14
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Industrial Crops & Products journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/indcrop Research paper (UV/Oxidative) dual curing polyurethane dispersion from cardanol based polyol: Synthesis and characterization Vikash Mishra a , Jatin Desai a,b , Kalpesh I. Patel a, a Surface Coating Technology Department, Institute of Science & Technology for Advanced Studies & Research (ISTAR), Vallabh Vidyanagar, Gujarat, India b Sophisticated Instrumentation Centre for Applied Research & Testing (SICART), Vallabh Vidyanagar, Gujarat, India ARTICLE INFO Keywords: Waterborne coatings UV-curable polyurethane dispersions (UV- PUDs) Green coatings Cardanol-based polyol UV/oxidative dual curing ABSTRACT This study reports the synthesis and property evaluation of UV/oxidative dual curing waterborne polyurethane dispersion prepared from cardanol-based polyol using dierent mode of curing. Cardanol-based polyol was prepared by reacting epoxidized cardanol with itaconic acid in presence of triphenyl phosphine catalyst. Structures of cardanol-based intermediates (both epoxidized cardanol and polyol) are conrmed by FTIR, 1 H NMR and 13 C NMR spectroscopy. The intermediates were characterized for various physicochemical properties such as hydroxyl value, acid value, epoxy equivalent weight (EEW), viscosity, color etc. Waterborne poly- urethane oligomer was synthesized by reacting polyol, isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), dimethylol propionic acid (DMPA) and 2-hydroxy methyl methacrylate (HEMA) in acetone as solvent. The prepolymer was neutralized with triethyl amine (TEA) and subsequently dispersed in deionized water and oligomer was obtained after removal of acetone. The coating lms were formulated using suitable metal drier and/or photoinitiator blend based on dierent mode of curing, viz. oxidative curing, UV curing and (UV/oxidative) dual curing. The impact of curing process on properties of cured lms was evaluated. Inuence of curing process has been investigated by DMA, DSC and gel content analysis. The results showed that crosslink density plays an important role in deciding the nal performance properties of cured lms. The increase in crosslink density of UV/oxidative dual-cured system leads to an improvement in thermal, mechanical, chemical, water and solvent resistance properties along with other coating performance properties. In conclusion, the result of this study conrms that cardanol-based waterborne oligomer is suitable candidate for high performance environment-friendly coatings. 1. Introduction From past few decades, the demand for environment friendly coatings, like high solid coatings (Manea, 2008), waterborne coatings (Madbouly and Otaigbe, 2009; Parmar et al., 2005), UV curable coat- ings (Patel et al., 2008; Glöckner et al., 2008; Schwalm, 2007) and powder coatings (Haveren et al., 2007) has increased tremendously. Environmental concerns, such as volatile organic solvent emissions and recycling or waste disposal problems at the end of their economic lifetime, as well as government regulations are the major factors behind this shift (Weiss, 1997; Staring et al., 2002; Patel et al., 2009; Mishra and Patel, 2015). Over the years, waterborne UV coatings have estab- lished themselves as a greener alternative for myriads of applications (Glöckner et al., 2008). Waterborne UV coatings have inherent ad- vantages such as, low energy consumption, high curing speed, en- vironment safety, cost ecient, excellent adhesion, block resistance, low temperature resistance and enhanced performance (Dai et al., 2015; Asif and Shi, 2003; Hwang et al., 2011; Li et al., 2015a, 2015b). Among waterborne UV coatings, UV-curable polyurethane disper- sions (abbreviated as UV-PUDs) have been most extensively studied due to their versatility, environmental friendliness and excellent mechanical performance (Tielemans et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2006; Tielemans et al., 2012). The presence of hard urethane or urea segments together with acrylate double bond in UV-PUD oligomer oers the cured polymer network, hardness and resistance properties, while the soft segments serve as buer zones and account for the exibility and impact re- sistance (Zhang et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2007; Bai et al., 2008). In spite of all these benets, application of UV-PUDs are mostly limited to at substrate (wood, metal, plastic, paper) due to their in- ability to cure three-dimensional objects, i.e. the presence of some shadow areas which can hardly be reached by the UV radiation, therefore will remain uncured (Decker et al., 2003). To address this shortcoming, dual-cure systems have been recently developed which comprises additional chemical cross-linking process along with UV- curing, for e.g. a thermal curing (Bas and Soucek, 2012), oxidative polymerization (usually an drying oil or fatty acid) (Chang and Lu, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.015 Received 22 March 2017; Received in revised form 17 September 2017; Accepted 8 October 2017 Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (K.I. Patel). Industrial Crops & Products 111 (2018) 165–178 0926-6690/ © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. MARK

Industrial Crops & Products...2015), reactive diluents (Jie et al., 2015), polyols for polyurethanes (Mythili et al., 2004), plasticizers (Greco et al., 2010), rubber com-pounding

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Industrial Crops & Products...2015), reactive diluents (Jie et al., 2015), polyols for polyurethanes (Mythili et al., 2004), plasticizers (Greco et al., 2010), rubber com-pounding

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Industrial Crops & Products

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/indcrop

Research paper

(UV/Oxidative) dual curing polyurethane dispersion from cardanol basedpolyol: Synthesis and characterization

Vikash Mishraa, Jatin Desaia,b, Kalpesh I. Patela,⁎

a Surface Coating Technology Department, Institute of Science & Technology for Advanced Studies & Research (ISTAR), Vallabh Vidyanagar, Gujarat, Indiab Sophisticated Instrumentation Centre for Applied Research & Testing (SICART), Vallabh Vidyanagar, Gujarat, India

A R T I C L E I N F O

Keywords:Waterborne coatingsUV-curable polyurethane dispersions (UV-PUDs)Green coatingsCardanol-based polyolUV/oxidative dual curing

A B S T R A C T

This study reports the synthesis and property evaluation of UV/oxidative dual curing waterborne polyurethanedispersion prepared from cardanol-based polyol using different mode of curing. Cardanol-based polyol wasprepared by reacting epoxidized cardanol with itaconic acid in presence of triphenyl phosphine catalyst.Structures of cardanol-based intermediates (both epoxidized cardanol and polyol) are confirmed by FTIR, 1HNMR and 13C NMR spectroscopy. The intermediates were characterized for various physicochemical propertiessuch as hydroxyl value, acid value, epoxy equivalent weight (EEW), viscosity, color etc. Waterborne poly-urethane oligomer was synthesized by reacting polyol, isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), dimethylol propionicacid (DMPA) and 2-hydroxy methyl methacrylate (HEMA) in acetone as solvent. The prepolymer was neutralizedwith triethyl amine (TEA) and subsequently dispersed in deionized water and oligomer was obtained afterremoval of acetone. The coating films were formulated using suitable metal drier and/or photoinitiator blendbased on different mode of curing, viz. oxidative curing, UV curing and (UV/oxidative) dual curing. The impactof curing process on properties of cured films was evaluated. Influence of curing process has been investigated byDMA, DSC and gel content analysis. The results showed that crosslink density plays an important role in decidingthe final performance properties of cured films. The increase in crosslink density of UV/oxidative dual-curedsystem leads to an improvement in thermal, mechanical, chemical, water and solvent resistance properties alongwith other coating performance properties. In conclusion, the result of this study confirms that cardanol-basedwaterborne oligomer is suitable candidate for high performance environment-friendly coatings.

1. Introduction

From past few decades, the demand for environment friendlycoatings, like high solid coatings (Manea, 2008), waterborne coatings(Madbouly and Otaigbe, 2009; Parmar et al., 2005), UV curable coat-ings (Patel et al., 2008; Glöckner et al., 2008; Schwalm, 2007) andpowder coatings (Haveren et al., 2007) has increased tremendously.Environmental concerns, such as volatile organic solvent emissions andrecycling or waste disposal problems at the end of their economiclifetime, as well as government regulations are the major factors behindthis shift (Weiss, 1997; Staring et al., 2002; Patel et al., 2009; Mishraand Patel, 2015). Over the years, waterborne UV coatings have estab-lished themselves as a greener alternative for myriads of applications(Glöckner et al., 2008). Waterborne UV coatings have inherent ad-vantages such as, low energy consumption, high curing speed, en-vironment safety, cost efficient, excellent adhesion, block resistance,low temperature resistance and enhanced performance (Dai et al.,2015; Asif and Shi, 2003; Hwang et al., 2011; Li et al., 2015a, 2015b).

