1
1417 PASTEURISATION AND THE NUTRITIVE VALUE OF MILK wait until the report of the Astor Departmental Committee in 1912 before the dream of its founder was realised. Flick has pointed out that the period of voluntary hospital development in this country saw a marked decline in tuberculosis mortality. In 1848 the death-rate was 2-97 per 1000 living ; in 1888 it had fallen to 1-54. Now it has been nearly halved again, and although these declines in mortality cannot be attributed to any one agency, there can be no doubt whatever that the dispensary movement has justified the faith of its founder’! IN DEFENCE OF RESEARCH Prof. G. Grey Turner, professor of surgery in the University of London at the British Postgraduate Medical School, who has recently been elected a vice- president of the Research Defence Society, will deliver the eleventh Stephen Paget memorial lecture at the annual general meeting of the society which is being held on Tuesday, June 15th, at 3 P.M., at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel-street, W.C. Prof. Grey Turner will speak on what research owes to the Paget tradition, and the chair will be taken by Lord Lamington, president of the society, who will be supported by Sir Arthur Stanley and Prof. A. V. Hill, F.R.S. Members are invited to bring their friends to the meeting. The society may be addressed at 11, Chandos-street, Cavendish-square, London, W.l. INDUCTION AS A ROUTINE Mathieu and Holman 2 of Portland, Oregon, compare the results in some 750 consecutive cases in which premature labour was induced, with those in another 750 contemporary cases in which the onset of labour was left to Nature. A study of these two series should (but may not) leave the reader convinced that no woman ought to be allowed to go into labour spontaneously. In the series in which induction was performed, the maternal mortality (one death) was half what it was in the other group, while the foetal mortality (corrected) was in the same proportion. The length of the first stage of labour was considerably diminished in the induced series, and there was no difference in the morbidity-rate. The method of induction used is said ’to have been completely successful. At 7 A.M. an enema is given, followed at 7.30 by a variable dose of pentobarbital. The patient is asleep in half an hour, and pituitary extract in 3-minim doses is injected at half-hour intervals afterwards. If labour has not started after the third or fourth injection and the membranes are still intact, they are ruptured artificially. (It should be noted that this is not advised if there is a malpresentation or if the fcetal head is not engaged.) The injections of pituitary extract are then continued until the patient is definitely in labour. In Mathieu and Holman’s series there were no untowards results-no pituitary shock, no premature separation of the placenta, no precipitate labour-and it is somewhat ironical that the only case of rupture of the uterus was in the series of controls in whom labour was not induced. The indications for induction are stated most briefly as " those cases which promised trouble, the toxaemias, large babies, contracted pelvic outlets, apprehensive and nervous patients, &c." The results seem to have been excellent, yet we are not altogether 1 A tribute is paid by the Edinburgh medical school to Sir Robert Philip’s work in the Edinburgh Medical Journal for May, 1937. 2 Mathieu, A., and Holman, A., Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. Feb., 1937, p. 268. surprised that many of the speakers at a meeting to which they were related commented adversely upon the procedure, and suggested that it is better to allow labour to start spontaneously unless there is some definite reason for the termination of pregnancy. Be this as it may, certain facts do demand careful attention. The method was employed over a large number of cases, and the incidence of complications was negligible. Pituitary extract was used as a routine but in small repeated doses, and its administration was stopped as soon as labour pains were established. There was no report of uterine inertia, and this is of interest in view of the attention lately drawn to the high incidence of inertia of the uterus in women in whom labour had been started by the insertion of bougies. The advisability of administering pituitary extract during induction of labour needs further examination. PASTEURISATION AND THE NUTRITIVE VALUE OF MILK THE dangers of raw milk as a vehicle for the conveyance of disease are well known and repeatedly emphasised in our columns, as well as the safety given by efficient pasteurisation. These are demon- strable facts that cannot be gainsaid ; so the opponents of pasteurisation, who fear its advent chiefly because of the disturbance they believe it will cause in present methods of distribution, have to fall back on the argument that heat reduces the nutritive value of milk. They are apt to talk vaguely of the possible presence of some component that might be affected by pasteurisation, but they cannot isolate or define it. A valuable report issued by the Milk Nutrition Committee provides no reason for thinking that milk contains any such factor and shows that there is little difference between the nutritive value of raw and pasteurised milk. Further evidence may be found in a report on the nutritive value of raw and pasteurised milk for calves by Prof. Wilson, Prof. Minett, and Mr. Carling.2 2 Their experiment, which lasted over two years, was made with milk from a healthy shorthorn herd. Calves as they were born were allotted alternately, without any selection, into two groups, one fed on the raw milk and the other on the same milk after pasteurisation. Mixed morning milk was used, and it was given in measured quantities in strict relation to the weight of the calves. This impartial allocation was not perfectly satis- factory and in fact operated against the pasteurised group because fewer bull calves happened to be allocated to this group while it included two weaklings who died from other causes. Apart from these two, all the animals throve well and showed no signs of rickets or anaemia. The average increase in weight over the eight-week period for the animals in the raw-milk group (25 calves) was 53-72 lb. ; in the pasteurised-milk group (23 calves) it was 53-86 lb. Incidentally the highest individual gain among the bull calves and also among the heifer calves was in an animal fed on pasteurised milk. No physical differences could be noted by any observers between the animals in the two groups. Prof. Wilson and his colleagues conclude that " there is nothing in these results to suggest that the nutritive value of pasteurised milk for calves is in any way inferior to that of raw milk." Earlier studies have suggested that one effect of pasteurisation is to diminish the availability of the calcium and phosphorus in milk. 1 See Lancet, May 15th, 1937, p. 1179. 2 Wilson, G. S., Minett, F. C., and Carling, H. F. (1937) J. Hyg. 37, 243.

