Upload
nitsa
View
53
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Image Subtraction. or. Peter Nugent(LBNL/UCB). If I Could R edo E verything A gain for PTF, T his I s W hat I Would D o. Peter Nugent(LBNL/UCB). Things to Know. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Image SubtractionImage Subtraction
Peter Nugent(LBNL/UCB)Peter Nugent(LBNL/UCB)
or....or....
If I Could Redo If I Could Redo Everything Again for Everything Again for PTF, This Is What I PTF, This Is What I
Would Do...Would Do...
Peter Nugent(LBNL/UCB)Peter Nugent(LBNL/UCB)
Things to KnowThings to Know Understand the instrument and changes to it - de-trending is
key to getting off to a good start: talk to the instrument scientists!
NEVER be happy with what you have: Speed/turn-around Types of db queries References Catalogs (stars, galaxies, etc.)
Know what science the collaboration would like to achieve: Try to accommodate everything from start Be flexible enough to adapt mid-way Always look for new scientific opportunities Learn their science
Do not mix image subtraction with other parts of pipelineiPTF Summer School
You do not need to visit the observatory!
I have processed ~1PB of data (20M ccd chips) between Palomar-QUEST and PTF. I did not have to go to the mountain, the mountain came to me...
PTF PipelinePTF Pipeline
50-100 GBs/night
iPTF Summer School
Image SubtractionImage Subtraction
iPTF Summer School
There are two types of image subtraction and they should not be confused – ever:
Real-Time Goal is to identify transients Photometry should be good, but does not have
to be perfect – in principle it can not be
Final Photometry Good enough to write a paper on cosmology Strives for perfection Major advantage: You know where the object
is... zoom in, pick your calibration stars, make perfect references, etc.
What is out thereWhat is out there
iPTF Summer School
hotpants – by Andy BeckerHigh Order Transform of PSF ANd Template Subtraction
http://www.astro.washington.edu/users/becker/v2.0/hotpants.html
There are a few variants (and you will hear more about one tomorrow) but they all have the same form:
Make a reference image Align and convolve with a new image Perform a subtraction Identify the candidates
hotpantshotpants
iPTF Summer School
hotpants -inim ${new} –hki -n i -c t -tmplim ${refremap} -outim ${sub} -tu ${template_saturation} -iu ${new_sturation} -tl ${template_lower} -il ${input_lower} -r ${2.5*seeing} -rss ${6.0*seeing} -tni ${refremapnoise} -ini ${newnoise} -imi ${submask} -nsx ${nsx} -nsy ${nsy}
hki : verbose output-c t : convolve to template-n i : normalize imagensx & nsy : size of regions within image (128X128 pixels ~ 2.5’)submasks: are key to getting things right (bad pixels kill)
I used the standard 3 gaussian & 6 degree polynomial for the kernel. No need to do more or less.
ReferenceReference
iPTF Summer School
Ideally the reference comes from one image, contributes no noise in the subtraction, and is of comparable seeing.
Nothing is ideal:
PTF had a dead chip. Pointing was atrocious, became ~1’ after
improvements Took ~3 months to obtain images from each field
that could make up a good reference Photometric calibration was USNO B1 catalog! Constantly made an effort to make better
reference images during the survey
Settled on ~7 images, best seeing (but not undersampled) to make reference on a PTF field/chip basis: depth, area & bad pix.
NewNew
iPTF Summer School
Don’t settle for having the survey forced down your throat, complain when things are going wrong!
Demand that fits header keywords are right, say for example the FILTER: this separates you from them
Know what the pointing/survey strategy is ahead of time (hitting M31 30 times in one night causes problems if you are not prepared for it)
Don’t bother with subtractions when they are not needed (|galactic latitude| < 10)
Everything is relative, treat the references as gold for photometric and astrometric calibration. Work out differences with the universe later (HST guide stars, absolute photometric calibration, etc.)
New- Ref = SubNew- Ref = Sub
iPTF Summer School
moon
This will always be a needle in a haystack problem.
New Image Reference Image Subtraction
New- Ref = SubNew- Ref = Sub
iPTF Summer School
Per image we would have ~250 5-σ detections. We would require 2
independent detections.
Use Machine Learning to get rid of the crap... Do not attempt to make the perfect subtraction!
Up to 300 images taken per night ~
1000 sq. deg.
PTF Sky CoveragePTF Sky CoverageReferences were made for ~20000 sq.deg. in R-band (minimum 7 minutes w/ seeing < 3.0” and limiting magnitude > 19.9).
iPTF Summer School
iPTF Summer School
• Hopper (N6): Cray XE6 Opteron w/ 153,216 cores
• Edison (N7): Cray XC30 Intel Ivy Bridge w/ 133,824 cores
• Cori (N8) will be one of the first large Intel KNL systems and will have unique data capabilities. 9,300 single-socket nodes with 60 cores per node and burst buffer (NVRAM) for the entire memory footprint.
• NERSC has a Global Filesystem which is viewable from all compute systems (40GB/s). Very high-speed local scratch space on each of the big-irons (168 GB/s)
• 240 PB tape archive
• Data Transfer nodes using ESnet
• Science Gateway and Database nodes for access outside NERSC
Access though general DOE-HEP call for compute time at NERSC.
3B cpu hrs / year
NERSCNERSC
iPTF Summer School
Why NERSCWhy NERSC• Why buy the cow, when you get the milk for free?
