Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee: Rosalie A. Doronila Name of Rater: Mary Cris T. CasalanPosition: Teacher 3 Position: Head Teacher IIIReview Period: June 2015 to March 2016 Date of Review:

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education, Division of Antique, Apgahan Elementary School

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNINGTO BE FILLED IN DURING

EVALUATION

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVESTIMELIN

E

Weight per

KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency,

Timeliness)

ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING SCORE

Conducted/Participated in seminars, workshops, trainings within a year (division, regional or national)

June 2015 to March 2016

35% 5 Conducted/Participated 5

seminars/workshops/ trainings for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidence/assessment reports)

4 Conducted/Participated 4

seminars/workshops/ trainings for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidence/assessment reports)

3 Conducted/Particpated 3

seminars/workshops/ trainings for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidence/assessment reports)

2 Conducted/Participated 2 seminars/

workshops/ trainings for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidence/assessment reports)

1 Conducted/Participated 1 seminars/

workshops/ trainings for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidence/assessment reports)

Received (division, regional or national) awards /recognitions within a year

June 2015 to March 2016

5 4 awards /recognitions received

4 3 awards /recognitions received

3 2 awards /recognitions received

2 1 awards /recognitions received

1 No awards /recognitions received

Instructional Competence (35%)

Handled teaching loads every year

June 2015 to March 2016

35% 5 100% and above required teaching

load handled for year

4 84-99% required teaching load

handled for the year

3

68-83% required teaching load handled for the year

2 51-67% required teaching load

handled for the year

1 50% and below of required teaching

loads handled for the year

Achieved at least 10% increase of the pupils’ performance at the end of the school year

June 2015 to March 2016

5 100% and above student

performance (in MPS or GSA)4 84-99% student peformance (in

MPS or GSA)3 68-83% student peformance (in

MPS or GSA)2 51-67% student peformance (in

MPS or GSA)1 50% and below student performance

(in MPS of GSA) Attained 100% of the

required learning competencies for the students in every quarter

June 2015 to March 2016

5 100% and above of the required

competencies in every quarter completed

4 84-99% of the required

competencies in every quarter completed

3 68-83% of the required

competencies in every quarter completed

2 51-67% of the required

competencies in every quarter competed

1 50% and below of the required

competencies in every quarter completed

Increased NAT performance by 10%

5 10% increase

4 6% increase

3 5% increase

2 4% increase

1 3% and below increase

Instructional Supervision(30%)

Observed 2 teachers every quarter

June 2015 to March 2016

30% 5 100% and above of teachers

observed with post conference with teacher observation reports held in every quarter

4 84-99% of teachers observed with

teacher observation and post conference reports, held in every quarter

3 68-83% of teachers observed with

teacher observation and post

conference reports, held in every quarter

2 51-67% teachers observed with

teacher observation and post conference reports, held in every quarter

1 50% and below of teachers

observed with teacher observation and post conference reports, held in every quarter

Conducted at least 3 mentoring/ coaching activities with teachers quarterly

June 2014 to March 2015

5 5 and above teacher mentoring

/coaching sessions were conducted in every quarter ( with report)

4 4 teacher mentoring /coaching

sessions conducted in every quarter (with report)

3 3 teacher mentoring /coaching

sessions conducted in every quarter (with report)

2 1-2 teacher mentoring /coaching

sessions conducted in every quarter (with report)

1 No teacher mentoring /coaching

sessions conducted in every quarter (with report)

Evaluated teachers’ performance twice a year.

June 2014 to March 2015

5 Evaluated 100% and above teacher

performance following RPMS framework cycle

4

Evaluated 84-99% teacher performance following RPMS framework cycle

3 Evaluated 68-83% teacher

performance following RPMS framework cycle

2 Evaluated 51-67%of teacher

performance following RPMS framework cycle

1 Evaluated 50% and below of

teacher performance following RPMS framework cycle

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned Overall Rating for Accomplishments

AURELIO D. ODIONGRater

ELMER G. DORONILA, IVRatee