INDUCTION AS A ROUTINE

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: INDUCTION AS A ROUTINE

1417PASTEURISATION AND THE NUTRITIVE VALUE OF MILK

wait until the report of the Astor DepartmentalCommittee in 1912 before the dream of its founderwas realised. Flick has pointed out that the periodof voluntary hospital development in this countrysaw a marked decline in tuberculosis mortality. In1848 the death-rate was 2-97 per 1000 living ; in1888 it had fallen to 1-54. Now it has been nearlyhalved again, and although these declines in

mortality cannot be attributed to any oneagency, there can be no doubt whatever thatthe dispensary movement has justified the faith ofits founder’!

IN DEFENCE OF RESEARCH

Prof. G. Grey Turner, professor of surgery in theUniversity of London at the British PostgraduateMedical School, who has recently been elected a vice-president of the Research Defence Society, willdeliver the eleventh Stephen Paget memorial lectureat the annual general meeting of the society which isbeing held on Tuesday, June 15th, at 3 P.M., at theLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,Keppel-street, W.C. Prof. Grey Turner will speak onwhat research owes to the Paget tradition, and thechair will be taken by Lord Lamington, president ofthe society, who will be supported by Sir ArthurStanley and Prof. A. V. Hill, F.R.S. Members areinvited to bring their friends to the meeting. The

society may be addressed at 11, Chandos-street,Cavendish-square, London, W.l.

INDUCTION AS A ROUTINE

Mathieu and Holman 2 of Portland, Oregon,compare the results in some 750 consecutive casesin which premature labour was induced, with thosein another 750 contemporary cases in which the onsetof labour was left to Nature. A study of these twoseries should (but may not) leave the reader convincedthat no woman ought to be allowed to go into labourspontaneously. In the series in which induction wasperformed, the maternal mortality (one death) washalf what it was in the other group, while the foetal

mortality (corrected) was in the same proportion.The length of the first stage of labour was considerablydiminished in the induced series, and there was nodifference in the morbidity-rate. The method ofinduction used is said ’to have been completelysuccessful. At 7 A.M. an enema is given, followed at7.30 by a variable dose of pentobarbital. The patient isasleep in half an hour, and pituitary extract in 3-minimdoses is injected at half-hour intervals afterwards.If labour has not started after the third or fourth

injection and the membranes are still intact, theyare ruptured artificially. (It should be noted thatthis is not advised if there is a malpresentation or ifthe fcetal head is not engaged.) The injections ofpituitary extract are then continued until the patient isdefinitely in labour. In Mathieu and Holman’s seriesthere were no untowards results-no pituitary shock,no premature separation of the placenta, no precipitatelabour-and it is somewhat ironical that the onlycase of rupture of the uterus was in the series ofcontrols in whom labour was not induced. Theindications for induction are stated most brieflyas

