Installation of Underground

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    1/74

    Installation of UndergroundInstallation of Underground

    Services using HDD:Services using HDD:Design ConsiderationsDesign Considerations

    By Dr. Samuel T. Ariaratnam, Ph.D., P.Eng.

    Arizona State University, USA

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    2/74

    HDD Installation ProcessHDD Installation Process

    Pilot Bore Phase

    Pullback Phase

    Typical Reamers

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    3/74

    Bore Path PlanBore Path Plan should show:

    the surface grade line

    locations of important surface features

    anticipated lateral utility connections and

    intersection points

    bore depth at each reference point and at critical

    points

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    4/74

    Bore Path SelectionBore Path Selection in agreement with:

    geometric restrictions and/or requirements

    topography

    geology

    site-specific issues

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    5/74

    Designed Bore ProfileDesigned Bore Profile

    recommended:at least one complete length of drill pipe beforestarting to level out the bore path

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    6/74

    BoreplanningBoreplanning SoftwareSoftware

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    7/74

    Entry and Exit AngleEntry and Exit Angle entry angle :

    8-16 degrees

    determines a set-backdistance of the

    machine

    exit angle:

    5-10 degrees

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    8/74

    Recommended Relationship betweenRecommended Relationship between

    Product Diameter and Reamed DiameterProduct Diameter and Reamed Diameter

    Diameter of product + 12> 24

    Diameter of product x 1.58 24

    Diameter of product + 4< 8

    Reamed DiameterProduct

    Diameter

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    9/74

    Design AspectsDesign Aspects

    Essential for successful installation

    Allows suitable alignment selection

    Can define installation procedures( buoyancy control)

    Determines Suitable Equipment Selection

    Minimizes Pipe Failure

    During Installation

    Long term operational (bending)

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    10/74

    BackgroundBackground

    Two Publications

    Installation Loading and Stress Analysis

    Involved with Pipelines Installed by

    Horizontal Directional Drilling Form basis of American Gas Association

    design guidelines for HDD

    Polyethylene Pipe for HorizontalDirectional Drilling

    Developed by the Plastic Pipe Institute for

    design of HDPE for HDD

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    11/74

    Pipe MaterialPipe Material

    Steel Linear Elastic Material

    High Tensile strength

    High modulus of Elasticity

    Large Diameters (>24) except for casings Corrosion and Abrasion Typically Required

    High Density Polyethylene Viscoelastic material

    Tensile stress & Modulus of Elasticity time,temperature, andduration dependent

    Higher resistance to short term loading than long term loading

    Duration of loads needs to be considered

    Low Modulus of Elasticity & Tensile Stress

    5% strain level to prevent long term structural damage

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    12/74

    SOIL COMPARISONSSOIL COMPARISONS

    FOR 8 HDPE DR17FOR 8 HDPE DR17

    -0.20

    0.00

    0.20

    0.40

    0.60

    0.80

    1.00

    1.20

    1.40

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    Bore Path Location (m)

    Strain(%)

    Clay 1

    Clay 2

    Sand

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    13/74

    HDPEHDPE

    Typical Apparent Modulus of Elasticity (E) Typical Safe Pull Stress

    Duration HDPE MDPE Duration HDPE MDPE

    Short-term 110,000 psi(800 Mpa)

    87,000 psi(600 Mpa)

    30 min 1,300 psi(9.0 Mpa)

    1,000 psi(6.9 Mpa)

    10 hours57,500 psi

    (400 Mpa)

    43,500 psi

    (300 Mpa)60 min

    1,200 psi

    (8.3 Mpa)

    900 psi

    (6.2 Mpa)

    100 hours51,200 psi

    (350 Mpa)

    36,200 psi

    (250 Mpa)12 hours

    1,150 psi

    (7.9 Mpa)

    850 psi

    (5.9 Mpa)

    50 years28,200 psi

    (200 Mpa)

    21,700 psi

    (150 Mpa)

    24 hours1,100 psi

    (7.6 Mpa)

    800 psi

    (5.5 Mpa)

    Apparent Modulus of Elasticity and safe Pull Tensile Stress @ 73oF

    (Plastic Pipe Institute, August 1998)

