Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
FINAL REPORT OF THE:
INDEPENDENT ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL CONSULTANT
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL DUE DILIGENCE OF THE TRANS ANATOLIAN NATURAL GAS PIPELINE PROJECT FINAL JUNE 2017
INDEPENDENT ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL CONSULTANT
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL DUE DILIGENCE
TRANS ANATOLIAN NATURAL GAS PIPELINE PROJECT
Prepared for: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
Prepared by: Sustainability Pty Ltd
Suite 3, 118 Flora Terrace
North Beach, Western Australia, 6020
www.sustainability.net.au
+61 (0)8 9246 6666
Team Members: John Miragliotta Project Director
Marc Barendrecht Environmental Specialist
Amy Sexton Social/Cultural Heritage Specialist
Catherine Grant Social Advisor
Saniye Onur Local Environmental Specialist
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental Due Diligence June 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................ I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... III
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 1: ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS AND ISSUES ............................................................ III
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 2: LABOUR AND WORKING CONDITIONS ........................................... V
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 3: RESOURCE EFFICIENCY ................................................................ VII
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 4: HEALTH AND SAFETY .................................................................. VIII
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 5: LAND ACQUISITION, INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT AND ECONOMIC DISPLACEMENT ................................................................................................ IX
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 6: BIODIVERSITY AND LIVING NATURAL RESOURCES ................... XII
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 8: CULTURAL HERITAGE .................................................................. XIV
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 10: INFORMATION DISCLOSURE AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ............................................................................................................................ XIV
REPORT ORGANISATION .................................................................................................. XVI
1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1
1.1 SCOPE OF WORK ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Reviews and Assessments .................................................................................................. 2 1.1.2 Site Reconnaissance ........................................................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Reporting .......................................................................................................................... 3
1.2 LENDER POLICIES ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.1 EBRD Performance Requirements ........................................................................................ 6
1.3 SOURCES OF INFORMATION ......................................................................................................... 6
2. SUMMARY OF PROJECT CHARACTERTISTICS .............................................................. 7 2.1.1 Current Progress ................................................................................................................ 8
3. INSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................... 10
4. ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL, HEALTH & SAFETY REVIEW AND AUDIT ........................... 12
5. COMPLIANCE AGAINST EBRD PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ............................... 13
5.1 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 1: ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS AND ISSUES ............................................................. 13 5.1.1 Environmental and Social Assessment ................................................................................ 13 5.1.2 Environmental and Social Management System .................................................................. 18 5.1.3 Environmental and Social Policy ........................................................................................ 19 5.1.4 Environmental and Social Management Plans ..................................................................... 19 5.1.5 Organisational Capacity and Commitment .......................................................................... 21 5.1.6 Supply Chain Management ............................................................................................... 22 5.1.7 Project Monitoring and Reporting ...................................................................................... 22
5.2 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 2: LABOUR AND WORKING CONDITIONS .............................. 28 5.2.1 Human Resource Policies and Working Relationships ........................................................... 28 5.2.2 Child and Forced Labour ................................................................................................... 30 5.2.3 Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity ......................................................................... 30 5.2.4 Workers Organisations ..................................................................................................... 30 5.2.5 Working Conditions .......................................................................................................... 30 5.2.6 Retrenchment.................................................................................................................. 32 5.2.7 Grievance Mechanism....................................................................................................... 32 5.2.8 Non-Employee Workers .................................................................................................... 33 5.2.9 Supply Chain ................................................................................................................... 33
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental Due Diligence June 2017
5.2.10 Security Personnel ........................................................................................................... 33
5.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 3: RESOURCE EFFICIENCY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL ...................................................................................................... 40 5.3.1 Resource Efficiency .......................................................................................................... 40 5.3.2 Pollution Prevention and Control ....................................................................................... 40 5.3.3 Greenhouse Gases ........................................................................................................... 42 5.3.4 Water ............................................................................................................................. 43 5.3.5 Waste ............................................................................................................................. 43 5.3.6 Hazardous Substances ..................................................................................................... 43
5.4 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 4: HEALTH AND SAFETY ........................................................... 47 5.4.1 Occupational Health and Safety ......................................................................................... 47 5.4.2 Community Health and Safety ........................................................................................... 49 5.4.3 Infrastructure, Building and Equipment Design and Safety ................................................... 49 5.4.4 Hazardous Materials Safety ............................................................................................... 50 5.4.5 Traffic and Road Safety .................................................................................................... 50 5.4.6 Natural Hazards ............................................................................................................... 50 5.4.7 Exposure to Disease ......................................................................................................... 50 5.4.8 Emergency Preparedness and Response ............................................................................ 51
5.5 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS 5: LAND ACQUISITION, INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT, AND ECONOMIC DISPLACEMENT .................................................................... 56 5.5.1 Physical and Economic Displacement ................................................................................. 56 5.5.2 Consultation .................................................................................................................... 57 5.5.3 Compensation ................................................................................................................. 59 5.5.4 Grievance Mechanism....................................................................................................... 61 5.5.5 RAP/LRP Documentation .................................................................................................. 62 5.5.6 RAP/LRP Implementation.................................................................................................. 62 5.5.7 Monitoring ...................................................................................................................... 63
5.6 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 6: BIODIVERSITY AND LIVING NATURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................. 68 5.6.1 Assessment of Biodiversity and Living Natural Resources ..................................................... 69 5.6.2 Conservation of Biodiversity .............................................................................................. 77
5.7 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 7: INDIGENOUS PEOPLE.......................................................... 87
5.8 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 8: CULTURAL HERITAGE .......................................................... 88 5.8.1 Assessment and Management of Impacts on Cultural Heritage ............................................. 88 5.8.2 Consultation .................................................................................................................... 89
5.9 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 10: INFORMATION DISCLOSURE AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ..................................................................................................... 91 5.9.1 Stakeholder Engagement Plan ........................................................................................... 91 5.9.2 Operational Grievance Mechanism ..................................................................................... 92 5.9.3 Information Disclosure ..................................................................................................... 92
6. COMPLIANCE AGAINST TURKISH ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, SAFETY,
AND SOCIAL LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS ................................................... 95
6.1 HOST GOVERNMENT AGREEMENTS ............................................................................................ 95
6.2 EIA PROCESS IN TURKEY ............................................................................................................ 95
7. COMPLIANCE AGAINST OTHER APPLICABLE STANDARDS / LAWS / CONVENTIONS ........................................................................................................... 98
7.1 EU DIRECTIVES ........................................................................................................................... 98
7.2 INTERNATIONAL LAWS / CONVENTIONS .................................................................................. 98
7.3 IFC EHS GUIDELINES .................................................................................................................. 98
7.4 TANAP PROJECT HSES STANDARDS ........................................................................................... 98
8. HIGH LEVEL COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT OF ASSOCIATED
INFRASTRUCTURE...................................................................................................... 99
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental Due Diligence June 2017
APPENDIX A: DOCUMENT LIST ........................................................................................................... 113
APPENDIX B: IFC EHS GUIDELINES COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT TABLE........................................... 162
APPENDIX C: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ACTION PLAN ............................................................ 183
TABLES
Table 5-1 PR 1 Findings Summary .................................................................................................... 24 Table 5-2 PR 2 Findings Summary .................................................................................................... 36 Table 5-3 PR 3 Findings Summary .................................................................................................... 44 Table 5-4 PR 4 Findings Summary .................................................................................................... 52 Table 5-5 PR 5 Findings Summary .................................................................................................... 65 Table 5-6 PR 6 Findings Summary .................................................................................................... 80 Table 5-7 PR 8 Findings Summary .................................................................................................... 90 Table 5-8 PR 10 Findings Summary .................................................................................................. 93 Table 8-1 High Level Compliance Evaluation – Associated Infrastructure ............................................ 100
FIGURES
Figure 1.1 TANAP Pipeline Overview ................................................................................................... 4 Figure 1.2 TANAP Pipeline Route Within Turkey ................................................................................... 5 Figure 5.1 Pipeline Route Assessment Process ................................................................................... 16 Figure 5.2 ESIA Consultation approach .............................................................................................. 17 Figure 6.1 Turkish EIA Process ......................................................................................................... 97
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page i
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ADB Asian Development Bank
AGI Above-Ground Installation
BAP Biodiversity Action Plan
BAT Best Available Technology
bcma billion cubic meters per annum
BOP Blow Out Preventer
BTC Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
CAP Corrective Action Plan
CC Construction Contractor
CST Compressor Station
ERP Emergency Response Plan
CFC Chlorofluorocarbon
CHMP Cultural Heritage Management Plan
CHSS Community, Health, Safety, and Security
EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
EHS Environment, Health and Safety
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EMP Environmental Management Plan
EPs Equator Principles
ERMP Employee Relations Management Plan
ES Environmental and Social
ESAP Environmental and Social Action Plan
ESHS Environmental, Social, and Health and Safety
ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan
ESMS Environmental and Social Management System
ESR Environmental and Social Review
EU European Union
FFD Full Field Development
FGR Flare Gas Recovery
FID Final Investment Decision
GHG Greenhouse Gas
GIP Good International Practice
HCFC Hydrochlorofluorocarbon
H&S Health and Safety
HR Human Resource
HSES Health, Safety, Environmental and Social
HSE Health, Safety and Environmental
HUC Hook-Up and Commissioning
IBA Important Bird Area
IESC Independent Environmental and Social Consultant
IFC International Finance Corporation
ILO International Labour Organisation
IP Indigenous Peoples
ISD Inherently Safer Design
JV Joint Venture
KBA Key Bird Area
KPI Key Performance Indicator
LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Procedures
LTMOBM Low Toxicity Mineral Oil Based Muds
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page ii
MEG monoethylene glycol
MoEU Ministry of Environment and Urbanisation
MP Management Plan
MSDS Material Safety Data Sheet
NCR Non-Conformance Report
NGO Non-Governmental Organisation
NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide
Nitrous Oxide Nitrous Oxide
OHS Occupational, Health and Safety
OMS Operating Management System
OSID Online Stakeholder Interaction Database
OSPAR The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic
OSRP Oil Spill Response Plan
PAHs Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
PAP Project-Affected Person
PPE Personal Protective Equipment
PS Performance Standard
PR Performance Requirement
RfP Request for Proposal
RAP Resettlement Action Plan
SCP Southern Caucasus Pipeline
SD Shah Deniz
SEP Stakeholder Engagement Plan
SMP Social Management Plan
SOP Standard Operating Procedure
SPS Safeguard Policy Statement
Sustainability Sustainability Pty Ltd
TAP Trans Adriatic Pipeline
TANAP Trans Anatolian Pipeline
TSP Total Suspended Particle
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
VOC Volatile organic compounds
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report contains the Environmental and Social Due Diligence (ESDD) for the TANAP Project in
Turkey. Sustainability Pty Ltd (Sustainability) was engaged by the European Bank for Reconstruction
and Development (EBRD) as the Independent Environmental and Social Consultant (IESC) to conduct
the ESDD. The ESDD was developed based on an extensive document review and incorporated a site
visit to Lots 1 and 3 of the TANAP pipeline route.
The Project is substantially commenced, with construction works having started on all 4 Lots of the
pipeline route. Construction contracts for the offshore pipeline have been awarded but works have
not yet commenced. Relevant dates for the remainder of the construction period include:
• Commencement of offshore construction – July 2017;
• Mechanical Completion of Phase 0 pipeline – December 2017;
• Supply of gas to Eskişehir (offtake station) Phase 0 complete – June 2018;
• Material Completion of Phase 1 pipeline works – December 2018;
• Gas supply to Europe – June 2019.
The IESC observed strong adherence to the EBRD Environmental and Social Policy requirements as
communicated through the respective Environmental and Social Performance Requirements (PRs) of
the EBRD. TANAP personnel involved in the ESDD process were open, transparent, and willing to
provide all requested documentation and assistance to the IESC before, during and after the site visit
in order to facilitate the finalisation of this ESDD. The structure of the ESDD Report is outlined at the
end of this Executive Summary.
With respect to compliance with the PRs, the IESC has observed no Material Non-Compliances, and a
number of Partial Compliances, which are explained further in this Executive Summary and again in
more detail in the body report. The partial compliance items identified are considered readily
addressed through the development and implementation of the Environmental and Social Action Plan
presented in Appendix C of this ESDD Report.
Applicable Performance Requirements are PR1, PR2, PR3, PR4, PR5, PR6, PR8 and PR10.
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 1: ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS AND ISSUES
The TANAP project is under development in Turkey consistent with the Project’s Host Government
Agreement (HGA), which provide guidance on the expected Environmental and Social (E&S)
standards and requirements, preparation of an ESIA, and the project’s social investment program.
The Project carried out an ESIA as the means of scoping and assessing its environmental and social
impacts, commensurate with the environmental and social impacts presented by the Project. The
ESIA was publicly disclosed on the TANAP website (22 June 2015). Turkey’s Ministry of Environment
and Urbanisation (MoEU) approved the ESIA in June 2014.
E&S aspects and impacts have been considered during Project scoping and planning, with due
consideration of the mitigation hierarchy and Good International Practice (GIP). Route selection was a
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page iv
key focus for ensuring that E&S impacts were minimised while providing for technical feasibility in
installation. E&S criteria were used to narrow the Preferred Route Corridor from 2km to 500m. Within
this 500-metre corridor the centreline for the corridor was delineated and the Right of Way (RoW)
disturbance area of 36 metres was located. The ESIA was conducted on the full 500-metre pipeline
corridor on Route H. Significantly, there is no physical displacement of households along the entire
corridor route. Route selection changes were implemented throughout the construction phase to
avoid significant cultural heritage sites and designated wildlife areas, among others, managed
through a Management of Change (MoC) process.
Stakeholder engagement and consultation has been carried out throughout scoping, preconstruction,
and construction phases, and the key issues raised through consultation are considered within the
final ESIA and ESMPs. Consultation provided for the input of local, regional, national and international
stakeholders, and separate inputs of local authorities and vulnerable groups, including women and
children locally. TANAP has in place a web-based online stakeholder interaction database (OSID) to
track, record and manage all stakeholder engagement activities including grievance management.
At the commencement of the Project, TANAP employed a three-tiered contractor structure to
implement the Project, with an Engineering, Procurement, Construction and Management (EPCM)
contractor managing the selected Construction Contractors (CCs) in the field. TANAP has recently
modified this structure to an integrated two-tier organisation (with TANAP and CCs), removing the
EPCM contractor from the organisational structure. The IESC noted during the audit that the ESMS
was out of date with respect to roles and responsibilities and subsequent system documentation. In
many instances, the same individuals are working in the same roles (i.e. former EPCM staff are now
directly employed by TANAP) so while day to day activities appear to remain well-managed and
understood by staff, ESMS documentation reviewed during the audit did not reflect the current
organisational structure and so may not effectively manage potential risks (e.g. arising from incidents,
staff changes). The IESC team considers this issue to be compliant with this PR, given that the issue
is known, changes substantially commenced, and is considered to be part of normal ESMS review and
improvement during the life of the Project. Furthermore, subsequent evidence provided to the IESC
indicates that the revision of TANAP documents is complete, and that CC reviews are ongoing and will
be provided to the IESC as they are approved.
The ESIA assessed potential E&S impacts of the project on communities and the related ESMPs were
prepared to manage any outstanding residual risks. Internal and third party monitoring is undertaken
of delivery of ESIA and ESMP commitments. This includes third party monitoring by Turkish
consultants, Çınar Engineering Consulting Co. (Çinar), of:
• Construction Impacts Management Plan (ESIA Appendix 5.1);
• Community Safety Management Plan (Appendix 5.2);
• Community Relations Plan (Appendix 5.3);
• Employment and Training Plan (Appendix 5.4);
• Procurement and Supply Management Plan (Appendix 5.5);
• Aggregate Management Plan (Appendix 5.6);
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page v
• Traffic Management Plan (Appendix 5.7);
• Cultural Heritage Management Plan (Appendix 5.8);
• Erosion, Reinstatement and Landscaping Plan (Appendix 5.9);
• Pollution Prevention Plan (Appendix 5.10);
• Waste Management Plan (Appendix 5.11);
• Emergency Response Plan (Appendix 5.12).
Some gaps were observed in the review of the ESIA related to the assessment of offshore
construction impacts. The review found that the ESIA did not adequately assess the impacts related
to the potential for vessel to vessel interactions and vessel interactions with marine fauna. Vessel to
vessel interactions are considered a high risk given the stated level of high shipping traffic and vessel
use in the offshore project area. Subsequent evidence provided is sufficient to demonstrate
compliance to the IESC. Specifically, as there was limited information available regarding offshore
construction methodology during the ESIA development, a comprehensive HAZID was conducted
post-ESIA development, which assesses construction related risks, including vessel to vessel
interactions. Prior to commencement of offshore construction activities, the existing HAZID will be
updated and a set of Task Risk Assessments will be developed by the Contractor to identify and
mitigate potential Project-related risks for offshore activities. Disclosure of Offshore ESMS
documentation is also planned to occur to ensure requirements of EBRD PRs are met.
As one of the major goods or services purchased by the Project, the lengths of pipe for the
construction of the pipeline presented a significant potential supply chain management risk, with
suppliers located within Turkey and internationally, in China. Evidence from TANAP describes the
desktop environmental assessment of Pipe producers that was undertaken during the pre-qualification
process including an OHS inspection by the EPCM. Documentation demonstrates TANAP’s efforts in
broadly ensuring E&S requirements can be managed appropriately in its supply chain through the
suppliers’ requirements for implementing an ESMS commensurate to the complexity, nature and scale
of the Project.
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 2: LABOUR AND WORKING CONDITIONS
No material non-compliances were identified as part of the review against labour and working
conditions criteria. Some partial compliances were observed in other areas within this PR.
During discussions related to employee grievances, overtime work and fatigue management were
raised on several separate occasions to the IESC. Interviews revealed confusion at a site level as to
the TANAP policy on overtime. TANAP does not encourage overtime work for its employees, however,
due to the nature of the project, overtime work may occur within the legal limits. During interviews
on site with Lot 1 Contractor Fernas, personnel reported that overtime was allowed under Fernas
company policy. . TANAP is working to address overtime issues through a “Working Hours Action
Plan” that substantively addresses overtime issues, including stakeholder complaints of overtime, CC
compliance with TANAP overtime policies, and enforcing legal compliance with the Turkish Labour
Code. The Action Plan aims to reach compliance with the Labour Code by December 31, 2017. The
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page vi
IESC notes that the Action Plan emphasis is directed to legal compliance around overtime. While
there is a commitment to ensure that overtime hours are worked safely and without duress, it was
not clear how fatigue management measures are linked with effective overtime management. It is
also noted that contractors are financially incentivised for being on time/advance of deadlines, which
may contribute to the issue of overtime and fatigue. To this end, additional information was provided
to the IESC by TANAP in the form of the H&S Incentive Procedure (TNP-PCD-HSM-GEN-025) which
aims to promote awareness of H&S and incentivise workers regarding their H&S performance in order
to ensure that there is a balance between schedule / milestone incentives. During meetings with the
IESC on 12 May 2017, TANAP also noted that the link between financial incentives and effective
fatigue management is an area of current concern, and provided the example of hydrotesting,
whereby additional resources were engaged rather than the use of longer hours (Lot 1 had two
hydrotest crews, and it now has three crews and a fourth is being mobilised).
TANAP, through its contracting arrangements, ensure no child or forced labour is in use in the Project
through employment procedures. Nationally, Turkey has ratified the core ILO conventions including
on non-discrimination and TANAP’s role includes ensuring compliance with core labour standards on
behalf of the Project. Worker organisations are in place in parts of the Project, and all employees are
free to join labour unions.
Interviews with short term labour suggests that not all CCs are making clear what the working
conditions (including retrenchment/termination) are, and in absence of a TU, the individuals
interviewed stated that any issues have been raised through the Muhtar to the relevant CC for
resolution through the Grievance Mechanism. While the TANAP Project Site Audit Procedure provided
as evidence includes requirement for provision of document of resignation or notice of termination,
there appears to be confusion at a ground level regarding termination and retrenchment. This may be
exacerbated in the case of short-term contracts that are open-ended, or, renewed without formal
extension of the completion date. While notice periods for dismissal of staff are in accordance with
Turkish Labour Law requirements, in practice notice periods for dismissal may be occurring
inconsistently, particularly in relation to casual / short-term work. For example, TANAP reported that
the third-party audits have not found inconsistencies with national legislative requirements, however
in interviews with locally engaged staff at Ardiçli village, it was stated that following the completion of
a one year contract at the CC, a short-term contract was commenced with a subcontractor with no
contract in place and little notice for ‘termination’ of the worker. Internal audits are conducted of CCs
indicating compliance checks against labour issues including overtime and communications on
contracts with workers. These audits are documented in the TANAP Project Site Control Procedure,
the scope of which is to audit working conditions and rights of workers including working hours,
leave, payroll, Social Security, and terminations/new hires by carrying out a physical audit at least in
one camp monthly.
Some working conditions and amenities observed at Lot 1 did not appear appropriate to the nature of
the work being conducted and the climatic conditions at the time. TANAP presented to the IESC
information regarding non-conformance reporting (NCRs) and management. NCR requirements
address the process in place to develop and assess criticality of NCRs, and steps for root cause
analysis, corrective action implementation and NCR closure. This observation was noted in relation to
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page vii
works conducted at Lot 1 and it is recognised that working conditions observed at Lot 3 were much
improved.
In relation to security, the IESC considers that reasonable efforts have been made to align with this
PR, including adequate due diligence of security providers and presence of Standard Operating
Procedures guiding activities. Training on use of force and appropriate conduct towards communities
by security personnel is considered efficient to demonstrate compliance (e.g. Security Risk
Assessment, training records, Security Management Plan).
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 3: RESOURCE EFFICIENCY
Observed performance against this PR was found to be strong, and in full compliance with the PRs.
The ESIA and ESMPs provide the overarching Project principles for the application of resource
efficiency and pollution prevention principles. These Principles are defined as: identify and understand
impacts; consult with others; design and avoid adverse impacts and minimise use of natural
resources. The ESMPs includes environmental control strategies designed to reduce waste and
conserve natural resources through engineering and procurement environmental design controls and
construction and installation controls.
PR 3 requires that the ESIA process identifies opportunities and alternatives for resource efficiency in
accordance with GIP. The Compressor Stations (CSTs) are a major emitter of GHG during operation
of the pipeline, as identified in the ESIA. A Best Available Technology (BAT) assessment has been
conducted and provides sufficient detail so as to verify that EBRD guidance requirements have been
met in relation to how the adoption of resource efficiency and waste reduction considerations helped
to define the technology chosen in the CSTs. The BAT included detail on the realisation of the energy
savings that are possible because of the adoption of BAT for the CSTs and demonstrated that energy
efficiency measures have been identified.
Regarding onshore hydrotest water, this will preferentially be taken from surface water bodies. After
use, it is intended that water be treated until it meets the required Project Standards and discharged
back to the closest receiving environment (surface water). Where possible, addition of chemical
corrosion inhibitors will be avoided, although in some cases they may be required. The hydrotesting
process is managed through an Environmental Hydrotest Monitoring Plan, developed under TANAP
guidance for each CC over the four Lots. Each water abstraction and discharge point along the entire
route was assessed for water quality and ecological restrictions and appropriate management
measures proposed (i.e. exclusion of fish spawning periods for extraction activities).
The ESIA has assessed impacts related to GHG emissions, although it does not appear to contain
consideration of technically and financially achievable options to minimise emissions of GHG in the
assessment process. Upon IESC request, supplementary evidence was provided, in the form of the
BAT emissions inventory and relevant evaluation data, that demonstrates that resource efficiency
measures have been considered during design (e.g. ability to limit venting of gas, alternative forms of
power supply during operations or waste heat recovery systems).
As per the requirements of both Turkish and EU legislation, TANAP utilises licenced contractors to
transport and dispose of hazardous waste. The EBRD PRs recommend that clients ascertain whether
licenced disposal sites are being operated to acceptable standards. TANAP has conducted site
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page viii
verification audits of a sample of disposal facilities along the pipeline route to ensure that their waste
is being disposed of appropriately by the contractor.
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 4: HEALTH AND SAFETY
The IESC team has not recorded any material non-compliances within PR 4, while there are several
partial compliance areas.
A review of the Project incident database identified that there were many incidents that involved near
misses and first aid / lost time injuries related to pipeline lifting activities. One of the recorded
fatalities was also a lifting incident. The detailed incident report related to the lifting fatality stated
that root causes of the incident were insufficient training and a lack of suitable procedures for the
tasks. Interviews with employees on the Lot indicated that it was normal practice for personnel to be
in the designated ‘danger zone’ during lifts, amongst other system failings. The fact that it was
considered normal working practice to be within the ‘danger zone’ during lifts also indicates that there
may have been a lack of appropriate supervision and conduct of workplace inspections of lifting
activities by TANAP in the field. It is also unclear if corrective actions (i.e. retraining all lifting
personnel) were rolled out to all CCs on other Lots or were contained to just the Lot on which the
incident occurred.
The IESC team has some concern that lifting activities in particular are leading to a relatively high
occurrence of reported incidents / near misses. Given that lifting of pipe is one of the most common
activities on the Project which has the potential for serious injury or fatalities, a certain level of
control and supervision of the tasks by TANAP would be expected, particularly given that lifts on the
Project are not controlled under the permit to work system TANAP reports that Lessons Learnt
documents of incidents are being shared with all lots and stations, and actions are being followed up
by LOT and Station Leads (Delivery Manager, Lot HS Lead, etc). Relevant procedures and official
letters provided and discussed with TANAP in meetings held on 12 May 2017 indicate that appropriate
remedial actions are being implemented by TANAP in relation to lifting activities.
Other areas of concern relate to CC performance in managing community safety on site (e.g. fencing,
signage, accessibility of open trenches, engagement with affected communities); and the Project’s
use of epidemiological studies to inform management of communicable diseases and implementation
of community health programs. TANAP reports that trench registers are being kept for the entire
route, including the barricading status of open trenches, and are being closely followed up by the
Construction and HS Teams. Additionally, the Community Relations Team is undertaking Community
Safety Awareness meetings including access to open trenches, ROW, risks related with unauthorised
site access, and construction and traffic safety with communities throughout the pipeline route.
In alignment with a key construction phase project risk, there was evidence of strong management of
potential road safety impacts to both workers and communities. These included travel management
tools, vehicle controls and monitoring, and community and worker training, and specific training with
women and children to minimise public health risks due to vehicle traffic. TANAP is commended for
investing significantly and providing strong management of potential road safety impacts to both
workers and communities. These included travel management tools, vehicle controls and monitoring,
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page ix
and community and worker training, and specific training with women and children to minimise public
health risks due to vehicle traffic.
Construction Contractor MPs and procedures are aligned with those prepared by TANAP, and
documentation reflects a mitigation hierarchy approach. Awareness-raising within the workforce of
interactions with the community, interactions with emergency responders, and awareness for the
community of potential project hazards are all included in worker training.
Community Safety MPs provide for communicable disease training to the workforce and engagement
with local health authorities to agree appropriate mitigation actions, who have also been investigated
and engaged should any incidences of communicable diseases eventuate. Local engagement and
employment practices have been key in mitigating any potential effects of population influx, including
community exposure to disease.
Emergency Response Plans (ERPs) have additionally been developed and approved by TANAP,
including provision for engagement and training with external emergency responders by the Project,
led by TANAP’s Security and Emergency Response departments. These plans are supplemented by
mapping of available health services along the pipeline, and address potential for community conflicts
that may occur as a result of the Project. Regular walk-overs and fly-overs of the pipeline are in place
for the construction phase of the Project to monitor potential pipeline intrusion, while building
intrusion systems are being implemented during construction for all AGIs.
ERPs related to operation of the pipeline are currently in development and are stated to be ready six
months prior to operation. Offshore construction ERPs including an Oil Spill Emergency Response
Plan required to manage response to vessel interactions have been drafted and TANAP plan to
complete these prior to construction in the offshore package commencing in late June 2017. TANAP
are required to have these developed and disclose these plans prior to commencement of offshore
works.
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 5: LAND ACQUISITION, INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT AND ECONOMIC DISPLACEMENT
No material non-compliances were identified as the part of the review against land acquisition,
involuntary resettlement and economic displacement criteria. The RAPs present the overall impacts,
policy and legislative framework, land acquisition process, consultations and disclosure details and
implementation arrangements, indicative implementation schedules and budgets and significant
further work has been undertaken by TANAP and Lenders to develop additional commitments to meet
international requirements in land acquisition and resettlement.
The suite of key documents relating to TANAP land acquisition, involuntary resettlement and
economic displacement activities are the 2014 Resettlement Action Plan (RAP), the RAP for Above
Ground Installations (AGIs RAP) and a RAP for the Pipeline (Pipeline RAP), and the Guide to Land
Acquisition and Compensation (GLAC), developed for stakeholders.
Following an Implementation Audit and World Bank due diligence investigations, a new suite of
studies, commitments, processes, and documents was developed and implemented by TANAP to fulfil
international standards in land acquisition and livelihood restoration. The areas covered by the
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page x
additional corrective actions identified by TANAP address: Compensation and Entitlements; Livelihood
Restoration; Vulnerable Groups; Grievance Redress Mechanism; Community Engagement and
Disclosure Policy; Monitoring Process; and Local Employment.
Full compliance was observed in relation to avoidance or minimisation of displacement. Route
realignment has been carried out during the construction phase to manage deviations from the ESIA
approved alignment, in accordance with Project procedures. The pipeline requires temporary (3-year)
acquisition of 6,340ha, while 263ha of land was acquired permanently for AGIs, across 578 land
parcels and 936 Project Affected Persons (PAPs).
Partial non-compliances were observed in relation to consultation, assessment and census,
compensation for displaced persons, the Project grievance mechanism, RAP/LRP documentation and
implementation, and monitoring.
BOTAS, the entity responsible for land acquisition, TANAP and CCs’ also undertake consultation with
stakeholders, requiring identification and consultation with approximately 97,000 landowners, land
shareholders and land users. Consultation and engagement has included: Information meetings prior
to negotiations/census data gathering; 2 rounds of negotiation meetings; crop determination
studies/meetings; preconstruction information meetings; and land entry meetings. Land exit meetings
will also be undertaken following reinstatement (approximately 3 years after land entry).
Consultation processes provide for engagement with vulnerable groups including women. TANAP has
committed to undertaking additional engagement and disclosure actions to strengthen the Project’s
responsiveness to stakeholders’ issues.
The cut-off date from the original RAP could not be met, as construction commenced in advance of
this date and identification of PAPs and assets inventory had not been completed, however BOTAS
has developed a practicable approach to evaluate and compensate every additional claim and justified
complaint that falls before or after the relevant cut-off date because the international standards on
applying a cut-off date could not be met.
As at August 2016, approximately 5,450 formal land users have been identified (i.e. users occupying
privately owned or treasury owned land, both documented and non-documented, to be compensated
through BOTAS) and 324 informal users (i.e. users occupying publicly owned land such as pastures or
forest lands, unauthorized or tolerated users, to be compensated through the RAP Fund, administered
by TANAP). BOTAS cannot acquire land from or compensate these categories that fall outside the
Turkish legal RAP requirements, hence the need to establish a mechanism from the Project that
provides for compensation to international standards, including transaction costs, transitional
payments, support to vulnerable households, and compensation for unviable land parcels. A RAP
Fund Management Procedure focusing on RAP Fund strategy and implementation principles has been
drafted and is currently being delivered to Project-affected settlements and PAPs, along with the new
GLAC (Guide to Land Acquisition). The RAP Fund Evaluation Committee has additionally been
established.
Permanent land acquisition is required for approximately 260ha for the AGIs, while approximately
6,600ha is required for a temporary period of 3 years (easement land for the construction corridor, or
unrestricted access for the ROW). This land is to be returned to owners after construction, with some
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page xi
restrictions on agriculture / buildings in easement areas. TANAP is commissioning a retrospective
study (due for completion in July 2017) to identify and compensate PAPs who have not been yet been
compensated under the new Entitlements Matrix framework (ref: Summary of Corrective Actions).
Further, TANAP has committed to providing for full replacement cost for all assets and will ensure
that lost income is fully restored through the compensation process.
The procedure for demonstrating avoidance of expropriation appears to be a gap. While TANAP’s LA
process allows for negotiation with landowners, 67% of agreements are not amicable and trigger the
expropriation process, which does not meet with GIP and suggests the process of determining and
compensating landowners is rushed, in addition to absentee owners or other factors, resulting in
significant expropriation by international standards. While acknowledging that the pipeline component
of the project is linear, temporary and land acquisition has been completed, it should be clear to
TANAP that the expropriation process has not caused undue hardship to those losing access to their
resources. Through the Corrective Action Register, TANAP have committed to ensure that all eligible
PAPs are informed on entitlements in order to come forward for losses that have not yet been
compensated. TANAP will compensate all additional claims that are valid, consistent with the
conditions and criteria set in TANAP’s information brochures and GLAC document.
A grievance mechanism and Online Stakeholder Information Database, OSID, are in place for the
Project. As part of TANAP’s has commitment to strengthen this mechanism, an Appeals Committee
has been established (in January 2017), with notification at the community level from February 2017.
TANAP has also committed to strengthening disclosure of summary grievance information to
stakeholders.
TANAP has committed to development of a range of new RAP documents, documented in the
Summary of Corrective Actions in the Pipeline RAP. These include the Livelihood Restoration Plan
(LRP), RAP Fund guidance and documentation. The RAP Fund intends to fill the gap between
payments that can be provided for by BOTAS (as the national responsible agency) and international
requirements managed and implemented by TANAP. Some payments are reported to have already
been made from the RAP Fund, and for transparency these should be reconciled following approval of
guidance on implementation of the Fund. RAP Fund Management Procedure has been drafted and
disclosure with PAPs commenced. TANAP has contracted independent experts for RAP External
Monitoring and will produce their 1st Semi-Annual External Monitoring Report in June 2017.
The Pipeline RAP additionally identifies measures to strengthen ongoing implementation of the RAP.
This includes a study to investigate potential impacts to fisherfolk in the Sea of Marmara and
thereafter develop an appropriate Livelihood Restoration Plan. The study has been carried out, (i.e.
with adequate time to investigate, plan and respond, in advance of any impacts occurring). Similarly,
the AGI RAP provides for the development of an LRP to PAPs who have experienced a permanent loss
of livelihoods. Mitigation measures are yet to be developed and will differ from those who experience
temporary loss, which should be clearly managed and communicated to stakeholders.
The AGI and pipeline RAPs specify monitoring and evaluation mechanisms including indicators,
implementation schedule, and budget. These RAPs would be subject to IESC/independent monitoring
and review throughout implementation in accordance with GIP. A RAP Monitoring Plan has been
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page xii
completed, and both internal and external monitoring has commenced so as to inform the impact
evaluation at the conclusion of the LA and livelihood restoration program.
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 6: BIODIVERSITY AND LIVING NATURAL RESOURCES
The biodiversity assessments and studies have been completed in consideration of the IFC 2012
Performance Standards and with specific reference to Performance Standard 6 (PS): Biodiversity
Conservation and Sustainable Natural Resource Management of Living Natural Resources. TANAP has
developed a Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) with specific reference to the IFC 2012 PS6 and the
Turkish National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan3.
The TANAP route selection described in the ESIA Chapter 5 describes the process for defining the
TANAP route and included consideration of a range of factors included the presence of protected
areas, sensitive habitats, scrublands, meadows, pastures and wetlands. A number of route
alternatives were identified to avoid key biodiversity conservation areas including the Posof Ardahan
Wildlife Development Area, Kakgol-Sahara National Park, Sarikamis Allahaukber Mountains National
Park, and the Akdagmadeni Forest (Important natural area).
Baseline studies were completed between 2013 and 2014 and include comprehensive desktop studies
supplemented with targeted site surveys focused on the areas where impacts to priority biodiversity
values are likely to occur.
The TANAP Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) was developed with the specific objective to identify the
species and habitats in consideration of national and international significance and to consequently
determine the applicable area specific actions required to protect and conserve biodiversity within the
36m pipeline Right of Way (RoW). The BAP has identified the presence of critical habitats,
intersections of the ROW with protected or conservation areas and the presence of ecologically
sensitive species within the ROW.
The BAP includes a discussion of EUNIS habitat types encountered along the TANAP route including
30 different terrestrial habitat types classified as Level III and 6 level III freshwater habitats. Habitat
types classified as significant under the Turkish ‘National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan” were
also identified as priority habitats including steppe, coastal sand-dunes, and mountainous forest
ecosystems.
The re-assessment of critical habitat in the BAP identified 67 terrestrial and 27 freshwater critical
habitats. The terrestrial critical habitats cover only 0.39% of the 500m LSA corridor assessed in the
ESIA and 5.6% of the ROW (36m). This represents a significant decrease in terrestrial critical habitat
affected by the Project from that identified in the initial ESIA studies following the BAP re-assessment.
However, this reassessment of critical habitat area is based on the presence or absence of critical
habitat triggering species or values within the project’s direct impact area and removes critical habitat
areas where the triggering species or values were found to be undisturbed by direct impacts of the
ROW. The IESC finds that the TANAP critical habitat assessment is not in full compliance with the IFC
PS6 GN and is therefore in partial compliance with the requirements of PR6 to ensure net biodiversity
gain of critical habitat and no net loss of priority biodiversity features.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page xiii
The BAP states that the impact assessment undertaken in the ESIA confirms a low degree of impact
expected on natural and critical habitat, and states that significant permanent and long term impacts
are not expected and the defined mitigation measures are sufficient for the recovery of habitats. The
BAP also refers to the ESIA in confirming no long term or permanent significant impact to Species of
Conservation Concern. However, the BAP does recognise the threat of permanent impacts on SCCs
from alien invasive species, including the pathways for introduction of weed species, within the
pipeline ROW and reiterates the importance of the Alien Invasive Species Guidance Document.
Furthermore, the TANAP’s “Erosion, Reinstatement, and Landscaping Plan” and the “Specification for
Reinstatement” includes the range of actions for reinstatement and bio restoration of the project sites
to achieve pre-development biodiversity criteria. The performance of the bio restoration efforts in
achieving the stated biodiversity objectives is proposed to be monitored and reported through the
“Bio-Restoration Monitoring Plan (October, 2016).
Section 3.2.1 of the most recent version of the BAP does include discussion on the application of the
mitigation hierarchy for critical habitats. The BAP describes how mitigation measures are applied for
each critical habitat that occurs along the Project and identifies where additional conservation actions
are required to ensure no net loss of priority species. Annex 9 of the BAP includes a range of
measures designed to ensure a net gain in critical habitat that is impacted by the Project. However,
these net gain actions are not described in a way that demonstrate how a net gain would be
achieved. There is no quantification of the no net loss/ net gain objectives of the BAP to demonstrate
full compliance with PR6. Neither the ESIA nor the BAP provide sufficient detail of the project related
direct, indirect, and residual impacts on populations; species and ecosystems identified in the baseline
studies. There is insufficient assessment of the project impacts on critical habitat other than the direct
impacts within the ROW and the potential for introduced pest species (weeds). The impact
assessment on biodiversity values provides insufficient discussion on why aspects such as habitat
fragmentation, fauna avoidance and impacts from increased third party access are not considered.
The project has not demonstrated full compliance with PS6 GN15 in its assessment of impacts to
critical habitat and has provided insufficient evidence that bio restoration works on the ROW will be
adequate to achieve the biodiversity outcomes required to demonstrate compliance with PR6. The
IESC has found that TANAP has relied heavily on the assumptions that mitigation of temporary
disturbance through bio-restoration and alien species control will be effective in ensuring no residual
impacts to priority biodiversity values and critical habitat. There is little discussion in the ESIA that
supports the assumption that bio-remediation will ensure no permanent or long term impacts to
priority biodiversity values and critical habitat. The limitations of bio-reclamation are stated in various
sections of the ESIA that refer to challenges in achieving propagation or translocation of some
species, and the inability to replace tree species over the ROW to ensure the integrity of the pipeline
is maintained.
The effectiveness of the mitigation measures, including bio-restoration and alien species controls,
should be discussed in further detail and, where possible, refer to examples where these mitigation
measure have been effective in ensuring no loss of priority biodiversity values or critical habitat.
However, if relevant and geographic specific examples of successful bio-restoration are not available,
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page xiv
then the assumption that there will be no residual impact to priority features and critical habitat
cannot be supported.
In consideration of the limitations found with the TANAP critical habitat assessment and management
approach, and recognising the current status of Project construction. The IESC recommends that
TANAP develop and implement an Offset Management Strategy document that supplements the BAP.
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 8: CULTURAL HERITAGE
TANAP is in full compliance with the requirements of PR 8.
A total of 161 sites were identified in the ESIA process, and mitigation actions defined. Eleven sites
were identified as unavoidable at preconstruction phase. A Cultural Heritage Management Plan
(CHMP) is in place, including a Chance Find Procedure, which is reflected in each of the CCs’ MPs.
The CCs’ Archaeologist, who liaises with the TANAP Cultural Heritage Officer and the Museum
Directorate, monitors ground clearance work. Third party monitoring of implementation of the CHMP
is also undertaken by Çinar.
During the construction phase to date, five route changes have been implemented at the eleven
unavoidable sites, following engagement and mitigation actions implemented under the direction of
the with the relevant authorities (Museum Directorate of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism).
Ongoing and close engagement has been undertaken with the Museum Directorate of the Ministry of
Culture and Tourism, as the responsible agency for advice and direction on archaeological finds and
appears to have been effective in managing and mitigating potential impacts to tangible heritage in
line with the mitigation hierarchy approach. However, consultation with affected communities and
other stakeholders has been largely limited. Invitations to specialist interest groups at the ESIA
consultation phase has been recorded. IESC notes that consultation with affected communities is
carried out for intangible cultural heritage and registered tangible cultural heritage elements.
However, the chance finds are managed differently due to security reasons (the risk of illegal
excavations).
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 10: INFORMATION DISCLOSURE AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
No material non-compliances were observed in reviewing the information disclosure and stakeholder
engagement criteria. Partial compliance was observed in relation to operational grievance
mechanism, and information disclosure.
Policies and standards are in place for the Project regarding stakeholder engagement,
communications and social impact management and requirements. The total number of consultation
meetings during the construction phase (as at November 2016) was 1,234, including meetings with
women, safety awareness for children, and with local authorities, across all Lots and stations.
Comments raised during project disclosure were reflected and analysed and incorporated into Project
SMPs, completing the feedback loop in line with GIP.
The Project SEP was published (18 August 2013) on the TANAP website in Turkish and English,
appropriate to the nature, scale and risks posed by the Project and reflecting engagement actions
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page xv
specific to different stakeholder groups (e.g. vulnerable groups). This SEP has been recently updated
and finalized (30 January 2017) and includes additional guidance on stakeholder engagement
implementation for CCs during the construction phase, and provides for updated roles and
responsibilities.
ESIA documents were disclosed on the TANAP website, with key documents in English and Turkish.
The current SEP specifies periodic review of the document in line with PR 10 requirements for
ongoing provision of information to stakeholders appropriate to the nature of the Project and its
adverse impacts. PR 10 requires at least annual reporting to stakeholders for Category A projects;
commitment on this aspect is included in the SEP. The modality of disclosure of Project documents
was described by TANAP. For RAP documentation, the disclosure process was addressed adequately
through provision of written summary information in the local language, available to public disclosure
meetings, which subsequently informed the final RAPs prior to their disclosure. Additional
engagement planning and disclosure material is required of TANAP on the next phase of RAP activity
(i.e. in identifying and appropriately compensating new PAPs) and in the development and disclosure
of the BAP.
The grievance mechanism is operational and is aligned with the CCs. All grievances are logged in an
online grievance recording and tracking system. A total of 790 complaints have been received from
1/1/14 to 17/11/16 with 85% closed over an average of 15-day response time (30 days is the time
limit in the procedure for closure of complaints). The most common grievances since project
commencement relate to damage to property/land; land acquisition and compensation process;
damage to irrigation infrastructure; damage to roads; and outstanding subcontractor payments (as
per: Complaints issues – Top 20, 17.Nov. 2016). An Appeals Committee has been established to
provide third party review of unresolved grievances between TANAP and the Complainant.
Documentation on this committee has been developed and is to be provided to the IESC. Legal
redress is possible regardless of establishment of the Appeals Committee with complainants able to
take matters to court independently. This has not occurred in the Project to date; a third-party
valuation had been sought to resolve land valuation, and a policy of resolution by mutual agreement
is in place by the project.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page xvi
REPORT ORGANISATION
Subsequent sections of this Environmental and Social Review to Support Financing report are
organised as follows:
• Section 1 – Introduction;
• Section 2 – Summary Project Description;
• Section 3 – Institutional and Legal Framework;
• Section 4 – Environment, Social, Health and Safety Review and Audit Overview;
• Section 5 – Compliance with EBRD PRs;
• Section 6 – Compliance with Turkish Legislation
• Section 7 – Compliance with Other Applicable Laws / Conventions / Treaties
• Section 8 – High-level assessment of export gas pipelines projects against Lender Group
requirements for associated facilities.
• ESDD Appendices
The basic findings of the review are presented in the form of observations, comments, and
recommendations according to each standard assessed against. Direct comparison between each
requirement and reviewed Project documentation is provided in a table format at the end of each
section where relevant comments and suggested action, if necessary, to achieve compliance are also
included. The findings presented in the summary table sections form the basis of the Environmental
and Social Action Plan contained in Appendix C of this report. Descriptions of the Project have been
provided only to a degree necessary to provide context for the observations and recommendations
provided in the text.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 1
1. INTRODUCTION
This report contains the Environmental and Social Due Diligence (ESDD) for the TANAP Project in
Turkey. Sustainability Pty Ltd (Sustainability) was engaged by the European Bank for Reconstruction
and Development (EBRD) as the Independent Environmental and Social Consultant (IESC) to conduct
the ESDD.
The TANAP Project involves a 1,850km pipeline to facilitate the transport of natural gas produced
from the Shah Deniz Phase II development in Azerbaijan to Turkey and Europe (Figure 1.1). The
TANAP Project will connect the South Caucasus Pipeline Expansion Project (SCPx) in Georgia to the
Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) Project, which commenced construction in March 2015 and extends
through Greece and Albania and across the Adriatic Sea to southern Italy.
The TANAP is being developed by a group of shareholders who currently comprise of Southern Gas
Corridor Closed Stock Joint Company (58%), BOTAS (30%) and BP (12%) and are herein referred to
collectively as the “Sponsors”. The TANAP Project, in conjunction with the South Caucasus Pipeline
(SCP) and the Trans-Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) form the elements of the Southern Gas Corridor.
TANAP will run from the Turkish border with Georgia, beginning in the Turkish village of Türkgözü in
the Posof district of Ardahan, will run through 20 provinces ending at the Greek border in the İpsala
district of Edirne (Figure 1.2). Two off-take stations are located within Turkey for national natural gas
transmission, one located in Eskişehir and the other in Thrace. With 19km running under the Sea of
Marmara, the main pipeline within Turkey reaches a total of 1,850km, along with off-take stations
and above-ground installations, with their numbers and properties detailed below:
• 7 compressor stations,
• 4 measuring stations,
• 11 pigging stations,
• 49 block valve stations and
• 2 off-take stations to supply Turkey’s national natural gas network.
In addition to the aboveground installations, temporary camps to accommodate workers, pipe storage
areas and access roads necessary during the construction phase will also be built.
TANAP is a Category A project, requiring comprehensive Environmental and Social Impact
Assessment (ESIA) in accordance with the EBRD Environmental and Social (ES) Policy. Based on the
above, the EBRD engaged Sustainability to review the existing ESIA documentation and conduct the
ESDD (to the extent possible based on available information) of the Project. The focus of the ESDD is
on the TANAP Project, however a cursory review (to identify main risks or gaps and discussion about
the significance of any identified gaps) of associated facilities, including the SCPx, TAP, and SD2
documentation is also within the scope of this ESDD.
1.1 SCOPE OF WORK
The role of the IESC comprised four major elements. These included:
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 2
• Summarizing the relevant characteristics of the Project including its associated facilities and
area of influence related to environmental and social aspects based upon a review of existing
information and appropriate site reconnaissance. Relevant characteristics include: the Project
description; institutional and legal framework; environmental and social conditions;
environmental and social impacts (direct, indirect and induced) and risks; analysis of
reasonable alternatives; environmental and social mitigation, compensation, and remedial
measures; monitoring system in place including indicators; and consultation and engagement
of affected population;
• Evaluating the adequacy of, and likely costs associated with, the proposed Project
environmental, social, and health and safety assessments, management and action plans and
procedures and present conclusions and recommendations associated with identified issues;
• Confirming to EBRD the compliance of the proposed development plan for the Project with
the applicable environmental, health, safety and social requirements, including statutory
requirements and project requirements under the Applicable Standards, and;
• Coordinating and assist the EBRD in the due diligence process in respect of environmental
and social matters in connection with the financing of the Project, answering questions and
attending meetings and conference calls as required.
Sustainability, as the IESC, provided independent review, assessment and comment on the TANAP
Project’s compliance with EBRD standards for the purposes of Project financing. This included
advising the EBRD on the adequacy of the Project’s assessments, management and mitigation
controls and monitoring measures against EBRD standards.
On account of TANAP forming a sub-component of a larger gas chain, which encompasses the TAP,
SCPx and the Shah Deniz Phase II Development, Sustainability also undertook a high level
environmental due diligence review of these associated facilities, based on publicly-available ESIAs
and management plans. Sustainability also drew upon its current experience as the IESC for Lenders
on the Shah Deniz II Development and the previous high-level assessments completed for the TAP
and SCPx Projects.
Key tasks undertaken in the documentation of this ESDD Report included:
1.1.1 Reviews and Assessments
Review of key HSES documentation, which included, but was not limited to:
• The ESIAs produced for the Project including the information prepared for the trans-boundary
notification and consultation;
• The Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and relevant additional specific
plans including the Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP);
• Environmental and Social Management System (ESMS);
• Other relevant HSES materials including baseline studies, surveys, and additional
assessments, and;
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 3
• Relevant Land Acquisition and Compensation (LAC) and Resettlement Action Plan (RAP)
documentation and Grievance Mechanism.
1.1.2 Site Reconnaissance
The IESC conducted a single site visit from the 23 – 27th November 2016, with EBRD team members
also attending. Tasks associated with the site visit included:
• Inspection of Project site locations that are agreed with the Sponsors and Lenders including
pipeline construction, compression and metering stations;
• Inspection of the associated facilities (as defined under EBRD’s Performance Requirement 1)
as appropriate, and;
• Interviews with Project HSES and other personnel and key stakeholders as relevant to the
scope of work.
The Site Visit Report is included as Appendix D.
1.1.3 Reporting
The primary objective of the Reporting task is to produce an Environmental and Social Due Diligence
(ESDD) Report (this Report).
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Page 4
Figure 1.1 TANAP Pipeline Overview
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Page 5
Figure 1.2 TANAP Pipeline Route Within Turkey
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 6
1.2 LENDER POLICIES
1.2.1 EBRD Performance Requirements
EBRD-financed projects are expected to be designed and operated in compliance with good
international practices relating to sustainable development. To assist clients and their projects achieve
this, the EBRD has defined ten performance requirements covering the key areas of environmental
and social issues and impacts. In order to obtain financial support from the EBRD clients should meet
a set of 10 PRs, as follows:
• PR 1: Environmental and Social Appraisal and Management;
• PR 2: Labour and Working Conditions;
• PR 3: Pollution Prevention and Abatement;
• PR 4: Community Health, Safety and Security;
• PR 5: Land Acquisition, Involuntary Resettlement and Economic Displacement;
• PR 6: Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Living Natural Resources;
• PR 7: Indigenous Peoples;
• PR 8: Cultural Heritage;
• PR 9: Financial Intermediaries; and
• PR 10: Information Disclosure and Stakeholder Engagement.
The PRs should be read in conjunction with the EBRD’s ES Policy. The EBRD is bound by its founding
agreement to adhere to sound banking principles and “promote in the full range of its activities
environmentally sound and sustainable development.” The ways in which the EBRD promotes such
development are described in the EBRD’s Environmental Policy document. One specific step taken by
the EBRD to address this mandate and the General Principles and Objectives set out in the Policy is to
ensure that all its investment and technical cooperation projects undergo environmental and
socioeconomic appraisal along with the financial, economic, legal and technical due diligence, and to
ensure that appropriate monitoring is undertaken following approval of projects by the Board of
Directors.
1.3 SOURCES OF INFORMATION
The review and audit was based on 1) publicly available ESIA documentation, and 2) Information
provided by TANAP, which is not available in the public domain. The main sources of information
used to prepare this Report included, among others: the ESIA and appendices; ESMPs and
supplementary slide packs prepared by TANAP and a range of implementation evidence requested by
the IESC as a result of the site visit. A full list of all documents used to prepare this Report is
provided in Appendix A.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 7
2. SUMMARY OF PROJECT CHARACTERTISTICS
The TANAP Project is part of the Southern Gas Corridor, which aims to transport natural gas from
Shah Deniz 2 Gas Field and other fields in the South Caspian Sea to Turkey and Europe in Azerbaijan.
The Southern Gas Corridor comprises the South Caucasus Pipeline (SCP), TANAP and the
TransAdriatic Pipeline (TAP). The TANAP corridor starts from the Georgia/Turkey border at
Türkgözü/Posof/Ardahan where it connects to SCP and ends at the Turkey/Greece border in
İpsala/Edirne, where it feeds into the TAP Pipeline. There is an off-take station at Eskişehir, Turkey,
and another one at Thrace, Turkey to connect to the Turkish natural gas distribution network.
The TANAP Project is a 56-inch and 48-inch pipeline system of 1,850km, and will transport natural
gas to the required specifications and quantity in stages starting with 16 bcma as initial phase leading
up to a high flow case of 31 bcma which is the last phase. 6 bcma will be delivered to BOTAŞ (Boru
Hatları ile Petrol Taşıma A.Ş.) to be used within the Republic of Turkey via off-take stations by Gas
Transport Agreement (GTA). The construction of the Project is expected to last for 4 years, and a
phased approach will be pursued where the target for completion of the construction and starting
operation is by the middle of 2018. The initial capacity of 16 bcma (First Stage) is expected to expand
to 24 bcma by 2023 (Second Stage) and to 31 bcma by 2026 (Third Stage), upon construction of the
required additional compressor stations. TANAP is planned to begin from the Georgia/Turkey border
and go through the provincial borders of Ardahan, Kars, Erzurum, Erzincan, Bayburt, Gümüşhane,
Giresun, Sivas, Yozgat, Kırşehir, Kırıkkale, Ankara, Eskişehir, Bilecik, Kütahya, Bursa, Balıkesir,
Çanakkale, Tekirdağ and Edirne. At the beginning of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
(ESIA) process the pipeline was planned to be divided into two branches after crossing Marmara Sea
and the second branch would pass Tekirdağ and enter Bulgaria through Kırklareli. However, due to
the change in the marketing strategy of Azerbaijan, natural gas to Europe by the Bulgarian section
was cancelled. The TANAP system will be fully automated with main and back-up control centres to
meet the requirements of gas transmissions and associated environmental and safety considerations.
The main pipeline facilities include the required number of compression facilities, block valve stations,
distribution and custody transfer metering facilities. The pipeline crosses terrain with challenging
geotechnical features, including landslides and other geo-hazards, in addition to crossing regions with
different levels of urbanization and economic activity. TANAP includes:
• Onshore pipeline:
o A main natural gas pipeline from the Turkey/Georgia border to the Turkey/Greece
border.
o Diameter: 56 inches to the Eskişehir Compressor Station and 48 inches from
Eskişehir.
o Compressor Station to the Turkey/Greece border.
o Total pipe length: 1850 km.
o Onshore length: 1832 km.
o Nominal capacity: 31 bcma in high-flow case.
o Design Pressure: 95.5 barg.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 8
o Main design according to ASME B31.8, 2012.
• Offshore pipeline section:
o Looping at Marmara Sea crossing.
o Diameter: 2 x 36 inches.
o Length: 18 km, approximately.
• Compressor Stations:
o 7 compressor stations at intermediate points for fulfilling pressure requirements. A
separate compressor train is foreseen for the gas supply to BOTAS in CST-5A
(identified as CST-5AL).
• Metering Stations:
o 1 custody receiving border metering station at the entry point.
o 1 delivery border metering station at the exit point.
o 2 fiscal metering stations at Eskişehir and Thrace Offtakes.
• Pig Launcher and Receiver facilities:
o at each compressor station (including phase compressors).
o at each metering station.
o at both sides of the shore approaches of the Dardanelles Strait Crossing.
• Block Valve Stations:
o 49 in accordance with ASME B31.8, 2012 requirements.
• Off-take Points:
o 2 in Turkey, with metering stations.
• Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) automation, control and
Telecommunication equipment:
o Main Control Centre in Ankara, Turkey.
o Back-up Control Centre located with Compressor Station CST-5A in Eskişehir, Turkey.
2.1.1 Current Progress
The Project is substantially commenced, with construction works having commenced on all 4 Lots.
Construction contracts for the offshore pipeline have been awarded but have not yet commenced. A
summary of construction progress at the time of the field visit, in November 2016, across all Lots is
outlined below. It is acknowledged that these figures are impacted by the inclusion of Lot 4 progress,
as works at Lot 4 had only recently commenced at that time. The completion figures for Lots 1 -3 are
significantly higher:
• 65% of pipeline welds completed;
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 9
• 45% of pipeline lowered into construction trench;
• 38% of backfilling completed.