• You always want ~10X the compute you need to run a single night on hand at any time to catch up (network, shutdowns, new refs, etc.)
• The subtractions are the source of all complaints, whether they are justified or not.
– Where are my fields from last night?
– How come it is taking so long to see the subs?
– What is my SN/CV/GRB doing now?
Thus you don’t want computing to be one of them. NERSC operates 24/7 with staff on-call for issues that come up round the clock. As PTF was special, 100 khrs/yr but real-time, we were granted special privileges. Special queues, db’s, global disk space, etc. On average there are 3-4 shutdowns per year: all moved to full moon since 2009.
PipelinePipeline
NERSC GLOBAL FILESYSTEM250TB (170TB used)
DataTransferNodes
ScienceGatewayNode 2
ScienceGatewayNode 1
Observatory PTF Collaboration
via Web
Processing/db
Carver
Subtractions
iPTF Summer School
iPTF Summer School
• Chose a Postgres db with q3c for spatial queries• Based on studies comparing Oracle, mysql and
postgres• Runs at NERSC on their scidb nodes: 32-core nodes
on a ZFS filesystem• This currently houses the iPTF database which has
over ~3M images and ~1.5B detections which are queried in real-time 24/7.
ZFS is a combined file system and logical volume manager designed by Sun Microsystems. The features of ZFS include protection against data corruption, support for high storage capacities, efficient data compression, integration of the concepts of filesystem and volume management, snapshots and copy-on-write clones, continuous integrity checking and automatic repair, RAID-Z and native NFSv4 ACLs.
PTF dbPTF db
iPTF Summer School
q3cq3cQ3C is the plugin for PostgreSQL database, designed for working with large astronomical catalogs or any catalogs of objects on the sphere. Q3C allows you to perform fast circular, elliptical or polygonal searches on the sphere as well as perform fast positional cross-matches and nearest neighbor queries. Similar to htm (Hierarchical Triangular Mesh).
The ideas behind Q3C are described in Koposov et al. (2006)
PTF DatabasePTF Database
iPTF Summer School
PTF DatabasePTF Database
All in 851 nights. An image is an individual chip (~0.7 sq. deg.)The database reached 1 TB.
R-band g-band
images 1.82M 305k
subtractions
1.52M 146k
references 29.2k 6.3k
Candidates
890M 197M
Transients 42945 3120
Turn-aroundTurn-around
What does “real-time” subtractions really mean?
In the last 2 years of PTF, for 95% of the nights all images are processed, subtractions are run, candidates are put into the database and the local universe script is run in < 1hr after observation.
Median turn-around is 30m.
2012-07-06
iPTF Summer School
iPTF Summer School
Palomar 48”
Telescope
Palomar 48”
Telescope
SDSC to ESNETSDSC to ESNET
Astrometric SolutionAstrometric Solution
Reference Image
Creation
Reference Image
Creation
Image Processing
/ Detrending
Image Processing
/ Detrending
Star/Asteroid Rejection
Star/Asteroid Rejection
Image Subtractio
n
Image Subtractio
n
Nightly Image
Stacking
Nightly Image
Stacking
Transient CandidateTransient Candidate
Real-Bogus ML
Screening
Real-Bogus ML
Screening
HPWREN Microwave
Relay
HPWREN Microwave
Relay
NERSC Data Transfer
Node
NERSC Data Transfer
Node
Scanning Page
Scanning Page
Wake Me Up – Real Time
Trigger
Wake Me Up – Real Time
Trigger
Web UI MarshalWeb UI Marshal
Outside Telescope Follow-up
Outside Telescope Follow-up
Outside Database for Triggers
Outside Database for Triggers
40 Minutes
40 Minutes
Computing – I/O
Computing – I/O
Heavy DB
Access
Heavy DB
Access
Networking Data
Transfer
Networking Data
Transfer
500 GB/night
100 TBs of Reference Imaging
1.5B objects in DB
Real-TimeTrigger
Publish to Web
iPTF Summer School
Future SurveysFuture Surveys
ZTF (46 deg.2) iPTF (7.2deg.2)
Telescope AΩ
iPTF/PTF 8.7
DES 11.7
ZTF 42.6
LSST 82.2
ZTF image processing will be more challenging as the goal will be to do everything even faster and it is 12
times more data.
Parallel Parallel Processing/SubtractionsProcessing/Subtractions
All computers will have many cores, and the same All computers will have many cores, and the same amount of memory, 2+ years from now (10-100).amount of memory, 2+ years from now (10-100).
Current pipelines work at the level of one ccd chip Current pipelines work at the level of one ccd chip per core – this will fail in the future.per core – this will fail in the future.
Need to parallelize all aspects of the pipeline Need to parallelize all aspects of the pipeline where possible. Threading is easy for most of this, where possible. Threading is easy for most of this, keeping things in memory where possible is ideal:keeping things in memory where possible is ideal: Astrometric catalogs matchingAstrometric catalogs matching Bad pixel masks, CR’sBad pixel masks, CR’s Flats, biases, masks, etc.Flats, biases, masks, etc. Asteroid rejection (verification)Asteroid rejection (verification) Comparison with historical transientsComparison with historical transients
iPTF Summer School
iPTF Summer School
Bottlenecks…crude Bottlenecks…crude vsvs. . realreal
time
bri
gh
tness
5- data in db
iPTF Summer School
Conclusions - FutureConclusions - Future
LSST - 15TB data/nightOnly one 30-m telescope