Upload
julius-owen
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Improving Learning Outcomes with Interactive Whiteboards
Don PasseySenior Research Fellow
Department of Educational Research
Lancaster University
“Preparing lessons for use on an interactive whiteboard means that lesson preparation is focused on how pupils learn, rather than on what needs to be taught.”
How can interactive whiteboard use be focused to improve outcomes?
Sources (over a 4 year research period): Two year study of 14 schools using a year 7
complete subject curriculum designed for use on interactive whiteboards (RM Mathsalive)
One year study of pupil motivation arising from uses of ICT (DfES)
Two year study of e-learning developments in schools across a regional broadband consortium (RBC)(WMNet and its 14 LEAs)
What sort of learning outcomes would you want?
Would you want this – example 1?
92% of all pupils indicated they enjoyed using computers at school.
87% indicated they thought their computer skills had increased.
87% indicated they enjoyed using computers at home.
86% indicated they enjoyed using the interactive whiteboard.
85% indicated more use of technology than the previous year.
75% indicated that mathematical games helped them to remember.
73% indicated the interactive whiteboard resources made mathematics easier.
73% indicated they understood most things in mathematics lessons.
72% indicated they could answer questions more easily.
70% indicated interest in use of graphical calculators.
69% indicated more interest in mathematics than in the previous year.
64% indicated more enjoyment of school than the previous year.
61% indicated they learned from the video.
60% indicated they discussed mathematics more than in the previous year.
Responses from 425 year 7 pupils, from across 14 schools
Or would you want this – example 2?
Question
Level of difference by the end of the
year
I enjoy school. -0.41
Mathematics is my favourite subject at school -0.37
I enjoy doing mathematics homework more than homework in other subjects. -0.30
Worksheets make mathematics easy. -0.23
I like mathematics. -0.20
I understand most things in mathematics lessons. -0.15
I enjoy using computers at school. -0.15
Mathematics lessons give me more ideas of how to do mathematics. -0.10
Matched responses from 264 matched year 7 pupils, showing the decrease in attitudes towards certain aspects of school, teaching and learning from across the group, between Autumn Term 2001 and Summer Term 2002
These results came from the same schools, and the same teachers. The results came from successive year groups, and the results were largely consistent across the 14 schools involved So what was the difference?
The system developed: was a complete curriculum able to be delivered by teachers through the use of interactive
whiteboards provided a range of resources video introductions to topics mental and oral starters main activities worksheets and activity sheets games homework activities
An analysis of lessons observed during each half term of use of the resources showed how teachers were using the lesson time available at each stage:
a great deal of time was spent on the main activities (which were largely whole class teaching sessions) in the first term
mental starter and group activities accounted for the next largest proportions of time
the amount of time spent on classroom administration seemed to be high, but at least some teachers found ways to ensure that useful activities were occurring during this time
time spent on reviews and plenary sessions accounted for only about the same amount of time that was spent on classroom administration
Different forms of ICT were used
Resource Total time used in lessons in minutes during the first term
Percentage
Total time used in lessons in minutes during the first half of the second term
Percentage
Total time used in lessons in minutes during the second half of the second term
Percentage
Interactive whiteboard
395 59.4 317 45.16 269 46.54
Computers 163 24.51 120 17.09 51 8.82
Worksheets 84 12.63 248 35.33 244 42.21
Graphical calculators
23 3.46 17 2.42 14 2.42
Total 665 100 702 100 578 100
It was clear that: the level of use of interactive whiteboards was
high in the first term use of computers was at a higher level than that of
worksheets the substantial changes by the second half of the
second term were that the levels of use of the interactive whiteboard were beginning to decrease, the levels of computer use had decreased substantially, and the amounts of worksheet use had increased substantially
Observations in the lessons identified the forms of pupil interaction occurring:
pupils were engaged in high levels of listening, but also that they were engaged in response to teacher questions at a high level during the first term
the levels of writing and working on worksheets were initially lower
the resources were shifting pupil interactions away from the dominant use of worksheets and writing towards responding to teacher questions verbally
the substantial change during the later half terms was concerned with the amount of time using worksheets, which was greater
the amount of time listening, responding to teachers questions verbally and writing notes was lower as a consequence
Forms of teacher interaction used initially were identified
Form of teacher interaction Total maximum times spent in lessons in minutes in the first term
Percentage
Questioning and stimulating responses
290 38.62
Instructing 95 12.65
Monitoring 219 29.16
Presenting 20 2.66
Explaining 127 16.91
Total 751 100
This analysis indicated that: high levels of teacher time were spent in
questioning, stimulating responses and monitoring pupils while they worked
lower levels of time were spent in given instructions and presenting
teaching was more of a focus than instruction
Classroom management and planning were clearly essential:
