Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Impacts of single and repeated glyphosate herbicide applications on plant community diversity in
an Alberta spruce plantation
Phil Comeau1, Erin Fraser2 and Susan Humphries1
1Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
2Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Edmonton, Canada
Outline
• Background • Project Objectives • Methods • Results • Conclusions • Acknowledgements
2
Background
• Alberta operates under a Sustainable Forest Management system.
• Forest operators are required to fully reforest every harvested opening.
• Generally, operators are expected to regenerate the forest type that was removed.
3
Background
• Alberta reforestation standards mandate two assessments to evaluate reforestation success: – 4 – 8 years post-harvest; and – 11 – 14 years post-harvest.
4
Photo: Marty O’Byrne
• The first assessment is the first and best opportunity to identify any early issues. Evaluates: – Site occupancy; – Species composition; and – Seedling height.
Background • If early reforestation assessment identifies:
– Too few trees – Undesirable species composition – Trees are too short
• Follow-up action is required. • Several options available, depending on the
issue and management objectives.
5 http://srs4158clemson.blogspot.ca/2012_05_01_archive.html Photo: Marty O’Byrne
Background
• Re-treatment could include implementing a vegetation management program.
6
Background
• Herbicide is a common tool used to control competitive vegetation.
• Herbicide usage in Alberta:
7
Background
• Two of the most common vegetation species that compete with coniferous seedlings:
8
Trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides)
Marsh reed grass (Calamagrostis canadensis)
Background
• Herbicide has been shown to be effective for reducing the cover of broadleaved trees, shrubs, herbs and grass.
• However, questions remain:
9
– Alberta-specific results?
– Impacts of application timing?
– Longer-term (>10 yr.) plant community impacts?
– Impacts of one vs. two applications? Photo: Marty O’Byrne
Project Objectives
• Examine the longer-term effects of herbicide (glyphosate) application timing and frequency on: – Plant community diversity and development; – Trembling aspen density and size; and – Planted white spruce survival and growth.
10
Methods • Four cutblocks harvested in winter 2003/2004. • Planted in July 2004 with white spruce. • Mesic-subhygric soil moisture. • Medium-rich soil nutrient regime.
11
• Sites near Calling Lake, Alberta
Methods
• Four treatments: 1. Untreated (control). 2. Herbicide in first growing season after harvesting. 3. Herbicide in third growing season after harvesting. 4. Herbicide in both the second and fourth growing
seasons after harvesting.
12
• All herbicide treatments were aerially applied glyphosate at a rate of 2.1 kg active ingredient per hectare.
Methods
• Randomized Incomplete Block Design. • Each of four treatments replicated 3 – 5 times
across the four harvested areas. • Treatment plots at least 100 x 200 m. • One 30 x 30 m measurement plot established
in a representative area near the centre of each treatment plot.
13
Methods
Measurements were completed in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2008, and 2014.
14
Vegetation assessment in quadrant 1 Four – 3.99m radius tree plots 36 repeatedly measured planted white spruce
Species Richness (2014)
15
P=0.1766
Species Diversity (2014)
16
P=0.0305
b a b b
Species Composition
• Some differences in vegetation community composition were observed among treatments.
• Major differences were:
17
Paper birch (Betula papyrifera)
Cover
Trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) Cover & frequency
Woodland horsetail (Equisetum sylvaticum) Cover & frequency
Marsh Reed Grass Cover
18
Trembling Aspen Cover
19
Trembling Aspen Height (2014)
20
a b ab b
P=0.0078
Trembling Aspen Density (2014)
21
a c b c
P
White Spruce Survival (2014)
22
P=0.2480
White Spruce Height (2014)
23
P=0.7400
White Spruce Diameter (2014)
24
P=0.0531
b b ab a
MGM Yield Forecasts – Age 90
25 http://www.rr.ualberta.ca/Research/MixedwoodGrowthModel.aspx
164.9
3.1 68.6
200.8 295
246.9
299 340
Untreated Control
26
Treated in Third Growing Season
27
Treated in Second + Fourth Growing Seasons
28
Conclusions
• Herbicide did not reduce vegetation species richness or diversity. But – some changes to vegetation community composition were observed.
• Herbicide application significantly reduced trembling aspen cover, height and density. No long-term impact to marsh reed grass cover.
• White spruce height and diameter were highest in areas treated twice.
• Herbicide can be a useful forest management tool, especially where the goal is to accelerate the development of a spruce stand type.
29
Acknowledgements
• Funding was provided by: – Alberta Forest Products Association – Alberta Agriculture and Forestry
• Treatment application was supervised by Vanderwell Contractors.
30
31
Thank you….Questions?
Impacts of single and repeated glyphosate herbicide applications on plant community diversity in an Alberta spruce plantationOutlineBackgroundBackgroundBackgroundBackgroundBackgroundBackgroundBackgroundProject ObjectivesMethodsMethodsMethodsMethodsSpecies Richness (2014)Species Diversity (2014) Species CompositionMarsh Reed Grass CoverTrembling Aspen CoverTrembling Aspen Height (2014)Trembling Aspen Density (2014)White Spruce Survival (2014)White Spruce Height (2014)White Spruce Diameter (2014)MGM Yield Forecasts – Age 90Untreated ControlTreated in Third Growing SeasonTreated in Second + Fourth Growing SeasonsConclusionsAcknowledgementsThank you….Questions?