Information in the Nature of Quo Warranto AnyGOV V2

8/4/2019 Information in the Nature of Quo Warranto AnyGOV V2

1/11

INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTOICO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II

RELATOR:YOUR NAME ___________________________________________

ADDRESS _____________________________________________

CITY STATE ZIP ________________________________________

PHONE _______________________________________________

Voter Registration Statement:I __________________________________ am registered to vote in:

(print your name)

City: ________________________________

County: _____________________________

State: ________________

DATE : ________________________

Governor ________________________________________________

Address: _________________________________________________

City, State, Zip ____________________________________________

Dear Governor _____________________________ :

UNITED STATES CODESTITLE 18CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

CHAPTER 115TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES2382. Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of thecommission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be,disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United

States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty ofmisprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than

seven years, or both.[1]

CAVEAT: THIS INFORMATION IS NOT AN ENDORSEMENT OF ANY CANDIDATE.

Chronology of Points and Authorities:

1776 Declaration of Independence1787 US Constitution1855 Act of Congress XXII1874 Minor v Happersett1898 USA v Wong Kim Ark1906 Perkins v Elg1907 George W. Romney


1 of 11


2/11


1922 Cable Act1931 Lowell Palmer Weicker, Jr1936 John Sidney McCain III1939 Perkins v Elg1947 Mitt Romney1948 British Nationality Act1952 US/British Treaty1961 Barack Hussein Obama II born1998 Malia Ann Obama born2001 Natasha (Sasha) Obama born

1. 1776 Declaration of Independence That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and

Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the BritishCrown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great

Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved[2]

2. 1787 US Constitution [3](a) Preamble(b) Article 1 sets eligibility requirements for US Legislature.(c) Article 2 sets eligibility requirements for US President.

(d) Article 6 binds treaties.

3. Act of Congress XXII February 10, 1855

"1-That persons heretofore born, or hereafter born, out of the limits andjurisdiction of the United States, whose fathers were, or shall be at the timeof their birth, citizens of the United States, shall be deemed and considered,and are hereby declared, to be citizens of the United States: Provided,however, That the rights of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose

fathers never resided in the United States."2-And be it further enacted, That any woman who might lawfully benaturalized under the existing laws, married, or who shall be married to acitizen of the United States, shall be deemed and taken to be a citizen."[4]

4. 1874 Minor v Happersett (Act of Congress February 10, 1855)

... " Looking at the Constitution itself we find that it was ordained andestablished by 'the people of the United States,' and then going furtherback, we find that these were the people of the several States that hadbefore dissolved the political bands which connected them with Great

Britain, and assumed a separate and equal station among the powers ofthe earth, and that had by Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union,in which they took the name of 'the United States of America,' entered intoa firm league of [88 U.S. 162, 167] friendship with each other for theircommon defence, the security of their liberties and their mutual andgeneral welfare, binding themselves to assist each other against all force


2 of 11


3/11


offered to or attack made upon them, or any of them, on account ofreligion, sovereignty, trade, or any other pretence whatever.

Whoever, then, was one of the people of either of these States when theConstitution of the United States was adopted, became ipso facto a citizen-a member of the nation created by its adoption. He was one of the personsassociating together to form the nation, and was, consequently, one of itsoriginal citizens. As to this there has never been a doubt. Disputes havearisen as to whether or not certain persons or certain classes of personswere part of the people at the time, but never as to their citizenship if theywere.

Additions might always be made to the citizenship of the United States intwo ways: first, by birth, and second, by naturalization. This is apparent

from the Constitution itself, for it provides that 'no person except anatural-born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of theadoption of the Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President,' andthat Congress shall have power 'to establish a uniform rule of

naturalization.' Thus new citizens may be born or they may be created bynaturalization.

The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-borncitizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law,with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were

familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country ofparents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizensalso. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished fromaliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizenschildren born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship oftheir [88 U.S. 162, 168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts,

but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary tosolve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to considerthat all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction arethemselves citizens. The words 'all children' are certainly ascomprehensive, when used in this connection, as 'all persons,' and if

females are included in the last they must be in the first. That they areincluded in the last is not denied. In fact the whole argument of the

plaintiffs proceeds upon that idea.

