In challenge lies opportunity - UBS · 2. End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture. 3. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being

ab

Fourth quarter 2015

In challenge lies opportunityInvesting for sustainable development

Chief Investment Office WMSeptember 2015

2 Fourth quarter 2015 Investing for sustainable development

In challenge lies opportunity

04 Editorial

05 Chapter 1: From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals

10

Chapter 2: Investment opportunities linked to SDGs

18 Chapter 3: Investment implementation

24 Outlook and conclusion

26 Appendix

Publication details

This report has been prepared by UBS AG, UBS Switzerland AG and UBS Finan-cial Services Inc. (hereafter together “UBS”). Please see important disclaimer and disclosures at the end of the document.

This report was published on 22 September 2015.

Editor-in-chief and lead authorStephen Freedman

Contributing authors (in alphabetical order)Carl BerrisfordCyril DemariaBeatrice FässlerLaura KaneAlexander StiehlerThomas Wacker

Desktop Publishing Margrit Oppliger Illustrations: Rodrigo Jimenez

Project ManagementJoscelin Tosoni

Cover photogettyimages/Mattej Smucr

Contents

Investing for sustainable development Fourth quarter 2015 3

Contents

Action without vision is only passing time, vision without action is merely day dreaming, but vision with action can change the world. Nelson Mandela, political leader (1918–2013)


Stephen Freedman

This month marks the adoption by the UN General Assembly of the Sustainable Devel-opment Goals (SDGs). They succeed the Millennium Development Goals, which entered into force at the turn of the century and helped to define and drive global development efforts for the last 15 years.

The SDGs have a broader mission than their predecessors, one not limited to improving the economies of developing countries. They address universal priorities of the global community, with a strong focus on sustainability.

We have taken them as the starting point for this second edition of our Sustainable Investing Quarterly series. We highlight them not to introduce economic and social development concepts, which is best left to development experts. Instead, we see rel-evant investment implications arising from them. Governments worldwide will need to harness private capital to meet the ambitious new objectives. We expect a variety of new initiatives targeting private investment to help countries achieve the SDGs.

This report spotlights a number of actionable, sustainability-themed investment ideas well suited to pursuing the SDGs. It also lays out the types of instruments, within both liquid and private markets, that can be invested in to further the process. Such solutions are becoming increasingly mainstream and easy to incorporate in portfolios for sustain-ability-minded investors.

Sincerely,

Dear readers,

Alexander Stiehler Carl Berrisford

Stephen FreedmanHead of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Investing

Alexander StiehlerHead of Sustainability-themedInvesting

Carl BerrisfordHead of Sustainable InvestingAPAC


From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals

The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss it, but that it is too low, and we reach it.Michelangelo, artist (1475–1564)

Chapter 1

iSto

ck



The UN’s Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) have been the focal point of most policy mak-ing in international development. Initiated in September 2000 by heads of state at the UN’s Millennium Summit, they were finalized the fol-lowing year, with all 189 UN member states com-mitting to them. These eight time-bound and quantitative goals replaced prior independent UN initiatives and organized pursuit of global devel-opment priorities worldwide. The MDGs have served as the overarching development frame-work for the world for the past 15 years.

The MDGs were time-bound and supposed to be achieved by December 2015. They were expressed quantitatively through a set of 18 tar-gets and 48 specific indicators. The targets and indicators made it possible to turn the goals into

actionable initiatives that the entire development community could rally behind, thereby mobilizing considerable amounts of donor finance.

As their expiration date approaches, the final MDG report card (see Fig. 1) rates them a par-tial success. While certain goals and targets have been reached since 2000, much remains to be done. For example, extreme poverty has been dramatically reduced but is hardly eradi-cated. Slow progress has been made on the path toward gender equality. Maternal mortality rates have fallen by one-third but remain unacceptably high. And, finally, while some progress has been made in environmental sustainability, a key envi-ronmental challenge of our time, the carbon crisis and the challenges it poses to climate change are still far from being adequately addressed.

iSto

ck



Fig. 1: Millennium Development Goals and their report card

Achievements More progress needed

Goal 1 Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger

Number of people living in extreme poverty has fallen from 1.75 billion in 1999 to 836 million in 2015.

About 800 million people still live in extreme poverty and suffer from hunger. Over 160 million children under age five have inadequate height for their age due to malnu-trition.

Goal 2 Achieve universal primary education

Primary school net enrollment rate in the developing regions has reached 91% in 2015 from 83% in 2000.

Further efforts needed to achieve universal primary education.

Goal 3 Promote gender equality and empower women

The average proportion of women in parliament has increased from 14% to 22% since 2000, but remains low in absolute terms.

Globally, about three-quarters of working-age men participate in the labor force, compared to only half of working-age women. Women earn 24% less than men globally.

Goal 4 Reduce child mortality

The global under-five mortality rate has declined by more than half, dropping from 90 to 43 deaths per 1,000 live births between 1990 and 2015.

More work is needed to improve child survival rates. Every minute around the world, 11 children die before their fifth birthday, mostly from preventable causes.

Goal 5 Improve maternal health

The global maternal mortality ratio has fallen from 330 to 210 deaths per 100,000 live births between 2000 and 2013.

Only half of pregnant women receive the recommended amount of antenatal care.

Goal 6 Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases

New HIV infections fell by 40% between 2000 and 2013, from an estimated 3.5 million cases to 2.1 million.

In sub-Saharan Africa, still less than 40% of youth aged 15 to 24 years had correct knowledge of HIV trans-mission in 2014.

Goal 7 Ensure environmental sustainability

Between 1990 and 2015, the propor-tion of the global population using an improved sanitation facility has risen from 54% to 68%, and those using an improved drinking water source increased from 76% to 91%.

Emissions of carbon dioxide rose from 23.8 to 33.0 billion metric tons from 2000 to 2012.

Goal 8 Develop a global partnership for development

Official development assistance from developed countries rose 66% in real terms between 2000 and 2014, to USD 135.2bn.

Funding will remain a critical factor for the post-2015 development agenda.

Source: The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015, UN



Against this backdrop, the UN has developed a new set of goals and targets to take the global development agenda into its post-2015 phase. The new Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) seek to build on the MDGs and complete what they did not achieve. With 17 goals rather than eight, they also represent a larger set of prior-ities derived through a broad-based consulta-tive process that formally started in 2012 at the Rio de Janeiro UN Conference on Sustainable Development.

The SDGs differ from the MDGs in key respects. They emphasize sustainability in addition to development needs and apply to all countries, not just the developing world. Their focus is on people, the planet, prosperity, peace and part-nership, with these elements considered inextri-cably integrated. Approved by the UN General Assembly in September, they will come into effect on 1 January 2016 and will guide policy decisions of member states for the next 15 years.

Box 1: Sustainable Development Goals1. End poverty in all its forms everywhere.

2. End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.

3. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages.

4. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all.

5. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.

6. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.

7. Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all.

8. Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all.

9. Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation.

10. Reduce inequality within and among countries.

11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable.

12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.

13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts.

14. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development.

15. Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss.

16. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.

17. Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development.

Source: UN



Box 2: Examples of specific SDG targets (169 in total)

By 2030, double the agricultural productivity and incomes of small-scale food producers.

By 2030, reduce the global maternal mortality ratio to less than 70 per 100,000 live births.

By 2030, end the epidemics of AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and neglected tropical diseases and combat hepatitis, water-borne diseases and other communicable diseases.

By 2020, halve the number of global deaths and injuries from road traffic accidents.