the use of the resources and the interactive whiteboard were leading to improved planning at early stages
at later stages planning was less focused and less detailed
it relied more upon ‘teacher wit’ than ‘planned interaction’
the movement observed was concerned with a shift from ‘planned interaction’ to ‘covering content’
Teachers’ approaches latterly meant that: Pupils had been less directly involved in the use of
interactive whiteboards Teachers had used interactive whiteboards
increasingly for presentational purposes Less kinaesthetic and visual approaches to stimulate
learning engagement had been involved There had been more use of text-based resources
and writing in exercise books The use of resources had moved from often being
the key resource to that of a resource integrated with others (often largely book or text based)
Teaching approaches had shifted during the course of the trial in the second year
Type of teaching approach Total amount of use (in minutes) Percentage
Discussion, questions and answers 540 34
Writing in books or on paper 526 33
Interactive whiteboard for presentation 350 22
Interactive whiteboard for verbal responses 251 16
Interactive whiteboard used by pupils 70 4
Worksheets completed 67 4
Computer use with pairs of pupils 60 4
Physical resources, such as dice 34 2
Graphical calculators 19 1
Video 16 1
OHP 11 1
Total 1607 100
Teacher discussion (in nearly 50% of cases with use of an interactive whiteboard to stimulate or form a background to that discussion), writing in books and on paper, and the uses of interactive whiteboards for presentation purposes and as a background to discussion, constituted the majority of use
Pre-preparation and planning were focused and
key issues at the earlier stages: What to present How to present it How it would engage pupils and learning
Why do pupils feel that interactive whiteboards help them? (the things that will make the difference)
School exemplar 1 School exemplar 2
Pupil responses are given in the tables
Classroom practice examples following the tables
The school is in the bottom 5% of areas of social deprivationThere is an interactive whiteboard in every areaThere is a full set-up in each area, including speakers, for composition, and for playing musicTeachers have access to Espresso, Granada Learning, and ICT AliveSome staff modify resource for use on interactive whiteboards to support interactive use
The school has 720 pupils, is 3 form entry with 23 classesIn 1998 ICT was identified as an Ofsted needAn NGfL grant funded a dedicated ICT suite, with 1 hour per week per class from year 1By 2003 there was an interactive whiteboard in every classroom including the nursery and reception areasUse varies, with nursery and year R involved in a lot of 'touching' use, and older pupils using on-line learning, video, animation, etc.Espresso and Easiteach are available to teachersAll staff have laptopsAll staff plan using ICT
Engagement and attention span Interactive whiteboard features
Year 2 pupil responses
Year 4 pupil responses
Year 5 pupil responses
Year 6 pupil responses
It engages over a long time period
Use it a great deal
Used a lot Had it for about 2½ years and not getting bored with it
It can engage pupils through the forms of game activities that are not available in other ways
It can be used for games as well as looking at information (dot-to-dot game)
Like games on Espresso
Attention is drawn to it
Variety is enhanced
Variety is important, games, tests, words, pictures, changes
In a year 6 class, the teacher brings up a test paper on the interactive whiteboard, and enlarges it so pupils can read it
It is left on the screen while the teacher asks questions and discusses teeth
Pupils focus their attention forward, rather than having to look down at a paper and then up at the teacher
Direct pupil use and interaction
Interactive whiteboard features
Year 2 pupil responses
Year 4 pupil responses
Year 5 pupil responses
Year 6 pupil responses
It can be used by pupils as well as for teaching
It is used in turns or in groups
Take use in turn
In a Year 3 class, the interactive whiteboard is used with ReviseWise Science, on the topic of foods
Ideas are presented through the use of sound as well as pictures
The teacher talks about food elements - carbohydrates, vitamins etc.
The teacher puts up an activity to put a healthy meal together
Pupils need to pick foods, to drag and drop foods on the interactive whiteboard
Forms of engagement and learning approaches
Interactive whiteboard features
Year 2 pupil responses
Year 4 pupil responses
Year 5 pupil responses
Year 6 pupil responses
Auditory features provide ‘other’ voices
Can listen to poems
Sound effects are good
Visual elements highlight and enhance things being covered
Can choose colour
Can see pictures, can put a background in
Like seeing videos from the internet, can see in your mind more
Kinaesthetic features can support pupil interaction
Can click and drag
More things to do
The teacher uses Virtual Experiments with a year 6 class
Experiments are shown with sound descriptions
The sound provides a voice that offers variety, which aids attention
Two year 6 pupils say they use the interactive whiteboard every day, and they can write on it
It is used for literacy, science, mathematics, history, geography, art
They say it helps them to learn, it is easier to understand
You cannot do so much on a blackboard
You can understand writing
Colour and images help
You can remember more, can save and look back
You have access to a lot of resources
You understand when things are gone over
You can go over homework and discuss it
Annotation and highlighter help
There is no chalk dust
The psychology of learning Interactive whiteboard features
Year 2 pupil responses
Year 4 pupil responses
Year 5 pupil responses
Year 6 pupil responses
Things are remembered through association with activity, colour, movement, etc.