Relevant dates for the remainder of the construction period include:
• Final pipeline manufacture and delivery – Completed March 2017;
• Commencement of offshore construction – July 2017;
• Mechanical Completion of Phase 0 pipeline – December2017;
• Supply of gas to Eskişehir (offtake station) Phase 0 complete – June 2018;
• Material Completion of Phase 1 pipeline works – December 2018;
• Gas supply to Europe – June 2019.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 10
3. INSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK
The key legal regime for the construction and operation of the TANAP Project is set out in the
applicable Host Government Agreements between Turkey and Azerbaijan (see Section 6). The Host
Government Agreement requires Project Environmental and Social Standards complying with National
Laws and also taking due account of international standards and practices generally prevailing in the
Natural Gas pipeline industry, including relevant Performance Standards of the International Finance
Corporation.
Turkey is signatory to numerous international and regional conventions that oblige the government to
prevent pollution and protect specified habitats, flora and fauna. Those of relevance to the TANAP
Project include:
Convention on the International Transportation of Hazardous Wastes, Basel, ratified by Turkey on 1994
Convention on the Persistent Organic Pollutants, Stockholm, ratified by Turkey on 2010
United Nations Climate Change Framework Convention, Bonn, ratified by Turkey on 2004
Convention on Protection of Ozone Layer, Vienna, ratified by Turkey on 1991
Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, ratified by Turkey on 1983
Convention on Biological Diversity. Turkey ratified this convention in 1992
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) (Turkey is a member country).
International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), ratified by Turkey on 1990
Convention on Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) (Turkey is a not yet member country).
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat (Ramsar) (Turkey is a contracting body)
Convention concerning the Protection of World Cultural and Natural Heritage (WHC) (Turkey ratified this convention)
Convention for the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats (BERN) (1984) (ratified by Turkey)
Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, Especially as Waterfowl Habitat (RAMSAR) (1994) (ratified by Turkey)
European Landscape Convention (2001) (ratified by Turkey)
Convention to Combat Desertification (CCD) (1998) (ratified by Turkey)
Convention on substances depleting Ozone Layer, Montreal, ratified by Turkey on 1991
Kyoto Protocol, ratified by Turkey on 2009
Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents, 2000
While not currently a member of the EU, much of Turkeys legislation has been drafted based on EU
legal provisions as a pre-cursor to membership talks that are currently ongoing. The key legislation
governing environment requirements in Turkey is the Environment Law (1983). The purpose of this
legislation is to protect the environment based on the principles of sustainable environment and
sustainable development.
Adopting the principle “Polluter Pays”, the Law encompasses principles about punishment and closure
of the facilities polluting the environment and the liabilities for informing the related authorities about
any changes to be made on the production process of the facilities. It sets the framework for other
environmental (and social) legislation within Turkey, including (as relevant to the Project):
• Law on Protection of Soil and Land Use (2005);
• Law on Pasture Land (1998);
• Conservation of Cultural and Natural Assets Law (1983);
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 11
• Forestry Law (1956);
• Groundwater Law (1960);
• Health and Safety Law (2012);
• Labour Law (2003);
• Shore Law (1990);
• Law on Protection of Animals (2004);
• Law on the Transit Transport of Petroleum with Pipelines (2000);
• Regulation on Control of Water Pollution (2004);
• Regulation on Control of Hazardous Wastes (2005);
• Regulation on EIA (2008);
• Regulation on Management of Surface Water Quality (2012); and
• Regulation on Permits and Licenses to be Secured According to the Environment Law (2009);
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 12
4. ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL, HEALTH & SAFETY REVIEW AND AUDIT
The Compliance Summary Table at the end of each PR in Section 5 provides a systematic review of
project compliance with the EBRD Environmental and Social Policy, as defined through the applicable
Performance Requirements (PRs). The review is intended to provide a baseline against which to
judge future performance of projects through the annual environmental and social reporting process.
Between 2 and 10 indicators are identified for each of the applicable PRs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10.
Within each sub-section, an introductory paragraph is included to provide the most relevant
observations and to facilitate the understanding of the compliance table that follows. Therefore, the
narrative paragraphs preceding the compliance tables for each Performance Requirement are aimed
to provide the “rationale” for the identified gaps, and explanation of the IESC prescriptions.
Justification for any derogation from a PR is summarised and supporting documents referenced. For
each indicator within a PR, the following three steps are completed:
• Decide whether the indicator is applicable. For Category A and B projects the starting point is
that all indicators are applicable unless the project has no significant aspects relevant to the
indicator (i.e. no risks), in which case the indicator should be scored "NA" and a brief
summary of the reason given.
• Decide whether an opinion is possible. If not (for example if the indicator will apply, but it is
too early in the project) score as "NOP" and a brief summary of why is provided. Where lack
of opinion represents a material omission to the review, reference to where this is addressed
in the report is made and recommendations are summarised.
• Indicators are scored as follows and a brief justification provided.
EC Exceeding Compliance: The project has gone beyond the expectations of EBRD’s PR requirements. EBRD should be able to use projects rated EC as a role model for positive Environmental and Social effects.
FC Fully Compliant: The project is fully in compliance with EBRD’s requirements, and EU and local environmental, health and safety policies and guidelines.
PC Partial Compliance: The project is not in full compliance with EBRD’s requirements, but has systems, processes or mitigation measure in place which are working towards addressing the deficiencies.
MNC Material Non-compliance: The project is not in material compliance with EBRD’s requirements, and the systems, processes and mitigation measures in place are not working towards addressing the deficiencies.
NOP No Opinion Possible: Based on the data provided to date, the IESC team has not been able to form a definitive position on the
subject being discussed.
• Comments/Issues: Provide a brief commentary on the relevance of this requirement for the
project and an explanation of the chosen score.
• Actions Required: Where applicable, briefly describe any actions required by the client to
achieve full compliance with each requirement.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental Due Diligence June 2017 Page 13
5. COMPLIANCE AGAINST EBRD PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS
5.1 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 1: ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS AND ISSUES
The EBRD outlines their requirements for assessment and management of environmental issues in
PR1. PR1 establishes the importance of integrated assessment to identify the environmental and
social impacts and issues associated with projects and the client’s management of environmental and
social performance throughout the life of the Project.
In addition to the ESIA documentation, a range of additional documentation has been requested and
provided and has been considered in this ESDD. This was undertaken to have a clear understanding
of the ESMS supporting the ESIA documents and, as mentioned above, this report is based only on
that information which has been received from TANAP or that which is in the public domain.
5.1.1 Environmental and Social Assessment
ESIA
The overarching agreement guiding development of the TANAP project with the Government of
Turkey is the Host Government Agreement (HGA, 26.06.2012). The HGA specifies the requirement
for the TANAP Project to identify E&S Standards, in line with Turkish national requirements and with
due account of prevailing international industry practices and the IFC Performance Standards (Article
17.1). The HGA further requires that TANAP prepare an ESIA in accordance with E&S Standards, for
approval by the Turkish Government, and that the ESIA include an environmental and social
investment program (Article 17.2).
The environmental and social impacts of the Project have been assessed through a systematic
process applied for all Project components as identified through the ESIA scoping process. The
primary assessment document is the TANAP ESIA which was publicly disclosed on the TANAP website
on the 22nd June 2015. The ESIA was approved by the Turkish Ministry of Environment and
Urbanisation (MoEU) in June 2014.
The ESIA involved a comprehensive assessment of the Project commensurate with and proportional
to the environmental impacts the Project presents. Prior to the detailed ESIA, a Project scoping
phase was undertaken of which the primary focus was to identify the preferred route of the pipeline
to minimise environmental and social impacts while maintaining a technically feasible installation
process. This process is outlined in detail in Chapter 5 of the ESIA and summarised in Figure 5.1
below. A predetermined set of criteria was used to determine the preferred route and these criteria
included environmental and social considerations. Preliminary assessment of the route was initially a
desktop exercise which determined a Preferred Route Corridor (PRC) of 2 kilometres in width. Once
the corridor was determined, a preferred centreline was chosen using a combination of desktop and
field data to reduce the PRC to a width of 500 metres. Within this 500-metre corridor the centreline
for the corridor was delineated and the Right of Way (RoW) disturbance area of 36 metres was
located. The ESIA was conducted on the full 500-metre pipeline corridor.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental Due Diligence June 2017 Page 14
Parameters considered during the determination of the 500-metre corridor included the following:
• General Topographical Properties;
• Soil Properties;
• Land Usage Status;
• General Geological-Geomorphologic Properties;
• Stratigraphy;
• Engineering Properties of the Rock Units;
• Surface Fault Hazards and Seismicity;
• Areas with Potential Geological Risks (Erosion, Landslide, Elevated Ground Water Layers and
Aquifers, Karstic Zones);
• Hydrological Properties;
• Ecological Properties (Protected Areas (National Parks, etc.), Sensitive Habitats, Forests,
Scrublands, Meadows-Pastures and Wetlands);
• Archaeological Sites;
• Tangible and Intangible Cultural Heritage;
• Socio-Economic Properties (Demographics, Economic Properties); and
• Existing and/or planned state authority infrastructure(s).
Potential social impacts were assessed on the effects of the following parameters:
• Effects on traffic and mobility;
• Effects on infrastructures and utility services;
• Opportunities for local economy;
• Changes to local employment conditions;
• Effects on livelihood from farming activities;
• Effects on livelihood from livestock activities;
• Effects on local healthcare services and facilities;
• Effects on human health and safety;
• Effects on local education services and facilities;
• Increase of tensions and conflicts;
• Disturbance and nuisance to daily activities;
• Influence on local population;
• Effects on intangible cultural heritage; and
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental Due Diligence June 2017 Page 15
• Effects on cultural sites and archaeology.
This planning process led to a series of documented route revisions prior to the ESIA PRC and RoW
centreline being approved at Revision H. Within this process, at total of 156 different route changes
were documented. Clear evidence of avoidance of key environmental features such as national parks
and designated wildlife areas, forested areas and identified biodiversity features was observed during
the review of Project documentation.
Further route changes post Revision H have been necessary as field construction activities have
discovered previously unidentified limitations to the proposed RoW. These route changes are
managed through the TANAP Environmental Management of Change (MoC) procedure. Completed
MoC examples that incorporated a range of environmental and social checks were reviewed by the
IESC team during the site inspection.
The IESC team could see clear evidence that environmental and social aspects and impacts were
considered in detail during Project scoping and planning stages and that the mitigation hierarchy and
Good International Practice (GIP) was implemented in the route selection process.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental Due Diligence June 2017 Page 16
Figure 5.1 Pipeline Route Assessment Process
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental Due Diligence June 2017 Page 17
Stakeholder engagement and consultation was undertaken during the scoping phase and results of
the consultation process incorporated into the final ESIA process. Public Participation Meetings (PPM),
Social Baseline data collection and disclosure activities were carried out along the entire pipeline route
as preliminary engagement, in accordance with the activities described in Figure 5 2 below and in line
with GIP and in line with the nature and scale of the Project.
Figure 5.2 ESIA Consultation approach
At the local level, social baseline data collection and engagement was carried out with a range of
stakeholders including local governors, local NGOs, media and communities, using primary research
methods and public disclosure meetings. Regionally, NGO & Interest Group Meetings were held in
Ankara & İstanbul, while International NGO & Interest Group meetings were held in Ankara.
A web-based online stakeholder interaction database (OSID) using software called Darzin has been
established to track, record and manage all stakeholder engagement activities including grievance
management, which has been active through pre-construction and construction and will continue into
the operations phase.
ESIA Methodology
A clear impact assessment methodology was undertaken in the conduct of the ESIA, outlined in
Chapter 2 of the ESIA Report. The ESIA was managed by international consultants Golder Associates
Ltd (Golder) to ensure compliance with both Turkish and international requirements. Local
consultants Çinar conducted the baseline studies under guidance from Golder. The impact
assessment methodology is stated to follow guidance of the European Environmental Agency (EEA)
and utilises a Drivers-Pressures-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework. The ESIA was
conducted in compliance with the Turkish Regulation on Environmental Impact Assessment (2008)
and in consideration of EU Directive 2011/92/EU.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental Due Diligence June 2017 Page 18
The scoping process allowed for the identification of Valued Environmental and Social Components
(VECs) that were defined as the distinct components of the physical, biological and social
environment in the Project Area of Influence (AOI) that are subject to National or International
policies, conventions, agreements, legislative or administrative acts aimed at their protection /
enhancement.
Some gaps were observed in the review of the ESIA related to the assessment of offshore
construction impacts. The review found that the ESIA did not adequately assess the impacts related
to the potential for vessel to vessel interactions and vessel interactions with marine fauna. Vessel to
vessel interactions are considered a high risk given the stated level of high shipping traffic and vessel
use in the offshore project area. Subsequent evidence provided is sufficient to demonstrate
compliance to the IESC. Specifically, as there was limited information available regarding offshore
construction methodology during the ESIA development, a comprehensive HAZID was conducted post
ESIA development, which assesses construction related risks, including vessel to vessel interactions.
Prior to commencement of offshore construction activities, the existing HAZID will be updated and a
set of Task Risk Assessments will be developed by the Contractor to identify and mitigate potential
Project-related risks for offshore activities. The primary objective of the Task Risk Assessments is to
ensure that any Project risks are appropriately mitigated and reduced to as low as reasonably
practicable. The Contractor is currently developing Emergency Management Plans for TANAP
approval. It was also reported to the IESC that all works will be completed under close
communication with local Marine Authorities and that communications have already commenced in
this regard.
Cumulative and Transboundary Assessment
The ESIA assesses the potential for cumulative and transboundary impacts in Chapter 10 of the
document. This assessment considers the interaction between existing and planned Projects within
Turkey and the cumulative impacts of these on the physical, biological and social aspects of the
Project. Minor transboundary impacts are possible on some of the major waterways crossed by the
Pipeline route that flow into neighbouring countries. The IESC team considers the assessment of
these potential impacts has been appropriately undertaken and of a suitable scale to the Project
characteristics.
5.1.2 Environmental and Social Management System
TANAP has developed and implemented a detailed Environmental and Social Management System
(ESMS) with which to manage the Project’s environmental and social aspects. TANAP has
documented the ESMS in line with ISO 14001 requirements. The ESMS was observed to be
appropriate to the size and scale of the Project, documenting E&S policy, management plans,
procedures and guidance. The TANAP ESMS was communicated to the Project subcontractors to
ensure that their respective ESMS’ reflected the requirements of the TANAP ESMS. These
requirements were communicated through TANAP’s Environmental and Social Management Plan
(ESMP) (TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-001) and through Environmental and Social Requirements for Contractors
(ILF-SPC-ENV-GEN001). Samples of Construction Contractors (CCs) ESMS documentation was
reviewed during the site visit where it was confirmed that it meets the requirements of TANAPs
environmental and social objectives outlined in these documents.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental Due Diligence June 2017 Page 19
In line with the ESMS, weekly environmental coordination meetings are conducted and weekly reports
are issued; coordination meetings between TANAP E&S and construction team members are also held
regularly, and monthly construction meetings are held at construction sites. There are different types
of reporting (daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly) depending on the elements of the ESMS being
implemented. TANAP conducts regular audits and inspections of CCs in line with their ESMS
requirements. A range of documentation relating to implementation of the ESMS was reviewed as
part of the ESDD and the IESC team considers that the ESMS is working in a streamlined and
coordinated manner.
At the commencement of the Project, TANAP employed a three-tiered contractor structure to
implement the Project, with an Engineering, Procurement, Construction and Management (EPCM)
contractor managing the selected CCs in the field. TANAP formally made an organisational change
from 15 September 2016 to an integrated two-tier organisation (with TANAP and CCs), removing the
EPCM contractor from the organisational structure. The IESC noted during the audit that the ESMS is
out of date with respect to roles and responsibilities and subsequent system documentation. In many
instances, the same individuals are working in the same roles (i.e. former EPCM staff are now directly
employed by TANAP) so while day to day activities appear to remain well-managed and understood
by staff, ESMS documentation reviewed during the audit does not reflect the current organisational
structure and so may not effectively manage potential risks (e.g. arising from incidents, staff
changes). As a work in progress, the IESC team considers this issue to be compliant with this PR,
given that the issue is known, changes substantially commenced, and is considered to be part of
normal ESMS review and improvement during the life of the Project. Subsequent evidence1 provided
to the IESC by TANAP indicates that the revision of TANAP documents is complete, and that CC
reviews are ongoing and will be provided to the IESC as they are approved.
The ESMS structure (and ESMPs) for the offshore pipeline construction has been developed in draft
form, and is currently being finalised. Disclosure thereof is planned to occur upon finalisation. The
IESC reviewed the draft documents at meetings held in Ankara on 12 May 2017 and the
documentation appears suitable to meet the requirements of the EBRD PRs.
5.1.3 Environmental and Social Policy
TANAP and their CCs have documented Health & Safety, Environmental and Social Policies that have
been approved and signed off by the Board of Directors.
5.1.4 Environmental and Social Management Plans
Within the ESMS a series of ESMPs have been documented to manage the Project’s environmental
and social aspects during design, construction and operation. The following ESMPs were created to
manage the impacts identified during the ESIA process:
• Construction Impacts Management Plan;
• Community Safety Management Plan;
• Community Relations Plan;
1 Including updated management plans, and TANAP presentations in Ankara meetings on 12/05/2017
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental Due Diligence June 2017 Page 20
• Employment and Training Plan;
• Procurement and Supply Management Plan;
• Aggregates Management Plan;
• Traffic Management Plan;
• Cultural Heritage Management Plan;
• Erosion, Reinstatement and Landscaping Plan;
• Pollution Prevention Plan;
• Waste Management Plan; and
• Emergency Response Plan.
The framework for this suite of management plans is described in the TANAP Environmental and
Social Management Plan (TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-001). In conjunction with these above management
plans, management and mitigation measures are also further described in the:
• Environmental Action Plan (TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-002);
• Social Action Plan (TNP-PLN-SOC-GEN-002);
• Environmental Monitoring Plan (TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-003);
• Social Monitoring Plan (TNP-PLN-SOC-GEN-001); and
• Biodiversity Action Plan.
The ESIA provided the basis for a number of Social SMPs, including:
• Community Relations Management Plan, addressing: Consultation Meetings, Construction
impacts activities and grievance management;
• Local Employment & Workers Management Plan: local recruitment process, worker
disciplinary actions, and employee grievances;
• Local Procurement Management Plan: supplier of local goods and services, and control of
payments to local companies & workers;
• Community Safety Management Plan: Construction impacts of the local affected communities;
mitigation measures of high risk areas; and training and awareness meetings with
communities; and
• Traffic Management Plan: E&S evaluation of traffic impacts with associated mitigation
measures.
Further, with a material change in the approach by the Project to management of resettlement and
land acquisition, additional RAPs were developed and publicly disclosed:
• RAP for AGIs: approach to management of resettlement (including permanent land
acquisition) for the above ground installations (TNP-PLN-SOC-GEN-008-P3-0); and
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental Due Diligence June 2017 Page 21
• RAP for the Pipeline: approach to management of resettlement (and temporary land
acquisition) along the pipeline corridor (TNP-PLN-SOC-GEN-006-P3-0).
A range of other documentation in the form of procedures, work method statements and forms and
templates also form part of the ESMPs, which have been developed in line with ISO 14001 and the
Plan-Do-Check-Act approach.
These requirements have been communicated and enforced amongst the CCs. TANAP requires all
CCs to develop their own versions of these ESMPs, which are subsequently reviewed by TANAP for
suitability and approved for use.
As discussed in Section 5.1.2, the offshore construction ESMPs have now been developed in draft and
were able to be reviewed during meetings held with TANAP on 12 May 2017. The IESC believes the
documentation reviewed is suitable for purpose and meets the EBRD PRs.
Effective contractor management is provided for in the ESMPs, including a process for the
management of non-compliance of CCs, sighted by the IESC. However, the implementation of
contractor management mechanisms appears to differ between CCs. Regular internal and third party
monitoring is provided for through the ESMS, and records that this activity is carried out were sighted
by the IESC. However, the differing levels of capacity between CCs suggest that additional support
and performance management is required by TANAP to ensure implementation is carried out as
documented. This may be in the form of additional TANAP support staff available to those CCs who
are not as experienced or are demonstrating underperformance on site, while also providing
increased performance management focused on those specific Lots (See also PRs 2 and 4.). Non-
conformance reporting / quality management procedures have been developed, which include
performance monitoring and improvement requirements for contractors. Contractors are required to
specify KPIs and their monitoring frequency, along with specified internal and external quality audits.
Following performance reviews, any corrective action plans are developed and implemented for
regular reporting to TANAP, and escalation as appropriate based on the criticality of any non-
conformances (e.g. stop work for immediate risks, or periodic reporting to TANAP as required). As at
26.2.17, TANAP reports of 543 non-conformances raised during the Project to date to vendors and
contractors, that 90% are closed and 6% overdue. The NCRs have been raised on environmental
issues 91 times, health and safety 127 times, social and community liaison 12 times and security 16
times. In the year to date, 52 NCRs have been raised with 35% overdue.
The IESC team considers that the level of detail and breadth of coverage within the ESMPs is suitable
to manage the environmental and social impacts presented by the Project’s activities.
5.1.5 Organisational Capacity and Commitment
TANAP has a defined organisation structure, which is suitable to implement a Project of this size and
magnitude. Sufficient environmental and social personnel have been employed to implement the
ESMS and manage environmental and social issues that are present on the Project.
TANAP’s E&S team organisation is comprised of an HSSE manager, under which reports individual
Environmental and Social Impact Managers, environmental and social impact specialists (responsible
by Lots, Stations and Offshore), environmental and social impact specialist assistants and a RAP
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental Due Diligence June 2017 Page 22
specialist. Site-based organisation is comprised of Lot Site Managers, to whom report environmental
and social impact specialist leads by Lot, thereunder environmental and social impact specialists by
spread. It is noted that former EPCM staff are broadly now engaged directly by TANAP.
Training of staff includes core competencies required by workers, covered in induction training and on
the Code of Conduct to ensure appropriate worker conduct is well understood and implemented,
sighted by the audit team [refer to document list Appendix A].
Modification to the organisational roles and responsibility as part of the changes to the ESMS, as
discussed in Section 5.1.2, is complete for TANAP documentation and nearly complete for CCs.
5.1.6 Supply Chain Management
Suppliers of major goods and services to the Project were chosen through a tender process, which
included HSES pre-qualification requirements and a request for certificates of ISO 18001 and ISO
14001 certification, or a description of how HSEC aspects are managed if certification has not been
achieved. This includes the sample of the contract for 56” selected pipeline suppliers for Lots 1, 2 and
3, which clearly specifies management systems requirements and project standards. The contract
defines the requirements of contractors to develop, staff, implement and improve their own ESMS in
alignment with TANAP’s ESMS and policies; national and international statutory and regulatory
requirements; ISO 14001 Standards; and all requirements, mitigations and commitments stipulated in
the Project ESIA and ESMPs.
As one of the major goods or services purchased by the Project, the lengths of pipe for the
construction of the pipeline present a significant potential supply chain management risk, with
suppliers located within Turkey and internationally in China. Evidence from TANAP describes the
desktop environmental assessment of Pipe producers that was undertaken during the pre-qualification
process including an OHS inspection by the EPCM. While aspects of E&S issues were included in this
inspection, a separate E&S inspection was not conducted. Documentation demonstrates TANAP’s
efforts in broadly ensuring E&S requirements can be managed appropriately in its supply chain
through the suppliers’ requirements for implementing an ESMS commensurate to the complexity,
nature and scale of the Project. However, an E&S inspection or strengthening of prequalification
questionnaires on social issues could reasonably have been undertaken (by TANAP or by the EPCM)
to ensure that management at suppliers’ sites was sufficient. This would have included an assessment
of aspects relating to the prevention of child / forced labour in line with the requirements of PR2.
Assessment of this aspect is not considered sufficient and is described further in the section on PR2
below.
The EBRD PRs recommend that clients ascertain whether licenced disposal sites are being operated to
acceptable standards. Evidence has been supplied to validate that TANAP has conducted site
verification audits of licenced waste disposal facilities along the pipeline route to ensure that Project
generated waste is being disposed of appropriately by the contractor.
5.1.7 Project Monitoring and Reporting
TANAP has documented and is implementing the following monitoring activities as part of their ESMS:
• Environmental Action Plan;
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental Due Diligence June 2017 Page 23
• Environmental Monitoring Plan;
• Social Action Plan;
• Social Monitoring Plan;
• Commitments Register;
• Resettlement Action Plan; and
• Biodiversity Action Plan.
The Environmental Monitoring Plan (TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-003-P3-2) has been prepared by TANAP and
is currently being implemented on the Project. This Plan defines the Environmental Monitoring
requirements for the Project, which is established based on the FEED phase Environmental and Social
Monitoring Procedure and defined in the ESIA. It ensures the appropriate management of
environmental impacts in all phases of construction, operation and de-commissioning of the Project.
Environmental & Social monitoring plans are applied to the detailed planning, reporting and follow up
of environmental and social performance measurement and monitoring throughout the Project.
TANAP establishes measurable environmental and social performance indicators (KPIs) to track
Project progress in achieving the objectives and targets and to evaluate and improve environmental
and social performance.
The Environmental Action Plan (TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-002_P3-2) outlines how TANAP intends to ensure
that the environmental aspects of the Projects construction, operation and decommissioning are
managed in line with Project requirements. It is noted that this document currently only refers to the
requirements of the IFC Performance Standards (2012) when committing to international standards.
Evidence of implementation of the commitments made in the Project monitoring document suite was
observed during the site visit and through revision of documents in the ESDD process.
Compliance with Turkish legal requirements is overseen by the MoEU and mainly relies on quarterly
third-party monitoring reports by Çinar, distributed electronically to relevant parties, and with a hard
copy sent to the Ministry and local authorities. It is noted that Çinar is the same company who
gathered the in-country baseline data, developed the local ESIA and the BAP and there may be a
perceived conflict of interest issue with regard to using the same company for the ESIA development
and independent monitoring over the ESIA implementation. Evidence, in the form of detailed
organisation charts have been provided by TANAP to demonstrate that the levels of independence
between separate teams is sufficient and eliminates the potential for conflict of interest queries by
interested third parties.
The IESC were unable to verify the financial provision for implementation of BAP monitoring
requirements to determine if these are sufficient for monitoring of biorestoration effectiveness in
critical habitat and to ensure sufficient consideration of ongoing maintenance of biorestoration works.
The details of these cost estimates are yet to be developed by TANAP for its operational budget. The
IESC team recommends that a detailed cost breakdown is provided in order to justify that the
financial allocation is sufficient for the length of the pipeline corridor and ensure sufficient
contingency budget allocations for any newly identified biodiversity remedial and offset activities.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 24
Table 5-1 PR 1 Findings Summary
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
1 Assessment and Management of Environmental and Social Impacts and Issues
1.1 Environmental and Social
Assessment
FC The environmental and social impacts have been assessed through a
systematic process applied for all Project components as identified through the ESIA scoping and through engagement with key Government stakeholders in Turkey. The ESIAs have been developed to meet national standards, TANAP policy and guidance provided by international institutions such as the IFC, EBRD and EU. Some gaps were observed in the review of the ESIA related to the assessment of offshore construction impacts. The review found that the EISA did not adequately assess the impacts related to the potential for vessel to vessel interactions and vessel interactions with marine fauna. Vessel to vessel interactions are considered a high risk
given the stated level of high shipping traffic and vessel use in the offshore project area. Additional evidence provided by TANAP is sufficient to demonstrate compliance., including a HAZID which assesses this risk, and which will be updated prior to the commencement of construction activities. A set of Task Risk Assessments will also be developed, and the Contractor is currently developing comprehensive Emergency Management Plans.
1.2 Environmental and Social Management Systems
FC At the commencement of the Project, TANAP employed a three-tiered contractor structure to implement the Project, with an Engineering, Procurement, Construction and Management (EPCM) contractor managing the selected CCs in the field. TANAP has recently modified
this structure to an integrated two-tier organisation (with TANAP and CCs), removing the EPCM contractor from the organisational structure. At the time of the audit, the ESMS was out of date with respect to roles and responsibilities and subsequent system documentation. In many instances, the same individuals are working in the same roles (i.e. former EPCM staff are now directly employed by TANAP) so while day to day activities currently appear to remain well-managed and understood by staff, ESMS documentation
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 25
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
reviewed during the audit does not reflect the current organisational structure and so may not effectively manage potential risks (e.g. arising from incidents, staff changes). As a work in progress, the IESC team considers this issue to be compliant with this, given that the issue is known, changes substantially commenced, and is considered
to be part of normal ESMS review and improvement during the life of the Project. Additional evidence provided to the IESC by TANAP indicates that the revision of TANAP documents is complete, and that CC reviews are ongoing and will be provided to the IESC as they are approved. The shift to an integrated team was instituted in August 2016, and the process of E&S integration is approximately 70% complete. The Integrated Management System (IMS) team appear to have adequate support, human and financial resources to implement the ESMS, with competent professionals supported by external experts as required.
1.3 Environmental and Social Policy2 FC TANAP has a documented Environmental and Social Policy. TANAP subcontractors also have documented Environmental and Social policies.
1.4 Environmental and Social Management Plan
PC TANAP has developed and implemented a detailed suite of Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) for the Project. As discussed in 1.2, ESMS documentation, revision of TANAP documentation is complete, while CC documentation is nearly complete (currently under review by TANAP). Adequate for purpose offshore ESMPs have been developed, although are still subject to disclosure in order to meet PR requirements.
Disclose Offshore ESMS documentation to ensure requirements of EBRD PRs have been met.
1.5 Organisational Capacity and Commitment
FC TANAP has a defined organisation structure, which is suitable to implement a Project of this size and magnitude. Sufficient environmental and social personnel have been employed to implement the ESMS and manage environmental and social issues
2 Where the project represents a substantial extension to the client activities, confirm that Policy and supporting management systems and plans are appropriate for the new activities.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 26
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
that are present on the Project. Refer to discussion in PR Ref 1.2 regarding discussion on organisational structure.
1.6 Supply Chain Management FC The major project activity of potential E&S supply chain risk is of
pipeline procurement; pipeline procurement was carried out following pre-qualification of potential suppliers from mills in Turkey and China. OHS inspection of pipeline mills was reported to have been carried out by the EPCM prior to selection of the mills. Seven pipe mills in total were supplying to the Project, supplying to TANAP as well as other Projects. Pre-qualification processes broadly addressed E&S requirements at the mills and contracts with major suppliers specify ESMS requirements and Project E&S standards. See also PR2. As a key tool for ensuring supplier compliance with E&S requirements, CCs are required to develop and implement Non-Conformance reporting (NCRs) /Quality management plans to define KPIs and quality reporting requirements. NCRs include criticality assessment and root cause analysis, auditing/improvement processes to reduce repetition of non-conformances, and requirements for reporting to TANAP.
1.7 Project Monitoring and Reporting3 PC TANAP has documented and is implementing the following monitoring activities as part of their ESMS: Environmental Action Plan; Environmental Monitoring Plan; Social Action Plan; Social Monitoring Plan; Resettlement Action Plan; and Biodiversity Action Plan. Regular monitoring and reporting of HSES requirements against
TANAP provide a more detailed cost breakdown to justify that the financial allocation for BAP Biorestoration monitoring is sufficient for the length of the pipeline corridor and ensure sufficient contingency budget allocations for any newly identified biodiversity remedial and offset activities.
3 At appraisal stage there will be limited information. Compliance assessment should address specific plans for monitoring and reporting (against for example ESAP requirements) and also consider whether there is evidence of weak monitoring/reporting by client on other relevant projects - which may reduce confidence in future performance.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 27
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
stated Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) was observed. Çinar is observed to be the same company who gathered the in-country baseline data, developed the local ESIA and the BAP. Evidence provided is sufficient to demonstrate that there is no conflict
of interest associated with the same company also performing independent third-party monitoring of Project implementation. Financial provisions for implementation of BAP monitoring requirements may not be sufficient to adequately characterise biorestoration effectiveness.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 28
5.2 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 2: LABOUR AND WORKING CONDITIONS
No material non-compliances were identified as the part of the review against labour and working
conditions criteria. Full compliance was observed in relation to child and forced labour, non-
discrimination and equal opportunity, and worker organisations. Some partial compliances were
observed in other areas within PR 2, outlined below.
5.2.1 Human Resource Policies and Working Relationships
The Host Govt Agreement requires that the labour standards applicable to the TANAP Project are
pursuant to National Laws, and no less beneficial than the provisions of the State’s relevant legislation
generally applicable to its citizens. It also requires that the Project Standards “take due account of
international standards and practices generally prevailing in the natural gas pipeline industry,
including relevant Performance Standards of the International Finance Corporation” (Article 17.1).
Turkey has ratified the core ILO Conventions on freedom of association, non-discrimination, child
labour and forced labour. The ESIA included assessment of labour issues in ESIA chapter 8.3.
The ESMP for this area is included in the Employment and Training MPs for TANAP and each of the
CCs (See ESIA Appendix 5.4 – pg 3-4 is on contracting and training requirements); addresses hiring,
training, compensation, benefits, work hours and grievance mechanism.
Project contractors’ HR policies included in their Employment and Training Management Plans are
reviewed and approved by TANAP. Third party monitoring is undertaken of implementation of these
MPs by Çinar. Additional third-party monitoring is conducted by Practical Solutions Group Dan Hiz.
Ltd. Sti on procedures in relation to TANAP contractor and sub-contractor working hours, leave, and
pay (TANAP Project Site Control Procedure, 01/03/2016). This reporting is provided to TANAP (stated
by TANAP during audit). The authorities are conducting their own labour law related inspections at
all workplaces in compliance with the legislation.
HR policies are consistent with national laws and implementation thereof is being monitored by a
Turkish labour law firm to ensure compliance (Practical Solutions Group). This is ensured by site
visits, audits, and interviews on site monthly. Requirements apply to all people working on the Project
regardless whether national or expatriate. Documentation on roles and responsibilities between the
Project and CCs requires updating to reflect the change in structure away from having an EPC in
place (see also Section 5.1.2).
The Report of “Manpower Analysis Study in Settlements on TANAP Natural Gas Pipeline Route” (HZR-
REP-SOCGEN-001) provided workforce analysis, and evaluation of the manpower capacity of the
provinces in which TANAP is active, to inform management of employment and training for the
Project. KPIs are in place for local employment (including unskilled, semi-skilled and skilled staff at
the national, province, district, village levels) in line with GIP, documented in Employment and
Training MPs for each CC (e.g. FRN-PLN-SOC-PL1-001).
All workers are reported to be advised of their rights and working conditions at the time of
engagement by human resources (including induction, code of conduct, probation period, grievance
mechanism). Additionally, this is provided for in CCs sample employment contracts (ref: Fernas
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 29
sample contract). Induction records were sighted and are consistent with lender requirements.
However, it was reported to the audit team during the site visit by some local community contract
workers that contract terms were not clearly understood. This suggests that induction requirements
may not be applied consistently across all CCs.
Correspondence sighted (TANAP-TKF-WRP-0651) indicates that CCs are free to associate and union
agreements are in place where threshold limits are met (i.e. greater than 50% worker membership
with a single TU organisation); there are TUs in place at Lots 2 and 3 (refs: TANAP-SYA-LET-WRP-
0533 and TANAP-TKF-LET-WRP-0651).
It was noted during discussions on-site and in the head office related to employee grievances (see
5.2.7), that overtime work and fatigue management were raised on several separate occasions.
Interviews revealed there is confusion at a site level as to the TANAP policy on overtime. The IESC
understands that TANAP does not encourage overtime working for its employees, however, due to
nature of the project, overtime working may occur within the legal limits. During interviews on site
with Lot 1 Contractor Fernas, personnel reported that overtime was allowed under Fernas company
policy. According to the World Bank TANAP Disclosure Package, TANAP is working to address
overtime issues through a “Working Hours Action Plan” that substantively addresses overtime issues,
including stakeholder complaints of overtime, CC compliance with TANAP overtime policies, and
enforcing legal compliance with the Turkish Labour Code. The Action Plan aims to reach compliance
with the Labour Code by December 31, 2017. The IESC notes that the Action Plan emphasis is
directed to legal compliance around overtime. While there is a commitment to ensure that overtime
hours are worked safely and without duress, it is not clear how fatigue management measures are
linked with effective overtime management. It is also noted that contractors are financially
incentivised for being on time/advance of deadlines, which may contribute to the issue of overtime
and fatigue (see 1.3 Contractor Management and Non-Conformances regarding holding back
payments). The IESC acknowledges TANAP’s recent focus on the above issues of overtime and
fatigue management. To this end, additional information was provided to the IESC in the form of the
H&S Incentive Procedure (TNP-PCD-HSM-GEN-025), which aims to promote awareness of H&S and
incentivise workers regarding their H&S performance in order to ensure that there is a balance
between schedule / milestone incentives. During meetings on 12 May 2017, TANAP also noted that
the link between financial incentives and effective fatigue management is an area of current concern,
and provided the example of hydrotesting, whereby additional resources were engaged rather than
the use of longer hours (Lot 1 had 2 hydrotest crews, and it now has 3 crews and a 4th is being
mobilised).
The provision of employee assistance programs as GIP was discussed during the field audit (e.g.
support following presence of workers at serious accidents/fatalities while working on the Project).
TANAP stated that employees are covered under the Turkish (public) Social Insurance System, which
includes indemnity for work related incidents, valid for all workers (both CCs and TANAP employees).
TANAP has initiated a private insurance coverage (MARSH) for its employees in the event of work
related accidents, however this does not extend to CCs employees (TANAP has not set up separate
(private) insurance to cover CC workers in the event of work related accidents they may be involved
in).
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 30
5.2.2 Child and Forced Labour
TANAP procures a wide range of goods and services, and the IESC found that no audits/inspections
of the TANAP supply chain with a focus on working conditions and child/forced labour has been
conducted to determine compliance with this PR (see related to discussion in Ref 1.6). The pipe
manufacturer pre-qualification questionnaire sighted does not contain provisions to assess the risk of
child and forced labour. However, the Health, Safety, Social and Environmental Requirements for
Suppliers and Vendors require supplier compliance with Turkish laws and regulations including the
Regulation on the Procedures and Principles of the Employment of Children's and Young Workers.
5.2.3 Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity
Nationally, Turkey has ratified the core ILO conventions including on non-discrimination and TANAP’s
role includes ensuring compliance with core labour standards on behalf of the Project. There was no
evidence of non-conformances of these requirements while on site.
The TANAP Employment and Training Management Plan makes an explicit commitment to non-
discrimination and equal opportunity (see ESIA Appendix 5.4 pg 1).
5.2.4 Workers Organisations
Worker organisations are in place in parts of the Project, and all employees are free to join labour
unions. Membership tends to reflect blue collar/white collar representation in each CC/TANAP
workforce. Turkish legislative requirements are that 51% of the workforce must have membership of
one Trade Union (TU) to enable an agreement to be established with the Company. The CCs in Lots 2
and 3 have an agreement with one national TU (“Yolic”/ “Is-Yol”). It was stated that all the workers
and some of the subcontractors are members of this union. Subsequent correspondence sighted
(TANAP-SYA-LET-WRP-0533) confirms that most of the workers of the contractor (as of February
2016, 600 of 700) are members of the TU, and the others do not belong to another organisation.
Further, the collective bargaining agreement came into force on 01/01/2016 and it valid until
31/12/2017 (applicable to workers in Sivas and Erzincan camp sites). Per the same correspondence,
the collective bargaining agreement specifies weekly working hours, and overtime payments in line
with the Labour Law. It was reported that negotiations are ongoing for Lots 1 and 4.
In the absence of trade union membership, there is a functional grievance mechanism in place for
employees (see 5.2.7).
5.2.5 Working Conditions
Interviews with short term labour suggests that not all CCs are making clear what the working
conditions (including retrenchment/termination) are (see 5.2.6) and in absence of a TU, the
individuals interviewed stated that any issues have been raised through the Muhtar to the relevant CC
for resolution through the Grievance Mechanism. TANAP CLOs are also in place and receive
comments from local workers, in addition to receiving and resolving comments/grievances via
Muhtars. While the TANAP Project Site Audit Procedure provided as evidence includes requirement for
provision of document of resignation or notice of termination, there appears to be confusion at a
ground level regarding termination and retrenchment. This may be exacerbated in the case of short-
term contracts that are open-ended, or, renewed without formal extension of the completion date.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 31
While notice periods for dismissal of staff are in accordance with Turkish Labour Law requirements4,
which should reflect ILO Convention 158 Termination of Employment Convention, 1982 (which Turkey
has ratified), in practice notice periods for dismissal may be occurring inconsistently, particularly in
relation to casual / short-term work. For example, TANAP reported that the third-party audits have
not found inconsistencies with national legislative requirements, however in interviews with locally
engaged staff at Ardiçli village, it was stated that following the completion of a one year contract at
the CC, a short-term contract was commenced with a subcontractor with no contract in place and
little notice for ‘termination’ of the worker. Internal audits are conducted of CCs (e.g. evidence from
EPCM audit of CC (WRP-REP-ENV-PL1-001; WRP-REP-ENV-PL2-003) indicating compliance checks
against labour issues including overtime and communications on contracts with workers. These
audits are documented in the TANAP Project Site Control Procedure, the scope of which is to audit
working conditions and rights of workers including working hours, leave, payroll, Social Security,
terminations/new hires and so on by carrying out a physical audit at least in one camp monthly.
The TANAP Health and Safety team is engaged in the design and inspection of CC accommodation.
This includes for example, that TANAP review the Lot 4 camp design to ensure requirements are met,
and for those now in place, regular inspections of accommodation. The Construction Camp
Management Plans describes weekly inspections by Camp Management personnel to ensure hygiene,
maintenance, and safety requirements are maintained. Stations contractors are supplying their own
camps however it was not possible to view one during the field audit. The Health and Safety team
audit food, accommodation, and medical facilities. A visual inspection of the camp at Lot 2 indicated
appropriate accommodation requirements are met.
Some working conditions and amenities observed at Lot 1 did not appear appropriate to the nature of
the work being conducted and the climatic conditions at the time (see also PR4 on OHS). A lack of
in-field amenities including toilets, shelters and heating were observed in a range of separate
locations in the field at Lot 1. Temperature in the field during the site visit was approximately -5 to -
10C. Remains of a campfire on bare ground were observed in the Erzurum Wetland (Critical Habitat
area). TANAP presented to the IESC information regarding non-conformance reporting (NCRs) and
management. NCR requirements address the process in place to develop and assess criticality of
4 Article 29 of the Turkish Labour Law Turkish requires 30 days notice to implement collective dismissal for economic, technical or similar reasons, affecting a specific number of workers of an organization. In relation to individual termination and retrenchment, international Law, specifically ILO Convention 158 Termination of Employment Convention, 1982 on the issue of notice periods for dismissal of staff states that “a worker whose employment is to be terminated shall be entitled to a reasonable period of notice or compensation in lieu thereof, unless he is guilty of serious misconduct, that is, misconduct of such a nature that it would be unreasonable to require the employer to continue his employment during the notice period”. The Turkish Labour Law allows termination without notice for reasons that are less stringent than the ILO provision for “serious misconduct”. According to the Turkish Labour Law, the employer can immediately terminate an employment contract for a just cause whether for a definite or indefinite period, before its expiry or without the prescribed notice periods. The law provides a list of reasons for breaking the contract for just cause which are divided in three groups for the employee and four groups for the employer (Art. 24 and 25), namely, reasons of health; immoral or dishonourable conduct or other similar behaviour and force majeure. There is also a fourth group for the employer which is the employee being under arrest or under custody. The employer is entitled to break the employment contract, whether for a definite or indefinite period, before its expiry or without the prescribed notice periods in the above cases.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 32
NCRs, and steps for root cause analysis, corrective action implementation and NCR closure; this is
addressed further in PR 1.
Construction camp facilities provide adequate accommodation for workers, documented in Camp MPs
(e.g. TKN-PLN-HSM-GEN-003-P4-0).
5.2.6 Retrenchment
Local workers are being recruited by CCs for finite periods of time for work in each pipeline section
before retrenchment. It was reported and documented that workers are informed in advance of their
appointment about the duration, scope, and worker conditions (including demobilisation processes) at
their appointment. There is a large, skilled workforce in Turkey, therefore the Project is trying to
maximise local employment opportunities as the work in each area progresses. Opportunities for
local employment exist now during the current construction phase of work and retrenchment is
carried out rather than engage and move local unskilled labour outside their village/district; this is
also an approach to minimise any potential influx issues between villages/districts. It was reported
that retrenchment activities including notification and final payments, are carried out in accordance
with Turkish legal requirements.
Specific retrenchment programs are carried out by CCs, including provision of references to good
performers and providing employment again on other construction contracts (e.g. as reported by
Fernas) and TANAP reports that CCs prepare Retrenchment Plans (not sighted).
Interviews with short term labour suggests that not all CCs are making clear what the working
conditions (including retrenchment) are; in absence of a TU, the individuals interviewed stated that
any issues have been raised through the Muhtar to the relevant CC for resolution through the
Grievance mechanism (see 2.5 for further discussion).
5.2.7 Grievance Mechanism
All TANAP workers (worker and non-employee workers) have access to SpeakOut, TANAP’s whistle-
blower mechanism. Training on SpeakOut is provided during induction for all workers, and
signage/access is provided in camps and offices. During induction, workers are informed that any
complaint they have should go through the CRO of CC, or direct to TANAP. If the complainant wishes
to remain anonymous, then it is possible to call through a dedicated hotline or use a non-identifying
form for lodging the complaint; most complaints are not anonymous. TANAP reports that status
update and trend analysis of worker complaints will be announced on Community Relations
noticeboards available in camp sites, to be updated monthly.
CC Tekfen additionally has access for all its staff to the grievance mechanism ‘Sound off’ (ref: TANAP-
TKF-LET-WRP-0651). Coordination between CC and TANAP grievance mechanisms is documented in
the CC’s SMP with implementation monitoring by TANAP through internal and external auditing. CCs
are required to establish their own grievance mechanism, which are in effect for both community and
worker grievances. The Community Relations and Human Resources Departments coordinate
grievance handling in accordance with the grievance mechanism, Turkish law, and Project
requirements. All grievances are recorded in OSID (Online Stakeholder Interaction Database,
regarding grievances raised and corrective actions.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 33
The TANAP Grievance Mechanism (TNP-PCD-SOC-GEN-001) was updated on 31/1/17, and is
considered by the IESC to be compliant with the Performance Requirements.
Demobilisation process and late payment of salaries are the main topics of grievances raised by
workers overall, while Fernas also reported issues of unfair dismissal, and of poor food quality at
camp, which was resolved and rectified through the internal monthly monitoring system.
5.2.8 Non-Employee Workers
Engagement of non-employee workers carried out by CCs is undertaken in accordance with the
contractor management processes and procedures that are in place. TANAP has developed guidance
for CCs (through the former EPCM) for their development of ESMPs including Worker Management
MPs, that required approval by TANAP prior to their implementation to ensure minimum requirements
are met across all CCs. Skilled/unskilled work opportunities are locally advertised including (generally
reported) notification of working conditions and contract duration. Contract workers are informed that
the construction phase is temporary (20,000 people engaged); there is no obligation in contractor
employment agreements to provide ongoing employment. At the first consultation meeting in
settlements along the pipeline corridor, announcements are made of employment opportunities, the
type of labour required and duration, in accordance with the Local Employment MP.
Minimum working conditions for contractors are also third party monitored and are subject to
regulatory inspections.
5.2.9 Supply Chain
TANAP procures a wide range of goods and services required to complete the Project. Related to the
discussion in Ref 1.6, TANAP has not conducted any audits/inspections of their supply chain with a
focus on working conditions and child/forced labour to determine if they are compliant with this PR.
Pipe manufacturer pre-qualification questionnaire sighted does not contain provisions to assess the
risk of child and forced labour. However, the Health, Safety, Social and Environmental Requirements
for Suppliers and Vendors (ILF·SPC-HSE-GEN-001, Rev P2-0, 07.03 .2014) requires supplier
compliance with Turkish laws and regulations including the Regulation on the Procedures and
Principles of the Employment of Children's and Young Workers (#25425, 06.04.2004).
5.2.10 Security Personnel
The Host Govt Agreement provides that:
• the TANAP Project Entity shall provide the security of manned Facilities, including material
storage yards and permanent installations, in accordance with National Laws; and
• the Parties will develop a security plan to co-ordinate these activities.
TANAP specifies its security requirements to contractors through the Security Management Appendix
of the CC contract (consistent across all CCs), and directs communications through each CC’s Security
Manager. Each CC has a security subcontractor. Governors of each area determined whether security
guards are armed or unarmed, and this was reported to be detailed in a Security Risk Assessment for
the use of arms (sample Security Risk Assessments and security due diligence materials were
provided for IESC review).
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 34
Private security legislation additionally guides implementation of local legal requirements with respect
to security personnel, roles, and responsibilities. In Turkey, the law regulating the private security
industry is Law No. 5188 on Private Security Services, enacted in 2004, which regulates the private
security industry and allows for armed private security services. Licensing for private security
companies and guards is mandatory, and the Ministry of the Interior is the national authority in
charge of controls and inspections for the industry. Legal provisions include the identifying
requirements of guards (i.e. distinguishing uniforms, identification cards), and competencies and
powers of guards. Use of force is provided for, in accordance with Article 981 of Turkish Civil Law and
Article 7 of Law No. 5188 on Private Security Services, and a special licence is required for private
security companies owning weapons. Private security companies cannot provide services and
activities that are/would normally be reserved to police forces or other public security authorities in
Turkey. Turkish national-level private security legislation is considered ‘strict’ in relation to that of
other nations in the EU. 5
A suite of security related documents has been developed by TANAP. An evaluation plan, crisis
management, and training plan have been developed to guide security-related events and activities
and sample training records of Contractors have been provided for review. A protocol between the
Gendarmerie (law enforcement authority in rural areas) and TANAP for the construction phase is
under review. A project specific Security Management Plan has been developed for implementation
by Fernas. This Plan specifies that Government Private Security Commissions in each of the following
determined that security contractors will carry or use a weapon; in: Erzrum, Kars, Ardahan, Erzincan,
Sivas, Gumushane, and Giresun. Some of these districts include Kurdish populations. The Plan
requires that the Security Subcontractor Company provide a statement that they are willing to comply
with the “Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPSHR)”, and photographic evidence of
the training sessions have been provided. The plan also specifies plan roles and responsibilities;
reasonable use of (lethal) force/rules of engagement; provisions for weapons storage, handling and
use; licencing; staff qualifications and training; and reporting. Coordination between the Security
Coordinator, Law Enforcement, and Regional police/Gendarme Commanders is also articulated,
specifying mechanisms in crisis events / natural disasters.
TANAP Security Department has responsibility for security analysis, inspection, training functions, as
well as the Security Management System during the operations phase, to be run from the Main
Control Centre (for the whole of the project, near Ankara).
Camp security managers are responsible for communications with HS Manager and Camp manager on
Camp Emergency Response matters, including drills, and with other stakeholders such as TANAP,
Local Authorities and local Communities (e.g. Camp management system SYA-PLN-HSE-GEN-012 and
see also PR4 item 4.9 regarding community conflicts/demonstrations).
IESC considers that reasonable efforts have been made to align with this PR, including adequate due
diligence of security providers and presence of Standard Operating Procedures guiding activities.
Training on use of force and appropriate conduct towards communities by security personnel is
5 Private Security services in Europe: CoESS Facts and Figures 2013 (Confederation of European Security Services)
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 35
considered efficient to demonstrate compliance (e.g. Security Risk Assessment, training records,
Security Management Plan).
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 36
Table 5-2 PR 2 Findings Summary
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
2 Labour and Working Conditions
2.1 Human Resource Policies and
Working Relationships
PC It was noted during discussions on-site and in the head office related
to employee grievances, that overtime work and fatigue management were raised on several separate occasions. Interviews revealed there is confusion at a site level as to the TANAP policy on overtime. The IESC understands that TANAP does not encourage overtime working for its employees, however, due to nature of the project, overtime working may occur within the legal limits. During interviews on site with Lot 1 Contractor Fernas, personnel reported that overtime was allowed under Fernas company policy. According to the World Bank TANAP Disclosure Package, TANAP is working to address overtime issues through a “Working Hours Action Plan” that substantively addresses overtime issues, including stakeholder complaints of
overtime, CC compliance with TANAP overtime policies, and enforcing legal compliance with the Turkish Labour Code. The Action Plan aims to reach compliance with the Labour Code by December 31, 2017. The IESC notes that the Action Plan emphasis is directed to legal compliance around overtime. While there is a commitment to ensure that overtime hours are worked safely and without duress, it is not clear how fatigue management measures are linked with effective overtime management. It is also noted that contractors are financially incentivised for being on time/advance of deadlines, which may contribute to the issue of overtime and fatigue. The IESC acknowledges TANAPs recent focus on the issues of overtime and fatigue management. To this end, additional information was provided to the IESC in the form of the H&S Incentive Procedure (TNP-PCD-HSM-GEN-025), which aims to promote awareness of H&S and incentivise workers regarding their H&S performance in order to ensure that there is a balance between schedule / milestone incentives. During meetings on 12 May 2017, TANAP also noted that the link between financial incentives and effective fatigue
Develop strengthened documentation and key
actions for agreement with TANAP and EBRD on overtime, to be incorporated into the ESMS, as follows: Develop and conduct a program of engagement
with CC workers through appropriate mechanisms (e.g. HR Managers) to clarify overtime policy at the site level and strengthen worker understanding of policy;
Continue to implement procedures, plans and employment contracts consistent with working hour policies. TANAP to share audit reports from Practical Solutions with EBRD.
Fatigue Management: Develop a Fatigue Management Plan for TANAP
and its CCs; Agree the Plan and its timeframe for
implementation with the EBRD; Implement the Plan as agreed.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 37
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
management is an area of current concern, and provided the example of hydrotesting, whereby additional resources were engaged rather than the use of longer hours (Lot 1 had 2 hydrotest crews, and it now has 3 crews and a 4th is being mobilised).
2.2 Child and Forced Labour FC TANAP and, through its contracting arrangements, the CCs, ensure no
child or forced labour is in use in the Project through employment procedures. This includes confirmation of age through provision of identification (proof of age) at recruitment, and the requirement to report to the relevant Government agency of compliance with national legislation that precludes employment of anyone under 18 years of age. All employees (TANAP and CCs) provide social security, demonstrating no staff are engaged forcibly.
2.3 Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity
FC Nationally, Turkey has ratified the core ILO conventions including on non-discrimination and TANAP’s role includes ensuring compliance with core labour standards on behalf of the Project. There was no evidence of non-conformances of these requirements while on site.
2.4 Workers Organizations FC Worker organisations are in place in parts of the Project, and all employees are free to join labour unions
2.5 Wages, benefits, and conditions of work and accommodation
PC Interviews with short term labour suggests that not all CCs are making clear what the working conditions (including retrenchment/termination) are. TANAP requires provision of a document of resignation or notice of termination, in practice notice periods for dismissal may be occurring inconsistently, particularly in relation to casual / short-term work. It is noted that the CCs are required to prepare Retrenchment Plans.
Termination and retrenchment provisions: Share with EBRD the Retrenchment Plans of
each of the CCs Share the first two quarterly monitoring reports
of the Retrenchment Plans, undertaken by TANAP of the CCs.
2.6 Retrenchment6 PC With respect to notice periods, interviews with short term labour suggests that not all CCs are making working conditions (including retrenchment / termination procedures) clear. TANAP requires
provision of a document of resignation or notice of termination, in practice notice periods for dismissal may be occurring inconsistently, particularly in relation to casual / short-term work.
Refer to PR Ref 2.5
6 Will not be applicable to many projects at appraisal stage. However evidence, within the last 3 years of client approach to retrenchment which is not compatible with the Policy should be taken into consideration.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 38
2.7 Grievance Mechanism FC An operational grievance mechanism is in place with appropriate documentation, which appears to be being used effectively. Informal mechanisms for raising grievances were also noted (e.g. though Muhtars at village level for local workers), although it appears that some of these informally raised grievances may not be registered for tracking, monitoring and reporting within in the central recording and tracking system (OSID). OSID has oversight and overall management by TANAP, of all TANAP and CCs complaints, provided these have been appropriately uploaded into the system.
2.8 Non-Employee Workers FC Engagement of non-employee workers carried out by CCs is undertaken in accordance with the contractor management processes and procedures that are in place. Skilled/unskilled work opportunities are locally advertised including (generally reported) notification of working conditions and contract duration. Contract workers are informed that the construction phase is temporary (20,000 people engaged); there is no obligation in contractor employment agreements to provide ongoing employment. At the first consultation meeting in settlements along the pipeline corridor, announcements are made of employment opportunities, the type of labour required and duration, in accordance with the Local Employment MP. Working conditions of the employees of the contractors are also third party monitored.
2.9 Supply Chain FC TANAP procures a wide range of goods and services required to complete the Project. TANAP has not conducted any audits/inspections of their supply chain with a focus on working conditions and child/forced labour to determine if they are compliant with this PR. Pipe manufacturer pre-qualification questionnaire sighted does not contain provisions to assess the risk of child and forced labour. However, the Health, Safety, Social and Environmental Requirements for Suppliers and Vendors (ILF·SPC-HSE-GEN-001, Rev P2-0, 07.03 .2014) requires supplier compliance with Turkish laws and regulations including the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles of the Employment of Children's and Young Workers (#25425, 06.04.2004).
