2
249 Ann. appl. Biol. (2004), 144:249-250 Printed in UK *Corresponding Author E-mail: [email protected] ' 2004 Association of Applied Biologists Improving resistance to drought and salinity in plants By P J LEA 1 *, M A J PARRY 2 and H MEDRANO 3 1 Biological Sciences, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK 2 Crop Production and Improvement, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK 3 Laboratori de Fisiologia Vegetal, Departament de Biologia ,Universitat de les Illes Balears, 07071 Palma de Mallorca, Spain (Accepted 17 May 2004; Received 13 May 2004) As has been reported previously (Parry et al., 2004), a European Commission sponsored conference on the Optimisation of Water Use by Plants in the Mediterranean, OPTIMISE (INCO- MED ICA3-CT-2002-50005) was held in Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain in March 2003. Water is a scarce commodity in Mediterranean countries. Agriculture accounts for 75% of the total water consumption, but drought is the major limitation for growing many crops. The predicted change in climate, greater use through tourism, industrialisation and salinisation of water supplies, will further exacerbate the situation (Araus, 2004; Clary et al., 2004). There is therefore an important requirement to improve the drought and salinity tolerance of agricultural crops. Considerable advances have been made in the selection of crop varieties that are able to tolerate drought and salinity. These have been through traditional breeding (Araus et al., 2003; Munns et al., 2003; Slafer, 2003), mutant selection (Mahar et al., 2003; Ahloowalia et al., 2004) and more recently QTL analysis (Baum et al., 2003; Thomas 2003; Foolad, 2004; Forster et al., 2004; TalamL et al., 2004). The identification of wild relatives (e.g. Porteresia coarctata for rice) that are able to grow in saline soils, may also provide a useful supply of new germplasm for future breeding (Latha et al., 2004). Molecular approaches have identified a large number of genes that are induced following the application of drought or saline conditions. These genes and the proteins that they encode can be divided into three categories: (1) signalling and transcriptional control; (2) the protection of membranes and proteins and (3) water and ion transport (Shinozaki et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2003). As a result of these studies there have been a number of attempts to genetically manipulate plants to become more tolerant to drought and salinity stresses. Potential candidate genes have included those encoding: (1) transcription factors; (2) compatible solutes (e.g. proline); (3) antioxidants and detoxifying enzymes; (4) ion transport and (5) heat shock and late embryogenesis abundant proteins. A number of articles have discussed at length the results obtained from the laboratory testing of transgenic plants containing such potentially useful genes (Yoshida 2002; Chaves et al. 2003; Figueras et al. , 2004). As yet we are awaiting evidence from major field trials, to establish if such genetic manipulation will eventually lead to useful drought and salinity tolerant crop plants that are safe and acceptable to the public. Acknowledgements The OPTIMISE workshop was supported by the European Commission INCO-MED programme contract ICA3-CT-2002-50005. Rothamsted Research receives grant-aided support from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC). References Ahloowalia B S, Maluszynski M, Nichterlein K. 2004. Global impact of mutation-derived varieties. Euphytica 135:187-204. Araus J L. 2004. The problems of sustainable water use in the Mediterranean and research requirements for agriculture. Annals of Applied Biology 144:259-272. Araus J L, Bort J, Steduto P, Villegas D, Royo C. 2003. Breeding cereals for Mediterranean conditions: ecophysiological clues for biotechnology applications. Annals of Applied Biology 142:129-141. Baum M, Grando S, Backes G, Jahoor A, Sabbagh A, Ceccarelli S. 2003. QTLs for agronomic traits in the Mediterranean environment identified in recombinant inbred lines of the cross Arta x H. spontaneum 41-1. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107:1215-1225. Chaves M M, Maroco J P, Pereira J S. 2003. Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology 30:239-264. Clary J, SavØ R, Biel C, De Herralde F. 2004. Water relations in competitive interactions of Mediterranean grasses and shrubs. Annals of Applied Biology 144:149-155. Figueras M, Pujal J, Saleh A, SavØ R, Pages M, Goday A. 2004. Maize Rab17 overexpression in Arabidopsis plants promotes osmotic stress tolerance. Annals of Applied Biology 144:251-257. Foolad M R. 2004. Recent advances in genetics of salt tolerance in tomato. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 76:101-119 Forster B P, Ellis R P, Moir J, TalamL V, Sanguineti M C, Tuberosa R, This D, Teulat-Merah B, Ahmed I, Mariy S A E E, Bahri H, El Ouahabi M, Zoumarou-Wallis N, El- Fellah M, Ben Salem M. 2004. Genotype and phenotype associations with drought tolerance in barley tested in North Africa. Annals of Applied Biology 144:157-168. Latha R, Srinivas Rao C, Subramaniam H M SR, Eganathan P, Swaminathan M S. 2004. Approaches to breeding for

