1
Initial energy density estimation from RHIC Au+Au data Gábor Kasza 1,2,3 ; Tamás Csörgő 1,2 1 HAS Wigner RCP 2 Eszterházy Károly University 3 Eötvös Loránd University Gábor Kasza Wigner RCP, Eszterházy Károly University Email: [email protected] Phone: +36-1/392-2512/1939 Contact 1. T. Csörgő, G. Kasza, M. Csanád and Z-F. Jiang, Universe no. 4, 69. 2. PHENIX Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 162301. 3. G. Kasza and T. Csörgő, arXiv:1811.09990 [nucl-th]. 4. J. D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D 27, 140. 5. M. I. Gorenstein, Yu. M. Sinyukov and V. I. Zhdanov, Phys. Lett 71B, 199-202. 6. PHENIX Collaboration, Phys. Rev. C 69, 034909. 7. T. Csörgő, B. Lörstad and J. Zimányi, Z.Phys. C71 (1996) 491-497. 8. T. Csörgő and G. Kasza, Proceedings supplement of WPCF 2018, arXiv:1810.00154 [nucl-th]. 9. T. Csörgő and G. Kasza, Proceedings supplement of WPCF 2018, arXiv:1806.11309 [nucl-th]. References Original idea: initial energy density of QGP can be measured from dE/dy distributions Bjorken’s famous estimation for boost-invariant systems [4]: But Bjorken’s formula ignores the 1st law of thermodynamics! The correct formula for boost-invariant systems was found by Gorenstein, Sinyukov and Zhdanov (before Bjorken!) [5]: Measurments: dN/dη is not flat, thus we need an accelerating solution of hydro to reevaluate the initial energy density! We have developed a novel method to estimate the initial energy density in three steps. We applied this new method on three systems: Au+Au at 62.4, 130 and 200 GeV [3] Motivation At 130 and 200 GeV: T eff is published by PHENIX At 62.4 GeV: we had to fit the p T (or m T -m 0 ) spectra with the following fit function [6]: The centrality dependence of the T eff parameter of pions is found to be negligible. In the next steps, we assume pion dominance: we use centrality independent T eff values The Csörgő-Kasza-Csanád-Jiang (CKCJ) solution Rapidity density (embedded to 1+3 d space) [1]: Four fit parameters: κ (or the speed of sound, known from PHENIX meas.), λ, T eff , dN/dy| y=0 The values of T eff are determined from fits to the transverse mass spectra of hadrons The pseudorapidity density distribution is determined as a parametric curve, where the parameter of the curve is the momentum-space rapidity y: Fits to PHOBOS data [3]: 2nd step: obtain the acceleration parameter (λ) For a 1+1 d relativistic, Gaussian source, obtained from the CKCJ solution [7,8]: Here Δη x is the Gaussian width of the rapidity distribution From fits to dN/dη: λ, T eff are known τ f is the only fit parameter Fits to PHENIX and STAR data [3]: 3rd step: obtain the lifetime (τ f ) We used a realistic, but average value of speed of sound. It is measured by PHENIX in ref. [2]. In 1+1 dimensions, the Rindler coordinates are useful: τ (proper time), η x (space-time rapidity) The fluid rapidity (Ω) and the four-velocity is the function of only η x : A finite, accelerating, 1+1 dimensional relativistic solution was recently given by Csörgő, Kasza, Csanád and Jiang as a family of parametric curves (where the parameter is H) [1]: Here λ is the acceleration parameter, s=s(τ,H) is the scale variable, and ν σ is the scaling function. This solution is limited to a cone around mid-rapidity. 1st step: obtain the effective temperature (T eff ) From the CKCJ solution ε 0 is exactly calculated [9]: Now, the fundamental correction to ε 0 Bj is known λ and τ f are obtained by fits τ 0 dependence Calculated for Au+Au at 62.4, 130 and 200 GeV, only the thermalized energy is included [3] Bjorken’s formula can be applied only for order of magnitude estimation! Indication for an increasing initial energy density with decreasing colliding energy? The results suggest a non-monotonic behaviour of the initial energy density with s At LHC energies, our method predicts greater ε 0 At 200 GeV, our results are compared to 1+3 d numerical hydro, with lQCD EoS: surprisingly good agreement Of course, further investigations are needed: lower collision energies, extensions of CKCJ solution (1+3 d, shockwaves, fit to data on the whole η interval) Initial energy density estimation

Initial energy density estimation from RHIC Au+Au data · Initial energy density estimation from RHIC Au+Au data Gábor Kasza1,2,3; Tamás Csörgő1,2 1HAS Wigner RCP 2Eszterházy

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Initial energy density estimation from RHIC Au+Au data · Initial energy density estimation from RHIC Au+Au data Gábor Kasza1,2,3; Tamás Csörgő1,2 1HAS Wigner RCP 2Eszterházy