The guaranty is of a republican form of government. No particulargovernment is designated as republican, neither is the exact form to beguaranteed, in any manner especially designated. Here, as in other parts

of the instrument, we are compelled to resort elsewhere to ascertain whatwas intended.

The guaranty necessarily implies a duty on the part of the Statesthemselves to provide such a government. All the States had governmentswhen the Constitution was adopted. In all the people participated to someextent, through their representatives elected in the manner specially

provided. [88 U.S. 162, 176] These governments the Constitution did not


3 of 11


4/11


change. They were accepted precisely as they were, and it is, therefore, tobe presumed that they were such as it was the duty of the States to provide.Thus we have unmistakable evidence of what was republican in form,within the meaning of that term as employed in the Constitution. As hasbeen seen, all the citizens of the States were not invested with the right ofsuffrage. In all, save perhaps New Jersey, this right was only bestowedupon men and not upon all of them. Under these circumstances it iscertainly now too late to contend that a government is not republican,within the meaning of this guaranty in the Constitution, because womenare not made voters.

In 1855, however, the last provision was somewhat extended, and allpersons theretofore born or thereafter to be born out of the limits of thejurisdiction of the United States, whose fathers were, or should be at thetime of their birth, citizens of the United States, were declared to becitizens also.

and in 1855 it was further provided that any woman who might lawfully be

naturalized under the existing laws, married, or [88 U.S. 162, 169] whoshould be married to a citizen of the United States, should be deemed andtaken to be a citizen. "[5] ...

5. 1898 USA v Wong Kim Ark (Act of Congress XXII February 10, 1855)

'But no sovereignty can extend its jurisdiction beyond its own territorial

limits so as to relieve those born under and subject to another jurisdiction,

from their obligations or duties thereto; nor can the municipal law of one

state interfere with the duties or obligations which its citizens incur while

voluntarily resident in such foreign state, and without the jurisdiction of

their own country.[169 U.S. 649, 691] 'It is evident from the proviso in the

act of February 10, 1855, viz. 'that the rights of citizenship shall not

descend to persons whose fathers never resided in the United States,' that

the lawmaking power not only had in view this limit to the efficiency of its

own municipal enactments in foreign jurisdiction, but that it has conferred

only a qualified citizenship upon the children of American fathers born

without the jurisdiction of the United States, and has denied to them, what

pertains to other American citizens, the right of transmitting citizenship to

their children, unless they shall have made themselves residents of the

United States, or, in the language of the fourteenth amendment of the

constitution, have made themselves 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof.'

'The child born of alien parents in the United States is held to be a citizenthereof, and to be subject to duties with regard to this country which do

not attach to the father.

'The same principle on which such children are held by us to be citizens of

the United States, and to be subject to duties to this country, applies to the

children of American fathers born without the jurisdiction of the United


4 of 11


5/11


States, and entitles the country within whose jurisdiction they are born to

claim them as citizens and to subject them to duties to it.

'Such children are born to a double character: the citizenship of the father

is that of the child, so far as the laws of the country of which the father is a

citizen are concerned, and within the jurisdiction of that country: but the

child, from the circumstances of his birth, may acquire rights and owes

another fealty besides that which attaches to the father.'

Opinions of the Executive Departments on Expatriation, Naturalization,

and Allegiance (1873) 17, 18; U. S. Foreign Relations, 1873-74, pp. 1191,

1192.Wong Kim Ark was declared a citizen of the United States.[6]

6. 1906 (Perkins v Elg 1939) (Act of Congress XXII February 10, 1855) Miss Elg was born in Brooklyn, New York, on October 2, 1907. Her parents,who were natives of Sweden, emigrated to the United States sometime prior to

1906 and her father was naturalized here in that year.[7](Note: Her mother derivative naturalized under Act XXII of February 10, 1855.)

