India: Economic Overview

P.V. Viswanath

FIN 680V/ FIN 360Spring 2012

Economic History: 1950-1990

Post-independence India had a mixed economy, i.e. including both private and public sectors. The reasons for a strong public sector were:– Greate inequality in income distribution – doubts as

to the viability of free markets– Free trade would probably have led to exploitation by

stronger foreign countries• Exports were seen as a drain of resources from the

country.

Post-independence economy

Foreign Investment was seen as foreign domination.The quickest path to economic development was seen to be rapid industrialization, which would probably not happen without government intervention– Capital goods and heavy industry were seen as particularly

needed.– Planning was needed to ensure industrial growth and the

concomitant agricultural and service growth, as well as employment growth

Objectives

The broad objectives were:– Rapid growth in production with a view to achieving a

higher level of national and per-capita income.– Full employment– Reduction of inequalities in income and wealth– Socialistic pattern of society with a democratic

framework, based on equality and justice and absence of exploitation.

Policy Measures for Industrial Development

Trade and Regulatory Regimes designed to shield industrial producers from competition– High tariffs– Industrial licensing of production and investment– Monopoly and Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP)

Act– Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA)– Export Restrictions

Industrial Policy

Directed allocation of subsidized credit through the commercial and developmental banking systemAdministered interest rates and financial institutions required to lend for specific purposes at the administered rates.Fixed, overvalued exchange rates; this ensured cheap imports for the government.

Industrial & Agricultural Policy

Price control for many productsRigid labor laws that made it difficult to lay off workers.Direct public investment in industrial activities.Management of the agricultural sector to ensure reasonable supplies of food grains, edible oils, sugar and cotton to the domestic market.

Agricultural Policy

Procurement prices were fixed, which , in times of surplus, worked as a minimum support price.At times of deficit, the government mandatorily procured a part of the grain at the procurement price and distributed it to poorer people through ration shops.Fertilizer, irrigation, power and credit were subsidised for the agricultural sector.

Agricultural and Fiscal Policy

The need to mop up excess production led to trade restrictions. – Quantitative restrictions on exports and imports,

through licensing– Canalization – the use of a single parastatal for

imports and exports; the use of minimum export prices.

– High income tax rates

Social Policies

Higher education was emphasized (IITs and IIMs)Growth-oriented strategy as a means of mitigating poverty and unemployment.However, structural inequalities in land ownership, availability of water, access to credit etc. led to growth without income and employment growth for poorer people.

Social Policies

Land reform; however, it required the cooperation of the states, which was not always forthcoming for political reasons.Alleviation of poverty through special programs and policies, such as asset creation programs, employment generation programs, minimum needs programs.Intervention programs to solve the problems of malnutrition and hunger.

Did the policies work? Industry

Industry grew 6% p.a. between 1951 and 1989There was little competition; hence there was little R&D.The capital-input ratio went up considerably; total factor productivity dropped. Capacity utilization fell.Deeply entrenched interest groups.

Agricultural Progress

Between 1950 and 1980, food grain production increased by 2.8% p.a., due primarily to productivity gains and multiple cropping.But, investment growth slowed.R&D suffered, development of irrigation lagged behind plan targets.There was a substantial rise in subsidies for food and fertilizer and for credit, water and electricity.India became more or less self-reliant, but at great cost.

Social Progress

From 1970-88, the proportion of population below poverty dropped from 46.17% to 37.76% in urban areas and from 58.75% to 48.69% in rural areas.Average life expectancy improved from 32.1 in 1950-51 to 58.7 in 1990-91. The death rate dropped from 27.4 to 12.5 during the same period.Literacy was 52.2% in 1990-91 compared to 18.33% in 1950-51.But compared to other developing countries, this was not good.

The crisis and the change

A massive rise in the government deficit spilled over to the current account deficit because it was financed by external debt.External shocks, such as increased oil prices, decreased access to concessionary loans from abroadStructural rigidities in the Indian economy made Indian products non-competitive, globally.

The solution

A twofold solution:– Make the economic structure more competitive– Contain the government deficit

Effects:– Structural Change and – Fiscal stabilization.

Initial Reforms

Trade policy reforms have done away with most quantitative restrictions and reduced tariff levelsIndustrial policy has removed barriers to entry and limits on growth in the size of firmsRegimes for foreign investment and foreign technology have been liberalized considerablyDomestic tax structure has been rationalized.The financial sector is being deregulated.

Second-generation reforms

Privatization of public sector undertakings– Very slow, but steady. BHEL

Exit policy for laborReforms of the agricultural sectorReforms of the state government

GDP from 50-51 to 2008-9

1950

-51

1952

-53

1954

-55

1956

-57

1958

-59

1960

-61

1962

-63

1964

-65

1966

-67

1968

-69

1970

-71

1972

-73

1974

-75

1976

-77

1978

-79

1980

-81

1982

-83

1984

-85

1986

-87

1988

-89

1990

-91

1992

-93

1994

-95

1996

-97

1998

-99

2000

-01

2002

-03

2004

-05

2006

-07

2008

-09

0

1000000

2000000

3000000

4000000

5000000

6000000

GDP at Factor Cost

GDP: Post Liberalization

1991

-92

1992

-93

1993

-94

1994

-95

1995

-96

1996

-97

1997

-98

1998

-99

1999

-00

2000

-01

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

2006

-07

2007

-08

2008

-09

0

1000000

2000000

3000000

4000000

5000000

6000000

GDP at Factor Prices

Series1

Industrial Production

Weight

1994-95

1995-96

1996-97

1997-98

1998-99

1999-00

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

0.00

50.00

100.00

150.00

200.00

250.00

300.00

350.00

Index Nos of Industrial Production (1993:94 Base)

Mining & QuarryingManufacturingElectricityGeneral

Growth in Industrial Production

Atul Kohli, “Politics of Economic Growth in India, 1980-2005,” Economic and Political Weekly, April 2006, pp. 1251-1259 and 1361-1370

Changes post-1991

Disparity in growth across statesMove towards service sectorLack of industrial growthIncome inequalitiesHigh poverty in the rural sector – farmer suicidesContinued casteism, gender inequality, communal unrest

Change in the structure of the economy

Year Agriculture and Allied

Industries Manufacturing Services

1952-53 55 11 10 34

1964-65 47 15 13 38

1980-81 38 17 14 45

1987-88 32 19 15 49

2004-5 19 20 15 60

2010-11 14 20 16 66

Source: Table 3, Components of Gross Domestic Product, Handbook of Statistics on the Indian Economy