By 2030, ensure that all girls and boys complete free, equitable and quality primary and second-ary education leading to relevant and effective learning outcomes.

Enhance the use of enabling technology, in particular information and communications technol-ogy, to promote the empowerment of women.

By 2030, improve water quality by [...] halving the proportion of untreated wastewater [...].

By 2030, double the global rate of improvement in energy efficiency.

Sustain per capita economic growth in accordance with national circumstances and, in particular, at least 7% gross domestic product growth per annum in the least-developed countries.

Significantly increase access to information and communications technology and strive to provide universal and affordable access to the Internet in the least-developed countries by 2020.

By 2030, halve per capita global food waste at the retail and consumer lev els and reduce food losses along production and supply chains [...].

By 2020, conserve at least 10% of coastal and marine areas […].

Source: UN

While the SDGs (see Box 1) are formulated in general terms, they are accompanied by 169 specific targets that make the agenda actionable and able to be monitored (see a selection of tar-gets in Box 2). The SDGs are intended to steer government development priorities and marshal resources from public and private sources. Many governments are expected to integrate the goals and targets into their national development and

budget strategies. Action programs will likely also find their way into regional or even city-level legislation in many advanced economies. The specificity of the targets and the need for the public sector to mobilize private sources of capital also suggest that the SDGs will ultimately create opportunities for investors as discussed in chapters 2 and 3.


Chapter 2

Investment opportunities linked to SDGs

The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity; the optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty. Sir Winston Churchill, statesman (1874–1965)

plai

npic

ture



Initiatives that support the Sustainable Devel-opment Goals (SDGs) will create a number of long-term investment opportunities. The SDGs’ 15-year lifespan is considerable from an investment perspective. UBS CIO sees value in focusing on the long-term drivers of investment performance. This philosophy is central to our “Longer Term Investments” (LTI) series, which focuses on investing in enduring and undispu-ted structural trends (e.g. population growth, aging, increased urbanization). The SDGs target many of the same challenges – water scarcity, the grow ing need for waste management, the

threats to clean air, etc. – that arise from the trends we identified. We believe that investors willing to commit to such themes over multi-ple business cycles can benefit from potential mispricing created by the typically shorter-term focus of financial markets. Alternatively, these ideas may serve as a basis to find investments within private markets (equity, debt and real assets), as discussed in chapter 3.

In this chapter, we describe in more detail the links between our published LTIs and the rele-vant SDGs.

Fig. 2: Long-term investment themes linked to SDGs

Long-term invest-ment theme

Associated SDGs (See box 1, page 8)

Investment opportunity

Water scarcity 2, 6 Water infrastructure, treatment and management, agricultural technology (e.g. advanced irrigation)

Energy efficiency 7, 12, 13 Building systems, industrial processes, transportation infrastructure, technology/software

Waste manage-ment and recycling

6, 12 Waste management (particularly EM exposure)

Automation and robotics

12 Industrial automation/robotics, technology/industrial software

Clean air and carbon reduction

3, 11, 13 Renewable energy, energy efficiency & storage, clean fuel, emission control technology, carbon capture/storage

Emerging market healthcare

3, 10 Emerging market healthcare

Obesity 2, 3 Consumer (food, health, wellness), healthcare (treatment of obesity & related diseases)

Mass transit rail 9, 11, 13 Companies with high exposure to mass transit rail (including contractors, capital equipment suppliers, operators, and property developers)

Agricultural yield 2, 15 Agricultural equipment, biotech, irrigation technology, fertilizer producers

Source: UBS



Water scarcityThe World Economic Forum has recognized water scarcity as the most critical risk to our planet. An

inadequate water supply threatens the viability of the global economy, the environment, and human life. Given the severity of the issue, it is no wonder that ensuring the “availability and sustainable management of water and sanita-tion for all” is one of the SDGs (#6).

Water scarcity arises from an imbalance of sup-ply and demand. The amount of water suitable for human consumption is limited, and the resource is unevenly distributed around the world. Despite this inflexible supply, demand is constantly growing. The UN estimates that 40% of the world’s population depends on cross-bor-der freshwater resources.

Long-term developments, such as population growth, higher living standards, industrializ-ing emerging markets, a lack of infrastructure and climate change, exacerbate the water sup-ply/demand mismatch. Population growth will increase demand for food, energy and con-sumer products – all of which require substan-tial amounts of water to produce. In fact, food production is the second-most water-intensive sector. Higher living standards will also raise water demand. The water consumption of food producers will likely rise as the growing middle classes in the emerging markets adopt more protein-rich diets. One kilogram of beef can be 17 times more water-intensive to produce than the same amount of wheat.

Climate change also influences the global water supply in terms of quality, quantity and tim-ing aspects. Recent developments in Califor-nia illustrate this point. Due to melting glaciers and polar ice caps, sea levels are rising. Saltwa-ter intrusion will harm freshwater aquifers. We expect an accelerated rate of evaporation from land and sea, which will boost moisture in the atmosphere and likely lead to flooding. Equally likely are droughts in low-precipitation areas. Thus, climate change creates not only water scarcity but water overflow.

Combatting water scarcity creates investment opportunities. We estimate that the current global water market is roughly USD 500–600bn annually. Market studies estimate that the mar-ket size could reach USD 1trn by 2020. The long-er-term growth outlook is compelling because we expect water demand to exceed supply over

the next several decades, requiring additional investment. Companies benefiting from this trend could grow revenues and profits mark-edly. We see the most potential in three sectors: water infrastructure, water treatment and water management.

To accommodate growing populations, cities will need to invest heavily in water infrastructure. It is already strained and suffers from chronic underinvestment. For example, the US Environ-mental Protection Agency estimates that 60% of all US water-main pipes, most of which are more than 60–80 years old, will be classified as sub-standard by 2020. Investment in water treatment is also urgently needed. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization only 2.4% of water is recycled today. Industrializa-tion in emerging markets has created a greater need to treat industrial waste water, which is threatening the fresh water supply. Finally, the need for better water management has, once again, become evident with the latest drought in California. Investment in measurement and planning systems to avoid wasting water is necessary, in particular in the agricultural sector. Technologies that improve agricultural water efficiency (e.g. advanced irrigation) should benefit.

Energy efficiencyImproving energy efficiency addresses critical challenges that humanity faces, including its exces-

sive dependence on fossil fuels and the lack of competitive storage technologies that exist for intermittent renewable energies. Saving energy directly at the source lowers costs, conserves resources and reduces emissions. Energy effi-ciency is related to several SDGs, in particular #7 (affordability, reliability, and sustainability of energy), #13 (combat climate change) and #12 (sustainable consumption and production patterns).

Since 2010, the 50% of the world’s popula-tion living in cities has consumed 75% of the energy produced and accounted for 80% of the greenhouse gases emitted. As a rule of thumb, for each US dollar invested in energy-efficiency measures, around two US dollars can be saved in investments in electricity supply, and up to four US dollars in electricity costs over the life-cycle of a product. Although the payback period for most energy-efficiency applications



ranges from only a few months (e.g. LEDs) to several years (e.g. insulation), a shift toward energy efficiency is often triggered by govern-ment incentives and regulations. As a result, it is becoming a key business factor for a growing number of companies.