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 39
2.10 Security Personnel Requirements FC The IESC considers that reasonable efforts have been made to align with PR 2.10 Security Personnel Requirements, including the adequate due diligence of security providers, their training on the use of force and appropriate conduct towards communities by security personnel occurs.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 40
5.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 3: RESOURCE EFFICIENCY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL
This section provides comments on the baseline characterisation and the impact analysis with respect
to pollution prevention and abatement measures expected for all Project-related facilities during both
construction and operations. The analysis focuses on the adequacy of mitigation measures and
pertinent ESMPs reviewed. In this section, the attention is focused on the topics included in PR 3,
Resource Efficiency and Pollution Prevention and Control.
5.3.1 Resource Efficiency
The ESIA and ESMPs provides the overarching Project principles for the application of resource
efficiency and pollution prevention principles. These Principles are defined as: identify and understand
impacts; consult with others; design and avoid adverse impacts and minimise use of natural
resources. The ESMPs includes environmental control strategies designed to reduce waste and
conserve natural resources through engineering and procurement environmental design controls and
construction and installation controls.
PR 3 requires that the ESIA process identifies opportunities and alternatives for resource efficiency in
accordance with GIP. Regarding the Compressor Stations (CSTs), it is not clear in the ESIA and
supporting documentation available for review how this has occurred. The CSTs are a major emitter
of GHG during operation of the pipeline, as identified in the ESIA. A BAT assessment has been
conducted and provides sufficient detail to verify that EBRD guidance requirements have been met in
relation to how the adoption of resource efficiency and waste reduction considerations helped to
define the technology chosen in the CSTs. The BAT included detail on the realisation of the energy
savings possible because of the adoption of BAT for the CSTs and demonstrated that energy
efficiency measures have been identified.
5.3.2 Pollution Prevention and Control
A Pollution Prevention MP has been developed by TANAP and its construction contractors to minimise
and manage pollution on the environment. Avoidance and minimisation of emissions is demonstrated
in the ESIA and through the incorporation of appropriate controls.
This MP sets out the ESIA compliance requirements and relevant responsibilities associated with
pollution prevention and spill prevention and response. It provides a list of the relevant ESIA
commitments and who has responsibility for the task(s) required for compliance with the
commitment, in line with the tasks and responsibilities assigned within the TANAP Environmental and
Social Compliance Registers. Contractor responsibilities are clearly defined and include the
requirement to develop a specific Pollution Prevention MP. Examples of CC Pollution Prevention MPs
were reviewed for suitability during the ESDD process. CC MPs are also publicly disclosed on the
TANAP website.
5.3.2.1 Air Quality
Project emissions were analysed and assessed through the conduct of an atmospheric dispersion
modelling exercise. TANAP utilised AERMOD, a USEPA approved modelling software, to conduct
emission modelling for particulates and gaseous emissions caused by Project activities. Emissions
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 41
from the modelling exercise were compared against the requirements of the Turkish Regulation on Air
Quality Assessment and Management (2008) as well as the WHO Ambient Air Quality Guidelines and
EU Directive 2008/50/EC/.
Construction
Generation of particulate matter was the primary impact identified during construction activities and
these are managed in the Pollution Prevention MP. Particulate emissions at sensitive receptors
(human and ecological) were assessed with appropriate methodology. Mitigation measures included
consideration of technically and financially feasible options to reduce construction emissions.
Operation
The primary emission source during operations are the CSTs located along the pipeline route (4
CSTs). These are designed to increase the gas pressure to adjust the gas flow to the desired
throughput. Each compressor station will be operated by gas turbines and the gas supply will be
provided from the gas flow in the pipeline. As such these facilities will have associated gaseous
emissions which required assessment. The ESIA states (in Chapter 2) that best practice technology
has been considered in reducing emissions from the CSTs. Modelled Ground Level Concentrations
(GLCs) of gaseous emissions surrounding the CSTs indicate that they are below applicable Project
Standards.
The maximum rated output of the CSTs is 157MW (for three out of four of the CSTs). EU Directive
2010/75 requires that facilities with power rating greater than 100MW shall have their emissions
monitored continuously. This should be confirmed once the infrastructure design has been defined
further.
Management and monitoring plans for air emissions during operation phases (both routine and non-
routine) of the Project have not yet been developed; although the design requirements for equipment
are specified and include minimum emission performance standards. The emissions to air from the
CST’s has been predicted using air dispersion models.
5.3.2.2 Water Quality
The Project generates two main streams of waste water from its construction activities; these being
effluent water generated from Project camps/facilities and hydrotest waste water.
The ESIA states that waste water from domestic requirements will be captured and treated in water
treatment facilities prior to being discharged to the environment. Prior to discharge, testing would be
undertaken to ensure compliance with Project Standards.
Onshore hydrotest water will preferentially be taken from surface water bodies. After use, it is
intended that water be treated until it meets the required Project Standards and discharged back to
the closest receiving environment (surface water). Where possible, addition of chemical corrosion
inhibitors will be avoided, although in some cases they may be required. The hydrotesting process is
managed through an Environmental Hydrotest Monitoring Plan, developed under TANAP guidance for
each CC over the four Lots. Each water abstraction and discharge point along the entire route was
assessed for water quality and ecological restrictions and appropriate management measures
proposed (i.e. exclusion of fish spawning periods for extraction activities).
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 42
Water intake for hydro testing is taken based on permits granted by DSI, the General Directorate for
State Hydraulic Works. Water intake is metered at the source and instant flow rate monitors are
used. To reduce the intake of water, used hydrotesting water is pumped from one section to another.
Used hydro testing water goes through sedimentation and filtration before the discharge; and
laboratory tests are conducted to ensure water meets Project Standards prior to discharge.
Hydrostatic testing of offshore equipment and marine section of the pipeline involves pressure testing
with water (typically filtered seawater, unless equipment specifications do not allow it) to verify
equipment and pipeline integrity. Chemical additives (corrosion inhibitors, oxygen scavengers, and
dyes) may be added to the water to prevent internal corrosion or to identify leaks. A range of
measures have been proposed to minimise pollution to the marine environment from hydrotesting,
although these have yet to be formalised within the ESMPs and require review against EBRD PRs
when completed.
Water supplied to the construction camps is extracted from groundwater bores at the site under
permit from the DSI. Sanitary wastewater from the camps is treated at on-site wastewater treatment
plant and discharged to an approved location after it meets applicable Project Standards. As for the
wastewater from construction sites, it is understood that such water is collected in septic tanks and
then transported to the camps for treatment.
During operation, the collection of process waste water in the Above Ground Facilities is possible. It
will be collected in impermeable storage containers and either pumped to waste water treatment
plants if nearby or transferred by truck to an appropriate facility.
5.3.2.3 Soil
Soils were studied with specific reference to their ability to produce acidic conditions (due to sulphide
oxidation) upon excavation. Specifications for this soil testing were documented in a Subsurface
Investigation Works procedure, primarily designed to determine soil conditions and their potential for
corrosion of steel and concrete. If hostile soil conditions were encountered, then changes to the
pipeline route were considered or specific management and mitigation measures introduced.
5.3.3 Greenhouse Gases
The ESIA has assessed impacts related to GHG emissions, although it does not appear to contain
consideration of technically and financially achievable options to minimise emissions of GHG in the
assessment process. Upon IESC request, supplementary evidence was provided, in the form of the
BAT emissions inventory and relevant evaluation data, that demonstrates that resource efficiency
measures have been considered during design (e.g. ability to limit venting of gas, alternative forms of
power supply during operations or waste heat recovery systems).
An assessment of GHG emissions has been conducted in Section 8.1.1 of the ESIA. Emissions were
calculated using the guidance outlined in INGAA, 2005. Greenhouse gas emission estimation
guidelines for natural gas transmission and storage – Volume 1 – GHG emission estimation
methodologies and procedures.
Section 10.5 of the ESIA estimates total annual GHG emissions as follows (CO2-equivalent):
• GHGs emissions during construction phase: 78,883 tonnes per year;
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 43
• GHGs emissions from operation: 1,956,049 tonnes per year; and
• GHGs emissions during decommissioning: 7,888 tonnes per year.
The EBRD requires that operations that produce more than 25,000 tonnes CO2-equivalent annually
quantify and report these emissions to the EBRD annually, in accordance with the EBRD Methodology
for Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
5.3.4 Water
Combined with the discussion in 5.3.2, abstraction of water for hydrotest activities is assessed in the
ESIA; with more detail on each abstraction point given in the BAP and within the CCs respective
Hydrotest Management Plans. Examples reviewed demonstrated that both ecological and social
aspects were considered when assessing the abstraction and discharge points for each hydrotest
location, as required by PR 3.
5.3.5 Waste
The ESIA includes a detailed assessment of waste streams generated by the Project during
construction, operation and decommissioning. Management and mitigation measures are documented
in a Waste Management Plan and Pollution Prevention Plan developed by TANAP and each CC has
developed their own equivalent plans for implementation on the Project. The Plan’s includes key
responsibilities and accountability; waste forecasting requirements; segregation; application of the
waste management hierarchy; organisational structure; training; monitoring and reporting.
Waste disposal is regulated under Turkish legislation, with which TANAP complies. Waste contractors
are utilised to transfer waste to the nearest municipality landfill and disposed of. Recyclable material
will be segregated and disposed of at appropriate facilities licenced by the applicable Ministry.
Hazardous wastes are disposed of by a licenced waste disposal contractor with applicable permits
under Turkish legislation. Chain of custody records are held by TANAP confirming waste has been
disposed of at an appropriate facility.
As discussed in Section 5.1.6, EBRD PRs recommend that clients ascertain whether licenced disposal
sites are being operated to acceptable standards. Evidence has been supplied to validate that TANAP
has conducted site verification audits of licenced waste disposal facilities along the pipeline route to
ensure that Project generated waste is being disposed of appropriately by the contractor.
5.3.6 Hazardous Substances
The Project does not use or generate substantial hazardous waste volumes. The Project utilises a
formal chemical management system (ChemAlert) to manage and inform their use and selection of
chemicals that may be required during Project activities. This system preferentially selects chemicals
with the least ecological impact.
As per the requirements of both Turkish and EU legislation, TANAP utilises licenced contractors to
transport and dispose of hazardous waste. The EBRD PRs recommend that clients ascertain whether
licenced disposal sites are being operated to acceptable standards. TANAP has conducted site
verification audits of a sample of disposal facilities along the pipeline route to ensure that their waste
is being disposed of appropriately by the contractor.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 44
Table 5-3 PR 3 Findings Summary
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
3 Resource Efficiency and Pollution Prevention
3.1 Resource Efficiency FC The principles of resource efficiency appear to have been suitability
identified during the ESIA process. Supplementary evidence provided to the IESC is sufficient to demonstrate appropriate consideration of energy efficient measures during project planning.
3.2 Pollution Prevention and Control - Air emissions
FC A Pollution Prevention Management Plan has been developed by TANAP and its construction contractors to minimise and manage pollution on the environment. The ESIA states (in Chapter 2) that best practice technology has been considered in reducing emissions from the Compressor Stations
(CSTs). The maximum rated output of the CSTs is 157MW (for three of the CSTs). EU Directive 2010/75 requires that facilities with power rating greater than 100MW shall have their emissions monitored continuously. It is not clear in the ESIA whether this will occur at the CSTs as part of the commitment to best practice technology. Emission limits are listed in Chapter 4 (Table 4.4-3) and discussed in Chapter 8.1.14 of the ESIA. Modelled emissions for CST’s have been provided and the maximum emission criteria for each unit is specified
in the design documentation.
3.3 Pollution Prevention and Control - Waste waters
FC A Pollution Prevention Management Plan has been developed by TANAP and its construction contractors to minimise and manage pollution on the environment. The Project generates two main streams of waste water from its construction activities; these being effluent water generated from Project camps/facilities and hydrotest waste water.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 45
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
The ESIA states that waste water from domestic requirements will be captured and treated in water treatment facilities prior to being discharged to the environment. Prior to discharge, testing would be undertaken to ensure compliance with Project Standards.
Onshore hydrotest water will preferentially be taken from surface water bodies. After use, it is intended that water be treated until it meets the required Project Standards and discharged back to the closest receiving environment (surface water). Where possible, addition of chemical corrosion inhibitors will be avoided, although in some cases they may be required. Hydrostatic testing of offshore equipment and marine section of the pipeline involves pressure testing with water (typically filtered seawater, unless equipment specifications do not allow it) to verify equipment and pipeline integrity. Chemical additives (corrosion
inhibitors, oxygen scavengers, and dyes) may be added to the water to prevent internal corrosion or to identify leaks. A range of measures have been proposed to minimise pollution to the marine environment from hydrotesting. During operation, the collection of process waste water in the Above Ground Facilities is possible. It will be collected in impermeable storage containers and either pumped to waste water treatment plants if nearby or transferred by truck to an appropriate facility.
3.4 Greenhouse Gases7 FC The ESIA has assessed impacts related to GHG emissions, although it does not appear to contain consideration of technically and financially
achievable options to minimise emissions of GHG in the assessment process. Upon IESC request, supplementary evidence was provided in the form of the BAT emissions inventory and relevant evaluation data
Commit to annual reporting of GHG emissions to the EBRD in line with their accepted methodology.
7 Particular attention should be given to client demonstration of consideration of alternatives. Projects expected annually to produce more than 25,000 tonnes of Co2 equivalent should provide an emission inventory and plans for annual reporting.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 46
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
that demonstrates resource efficiency measures have been considered during design (e.g. ability to limit venting of gas, alternative forms of power supply during operations or waste heat recovery systems). While this may have formed part of Project planning and assessment, it has not been expressly stated in the ESIA documentation.
An assessment of GHG emissions has been conducted in Section 8.1.1 of the ESIA. Emissions were calculated using the guidance outlined in INGAA, 2005. Greenhouse gas emission estimation guidelines for natural gas transmission and storage – Volume 1 – GHG emission estimation methodologies and procedures. The EBRD requires that operations that produce more than 25,000 tonnes CO2-equivalent annually (which TANAP does) quantify and report these emissions to the EBRD annually, in accordance with the EBRD Methodology for Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
3.5 Water FC Discussion is evident in the ESIA on the need to minimise and re-use water where possible.
3.6 Wastes FC Detailed consideration of waste streams and their impact has been provided in the ESIA.
3.7 Hazardous Substances and Materials FC As per the requirements of both Turkish and EU legislation, TANAP utilises licenced contractors to transport and dispose of hazardous waste. The EBRD PRs recommend that clients ascertain whether licenced disposal sites are being operated to acceptable standards. TANAP has conducted site verification audits of a sample of disposal facilities along the pipeline route to ensure that their waste is being disposed of appropriately by the contractor.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 47
5.4 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 4: HEALTH AND SAFETY
This PR recognises the importance of avoiding or mitigating adverse health and safety impacts and
issues associated with Project activities on workers, communities and consumers.
5.4.1 Occupational Health and Safety
TANAP implements a detailed Health and Safety Management System (HSMS) to manage the
Project’s Health and Safety (H&S) risks. The principles of the HSMS are documented in the TANAP
H&S Commitment (Policy) signed by the executive management team of TANAP.
Risk assessments form the basis of the management controls within the HSMS and apply the
mitigation hierarchy in their implementation. A dedicated organisational structure has been defined
to implement the TANAP HSMS.
H&S expectations for CCs were communicated during the tender process through the Health, Safety,
Social and Environmental Requirements for Suppliers and Vendors. CCs implement their own internal
HSMS which aligns with the TANAP HSMS.
High risk hazards are controlled through a Permit to Work (PTW) process, implemented by each Lot
CC and under supervision from TANAP personnel. Activities that require implementation of a PTW
include:
• Cold Work;
• Hot Work;
• Excavation;
• Confined Space;
• Lock Out / Tag Out; and
• Gas Measurement.
Lifting of pipeline on each Lot is managed under procedural guidance in the form of Safe Work
Method Statements (SWMS), as it was determined that due to the large amount of pipeline lifts on
the Project that control through a PTW system would be time consuming without providing additional
benefits to the task.
Some working conditions and amenities observed at Lot 1 did not appear appropriate to the nature of
the work being conducted and the climatic conditions at the time (see also PR 2 on working
conditions). A lack of in-field amenities including toilets, shelters and heating were observed in a
range of separate locations in the field at Lot 1. Temperature in the field during the site visit was
approximately -5 to -10C. Remains of a campfire on bare ground were observed in the Erzurum
Wetland (Critical Habitat area). The IESC considers that the observed working conditions may pose
an occupational health and safety risk to construction workers on this Lot. TANAP has a NCR system
in place to manage CC performance. However, it is not clear when / if it has been used for OHS
breaches relating to environmental conditions experience in each Lot. The TANAP Assurance Review
process provides a detailed review of contractor management of HSE issues including site worker
facilities, fatigue management for drivers, high risk work procedures, work permit system
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 48
implementation, worker training requirements and competency. The outcomes and corrective
actions of the assurance review process are tracked by TANAP.
5.4.1.1 Project H&S Incidents
TANAP monitors workplace H&S incidents and near misses. This process is outlined in the Incident
Management, Reporting and Action Tracking Procedure (TNP-SCD-HSM-GEN-006). Clear evidence
was available during the site visit that incidents are investigated in an appropriate manner and
measures to prevent reoccurrence implemented. TANAP monitors worker health through a Health
and Hygiene Monitoring process, also implemented by the CCs.
As of March 2017, the Project had recorded 1 fatality in the year to date and 6 fatalities for the period
of the Project. There have been 5 Lost Time Incidents in the year to date and 27 for the Project to
date. For road accidents attributable to the Project, there have been 2 recordable accidents in the
year to date and 14 over the life of Project. TANAP has recorded a Lost Time Injury frequency rate of
0.66 which is below its target of 0.82. The Project’s Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR)
is 1.45 which is also below the Project target frequency rate of 2.
For each major safety incident, the IESC team reviewed the detailed incident reports to determine
whether the appropriate response measures had been investigated and implemented. Each incident
appeared to have been investigated in detail, with numerous corrective actions implemented.
Fatalities that occurred were on Lots managed by different CCs and involving a range of scenarios
(i.e. no pattern of occurrence) however a review of incident root cause analysis indicated that some
recurring trends were observed. These included insufficient training, infrequent audits and
evaluations and inadequate risk assessment of tasks. For personnel involved in or witnessing these
incidents, it is not clear if additional support in terms of counselling services has been offered to these
employees.
A review of the Project incident database identified that there were many incidents that involved near
misses and first aid / lost time injuries related to pipeline lifting activities. One of the recorded
fatalities was also a lifting incident. The detailed incident report related to the lifting fatality stated
that root causes of the incident were insufficient training and a lack of suitable procedures for the
tasks. Interviews with employees on the Lot indicated that it was normal practice for personnel to be
in the designated ‘danger zone’ during lifts, amongst other system failings. The fact that it was
considered normal working practice to be within the ‘danger zone’ during lifts also indicates that there
may have been a lack of appropriate supervision and conduct of workplace inspections of lifting
activities by TANAP in the field.
The IESC team has some concern that lifting activities in particular are leading to a relatively high
occurrence of reported incidents / near misses. Given that lifting of pipe is one of the most common
activities on the Project which has the potential for serious injury or fatalities, a certain level of
control and supervision of the tasks by TANAP would be expected, particularly given that lifts on the
Project are not controlled under the PTW system. TANAP reports that Lessons Learnt documents of
incidents are being shared with all lots and stations, and actions are being followed up by LOT and
Station Leads (Delivery Manager, Lot HS Lead, etc). Relevant procedures and official letters provided
and discussed with TANAP in meetings held on 12 May 2017 indicate that appropriate remedial
actions are being implemented by TANAP in relation to lifting activities.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 49
5.4.2 Community Health and Safety
Assessment of potential community health and safety impacts of the project on communities was
articulated in the ESIA (Chapter 8.3), along with the related Community Safety, Emergency Response
and Traffic Management Plans. TANAP, and third-party monitoring contractor, CINAR, undertake
periodic monitoring of delivery of ESIA commitments and MPs. Construction Contractor MPs and
procedures are aligned with those prepared by TANAP, and the documentation reflects a mitigation
hierarchy approach. Training for MP implementation includes awareness-raising within the workforce
of interactions with the community, interactions with emergency responders, and awareness for the
community of potential project hazards.
Site-based practices vary across CCs, with evidence of differing standards of security of Project site
access and protection of communities from potential hazards (e.g. fencing, signage, accessibility of
open trenches, engagement with affected communities). TANAP reports that trench registers are
being kept for the entire route, including the barricading status of open trenches, and are being
closely followed up by the Construction and HS Teams. Additionally, the Community Relations Team
is undertaking Community Safety Awareness meetings including access to open trenches, ROW, risks
related with unauthorised site access, and construction and traffic safety with communities
throughout the pipeline route.
However, in alignment with a key construction phase project risk, there was evidence of strong
management of potential road safety impacts to both workers and communities. These included
travel management tools, vehicle controls and monitoring, and community and worker training, and
specific training with women and children to minimise public health risks due to vehicle traffic.
Emergency Response Plans have additionally been developed and approved by TANAP, including
provision for engagement and training with external emergency responders by the Project, led by
TANAP’s Security and Emergency Response departments. These plans are supplemented by mapping
of available health services along the pipeline, and address potential for community conflicts that may
occur as a result of the Project. Regular walk-overs and fly-overs of the pipeline are in place for the
construction phase of the Project to monitor potential pipeline intrusion, while building intrusion
systems are being implemented during construction for all AGIs.
Transportation of explosives for blasting of some pipeline trenches in rocky terrain areas is done
under the supervision of Gendarmerie. Blasting is done by a series of controlled explosions, and any
excess explosives are collected by the Gendarmerie. No explosives are stored on-site.
5.4.3 Infrastructure, Building and Equipment Design and Safety
TANAP has considered GIP in the design and safe operation of its infrastructure required for operation
of the pipeline. Block valves will be operated from the CSTs manned by TANAP staff. Intelligent
pigging will be conducted regularly to monitor the mechanical integrity of the pipeline. The Project
will also install and operate a SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) System. The pipeline
will also have leak detection systems installed along its length, with data reviewed on the SCADA
system.
Process safety and equipment safety procedural guidance has yet to be developed and will be done
prior to operations commencing.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 50
5.4.4 Hazardous Materials Safety
The process and tools used to manage and monitor implementation of the environmental and social
compliance requirements relevant to construction Project are described within the ESMS. The ESMS
requires the development and implementation of a Pollution Prevention MP as part of the ESMPs,
which includes the management of hazardous materials and selection of chemicals required during
the Project construction to ensure compliance with ESIA commitments.
The ESMPs provide construction phase management controls to prevent impacts from Project related
activities resulting in harmful exposures or degradation of environmental values that are important in
maintaining community health. The construction phase plans include interface with stakeholder
engagement plans and recognise the need to communicate with local communities regarding
environmental performance and to respond to external stakeholder concerns. The Pollution
Prevention MP describes the control measures to be implemented by all Project delivery teams to
prevent contamination of soil and water, minimise spills risks and prevent impacts to livestock.
5.4.5 Traffic and Road Safety
Given the scale of the Project and the reliance on vehicles to access the pipeline route, vehicle and
road safety was identified as one of the biggest health and safety risks during Project construction
activities.
A specific Road Safety Management Unit was created to work within the overall HSMS. Detailed
ESMS documentation has been developed related to road safety, vehicle use and journey
management. Each driving route was risk assessed using a road risk analysis. Mitigation measures
on vehicles including GPS tracking and vehicle cameras were observed in all Project vehicles. Use of
mobile phones is prohibited when driving.
From a community perspective, evidence from community meetings concurs with Lender
requirements and GIP. This includes provision of training in project-affected communities on road and
traffic safety, commencing from the construction phase. Evidence has been sighted of training
programs with women and children, facilitated by CCs and TANAP social staff.
5.4.6 Natural Hazards
Detailed assessment and design studies were conducted for seismic risks along the pipeline route
during the ESIA. Where the pipeline crosses known active fault zones or is in high seismic risk areas,
specific designs are utilised to allow for potential shifts in the land surface to minimise stress on the
pipe and avoid tension in the case of surface displacement. Specialist international experts were
employed to design the seismic crossings. Specialised design drawings were observed during the site
inspection for these crossings. Section 8.1.3 of the ESIA also considers impacts associated with slope
instability in the design of the pipeline route.
5.4.7 Exposure to Disease
Community Safety MPs provide for communicable disease training to the workforce and engagement
with local health authorities to agree appropriate mitigation actions. Further, TANAP is conducting
Occupational Health Audits of CCs and sharing the actions officially with them. It is not clear if this
engagement on epidemiological studies has occurred to inform the CCs’ MPs, however in practice,
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 51
third party contractors are available to assist in the event of any incidences of communicable diseases
as a last response with respect to the mitigation hierarchy.
Potential effects of population influx including community exposure to disease has been minimised by
local employment practices. A local hiring plan with associated KPIs, and communications with local
communities on potential hiring opportunities, have minimised population influx. Further, documented
engagement results demonstrate variation in the demand for unskilled jobs across different Lots,
which can also influence potential for influx.
5.4.8 Emergency Preparedness and Response
Appropriate Emergency Response Plans (ERPs) have been developed by TANAP and the CCs for
construction activities. Evidence of drills against the requirements of the plans was provided. TANAP
identifies that contractors operating the construction Lots are primarily responsible for emergency
response management. This includes development and testing of site specific emergency response
plans; maintaining adequate response resources and communicating with communities.
ERPs related to operation of the pipeline are currently in development and are stated to be ready six
months prior to operation. Offshore construction ERPs including an Oil Spill Emergency Response
Plan required to manage response to vessel interactions have been drafted and TANAP plan to
complete these prior to construction in the offshore package commencing in late June 2017. TANAP
are required to have these developed and disclose these plans prior to commencement of offshore
works.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 52
Table 5-4 PR 4 Findings Summary
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
4 Health and Safety
4.1 Occupational Health and Safety FC The Project has recorded 6 fatalities since its commencement, with 4 of these occurring in 2016. Detailed incident analysis of each event was undertaken. A range of corrective and preventative actions were implemented as a result of these detailed incident investigations. Particular attention was given to lifting activities on the Project and whether appropriate controls and supervision of lifting is occurring to ensure incidents are minimised. The IESC team was provided with additional information following the site audit that demonstrated that the actions resulting from major incident investigations were being adequately applied and that the incident rates due to construction activities had been reduced for the period from January to March 2017.
4.2 Community Health and Safety FC Potential impacts to Community health and safety was assessed in the ESIA chapter 8.3 (Social impact assessment – onshore) and the relevant SMPs subsequently developed: Community Safety Management Plan (Appendix 5.2)
Traffic Management Plan (Appendix 5.7). TANAP conducts periodic monitoring of implementation by CCs’ of the MPs and third party independent monitoring is additionally undertaken by CINAR. Contractors are required to develop their own procedures (pursuant to Contracts and consistent with the ESIA commitments and TANAP ESMPs), which have been submitted to TANAP and approved. MPs are consistent with the mitigation hierarchy approach and include awareness of communities to potential hazards (particularly at the construction phase), as well as preparedness of Project staff in managing potential risks. Management measures for key risks are documented in CC MPs, including: Appropriate engagement with external emergency responders (CCs’ Emergency
Response Plans) Communicable disease mitigation measures (CCs’ Community Safety MPs) Reduction of potential community-traffic interactions (CCs’ Community Safety MPs
and Traffic MPs). While TANAP provides support through its Construction, HS and CR Teams, variation between site management practices was evident between different CCs,
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 53
with varying standards of security of site access between different Lots visited. Variations included: fencing, signage, accessibility of open pits/other potential hazards, and engagement with local affected communities. Evidence was provided in community meetings that TANAP/CCs have held community safety meetings, including with women and children on trench access and road safety. The community raised concerns about road safety in ESIA consultation meetings, but no accidents involving communities were reported in community meetings attended by the audit team. The project has dedicated significant resources to minimising potential road/traffic related incidents and accidents, including travel management tools, vehicle tracking and monitoring equipment. See also s.4.6 below.
4.3 Infrastructure, Building, and Equipment Design and Safety
FC TANAP has demonstrated that safety considerations relating to Project infrastructure have been assessed appropriately.
4.4 Hazardous Materials Safety FC TANAP has considered safe use and transport of hazardous materials appropriately.
4.5 Product and Services Safety N/A Not applicable to this Project
4.6 Traffic and Road Safety FC Given the scale of the Project and the reliance on vehicles to access the pipeline route, vehicle and road safety was identified as one of the biggest health and safety risks.
Detailed ESMS documentation has been developed related to vehicle use and journey management. Mitigation measures on vehicles including GPS tracking and vehicle cameras were observed in all Project vehicles. Use of mobile phones is prohibited when driving. From a community perspective, evidence from community meetings concurs with Lender requirements and GIP. This includes provision of training in project-affected communities on road and traffic safety, commencing from the construction phase. Evidence has been sighted of training programs with women and children, facilitated by CC and TANAP social staff.
4.7 Natural Hazards FC Detailed assessment and design studies were conducted for seismic risks along the
pipeline route. Where the pipeline crosses known fault zones or is in high seismic risk areas, specific designs are utilised to allow for potential shifts in the land surface. Specialist international experts were employed to design the seismic crossings. Design drawings were observed during the site inspection. Section 8.1.3 of the ESIA also considers impacts associated with slope instability in the design of the pipeline route.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 54
4.8 Exposure to Disease PC CCs’ Community Safety MPs make commitments to provide periodic communicable disease training to workers and training on worker interactions with community members. The Community Safety MP requires that the CCs will prepare studies on incidence of communicable diseases in affected Provinces, based on epidemiological information available, to ensure that all precautions are taken to prevent the transmission of such diseases due to the presence of workers. Engagement is required by CCs with local health authorities to agree appropriate mitigation strategies as required. This is reflected in CCs’ MPs (e.g. SYA-PLN-SOC-GEN-001, Table 4.2); it is not clear if such engagement/studies have been undertaken by all CCs. TANAP reports that it is conducting Occupational Health Audits throughout the route. One of the audit items was to understand the status of providing training for communicable diseases among the employees. The findings are being shared via official Audit Reports with related EPC/PCCs. Also, related community safety training regarding communicable disease is to be undertaken from April to June 2017 in camp affected settlements in liaison with local Health Authorities. TANAP stated during the audit that 3rd party contractors are on call for any incidences of communicable diseases, together with the Project Occupational Health doctors, whose program of work is also periodically audited. Communicable disease management is provided for occupational response, in the Medical Emergency Response Plan (see PLK-PLN-HSM-PL4-011, 13.12.2016), however this Plan does not extend to community health response to Project-induced communicable disease. Any potential effects of population influx, with the consequent potential impact of exposure to communicable diseases, were stated as being mitigated predominantly through local employment practices. A study on manpower resources requirements and availability was undertaken, in consultation with relevant stakeholders (local authorities, chambers of commerce and others) (ref: HZR-REP-SOCGEN-001, 11.12.2015). This study indicated province-specific manpower context and informed
CCs’ local hiring plans, with associated roles, responsibilities and KPIs, developed by each CC (e.g. FRN-PLN-SOC-PL1-001). Potential employment opportunities for local labour are promoted at the village level near the current construction sites, based on local hiring plans. Resulting levels of influx are low, as local potential hiring opportunities are well understood and communicated to communities according to the site-specific manpower resources.
Develop a program on the prevention and management of communicable diseases in Project-affected communities: Develop the program Terms of
Reference for EBRD approval; Implement the program as agreed,
including regular monitoring and reporting;
Share with EBRD for the Banks’ comment the plans for worker training on communicable diseases.
4.9 Emergency Preparedness and Response
PC Environmental Emergency Response Plans have been developed by construction contractors based on the requirements of the Guidelines for Contractors
Develop offshore construction ERPs and disclose information in line with
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 55
specification developed by TANAP. The Security and Emergency Response departments of TANAP have undertaken training with relevant emergency response agencies and CCs on site, initiated by TANAP. Major incidents are to be prevented and contained by security systems including pipeline intrusion inspection system, which can be operated on any station or route (this will be moved to the Main Control Centre functions during the operations phase), as documented in the Security Management Plan. Fence and Building Intrusion Detection systems are in place on all AGIs, and regular walkovers and flyovers are in place of the pipeline for the construction phase. The Environmental Emergency Response Plan, which includes oils spill response, has been drafted for the offshore construction package and is expected to be finalised prior to the commencement of the offshore construction – late June 2017.
PR 10, allowing for EBRD review of documentation prior to disclosure.
Develop operational ERPs 6 months prior to operations commencing.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 56
5.5 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS 5: LAND ACQUISITION, INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT, AND ECONOMIC DISPLACEMENT
The TANAP project passes through 20 provinces and 585 settlements across Turkey, with
construction of a pipeline with a 36m wide Right of Way (ROW), above ground installations (AGIs),
access roads, powerlines, some permanent operational facilities and temporary facilities during the
construction phase.
The project will cause no physical displacement, but will require permanent and temporary land
acquisition, on both public and private land. Livelihoods impacts will predominantly be from short-
term construction impacts but will cause loss of agricultural land and crops, and common natural
resources.
A number of documents regarding resettlement have been prepared for the TANAP Project. This
commenced with the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP), which was prepared at the time of the ESIA
(Golder, 2015, GLD-PLN-LAC-GEN-003-P3-1). Following this, an Implementation Audit (carried out by
ERM in 2016) and WB due diligence investigation have been undertaken on the TANAP land
acquisition, involuntary resettlement and economic displacement activities to identify gaps in
inventory studies and against World Bank E&S safeguards policies. These resulted in the development
of the RAP for Above Ground Installations (AGIs RAP) and a RAP for the Pipeline (Pipeline RAP).
These documents present a new suite of studies, commitments, processes and documents for
development and implementation by TANAP in fulfilling international standards in land acquisition and
livelihood restoration, including filling gaps in having not completed a full socio-economic survey and
census8, or livelihood restoration mechanism. The areas covered by the additional corrective actions
identified by TANAP address: Compensation and Entitlements; Livelihood Restoration; Vulnerable
Groups; Grievance Redress Mechanism; Community Engagement and Disclosure Policy; Monitoring
Process; and Local Employment9. TANAP has made an additional 16 commitments to be taken for the
remaining implementation period including preparation of a monitoring program to ensure delivery of
the commitments against international standards.
No material non-compliances were identified as the part of the review against land acquisition,
involuntary resettlement and economic displacement criteria. The RAPs present the overall impacts,
policy and legislative framework, land acquisition process, consultations and disclosure details and
implementation arrangements, indicative implementation schedules and budgets and significant
further work has been undertaken by TANAP and Lenders to develop additional commitments to meet
international requirements in LAR.
5.5.1 Physical and Economic Displacement
TANAP has avoided physical displacement through remote preferred route corridor investigation,
application of more selective selection criteria as more detailed planning progressed in assessing and
selecting the preferred corridor, and subsequent evaluation of alternative route corridors. The Route
8 A full census was not carried out for the pipeline. Instead, a representative socioeconomic survey was conducted with 876 Project affected households, in-depth interviews with 132 village headmen and focus group discussions with 16 different women’s groups. 9 The corrective actions are summarized in Table 24: Summary of Corrective Actions of the Pipeline RAP (pp. 48)
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 57
has been frozen at Route H (i.e. ESMPs were developed according to this alignment). Additional
baseline studies have been undertaken to avoid key features (e.g. archaeological sites, homes, critical
habitat) with successive alignment changes, such that the current alignment is Route J. An E&S
checklist is used to determine whether desktop or field studies are required.
Four different land types are required: 49-year unrestricted and exclusive rights (16m pipeline
corridor); temporary (3year) easement rights (20m pipeline corridor); permanent ownership rights
(AGIs, access roads, poles); and 5-year contractual (rental agreement) rights for temporary facilities
such as camps. BOTAS as the land rights entity (LRE) is carrying out management and execution of
all land acquisition, in accordance to national requirements, project standards and international
policies, monitored by TANAP. The pipeline requires acquisition of 6,340ha (2,307ha of public land
and 4,032ha of private land), while 263ha of land was acquired permanently for AGIs, across 578
land parcels (79% privately owned) and impacting 936 Project Affected Persons (PAPs). AGIs for the
TANAP project include 7 compressor stations, 4 Metering stations, 11 Pig Launcher and receiver
facilities, 49 Block Valve Stations (BVS), and 2 Off-Take points.
Route realignment has been carried out during the construction phase in accordance with the re-
routing procedure to manage deviations that are required from the ESIA approved alignment. Site
surveys are undertaken by an assessment with TANAP, the CC and survey team for TANAP final
approval prior to route change implementation, including consultation with relevant stakeholders. The
process is described for community engagement in the Guide to Land Acquisition and Compensation
(currently being updated). A third-party consultant, consisting of three senior experts and one junior
expert has been engaged to conduct monitoring of PR 5 related issues (CINAR is the third-party
monitoring consultant for all other areas, excluding PR5 related issues).
TANAP has committed to follow international and national policies on LA, and in the event of a
conflict in interpretation, the international standards (World Bank OP4.12) will prevail.
5.5.2 Consultation
Consultation is required with the land owners, tenants, users, squatters, encroachers and those who
will/are experiencing loss of grazing, forest and community lands and severance/fragmentation of
lands. BOTAS is the government entity responsible for carrying out land acquisition and expropriation
on behalf of the TANAP project, including identifying, engaging with some 97,000 landowners, with
TANAP. Good working relationships were evident during the audit between BOTAS and TANAP.
Consultations commenced during Project planning phase activities, with 80 meetings with Project
affected settlements in September 2014 including distribution of the Guide to Land Access and
Resettlement (GLAC). Subsequent consultation has been undertaken by BOTAS, TANAP and CCs,
from 2014 to the present, including: Information meetings prior to negotiations/gathering sample
census data; 2 rounds of negotiation meetings; crop determination studies/meetings; preconstruction
information meetings; and land entry meetings. Advance notice/information is provided to PAPs prior
to discussions/negotiations and legal advisors present during negotiation meetings to advise on
procedural matters. Land entry meetings are held only after compensation has been paid to the
relevant landowner(s) or into an escrow account. CCs’ Community Liaison Officers (CLOs) maintain
continuous relations with PAPs and TANAP field staff maintain continuous relations with other
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 58
stakeholders according to the RAP, and TANAP field staff providing monitoring and support in RAP
consultation and engagement to CLOs. Consultation processes provide for greater participation of
women and vulnerable groups through targeted meetings, in addition to wider village-level meetings.
Engagement as well as grievances is tracked through OSID, with data collected for TANAP and all
CCs. The Corrective Actions presented by TANAP in the Pipeline RAP additionally provides for
identification of and support to vulnerable groups.
TANAP acknowledges in the RAP for the Pipeline that the cut-off date identified in the initial RAP was
not applied in practice, as the construction commenced in advance of the original schedule and the
identification of PAPs and their assets inventory had not been completed, as is required by
international standards. However, in line with the concept of multiple cut-off dates across the
different provinces, BOTAS is applying the following approach in line with the Pipeline RAP
specifications:
• For land and other assets; the cut-off date was determined as “the day before negotiations”
(noting that BOTAS branch office representatives announced information regarding the cut
off dates and distributed the GLAC during the village consultations prior to negotiations); and
• For standing crops; the cut-off date was determined as “the day of the determination of
users” after Article 27 was put into force.
While the original approach was not in compliance with GIP, BOTAS has committed to evaluating and
compensating every additional claim and justified complaint (i.e. in line with eligibility requirements)
including those that fall after the cut-off date, which is considered a practicable approach to this
requirement (ref: Pipeline RAP s.2.34).
TANAP also acknowledges that a full socioeconomic census was not conducted (Ref: Pipeline RAP s.
2.102), rather, a sample survey was undertaken that did not allow for a full census or identification of
vulnerable households. TANAP has committed to carrying out a retrospective study to inform all
eligible PAPs and compensate these PAPs who have not yet been compensated under the new
Entitlements Matrix, to be undertaken with the development and disclosure of the public brochure
describing the RAP Fund and its management. Further, in absence of one to date, TANAP commits to
developing a Livelihood Restoration Plan to address livelihoods impacts of the Project. This should
address PAPs, and as per s.5.5.3 below, also specifically respond to whether undue hardship has
been caused through the expropriation process. Note this will allow for an additional layer of analysis
to the commitment to investigate and provide support for vulnerable groups, as identified in the
Corrective Actions summary (Table 24, RAP for Pipeline).
Consultation identified community concerns related to the themes:
• Limited access to agricultural land thus direct impact on agricultural production and livelihood
reduction
• Limited access to grazing land thus impacting livestock activities
• Damages to crops during construction
• Health risks due to leakages
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 59
• Damage to land quality, poor reinstatement of previous projects,
• Perception of pipeline existence affecting the value of land; and
• Damages to existing infrastructure.
Consultation and information disclosure has been undertaken providing details of project activities,
timelines and responsibilities of various parties in land acquisition (LA), including distribution of the
Guide to Land Acquisition and Compensation (GLAC). The IESC notes that the corrective actions
identified in the RAP include additional engagement and disclosure actions to strengthen the Project’s
response and management of these identified issues. The RAP Fund Management Procedure has
been drafted and defines the process for implementing the RAP Fund to entitled PAPs (i.e. the
mechanism for ensuring those eligible under the revised Entitlements Matrix are identified and
compensated accordingly). Further, a new brochure is being prepared for those who are entitled to
RAP Fund compensation in line with the revised Entitlements Matrix for a widespread disclosure of
RAP Fund components and entitlements to facilitate information disclosure to PAPs in detail about
eligibility, entitlements and processes. This brochure is being delivered to eligible households and
affected communities, commencing April 2017. In parallel, internal training on international Lender
requirements has been scheduled or undertaken with all LOTS to ensure consultation and
engagement with PAPs is in line with the requirements. Lastly a stakeholder engagement plan specific
to the disclosure and engagement process on the revised entitlements matrix is yet to be complete.
This engagement plan should ensure that TANAP is proactively identifying potentially eligible
households. For disclosure of and engagement on RAP Implementation, TANAP advise that an Annex-
2 to the existing SEP is the preferred method, rather than developing a new plan of engagement
specific to RAP Implementation. This is intended to minimise confusion by making the documentation
as simple and user-friendly as possible.
5.5.3 Compensation
TANAP has described the LA process (including, broadly, identifying the corridor,
landowner/landowner shareholders, negotiation and agreement with landowners or expropriation
process). LA compensation is: (a) cash compensation for private land acquisition; (b) other assistance
through implementation of livelihood restoration plans (c) RAP Fund assistance for PAPs (informal
users or settlers not covered by Turkish legal requirements); (d) entry costs and leases for the
forestry lands. As at August 2016, approximately 5,450 formal land users have been identified (to be
compensated through BOTAS) and 324 informal users to be compensated through the RAP Fund,
administered by TANAP, as BOTAS cannot acquire land from or compensate these categories that fall
outside the Turkish legal framework. PAPs in categories eligible to receive compensation from the
RAP Fund are defined in the Entitlement Matrix in the AGIs and Pipeline RAPs. A RAP Fund
Management Procedure focusing on RAP Fund strategy and implementation principles has been
drafted and is currently being delivered to Project-affected settlements and PAPs, along with the new
GLAC (Guide to Land Acquisition). The RAP Fund Evaluation Committee has additionally been
established.
Permanent land acquisition is required for approximately 260ha for the AGIs, while approximately
6,600ha is required for a temporary period of 3 years (easement land for the construction corridor, or
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 60
unrestricted access for the ROW). This land is to be returned to owners after construction, with some
restrictions on agriculture / buildings in easement areas.
Eligibility criteria for AGIs are defined and include provision for support to vulnerable groups. TANAP
has committed to provide additional support from this fund for economic losses of producers that
earn income from agricultural activities carried out on private or public lands affected by permanent
acquisition of land for AGIs, and to compensate such losses by allowing producers to benefit from
activities to be determined within the scope of Livelihood Restoration Program. Field studies for the
preparation of LRP for AGIs, focusing on AGI-based vulnerable groups, were completed in April 2017
and the following Livelihood Restoration Program is to be drafted by the end of June 2017. Types of
support will depend on the settlement impacted, but may include priority for employment during
Project construction, agricultural support, support to livestock production, intensive farming support,
irrigation support, alternative income generation, trainings and capacity building.
Payments to be made were initially developed to meet Turkish national expropriation requirements,
however additional entitlements have been included to meet WB OP 4.12 requirements (transaction
costs, transitional payments, support to vulnerable households, and compensation for unviable land
parcels). In some areas, this is to be applied retrospectively (for example, 100% of ROW activity has
been completed in Lot 1). A retrospective study is being undertaken (due for completion in July 2017)
to identify and compensate PAPs who have not been compensated yet under this change in
Entitlements Matrix (ref: Summary of Corrective Actions). Further, TANAP will explicitly allow for full
replacement cost for all assets and will ensure that lost income is fully restored through the
compensation process.
The Guide to Land Acquisition and Compensation (GLAC) was developed in 2014 to inform
landowners about the process for land acquisition, including the grievance mechanism, rights, and the
Land entry protocols in place to ensure land parcels are not able to be accessed by CCs without
compensation payments having been received by land owners. In addition, TANAP has developed a
brochure as a supplementary document to GLAC-2014 to explain new entitlements and eligibility
requirements as per the new Entitlements Matrix (as referenced in the above), as well as new
grievance mechanism information such as the Appeals Committee process (i.e. as per Pipeline RAP).
This new brochure developed for disclosure focuses on the frequently asked questions related to land
acquisition, and additional RAP Fund items, together with the revised / improved Entitlements Matrix.
The procedure for demonstrating avoidance of expropriation appears to be a gap. While TANAP’s LA
process allows for negotiation with landowners, 67% of agreements are not amicable and trigger the
expropriation process, which does not meet with GIP and suggests the process of determining and
compensating landowners is rushed, in addition to absentee owners or other factors, resulting in
significant expropriation by international standards. While acknowledging that the pipeline
component of the project is linear, temporary and land acquisition has been completed, it should be
clear to TANAP that the expropriation process has not caused undue hardship to those losing access
to their resources, and thus the interviews and community-level meetings planned with disclosure of
the new RAP Fund brochure are key to ensuring proactive identification of potentially eligible PAPs.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 61
5.5.4 Grievance Mechanism
The grievance mechanism in place for the land acquisition process is the same integrated system as
per the Stakeholder Engagement Plan (the Online Stakeholder Information Database, OSID).
Complaints and requests can be lodged online, by phone, in person or with CLOs/TANAP Social
Specialists and via Muhtars. Complaints can be lodged anonymously or complainants can identify
themselves.
All PAPs are provided with general information about the Project and specific information regarding
the LA activities, through meetings and engagement activities, as well as receiving disclosure
information such as the GLAC. The GLAC also describes the grievance process, including ways in
which grievances can be raised and the process and timelines for resolution. A quarter of all
complaints across all Lots received to date relate to damage to land (see also PR10).
Appeals Committees have been established for each Lot in January 2017 with notification at the
community level from February 2017. These will provide for third party consideration of grievances
that cannot be agreed between TANAP and the complainant. Appeals Committees were established in
January 2017 for each Lot and are being announced via posters at settlement level in addition to
public disclosure on the TANAP website and supported by documentation including the SEP,
Grievance Procedure and an Appeals Committee Application Form. Currently, no complaints have
been escalated to Appeals Committees. The SEP was updated to reflect their formation, and
disclosed via new brochure being prepared to announce RAP Fund and Appeals Committee as a part
of TANAP’s Grievance Mechanism as of April 2017. Further, incorporating additional grievance
categories into OSID will now to allow for deeper analysis and better responsiveness to issues raised
by PAPs.
CCs have a maintenance period of one year, which will include the period for testing success of
reinstatement of land. This is to be completed to the satisfaction of TANAP, and losses of income due
to the failure of reinstatement are anticipated in the payments to landowners. Landowners are
additionally able to raise a grievance following the Land Exit process. For example, if grievances
relate to satisfaction of reinstatement and this falls during the maintenance period, this will fall under
the jurisdiction of the CC to rectify, otherwise this will be responded to as per the grievance
mechanism. According to TANAP, post-maintenance period land reinstatement rectification for the 2
years after reinstatement is the responsibility of the associated construction contractors as per their
contracts. ; the guidance on the Fund’s operation is yet to be developed and is anticipated for
completion by June 2017. Depreciation of land value is factored in to the valuation of land parcels
during the negotiation process (payments are between 70-90% of easement value, depending on the
type of land, and productivity losses are calculated as 30% for year 1, 20% loss for year 2 and 10%
loss for year three, added to the land value.)
It can be anticipated that there may be issues regarding reinstatement success due to soil storage
practices (see PR 6) hence the need to ensure the guidance provides clarity that this reinstatement
will be provided for and grievances redress actions taken, whether financed through the RAP Fund or
elsewhere, and an assessment that the productivity loss factors are accurate and sufficient to cover
real losses experienced in practice. See also Section 5.5.6 and 5.5.7. It is noted that Reinstatement
has been included as a new category in OSID to enable tracking of this issue.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 62
5.5.5 RAP/LRP Documentation
The Project RAP (GLD-PLN-LAC-GEN-003-P3-1) was developed with a focus primarily on meeting
Turkish legal requirements and international standards, without IFI involvement. Additional
documentation has been developed and publicly disclosed, including the RAP for the Pipeline (relating
to temporary land acquisition, TNP-PLN-SOC-GEN-006-P3-0), and the RAP for AGIs (relating to
permanent land acquisition, TNP-PLN-SOC-GEN-008-P3-0). A Guide to Land Acquisition and
Compensation (GLAC) has been developed and disclosed that outlines the process of LA for owners
and non-legal land users and other stakeholders. These documents have all been publicly disclosed
on TANAP’s website.
Gaps in meeting international requirements have been identified and plans are in place to address
these, as publicly disclosed commitments in the Summary of Corrective Actions (Addendum to the
Pipeline RAP) for development and implementation of a Livelihood Restoration Plan (LRP) for the AGIs
,, focusing on AGI-affected vulnerable groups, and an LRP for Offshore Fishermen. Some of the
livelihood restoration activities are to be supported through the RAP Fund (e.g. squatters, informal
land users and vulnerable households). The LRP documentation reflects onshore and offshore
impacts; the Draft Fisheries LRP was disclosed to fishermen at two impacted settlements (Kemer &
Aksaz villages) from April 2017 and the LRP has been finalised with the inputs from disclosure and
other Lenders. The field studies for the preparation of the LRP for AGIs, focusing on AGI-based
vulnerable groups, were completed in April 2017, with the LRP to be drafted by the end of June 2017.
There have been some crop payments made from the RAP Fund already, in absence of the RAP Fund
guidance (e.g. small costs in transporting landowners to meetings during the land acquisition
process); these payments will need to be reconciled and audited by a third party (the RAP External
Monitoring Team).
5.5.6 RAP/LRP Implementation
The Pipeline RAP identifies measures to strengthen remaining implementation (RAP s.4). These
include conduct of additional studies are required to be undertaken by TANAP to fill gaps between
existing RAP implementation and as a result of expansion to the Entitlements Matrix. This includes
determining which categories of PAPs are now eligible for compensation, and confirms which have
and have not already been compensated. The AGI and Pipeline RAPs identify that some of this work
will be undertaken retrospectively as land acquisition is already finalised or commenced (i.e. only in
Lot 4 will these new RAP measures be possible to initiate from commencement of implementation in
that Lot).
TANAP commissioned a study to identify possible livelihood impacts on fishery communities near
Marmara Sea in order to develop a mitigation approach and Livelihood Restoration Plan appropriate
to the impact of the Project on fisher livelihoods. The IESC notes that completion and commencement
of implementation of this Plan is on track to commence in advance of early works and exclusion of
fisherfolk from the fishing areas. TANAP and the Offshore CC are, at May 2016, preparing for
stakeholder engagement and LRP implementation.
The Specification for Reinstatement (WRP–SPC-EGG-PLG-001) guides CCs on development,
management and implementation of reinstatement plans to ensure the ROW is restored to a form
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 63
suitable for future use. This requires that method statements be prepared which consider the specific
environment in which reinstatement is to be undertaken, and that the CC undertakes monitoring, and
if necessary, repair, to achieve ecological and biological restoration as agreed with the landowner.
This includes for example; the land is to be made ready for re-planting with crops in arable areas and
there is a contract maintenance period during which biorestoration measures must be maintained by
the CC. The grievance management system is referenced, providing additional protections for PAPs.
Land acquisition for AGI has commenced for 349 of the 458 parcels impacted by the Project, and A
Socio-economic field study conducted during July-August 2016 with 182 PAPs impacted by
Compressor Stations and Metering Stations. Engagement identified the key findings that PAPs do not
clearly distinguish land acquisition between the pipeline compared to the AGIs, that most do not use
the grievance mechanism and that PAPs do not distinguish between TANAP, BOTAS or CCs on site,
rather, the Project is viewed as a single entity. IESC notes that TANAP is addressing these
shortcomings; AGI-specific disclosure to respond to all concerns raised by PAPs (including Project
information, grievance mechanism, compensation strategy, employment opportunities, subcontractors
and Project details regarding implementation) are currently being implemented. The AGIs land
census survey was completed with 1008 PAPs in 265 households, and according to PAP declaration,
almost half of the households lost less than 20 percent of their total land holdings due to permanent
land take resulted from MS and CS specific AGIs. The IESC notes that the LRP for PAPs whom have
been subjected to a loss of livelihood are to be compensated through the AGI LRP now under
development.
5.5.7 Monitoring
The AGI and pipeline RAPs specify monitoring and evaluation mechanisms including indicators,
implementation schedule, and budget. These RAPs will be subject to IESC/independent monitoring
and review throughout implementation in accordance with GIP and EBRD PR 5 requirements.
TANAP reports that the Final RAP Monitoring Plan has been prepared and approved by TANAP (and
the World Bank) and an independent expert contracted for RAP External Monitoring. This Team
commenced External Monitoring in April 2017 and their 1st Semi-Annual Report will be submitted in
June 2017. The 1st RAP Quarterly Internal Monitoring Report has been prepared, and is now also
available for input to the RAP External Monitoring Team review/assessment.
TANAP has committed that the monitoring process for the Project is to be immediately implemented,
and it is to be closely linked to the grievance mechanism to provide a feedback loop. Internal
monitoring processes, key indicators (input, output, process, outcome and impact, see RAP s8.8) are
to be monitored through regular internal progress reports. The IESC notes that specific indicators will
apply to BOTAS and TANAP. This RAP Monitoring plan has been reviewed by the IESC.
Internal and external monitoring activities will be further defined in line with RAP commitments, and
includes TANAP internal performance monitoring, external experts/consultants undertaking impact
monitoring, and TANAP and external consultants conducting the RAP Completion audit. Further,
TANAP has committed to undertaking an end term impact evaluation by an independent firm, one
year following substantial RAP implementation, to evaluate the outcomes of compensation and
assistance impact on project affected people to improve their living standards. This report is to be
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 64
commissioned to document whether RAP/LRP provisions have been met, with a corrective action
identified to close out any outstanding TANAP obligations for compensation, livelihood restoration and
development benefits. The IESC notes that internal monitoring should inform the date of the
completion of the impact evaluation as the specification of one year following implementation may
not be appropriate to be able to see impacts on longer term livelihoods programs on PAPs.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 65
Table 5-5 PR 5 Findings Summary
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
5 Land Acquisition, Involuntary Resettlement, and Economic Displacement
5.1 Avoid or minimise displacement FC Full compliance was observed in relation to avoidance or minimisation
of displacement, with no physical resettlement required over the length of the pipeline or at AGIs. Route realignment has been carried out during the construction phase to manage deviations from the ESIA approved alignment, in accordance with Project procedures and the Guide to Land Acquisition and Compensation (GLAC), developed for stakeholders. The pipeline requires temporary (3-year) acquisition of 6,340ha, while 263ha of land was acquired permanently for AGIs, across 578 land parcels and 936 Project Affected Persons (PAPs).
5.2 Consultation PC Consultation with stakeholders is undertaken by TANAP as the Project owner, CCs’ through site-based community liaison officers, and BOTAS, as the entity responsible for land acquisition, requiring
identification and engagement with approximately 97,000 landowners. Consultation commenced during the Project planning phase, and has since additionally included engagement specifically on: Information meetings prior to negotiations/census data gathering; 2 rounds of negotiation meetings; crop determination studies/meetings; preconstruction information meetings; and land entry meetings. Land exit meetings will also be undertaken following reinstatement (approximately 3 years after land entry). Consultation processes provide for engagement with vulnerable groups including women, and overall, the IESC notes that the corrective actions identified in the RAP include additional engagement and disclosure actions to
strengthen the Project’s responsiveness to stakeholders’ issues. The Cut-off date from the original RAP could not be met, and BOTAS has developed a practicable approach to evaluate and compensate every additional claim and justified complaint even after the cut-off date. TANAP should ensure that this commitment is met through its monitoring and auditing processes.
RAP Fund Management: (a) Provide EBRD the stakeholder engagement
plan, Annex 2 on RAP Implementation),
including specific provisions for engagement with vulnerable households.