Among waterborne UV coatings, UV-curable polyurethane disper-sions (abbreviated as UV-PUDs) have been most extensively studied dueto their versatility, environmental friendliness and excellent mechanicalperformance (Tielemans et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2006; Tielemans et al.,2012). The presence of hard urethane or urea segments together withacrylate double bond in UV-PUD oligomer offers the cured polymernetwork, hardness and resistance properties, while the soft segmentsserve as buffer zones and account for the flexibility and impact re-sistance (Zhang et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2007; Bai et al.,2008). In spite of all these benefits, application of UV-PUDs are mostlylimited to flat substrate (wood, metal, plastic, paper) due to their in-ability to cure three-dimensional objects, i.e. the presence of someshadow areas which can hardly be reached by the UV radiation,therefore will remain uncured (Decker et al., 2003). To address thisshortcoming, dual-cure systems have been recently developed whichcomprises additional chemical cross-linking process along with UV-curing, for e.g. a thermal curing (Bas and Soucek, 2012), oxidativepolymerization (usually an drying oil or fatty acid) (Chang and Lu,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.015Received 22 March 2017; Received in revised form 17 September 2017; Accepted 8 October 2017

⁎ Corresponding author.E-mail address: [email protected] (K.I. Patel).

Industrial Crops & Products 111 (2018) 165–178

0926-6690/ © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

MARK

Page 2: Industrial Crops & Products...2015), reactive diluents (Jie et al., 2015), polyols for polyurethanes (Mythili et al., 2004), plasticizers (Greco et al., 2010), rubber com-pounding

2013) or other hybrid systems like sol-gel curing, thiol based hybridcoatings etc. (Glöckner et al., 2008; Mishra et al., 2017).

Most coating and polymer materials, including polyurethanes, areproduced entirely from petroleum-based products which will sooner orlater run short (Xia and Larock 2010). Accordingly, efforts have beenmade to incorporate bio-renewable raw materials as a substitute ofpetroleum-based building blocks, for production of valuable polymericPU materials (Raquez et al., 2010) particularly in UV-coatings (Patelet al., 2009; Patel et al., 2008; Fertier et al., 2013; Rengasamy andMannari, 2013), PUDs (Patel et al., 2010; Saalah et al., 2015) and UV-PUDs (Chang and Lu, 2013; Mishra et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015a, 2015b;Rengasamy and Mannari, 2014), providing a “greener” solution tocoating industry. A variety of renewable starting materials, like sugarsand polysaccharides, vegetable oils, cashew nut shell liquid (CNSL),lignin, pine resin derivatives, and their derivatives, have been used toprepare these coating materials (Raquez et al., 2010).

Cardanol is a valuable raw material obtained from cashew nut shellliquid (CNSL) for polymer production and represents a good naturalalternative to petrochemicals derived phenols (Balgude and Sabnis,2014; Quirino et al., 2014). Because of the phenolic nature and pre-sence of unsaturated C15 alkyl chain at meta position, which can beused as oxidative sites for curing of polymers, cardanol offers reactionsites on the aromatic ring and also on the side chain, which makes it asuitable raw material for variety of reactions (Voirin et al., 2013; Lubiand Thachil, 2000). Cardanol has drawn considerable attention of manyresearchers for the production of phenolic resin (Yadav and Srivastava,2009a, 2009b; Unnikrishnan and Thomas Thachil 2008), epoxy resin(Kathalewar and Sabnis, 2014; Jaillet et al., 2014), vinyl esters(Sultania et al., 2010), curing agents for epoxy (Kathalewar and Sabnis,2015), reactive diluents (Jie et al., 2015), polyols for polyurethanes(Mythili et al., 2004), plasticizers (Greco et al., 2010), rubber com-pounding etc.

Both, CNSL and cardanol have been explored in polyurethanes aspolyols for different applications such as coatings, foams, adhesives etc.and products with better thermal, mechanical, and chemical char-acteristics were obtained (Suresh and Kishanprasad, 2005; Darromanet al., 2015; Chen et al., 2009; Suresh, 2013; Kathalewar et al., 2014;Sakulsaknimitr et al., 2015). Suresh and Harikrishnan (2014) reportedon the preparation of cardanol-based diol chain extender and its ap-plication in synthesis, film formation and film properties of aqueouspolyurethane dispersions. Patel and Mannari (2014) reported the use ofcardanol-based polyol in the synthesis of auto-oxidizable polyurethanedispersion that also provides self-crosslinking attribute to the PUDs. Theuse of CNSL and cardanol as feedstock for UV curable systems has alsobeen reported in literature (Li et al., 2014; Cheng et al., 2013). Rekhaand Asha (2008) reported the synthesis of UV curable telechelic ur-ethane methacrylate crosslinkers based on cardanol. Liu et al. (2015a,2015b, 2016) prepared biobased coatings from branched and multi-armed cardanol-based acrylate oligomers after UV curing of these oli-gomers.

Although cardanol has been explored in both 100% UV curablecoatings and polyurethane dispersions; there is hardly any report on theuse of cardanol in UV-curable polyurethane dispersions, particularlyUV/oxidative dual-cured system, to the best of our knowledge.

Consequently, the objective of this work is to investigate the dualcuring behavior (both oxidative and/or UV curing) of cardanol-basedpolyol in UV-curable polyurethane dispersions. Cardanol-based polyol,prepared by reacting itaconic acid (IA) with epoxidized cardanol andwas used to develop waterborne UV-PUD oligomer. Clear coating filmswere formulated from UV-PUD oligomer based on the different mode ofcuring, i.e. oxidative curing, UV curing, UV/oxidative dual curing. Thecured films were evaluated for various mechanical, visco-elastic,thermal and coating performance properties to investigate the effect ofthe curing process. Cardanol derived UV/oxidative dual curing poly-urethane dispersion should be more advantageous, with its ability torapid cure under UV irradiation and post-cured with oxidative curing of

unsaturated alkyl chain present in cardanol where UV radiation is un-able to reach (e.g. shadow area). These features make it suitable for thedevelopment of sustainable and VOC free high performance coatingswith enhanced performance than conventional UV coatings.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Cardanol was procured from South India Cashew Corporation, Goa,India. Isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI, Desmodur®I) was received fromBayer Material Science, Mumbai. Dimethylolpropionic acid (DMPA)was a kind gift of Perstorp, Sweden. Photoinitiators, Benzophenone and1-Hydroxycyclohexyl phenyl ketone, were kindly provided by EnvironSpeciality Chemicals Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, India. Liquid photoinitiatormixture of Benzophenone and 1-Hydroxycyclohexyl phenyl ketone(50:50) was prepared for further use. All other chemicals such as epi-chlorohydrin (ECH), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), tetrabutyl ammoniumbromide (TBAB) as phase transfer catalyst, triphenyl phosphine (TPP),triethylamine (TEA) as neutralizing agent, triethanolamine as aminesynergist, 2-hydroxy methyl methacrylate (HEMA) as acrylating agent,acetone, dibutyltindilaurate (DBTDL), were purchased fromSigma–Aldrich, USA. All the above materials were used as received.Deionized water (DIW) was procured from SICART, VallabhVidyanagar, India.

2.2. Synthesis of epoxidized cardanol

Cardanol was epoxidized by a method similar to the method givenin the literature (Kathalewar and Sabnis, 2014) with epichlorohydrin inbasic medium for a period of 5 h at 100 °C. In a typical experiment,202.68 g (0.67 mol) of cardanol, 370.46 g (4.02 mol) of ECH and 2 gTBAB were placed in a 1000 mL round-bottom flask fitted with a me-chanical stirrer, thermometer, reflux condenser and dropping funneland mixed for 10 min at room temperature. The mixture was then he-ated to 95–100 °C for 30 min. Then a stoichiometric amount of sodiumhydroxide solution (40% in water) was added dropwise. The reactiontemperature was increased to 100–105 °C and heating continued for2–3 h. The product was separated and washed with excess water toremove the byproduct sodium chloride and unreacted materials.Epoxidized cardanol was obtained after removing the water and re-sidual epichlorohydrin by vacuum distillation. The epoxy equivalentweight (EEW) of epoxidized cardanol as determined experimentally,according to ASTM D 1652–04 method was 428 g/equi. The syntheticscheme is shown in Fig. 1.

2.3. Synthesis of cardanol-based polyol

The cardanol-based polyol was prepared by reacting epoxidizedcardanol with itaconic acid (IA) using triphenyl phosphine (TPP) ascatalyst. In a typical process; 2.0 mol of epoxidized cardanol was re-acted with 1.0 mol of IA placed in a 3-neck flask equipped with me-chanical stirrer, water condenser, nitrogen inlet, thermometer andheating mantle connected with temperature controller. The reactionmass was heated to 110 °C with continuous purge of nitrogen gas andtemperature was gradually increased to 150–160 °C in 30 min. The re-action was then continued at this temperature until acid value (ASTMD465-01) reduced below 5 mg/g of KOH. The polyol was characterizedfor various physicochemical properties such as hydroxyl value, acidvalue, viscosity, color etc. The structure of polyol was further confirmedby FTIR, 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectral analysis and its molecularweight by GPC. The reaction scheme for synthesis of cardanol-basedpolyol is shown in Fig. 1 and physico-chemical properties are providedin Table 1.