We see investment opportunities in the follow-ing areas. Buildings offer the greatest potential for reducing energy consumption; this segment currently accounts for 40% of energy demand and 30% of CO

2 emissions. On average, a build-

ing in the US is used for 50 to 75 years: 60% to 85% of overall building costs stem from opera-tions (fuel, maintenance, repair, etc.), compared with just 5% to 10% for design and construc-tion, according to the US National Institute of Building Services. Energy efficiency is a simple way to save on maintenance. Efficiency gains can also be achieved in industrial processes. ABB Ltd. estimates that around 80% of energy is lost between resource extraction (of coal, for instance) and its use in producing electric-ity. Numerous industrial applications are also used to transport the energy and to produce end-products. Finally, in the transport sector, responsible for 30% of energy consumption, it is clear that trains and buses are far more energy efficient for passenger transport than cars or aircraft. Rail is the most environmentally friendly form of transport (burning only 0.4 liters of fuel per 100km per person compared to 0.6 to 0.9 liters for a bus and several times that for a car or plane). Yet most people still use cars even for short distances. These areas represent opportunities to limit the demand growth for energy. We see informa-tion technology as a key to achieving effi-ciency gains in these sectors, whether through software applications, cloud computing, modern

telecommunication or mobile technology. The International Energy Agency (IEA) expects the demand for energy-efficient products to grow by around 7% to 8% annually. Investments in them could reach USD 530bn annually in 20 years from USD 130bn in 2013.

Waste management and recycling Waste management is specifically

addressed in SDGs #12 (sustainable consump-tion and production) and #6 (water manage-ment and sanitation). According to the Waste Atlas, for every USD spent globally, about 47 grams of waste are produced. Worldwide waste volumes are expected to more than double by 2050. Several megatrends are behind this antic-ipated rise: population growth, rising living standards, industrialization and urbanization in emerging markets, and shorter product life-cy-cles of electronic devices. Rising volumes are driving the demand for efficient waste manage-ment around the world. Today, the total waste market is valued at USD 1.2trn per year. It is likely to grow at a high-single-digit percentage rate and reach USD 2trn by 2020.

The waste sector follows the well-known waste hierarchy (the four R’s) first mentioned in the 1970s: recover, recycle, reuse and reduce. The hierarchy encourages minimizing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The most sustainable form

Fig. 3: Municipal solid waste generation by country

Source: The World Bank (What a waste: A Global Review of Solid Waste Management)

2012 estimates

China 27%

US 15%

Brazil 4%Japan 4%

Germany 3%

India 3%

Italy 2%

UK 2%

France 2%

Russia 2%

Others36%Box 3: Did you know?

The recycling of one ton of aluminum demonstrates how efficient and effective recycling is. It requires 95% less energy than producing it from virgin materials, saves 1.3 tons of bauxite residues, 15 cubic meters of cooling water, 0.86 cubic meters of process water and 37 barrels of oil, while preventing the emission of two tons of carbon dioxide and 11 kilograms of sulfur dioxide.


of “treatment” is outright reduction, of course, though other methods also mitigate environ-mental damage. They include recycling, aerobic composting and anaerobic digesting. The cheap-est and fastest method of treatment is disposal, which takes the form of landfills or incinera-tion. In most emerging markets these traditional methods are well established. In the case of China, landfills dominate (72% of capacity). Due to the time pressure to ramp up capacity and a lack of sorting capabilities, we think they will remain the primary way of treating waste in the near future.

Emerging markets offer the clearest opportunity for investment growth in waste management. Rising living standards and urbanization will raise waste volumes. In general, the higher the income level and urbanization rate of a country, the greater the amount of solid waste it pro-duces. This trend is already unfolding in China. In 2004, it overtook the US as the world’s larg-est waste generator and, according to World Bank forecasts, will produce twice as much municipal solid waste as the US in 2030. Low treatment rates there and in other emerging markets relative to developed countries offer significant catch-up potential that could lead to extraordinary growth rates in coming years. While waste collection rates in developed coun-tries have risen to 98%, they can be as low as 40% in low- and middle-income countries. In 2012, 3.5 billion people had no access to reg-ular waste collection services, according to the UN Environment Programme. Developing effi-cient waste management systems to collect and treat rising waste volumes in emerging markets should lead to compelling investment opportuni-ties over the next several decades.

Automation and roboticsThe main reason most electron-

ics, including premium products like the iPhone, are manufactured in China relates to the huge cost savings its vast pool of cheap labor cre-ates. For instance, Apple’s contract manufac-turer, Foxconn, employs more than half a million employees in China to assemble Apple products exclusively. But cheap labor in emerging mar-kets, particularly China with its rising wages and aging population, is unlikely to be a sustainable long-term growth driver. The mass movement of poor agricultural workers to the manufac-turing sector is ending. Increasingly, we expect

automation to drive global manufacturing out-put thanks to the substantial productivity gains it can generate.

Automation, if properly relied on, should prove an important solution to SDG #12 (sustainable consumption and production patterns). Smart automation is enabling innovative industrial and IT processes to fuel global manufacturing pro-ductivity gains. The opportunity in emerging markets is especially attractive since robotics use here lags that of developed countries, and their aging populations and rising wages under-score the need for productivity gains. Given the relatively large size of the manufacturing sector, there is potential for a sustained expansion in automation equipment.

Rising IT penetration in the manufacturing sec-tor through industrial software should also lead to a new wave of automation investment in developed countries. Its use in manufacturing should lower resource consumption (of water, energy and other commodities). Compared to such industries as office automation and health-care, software penetration remains lower in the manufacturing automation world, though we are now reaching an inflection point.

To be clear, automation is not a panacea for achieving the SDG agenda across the board. Its use will be helpful on a case-by-case basis, most clearly when the efficiency gains it generates alleviate scarcity in environmental and financial resources. But automation is a double-edged sword. Productivity gains, especially in develop-ing countries, can run counter to employment objectives and hinder equality goals. Automa-tion-based investments should be considered carefully in terms of their overall impact.

Clean air and carbon reductionMuch like safe drinking water,

clean air is a basic human need. Population growth and urbanization have greatly worsened air pollution through fossil-fuel use, creating the need for clean-air innovations. The ever-in-creasing concentration of greenhouse gases and particulates, such as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, in the atmosphere is degrading air qual-ity. In the past decade, carbon emissions grew substantially, particularly in non-OECD countries. In China alone they grew by more than 150% due to rapid industrialization and higher energy


CO2



consumption. No significant multilateral regula-tions limiting emissions have materialized since the Kyoto Protocol was signed in 1997. Given how long particulates remain in the air, there is a critical need to act. We believe that clean air in its broadest sense is an investable theme aligned with SDG #11 (safe, resilient and sustainable cit-ies), SDG #13 (combat climate change) and even SDG #3 (healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages).

The overwhelming scientific consensus on human-made climate change is generating reform momentum. A new multilateral agree-ment could emerge at the upcoming UN Cli-mate Conference in Paris in December. The US and China, as the top carbon emitters, have stated their intention to reduce carbon emis-sions by 2020, and announced joint cooperation in November 2014. Moreover, this year the G7 also agreed to a target of zero carbon emissions from fossil fuels by 2100. Electrical power plants generate 14 gigatons, or 42%, of total annual carbon emissions. Coal-based utilities are likely to face the most pressure from stricter regula-tions. Indeed, the phase-out of inefficient coal plants is the fastest way to cut CO

2. In the US,

the Environmental Protection Agency introduced its Clean Power Plan in August to reduce CO

2

emissions from fossil fuel power plants 32% by 2030.

Clean air solution providers specialized in renew-able energy, energy efficiency, energy stor-age, clean fuel (e.g. biofuels), emissions control technologies, and carbon capture and storage will experience greater demand for their tech-nologies from emission-heavy companies that must comply with changing rules. During the

transition phase, the natural gas industry will benefit from a shift away from coal. According to estimates by the International Energy Agency, USD 35.8trn will be cumulatively invested in clean air solutions by 2030 as a base-case scenario.

