Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
06973-00001/8978191.1 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
ALACRITECH, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CENTURYLINK COMMUNICATIONS
LLC, et al.
Defendants.
Case No. 2:16-cv-693-JRG-RSP
LEAD CASE
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ALACRITECH, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
WINSTRON CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:16-cv-692-JRG-RSP
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
MEMBER CASE
ALACRITECH, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
DELL INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 2:16-cv-695-RWS-RSP
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
MEMBER CASE
INTEL CORPORATION,
Intervenor.
JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO PATENT RULE 4-3
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 4126
INTEL Ex.1039.001
06973-00001/8978191.1 2
Pursuant to Patent Rule 4-3 and the Court’s Docket Control Order, Plaintiff Alacritech,
Inc. (“Alacritech”) and Intervenor and Defendants (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby submit
this Joint Claim Construction Statement.
A. CONSTRUCTION OF THOSE CLAIM TERMS, PHRASES, OR CLAUSES
ON WHICH THE PARTIES AGREE
The parties do not presently agree on the constructions of any terms.
B. EACH PARTY’S PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF EACH DISPUTED
CLAIM TERM, PHRASE, OR CLAUSE, TOGETHER WITH AN
IDENTIFICATION OF INTRINSIC AND OTHER EVIDENCE
Exhibits A and B, attached hereto, identify the disputed claim terms. Exhibit A contains
Alacritech’s proposed constructions for each disputed claim term and intrinsic and other
evidence in support; Exhibit B contains Defendants’ proposed constructions for each disputed
claim term and intrinsic and other evidence in support.
C. THE ANTICIPATED LENGTH OF TIME NECESSARY FOR THE
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING
The parties anticipate that two hours per side will be sufficient time to present the parties’
respective positions.
D. POSSIBLE WITNESSES AT THE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING
The parties do not presently intend to call any witnesses at the Claim Construction
Hearing.
E. OTHER ISSUES WHICH MIGHT APPROPRIATELY BE TAKEN UP AT
A PREHEARING CONFERENCE PRIOR TO THE CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION HEARING
The parties are not aware of any other issues that should be taken up at a pre-hearing
conference before the Claim Construction Hearing.
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134 Filed 02/21/17 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 4127
INTEL Ex.1039.002
06973-00001/8978191.1 3
Dated: February 21, 2017 Respectfully submitted,
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
/s/ Joseph M. Paunovich_______________
Claude M. Stern
California State Bar No. 96737
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
Joseph M. Paunovich
California State Bar No. 228222
Jordan Brock Kaericher
California State Bar No. 265953
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
T. John Ward, Jr.
Texas State Bar No. 00794818
Claire Abernathy Henry
Texas State Bar No. 24053063
WARD & SMITH LAW FIRM
1507 Bill Owens Parkway
Longview, Texas 75604
Telephone: (903) 757-6400
Facsimile: (903) 757-2323
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
ALACRITECH, INC.
WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP
/s/ Garland T. Stephens
Garland T. Stephens, Lead Attorney (24053910)
Douglas W. McClellan (24027488)
Melissa L. Hotze (24049831)
Justin L. Constant (24067551)
Richard D. Eiszner (65891)
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
700 Louisiana, Suite 1700
Houston, TX 77002
Telephone: (713) 546-5000
Facsimile: (713) 224-9511
Anne Marie Cappella (181402)
Jeremy Jason Lang (255642)
Amanda K. Branch (300860)
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 802-3000
Facsimile: (650) 802-3100
William Sutton Ansley (80085)
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
1300 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: (202) 682-7000
Facsimile: (202) 857-0940
David Mitchell DesRosier (676024)
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
100 Federal Street, 34th Floor
Boston, MA 02110
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134 Filed 02/21/17 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 4128
INTEL Ex.1039.003
06973-00001/8978191.1 4
Telephone: (617) 772-8300
Facsimile: (617) 772-8333
Harry L. Gillam, Jr. (07921800)
Gillam & Smith LLP
303 S. Washington Ave.
Marshall, TX 75670
Telephone: (903) 934-8450
Facsimile: (903) 934-9257
David Folsom (07210800)
Jackson Walker L.L.P.
6002 Summerfield Dr., Suite B
Texarkana, TX 75503
Telephone: (903) 255-3250
Facsimile: (903) 255-3265
ATTORNEYS FOR INTERVENOR
INTEL CORPORATION
/s/ Frank V. Pietrantonio
Deron R. Dacus
Texas Bar No. 00790553
THE DACUS FIRM, P.C.
821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430
Tyler, TX 75701
Tel: (903) 705-1117
Fax: (903) 705-1117
Jonathan G. Graves (VA Bar 46136)
Frank V. Pietrantonio (VA Bar 25473)
Stephen C. Crenshaw (VA Bar 82016)
COOLEY LLP
One Freedom Square
Reston Town Center
11951 Freedom Drive
Reston, VA 20190-5656
Telephone: (703) 456-800
Fax: (703) 456-8100
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134 Filed 02/21/17 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 4129
INTEL Ex.1039.004
06973-00001/8978191.1 5
Phillip E. Morton (DC Bar 1032243)
COOLEY LLP
1299 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Suite 700
Washington, DC 20004-2400
Telephone: (202) 842-7800
Fax: (202) 842-7899
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS TIER 3,
INC., SAVVIS COMMUNICATIONS CORP.,
AND CENTURYLINK COMMUNICATIONS
LLC
/s/ Michael J. Newton
Michael J. Newton (TX Bar No. 24003844)
Brady Cox (TX Bar No. 24074084)
ALSTON & BIRD, LLP
2828 North Harwood Street, 18th Floor
Dallas, Texas 75201-2139
Tel: (214) 922-3400
Fax: (214) 922-3899
Deron R. Dacus (TX Bar No. 00790553)
THE DACUS FIRM, PC
821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430
Tyler, Texas 75701
(903) 705-1117
(903) 581-2543 Fax
Kirk T. Bradley (NC Bar No. 26490)
ALSTON & BIRD, LLP
Bank of America Plaza
101 South Tryon Street, Suite 4000
Charlotte, NC 28280-4000
Tel: (704) 444-1000
Fax: (704) 444-1111
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134 Filed 02/21/17 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 4130
INTEL Ex.1039.005
06973-00001/8978191.1 6
Lindsey Yeargin (GA Bar No. 248608)
Emily Chambers Welch (GA Bar No. 606071)
ALSTON & BIRD, LLP
One Atlantic Center
1201 West Peachtree St NW #4900
Atlanta, GA 30309
Tel: 404-881-7000
Fax: 404-881-7777
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT DELL INC.
/s/Harold H. Davis, Jr.
Ravi S. Deol
State Bar No. 24090073
K&L GATES LLP
1717 Main St.
Suite 2800
Dallas, Texas 75201
214.939.5500
214.939.5849 Facsimile
Harold H. Davis, Jr., Lead Counsel
California Bar No. 235552 (admitted in E.D. Tex.)
Howard Chen
Texas Bar No. 24009953
Rachel Burnim
California Bar No. 292952 (admitted in E.D. Tex.)
K&L GATES LLP
Four Embarcadero, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415.882.8200
Facsimile: 415.882.8220
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS WISTRON
CORP., WIWYNN CORP., AND SMS
INFOCOMM CORP.
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134 Filed 02/21/17 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 4131
INTEL Ex.1039.006
06973-00001/8978191.1 7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
document has been served on February 21, 2017, to all counsel of record who are deemed to
have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).
/s/ Antonio Sistos
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134 Filed 02/21/17 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 4132
INTEL Ex.1039.007
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 1 -
Exhibit A
Alacritech’s Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
JointlyProposedClaimConstructionTermsClaim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
1. “fast-path processing”
/ “slow-path processing”
Fast-path: “the protocol stack of the
host computer performs little or no
network layer or transport layer
processing”
---------------------------------
Slow-path: No construction necessary
‘205 Patent at Abstract
‘205 Patent at 3:48-51
‘205 Patent at 3:63 through 4:4
‘205 Patent at 8:8-40
‘205 Patent at 8:41-60
‘205 Patent at 11:18-30
‘205 Patent at 15:51-55
‘205 Patent at 17:6-34
‘205 Patent at 18:16-37
‘205 Patent at 21:45-50
‘205 Patent at 24:45-50
‘205 Patent at 39:35-45
‘205 Patent Claim 1
‘205 Patent Claim 8
‘205 Patent Claim 31
‘205 File History, 4/18/2006
Amendment at ALA00014037,
ALA00014043
‘036 Patent at 39:10-20
‘036 Patent at 39:45-48
‘241 File History, 10/04/2006
Amendment at ALA00015142
‘809 Provisional at 7-8
‘809 Provisional at 13
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
2. “context [for
communication]”
“data regarding an active connection” ‘036 Patent Claim 1
‘036 Patent Claim 6
‘036 Patent Claim 7
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
Context: the set of circumstances or
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 23 PageID #: 4133
INTEL Ex.1039.008
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 2 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
‘036 Patent at 7:62 through 8:2
‘036 Patent at 8:25-30
‘036 Patent at 10:10-22
‘036 Patent at 15:22-27
‘036 Patent at 37:63 through 38:10
‘036 Patent at 39:33-40
‘036 Patent at 39:45-48
‘036 Patent at Fig. 2
‘036 Patent at Fig. 4B
‘072 Patent Claim 7
‘072 Patent Claim 15
‘072 Patent Claim 21
‘036 File History, 03/28/2006
Amendment at ALA00014675,
ALA00014686
‘036 File History, 10/10/2006
Amendment at ALA00014513,
ALA00014514
‘241 File History, 10/04/2006
Amendment at ALA00015142
‘809 Provisional at 4-6
facts that surround a particular event,
situation, etc.1
Context: the circumstances in which
an event occurs.2
3. “flow key” “an identifier for a connection”
‘880 Patent Claim 1
‘880 Patent Claim 9
‘880 Patent Claim 10
‘880 Patent Claim 12
‘880 Patent Claim 13
‘880 Patent Claim 22
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
02/11/2011 Boucher Tr. (Patent
Interference No. 105,775), 63:23-
65:17.