    Steel? Modulus of Elasticity = 2.9 X 10

    7 psi

    ? Safe Minimum Yield Strength 30,000 to 50,000 psi

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    14/74

    Pipe Capacity ComparisonPipe Capacity Comparison

    SteelSteel

    O.D. = 14O.D. = 14

    w.t. = 0.25w.t. = 0.25I.D. = 14 - 2(0.25 ) = 13.5I.D. = 14 - 2(0.25 ) = 13.5

    O.D. = 14 DR 17O.D. = 14 DR 17

    w.t. = 0.82w.t. = 0.82I.D. = 14 - 2(0.82 ) = 12.36I.D. = 14 - 2(0.82 ) = 12.36

    HDPEHDPE

    Allowable Pull LoadAllowable Pull Load Allowable Pull LoadAllowable Pull Load

    = 40,700 lbs= 40,700 lbs

    = ( 14= ( 1422 - 12.36- 12.3622 ) 1200psi) 1200psi??44

    = 324,000 lbs= 324,000 lbs

    = ( 14= ( 1422 - 13.5- 13.522 ) 30,000psi) 30,000psi??44

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    15/74

    Installation Loads andInstallation Loads and

    StressesStresses Two Phases

    1) Installation

    2) Operation

    Installation usually governs except inhigh operation pressure conditions

    Deep Installation can limit HDPEinstallations

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    16/74

    Installation LoadsInstallation Loads Tension

    Frictional Drag

    Fluidic Drag Unbalanced Gravity Effects

    Bending

    External Hoop

    Pipe Support Spanning

    Pipe Overbend at Entry

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    17/74

    KEY STRESS AREASKEY STRESS AREAS

    DURING PULLBACKDURING PULLBACK

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    18/74

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    19/74

    OperationalOperational Conduit Pressure/Vacuum

    Ground Water/ Soil Pressure Key Assumption Stable/Unstable borehole

    Live Loads -H2O, Coopers, E80,

    nearby structures

    Generally small at depths greater than 5 - 10

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    20/74

    Stable boreholes, no side support

    Unstable borehole Pipe Arching

    GROUNDWATER GROUNDWATER

    STABLE BOREHOLE

    BOREHOLE

    DEFORMATION

    SLURRY SLURRY

    Borehole DeformationBorehole Deformation(Plastic Pipe Institute, Aug. 1991)(Plastic Pipe Institute, Aug. 1991)

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    21/74

    1 DAY 1 WEEK

    2 WEEKS 4 WEEKS

    8 HDPE Pipe8 HDPE Pipe

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    22/74

    1 DAY 1 WEEK

    2 WEEKS 4 WEEKS

    8 HDPE Pipe8 HDPE Pipe

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    23/74

    Summary of 1 Year Digups 8 PipeSummary of 1 Year Digups 8 Pipe

    Clay

    Sand

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    24/74

    Load CalculationsLoad Calculations

    Crossing broken down into straight

    line and curved sections.

    Loads Determined for:

    Net External Loads

    Pipe Deflection Unconstrained Buckling

    Pullback forces, (Friction, Fluidic,

    bending, unbalanced gravity)

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    25/74

    FFTOTALTOTAL = T= TAA + T+ TBB + T+ TCC + T+ TDD + T+ TEE + T+ TFF

    Horizontal Directional Drill ProfileHorizontal Directional Drill Profile(Huey et al, 1996)(Huey et al, 1996)

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    26/74

    Net External LoadsNet External Loads Stable Borehole

    PNET = PMUD - PI

    Unstable BoreholePNET = PE + PGW + PLIVE - PI

    P = H

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    27/74

    Pipe DeflectionPipe Deflection

    Buoyancy

    Earth Load

    For HDPE pipe, care needs to be utilized onselecting an appropriate E. Conservative islong term values.

    Deflection generally minor on steel pipe

    4

    =EI

    0.1169

    2

    D

    D

    3

    =E

    0.0125 PE

    D

    12 (DR-1)

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    28/74

    Unconstrained BucklingUnconstrained Buckling

    Uniform external pressure results incompressive hoop stress

    For HDPE

    For Steel

    fo = ovality factor (0.4 for 7.5% deflection)

    fr = tensile reduction factor

    if pipe is constrained by soil or grout fr is replaced by

    fs (grout enhancement factor) which is approximately 5 for grout

    ? = Poissons ratio

    D

    tPALLOW = 0.88 E

    2

    2t

    Pnet Dfn =

    DR-1

    1PALLOW =(1 - u2 )

    2Efo fr

    3

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    29/74

    Buckling for HDPEBuckling for HDPE

    During PullbackDuring Pullback

    14 HDPE DR 17

    = 9.8 psi

    17-1

    1PALLOW =

    ( 1 - 0.352 )