Emerging market healthcareEmerging markets (including China, India, Indonesia, Brazil) are

home to half the world’s population. But health-care spending there is less than half that of developed markets. Stepping up public invest-ment in healthcare will require greater urgency in the next 10 years due to rapidly graying pop-ulations and rising demand for modern health-care services from urban middle classes. The 65-year-plus demographic of the emerging mar-ket population will rise from 10% to 15% by 2030, according to the UN. The growing health-care demands of hundreds of millions of senior citizens, coupled with the more expensive costs of treating non-communicable disease, suggest that healthcare investment will need to rise.

Emerging market healthcare investment ties most prominently to SDG #3 (ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being at all ages). It mitigates inequality in healthcare services between rich and poor countries as well as within countries themselves. This also engages SDG #10, which is concerned with reducing inequality among and within countries. One example of this inequality is the strong link between the quality of healthcare service in a country and its rate of child mortality.

Fig. 4: Examples of GHG emission-reduction commitments ahead of climate conference

Country/Region Intended Nationally Determined Contribution

EU Reduce EU domestic GHG emissions by at least 40% below 1990 levels by 2030.

US Reduce net GHG emissions by 26% to 28% below 2005 levels by 2025.

Russia Reduce anthropogenic GHG emissions by 25% to 30% below 1990 levels by 2030 subject to the maximum possible account of absorptive capacity of forests.

Switzerland Reduce GHG emissions by 50% below 1990 levels by 2030 (35% below by 2025).

Norway Reduce GHG emissions by at least 40% compared with 1990 levels by 2030.

Mexico Reduce GHG and short-lived climate pollutant emissions unconditionally by 25% by 2030 with respect to a business-as-usual scenario.

Source: UN Framework Convention on Climate Change; Note: GHG = greenhouse gas



Discussion of inequality in healthcare services between urban and rural areas also requires addressing sanitation and access to safe drink-ing water, as well as immunization. For exam-ple, safe drinking water inequalities between urban and rural areas remain marked, with 47% of the emerging market population residing in rural areas, where access to water stands at 60% vs. 80% in urban areas. Healthcare invest-ment needs to address prevention as well as treatment of illness. This includes solving water management issues (to control the spread of dengue and malaria) and improving sanitation, as embodied in SDG #6. We expect growth in emerging market healthcare to outpace the global healthcare average over the long term.

ObesityAccording the World Obesity Foundation, obesity is “one of the most important public health prob-

lems facing the world today.” Given its severity and prevalence, no discourse on healthy liv-ing can avoid it. Treating the obesity epidemic supports SDG #3, which focuses on “ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all at all ages.” There are already 2.1 billion over-weight people globally, of which 671 million are clinically obese. While Western economies are most associated with obesity, it is no longer just a rich-world problem. Indeed, rapid urbaniza-tion and increasing per-capita GDP are raising calorie consumption in emerging markets, so we expect them to lead the increase in the num-ber of obese and overweight people in the next decade.

Obesity imposes a significant cost on both the individual and society and is expected to raise per-capita healthcare spending in emerging markets. Preventing it involves improving the nutritional content of food, as well as creating greater education and awareness of nutrition, an essential mandate of SDG #2. Treating obese patients earlier and more effectively also helps reduce the co-morbidities that lead to the bulk of associated healthcare costs. Type 2 diabe-tes, in particular, is the disease most highly cor-related with obesity. It is on the rise worldwide, with two-thirds of all cases expected to occur in low- to middle-income countries by 2030, according to the International Diabetes Federa-tion. Better treatment of obesity will also help already stretched healthcare budgets go fur-ther, enabling more patients to access adequate healthcare, particularly in the developing world. Investing in the battle against obesity offers defensive growth with predictable volume trends, high returns on capital and steady div-idend growth, in our view. Investment oppor-tunities in two broad categories – prevention and treatment – stand out. Companies selling healthier food, fitness products and sportswear, as well as the vitamin and supplement industry, should benefit from attempts to curb the epi-demic. Also, companies providing drugs, med-ical products and services to reduce weight or treat obesity-related conditions such as diabe-tes should be well positioned. We recommend investing in a diversified way across the con-sumer and healthcare industries to minimize company-specific risks associated with the fail-ure of drugs in development.

Fig. 5: EM healthcare services are undersuppliedHospital beds per 1,000 population, 2007–2013

0

12

4

8

6

10

2

Source: World Bank, UBS. GDP weighted using 2014 GDP

Chi

le

Gre

ece

Col

ombi

a

Indo

nesi

a

Peru

Indi

a

Chi

na

Thai

land

Turk

ey

Mex

ico

UA

E

Mal

aysi

a

Emer

ging

mar

kets

Egyp

t

Sout

h K

orea

Sout

h A

fric

a

Pola

nd

Hun

gary

Braz

il

Cze

ch R

epub

lic

Russ

ia

Dev

elop

ed m

arke

ts

Qat

ar


Fig. 6: Emissions by means of transportationCO2 emission in grams per passenger/km, 2012 estimates

Source: Alstom

0 40 80 120 16020 60 100 140

16

115

145

Mass transit railAsians will continue to migrate from the countryside to city in the next two decades, with the num-

ber living in megacities of over 10 million fore-cast to double by 2025, according to the UN. Meanwhile, as incomes rise, vehicle ownership is doubling every five years, and sharply climb-ing CO

2 emissions are adding to air-quality prob-

lems in Asia’s largest cities. By 2030, Asia will account for 31% of total worldwide transport sector-related CO

2 emissions, almost double the

1990 figure, according to the Emissions Data-base for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR). Indeed, the use of fossil fuels has accounted for a three-fold rise in per capita emissions in China between 1990 and 2012, and a two-fold increase in countries like Thailand, India and Indonesia.

Soaring car ownership has spurred the sharp rise in CO

2 production in Asian emerging mar-

kets, with the impact exacerbated by the effect of climate change on air quality. Mass transit rail (MTR) systems have proven highly cost-effective transport solutions for Asia’s densely populated megacities. New governments in India, Indo-nesia, Thailand and Malaysia are expected to spend over USD 200bn in greenfield MTR systems in the next decade to combat urban congestion. An emphasis on MTR, in particular in Asia, addresses three SDGs: #9 (resilient infra-structure), #11 (safe, resilient and sustainable cities) and #13 (combat climate change and its impacts).

Contractors, property developers, capital equip-ment suppliers and MTR operators will enjoy high earnings visibility across the public spend-ing cycle, as well as above-GDP earnings growth rates, suggesting that they could be an attrac-tive long-term opportunity.

Agricultural yieldPer capita consumption of cal-ories is increasing as a result of urbanization and rapid income

growth in populous developing countries. Rising income, in particular, leads to greater demand for land-intensive food, such as meat, reducing available arable land per capita for food produc-tion. Urbanization and the expansion of living and working spaces, driven by the buy-up of

farmland by governments and corporations, are also decreasing the amount of arable land, as are erosion and desertification brought about by climate change. The challenge is considerable in light of a 34% rise in the global population by 2050, estimated by the UN, even as global ara-ble land continues to decline.

Feeding a growing and more demanding world population clearly requires raising agricultural yields. Addressing this need is inextricably linked to SDG #2: “End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustain-able agriculture.” A narrow focus on increasing yields may run counter to other SDGs, however. For instance, excessive reliance on fertilizers may affect water quality and availability through run-offs and conflict with SDG #6 (water availability). A large emphasis on monocultures and biotech-nology may hurt progress on SDG #15 (prevent loss of biodiversity).