1 Random House Webster’s College Dictionary, 2nd ed. (1999).
2 The American Heritage Dictionary, 3rd ed. (1994).
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 2 of 23 PageID #: 4134
INTEL Ex.1039.009
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 3 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
‘880 Patent Claim 23
‘880 Patent Claim 31
‘880 Patent Claim 32
‘880 Patent Claim 35
‘880 Patent Claim 36
‘880 Patent Claim 42
‘880 Patent Claim 48
‘880 Patent Claim 52
‘880 Patent Claim 56
‘880 Patent Claim 58
‘880 Patent Claim 59
‘880 Patent at 7:15-28
‘880 Patent at 7:47-60
‘880 Patent at 11:66 through 12:13
‘880 Patent at 13:29-48
‘880 Patent at 18:15-26
‘880 Patent at 36:38-46
‘880 Patent at 37:66 through 38:21
‘880 Patent at 59:27-33
‘880 Patent at 60:19-35
‘880 Patent at 61:56 through 62:2
‘880 Patent at 64:4-18
‘880 File History, 6/19/2003 Request to
Provoke Interference at
ALA07368392, ALA07368395,
ALA07368397, ALA07368401,
ALA07368412, ALA07368414
2/10/2011 Boucher Dep. Tr. 99:13-
20.
Key: In databases, a unique value
that is used to identify a data record.
Synonymous with primary key.3
Key: In database management, an
identifier for a record or group of
records in a datafile.4
Key: a group of characters that
identifies a record in a database or
other computer file.5
3 Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms, 8th ed. (2000).
4 Microsoft Computer Dictionary, 4th ed. (1999).
5 Random House Webster’s College Dictionary, 2nd ed. (1999).
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 3 of 23 PageID #: 4135
INTEL Ex.1039.010
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 4 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
‘880 File History, 6/14/2010
Amendment at ALA00016718
4. “database” / “flow
database”
“collection of organized data” ‘880 Patent Claim 43
‘880 Patent at 36:38-42
‘880 Patent at 64:4-18
‘880 File History, 6/19/2003 Request to
Provoke Interference at
ALA07368397, ALA07368408,
ALA07368412, ALA07368415
‘880 File History, 6/14/2010
Amendment at ALA00016722
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
Database: A collection of organized,
related data, esp. one in electronic
form that can be accessed and
manipulated by specialized computer
software.6
Database: A collection of related
information about a subject
organized in a useful manner that
provides a base or foundation for
procedures, such as retrieving
information, drawing conclusions,
and making decisions. Any
collection of information that servers
these purposes qualifies as a
database, even if the information
isn’t stored on a computer. In fact,
important predecessors of today’s
sophisticated business database
systems were files kept on index
cards and stored in file cabinets.
Information usually is divided into
data records, each with one or more
data fields.7
6 Random House Webster’s College Dictionary, 2nd ed. (1999).
7 Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms, 8th ed. (2000).
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 4 of 23 PageID #: 4136
INTEL Ex.1039.011
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 5 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
5. “a destination [] in the
memory of the
computer” / “a
destination memory;” /
“a destination in
memory;” / “a
destination . . . on the
host computer system”
“a single contiguous block or several
associated blocks of memory in the
computer”
‘699 Patent Claim 1
‘699 Patent Claim 2
‘699 Patent Claim 7
‘699 Patent Claim 13
‘699 Patent Claim 19
‘699 Patent Claim 20
‘699 Patent at Abstract
‘699 Patent at 2:44-60
‘699 Patent at 2:67 through 3:11
‘699 Patent at 5:36 through 6:8
‘699 Patent at 6:60-7:2
‘699 Patent at Figs. 2 and 3
‘241 Patent Claim 1
‘241 Patent Claim 3
‘241 Patent Claim 22
‘241 Patent Claim 23
‘205 Patent Claim 1
‘205 Patent Claim 6
‘205 Patent Claim 8
‘205 Patent at 43:4-18
‘809 Provisional at 1-3
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
Destination: 1. the place to which a
person or thing travels or is sent. 2.
The purpose for which something is
destined.8
Destination: The record, file,
document, or disk to which
information is copied or moved, as
opposed to the source.9
Destination: The location (drive,
folder, or directory) to which a file is
copied or moved. Compare source
(definition 1).10
8 Random House Webster’s College Dictionary, 2nd ed. (1999)
9 Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms, 8th ed. (2000)
10 Microsoft Computer Dictionary, 4th ed. (1999)
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 5 of 23 PageID #: 4137
INTEL Ex.1039.012
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 6 -
TermsProposedByPlaintiffClaim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
6. “operation code” “status data” ’880 Patent Claim 1
‘880 Patent Claim 13
‘880 Patent Claim 17
‘880 Patent Claim 32
‘880 Patent Claim 34
‘880 Patent Claim 46
‘880 Patent Claim 51
‘880 Patent Claim 52
‘880 Patent Claim 56
‘880 Patent at 7:47-60
‘880 Patent at 53:63 through 54:6
‘880 Patent at 63:28 through 64:18
‘880 Patent File History, 6/19/2003
Request to Provoke Interference
at ALA07368393,
ALA07368397, ALA07368406,
ALA07368411, ALA07368415
‘880 Patent File History, 6/14/2010
Amendment at ALA00016214,
ALA00016218
‘880 Patent File History, 11/1/2010
Amendment at ALA00016880,
ALA00016884
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
Word: The native unit of storage on
a particular machine. A word is the
largest amount of data that can be
handled by the microprocessor in one
operation and is also, as a rule, the
width of the main data bus. Word
sizes of 16 bits and 32 bits are the
most common.11
Word: A unit of information
composed of characters, bits, or bytes
that’s treated as an entity and that can
be stored in one location.12
11 Microsoft Computer Dictionary, 4th ed. (1999).
12 Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms, 8th ed. (2000)
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 6 of 23 PageID #: 4138
INTEL Ex.1039.013
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 7 -
TermsProposedByDefendantsClaim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
7. “prepending” /
“prepended”
No construction necessary ‘036 Patent Claim 4
‘072 Patent Claim 1
‘072 Patent Claim 9
‘072 Patent Claim 15
‘104 Patent Claim 1
‘104 Patent Claim 22
‘241 Patent Claim 7
‘241 Patent Claim 9
‘241 Patent Claim 12
‘241 Patent Claim 17
‘241 Patent Claim 18
‘036 Patent at 14:5-12
‘036 Patent at 4:14-18
‘036 Patent at 4:28-33
‘036 Patent at 4:39-46
’036 Patent at 8:8-14
‘036 Patent at 11:10-16
‘036 Patent at 11:36-42
‘036 Patent at 29:61-64
‘036 Patent at 39:21-27
‘036 Patent at Fig. 5
‘241 File History, 4/19/2007
Amendment at ALA00015063-
064, ALA00015071
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
8. “status information”
No construction necessary ‘072 Patent Claim 2
‘072 Patent Claim 3
‘072 Patent Claim 9
‘072 Patent Claim 10
‘072 Patent Claim 14
‘072 Patent Claim 15
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 7 of 23 PageID #: 4139
INTEL Ex.1039.014
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 8 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
‘072 Patent Claim 17
‘072 Patent Claim 21
‘072 Patent at 11:18-33
‘072 Patent at 13:51 through 14:10
‘072 Patent at 27:24-30
‘072 Patent at 30:14-16
‘072 Patent at 63:59-67
‘072 Patent at 64:21-38
9. “substantially no
network layer or
transport layer
processing” /
“significant network
layer or significant
transport layer
processing”
No construction necessary ‘205 Patent Claim 22
‘205 Patent Claim 31
‘205 Patent at Abstract
‘205 Patent at 4:48-50
‘205 Patent at 39:35-45
‘205 Patent at 43:13-17
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
10. “substantially
contiguous manner”
No construction necessary ‘205 Patent Claim 6
‘205 Patent at 42:30-47
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
11. “without an interrupt
dividing”
No construction necessary.13 ‘241 Patent Claim 1
‘241 Patent Claim 2
‘241 Patent Claim 17
‘241 Patent Claim 18
‘241 Patent Claim 22
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
Interrupt: A hardware or software
signal that temporarily stops program
execution in a computer so that
13 Should Defendants seek unnecessary judicial review of the term, Plaintiff reserves the right to rely on the provided extrinsic evidence.