5.3 Compensation for displaced persons PC Permanent land acquisition is required for approximately 260ha for
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 66
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
the AGIs, while approximately 6,600ha is required for a temporary period of 3 years (easement land for the construction corridor, or unrestricted access for the ROW). This land is to be returned to owners after construction, with some restrictions on agriculture / buildings in easement areas. TANAP is commissioning a retrospective
study (due for completion in July 2017) to identify and compensate PAPs who have not been yet been compensated under the new Entitlements Matrix framework (ref: Summary of Corrective Actions). Further, TANAP has committed to providing for full replacement cost for all assets and will ensure that lost income is fully restored through the compensation process.
5.4 Grievance mechanism PC There is a grievance mechanism in place. The same system for stakeholder engagement is also applied to grievance management (the Online Stakeholder Information Database, OSID). TANAP has made commitments to strengthen this mechanism including through establishment of an Appeals Committee and strengthened disclosure of summary grievance information to stakeholders.
Disclosure to communities of summary grievance data and measures taken by TANAP and CCs to address the common causes of grievances, in line with recommendations made in 10.2.
Provide a copy of Appeals Committee
documentation to EBRD including Terms of Reference and publicly disclosed information regarding the Committees
5.5 RAP/LRP documentation PC TANAP has committed to development of a range of new RAP documents, documented in the Summary of Corrective Actions in the Pipeline RAP. These include the Livelihood Restoration Plan (LRP), RAP Fund guidance and documentation. The RAP Fund intends to fill the gap between payments that can be provided for by BOTAS (as the national responsible agency) and international requirements managed and implemented by TANAP. Some payments are reported to have already been made from the RAP Fund, and for transparency these
should be reconciled following approval of guidance on implementation of the Fund. RAP Fund Management Procedure has been drafted and disclosure with PAPs commenced. LRPs are the AGI-affected resettlement (currently under development) and the Offshore Fisheries LRP (completed).
Livelihood Restoration Program (LRP): (a) Provide for EBRD comment the LRP for
AGI-affected settlement prior to the Plan’s disclosure;
(b) Provide a copy of the completed Offshore Fisheries LRP to EBRD.
5.6 RAP/LRP implementation PC The Pipeline RAP additionally identifies measures to strengthen See 5.5.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 67
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
ongoing implementation of the RAP. This includes a study to investigate potential impacts to fisherfolk in the Sea of Marmara and thereafter develop an appropriate Livelihood Restoration Plan. The study has been carried out, (i.e. with adequate time to investigate, plan and respond, in advance of any impacts occurring). Similarly, the
AGI RAP provides for the development of an LRP to PAPs who have experienced a permanent loss of livelihoods. Mitigation measures are yet to be developed and will differ from those who experience temporary loss, which should be clearly managed and communicated to stakeholders.
5.7 Monitoring PC The AGI and pipeline RAPs specify monitoring and evaluation mechanisms including indicators, implementation schedule, and budget. These RAPs would be subject to IESC/independent monitoring and review throughout implementation in accordance with GIP. Both internal and external monitoring have commenced, with the 1st Quarterly Internal Monitoring Report (March 31, 2017) reviewed by the IESC in May 2017. TANAP has contracted independent experts for RAP External Monitoring and will produce their 1st Semi-Annual External Monitoring Report in June 2017.A site visit and investigation by the RAP External Monitoring Team was completed as of May 5, 2017. This monitoring, will, in turn, inform the Impact Evaluation at the conclusion of the LA and livelihood restoration program.
RAP Monitoring: Provide to EBRD a copy of the Internal
Monitoring Report(which includes monitoring of the RAP Fund, and implementation of the Corrective Actions Register);
Provide to EBRD the results of external regular monitoring of the RAP, including payments
from the RAP Fund.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 68
5.6 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 6: BIODIVERSITY AND LIVING NATURAL RESOURCES
The TANAP Project presents significant challenges to ensuring that potential biodiversity impacts are
effectively managed. The construction of the 1787 km underground pipeline and an 18km subsea
crossing through the Sea of Marmara, including all aboveground support facilities, involves direct
disturbance within the pipeline Right of Way (RoW) corridor through numerous ecological regions and
habitat types including terrestrial, fresh water and marine habitats. Linear construction projects of
this nature require extensive broad range data gathering to effectively characterise the biodiversity
values likely to be affected. Biodiversity management measures applied during construction are
required to be site specific to reflect the range of landscapes and habitat types encountered. These
biodiversity protection measures are therefore non-standard and require intensive management to
ensure effective outcomes.
The IESC recognise that the application of impact assessment methodology and various standards for
characterising the significance of biodiversity values for large scale linear projects requires some
modification from that which would be applied for projects that have limited geographical extent.
The consideration of area of influence and the temporal extent of likely impacts is significant in
assessment of biodiversity issues for the TANAP project and the extent to which the Project can
achieve its stated objectives for protection of biodiversity.
The TANAP Project has developed extensive documentation for baseline studies, impact assessment
and biodiversity management and monitoring. The extent of documentation reflects the diversity of
ecological regions and habitat types and the need for biodiversity management measures to be fit for
purpose. The Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) has been developed and was being implemented at the
time of the IESC site visit and the effectiveness of these measures was observed at a sample of work
sites, including those where critical habitat had been identified.
The biodiversity assessments and studies have been completed in consideration of the IFC 2012
Performance Standards and with specific reference to Performance Standard 6: Biodiversity
Conservation and Sustainable Natural Resource Management of Living Natural Resources. In addition,
key international guidelines and standards referenced in the ESIA relevant to biodiversity
management include:
• International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red Book (RDB) for protected species;
• Action Plan for the conservation of marine vegetation in the Mediterranean Sea (1999);
• Strategic Action Programme for the conservation of Biological Diversity (SAPO BIO) on the
Mediterranean Region (2003);
• Priority habitats according to the SAP/BIO Protocol (Barcelona Convention) (1999);
• Biodiversity in Impact Assessment Background Document to Decision VIII/28 of the
Convention on Biological Diversity – CBD Technical Series No. 26;
• The Action Plan for the conservation of Mediterranean Marine Turtles (UNEP-MAP);
• European Directive 2009/147/EEC The Birds Directive; and
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 69
• 92/43/EEC Council Directive on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and
flora.
5.6.1 Assessment of Biodiversity and Living Natural Resources
Baseline Studies:
Baseline studies for the initial ESIA report were completed between February 2013 and March 2014.
The individual component studies did not extend throughout this period but were scheduled, for
various lengths of time, within this period. The studies were completed by Çinar Engineering who sub
contracted a range of specialist experts from various national academic and research institutions. The
baseline studies included desktop studies, aimed at collection and analysis of existing relevant
bibliographic data for all the valued environmental components (VEC’s), as identified through ESIA
scoping, and included field studies aimed at collection of field data for selected VECs, filling
knowledge gaps and verification of the desktop study results. Field surveys for the ESIA were
completed by Çinar using a defined survey methodology developed by Golder Associates who were
engaged by TANAP to assist in guiding the ESIA compliance with international standards including IFC
and EBRD requirements. A review of the baseline methodology found that the component field
studies had been undertaken using representative sampling that appears to be representative of the
project AoI. These field studies were undertaken selectively within the 500m wide Local Study Area
(LSA) for the ESIA followed by a more focussed field surveys within the 36-70m wide Right of Way
(RoW) to support the Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP). The IESC notes that the initial ESIA flora studies
were limited in duration to only one flowering season and that the flowering season in eastern and
western Turkey varies considerably. These deficiencies were somewhat addressed through the
further BAP studies undertaken between August and October 2014 that was focussed on identification
or priority species within the Pipeline Right of Way ROW (which ranges from 36 to 70 m in width).
A Baseline LSA was defined based on the likely AoI in which direct or indirect impacts to VECs could
occur. The LSA considers a 500m wide route corridor for the onshore pipeline and 100m wide for the
offshore component. A Regional Study Area (RSA) was also defined through the ESIA to allow impact
significance assessments, including identification of priority biodiversity features and critical habitat.
The RSA included terrestrial flora and fauna and habitats through Eco-regional data, and protected
areas within 5km of the TANAP route. There were 20 RSA provinces covered through the baseline
study that capture a vast array of ecoregions across the extent of Turkey. The RSA and LSA were
mainly assessed through desktop study while the AoI was assessed through field study.
The scale and linear nature of the Project presented some significant issues in collection of sufficient
baseline data required to undertake a comprehensive habitat assessment. The ESIA mapped the
EUNIS habitat types along the full pipeline route and identified 30 different Level 3 habitat types
along the route. The IESC notes that the ESIA did not establish a discrete management unit (DMU),
which is essential for the quantitative evaluation of the proportion of the global population occurring
within it. The ESIA concedes that the baseline data gathering was insufficient to delineate habitats
distribution around the LSA and the absence of population data from the baseline studies resulted in
the LSA being used as the spatial unit of analysis and critical habitat being only identified and mapped
at the LSA scale (500m from the Project footprint). The ESIA does recognise this deficiency and
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 70
states that “it would be appropriate to conduct in-depth critical habitat assessments for the Project if
data become available for identifying the appropriate DMU’s”. The critical habitat assessment in the
ESIA was unable to assess against the quantitative thresholds set in Criteria 1 to 3 as a DMU was not
determined and therefore the assessment does not follow Guidance Note 65 of IFC PS6. As a result of
this, the ESIA applied conservative critical habitat assessment to define:
• Confirmed critical habitat – where species under Criteria 1 to 3 were observed and therefore
the entire patch of EUNIS Level 3 Habitat relevant to that species within the LSA was
determined to be critical habitat.
• Potential Critical habitat – where species under Criteria 1 to 3 were identified to be potentially
present and /or the habitats might contain unique evolutionary processes and/or high
biodiversity values (Criteria 4 and 5).
The baseline survey biodiversity studies included:
• Marine Fauna Baseline Report - containing data gathered from field observations, materials
collected, literature screening and personal interviews for a 2km wide buffer zone within the
local study area along the section of pipeline through the Sea of Marmara;
• Marine Flora Baseline Report – including data gathered form field observations, collected
materials and literature reviews for the local study area associated with the subsea pipeline
corridor;
• Marine Biodiversity Baseline Report – includes the findings and analysis obtained from the
marine flora and fauna reports along with literature review to characterise the biodiversity of
the local and regional study areas;
• Marine Habitats and Ecosystems Baseline Report – focussed on a 500m wide subsea pipeline
corridor route for the local study area and a 100m wide regional study area to identify habitat
types and assess the potential for critical and priority habitats;
• Terrestrial Fauna Baseline Report – includes both desktop and field studies (May and July
2013) with field studies prioritised to confirm presence and distribution of fauna within
natural and critical habitat areas of the LSA and to identify priority species and habitats.
• Terrestrial Flora Baseline Report - Terrestrial flora field data was collected in May to July of
2013, being only one flowering season, to confirm the presence and distribution of terrestrial
flora species particularly within Natural and Critical habitat areas of the LSA (500 m corridor),
and determine the presence of endemic, restricted-range, critically endangered and
endangered flora species in the LSA.
• Terrestrial Protected Areas Baseline Report - identified protected areas present in the LSA
(500m corridor) and Regional Survey Area (RSA) (within 5km of the LSA) and identify where
impacts may be predicted.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 71
• Terrestrial Biodiversity Baseline Report – collected field data and documented information on
the biodiversity characteristics of the RSA with respect to ecological values and characterised
the biodiversity values, including potential for critical habitats, within the LSA and relevant
nearby locations where impacts are predicted.
• Terrestrial Habitats and Ecosystems Baseline Report – included ground truthing of European
Nature Information System (EUNIS) level 3 habitat classification map and acquire data
regarding the status if habitats of conservation importance.
• Freshwater Fauna Baseline Report – included desktop and field studies, June-July 2013 and
September-November 2013) at 200 sampling stations to confirm the presence of fish species
within rivers subject to pipeline crossings and determine presence of endemic, restricted
range, critically endangered and endangered fish species for habitat assessments.
• Freshwater Flora Baseline Report – included desktop and field surveys conducted during key
flowering periods (May to June for the western sectors and July to August for the eastern
Turkey section), to determine distribution and presence of flora species in the LSA and to
determine priority species and allow the assessment of critical habitats.
• Freshwater Habitats and Ecosystems Baseline Report - was completed for freshwater habitats
within the LSA to confirm the distribution of habitats defined at a desktop level using the
EUNIS standardised habitat system, and also to acquire recent data regarding conservation
status and significance using National and international data and criteria.
• Ecosystem Assessment of TANAP corridor through Posof Wildlife Development Area – was
undertaken by a multi-disciplinary team of National scientific specialists in July 2013 to
undertake an ecological assessment of a range of protected areas within the WDA that are
likely to be affected by the TANAP LSA.
The baseline studies undertaken for the ESIA were sufficient to allow the scoping of critical habitat
(PR6 paragraph 6) but are not sufficiently detailed to allow for a critical habitat assessment in
accordance with PR6 paragraphs 7-9.
The European Nature Information System (EUNIS) habitat criteria appeared to provide a useful tool
for desktop studies and impact assessment of biodiversity values within the study areas (RSA, LOA
and AoI).
Community engagement undertaken for the ESIA included a range of surveys that include questions
regarding the presence of conservation significant species within the Project AoI and request for
information regarding community use of natural ecosystems including hunting, collection, bee
keeping and livestock grazing. This social data was used to supplement biodiversity baseline where
relevant.
Additional BAP Studies and Surveys
Further field and desktop biodiversity studies were undertaken by Cinar from August to October 2014
as part of the Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) development. The BAP has been subject to a number of
revisions, the latest being the version Rev-P3-10 issued in May 2017. The BAP studies were required
to address data gaps identified in the ESIA studies, as described below, accommodate route changes
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 72
that had occurred and to revise the critical habitat assessment completed for the ESIA. The BAP
ecological surveys were targeted towards the presence of ecological sensitive species and habitats
along the RoW, between 36m and 70 m in width.
BAP ecological field surveys focused on potential impacts within and along and immediately adjacent
to the ROW (36-70m) and used the ESIA as a macro perspective of the ROW surroundings.
The BAP objective is to protect and conserve the biodiversity within the 36m ROW during the
construction, operation and decommissioning phases of the project. The BAP identifies species and
habitats of significance with the aim of developing area specific actions. The BAP objectives include
the identification and management of critical habitat in line with IFC Performance Standard 6 and the
requirements of the Turkish National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan.
The BAP re-evaluated the baseline surveys carried out in the ESIA studies. This re-evaluation
included:
• The findings of the ESIA baseline studies within the 500m LSA were re-assessed for the 36 m
ROW;
• Verification and re-evaluation of Species of Conservation Concern;
• Field studies for considered species and habitats were planned; and
• Intersections between the ROW and protected areas or high biodiversity areas were
reviewed.
The BAP, including the re-evaluation of critical habitat, was undertaken by Çinar by relevant subject
matter national specialists. The Critical Habitat assessment methodology was developed in
consultation with other Project lenders and recognised the lack of identified Discrete Management
Unit and the species level data limitations for the 500m wide corridor.
Impact Assessment
The ESIA baseline data was used to define the sensitivity of the various VEC’s to identify likely
impacts associated with the project and to define the pre- project condition that will be used as a
benchmark to detect changes during monitoring. VECs were assigned sensitivity levels based on a
range of factors including current quality of the component and susceptibility to environmental
changes. Those impact factors most relevant to biodiversity impacts were identified as:
• Reduction in topsoil quality/availability;
• Site restoration;
• Sediment suspension;
• Removal of natural vegetation; and
• Introduction of alien species.
The impact assessment methodology for biodiversity assigned impact factor intensity based on
assumed standard mitigations being applied in accordance with good industry practice, so impact
factors are measured only after mitigation. The impact assessment methodology was based on that
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 73
provided by Golder Associated which applies a GIS approach using a Driving Forces –Pressures-State-
Impacts-Response (DPSIR) framework.
Protection of terrestrial flora species in Turkey is a key issue as Turkey represents the richest flora in
the Palearctic (approximately 9700 species) and a very high rate of endemism (over 30%).
Priority Biodiversity Features
The TANAP BAP was developed with the specific objective to identify the species and habitats in
consideration of national and international significance and to consequently determine the applicable
area specific action to protect and conserve biodiversity within the 36 m RoW. The BAP has
identified the presence of natural habitats, intersections of the ROW with protected or conservation
areas and the presence of ecologically sensitive species within the ROW.
Flora studies included the sampling of 246 stations along the pipeline route. Species of conservation
significance were identified from assessments against the Red Book of Turkish Plants and IUCN 2001.
The studies identified 9 species considered critically endangered, 14 endangered, 35 vulnerable and
14 are near threatened. Moreover, 221 taxa were found to endemic and 62 of these are considered
restricted range. Of the 86 Species of Conservation Concern (SCC), 62 were found along the pipeline
ROW during field studies and one species was identified as new to science, bringing the total number
of SCC to 87.
The terrestrial fauna surveys identified five mammal SCC as a result of desktop and field studies
including 3 vulnerable and one near threatened. Bird studies identified 11 SCC including one critically
endangered, 4 endangered, 2 vulnerable and one near threatened species. There were 3 reptile SCC
identified including one critically engaged, on endangered and one near threatened. One vulnerable
amphibian species was identified. A total of 34 Arthropod species were identified as SCC including one
critically endangered, 7 endangered, 2 vulnerable and one near threatened.
The BAP includes a discussion of EUNIS habitat types encountered along the TANAP route including
30 different terrestrial habitat types classified as Level III and 6 level III freshwater habitats. Habitat
types classified as significant under the Turkish ‘National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan” were
also identified as priority habitats including steppe, coastal sand-dunes and mountainous forest
ecosystems.
Freshwater biological studies found no flora taxa that triggered SCC. The fish species were identified
from 189 river crossing sites sampled over two field campaigns in different seasons. These studies
identified 13 SCC fish species, 11 of which are highly endemic and two critically endangered. One
species of endangered aquatic invertebrate was identified as being potentially occurring at project
river crossings.
Protection status and endemism (for some species) have been determined by checking against BERN,
IUCN, CITES, Bird Directive, Habitat Directive, CHCD and RDBT. Protected and conservation areas in
the 10-km buffer around the Project have been determined.
Threatened flora and fauna species within the 500m corridor have been assessed. Freshwater critical
habitats (FCH) have been determined according to EUNIS Code with classification of confirmed versus
potential critical habitat.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 74
BAP Critical Habitat Assessment
The BAP states that it has identified critical habitat under five criteria outlined in the IFC PS6 (2012)
and GN6 and quantitative assessment for Tier 1 and 2 of Critical Habitat Criteria 1-3. Critical Habitat
was first identified during the baseline phase of the ESIA study and has been re-evaluated and
further defined in the BAP using the following approach:
• Information about the current status of the critical habitats (i.e. at the species, ecosystem
and landscape scales) was collected;
• The relationship between critical habitat with relevant conservation significant species was
identified;
• Intersects of the ROW with protected areas or high biodiversity areas were reviewed;
• Species and habitats were evaluated and prioritised as “low, medium and high” significance
scale in consideration of a range of factors including conservation status, distribution,
endemism, species/habitats and local conditions.
For critical habitat triggering flora species identified in the ESIA Studies, those that occurred within
the 36 m ROW were identified and included in the critical species list; those that were not observed in
the ROW were removed. For terrestrial fauna species identified as potentially critical habitat triggers
in the ESIA, the re-evaluation considered the potential for those species to use the 36m wide ROW
for reproduction, feeding, nesting or other habitat use was assessed on the basis of field investigation
and where no habitat use was identified then those species were removed from the critical species
list.
This process represents some limitations to the critical habitat determination as it is focussed on the
TANAP impact on species that trigger critical habitat rather than the critical habitat itself. PS6 GN 64
requires that critical habitat should be determined based on the biodiversity attributes particular to
the habitat in question and the ecological processes required to maintain them. It is recognised that
TANAP has applied the critical habitat assessment methodology using the available collected data
from the RoW, and more broadly in certain areas. However, TANAP’s critical habitat assessment was
limited due to the lack of regional species population and habitat data over the whole corridor.
TANAP has considered the broad scale EUNIS habitat scale data in determining critical habitat and
has also consulted with Project stakeholders in the critical habitat assessment methodology.
Where seasonal or other limitations to field investigations meant that the presence or of species or
habitat could not be assessed within the ROW then the BAP applied the precautionary principle and
included these in the critical habitat assessment and made recommendations for further field studies
to verify the assessment. TANAP does require construction contractors to undertake pre-construction
biological surveys of the RoW and uses this data to further verify the assessments.
The BAP provides a tabular summary of the critical habitat assessment outcomes including the criteria
triggers, the outcomes of the quantitative assessment to determine the appropriate tier for Criteria 1-
3 and area of critical habitat within the ROW. However, the BAP does provide limited information on
how the species data has been screened against the quantitative thresholds as described in the GN6
paragraph 69. As described above, there is no discussion or detail of the discrete management units
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 75
for species and habitats that are identified as potentially critical. Quantitative assessments have been
applied by TANAP using the broad EUNIS habitat classifications.
The TANAP BAP includes a revision of the Critical Habitat determination made in the ESIA. The ESIA
assessment of critical habitat was limited to habitats within the LSA due to the limited area of
investigation and the lack of population data, as discussed above. This initial critical habitat
assessment identified that 10.8 % of the TANAP terrestrial LSA was confirmed as triggering critical
habitat and 81% of the LSA being identified as potential critical habitat. For rivers crossed through
the LSA, 41 rivers were confirmed as critical habitat and all the remaining rivers (1170 crossings)
were assessed as being potentially critical habitat. The ESIA identified further studies requiring to be
completed to further define critical habitat and these additional studies were completed during the
BAP surveys completed from August to October of 2014.
The re-assessment of critical habitat in the BAP identified 67 terrestrial and 27 freshwater critical
habitats. The terrestrial critical habitats cover only 0.39% of the 500m LSA corridor assessed in the
ESIA and 5.6% of the ROW (36m). This represents a significant decrease in terrestrial critical habitat
affected by the Project from that identified in the initial ESIA studies following the BAP re-assessment.
However, this reassessment of critical habitat area is based on the presence or absence of critical
habitat triggering species or values within the project’s direct impact area and removes critical habitat
areas where the triggering species or values were found to be undisturbed by direct impacts of the
ROW.
The IESC finds that the TANAP critical habitat assessment is not in full compliance with the IFC PS6
GN and is therefore in partial compliance with the requirements of PR6 to ensure net biodiversity gain
of critical habitat and no net loss of priority biodiversity features.
The BAP states that the impact assessment undertaken in the ESIA confirms a low degree of impact
expected on natural and critical habitat; states that significant permanent and long-term impacts are
not expected, and the defined mitigation measures are sufficient for the recovery of habitats. The
BAP also refers to the ESIA in confirming no long term or permanent significant impact to Species of
Conservation Concern. However, the BAP does recognise the threat of permanent impacts on SCCs
from alien invasive species, including the pathways for introduction of weed species, within the
pipeline ROW and reiterates the importance of the Alien Invasive Species Guidance Document.
Furthermore, the TANAP’s “Erosion, Reinstatement, and Landscaping Plan” and the “Specification for
Reinstatement” includes the range of actions for reinstatement and bio restoration of the project sites
to achieve pre-development biodiversity criteria. The performance of the bio restoration efforts in
achieving the stated biodiversity objectives is proposed to be monitored and reported through the
“Bio-Restoration Monitoring Plan (October, 2016).
The IESC review of the ESIA and BAP has found the impact assessment does recognises the potential
direct impacts to species of conservation concern including those that trigger critical habitat. For
example, high impacts are identified for two areas within the Ardahan and Kutahaya provinces for a
total of 4.8 hectares where SCC species are potentially present within the Project AoI. The mitigation
recommended in the ESIA for identified high impact includes measures to translocate individuals,
which is stated to be a “high risk option”. The mitigation measures also include seed collection from
SCC species for use in conservation projects and additional conservation measured where critically
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 76
endangered species are impacted. The conservation measures include measures to re-introduce
populations in suitable habitats within the species range and includes the option to translocate to
suitable sites outside the RoW.
Section 3.2.1 of the most recent version of the BAP does include discussion on the application of the
mitigation hierarchy for critical habitats. The BAP describes how mitigation measures are applied for
each critical habitat that occurs along the Project and identifies where additional conservation actions
are required to ensure no net loss of priority species. Annex 9 of the BAP includes a range of
measures designed to ensure a net gain in critical habitat that is impacted by the Project. The net
gain measures include:
• Species specific action plans;
• Support for scientific research;
• Reducing grazing pressure on habitats; and
• A range of public awareness raising activities.
However, these net gain actions are not described in a way that demonstrate how a net gain would
be achieved. There is no quantification of the no net loss/ net gain objectives of the BAP to
demonstrate full compliance with PR6.
Neither the ESIA nor the BAP provide sufficient detail of the project related direct, indirect and
residual impacts on populations; species and ecosystems identified in the baseline studies. There is
insufficient assessment of the project impacts on critical habitat other than the direct impacts within
the ROW. The impact assessment on biodiversity values provides insufficient discussion on why
aspects such as habitat fragmentation, fauna avoidance and impacts from increased third party
access are not considered.
The BAP discussion of impacts to habitat includes reference to two other pipeline routes that passed
through some sections of the areas studied. One of these pipeline route corridors had restoration
work completed some years past and the BAP concluded that “there is no damage” evident after the
restoration has been completed. The other had no restoration work completed and damage to
biodiversity remains evident after long years being passed. This does demonstrate that good practice
remediation measures are an important mitigation necessary for biodiversity management. However,
there is no specific study cited or detailed evidence that supports the assertion that restoration work
on the TANAP ROW will result in net biodiversity gains in critical habitat and no net loss of priority
biodiversity features.
The project has not demonstrated full compliance with PS6 GN15 in its assessment of impacts to
critical habitat and has provided insufficient evidence that bio restoration works on the ROW will be
adequate to achieve the biodiversity outcomes required to demonstrate compliance with PR6.
The IESC has found that TANAP has relied heavily on the assumptions that mitigation of temporary
disturbance through bio-restoration and alien species control will be effective in ensuring no residual
impacts to priority biodiversity values and critical habitat. There is little discussion in the ESIA that
supports the assumption that bio-remediation will ensure no permanent or long-term impacts to
priority biodiversity values and critical habitat. The limitations of bio-reclamation are stated in various
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 77
sections of the ESIA that refer to challenges in achieving propagation or translocate of some species,
and the inability to replace tree species over the ROW to ensure the integrity of the pipeline is
maintained (see Terrestrial Flora Baseline Report Section 2).
The effectiveness of the mitigation measures, including bio-restoration and alien species controls,
should be discussed in further detail and, where possible, refer to examples where these mitigation
measure have been effective in ensuring no loss of priority biodiversity values or critical habitat.
However, if relevant and geographic specific examples of successful bio-restoration are not available,
then the assumption that there will be no residual impact to priority features and critical habitat
cannot be supported.
In consideration of the limitations found with the TANAP critical habitat assessment and management
approach, and recognising the current status of Project construction. The IESC recommends that
TANAP develop and implement an Offset Management Strategy document that supplements the BAP.
The Offset Management Strategy should include:
• Quantification of the residual impacts to Priority Biodiversity Features and Critical Habitats, as
defined in the BAP;
• Identification of specific biodiversity measures in accordance with the mitigation hierarchy, to
achieve No Net Loss/ Net Gain outcomes of the species and habitats of conservation
importance;
• Quantifies No Net Loss/ Net Gains based on the successful implementation of the above
actions over a reasonable timeframe
Ecosystem Services
The ESIA assessed ecosystem services were assessed for TANAP in consideration of information
derived from both social and biological studies. Impacts and risks relating to ecosystem services were
measured through a range of component studies including:
• Employment and livelihoods;
• Land use and agriculture;
• Flora (terrestrial and freshwater);
• Fauna (terrestrial and freshwater)
The ESIA identified potential TANAP effects on ecosystem services and has considered these within
both environmental and social impact assessment and mitigation measures.
5.6.2 Conservation of Biodiversity
Application of the mitigation hierarchy
The TANAP route selection described in the ESIA Chapter 5 describes the process for defining the
TANAP route and included consideration of a range of factors included the presence of protected
areas, sensitive habitats, Scrublands, Meadows-pastures and wetlands. A number of route
alternatives were identified to avoid key biodiversity conservation areas including the Posof Ardahan
Wildlife Development Area, Kakgol-Sahara National Park, Sarikamis Allahaukber Mountains National
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 78
Park, and the Akdagmadeni Forest (Important natural area). The range of constraints presented by
the TANAP project over the complete route presents challenges to avoidance of all priority
biodiversity features. However, ESIA Figures 5.10 and 5.11 demonstrate that route selection has been
successful in minimising impacts to protected areas and priority features.
The final TANAP route impacts are assessed in Annex 2 of the BAP (Rev P3-6) which shows 18
protected areas being intersected by the TANAP RoW. The ESIA baseline studies included detailed
assessment of the protected areas (Chapter 7.3.1.7 and Appendices) and a detailed assessment of
TANAP impacts to each protected area is provided in Chapter 8.2.2. The BAP assessment found all
intersections to be of a low impact level. The disturbance of protected areas from the TANAP RoW is
generally under 1% of the protected land area except for Bataklikduzi, Corakik Lake and Tuzlu lake
wetlands where the RoW disturbance area represents 1.26 %, 2% and 2.96 % of the protected area
respectively. Specific plans have been developed for each impacted protected area in consultation
with the relevant authorities that demonstrate compliance with Article 6 of the EU Habitats Directive.
Implementation of the BAP
The IESC site visit reviewed the implementation of the specific management measures outlined in the
Erosion, Reinstatement and Landscaping Management Plan (MP) for management of topsoil in
identified critical habitat and found that these measures are not realistically achievable in the field.
This MP states that topsoil shall be replaced onto the disturbed area as soon as the pipeline has been
placed into the ground and the surface reinstated. During the site visit it was found that this
commitment is not achievable in the field due to the need to conduct ongoing hydro-testing and
pressure testing activities that may require that the land surface be disturbed again after
reinstatement. Considering this, topsoil stockpiles in these areas may remain in place for up to 18 –
24 months before they are used in rehabilitation. As such, additional measures to ensure the topsoil
and seedbank remains viable should be considered. The delay in restoration is also likely to result in
biodiversity impact durations being extended and would require a re-evaluation of the biodiversity
impact assessment.
The observation of the critical habitat area (Erzurum Wetland) of ROW from the site visit confirms the
IESC’s concerns regarding the reliance on successful bio-restoration to ensure no long term or
permanent impacts to critical habitat. If topsoil management measures prescribed in the site-specific
restoration plans are not being followed, then it would suggest that alternative mitigation measures
or offset measures may be required.
The site visit to the pipeline construction sites noted the lack of implementation of specific measures
to minimise impacts top biodiversity including:
• Disturbance outside of the ROW corridor from vehicle and equipment movements;
• Presence of open trenches for extended periods without measures to prevent animal being
trapped in the excavation or means for trapped animals to egress;
• Lack of covers on open pipelines to prevent animals being accidently trapped during the
construction phase.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 79
The TANAP BAP implementation will require substantial level of effort and capability for both
implementation of the Erosion, Reinstatement and Landscape Management Plan by the relevant
construction contract teams and the monitoring efforts required for the Bio-Restoration Monitoring
Plan (October, 2016). The IESC has reviewed these plans and has some concern regarding the
resources available to fully implement both plans. For example, it is unclear how TANAP will ensure
the financial resources are available and planned for to ensure that failures in bio restoration
identified from monitoring are addressed up to 10 years following the completion of construction.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 80
Table 5-6 PR 6 Findings Summary
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
6 Biodiversity and Living Natural Resources
6.7 Assessment of Biodiversity and Living
Natural Resources, Baseline Studies Assessment process will characterise the baseline conditions to a degree that is proportional and specific to the anticipated risk and significance of impacts. The baseline assessment will consider:
• loss of habitat, • degradation and fragmentation, • invasive alien species, • overexploitation,
• migratory corridors, • hydrological changes, • nutrient loading • pollution, • impacts relevant to climate
change and adaptation.
PC The BAP reassessment of critical habitat area is based on the
presence or absence of critical habitat triggering species or values within the project’s direct impact area and removes critical habitat areas where the triggering species or values were found to be undisturbed by direct impacts of the ROW. This method is inconsistent with PS6 GN64. The IESC finds that the TANAP critical habitat assessment is not in full compliance with the IFC PS6 GN and is therefore unable to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of PR6 to ensure net biodiversity gain of critical habitat and no net loss of priority biodiversity features.
The IESC recommends that TANAP quantify
the critical habitat/ priority biodiversity Features to be impacted directly/indirectly by the Project. The results of the quantification of critical habitat/ Priority Biodiversity Features should inform a Biodiversity Offset Strategy.
6.8 Identification of project related opportunities, risks and impacts on biodiversity. Characterise impacts based on likelihood, significance and severity and reflect concerns of communities and other
stakeholders. Consideration of direct, indirect and cumulative impacts
PC Impact assessment methodology is applied in accordance with accepted standards and is effective in identification of mitigation requirements. The ESIA baseline data was used to define the sensitivity of the various VEC’s to identify likely impacts associated with the
project and to define the pre- project condition that will be used as a benchmark to detect changes during monitoring. VECs were assigned sensitivity levels based on a range of factors including current quality of the component and susceptibility to environmental changes. Those impact factors most relevant to biodiversity impacts were identified as:
• Reduction in topsoil quality/availability • Site restoration
As per 6.7 above
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 81
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
• Sediment suspension • Removal of natural vegetation • Introduction of alien species
The impact assessment methodology for biodiversity assigned impact factor intensity based on assumed standard mitigations
being applied in accordance with good industry practice, so impact factors are measured only after mitigation. Neither the ESIA nor the BAP provide sufficient detail of the project related direct, indirect and residual impacts on populations; species and ecosystems identified in the baseline studies. There is insufficient assessment of the project impacts on critical habitat other than the direct impacts within the ROW . The impact assessment on biodiversity values provides insufficient discussion on why aspects such as habitat fragmentation, fauna avoidance and impacts from increased third party access are not considered.
6.9 Assessment to consider the use of ecosystems by potentially affected communities and/or indigenous peoples. Avoid impacts to those ecosystems used. Where avoidance in not possible – minimise or implement appropriate mitigation measures to maintain overall functionality.
FC The ESIA assessed ecosystem services were assessed for TANAP in consideration of information derived from both social and biological studies. Impacts and risks relating to ecosystem services were measured through a range of component studies including:
• Employment and livelihoods; • Land use and agriculture; • Flora (terrestrial and freshwater); • Fauna (terrestrial and freshwater)
The ESIA identified potential TANAP effects on ecosystem services and has considered these within both environmental and social impact assessment and mitigation measures.
No action required
6.10 For projects that could potentially have such impacts on Indigenous Peoples and local communities, the client will provide opportunities for fair and equitable sharing of the benefits derived from the utilisation of living natural resources in accordance with:
N/A Utilisation of living natural resources is not an aspect of this Project
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 82
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
(i) the requirements for addressing economic displacement issues in PR 5;
(ii) the specific requirements relating to managing potential issues and
impacts on Indigenous Peoples in PR 7; and
(iii) the stakeholder engagement requirements provided in PR 10.
6.11
Conservation of Biodiversity Project related impacts to biodiversity will be managed in accordance with the mitigation hierarchy and GIP. Adopt precautionary approach and apply adaptive management practices
PC A detailed Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) has been developed by TANAP contractor Cinar for implementation on the Project. The most recent revision to this document occurred in October 2016 and included the addition of a Biorestoration Monitoring Plan as an Annex to the document. The BAP has not adequately identified and addressed critical habitat that is likely to be disturbed by the Project. The BAP does not discuss how the species data has been screened against the quantitative thresholds as described in the GN6 paragraph 69. It appears that TANAP has applied a scale of analysis to assess criticality of species and habitats of conservation significance using project disturbance boundaries, the ROW, and has not applied discrete management units in accordance with the requirement of GN6 paragraph 64 and 65. It is therefore very likely that critical habitat exists within the ROW that has not been identified as such due to the absence of critical habitat triggering species.
Specific management measures outlined in the Erosion, Reinstatement and Landscaping Management Plan (MP) for management of topsoil in identified critical habitat are not realistically achievable in the field, as evidenced during the field visit. The impact assessment on biodiversity values provides insufficient discussion on why aspects such as habitat fragmentation, fauna avoidance and impacts from increased
It is recommended that TANAP identifies the specific biodiversity management actions in accordance with the mitigation hierarchy, to achieve No Net Loss/ Net Gain outcomes of the species and habitats of conservation significance. The biodiversity management actions should inform a Biodiversity Offset Strategy.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 83
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
third party access are not considered. Residual impacts to biodiversity will occur of bio restoration works are not 100% effective. This has not been effectively considered.
6.12 6.13
Maintain the viability of priority biodiversity features: Threatened habitats; vulnerable species; significant biodiversity features; and, ecological structure and functions needed to maintain the viability of priority biodiversity features. Where significant, adverse and irreversible impacts to priority biodiversity features are identified, activities should not be implemented unless: there are no feasible alternatives; overall benefits outweigh project impacts; stakeholders are consulted; permits are granted under applicable laws; appropriate mitigation measures are put in place.
PC TANAP has stated that no significant long term or permanent impacts to priority biodiversity features due to effective mitigation using bio-restoration and alien species control. The IESC has found that TANAP has relied heavily on the assumptions that mitigation of temporary disturbance through bio-restoration and alien species control will be effective in ensuring no residual impacts to priority biodiversity values and critical habitat. The limitation of bio-restoration is stated in various sections of the ESIA that refer to challenges in achieving propagation or translocate of some species, and the inability to replace tree species over the ROW to ensure the integrity of the pipeline is maintained (see Terrestrial Flora Baseline Report Section 2). The latest version of the BAP (Rev P3-10) provides prescriptive detail of the post construction bio-restoration monitoring requirements to ensure that residual impacts are avoided or additional measures are implemented to offset these impacts . The BAP has been subject to a number of revisions, the latest being the version Rev-P3-10 issued in May 2017. The BAP studies were required to address data gaps identified in the ESIA studies, as described below, accommodate route changes that had occurred and to revise the critical habitat assessment completed for the ESIA. The BAP ecological surveys were
targeted towards the presence of ecological sensitive species and habitats along the RoW, between 36m and 70 m in width. The effectiveness of the mitigation measures, including bio-restoration and alien species controls, should be discussed in further detail and, where possible, refer to examples where these mitigation measure have been effective in ensuring no
See 6.7 and 6.11 actions
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 84
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
loss of priority biodiversity values or critical habitat. However, if relevant and geographic specific examples of successful bio-restoration are not available, then the assumption that there will be no residual impact to priority features and critical habitat cannot be supported.
6.14, 6.15 6.16 6.17 6.18
Impacts to critical habitat to be identified, including (i) highly threated or unique ecosystems; (ii) habitats of significant importance to engaged or critically endangered species; (iii) habitats of significant importance to endemic or geographically restricted species; (iv) areas associated with key evolutionary processes; or (v) ecological functions that are vital to maintaining the viability of these biodiversity features. Where impacts to critical habitat have been identified the client will retain experienced external experts to conduct the assessment of the potential adverse impacts on this critical habitat. Critical habitat must not be impacted to the extent that ecological integrity is compromised. Activities in areas of critical habitat are not to be implemented unless:
No viable alternative; stakeholders consulted; project is permitted under applicable law; no measurable adverse impact on those biodiversity features that trigger critical habitat; project is designed to deliver net gains for impacted critical habitat; no anticipated net reduction in
PC See 6.12 and 6.13 above
Develop and implement a Biodiversity Offset Strategy document that: Quantifies residual impacts to Priority
Biodiversity Features and Critical Habitats, as defined in the BAP [Rev P3 – 10]
Identifies specific biodiversity management actions, in accordance with the mitigation hierarchy, to achieve No Net Loss / Net Gain outcomes of these species and habitats of conservation importance
Quantifies No Net Loss / Net Gains based on the successful implementation of the above actions over a reasonable timeframe
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 85
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
population of any endangered or critically endangered species; long term biodiversity monitoring and evaluation programme to assess status of critical habitat is implemented.
Where critical habitat requirements can be met - mitigations strategy will be defined in a BMP or BAP Where offsets are proposed for priority biodiversity features of critical habitat, the Client must demonstrate through an assessment that the significant residual impacts on biodiversity will be adequately mitigated and retain external expertise with knowledge of offset design and
implementation.
6.19 6.20
Impacts to protected areas to be identified and mitigation hierarchy applied Where impacts to priority biodiversity features and /or critical habitat occur within protected areas, then these impacts will be avoided and the client will: Show that the development is legally permitted; act in a manner consistent with recognised management plans; consult
protected area managers; implement additional programmes to promote and enhance the conservation objectives of the project area.
FC The TANAP route selection described in the ESIA Chapter 5 describes the process for defining the TANAP route and included consideration of a range of factors included the presence of protected areas, sensitive habitats, Scrublands, Meadows-pastures, and wetlands. A number of route alternatives were identified to avoid key biodiversity conservation areas including the Posof Ardahan Wildlife Development Area, Kakgol-Sahara National Park, Sarikamis Allahaukber Mountains National Park, and the Akdagmadeni Forest (Important natural area). The range of constraints presented by the TANAP project over the
complete route presents challenges to avoidance of all priority biodiversity features. However, ESIA Figures 5.10 and 5.11 demonstrate that route selection has been successful in minimising impacts to protected areas and priority features.
6.21 Invasive Alien Species: avoid and proactively prevent accidental or deliberate introduction of alien species that could
FC The Alien Invasive Species Guidance Document provides a comprehensive process for mitigation of potential invasive species and this mitigation is critical in ensuring successful
No Action Required
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 86
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
have significant adverse impacts in biodiversity
mitigation of identified biodiversity impacts including the successful implementation of the Bio-restoration plan.
6.22 - 6.37
Sustainable Management of Living Natural Resources – applicable for projects which involve the primary production of living
natural resources or where such resources are central to the project’s core function
N/A Not applicable to TANAP
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 87
5.7 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 7: INDIGENOUS PEOPLE
This Performance Requirement is not applicable to the TANAP Project.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 88
5.8 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 8: CULTURAL HERITAGE
As defined by EBRD in PR 8, cultural heritage includes both tangible (physical) and intangible heritage
recognized at local, regional, national or international levels. The TANAP ESIA assessed cultural and
archaeological sites and intangible heritage along the pipeline route, including incorporation of
cultural heritage criteria in the route selection process.
5.8.1 Assessment and Management of Impacts on Cultural Heritage
The ESIA includes assessment of cultural and archaeological sites, and intangible cultural heritage.
Mitigation actions for the 161 sites identified included: Route change/Area change; Archaeological
Monitoring; Salvage excavation and test pits; or, No action.
Avoidance of cultural heritage (CH) sites has been achieved to date as far as practicable using the
corridor assessment process that included cultural heritage selection criteria.
A CHMP has been developed (TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-006), which specifies actions required to identify
and mitigate potential impacts to intangible CH, through engagement and liaison by Contractors with
local authorities.
The CHMP further identifies identification of tangible heritage resources and definition of mitigation
measures at pre-construction phase, informed by baseline and survey results. At those sites identified
as unavoidable, engagement with statutory authorities was reported, as required in the CHMP. Of 161
sites identified during surveys, 55 were already registered with authorities, while 106 newly
discovered sites were revisited with the Ministry, and as a result, 20% of these sites were registered
as Protection Sites by the Ministry of Culture and Tourism.
Day to day management is the responsibility of the site-based Cultural Heritage Officer, formerly an
EPCM role now under TANAP (see also comments in PR1 on organisational implementation of ESMS).
Monitoring is required by the contractors’ archaeologist during ground disturbance, under a SOW that
complies with requirements of a Protocol between TANAP and the Ministry of Culture and Tourism. A
chance find process is in place (defined in Annex A of TNP-PCD-ENV-GEN-006, and replicated by each
of the CCs) to address avoidance of significant finds during construction and land preparation. Further
studies have been carried out on those sites that were unavoidable during routing studies, followed
by either permission to proceed by local authority, or, preferentially, to implement a route change.
Eleven sites were identified as unavoidable at pre-construction phase, of which five route changes
were implemented during construction. A contracted third party, operating under supervision of the
Ministry, carries out all test pits and salvage excavations.
Sites that were inspected by the audit team had completed cultural heritage site management.
Additional evidence (provided in meetings on 12 May 2017) requested by the IESC on chance finds
records, indicated that a total of 49 chance finds have occurred during construction, 46 of which have
been closed out, and actions for 3 remain open. Details of the corrective actions taken regarding
these chance finds have not been sighted by the IESC.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 89
5.8.2 Consultation
The CHMP identifies the Museum Directorate of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism as the
responsible agency for advice and direction on archaeological finds, under direction and decisions
from the Regional Board Directorate of Protection of Cultural Heritage.
TANAP and CCs stated and provided written evidence strong engagement with regulatory bodies on
cultural heritage, including assessment with museum specialists being undertaken at critical sites to
make a determination on any excavation, salvage or other mitigation requirements. The CC’s
archaeologist SOW includes consultation with the relevant state authorities on behalf of TANAP and
site-based CHOs provide additional support.
Stakeholder engagement with individuals or groups with specialist interests by the Project has been
limited; at the ESIA consultation phase, specialist NGOs were invited but did not participate (ESIA
Appendix 3.2d). Consultation with affected communities is carried out for intangible cultural heritage
and registered tangible cultural heritage elements. However, chance finds are managed differently
due to security reasons (due to the risk of illegal excavations).
TANAP is encouraged to continue to engage with CH specialist stakeholders for the duration of
construction in particular, in line with GIP. Museum specialists are the parties responsible for
informing stakeholders and making determinations on behalf of the Ministry of Culture, while TANAP
follows the expert advice in ensuring implementation requirements are followed by the CC.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 90
Table 5-7 PR 8 Findings Summary
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
8 Cultural Heritage
8.1 Assessment and Management of
Impacts on Cultural Heritage
FC A total of 161 sites were identified in this process, and mitigation actions
defined. Eleven sites were identified as unavoidable at preconstruction phase. A Cultural Heritage Management Plan (CHMP) is in place, owned by TANAP and requirements of which reflected in construction contractor MPs. This includes a Chance Find Procedure. The CCs’ Archaeologist, who liaises with the TANAP Cultural Heritage Officer and the Museum Directorate, undertakes monitoring of ground clearance work. Third party monitoring of implementation of the CHMP is also undertaken by CINAR. It is noted that the former EPCM Chance Find requirements are still in place, and are expected to be deleted from the TANAP ESMS by 31 January 2017 (see also Section 5.1 on PR1).
During the construction phase to date, five route changes have been implemented at the eleven unavoidable sites, following engagement and mitigation actions implemented under the direction of the with the relevant authorities (Museum Directorate of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism).
8.2 Consultation with affected communities and other stakeholders
FC Ongoing and close engagement has been undertaken with the Museum Directorate of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, as the responsible agency for advice and direction on archaeological finds and appears to have been effective in managing and mitigating potential impacts to tangible heritage in line with the mitigation hierarchy approach. However, consultation with affected communities and other stakeholders has been
largely limited. Invitations to specialist interest groups at the ESIA consultation phase has been recorded. IESC notes that consultation with affected communities is carried out for intangible cultural heritage and registered tangible cultural heritage elements. However, the chance finds are managed differently due to security reasons (the risk of illegal excavations).
8.3 Project use of Cultural Heritage FC Not applicable
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 91
5.9 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 10: INFORMATION DISCLOSURE AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
Policies and standards are in place for the Project regarding Stakeholder engagement,
communications and social impact management and requirements. The Project Stakeholder
engagement approach was firstly outlined in the ESIA (Chapter 6), outlining engagement function
and approach across project phases and the Project’s grievance mechanism. Stakeholder
engagement past activities, current program and monitoring activities were also detailed, in line with
GIP. The total number of consultation meetings during the construction phase (as at November
2016) were 1,234, including meetings with women, safety awareness for children, and with local
authorities, across all Lots and stations. Comments raised during project disclosure were reflected
and analysed and incorporated into Project SMPs including the Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP)
and Resettlement Action Plan (RAP).
5.9.1 Stakeholder Engagement Plan
Policies and standards are in place for the Project regarding Stakeholder engagement,
communications and social impact management and requirements.
The SEP (Aug 2013) was prepared to meet international standards and was finalised reflecting public
participation and disclosure requirements. The SEP is aligned with an online Stakeholder Information
System for tracking ongoing engagement and issues of stakeholder interest.
Engagement activities during ESIA development and disclosure in line with GIP (including village-level
meetings, gender-segregated meetings/focus groups) and included stakeholder analysis of engaged
organisations (e.g. ERM-REP-ENV-GEN-003 Rev.P2-0, 17 January 2014). Engagement was
appropriate to the nature and the scale of the Project, at the pre-construction phase covering:
• 7 province and 56 District PPMs with the participation of local governors, local NGOs, media
and community representatives;
• 513 Village Questionnaires and 2,253 Household Questionnaires;
• 307 Focus Group Meetings with youth, women and fishermen;
• 151 in-depth interviews with Local Authorities, Sub-governors & Mayors;
• 83 Disclosure village meetings held; and
• 572 villages invited the village disclosure meetings.
Ongoing stakeholder engagement is undertaken by CCs with support of TANAP social specialists. The
last Lots/areas for construction phase engagement are Lot 4 and AGIs. A new SEP was developed
(2016 TNP-PLN-SOC-GEN-001-Rev3-2, 30/01/2017)), which provides for updated roles and
responsibilities.
Social induction training is provided to all workers thereby supporting culturally appropriate
behaviours by all workers on the Project, in line with GIP.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 92
The Social and Environmental Investment Program (SEIP) has been developed and approved by the
Board of Directors. The SEIP is TANAP’s CSR Program and intends to support wider project-affected
areas; it is not a fund for mitigating specific project impacts.
5.9.2 Operational Grievance Mechanism
The grievance mechanism is operational and is aligned with the CCs. All grievances are logged in an
online grievance recording and tracking system. CCs have access to and management of the same
system for Lots within their areas of responsibility only; TANAP has control of the system overall.
A total of 790 complaints have been received from 1/1/14 to 17/11/16 with 85% closed over an
average of 15d response time (30d is the time limit in the procedure for closure of complaints). The
most common grievances since project commencement relate to Damage to property/land; Land
acquisition and compensation process; damage to irrigation infrastructure; damage to roads; and
outstanding subcontractor payments (as per: Complaints issues – Top 20, 17.Nov. 2016). One quarter
of complaints related to damage to land.
An Appeals Committee has been established to provide third party review of unresolved grievances
between TANAP and the Complainant. Documentation on this committee has been developed and is
to be provided to the IESC.
Legal redress is possible regardless of establishment of the Appeals Committee with complainants
able to take matters to court independently. This has not occurred in the Project to date; a third-
party valuation had been sought to resolve land valuation, and a policy of resolution by mutual
agreement is in place by the project.
5.9.3 Information Disclosure
The ESIA documents were disclosed on the TANAP website in English and Turkish on 22 June 2015;
this included the ESIA, a Guide to Land Acquisition and Compensation, a RAP and a Stakeholder
Engagement Plan based on international good practices and standards, including the 2012 IFC
Performance Standards.
The current SEP specifies periodic review of the document in line with PR 10 requirements for
ongoing provision of information to stakeholders appropriate to the nature of the Project and its
adverse impacts. Material changes to the project included the revised approach to land acquisition
and resettlement, as documented in the AGIs and Pipeline RAPs. PR 10 requires at least annual
reporting to stakeholders for Category A projects; commitment on this aspect is included in the SEP.
The modality of disclosure of Project documents was described by TANAP. For RAP documentation,
the disclosure process was addressed adequately through provision of written summary information
in the local language, available to public disclosure meetings, which subsequently informed the final
RAPs prior to their disclosure. Additional engagement planning and disclosure material is required of
TANAP on the next phase of RAP activity (i.e. in identifying and appropriately compensating new
PAPs) and in the development and disclosure of the BAP
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 93
Table 5-8 PR 10 Findings Summary
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
10 Information Disclosure and Stakeholder Engagement
10.1 Stakeholder Engagement Plan FC A SEP was published (18 August 2013) on the TANAP website in
Turkish and English, specifying objectives, legal context and project standards, previous engagement, stakeholder identification and the SE program. Roles and responsibilities, Grievance management processes and monitoring, evaluation and reporting were all included, in line with GIP and appropriate to the nature, scale and risks posed by the Project. The SEP specified engagement approaches with different stakeholder groups (e.g. community leaders, vulnerable groups). This SEP has been recently updated on 30/01/2017 (TNP-PLN-SOC-GEN-001-Rev3-2) and includes additional guidance on SE
implementation for the construction phase (Annex 1_Stakeholder Engagement Implementation Guidelines for Construction) to assist CCs in achieving consistent, responsive and effective engagement with the Project.
10.2 Operational Grievance Mechanism PC The Project’s grievance mechanism is in place to receive and respond to stakeholders’ concerns and grievances about the Project. The total grievances received across all Lots as at November 2016 were 746, of which 88% were closed, and 87 (12%) were open. The main grievances received since project commencement relate to damage to property and land, and the land acquisition process. A quarter of all complaints registered related to damage to land.
TANAP has committed to providing grievance feedback and data to communities during regular consultation meetings. An additional standing agenda item is to be added to consultation meetings, for follow up as appropriate; this will be reflected in the next SEP revision. The grievance process provides for legal redress, and an Appeals
Disclosure and actions to address common grievances:
(a) Conduct disclosure to communities of summary grievance data and measures taken by TANAP and CCs to address the common causes of grievances;
(b) include a specific section regarding
resettlement related grievances to be disclosed in summary form to relevant resettlement-affected stakeholders, with measures taken by TANAP to address the common causes of these grievances.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 94
PR Ref.
Performance Requirement Score Comments/ Issues Actions Required
Committee has additionally been established to provide third party review of grievances between TANAP and complainants, to provide an additional level of independent review of any unresolved complaints or grievances.
10.3 Information Disclosure PC ESIA documents were disclosed on the TANAP website, with key
documents in English and Turkish. Supplementary reports prepared included the RAP for Above-Ground Installations (AGIs) and the RAP for the Pipeline, prepared and disclosed due to material changes in the Project (i.e. approach to resettlement). The IESC recognizes that disclosure has been achieved online, and the modality of disclosure according to communities in a form and format readily understood by stakeholders. The RAP for AGIs was finalised with inputs from priority settlements; the revised Entitlements Matrix was disclosed in October 2016 and during this phase, informative leaflets were delivered to meeting attendees, as well as to Muhtars (for non-attendees). Details of these meetings were then incorporated into the RAP for AGIs. The final Plan was finalized and disclosed by TANAP. A RAP specific engagement plan (planned to be included as Annex 2 to existing SEP) is required as disclosure of the RAP Fund brochure is critical in ensuring that all PAPs are identified as compensated as is required.
Provide evidence to EBRD of the modality of
public disclosure of existing key project ESMPs, including the BAP and RAP documents.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 95
6. COMPLIANCE AGAINST TURKISH ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, SAFETY, AND SOCIAL LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS
A key objective of the TANAP ESIA is to ensure that applicable Turkish legal requirements and
expectations are addressed. Chapter 4 of the ESIA provides an overview of the agreements,
legislation, standards and guidelines, which are applicable to the TANAP Project including the
applicable national legislation, applicable requirements of international conventions ratified by the
national government, international petroleum industry standards and TANAP’s Health & Safety,
Environment and Social Policy. Chapter 3 of the ESIA describes the required EIA process within
Turkey which is also summarised below in Figure 6.1.
6.1 HOST GOVERNMENT AGREEMENTS
The following Host Government Agreements and Inter-Government Agreements have been signed by
TANAP in order to meet legal compliance with Turkish requirements and set the basis for the Projects
implementation.
“Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the Republic of Turkey and the
Government of the Republic of Azerbaijan Concerning the Development of a Standalone Pipeline for
the Transportation of The Natural Gas Originating and Transiting from the Republic of Azerbaijan
across the Territory of the Republic of Turkey”, was signed on 24 December 2011 in Ankara, which
was approved by Law no 6342 dated 29 June 2012 and was published in the Official Gazette on 12
July 2012. Following approval by Council of Ministers, the Agreement was published in the Official
Gazette on 11 October 2012 and entered into force. Within the framework of this Memorandum of
Understanding, Trans Anatolian Gas Pipeline Company B.V was established.”
“The Host Agreement Between the Government of the Republic of Turkey and the Government of the
Republic of Azerbaijan Concerning the Trans-Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline System", and its
attachment, "The Host Government Agreement (HGA) between the Government of the Republic of
Turkey and The Trans Anatolian Gas Pipeline Company B.V. Concerning Trans-Anatolian Natural Gas
Pipeline System", were signed on 26 June 2012 in Istanbul. These Agreements were approved by Law
no 6375 dated 02 January 2013, which was published in the Official Gazette on 17 January 2013.
Following approval by Council of Ministers, the Agreements were published in the Official Gazette on
19 March 2013 and entered into force.”
The Host Government Agreement requires Project Environmental and Social Standards complying
with National Laws and also taking due account of international standards and practices generally
prevailing in the Natural Gas pipeline industry, including relevant Performance Standards of the
International Finance Corporation.
6.2 EIA PROCESS IN TURKEY
The Turkish legal framework for environmental protection was developed in line with national and
international initiatives and standards, and some of them have been revised recently to be
harmonized with the EU Directives in the scope of pre-accession efforts of Turkey to the EU. The
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 96
main legal basis for TANAP under Turkish environmental legislation is the Environment Law no. 2872,
which was published in the Official Gazette no. 18132 dated 11.08.1983 and amended by Law no.