V. Mishra et al. Industrial Crops & Products 111 (2018) 165–178

166

Page 3: Industrial Crops & Products...2015), reactive diluents (Jie et al., 2015), polyols for polyurethanes (Mythili et al., 2004), plasticizers (Greco et al., 2010), rubber com-pounding

2.4. Synthesis of cardanol-based UV curable polyurethane dispersion (UV-PUD)

Calculated amount of cardanol-based polyol, DMPA and acetonewere placed in a 3-neck flask connected with mechanical stirrer, watercondenser, nitrogen inlet, thermometer, and heating mantle connectedwith temperature controller. The reaction was carried out at 80 °C untilDMPA was completely dissolved in polyol and acetone mixture. DBTDLcatalyst (0.01% by weight of total reaction mass) was added at thispoint. Then IPDI (NCO/OH ratio = 1.6) was slowly added to the re-action mixture within approximately 30 min. A sample of reactionmixture was drawn at every 30 min and tested for% free isocyanatecontent by n-butyl amine back titration method (ASTM D – 2572-97).When desired% isocyanate content was reached, pre-polymer was end-capped with HEMA at 80 °C until the% free isocyanate content reachedtheoretical value of ∼0%. After which reaction mixture was cooleddown to 50 °C and calculated amount of triethylamine (neutralizingagent) was added (degree of neutralization ∼100%) and the mixturewas stirred for 30 min. The neutralized prepolymer was then dispersed

Fig. 1. Reaction scheme for synthesis of epoxidizedcardanol and cardanol-based polyol.

Table 1Properties of epoxidized cardanol and cardanol based polyol.

Properties Epoxidized cardanol Cardanol based polyol

Appearance Reddish BrownLiquid

Reddish Brown Viscousliquid

Epoxy Equivalent Weight (g/equi)

428 –

Hydroxyl Value (mg of KOH/g)

– 102.44

Acid Value (mg of KOH/g) – 4. 6Viscosity (Pa.s) @ 25 °C – 1.63% Non Volatile Matter ∼100% ∼100%Molecular weight (Mn) 377.1- 460 (m/z)* 749Molecular weight (Mw) – 1700Mw/Mn (PDI) – 2.74

*from mass spectroscopy.

V. Mishra et al. Industrial Crops & Products 111 (2018) 165–178

167

Page 4: Industrial Crops & Products...2015), reactive diluents (Jie et al., 2015), polyols for polyurethanes (Mythili et al., 2004), plasticizers (Greco et al., 2010), rubber com-pounding

in deionized water and finally acetone was distilled off from the dis-persion. Table 2 shows the feed composition of UV-PUD and the generalreaction scheme for synthesis of cardanol-based dual-cured UV-PUD isshown in Fig. 2.

2.5. Preparation of coating films

To investigate the effect of curing process on properties of cured UV-PUD films, three coatings were prepared based on their mode of curing,viz. oxidative (air) curing, UV-curing, and UV/oxidative dual curing.Coating films were prepared by applying the newly synthesized oligo-mers onto glass and metal substrate, using a K-bar applicator, and curedusing the conditions described below:

For oxidative cured system, UV-PUD oligomer was mixed with0.3 wt% mixed metal driers (Co, Zr, and Ca) of the weight of oligomer,and dried at 65 °C in oven for 30 min followed by curing at roomtemperature for 7 days to complete the oxidative curing process.

In UV cured system, UV-PUD oligomer was mixed with 3 wt%photoinitiator blend along with 1.5 wt% amine synergist. The film wasdried at 65 °C in oven for 30 min followed by UV curing (Main wave-length: 365 nm, power of the lamp: 1000 W, UV energy per second:1000 J/s). Similarly, UV/oxidative dual-cured coating was prepared byblending photoinitiator mixture (3 wt% on prepolymer), and mixedmetal driers (0.3 wt% on oligomer) along with 1.5 wt% amine syner-gist. The film was dried at 65 °C in oven for 30 min followed by UVcuring. Further film was cured at room temperature for 7 days tocomplete oxidative curing process.

The cured films were further evaluated for various mechanical andchemical resistance properties. For tensile strength and additional

Table 2Formulation of UV-curable polyurethane dispersion from cardanol based polyol.

Material Wt (g)

Polyol 26.94 (0.0489)DMPA 2.19 (0.0326)IPDI 14.50 (0.131)HEMA 6.37 (0.049)TEA ∼100% NeutralizationDI Water 92.86

Theoretical constants Value

NCO/OH ratio ofprepolymer

1.6

% DMPA 4.35Acid Value (mg of KOH/gm) 18Non Volatile Content (%

NVM)∼35%

*Values in the bracket indicate equivalent ratios.

Fig. 2. Synthesis of dual curing UV-PUD and their coatings using different curing process.

V. Mishra et al. Industrial Crops & Products 111 (2018) 165–178

168

Page 5: Industrial Crops & Products...2015), reactive diluents (Jie et al., 2015), polyols for polyurethanes (Mythili et al., 2004), plasticizers (Greco et al., 2010), rubber com-pounding

property measurements, films were also cast on teflon sheets to obtainfree-standing films.

2.6. Characterizations

2.6.1. Characterization of intermediates1H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopy of epoxidized cardanol and

polyol were performed on AVANCE II 400 NMR spectrometer (Bruker,Switzerland) with CDCl3 as a solvent. Mass spectroscopy of epoxidizedcardanol was done by Waters, Q-TOF Micromass instrument.

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of epoxidized car-danol, polyol, and UV-PUD oligomer was performed with Spectrum GXFTIR spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, USA) in the mid operating rangeof 4000 cm−1–400 cm−1.

The epoxy equivalent weight (EEW) of the prepared epoxidizedcardanol was determined by the volumetric titration method accordingto ASTM D 1652–04. The hydroxyl value (OHV) was determined ac-cording to acetic anhydride – pyridine method (ASTM D1957-86). Acidvalue (AV) was determined by titrating the polyol sample with a po-tassium hydroxide solution in ethanol (0.1 mol/L) according to ASTMD465-01. Molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of finalpolyol was determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) per-formed on instrument series 2000 (PerkinElmer, USA).

Waterborne UV-PUD oligomer was characterized for various phy-sical characteristics viz., appearance, pH, % non-volatile, viscosity,particle size, compatibility with water and stability data is provided inTable 3. The viscosity of dispersions was determined by BrookfieldViscometer (ASTMD2196) using RVT Model (spindle 6 at 100 rpm).

Prepared UV-PUD was examined for water compatibility test. In thetest, the sample was taken in 100 mL glass cylinder and water (equalamount) was added. After addition the material was mixed thoroughlyand observed for miscibility.

Long-term stability was carried for UV-PUD by storing in a sealedcontainer at room temperature and observations were made on thebasis of phase separation (water and resin layer) due to particle set-tlement. The accelerated storage stability of the UV-PUDs was checkedby storing the sample for 1 month at 50 °C. Any negative change in theappearance like phase separation was observed and reported. Particlesize and zeta potential (ZP) of UV-PUD was measured using Zetasizer1000 HS, Malvern Instrument India Ltd. All the measurements werecarried out at 25 °C. A summary of these observations is presented inTable 3.

The morphology of UV-PUD was investigated by TEM (Tecnai 20,Philips, Holland). A certain quantity of the final UV-PUD was dilutedproperly by deionized water and dried in air before observation.

2.6.2. Characterization of cured filmsA Triton instruments model Tritec 2000 B was used for the dynamic

mechanical analysis (DMA) measurements. Under a dry nitrogen at-mosphere, the samples were heated from room temperature to200 °C,subjected to a 2 °C/min heating scan; tan delta and storage modulusdata were obtained at a frequency of 1 Hz. Samples are of dumbbell

shaped (23 mm× 5 mm× 0.4 mm) and are measured in a singlecantilever mode.

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the UV-PUD films was per-formed on a Perkin Elmer instrument (Pyris-1, Perkin Elmer, USA). Theprogrammed heating range was from room temperature to 700 °C at aheating rate of 10 °C/min under nitrogen atmosphere.

Glass transition temperature of cured polymer was determinedusing differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) (Pyris-1, Perkin Elmer,USA). The sample was taken in an aluminum pan and kept for thermalanalysis in DSC under nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate of 10 °C/min between the temperature ranges of 20–120 °C.