" those cases which promised trouble, the toxaemias,large babies, contracted pelvic outlets, apprehensiveand nervous patients, &c." The results seem tohave been excellent, yet we are not altogether

1 A tribute is paid by the Edinburgh medical school to SirRobert Philip’s work in the Edinburgh Medical Journal forMay, 1937.

2 Mathieu, A., and Holman, A., Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec.Feb., 1937, p. 268.

surprised that many of the speakers at a meetingto which they were related commented adverselyupon the procedure, and suggested that it is betterto allow labour to start spontaneously unless thereis some definite reason for the termination of

pregnancy. Be this as it may, certain facts dodemand careful attention. The method was employedover a large number of cases, and the incidence ofcomplications was negligible. Pituitary extract wasused as a routine but in small repeated doses, and itsadministration was stopped as soon as labour painswere established. There was no report of uterine

inertia, and this is of interest in view of the attentionlately drawn to the high incidence of inertia of theuterus in women in whom labour had been startedby the insertion of bougies. The advisability of

administering pituitary extract during induction oflabour needs further examination.

PASTEURISATION AND THE NUTRITIVE VALUE

OF MILK

THE dangers of raw milk as a vehicle for the

conveyance of disease are well known and repeatedlyemphasised in our columns, as well as the safetygiven by efficient pasteurisation. These are demon-strable facts that cannot be gainsaid ; so the opponentsof pasteurisation, who fear its advent chiefly becauseof the disturbance they believe it will cause in presentmethods of distribution, have to fall back on the

argument that heat reduces the nutritive value ofmilk. They are apt to talk vaguely of the possiblepresence of some component that might be affectedby pasteurisation, but they cannot isolate or define it.A valuable report issued by the Milk NutritionCommittee provides no reason for thinking thatmilk contains any such factor and shows that thereis little difference between the nutritive value ofraw and pasteurised milk. Further evidence maybe found in a report on the nutritive value of raw andpasteurised milk for calves by Prof. Wilson, Prof.Minett, and Mr. Carling.2 2 Their experiment, whichlasted over two years, was made with milk from a

healthy shorthorn herd. Calves as they were bornwere allotted alternately, without any selection,into two groups, one fed on the raw milk and theother on the same milk after pasteurisation. Mixedmorning milk was used, and it was given in measuredquantities in strict relation to the weight of the calves.This impartial allocation was not perfectly satis-

factory and in fact operated against the pasteurisedgroup because fewer bull calves happened to beallocated to this group while it included two weaklingswho died from other causes. Apart from these two,all the animals throve well and showed no signs ofrickets or anaemia. The average increase in weightover the eight-week period for the animals in theraw-milk group (25 calves) was 53-72 lb. ; in the

pasteurised-milk group (23 calves) it was 53-86 lb.

Incidentally the highest individual gain among thebull calves and also among the heifer calves was inan animal fed on pasteurised milk. No physicaldifferences could be noted by any observers betweenthe animals in the two groups. Prof. Wilson and his

colleagues conclude that " there is nothing in theseresults to suggest that the nutritive value of

pasteurised milk for calves is in any way inferiorto that of raw milk." Earlier studies have suggestedthat one effect of pasteurisation is to diminish theavailability of the calcium and phosphorus in milk.

1 See Lancet, May 15th, 1937, p. 1179.2 Wilson, G. S., Minett, F. C., and Carling, H. F. (1937)

J. Hyg. 37, 243.