Remember quite a lot that are associated through activities and features such as colour
Can change colour of pen
Can change things, cartoons help, can picture things in the mind, and then it is possible to remember
Can move and see pictures, can rotate them, easier to learn with activities, can memorise things, can recall things more
Reconstruction of ideas can be accommodated
Can move things around, rearrange things, put in things that are forgotten, put them in the right order or place
Can change fonts, and can discard easily
Can add or delete things, can show where to improve, how to do it
Modelling of ideas and outcomes is enhanced
Can make things correct that are wrong
Can try things, can try possibilities yourself
Tells you when you go wrong, with spelling
In a year 5 lesson, different parts of the lesson used different resources on the interactive whiteboard
The different resources allowed the lesson to ‘restart’
Attention is often highest at the start of a lesson
Being able to restart means that high attention is renewed
Pace and style in lessonsInteractive whiteboard features
Year 2 pupil responses
Year 4 pupil responses
Year 5 pupil responses
Year 6 pupil responses
It is possible to easily go back to review something already done
Can save things Can save work to another board, cleaners don’t rub the work off
Can save work, can go back to things easily
Can leave things, do not need to ‘rub things out’
Distraction elements are reduced
Traditional boards squeak and pens run out
Clarity can be enhanced
Can make writing bigger
Pictures are better than those drawn by teachers
‘Computing writing’ is clearer
Detail can be enhanced
Labelling helps Explains better, diagrams help, can click on words for explanation
Can make things bigger
The ‘unexpected’ can be used
Can cover things or use the ‘blind’
What is seen is ‘neat’, and felt to be sophisticated
It is neater to uncover using the interactive whiteboard
Visibility is important
It’s like having a ‘giant computer on the wall’, can see things easily
A year 6 boy likes ‘working’ rather than listening
He says he has to listen more if not using an interactive whiteboard
With a blackboard you have to wait more; pace is enhanced with the interactive whiteboard
There is no need to wait
If he does (without the interactive whiteboard), he starts talking, then gets told off, does not like this, and then gets into trouble
Matching the needs of subject areas
Interactive whiteboard features
Year 2 pupil responses
Year 4 pupil responses
Year 5 pupil responses
Year 6 pupil responses
Numeracy aspects can be covered, and remembered
Can cover areas of numeracy (number grid)
Maths questions are put on the board
Helps a lot with maths
Maths is covered a lot
Subjects areas and topics are covered widely
Easter story and RE, helps with the Tudors, can use objects, a ruler, protractor, music paper
Used in all subjects
The teacher uses a video clip about insulationThe teacher discusses the results of the
experimentThe teachers gets pupils to estimate cooling
effectsThe teacher asks questions of individual pupils
and asks whether others agreeThe teacher can focus on the analysis of the
results, rather than spending time always on having to reproduce the procedure of the experiment
Involvement, collaboration and ownership
Interactive whiteboard features
Year 2 pupil responses
Year 4 pupil responses
Year 5 pupil responses
Year 6 pupil responses
Checking answers becomes more of a shared activity
Can use a ‘blind’ to check the answer
Collaboration is enhanced as the focus of attention is shifted from teacher to teacher AND interactive whiteboard
Can work together more, can see things more and work together
Concentrate more, boring if using the static board, teachers talk too much, helps to work together to solve problems
Can show pupils’ work easily, help each other, work together more
The teacher says it engages pupils for longerThere are lots of resources to use in all topicsGames in mathematics are felt to be very usefulSome pupils go home and continue to use theseSome pupils find other resources or URLs and
bring them into schoolThe teacher accesses the resources found by
pupils in the class and picks out key points or ideas from these
In this way pupils are leading learning and involvement is being encouraged
Context, pertinence and relevance
Interactive whiteboard features
Year 2 pupil responses
Year 4 pupil responses
Year 5 pupil responses
Year 6 pupil responses
Can access ‘real’ situations
Can see things in every day life situations
Two year 6 pupils feel that the interactive whiteboard brings new resources not old books
They find they can find things without going into the ICT suite
They find it easier to listen to 2 voices rather than 1
They can check facts and one voice explains the other
Visual descriptions helpThings that are annotated and coloured helpThis can indicate what is wrong
A focus on the ‘real’ audience
Interactive whiteboard features
Year 2 pupil responses
Year 4 pupil responses
Year 5 pupil responses
Year 6 pupil responses
Discussion about learning can be focused on
Discuss things more, try to work out strategies, try them out, and tend to remember strategies more
Helps to discuss more
ICT (including interactive whiteboards) appears to be offering a means for a range of pupils to be able to view success
It enables pupils to see possible end-points for their work, and to recognise that they could work towards these in order to complete work
But the use of ICT has to be coupled with learning tasks that are appropriate, and where teaching is providing a core of focused pointers (for example, research activities need to be coupled for some pupils with pointers of where to find appropriate sources, how to view their validity and bias, how to consider appropriate questions to ask, and how to select pieces of information of relevance and pertinence)