Nonetheless, there are companies that can boost agricultural yields through activities com-patible with the SDGs, in our view. They can help meet the enormous challenge of producing more food with less land while achieving attrac-tive earnings growth over the long term. They include select farm-equipment manufacturers, irrigation technology and fertilizer producers, and biotech companies. Investors should bear in mind that, over shorter time horizons, these types of investments are likely to follow the agri-cultural commodity cycle, which can be highly volatile.



Chapter 3

Investment implementation

The secret of change is to focus all of your energy, not on fighting the old, but on building the new. Socrates, philosopher (470/469–399 BC)

plai

npic

ture



Portfolio integration of sustainability themes

Sustainability-themed investment ideas such as those identified in chapter 2 can be integrated into portfolios in a variety of ways. Many can be invested in via traditional stocks and bonds. Some are better pursued with more innovative financial instruments. Given the universality of the SDGs, such investments are likely to target developed and developing countries alike.

By directing assets to these and other related themes, investors can pursue return opportunities and express their interests with satellite invest-ments that complement an otherwise well-diver-sified portfolio. Such thematic ideas can also help populate core portfolio investments. In fact, such themes can be used to guide each of the three main approaches to sustainable investing (SI): exclusion, integration and impact investing (see Box 4). These three approaches are described in greater detail in the third-quarter edition of this series “To integrate or to exclude.”

For example, within impact investing, a private equity fund may invest in typical SI investment themes such as clean tech, healthcare or educa-tional ventures. Within an integration approach,

a sustainable fund manager may select compa-nies based on their resource efficiency, gender diversity or supply chain management. Finally, within an exclusion approach, an investor may decide to divest from coal companies based on views about their climate change impact.

To help identify specific investment solutions, the rest of the chapter describes how the public sec-tor is likely to harness private capital; it provides a detailed account of the main investment vehicles available to private investors who want to pro-mote individual SDGs.

Public sector to incentivize private-sector financingThe now-expiring MDGs were associated with a reasonable amount of financial innovation designed to mobilize private capital. For instance, in 2006 the International Finance Facility for Immunization was created by several European countries to issue vaccine bonds on the global capital markets. These instruments accelerate the availability and predictability of funds for immu-nization. Green bonds (see the following section) are designed to finance environmentally friendly projects and have been expanding rapidly as a


Box 4: Approaches to Sustainable Investing

Exclusion: Investors determine what activities they wish to avoid financing and remove firms engaged in them from portfolios. These choices are largely subjective, i.e. investor-specific. Typi-cal exclusions are alcohol, weapons, tobacco, gambling or adult entertainment.

Integration: This approach centers on systematically combin-ing environmental, social and governance (ESG) information with traditional financial considerations to guide investment decisions. Compared to exclusion, integration is more holistic, proactive and involves a higher level of expertise and data availability. It is becoming the state of the art in the SI industry.

Impact investing: The objective is to have a positive and mea-surable impact on society or the environment in addition to achieving a financial return. A variety of structures, including private equity or through lending-based solutions such as micro-finance, can be employed.



market in recent years. Finally, different forms of impact investing aimed at addressing various development and sustainability challenges have been growing at a fast pace.

Achieving the SDGs will require even more inno-vation and partnership between public actors and private investors. It will necessitate funding far in excess of what is currently available from both public and private sources; specifically, the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNC-TAD) estimates in its World Investment Report 2014 an annual investment gap of USD 2.5trn over the next 15 years. The World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the multilateral development banks have said they will scale up their financing in support of the SDGs. But given how tight public-sector budgets are today relative to when the MDGs were launched, harnessing private capital will be crucial to closing the fund-ing shortfall, especially in the infrastructure, food security and climate change mitigation sectors.

Appropriate public policy aimed at incentivizing investment in SDG-related initiatives will help maximize the potential of private capital. To this end, UNCTAD proposed a framework for attract-ing private investment in SDGs. The first compo-nent is leadership, which encompasses agreeing to a global set of guiding principles for invest-ment policymaking. Next is the mobilization of funds through improved-pricing mechanisms, exchanges and reform. These funds are then channeled to relevant sectors through incentive schemes and partnerships. Finally, impact must be maximized by using technology and entre-preneurship paired with effective regulation and risk-minimization measures.

Putting this framework into practice is not straightforward. Significant barriers impede the marshaling and channeling of capital into markets most starved for funds. Most notably, expected returns are not always proportionate with the level of perceived risk associated with investments in development initiatives. In particular, invest-ments in developing nations face hurdles as their markets are often inefficient and less understood, and lack strong, transparent local regulatory and legal systems.

The key to overcoming these obstacles is new forms of public-private partnerships and innova-tive financing methods often labeled as blended finance. They seek to align public and private interests through incentive schemes and risk-shar-ing approaches, including grants, guarantees

and first-loss provisions designed to draw private investors.

Available and prospective investment vehicles

Listed equitiesListed equities are an easily accessible way to sup-port sustainable development objectives, in par-ticular through investment themes such as those outlined in chapter 2. The focus lies on finding listed companies whose activities and business profile further sustainability. This can occur in one of two ways.

First, the company’s output, i.e. its goods and services, may directly reduce a social or envi-ronmental problem. The company may offer renewable-energy solutions, provide improved water infrastructure or promote a healthy life-style through its food products. This approach has drawbacks because listed companies with sufficient liquidity and of a sufficient size often do not limit their output to one specific prod-uct or service. Investors often have to accept investments that are not pure plays on address-ing specific sustainability challenges. A certain threshold is usually chosen, such as a minimum of 25% of revenues arising from a sustainabili-ty-themed activity. Smaller companies may often allow for a more targeted investment in a theme. But investing in them also comes with risks, such as lower liquidity and less available research on them to enable a considered investment decision.

Fig. 7: SDG investment gap and potential private sector contributionAnnual figures (2015–2030), trillions of USD

0

4.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

1.5

2.5

3.5

0.5

Total annual investment

needs

Current annual

investment

Annual investment

gap

Potential private sector

contribution at current

levels

Potential private sector

contribution at increased

levelsSource: UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2014

3.9 1.4

2.5

0.9

1.8



Pursuing such strategies is often best delegated to professional money management.

A second angle is to focus on companies that contribute to sustainability goals by fostering good corporate practices and systematically min-imizing their environmental and social footprint, i.e. the negative effects their activities may have on environment and society. This can be achieved through strong processes, e.g. superior supply chain management, active stakeholder relations, and/or a sustainability-minded corporate culture. This perspective is in line with the integration approach to sustainable investing presented in the first section of this chapter.

BondsInvesting to promote sustainable development through the fixed income market offers more options than it does with equities. For investors focused on corporate issuers, the same princi-ples discussed for equities above can readily be applied to bonds. But bonds can be structured in a way that enables better targeting of specific projects either through earmarking or asset secu-ritization. These features have been instrumen-talized by the rapidly expanding market for green bonds.

Green bonds are issued to raise funds for environ-mental projects. Their emergence was originally spearheaded by the World Bank in 2008 to sup-port lending for eligible projects that sought to mitigate climate change or help affected people adapt to it. While multilateral institutions remain active issuers, corporations over the last two to three years have started issuing green bonds as well, using the earmarked proceeds to finance environmentally friendly projects. According to the Climate Bond Initiative, a non-profit organi-zation, green bonds issuance reached nearly USD 36.6bn last year, while total issuance in 2013 amounted to USD 11bn. Issuance through August of this year has totaled USD 23.3bn. The need to fund environmental projects and the desire of issuers to diversify their funding sources have boosted green bond issuance in the last two years, especially out of Europe. A pickup in issu-ance activity by US state and local governments, a market segment largely targeted at individual investors, is a recent phenomenon. It corresponds with a broadening investor base for green bonds, which were originally a focus of institutional investors.