The cured cast films of the dispersions were tested for tensileproperties using tensile tester Autograph AG100KNG, Shimadzu, Japan.Cured films were cut in test specimens of the dimensions150mm × 20 mm were cut from the dried films and pulled at a cross-head speed of 25 mm/min to determine tensile strength and the elon-gation at break.

To evaluate the extent of photo-polymerization in the film, the gelcontent of the cured coatings was evaluated. The UV-PUD films werecut into the size of 200mm × 200 mm, then the sample was put into asolvent (acetone) for 48 h, and dried in oven for 1 h at 80 °C to give aconstant weight. The gel content (% by mass) was calculated as follow:

Gel content = (W/ W0) × 100

Where W0 is the mass of the original dry film and W is the mass of thefilm after kept in the solvent.

Water swell was measured according to ASTM D570 by immersing afilm in deionized water at room temperature and after 48 h later, thefilm was taken out, rub dry by wiping off the surface water with a pieceof filter paper, and then weighed again. The aim of this test is to checkthe resistance of the coating against prolonged exposure to moisture.The water absorption (or swelling degree), WA, was calculated by asfollows Eq.:

=−

×%WA W WW

1002 1

1

where W1 is the mass of the film before immersing into the water, etc.W2 is the mass of the film after immersion into the water, etc.

The cured films were evaluated for various performance char-acteristics including different mechanical properties such as adhesion(ASTM D-3359-95a), pencil hardness (ASTM D3363-92a), scratchhardness (ASTM D 5178), flexibility (ASTM D 522-399) and impactresistance (ASTM D2794). The chemical resistance of the coated panelswas evaluated by acid and alkali as well as salt water immersionmethod according to ASTMD-1308 and ASTM D-870 respectively. Glasspanels coated with samples were immersed in Acid (5% w/v H2SO4),Alkali (5% w/w NaOH) and 5% w/w sodium chloride aqueous solu-tions. Wax was applied to the edges in order to prevent the penetrationof water under the film from the open ends. Changes in the appearanceof the films were noted after a specified time. MEK double rub test wasused to evaluate the solvent resistance using a piece of white cottoncloth (ASTM D 5402). The results reported were the maximum numberof double rubs at which the film detached from the surface.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Preparation and physicochemical properties epoxidized cardanol andpolyol

The physico-chemical properties of epoxidized cardanol and car-danol-based polyol, measured according to standard test methods, areas given in Table 1 . In the synthesis of epoxidized cardanol, calculatedamount of cardanol and epichlorohydrin have been reacted at 100 °C inthe presence of NaOH catalyst (Yadav and Srivastava, 2009). Underthese conditions, phenolic OH groups are expected to react with

Table 3Fundamental properties of UV-PUD.

Property Value

Appearance Translucent brownish dispersionpH 7.5–7.8%NVM 34.89%Viscosity at 25 °C (mPa.s) 65.4Particle size (nm) 236.9Zeta Potential (mV) −49.7Compatibility with water CompatibleStability (30 °C) > 6 monthsAccelerated stability (50 °C) 1 month

V. Mishra et al. Industrial Crops & Products 111 (2018) 165–178

169

Page 6: Industrial Crops & Products...2015), reactive diluents (Jie et al., 2015), polyols for polyurethanes (Mythili et al., 2004), plasticizers (Greco et al., 2010), rubber com-pounding

epichlorohydrin producing epoxidized cardanol (Kathalewar andSabnis, 2014; Suresh, 2013). Progress of the reaction was monitored bydetermining epoxy equivalent weight (EEW). The measured epoxyequivalent weight (ASTM D 1652-04) of epoxidized cardanol was428 g/eq, indicating completion of the reaction. Mass spectroscopy(MS) is regarded as an excellent method for characterizing the mole-cular weight of epoxidized cardanol. The MS spectrum of epoxidizedcardanol (Fig. 3) shows intense peaks between m/z 377.1–460, corre-sponding to the monoglycidyl ether of cardanol (epoxidized cardanol)which is in complete agreement with theoretical values (Suresh andKishanprasad, 2005).

The cardanol-based polyol was prepared by ring opening reaction ofthe epoxidized cardanol along with itaconic acid at a constant molarratio of 2:1 to produce bio-based unsaturated polyol (Fig. 1). Thesynthesis of polyol was monitored by a change in acid value and wasstopped when acid value reached below 5 mg KOH/gm. The polyol wasclear reddish brown viscous liquid having 1.63 PaS viscosity which canbe attributed to the H-bonding resulting from hydroxyl groups of polyoland some oligomer formation due to minor side reactions. The mea-sured hydroxyl value of polyol (102.44 mg of KOH/g) is in closeagreement with the feed composition as given in Table 1. The molecularweight (Mn = 735 and Mw= 1743) data, determined by gel permea-tion chromatography, reveals that the molecular weight of cardanol-based polyol is in close proximity with the feed composition. Thepolydispersity index of 2.37 for cardanol-based polyol can be due tominor side reactions such as self-condensation of epoxy groups or oxi-dative polymerization of cardanol side chain during synthesis (Pateland Mannari, 2014).

3.2. Spectral characterization (FTIR, 1H NMR and 13C NMR analysis) ofintermediates

The chemical structures of epoxidized cardanol and cardanol-basedpolyol were confirmed by FTIR, 1H NMR and 13C NMR analysis.

The FTIR spectra of the epoxidized cardanol and cardanol-basedpolyol are shown in Fig. 4(a) and (b) respectively. In the spectra of

epoxidized cardanol, characteristic peak at 911 cm−1 appeared due tothe formation of epoxy ring on cardanol while peak at 3480 cm−1 dueto phenolic group diminished indicating the successful completion ofreaction. Absorption peaks at around 3010 cm−1, 2926 cm−1, and2854 cm−1, common to both epoxidized cardanol and polyol, is as-cribed to C]Ce, aliphatic eCeH and eCH2 groups stretching in theside chain of cardanol respectively. The absorption bands at around1050 cm−1 and 1261 cm−1 indicate the presence of phenolic etherlinkage in both the products.

The characteristic medium band at 911 cm−1 due to eCeOstretching of epoxy group of epoxidized cardanol is diminished tominimum for polyol indicating almost complete consumption of epoxygroups in the ring opening reaction with itaconic acid. The strong broadpeak at 3427 cm−1 in the FTIR spectrum of polyol is attributed to eOHstretching vibrations of secondary hydroxyl groups generated in polyol.The emergence of a characteristic peak at 1726 cm−1 in polyol, whichis not evident in the spectrum of epoxidized cardanol is attributed toeC]O (carbonyl) group stretching vibrations due to ester linkagegenerated by the ring-opening reaction of epoxy group with carboxylicgroup of itaconic acid. In spectra of polyol, peak at 1637 cm−1 corre-sponds to eC]CH2 stretching frequency due to the presence of un-saturated group from itaconic acid.

Fig. 5 Exhibits 1H NMR spectra of the epoxidized cardanol andcardanol-based polyol. For epoxidized cardanol, the epoxy group pro-tons appear from 2.8–3.2 ppm in the 1H NMR spectra. Besides, peak at3.6–4.2 ppm corresponding to the proton bonded with carbon atomadjacent to phenolic ether confirms the epoxidation of hydroxyl groupsof cardanol. A series of overlapping signals between 4.9-5.8 ppm inspectra corresponds to eHC]CHe protons present in the side chain ofcardanol in both epoxidized cardanol and polyol. The peaks between6.7–7.3 ppm attributed to the phenyl ring in epoxidized cardanol andpolyol. In 1H NMR spectra of polyol, the successful conversion of epoxygroup to the secondary hydroxyl group is evident from diminishedpeaks between 2.8- 3.2 ppm in spectra.

Fig. 6 shows 13C NMR spectra of the epoxidized cardanol and car-danol-based polyol. The 13C NMR spectra also confirm the formation of

Fig. 3. Mass spectra of epoxidized cardanol.

V. Mishra et al. Industrial Crops & Products 111 (2018) 165–178

170

Page 7: Industrial Crops & Products...2015), reactive diluents (Jie et al., 2015), polyols for polyurethanes (Mythili et al., 2004), plasticizers (Greco et al., 2010), rubber com-pounding

the epoxidized cardanol as it shows characteristic peaks at 44.6 and50.2 ppm for the glycidyl ether group and a peak at 68.2 ppm due thecarbon attached to the phenolic oxygen. In polyol, the emergence ofpeak at 171 ppm, which is not evident in the spectrum of epoxidized

cardanol, is attributed to eC]O (carbonyl) group stretching vibrationsdue to ester linkage.

Both epoxidized cardanol and polyol show characteristic peak at131–126 ppm, corresponding to eHC]CHe protons present in the side

Fig. 4. FTIR spectra of (a) epoxidized cardanol and (b) polyol.