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 8 of 23 PageID #: 4140
INTEL Ex.1039.015
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 9 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
‘241 Patent at 4:20-33
‘241 Patent at 5:24-28
‘241 Patent at 11:34-46
‘241 Patent at 14:9-33
‘241 Patent at 14:64 through 16:1
‘241 Patent at 16:19-22
‘241 Patent at 34:60 through 35:1
‘241 Patent at 36:24-54
‘241 Patent at 37:16-32
‘241 Patent at 41:27-40
another procedure can be carried
out.14
Interrupt: A signal to the
microprocessor indicating that an
event has occurred that requires its
attention. Processing is halted
momentarily so that input/output or
other operations can take place.
When the operation is finished,
processing resumes.15
Interrupt: A signal from a device to
a computer’s processor requesting
attention from the processor. When
the processor receives an interrupt, it
suspends its current operations, saves
the status of its work, and transfers
control to a special routine known as
an interrupt handler, which contains
the instructions for dealing with the
particular situation that caused the
interrupt. Interrupts can be generated
by various hardware devices to
request service or report problems, or
by the processor itself in response to
program errors or requests for
operating-system services. Interrupts
14 Random House Webster’s College Dictionary, 2nd ed. (1999)
15 Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms, 8th ed. (2000)
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 9 of 23 PageID #: 4141
INTEL Ex.1039.016
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 10 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
are the processor’s way of
communicating with the other
elements that make up a computer
system. A hierarchy of interrupt
priorities determines which interrupt
request will be handled first if more
than one request is made. A program
can temporarily disable some
interrupts if it needs the full attention
of the processor to complete a
particular task.16
12. “re-assembly buffer”
No construction necessary ‘880 Patent Claim 1
‘880 Patent Claim 18
‘880 Patent Claim 32
‘880 Patent Claim 56
‘880 Patent Claim 57
‘880 Patent at 22:57 through 23:4
‘880 Patent at 29:35-48
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
13. “Flow re-assembler”
No construction necessary. ‘880 Patent Claim 41
‘880 Patent at 11:66 through 12:13
‘880 Patent at 13:13-28
‘880 Patent at 13:29-48
‘880 Patent at 13:49-51
‘880 Patent at 14:4-9
‘880 Patent at 18:15-26
‘880 Patent at 33:64-34:9
‘880 File History, 11/1/2010
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
16 Microsoft Computer Dictionary, 4th ed. (1999)
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 10 of 23 PageID #: 4142
INTEL Ex.1039.017
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 11 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
Amendment at ALA07367744
‘880 File History, 6/14/2010 at
ALA07367903
‘880 File History, 6/19/2003 Request to
Provoke Interference at
ALA07368408, ALA07368415-
16
14. “packet batching
module”
No construction necessary.
‘880 Patent Claim 41
‘880 Patent Claim 54
‘880 Patent Claim 60
‘880 Patent at 64:4-18
‘880 Patent at Fig. 50
‘880 Patent at 5:48-63
‘880 Patent at 36:38-46
‘880 Patent at 37:66 through 38:21
‘880 Patent at 59:27-33
‘880 Patent at 60:19-35
‘880 Patent at 61:56 through 62:2
‘880 File History, 6/19/2003 Request to
Provoke Interference at
ALA07368408
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
15. “traffic classifier”
No construction necessary.17
‘880 Patent Claim 41
‘880 Patent Claim 42
‘880 Patent at 59:27-33
‘880 Patent at 63:25-63
‘880 File History, 6/19/2003 Request to
Provoke Interference at
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
Traffic: The messages sent and
received over a communication
channel.18
17 Should Defendants seek unnecessary judicial review of the term, Plaintiff reserves the right to rely on the provided extrinsic evidence.
18 Modern Dictionary of Electronics, 6th ed. (1997).
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 11 of 23 PageID #: 4143
INTEL Ex.1039.018
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 12 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
ALA07368407
‘880 File History, 11/1/2010
Amendment at ALA07367744
Traffic: Bellcore’s definition: A flow
of attempts, calls, and messages. My
definition: The amount of activity
during a given period of time over a
circuit, line or group of lines, or the
number of messages handled by a
communications switch. There are
many measures of “traffic.”
Typically it’s so many minutes of
voice conversation, or so many bits
of data conversation. Note that
Bellcore includes attempts in its
definition of traffic. I don't. The
decision is yours. But you should be
aware of what you include in your
calculations.19
Traffic: Messages that are
transmitted and received over a
communication channel.20
Prioritization of Network Traffic
Prioritization can be explained as
follows: implement some method to
get important packets through a
network when the network is
congested and delay unimportant
packets until later. Important packets
19 Newton’s Telecom Dictionary, 16th ed. (2000).
20 IEEE Standard Glossary of Computer Networking Terminology (1995).
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 12 of 23 PageID #: 4144
INTEL Ex.1039.019
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 13 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
are generally classified as delay-
sensitive traffic such as that generated
by live videoconferencing, voice
calls, mission-critical transaction
processing, remote monitoring, and
collaborative computing (in which
people work in real time on their
computer screens across networks).
Unimportant packets may include
packets carrying electronic mail or
packets downloaded from Internet
Web sites by freeloading users.21
See also Gupta, Sanjay et al., Traffic
classification and scheduling in ATM
networks (1993).
See also Kubbar, Osama et al.,
Traffic Classification and Resource
Allocation in ATM Networks (1996)
16. “flow database
manager”
No construction necessary [beyond
proposal for “database”]22
‘880 Patent Claim 42
‘880 Patent Claim 56
‘880 Patent at 59:11-12
‘880 Patent at 59:54-58
‘880 Patent at 64:29-35
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
Database: A collection of organized,
related data, esp. one in electronic
form that can be accessed and
21 Encyclopedia of Networking (1998).
22 Should Defendants seek unnecessary judicial review of the term, Plaintiff reserves the right to rely on the provided extrinsic evidence.
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 13 of 23 PageID #: 4145
INTEL Ex.1039.020
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 14 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
‘880 Patent at 68:25-29
‘880 File History, 6/19/2003 Request to
Provoke Interference at
ALA07368408
manipulated by specialized computer
software.23
Database: A collection of related
information about a subject organized
in a useful manner that provides a
base or foundation for procedures,
such as retrieving information,
drawing conclusions, and making
decisions. Any collection of
information that servers these
purposes qualifies as a database, even
if the information isn’t stored on a
computer. In fact, important
predecessors of today’s sophisticated
business database systems were files
kept on index cards and stored in file
cabinets. Information usually is
divided into data records, each with
one or more data fields.24
Database management: Tasks
related to creating, maintaining,
organizing, and retrieving
information from a database. See
data manipulation.25
23 Random House Webster’s College Dictionary, 2nd ed. (1999).
24 Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms, 8th ed. (2000).
25 Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms, 8th ed. (2000).
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 14 of 23 PageID #: 4146
INTEL Ex.1039.021
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 15 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
17. “flow manager”
No construction necessary.26 ‘880 Patent Claim 43
‘880 Patent Claim 46
‘880 Patent Claim 49
‘880 Patent at 11:66 through 12:13
‘880 Patent at 18:15-26
‘880 Patent at 59:27-33
‘880 Patent at 63:47-64
‘880 Patent at 87:60-65
‘880 File History, 6/19/2003 Request to
Provoke Interference at
ALA07368409, ALA07368411,
ALA07368412
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
Traffic: The messages sent and
received over a communication
channel.27
Traffic: Bellcore’s definition: A flow
of attempts, calls, and messages. My
definition: The amount of activity
during a given period of time over a
circuit, line or group of lines, or the
number of messages handled by a
communications switch. There are
many measures of “traffic.”
Typically it’s so many minutes of
voice conversation, or so many bits
of data conversation. Note that
Bellcore includes attempts in its
definition of traffic. I don't. The
decision is yours. But you should be
aware of what you include in your
calculations.28
26 Should Defendants seek unnecessary judicial review of the term, Plaintiff reserves the right to rely on the provided extrinsic evidence.
27 Modern Dictionary of Electronics, 6th ed. (1997).
28 Newton’s Telecom Dictionary, 16th ed. (2000).
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 15 of 23 PageID #: 4147
INTEL Ex.1039.022
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 16 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
Traffic: Messages that are
transmitted and received over a
communication channel.29
Prioritization of Network Traffic
Prioritization can be explained as
follows: implement some method to
get important packets through a
network when the network is
congested and delay unimportant
packets until later. Important packets
are generally classified as delay-
sensitive traffic such as that generated
by live videoconferencing, voice
calls, mission-critical transaction
processing, remote monitoring, and
collaborative computing (in which
people work in real time on their
computer screens across networks).
Unimportant packets may include
packets carrying electronic mail or
packets downloaded from Internet
Web sites by freeloading users.30
See also Gupta, Sanjay et al., Traffic
classification and scheduling in ATM
networks (1993).