5491 dated 26.04.2006. The objective of the Environment Law is to protect the environment in
accordance with the sustainable development principles.
The basic principles of EIA process applied in Turkey are defined by the Regulation on Environmental
Impact Assessment. As per the Turkish Regulation on EIA, whether a project requires an EIA study or
not is determined in relation to the scope and capacity of the project. The TANAP Project was
determined to require an EIA under Turkish legislation and was implemented following this regulation
appropriately. Legal approval through the MoEU for the ESIA Report of the Project was received on
24 July 2014.
The IESC team observes that the Project appears to be operated in full compliance with Turkish
legislation based upon the site visit and a review of provided documentation.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 97
Figure 6.1 Turkish EIA Process
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 98
7. COMPLIANCE AGAINST OTHER APPLICABLE STANDARDS / LAWS / CONVENTIONS
Chapter 4 of the ESIA discusses the legal, political and institutional framework under which the
Project is being implemented. This Chapter identifies the following major Standards / Laws /
Directives as being applicable to the Project:
• Equator Principles and IFC Standards and Guidelines;
• IFC Performance Standards (2012);
• IFC EHS Guidelines;
• World Health Organisation (WHO) Standards;
• Various International Conventions (refer to Section 3);
• EU EIA Directive - 85/337/EEC Council Directive on the assessment of the effects of certain
public and private projects on the environment (EIA Directive). The EIA Directive of 1985
has been amended three times, in 1997, in 2003 and in 2009 and is now codified by Directive
2011/92/EU of 13 December 2011.
• 2009/147/EEC The Birds Directive; and
• 92/43/EEC Council Directive on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and
flora (the Habitats Directive).
7.1 EU DIRECTIVES
Chapter 4 of the ESIA lists a raft of EU legislation as having been considered and applied during
Project scoping and ESIA development.
7.2 INTERNATIONAL LAWS / CONVENTIONS
Turkey is signatory to a range of applicable international treaties and conventions, as discussed in
Chapter 4 of the ESIA. The requirements of these laws and treaties were observed to be considered
during the ESIA process.
7.3 IFC EHS GUIDELINES
A high-level compliance assessment against the IFC EHS General Guidelines is included as Appendix B
to this ESDD. The IESC notes no particular issues of concern in this assessment.
7.4 TANAP PROJECT HSES STANDARDS
TANAP Project Standards have been defined in Chapter 4 of the ESIA, considering the requirements
of Turkish legislation, IFC Guidelines and EU Directives, applying the most stringent criteria from each
source as the adopted Project Standard.
The Project Standards are captured within TANAPs and the CCs respective ESMS and ESMPs and
compliance against them regularly monitored and assessed. Evidence of this was reviewed and
agreed to be of a satisfactory nature by the IESC team.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 99
8. HIGH LEVEL COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT OF ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE
The TANAP Project associated facilities include the SCPx; the SD2 Project and the TAP Project. Separate ESIA
reports were completed for these projects including three ESIA documents for the TAP Project: TAP Albania, TAP
Greece and TAP Italy. These associated facilities have been subject to a high-level review by the IC against
EBRD PRs. As the scope of the IC’s review of TANAP’s associated facilities called for a high-level assessment,
this section should be read within the following context and is subject to several limitations, as follows:
• Findings are based on a sample of the publicly available ESIA documentation for the
associated facilities. Whilst the IC has made all efforts to establish compliance, it is
recommended that further detailed assessment, specifically on-site verification, be conducted.
• Due to the limited scope of the high-level review, the findings produced are necessarily
general. The IC has not provided a definitive opinion on compliance, rather findings are
written as observations with the intent that further detailed review be undertaken to establish
compliance.
• The TAP ESIAs (Greece, Albania, and Italy) were all conducted by ERM, utilising a common
methodology and approach. The findings of the high-level review for the TAP ESIAs are
therefore highly consistent with each other with respect to compliance and gaps.
• Sustainability is contracted to conduct bi-annual ESDD review and monitoring of the SD2
Project, and therefore is able to present a high-level review of this associated facility with a
far greater level of detail and confidence than the other facilities assessed. Findings for SD2
are taken directly from the most recent ESDD conducted in July 2016.
The scope of the review includes the assessment of each project’s ESIA report, namely:
• South Caucasus Pipeline Expansion Project, Azerbaijan ESIA, June 2013.
• ESIA for the Shah Deniz 2 Project, November 2013.
• ESIA for Greece, Trans Adriatic Pipeline, June 2013.
• ESIA for Italy, Trans Adriatic Pipeline, September 2013.
• ESIA for Albania, Trans-Adriatic Pipeline, January 2013.
Findings are derived from a review of the following chapters of each ESIA report:
• Table of Contents;
• Executive summary; and
• Methodology.
The review found all the associated infrastructure ESIA reports to be completed in general alignment with the
requirements of the EBRD. The findings of the high-level desktop review of the associated facilities is provided
below.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 100
Table 8-1 High Level Compliance Evaluation – Associated Infrastructure
Performance Requirement
SCPx SD2 TAP Albania TAP Greece
TAP Italy
PR 1. Assessment and Management of Environmental and Social Impacts and Issues
Environmental and Social Assessment,
Environmental and Social Management Systems, Environmental and Social Policy10, Environmental and Social Management Plan, Organisational Capacity and Commitment, Supply Chain Management, Project Monitoring and
Reporting11
An ESIA and ESMS have been prepared for the SCPx by a third party. ESIA
appears comprehensive, having been produced in line with the requirements of the SCP Host Government Agreement (aligned with International Standards). Several activities in the ESIA were deemed yet to be finalised, including: Waste Disposal; sourcing of aggregates and other construction materials; river crossing methodologies; temporary access roads to the ROW. Documentary evidence as to progress / resolution of these issues is required. There is a
comprehensive Guide to Land Acquisition and Compensation that is stated to form the basis for the Land Acquisition and Compensation Framework. The emphasis of the ESIA is on the construction and less so on the operational and decommissioning phase. An overarching Environmental and Social
The environmental and social impacts have been assessed through a systematic
process applied for all Project components as identified through the ESIA scoping and through engagement with key Government stakeholders in Azerbaijan. This is the latest assessment for the SD Project that was initially subject to ESIA for Stage 1 in 2002. Baseline environmental and social data are comprehensive, being developed from monitoring programmes refined over a
10-year period. The impact assessment methodology is sound and consistent with GIP. The IC notes that the Project has various management plans (MPs) in place for its existing SD operations, and that these plans include measurable targets and indicators and assign clear roles and responsibilities for time-bound implementation. The social impact
High level review indicates that all major components of an international
standard ESIA are present. ESIA was conducted by relevant local and international third parties, in consultation with local authorities and appropriate engagement with stakeholders. The ESMS framework is clearly presented in the ESIA, as is the framework for each ESMP (the proposed contents for each ESMP is summarised in Section 9).
HSE policy framework is summarised, including basic objectives and content. Physical policy is not provided in the ESIA. Process for identification of risks and impacts appears robust, and consistent with the principle of GIP. Environmental and social baseline appears sufficient in all areas. The
See TAP
Albania
See TAP
Albania
10 Where the project represents a substantial extension to the client activities, confirm that Policy and supporting management systems and plans are appropriate for the new activities. 11 At appraisal stage, there will be limited information. Compliance assessment should address specific plans for monitoring and reporting (against for example ESAP requirements) and also consider whether there is evidence of weak monitoring/reporting by client on other relevant projects - which may reduce confidence in future performance.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 101
Performance Requirement
SCPx SD2 TAP Albania TAP Greece
TAP Italy
Policy is provided, stipulating environmental and social objectives and principles that guide the Project. The Policy is broadly aligned with the key principles of the EBRD PRs.
Management programs have been developed for the construction of the Project (i.e. not for the operational phase of the Project). The management programs sufficiently describe mitigation and performance improvement measures and actions that address the identified environmental and social risks. It is stated that operational phase management plans will be based on those developed for the construction
phase and developed prior to operations commencing. Roles, responsibilities and authorities are stipulated for the implementation of the construction phase ESMS. Clear lines of responsibilities are defined, including management representatives. Roles and responsibilities are also defined for contractors. Chapter 13: Management and
Monitoring adequately describes monitoring and review of the effectiveness of the management program, including legal compliance and contractual obligations.
management planning for the Project relies on both SD2 construction/contractor management planning and BP’s Regional Community and External Affairs team who implement
on-going consultation with potentially affected communities in the vicinity of the Sangachal Terminal. .
risks and impacts identification process considers the emissions of greenhouse gases, relevant risks associated with a changing climate, and potential trans-boundary and
cumulative effects. Environmental and social risks and impacts are suitably identified within the Project area of influence. The ESMS framework is clearly presented in the ESIA, as is the framework for each ESMP (the proposed contents for each ESMP are summarised in Section 9). Review of completed ESMPs is required to assess adequacy.
Environmental and social organisational structure and management are defined in Section 9 ESMP. Roles and responsibilities are clearly outlined in Section 9 ESMP, including that of contractors with regard to environmental and social management. Environmental, social, and cultural
monitoring procedures are proposed in Section 9 ESMP, including for pre-construction, construction, and operational phase monitoring.
PR 2. Labour and Working Conditions
Human Resource ESIA addresses the requirements for No substantial deficiencies were identified ESIA sufficiently addresses the
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 102
Performance Requirement
SCPx SD2 TAP Albania TAP Greece
TAP Italy
Policies and Working Relationships, Child and Forced Labour, Non-Discrimination and
Equal Opportunity, Workers Organizations, Wages, benefits, and conditions of work and accommodation, Retrenchment12, Grievance Mechanism, Non-Employee Workers, Supply Chain, Security Personnel Requirements
working conditions and management of worker relationships in the ESMMS Section 16: Local Recruitment and Training Plan which details the measures in place for recruitment and training
management in line with PS2. Further verification through review and sighting of Labour, Health and Safety Management Plans, Programs, and HR Policies documentation is required. ESIA addresses the requirements for workers engaged by third parties in the ESMMS Section 16: Local Requirement and Training Plan which details the measures in place for contractor's including hiring, training, etc., in line with PS2. This review is unable to verify
whether monitoring is taking place, although it is stipulated in Section 16.
as a part of this review against labour and working conditions criteria. The SD2 construction project had maintained an excellent safety record for the period from commencement of construction to
the site visit in May 2016. The Project had amassed a total of 20.5 million man-hours, including both BP direct hire and contractors, and has achieved a very low accident frequency rate when compared to relevant industry benchmarks. At the time of the site visit there were a total of 18,976 contracted workers. The employment numbers had peaked for the construction phase and de-manning had occurred at Project sites in response to
completed work packages. The changes to Project labour requirements have been implemented through a de-manning strategy aimed at minimising the impacts of reduced employment as the Project moves towards completion. A Labour Management Committee has been put in place to discuss and resolve key HR/IR issues relevant to contracts and BP personnel working on the SD2 construction, including grievances, and
meeting records of which indicate no significant labour relations issues. The IESC notes that there is a potential for an
requirements for working conditions and management of worker relationships in Section 9 ESMP, including outlined the proposed content of the Workers MP. An
overview is provided in the Workers MP on the measures in place for recruitment and training management in line with PR2 (including legal framework, worker health and safety, contractor management, worker grievance mechanism, and monitoring). Further verification through review and sighting of the completed Workers MP, and associated
procedures, as well as HR Policies documentation is required to conduct a full review of adequacy. Child labour, worker rights and forced labour are assessed in Section 8 Assessment of Impacts and Mitigation Measures. In addition, these issues are considered in the Human Rights Impact Assessment. Section 9 ESMP indicates that provisions for protecting
the work force will be put in place (including reference to specific documents such as tender
12 Will not be applicable to many projects at appraisal stage. However, evidence, within the last 3 years of client approach to retrenchment which is not compatible with the Policy should be taken into consideration.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 103
Performance Requirement
SCPx SD2 TAP Albania TAP Greece
TAP Italy
increase in grievances during the de-manning process, particularly given the depressed Azeri economy and fewer future employment opportunities for particular skillsets. This will be followed
up during the next site visit.
documentation, supplier contracts, HR policy, etc.). Further validation of these documents is required to assess adequacy of measures.
A framework H&S MP is provided in Section 9 ESMP that outlines aspects to be included in the Plan, including HSE Policy, H&S Organisation, H&S Standards, Accidents and Incidents, H&S Auditing. Further validation of the full Plan is required to assess adequacy. In addition, the Local Content Plan also provides additional proposed management measures for a
responsible supply chain in compliance with GIP. The Local Content Plan also provides additional proposed management measures for a responsible supply chain in compliance with good international industry practice.
PR 3. Resource Efficiency and Pollution Prevention and Control
Resource Efficiency, Pollution Prevention and Control - Air emissions, Greenhouse Gases13, Pollution Prevention and Control - Waste waters,
High level review indicates that resources efficiency is sufficiently addressed in the ESIA. The ESMMP Section 11 Resources MP provides detailed information on the management of aggregates, water,
Oil spills and spill prevention: A key construction phase risk is the potential for spills to the environment resulting in soil and water contamination and discharge to the marine environment. Two spills over 1 barrel in volume were recorded in
High level review indicates that resource efficiency is sufficiently addressed in the ESIA. Section 8 Assessment of Impacts and Mitigation Measures is comprehensive, including detailed assessment of onshore and
13 Particular attention should be given to client demonstration of consideration of alternatives. Projects expected annually to produce more than 25,000 tonnes of Co2 equivalent should provide an emission inventory and plans for annual reporting.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 104
Performance Requirement
SCPx SD2 TAP Albania TAP Greece
TAP Italy
Water, Wastes, Hazardous Substances and Materials
energy efficiency and timber to sufficiently address the requirements of PS2. Chapter 10 Environmental and Social Impacts and Mitigations (Planned Activities) also provides detailed energy
consumption, water and other resources and inputs, their impacts and mitigation measures. Alternatives are considered in Chapter 4: Project Development and Evaluation of Alternatives, with options assessed against environmental and social sensitivity indicators.
2015, which were investigated and corrective and preventative actions identified and implemented. The operator has invested in improvement to oil spill response preparedness including
oil spill response planning with the Ministry of Emergency Situations and has engaged the services of oil spill responders for offshore and nearshore construction works. Waste Management: The ATA topsides fabrication yard expansion included installation of a sewage treatment plant with a capacity of treating 300m3 per day. Monitoring data indicates compliance with discharge water quality criteria. However,
the SD2 temporary onshore construction workforce sewage treatment plant at ST was not operational at the time of the site visit due to delays in obtaining permits. Alternative wastewater removal to licensed treatment facilities was in place for the work site and accommodation camp. The process to enable full operation of the temporary wastewater treatment facility by the construction contractor is well understood and in
progress, and will be monitored by the IE at the next site visit. Wastes at the offshore fabrication yards ATA and BDJF are segregated on site prior to transport to a centralised waste accumulation centre. At the centre, a BP
offshore aspects. Section 9 ESMP provides a detailed overview of the proposed content for each MP, including plans for waste, water, hazardous material management,
watercourse crossings, pollution prevention, landscape management, erosion and sediments control, and aggregates, among others, to sufficiently address the requirements of PR3. Alternatives are considered in Section 2 Project Justification.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 105
Performance Requirement
SCPx SD2 TAP Albania TAP Greece
TAP Italy
managed waste contractor transfers wastes to various waste treatment, recycling and disposal facilities. Approximately 500 tonnes of waste per month is generated at the ATA Yard,
including hazardous wastes. Noise and Vibration: Noise monitoring has been undertaken at the four communities near the ST, and shows regular noise levels above the daytime criteria of 65dB (LAeq). Elevated noise levels have been attributed to a range of contributing sources and have been reported back to the communities by the construction contractor. There have been no instances where the action triggers established in construction environmental
management plans has been reached. BP advised the IESC that construction noise from SD2 activities has generally not been audible at monitoring locations during the surveys and that no noise complaints have been received in Q1/2016.
PR 4. Health and Safety
Occupational Health and Safety, Community Health and Safety, Infrastructure, Building, and Equipment Design and Safety, Hazardous Materials Safety, Product and Services
General OHS programs and procedures are not included in the ESIA and therefore a full assessment is unable to be undertaken to determine compliance. Chapter 8 Socio-Economic Baseline does not appear to include any assessment of security context of the Project. The ESIA states that the existing SCPx Emergency Response Plan (ERP) will be updated to integrate the SCPX and
Occupational Health and Safety: In general, the LESC observed a strong Project health and safety culture. H&S management remains a priority at the site, particularly the ST with very few incidents reported especially considering the number of man-hours worked, compared to industry benchmarks. The project has achieved a commendable rolling 12-month Recordable Injury
Socio-Economic Baseline appears to adequately assess the social context of the Project, including health and safety. Section 8 Assessment of Impacts and Mitigations Measures evaluates risks and impacts to occupational health and safety and affected communities during all phases of the Project.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 106
Performance Requirement
SCPx SD2 TAP Albania TAP Greece
TAP Italy
Safety, Traffic and Road Safety, Natural Hazards, Exposure to Disease, Emergency
Preparedness and Response
refers to updates that will be included in the SCPX ERP. The ERP for the SCPX is insufficiently described in the ESIA to assess its adequacy. Chapter 12 Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment
(Unplanned Events) comprehensively describes and assesses unplanned events and risks to public safety and harm to the environment including mitigation measures.
Frequency Rate (RIF) of 0.04 and a total RIF of 0.05, since the commencement of construction. Key statistics show that there have been no fatalities on the Project to date; 3 high potential incidents,
7 injuries requiring a day away from work, 18 recordable injuries, 193 first aid incidents and 520 safety near misses recorded. The IC notes the effective health and safety management structures and framework established between the Project Operator and key contractors who have all had experience in working with BP in the Caspian region since the AGT Project construction. Community Health, Safety and Security The Operator has described the HSE
leadership, planning and management, legal and regulatory framework, as well as management of contractor health and safety, security, environmental and social responsibility, and self-verification in the Programme HSE Management Plan, demonstrating an established system is in place for addressing emergencies. As with other management plans, the specific documented plans have not been publicly disclosed, which is inconsistent with the
requirements of the Lender Group policies. However, records of community engagement reviewed by the IC included communications, via public meetings, provided to potentially impacted communities on the measures proposed in response to emergencies and specific
Section 9 ESMPs provides an outline of the proposed content for the Community Health MP (including Safety and Security).
Security Personnel are addressed as per the provisions of PR 4. Section 8 Impacts Assessment and Mitigation Measures is comprehensive and includes a detailed assessment (including an HRIA). The Community Health MP includes provisions for due diligence of security providers, and training in Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights, and performance monitoring of security providers.
Community Grievance Mechanism is provided. An Emergency Response Plan framework and proposed contents is outlined in Section 9 ESMP. Further review once the finalised plan is available is required to assess adequacy.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 107
Performance Requirement
SCPx SD2 TAP Albania TAP Greece
TAP Italy
mitigations taken to ensure community safety during construction and operations. Furthermore, the impact of population influx to local communities was scoped
out at the ESIA Phase due to past Project experience and proven labour management practices. However, with a reduced construction workforce labour demand and fewer forward employment opportunities available in the current Azeri market, the mechanism for tracking potential impacts of the de-mobilised workforce on communities remains unclear. To enable independent verification of the available project data the IC recommends
that the next site visit include engagement with key external stakeholders on their experience and preparedness for emergencies and potential for social impacts as a result of demobilised workforce.
PR 5. Land Acquisition, Involuntary Resettlement and Economic Displacement
Avoid or minimise displacement, Consultation, Compensation for
displaced persons, Grievance mechanism, RAP/LRP documentation, RAP/LRP implementation, Monitoring
Project design is detailed in Chapter 4 Project Development and Evaluation of Alternatives - including consideration of physical and economic displacement
associated with options. Compensation and benefits appear to be compliant with PR 5 principles. The Project has developed a comprehensive Guide to Land Acquisition and Compensation that forms the basis of the Land Acquisition and Compensation
The Project induced some temporary economic displacement of fishing households in the vicinity of the export gas pipeline and monoethylene glycol
(MEG) pipeline shore crossing during the construction period when a marine exclusion zone was in place. Impact assessment on enforcement of the marine exclusion zone recognised the potential impact to small-scale fishermen, resulting in a fishing livelihood baseline
Social baseline report includes a detailed section on Land Use and Ownership. It is stated that a detailed Resettlement Action Plan and
associated Livelihoods Restoration Framework and Plan will be established and a detailed summary of the contents and objectives are stipulated. In addition a Draft Entitlements Matrix is provided in the ESIA. Further assessment once the
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 108
Performance Requirement
SCPx SD2 TAP Albania TAP Greece
TAP Italy
Framework. Further documentary evidence of the framework is required to assess adequacy. Community engagement on land issues appears to be adequately detailed in the
Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan, including description of community feedback and Project responses. Grievance mechanism appears established and publicised. Resettlement and livelihood restoration baseline appears to adequately define potential impacts on land users at specific locations, to determine eligibility for compensation and assistance. The ESMMP provides procedures for the monitoring and evaluation of the
implementation of the Land MP and the Land Acquisition and Compensation Framework (pending its development). Additionally, the Guide to Land Acquisition and Compensation provides comprehensive guidance in line with PR 5 on land acquisition and resettlement. The responsibilities of the Company and the Government in resettlement are clearly delineated, including that the State will take responsibility for land
acquisition within the framework of the joint (i.e. State and Company) Land Acquisition Teams. The Guide to Land Acquisition and Compensation clearly outlines the process to be followed by all parties for all types of acquisition.
survey being undertaken to gather additional information on small-scale fishing activities within Sangachal Bay and the nearshore environment. The baseline determined that livelihood
restoration is required to compensate the fishermen’s temporary loss of access to natural resources of the Bay. The Project has developed and implemented a Fishing Livelihoods Management Plan (FLMP) which describes the mechanisms to be used to engage with Project-affected fishing households, the validation of information underpinning the impact assessment and to define priorities in relation to mitigation measures. Further, the Plan specifies measures to address
the needs of vulnerable fishing households (75% of, or 45 impacted fishing households). The Project reached agreement with the identified impacted fishing households, including support workers. The IC has reviewed the details of compensation measures which have been made to affected households and further adjusted agreements based on additional fishermen being deemed eligible and
increased payments made to accommodate for a longer period of marine exclusion. Evidence of effective engagement with affected fisherman has been reviewed including minutes of meetings, participant registers and two household surveys of eligible fishermen.
Resettlement Action Plan is available for review is required to ascertain compliance with the PS. The SEP outlines grievance mechanism that is consistent with PS
1.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 109
Performance Requirement
SCPx SD2 TAP Albania TAP Greece
TAP Italy
The grievance process outlined in the FLMP remains active with ongoing consideration of some issues. The IC will continue to monitor the implementation of the FLMP during the next site visit with
a focus on the resolution of residual grievances. It is recommended that the FLMP remain in place pending the outcome of the next planned independent FLMP monitoring report. Further, the IC notes that although the FLMP was disclosed by Lenders, on the ADB website, the SD2 Operator has not publicly disclosed the FLMP on the Operator’s website in local language and that such disclosure is necessary to fully comply with Lender policies and
requirements. This disclosure of key documentation is essential to verification that potentially affected fishermen have full access to the livelihood restoration mechanism outlined in the FLMP including the engagement and grievance process.
PR 6. Biodiversity and Living Natural Resources
Assessment of Biodiversity and Living Natural Resources,
Conservation of Biodiversity, Sustainable Management of Living Natural Resources
Chapter 7 Environmental Baseline appears to contain adequate detail. Chapter 10 Environmental and Social
Impacts and Mitigations (Planned Activities) also appears to address in sufficient detail the provisions of PS6.
ST environmental monitoring includes the water quality and water levels of wetlands (or wadi) located to the east of
the SD2 expansion area, in the proximity of the beach pull site. Pre-existing soil and water contamination was identified as well as possible sources of contamination from nearby pipelines and neighbouring land use. Free phase oil on water has been observed in wetlands near the neighbouring power station, and
Biodiversity risk and impacts appear well documented for both offshore and onshore, including modified,
natural and critical habitats. A Biodiversity Action Plan overview including all elements proposed for the Plan is provided (including a biodiversity offsets program). Ecosystem services are not explicitly discussed in the ESIA.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 110
Performance Requirement
SCPx SD2 TAP Albania TAP Greece
TAP Italy
the SD2 Project now maintains a monitoring programme to identify the cause of contamination at the wetlands area and monitor the ecological use of these wetlands by birds and other fauna,
the results of which are reported annually to the Ministry for Environment.
PR 7. Indigenous People
Not applicable to associated facility projects.
PR 8. Cultural Heritage
Assessment and Management of Impacts on Cultural Heritage, Consultation with affected communities
and other stakeholders, Project use of Cultural Heritage
Cultural heritage is comprehensively identified and documented in Chapter 7 Environmental Baseline Study. A thorough risk and impact assessment is conducted in Chapter 10 Environmental
and Social Impacts and Mitigations (Planned Events), indicating the application of mitigation measures that favour avoidance. A Cultural Heritage Chance Finds Process is provided in the ESMMP. Baseline indicates that surveys and consultation was conducted, and additional consultation is delineated in the ESMMP for the purposes of identification and decision-making.
The SD2 construction at ST includes provision of ongoing monitoring of potential impacts to Cultural Heritage and a watching brief for works being undertaken outside of past detailed
heritage surveys in line with the Project’s cultural heritage plan commitments. Local experts have been undertaking the monitoring in consultation with the Ministry for Culture and Tourism as cultural heritage observers, and initial surveys were completed and submitted for approval to the Ministry of Environment. A range of isolated artefacts have been identified during the watching brief of construction at ST but
no finds have been deemed to be of significant heritage value. Vibration monitoring at the Sand Cave heritage site has been undertaken by the SD2 Project to protect the site from potential damage from Project related activities in the vicinity of the shore crossing and pipeline beach pull site. The
Cultural heritage baseline appears comprehensive. The risks and impacts to Intangible cultural heritage are also assessed in a comprehensive manner. A CHMP overview and proposed
contents is defined (including a chance finds procedure).
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 111
Performance Requirement
SCPx SD2 TAP Albania TAP Greece
TAP Italy
action trigger was not reached during monitoring, but the Project did amend the piling technique to reduce vibration in response to the monitoring results, and no damage to the Sand Cave site was
observed throughout the works.
PR9. Financial Intermediaries
Not applicable.
PR10. Information Disclosure and Stakeholder Engagement
Stakeholder Engagement Plan, Operational Grievance Mechanism, Information Disclosure
A Community Liaison Plan is defined within the ESIA that includes community relations training, establishment and maintenance of good community relations, and a grievance procedure. In addition, there is a Public Consultation
and Disclosure Plan that presents and describes the stakeholder disclosure and consultation procedures as part of the ESIA process. In sum, the plans appear substantive. Concerning disclosure, the ESIA documentation was disseminated for public review and comment for a period of 60 days, including public meetings. The Community Liaison Plan and the Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan both adequately define procedures for external communications and the lodging and resolution of grievances. Periodic reporting is adequately documented in the ESIA (i.e. of the ESIA itself), including evidence of reporting notifications and materials. In addition, there is a commitment to periodic
The IC notes that the environmental and social management plans documented for the SD2 construction phase have not been publicly disclosed during the SD2 ESIA process and are not currently available to the general public which
indicates a deficiency in conformance to Lender Group requirements. It is recommended that the SD2 Operator publicly disclose documented environmental and social management plans where these plans contain the details and commitments to manage or mitigate potentially significant environmental and social impacts of the Project. In line with stakeholder engagement and grievance management requirements, responses to affected communities, summary feedback and adjustment to management plans as a result of consultations and grievances received are recommended to be communicated back to interested stakeholders and affected communities. Verification on
Extensive engagement (analysis, planning disclosure and consultation) is documented in the ESIA in the following sections - Section 7 Stakeholder Engagement, Annex 7 Stakeholder Engagement Data, and
Annex E ESIA Disclosure indicating that engagement was conducted in accordance with IFC principles. The documentation indicates that stakeholder analysis and engagement planning was conducted, that there was adequate disclosure of Project information, and that the principles of informed consultation and participation were adhered to. A grievance mechanism is documented Section 7 Stakeholder Engagement.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017 Page 112
Performance Requirement
SCPx SD2 TAP Albania TAP Greece
TAP Italy
reporting to affected communities as the Project develops in both the Community Liaison Plan and the Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan.
effectiveness of engagement and grievance management with key stakeholders such as community members and representatives, commercial fishers, and local government
representatives is sought by the IESC for the next site visit.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
APPENDIX A: DOCUMENT LIST
File Name Document Name Author / Company Rev / Date / Period
Documents 21122016\1.5 Appendix 1.3 of ESIA Maps\1.Topographical Map and Crossing Points - CIN_MAP_GEN_001_01 to 001_85 and CIN_MAP_GEN_002_1 to 002_6
001: Topographic map and crossing points002: Topographic Map
TANAP CINAR
2014
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence
Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ 08 Spread-3 Drill Exercise Plan
2017 year training activity schedule SICIM
YUKSEL
2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due diligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ 09 Spread-4 Drill Exercise Plan
2017 year training activity schedule SICIM YUKSEL
2017
Documents 21122016\6.5 Completed Quarterly Third Party Monitoring Reports by ЗINAR - CIN-PRQ-PRC-GEN-009_9th quarterly monitoring report
9th QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT (English Version)ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MONITORING STUDIES
CINAR TANAP
2/12/2016
2015-16 Action Status Report Action Status Report (ASR) – Environmental Monitoring
A. Selim KILIC / Tanap 1/1/2015 – 31/12/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 3-CC Sub EMPs - Aggregates Man. Plan - SYA-PLN-ENV-GEN-012_P3-0
AGGREGATE MANAGEMENT PLAN SICIM – YUKSEL – AKKORD JV
04/04/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 3-CC Sub EMPs - Aggregates Man. Plan - FRN-PLN-ENV-PL1-015-P4-0
AGGREGATES MANAGEMENT PLAN FERNAS iNŞAAT A.S. 16/06/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.1 \ CC- ESMS \ SPK-PLN-ENV-DAR-009- Aggregates Management Plan- P4-0
Aggregates Management Plan TANAP 13-03-17
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 3-CC Sub EMPs - Aggregates Man. Plan - PLK-PLN-ENV-PL4-008_P4-C - PLK-PLN-ENV-PL4-008_P4-C
AGGREGATES MANAGEMENT PLAN – 48’’ ONSHORE PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION LOT 4
PUNJ LLOYD-LİMAK-KALYON JV
22/06/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.1.6
Agriculture and Livestock TANAP
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 3 \ BAT_emission inventory and relevant evaluation data \ BCH-CAL-ENV-CSG-001-Rev-P2-2-AIR EMISSION INVENTORY
AIR EMISSION INVENTORY TANAP iLF BEACHTEL
04.03.2014
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR3(3.2) \ BCH-CAL-ENV-CSG-001-Rev-P2-2-AIR EMISSION INVENTORY
AIR EMISSION INVENTORY TANAP iLF Bechtel
04.03.2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\4_Air Quality (PM10&PM2.5) Baseline Report - Air Qual PM10&2_5 BL Report
AIR QUALITY (PM10&PM2.5)Baseline Report TANAP 24/7/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\5_Air Quality (SO2, NOX, O3) Baseline Report - CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-010-22 Rev-P2-F_EN
AIR QUALITY (SO2, NOX, O3) Baseline Report TANAP 2/6/2014
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Documents 21122016\1.1 Host Gov. & Int Agreement - E&S specific Provisions - HGA [ENG]
Amendment to “the host government agreement between the government of the republic of turkey and trans Anatolian gas pipeline company b.v. concerning the trans Anatolian natural gas pipeline system”
26/5/2014
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.2.8
Amphibians TANAP
Documents 21122016\8.2 List & Analysis of Stakeholders & Records of
Consultation - 8.2 Analysis of Stake Holder Consultation
Analysis of stakeholders and records of
consultation with relevant regulation authorities and stakeholders
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 3 \Waste Facility Inspection Report \ Annex 1_Inspection checklist
ANNEX 1 CHECKLIST-WASTE MANAGEMENT 17.03.2017
New Data May 4 2017 \ Annex 1_Stakeholder Engagement Implementation Guideline For Construction... (1)
ANNEX 1 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINE FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE
TANAP 30/01/2017
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\1_Sea Water and Sediment Quality BL Report - Annex 1 The Analysis Reports for Seawater
Annex 1 The Analysis Reports for Seawater CINAR 2/7/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\2_Surface Water Quality Baseline Report - Annex 1 The Analysis Reports for
Seawater
Annex 1 The Analysis Reports for Seawater CINAR 2/7/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\1_Sea Water and Sediment Quality BL Report - Annex 1 The Analysis Reports for Sediment
Annex 1 The Analysis Reports for Sediment CINAR 18/6/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\2_Surface Water Quality Baseline Report - Annex 1The Analysis Reports for Sediment
Annex 1 The Analysis Reports for Sediment CINAR 18/6/2013
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 1 – Introduction - ANNEX 1.1 - Existing & Planned Pipeline Projects
ANNEX 1.1. EXISTING AND PLANNED PİPELİNE PROJECTS IN TURKEY
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 1 – Introduction - ANNEX 1.2 - Detailed Tables on Project Affected Settlements
ANNEX 1.2. DETAILED TABLES RELATED TO THE PROJECT AFFECTEDSETTLEMENTS
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\11_Marine Habitat and Ecosystems Baseline Report - Biocenosis Annex- 1 to 3
Annex 1: Distribution Map of biocenosis in the local study area
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\1_Sea Water and Sediment Quality BL Report - Annex 2 Field Forms for Seawater
Annex 2 Field Forms for Seawater TANAP 31/5/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\2_Surface Water Quality Baseline Report - Annex 2 Field Forms for Seawater
Annex 2 Field Forms for Seawater TANAP 31/5/2013
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\1_Sea Water and Sediment Quality BL Report - Annex 2 Field Forms for Sediment
Annex 2 Field Forms for Sediment TANAP 30/5/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\2_Surface Water Quality Baseline Report - Annex 2 Field Forms for Sediment
Annex 2 Field Forms for Sediment TANAP 30/5/2013
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 4 - Project Affected Population - ANNEX 4.1 - Survey Questions
ANNEX 4.1 – SURVEY QUESTIONSTANAP Pipeline Project Socio-Economic Survey of Affected Land Owners and Land Users
TANAP
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 6 – Impact - ANNEX 6.2 - Valuation Process According to Expropriation Law
ANNEX 4.1 – Valuation Process According to Expropriation Law
Union of Chambers of Turkish Architects and Engineers
2012
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 4 - Project Affected Population - ANNEX 4.3 - Village Headmen In-Depth Interview Summary Tables
ANNEX 4.3 - Village Headmen In-Depth Interview Summary Tables
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\1_Sea Water and Sediment Quality BL Report - Annex 4_Laboratory Competency Certificate
Annex 4_Laboratory Competency Certificate CINAR
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 5-Land acquisition - ANNEX 5.10 - Land Acquisition of Jointly Owned Land
ANNEX 5.10 - Land Acquisition for Jointly Owned Land
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 5-Land acquisition - ANNEX 5.11 - Land Acquisition for Deceased Owner
ANNEX 5.11 – Land Acquisition Process for Deceased Owner
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 5-Land acquisition - ANNEX 5.12 - Additional Information on Land Consolidation
ANNEX 5.12 – Additional Information on Land Consolidation in Turkey
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 5-Land acquisition - ANNEX 5.13 - Quality Control and Reporting
ANNEX 5.13 - Quality Control and Reporting
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 5-Land acquisition - ANNEX 5.14 - Land Exit Process
ANNEX 5.14 - Land Exit Process
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 5-Land acquisition - ANNEX 5.15 - Transfer of Land Rights
ANNEX 5.15 - Transfer of Land Rights from LRE (BOTAS) to TANAP
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 5-Land acquisition - ANNEX 5.2 - Key Steps in Land Acquisitionrev revP3-1
ANNEX 5.2 - Key Steps in Land Acquisition
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 5-Land acquisition - ANNEX 5.4 - Land
Acquisition of State Pasture and Forest Land revp3-1
ANNEX 5.4 - Acquisition Procedures of State
Authority Land, Pasture Land and Forest Land
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 5-Land acquisition - ANNEX 5.5 - Land Acquisition Under Customary Rights revp3-1
ANNEX 5.5 – Land Acquisition under Customary Rights
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 5-Land acquisition - ANNEX 5.6 - Land Delivery Process revp3-1
ANNEX 5.6 - Land Delivery (Possession of Site) Process
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 5-Land acquisition - ANNEX 5.7 - Land Entry Processrevp3-1
ANNEX 5.7 - Land Entry Process
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 5-Land acquisition - ANNEX 5.8 - Pipeline Route Deviation
ANNEX 5.8 – Pipeline Route Deviation
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 5-Land acquisition - ANNEX 5.9 - Court Process Based on Article 10 of Expropriation Law revp3-1
ANNEX 5.9 - Court Process Based on Article 10 of the Expropriation Law
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 6 – Impact - ANNEX 6.1 - Additional Tables and Figures
ANNEX 6.1. Additional Tables and Figures of Chapter 6
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ 06 SitePlus Security Due Diligence Report
Annex 7 Business Partner risk approval form SICIM YUKSEL AKKORD
13/06/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ 07 Yuksel Guvenlik Due Diligence Report
Annex 7 Business Partner risk approval form SICIM YUKSEL AKKORD
4/06/2015
Guide to Land Aquisition and Compensation ANNEX 7.1 – Guide to Land Acquisition and Compensation (GLAC)LAND ACQUISITION
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\3_Soil Contamination Baseline Study Report - Annex I_The Analysis Reports
Annex I The Analysis Reports for Soil CINAR 2/12/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\3_Soil Contamination Baseline Study Report - Annex II_Field Forms
Annex II_Field Forms for Soil TANAP 1/11/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\2_Surface Water Quality Baseline Report - Annex IV_Laboratory Competency Certificate
Annex IV Laboratory Competency Certificate
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\3_Soil Contamination Baseline Study Report - Annex IV_Laboratory Competency Certificate
Annex IV_Laboratory Competency Certificate
BRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \PR 5&10\ Appeals Committee \ APPEALS COMMITTEE_WEB ANNOUNCEMENTS
ANNOUNCEMENT
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Training and Drill Documents \ ANNUAL TRAINING PLAN AND TOPICS
ANNUAL TRAINING PLAN AND TOPICS
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 5-Land acquisition - ANNEX 5.16 - Application of Article 27revp31
App 5.16 Application of Article 27
BRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \PR 5&10\ Appeals Committee \ TNP-SOC-FRM-006 Appeals Committee_Application Form
APPEALS COMMITTEE APPLICATION FORM
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.6 - Appendix %96 2.6.1. Photographs of Project Area
Appendix – 2.6.1. Photographs of Project Area TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 4 - Appendix 4.5
APPENDIX - 4.5 IMPACT REGISTERS TANAP
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 4 - Appendix 4.6
APPENDIX - 4.6. LEGISLATION REGISTERS TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 4 - Appendix 4.7
APPENDIX - 4.7COMMITMENTS REGISTERS TANAP
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Stations \ Risk Rating Matrix
APPENDIX (4) RISK ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Documents 21122016\1.5 Appendix 1.3 of ESIA Maps - APPENDIX 1.3_index
APPENDIX 1.3 MAPS AND PLANS TANAP
Ref Mat\Documents 21122016\1.1 Host Gov. & Int Agreement - E&S specific Provisions - TANAP HGA English Final 25062012
Appendix 1: Host government between the government of the republic of turkey and trans Anatolian gas pipeline company (attached to and forms an integral part of the Intergovernmental agreement)
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA - APPENDIX 2.1 APPENDIX 2.1. TECHNICAL STUDIES, FIELD STUDIES, REPORTS, ANALYSES, MAPS AND PHOTOGRAPHS
TANAP
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA - APPENDIX 2.2 APPENDIX 2.2METEOROLOGICAL BULLETIN
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA - APPENDIX 2.3 APPENDIX 2.3. ANALYSES TANAP
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4 APPENDIX 2.4. REPORTS TANAP
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA - APPENDIX 2.5 APPENDIX 2.5. ECOLOGICAL FIELD SURVEYS OBSERVATION POINTS
TANAP
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.6 - APPENDIX 2.6_index
APPENDIX 2.6. PHOTOGRAPHY ARCHIVE AND LOADED DATA BANK CATALOGUE
TANAP
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA - APPENDIX 2.7 Appendix 2.7. “ModellingReport on Emission ofCompressor Station” of ESIA REPORT
ALTOSENE 16/04/2014
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR3(3.2) \ TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_APPENDIX 2.7
Appendix 2.7. “ModellingReport on Emission ofCompressor Station” of ESIA REPORT
TANAP CINAR
16.04.2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA - APPENDIX 2.8 Appendix 2.8 “Noise ModellingReport For CompressorStations ”of ESIA REPORT
OZMEALTOSENE 16/04/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA - APPENDIX 2_index APPENDIX 2_index TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) - APPENDIX 3_index
APPENDIX 3 TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 3 - APPENDIX 3.1
APPENDIX 3.1. INFORMATION AND REGISTERS RELATED TO PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 3 - APPENDIX 3.2_index
APPENDIX 3.2 STAKEHOLDER REGISTERS TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 3 - APP 3.2d-Invitee List and Forms
APPENDIX 3.2d Invitee List for NGO Meeting and FormsINVITEES AND PARTICIPANTS
TANAP 12/11/2013
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
FROMNATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL STAKEHOLDERS
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 3 - APP 3.2e-List of NGOs which received Info Packs
APPENDIX 3.2e List of NGOs which received Info Packs
TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 3 - APP 3.2f-Feedback forms
APPENDIX 3.2f Feedback Form TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 3 - APPENDIX 3.3
APPENDIX 3.3ANNOUNCEMENT RECORDS TANAP 12/02/2013
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 3 - APPENDIX 3.4
APPENDIX 3.4NOTIFICATION REGISTERS TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 3 - APPENDIX 3.5
APPENDIX 3.5COMPLAINT REGISTERS TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 4 - APPENDIX 4.1
APPENDIX 4.1. INFORMATION AND REGISTERS, AND AUTHORITY OPINIONS RELATED TO EIA PROCESS
TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 4 - APPENDIX 4.2
APPENDIX 4.2 SPECIAL FORMAT OF ESIA REPORT
TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 5 - Appendix 5.1
Appendix 5.1. Construction Impacts Management Plan
TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 5 - Appendix 5.10
APPENDIX 5.10. Pollution Prevention Plan TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 5 - Appendix 5.11
APPENDIX 5.11. Waste Management Plan TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 5 - Appendix 5.12
APPENDIX 5.12. Emergency Response Plan TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 5 - Appendix 5.2
APPENDIX 5.2. Community Safety Management Plan
TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 5 - Appendix 5.3
APPENDIX 5.3. Community Relations Plan TANAP
Documents 21122016\2.7 Local Hiring Plans - CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-010-45 Rev-P2-C_App. 5.4_EN
Appendix 5.4. “Employment and Training Plan” of ESIA REPORT
CINAR TANAP
2/6/2014
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 5 - Appendix 5.4
APPENDIX 5.4. Employment and Training Plan TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 5 - Appendix 5.5
APPENDIX 5.5. Procurement and Supply Management Plan
TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 5 - Appendix 5.6
APPENDIX 5.6. Aggregates Management Plan TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 5 - APPENDIX 5.7. Traffic Management Plan TANAP
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Appendix 5.7
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 5 - Appendix 5.8
APPENDIX 5.8. Cultural Heritage Management Plan
TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 5 - Appendix 5.9
APPENDIX 5.9. Erosion, Reinstatement and Landscaping Plan
TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 5 - APPENDIX 5_index
APPENDIX 5MANAGEMENT PLANS TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 3-CC Sub EMPs - Aggregates Man. Plan - PLK-PLN-ENV-PL4-008_P4-C - Appendex A
Appendix A - OFF ROW AGGREGATE CONSUMPTION REGISTER
Revised 12.10.2016 - Biodiverity action plan (BAP) - Annex-8_Biorestoration Monitoring Plan – Appendices - APPENDIX A LIST OF SLOPES AND RELATED BIORESTORATION ACTIVITIES
APPENDIX A LIST OF SLOPES AND RELATED BIORESTORATION ACTIVITIES
Documents 21122016\6.1 Description of Timing and Baseline Survey Methodologies\BAP\Annex-8\Appendices - APPENDIX A LIST OF SLOPES AND RELATED BIORESTORATION ACTIVITIES
APPENDIX A LIST OF SLOPES AND RELATED BIORESTORATION ACTIVITIES
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 6 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-9 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX A LIST OF SLOPES AND RELATED BIORESTORATION ACTIVITIES
APPENDIX A LIST OF SLOPES AND RELATED BIORESTORATION ACTIVITIES
New Data May 4 2017 \ 2 May 2017 Documentation \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX A LIST OF SLOPES AND RELATED BIORESTORATION ACTIVITIES
APPENDIX A LIST OF SLOPES AND RELATED BIORESTORATION ACTIVITIES
New Data May 4 2017 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex 8 \ APPENDIX A LIST OF SLOPES AND RELATED BIORESTORATION ACTIVITIES
APPENDIX A LIST OF SLOPES AND RELATED BIORESTORATION ACTIVITIES
Documents 21122016\1.9 Pipe Supply Contract and Prequalication Requirements - Extract from LЭne Pipe Supply Contract
Appendix A: Schedule of requirementsHealth, Safety, Social and Environmental Requirements for Suppliers and Vendors
Consulting Engineers TANAP
7/3/2014
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - PLK-PLN-ENV-PL4-003_P4-1 - APPENDIX A TRAINING REGISTER
APPENDIX ATRAINING REGISTER
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 -
CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - PLK-PLN-ENV-PL4-003_P4-1 - APPENDIX B FAUNA REGİSTER
APPENDIX B FAUNA REGİSTER
Revised 12.10.2016 - Biodiverity action plan (BAP) - Annex-8_Biorestoration Monitoring Plan – Appendices - APPENDIX B.1 TERRESTRIAL FLORA MONITORING TABLE
APPENDIX B.1 TERRESTRIAL FLORA MONITORING TABLE
Documents 21122016\6.1 Description of Timing and Baseline Survey Methodologies\BAP\Annex-8\Appendices - APPENDIX B.1 TERRESTRIAL
APPENDIX B.1 TERRESTRIAL FLORA MONITORING TABLE
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
FLORA MONITORING TABLE
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 6 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-9 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX B.1 TERRESTRIAL FLORA MONITORING TABLE
APPENDIX B.1 TERRESTRIAL FLORA MONITORING TABLE
New Data May 4 2017 \ 2 May 2017 Documentation \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX B.1 TERRESTRIAL FLORA MONITORING TABLE_clean/tc/pdf file
APPENDIX B.1 TERRESTRIAL FLORA MONITORING TABLE
New Data May 4 2017 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex 8 \ APPENDIX B.1 TERRESTRIAL FLORA MONITORING TABLE_tc/clean/pdf file
APPENDIX B.1 TERRESTRIAL FLORA MONITORING TABLE
Revised 12.10.2016 - Biodiverity action plan (BAP) - Annex-8_Biorestoration Monitoring Plan – Appendices - APPENDIX B.2 TERRESTRIAL FAUNA MONITORING TABLE_clean
APPENDIX B.2 TERRESTRIAL FAUNA MONITORING TABLE
Documents 21122016\6.1 Description of Timing and Baseline Survey Methodologies\BAP\Annex-8\Appendices - APPENDIX B.2 TERRESTRIAL FAUNA MONITORING TABLE_clean
APPENDIX B.2 TERRESTRIAL FAUNA MONITORING TABLE
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 6 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-9 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX B.2 TERRESTRIAL FAUNA MONITORING TABLE
APPENDIX B.2 TERRESTRIAL FAUNA MONITORING TABLE
New Data May 4 2017 \ 2 May 2017 Documentation \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX B.2 TERRESTRIAL FAUNA MONITORING TABLE_clean/tc/pdf file
APPENDIX B.2 TERRESTRIAL FAUNA MONITORING TABLE
New Data May 4 2017 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex 8 \ APPENDIX B.2 TERRESTRIAL FAUNA MONITORING TABLE_tc/ clean / pdf file
APPENDIX B.2 TERRESTRIAL FAUNA MONITORING TABLE
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 6 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-9 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX B.3 FRESHWATER FAUNA MONITORING TABLE
APPENDIX B.3 FRESHWATER FAUNA MONITORING TABLE
New Data May 4 2017 \ 2 May 2017 Documentation \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX B.3 FRESHWATER FAUNA MONITORING TABLE
APPENDIX B.3 FRESHWATER FAUNA MONITORING TABLE
New Data May 4 2017 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex 8 \ APPENDIX B.3 FRESHWATER FAUNA MONITORING TABLE
APPENDIX B.3 FRESHWATER FAUNA MONITORING TABLE
Revised 12.10.2016 - Biodiverity action plan (BAP) - Annex-8_Biorestoration Monitoring Plan – Appendices - APPENDIX B.3 FRESHWATER FAUNA MONITORING TABLE
APPENDIX B.3 TERRESTRIAL FAUNA MONITORING TABLE
Documents 21122016\6.1 Description of Timing and Baseline Survey Methodologies\BAP\Annex-8\Appendices - APPENDIX B.3 FRESHWATER
APPENDIX B.3 TERRESTRIAL FAUNA MONITORING TABLE
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
FAUNA MONITORING TABLE
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 3-CC Sub EMPs - Aggregates Man. Plan - PLK-PLN-ENV-PL4-008_P4-C - Appendex B
APPENDIX B-LIST OF QUARRIES ALONG THE LOT 4 PIPELINECORRIDOR (AS PROVIDED)
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - PLK-PLN-ENV-PL4-003_P4-1 - APPENDIX C SENSITIVE AREA REGİSTER
APPENDIX C SENSITIVE AREA REGİSTER
New Data May 4 2017 \ 2 May 2017 Documentation \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX C.1 SAMPLE SITE SELECTION METHODOLOGY
APPENDIX C.1 SAMPLE SITE SELECTION METHODOLOGY
New Data May 4 2017 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex 8 \ APPENDIX C.1 SAMPLE SITE SELECTION METHODOLOGY
APPENDIX C.1 SAMPLE SITE SELECTION METHODOLOGY
Documents 21122016\6.1 Description of Timing and Baseline Survey Methodologies\BAP\Annex-8\Appendices - APPENDIX C.1 SAMPLE SITE SELECTION METHODOLOGY
APPENDIX C.1 SAMPLE SITE SELECTION METHODOLOGY -ESTIMATION OF SAMPLE NUMBER AND SAMPLE LOCATION FOR SPECIES COMPOSITIONASSESSMENT
Revised 12.10.2016 - Biodiverity action plan (BAP) - Annex-8_Biorestoration Monitoring Plan – Appendices - APPENDIX C.1 SAMPLE SITE SELECTION METHODOLOGY
APPENDIX C.1 SAMPLE SITE SELECTION METHODOLOGYESTIMATION OF SAMPLE NUMBER AND SAMPLE LOCATION FOR SPECIES COMPOSITIONASSESSMENT
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 6 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-9 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX C.1 SAMPLE SITE SELECTION METHODOLOGY
APPENDIX C.1 SAMPLE SITE SELECTION METHODOLOGYESTIMATION OF SAMPLE NUMBER AND SAMPLE LOCATION FOR SPECIES COMPOSITIONASSESSMENT
New Data May 4 2017 \ 2 May 2017 Documentation \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX C.2 SITE RECORDS
APPENDIX C.2: SITE RECORDS
New Data May 4 2017 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex 8 \ APPENDIX C.2 SITE RECORDS
APPENDIX C.2: SITE RECORDS
Revised 12.10.2016 - Biodiverity action plan (BAP) - Annex-8_Biorestoration Monitoring Plan – Appendices - APPENDIX C.2 SITE RECORDS
APPENDIX C.2: SITE RECORDSSITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA
Documents 21122016\6.1 Description of Timing and Baseline Survey Methodologies\BAP\Annex-8\Appendices - APPENDIX C.2 SITE RECORDS
APPENDIX C.2: SITE RECORDSSITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 6 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-9 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX C.2 SITE RECORDS
APPENDIX C.2: SITE RECORDSSITE ASSESSMENT PROFORMA
Revised 12.10.2016 - Biodiverity action plan (BAP) - Annex- APPENDIX C.3 SITE ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
8_Biorestoration Monitoring Plan – Appendices - APPENDIX C.3 SITE ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
Documents 21122016\6.1 Description of Timing and Baseline Survey Methodologies\BAP\Annex-8\Appendices - APPENDIX C.3 SITE ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
APPENDIX C.3 SITE ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 6 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-9 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX C.3 SITE ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
APPENDIX C.3 SITE ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
New Data May 4 2017 \ 2 May 2017 Documentation \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX C.3 SITE ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
APPENDIX C.3 SITE ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
New Data May 4 2017 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex 8 \ APPENDIX C.3 SITE ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
APPENDIX C.3 SITE ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
Revised 12.10.2016 - Biodiverity action plan (BAP) - Annex-8_Biorestoration Monitoring Plan – Appendices - APPENDIX C.4 ESTIMATING PERCENT COVER
APPENDIX C.4 ESTIMATING PERCENT COVER
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 6 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-9 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX C.4 ESTIMATING PERCENT COVER
APPENDIX C.4 ESTIMATING PERCENT COVER
New Data May 4 2017 \ 2 May 2017 Documentation \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX C.4 ESTIMATING PERCENT COVER
APPENDIX C.4 ESTIMATING PERCENT COVER
New Data May 4 2017 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex 8 \ APPENDIX C.4 ESTIMATING PERCENT COVER
APPENDIX C.4 ESTIMATING PERCENT COVER
Documents 21122016\6.1 Description of Timing and Baseline Survey Methodologies\BAP\Annex-8\Appendices - APPENDIX C.4 ESTIMATING PERCENT COVER
APPENDIX C.4 ESTIMATING PERCENT COVER – VISUAL GUIDE TO ESTIMATING PERCENTAGE COVER
Revised 12.10.2016 - Biodiverity action plan (BAP) - Annex-8_Biorestoration Monitoring Plan – Appendices - APPENDIX C.5 CALCULATION OF NDVI VALUES
APPENDIX C.5 CALCULATION OF NDVI VALUES
Documents 21122016\6.1 Description of Timing and Baseline Survey
Methodologies\BAP\Annex-8\Appendices - APPENDIX C.5 CALCULATION OF NDVI VALUES
APPENDIX C.5 CALCULATION OF NDVI VALUES
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 6 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-9 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX C.5 CALCULATION OF NDVI VALUES
APPENDIX C.5 CALCULATION OF NDVI VALUES
New Data May 4 2017 \ 2 May 2017 Documentation \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX C.5
APPENDIX C.5 CALCULATION OF NDVI VALUES
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
CALCULATION OF NDVI VALUES
New Data May 4 2017 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex 8 \ APPENDIX C.5 CALCULATION OF NDVI VALUES
APPENDIX C.5 CALCULATION OF NDVI VALUES
Revised 12.10.2016 - Biodiverity action plan (BAP) - Annex-8_Biorestoration Monitoring Plan – Appendices - APPENDIX D TERRESTRIAL FAUNA SURVEY FORMS
APPENDIX D TERRESTRIAL FAUNA SURVEY FORMS
Documents 21122016\6.1 Description of Timing and Baseline Survey Methodologies\BAP\Annex-8\Appendices - APPENDIX D TERRESTRIAL FAUNA SURVEY FORMS
APPENDIX D TERRESTRIAL FAUNA SURVEY FORMS
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 6 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-9 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX D TERRESTRIAL FAUNA SURVEY FORMS
APPENDIX D TERRESTRIAL FAUNA SURVEY FORMS
New Data May 4 2017 \ 2 May 2017 Documentation \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex-8 \ Appendices \ APPENDIX D TERRESTRIAL FAUNA SURVEY FORMS
APPENDIX D TERRESTRIAL FAUNA SURVEY FORMS
New Data May 4 2017 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex 8 \ APPENDIX D TERRESTRIAL FAUNA SURVEY FORMS
APPENDIX D TERRESTRIAL FAUNA SURVEY FORMS
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - PLK-PLN-ENV-PL4-003_P4-1 - APPENDIX D WATERCOURSE CROSSİNG REGISTER
APPENDIX D WATERCOURSE CROSSİNG REGISTER
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - PLK-PLN-ENV-PL4-003_P4-1 - APPENDIX E REINSTATEMENT REGISTER
APPENDIX E REINSTATEMENT REGISTER
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - PLK-PLN-ENV-PL4-003_P4-1 - APPENDIX F TREE_SHRUB CUT & RELOCATED REG
APPENDIX F TREE/SHRUB CUT & RELOCATED REGISTER
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - PLK-PLN-ENV-PL4-003_P4-1 - APPENDIX G MAJOR RIVER CROSSINGS
APPENDIX G MAJOR RIVER CROSSINGS
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence
Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.6) \ Appendix M Environmental and Social
Appendix M: Environmental and Social
Management for 56” Onshore Pipeline Construction
22.04.2014
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 4 - APPENDIX 4_index
APPENDIX-4 TANAP
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ 03 TANAP-WRP-LET-SYA-0069
Approval of subcontracts WorleyParson 14/04/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Approval of subcontracts SICIMYUKSELAKKORD JV 24/03/2015
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ 02 TANAP-SYA-LET-WRP-0066
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.2.11
Aquatic Invertebrates TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.2.4
Aquatic Vegetation TANAP
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.6\Appendix-2.6.5. Archaeological Baseline Studies - 5. Archaeological Baseline Studies
Archaeological Baseline Studies 25/5/2014
Documents 21122016\1.5 Appendix 1.3 of ESIA Maps\9.Archaeological Areas Map - CIN_MAP_ARC_001_01 to 001_63
Archaeological site map TANAP CINAR
2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\22_Terrestrial Archaeology Baseline Report - Annex 1 Archaeological Status Table 29052014
Archaeological Status Table 29/5/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\22_Terrestrial Archaeology Baseline Report - Annex 2 Archaeological Survey Forms29052014
Archaeological Survey Forms REGIO 29/5/2014
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.1.8
Areas Under The Provision of Government (Military Prohibited Zones, Areas Allocated to State Institutions and Organizations with Special Purposes, “Restricted Areas” by Cabinet Decree no. 7/16349, etc.)
