Upload
p
View
218
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
128 11 JULY 2014 • VOL 345 ISSUE 6193 sciencemag.org SCIENCE
PH
OT
O:
P.
BA
GL
A
By Pallava Bagla, in New Delhi
In one of the most ambitious engineering
projects ever conceived, the Indian gov-
ernment is preparing to forge ahead on
a plan to build a 15,000-kilometer-long
network of canals and tunnels that would
move 174 billion cubic meters of water
each year—almost a third of the amount
the United States withdraws from aquifers
each year—from areas with surplus water to
parched regions of India.
The prime rationale for the $168 billion
National River Linking Project (NRLP) is
simple: To feed its growing population, the
Indian government has determined that it
must drastically expand its arable land. Now,
about 100 million hectares in India are ir-
rigated; NRLP, if fully implemented, would
increase that amount to about 135 million
hectares, while also curtailing flood damage
during the summer monsoon season and
adding another 34 gigawatts of hydropower
capacity. The current plan, honed by India’s
National Water Development Agency, envi-
sions 16 links between Himalayan-fed rivers
and rivers in drought-afflicted western India,
and another 14 links in the southern half
of the peninsula (see map). Newly elected
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has
hailed the “river interlinking project” as a
national “dream.”
Thanks to Modi’s patronage, that dream
is moving closer to reality. “All possibili-
ties will be explored for early implementa-
tion of the river interlinking project,” Uma
Bharti, India’s new water minister, told
Science at a meeting here on 7 July on
cleaning up the Ganges River. But NRLP,
which could take upward of a quarter-
century to complete, faces political hur-
dles and scientific dissent. Critics contend
that the water transfer would spread
invasive species and waterborne dis-
eases and interfere with fish migration.
Water-rich states may also balk at shar-
ing. “There will undoubtedly be winners
and losers,” says Donald Alford, a hydro-
logist who has studied the Himalayas with
the firm Mountain Hydrologic Systems in
Billings, Montana. “Who, and where they
are, will help to define feasibility.”
The Indian government first proposed a
“national water grid” in 1972, but the idea,
featuring a 2640-kilometer-long canal be-
tween the Ganges and Cauvery rivers, was
shelved due to cost. Over the years, as the
project’s aspirations grew, political support
“waxed and waned,” says Upali Amarasinghe,
a statistician with the International Water
Management Institute in Hyderabad. Several
links were built, including one between the
Narmada and Sabarmati rivers in Gujarat
state, which Modi governed before becoming
prime minister.
India’s previous government, led by
Manmohan Singh, was never enamored
with NRLP and did not push for broad
implementation. “River interlinking is
against the forces of nature,” says chemist
T. Ramasami, the former secretary of the
Department of Science and Technology who
chaired a Supreme Court–mandated expert
committee on water issues. “Intense scien-
tific scrutiny,” he says, is necessary “before
such a big project is undertaken.”
NRLP critics say that Singh was right to
keep the project on ice. “The equation that
flooding means surplus water and drought
means deficit is misleading and wrong,” ar-
gues Himanshu Thakkar, an engineer with
the South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and
People, an advocacy group based here. He
points out that areas with heavy monsoon
rainfalls can face water scarcity during the
dry season. Moreover, NRLP’s viability de-
pends on states sharing water resources—an
unreasonable assumption, Thakkar says, be-
cause “all of them are equally facing increas-
ing scarcity of water. From this point of view
alone, the links are unviable.”
That’s not how Bharti sees it. She contends
that Singh’s government “slept” on the proj-
ect, even after the Supreme Court in February
2012 held that NRLP “is a matter of national
benefit.” In a sign that the new government
will push ahead, last month it
granted permission to Gujarat
to raise the height of the Sardar
Sarovar Dam by 17 meters, tak-
ing it to 138 meters. Completed
in 2006, the hydropower project
transfers water across basins to
irrigate 1.8 million hectares; rais-
ing the height would irrigate an-
other 68,000 hectares.
Modi’s government is still
thrashing out just how fast it will
move on NRLP. Its near-term
ambitions will become apparent
when it releases its first bud-
get, for 2014 to 2015, later this
month. Whatever shape NRLP
takes, Bharti assures Science that
“no environmental laws will be
broken.” ■
Under the river-linking project, surplus
water from the Brahmaputra River would be
diverted to parched regions in northern India.
WATER
India plans the grandest of canal networksNationwide water transfer scheme could aid farming, but critics fear ecological havoc
INDIA
I N D I A
Brahmaputra
Ganges
Himalayan links
Peninsular links
Source: International Water Management Institute
Yamuna
Krishna
Cauvery
Narmada
No more going with the flowIndia’s plan calls for 15,000 kilometers of canals and tunnels (not all are shown)
Published by AAAS
on
Nov
embe
r 9,
201
4w
ww
.sci
ence
mag
.org
Dow
nloa
ded
from