29 IEEE Standard Glossary of Computer Networking Terminology (1995).
30 Encyclopedia of Networking (1998).
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 16 of 23 PageID #: 4148
INTEL Ex.1039.023
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 17 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
See also Kubbar, Osama et al.,
Traffic Classification and Resource
Allocation in ATM Networks (1996)
18. “re-assembler”
No construction necessary. ‘880 Patent Claim 43
‘880 Patent at 6:58 through 7:7
‘880 Patent at 13:49-56
‘880 Patent at 87:60-64
‘880 File History, 6/19/2003 Request to
Provoke Interference at
ALA07368405, ALA07368410,
ALA07367744-45
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
19. “means for
receiving, by the
network interface device
from the computer, a
command to transmit
data from the computer
to the network”
No construction necessary
Not subject to 112(6)
To the extent the Court determines
otherwise,
Function: Receiving a command to
transmit data from the computer to the
network
Structures: a network interface
device, a register on the network
interface device, and equivalents
thereof.
‘104 Patent Claim 22
‘104 Patent at Fig. 4
‘104 Patent at 3:30-44
‘104 Patent at 5:3-32
‘104 Patent at 6:14-26
‘205 Patent at 38:15-26
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
20. “means for sending,
by the network interface
No construction necessary
‘104 Patent Claim 22
‘104 Patent at 3:37-44
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 17 of 23 PageID #: 4149
INTEL Ex.1039.024
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 18 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
device to the network,
data corresponding to
the command, including
means for prepending a
transport layer header to
at least some of the
data”
Not subject to 112(6)
To the extent the Court determines
otherwise,
Function: Sending data corresponding
to the command, including means for
prepending a transport layer header to
at least some of the data
Structures: a network interface
device and equivalents thereof.
‘104 Patent at 5:5-16
‘104 Patent at 6:14-26
‘205 Patent at 38:15-26
21. “means for sending,
by the network interface
device to the computer,
an indication that the
data has been sent from
the network interface
device to the network,
prior to receiving, by the
network interface device
from the network, an
acknowledgement
(ACK) that the data has
been received.”
No construction necessary
Not subject to 112(6)
To the extent the Court determines
otherwise,
Function: Sending an indication that
the data has been sent from the
network interface device to the
network prior to receiving, by the
network interface device from the
network, an acknowledgment (ACK)
that the data was received.
Structures: a network interface
device and equivalents thereof.
‘104 Patent Claim 22
‘104 Patent at Abstract
‘104 Patent at 2:41-51
‘104 Patent at 4:1-11
‘104 Patent at 4:35-44
‘104 Patent at 4:45-62
‘205 Patent at 38:15-26
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
22. “means, coupled to Subject to 112(6) ‘205 Patent Claim 23 Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 18 of 23 PageID #: 4150
INTEL Ex.1039.025
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 19 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
the host computer, for
receiving from outside
the apparatus a response
to an ISCSI read request
command and for fast-
path processing a
portion of the response
to the ISCSI read
request command, the
portion including data,
the portion being fast-
path processed such that
the data is placed into
the destination memory
on the host computer
without the protocol
stack of the host
computer doing
significant network
layer or significant
transport layer
processing, the means
also being for receiving
a subsequent portion of
the response to the
ISCSI read request
command and for slow-
path processing the
subsequent portion such
that the protocol stack of
the host computer does
network layer and
Function: “receiving from outside the
apparatus a response to an ISCSI read
request command and for fast-path
processing a portion of the response to
the ISCSI read request command, the
portion including data, the portion
being fast-path processed such that the
data is placed into the destination
memory on the host computer without
the protocol stack of the host
computer doing significant network
layer or significant transport layer
processing, the means also being for
receiving a subsequent portion of the
response to the ISCSI read request
command and for slow-path
processing the subsequent portion
such that the protocol stack of the host
computer does network layer and
transport layer processing on the
subsequent portion”
Structure: A network interface
device, a processor in a network
interface device, and equivalents
thereof
‘205 Patent Claim 31
‘205 Patent at Abstract
‘205 Patent at Fig. 27
‘205 Patent at 4:23-39
‘205 Patent at 4:40-59
‘205 Patent at 6:15-18
’205 Patent at 17:6-19,
’205 Patent at 17:35-46
’205 Patent at 17:60-67
‘205 Patent at 38:4 through 40:63
‘205 Patent at 41:23-35
‘205 Patent at 43:4-22
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 19 of 23 PageID #: 4151
INTEL Ex.1039.026
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 20 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
transport layer
processing on the
subsequent portion”
23. “first mechanism” /
“second mechanism”
No construction necessary
Not subject to 112(6)
To the extent the Court determines
otherwise,
Claim 1
Function (1: “first mechanism”):
processing the packets so that for each
packet the network layer header and
the transport layer header are validated
without an interrupt dividing the
processing of the network layer header
and the transport layer header…
sending the data from each packet of
the first type to a destination in
memory allocated to an application
without sending any of the media
access control layer headers, network
layer headers or transport layer
headers to the destination
Structures (1: “first mechanism”):
A network interface device, a
processor in a network interface
device, and equivalents thereof
‘241 Patent Claim 1
‘241 Patent Claim 3
‘241 Patent Claim 17
‘241 Patent at 7:42-58
‘241 Patent at 8:61 through 9:5
‘241 Patent at 9:34-48
’241 Patent at 9:66 through 10:23
‘241 Patent at 10:24-40
‘241 Patent at 11:36-46
‘241 Patent at 13:8-33
‘241 Patent at 14:34-46
‘241 Patent at 15:16-30
‘241 Patent at 15:53-60
‘241 Patent at 17:20-36
‘241 Patent at 17:37 through 18:9
‘241 Patent at 31:51-66
‘241 Patent at 32:9-16
‘241 Patent at 39:32-45
‘241 Patent at 40:22-42
‘241 Patent at 43:9-35
‘241 Patent at Fig. 4B
‘241 Patent at Fig. 11
‘036 Patent at 5:21-29
‘036 Patent at 6:32-33
‘036 Patent at 39:21-27
‘036 Patent at 41:31-37
‘036 Patent at Fig. 3
‘036 Patent at Fig. 6
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 20 of 23 PageID #: 4152
INTEL Ex.1039.027
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 21 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
Claims 3 & 4:
Function (Claim 3: “second mechanism”): “processing an upper
layer header of at least one of the
packets thereby determining the
destination, wherein the upper layer
header corresponds to a protocol layer
above the transport layer.
Function (Claim 4: “second mechanism”): processing an upper
layer header of at least one of the
packets of the second type thereby
determining the destination
Structure(s) (Claims 3 & 4: “second
mechanism”): a host CPU operating
a TCP protocol stack, as detailed in,
e.g., ’241 Patent, 9:66 to 10:23, 40:22-
42, 43:9-35, Fig. 4B, and equivalents
thereto.
Claim 5
Function (Claim 5: “second mechanism”): processing a transport
layer header of another packet prior to
receiving the plurality of packets
from the network, thereby establishing
a Transmission Control Protocol
‘036 Patent at Fig. 9
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 21 of 23 PageID #: 4153
INTEL Ex.1039.028
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 22 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
(TCP) connection for the packets of
the first type.
Structure(s) (Claim 5: “second
mechanism”): a host CPU operating
a TCP protocol stack, as detailed in,
e.g., ‘241 patent, 9:34-48, 9:66 to
10:23, 39:32-45, 43:9-35, Fig. 4B, and
equivalents thereto
Claim 17
Function (17: “first mechanism”):
providing a block of data and a
Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
connection
Structures (17: “first mechanism”):
a host CPU operating a TCP protocol
stack, as detailed in, e.g., ‘241 patent,
7:42-58; 17:20-36; Fig. 11; and
equivalents thereof.
Function (17: “second mechanism”):
dividing the block of data into
multiple segments; prepending an
outbound packet header to each of the
segments, thereby forming an
outbound packet corresponding to
each segment, the outbound packet
header containing an outbound media
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 22 of 23 PageID #: 4154
INTEL Ex.1039.029
06973-00001/8977889.2 - 23 -
Claim Term Proposed Construction(s) Intrinsic Evidence Extrinsic Evidence
access control layer header, an
outbound Internet Protocol (IP) header
and an outbound TCP header, wherein
the prepending of each outbound
packet header occurs without an
interrupt dividing the prepending of
the outbound media access control
layer header, the outbound (IP) header
and the outbound TCP header.
Structures (17: “second
mechanism”): A network interface
device, a processor in the network
interface device, and equivalents
thereof
24. second
apparatus[es]”
No construction necessary
Not subject to 112(6).