TANAP
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\13_Terrestrial Fauna Baseline Report - Ek 7 -Arthropoda Field Forms
Arthropoda Field Forms 1/05/2013
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 9 ASSESSMENT OF AREAS TO BE GIVEN UP IN THE PROJECT
TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.5
Assessment of Offshore Biological Environment TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.6
Assessment of Offshore Socio-Economic Environment
TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 8 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-8.3 Assessment of On Shore Social Characteristics TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-
7.3.3
Assessment of Onshore Socio-Economic
Environment
TANAP
Documents 21122016\11.1 Copies of All Presentations - EBRD Attendance Sheet
Attendance sheet TANAP Worley Parsons
Documents 21122016\6.9 BAP Monitoring Plans for Contractors - 6.9 BAP Monitoring Plans for Contractors (Read Me)
BAP Monitoring Plans for Contractors (Read Me)
Documents 21122016\1.5 Appendix 1.3 of ESIA Maps\7.Baseline Map - CIN_MAP_BAS_001_01 to 001_41
Baseline Map (Surveying Map) TANAP CINAR
2014
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Basis of Design Pipeline Crossings of Active Tectonic Faults - WRP-REP-PPL-GEN-017
Basis of Design: Pipeline Crossings of Active Tectonic Faults
TANAP WorleyParsons
14/10/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 3 \ BAT_emission inventory and relevant evaluation data \ BAT Assessment Report
BAT Assessment Report TANAP iLF BEACHTEL
10.03.2014
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.2.14A
Biodiversity TANAP
Documents 21122016\6.1 Description of Timing and Baseline Survey Methodologies\BAP - CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-6
BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN CINAR TANAP
12/10/2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 6 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-9 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-9
BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN TANAP CINAR
31.01.2017
New Data May 4 2017 \ 2 May 2017 Documentation \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10
BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN TANAP CINAR
02/05/2017
New Data May 4 2017 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10.pdf \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10
BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN CINAR TANAP
02/05/2017
Revised 12.10.2016 - Biodiverity action plan (BAP) - Modification Register_12102016
BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN (BAP) MODIFICATION REGISTER
CINAR
New Data May 4 2017 \ 2 May 2017 Documentation \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Modification Register_clean
BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN (BAP) MODIFICATION REGISTER
TANAP CINAR
20/04/2017
New Data May 4 2017 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \Modification Register_clean.docx \ Modification Register_clean
BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN (BAP) MODIFICATION REGISTER
CINAR TANAP
20/04/2017
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ BAP_final draft \ Modification Register
BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN (BAP) MODIFICATION REGISTER
TANAP CINAR
20/04/2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 6 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-9 \ Modification Register_31012017
BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN (BAP)MODIFICATION REGISTER
TANAP CINAR
31.01.2017
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ BAP_final draft \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-11_tc
BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN (Review P3-11) TANAP CINAR
18/05/2017
ESIA – ESMS Docs – BAP - BAP_CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017_P3-4 Biodiversity Action Plan (The Trans-Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project)
CINAR 12/07/2016
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\12_Freshwater Fauna Baseline Report - Freshwater Fauna BL Rep
BIOLOGICAL / FRESHWATERFAUNA BASELINE REPORT 2
OZEC 2/6/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\14_Freshwater Flora Baseline Report - Freshwater Flora BL Report
BIOLOGICAL / FRESHWATERFLORA BASELINE REPORT
DUMH 13/2/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\18_Freshwater Habitat and Ecosystems Baseline Report - Freshwater Habitat and Ecosystems BLReport
BIOLOGICAL / FRESHWATERHABITATS AND ECOSYSTEMSBASELINE REPORT
DUMH 2/6/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\10_Marine Biological / Marine BiodiversityBaseline Report KATT 27/1/2014
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Biodiversity Baseline Report - Marine Biodiversity BL Rep CINM
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\7_Marine Fauna BL Report - Marine Fauna BL Report
BIOLOGICAL / MARINE FAUNABASELINE REPORT
KATT CINM
23/1/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\8_Marine Flora Baseline Report - Marine Flora BL Rep
Biological / Marine FloraBaseline Report TASE CINM
27/1/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\11_Marine Habitat and Ecosystems Baseline Report - Marine Habitat&Ecosystem BL Rep
Biological / Marine Habitats andEcosystems Baseline Report
KATT CINM
28/1/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\9_Marine Protected Areas Baseline Report - Marine Protected Areas BL Rep
Biological / Marine ProtectedAreas Baseline Report
CINM 30/1/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\17_Terrestrial Biodiversity Baseline Report - 17_Terrestrial Biodiversity Baseline Report
BIOLOGICAL / TERRESTRIALBIODIVERSITY BASELINEREPORT
HASA 2/6/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\13_Terrestrial Fauna Baseline Report - Terrestrial Fauna BL Report
BIOLOGICAL / TERRESTRIALFAUNA BASELINE REPORT
HASA 2/6/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\15_Terrestrial Flora Baseline Report - Terrestrial Flora Baseline Report
BIOLOGICAL / TERRESTRIALFLORA BASELINE REPORT
DUMH 2/6/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\19_Terrestrial Habitat and Ecosystems Baseline Report - Terrestrial Habitat and Ecosystems BL Rep.
BIOLOGICAL / TERRESTRIALHABITATS AND ECOSYSTEMSBASELINE REPORT
DUMH 7/2/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\16_Terrestrial Protected Areas Baseline Report - 16_Terrestrial Protected Areas Baseline Report
BIOLOGICAL / TERRESTRIALPROTECTED AREAS BASELINEREPORT
HASA 2/6/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.6\Appendix-2.6.3. Biological Baseline Studies - 3. Biological Baseline Studies
Biological Baseline Studies CINAR
Documents 21122016\1.5 Appendix 1.3 of ESIA Maps\6.Biological Sampling Stations Map - CIN_MAP_BIO_001_01 to 001_41
Biological Sampling Stations Map TANAP CINAR 2014
Revised 12.10.2016 - Biodiverity action plan (BAP) - Annex-8_Biorestoration Monitoring Plan – CIN-PLN-ENV-GEN-014-Rev-P3-1
BIORESTORATION MONITORING PLAN CINAR 10/2016
Documents 21122016\6.1 Description of Timing and Baseline Survey
Methodologies\BAP\Annex-8 - CIN-PLN-ENV-GEN-014-Rev-P3-1
BIORESTORATION MONITORING PLAN TANAP
CINAR
12/10/2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 6 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-9 \ Annex-8 \ CIN-PLN-ENV-GEN-014-Rev-P3-2
BIORESTORATION MONITORING PLAN TANAP CINAR
31.01.2017
New Data May 4 2017 \ 2 May 2017 Documentation \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex-8 \ CIN-PLN-ENV-GEN-014-Rev-P3-2
BIORESTORATION MONITORING PLAN CINAR TANAP
31/01/2017
New Data May 4 2017 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex 8 \ BIORESTORATION MONITORING PLAN CINAR 1/2017
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
CIN-PLN-ENV-GEN-014-Rev-P3-2 TANAP
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\13_Terrestrial Fauna Baseline Report - Ek 5- Bird Field Forms
Bird Field Forms TANAP 21/2/2013
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.2.6
Birds TANAP
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\25_Geotechnical Survey Borelogs - BoreLog Rep5-TR
Boring Log TANAP SOCAR
4/10/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\25_Geotechnical Survey Borelogs - BoreLog Rep2-TR
Boring log TANAP SOCAR SEBAT
17-26/9/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\25_Geotechnical Survey Borelogs - BoreLog Rep3-TR
Boring log TANAP SOCAR SEBAT
30/10 – 6/11/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\25_Geotechnical Survey Borelogs - BoreLog Rep4-TR
Boring log TANAP SOCAR SEBAT
27-30/9/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\25_Geotechnical Survey Borelogs - BoreLog Rep6-TR
Boring Log TANAP SOCAR
4-7/10/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\25_Geotechnical Survey Borelogs - BoreLog Rep7-TR
Boring log TANAP SOCAR
29/8 – 1/9/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\25_Geotechnical Survey Borelogs - BoreLog RepCS-TR
Boring log TANAP SOCAR SEBAT
5-20/2/2014
Documents 21122016\3.4 Engin. & Design Sol. & Pro. Pipe Shifting Wetlands & Seismic Act\Buoyancy Calculation - WRP-CAL-PPL-PLG-006
Buoyancy Calculation TANAP WorleyParsons
23/9/2015
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\6_Noise & Vibration BL Report - A 4 SVAN CALIBRATOR new
Calibration report Protos 30/10/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\6_Noise & Vibration BL Report - A 4 SVAN CALIBRATOR
Calibration report Protos 6/6/2013
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Access Control ID Check \
Sample ID Badges
CAMP ID CARDS
Documents 21122016\3.6 Construction Camp Site Drainage Management Process - PLK-PLN-ENV-PL4-004_Camp management plan_Lot 4
CAMP MANAGEMENT PLAN (LOT 4) TANAP WorleyParsons
4/8/2016
Documents 21122016\3.6 Construction Camp Site Drainage Management Process - FRN-PLN-ENV-PL1-002_Camp management plan_Lot 1
Camp Management Plan (LOT1) TANAP WorleyParsons FERNAS
11/5/2015
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Documents 21122016\3.6 Construction Camp Site Drainage Management Process - SYA-PLN-HSE-GEN-012_Camp management plan_Lot 2
Camp Management System (LOT2) SYA ‐ Sicim‐Yuksel‐Akkord JV
TANAP WorleyParsons
5/5/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 3 \ TKF-PLN-SEC-PL3-003-P4-2 (SEC. PLAN SPRD-5)
Camp Security Plan For Spread-5 TANAPTEKFEN 15.12.2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 3 \ TKF-PLN-SEC-PL3-004-P4-2 SEC. PLAN SPRD-6
Camp Security Plan For Spread-6 TANAP TEKFEN
15.12.2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ Enclosure 4 Yuksel Guvenlik Securty license
Certificate of operating permit for private security company
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 3 \ VPSHR TRAINING \ certificate
Certificate of participation as trainer
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 6-Cultural Heritage Management Plan - Annex B - WRP-PCD-ENV-GEN-003
Chance Finds Procedure WorleyParsons 14/04/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 2 Chapter 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION TANAP
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR3(3.2) \ TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-2
CHAPTER 2: TRANS ANATOLIAN NATURAL GAS PIPELINE (TANAP) PROJECT ESIA REPORT
TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.1.1
Chapter 7.3.1.1 Meteorological and Climatic Characteristics
TANAP
Documents 21122016\3.1 Hydrotest Management Plan – Procedure - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-8.1
CHAPTER 8.1 Assessment Of Impacts On Physical Components
TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 8 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-8.1 Chapter 8.1 Assessment Of Impacts On Physical Components
TANAP
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 3 \ BAT_emission inventory and relevant evaluation data \ TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-8.1
CHAPTER 8.1 Assessment Of Impacts On Physical Components
TANAP
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR3(3.2) \ TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-8.1
CHAPTER 8.1: TRANS ANATOLIAN NATURAL GAS PIPELINE (TANAP) PROJECT ESIA REPORT
TANAP
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\4_Air Quality (PM10&PM2.5) Baseline Report - A 2 Field Forms_PM10
ÇINAR ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS LABORATORY PM 10 SAMPLING FORM
CINAR 21/12/2010
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\5_Air Quality (SO2, NOX, O3) Baseline Report\ANNEXES - Annex III_CINAR Laboratory Competency Certificate
CINAR Laboratory Competency Certificate CINAR
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - COMMUNITY COMMUNITY RELATIONS MANAGEMENT PLAN FERNAS 19/06/2015
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
RELATIONS PLANS OF CCs - FRN-PLN-SOC-PL1-005_P4-0
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLANS OF CCs - PLK-PLN-SOC-PL4-002_P4-2
COMMUNITY RELATIONS MANAGEMENT PLAN PUNJ LLOYD-LIMAK JV 14/06/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLANS OF CCs - SYA-PLN-SOC-GEN-002_P4-0
Community Relations Management Plan SYA ‐ Sicim‐Yuksel‐Akkord JV
21/05/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.7) \ FRN-PLN-SOC-PL1-005
Community Relations Management Plan TANAP FERNAS
19.01.2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \
1.1 \ CC- ESMS \ SPK-PLN-SOC-DAR-002- Community Relations Plan- P4-0
Community Relations Plan TANAP 16-02-17
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - COMMUNITY SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - FRN-PLN-SOC-PL1-004_P4-0
COMMUNITY SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLAN FERNAS 17/06/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - COMMUNITY SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - PLK-PLN-SOC-PL4-005_P4-0
COMMUNITY SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLAN PUNJ LLOYD-LIMAK JV 15/06/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - COMMUNITY SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - SYA-PLN-SOC-GEN-001_P4-0
Community Safety management plan SYA ‐ Sicim‐Yuksel‐Akkord JV
07/05/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.1 \ CC- ESMS \ SPK-PLN-SOC-DAR-001- Community Safety Management Plan- P4-0
Community Safety Management Plan TANAP 02-02-17
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR3(3.2) \ WRP-REP-MEC-GEN-001-P3-2. Technical bid evaluation report.emission values
COMPRESSOR STATION 1 - DESIGN CASE PERFORMANCE DETAIL
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\26_ENVID Report - 26_ENVID Report
Compressor Station Environmental Impact Identification (ENVID) REPORT
2013
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 12 Conclusion TANAP
Documents 21122016\3.6 Construction Camp Site Drainage Management Process - TKF-PLN-ENV-PL3-012_Camp management plan_Lot 3
Construction Camp Management Plan (LOT 3) Tekfen TANAP
16/4/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - PLK-PLN-ENV-PL4-003_P4-1 - PLK-PLN-ENV-PL4-003_P4-1
CONSTRUCTION IMPACT MANAGEMENT PLAN PUNJ LLOYD – LİMAK JV 10/06/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - FRN-PLN-ENV-PL1-003_P4-1
CONSTRUCTION IMPACT MANAGEMENT PLAN FERNAS 15/06/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.1 \ CC- ESMS \ SPK-PLN-ENV-DAR-002- Construction Impact Management Plan- P4-0
Construction Impact Management Plan TANAP 07-03-17
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS MANAGEMENT PLAN SYA ‐ 28/05/2015
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - SYA-PLN-ENV-GEN-008_P4-0 - SYA-PLN-ENV-GEN-008_P4-0
Sicim‐Yuksel‐Akkord JV
Documents 21122016\6.7 Procedures Management Plan for Invasive Species - SYA-PLN-ENV-GEN-008_Construction impacts management plan(revised)
CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS MANAGEMENT PLAN TANAP Worley Parsons SICM YUKSEL AKKORD JV
11/11/2016
Documents 21122016\4.5 Country Industry Project Safety Zone Distances from AGI's - 4.5 Country Industry Project Safety Zone
Distances
Country Industry Project Safety Zone Distances
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 1 \ FRN-PLN-SEC-PL1-004 Crissis Management Plan
CRISIS MANAGEMENT PLAN TANAP FERNAS
21.02.2017
Documents 21122016\8.1 Criteria for Avoiding Salvage Excavation of Cultural Heritage - 8.1 Criteria for Avoiding Salvage Excavation of Cultural Heritage (Read me)
Criteria for Avoiding Salvage Excavation of Cultural Heritage (Read me)
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.2.17A
Critical Habitats TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 6-Cultural Heritage Management Plan - Annex B - LOT 1- FRN-PLN-ENV-PL1-016
Cultural Heritage Management Plan FERNAS 27/01/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 6-Cultural Heritage Management Plan - Annex B - LOT 2- SYA-PLN-ENV-GEN-006
Cultural Heritage Management Plan SYA ‐ Sicim ‐ Yuksel‐Akkord JV
04/05/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 6-Cultural Heritage Management Plan - Annex B - LOT 3- TKF-PLN-ENV-PL3-018
Cultural Heritage Management Plan Tekfen 14/05/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 6-Cultural Heritage Management Plan - Annex B - LOT 4- PLK-PLN-ENV-PL4-009
CULTURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN PUNJ LLOYD – LİMAK JV 05/06/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 6-Cultural Heritage Management Plan - TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-006
CULTURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN 19/07/2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.1 \ CC- ESMS \ SPK-PLN-SOC-DAR-007-Cultural Heritage Management Plan-P4-C
Cultural Heritage Management Plan TANAP 15-10-16
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 6-Cultural Heritage Management Plan - Annex B - Annex B_ Chance Finds Procedure of EPCM and CHMP of CCs
CULTURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - ANNEX B CHANCE FINDS PROCEDURE OF EPCM AND CHMP OF CCS
19/07/2016
Documents 21122016\8.3 Cultural Heritage Management Plan - 8.3 Cultural Heritage Management Plan (Read me)
Cultural Heritage Management Plan (Read me)
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 6-Cultural Heritage Management Plan - Annex D
CULTURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLANANNEX D SCOPE OF WORK ARCHAEOLOGY CONSULTANT
19/07/2016
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 10 Cumulative and Global Impact Assessment TANAP
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\7_Marine Fauna BL Report - Annex 5_Hard Bottom Macrobenthos Field Forms
Daily activities report form: Annex 5_Hard Bottom Macrobenthos Field forms
TANAP 2/9/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\7_Marine Fauna BL Report - Annex 3_Fish Field Forms
Daily activities report form: Fish field forms TANAP 2/9/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\7_Marine Fauna BL Report - Annex 4_Soft Bottom Macrobenthos Field Forms
Daily activities report form: Soft Bottom Macrobenthos Field forms
TANAP 2/9/2013
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.1.9
Determination of Baseline Pollutant Load in the Project Area and in Impact Area (in terms of Air, Water, Soil, Noise etc.)
TANAP
Documents 21122016\2.1 Fatique Man. Guidelines & Man. Plan - TNP-MAN-HSM-GEN-001-Rev-P2-0_EN
Diver Manual DRIVING STANDARDS AND APPLICATIONSFOR TANAP PROJECT
TANAP 21/8/2014
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \PR 5&10\ TNP-PCD-SOC-GEN-003-Draft RAP Fund Management Procedure
DRAFT-TANAP RAP FUND MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE
TANAP 23/05/2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Training and Drill Documents \ ROW Security Training Dutluca Eskiюehir 2017 \ Security Drills in Gonen - Karaorman 2017 \ Gonen Drill and Karaorman DrillL
Drill / Execution TANAP 03/02/2017
Documents 21122016\2.1 Fatique Man. Guidelines & Man. Plan - HED-PCD-HSM-GEN-001-Rev-P2-2_EN
Driver and vehicle Management procedure HED Academy TANAP
8/8/2016
New Data 15 May 2017 \ BAP_Presentation_EBRD_11_05_2017_R1 ECOLOGICAL STUDIES TANAP CINAR
11/05/2017
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING PLANS OF CCs - FRN-PLN-SOC-PL1-001_P4-0
EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING PLAN FERNAS 17/06/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING PLANS OF CCs - PLK-PLN-SOC-PL4-003_P4-2
EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING PLAN PUNJ LLOYD-LIMAK JV 14/06/2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.1 \ CC- ESMS \ SPK-PLN-SOC-DAR-003- Employment and Training Plan-P4-D
Employment and Training Plan TANAP 15-03-17
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.7) \ FRN-PLN-SOC-PL1-001
Employment and Training Plan TANAP FERNAS
19.01.2017
Documents 21122016\2.7 Local Hiring Plans - FRN-PLN-SOC-PL1-001-P4-0-C1
Employment and training plan (Lot 1) Worley Parsons TANAPFERNAS
17/6/2015
Documents 21122016\1.2 Process & Timeline for transfer of Org - ENV-SOC REMAINING DOCUMENT REVISION STATUS 16122016
Environment and social remaining document revision status
Documents 21122016\1.2 Process & Timeline for transfer of Org - ENV- Environment and social remaining document
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
SOC REMAINING DOCUMENT REVISION STATUS 16122016 revision status
Documents 21122016\11.1 Copies of All Presentations - EBRD-_ENV DEPT
Environment Department 29/11/2016 TANAP FERNAS
29/11/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-001_P3-1 ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
TANAP 21/07/2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.1 \ CC- ESMS \ SPK-PLN-ENV-DAR-008- Environmental & Social Monitoring Plan- P4-0
Environmental & Social Monitoring Plan TANAP 27-02-17
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.1 \ CC- ESMS \ SPK-PLN-SOC-DAR-008- Environmental & Social Training Plan -P4-D
Environmental & Social Training Plan Sapura Kencana
12-01-17
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-002_P3-2 Environmental Action Plan TANAP 20/07/2016
Documents 21122016\1.7 Onshore Fuel & Chemicals Spill Plan - TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-002
Environmental Action Plan TANAP 24/11/2014
Documents 21122016\1.7 Onshore Fuel & Chemicals Spill Plan\TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-002 P3-2 Annexes - Annex 2-ESMP of EPCM (WRP-PLN-ENV-GEN-002_P4-2)
Environmental Action Plan Annex 2-ESMP of EPCMEnvironmental and Social Management system
TANAP Worley Parsons
20/7/2016
Documents 21122016\1.7 Onshore Fuel & Chemicals Spill Plan\TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-002 P3-2 Annexes\Annex 5-Sensitive Biodiversity Areas - TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-002-P3-2_Annex 5_clean
ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PLAN ANNEX 5 SENSITIVE BIODIVERSITY AREAS (MS. Word)
TANAP 20/7/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 1-National and Internatiol Standards
ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PLANANNEX 1 NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS OF TANAP PROJECT
TANAP 20/07/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 2-ESMP of EPCM (WRP-PLN-ENV-GEN-002_P4-2)
ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PLANANNEX 2 ESMP OF EPCM
WorleyParsons 11/01/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 3-CC Sub EMPs - Annex 3-CC Sub-Management Plans
ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PLANANNEX 3 CC SUB-MANAGEMENT PLANS
20/07/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 4- Environmental Management Guidelines for Contractors
ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PLANANNEX 4 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR CONTRACTORS
24/11/2014
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 5-Sensitive Biodiversity Areas
- TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-002-P3-2_Annex 5
ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PLANANNEX 5
SENSITIVE BIODIVERSITY AREAS
20/07/2016
Documents 21122016\1.7 Onshore Fuel & Chemicals Spill Plan\TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-002 P3-2 Annexes\Annex 5-Sensitive Biodiversity Areas - TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-002-P3-2_Annex 5
ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PLANANNEX 5 SENSITIVE BIODIVERSITY AREAS (PDF)
TANAP 20/7/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 11 Environmental and Social Management TANAP
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.1 \ CC- ESMS \ SPK-PLN-ENV-DAR-001- Environmental & Social
Environmental and Social Management Plan TANAP 31/01/2017
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Management Plan- P4-2
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.1 \ CC- ESMS \ SPK-PLN-ENV-DAR-007- Environmental Emergency Response Plan- P4-C
Environmental Emergency Response Plan TANAP 31-10-16
Documents 21122016\3.1 Hydrotest Management Plan – Procedure - SYA-PLN-ENV-PL2-001.Environmental Hydrotest Monitoring Plan
ENVIRONMENTAL HYDROTEST MONITORING PLAN
TANAP Worley Parsons SICIM – YUKSEL – AKKORD JV
18/11/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Env Mon Plan - TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-003_P3-2
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN TANAP 01/07/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Env Mon Plan - Annex 2 - TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-003-Rev-P3-1 Annex 2
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLANANNEX 2 ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS FOR MONITORING
TANAP 01/07/2016
Documents 21122016\6.6 Records of Seed Collection - TNP-REG-ENV-GEN-008_Environmental Monthly Summary Registers
Environmental monthly registers summary report – September 2016
TANAP 26/10/2016
Documents 21122016\1.5 Appendix 1.3 of ESIA Maps\10.Environmental Master Plan and Legends - CIN_MAP_EMP_001_01 to 001_67
Environmental Plans (ARDAHAN) TANAP CINAR
2014
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 1 EPCM Environment and Social Management System
WorleyParsons 11/01/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – BAP – BAP- Annex 6 - Annex-6.3 Erosion, Reinstatement and Landscaping Plan for LOT-2
Erosion Control, Reinstatement & Landscaping Plan
SYA ‐ Sicim‐Yuksel‐Akkord JV
25/05/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – BAP – BAP- Annex 6 - Annex-6.2 Erosion, Reinstatement and Landscaping Plan for LOT-1
EROSION, REINSTATEMENT AND LANDSCAPING PLAN
FERNAS 11/12/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – BAP – BAP- Annex 6 - Annex-6.5 Erosion, Reinstatement and Landscaping Plan for LOT-4
EROSION, REINSTATEMENT AND LANDSCAPING PLAN
PUNJ LLOYD – LİMAK Joint Venture
06/06/2016
Revised 12.10.2016 - Biodiverity action plan (BAP) - Annex-6_Contractor Documents - Annex-6.5 Erosion, Reinstatement and Landscaping Plan for LOT-4
EROSION, REINSTATEMENT AND LANDSCAPING PLAN
PUNJ LLOYD – LİMAK - KALYON JV
01/07/2016
Documents 21122016\10.1 NGO & International NGO TANAP Meeting Minutes - ERM-REP-ENV-GEN-003-Rev-P2-0_NGO Meeting Report
ESIA of TANAP ProjectSTAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION MEETINGS REPORT
TANA PERM
17/1/2014
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.1 \ Off-shore ESIA summary
ESIA Report Summary Evaluations for Off-shore Section
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 1 \ FRN-PLN-SEC-PL1-007 Evacuation PLan
Evacuation Plan TANAP FERNAS
21.02.2017
RAP Executive Summary Executive Summary (Natural Gas Pipeline Project)
Revised 12.10.2016 - Executive Summary_BAP - CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-022- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF BAP (English Version) CINAR 10/2016
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Rev-P3-C_en
Documents 21122016\4.4 Explosives Management Plan - 4.4 Explosives Management Plan (Read Me)
Explosives Management Plan
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 3 – Legal - ANNEX 3.3 - Expropriation Law (2942)
EXPROPRIATION LAW
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Fault Crossing Engineering Critical Assessment Report - WRP-REP-PPL-PLG-056
Fault Crossing Engineering Critical Assessment Report
TANAP WorleyParsons
27/6/2016
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\12_Freshwater Fauna Baseline Report - 1. Fieldwork Forms
Fauna (Fish and Macroinvertebrate) Survey Form
7/7/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\12_Freshwater Fauna Baseline Report - 2. Fieldwork Forms
Fauna (Fish and Macroinvertebrate) Survey Form
29/10/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\6_Noise & Vibration BL Report - Annex II_Field Forms
Field Forms CINAR
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\4_Air Quality (PM10&PM2.5) Baseline Report - A 2 Field Forms_PM2_5&PM10
Field Forms_PM2_5&PM10 TANAP
RAP for Pipeline Final Addendum to RAP for TANAP Pipeline Route (The Trans-Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project)
TANAP 21/10/2016
Addendum to RAP for Pipeline FINAL ADDENDUM TORESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP) FOR TANAP PIPELINE ROUTE - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RAP for AGIs Final RAP for AGIs – Final Resettlement Action Plan for Above Ground Installations (The Trans -Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline)
24/10/2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR10(10.3) \TNP-PLN-SOC-GEN-008-RAP for AGIs_smallsize
Final resettlement action plan (RAP) for above ground installations
TANAP 24/10/2016
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \PR 5&10\CIN-PLN-SOC-GEN-002_Offshore Fisheries LRP
FISHERIES LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION PLAN TANAP CINER
10/05/2017
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX
2.4\15_Terrestrial Flora Baseline Report - Annex IV_Flora Field Forms
Flora Field Forms 1/5/2013
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.2.1
Forest Areas TANAP
Documents 21122016\1.5 Appendix 1.3 of ESIA Maps\4.Forestry Map - CIN_MAP_FRS_001_01 to 001_85
Forest Map TANAP CINAR 2014
Revised 12.10.2016 - Biodiverity action plan (BAP) - Critical Habitats KMZ Files
Freshwater Critical Habitats
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.2.10
Freshwater Fishes TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.2.13A
Freshwater Habitats and Ecosystems TANAP
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Geohazard Assessment Report - ILF-REP-ROU-PLG-005-Rev-P1-0
Geohazard Assessment Report TANAP 12/7/2013
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Geohazard Close Out Report 48 Section - WRP-REP-EGG-PLG-026
Geohazard Close Out Report 48 Section TANAP WorleyParsons
9/11/2015
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Geohazard Close Out Report 56 Section - WRP-REP-EGG-PLG-025
Geohazard Close Out Report 56 Section TANAP WorleyParsons
9/9/2015
Documents 21122016\1.5 Appendix 1.3 of ESIA Maps\2.Geological Map and Geohazards - CIN_MAP_GEO_001_01 to 001_85
Geologic Map and Geohazards TANAP CINAR
2014
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.1.3
Geological Characteristics TANAP
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ Enclosure 1 - Decision of Erzincan Governerate
Governorship of Erzincan Decision of the provincial private security commission
Documents 21122016\1.6 Routing Report - Feasibility Study - TNP-GUI-ROU-PLG-001
Guideline for route confirmation, centreline design and baseline field study
TANAP SOCAR
15/08/2012
New Data 15 May 2017 \ TNP-PCD-HSM-GEN-025_Incentive programme H&S incentive programme procedure TANAP 21/04/2017
Documents 21122016\1.5 Appendix 1.3 of ESIA Maps\5.Habitat Map - CIN_MAP_HAB_001_01 to 001_85
Habitant Map TANAP CINAR
2014
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.5)&PR4(4.1) \ FRN-PCD-HSE-PL1-045 health and industrial hygiene procedure
HEALTH AND INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE PROCEDURES
TANAP WorleyParsons FERNAS
25.04.2015
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 3 – Legal - ANNEX 3.2 - HGA Host Government Agreement between the government of the republic of Turkey and Trans Anatolian Gas Pipeline Company B.V. Concerning
the Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline System
26/06/2012
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.1.5
Hydrogeological Characteristics TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.1.4
Hydrological Characteristics TANAP
Documents 21122016\3.1 Hydrotest Management Plan – Procedure - 3.1 Hydrotest MAnagement Plan (Read me)
Hydrotest MAnagement Plan (Read me)
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 3 IMPACT ASSESSMENT APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
TANAP
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\22_Terrestrial Archaeology Baseline Report - Annex 5 Impact Asessment Forms29052014
Impact Assessment Forms 29/5/2014
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Daily Security Reports \ SP7-28.02.2017 ROW Securi
INFORMATION TABE AND MACHINERY & SECURITY PERSONS FOR ROW SPREAD 7
28/02/2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Daily Security Reports \ 2-SP-8 28.02.2017 ROW
INFORMATION TABE AND MACHINERY & SECURITY PERSONS FOR ROW SPREAD 8
28/02/2017
Documents 21122016\5.1 Documented Evidence of RAP Communication Consultation Disclosure - 5.1 Tanap_AGI RAP Disclosure Leaflet-ENG_Oct2016
INFORMATIVE LEAFLET FOR COMPENSATION OF LOSS OF LAND AND ECONOMIC LOSSES DUE TO LAND ACQUISITION ACTIVITIES FOR ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATIONS
TANAP 10/2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Access Control ID Check \ Instructions On Ways of Conduct At Main Gates
Instructions On Ways of Conduct At Main Gates
Documents 21122016\1.1 Host Gov. & Int Agreement - E&S specific Provisions - TANAP IGA English Final 25062012 (2)
Intergovernmental agreement between the government of the republic of turkey and the
government of the republic of Azerbaijan concerning “The trans Anatolian natural gas pipeline system”
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 3 – Legal - ANNEX 3.1 - IGA Intergovernmental Agreement between the government of the Republic of Turkey and The Government of the republic of Azerbaijan concerning the trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline System
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.1&7.2
Introduction of Environmental Baseline Features TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 1 Introduction of TRANS-ANATOLIAN NATURAL GAS PIPELINE (TANAP) PROJECT ESIA REPORT
TANAP
Documents 21122016\1.3 Contractor Man. Pro & Non-Conformance Sys - 1.3 Contractor Man Pro & Non-Conformance System
Item 1.3 Contractor Management Procedures and Non-Conformance system – details of how used and financial penalty structure
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\4_Air Quality (PM10&PM2.5) Baseline Report - A IV_Laboratory Competency Certificate
Laboratory Competency Certificate CINAR
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\6_Noise & Vibration BL Report - Annex IV_Laboratory Competency Certificate
Laboratory Competency Certificate
Documents 21122016\2.2 Turkish Labour Law (in English) - Turkish Labor Law
LABOUR LAW 22/3/2003
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.1 \ CC- ESMS \ SPK-PLN-ENV-DAR-003- Land Acquisition Plan- P4-C
Land Acquisition Plan TANAP 14-11-16
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 5-Land acquisition - ANNEX 5.1 - Land Acquisition Strategy
LAND ACQUISITION STRATEGY iLF 22/08/2013
Documents 21122016\1.5 Appendix 1.3 of ESIA Maps\3.Land Use Map - CIN_MAP_LND_001_01 to 001_85
Land Use Map TANAP CINAR
2014
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 5-Land acquisition - ANNEX 5.3 - Land Valuation Management Procedure
LAND VALUATION MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE TANAP 21/08/2014
Documents 21122016\2.2 Turkish Labour Law (in English) - Turkish Law on Unions - see article 41
LAW ON TRADE UNIONS AND COLLECTIVE LABOUR AGREEMENTS
7/11/2012
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 4 LEGAL, POLITICAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
TANAP
Documents 21122016\3.4 Engin. & Design Sol. & Pro. Pipe Shifting Wetlands & Seismic Act\Liquefaction Assessment Report - Priority 1- WRP-REP-EGG-PLG-020
Liquefaction Assessment Report - Priority 1 TANAP WorleyParsons
23/11/2015
Documents 21122016\3.4 Engin. & Design Sol. & Pro. Pipe Shifting Wetlands & Seismic Act\Liquefaction Assessment Report - Priority 2 - WRP-REP-EGG-PLG-021
Liquefaction Assessment Report - Priority 2 TANAP WorleyParsons
19/11/2015
Documents 21122016\3.4 Engin. & Design Sol. & Pro. Pipe Shifting Wetlands & Seismic Act\Liquefaction Assessment Report - Priority 3 - WRP-REP-EGG-PLG-022
Liquefaction Assessment Report - Priority 3 TANAP WorleyParsons
7/12/2015
Documents 21122016\3.6 Construction Camp Site Drainage Management Process - ILF-LST-CST-GEN-001-P2-1 List of Requirements for Main Camps and Storage Yards
List of Requirements for Main Camps and StorageYards
iLF TANAP
29/05/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\13_Terrestrial Fauna Baseline Report - Ek 4-Mammal Field Forms
Mammal Field Forms 1/5/2013
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-
7.3.2.5
Mammals TANAP
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\7_Marine Fauna BL Report - Annex 2_Mammals and Turtles Questionnaire Survey Forms
Mammals and Turtles Questionnaire Survey Forms
5-6/9/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\21_Marine Archaeology Desktop Study Baseline Report - Marine Archaeology Desktop Study Baseline Report
Marine Archaeology DesktopStudy Baseline Report
MUSG DAGH
17/2/2014
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Documents 21122016\1.12 Preconstruction Survey Methodology - TKF-MST-PPL-PL3-023
Method Statement and Risk Assessment for Pre-Construction Survey
TEKFEN TANAP
25/6/2015
Documents 21122016\1.12 Preconstruction Survey Methodology - FRN-MST-PPL-PL1-001
Method Statement for Pre construction Activities WorleyParsons TANAP FERNAS
26/10/2015
Documents 21122016\1.12 Preconstruction Survey Methodology - SYA-MST-ROW-PL2-001
Method Statement:Pipeline Pre construction survey, survey and stake out
SICIM YUKSEL AKKORD JV
TANAP Worley Parsons
11/5/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - SYA-PLN-ENV-GEN-008_P4-0 - Appendix-2_Lot2
Mitigation Measures – Lot 2 TANAP
Documents 21122016\6.5 Completed Quarterly Third Party Monitoring Reports by ЗINAR - CIN-PRM-PRC-GEN-046_monthly report
MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT FORENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MONITORING WORKS
CINAR TANAP 2/8/2016
Documents 21122016\6.5 Completed Quarterly Third Party Monitoring Reports by ЗINAR - CIN-PRM-PRC-GEN-051_monthly report
MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT FORENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MONITORING WORKS
CINAR TANAP
9/12/2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 3 \
BAT_emission inventory and relevant evaluation data \ WRP-REP-EGG-MS2-100-Rev-P3-0_heating&cooling study
MS2 Heating and Cooling System Concept
Study – Final Report
TANAP
WorleyParsons
10/12/2014
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Narrow Ridge Assessment %96 Зadirkaya (KP410) - WRP-TNO-PPL-GEN-001
NARROW RIDGE ASSESSMENT - ÇADIRKAYA (KP410)
TANAP WorleyParsons
21/10/2015
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Narrow Ridge Assessment %96 Meryem Dag (KP392) - WRP-TNO-PPL-GEN-002
NARROW RIDGE ASSESSMENT - Meryem Dag (KP392)
TANAP WorleyParsons
27/10/2015
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Narrow Ridge Assessment %96 Posof (KP16) - WRP-TNO-PPL-GEN-005
NARROW RIDGE ASSESSMENT - POSOF (KP16) TANAP WorleyParsons
22/9/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.6) \ Quality Plans & NCR Procedures of the Contractors-TANAP NCR Register \ NCR Register 2017_Rev0_26.02.2
NCR Register 2017
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\6_Noise & Vibration BL Report - 6_Noise & Vibration BL Report
Noise & Vibration BaselineReport TANAP 24/7/2014
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.5)\ WRP-QAC-FRM-001-00385-P3-2
Non conformance report – Berms with stones TANAP WorleyParsons 10/05/2016
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.6) \ Quality Plans & NCR Procedures of the Contractors-TANAP NCR Register \ SPK \ SPK-PCD-QAC-DAR-002
Non-Conformance Management System Procedure
TANAP Sapura Kencana
7-12-2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Non-Technical Summary - Non-Technical Summary
NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY TANAP
New Data 15 May 2017 \ Content of Compulsory HS trainings Occupational Health and Safety basic Training KURAL
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 8 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-8.5 Offshore Biological Impact Assessment TANAP
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.1 \ WRP-REP-TSF-GEN-005_Offshore HAZID
OFFSHORE HAZID CLOSE OUT REPORT TANAP Worley Parsons
5/12/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.4
Offshore Physical Characteristics TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 8 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-8.4 Offshore Physical Impact Assessment TANAP
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.6) \ Quality Plans & NCR Procedures of the Contractors-TANAP NCR Register \ SPK \ SPK-PLN-QAC-DAR-001
OFFSHORE PROJECT QUALITY PLAN (PQP) TANAP Sapura Kencana
10-10-2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 8 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-8.2.5-11
Onshore Biological Characteristics - Biological Features – Terrestrial Fauna
TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 8 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-8.2.1-4
Onshore Biological Characteristics - Biological Features - Terrestrial Flora
TANAP
Documents 21122016\1.7 Onshore Fuel & Chemicals Spill Plan - 1.7
Onshore Fuel & Chemical Spill Plan (Read me)
Onshore Fuel & Chemical Spill Plan TANAP
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 3 \ WRP-REP-TSF-GEN-030_Onshore HAZID
ONSHORE HAZID CLOSE OUT REPORT TANAP WorleyParsons
29/11/2016
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Onshore Pipeline River Crossing Methodology - WRP-MAN-EGG-PLG-001
Onshore Pipeline: Hydrological Assessment Methodology
TANAP WorleyParsons
27/10/2015
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Onshore Pipeline Watercourse Crossing Philosophy - WRP-PHL-EGG-PLG-001
Onshore Pipeline: Watercourse Crossing Philosophy
TANAP WorleyParsons
26/3/2015
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Onshore Route and Geohazard Assessment Report - BCH-REP-EGG-PLG-008-Rev-P2-0
Onshore Route and Geohazard Assessment Report
BECHTEL TANAP iLF
2/4/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\22_Terrestrial Archaeology Baseline Report - Annex 4 Other Archaeological Sites List
Other Archaeological Sites List
Documents 21122016\5.4 Identification of Land Parcels size and location for future Compressor - 5.4 Identification of Land Parcels Size and Location for future Compressor Station
Parcel size and locations for existing and future compressor stations and pig launching and receiving pads.
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Documents 21122016\6.1 Description of Timing and Baseline Survey Methodologies - revision status regarding requested items
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT 6
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 3 – Legal - ANNEX 3.5 - IFC Performance Standard 5
Performance Standard 5 Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement
International Finance Corporation
01/01/2012
Documents 21122016\4.10 Permit to Work Descriptions - 4.10 Permit To Work
PERMIT TO WORK PROCEDURE (LOT2) SICM YUKSEL AKKORD JV TANAP
Worley Parsons
30/3/2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 3 \Waste Facility Inspection Report \ Annex3_photos
Photos
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Daily Security Reports \ Security Cabins placed (1) (2) and alo
Photos
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Training and Drill Documents \ Gendarmerie Training Dutluca Eskiюehir 2017 \ E__T_M G_RSEL (1)
Photos - Gendarmerie Training Dutluca Eskiюehir 2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 3 \ VPSHR TRAINING \ SPREAD 5 – DOGANKENT \ Doрankent 1, 2, 3
Photos - Doрankent 1, 2, 3
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 3 \ VPSHR TRAINING \ SPREAD 6 – POLATLI \ Polatlэ-1, 2, 3, 4
Photos - Polatlэ-1, 2, 3, 4
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Training and Drill Documents \ ROW Security Training Dutluca Eskiюehir 2017 \ IMAG4304 and IMAG4308
Photos - Training Dutluca Eskiюehir 2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Training and Drill Documents \ ROW Security Training Dutluca Eskiюehir 2017 \ Trainings in Gцnen-Karaorman 2016 \ IMG-20161122-WA0000, 02, 05, 08, 16,22, 24
Photos - Trainings in Gцnen-Karaorman 2016
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.6\Appendix-2.6.3. Biological Baseline Studies\Freshwater Habitat and Ecosystems\First field survey
Photos of first field survey 2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.6\Appendix-2.6.2. Physical Baseline Studies - 2. Physical Baseline Studies
Physical Baseline Studies CINAR
Documents 21122016\1.12 Preconstruction Survey Methodology - WRP-SPC-PPL-PLG-001 Pipeline Construction Specification P4-4
Pipeline Construction Specification TANAPWorley Parsons 20/5/2016
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Documents 21122016\3.4 Engin. & Design Sol. & Pro. Pipe Shifting Wetlands & Seismic Act\Pipeline Stress Analysis Report - WRP-REP-PPL-PLG-003
Pipeline Stress Analysis Report TANAP WorleyParsons
26/11/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Daily Security Reports \ SP7-28.02.2017 Daily Secu
PLK -LOT 4-SPREAD 7 SİTE PLUS DAILY SECURITY REPORT (DSR)
Punj Lioyd Limak Kalyon
28/02/2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Daily Security Reports \ 1 -SP -
8 28.02.2017 Dai
PLK -LOT 4-SPREAD 8 SİTE PLUS DAILY SECURITY REPORT (DSR)
Punj Lioyd Limak
Kalyon
27/02/2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.1 \ CC- ESMS \ SPK-PLN-ENV-DAR-005- Pollution Prevention Plan-P4-D
Pollution Prevention Plan TANAP 15-03-17
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\23_Eco-system Evaluation Report - Eco-system Evaluation Report
POSOF WDA ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENTREPORT 2014
Documents 21122016\1.12 Preconstruction Survey Methodology - Pre- Construction Survey Note
Preconstruction survey methodology
Documents 21122016\1.12 Preconstruction Survey Methodology - Pre- Construction Survey Note
Preconstruction survey methodology (PDF)
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment Report – Pipeline - WRP-REP-EGG-GEN-026
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment Report - Pipeline
TANAP WorleyParsons
14/9/2015
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment Report – Stations - WRP-REP-EGG-GEN-028
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment Report - Stations
TANAP WorleyParsons
14/9/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.6) \ Quality Plans & NCR Procedures of the Contractors-TANAP NCR Register \ FRN \ FRN-PCD-QAC-PL1-004
PROCEDURE FOR CONTROL OF NON CONFORMANCEPREVENTATIVE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
TANAP WorleyParsons FERNAS
08.07.15
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.6) \ Quality Plans & NCR Procedures of the Contractors-TANAP NCR Register \ PLK \ PLK-PCD-QAC-PL4-001
PROCEDURE FOR CONTROL OF NON-CONFORMANCES, CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVEACTIONS
TANAP Punj Lioyd Limark Kalyon
25.01.2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence
Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.6) \ Quality Plans & NCR Procedures of the Contractors-TANAP NCR Register \ TKF \ TKF-PCD-QAC-PL3-010
Procedure for Corrective, Preventive Action
andControl of Non-Conformance
TANAP
WorleyParsons Tekfen
11/09/2015
Documents 21122016\5.6 Land Entry Exit Procedure Examples - 5.6 SAMPLE LAND ENTRY - EXIT PROCEDURE_
Procedure for Land Delivery, Entry and Exit TEKFEN TANAP
19/11/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.6) \ Quality Plans & NCR Procedures of the Contractors-TANAP NCR Register \ SYA \ SYA-PCD-QAC-GEN-001
PROCEDURE FOR MANAGEMENT OF NON CONFORMITYCORRECTIVE & PREVENTIVE ACTIONS
TANAP WorleyParsons SICIM
01/07/2015
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
YUKSEL AKKORD JV
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.6) \ Quality Plans & NCR Procedures of the Contractors-TANAP NCR Register \ TKN \ TKN-PCD-QAC-GEN-075
Procedure for Non-Conformance Management TANAP Tekfen
08.11.2016
Documents 21122016\3.8 Procedures for Physical & Final Reinstatement - 3.8 Procedures for Physical & Final reinstatement (Read me)
Procedures for Physical & Final reinstatement (Read me)
Documents 21122016\3.7 Procedures for Testing of Excess Excavation Dredging Spoil - 3.7 Procedures for Testing of Excess Excavation Dredging Spoil (Read me)
Procedures for Testing of Excess Excavation Dredging Spoil (Read me)
Documents 21122016\6.7 Procedures Management Plan for Invasive Species - 6.7 Procedures Management Plan for Invasive Species (Read me)
Procedures Management Plan for Invasive Species (Read me)
Documents 21122016\1.2 Process & Timeline for transfer of Org - 1.2 Process & Timeline for Transfer of Organisation (Read Me)
Process & Timeline for Transfer of Organisation
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - SYA-PLN-SOC-GEN-003_P4-0
Procurement & Supply Management Plan SYA ‐ Sicim‐Yuksel‐Akkord JV
21/05/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - TKF-PLN-ENV-PL3-017_P4-0
Procurement and Supply Management Tekfen 11/12/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - FRN-PLN-SOC-PL1-002_P4-0
PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT PLAN
FERNAS 17/06/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.1 \ CC- ESMS \ SPK-PLN-SOC-DAR-004-Procurement and Supply Management Plan- P4-C
Procurement and Supply Management Plan TANAP 21-11-16
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Project Basis of Design - WRP-REP-EGG-GEN-003
Project Basis of Design TANAP WorleyParsons
4/5/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Env Mon Plan - Annex 1 - TNP-REG-ENV-GEN-003-Rev-P3-1
Project Environment and Social Commitments Register
TANAP 23/06/2016
Revised 12.10.2016 -Commitment Register - TNP-REG-ENV-GEN-003-Rev-P3-3
Project Environmental and Social CommitmentsRegister
TANAP 12/10/2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.7) \ TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-003_Annex 1
Project Environmental and Social CommitmentsRegister
TANAP 29.08.2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ PROJECT EXECUTION PLAN TANAP 9/2012
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
1.1 \ CC- ESMS \ CIN-PLN-ENV-GEN-001-Rev-P1-0_PEP_ESIA.Org. chart CINAR
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.4 \ CIN-PLN-ENV-GEN-002_Rev-P3-3_PEP_TPMC.Org.chart
PROJECT EXECUTION PLAN (PEP)THIRD PARTY ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MONITORING SERVICES
TANAP CINAR
24/02/2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.4 \ CIN-PLN-ENV-GEN-001-Rev-P1-0_PEP_ESIA.Org. chart
PROJECT EXECUTIONPLAN TANAP CINAR SOCAR
9/2012
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.6) \ Quality Plans & NCR Procedures of the Contractors-TANAP NCR Register \ ABB \ ABB-PCD-QAC-GEN-003
Project Nonconformity Management Procedure TANAP WorleyParsons ABB
22.06.16
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.6) \ Quality Plans & NCR Procedures of the Contractors-TANAP NCR Register \ SYA \ SYA-PLN-QAC-GEN-001
Project Quality Management Plan TANAP WorleyParsons SICIM YUKSEL AKKORD JV
20/04/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.6) \ Quality Plans & NCR Procedures of the Contractors-TANAP NCR Register \ FRN \ FRN-PLN-QAC-PL1-001
PROJECT QUALITY PLAN TANAP WorleyParsonsFERNAS
07.05.2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.6) \ Quality Plans & NCR Procedures of the
Contractors-TANAP NCR Register \ PLK \ PLK-PLN-QAC-PL4-001
PROJECT QUALITY PLAN TANAP Punj Lioyd
Limark Kalyon
20/06/2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.6) \ Quality Plans & NCR Procedures of the Contractors-TANAP NCR Register \ TKN \ TKN-PLN-QAC-GEN-001
Project Quality Plan TANAP Tekfen
07.11.2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.6) \ Quality Plans & NCR Procedures of the Contractors-TANAP NCR Register \ ABB \ ABB-PLN-QAC-GEN-001
Project Quality Plan (PQP) TANAP WorleyParsons ABB
22/11/2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.6) \ Quality Plans & NCR Procedures of the Contractors-TANAP NCR Register \ TKF \ TKF-PLN-QAC-PL3-001
Project Specific Quality Plan (PSQP) TANAP WorleyParsons Tekfen
14.05.2016
New Data 15 May 2017 \ 17.05.11 TANAP_EBRD_Presentation_2017.05.09
Project Status and Progress on ESIA Implementation EBRD - TANAP – TPMC
TANAP 11/05/2017
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.2.2
Protected and Sensitive Habitats TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.2.15A
Protected areas TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH- Protected Areas (In the scope of the list of TANAP
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
7.3.1.7 buffer regions in Annex V)
Documents 21122016\1.5 Appendix 1.3 of ESIA Maps\8.Protected Areas Map - CIN_MAP_PAR_001_01 to 001_08
Protected Areas and high biodiversity area Map TANAP CINAR
2014
Documents 21122016\1.9 Pipe Supply Contract and Prequalication Requirements - Annex 2 - Questionnaires
Questionnaires (Prequalification for Line Pipe)
Documents 21122016\5.7 RAP Fund Strategy - 5.7 RAP Fund Strategy (Read Me )
RAP Fund Strategy (Read Me )
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 4 - Project Affected Population - ANNEX 4.2 - Socioeconomic Survey Methodology
RAP of TANAP Project - METHODOLOGY FOR SOCIOECONOMIC SURVEY
Golder Associates 19/02/2014
Documents 21122016\5.2 Initial Draft of the Livelihood Restoration Plan - 5.2 Initial Draft of the Livelihood Restoration Plan (Read me)
Read me - Initial Draft of the Livelihood Restoration Plan
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 3 \ BAT_emission inventory and relevant evaluation data \ Read me
Read me - Notepad
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR10(10.3) \ Read Me 10.3
Read Me 10.3 TANAP
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.7) \ Read Me 2.7
Read Me 2.7 Social Management Plans
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR3(3.2) \ Read me 3.2
Read me 3.2
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence
Report-02.03.2017 \ PR6(6.11) \ Read Me 6.11
Read Me 6.11
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR1(1.6) \ Read Me PR1 (1.6)
Read Me PR1
Documents 21122016\6.1 Description of Timing and Baseline Survey Methodologies - 6.1 Description of Timing and Baseline Survey Methodolgies (Read me)
Read me: Description of Timing and Baseline Survey Methodolgies
Documents 21122016\8.4 Documented Evidence of Identified Disturbed Graveyards - 8.4 Documented Evidence of Identified Disturbed Graveyards (Read me)
Read me: Documented Evidence of Identified Disturbed Graveyards
Documents 21122016\6.3 Meth. used for the App. Assessment of Biodiversity Impacts - 6.3 Meth. used for the App. Assessment of Biodiversity Impacts (Read me)
Read me: Meth. used for the App. Assessment of Biodiversity Impacts
Documents 21122016\6.8 Method Statement for Tree Cutting and Replanting - 6.8 Method Statement for Tree Cutting and Replanting (Read me)
Read me: Method Statement for Tree Cutting and Replanting
Documents 21122016\6.2 The Methodology for Assessment of the current status of the Habitats - 6.2 The Methodology for Assessment of the current status of the Habitats (Read me)
Read me: The Methodology for Assessment of the current status of the Habitats
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 5 REASONS FOR THE ROUTE SELECTION AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES
TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING PLANS OF CCs - SYA-PLN-SOC-GEN-004_P4-0
RECRUITMENT AND WORKERS MANAGEMENT PLAN
SYA ‐ Sicim‐Yuksel‐Akkord JV
21/05/2015
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Reinstatement and Erosion Control Requirements - WRP-REP-EGG-GEN-004-Rev-P3-0
REINSTATEMENT AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
TANAP WorleyParsons
25/9/2014
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Reinstatement and Erosion Control Requirements for the 48 Pipe - WRP-REP-EGG-GEN-027
REINSTATEMENT AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 48" PIPE
TANAP WorleyParsons
1/9/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR10(10.3) \ REPORT FOR ESIA DISCLOSURE MEETINGS
REPORT FOR ESIA DISCLOSURE MEETING TANAP CINAR
25/11/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\13_Terrestrial Fauna Baseline Report - Ek 6 -Reptile and Amfibi Field Forms
Reptile and Amfibi Field Forms 1/5/2013
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.2.7
Reptiles TANAP
ESIA – RAP - GLD-PLN-LAC-GEN-003_P3-1 Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for TANAP Project
Golder Associates 05/10/2015
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \PR 5&10\TNP-PLN-SOC-GEN-010 RAP Monitoring Plan
Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) Monitoring Plan
TANAP 12/05/2017
New Data May 4 2017 \ 2 May 2017 Documentation \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ TANAP-CIN-TRA-TNP-0493
Revised Version of Biodiversity Action Plan TANAP CINAR
02/05/2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Daily Security Reports \ SPREAD 7 Night Push to Tal
Row security personnel control schedule 07- 08 /02/2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Daily Security Reports \ SPREAD 7 Night Push to (1)
Row security personnel control schedule 26 – 27 /02/2017
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\5_Air Quality (SO2, NOX, O3) Baseline Report\ANNEXES - Annex III_GRADKO Laboratory Accreditation Certificate
Schedule of Accreditation UKAS 31/10/2011
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\1_Sea Water and Sediment Quality BL Report - Sea Water&Sediment Quality Report
Sea Water and Sediment QualityBaseline Report TANAP 2/6/2014
New Data 15 May 2017 \ TNP-PRE-SEC-GEN-007-EBRD 11.05.2017 Security Department TANAP 11/05/2017
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ 04 TANAP-SYA-LET-WRP-0172
Security Licenses and permits SICIM YUKSEL AKKORD JV
04/06/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 1 \ FRN-PLN-SEC-PL1-001 Security Management Plan (Rev.2)
Security Management Plan TANAP FERNAS
21.02.2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ SYA-PLN-SEC-PL2-001
SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TANAP WorleyParsons SYA ‐ Sicim‐Yuksel‐Akkord JV
14/08/15
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ PLK-PLN-SEC-PL4-002
SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TANAP Punj Lioyd Limak Kalyon
22.09.2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Stations \ Security Management Plan 347
Security Management Plan WorleyParsons TANAP TAFFEN
07/06/2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ 13 Security Risk Assessment
SECURITY RISK ASSESSMENT TANAP SICIM YUKSEL AKKORD JV
25.02.2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Stations \ Security Training Plan
Security Training Plan
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Stations \ Security Exercises Plan
Site Plus Security Exercises Plan
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ HS 4.1 \ TNP-HSM-FRM-015-00008 Site Safety Inspection Report for CS5
Site safety inspection report form (CS - 5) TANAP 17/01/2017
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ HS 4.1 \ TNP-HSM-FRM-015-00001 Site Safety Inspection Report for CS1
Site safety inspection report form (CS 1) TANAP 21/12/2016
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ HS 4.1 \ TNP-HSM-FRM-015-00006 Site Safety Inspection Report for LOT1 -
Spread 2 - Ilэca Camp
Site safety inspection report form (Lot 1 / Spead 2 IIica Camp)
TANAP 23/12/2016
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ HS 4.1 \ TNP-HSM-FRM-015-00005 Site Safety Inspection Report for LOT1 - Spread 2 - Pasinler Camp
Site safety inspection report form (Lot 1 / Spead 2 Pasinler Camp)
TANAP 22/12/2016
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ HS 4.1 \ TNP-HSM-FRM-015-00007 Site Safety Inspection Report for LOT1 - Spread 9 - Refahiye Camp
Site safety inspection report form (Lot 1 / Spead 9 Refahiye Camp)
TANAP 24/12/2016
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ HS 4.1 \ TNP-HSM-FRM-015-00003 Site Safety Inspection Report for LOT1 - Spread 1 - Posof Camp
Site safety inspection report form (Lot 1 / Spread 1 Posof region)
TANAP 20/12/2016
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ HS 4.1 \ TNP-HSM-FRM-015-00004 Site Safety Inspection Report for LOT1 - Spread 1 - Selim Camp
Site safety inspection report form (Lot 1 / Spread 1 Selim Camp)
TANAP 19 - 21/12/2016
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ HS 4.1 \TNP-HSM-FRM-015-00024 Site Safety Inspection Report for MS1 Camp
site
Site safety inspection report form (MS - 1 Camp Site)
TANAP 19-20/03/2017
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ HS 4.1 \ TNP-HSM-FRM-015-00002 Site Safety Inspection Report for MS1 Camp site
Site safety inspection report form (MS 1 Camp Site)
TANAP 20/12/2016
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ HS 4.1 \TNP-HSM-FRM-015-00029 Site Safety Inspection Report for SP-7 Dutluca Camp site
Site safety inspection report form (SP-7 Dutluca Camp Site)
TANAP 29/03/2017
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ HS 4.1 \ TNP-HSM-FRM-015-00027 Site Safety Inspection Report for SP-8 Ilэcak Camp site
Site safety inspection report form (SP-8 Iiicak Camp Site)
TANAP 28/03/2017
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ HS 4.1 \TNP-HSM-FRM-015-00028 Site Safety Inspection Report for SP-8
Karaorman Camp site
Site safety inspection report form (SP-8 Karaorman Camp Site)
TANAP 28/03/2017
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ HS 4.1 \ TNP-HSM-FRM-015-00012 Site Safety Inspection Report for Spread-3 KELKЭT Fly Camp
Site safety inspection report form (Spread 3 - Kelkit Fly Camp)
TANAP 24/01/2017
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ HS 4.1 \ TNP-HSM-FRM-015-00011 Site Safety Inspection Report for Spread-3 ЗADIRKAYA Camp
Site safety inspection report form (Spread 3) TANAP 23/01/2017
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ HS 4.1 \TNP-HSM-FRM-015-00013 Site Safety Inspection Report for Spread-4 HAFЭK Camp
Site safety inspection report form (Spread 4 - Hafik Camp)
TANAP 25/01/2017
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ HS 4.1 \TNP-HSM-FRM-015-00010 Site Safety Inspection Report for LOT3 - Spread 5 …
Site safety inspection report form (Spread 5) TANAP 26/01/2017
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ HS 4.1 \ TNP-HSM-FRM-015-00009 Site Safety Inspection Report for LOT3 - Spread 6 …
Site safety inspection report form (Spread 6) TANAP 18/01/2017
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Slope Assessment Report %96 Priority 1
Slope Assessment Report - Priority 1 Areas TANAP WorleyParsons
26/3/2015
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Areas - WRP-REP-EGG-PLG-010
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Slope Assessment Report %96 Priority 2 Areas - WRP-REP-EGG-PLG-011
Slope Assessment Report - Priority 2 Areas TANAP WorleyParsons
11/8/2015
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Slope Assessment Report %96 Priority 3 Areas - WRP-REP-EGG-PLG-012
Slope Assessment Report - Priority 3 Areas TANAP WorleyParsons
5/10/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - TNP-PLN-SOC-GEN-002_P3-1
SOCIAL ACTION PLAN TANAP 15/07/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 3 SOCIAL ACTION PLANANNEX 3 SOCIAL MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR CONTRACTORS
15/07/2016
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\20_Social Baseline Report - Social Baseline Report
Social Baseline Report AYDSFIDG 24/3/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\20_Social Baseline Report - APPENDIX 1F HOUSEHOLD QUESTIONNAIRE_AGI
SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDYHOUSEHOLD QUESTIONNAIRE (FOR AGI’s)
TANAP 2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\20_Social Baseline Report - APPENDIX 1E HOUSEHOLD QUESTIONNAIRE_ROUTE
SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDYHOUSEHOLD QUESTIONNAIRE(ROUTE SURVEY)
TANAP 2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\20_Social Baseline Report - APPENDIX 1C SETTLEMENT QUESTIONNARE_AGI
SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDYSETTLEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE (FOR AGI’s)
TANAP 2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\20_Social Baseline Report - APPENDIX 1D SETTLEMENT QUESTIONNARE_ESKISEHIR OFF TAKE
SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDYSETTLEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE (FOR ESKISEHIR CONNECTION)
TANAP 2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\20_Social Baseline Report - APPENDIX 1B SETTLEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE_PHONE INTERVIEW
SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDYSETTLEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE (PHONE INTERVIEW)
TANAP 2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\20_Social Baseline Report - APPENDIX 1A SETTLEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE_ROUTE
SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDYSETTLEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE(ROUTE SURVEY)
TANAP 2013
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 8 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-8.6 Social Impact Assessment-Offshore TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Monitoring Plan - TNP-PLN-SOC-GEN-003_P3-1
SOCIAL MONITORING PLAN TANAP 18/07/2016
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.6\Appendix-2.6.4. Socio-economic Baseline Studies - 4. Socio-economic Baseline Studies
Socio-economic Baseline Studies
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH- Soil Characteristics TANAP
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
7.3.1.2
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\3_Soil Contamination Baseline Study Report - Soil Contamination BL Rep.