Generally speaking, green bonds gather fund-ing for environmental projects associated with

climate change or sustainability. Since early last year, the Green Bond Principles have been provid-ing guidance on what qualifies as a green bond. But they are voluntary and only certain green bonds issued have been reviewed and audited by independent agencies like Cicero, Vigeo or DNV-GL. The most commonly used structure is a regular senior unsecured bond, with the issuer promising to use the proceeds for “green” pur-poses. The investor does not directly participate in the revenues and risk of the funded projects, however. In this case, the risk of an investment is identical to that of a regular bond of this issuer, and the green bonds should trade at similar val-uations, which they usually do. Alternative types of green bonds include structures in which there is a direct exposure to the funded projects. This includes “use of proceeds revenue bonds,” in which investors have a claim on the cash flows of the funded projects but no recourse to the issuer. “Green project bonds” also have direct exposure to the project risk, but may provide recourse to the issuer. The most complex version is “green securitized bonds,” which can be structured like asset-backed securities or covered bonds.

We think green bonds have plenty of social value and enhance awareness about environmental issues and the projects undertaken to mitigate them. There are also reputational benefits to issu-ers of and investors in them. The economic value mainly comes from supporting companies and development institutions in gathering funding for large environmental projects. Looking at the asset class from a pure risk/return angle, we see no additional benefit to investing in them ver-sus other bonds at this stage, but there is also no

Fig. 8: Green bond market expanding fastAnnual and cumulative issuance in USD billions

0

40

10

20

30

15

25

35

5

0

90

20

40

60

70

30

50

80

10

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20142013 2015 ytd

Amount issued per year(le scale)

Cumulative amount outstanding (right sale)

Source: The Climate Bonds Initiative, as of 25 August 2015



disadvantage besides the potentially somewhat lower secondary market liquidity. We consider them a viable addition to a well-diversified port-folio, and recommend either focusing on issuers of sound credit quality (at least investment grade rated) to mitigate the adverse consequences of lower market liquidity or choosing diversified investment solutions like mutual funds.

Pay-for-success contractual structures Social Impact Bonds (SIBs) are a relatively new funding mechanism for putting private capital to work on behalf of social issues as an alter-native to traditional government funding. They differ from regular bonds in terms of their struc-ture and their payoff to the lender. Their specific structure varies, but generally they are financial contracts for private investors to lend money to a third-party social services provider charged with completing a public service project specified by a government agency. Unlike regular bonds, which typically earn a fixed rate, SIBs are unique in that the financial returns to the lenders depend on achieving specific social outcomes set forth when the bond is issued. The government only pays the service provider for verified outcomes, and the financial return to private investors is commensu-rate with the level of success of the social project (pay for success). Simply put, investors are only paid back if predefined objectives are met. This feature of the contract can incentivize service pro-viders to focus more on outcomes than on pro-cess and can achieve net savings for governments over time.

Development Impact Bonds (DIBs) are a specific type of SIB that has emerged more recently and is applied to the development context. The out-come payer is some entity other than a local/national government – for example, an aid agency, foreign development aid ministries, mul-tilateral institutions or a philanthropist. While SIBs typically focus on providing social services in developed economies, DIBs focus on economic and social development in developing countries, whose governments may not have the resources to pay for the projects in question on their own.

SIBs and DIBs carry a unique set of risks, since repayment is contingent on a successful social outcome and significant losses are possible in the case of failure. They also offer an attractive net return potential should the project succeed, as well as low correlation with the rate of local eco-nomic growth, equity markets and interest rates.

These instruments can be structured with a first-loss guarantee feature, with either philanthropic capital or a development aid institution standing ready to absorb loss up to a certain threshold. This serves as a form of credit enhancement and catalyst to attract private investors. As returns vary according to the level of social impact, dis-cretion must be used to identify bonds associated with effective service providers.

SIBs have achieved varying degrees of success since inception. The first one, called the Peterbor-ough Social Impact Bond, was issued in the UK in 2010. It was launched by Social Finance, a not-for-profit organization that addresses social issues through public-private partnerships. The goal of the program was to rehabilitate 3,000 short-term male prisoners at Peterborough prison. Its success would be measured by a set reduction (at least 7.5%) in the 12-month reconviction rate over a seven-year term, with greater upside for reductions above the threshold. According to the G8’s Social Impact Investment Taskforce, the program has met its objective, with the first cohort of 1,000 prisoners demonstrating an 8.4% reduction in reconviction events relative to the comparable national baseline. Similar success was achieved in Australia: its first SIB returned 7.5% to investors. But the initial SIB in the US disappointed. The goal of the program was to reduce youth recidivism rates at Riker’s Island jail through cognitive therapy. Unfortunately, it did not achieve the threshold rate needed to trigger returns, and as a result was discontinued.

Fig. 9: Active social impact bonds by sector

Source: Gustafsson-Wright et al. (2015)

18

13

4

3

Social welfare

Employment

Criminal justice

Education



Despite their uneven track record, SIBs and DIBs are likely to continue to gain in popularity. SIBs today fund over 40 programs globally, pro-viding quality preschool education, reducing prison recidivism and increasing youth employ-ment. Though still in their infancy, DIBs have been launched in areas such as healthcare and education.

The learning curve is steep, as these deals involve public and private stakeholder collaboration in an often unchartered, complex area. Success has been best in fields with complex inputs but simple outcomes that can be easily quantified, though impact bonds will likely come to include a wider range of objectives, including those related to childhood development, health, housing, and water and sanitation, according to a recent study by the Brookings Institution. As the market grows, the difficulties faced in the first five years of deal development should lessen, opening up more opportunities. In fact, the US Congress is currently considering the bipartisan Social Impact Bond Act, legislation that would enable the US federal government to allocate USD 300m to SIBs.

Sustainable private market investmentsBecause finding listed equity investments focused exclusively on specific sustainable activities is dif-ficult, sustainability-minded investors are increas-ingly turning to private markets. Funds engaged in private equity, private debt and private real assets (such as real estate and infrastructure) have emerged as effective structures to invest in while targeting certain sustainability objectives.

Private market vehicles dedicated to sustainable investment are typical examples of impact invest-ing, which targets generating a measurable posi-tive social and/or environmental impact alongside financial returns. Impact investing funds are run by fund managers (general partners) who aim to effect this positive social outcome and finan-cial return through direct financing of non-listed companies or assets. Fund investors (limited part-ners) own the fund and receive updates about how well it is faring according to specific sus-tainability metrics as well as the usual financial metrics. Impact investing funds are illiquid invest-ments, require a longer-term capital commitment and involve periodic capital calls when the gen-eral partner is ready to invest in a company.

Private equity impact funds aim to provide equity financing (such as venture and growth capital) to non-listed companies. Private debt impact funds operate through a wide range of debt instruments (from senior secured to unsecured subordinated), which are adapted to the profile and needs of borrowers. Private real asset funds finance projects (such as social housing or educa-tional infrastructure) through a mix of equity and debt injection. Impact investing through private market funds targets a broad range of non-finan-cial outcomes, such as job creation in underpriv-ileged communities and regions and improved access to education, healthcare and capital.

