36
INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum, RAS (Moscow) Russian-French Metallogenic Laboratory

INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

  • View
    214

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCESAPPROACH

DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOVVernadsky State Geological Museum, RAS (Moscow)Russian-French Metallogenic Laboratory

Page 2: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

1.History and current situation in Russia (in terms of developing and distribution of mineral resources).

2.Re-evaluation of mineral potential.

3.From current situation to the future – challenges and solutions.

Page 3: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

AntiquityXVIII centuryXIX centuryBy 1915by 1939by 1975

USE OF ELEMENTS BY HUMAN BEINGS

Page 4: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,
Page 5: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

Granite open pit in Kuznechny, near St. Petersburg

Page 6: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,
Page 7: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

Deserted open pit in Murmansk Region

Page 8: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,
Page 9: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

Lebedinsky open pit (Kursk magnetic anomaly)

Page 10: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

RUSSIATODAY

LAND 12.5%POPULATION 3%FORESTS 22%FRESH WATER 20%TOTAL AREA OF SHELF 30%MINERAL RESOURCES 16%

Page 11: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

Geological knowledge about Russia

Page 12: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

Map of mineral deposits

Page 13: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

0

10

20

30

40

50

Pe

rce

nts

Resources

Reserves

Production

Consumption

For the most important mineral resources, Russia’s share of For the most important mineral resources, Russia’s share of world resources and reserves is greater than its relative world resources and reserves is greater than its relative share of the production and consumption of the same share of the production and consumption of the same commoditiescommodities

Page 14: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

0

10

20

30

40

50

Pe

rce

nts

Platinum Palladium Nickel

Resources

Reserves

Production

Consumption

The only exception is the The only exception is the intensiveintensive production of production of platinum group metals and, to some extent, nickelplatinum group metals and, to some extent, nickel

Page 15: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

Norilsk on a frost day

Page 16: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

Norilsk

The same place in summer,and…

…40 years ago.

Page 17: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

Norilsk

Page 18: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

Oil - 57,3%

Gas – 32%

Coal – 12%

Iron ore –14,9%

Copper –85%

Nickel – 91%

Zinc –59%

Lead –9,1%

Tungsten – 96%

Besides the decrease in exploration during the last 10 years, we have also had shrinkage of the domestic market. The mining, oil and gas industries have became export-oriented. The share of exports in total production is shown here for 1999.

As a result, per capita resource consumption, As a result, per capita resource consumption, including energy resources, is now only 1/3 to 1/2 including energy resources, is now only 1/3 to 1/2 its level in developed countries.its level in developed countries.

uranium - 416,6% of uranium - 416,6% of production (as of 1996)production (as of 1996)

molmolyybdenum – 356,2%bdenum – 356,2%

At the expense of At the expense of pre-existing pre-existing stockstockpilespiles, export, exportss reached: reached:

Page 19: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

DISTRIBUTION OF RUSSIAN MINERAL RESOURCESBY FEDERAL DISTRICT

Page 20: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

Ñòàâðî ï î ëü

Âëàäèâî ñòî ê

Áèðî áèäæàí

220-260

260-300

140-300

220-260

((BILLIONS USDBILLIONS USD))

8000-7000

4000-30004000-3000

1300-9001300-900

500-200500-200

200-100200-100

<100<100

DISTRIBUTION OF MINERAL RESOURCES IN BILLIONS OF USD AND NUMBER OF DAYS WITH LOW (below 0oC) TEMPERATURE

Page 21: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

Drilling site in Siberia during snowstorm

Page 22: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

During the last 40-45 years we have utilized

85% of oil50% of coal50% of iron

produced throughout human history

Consumption of metals increased 3- to 5-fold in that period, compared with the previous 35 - 40 years

Page 23: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

Russia is rich with energy resources (32% of gas; 12--13% of oil; and 12% of coal – world explored reserves);precious metals (platinum - 40%, palladium - 90%);RE and REE (niobium - about 35%, tantalum - about 80%, yttrium - 50%, lithium - 28%, beryllium - 15%, and zirconium, 12%);metals for metallurgy (Ni – 36%, Fe – 27%, Sn – 27%, Co – 20%, Zn – 16%, Pb – 12%.); agrochemical ores (potassium salts – Russia heads the list, apatite and phosphorite – Russia is second in the World).Russia has the largest diamond resources in the world and ranks third in gold.

Page 24: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

REASONS TO RE-EVALUATE MINERAL POTENTIAL

GROWING DEMAND, CHANGING THE STRUCTURE OF DEMAND;

DISCOVERIES OF NEW TYPES OF MINERAL DEPOSITS;

NEW TECHNOLOGIES OF EXTRACTION;

DIFFERENCE IN METHODOLOGY OF EVALUATION IN SOVIET UNION, RUSSIA, AND WESTERN WORLD.

Page 25: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

Mineral wealth of Russia. Eds.: B. Mikhailov, O. Petrov, S. Kimelman. SPb., VSEGEI, 2007, 550 p.

Mineral resources of Russian Arctic. Ed. D. Dodin. SPb., NAUKA, 2007, 767 p.

Page 26: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

Large and Superlarge Mineral Deposits. Vol. 1. D. Rundqvist, A. Tkachev, S. Cherkasov, et al. Ed. D. Rundqvist. Moscow, IGEM RAS, 2006, 390 p.

D. Rundqvist, S. Cherkasov, A. Tkachev, et al. Moscow, RFML, 2006.

Page 27: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

GENERAL RESULTS OF RAS PROGRAM ON LARGE AND SUPERLARGE MINERAL DEPOSITS

AuAgCuMo

Au, Cu, Zn

Au, Ag, Sn, U

AuUCuPGE

Au, PGE,Ti, diam.

diam.Au, PGE,V

Au, PGE,Cu, Zn, Mo

Au, Ti,Zr, Li Cu, Ni, PGE

Page 28: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

GENERAL RESULTS OF RAS PROGRAM ON LARGE AND SUPERLARGE MINERAL DEPOSITS

AuAgCuMo

Au, Cu, Zn

Au, Ag, Sn, U

AuUCuPGE

Au, PGE,Ti, diam.

diam.

Au, PGE,V

Au, PGE,Cu, Zn, Mo

Au, Ti,Zr, Li

Cu, Ni, PGE

Page 29: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORSIN RUSSIA

Trans-Siberian railway9288.2 km (Moscow-Vladivostok)

Railway “Industrial Urals – Polar Urals”Above 1000 km About 2,4 bln. dollarsplus 3.5 bln. dollars –energy infrastructure

Page 30: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORSIN RUSSIA

Sakha (Yakutia) Republic

Page 31: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

Sakha (Yakutia) Republicpopulation 0.95 mln0.28 mln. – Yakutsk10 towns, 55 villages

Germanypopulation 82.5 mln.

Francepopulation 60 mln.

Page 32: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

Verkhoyanye Ridge

Buildings on pilesDiamond mining – southern

Sakha (Yakutia)

Page 33: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORSIN RUSSIA

Page 34: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

YANA-KOLYMA GOLD BEARING (GREEN) AND VERKHOYANYE SILVER BEARING (RED) PROVINCES

Germany

Page 35: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

SUMMARY transportation infrastructure is the key

to Russian mineral resources

to develop new territories, we have to think of social and demographic problems, and to solve them using global common sense new geological prospecting, mining,

and refining technologies open up new resources

Page 36: INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDORS IN RUSSIA - PROS AND CONS: A MINERAL RESOURCES APPROACH DMITRI V. RUNDQVIST, SERGEI V. CHERKASOV Vernadsky State Geological Museum,

THANKS

FOR YOUR

ATTENTION