Fig. 5. 1H NMR spectra of epoxidized cardanol and polyol.

V. Mishra et al. Industrial Crops & Products 111 (2018) 165–178

171

Page 8: Industrial Crops & Products...2015), reactive diluents (Jie et al., 2015), polyols for polyurethanes (Mythili et al., 2004), plasticizers (Greco et al., 2010), rubber com-pounding

chain of cardanol and also due to unsaturation from itaconic acid incase of polyol.

3.3. Preparation, physicochemical and spectroscopic analysis of UV-PUDoligomer

In this study, it was anticipated that the presence of unsaturatedalkyl chain in cardanol will provide the additional oxidative curingability to UV-PUD oligomer along with UV curing from acrylate groups.Thus the dual curing aspect of the oligomer is expected to address theshortcomings of conventional UV curing, i.e. inability to cure three-dimensional object, and substantial improvement in properties can beachieved.

Aqueous UV-PUD oligomer was prepared by the acetone processand the procedure is shown in Fig. 2. In the first step, an isocyanateterminated prepolymer was prepared by reacting polyol, DMPA, IPDIand end capped with HEMA in the second step. Finally, oligomer wasneutralized with triethylamine and dispersed in deionized water withsubsequent removal of acetone. The composition of the synthesizeddispersion is summarized in Table 2. Depending on the curing processemployed the UV-PUD was blended with mixed metal driers and/orphotoinitiator blend.

The structure of isocyanate terminated UV-PUD oligomer was fur-ther confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy and is shown in Fig. 7. The ab-sorption peaks at 3357 cm−1 and 1719 cm−1 is assigned to −NHstr.and eC]Ostr. respectively, due to the formation of urethane linkage.Small peak at 2267cm-1 indicates the presence of unreacted isocyanategroup (-NCO) in the prepolymer. In addition, the absorption peaksobserved at 1638 cm−1 and 814 cm−1 is ascribed to eC]CH2 due tounsaturation present in prepolymer. Moreover, the absorption bands at2926 cm−1, 2854 cm−1, and 1453 cm−1 correspond to the eCeHstretching of the eCH2 and eCH3 groups.

FTIR spectra confirm the formation of desired prepolymer structure.The fundamental properties such as appearance, solid content, par-

ticle size, viscosity, pH and stability are reported in Table 3. UV-PUDshows a relatively low viscosity of 65.4 mPa.s at a solid content of∼35 wt%. The viscosity of dispersion depends on the particle size andsolid content and is very important in deciding a suitable applicationmethod of dispersion on a substrate. A lower viscosity is generally re-quired for spray and brush application. The reported pH of 7.5–7.8 is inthe range of the pH of commercially available polyurethane dispersions.Particle size and particle-size distribution are important parameters af-fecting the film formation and properties of aqueous dispersions. Col-loidal stability of dispersions with relatively large average particle size isgenerally low while dispersions with smaller particle size are more usefulsince such dispersions have high surface energy which enhances filmformation (Tielemans et al., 2006). However particle size of dispersionsalso varies with the intended area of application, i.e. relatively largerparticles are preferred in surface coatings for rapid drying, while smallparticles are sought after when deep penetration of the dispersion intothe substrate is required (Asif and Shi, 2003; Saalah et al., 2015).

The particle size distribution and TEM micrograph of the UV-PUDare shown in Fig. 8 and mean values is given in Table 3. The preparedUV-PUD shows average particle diameter of 236.9 nm. Detailed ana-lysis of the particle-size distribution plot confirms the heterogeneousnature of the size distribution of UV-PUD which is well supported byTEM micrograph. The large particle size of UV-PUD having in-homogeneous particle size distribution may be due to some thermalpolymerization of unsaturated alkyl chain in cardanol and/or due to thepresence of some oligomers due to side reaction during the polyolsynthesis. Obtained results are in accordance with observations re-ported by Suresh and Harikrishnan (2014) for cardanol diol basedpolyurethane dispersion and Chang and Lu (2013) for linseed oil basedwaterborne UV/air dual cured coating. The zeta potential of dispersion

Fig. 6. 13C NMR spectra of epoxidized cardanol and polyol.

V. Mishra et al. Industrial Crops & Products 111 (2018) 165–178

172

Page 9: Industrial Crops & Products...2015), reactive diluents (Jie et al., 2015), polyols for polyurethanes (Mythili et al., 2004), plasticizers (Greco et al., 2010), rubber com-pounding

was measured over a wide pH range (pH = 3, 5, 7 and 9), as illustratedin Fig. SI 2 and data provided in Table SI 1. The pH level of dispersionwas adjusted with sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid solutions.The average zeta potential at pH 3, 5, 7 and 9 are −7.3, −18.03,−49.1 and −64.1 mV respectively. This clearly reflects the increaseddispersion stability at pH > 7 (alkaline) due to the progressive de-protonation of the acid groups and increased electrostatic repulsionbetween the chains.

3.4. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA)

Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) is a highly sensitive methodfor measuring the viscoelastic properties of a polymer as cross-linkingproceeds (Patel et al., 2010). The dynamic mechanical behavior wasstudied as a function of different mode of curing formulations and re-sults are shown in Fig. 9.

All cured films in this study demonstrated similar DMA behaviorand their modulus, crosslink density (ʋe) as well as glass transitiontemperature (Tg) data are listed in Table 4.

The storage modulus (E′) obtained from DMA in the rubbery plateauregion (Tg + 60 °C) is often used to calculate the crosslink density (ʋe)based on the following formula (Dai et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2009):

ʋe = E′/3RT

where E′ is the storage modulus of thermoset in the rubbery plateauregion at Tg + 60 °C, R is the gas constant, and T is the absolute tem-perature.

Storage modulus values in different regions of a curve and theirrelative interpretation gives understanding regarding material mor-phology. Starting from the glassy state, all the systems clearly exhibitonly one main alpha relaxation implying a phase mixed structure. Mainalpha relaxation is at 33.7 °C, 42.5 °C and 64.1 °C for oxidative cured,

Fig. 7. FTIR spectra of UV-PUD oligomer.

Fig. 8. Particle size and TEM analysis of UV-PUD.

V. Mishra et al. Industrial Crops & Products 111 (2018) 165–178

173

Page 10: Industrial Crops & Products...2015), reactive diluents (Jie et al., 2015), polyols for polyurethanes (Mythili et al., 2004), plasticizers (Greco et al., 2010), rubber com-pounding

UV cured and UV/oxidative dual-cured system respectively. As ob-served from Fig. 9, the main relaxation is shifted to higher side andmodulus plateau is seen broader for UV cured and air/UV dual-curedsystem as compared to oxidative cured system, suggesting increment incross-linking. As observed from the modulus curves, changes in curingmode have imparted a significant effect on material morphology andthus on the shape of the elastic modulus curve for cured films. Besidesthe value of storage modulus of UV/oxidative dual-cured system in theglassy and rubbery plateau region is considerably higher than oxidativeas well as UV cured system and there is no other second transitionsuggesting the presence of a substantial amount of cross-linking. Basedon Fig. 9 and data from Table 4, the oxidative cured system showed thelowest E′ at 25 °C as well as cross-link density (ʋe) in the rubbery plateauregion.

The investigation of DMA curve, in terms of tan δ (loss factor) vs.temperature, can provide explanation for the change in phase mor-phology. The alpha relaxation peak of tan δ is associated with glasstransition and can be analyzed to provide qualitative insight into thenetwork structure of UV-PUD films. The tan δ peaks corresponding tothe glass transition temperature for oxidative curing, UV curing, andUV/oxidative dual curing is observed at 33.7 °C, 42.5 °C and 64.1 °Crespectively. The presence of single tan δ in cured films implies phasemixed network. Furthermore, the tan δ peak shifts toward highertemperature and peak height decreases suggesting an increase in cross-linking with change in the mode of curing from oxidative to UV curedto UV/oxidative dual-cured system. As tan δ is the ratio of viscous toelastic components, the decrease in height is associated with lowersegmental mobility and thus is indicative of a higher degree of cross-linking. In addition, it can be observed that tan δ peak of UV/oxidativedual-cured system is relatively narrow, indicating more uniform net-work structure than oxidative cured and UV-cured systems.