7. 1907 George W. Romney (Act of Congress XXII February 10, 1855)

Romney's grandparents werepolygamousMormonswho fled theUnited States with their children because of the federal government'sopposition to polygamy. His maternal grandfather wasHelaman

Pratt(18461909), who presided over the Mormon mission inMexicoCitybefore moving to the state of Chihuahua and who was the son oforiginal Mormon apostleParley P. Pratt(18071857). Romney's uncleRey

L. Pratt(18781931) would in the 1920s play a major role in thepreservation and expansion of the Mormon presence in Mexico and in itsintroduction to South America. A more distant kinsman was George

Romney (17341802), a noted portrait painter in Britain during the last

quarter of the 18th century.George Wilcken Romney's parents were monogamous American citizensGaskell Romney (18711955) and Anna Amelia Pratt (1876-1926); theymarried in 1895 in Mexico and lived in Colonia Dubln,Galeana, intheMexican stateofChihuahua (one of the Mormon colonies in Mexico)where George was born on July 8, 1907, a US Citizen.[4],[8]

8. Cable Act of September 22, 1922repealed the Act XXII of Congress enacted February10, 1855.[9]

9. Lowell Palmer Weicker, Jr.is an American politician who served as a U.S.Representative, U.S. Senator, and the 85th Governor of Connecticut, and

unsuccessfully sought the Republican nomination for President in 1980. Weicker wasborn in Paris, on May 16, 1931, the son of American parents Mary Hastings (neBickford) and Lowell Palmer Weicker. Lowell Palmer Weicker, Jr., is a US Citizen byhis presence in a United State, but not eligible to be a US President. He was born outof the US, after Act XXII of February 10, 1855 was repealed by the Cable Act of 1922.[9],[10]


5 of 11
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygamyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helaman_Pratthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helaman_Pratthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_Cityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_Cityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chihuahua_(state)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parley_P._Pratthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rey_L._Pratthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rey_L._Pratthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Americahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Romney_(painter)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Romney_(painter)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonia_Dubl%C3%A1nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galeana,_Chihuahuahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galeana,_Chihuahuahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chihuahua_(state)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormon_colonies_in_Mexicohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygamyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helaman_Pratthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helaman_Pratthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_Cityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_Cityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chihuahua_(state)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parley_P._Pratthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rey_L._Pratthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rey_L._Pratthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Americahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Romney_(painter)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Romney_(painter)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonia_Dubl%C3%A1nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galeana,_Chihuahuahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chihuahua_(state)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormon_colonies_in_Mexico


6/11


10. John Sidney McCain III, was born on August 29, 1936 at Coco Solo Naval Air Stationin the Panama Canal Zone, to naval officer John S. McCain, Jr. (19111981) andRoberta (Wright) McCain (b. 1912). At that time, the Panama Canal was under U.S.control. The Panama Canal Zone was a territory not a State, it was not even anincorporated territory or an organized territory.John Sidney McCain III was, at best, born a US Citizen, not a natural born citizen, andas such he could, like Barack Hussein Obama II grow up to become a US Senator, butnot a US President.[11]

11. 1939 Perkins v Elg, (Act of Congress XXII February 10, 1855)Supreme Court declares Marie Elg, native-born in New York, in 1907 to two US Citizenparents, is a natural born citizen. Fifth. But the Secretary of State, according to the allegation of the bill ofcomplaint, had refused to issue a passport to Miss Elg 'solely on the groundthat she had lost her native born American citizenship.' The court below,

properly recognizing the existence of an actual controversy with thedefendants[307 U.S. 325, 350] (Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth,300 U.S. 227,

57 S.Ct. 461, 108 A.L.R. 1000), declared Miss Elg 'to be a natural born citizenof the United States' (99 F.2d 414) and we think that the decree should includethe Secretary of State as well as the other defendants.[4],[12]

12. 1947 Mitt Romney born in Detroit to two US Citizen parents is a natural born citizen.[13]

13. Did the United Kingdom enact the 1948 British Nationality Act which extendedconsulate jurisdiction wherever a child was born to a British citizen, in territory underinternational treaty with the UK? YES 5.(1) Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after thecommencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom andColonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom andColonies at the time of the birth:

Provided that if the father of such a person is a citizen of the UnitedKingdom and Colonies by descent only, that person shall not be a citizen ofthe United Kingdom and Colonies by virtue of this section unless:

that person is born or his father was born in a protectorate, protected state,mandated territory or trust territory or any place in a foreign countrywhere by treaty, capitulation, grant, usage, sufferance, or other lawfulmeans, His Majesty then has or had jurisdiction over British subjects; or [14]

14. Was the British Treaty of 1952 signed by President Truman in 1951? YES [15]

15. CLAIM: On June 6, 1951, in Washington DC, President Harry S. Truman signed the1951 British Treaty (September 7, 1952, Date-In-Force), authorizing Britain consular

jurisdiction over British citizens, in the USA, where consular officers could registerbirths to British citizens, in the district of jurisdiction, and issue passports to thosechildren. TRUE[15]


6 of 11
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=300&invol=227http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=300&invol=227


7/11


16. Was Obamas father a British citizen, with a visa, in the US under the British Treaty of1952, and represented by a British consulate? YES

17. CLAIM: Barack Obama Sr., was a foreign born student, carrying a British passport, ona US non-immigrant student visa (8USC1101(a)(15)(F)(i)), under British consular

jurisdiction, per 1951 British Treaty. TRUE

18. Did Barack Obama Sr., become a naturalized US citizen before August 4, 1961? NO

19. Were Barack Obama Sr and Stanley Ann Dunham, legally married under the laws ofHawaii, on February 2, 1961? UNKNOWN

20. Was Barack Hussein Obama II born on August 4, 1961, subject to the Constitution ofthe United States? YES He was born a US Citizen, and is eligible to be a US Senator.[16] Although missed presidential eligibility by one generation, both of his children,Malia Ann Obama born on July 4, 1998, and Natasha (Sasha) Obama born on June 10,

2001, are both natural born citizens.

21. CLAIM: Barack Hussein Obama II cannot prove his father Barack Obama Sr., becamea naturalized US citizen before August 4, 1961. TRUE

22. RELIEF REQUESTED: With utmost urgency, Barack Hussein Obama II must resignfrom office without benefits and face trial for offenses against the US Constitution.

23. Did the British Nationality Act of 1948 apply to Barack Hussein Obama II's birth?YES[17]

When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu,Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdoms

dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was aBritish subject whose citizenship status was governed by The BritishNationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of ObamaSr.s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship norsworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenshipautomatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.[17]

24. Did the Kenya Independence and 1963 Kenya Constitution affect the nationality ofBarack Hussein Obama II? YES [17],[24]

25. CLAIM: It takes more than just being born an American citizen, to be a US President.A natural born citizen is born in the US to two US nationals. Since Barack H Obama II,was born in Hawaii, ON August 4, 1961, then per (circa 1961 law) 8USC1401(a)(1), hewould have been native born a US citizen; and under consular jurisdiction of the 1951British Treaty and under jurisdiction of the British Nationality Act of 1948, Part II(5)(1)(a) he was born a British Citizen, thus a dual-citizen UK/US, and not a natural born


7 of 11

NEW


8/11


citizen, and not constitutionally eligible for the 2008/2012 Presidential elections, or tobe a US President. TRUE [5],[14],[15],[16]

26. Would the British Nationality Act of 1948 or Kenya Constitution apply to him if he wasborn in United States to two United States citizens? NO [20]

27. CLAIM: Barack Hussein Obama II cannot prove he was born in United States to twoUnited States citizens. TRUE

28. RELIEF REQUESTED: With utmost urgency, Barack Hussein Obama II must resignfrom office without benefits and face trial for offenses against the US Constitution.

29. Is Barack Hussein Obama II an Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 natural born citizen? NO[5]

30. CLAIM: Barack Hussein Obama II cannot prove he is an Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5natural born citizen. TRUE

31. Did Barack Hussein Obama II, a Constitutional Law Professor, enter a presidentialrace in 2007 or 2008 knowing or having direct knowledge of the facts of hisparentage, and the constitutional requirement for a president to be a natural borncitizen? YES Is this a felony against the US Constitution? YES OR IT SHOULD BE.