‘036 Patent Claim 1
‘036 Patent Claim 5
‘036 Patent Claim 7
‘036 Patent at Abstract
‘036 Patent at 7:53-66
‘036 Patent at 8:9-15
‘036 Patent at 15:9-27
‘036 Patent at 15:
Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 23 of 23 PageID #: 4155
INTEL Ex.1039.030
1
Exhibit B
Defendants’ and Intervenors’ Proposed Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
“prepending” /
“prepended”
036: 4
072: 1, 9, 15
104: 1, 22
241: 7, 9, 12,
15, 17, 18
“adding to the
front” / “added to
the front”
[Alacritech 1997 Prov. pp. 6, 57, ALA00138383 at ALA00138392, 443]
[Alacritech 1998 Prov. pp. 91-92, ALA00138562 at ALA00138654-55]
[Alacritech 2002 Prov., 2002-04-22 Specification, 60/374,788, pp. 122, 159, 338, 377,
378, 521, 562, 725, 782]
[241 Patent Claim 7]
[241 Patent Claim 9]
[241 Patent Claim 12]
[241 Patent Claim 15]
[241 Patent Claim 17]
[241 Patent Claim 18]
[241 Patent Claim 21]
[241 Patent 11:9-46]
[241 Patent 12:19-50]
[241 Patent 13:48-14:33]
[241 Patent 16:9-33]
[241 Patent 16:57-17:19]
[241 Patent 29:42-55]
[241 Patent 32:56-33:18]
[241 Patent 68:48-50]
[072 Patent Claim 1]
[072 Patent Claim 9]
1 To the extent that the cited Supporting Evidence includes references to other portions of specifications, figures, or other documents,
they are expressly incorporated. To the extent that the testimony of Mark Lanning is cited as Supporting Evidence, all references or
citations included in the Declarations of Mr. Mark Lanning regarding claim construction in this case are expressly incorporated.
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 100 PageID #: 4156
INTEL Ex.1039.031
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
2
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[072 Patent Claim 15]
[072 Patent 11:18-54]
[072 Patent 12:26-57]
[072 Patent 13:52-14:36]
[072 Patent 16:10-34]
[072 Patent 16:57-17:18]
[072 Patent 29:33-45]
[072 Patent 32:41-33:2]
[072 Patent 67:57-67]
[104 Patent Claim 1]
[104 Patent Claim 21]
[104 Patent Claim 22]
[104 Patent Claim 23]
[036 Patent Claim 4]
[036 Patent Claim 21]
[036 Patent 11:20-57]
[036 Patent 12:30-61]
[036 Patent 13:59-14:44]
[036 Patent 16:20-44]
[036 Patent 17:1-30]
[036 Patent 29:52-64]
[036 Patent 32:65-33:27]
[036 Patent 68:40-52]
“fast-path
processed” /
“fast-path
processing”
205: 1, 8, 31
“a mode of
operation in
which the
network interface
device performs
all physical layer,
[Alacritech 1997 Prov. pp. 6, 7, 10-14, 15, 18, 21, 24, 25-28, 30, 35, 39-45, 53, 55, 57,
ALA00138383 at ALA00138392, 393, 396-400, 401, 404, 407, 410, 411-414, 416, 421,
425-431, 439, 441, 443]
[205 Patent Claim 1]
[205 Patent Claim 8]
[205 Patent Claim 14]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 2 of 100 PageID #: 4157
INTEL Ex.1039.032
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
3
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
MAC layer, IP
layer, and TCP
layer processing”
[205 Patent Claim 17]
[205 Patent Claim 31]
[205 Patent 1:37-56]
[205 Patent 2:19-31]
[205 Patent 3:40-59]
[205 Patent 3:60-4:6]
[205 Patent 4:23-39]
[205 Patent 4:40-64]
[205 Patent 5:40-42]
[205 Patent 6:14-17]
[205 Patent 8:8-24]
[205 Patent 8:25-40]
[205 Patent 8:41-60]
[205 Patent 9:17-29]
[205 Patent 10:26-38]
[205 Patent 10:39-57]
[205 Patent 10:58-11:17]
[205 Patent 11:18-31]
[205 Patent 11:53-12:3]
[205 Patent 12:4-24]
[205 Patent 12:59-13:13]
[205 Patent 13:14-42]
[205 Patent 14:21-49]
[205 Patent 15:51-16:9]
[205 Patent 16:24-52]
[205 Patent 16:53-17:5]
[205 Patent 17:6-18]
[205 Patent 17:19-34]
[205 Patent 17:35-49]
[205 Patent 18:1-15]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 3 of 100 PageID #: 4158
INTEL Ex.1039.033
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
4
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[205 Patent 18:16-37]
[205 Patent 18:38-56]
[205 Patent 18:57-19:10]
[205 Patent 19:11-31]
[205 Patent 20:61-21:12]
[205 Patent 21:13-26]
[205 Patent 22:43-56]
[205 Patent 35:27-44]
[205 Patent 36:8-21]
[205 Patent 36:22-43]
[205 Patent 36:44-49]
[205 Patent 36:50-37:7]
[205 Patent 37:8-18]
[205 Patent 37:19-61]
[205 Patent 39:30-45]
[205 Patent 39:46-62]
[205 Patent 39:63-40:11]
[205 Patent 40:36-63]
[205 Patent 41:23-35]
[205 Patent 42:11-16]
[205 Patent 42:48-60]
[205 Patent 43:4-28]
“slow path
processing”
205: 8, 31
“a mode of
operation in
which the host
performs at least
some of the
physical layer,
MAC layer, IP
layer, or TCP
[Alacritech 1997 Prov. pp. 6, 7, 10-14, 15, 18, 21, 24, 25-28, 30, 35, 39-45, 53, 55,
ALA00138383 at ALA00138392, 393, 396-400, 401, 404, 407, 410, 411-414, 416, 421,
425-431, 439, 441]
[205 Patent Claim 8]
[205 Patent Claim 14]
[205 Patent Claim 31]
[205 Patent Claim 34]
[205 Patent 2:52-3:13]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 4 of 100 PageID #: 4159
INTEL Ex.1039.034
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
5
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
layer processing”
[205 Patent 4:23-39]
[205 Patent 4:40-64]
[205 Patent 5:40-42]
[205 Patent 6:14-17]
[205 Patent 8:25-40]
[205 Patent 11:53-12:3]
[205 Patent 14:21-49]
[205 Patent 17:6-18]
[205 Patent 17:19-34]
[205 Patent 18:16-37]
[205 Patent 18:57-19:10]
[205 Patent 28:63-29:17]
[205 Patent 30:43-31:5]
[205 Patent 36:8-21]
[205 Patent 36:44-49]
[205 Patent 36:50-37:7]
[205 Patent 39:30-45]
[205 Patent 40:36-63]
[205 Patent 40:64-41:22]
[205 Patent 41:23-35]
“a destination
[] in the [a]
memory of the
computer”
699: 1, 2, 7, 13,
20
“a destination
memory”
205: 1, 8, 22,
31, 36
“the location in
host memory
where data
resides when all
MAC layer,
network layer,
and transport
layer processing
is complete”
ALA00120474-512
[Alacritech 1997 Prov. pp. 1-3, 6-16, ALA00138383 at ALA00138387-389, 392-402]
[880 File History, ALA00016191 at ALA0016422]
[241 Patent Claim 1]
[241 Patent Claim 3]
[241 Patent Claim 4]
[241 Patent Claim 5]
[241 Patent Claim 7]
[241 Patent Claim 9]
[241 Patent Claim 11]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 5 of 100 PageID #: 4160
INTEL Ex.1039.035
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
6
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
“a destination
in memory”
241: 1, 22
“a
destination...on
the host
computer
system”
880: 5
[241 Patent Claim 16]
[241 Patent Claim 18]
[241 Patent Claim 22]
[241 Patent Claim 23]
[241 Patent Claim 24]
[241 Patent 1:50-2:18]
[241 Patent 2:27-44]
[241 Patent 2:61-3:10]
[241 Patent 3:27-49]
[241 Patent 3:50-65]
[241 Patent 3:66-4:19]
[241 Patent 4:20-33]
[241 Patent 5:18-38]
[241 Patent 5:39-60]
[241 Patent 6:6-9]
[241 Patent 7:17-19]
[241 Patent 7:42-58]
[241 Patent 7:59-8:4]
[241 Patent 8:39-60]
[241 Patent 9:17-33]
[241 Patent 9:49-65]
[241 Patent 9:66-10:23]
[241 Patent 10:24-40]
[241 Patent 11:9-46]
[241 Patent 11:47-62]
[241 Patent 12:51-13:7]
[241 Patent 13:8-33]
[241 Patent 13:34-47]
[241 Patent 13:48-14:33]
[241 Patent 14:48-64]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 6 of 100 PageID #: 4161
INTEL Ex.1039.036
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
7
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[241 Patent 14:65-15:16]
[241 Patent 15:17-30]
[241 Patent 15:31-56]
[241 Patent 15:57-16:8]
[241 Patent 16:9-33]
[241 Patent 16:34-56]
[241 Patent 16:57-17:19]
[241 Patent 17:20-36]
[241 Patent 18:10-27]
[241 Patent 18:39-64]
[241 Patent 18:65-19:30]
[241 Patent 19:61-20:8]
[241 Patent 20:20-60]
[241 Patent 21:12-30]
[241 Patent 21:65-22:27]
[241 Patent 23:46-24:3]
[241 Patent 26:24-49]
[241 Patent 27:2-31]
[241 Patent 27:32-47]
[241 Patent 30:40-53]
[241 Patent 30:54-31:8]
[241 Patent 31:14-39]
[241 Patent 31:40-50]
[241 Patent 31:51-32:26]
[241 Patent 32:27-35]
[241 Patent 33:19-29]
[241 Patent 34:14-59]
[241 Patent 35:20-46]
[241 Patent 35:64-36:11]
[241 Patent 36:40-47]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 7 of 100 PageID #: 4162
INTEL Ex.1039.037
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
8