3.5. Thermal properties of cured films

The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) study was performed to

measure the glass-transition temperature (Tg) of UV-PUD films pre-pared with different curing processes. The DSC thermograms obtainedfrom films of oxidative cured, UV cured and dual-cured coatings areillustrated in Fig. 10. In the thermogram of samples, the glass transitiontemperature (Tg) is observed at 28.5 °C, 34.5 °C and 53.8 °C for oxida-tive cured, UV cured and dual-cured film respectively. It is clear that theglass-transition temperature of UV-PUD film varies as the mode ofcuring was changed. This behavior can be more clearly explained basedon the degree of crosslinking in the film (Chang and Lu, 2013), i.e., thecross-linked films show higher Tg compared to uncrosslinked films(Patel and Mannari, 2014). Moreover, the Tg width is also seen to benarrowing, as mode of curing is changed from oxidative cured, UVcured to UV/oxidative dual-cured system, suggesting a uniform net-work formation in the dual-cured system as described in DMA study. Inthe present case, cross-linking increases from oxidative cured system toUV cured system, while the dual-cured system has the highest cross-linking. In the case of dual-cured film, substituted alkyl chain in thecardanol is cross-linked through oxidative curing of their double bondsalong with UV curing resulting in the highly cross-linked structure.

The TGA and their derivative curves of all the cured UV-PUD filmsprepared using different curing processes are presented in Fig. 11, andthe thermal parameters, T10%, T50% and Tmax are summarized inTable 4. Thermal stability of the PUs primarily depends upon thepolyols and isocyanate structures. As evident from literature, thermaldecomposition of polyurethane chains has at least two stages (hard andsoft segments) and show lower thermal stability because of the presenceof labile urethane and urea linkages of PU polymers.

For all the systems, initial decomposition of cured films ranges from290 to 300 °C. However, more pronounced changes are visible in thesecond stage of the degradation process which is attributed to the de-gradation of the soft segments. As shown in Fig. 11, the second stagedecomposition (T50%) starts at about 344 °C for the oxidative curedsample and at 351 °C for UV cured sample while UV/oxidative dual-cured system has the highest decomposition temperature at about360 °C.

Thus, with the change in mode of curing, it is interesting to note thatthe thermal stability for UV-PUD increased steadily in the second stageof decomposition as the cross-linking increased, indicating a synergisticeffect. These results are also in agreement with earlier studies, wherepolyurethanes with cardanol polyol displayed higher thermal stability,attributed to the crosslinking of the unsaturation present in the alkylchain of cardanol moiety (Sakulsaknimitr et al., 2015; Suresh andHarikrishnan, 2014).

3.6. Tensile strength and% elongation

Stress-Strain curve for oxidative cured, UV cured and dual-curedcoatings are shown in Fig. 12. The tensile strength of the (UV/oxida-tive) dual-cured coating (5.64 MPa) is higher than that of UV curedcoating (4.6 MPa), while oxidative (air) cured coating shows the leasttensile strength (2.6 MPa). These results are attributed to more ex-tensive crosslinking of the C]C bonds in the dual-cured coatings,which is in accordance with the DMA and DSC results as describedpreviously. The reason is that with dual-cured system, crosslinkingamong the polymer backbone increased thus reducing the mobility of

Fig. 9. Storage modulus and tan δ vs. temperature curves of cured films.

Table 4Thermal properties of UV-PUD films with different curing process.

Curing Process E′ (MPa)a ʋe(x 103mol m−3) Tg (°C) TGA (°C)

at 25 °C at Tg + 60 °C from DSC from DMA T10% T50% Tmax%

Oxidative Cured 14.5 3.6 0.39 28.5 33.7 302 344 328UV Cured 115.3 5.4 0.57 34.5 42.5 292 351 336UV/oxidative dual Cured 144.1 27.5 2.76 53.8 64.1 298 360 333

a From DMA analysis.

V. Mishra et al. Industrial Crops & Products 111 (2018) 165–178

174

Page 11: Industrial Crops & Products...2015), reactive diluents (Jie et al., 2015), polyols for polyurethanes (Mythili et al., 2004), plasticizers (Greco et al., 2010), rubber com-pounding

Fig. 10. DSC thermograms of UV-PUD films.

Fig. 11. TGA curves of the cured films.

Fig. 12. Stress-strain curves of (a) oxidative cured (b) UV cured (c) UV/oxidative dual-cured systems.

V. Mishra et al. Industrial Crops & Products 111 (2018) 165–178

175

Page 12: Industrial Crops & Products...2015), reactive diluents (Jie et al., 2015), polyols for polyurethanes (Mythili et al., 2004), plasticizers (Greco et al., 2010), rubber com-pounding

chain segments. Furthermore, due to oxidative polymerization occur-ring through unsaturated alkyl side chain of cardanol, crosslinkingdensity is further increased to synergize above effect.

Oxidative cured coating exhibited the highest elongation at break(116%), followed by the coating cured using UV/oxidative dual-curingmethod (50.3%), while only UV cured coating system has lowestelongation at break (42.7%). Compared to the UV cured coating, theair/UV dual-cured coating not only exhibited improved tensile strengthbut also enhanced elongation at break due to the additional crosslinkingof long alkyl chain of the cardanol through the oxidative curing process,along with UV curing, which provides the better distribution of stress.While higher% elongation and lower tensile strength of oxidative curedsystem is mainly attributed to lower cross-linking.

3.7. Water contact angle

To evaluate the hydrophobic character of all the cured films, wehave measured the surface water contact angle of all cured films usingdistilled water and the results are shown in Fig. 13 and data is tabulatedin Table 5. The results indicate that there is not a remarkable differencein contact angles of all the cured films and it ranges from 80° to 90°. Thecontact angle data reveals the hydrophobic nature of all the cured films,which may be ascribed to high hydrophobicity of cardanol-basedpolyol, believed to be due to the presence of aromatic structure anddangling aliphatic linear alkyl chains of cardanol (Patel and Mannari,2014). From data, it is observed that contact angle slightly increases ascross-link density of cured films increases from only oxidative curedsystem to dual-cured system. However the major factor governing thecontact angle was the hydrophobic nature of cardanol in all these cured

films and the results are comparable to other vegetable oil basedpolyurethane coatings (Saalah et al., 2015; Rengasamy and Mannari,2014).

3.8. Water resistance and gel content of cured films

Water resistance properties of polymers have received considerableattention, especially when waterborne systems are used as resins forcoating and adhesives, due to the importance of these phenomena inthe case of environmental aging of polymers. Poor water resistance hasbeen the more prominent factor for restriction of these waterbornepolyurethanes in high-end applications. To overcome this disadvantage,the present paper describe about using cardanol-based polyol for UV/oxidative dual curing to improve the water resistance of waterbornepolyurethanes. Investigations have reported that, the water absorptionof polymers is directly related with their free volume fraction, chemicalcomposition, cross-link density and presence and amount of polargroups capable to form hydrogen bonds with water molecules (Li et al.,2015a, 2015b; Chen et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2007;Bai et al., 2008; Patel and Mannari, 2014).

The gel-content test for a coating provides an indirect measure ofthe extent of cross-linking in thermosetting coatings, i.e. gel content isproportional to the crosslink density (Schwalm, 2007; Li et al., 2015a,2015b; Chen et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2010). In the present study,therefore, we have determined water uptake and gel-content values forall the three films cured using different processes. Since these coatingsdiffer only in the mode of curing, it has been anticipated that the waterabsorption and gel content values can provide insight into the impact ofoxidative, UV and UV/oxidative dual cross-linking in these systems.

The result of water absorption test of cured samples is provided inTable 5. All coatings show lower water absorption as compared toconventional polyurethane dispersion, which is attributed to high hy-drophobicity of cardanol-based polyol (Suresh and Harikrishnan, 2014)as discussed in contact angle study. There is steady decrease in thewater absorption of the cured UV-PUD film with change in mode ofcuring from oxidative curing to UV/oxidative dual curing (Table 5)which strongly supports the increased cross-linking per unit volumehence lower water absorbance (Decker et al., 2003; Patel and Mannari,2014).

In order to further investigate the crosslink properties of the curedcoating films, the gel content measurements were performed and data isgiven in Table 5. For all of these cured coating films, the gel contentincreased from 72.4% for oxidative cured to 85.1% for UV curedsystem, while it was 93.3% for UV/oxidative dual-cured system. Thisindicates an increase in crosslink density with the change in mode ofcuring. It should be noted that as the degree of cross-linking increases,the molecular weight of the polymer increases which results in thebetter solvent resistance, and hence higher gel contents for their films.All the films demonstrated the general formation of a highly cross-linked network in the coating system (Decker et al., 2003; Bas andSoucek, 2012; Chang and Lu, 2013).

3.9. Coating properties

Coating properties of all UV-PUD cured films are given in Table 5.Adhesion of all coatings were quite encouraging and showed 100%adhesion to the metal substrate which is an inherent characteristic ofpolyurethane coatings due to strong hydrogen bonding capability ofurethane linkages in the backbone. The flexibility of dual-cured systemwas slightly inferior to oxidative and UV-cured system. The hardness(scratch and pencil hardness) of cured films show a conspicuous in-crease in value as mode of curing was changed from oxidative curing todual curing. This can be ascribed to the rigid nature of UV-PUD, due tothe presence of phenyl group of cardanol, and close packing of the hardsegment. In addition, the increase in hardness of dual-cured system wasalso due to increase in cross-linking of the film which can be easily

Fig. 13. Water contact angle and water absorption of cured films.