    2 ( 55,000psi )(0.4) (0.8)

    3

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    30/74

    P = h

    = 17.5ft of drilling fluid head

    if water utilized to counteract external pressure

    h =P

    =9.8psi ( 144 )in2

    80 lbs ft3

    ft2

    h =9.8psi ( 144 )in2

    80 - 62.4

    ft2= 80ft

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    31/74

    Pull Back ForcePull Back Force

    Main component is pullback forces

    Determined in straight line and

    curved sections

    Consists of:Friction

    FluidicUnbalanced Gravity

    Bending

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    32/74

    Straight Section ModelStraight Section Model(Huey et al, 1996)(Huey et al, 1996)

    T1

    T2

    N2DRAG

    L

    frict

    0

    WsL

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    33/74

    Pull Back ComponentsPull Back Components

    Buoyancy has significant effect on Ws

    0.25 - 0.40usoil

    FTOTAL = Ffrict + Fdrag + Ws L Sin 0

    Unbalanced Weight EffectsFweight = Ws Sin 0 L* *

    ?

    Fluidic Drag

    Fdrag = 12 D L umud* * * *

    * * Friction

    Ffrict = Ws L Cos ? usoil*

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    34/74

    Buoyancy EffectsBuoyancy Effects

    No buoyancyNo buoyancy

    Pipe WeightPipe Weight = 14.9 lbs / ft= 14.9 lbs / ft

    NET ( Ws )NET ( Ws ) = 70.6 lbs / ft= 70.6 lbs / ft

    14 DR 17 HDPE14 DR 17 HDPE

    Weight = 14.9 lbs / ftWeight = 14.9 lbs / ft Mud Weight =Mud Weight = mudmud = 80 lbs / ft= 80 lbs / ft

    33

    == 85.585.5 lbslbs/ ft/ ftBuoyancyBuoyancy == mudmud = ( )2 80 lbslbs / ft/ ft 23

    ??

    44

    12121414DD2

    ?

    44

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    35/74

    Buoyancy - Water Utilized in PipeBuoyancy - Water Utilized in Pipe

    For 400 ft BoreFor 400 ft Bore

    85.5 - 14.9 - 52.085.5 - 14.9 - 52.0 = 18.6 lbs / ft= 18.6 lbs / ftNET ( Ws ) =NET ( Ws ) =

    14 DR 17 HDPE I.D. = 12.3614 DR 17 HDPE I.D. = 12.36

    (( ))22 62.462.4 lbslbs / ft/ ft33??

    441212

    12.3612.36 = 52.0 lbs / ft= 52.0 lbs / ftWeight of Water =Weight of Water =

    F no buoyancy =F no buoyancy = ( 70.6 lbs / ft )( 400 ft )( 0.3 )( 70.6 lbs / ft )( 400 ft )( 0.3 ) = 8,470 lbs= 8,470 lbs

    F buoyancy =F buoyancy = ( 18.6 lbs / ft )( 400 ft )( 0.3 )( 18.6 lbs / ft )( 400 ft )( 0.3 ) = 2,230 lbs= 2,230 lbs

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    36/74

    T1

    N

    N2

    N1

    WsL

    frict

    frict2

    frict1DRAG

    01

    02

    a

    R

    Curved Section ModelCurved Section Model(Huey et al, 1996)(Huey et al, 1996)

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    37/74

    BendingBending Steel

    Modelled as 3 point bending and is complex

    and iterative

    HDPE

    Not an issue as safe bending stress (?40D) is

    much less than typical drill curve radii of 300

    ft or more (i.e. drill rod limiting)

    Forces calculated using cable laying formula

    Fcurve = e?? (? soilWBL)

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    38/74

    Stress AnalysisStress Analysis Once all loads are calculated, stress

    analysis is undertaken to ensure allowable

    stresses are not exceeded.

    Highest stress will typically occur wherebending, tension and external/internalpressure act together.

    Loads to be looked at individually and incombination.