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[241 Patent 37:23-25]
[241 Patent 37:26-30]
[241 Patent 37:38-38]
[241 Patent 37:50-50]
[241 Patent 37:51-65]
[241 Patent 38:7-24]
[241 Patent 38:25-38]
[241 Patent 38:41-45]
[241 Patent 38:54-62]
[241 Patent 39:21-31]
[241 Patent 39:52-67]
[241 Patent 40:15-15]
[241 Patent 40:16-21]
[241 Patent 40:23-35]
[241 Patent 40:36-42]
[241 Patent 40:43-56]
[241 Patent 40:57-41:3]
[241 Patent 41:42-42]
[241 Patent 41:43-51]
[241 Patent 42:27-27]
[241 Patent 42:28-47]
[241 Patent 43:10-36]
[241 Patent 43:37-40]
[241 Patent 44:8-18]
[241 Patent 44:33-55]
[241 Patent 47:41-50]
[241 Patent 48:10-12]
[241 Patent 48:20-24]
[241 Patent 48:29-38]
[241 Patent 50:4-14]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 8 of 100 PageID #: 4163
INTEL Ex.1039.038
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
9
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[241 Patent 50:28-35]
[241 Patent 50:38-38]
[241 Patent 52:18-26]
[241 Patent 53:8-13]
[241 Patent 54:23-29]
[241 Patent 55:4-6]
[241 Patent 56:4-4]
[241 Patent 56:5-9]
[241 Patent 56:10-10]
[241 Patent 56:11-37]
[241 Patent 56:42-48]
[241 Patent 56:61-62]
[241 Patent 56:64-57:7]
[241 Patent 57:8-15]
[241 Patent 57:28-45]
[241 Patent 57:57-60]
[241 Patent 58:12-17]
[241 Patent 58:62-59:4]
[241 Patent 60:12-22]
[241 Patent 60:33-42]
[241 Patent 60:43-47]
[241 Patent 60:54-61:2]
[241 Patent 61:3-16]
[241 Patent 61:18-34]
[241 Patent 61:36-51]
[241 Patent 61:53-62]
[241 Patent 62:22-25]
[241 Patent 62:42-45]
[241 Patent 62:47-57]
[241 Patent 62:59-63:7]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 9 of 100 PageID #: 4164
INTEL Ex.1039.039
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
10
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[241 Patent 63:18-35]
[241 Patent 63:63-65]
[241 Patent 64:2-5]
[241 Patent 64:7-16]
[241 Patent 64:17-36]
[241 Patent 64:47-62]
[241 Patent 65:19-45]
[241 Patent 66:6-10]
[241 Patent 66:23-43]
[241 Patent 67:41-52]
[241 Patent 67:61-68:15]
[241 Patent 68:17-46]
[241 Patent 68:48-50]
[241 Patent 70:17-21]
[241 Patent 71:30-41]
[241 Patent 72:32-54]
[241 Patent 72:64-73:13]
[241 Patent 73:14-23]
[241 Patent 73:28-34]
[241 Patent 75:1-15]
[241 Patent 76:16-19]
[241 Patent 77:54-61]
[241 Patent 78:21-28]
[241 Patent 78:29-30]
[241 Patent 78:55-58]
[241 Patent 79:60-65]
[241 Patent 79:66-80:3]
[241 Patent 80:4-5]
[241 Patent 84:53-85:52]
[241 Patent 85:62-86:2]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 10 of 100 PageID #: 4165
INTEL Ex.1039.040
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
11
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[241 Patent 86:8-16]
[241 Patent 86:17-30]
[241 Patent 86:31-36]
[241 Patent 86:37-56]
[241 Patent 87:32-37]
[241 Patent 88:56-62]
[241 Patent 95:15-37]
[241 Patent 96:23-34]
[241 Patent 97:50-65]
[241 Patent 97:66-67]
[241 Patent 98:6-30]
[205 Patent Claim 1]
[205 Patent Claim 2]
[205 Patent Claim 5]
[205 Patent Claim 6]
[205 Patent Claim 7]
[205 Patent Claim 8]
[205 Patent Claim 11]
[205 Patent Claim 12]
[205 Patent Claim 15]
[205 Patent Claim 20]
[205 Patent Claim 22]
[205 Patent Claim 23]
[205 Patent Claim 24]
[205 Patent Claim 26]
[205 Patent Claim 28]
[205 Patent Claim 29]
[205 Patent Claim 31]
[205 Patent Claim 32]
[205 Patent Claim 33]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 11 of 100 PageID #: 4166
INTEL Ex.1039.041
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
12
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[205 Patent Claim 35]
[205 Patent Claim 36]
[205 Patent 1:37-56]
[205 Patent 4:23-39]
[205 Patent 4:40-64]
[205 Patent 4:65-67]
[205 Patent 6:12-13]
[205 Patent 6:25-42]
[205 Patent 8:8-24]
[205 Patent 8:41-60]
[205 Patent 8:61-9:16]
[205 Patent 9:17-29]
[205 Patent 9:30-48]
[205 Patent 10:39-57]
[205 Patent 10:58-11:17]
[205 Patent 11:18-31]
[205 Patent 12:25-58]
[205 Patent 13:14-42]
[205 Patent 13:43-57]
[205 Patent 14:8-20]
[205 Patent 14:21-49]
[205 Patent 15:27-50]
[205 Patent 15:51-16:9]
[205 Patent 16:10-23]
[205 Patent 16:53-17:5]
[205 Patent 17:19-34]
[205 Patent 17:35-49]
[205 Patent 17:50-67]
[205 Patent 18:16-37]
[205 Patent 19:47-20:8]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 12 of 100 PageID #: 4167
INTEL Ex.1039.042
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
13
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[205 Patent 21:45-60]
[205 Patent 22:13-25]
[205 Patent 22:26-42]
[205 Patent 22:57-23:8]
[205 Patent 23:9-21]
[205 Patent 24:7-26]
[205 Patent 24:51-25:11]
[205 Patent 25:12-42]
[205 Patent 26:5-19]
[205 Patent 26:31-60]
[205 Patent 27:23-41]
[205 Patent 28:9-38]
[205 Patent 29:58-30:15]
[205 Patent 32:41-59]
[205 Patent 33:5-20]
[205 Patent 36:8-21]
[205 Patent 36:22-43]
[205 Patent 36:50-37:7]
[205 Patent 37:8-18]
[205 Patent 37:19-61]
[205 Patent 37:62-38:3]
[205 Patent 38:27-38]
[205 Patent 38:39-51]
[205 Patent 38:65-39:11]
[205 Patent 39:30-45]
[205 Patent 39:46-62]
[205 Patent 39:63-40:11]
[205 Patent 40:12-26]
[205 Patent 40:27-35]
[205 Patent 40:36-63]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 13 of 100 PageID #: 4168
INTEL Ex.1039.043
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
14
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[205 Patent 40:64-41:22]
[205 Patent 41:23-35]
[205 Patent 41:54-42:10]
[205 Patent 42:31-47]
[205 Patent 42:48-60]
[205 Patent 42:61-43:3]
[205 Patent 43:4-28]
[880 Patent Claim 1]
[880 Patent Claim 2]
[880 Patent Claim 4]
[880 Patent Claim 5]
[880 Patent Claim 6]
[880 Patent Claim 7]
[880 Patent Claim 13]
[880 Patent Claim 14]
[880 Patent Claim 15]
[880 Patent Claim 18]
[880 Patent Claim 24]
[880 Patent Claim 31]
[880 Patent Claim 32]
[880 Patent Claim 41]
[880 Patent Claim 42]
[880 Patent Claim 43]
[880 Patent Claim 45]
[880 Patent Claim 46]
[880 Patent Claim 48]
[880 Patent Claim 52]
[880 Patent Claim 53]
[880 Patent Claim 55]
[880 Patent Claim 56]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 14 of 100 PageID #: 4169
INTEL Ex.1039.044
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
15
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[880 Patent Claim 57]
[880 Patent 1:37-49]
[880 Patent 1:57-2:14]
[880 Patent 2:31-44]
[880 Patent 3:4-16]
[880 Patent 3:45-60]
[880 Patent 4:24-25]
[880 Patent 5:48-63]
[880 Patent 6:5-23]
[880 Patent 6:24-37]
[880 Patent 6:48-57]
[880 Patent 7:15-28]
[880 Patent 7:47-62]
[880 Patent 8:7-11]
[880 Patent 8:12-24]
[880 Patent 8:25-32]
[880 Patent 8:33-46]
[880 Patent 8:47-60]
[880 Patent 9:27-34]
[880 Patent 10:1-19]
[880 Patent 10:41-11:2]
[880 Patent 11:3-12]
[880 Patent 11:40-50]
[880 Patent 11:66-12:13]
[880 Patent 12:14-26]
[880 Patent 13:49-59]
[880 Patent 15:45-50]
[880 Patent 15:51-56]
[880 Patent 16:14-25]
[880 Patent 16:26-36]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 15 of 100 PageID #: 4170
INTEL Ex.1039.045
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
16
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[880 Patent 17:60-18:3]
[880 Patent 18:16-26]
[880 Patent 18:27-29]
[880 Patent 20:1-8]
[880 Patent 20:32-37]
[880 Patent 21:5-13]
[880 Patent 21:32-41]
[880 Patent 23:21-28]
[880 Patent 23:29-41]
[880 Patent 23:42-51]
[880 Patent 23:58-67]
[880 Patent 24:1-9]
[880 Patent 24:10-20]
[880 Patent 24:21-33]
[880 Patent 24:43-48]
[880 Patent 24:52-25:2]
[880 Patent 25:60-67]
[880 Patent 26:18-25]
[880 Patent 27:21-30]
[880 Patent 27:37-45]
[880 Patent 27:46-49]
[880 Patent 27:55-28:3]
[880 Patent 28:4-17]
[880 Patent 28:21-35]
[880 Patent 28:36-53]
[880 Patent 28:54-62]
[880 Patent 29:14-16]
[880 Patent 29:24-34]
[880 Patent 29:35-48]
[880 Patent 29:57-64]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 16 of 100 PageID #: 4171
INTEL Ex.1039.046
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
17
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[880 Patent 30:14-23]
[880 Patent 30:24-44]
[880 Patent 30:53-67]
[880 Patent 31:21-46]