Table 5Performance properties of cured films.

Properties Curing Process

Oxidative Cured UV Cured Dual Cured

Tensile strength (MPa) 2.6 4.6 5.7Elongation at break (%) 116 42.7 50.3Gel fraction (wt%) 72.4 85.1 93.3Water contact angle (o) 81.6 86.4 89.7Water absorption (wt%) 7.4 5.3 3.4Adhesion (cross-hatch) 5B 5B 5BFlexibility (1/8” mandrel) passes passes minor crack observedPencil hardness 2H 4H 5HScratch hardness (kg) 1.8 2.4 > 3.0Impact strength (cm) 80 80 70

V. Mishra et al. Industrial Crops & Products 111 (2018) 165–178

176

Page 13: Industrial Crops & Products...2015), reactive diluents (Jie et al., 2015), polyols for polyurethanes (Mythili et al., 2004), plasticizers (Greco et al., 2010), rubber com-pounding

correlated with increase in Tg values as describe earlier. In addition, theimpact resistance of UV-PUD films followed the same trend as that offlexibility, i.e. impact resistance of oxidative and UV-cured systemswere higher than dual-cured system. This can be attributed to increasedrigidity of the film resulting from the presence of phenyl ring of car-danol and increased cross-link density as described previously.

The solvent resistance property of coatings is also very importantand dictates the final application. It is an indirect measure of the degreeof cure of thermosetting coatings. It has been anticipated that dual-curesystem will have increased cross-linking due to oxidative as well as UVcuring when compared to other two systems. The results of solventresistance tests (Table 6) also confirm that there is an increase in cross-link density as mode of curing is changed. Chemical resistance of theUV-PUD films was carried out under different chemical environments(Table 6) such as 5% aqueous NaOH, 5% aqueous HCl, and 5% aqueousNaCl and the changes in the appearance of films were observed. Theresults reported in Table 6 were encouraging as almost all the for-mulations showed satisfactory film performance and, as already noted,all panels passed the salt water and acid resistance test. However, alkaliresistance of oxidative cured system was comparatively poor due to lowcross-link density of the film as described previously.

4. Conclusion

The cardanol-based polyol was successfully synthesized fromepoxidized cardanol and itaconic acid. The polyol was utilized in pre-paration of green environment-friendly UV/oxidative dual curing UV-PUD. Coatings were formulated based on the mode of curing (eitheroxidative (air) cured, UV cured or UV/oxidative dual cure) using metaldriers and/or photoinitiator combination. Influence of curing process isevident from DMA, DSC, and gel content analysis, i.e. dual-cured sys-tems has increased crosslink density than oxidative cured and UV curedsystem. Crosslink density plays an important role in deciding the finalperformance properties of cured films. The increase in crosslink densityleads to improvement in thermal, mechanical, chemical, water andsolvent resistance properties along with coating performance proper-ties.

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to thank Director, Institute ofScience & Technology for Advanced Studies & Research (ISTAR) andDirector, Sophisticated Instrumentation Center for AppliedResearch & Testing (SICART) for constant support and providing ne-cessary laboratory and testing facility.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in theonline version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.015.

References

Asif, A., Shi, W., 2003. Synthesis and properties of UV curable waterborne hyperbranchedaliphatic polyester. Eur. Polym. J. 39, 933–938.

Bai, C.Y., Zhang, X.Y., Dai, J.B., 2008. Synthesis of UV crosslinkable waterborne silox-ane–polyurethane dispersion PDMS-PEDA-PU and the properties of the films. J. Coat.Technol. Res. 5 (2), 251–257.

Balgude, D., Sabnis, A., 2014. CNSL: an environment friendly alternative for coating in-dustry. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 11 (2), 169–183.

Bas, S., Soucek, M.D., 2012. Dual-cure thermoset amide- and acrylate-functionalized la-texes. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 297, 1081–1090.

Chang, C., Lu, K., 2013. Linseed-oil-based waterborne UV/air dual-cured wood coatings.Prog. Org. Coat. 76 (7–8), 1024–1031.

Chen, Y.B., Xing, Y.Z., Jia, B.D., 2006. A new UV curable waterborne polyurethane: effectof C=C content on the film properties. Prog. Org. Coat. 55, 291–295.

Chen, Z., Chisholm, B.J., Webster, D.C., Zhang, Y., Patel, S., 2009. Study of epoxidized-cardanol containing cationic UV curable materials. Prog. Org. Coat. 65, 246–250.

Cheng, C., Bai, X., Liu, S., Huang, Q., Tu, Y., Wu, H., Wang, X., 2013. UV cured polymerbased on a renewable cardanol derived RAFT agent. J. Polym. Res. 20 (7), 197.

Dai, J., Ma, S., Liu, X., Han, L., Wu, Y., Dai, X., Zhu, J., 2015. Synthesis of bio-basedunsaturated polyester resins and their application in waterborne UV-curable coatings.Prog. Org. Coat. 78, 49–54.

Darroman, E., Durand, N., Boutevin, B., Caillol, S., 2015. New cardanol/sucrose epoxyblends for bio based coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 83, 47–54.

Decker, C., Masson, F., Schwalm, R., 2003. Dual-curing of waterborne urethane-acrylatecoatings by UV and thermal processing. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 288 (1), 17–28.

Fertier, L., Koleilat, H., Stemmelen, M., Giani, O., Duhamel, C.J., Lapinte, V., Robin, J.J.,2013. The use of renewable feedstock in UV-curable materials –A new age forpolymers and green chemistry. Prog. Polym. Sci. 38, 932–962.

Glöckner, P., Jung, T., Struck, S., Studer, K., 2008. Radiation curing: coatings and printinginks. Technical Basics, Applications and Troubleshooting. Vincentz Network,Hanover Germany.

Greco, A., Brunetti, D., Renna, G., Mele, G., Maffezzoli, A., 2010. Plasticizer for poly(vinylchloride) from cardanol as a renewable resource material. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 95,2169–2174.

Haveren, J., Oostveen, E.A., Miccichè, F., Noordover, B.A.J., Koning, C.E., Benthem,R.A.T.M., Frissen, E., Weijnen, J.G.J., 2007. Resins and additives for powder coatingsand alkyd paints, based on renewable resources. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 4 (2),177–186.

Hwang, H.D., Park, C.H., Moon, J.I., Kim, H.J., Masubuchi, T., 2011. UV-curing behaviorand physical properties of waterborne UV-curable polycarbonate-based polyurethanedispersion. Prog. Org. Coat. 72, 663–675.

Jaillet, F., Darroman, E., Ratsimihety, A., Auvergne, R., Boutevin, B., Caillol, S., 2014.New biobased epoxy materials from cardanol. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 116, 63–73.

Jie, C., Xiaoan, N., Zengshe, L., Zhen, M., Yonghong, Z., 2015. Synthesis and applicationof polyepoxide cardanol glycidyl ether as biobased polyepoxide reactive diluent forepoxy resin. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 3 (6), 1164–1171.

Kathalewar, M., Sabnis, A., 2014. Epoxy resin from cardanol as partial replacement ofbisphenol-A-based epoxy for coating application. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 11 (4),601–618.

Kathalewar, M., Sabnis, A., 2015. Effect of molecular weight of phenalkamines on thecuring mechanical, thermal and anticorrosive properties of epoxy based coatings.Prog. Org. Coat. 84, 79–88.

Kathalewar, M., Sabnis, A., DMelo, D., 2014. Polyurethane coatings prepared from CNSLbased polyols: synthesis, characterization and properties. Prog. Org. Coat. 77 (3),616–626.

Lee, M.H., Choi, H.Y., Jeong, K.Y., Lee, J.W., Hwang, T.W., Kim, B.K., 2007. High per-formance UV cured polyurethane dispersion. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 92 (9),1677–1681.

Li, S.H., Yang, X.J., Huang, K., Li, M., Xia, J.L., 2014. Design, preparation and propertiesof novel renewable UV-curable copolymers based on cardanol and dimer fatty acids.Prog. Org. Coat. 77 (2), 388–394.

Li, K.B., Shen, Y.D., Fei, G.Q., Wang, H.H., Wang, C., 2015a. The Effect of PETA/PETTAcomposite system on the performance of UV curable waterborne polyurethane ac-rylate. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 132, 41262–41270.

Li, K., Shen, Y., Fei, G., Wang, H., Li, J., 2015b. Preparation and properties of castor oil/pentaerythritol triacrylate-based UV curable waterborne polyurethane acrylate. Prog.Org. Coat. 78, 146–154.

