producers justifiably proud of their

How livestock producers avoid nonpoint source pollution: Good education

Page 34: IL producers justifiably proud of their

How livestock producers avoid nonpoint source pollution: Good records

Page 35: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Technology: Soil injection of liquid manure

Page 36: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Technology: Field research based

0 RUSLE2 soil erosion model

0 P, N risk assessments to drive application methods, timing, rates, placement

Page 37: IL producers justifiably proud of their

NMP and technology

0 Mobile Apps

0 GPS-aided application

0 Variable rate manure application equipment

Page 38: IL producers justifiably proud of their

NMP and technology

0 Towed-hose applicators

0 Nurse tanks

Page 39: IL producers justifiably proud of their

NMP and technology

0 Cover crops for N management and erosion control

0 Buffer strips and contour tillage

0 Tile drainage management

Photo: Mike Plummer, UI Ext. (ret.)

Page 40: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Quick quiz: Nutrient management example

0 Situation:

0 Beef producer with a slotted floor barn, 1200 head capacity, wants to apply liquid manure product to cropland

0 Time: October

0 Place: field that will have corn planted next spring, 200 bu/ac average

0 Regulation: apply at the “agronomic rate”, nitrogen or phosphorus based

0 What rate of manure application does he use?

Page 41: IL producers justifiably proud of their

What the livestock producer community would like to see happen

0 Evolution in regulatory constraints 0 Performance based rather than overly

prescriptive 0 Example: extra setback rules

0 Help with research and technology 0 Ag research is pathetically under-funded by

Federal partners 0 On-the-go manure nutrient

sensing>automatic application rate adjustment

0 Regulatory parity between principally livestock producing and strictly crop producing operations

Page 42: IL producers justifiably proud of their

Summary 0 Livestock industry has the will and incentive to use

nutrient management planning for water quality protection

0 Regulatory framework holds livestock producers to a different standard than other ag sectors (crops)

0 Technological challenges are gradually being overcome

0 Ag research $$ needed