Soil Contamination Baseline Study Report TANAP 24/7/2014
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ 12 Standard Operating Procedures (Sample)
SOPs Standart Operating Procedures – Site Security Likely scenarios & course of action
Documents 21122016\3.3 Specific Process Used to Calculate Sulphides in Soil - WRP-SPC-EGG-GEN-010
SPECIFICATION FOR PHASE 3 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION WORKS
TANAP Worley Parson
27/8/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – BAP – BAP- Annex 6 - Annex-6.1 Specification for Reinstatement
Specification for Reinstatement Worley Parsons 26/11/2015
Documents 21122016\6.1 Description of Timing and Baseline Survey Methodologies\BAP\Annex-6 - Annex-6.1 Specification for Reinstatement
Specification for Reinstatement Worley Parsons TANAP
26/11/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 6 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-9 \ Annex-6 \ Annex-6.1 Specification for Reinstatement
Specification for Reinstatement TANAP WorleyParsons
26-11-15
New Data May 4 2017 \ 2 May 2017 Documentation \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex-6 \ Annex-6.1 Specification for Reinstatement
Specification for Reinstatement WorleyParsons TANAP
26/11/2015
New Data May 4 2017 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ Annex 6 \ Annex-6.1 Specification for Reinstatement
Specification for Reinstatement TANAP WorleyParsons
26/11/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 3 \ SPREAD 5 DOРANKENT CAMP CCTV LAYOUT PLAN
SPREAD 5 DOРANKENT CAMP CCTV LAYOUT PLAN
Bordoter
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 3 \ SPREAD 6 POLATLI CAMP CCTV LAYOUT PLAN
SPREAD 6 POLATLI CAMP CCTV LAYOUT PLAN Bordoter
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 6 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT TANAP
Documents 21122016\11.2 Updated SEP - TNP-PLN-SOC-GEN-001-Rev P3-1
Stakeholder Engagement Plan TANAP 26/10/2016
New Data May 4 2017 \ TNP-PLN-SOC-GEN-001-Rev P3-2 Stakeholder Engagement Plan TANAP 30/01/2017
Documents 21122016\11.2 Updated SEP - Annex 1_Stakeholder Engagement Implementation Guideline For Construction Phase
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLANANNEX 1 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATIONGUIDELINE FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE
TANAP 26/10/2016
Stakeholder Engagement Plan StakeholderEngagement Plan Golder Associates 18/8/2013
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 3 - APP 3.2a-Stakeholder Engagement Plan
StakeholderEngagement Plan Golder Associates 18/08/2013
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Statement of compliance
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ Enclosure 5 Statement of compliance SITE PLUS
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\4_Air Quality (PM10&PM2.5) Baseline Report - A IV_2010-2013_Measurement Results
Station Report: Measurement results for SO2, PM10 and NOX
2010-2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\5_Air Quality (SO2, NOX, O3) Baseline Report\ANNEXES - Annex V_Measurement Results (Canakkale_Biga)
Station Report: Measurement results for SO2, PM10 and NOX
2010 – 2013
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Stations \ Risk Assessment-Feb 2017
Station Risk Analysis and Assessment results TANAP 01/03/2017
Documents 21122016\1.8 Status of Current Emergency Response Plans - 1.8 Status of Current Emergency Response Plans (Read me)
Status of Current Emergency Response Plans
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.5)\ TANAP-TNP-LET-FRN-0055
Stop Work Notice TANAP 23/09/2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 1 \ TANAP-FRN-LET-WRP-0116 - Submission for Subcontractor Agreement
SUBCONTRACTOR AGREEMENT 25/05/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ 01 TANAP-SYA-LET-WRP-0048 (1)
Subcontractor list SICIM YUKSEL AKKORD JV
06/03/2015
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\2_Surface Water Quality Baseline Report - Surface Water BL Rep.
Surface Water Quality Baseline Report TANAP 2/6/2014
Documents 21122016\4.1 Detailed Incident Analysis Reports - SYA Fatal Crash Executive Sum._Rev.0
SYA FATAL CRASH INCIDENT EXECUTIVE REPORT
5/9/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA - TOC Table of content TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - Index Table of content of Chapter 7: Environmental Baseline Features
TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 8 – Chapter 8_Index Table of content of chapter 8 – Impact Assessment
TANAP
New Data 15 May 2017 \ TANAP-TNP-LET-SYA-0093_submission of assurance review report_Lot 2
TANAP Assurance Review Report Findings TANAP 14/11/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 6-Cultural Heritage Management Plan - Annex A - TNP-PCD-ENV-GEN-006
TANAP Change Find Requirements TANAP 19/07/2016
Documents 21122016\2.4 Labour Data Breakdown - 2.4 TANAP Contractor Employment Status ( As of 01 December 2016)
TANAP Contractor Employees ( As of 01 December 2016)
TANAP 1/12/2016
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ TANAP comments 24052017
TANAP coomments 24052017 TANAP 24/05/2017
Documents 21122016\2.6 TANAP HR Audit on Subcontractors - 2.6 TANAP HR Audit on Subcontractors
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
TANAP HR Audit on Subcontractors (Read me)
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ 17.01.03 EBRD TANAP ISSUES REQUIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND CLARIFICATION Latest
TANAP ISSUES REQUIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND CLARIFICATION Latest
TANAP
Documents 21122016\2.7 Local Hiring Plans - HZR-REP-SOC-GEN-001 TANAP Manpower Baseline report TANAP HAZAR STRA TEJI
11/12/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 3 - APP 3.2b-Stakeholder Register
TANAP PROJECT APPENDIX 3.2b- STAKEHOLDER LIST
Documents 21122016\4.1 Detailed Incident Analysis Reports - Executive-OHPL 16.03.2016
TANAP PROJECT INCIDENT EXECUTIVE REPORT (overhead powerline Arc)
3/2016
Documents 21122016\4.1 Detailed Incident Analysis Reports - Executive Summary-Tire Burst 09.03.2016
TANAP PROJECT INCIDENT EXECUTIVE REPORT (rollover of machinery)
3/2016
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \PR 5&10\ TNP-REP-SOC-GEN-001 RAP Q1 Internal Monitoring Report
TANAP PROJECT RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP) 1ST QUARTERLY INTERNAL MONITORING REPORT (MARCH 2017)
TANAP 30/03/2017
Documents 21122016\2.5 Procedures for Third Party Monitoring on Labour - TANAP PROJECT SITE AUDIT PROCEDURE
TANAP PROJECT SITE CONTROL PROCEDURE 01/03/2016
New Data 15 May 2017 \ SOC_Presentation Social_11052017 TANAP PROJECT SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT TANAP 11/05/2017
Documents 21122016\4.1 Detailed Incident Analysis Reports - Executive Summary-Railway 03.02.2016
TANAP PROJECT TRAFFIC INCIDENT EXECUTIVE REPORT
2/2016
Documents 21122016\11.1 Copies of All Presentations - TANAP EBRD Presentation
TANAP project update TANAP 11/2016
EXECUTIVE-SUMMARY-ENG-No-Memo-07262016 TANAP Project’s Executive Summary of ESIA and Supporting Environmental and Social Safeguard Documents
TANAP 22/7/2016
ESIA - Executive Summary - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY_ENG TANAP Project’s Executive Summary of ESIA and Supporting Environmental and Social Safeguard Documents FOR SUBMISSION TO WORLD BANK’S BOARD AS PER PELOSI REQUIREMENT
TANAP 22/07/2016
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \
EBRD.ESAP.TANAPresponse.24.05.2017
TANAP Response:
APPENDIX C: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ACTION PLAN
TANAP 24/05/2017
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \ EBR014_TANAP ESDD Report_Rev2.TANAP.response.24.05.2017
TANAP response: Final Report of the Independent Environmental and social consultant 24/05/2017
TANAP 24/05/2017
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 13 (Appendices) – Appendix 3 - APP 3.2c-Project Brochure
TANAP Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline – The path of energy and cooperation
TANAP
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 7 – Consultation - App 7.1 GLAC rev P3-1 TANAP TRANS ANATOLIAN NATURAL GAS PIPELINEGUIDE TO LAND ACQUİSİTİON AND COMPENSATİON
06/2014
Documents 21122016\11.1 Copies of All Presentations - Presentation_29.11.2016
TANAP: LOT 1 29/11/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - SYA-PLN-ENV-GEN-008_P4-0 - Appendix-1_all_maps
TANAPTRANS ANATOLIAN NATURAL GAS PIPELINE PROJECT – LOT 2
TANAP
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 3 \ BAT_emission inventory and relevant evaluation data \ WRP-REP-MEC-GEN-001-P3-2. Technical bid evaluation report.emission values
Technical bid evaluation report emission values
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 3 \ BAT_emission inventory and relevant evaluation data \ WRP-TNO-PRS-CSG-002_waste heat recovery
Technical Note Compressor Stations Waste Heat Recovery
TANAP WorleyParsons
06/08/2015
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Technical Note for Design of Pipelines in Karst - WRP-TNO-EGG-PLG-001
TECHNICAL NOTE FOR DESIGN OF PIPELINES IN KARST
TANAP WorleyParsons
24/6/2015
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Technical Specification for Seismic Trenches - WRP-SPC-PPL-PLG-005
Technical Specification for Seismic Trenches 4/2/2016
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 3-CC Sub EMPs - Aggregates Man. Plan - TKF-PLN-ENV-PL3-011_P4-0
TEKFEN Aggregates Management Plan Tekfen 29/04/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLANS OF CCs -TKF-PLN-ENV-PL3-015_P4-0
TEKFEN Community Relations Plan Tekfen 21/05/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - COMMUNITY SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - TKF-PLN-ENV-PL3-014_P4-0
TEKFEN Community Safety Management Plan Tekfen 21/05/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING PLANS OF CCs - TKF-PLN-ENV-PL3-016_P4-0
Tekfen Employment and Training Plan Tekfen 08/06/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – BAP – BAP- Annex 6 - Annex-6.4 Erosion, Reinstatement and Landscaping Plan for LOT-3
Tekfen Erosion, Reinstatement and Landscaping Plan
Tekfen 30/06/2015
Documents 21122016\6.1 Description of Timing and Baseline Survey Methodologies\BAP\Annex-6 - Annex-6.4 Tekfen Erosion Control and Stabilisation Plan for LOT-3
TEKFEN Erosion, Reinstatement and Landscaping Plan
TEKFEN TANAP
30/6/2015
Documents 21122016\3.1 Hydrotest Management Plan – Procedure - TKF-PLN-ENV-PL3-022.Environmental Hydrotest Monitoring Plan
TEKFEN Hydrostatic Test Environmental Monitoring Plan
TEKFEN TANAP
5/12/2016
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 3 \ TKF-PLN-SEC-PL3-001-P4-2
TEKFEN Project Security Management Plan TANAP TEKFEN
15.12.2016
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
(SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN)
BRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \PR 5&10\ Appeals Committee \ToR_TANAP_Appeals Committee Experts
Terms of Reference for Appeals Committee Experts
1/01/2017
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\22_Terrestrial Archaeology Baseline Report - Terrestrial Archaeology Baseline Report
Terrestrial Archaeology BaselineReport SAVB 24/7/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\22_Terrestrial Archaeology Baseline Report\PHOTO_29052014
Terrestrial Archaeology PHOTOs
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.2.12A
Terrestrial Habitats and Ecosystems TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.2.9
Terrestrial Invertebrates TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.2.3
Terrestrial Vegetation TANAP
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\6_Noise & Vibration BL Report - A 4 SVAN 958
Test results of Calibration AVL 19/6/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\6_Noise & Vibration BL Report - A 4 SVAN 958 1
Test results of Calibration Protos 30/10/2013
ESIA – RAP – ANNEXES - Chp 3 – Legal - ANNEX 3.4 - Equator Principles THE EQUATOR PRINCIPLES Equator Principles Financial Institutions
06/2013
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Training and Drill Documents \ ROW Security Training Dutluca Eskiюehir 2017 \ Trainings in Gцnen-Karaorman 2016 \ Inspection Notes
THEORETICALLY AND PRACTICALLY SECURITY EDUCATION
Site Plus TANAP
22/11/2016
Documents 21122016\11.1 Copies of All Presentations - 3rd Party Environmental and Social Monitoring
Third Party Environmental & Social Monitoring
New Data 15 May 2017 \ 3rd Party Environmental Monitoring_EBRD_11_05_2017_final
Third Party Environmental Monitoring TANAP CINAR
11/05/2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 3 \Waste Facility Inspection Report \ TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-009
Third party facility E&S inspection checklist – Waste Management
TANAP 17-03-2017
New Data 15 May 2017 \ 3rd Party Social Monitoring_EBRD_11_05_2017
Third Party Social Monitoring TANAP CINAR
11/05/2017
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESIA – Chapter 7 - TNP-REP-ENV-GEN-002_CH-7.3.2.16A
Threatened species TANAP
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - FRN-PLN-SOC-PL1-003_P4-0
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN FERNAS 24/06/2015
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP - Social Action Plan - ANNEX 2 - TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLANS OF CCs - PLK-PLN-SOC-PL4-004_P4-1
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN PUNJ LLOYD-LIMAK JV 27/05/2016
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.1 \ CC- ESMS \ SPK-PLN-SOC-DAR-006-Traffic Management Plan- P4-C
Traffic Management Plan TANAP 11-11-16
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Training and Drill Documents \ Gendarmerie Training Dutluca Eskiюehir 2017 \ E__T_M KATILIM BELGE
Training Attendance Form TANAP Punj Lioyd Limak Kalyon
17/02/2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Training and Drill Documents \
ROW Security Training Dutluca Eskiюehir 2017 \ E__T_M KATILIM BELG
Training Attendance Form TANAP Punj Lioyd
Limak Kalyon
08/02/2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 3 \ VPSHR TRAINING \ SPREAD 6 – POLATLI \ POLATLI VPSHR TRAINING ATTENDANCE SHEET-1, 2, 3, 4
Training attendance sheet
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 3 \ VPSHR TRAINING \ SPREAD 5 – DOGANKENT \ DOРANKENT VPSHR TRAINING ATTENDANCE SHEET-1, 2
Training attendance sheet
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ 11 Spread-4 Training Plan
Training Plan
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence
Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Training and Drill Documents \ ROW Security Training Dutluca Eskiюehir 2017 \ Security Drills in Gonen - Karaorman 2017 \ Gonen Training and Karaorman Training
Training report: Class training TANAP 03/02/2017
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\6_Noise & Vibration BL Report - A 1 Analysis Reports
Trans anatolian natural gas pipeline (TANAP) project environmental and social impact assessment report baseline studies – Environmental Noise and vibration measurement report
CINAR 13/8/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\4_Air Quality (PM10&PM2.5) Baseline Report - A 1 The Analysis Reports_PM10
Trans anatolian natural gas pipeline (TANAP) project environmental and social impact assessment report baseline studies – PM10 measurement report
CINAR 13/8/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\4_Air Quality (PM10&PM2.5) Baseline Report - A 1 The Anlys Rep_PM10_Addtnl Camp Sites
Trans anatolian natural gas pipeline (TANAP) project environmental and social impact assessment report baseline studies – PM10 measurement report
CINAR 29/5/2014
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\4_Air Quality (PM10&PM2.5) Baseline Report - A 1 The Anlys
Trans anatolian natural gas pipeline (TANAP) project environmental and social impact
CINAR 29/5/2014
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Rep_PM2_5_Addtnl Camp Sites assessment report baseline studies - PM2.5 measurement report
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\4_Air Quality (PM10&PM2.5) Baseline Report - A 1 The Analysis Reports_PM2_5
Trans anatolian natural gas pipeline (TANAP) project environmental and social impact assessment report baseline studies - PM2.5 measurement report
CINAR 14/8/2013
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\6_Noise & Vibration BL Report - A 1 Analysis Reports_Additional Camp Sites
Trans anatolian natural gas pipeline (TANAP) project report baseline studies – Environmental
Noise measurement report
CINAR 29/5/2014
Documents 21122016\2.3 Labour Union Agreements In Place Lot 2& 3\Lot 3 - TANAP-TKF-LET-WRP-0651
Trans anatolian natural gas pipeline project – lot 3 – World Bank due diligence
TEKFEN 1/2/2016
Documents 21122016\2.3 Labour Union Agreements In Place Lot 2& 3\Lot 2 - TANAP-SYA-LET-WRP-0533
TRANS ANATOLIAN NATURAL GAS PIPELINE PROJECT - LOT2
SICIM YUKSEL AKKORD JV
3/2/2016
Documents 21122016\4.3 Transport of Dangerous Goods and Materials - 4.3 Transport of Dangerous Goods & Materials (Read Me)
Transport of Dangerous Goods & Materials
Documents 21122016\2.2 Turkish Labour Law (in English) - 2.2 Turkish Labour Law (Read me)
Turkish Labour Law
Documents 21122016\3.4 Engin. & Design Sol. & Pro. Pipe Shifting Wetlands & Seismic Act\Typical Drawing - Concrete Coated Pipe - WRP-DGA-PPL-PLG-030
Typical drawing concreate coated pipe TANAP WorleyParsons
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Typical Drawing Fault Crossings 56%94 & 48%94 Tanap Gas Pipeline - WRP-DGA-PPL-PLG-042
Typical drawing fault crossing 48’’ & 56’’ TANAP gas pipeline
TANAP WorleyParsons
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Typical Drawing - Karst Drainage Requirement - WRP-DGA-EGG-PLG-001
Typical drawing karst drainage requirement TANAP WorleyParsons
Documents 21122016\3.4 Engin. & Design Sol. & Pro. Pipe Shifting Wetlands & Seismic Act\Typical Drawing - Saddle Bag for Buoyancy Control - WRP-DGA-PPL-PLG-031
Typical drawing saddle bag for buoyancy control TANAP WorleyParsons
Documents 21122016\3.4 Engin. & Design Sol. & Pro. Pipe Shifting
Wetlands & Seismic Act\Typical Drawing - Screw Anchor Detail - WRP-DGA-PPL-PLG-032
Typical Drawing screw anchor detail TANAP
WorleyParsons
Documents 21122016\1.5 Appendix 1.3 of ESIA Maps\11.Typical Drawings
Typical Drawings
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Vehicle Inspection \ Vehicle and Visitor Inspection Records 1 - 5
Vehicle and Visitor Inspection Records Site Plus 11/2016
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 3 \ BAT_emission inventory and relevant evaluation data \ WRP-REP-PRS-CSG-001-vent & blow down report
Vent and Blowdown Report TANAP WorleyParsons
9/11/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR3(3.2) \ WRP-REP-PRS-CSG-001-vent & blow down report
Vent and Blowdown Report TANAP WorleyParson
09/11/2015
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 1 \ 1.1 \ CC- ESMS \ SPK-PLN-ENV-DAR-006- Waste Management Plan- P4-
0
Waste Management Plan TANAP 13-02-17
Documents 21122016\3.2 Water Intake Assessment & Allocation - 3.2 Water Intake Assessment & Allocation (Read me)
Water Intake Assessment & Allocation - 3.2 Water Intake Assessment & Allocation (Read me)
Documents 21122016\11.1 Copies of All Presentations - LOT-1 EBRD- Presentation
WELCOMESEUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT TEAM
FERNAS TANAP
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.5)&PR4(4.1) \ FRN-PLN-HSE-PL1-025 Winterizaiton Plan p4-1
WINTERIZATION PLAN TANAP FERNAS
31.08.2016
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\22_Terrestrial Archaeology Baseline Report\Att.2_Ann 3 – Tm 27, 30,33,36,39,and 42
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\25_Geotechnical Survey Borelogs - BoreLog Rep1-TR
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.6\Appendix-2.6.2. Physical Baseline Studies - Photographs
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.6\Appendix-2.6.3. Biological Baseline Studies - Terrestrial
Documents 21122016\4.6 H&S Requirements for Camps & Accommodations - 4.6 SYA-PLN-HSE-GEN-012-P4-0 - 4.6TKN-PLN-HSM-GEN-003-P4-0
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.6\Appendix-2.6.3. Biological Baseline Studies - Marine
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.6\Appendix-2.6.4. Socio-economic Baseline Studies - Photographs
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.6\Appendix-2.6.5. Archaeological Baseline Studies - Photographs
Documents 21122016\1.5 Appendix 1.3 of ESIA Maps\10.Environmental Master Plan and Legands\Plan Hьkьmleri Onaylэ\100.000 цlзekli_Mekansal
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Documents 21122016\1.5 Appendix 1.3 of ESIA Maps\10.Environmental Master Plan and Legands\Plan Hьkьmleri Onaylэ\Balэkesir
Documents 21122016\1.7 Onshore Fuel & Chemicals Spill Plan\TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-002 P3-2 Annexes - Annex 3-CC Sub-Management Plans
Documents 21122016\1.7 Onshore Fuel & Chemicals Spill Plan\TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-002 P3-2 Annexes – Annex 1 – National and International standards of TANAP project
Documents 21122016\1.7 Onshore Fuel & Chemicals Spill Plan\TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-002 P3-2 Annexes – Annex 4 – Environmental Management Guidelines for Contractors
Documents 21122016\1.7 Onshore Fuel & Chemicals Spill Plan\TNP-PLN-ENV-GEN-002 P3-2 Annexes\Annex 6-Cultural Heritage Management Plan
Documents 21122016\1.10 Quality Management System Procedure for Contractors
Documents 21122016\1.11 Traning Programmes & Rules of Engagement Code of Conduct - 01-5188 Sayэlэ Цzel Gьvenlik Hizmetlerine Dair Kanun
Documents 21122016\1.11 Traning Programmes & Rules of Engagement Code of Conduct - 02-5188 Sayэlэ Цzel Gьvenlik Hizmetlerine Dair Kanunun Uygulanmasэna Эl...
Documents 21122016\1.11 Traning Programmes & Rules of Engagement Code of Conduct - 03-Цzel Gьvenlik Hizmetlerinin Birleюtirilmiю Genelgesi
Documents 21122016\1.11 Traning Programmes & Rules of Engagement Code of Conduct - FRM.54 R.01 EРЭTЭM TUTANAРI
Documents 21122016\1.11 Traning Programmes & Rules of Engagement Code of Conduct - FRM.061 R00 TEBLЭР-TEBELLЬР BELGESЭ
Documents 21122016\1.11 Traning Programmes & Rules of Engagement Code of Conduct - FRM.063 R.00 ORYANTASYON EРЭTЭM RAPORU
Documents 21122016\1.11 Traning Programmes & Rules of Engagement
Code of Conduct - TLM.001 R00 GЦREV YERЭ ЦZEL TALЭMATI
Documents 21122016\2.3 Labour Union Agreements In Place Lot 2& 3\Lot 2 - sendika toplu sцzleюme
Documents 21122016\2.8 Example of Employment Contract - Sample employment contract-Fernas
FERNAS
Documents 21122016\2.8 Example of Employment Contract - Sample employment contract-SYA
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Documents 21122016\2.8 Example of Employment Contract - Sample employment contract-Tekfen
Documents 21122016\2.8 Example of Employment Contract - TANAP sample employee contract
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Engineering Design Validation Pipeline Crossings of Active Tectonic Faults
Documents 21122016\3.5 Outline of Procedures ( Geohazards,Slope Stability,Surface Fault Rupture)\Pipeline River Corssing Civil Protection Works Specification
Documents 21122016\4.2 Communicable Disease Management Plan
Documents 21122016\4.6 H&S Requirements for Camps & Accommodations - 4.6 SYA-PLN-HSE-GEN-012-P4-0
Documents 21122016\4.7 Security Risk Assessment for Use of Weapons on the Project - Genel Devriye-Keюifзi Gцrevlisi Gцrev Esaslarэ Talimatэ
Documents 21122016\4.7 Security Risk Assessment for Use of Weapons on the Project - Silah Depolama ve Bakэm Talimatэ
Documents 21122016\4.7 Security Risk Assessment for Use of Weapons on the Project - Silah Devir Teslim Talimatэ
Documents 21122016\4.7 Security Risk Assessment for Use of Weapons on the Project - Silah Emniyet ve Kaza Цnleme Talimatэ
Documents 21122016\4.7 Security Risk Assessment for Use of Weapons on the Project - Silahlэ Gьvenlik Nцbetзisi Gцrev Talimatэ
Documents 21122016\4.7 Security Risk Assessment for Use of Weapons on the Project - Silahlэ Ziyaretзi Kabul ve Silah Alma-Etme Esaslarэ Talimatэ
Documents 21122016\4.8 Emergency Response Drill Examples
Documents 21122016\4.9 Procedures For UXO identifications - 20- 4536 Sayэlэ Denizlerde ve Yurt Yьzeyinde Gцrьlen Patlayэcэ Madde ve ...
Documents 21122016\4.9 Procedures For UXO identifications - 21-Denizlerde ve Yurt Yьzeyinde Gцrьlen Patlayэcэ Madde ve Юьpheli Cisim...
Documents 21122016\5.3 Long Term Lease Agreement and Arrangements for the Forest Lands - 5.3 SAMPLE LONG TERM LEASE AGREEMENT WITH FOREST AUTHORITIES
Documents 21122016\5.5 Access Road Register
Documents 21122016\5.8 Social Investment Fund (strategy)
Documents 21122016\6.4 Itn. Con. & Stand. And EU Directives
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
benchmark biodiversity impact assessment
New Data April 17 2017 \ E&S DD Report Review-05.04.2017 \ PR 3 \Waste Facility Inspection Report \ Annex2_Inspections docs
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.5)\ WRP-QAC-FRM-001-00004-P3-2
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 1 \ SKM_C30817010614191
05.01.2017
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ 05 TANAP-WRP-TRA-SYA-0307
TANAP WorleyParsons
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ 10 Spread-3 Training Plan
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 2 \ Enclosure 2, 3,6
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Daily Security Reports \ 3-SP- 8 25.02.2017 Dut
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Daily Security Reports \ SP7-26.02.2017 Daily Shif
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Material Removal \ Material Removal Form 2 and 3 and old version form
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Perimeter Patrol Activity \ perimeter foot patrol Feb 26 2017 TOM Reader
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Perimeter Patrol Activity \ Perimeter Patrol Activity Records Book
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Perimeter Patrol Activity \ Perimeter Patrol Activity Records NIZAMIYE 1 and 2 TOM Reader
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Perimeter Patrol Activity \ Perimeter Patrol Feb 26-27 Motor TOM Readers
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Lot 4 \ Training and Drill Documents \ ROW Security Training Dutluca Eskiюehir 2017 \ Trainings in Gцnen-Karaorman 2016 \ Trainings in Gцnen-Karaorman 2016\ KARAORMAN
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
KAMP E__T_M 22.11.20 and KARAORMAN KAMP E__T_M 22.11.20
New Data April 17 2017 \ EBRD Questionarie on Social due dilligence Report-02.03.2017 \ PR2(2.10) \ Stations \ Akasaklэ eрitim ve tatbikat tutanak
New Data May 4 2017 \ CIN-REP-ENV-GEN-017-Rev-P3-10 \ TANAP-CIN-TRA-TNP-0493.pdf \
ESIA – ESMS Docs – ESMP – EAP - Annex 6-Cultural Heritage Management Plan - Annex C
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\5_Air Quality (SO2, NOX, O3) Baseline Report\ANNEXES\Annex I_The Analysis Reports
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\24_Hydro.,Ocean.,Geological and Geophysical S.R\Annexes - Annex-3 Lab Results for Core Sample
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\24_Hydro.,Ocean.,Geological and Geophysical S.R\Annexes - Annex-4 SDigital Data
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\24_Hydro.,Ocean.,Geological and Geophysical S.R\Annexes - Annex-5 Information and Calibration for Equipmant
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\24_Hydro.,Ocean.,Geological and Geophysical S.R\Annexes - Annex-6 Education Documents
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\24_Hydro.,Ocean.,Geological and Geophysical S.R\Annexes - Annex-7 Photos
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\24_Hydro.,Ocean.,Geological and Geophysical S.R\Annexes - Annex-8 Mozaic Map
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\24_Hydro.,Ocean.,Geological and Geophysical S.R\Annexes - Annex-
9 Seismic Profile
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\24_Hydro.,Ocean.,Geological and Geophysical S.R\Annexes - Annex-1 Bathymetric Map and Report
Documents 21122016\1.4 Appendix 2 of ESIA\APPENDIX 2.4\24_Hydro.,Ocean.,Geological and Geophysical S.R\Annexes - Annex-2 Lab Results
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \PR 5&10\ RAP Disclosure
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \PR 5&10\ RAP Fund Announcement Brochure_TR_2017_GLAC-2
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \PR 5&10\RAP Fund Announcement Leaflet_TR_2017
EBRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \PR 5&10\RAP Fund Announcement Poster_TR_2017
BRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \PR 5&10\ Appeals Committee \ Lot 2_Poster Sample
BRD_ESAP_ESDD&relevant docs.share_dated_24.05.2017 \PR 5&10\ Appeals Committee \ Lot 4_Poster Sample
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
APPENDIX B: IFC EHS GUIDELINES COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT TABLE
Demonstrates Compliance Item is considered in compliance with Local and/or International requirements/standards (based on IESC review of TANAP ESIA)
Compliance Anticipated
Item is considered in compliance with Local and/or International requirements/standards (based on IESC site visit of construction corridor and TANAP operational standards and existing construction phase Environment, Social and OHS documentation)
Partial Compliance
Project’s progress and/or information/data available to date are partially adequate to fulfil Local and/or International requirements/standards, further work is needed to achieve compliance
Not Applicable Item does not apply to this Project
General IFC EHS Guidelines Requirements Compliance Category
Environmental Protection
1. Air Emissions and Ambient Air Quality
Ambient Air Quality
1.1. Emissions do not result in pollutant concentrations that reach or exceed relevant ambient quality guidelines and standards by applying national legislated standards, or in their absence, the current WHO Air Quality Guidelines.
Demonstrates Compliance
1.2. Projects with significant sources of air emissions, and potential for significant impacts to ambient air quality, should prevent or minimize impacts by ensuring that: emissions do not contribute a significant portion to the attainment of relevant ambient air quality guidelines or standards. As a general rule, this Guideline suggests 25 percent of the applicable air quality standards to allow additional, future sustainable development in the same airshed.
Demonstrates Compliance
1.3. At facility level, impacts should be estimated through qualitative or quantitative assessments by the use of baseline air quality assessments and atmospheric dispersion models to assess potential ground level concentrations. Local atmospheric, climatic, and air
quality data should be applied when modeling dispersion, protection against atmospheric downwash, wakes, or eddy effects of the source, nearby structures, and terrain features. The dispersion model applied should be internationally recognised, or comparable.
Demonstrates
Compliance
1.4. Facilities or projects located within poor quality airsheds, and within or next to areas established as ecologically sensitive (e.g. national parks), should ensure that any increase in pollution levels is as small as feasible, and amounts to a fraction of the applicable short-term and annual average air quality guidelines or standards as established in the project-specific environmental assessment. Suitable mitigation measures should also include the relocation of significant sources of emissions outside the airshed in question, use of cleaner fuels or technologies, application of comprehensive pollution control measures, offset activities at installations controlled by the project sponsor or other facilities within the same airshed, and buy-down of emissions within the same airshed.
Demonstrates Compliance
Point Sources
1.5. The stack height for all point sources of emissions should be designed according to good international industry practice (GIP).
Compliance Anticipated
1.6. Emissions from small combustion process installations (3 MWth - 50 MWth), operated more than 500 hours per year, and those with an annual capacity utilisation of more than 30 percent should be in compliance with standards, recommended by General EHS guidelines of IFC.
Not Applicable
Fugitive Sources
1.7. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) emissions associated with equipment leaks should be prevented and controlled by techniques including: Equipment modifications; Implementation a leak detection and repair (LDAR) program that controls fugitive
emissions by regularly monitoring to detect leaks, and implementing repairs within a predefined time period;
Demonstrates Compliance
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Substitution of less volatile substances; Collection of vapours through air extractors and subsequent; Treatment with destructive control devices; Use of floating roofs on storage tanks.
1.8. Dust control methods should be implemented to prevent particulate matter (dust) emissions including the following: Covers, water suppression, or increased moisture content for open materials storage piles; Use of water suppression for control of loose materials on paved or unpaved road surfaces.
Demonstrates Compliance
1.9. Open burning of solid wastes, whether hazardous or nonhazardous, is not considered good practice and should be avoided.
Demonstrates Compliance
1.10. No new systems or processes should be installed using CFCs, halons, 1,1,1- trichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride, methyl bromide or HBFCs.
Demonstrates Compliance
Mobile Sources – Land-based
1.11 Emissions from on-road and off-road vehicles should comply with national or regional programs. In the absence of these, the following approach should be considered: Implementation of the manufacturer recommended engine maintenance programs; Drivers should be instructed on the benefits of driving practices that reduce both the risk of
accidents and fuel consumption, including measured acceleration and driving within safe speed limits;
Operators with fleets of 120 or more units of heavy duty vehicles, or 540 or more light duty vehicles within an airshed should consider additional ways to reduce potential impacts including replacing older vehicles with newer, more fuel efficient alternatives; Converting high-use vehicles to cleaner fuels, where feasible;
Installing and maintaining emissions control devices, such as catalytic converters; Implementing a regular vehicle maintenance and repair program.
Demonstrates Compliance
Greenhouse Gases (GHGs)
1.12. The following measures should be implemented to reduce and control greenhouse gases: Carbon financing; Protection and enhancement of sinks and reservoirs of greenhouse gases; Carbon capture and storage technologies; Limitation and / or reduction of methane emissions; Enhancement of energy efficiency.
Compliance Anticipated
Air quality monitoring
1.13. Air quality monitoring program should be developed. The monitoring parameters selected should reflect the pollutants of concern associated with project processes. The air quality monitoring program should consider the following elements: baseline calculations; monitoring type and frequency (data on emissions and ambient air quality generated
through the monitoring program should be representative of the emissions discharged by the project over time);
monitoring locations; sampling and analysis methods (monitoring programs should apply national or international
methods for sample collection and analysis).
Partial Compliance
1.14. Annual Stack Emission Testing of boilers with capacities between =3 MWth and < 20 MWth should be carried out to control SO2, NOx and PM (for gaseous fuel- fired boilers, only NOx). SO2 can be calculated based on fuel quality certification if no SO2 control equipment is used. If Annual Stack Emission Testing demonstrates results consistently and significantly better than the required levels, frequency of Annual Stack Emission Testing can be reduced from
annual to every two or three years. Annual Stack Emission Testing of boilers with capacities between =20 MWth and < 50 MWth should be carried out to control SO2, NOx and PM (for gaseous fuel-fired boilers, only NOx). Emission Monitoring: SO2. Plants with SO2 control equipment: Continuous. NOx: Continuous monitoring of either NOx emissions or indicative NOx emissions using
combustion parameters. PM: Continuous monitoring of either PM emissions, opacity, or indicative PM emissions
using combustion parameters / visual monitoring.
Partial Compliance
1.14. Air quality monitoring for turbines should include: Partial
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Annual Stack Emission Testing: NOx, SO2 and PM (NOx only for gaseous fuel-fired diesel engines).
If Annual Stack Emission Testing results show constantly (3 consecutive years) and significantly (e.g. less than 75 percent) better than the required levels, frequency of Annual Stack Emission Testing can be reduced from annual to every two or three years.
Emission Monitoring: NOx: Continuous monitoring of either NOx emissions or indicative NOx emissions using combustion parameters. SO2: Continuous monitoring if SO2 control equipment is used. PM: Continuous monitoring of either PM emissions or indicative PM emissions using operating parameters.
Compliance
2. Energy Conservation
Energy Management Programs
2.1. Energy management programs should include the following elements: Identification, and regular measurement and reporting of principal energy flows within a
facility at unit process level; Preparation of mass and energy balance; Definition and regular review of energy performance targets, which are adjusted to account
for changes in major influencing factors on energy use;
Regular comparison and monitoring of energy flows with performance targets to identify where action should be taken to reduce energy use;
Regular review of targets, which may include comparison with benchmark data, to confirm that targets are set at appropriate levels.
Compliance Anticipated
Energy Efficiency
2.2. For any energy-using system, a systematic analysis of energy efficiency improvements and cost reduction opportunities should include a hierarchical examination of opportunities to: Demand/Load Side Management by reducing loads on the energy system; Supply Side Management by reduce losses in energy distribution; improve energy
conversion efficiency; exploit energy purchasing opportunities; use lower- carbon fuels.
Compliance Anticipated
2.3. In process heating systems, a system heat and mass balance should be developed for examination of savings opportunities.
Compliance Anticipated
2.4. Special measures for heating load reduction should be used including the following: Ensure adequate insulation to reduce heat losses through furnace/oven etc. structure;
Recover heat from hot process or exhaust streams to reduce system loads; In intermittently-heated systems, consider use of low thermal mass insulation to reduce
energy required to heat the system structure to operating temperature; Control process temperature and other parameters accurately to avoid, for example,
overheating or overdrying; Examine opportunities to use low weight and/or low thermal mass product carriers, such as
heated shapers, kiln cars etc.; Review opportunities to schedule work flow to limit the need for process reheating between
stages; Operate furnaces/ovens at slight positive pressure, and maintain air seals to reduce air in-
leakage into the heated system, thereby reducing the energy required to heat unnecessary air to system operating temperature;
Robust Scheduled maintenance programs.
Compliance Anticipated
2.5. Losses in heat distribution systems should be reduced through the following actions: Promptly repair distribution system leaks; Regularly verify correct operation of steam traps in steam systems, and ensure that traps
are not bypassed;
Insulate distribution system vessels, such as hot wells and de-aerators, in steam systems and thermal fluid or hot water storage tanks;
In steam systems, return condensate to the boiler house for re-use, since condensate is expensive boiler-quality water and valuable beyond its heat content alone.
Compliance Anticipated
2.6. The following efficiency opportunities should be examined for process furnaces or ovens, and utility systems, such as boilers and fluid heaters: Regularly monitor CO, oxygen or CO2 content of flue gases to verify that combustion
systems are using the minimum practical excess air volumes; Consider combustion automation using oxygen-trim controls; Minimise the number of boilers or heaters used to meet loads;
Compliance Anticipated
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Use flue dampers to eliminate ventilation losses from hot boilers held at standby; Maintain clean heat transfer surfaces; In steam boiler systems, use economisers to recover heat from flue gases to pre-heat
boiler feed water or combustion air; Adopt automatic (continuous) boiler blowdown; Recover heat from blowdown systems through flash steam recovery or feed- water
preheat; With fired heaters, consider opportunities to recover heat to combustion air through the
use of recuperative or regenerative burner systems; Oxy Fuel burners; Fuel quality control/fuel blending and etc.
2.7. Special measures to improve process cooling efficiency should be used including the following: Ensure adequate insulation; Control process temperature; Operate cooling tunnels at slight positive pressure and maintain air seals to reduce air in-
leakage into the cooled system;
Examine opportunities to pre-cool using heat recovery to a process stream requiring heating, or by using a higher temperature cooling utility;
In cold and chill stores, minimise heat gains to the cooled space by use of air curtains, entrance vestibules, or rapidly opening/closing doors;
Do not use refrigeration for auxiliary cooling duties, such as compressor cylinder head or oil cooling;
Use energy efficiency techniques in air conditioning applications.
Compliance Anticipated
2.8. The efficiency of cooling systems should be improved by effective refrigeration system design and increased refrigerant compression efficiency, as well as minimisation of the temperature difference through which the system works and of auxiliary loads used to operate the refrigeration system.
Compliance Anticipated
2.9. Refrigerant compression efficiency should be improved by avoiding operation of multiple compressors at part-load conditions; considering turndown efficiency when specifying chillers.
Compliance Anticipated
2.10. Energy use of refrigeration system auxiliaries (e.g. evaporator fans and chilled water pumps) should be reduced.
Compliance Anticipated
Compressed Air Systems
2.11. Special energy conservation measures should be used including : examination of each true user of compressed air to identify the air volume needed and the
pressure at which this should be delivered; air use reduction opportunities review.
Compliance Anticipated
2.12. Monitoring of pressure losses in filters should be provided. Adequately sized distribution pipework designed to minimise pressure losses should be used.
Compliance Anticipated
3. Wastewater and Ambient Water Quality
General applicability and approach
3.1. In the context of their overall ESHS management system, facilities should understand the quality, quantity, frequency and sources of liquid effluents in its installations.
Demonstrates Compliance
3.2. Segregation of liquid effluents principally along industrial, utility, sanitary, and rainwater categories should be planed and implemented, in order to limit the volume of water requiring specialised treatment.
Demonstrates Compliance
3.3. Opportunities should be identified to prevent or reduce wastewater pollution through such measures as recycle/reuse within their facility, input substitution, or process modification.
Demonstrates Compliance
3.4. Wastewater discharges should be compliant with the applicable: (i) discharge standard (if the wastewater is discharged to a surface water or sewer), and (ii) water quality standard for a specific reuse.
Demonstrates Compliance
3.5. Water use efficiency should be provided to reduce the amount of wastewater generation.
Demonstrates Compliance
3.6. Process modification should be implemented, including waste minimisation, and reducing the use of hazardous materials to reduce the load of pollutants requiring treatment.
Demonstrates Compliance
3.7. When wastewater treatment is required prior to discharge, the level of treatment should be based on: National and local standards as reflected in permit requirements and sewer system capacity
Demonstrates Compliance
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
to convey and treat wastewater if discharge is to sanitary sewer; Assimilative capacity of the receiving water for the load of contaminant being discharged
wastewater if discharge is to surface water; Intended use of the receiving water body; Presence of sensitive receptors; GIP for the relevant industry sector.
Liquid Effluent Quality
3.8. Discharges of process wastewater, sewage, wastewater from utility operations or rainwater to surface water should not result in contaminant concentrations in excess of local ambient water quality criteria or, in the absence of local criteria, other sources of ambient water quality. Receiving water use and assimilative capacity, taking other sources of discharges to the receiving water into consideration, should also influence the acceptable pollution loadings and effluent discharge quality. Temperature of wastewater prior to discharge should not result in an increase greater than 3°C of ambient temperature at the edge of a scientifically established mixing zone which takes into account ambient water quality, receiving water use and assimilative capacity
among other considerations.
Demonstrates Compliance
3.9. Discharges of industrial wastewater, sewage, wastewater from utility operations or rainwater into public or private wastewater treatment systems should: Meet the pre-treatment and monitoring requirements of the sewer treatment system into
which it discharges; Not interfere, directly or indirectly, with the operation and maintenance of the collection
and treatment systems, or pose a risk to worker health and safety, or adversely impact characteristics of residuals from wastewater treatment operations;
Be discharged into municipal or centralised wastewater treatment systems that have adequate capacity to meet local regulatory requirements for treatment of wastewater • Generated from the project. Pre-treatment of wastewater to meet regulatory requirements before discharge from the project site is required if the municipal or centralised wastewater treatment system receiving wastewater from the project does not have adequate capacity to maintain regulatory compliance.
Demonstrates Compliance
3.10. The quality of treated process wastewater, wastewater from utility operations or rainwater discharged on land, including wetlands, should be established based on local regulatory requirements. Where land is used as part of the treatment system and the ultimate receptor is surface water, water quality guidelines for surface water discharges specific to the industry sector process should apply. Potential impact on soil, groundwater, and surface water, in the context of protection, conservation and long term sustainability of water and land resources should be assessed when land is used as part of any wastewater treatment system.
Demonstrates Compliance
3.11. Septic systems should be used for treatment and disposal of domestic sanitary sewage in areas with no sewerage collection networks. When septic systems are the selected form of wastewater disposal and treatment, they should be: Properly designed and installed in accordance with local regulations and guidance to
prevent any hazard to public health or contamination of land, surface or groundwater. Well maintained to allow effective operation. Installed in areas with sufficient soil percolation for the design wastewater loading rate. Installed in areas of stable soils that are nearly level, well drained, and permeable, with
enough separation between the drain field and the groundwater table or other receiving waters.
Demonstrates Compliance
3.12. Treatment technologies should be used to achieve the desired discharge quality for process wastewater and to maintain consistent compliance with regulatory requirements. The design and operation of the selected wastewater treatment technologies should avoid uncontrolled air emissions of volatile chemicals from wastewaters. Residuals from industrial wastewater treatment operations should be disposed in compliance with local regulatory requirements. Recommended water management strategies for utility operations include: Adoption of water conservation opportunities for facility cooling systems; Use of heat recovery methods or other cooling methods to reduce the temperature of
heated water prior to discharge to ensure the discharge water temperature does not result in an increase greater than 3°C of ambient temperature;
Demonstrates Compliance
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Minimising use of antifouling and corrosion inhibiting chemicals by ensuring appropriate depth of water intake and use of screens;
Testing for residual biocides and other pollutants of concern should be conducted to determine the need for dose adjustments or treatment of cooling water prior to discharge. Rainwater should be separated from process and sewage streams. Surface runoff from process areas or potential sources of contamination should be prevented. Runoff from process and storage areas should be segregated from potentially less contaminated runoff. Runoff from areas without potential sources of contamination should be minimised. Sludge from rainwater catchments or collection and treatment systems should be disposed in compliance with local regulatory requirements, in the absence of which disposal has to be consistent with protection of public health and safety, and conservation and long term sustainability of water and land resources.
3.13. Recommended sewage management strategies include: Segregation of wastewater streams to ensure compatibility with selected treatment option; Segregation and pre-treatment of oil and grease containing effluents prior to discharge into
sewer systems; If sewage from the industrial facility is to be discharged to surface water, treatment to
meet national or local standards for sewage discharges; If sewage from the industrial facility is to be discharged to either a septic system, or where
land is used as part of the treatment system, treatment to meet applicable national or local standards for sewage discharges is required;
Sludge from sewage treatment systems should be disposed in compliance with local regulatory requirements.
Demonstrates Compliance
3.14. A wastewater and water quality monitoring program with adequate resources and management oversight should be developed and implemented. The wastewater and water quality monitoring program should consider monitoring parameters, monitoring type and frequency, monitoring locations, data quality.
Demonstrates Compliance
4. Water Conservation
Water conservation program
4.1. Water conservation programs should be implemented commensurate with the magnitude and cost of water use. These programs should promote the continuous reduction in water consumption and achieve savings in the water pumping, treatment and disposal costs.
Demonstrates Compliance
4.2. The essential elements of a water management program should involve: Identification, regular measurement, and recording of principal flows within a facility. Definition and regular review of performance targets, which are adjusted to account for
changes in major factors affecting water use. Regular comparison of water flows with performance targets to identify where action
should be taken to reduce water use. 4.3. Water should be reused in multi-stage washing and rinsing processes or from one process for another with less exacting water quality requirements.
Demonstrates Compliance
4.4. Measures for water saving should be implemented to reduce consumption of building and sanitary water, including: Regularly maintain plumbing, and identify and repair leaks; Install self-closing taps, automatic shut-off valves, spray nozzles, pressure reducing valves,
and water conserving fixtures; Operate dishwashers and laundries on full loads, and only when needed; Install water-saving equipment in lavatories, such as lowflow toilets.
Demonstrates Compliance
4.5. Water conservation opportunities in cooling systems should include: Use of closed circuit cooling systems with cooling towers rather than once-through cooling
systems; Limiting condenser or cooling tower blowdown to the minimum required to prevent
unacceptable accumulation of dissolved solids; Use of air cooling rather than evaporative cooling; Use of treated waste water for cooling towers; Reusing/recycling cooling tower blowdown.
Demonstrates Compliance
4.6. Large quantities of water may be used by steam systems, and this should be reduced by the following measures: Repair of steam and condensate leaks, and repair of all failed steam traps; Return of condensate to the boilerhouse, and use of heat exchangers (with condensate
return) rather than direct steam injection where process permits;
Demonstrates Compliance
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Flash steam recovery; Minimising boiler blowdown consistent with maintaining acceptably low dissolved solids in
boiler water; Minimising deaerator heating.
5. Hazardous Materials Management
General Hazardous Materials Management
5.1. The level of risk should be established through an on-going assessment process based on: The types and amounts of hazardous materials present in the project. Analysis of potential spill and release scenarios using available industry statistics on spills
and accidents where available. Analysis of the potential for uncontrolled reactions such as fire and explosions. Analysis of potential consequences based on the physical geographical characteristics of
the project site, including aspects such as its distance to settlements, water resources, and other environmentally sensitive areas.
Demonstrates Compliance
5.2. The management actions to be included in a Hazardous Materials Management Plan should be commensurate with the level of potential risks associated with the production, handling, storage, and use of hazardous materials.
Demonstrates Compliance
5.3. Where there is risk of a spill of uncontrolled hazardous materials, facilities should prepare a spill control, prevention, and countermeasure plan as a specific component of their Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan.
Demonstrates Compliance
5.4. The plan should be tailored to the hazards associated with the project, and include: Training of Operators on release prevention, including drills specific to hazardous materials
as part of emergency preparedness response training; Implementation of inspection programs to maintain the mechanical integrity and operability
of pressure vessels, tanks, piping systems, relief and vent valve systems, containment infrastructure, emergency shutdown systems, controls and pumps, and associated process equipment;
Preparation of written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for filling USTs, ASTs or other containers or equipment as well as for transfer operations by personnel trained in the safe transfer and filling of the hazardous material, and in spill prevention and response;
SOPs for the management of secondary containment structures; Identification of locations of hazardous materials and associated activities on an emergency
plan site map;
Documentation of availability of specific personal protective equipment and training needed to respond to an emergency;
Documentation of availability of spill response equipment; Description of response activities in the event of a spill, release, or other chemical
emergency.
Demonstrates Compliance
5.5. Recommended practices to prevent hazardous material releases from transfer processes include: Use of transfer equipment that is compatible and suitable for the characteristics of the
materials transferred and designed to ensure safe transfer; Regular inspection, maintenance and repair of fittings, pipes and hoses; Provision of secondary containment, drip trays or other overflow and drip containment
measures, for hazardous materials containers at connection points or other possible overflow points.
Demonstrates Compliance
5.6. Special measures should be implemented to prevent overfills of vessels and tanks, including: Prepare written procedures for transfer operations; Installation of gauges on tanks to measure volume inside;
Use of dripless hose connections for vehicle tank and fixed connections with storage tanks; Provision of automatic fill shutoff valves on storage tanks to prevent overfilling; Use of a catch basin around the fill pipe to collect spills; Use of piping connections with automatic overfill protection; Pumping less volume than available capacity into the tank or vessel by ordering less
material than its available capacity; Provision of overfill or over pressure vents that allow controlled release to a capture point.
Demonstrates Compliance
5.7. Special measures should be implemented to avoid uncontrolled reactions or conditions resulting in fire or explosion, including: Storage of incompatible materials (acids, bases, flammables, oxidisers, reactive chemicals)
Demonstrates Compliance
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
in separate areas, and with containment facilities separating material storage areas; Provision of material-specific storage for extremely hazardous or reactive materials; Use of flame arresting devices on vents from flammable storage containers; Provision of grounding and lightning protection for tank farms, transfer stations, and other
equipment that handles flammable materials; Selection of materials of construction compatible with products stored for all parts of
storage and delivery systems, and avoiding reuse of tanks for different products without checking material compatibility;
Storage of hazardous materials in an area of the facility separated from the main production works. Where proximity is unavoidable, physical separation should be provided using structures designed to prevent fire, explosion, spill, and other emergency situations from affecting facility operations;
Prohibition of all sources of ignition from areas near flammable storage tanks.
Control Measures
5.8. Secondary containment should be used to control accidental releases of liquid hazardous materials during storage and transfer. Secondary containment design and construction should hold released materials effectively until they can be detected and safely recovered. Appropriate secondary containment structures consist of berms, dikes, or walls capable of containing the larger of 110 percent of the largest tank or 25 percent of the combined tank volumes in areas with above-ground tanks with a total storage volume equal or greater than 1,000 liters.