[880 Patent 32:4-7]
[880 Patent 32:19-39]
[880 Patent 33:26-37]
[880 Patent 33:43-63]
[880 Patent 33:64-34:14]
[880 Patent 34:15-27]
[880 Patent 36:8-18]
[880 Patent 37:25-34]
[880 Patent 37:48-53]
[880 Patent 38:3-9]
[880 Patent 38:10-21]
[880 Patent 38:28-32]
[880 Patent 38:33-47]
[880 Patent 38:48-55]
[880 Patent 38:56-60]
[880 Patent 39:28-41]
[880 Patent 44:40-43]
[880 Patent 46:36-43]
[880 Patent 46:44-53]
[880 Patent 46:61-62]
[880 Patent 46:66-67]
[880 Patent 47:3-19]
[880 Patent 47:26-37]
[880 Patent 48:56-67]
[880 Patent 49:1-3]
[880 Patent 49:4-23]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 17 of 100 PageID #: 4172
INTEL Ex.1039.047
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
18
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[880 Patent 49:54-57]
[880 Patent 49:58-67]
[880 Patent 50:1-3]
[880 Patent 50:4-5]
[880 Patent 50:19-23]
[880 Patent 51:5-16]
[880 Patent 52:17-23]
[880 Patent 52:24-26]
[880 Patent 53:39-47]
[880 Patent 54:1-17]
[880 Patent 54:22-27]
[880 Patent 54:28-37]
[880 Patent 54:38-50]
[880 Patent 54:59-55:3]
[880 Patent 55:9-23]
[880 Patent 55:24-33]
[880 Patent 56:11-19]
[880 Patent 56:31-42]
[880 Patent 57:28-35]
[880 Patent 57:40-53]
[880 Patent 58:8-9]
[880 Patent 58:10-12]
[880 Patent 58:24-25]
[880 Patent 58:26-27]
[880 Patent 58:30-31]
[880 Patent 58:57-59]
[880 Patent 59:3-3]
[880 Patent 59:59-65]
[880 Patent 60:19-35]
[880 Patent 60:45-54]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 18 of 100 PageID #: 4173
INTEL Ex.1039.048
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
19
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[880 Patent 60:55-67]
[880 Patent 61:3-9]
[880 Patent 61:23-38]
[880 Patent 63:36-40]
[880 Patent 63:41-46]
[880 Patent 64:4-18]
[880 Patent 66:10-23]
[880 Patent 68:3-13]
[880 Patent 70:1-13]
[880 Patent 71:1-10]
[880 Patent 73:24-30]
[880 Patent 73:31-40]
[880 Patent 74:53-65]
[880 Patent 74:66-75:9]
[880 Patent 75:10-16]
[880 Patent 75:29-37]
[880 Patent 75:38-45]
[880 Patent 75:51-59]
[880 Patent 75:60-76:6]
[880 Patent 76:7-12]
[880 Patent 76:26-30]
[880 Patent 76:34-45]
[880 Patent 77:51-56]
[880 Patent 78:33-62]
[880 Patent 79:24-42]
[880 Patent 80:21-50]
[880 Patent 81:38-44]
[880 Patent 87:50-88:15]
[880 Patent 88:65-89:7]
[699 Patent Claim 1]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 19 of 100 PageID #: 4174
INTEL Ex.1039.049
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
20
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[699 Patent Claim 2]
[699 Patent Claim 3]
[699 Patent Claim 4]
[699 Patent Claim 5]
[699 Patent Claim 6]
[699 Patent Claim 7]
[699 Patent Claim 8]
[699 Patent Claim 9]
[699 Patent Claim 10]
[699 Patent Claim 11]
[699 Patent Claim 12]
[699 Patent Claim 13]
[699 Patent Claim 14]
[699 Patent Claim 15]
[699 Patent Claim 16]
[699 Patent Claim 17]
[699 Patent Claim 18]
[699 Patent Claim 19]
[699 Patent Claim 20]
[699 Patent 2:28-43]
[699 Patent 2:44-61]
[699 Patent 2:64-3:20]
[699 Patent 3:27-30]
[699 Patent 3:39-42]
[699 Patent 3:49-60]
[699 Patent 4:11-27]
[699 Patent 4:28-44]
[699 Patent 4:55-67]
[699 Patent 5:11-24]
[699 Patent 5:25-35]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 20 of 100 PageID #: 4175
INTEL Ex.1039.050
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
21
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[699 Patent 5:36-48]
[699 Patent 5:49-53]
[699 Patent 5:54-58]
[699 Patent 5:59-64]
[699 Patent 5:65-6:8]
[699 Patent 6:9-16]
[699 Patent 6:17-28]
[699 Patent 6:29-37]
[699 Patent 6:38-43]
[699 Patent 6:58-7:5]
“database”
880: 9, 10, 12,
13, 23, 32, 35,
42, 43, 48, 50,
56, 58
“a collection of
logically related
data stored
together in one or
more
computerized
files”
[Definition of “database” in The New IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and
Electronics Terms, 6th ed. (1996), 88801DOC000883-000887]
[880 File History, ALA00016191 at ALA00016423-25, 29, 32-34, 36-38, 40, 43, 44]
[880 Patent Claim 9]
[880 Patent Claim 10]
[880 Patent Claim 12]
[880 Patent Claim 13]
[880 Patent Claim 23]
[880 Patent Claim 32]
[880 Patent Claim 35]
[880 Patent Claim 42]
[880 Patent Claim 43]
[880 Patent Claim 48]
[880 Patent Claim 50]
[880 Patent Claim 56]
[880 Patent Claim 58]
[880 Patent 7:15-28]
[880 Patent 7:29-42]
[880 Patent 7:43-46]
[880 Patent 7:47-62]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 21 of 100 PageID #: 4176
INTEL Ex.1039.051
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
22
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[880 Patent 7:63-67]
[880 Patent 11:13-27]
[880 Patent 17:51-59]
[880 Patent 21:42-55]
[880 Patent 21:56-61]
[880 Patent 22:23-38]
[880 Patent 22:39-42]
[880 Patent 22:51-56]
[880 Patent 36:38-46]
[880 Patent 59:5-7]
[880 Patent 59:11-12]
[880 Patent 60:19-35]
[880 Patent 60:45-54]
[880 Patent 60:55-67]
[880 Patent 61:1-2]
[880 Patent 61:10-22]
[880 Patent 61:41-49]
[880 Patent 61:50-55]
[880 Patent 61:56-62:2]
[880 Patent 62:19-44]
[880 Patent 62:52-52]
[880 Patent 62:55-55]
[880 Patent 62:56-59]
[880 Patent 63:5-22]
[880 Patent 63:47-64]
[880 Patent 63:65-64:3]
[880 Patent 64:4-18]
[880 Patent 64:24-47]
[880 Patent 64:48-65:6]
[880 Patent 65:19-22]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 22 of 100 PageID #: 4177
INTEL Ex.1039.052
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
23
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[880 Patent 65:25-26]
[880 Patent 65:27-27]
[880 Patent 65:28-28]
[880 Patent 65:29-29]
[880 Patent 65:33-43]
[880 Patent 65:58-67]
[880 Patent 66:1-9]
[880 Patent 66:10-23]
[880 Patent 66:42-54]
[880 Patent 67:9-20]
[880 Patent 67:44-68:2]
[880 Patent 68:19-33]
[880 Patent 68:44-69:7]
[880 Patent 69:8-11]
[880 Patent 69:30-42]
[880 Patent 69:43-50]
[880 Patent 69:56-60]
[880 Patent 69:61-67]
[880 Patent 70:1-13]
[880 Patent 70:14-16]
[880 Patent 71:42-58]
“operation
code”
880: 1, 17, 32,
34, 45
“the portion of a
machine language
or assembly
language
instruction that
specifies the type
of instruction and
the structure of
the data on which
[Definition of “operation code” in Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary, 3rd ed. (1997)]
[88801DOC000888-000893]
[88801DOC000894-000916]
[880 File History, ALA00016191 at ALA00016300, 304, 421, 425, 427, 433, 434, 439,
440, 451, 453, 784]
[Alacritech 1997 Prov., pp. 77-82, ALA00138383 at ALA00138463-68]
[Alacritech 1998 Prov., pp. 110-116, ALA00138562 at ALA00138673-79]
[880 Patent Claim 1]
[880 Patent Claim 13]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 23 of 100 PageID #: 4178
INTEL Ex.1039.053
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
24
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
it operates”
[880 Patent Claim 17]
[880 Patent Claim 32]
[880 Patent Claim 34]
[880 Patent Claim 45]
[880 Patent Claim 46]
[880 Patent Claim 51]
[880 Patent Claim 52]
[880 Patent Claim 53]
[880 Patent Claim 56]
[880 Patent 5:48-63]
[880 Patent 7:47-62]
[880 Patent 10:1-19]
[880 Patent 12:61-13:12]
[880 Patent 13:13-28]
[880 Patent 13:29-48]
[880 Patent 13:49-59]
[880 Patent 15:35-41]
[880 Patent 30:45-52]
[880 Patent 31:3-17]
[880 Patent 32:47-64]
[880 Patent 42:4-10]
[880 Patent 53:30-35]
[880 Patent 53:62-67]
[880 Patent 54:59-55:3]
[880 Patent 62:60-64]
[880 Patent 63:26-30]
[880 Patent 63:31-35]
[880 Patent 63:47-64]
[880 Patent 63:65-64:3]
[880 Patent 64:4-18]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 24 of 100 PageID #: 4179
INTEL Ex.1039.054
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
25
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[880 Patent 74:20-31]
[880 Patent 74:53-65]
[880 Patent 78:7-18]
[880 Patent 78:19-22]
[880 Patent 78:33-62]
[880 Patent 79:43-80:20]
[880 Patent 80:57-67]
[880 Patent 81:1-4]
[880 Patent 81:38-44]
[880 Patent, Fig. 2]
[880 Patent, Fig. 4]
[880 Patent, Fig. 23B]
“context”
036: 1, 3-7;
072: 1, 2, 7, 9,
15, 16, 19
Indefinite. Expert Testimony of Mark Lanning.