32. Did Barack Hussein Obama II or his campaign staff publish his computer-generated,laser-printed, short form, certification of live birth in June 2008, during a presidentialelection, as a tactic of fact or propaganda, to confuse voters and attract politicaldonations? YES [18]

33. Did Barack Hussein Obama II publish his long form birth certificate on April 27, 2011?

YES [16],[19]

34. RELIEF REQUESTED: With utmost urgency, Barack Hussein Obama II must resignfrom office without benefits and he and his cohorts, Nancy Pelosi, and others, shallface trial for offenses against the US Constitution.

35. 14th Amendment 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject tothejurisdictionthereof, are citizens of the United States and of the Statewherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shallabridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shallany Statedepriveany person of life, liberty, or property, withoutdue

processof law; nor deny to any person within itsjurisdictionthe equalprotection of the laws.[20]

36. Does Barack Hussein Obama II need the 14th Amendment to prove his UScitizenship? Yes


8 of 11
http://www.usconstitution.net/glossary.html#JURIShttp://www.usconstitution.net/glossary.html#JURIShttp://www.usconstitution.net/glossary.html#DEPRIVEhttp://www.usconstitution.net/glossary.html#DEPRIVEhttp://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_duep.htmlhttp://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_duep.htmlhttp://www.usconstitution.net/glossary.html#JURIShttp://www.usconstitution.net/glossary.html#JURIShttp://www.usconstitution.net/glossary.html#JURIShttp://www.usconstitution.net/glossary.html#DEPRIVEhttp://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_duep.htmlhttp://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_duep.htmlhttp://www.usconstitution.net/glossary.html#JURIS


9/11


37. Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5: No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States,at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of

President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall nothave attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a

Resident within the United States.[21]

38. Is Barack Hussein Obama II eligible to be a US President? NO, nor can he be in apresidential election or raise funds for his candidacy. He would be committing fraudand theft, and be in a conspiracy of such.

39. CLAIM: Barack Hussein Obama II, is a de facto president, not de jure, a usurper. Allhis official acts are void. He is guilty of infamous crimes against the US Constitution,that of unlawfully occupying the office of the President of the United States, feloniesand high crimes. TRUE

40. CLAIM: Obama was born a dual-citizen, and the fact he was affected by the 1952British Treaty and the British Nationality Act of 1948, proves he cannot be a naturalborn citizen, he is ineligible to serve as a US President, and therefore it is unlawful tosolicit donations for his political campaign. Any solicitation of money on his behalf isfraud, and using the US mail adds to the charges against him. TRUE

41. RELIEF REQUESTED: The Speaker of the House of Representatives must demandthat Barack Hussein Obama II immediately stand down. The Speaker must also seizethe White House, secure the furnishings, including all emoluments, and then swear inthe next in line of succession to the US President.

42. CLAIM: There is no specific federal agency' to review candidates for federal office,but everybody who takes the oath to protect the US Constitution accepts the duty toprotect it. Apparently the system relies on the honor of the candidate to vetthemselves. This is not sufficient protection of the US Constitution against a usurperand must be changed, but until then you have accepted the duty to defend theConstitution. TRUE [22]

43. RELIEF REQUESTED: Should Barack Hussein Obama II attempt to run in apresidential election his name shall be kept off the State ballots because he failsArticle 2 Section 1 Clause 5 eligibility.

44. CLAIM: Everybody reading this, aiding his crimes, and not acting to protect the USConstitution is guilty of misprision of felony. (18USC Sec. 4. Misprision of felony,18USC Sec. 2382. Misprision of treason, UCMJ 134/95 Misprision of Serious Offense).

To avoid charges of misprision, you must report knowledge of the felony or treasonto any magistrate judge or military flag officer or any US State governor. TRUE [1]

RELATOR:Signed: Date: .

Print Name ______________________________________________


9 of 11


10/11


REFERENCES:1. 18 U.S. CODES 2382

http://frwebgate2.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi?

WAISdocID=IBCSW5/0/2/0&WAISaction=retrieve

2. 1776 Declaration of Independence

http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/

3. 1787 US Constitution

http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html

4. 1855 Act of Congress XXIIAppendix to the Congressional Globe, for the Second Session, Thirty-Third Congress:Containing Speeches, Important State Papers, Laws, Etc.Page 378http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc30790/m1/1/

5. 1874 Minor v Happersett

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=88&invol=162

6. 1898 USA v Wong Kim Ark

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=169&invol=649

7. 1906 Perkins v Elg


8. 1907 George W. Romney

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Romney

9. 1922 Cable Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cable_Act

10. 1931 Lowell Palmer Weicker, Jr

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lowell_P._Weicker,_Jr.