Initial energy density estimation from RHIC Au+Au dataGábor Kasza1,2,3; Tamás Csörgő1,2

1HAS Wigner RCP2Eszterházy Károly University3Eötvös Loránd University

Gábor KaszaWigner RCP, Eszterházy Károly UniversityEmail: [email protected]

Phone: +36-1/392-2512/1939

Contact1. T. Csörgő, G. Kasza, M. Csanád and Z-F. Jiang, Universe no. 4, 69.2. PHENIX Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 162301.3. G. Kasza and T. Csörgő, arXiv:1811.09990 [nucl-th]. 4. J. D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D 27, 140.5. M. I. Gorenstein, Yu. M. Sinyukov and V. I. Zhdanov, Phys. Lett 71B, 199-202.6. PHENIX Collaboration, Phys. Rev. C 69, 034909.7. T. Csörgő, B. Lörstad and J. Zimányi, Z.Phys. C71 (1996) 491-497.8. T. Csörgő and G. Kasza, Proceedings supplement of WPCF 2018, arXiv:1810.00154 [nucl-th].9. T. Csörgő and G. Kasza, Proceedings supplement of WPCF 2018, arXiv:1806.11309 [nucl-th].

References

▪ Original idea: initial energy density of QGP can be measuredfrom dE/dy distributions

▪ Bjorken’s famous estimation for boost-invariant systems [4]:

▪ But Bjorken’s formula ignores the 1st law of thermodynamics!The correct formula for boost-invariant systems was found byGorenstein, Sinyukov and Zhdanov (before Bjorken!) [5]:

▪ Measurments: dN/dη is not flat, thus we need an acceleratingsolution of hydro to reevaluate the initial energy density!

▪ We have developed a novel method to estimate the initialenergy density in three steps. We applied this new method onthree systems: Au+Au at 62.4, 130 and 200 GeV [3]

Motivation

▪ At 130 and 200 GeV: Teff is published by PHENIX▪ At 62.4 GeV: we had to fit the pT (or mT-m0) spectra with the following fit function [6]:

▪ The centrality dependence of the Teff parameter of pions is found to be negligible.▪ In the next steps, we assume pion dominance: we use centrality independent Teff values

The Csörgő-Kasza-Csanád-Jiang (CKCJ) solution

▪ Rapidity density (embedded to 1+3 d space) [1]:

▪ Four fit parameters: κ (or the speed of sound, known from PHENIX meas.), λ, Teff , dN/dy|y=0

▪ The values of Teff are determined from fits to the transverse mass spectra of hadrons▪ The pseudorapidity density distribution is determined as a parametric curve, where the parameter

of the curve is the momentum-space rapidity y:

▪ Fits to PHOBOS data [3]:

2nd step: obtain the acceleration parameter (λ)

▪ For a 1+1 d relativistic, Gaussian source, obtained from the CKCJ solution [7,8]:

▪ Here Δηx is the Gaussian width of the rapidity distribution▪ From fits to dN/dη: λ, Teff are known▪ τf is the only fit parameter▪ Fits to PHENIX and STAR data [3]:

3rd step: obtain the lifetime (τf)

▪ We used a realistic, but average value of speed of sound. It is measured by PHENIX in ref. [2].▪ In 1+1 dimensions, the Rindler coordinates are useful: τ (proper time), ηx (space-time rapidity)▪ The fluid rapidity (Ω) and the four-velocity is the function of only ηx:▪ A finite, accelerating, 1+1 dimensional relativistic solution was recently given by Csörgő, Kasza,

Csanád and Jiang as a family of parametric curves (where the parameter is H) [1]:

▪ Here λ is the acceleration parameter, s=s(τ,H) is the scale variable, and νσ is the scaling function.▪ This solution is limited to a cone around mid-rapidity.

1st step: obtain the effective temperature (Teff)

▪ From the CKCJ solution ε0 is exactly calculated [9]:

▪ Now, the fundamental correction to ε0Bj is known

▪ λ and τf are obtained by fits → τ0 dependence▪ Calculated for Au+Au at 62.4, 130 and 200 GeV, only the

thermalized energy is included [3]

▪ Bjorken’s formula can be applied only for order of magnitudeestimation!

▪ Indication for an increasing initial energy density withdecreasing colliding energy?

▪ The results suggest a non-monotonic behaviour of the initialenergy density with s

▪ At LHC energies, our method predicts greater ε0

▪ At 200 GeV, our results are compared to 1+3 d numerical hydro,with lQCD EoS: surprisingly good agreement

▪ Of course, further investigations are needed: lower collisionenergies, extensions of CKCJ solution (1+3 d, shockwaves, fit todata on the whole η interval)

Initial energy density estimation