Microfinance provides financial services to individ-uals and small business entrepreneurs – typically in a developing country – who would otherwise lack access to them. While it also includes micro-savings and microinsurance, it was popularized through microcredit. Microcredit institutions lend small amounts of money usually to impoverished individuals without requiring collateral from them, such as assets or a secure job. The most famous modern microcredit institution is the Grameen Bank, which emerged in 1983 in Bangladesh. It provides microloans to women by relying on a group lending system. Its success has led to wide-spread adoption of variations of this model across the developing world.

Investors can invest in microfinance either through private equity participations in microfi-nance institutions, investments in microfinance funds or direct lending to such institutions. Funds enable investors to diversify their exposure by region, type of recipient and financing strategy.


Outlook andconclusion

I alone can’t change the world, but I can cast a stone across the water to create many ripples.Mother Theresa, missionary (1910–1997)

Outlook and conclusion

Achieving the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is unfeasible with public funds alone. The funding gap can only be bridged if the private sector steps up its contribution significantly. National governments and multi-lateral institutions are set to adopt policies and programs aimed at mobilizing private capital through regulations, incentive structures and public-private partnerships. The challenges underlying the SDGs create a range of opportunities for private investors, among them thematically driven investments of traditional stocks and bonds that can feature in portfolios in a mainstream fashion. They can focus on energy efficiency, climate change miti-gation, water and food availability, or infrastruc-ture construction in developing economies, to name just a few areas.

In addition, innovative investments aimed at sol-ving specific problems have emerged in recent years and will continue to grow in popularity, in our view. They include green bonds aimed at financing environmentally friendly projects, as well as social impact bonds and development impact bonds that finance social services and development projects with payoffs accruing to investors only when the projects succeed. Finally, within private markets, dedicated private equity, private debt and real asset funds that finance targeted, high-impact projects are also likely to garner greater investor attention. Today, investors so inclined can already stream-line a sustainable investing approach across their portfolios. Developments in coming years will make it even more straightforward.


GlossaryEM Emerging markets

EU European Union

GHG Greenhouse gas

LED Light-emitting diode

MDGs Millennium Development Goals

OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development

SDGs Sustainable Development Goals

SI Sustainable Investing

UN United Nations

UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development

Appendix

BibliographyGustafsson-Wright, E., Gardiner, S. and Putcha, V. (2015), “The Potential and Limitations of Impact Bonds: Lessons from the First Five Years of Experience Worldwide”, Global Economy and Development Pro-gram – Brookings.

UNCTAD (2014), “World Investment Report 2014, Investing in the SDGs: An Action Plan.”

Sustainable Development Goals and Targets:

United Nations (2015), “Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.”

Millennium Development Goals, Targets and Indicators:

http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/goals/gti.htm

United Nations (2015), “The Millennium Develop-ment Goals Report 2015,” New York.

The World Bank (2012), “What a waste: A Global Review of Solid Waste Management,” Washington D.C.


Appendix

UBS Chief Investment Office WM’s investment views are prepared and published by Wealth Management and Retail & Corporate or Wealth Management Americas, Business Divisions of UBS AG (regulated by FINMA in Switzerland), its subsidiary or affiliate (“UBS”). In certain countries UBS AG is referred to as UBS SA. This material is for your information only and is not intended as an offer, or a solicitation of an offer, to buy or sell any investment or other specific product. Certain services and products are subject to legal restrictions and cannot be offered worldwide on an unrestricted basis and/or may not be eligible for sale to all investors. All information and opinions expressed in this material were obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to its accuracy or completeness (other than disclosures relating to UBS). All information and opinions as well as any prices indicated are current as of the date of this report, and are subject to change without notice. The market prices provided in performance charts and tables are closing prices on the respective principal stock exchange. The analysis contained herein is based on numerous assumptions. Different assumptions could result in materially different results. Opinions expressed herein may differ or be contrary to those expressed by other business areas or divisions of UBS as a result of using different assumptions and/or criteria. UBS and any of its directors or employees may be entitled at any time to hold long or short positions in investment instruments referred to herein, carry out transactions involving relevant investment instruments in the capacity of principal or agent, or provide any other services or have officers, who serve as directors, either to/for the issuer, the invest-ment instrument itself or to/for any company commercially or financially affiliated to such issuers. At any time, investment decisions (including whether to buy, sell or hold securities) made by UBS and its employees may differ from or be contrary to the opinions expressed in UBS research publications. Some investments may not be readily realizable since the market in the securities is illiquid and therefore valuing the investment and identifying the risk to which you are exposed may be difficult to quantify. UBS relies on information barriers to control the flow of information contained in one or more areas within UBS, into other areas, units, divisions or affiliates of UBS. Futures and options trading is considered risky. Past performance of an investment is no guarantee for its future performance. Additional information will be made available upon request. Some investments may be subject to sudden and large falls in value and on realization you may receive back less than you invested or may be required to pay more. Changes in foreign exchange rates may have an adverse effect on the price, value or income of an investment. The analyst(s) responsible for the preparation of this report may interact with trading desk personnel, sales personnel and other constituen-cies for the purpose of gathering, synthesizing and interpreting market information. Tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future. UBS does not provide legal or tax advice and makes no representations as to the tax treatment of assets or the investment returns thereon both in general or with reference to specific client’s circumstances and needs. We are of necessity unable to take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation and needs of our individual clients and we would recommend that you take financial and/or tax advice as to the implications (including tax) of investing in any of the products mentioned herein. This material may not be repro-duced or copies circulated without prior authority of UBS. UBS expressly prohibits the distribution and transfer of this material to third parties for any reason. UBS accepts no liability whatsoever for any claims or lawsuits from any third parties arising from the use or distribution of this material. This report is for distribution only under such circumstances as may be permitted by applicable law. In developing the Chief Investment Office (CIO) economic forecasts, CIO economists worked in collaboration with economists employed by UBS Investment Research. Forecasts and estimates are current only as of the date of this publication and may change without notice. For information on the ways in which UBS CIO WM manages conflicts and maintains independence of its investment views and publication offering, and research and rating methodologies, please visit www.ubs.com/research. Additional informa-tion on the relevant authors of this publication and other CIO publication(s) referenced in this report; and copies of any past reports on this topic; are available upon request from your client advisor.