[ALA00019278-286]
[ALA00019294-300]
[“Fast-path TCP_TASK_OFFLOAD Porting Effort Summary,” Dkt. 38-3 in Alacritech
v. Microsoft, Case No. Case 3:04-cv-03284-JSW, ALA07371911]
[Connery Exhibit 2047, filed July 21, 2011 in In the matter of Connery v. Boucher,
Patent Interference No. 105,775, ALA07396518]
[Alacritech, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., Case No. 3:04-cv-03284-JSW, Dkt. 38 (N.D. Cal.
Nov. 11, 2004) (Declaration of Peter Craft In Support of Alacritech’s Motion for
Preliminary Injunction)]
[Alacritech, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., Case No. 3:04-cv-03284-JSW, Dkt. 96 (N.D. Cal.
Apr. 12, 2005) (Order regarding Alacritech’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction)]
[Interference No. 105,775 (Blightman testimony) at 67:21-68:2, ALA07369508 at
ALA07369574-75]
[Interference No. 105,775 (Higgen testimony) at 122:11-123:12, ALA07369639 at
ALA07369760-61]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 25 of 100 PageID #: 4180
INTEL Ex.1039.055
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
26
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
RFC 793 (88801DOC000917-88801DOC001006).
[Alacritech 1997 Prov., pp. 4-7, 11, 25-27, 42-45, 49-58, 71, ALA00138383 at
ALA00138390-393, 397, 411-413, 428-431, 435-444, 457]
[072 Patent Claim 1]
[072 Patent Claim 2]
[072 Patent Claim 3]
[072 Patent Claim 6]
[072 Patent Claim 7]
[072 Patent Claim 9]
[072 Patent Claim 10]
[072 Patent Claim 14]
[072 Patent Claim 15]
[072 Patent Claim 16]
[072 Patent Claim 17]
[072 Patent Claim 19]
[072 Patent Claim 20]
[072 Patent Claim 21]
[072 Patent 6:34-37]
[072 Patent 7:56-8:5]
[072 Patent 8:6-18]
[072 Patent 9:49-52]
[072 Patent 10:9-33]
[072 Patent 11:18-54]
[072 Patent 13:52-14:36]
[072 Patent 15:1-19]
[072 Patent 16:57-17:18]
[072 Patent 20:55-21:4]
[072 Patent 21:24-56]
[072 Patent 21:57-22:19]
[072 Patent 24:15-34]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 26 of 100 PageID #: 4181
INTEL Ex.1039.056
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
27
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[072 Patent 24:38-40]
[072 Patent 24:55-25:3]
[072 Patent 27:24-40]
[072 Patent 29:66-30:23]
[072 Patent 30:43-64]
[072 Patent 30:65-31:2]
[072 Patent 31:3-27]
[072 Patent 31:38-32:12]
[072 Patent 32:13-21]
[072 Patent 32:41-33:2]
[072 Patent 37:31-45]
[072 Patent 37:46-53]
[072 Patent 38:63-63]
[072 Patent 39:1-11]
[072 Patent 39:12-26]
[072 Patent 39:27-31]
[072 Patent 39:33-48]
[072 Patent 39:49-54]
[072 Patent 43:27-39]
[072 Patent 44:11-33]
[072 Patent 45:56-46:3]
[072 Patent 49:38-47]
[072 Patent 49:48-56]
[072 Patent 50:43-47]
[072 Patent 52:21-25]
[072 Patent 53:6-23]
[072 Patent 53:29-33]
[072 Patent 53:34-44]
[072 Patent 53:45-47]
[072 Patent 53:48-54]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 27 of 100 PageID #: 4182
INTEL Ex.1039.057
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
28
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[072 Patent 53:55-62]
[072 Patent 53:63-67]
[072 Patent 54:1-7]
[072 Patent 54:8-12]
[072 Patent 54:14-21]
[072 Patent 54:31-34]
[072 Patent 54:35-39]
[072 Patent 54:40-61]
[072 Patent 54:64-55:3]
[072 Patent 55:9-11]
[072 Patent 63:61-67]
[072 Patent 64:22-38]
[072 Patent 64:65-65:9]
[072 Patent 66:2-19]
[072 Patent 66:59-67:3]
[072 Patent 67:12-34]
[072 Patent 68:2-7]
[072 Patent 69:44-64]
[072 Patent 71:3-6]
[072 Patent 71:8-17]
[072 Patent 71:29-32]
[072 Patent 71:37-40]
[072 Patent 71:50-67]
[072 Patent 72:1-9]
[072 Patent 72:10-24]
[072 Patent 72:25-34]
[072 Patent 72:35-38]
[072 Patent 72:50-57]
[072 Patent 72:58-73:4]
[072 Patent 73:6-8]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 28 of 100 PageID #: 4183
INTEL Ex.1039.058
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
29
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[072 Patent 73:10-15]
[072 Patent 73:16-29]
[072 Patent 73:31-36]
[072 Patent 73:43-43]
[072 Patent 73:44-44]
[072 Patent 73:45-45]
[072 Patent 73:46-46]
[072 Patent 73:50-51]
[072 Patent 73:64-64]
[072 Patent 73:65-74:3]
[072 Patent 74:10-24]
[072 Patent 74:32-50]
[072 Patent 74:54-60]
[072 Patent 75:8-8]
[072 Patent 75:14-20]
[072 Patent 75:21-22]
[072 Patent 75:30-31]
[072 Patent 75:37-47]
[072 Patent 75:48-48]
[072 Patent 75:49-76:17]
[072 Patent 76:27-27]
[072 Patent 76:28-41]
[072 Patent 76:48-60]
[072 Patent 76:61-67]
[072 Patent 77:1-4]
[072 Patent 84:42-42]
[072 Patent 86:2-27]
[072 Patent 96:38-52]
[072 Patent 96:59-97:15]
[036 Patent Claim 1]
Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-2 Filed 02/21/17 Page 29 of 100 PageID #: 4184
INTEL Ex.1039.059
Defendants’ and Intervenor Proposed
Constructions and Supporting Evidence
Exhibit B
30
Term and
Asserted
Claims
Proposed
Construction Supporting Evidence
1
[036 Patent Claim 3]
[036 Patent Claim 4]
[036 Patent Claim 5]
[036 Patent Claim 6]
[036 Patent Claim 7]
[036 Patent Claim 8]
[036 Patent 6:28-31]
[036 Patent 7:53-8:2]
[036 Patent 8:3-15]
[036 Patent 9:50-53]
[036 Patent 10:10-34]