35
Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks Mike Thelwall Statistical Cybermetrics Research Group, University of Wolverhampton, UK Virtual Knowledge Studio (VKS) Information Studies

Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

  • Upload
    kendall

  • View
    52

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Virtual Knowledge Studio (VKS). Information Studies. Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks. Mike Thelwall Statistical Cybermetrics Research Group, University of Wolverhampton , UK. Contents. Introduction Examples of social network sites - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social NetworksMike ThelwallStatistical Cybermetrics Research Group,University of Wolverhampton, UK

Virtual Knowledge Studio (VKS) Information Studies

Page 2: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

ContentsIntroductionExamples of social network sites and ideas for recommending social

network sites to library users / information seekers

Cybermetric case study of MySpaceConclusion

Page 3: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

1. Introduction

Page 4: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

ContextMySpace, Facebook and similar sites are amongst the most popular web sitesAccording to HitWise, in 2007 MySpace overtook Google in the US

Facebook hasovertaken MySpace

Page 5: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

SNS definitionA web site allowing individuals to construct a public or semi-public

profile within a bounded system articulate a list of other users with

whom they share a connection view and traverse their list of

connections and those made by others within the system

boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11.

Page 6: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

FriendsNot all

friends are friends!

Some are not even acquaintances, family members, colleagues

Page 7: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

Why have sns friends? (1/2)

It would be socially inappropriate to say no because you know them Having lots of Friends makes you look popular It’s a way of indicating that you are a fan (of that person, band, product, etc.) Your list of Friends reveals who you areTheir Profile is cool so being Friends makes you look cool

boyd, d. (2006). Friends, Friendsters, and MySpace Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites.First Monday, 11(2)

Page 8: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

Why have sns friends? (2/2)

Collecting Friends lets you see more peopleIt’s the only way to see a private ProfileBeing Friends lets you see someone’s bulletins and their Friends-only blog postsYou want them to see your bulletins, private Profile, private blogYou can use your Friends list to find someone later It’s easier to say yes than no

Page 9: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

FriendsFriend news (Facebook)

Page 10: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

HistoryAfter a slow start,

many successful SNSs emerged – then other sites began adding SNS services or innovating for niche markets

boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites:Definition, history, and scholarship.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11.

Page 11: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

Today

Facebook dominant??

Page 12: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

Facebook dominant?

Google search volume

Page 13: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

2. Examples of social network sites

Page 14: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

Three types of social networking site

Socialising SNSs - for recreational social communication between membersNetworking SNSs - for non-social interpersonal communication (e.g. LinkedIn)(Social) navigation SNSs - social network features to help users find information or resources (e.g., YouTube, CiteULike)

Page 15: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

Types of SNS

Page 16: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

Examples of SNSLinkedInGaia OnlineCyWorldDiggLast.FM

Page 17: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

LinkedInSNS designed to help members find new business contactsEspecially helps look for friends of friends or aquaintances of acquaintances

Page 18: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks
Page 19: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks
Page 20: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

CyworldKorean SNSAvatar-based –users live in their own home in their mini-hompyArguably the world’s first popular SNSMembers meet new people onlineMembers seem to self-disclose online and make trusting relationshipsMicropayments via “acorn” currency

Page 21: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

Digg“a place for people to discover and share content from anywhere on the web” (digg.com/about, May 4, 2008)Can navigate stories by friending people who post storiesDigg is not really for friendship.

Page 22: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks
Page 23: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

Can friend LewP and navigate his stories (can also do this without friending) and friendsLewP is a human “recommender system”?

Page 24: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

Last.FM Music-based site Helps members listen to music that they like or might likePrompts users to friend people listening to similar musicCan find new music liked by others with similar taste

Page 25: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks
Page 26: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

3. Cybermetric case study of MySpace

Illustration of a range of types of “extractable” public information about MySpace members

Page 27: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

MySpace members data sets 1. random sample of 15,043 members2. systematic sample of 7,627

members who joined on July 3, 20063. excluded: music sites, ex-members,

members with 0 or 1 friendsall information on home pages was

automatically downloaded and harvested by SocSciBot -> Excel

Page 28: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

days since last access -members use MySpace once or frequently

allMembers >>

Page 29: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

days since last access -members use MySpace once or frequently

July 3members

Page 30: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

MySpace “age” profile:average “age” is 21

Page 31: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

younger members have more MySpace friends

Page 32: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

gender factorsfemale users more likely to be “here for” friendship and male users more likely to be “here for” dating (but only a minority)males and females both preferred to have more female friends and top 8 friendsfemales preferred a greater proportion of female Top 8 friends

women make the best friends!(403 data set)

Page 33: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

who swears most?for US MySpace home pages: male = more likely to contain strong swearing

for UK MySpace home pages male = more likely to contain moderate

swearing no difference in strong swearing - possibly more

strong swearing in female home pages in the younger age groups

apparent reversal in gendered strong swearing in the UK for young people

July 3, 2006 members, extended collection >>

Page 34: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

percentage of profiles containing swearing

moderate strong very strong sample size

US males 16-19 10% 47% 2% 1,530

US females 16-19 11% 38% 2% 1,287

UK males 16-19 33% 33% 8% 171

UK females 16-19 18% 38% 3% 130

(typical sample size 20-148 for non-web swearing research)

Page 35: Information Behaviour and Web 2.0 Social Networks

ConclusionsSocial network sites vary by country and typeSome sites with SNS features can help users find information (e.g., pictures, video, music, news) by navigating people rather than documents/objects“Friends” may also give specific advice, if asked nicely (as Lay Experts or even LIMs?)!Should librarians routinely suggest SNSs as an additional source of information – even emotional support?