19
Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works? What Counts? Evaluation Results Azadeh Khalili October 5, 2011 1

Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works? What Counts?

  • Upload
    cybele

  • View
    75

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works? What Counts?. Evaluation Results Azadeh Khalili October 5, 2011. Table of Contents. Evaluation Overview Quick Snapshot of Participant Ratings Results from the Morning Session Results from the Afternoon Breakout Sessions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

1

Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works? What Counts?

Evaluation Results

Azadeh KhaliliOctober 5, 2011

Page 2: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

2

Table of Contents

1. Evaluation Overview 2. Quick Snapshot of Participant Ratings3. Results from the Morning Session4. Results from the Afternoon Breakout

Sessions5. Considerations and Implications for Next

Steps

Page 3: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

3

Evaluation Overview• AECF evaluation forms measured extent to which convening achieved 5

desired results:1. Understand how language access contributes to achieving agency’s mission2. Identify strategies and action steps to move language access forward3. Connect with colleagues from other agencies to learn and share ideas4. Use knowledge, skills, and networks gained today to strengthen my language access

work5. Know who to contact for TA going forward

• Also asked: 1. Effectiveness of morning speakers and roundtable discussions2. What participants found useful3. What would have been more useful4. Other comments

• Separate evaluations of morning session (116 respondents) and afternoon breakouts (77 respondents)

Page 4: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

4

Snapshot of Participant Ratings:The Convening Was Productive Use of Time

Concurrent Afternoon Breakout Session B

Concurrent Afternoon Breakout Session A

Morning Session

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

strongly agree agree neutraldisagree strongly disagree

Page 5: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

5

Results from the Morning Session

Page 6: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

6

Results of Morning Session

Understanding of LA & Agency Mission

Identified Strategies and Action Steps

Know Who to Contact for TA

Roundtable Discussions Enhanced Thinking

The Speakers Enhanced My Thinking

Will Use Knowledge, Skills, and Networks

Connected With Colleagues

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

strongly agree agree neutraldisagree strongly disagree

Page 7: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

7

What was most useful about the morning?

Note: Relative size of words reflects how often they were mentioned in participant responses.

Page 8: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

8

What would have made the morning more useful?

Note: Relative size of words reflects how often they were mentioned in participant responses.

Page 9: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

9

Additional comments from the morning session…

Note: Relative size of words reflects how often they were mentioned in participant responses.

Page 10: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

10

Results from Afternoon Breakout Sessions

Page 11: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

11

Aggregate Results of Afternoon Breakout Sessions

Learned New Skills to Move LA Forward

Connected with Colleagues

Helped Refine Action Plan

Productive Use of Time

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

strongly agree agree neutraldisagree strongly disagree

Helped Refine Action Plan

Connected with Colleagues

Learned New Skills to Move LA Forward

Productive Use of Time

Session A (n=76)

Session B (n=64)

Page 12: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

12

Results of Each Breakout Session

Monitoring and Evaluating Plans B (n=24)

Interpretation: Outside Vendors A (n=10)

Monitoring and Evaluating Plans A (n=19)

Best Practices in Contracting B (n=10)

Interpretation: Testing & Training A (n=16)

Interpretation: Testing & Training B (n=18)

Best Practices in Contracting A (n=10)

Interpretation: Outside Vendors B (n=9)

Meeting Translation Needs A (n=20)

Meeting Translation Needs B (n=3)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

strongly agree agree neutraldisagree strongly disagree

* Results are the aggregate responses for the 3 desired results: learned new skills; helped refine action plan; and connected with colleagues.

Page 13: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

13

Results of Concurrent Breakout #1:Meeting Your Agency’s Translation Needs

Productive Use of Time

Connected with Colleagues

Helped Refine Action Plan

Learned New Skills to Move LA Forward

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

strongly agree agree neutraldisagree strongly disagree

Productive Use of Time

Connected with Colleagues

Helped Refine Action Plan

Learned New Skills to Move LA Forward

Session A (n=20)

Session B (n=3)

Page 14: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

14

Results of Concurrent Breakout #2:Interpretation Testing and Training

Productive Use of Time

Connected with Colleagues

Helped Refine Action Plan

Learned New Skills to Move LA Forward

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

strongly agree agree neutraldisagree strongly disagree

Productive Use of Time

Connected with Colleagues

Helped Refine Action Plan

Learned New Skills to Move LA Forward

Session A (n=16)

Session B (n=18)

Page 15: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

15

Results of Concurrent Breakout #3:Interpretation Using Outside Vendors

Productive Use of Time

Connected with Colleagues

Helped Refine Action Plan

Learned New Skills to Move LA Forward

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

strongly agree agree neutraldisagree strongly disagree

Productive Use of Time

Connected with Colleagues

Helped Refine Action Plan

Learned New Skills to Move LA Forward

Session A (n=10)

Session B (n=9)

Page 16: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

16

Results of Concurrent Breakout #4:Best Practices in Contracting

Productive Use of Time

Connected with Colleagues

Helped Refine Action Plan

Learned New Skills to Move LA Forward

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

strongly agree agree neutraldisagree strongly disagree

Productive Use of Time

Connected with Colleagues

Helped Refine Action Plan

Learned New Skills to Move LA Forward

Session A (n=10)

Session B (n=10)

Page 17: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

17

Results of Concurrent Breakout #5:Monitoring and Evaluation

Productive Use of Time

Connected with Colleagues

Helped Refine Action Plan

Learned New Skills to Move LA Forward

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

strongly agree agree neutraldisagree strongly disagree

Productive Use of Time

Connected with Colleagues

Helped Refine Action Plan

Learned New Skills to Move LA Forward

Session A (n=19)

Session B (n=24)

Page 18: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

18

Comments from afternoon breakout sessions

Note: Relative size of words reflects how often they were mentioned in participant responses.

Page 19: Implementing Language Access Plans: What Works?  What Counts?

19

Considerations and Implications for Next Steps• Design team set very ambitious goals for a single day

with a large, heterogeneous group• High demand among participants for continued

engagement:1. Examples of DOJ-approved LAPs2. Peer learning from federal agencies linked to specific

elements/challenges of their own LAPs3. More intentional networking (eg, all law-enforcement, mix-max from

multiple agencies) with more choice of content4. Responsive to concerns re: logistics (eg, room, handouts, etc)

• Opportunities to leverage greater role for federal LA task force members