Demonstrates Compliance
5.9. Transfer of hazardous materials from vehicle tanks to storage should be affected in areas with surfaces sufficiently impervious to avoid loss to the environment and sloped to a collection or a containment structure not connected to municipal wastewater / rainwater collection system.
Demonstrates Compliance
5.10. Where it is not practical to provide permanent, dedicated containment structures for transfer operations, one or more alternative forms of spill containment should be provided, such as portable drain covers, automatic shut-off valves on storm water basins, or shut off valves in drainage or sewer facilities, combined with oil-water separators.
Demonstrates Compliance
5.11. Storage of drummed hazardous materials with a total volume equal or greater than 1,000 liters should be affected in areas with impervious surfaces that are sloped or bermed to contain a minimum of 25 percent of the total storage volume.
Demonstrates Compliance
5.12. Double-walled, composite, or specially coated storage and piping systems should be used particularly for underground storage tanks (USTs) and underground piping. If double
walled systems are used, they should provide a means of detecting leaks between the two walls.
Demonstrates Compliance
5.13. Leak detection may be used in conjunction with secondary containment, particularly in high-risk locations. Leak detection is especially important in situations where secondary containment is not feasible or practicable, such as in long pipe runs. Acceptable leak detection methods include: Use of automatic pressure loss detectors on pressurised or long distance piping; Use of approved or certified integrity testing methods on piping or tank systems, at regular
intervals; Considering the use of SCADA if financially feasible.
Demonstrates Compliance
5.14. Special measures should be implemented for underground storage of hazardous materials to manage the risks of fire or explosion, vapor losses into the atmosphere, leaks of hazardous materials, including: Avoiding use of USTs for storage of highly soluble organic materials; Assessing local soil corrosion potential, and installing and maintaining cathodic protection
(or equivalent rust protection) for steel tanks; For new installations, installing impermeable liners or structures under and around tanks
and lines that direct any leaked product to monitoring ports at the lowest point of the liner or structure;
Monitoring the surface above any tank for indications of soil movement; Reconciling tank contents by measuring the volume in store with the expected volume,
given the stored quantity at last stocking, and deliveries to and withdrawals from the store; Testing integrity by volumetric, vacuum, acoustic, tracers, or other means on all tanks at
regular intervals; Evaluating the risk of existing UST in newly acquired facilities to determine if upgrades are
required for USTs that will be continued to be used, including replacement with new systems or permanent closure of abandoned USTs.
Demonstrates Compliance
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
5.15. Hazardous Materials Risk Management Plan should be prepared to prevent and control of catastrophic releases of toxic, reactive, flammable, or explosive chemicals that may result in toxic, fire, or explosion hazards.
Demonstrates Compliance
5.16. An Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan incorporated into and consistent with, the facility’s overall ES/OHS MS, should be prepared to cover the following: Planning Coordination: Procedures should be prepared for informing the public and
emergency response agencies; documenting first aid and emergency medical treatment; taking emergency response actions; reviewing and updating the emergency response plan to reflect changes, and ensuring that employees are informed of such changes;
Procedures should be prepared for using, inspecting, testing, and maintaining the emergency response equipment;
Employees and contractors should be trained on emergency response procedures.
Demonstrates Compliance
5.17. When hazardous materials are in use above threshold quantities, the management plan should include a system for community awareness, notification and involvement that should be commensurate with the potential risks identified for the project during the hazard assessment studies (availability of general information to the potentially affected community on the nature and extent of project operations, and the prevention and control measures in place to ensure no effects to human health; the potential for off-site effects to human health or the environment following an accident at planned or existing hazardous installations; specific and timely information on appropriate behavior and safety measures to be adopted in the event of an accident including practice drills in locations with higher risks).
Demonstrates Compliance
6. Waste Management
General Waste Management
6.1. Facilities that generate and store wastes should practice the following: Establishing waste management priorities at the outset of activities based on an
understanding of potential Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) risks and impacts and considering waste generation and its consequences;
Establishing a waste management hierarchy that considers prevention, reduction, reuse, recovery, recycling, removal and finally disposal of wastes;
Avoiding or minimising the generation waste materials, as far as practicable; Where waste generation cannot be avoided but has been minimised, recovering and
reusing waste; Where waste cannot be recovered or reused, treating, destroying, and disposing of it in an
environmentally sound manner.
Demonstrates Compliance
6.2. Effective planning and implementation of waste management strategies should include: Review of new waste sources during planning, siting, and design activities, including during
equipment modifications and process alterations, to identify expected waste generation, pollution prevention opportunities, and necessary treatment, storage, and disposal infrastructure;
Definition of opportunities for source reduction, as well as reuse and recycling; Definition of procedures and operational controls for onsite storage; Definition of options / procedures / operational controls for treatment and final disposal.
Demonstrates Compliance
6.3. Potential impacts and risks associated with the management of any generated hazardous waste should be assessed during its complete life cycle.
Demonstrates Compliance
6.4. It should be ensured that contractors handling, treating, and disposing of hazardous waste are reputable and legitimate enterprises, licensed by the relevant regulatory agencies and following good international industry practice for the waste being handled.
Compliance Anticipated
6.5. Processes should be designed and operated to prevent, or minimise, the quantities of wastes generated and hazards associated with the wastes generated in accordance with the following strategy:
Substituting raw materials or inputs with less hazardous or toxic materials, or with those where processing generates lower waste volumes;
Applying manufacturing process that convert materials efficiently; Instituting good housekeeping and operating practices, including inventory control to
reduce the amount of waste resulting from materials that are out-of- date, off-specification, contaminated, damaged, or excess to plant needs;
Instituting procurement measures that recognise opportunities to return usable materials such as containers and which prevents the over ordering of materials;
Minimising hazardous waste generation by implementing stringent waste segregation to prevent the commingling of non-hazardous and hazardous waste to be managed.
Demonstrates Compliance
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
6.6. Total amount of waste may be significantly reduced through the implementation of recycling plans, which should consider the following elements: Identification and recycling of products that can be reintroduced into the manufacturing
process or industry activity at the site; Investigation of external markets for recycling by other industrial processing operations
located in the neighbourhood or region of the facility; Providing training and incentives to employees in order to meet objectives.
Demonstrates Compliance
6.7. If waste materials are still generated after the implementation of feasible waste prevention, reduction, reuse, recovery and recycling measures, waste materials should be treated and disposed of and all measures should be taken to avoid potential impacts to human health and the environment. Such measures should include the following: On-site or off-site biological, chemical, or physical treatment of the waste material to
render it nonhazardous prior to final disposal; Treatment or disposal at permitted facilities specially designed to receive the waste.
Compliance Anticipated
6.8. In the absence of qualified commercial or government-owned waste vendors and disposal Operators (taking into consideration proximity and transportation requirements), facilities generating waste should consider using: Have the technical capability to manage the waste in a manner that reduces immediate
and future impact to the environment; Installing on-site waste treatment or recycling processes; As a final option, constructing facilities that will provide for the environmental sound long-
term storage of wastes on-site or at an alternative appropriate location up until external commercial options become available.
Demonstrates Compliance
Waste storage
6.9. Wastes should be stored in a manner that prevents the commingling or contact between incompatible wastes.
Demonstrates Compliance
6.10. Different type of wastes should be stored in different closed containers away from direct sunlight, wind and rain.
Demonstrates Compliance
6.11. Periodic inspections of waste storage areas should be conducted with documenting the findings.
Demonstrates Compliance
6.12. Secondary containment should be included wherever liquid wastes are stored in volumes greater than 220 liters. The available volume of secondary containment should be at least 110 percent of the largest storage container, or 25 percent of the total storage capacity (whichever is greater), in that specific location.
Demonstrates Compliance
6.13. Adequate ventilation should be provided where volatile wastes are stored. Demonstrates Compliance
6.14. Hazardous waste storage activities should also be subject to special management actions, conducted by employees who have received specific training in handling and storage of hazardous wastes: Provision of readily available information on chemical compatibility to employees, including
labelling each container to identify its contents; Clearly identifying (label) and demarcating the area, including documentation of its location
on a facility map or site plan; Conducting periodic inspections of waste storage areas and documenting the findings; Preparing and implementing spill response and emergency plans to address their accidental
release; Avoiding underground storage tanks and underground piping of hazardous waste.
Partial Compliance
Transportation
6.15. On-site and Off-site transportation of waste should be conducted so as to prevent or minimise spills, releases, and exposures to employees and the public.
All waste containers designated for off-site shipment should be secured and labeled with the contents and associated hazards, be properly loaded on the transport vehicles before leaving the site, and be accompanied by a shipping paper that describes the load and its associated hazards.
Demonstrates Compliance
Monitoring
6.16. Monitoring activities associated with the management of hazardous and non- hazardous waste should include: Regular visual inspection of all waste storage collection and storage areas for evidence of
accidental releases and to verify that wastes are properly labelled and stored. Regular audits of waste segregation and collection practices;
Partial Compliance
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Periodic auditing of third party treatment, and disposal services including re-use and recycling facilities when significant quantities of hazardous wastes are managed by third parties;
Regular monitoring of groundwater quality in cases of Hazardous Waste on site storage and/or pre-treatment and disposal.
7. Noise
Prevention and Control
7.1. Noise impacts should not exceed the following levels: 55 One Hour LAeq (dBA) at daytime for residential; institutional; educational receptors; 45 One Hour LAeq (dBA) at night time for residential; institutional; educational receptors; 70 One Hour LAeq (dBA) at daytime and night time for industrial; commercial receptors.
Compliance Anticipated
7.2. Noise prevention and mitigation measures should be applied where predicted or measured noise impacts from a project facility or operations exceed the applicable noise level guideline at the most sensitive point of reception. Noise reduction options that should be considered include: Selecting equipment with lower sound power levels; Installing silencers for fans;
Installing suitable mufflers on engine exhausts and compressor components; Installing acoustic enclosures for equipment casing radiating noise; Improving the acoustic performance of constructed buildings, apply sound insulation; Limiting the hours of operation for specific pieces of equipment or operations, especially
mobile sources operating through community areas; Reducing project traffic routing through community areas wherever possible Developing a mechanism to record and respond to complaints.
Compliance Anticipated
Monitoring
7.3. Noise monitoring programs should be designed and conducted by trained specialists. Typical monitoring periods should be sufficient for statistical analysis.
Compliance Anticipated
8. Contaminated Land
Prevention of land contamination
8.1. Contamination of land should be avoided by preventing or controlling the release of hazardous materials, hazardous wastes, or oil to the environment.
Compliance Anticipated
8.2. When contamination of land is suspected or confirmed during any project phase, the cause of the uncontrolled release should be identified and corrected to avoid further releases
and associated adverse impacts.
Compliance Anticipated
8.3. Contaminated lands should be managed to avoid the risk to human health and ecological receptors.
Compliance Anticipated
8.4. The preferred strategy for land decontamination is to reduce the level of contamination at the site while preventing the human exposure to contamination.
Compliance Anticipated
Risk assessment
8.5. Where there is potential evidence of contamination at a site, the following steps should be provided: Identification of the location of suspected highest level of contamination through a
combination of visual and historical operational information; Sampling and testing of the contaminated media (soils or water); Evaluation of the analytical results against the local and national contaminated sites
regulations; Verification of the potential human and/or ecological receptors and exposure pathways
relevant to the site in question.
Compliance Anticipated
8.6. Interim risk management actions should be implemented at any phase of the project life cycle if the presence of land contamination poses an “imminent hazard”, i.e., representing
an immediate risk to human health and the environment if contamination were allowed to continue, even a short period of time. Appropriate risk reduction should be implemented as soon as practicable to remove the condition posing the imminent hazard.
Compliance Anticipated
8.7. If the presence of land contamination poses an “imminent hazard”, a detailed site- specific, environmental risk assessment should be used to develop strategies that yield acceptable health risks, while achieving low level contamination on-site.
Compliance Anticipated
8.8. The risk factors and conceptual site model within the contaminant risk approach described should also provide a basis to manage and mitigate environmental contaminant health risks.
Compliance Anticipated
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Occupational Health and Safety
9. General Facility Design and Operation
Integrity of Workplace Structures
9.1. Permanent and recurrent places of work should be designed and equipped to protect OHS: Surfaces, structures and installations should be easy to clean and maintain, and not allow
for accumulation of hazardous compounds; Buildings should be structurally safe, provide appropriate protection against the climate,
and have acceptable light and noise conditions; Fire resistant, noise-absorbing materials should, to the extent feasible, be used for cladding
on ceilings and walls; Floors should be level, even, and non- skid; Heavy oscillating, rotating or alternating equipment should be located in dedicated
buildings or structurally isolated sections.
Demonstrates Compliance
Severe Weather and Facility Shutdown
9.2. Work place structures should be designed and constructed to withstand the expected elements for the region and have an area designated for safe refuge, if appropriate.
Demonstrates Compliance
9.3. Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) should be developed for project or process shut-down, including an evacuation plan. Drills to practice the procedure and plan should also be undertaken annually.
Compliance Anticipated
Workspace and Exit
9.4. The space provided for each worker, and in total, should be adequate for safe execution of all activities, including transport and interim storage of materials and products. Passages to emergency exits should be unobstructed at all times. Exits should be clearly marked to be visible in total darkness. The number and capacity of emergency exits should be sufficient for safe and orderly evacuation of the greatest number of people present at any time, and there should be a minimum two exits from any work area. Facilities also should be designed and built taking into account the needs of disabled persons.
Demonstrates Compliance
Fire Precautions
9.5. The workplace should be designed to prevent the start of fires through the implementation of fire codes applicable to industrial settings.
Demonstrates Compliance
9.6. Facilities should be equipped with fire detectors, alarm systems, and fire-fighting equipment. The equipment should be maintained in good working order and be readily accessible. It should be adequate for the dimensions and use of the premises, equipment installed, physical and chemical properties of substances present, and the maximum number of people present.
Demonstrates Compliance
9.7. Fire and emergency alarm systems that are both audible and visible. Demonstrates Compliance
Lavatories and Showers
9.8. Adequate lavatory facilities (toilets and washing areas) should be provided for the number of people expected to work in the facility and allowances made for segregated facilities, or for indicating whether the toilet facility is “In Use” or “Vacant”. Toilet facilities should also be provided with adequate supplies of hot and cold running water, soap, and hand drying devices. Where workers may be exposed to substances poisonous by ingestion and skin contamination may occur, facilities for showering and changing into and out of street and work clothes should be provided.
Demonstrates Compliance
9.9. Adequate supplies of potable drinking water should be provided from a fountain with an upward jet or with a sanitary means of collecting the water for the purposes of drinking. Water supplied to areas of food preparation or for the purpose of personal hygiene (washing or bathing) should meet drinking water quality standards.
Demonstrates Compliance
9.10. Where there is potential for exposure to substances poisonous by ingestion, suitable arrangements are to be made for provision of clean eating areas where workers are not exposed to the hazardous or noxious substances.
Demonstrates Compliance
Safe Access
9.11. Passageways for pedestrians and vehicles within and outside buildings should be segregated and provide for easy, safe, and appropriate access.
Demonstrates Compliance
9.12. Equipment and installations requiring servicing, inspection, and/or cleaning should Demonstrates
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
have unobstructed, unrestricted, and ready access. Compliance
9.13. Hand, knee and foot railings should be installed on stairs, fixed ladders, platforms, permanent and interim floor openings, loading bays, ramps, etc.
Demonstrates Compliance
9.14. Openings should be sealed by gates or removable chains. Demonstrates Compliance
9.15. Covers should, if feasible, be installed to protect against falling items. Demonstrates Compliance
9.16. Measures to prevent unauthorised access to dangerous areas should be in place. Demonstrates Compliance
First Aid
9.17. The employer should ensure that qualified first-aid can be provided at all times. Appropriately equipped first-aid stations should be easily accessible throughout the place of work.
Demonstrates Compliance
9.18. Eye-wash stations and/or emergency showers should be provided close to all workstations where immediate flushing with water is the recommended first-aid response.
Demonstrates Compliance
9.19. Remote sites should have written emergency procedures in place for dealing with
cases of trauma or serious illness up to the point at which patient care can be transferred to an appropriate medical facility.
Demonstrates
Compliance
Air Supply
9.20. Sufficient fresh air should be supplied for indoor and confined work spaces. Factors to be considered in ventilation design include physical activity, substances in use, and process related emissions. Air distribution systems should be designed so as not to expose workers to draughts.
Demonstrates Compliance
9.21. Mechanical ventilation systems should be maintained in good working order. Point- source exhaust systems required for maintaining a safe ambient environment should have local indicators of correct functioning.
Demonstrates Compliance
9.22. Re-circulation of contaminated air is not acceptable. Air inlet filters should be kept clean and free of dust and microorganisms. Heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) and industrial evaporative cooling systems should be equipped, maintained and operated so as to prevent growth and spreading of disease agents or breeding of vectors of public health concern.
Demonstrates Compliance
10. Communication and Training
OHS Training
10.1. Provisions should be made to provide OHS orientation training to all new employees. Demonstrates Compliance
10.2. Training should consist of basic hazard awareness, sites specific hazards, safe work practices, and emergency procedures for fire, evacuation, and natural disaster, as appropriate. Any site-specific hazard or color coding in use should be thoroughly reviewed as part of orientation training.
Demonstrates Compliance
10.3. If visitors to the site can gain access to areas where hazardous conditions or substances may be present, a visitor orientation and control program should be established to ensure visitors do not enter hazard areas unescorted.
Demonstrates Compliance
10.4. The employer should ensure that workers and contractors, prior to commencement of new assignments, have received adequate training and information enabling them to understand work hazards and to protect their health from hazardous ambient factors that may be present.
Demonstrates Compliance
10.5. A basic occupational training program and specialty courses should be provided, as needed, to ensure that workers are oriented. Workers with rescue and first-aid duties should receive dedicated training so as not to inadvertently aggravate exposures and health hazards to themselves or their coworkers. Training would include the risks of becoming infected with blood–borne pathogens through contact with bodily fluids and tissue. Through appropriate contract specifications and monitoring, the employer should ensure that service providers, as well as contracted and subcontracted labor, are trained adequately before assignments begin.
Demonstrates Compliance
Area Signage, Labeling of Equipment, Communicate Hazard Codes
10.6. Hazardous areas (electrical rooms, compressor rooms, etc.), installations, materials, safety measures, and emergency exits, etc. should be marked appropriately. Signage should be in accordance with international standards and be well known to, and easily understood by workers, visitors and the general public as appropriate.
Demonstrates Compliance
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
10.7. All vessels that may contain substances that are hazardous as a result of chemical or toxicological properties, or temperature or pressure, should be labeled as to the contents and hazard, or appropriately color coded. Similarly, piping systems that contain hazardous substances should be labeled with the direction of flow and contents of the pipe, or color coded whenever the pipe passing through a wall or floor is interrupted by a valve or junction device.
Demonstrates Compliance
10.8. Copies of the hazard coding system should be posted outside the facility at emergency entrance doors and fire emergency connection systems.
Demonstrates Compliance
10.9. Information regarding the types of hazardous materials stored, handled or used at the facility, including typical maximum inventories and storage locations, should be shared proactively with emergency services and security personnel to expedite emergency response when needed.
Demonstrates Compliance
10.10. Representatives of local emergency and security services should be invited to participate in periodic (annual) orientation tours and site inspections to ensure familiarity with potential hazards present.
Demonstrates Compliance
11. Physical Hazards
Rotating and Moving Equipment
11.1. Machines design should eliminate trap hazards and ensuring that extremities are kept out of harm’s way under normal operating conditions. Where a machine or equipment has an exposed moving part or exposed pinch point that may endanger the safety of any worker, the machine or equipment should be equipped with, and protected by, a guard or other device that prevents access to the moving part or pinch point. Guards should be designed and installed in conformance with appropriate machine safety standards.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.2. Turning off, disconnecting, isolating, and de-energising machinery with exposed or guarded moving parts, or in which energy can be stored (e.g. compressed air, electrical components) during servicing or maintenance, in conformance with a standard such as c.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.3. Designing and installing equipment, where feasible, to enable routine service, such as lubrication, without removal of the guarding devices or mechanisms.
Demonstrates Compliance
Noise
11.4. No employee should be exposed to a noise level greater than 85 dB(A) for a duration of more than 8 hours per day without hearing protection. In addition, no unprotected ear should be exposed to a peak sound pressure level (instantaneous) of more than 140 dB(C).
Demonstrates Compliance
11.5. The use of hearing protection should be enforced actively when the equivalent sound level over 8 hours reaches 85 dB(A), the peak sound levels reach 140 dB(C), or the average maximum sound level reaches 110dB(A). Hearing protective devices provided should be capable of reducing sound levels at the ear to at least 85 dB(A).
Demonstrates Compliance
11.6. For every 3 dB(A) increase in sound levels, the ‘allowed’ exposure period or duration should be reduced by 50 percent.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.7. Prior to the issuance of hearing protective devices as the final control mechanism, use of acoustic insulating materials, isolation of the noise source, and other engineering controls should be investigated and implemented.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.8. Periodic medical hearing checks should be performed on workers exposed to high noise levels.
Demonstrates Compliance
Vibration
11.9. Exposure to hand-arm vibration from equipment such as hand and power tools, or whole-body vibrations from surfaces on which the worker stands or sits, should be controlled through choice of equipment, installation of vibration dampening pads or devices, and limiting the duration of exposure. Exposure levels should be checked on the basis of daily exposure time and data provided by equipment manufacturers.
Demonstrates Compliance
Electrical
11.10. All energised electrical devices and lines should be marked with warning signs. Demonstrates Compliance
11.11. Devices should be locked out (de- charging and leaving open with a controlled locking device) and tagged-out (warning sign placed on the lock) during service or maintenance.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.12. All electrical cords, cables, and hand power tools should be checked for frayed or exposed cords. Manufacturer recommendations for maximum permitted operating voltage of the portable hand tools should be followed.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.13. Double insulating / grounding should be applied for all electrical equipment used in Demonstrates
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
environments that are, or may become, wet; using equipment with ground fault interrupter (GFI) protected circuits.
Compliance
11.14. Power cords and extension cords should be protected against damage from traffic by shielding or suspending above traffic areas.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.15. Use of appropriate labeling of service rooms housing high voltage equipment (‘electrical hazard’) and where entry is controlled or prohibited.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.16. “No Approach” zones should be established around or under high voltage power lines. Partial Compliance
11.17. Rubber tired construction or other vehicles that come into direct contact with, or arcing between, high voltage wires may need to be taken out of service for periods of 48 hours and have the tires replaced to prevent catastrophic tire and wheel assembly failure, potentially causing serious injury or death.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.18. Conduct detailed identification and marking of all buried electrical wiring prior to any excavation work.
Demonstrates Compliance
Eye Hazards
11.19. Use of machine guards or splash shields and/or face and eye protection devices, such as safety glasses with side shields, goggles, and/or a full face shield. Machine and equipment guarding should conform to standards published by organisations such as CSA, ANSI and ISO.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.20. Moving areas where the discharge of solid fragments, liquid, or gaseous emissions can reasonably be predicted away from places expected to be occupied or transited by workers or visitors. Where machine or work fragments could present a hazard to transient workers or passers-by, extra area guarding or proximity restricting systems should be implemented, or PPE required for transients and visitors.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.21. Provisions should be made for persons who have to wear prescription glasses either through the use over glasses or prescription hardened glasses.
Demonstrates Compliance
Welding / Hot Work
11.22. Provision of proper eye protection such as welder goggles and/or a full-face eye shield for all personnel involved in, or assisting, welding operations. Additional methods may include the use of welding barrier screens around the specific work station (a solid piece of light metal, canvas, or plywood designed to block welding light from others). Devices to extract and remove noxious fumes at the source may also be required.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.23. Special hot work and fire prevention precautions and Standard Operating Procedures
(SOPs) should be implemented if welding or hot cutting is undertaken outside established welding work stations, including ‘Hot Work Permits, stand-by fire extinguishers, stand-by fire watch, and maintaining the fire watch for up to one hour after welding or hot cutting has terminated. Special procedures are required for hot work on tanks or vessels that have contained flammable materials.
Demonstrates
Compliance
Industrial Vehicle Driving and Site Traffic
11.24. Provide training and licensing industrial vehicle Operators in the safe operation of specialised vehicles such as forklifts, including safe loading/unloading, load limits.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.25. Ensure moving equipment with restricted rear visibility is outfitted with audible back-up alarms.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.26. Establish rights-of-way, site speed limits, vehicle inspection requirements, operating rules and procedures, and control of traffic patterns or direction. Restrict the circulation of delivery and private vehicles to defined routes and areas, giving preference to ‘one-way’ circulation, where appropriate.
Demonstrates Compliance
Working Environment Temperature
11.27. Extreme temperatures in permanent work environments should be avoided through implementation of engineering controls and ventilation.
Compliance Anticipated
11.28. Monitor weather forecasts for outdoor work to provide advance warning of extreme weather and scheduling work accordingly. Provide temporary shelters to protect against the elements during working activities or for use as rest areas.
Partial Compliance
11.29. Adjustment of work and rest periods should be regulated according to temperature stress management procedures provided by ACGIH67, depending on the temperature and workloads.
Compliance Anticipated
11.30. Personnel should be provided with protective clothing and access to adequate hydration such as drinking water or electrolyte drinks. Consumption of alcoholic beverages should be avoided.
Compliance Anticipated
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
Ergonomics, Repetitive Motion, Manual Handling
11.31. Use of mechanical assists to eliminate or reduce exertions required to lift materials, hold tools and work objects, and requiring multi-person lifts if weights exceed thresholds.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.32. Selecting and designing tools that reduce force requirements and holding times, and improve postures.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.33. Provide user with adjustable work stations. Demonstrates Compliance
11.34. Incorporating rest and stretch breaks into work processes, and conducting job rotation.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.35. Implement quality control and maintenance programs that reduce unnecessary forces and exertions.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.36. Take into consideration additional special conditions such as left handed persons. Demonstrates Compliance
Working at Heights
11.37. Provide installation of guardrails with mid-rails and toe boards at the edge of any fall hazard area.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.38. Ladders and scaffolds should be properly used by trained employees. Demonstrates Compliance
11.39. Use of fall prevention devices, including safety belt and lanyard travel limiting devices to prevent access to fall hazard area, or fall protection devices such as full body harnesses used in conjunction with shock absorbing lanyards or self-retracting inertial fall arrest devices attached to fixed anchor point or horizontal life-lines.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.40. Provide personnel with appropriate training in use, serviceability, and integrity of the necessary PPE.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.41. Inclusion of rescue and/or recovery plans, and equipment to respond to workers after an arrested fall.
Demonstrates Compliance
Illumination
11.42. Work area light intensity should be adequate for the general purpose of the location and type of activity, and should be supplemented with dedicated work station illumination, as needed.
Demonstrates Compliance
11.43. Emergency lightening should be provided in case of tripping the main light source. Demonstrates Compliance
12. Chemical Hazards
Air Quality
12.1. Maintain levels of contaminant dusts, vapors and gases in the work environment at concentrations below those recommended by the ACGIH as TWA-TLV’s (threshold limit value)—concentrations to which most workers can be exposed repeatedly (8 hours/day, 40 hrs/week, week-after week), without sustaining adverse health effects.
Demonstrates Compliance
12.2. Developing and implementing work practices to minimise release of contaminants into the work environment.
Demonstrates Compliance
12.3. Where ambient air contains several materials that have similar effects on the same body organs (additive effects), taking into account combined exposures using calculations recommended by the ACGIH. Where work shifts extend beyond eight (8) hours, calculating adjusted workplace exposure criteria recommended by the ACGIH.
Demonstrates Compliance
Fire and Explosions
12.4. Flammables should be stored away from ignition sources and oxidising materials. Further, flammables storage area should be: Remote from entry and exit points into buildings;
Away from facility ventilation intakes or vents; Have natural or passive floor and ceiling level ventilation and explosion venting; Use spark-proof fixtures; Be equipped with fire extinguishing devices and self-closing doors.
Demonstrates Compliance
12.5. Provide bonding and grounding of, and between, containers and additional mechanical floor level ventilation if materials are being, or could be, dispensed in the storage area.
Demonstrates Compliance
12.6. Where the flammable material is mainly comprised of dust, provide electrical grounding, spark detection, and, if needed, quenching systems.
Demonstrates Compliance
12.7. Define and label fire hazards areas to warn of special rules (e.g. prohibition in use of smoking materials, cellular phones, or other potential spark generating equipment).
Demonstrates Compliance
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
12.8. Provide specific worker training in handling of flammable materials, and in fire prevention or suppression.
Demonstrates Compliance
Corrosive, oxidising, and reactive chemicals
12.9. Corrosive, oxidising and reactive chemicals should be segregated from flammable materials and from other chemicals of incompatible class (acids vs. bases, oxidisers vs. reducers, water sensitive vs. water based, etc.), stored in ventilated areas and in containers with appropriate secondary containment to minimise intermixing during spills. Workers who are required to handle corrosive, oxidising, or reactive chemicals should be provided with specialised training and provided with, and wear, appropriate PPE (gloves, apron, splash suits, face shield or goggles, etc.).
Demonstrates Compliance
Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM)
12.10. The use of asbestos containing materials (ACM) should be avoided in new buildings or as a new material in remodeling or renovation activities. Existing facilities with ACM should develop an asbestos management plan which clearly identifies the locations where the ACM is present, its condition, procedures for monitoring its condition, procedures to access the locations where ACM is present to avoid damage, and training of staff who can potentially come into contact with the material. The plan should be made available to all
persons involved in operations and maintenance activities. Repair or removal and disposal of existing ACM in buildings should only be performed by specially trained personnel following host country requirements, or in their absence, internationally recognised procedures.
Demonstrates Compliance
13. Biological Hazards
Measures to prevent biological hazards
13.1. If the nature of the activity permits, use of any harmful biological agents should be avoided and replaced with an agent that, under normal conditions of use, is not dangerous or less dangerous to workers. If use of harmful agents cannot be avoided, precautions should be taken to keep the risk of exposure as low as possible and maintained below internationally established and recognised exposure limits.
Demonstrates Compliance
13.2. Work processes, engineering, and administrative controls should be designed, maintained, and operated to avoid or minimise release of biological agents into the working environment. The number of employees exposed or likely to become exposed should be kept at a minimum.
Demonstrates Compliance
13.3. The employer should review and assess known and suspected presence of biological agents at the place of work and implement appropriate safety measures, monitoring,
training, and training verification programs.
Demonstrates Compliance
13.4. Measures to eliminate and control hazards from known and suspected biological agents at the place of work should be designed, implemented and maintained in close co-operation with the local health authorities and according to recognised international standards.
Demonstrates Compliance
13.5. Work involving agents in Groups 3 and 4 should be restricted only to those persons who have received specific verifiable training in working with and controlling such materials. Areas used for the handling of Groups 3 and 4 biological agents should be designed to enable their full segregation and isolation in emergency circumstances, include independent ventilation systems, and be subject to SOPs requiring routine disinfection and sterilisation of the work surfaces.
Demonstrates Compliance
14. Radiological Hazards
Acceptable effective dose limits for workplace radiological hazards
14.1. Places of work involving occupational and/or natural exposure to ionising radiation should be established and operated in accordance with recognised international safety standards and guidelines. The acceptable effective dose limits appear: Five consecutive year average – effective dose– 20 mSv/year for workers (min. 19 years of
age);
Single year exposure– effective dose– 50 mSv/year for workers (min. 19 years of age); 6 mSv/year for apprentices and students (16-18 years of age);
Equivalent dose to the lens of the eye –150 mSv/year for workers (min. 19 years of age); 50 mSv/year for apprentices and students (16-18 years of age);
Equivalent dose to the extremities (hands, feet) or the skin – 500 mSv/year for workers (min. 19 years of age); 150 mSv/year for apprentices and students (16-18 years of age).
Demonstrates Compliance
14.2. Exposure to non-ionising radiation (including static magnetic fields; sub-radio frequency magnetic fields; static electric fields; radio frequency and microwave radiation; light and near-infrared radiation; and ultraviolet radiation) should be controlled to internationally recommended limits.
Demonstrates Compliance
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
14.3. In the case of both ionising and non- ionising radiation, the preferred method for controlling exposure is shielding and limiting the radiation source. Personal protective equipment is supplemental only or for emergency use. Personal protective equipment for near-infrared, visible and ultraviolet range radiation can include appropriate sun block creams, with or without appropriate screening clothing.
Demonstrates Compliance
15. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Providing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for workers additional protection
15.1. Worker, co-workers, and occasional visitors should be provided with appropriate PPE that offers adequate protection.
Demonstrates Compliance
15.2. Proper maintenance of PPE should include cleaning when dirty and replacement when damaged or worn out. Proper use of PPE should be part of the recurrent training programs for employees.
Demonstrates Compliance
15.3. Selection of PPE should be based on the hazard and risk ranking and selected according to criteria on performance and testing established.
Demonstrates Compliance
16. Special Hazard Environments
Confined Space
16.1. Engineering measures should be implemented to eliminate, to the degree feasible, the existence and adverse character of confined spaces.
Demonstrates Compliance
16.2. Permit-required confined spaces should be provided with permanent safety measures for venting, monitoring, and rescue operations, to the extent possible. The area adjoining an access to a confined space should provide ample room for emergency and rescue operations. 16.3. Access hatches should accommodate 90% of the worker population with adjustments for tools and protective clothing.
Demonstrates Compliance
16.4. Prior to entry into a permit-required confined space: Process or feed lines into the space should be disconnected or drained, and blanked and
locked-out; Mechanical equipment in the space should be disconnected, de-energised, locked-out, and
braced, as appropriate; The atmosphere within the confined space should be tested to assure the oxygen content
is between 19.5 percent and 23 percent, and that the presence of any flammable gas or vapour does not exceed 25 percent of its respective Lower Explosive Limit (LEL);
If the atmospheric conditions are not met, the confined space should be ventilated until the target safe atmosphere is achieved, or entry is only to be undertaken with appropriate and
additional PPE.
Demonstrates Compliance
16.5. Safety precautions should include Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA), life lines, and safety watch workers stationed outside the confined space, with rescue and first aid equipment readily available.
Demonstrates Compliance
16.6. Before workers are required to enter a permit-required confined space, adequate and appropriate training in confined space hazard control, atmospheric testing, use of the necessary PPE, as well as the serviceability and integrity of the PPE should be verified. Further, adequate and appropriate rescue and / or recovery plans and equipment should be in place before the worker enters the confined space.
Demonstrates Compliance
Lone and Isolated Workers
16.7. Where workers may be required to perform work under lone or isolated circumstances, Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) should be developed and implemented to ensure all PPE and safety measures are in place before the worker starts work. SOPs should establish, at a minimum, verbal contact with the worker at least once every hour, and ensure the worker has a capability for summoning emergency aid.
Demonstrates Compliance
16.8. If the worker is potentially exposed to highly toxic or corrosive chemicals, emergency eye-wash and shower facilities should be equipped with audible and visible alarms to summon aid whenever the eye- wash or shower is activated by the worker and without intervention by the worker.
Demonstrates Compliance
17. Monitoring
Occupational health and safety monitoring program
17.1. The occupational health and safety monitoring program should be developed. It should include the following: regular inspection and testing of all safety features and hazard control measures; surveillance of the working environment: Employers should document compliance using an
appropriate combination of portable and stationary sampling and monitoring instruments; surveillance of workers health;
Demonstrates Compliance
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
training activities for employees and visitors should be adequately monitored and documented.
Accidents and Diseases monitoring
17.2. The employer should establish procedures and systems for reporting and recording: Occupational accidents and diseases; Dangerous occurrences and incidents. These systems should enable workers to report immediately to their immediate supervisor any situation they believe presents a serious danger to life or health. The systems and the employer should further enable and encourage workers to report to management all: Occupational injuries and near misses; Suspected cases of occupational disease; Dangerous occurrences and incidents.
Demonstrates Compliance
17.3. All reported occupational accidents, occupational diseases, dangerous occurrences, and incidents together with near misses should be investigated with the assistance of a person knowledgeable/competent in occupational safety.
Demonstrates Compliance
Community Health and Safety
18. Water Quality and Availability
18.1. Project activities involving wastewater discharges, water extraction, diversion or impoundment should prevent adverse impacts to the quality and availability of groundwater and surface water resources.
Demonstrates Compliance
18.2. Drinking water sources, whether public or private, should at all times be protected so that they meet or exceed applicable national acceptability standards or in their absence the current edition of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality.
Demonstrates Compliance
18.3. The potential effect of groundwater or surface water abstraction for project activities should be properly assessed through a combination of field testing and modeling techniques, accounting for seasonal variability and projected changes in demand in the project area.
Demonstrates Compliance
18.4. Project activities should not compromise the availability of water for personal hygiene needs and should take account of potential future increases in demand.
Demonstrates Compliance
19. Structural Safety of Project Infrastructure
19.1. The following issues should be considered and incorporated as appropriate into the planning, siting, and design phases of a project: Inclusion of buffer strips or other methods of physical separation around project sites to
protect the public from major hazards associated with hazardous materials incidents or
process failure, as well as nuisance issues related to noise, odours, or other emissions; Incorporation of siting and safety engineering criteria to prevent failures due to natural
risks posed by earthquakes, tsunamis, wind, flooding, landslides and fire. To this end, all project structures should be designed in accordance with engineering and design criteria mandated by site-specific risks, including but not limited to seismic activity, slope stability, wind loading, and other dynamic loads.
Demonstrates Compliance
20. Life and Fire Safety
20.1. All new buildings should be designed, constructed, and operated in full compliance with local building codes, local fire department regulations, local legal/insurance requirements.
Demonstrates Compliance
21. Traffic Safety
21.1. Traffic safety should be promoted by all project personnel during displacement to and from the workplace, and during operation of project equipment on private or public roads.
Demonstrates Compliance
21.2. Road safety initiatives proportional to the scope and nature of project activities should include: Adoption of best transport safety practices across all aspects of project operations with the
goal of preventing traffic accidents and minimising injuries suffered by project personnel
and the public; Regular maintenance of vehicles and use of manufacturer approved parts to minimise
potentially serious accidents caused by equipment malfunction or premature failure. Where the project may contribute to a significant increase in traffic along existing roads, or where road transport is a significant component of a project, recommended measures include: Minimising pedestrian interaction with construction vehicles; Collaboration with local communities and responsible authorities to improve signage,
visibility and overall safety of roads; Coordination with emergency responders to ensure that appropriate first aid is provided in
Demonstrates Compliance
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
the event of accidents; Using locally sourced materials, whenever possible, to minimise transport distances; Employing safe traffic control measures.
22. Transport of Hazardous Materials
22.1. The procedures for transportation of hazardous materials (Hazmats) should include: Proper labelling of containers, including the identify and quantity of the contents, hazards,
and shipper contact information; Ensuring that the volume, nature, integrity and protection of packaging and containers
used for transport are appropriate for the type and quantity of hazardous material and modes of transport involved;
Ensuring adequate transport vehicle specifications; Training employees involved in the transportation of hazardous materials regarding proper
shipping procedures and emergency procedures; Providing the necessary means for emergency response on call 24 hours/day.
Demonstrates Compliance
22.2. Guidance related to major transportation hazards should be implemented in addition to measures presented in the preceding section for preventing or minimising the consequences of catastrophic releases of hazardous materials, which may result in toxic, fire, explosion, or
other hazards during transportation. Projects which transport hazardous materials at or above the threshold quantities should prepare a Hazardous Materials Transportation Plan.
Demonstrates Compliance
22.3. Procedures and practices for the handling of hazardous materials and Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan should be developed for quick and efficient responses to accidents that may result in injury or environmental damage.
Demonstrates Compliance
23. Disease Prevention
Communicable Diseases
23.1. Recommended interventions at the project level include: Providing surveillance and active screening and treatment of workers; Undertaking health awareness and education initiatives, for example, by implementing an
information strategy to reinforce person-to-person counselling addressing systemic factors that can influence individual behaviour as well as promoting individual protection, and protecting others from infection, by encouraging condom use;
Training health workers in disease treatment; Conducting immunisation programs for workers in local communities to improve health and
guard against infection;
Providing treatment through standard case management in on-site or community health care facilities;
Promoting collaboration with local authorities to enhance access of workers families and the community to public health services and promote immunisation.
Demonstrates Compliance
Vector-Borne Diseases
23.2. Client in close collaboration with community health authorities, can implement an integrated control strategy for mosquito and other arthropod-borne diseases that might involve: Prevention of larval and adult propagation through sanitary improvements and elimination
of breeding habitats close to human settlements; Elimination of unusable impounded water; Increase in water velocity in natural and artificial channels; Considering the application of residual insecticide to dormitory walls; Promoting use of repellents, clothing, netting, and other barriers to prevent insect bites,
and other measures.
Demonstrates Compliance
24. Emergency Preparedness and Response
Communication Systems
24.1. Alarm bells, visual alarms, or other forms of communication should be used to reliably alert workers to an emergency.
Demonstrates Compliance
24.2. Testing warning systems at least annually (fire alarms monthly), and more frequently if required by local regulations, equipment, or other considerations.
Demonstrates Compliance
24.3. Installing a back-up system for communications on-site with off-site resources, in the event that normal communication methods may be inoperable during an emergency.
Demonstrates Compliance
24.4. If a local community may be at risk from a potential emergency arising at the facility, the company should implement communication measures to alert the community.
Demonstrates Compliance
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
24.5. Emergency information should be communicated to the media through: • A trained, local spokesperson able to interact with relevant stakeholders, and offer
guidance to the company for speaking to the media, government, and other agencies; •
Written press releases with accurate information, appropriate level of detail for the emergency, and for which accuracy can be guaranteed.
Demonstrates Compliance
Emergency Resources
24.6. A mechanism should be provided for funding emergency activities. Demonstrates Compliance
24.7. The company should consider the level of local fire fighting capacity and whether equipment is available for use at the facility in the event of a major emergency or natural disaster. If insufficient capacity is available, firefighting capacity should be acquired that may include pumps, water supplies, trucks, and training for personnel.
Demonstrates Compliance
24.8. The company should provide first aid attendants for the facility as well as medical
equipment suitable for the personnel, type of operation, and the degree of treatment likely to be required prior to transportation to hospital.
Demonstrates
Compliance
24.9. Appropriate measures for managing the availability of resources in case of an emergency should include: Maintaining a list of external equipment, personnel, facilities, funding, expert knowledge,
and materials that may be required to respond to emergencies; Providing personnel who can readily call up resources, as required; Tracking and managing the costs associated with emergency resources; Considering the quantity, response time, capability, limitations, and cost of these
resources, for both site-specific emergencies, and community or regional emergencies; Considering if external resources are unable to provide sufficient capacity during a regional
emergency and whether additional resources may need to be maintained on-site.
Demonstrates Compliance
24.10. Where appropriate, mutual aid agreements should be maintained with other organisations to allow for sharing of personnel and specialised equipment.
Demonstrates Compliance
24.11. The company should develop a list of contact information for all internal and external resources and personnel. The list should be maintained annually.
Demonstrates Compliance
25. Training and Updating
25.1. Training programs and practice exercises should be provided for testing systems to ensure an adequate level of emergency preparedness.
Demonstrates Compliance
25.2. Training should be conducted annually and perhaps more frequently, when the response includes specialised equipment, procedures, or hazards, or when otherwise mandated.
Demonstrates Compliance
25.3. Provide training exercises to allow personnel the opportunity to test emergency preparedness.
Demonstrates Compliance
26. Business Continuity and Contingency
26.1. Measures to address business continuity and contingency should include the following: Identifying replacement supplies or facilities to allow business continuity following an
emergency; Using redundant or duplicate supply systems as part of facility operations to increase the
likelihood of business continuity; Maintaining back-ups of critical information in a secure location to expedite the return to
normal operations following an emergency.
Demonstrates Compliance
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 5 Environmental and Social Due Diligence June 2017
APPENDIX C: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ACTION PLAN
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 4 Environmental and Social Action Plan June 2017 Page 1
APPENDIX C: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ACTION PLAN
No.1 Action Environmental & Social Risks (Liability/Benefits)
Requirement (Legislative, EBRD PR, Best Practice)
Resources, Investment Needs, Responsibility
Timetable / Frequency of Monitoring for Action
Target and Evaluation Criteria for Successful Implementation
Status
0.0
Facilitate and coordinate the International Environmental and Social Consultant, as agreed between EBRD and TANAP, to conduct monitoring of the project on 6 monthly intervals prior to operation of Phase 0. The audits will review the project against project commitments made in the ESIA and various Management Plans and against this ESAP. Reports will be reviewed by the company and released into the public domain.
Monitoring of project performance. EBRD PR1-10 Resources: External Investment: Responsibility:
6 monthly prior to Phase 0 operations
Actions completed / status updated
0.1
Operations phase monitoring will be implemented based on a ToR acceptable to EBRD using a consultant agreed by EBRD. The final scope of work for the monitoring will be provided to EBRD for approval on a no objection basis.
Monitoring of project performance. EBRD PR1-10 Resources: External Investment: Responsibility:
To be in place prior to beginning of operations phase
Actions completed / status updated
PR1 Assessment and Management of Environmental and Social Impacts and Issues
1.1 Disclose Offshore ESMS documentation including the Emergency Management Plan
Offshore ESMPs and Emergency Management Plan have been developed in draft form and being finalised but not yet disclosed.
EBRD PR1 (1.4) EIA EU Directive 2011/92/EU
Resources: In-house Investment: Responsibility:
Disclose prior to commencing offshore construction
ESMS documentation complete & disclosed.
1.2 Provide a cost estimate for operatonal phase Biorestoration monitoring and maintenance sufficient for the length of the pipeline corridor and ensure sufficient contingency budget allocations for any newly identified biodiversity remedial and offset activities.
Financial provisions for implementation of BAP & Biorestoration monitoring and maintenancerequirements may not be sufficient to adequately characterise biorestoration effectiveness.
EBRD PR1 (1.7) Resources: In-house Investment: Responsibility:
Prior to operations phase Rationale behind costs provided and deemed sufficient
PR2 Labour and Working Conditions
2.1 Develop strengthened documentation and key actions for agreement with TANAP and EBRD on overtime, to be incorporated into the ESMS, as follows:
(a) Develop and conduct a program of engagement with CC workers through appropriate mechanisms (e.g. HR Managers) to clarify overtime policy at the site level and strengthen worker understanding of policy;
(b) Continue to implement procedures, plans and employment contrcats consistent with working hour policies. TANAP to share labour audit reports from external provider (Practical Solutions) with EBRD.
Overtime work and fatigue management were raised on several separate occasions in the grievance mechanism. There is confusion at a site level as to the TANAP policy on overtime. TANAP is working to address overtime issues through a “Working Hours Action Plan”, but it is noted that emphasis is directed to legal compliance around overtime, and it is not clear what fatigue management measures are in place and how these measures are linked with effective overtime management. Further, contractors are financially incentivised for being on time/advance of deadlines, which may contribute to the issue of overtime and fatigue. IESC recognises that the reduction of LTIs is a focus area for TANAP.
EBRD PR2 (2.1) ILO Core Labour Standards
Resources: In-house / Contractors Investment: Responsibility:
(a) Engagement program shared with EBRD by Sept 2017. Ongoing engagement as per program. (b) Labour Audit Reports completed by external provider (Practical Solutions) during construction activities to be shared with EBRD.
Program rolled out to all workers.
Fewer grievances are lodged about overtime/fatigue.
All documents are consistent.
Fewer non-conformances by contractors
2.2 Fatigue Management: (a) Develop a Fatigue Management Plan for TANAP and
implement this across the project; (b) Agree the Plan and its timeframe for implementation with
the EBRD; (c) Implement the Plan as agreed.
EBRD PR2 Resources: In-house / Consultant Investment: Responsibility:
Fatigue Management Plan to be developed by TANAP prior to EBRD Board meeting
Plan developed and agreed Plan implemented as agreed
2.3 Termination and retrenchment provisions: (a) Share with EBRD the Retrenchment Plans of each of the
CCs; (b) Share the first two quarterly monitoring reports of the
Retrenchment Plans, undertaken by TANAP of the CCs.
Interviews with short term labour suggests that not all CCs are making clear what the working conditions (including retrenchment/termination) are. TANAP requires provision of a document of resignation or notice of termination, in practice notice periods for dismissal may be occurring inconsistently, particularly in
relation to casual / short-term work. It is noted that the CCs are required to prepare Retrenchment Plans.
EBRD PR2 (2.5) ILO Core Labour Standards
Resources: In-house Investment: Responsibility:
September 2017 for Retrenchment Plans Quarterly Monitoring Reports as these are available, by latest
December 2017
Engagement conducted and documented. Form amended.
PR3 Resource Efficiency and Pollution Prevention and Control
3.1 Provide annual reporting of GHG emissions to the EBRD in line with their accepted methodology.
The EBRD requires that operations that produce more than 25,000 tonnes CO2-equivalent annually, (which TANAP does), quantify and report these emissions to the EBRD annually, in accordance with the
EBRD PR3 (3.4) Resources: In-house / Consultant Investment:
1st Quarter 2018 & annually thereafter
Annual reporting conducted
1 These numbers refer to the action item, and are not a reference to the relevant section of the Performance Requirements. Reference to Performance Requirements are provided in the column titled Requirement (Legislative, EBRD, PR, Best Practice).
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 4 Environmental and Social Action Plan June 2017 Page 2
No.1 Action Environmental & Social Risks (Liability/Benefits)
Requirement (Legislative, EBRD PR, Best Practice)
Resources, Investment Needs, Responsibility
Timetable / Frequency of Monitoring for Action
Target and Evaluation Criteria for Successful Implementation
Status
EBRD Methodology for Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Responsibility:
PR4 Health and Safety
4.1 Develop a program on the prevention and management of communicable diseases in Project-affected communities:
(a) Develop the program Terms of Reference for EBRD approval;
(b) Implement the program as agreed, including regular monitoring and reporting;
(c) Share with EBRD for the Banks’ comment the plans for worker training on communicable diseases.
CCs’ Community Safety MPs make commitments to provide periodic communicable disease training to workers and training on worker interactions with community members. The Community Safety MP requires that the CCs will prepare studies on incidence of communicable diseases in affected Provinces, based on epidemiological information available, to ensure that all precautions are taken to prevent the transmission of such diseases due to the presence of workers. Engagement is required by CCs with local health authorities to agree appropriate mitigation strategies as required. This is reflected in CCs’ MPs, although it is not clear if such engagement / studies have been undertaken by all CCs. It is noted that TANAP has plans in place for worker training. Communicable disease management is provided for occupational
response, in the Medical Emergency Response Plan, however this Plan does not extend to community health response to Project-induced communicable disease.
EBRD PR4 (4.8) Resources: Contractors / Consultant Investment: Responsibility:
August 2017 (ToRs and the worker training plans) September 2017 (commencement of Program implementation)
Epidemiological studies conducted and findings incorporated in management approach / community health programs
PR5 Land Acquisition, Involuntary Resettlement and Economic Displacement
5.1 RAP Fund Management: (a) Provide EBRD with a copy of the final RAP Fund
Management Procedure and associated documents (including brochure for information dissemination);
(b) Provide for EBRD the stakeholder engagement plan, Annex 2 on RAP implementation, including specific provisions for engagement with vulnerable households.
The Cut-off date from the original RAP could not be met, and BOTAS has developed a practicable approach to evaluating and compensating every additional claim and justified complaint even after the cut-off date. TANAP should ensure that this commitment is met through the retrospective study to compensate all eligible PAPs (i.e. all members of households’ dependent on land income in addition to identified title holder, descendants of deceased land title holders with no formal paper, people with no formal title to land; customary users of land, disputed ownership, etc., as per the revised Entitlements Matrix) and subsequent monitoring and auditing processes.
EBRD PR5 (5.2) Resources: In-house / Consultant Investment: Responsibility:
August 2017 (implementation of engagement on the RAP Fund procedure)
Process determined and implementation commenced
5.2 Livelihood Restoration Program (LRP):
(a) Provide for EBRD comment the LRP for AGI-affected settlement prior to the Plan’s disclosure;
(b) Proivde a copy of the completed Offshore Fisheries LRP to EBRD.
TANAP is commissioning a retrospective study (due for completion in
July 2017) to identify and compensate PAPs who have not been yet been compensated under the new Entitlements Matrix framework. Further, TANAP has committed to providing for full replacement cost for all assets and will ensure that lost income is fully restored through the compensation process.
EBRD PR5
(5.5/5.6)
Resources:
Investment: Responsibility:
Prior to EBRD Board
meeting
Livelihood Restoration
Program developed in line with PR 5. EBRD to agree on contents of Program.
5.3 RAP Monitoring: (a) Provide to EBRD a copy of the Quarterly Internal
Monitoing Report (which includes monitoring of the RAP Fund, and implementation of the Corrective Actions Register);
(b) Provide to EBRD the results of external regular monitoring of the RAP, including payments from the RAP Fund.
Livelihood Restoration Plan (LRP), RAP Fund Guidance and documentation. Some payments are reported to have already been made from the RAP Fund, and for transparency these should be reconciled following approval of guidance on implementation of the Fund. The new RAP documents should be developed according to the identified timeline and publicly disclosed in a mode appropriate to the intended audience. The AGI and pipeline RAPs specify monitoring and evaluation mechanisms including indicators, implementation schedule, and budget. These RAPs would be subject to IESC/independent monitoring and review throughout implementation in accordance with GIP. Both internal and external monitoring have commenced, with
the 1st Quarterly Internal Monitoring Report (March 31, 2017) reviewed by the IESC in May 2017. TANAP has contracted independent experts for RAP External Monitoring and will produce their 1st Semi-Annual External Monitoring Report in June 2017.A site visit and investigation by the RAP External Monitoring Team was completed as of May 5, 2017. This monitoring, in turn will, inform the Impact Evaluation at the conclusion of the LA and livelihood restoration program.
EBRD PR5 (5.5) Resources: Consultant Investment: Responsibility:
Prior to EBRD Board meeting and quarterly for internal RAP monitoring and semi-annually for external RAP monitoring throughout construction period.
RAP External Monitoring Team Audit completed and first Semi-annual external monitoring Report. Results submitted to EBRD / IESC for review. Actions agreed and Corrective Actions tracked and monitored.
PR6 Biodiversity and Living Natural Resources
Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project Rev 4 Environmental and Social Action Plan June 2017 Page 3
No.1 Action Environmental & Social Risks (Liability/Benefits)
Requirement (Legislative, EBRD PR, Best Practice)
Resources, Investment Needs, Responsibility
Timetable / Frequency of Monitoring for Action
Target and Evaluation Criteria for Successful Implementation
Status
6.1 Develop and implement a Biodiversity Offset Strategy document that:
(a) Quantifies residual impacts to Priority Biodiversity Features and Critical Habitats, as defined in the BAP [Rev P3 – 10]
(b) Identifies specific biodiversity; management actions, in accordance with the mitigation hierarchy, to achieve No Net Loss / Net Gain outcomes of these species and habitats of conservation importance;
(c) Quantifies No Net Loss / Net Gains based on the successful implementation of the above actions over a reasonable timeframe.
The BAP [Rev P3 - 10] does not quantify how the project’s biodiversity management actions will result in No Net Loss of Priority Biodiversty Features and/or Net Gain of Critical Habitats, as per EBRD’s Performance Requirement 6
EBRD PR6
Resources: Third Party / Internal Investment: Responsibility:
Submission of the draft Biodiversity Offset Strategy Q3 2017 Final report to be disclosed by TANAP prior to EBRD Board Meeting
Submission of the draft Biodiversity Offset Strategy Final report disclosed by TANAP prior to EBRD Board Meeting
PR7 Indigenous People
7.1 Not applicable
PR8 Cultural Heritage
PR10 Information Disclosure and Stakeholder Engagement
10.1 Disclosure and actions to address common grievances: (a) Conduct disclosure to communities of summary grievance
data and measures taken by TANAP and CCs to address the common causes of grievances;
(b) Include a specific section regarding resettlement related grievances to be disclosed in summary form to relevant resettlement-affected stakeholders, with measures taken by TANAP to address the common causes of these grievances.
The main grievances received since project commencement relate to damage to property and land, and the land acquisition process. A quarter of all complaints registered related to damage to land. The grievance process provides for legal redress, and Appeals Committees are additionally established to provide third party review of grievances between TANAP and complainants. This Committee intends to provide an additional level of independent review of any unresolved complaints or grievances.
EBRD PR10 (10.2)
Resources: In-house Investment: Responsibility:
September 2017 & thereafter annually
Disclosure completed. Records available demonstrating disclosure conducted.
10.2 Provide evidence to EBRD of the modality of public disclosure of existing key project ESMPs, including the BAP and RAP documents.
ESIA documents were disclosed on the TANAP website, with key documents in English and Turkish. Supplementary reports prepared included the RAP for Above-Ground Installations (AGIs) and the RAP for the Pipeline, prepared and disclosed due to material changes in the Project. However, while the IESC recognizes that disclosure has been achieved online, the modality of disclosure to communities in a form and format readily understood by stakeholders is ongoing with the development of additional resettlement-related documents (i.e. including the RAP Fund procedure and associated brochure). The latest version of the BAP has yet to be disclosued and should be undertaken in line with GIIP.
EBRD PR10 (10.3)
Resources: In-house Investment: Responsibility:
Prior to EBRD Board meeting
Information provided and issue resolved. Information provided and issue not resolved, additional actions agreed