11. 1936 John Sidney McCain III

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86756.pdf

12. 1939 Perkins v Elg


13. 1947 Mitt Romney

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Mitt_Romney

14. 1948 British Nationality Act


10 of 11
http://frwebgate2.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=IBCSW5/0/2/0&WAISaction=retrievehttp://frwebgate2.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=IBCSW5/0/2/0&WAISaction=retrievehttp://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/http://www.usconstitution.net/const.htmlhttp://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc30790/m1/1/http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=88&invol=162http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=169&invol=649http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=307&invol=325http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Romneyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cable_Acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lowell_P._Weicker,_Jr.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCainhttp://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86756.pdfhttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=307&invol=325http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Mitt_Romneyhttp://frwebgate2.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=IBCSW5/0/2/0&WAISaction=retrievehttp://frwebgate2.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=IBCSW5/0/2/0&WAISaction=retrievehttp://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/http://www.usconstitution.net/const.htmlhttp://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc30790/m1/1/http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=88&invol=162http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=169&invol=649http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=307&invol=325http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Romneyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cable_Acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lowell_P._Weicker,_Jr.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCainhttp://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86756.pdfhttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=307&invol=325http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Mitt_Romney


11/11


http://www.uniset.ca/naty/BNA1948.htm

15. 1952 US/British Treaty

http://travel.state.gov/law/legal/treaty/treaty_1507.html

16. 1961 Barack Hussein Obama II bornhttp://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/27/president-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate

17. The Truth About Baracks Birth Certificate

http://www.fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate

18. Obamas Kenyan Citizenship?

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/08/obamas-kenyan-citizenship/

19. Born in the U.S.A.

The truth about Obama's birth certificate.http://factcheck.org/2008/08/born-in-the-usa/

20. 14th Amendment

http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am14

21. Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5

http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A2Sec1

22. Congressional Research Service MEMOhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/41131059/CRS-Congressional-Internal-Memo-What-to-Tell-

Your-Constituents-Regarding-Obama-Eligibility-Questionshttp://www.wnd.com/?pageId=225561#ixzz1Troq4TwQ


11 of 11
http://www.uniset.ca/naty/BNA1948.htmhttp://travel.state.gov/law/legal/treaty/treaty_1507.htmlhttp://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/27/president-obamas-long-form-birth-certificatehttp://www.fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificatehttp://www.factcheck.org/2008/08/obamas-kenyan-citizenship/http://factcheck.org/2008/08/born-in-the-usa/http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am14http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A2Sec1http://www.scribd.com/doc/41131059/CRS-Congressional-Internal-Memo-What-to-Tell-Your-Constituents-Regarding-Obama-Eligibility-Questionshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/41131059/CRS-Congressional-Internal-Memo-What-to-Tell-Your-Constituents-Regarding-Obama-Eligibility-Questionshttp://www.wnd.com/?pageId=225561#ixzz1Troq4TwQhttp://www.uniset.ca/naty/BNA1948.htmhttp://travel.state.gov/law/legal/treaty/treaty_1507.htmlhttp://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/27/president-obamas-long-form-birth-certificatehttp://www.fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificatehttp://www.factcheck.org/2008/08/obamas-kenyan-citizenship/http://factcheck.org/2008/08/born-in-the-usa/http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am14http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A2Sec1http://www.scribd.com/doc/41131059/CRS-Congressional-Internal-Memo-What-to-Tell-Your-Constituents-Regarding-Obama-Eligibility-Questionshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/41131059/CRS-Congressional-Internal-Memo-What-to-Tell-Your-Constituents-Regarding-Obama-Eligibility-Questionshttp://www.wnd.com/?pageId=225561#ixzz1Troq4TwQ

Documents

Information in the Nature of Quo Warranto AnyGOV V2