Liu, R., Zhu, G., Li, Z., Liu, X., Chen, Z., Ariyasivam, S., 2015a. Cardanol-based oligomerswith hard core: flexible shell structures: from synthesis to UV curing applications.Green Chem. 17, 3319–3325.

Liu, R., Zhang, X., Zhu, J., Liu, X., Wang, Z., Yan, J., 2015b. UV-curable coatings frommultiarmed cardanol-based acrylate oligomers. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 3 (7),1313–1320.

Liu, J., Liu, R., Zhang, X., Li, Z., Tang, H., Liu, X., 2016. Preparation and properties of UV-curable multi-arms cardanol-based acrylates. Prog. Org. Coat. 90, 126–131.

Lubi, M.C., Thachil, E.T., 2000. Cashew nut shell liquid (CNSL): a versatile monomer forpolymer synthesis. Des. Monom. Polym. 3 (2), 123–153.

Madbouly, S.A., Otaigbe, J.U., 2009. Recent advances in synthesis: characterization andrheological properties of polyurethanes and POSS/polyurethane nanocompositesdispersions and films. Prog. Polym. Sci. 34, 1283–1332.

Manea, M., 2008. High Solid Binders. Vincentz Network, Hanover Germany.Mishra, V., Patel, K.I., 2015. Synthesis and characterization of soya fatty acid-based self-

emulsifiable alkyds. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 36 (7), 1036–1046.Mishra, V., Mohanty, I., Patel, M.R., Patel, K.I., 2015. Development of green waterborne

Table 6Chemical and solvent resistance of cured films.

Properties Curing Process

Oxidative Cured UV Cured Dual Cured

Alkali resistance Film softens Whitening Mild WhiteningAcid resistance Slight color

changeUnaffected Unaffected

Salt water resistance Unaffected Unaffected UnaffectedSolvent resistance(MEK

double rub)< 100 >200 >200

V. Mishra et al. Industrial Crops & Products 111 (2018) 165–178

177

Page 14: Industrial Crops & Products...2015), reactive diluents (Jie et al., 2015), polyols for polyurethanes (Mythili et al., 2004), plasticizers (Greco et al., 2010), rubber com-pounding

UV curable castor oil based urethane acrylate coatings: preparation and propertyanalysis. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 20 (6), 504–513.

Mishra, V., Desai, J., Patel, K.I., 2017. High-performance waterborne UV-curable poly-urethane dispersion based on thiol–acrylate/thiol–epoxy hybrid networks. J. Coat.Technol. Res. 14 (5), 1069–1081.

Mythili, C.V., Retna, A.M., Gopalakrishnan, S., 2004. Synthesis, mechanical, thermal andchemical properties of polyurethanes based on cardanol. Bull. Mater. Sci. 27 (3),235–241.

Parmar, R., Patel, K., Parmar, J., 2005. High-performance waterborne coatings based onepoxy-acrylic-graft-copolymer-modified polyurethane dispersions. Polym. Int. 54,488–494.

Patel, C.J., Mannari, V., 2014. Air-drying bio-based polyurethane dispersion from car-danol: synthesis and characterization of coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 77 (5), 997–1006.

Patel, K.I., Parmar, R.J., Parmar, J.S., 2008. Novel binder system for ultraviolet-curablecoatings based on tobacco seed (Nicotiana rustica) oil derivatives as a renewableresource. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 107, 71–81.

Patel, M.M., Patel, K.I., Patel, H.B., Parmar, R.J., Parmar, J.S., 2009. UV-curable poly-urethane coatings derived from cellulose. Iran. Polym. J. 18 (11), 903–915.

Patel, A., Patel, C., Patel, M.G., Patel, M., Dighe, A., 2010. Fatty acid modified poly-urethane dispersion for surface coatings: effect of fatty acid content and ionic con-tent. Prog. Org. Coat. 67 255–263.

Quirino, R.L., Garrison, T.F., Kessler, M.R., 2014. Matrices from vegetable oils, cashewnut shell liquid, and other relevant systems for biocomposite applications. GreenChem. 16 (4), 1700–1715.

Raquez, J.-M., Deléglise, M., Lacrampe, M.-F., Krawczak, P., 2010. Thermosetting (bio)materials derived from renewable resources: a critical review. Prog. Polym. Sci. 35(4), 487–509.

Rekha, N., Asha, S.K., 2008. Synthesis and FTIR spectroscopic investigation of the UVcuring kinetics of telechelic urethane methacrylate crosslinkers based on the re-newable resource-cardanol. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 109, 2781.

Rengasamy, S., Mannari, V., 2013. Development of soy-based UV-curable acrylate oli-gomers and study of their film properties. Prog. Org. Coat. 76, 78–85.

Rengasamy, S., Mannari, V., 2014. UV-curable PUDs based on sustainable acrylatedpolyol: study of their hydrophobic and oleophobic properties. Prog. Org. Coat. 77,557–567.

Saalah, S., Abdullah, L.C., Aung, M.M., Salleh, M.Z., Biak, D.R.A., Basri, M., Jusoh, E.R.,2015. Waterborne polyurethane dispersions synthesized from Jatropha oil. Ind. Crop.Prod. 64, 194–200.

Sakulsaknimitr, W., Wirasate, S., Pipatpanyanugoon, K., Atorngitjawat, P., 2015.Structure and thermal properties of polyurethanes synthesized from cardanol diol. J.Polym. Environ. 23 (2), 216–226.

Schwalm, R., 2007. UV Coatings: Basics, Recent Developments and New Applications.

Elsevier, Amsterdam.Staring, E., Dias, A.A., Van Bentham, R.A., 2002. New challenges for R & D in coating

resins. Prog. Org. Coat. 45, 101–117.Sultania, M., Rai, J.S.P., Srivastava, D., 2010. Studies on the synthesis and curing of

epoxidized novolac vinyl ester resins from renewable resource material. Eur. Pol. J.46, 2019–2032.

Suresh, K.I., Harikrishnan, M.G., 2014. Effect of cardanol diol on the synthesis, char-acterization, and film properties of aqueous polyurethane dispersions. J. Coat.Technol. Res. 11, 619–629.

Suresh, K.I., Kishanprasad, V.S., 2005. Synthesis structure, and properties of novel polyolsfrom cardanol and developed polyurethanes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44, 4504–4512.

Suresh, K.I., 2013. Rigid polyurethane foams from cardanol: synthesis structural char-acterization, and evaluation of polyol and foam properties. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.1, 232–242.

Tielemans, M., Roose, P., De Groote, P., Vanovervelt, J.-C., 2006. Colloidal stability ofsurfactant-free radiation curable polyurethane dispersions. Prog. Org. Coat. 55,128–136.

Tielemans, M., Roose, P., Ngo, C., Lazzaroni, R., Leclère, P., 2012. Multiphase coatingsfrom complex radiation curable polyurethane dispersions. Prog. Org. Coat. 75,560–568.

Unnikrishnan, K.P., Thomas Thachil, E.B.Y., 2008. Studies on the modification of com-mercial epoxy resins using cardanol- based phenolic resins. J. Elastomers Plast. 40,271–286.

Voirin, C., Caillol, S., Sadavarte, N.V., Tawade, B.V., Boutevin, B., Wadgaonkar, P.P.,2013. Functionalization of cardanol: towards biobased polymers and additives.Polym. Chem. 9, 3142–3162.

Weiss, K.D., 1997. Paint and coatings: a mature industry in transition. Prog. Polym. Sci.22 (2), 203–245.

Xia, Y., Larock, R.C., 2010. Vegetable oil-based polymeric materials: synthesis, properties,and applications. Green Chem. 12 (11), 1893–1909.

Xu, J., Rong, X., Chi, T., Wang, M., Wang, Y., Yang, D., Qiu, F., 2013. Preparation,characterization of UV-curable waterborne polyurethane-acrylate and the applicationin metal iron surface protection. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130 (5), 3142–3152.

Yadav, R., Srivastava, D., 2009a. Synthesis and properties of cardanol-based epoxidizednovolac resins modified with carboxyl-terminated butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymer.J. Appl. Pol. Sci. 114, 1670–1681.

Yadav, R., Srivastava, D., 2009b. Studies on the process variables of the condensationreaction of cardanol and formaldehyde by response surface methodology. Eur. Polym.J. 45, 946–952.

Zhang, T., Wu, W., Wang, X., Mu, Y., 2010. Effect of average functionality on properties ofUV-Curable waterborne polyurethane-acrylate. Prog. Org. Coat. 68, 201–207.

V. Mishra et al. Industrial Crops & Products 111 (2018) 165–178

178