Improving resistance to drought and salinity in plants

  • Upload
    p-j-lea

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Improving resistance to drought and salinity in plants

249Ann. appl. Biol. (2004), 144:249-250Printed in UK

*Corresponding Author E-mail: [email protected]

© 2004 Association of Applied Biologists

Improving resistance to drought and salinity in plants

By P J LEA1*, M A J PARRY2 and H MEDRANO3

1Biological Sciences, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK2Crop Production and Improvement, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK

3Laboratori de Fisiologia Vegetal, Departament de Biologia ,Universitat de les Illes Balears, 07071Palma de Mallorca, Spain

(Accepted 17 May 2004; Received 13 May 2004)

As has been reported previously (Parry et al.,2004), a European Commission sponsoredconference on the �Optimisation of Water Use byPlants in the Mediterranean, OPTIMISE� (INCO-MED ICA3-CT-2002-50005) was held in Palma deMallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain in March 2003.

Water is a scarce commodity in Mediterraneancountries. Agriculture accounts for 75% of the totalwater consumption, but drought is the majorlimitation for growing many crops. The predictedchange in climate, greater use through tourism,industrialisation and salinisation of water supplies,will further exacerbate the situation (Araus, 2004;Clary et al., 2004). There is therefore an importantrequirement to improve the drought and salinitytolerance of agricultural crops.

Considerable advances have been made in theselection of crop varieties that are able to toleratedrought and salinity. These have been throughtraditional breeding (Araus et al., 2003; Munns etal., 2003; Slafer, 2003), mutant selection (Mahar etal., 2003; Ahloowalia et al., 2004) and more recentlyQTL analysis (Baum et al., 2003; Thomas 2003;Foolad, 2004; Forster et al., 2004; Talamè et al.,2004). The identification of wild relatives (e.g.Porteresia coarctata for rice) that are able to growin saline soils, may also provide a useful supply ofnew germplasm for future breeding (Latha et al.,2004).

Molecular approaches have identified a largenumber of genes that are induced following theapplication of drought or saline conditions. Thesegenes and the proteins that they encode can bedivided into three categories: (1) signalling andtranscriptional control; (2) the protection ofmembranes and proteins and (3) water and iontransport (Shinozaki et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2003).As a result of these studies there have been a numberof attempts to genetically manipulate plants tobecome more tolerant to drought and salinitystresses. Potential candidate genes have includedthose encoding: (1) transcription factors; (2)compatible solutes (e.g. proline); (3) antioxidantsand detoxifying enzymes; (4) ion transport and (5)heat shock and late embryogenesis abundantproteins. A number of articles have discussed atlength the results obtained from the laboratory testing

of transgenic plants containing such potentiallyuseful genes (Yoshida 2002; Chaves et al. 2003;Figueras et al., 2004). As yet we are awaitingevidence from major field trials, to establish if suchgenetic manipulation will eventually lead to usefuldrought and salinity tolerant crop plants that are safeand acceptable to the public.