External Asset Managers / External Financial Consultants: In case this research or publication is provided to an External Asset Manager or an External Financial Consultant, UBS expressly prohibits that it is redistributed by the External Asset Manager or the External Financial Consultant and is made available to their clients and/or third parties. Australia: 1) Clients of UBS Wealth Management Australia Ltd: This notice is issued by UBS Wealth Management Australia Ltd ABN 50 005 311 937 (Holder of Australian Financial Services Licence No. 231127): This Document is general in nature and does not constitute personal financial product advice. The Document does not take into account any person’s objectives, financial situation or needs, and a recipient should obtain advice from an independent financial adviser and consider any relevant offer or disclosure document prior to making any investment decisions. 2) Clients of UBS AG: This notice is issued by UBS AG ABN 47 088 129 613 (Holder of Australian Financial Services Licence No 231087): This Document is issued and distributed by UBS AG. This is the case despite anything to the contrary in the Document. The Document is intended for use only by “Wholesale Clients” as defined in section 761G (“Wholesale Clients”) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (“Corporations Act”). In no circumstances may the Document be made available by UBS AG to a “Retail Client” as defined in section 761G of the Corporations Act. UBS AG’s research services are only available to Wholesale Clients. The Document is general information only and does not take into account any person’s investment objectives, financial and taxation situation or particular needs. Bahamas: This publication is distributed to private clients of UBS (Bahamas) Ltd and is not intended for distribution to persons designated as a Bahamian citizen or resident under the Bahamas Exchange Control Regulations. Bahrain: UBS AG is a Swiss bank not licensed, supervised or regulated in Bahrain by the Central Bank of Bahrain and does not undertake banking or investment business activities in Bahrain. Therefore, Clients have no protection under local banking and investment services laws and regulations. Belgium: This publica-tion is not intended to constitute a public offering or a comparable solicitation under Belgian law, but might be made available for information purposes to clients of UBS Belgium, branch of UBS (Luxembourg) SA, registered with the National Bank of Belgian and authorized by the “Financial Services and Markets Authority”, to which this publication has not been submitted for approval. Brazil: Prepared by UBS Brasil Administradora de Valores Mobiliários Ltda, entity regulated by Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (“CVM”) Canada: In Canada, this publication is distributed to clients of UBS Wealth Management Canada by UBS Investment Management Canada Inc.. Dubai: Research is issued by UBS AG Dubai Branch within the DIFC, is intended for professional clients only and is not for onward distribution within the United Arab Emirates. France: This publication is distributed by UBS (France) S.A., French “société anonyme” with share capital of € 125.726.944, 69, boulevard Haussmann F-75008 Paris, R.C.S. Paris B 421 255 670, to its clients and prospects. UBS (France) S.A. is a provider of investment services duly author-ized according to the terms of the “Code Monétaire et Financier”, regulated by French banking and financial authorities as the “Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution.” Germany: The issuer under German Law is UBS Deutschland AG, Bockenheimer Landstrasse 2-4, 60306 Frankfurt am Main. UBS Deutschland AG is authorized and regulated by the „Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht“. Hong Kong: This publication is distributed to clients of UBS AG Hong Kong Branch by UBS AG Hong Kong Branch, a licensed bank under the Hong Kong Banking Ordinance and a registered institution under the Securities and Futures Ordinance. India: Distributed by UBS Securities India Private Ltd. 2/F, 2 North Avenue, Maker Maxity, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai (India) 400051. Phone: +912261556000. SEBI Registration Numbers: NSE (Capital Market Segment): INB230951431, NSE (F&O Segment) INF230951431, BSE (Capital Market Segment) INB010951437. Indonesia: This research or publication is not intended and not prepared for purposes of public offering of securities under the Indonesian Capital Market Law and its implementing regulations. Securities mentioned in this material have not been, and will not be, registered under the Indonesian Capital Market Law and Regulations. Israel: UBS AG is registered as a Foreign Dealer in cooperation with UBS Wealth Management Israel Ltd, a wholly owned UBS subsidiary. UBS Wealth Management Israel Ltd is a licensed Portfolio Manager which engages also in Investment Marketing and is regulated by the Israel Securities Authority. This publication shall not replace any investment advice and/or investment marketing provided by a relevant licensee which is adjusted to your personal needs. Italy: This publication is distributed to the clients of UBS (Italia) S.p.A., via del vecchio politec-nico 3, Milano, an Italian bank duly authorized by Bank of Italy to the provision of financial services and supervised by “Consob” and Bank of Italy. UBS Italia has not participated in the produc-tion of the publication and of the research on investments and financial analysis herein contained. Jersey: UBS AG, Jersey Branch, is regulated and authorized by the Jersey Financial Services Commission for the conduct of banking, funds and investment business. Luxembourg: This publication is not intended to constitute a public offer under Luxembourg law, but might be made available for information purposes to clients of UBS (Luxembourg) S.A., 33A avenue J.F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg, R.C.S. Luxembourg B 11142, a regulated bank under the supervision of the “Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier” (CSSF), to which this publication has not been submitted for approval. Mexico: This document has been distributed by UBS Asesores México, S.A. de C.V., a company which is not part of UBS Grupo Financiero, S.A. de C.V. or of any other Mexican financial group and whose obligations are not guaranteed by any third party. UBS Asesores México, S.A. de C.V. does not guarantee any yield whatsoever. Netherlands: This publication is not intended to constitute a public offering or a comparable solicitation under Dutch law, but might be made available for information purposes to clients of UBS Bank (Netherlands) B.V., a regulated bank under the supervision of “De Nederlansche Bank” (DNB) and “Autoriteit Financiële Markten” (AFM), to which this publication has not been submitted for approval. New Zealand: This notice is distributed to clients of UBS Wealth Management Australia Limited ABN 50 005 311 937 (Holder of Australian Financial Services Licence No. 231127), Chifley Tower, 2 Chifley Square, Sydney, New South Wales, NSW 2000, by UBS Wealth Management Australia Ltd. You are being provided with this UBS publication or material because you have indicated to UBS that you are a client certified as a wholesale investor and/or an eligible investor (“Certified Client”) located in New Zealand. This publication or material is not intended for clients who are not Certified Clients (“Non-Certified Clients”), and if you are a Non-Certified Client you must not rely on this publication or material. If despite this warning you nevertheless rely on this publication or material, you hereby (i) acknowledge that you may not rely on the content of this publication or material and that any recommendations or opinions in this publication or material are not made or provided to you, and (ii) to the maximum extent permitted by law (a) indemnify UBS and its associates or related entities (and their respective directors, officers, agents and advisers (each a “Relevant Person”) for any loss, damage, liability or claim any of them may incur or suffer as a result of, or in connection with, your unauthorised reliance on this publication or material and (b) waive any rights or remedies you may have against any Relevant Person for (or in respect of) any loss, damage, liability or claim you may incur or suffer as a result of, or in connection with, your unauthorised reliance on this publication or material. Saudi Arabia: This publication has been approved by UBS Saudi Arabia (a subsidiary of UBS AG), a Saudi Arabian closed joint stock company incorporated in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia under commercial register number 1010257812 having its registered office at Tatweer Towers, P.O. Box 75724, Riyadh 11588, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. UBS Saudi Arabia is authorized and regu-lated by the Capital Market Authority of Saudi Arabia. Singapore: Please contact UBS AG Singapore branch, an exempt financial adviser under the Singapore Financial Advisers Act (Cap. 110) and a wholesale bank licensed under the Singapore Banking Act (Cap. 19) regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, the analysis or report. Spain: This publication is distributed to clients of UBS Bank, S.A. by UBS Bank, S.A., a bank registered with the Bank of Spain. Taiwan: This material is provided in accordance with laws of Taiwan, in agreement with or at the request of clients. UAE: This research report is not intended to constitute an offer, sale or delivery of shares or other securities under the laws of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The contents of this report have not been and will not be approved by any authority in the United Arab Emirates including the UAE Central Bank or Dubai Financial Authorities, the Emirates Securities and Commodities Authority, the Dubai Financial Market, the Abu Dhabi Securities market or any other UAE exchange. UK: Approved by UBS AG, authorised and regulated by the Financial Market Supervisory Authority in Switzerland. In the United Kingdom, UBS AG is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Details about the extent of our regulation by the Pruden-tial Regulation Authority are available from us on request. A member of the London Stock Exchange. This publication is distributed to private clients of UBS London in the UK. Where products or services are provided from outside the UK, they will not be covered by the UK regulatory regime or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. USA: This document is not intended for distribution into the US and / or to US persons. UBS Securities LLC is a subsidiary of UBS AG and an affiliate of UBS Financial Services Inc., UBS Financial Services Inc. is a subsidiary of UBS AG.

Version 05/2015.

© UBS 2015. The key symbol and UBS are among the registered and unregistered trademarks of UBS. All rights reserved.

Documents

In challenge lies opportunity - UBS · 2. End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture. 3. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being