Acknowledgements

The OPTIMISE workshop was supported by theEuropean Commission INCO-MED programmecontract ICA3-CT-2002-50005. RothamstedResearch receives grant-aided support from theBiotechnology and Biological Sciences ResearchCouncil (BBSRC).

References

Ahloowalia B S, Maluszynski M, Nichterlein K. 2004. Globalimpact of mutation-derived varieties. Euphytica 135:187-204.

Araus J L. 2004. The problems of sustainable water use in theMediterranean and research requirements for agriculture.Annals of Applied Biology 144:259-272.

Araus J L, Bort J, Steduto P, Villegas D, Royo C. 2003.Breeding cereals for Mediterranean conditions:ecophysiological clues for biotechnology applications. Annalsof Applied Biology 142:129-141.

Baum M, Grando S, Backes G, Jahoor A, Sabbagh A,Ceccarelli S. 2003. QTLs for agronomic traits in theMediterranean environment identified in recombinant inbredlines of the cross �Arta� x H. spontaneum 41-1. Theoreticaland Applied Genetics 107:1215-1225.

Chaves M M, Maroco J P, Pereira J S. 2003. Understandingplant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant.Functional Plant Biology 30:239-264.

Clary J, Savé R, Biel C, De Herralde F. 2004. Water relationsin competitive interactions of Mediterranean grasses andshrubs. Annals of Applied Biology 144:149-155.

Figueras M, Pujal J, Saleh A, Savé R, Pages M, Goday A.2004. Maize Rab17 overexpression in Arabidopsis plantspromotes osmotic stress tolerance. Annals of Applied Biology144:251-257.

Foolad M R. 2004. Recent advances in genetics of salt tolerancein tomato. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 76:101-119

Forster B P, Ellis R P, Moir J, Talamè V, Sanguineti M C,Tuberosa R, This D, Teulat-Merah B, Ahmed I, Mariy SA E E, Bahri H, El Ouahabi M, Zoumarou-Wallis N, El-Fellah M, Ben Salem M. 2004. Genotype and phenotypeassociations with drought tolerance in barley tested in NorthAfrica. Annals of Applied Biology 144:157-168.

Latha R, Srinivas Rao C, Subramaniam H M SR, EganathanP, Swaminathan M S. 2004. Approaches to breeding for

Page 2: Improving resistance to drought and salinity in plants

250 P J LEA ET AL.

salinity tolerance � a case study on Porteresia coarctata.Annals of Applied Biology 144:177-184.

Mahar A R, Hollington P A, Virk D, Witcombe J R. 2003.Selection for early heading and salt-tolerance in bread wheat.Cereal Research Communications 31:81-88.

Munns R, Rebetzke G, Husain S, James R A, Hare R A.2003. Genetic control of sodium exclusion in durum wheat.Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54:627-635.

Parry M A J, Habash D, Araus J L. 2004. Optimisation ofwater use by plants. Annals of Applied Biology 144:125-126.

Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Seki M. 2003.Regulatory network of gene expression in the drought andcold stress responses. Current Opinion in Plant Biology6:410-417.

Slafer G A. 2003. Genetic basis of yield as viewed from a cropphysiologist�s perspective. Annals of Applied Biology 142:117-128.

Talamè V, Sanguineti M C, Chiapparino E, Bahri H, BenSalem M, Forster B P, Ellis R P, Rhouma S, ZoumarouW, Waugh R, Tuberosa R. 2004. Identification of Hordeumspontaneum QTL alleles improving field performance ofbarley grown under rain fed conditions. Annals of AppliedBiology 144:309-319.

Thomas W T B. 2003. Prospects of molecular breeding ofbarley. Annals of Applied Biology 142:1-12.

Wang W X, Vinocur B, Altman A. 2003. Plant responses todrought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards geneticengineering for stress tolerance. Planta 218:1-14.

Yoshida K. 2002. Plant biotechnology - Genetic engineeringto enhance plant salt tolerance. Journal of Bioscience andBioengineering 94:585-590.