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    39/74

    Effect of CollapsedEffect of Collapsed

    Borehole on Pipe FrictionBorehole on Pipe Frictionand Loadand Load

    GROUNDWATER GROUNDWATER

    STABLE BOREHOLEBOREHOLE

    DEFORMATION

    SLURRY SLURRY

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    40/74

    Stable BoreholeStable Borehole

    F frict = Ws L Cos ?? soil

    = (70.6 lbs)(400 ft)(0.3) =8,470 lbs

    F drag = 12? D L ? mud

    = 12? (14 )(400 ft)(0.05) =10,555 lbs

    F total = 8,470 + 10,555= 19,000 lbs

    Ffrict

    Fdrag

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    41/74

    Unstable BoreholeUnstable Borehole

    Assume 30% of length collapse

    Frict = (70.6 lbs)(280 ft)(0.3) =5,930 lbs

    F drag,collapse = 12? (14 )(120 ft )(0.3) =19,000 lbs

    F drag = 12? (14 )(280 ft)(0.05) =7,390 lbs

    F total = 32,320 lbs

    Frict

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    42/74

    Always Have A Plan!Always Have A Plan!

    Contractors

    Contingency Plan

    Engineers Plans

    and Specs

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    43/74

    Bore Tracking and EquipmentBore Tracking and Equipment

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    44/74

    IntroductionIntroduction Two categories of tracking methods

    Walkover systems

    Non-walkover systems

    Operate best in interference-free environment

    (active vs. passive interference)

    Drill locator is responsible for ensuring that thebore follows the design profile

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    45/74

    InterferenceInterference A log book containing drill pipe number,

    pitch, depth, steering commands, apparent

    underground obstructions, and groundconditions is recommended

    Brief inconsistencies in depth may be

    effectively overcome through the use of pitchreadings and calculations

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    46/74

    Interference Cont.Interference Cont. Drill locator is responsible for recognizing the

    limitations of the equipment and

    inconsistencies in readings If problems arise, the bore should be stoppeduntil identified and corrected

    Should walk the bore path with the receiver onprior to boring operators to assess potentialinterferences

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    47/74

    Active InterferenceActive Interference

    Can cause the following:

    Erratic signal strength and depth readings

    Loss of pitch and roll data

    Inaccurate receiver calibration, leading to depth

    errors

    May be caused by anything that emits a signal or

    generate its own magnetic field

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    48/74

    Examples of ActiveExamples of Active

    InterferenceInterference Buried power lines

    Traffic light power loops

    Microwave towers

    Invisible dog fences

    Airport landing systems

    Security systems

    Fiber line traces

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    49/74

    Passive InterferencePassive Interference

    Can cause the following:

    Depth may appear greater than they actually are

    All information may be blocked Drill head position may be incorrect

    May be caused by anything that blocks, absorbs,

    or distorts a magnetic field

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    50/74

    Examples of PassiveExamples of Passive

    InterferenceInterference Metals fences

    Re-bar in concrete

    Electronic ignitions from cars

    Buried metal

    Salt water

    Military operations

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    51/74

    Walkover Tracking SystemsWalkover Tracking SystemsConsists of three main components:

    Transmitter (beacon or sonde)

    Hand held receiver

    Optional remote monitor

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    52/74

    TransmitterTransmitter

    Emits a continuous magnetic signal at a

    predetermined frequency

    Ability to overcome interference is

    related to its frequency and signal

    strength

    Available for depths up to 140 ft.

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    53/74

    ReceiverReceiver

    Displays signals sent by

    the transmitter in numeric

    or graphic form Depth (ft. or m)

    Roll or clock position of the

    steering face or bent sub

    Pitch (% of slope ordegrees)

    Accuracy ranges of2%

    to 5% of depth

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    54/74

    Remote MonitorRemote Monitor

    Not essential to the drillingoperation

    However, reduces drilling

    time by providing the drilloperator with informationrequired to position andinterpret the reaction of thedrill head to the steering and

    drilling conditions Some provide a graphical

    representation of theprogression of the bore

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    55/74

    Bore Mapping SystemsBore Mapping Systems

    Built into the remote display of walkoverlocating systems and stores:

    Entry and exit locations and angles

    Depth and pitch Bend radius

    Alignment

    Topographical (surface) elevations

    Known surface and subsurface obstacles Transmitter temperature and battery status

    Time between data entries

    Drill pipe number

    Drill head location

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    56/74

    As-As-BuiltsBuilts/Operator Logs/Operator Logs

    HDD Contractor is responsible formarking the plans to indicate any and allvertical and horizontal deviations between

    the design and actual bore Operator logbook should be maintained

    and updated daily by the Drill Locator orSuperintendent and should include

    Pipe number, depth, pitch, steeringcommands, and notes

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    57/74

    Home to Target SystemsHome to Target Systems

    Enables the drill locator to program the

    receiver to direct the transmitter to aspecified location at a given pitch

    Beneficial in situations where the drill locator

    is unable to physically track the progress of

    the bore from the drill head

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    58/74

    DESIGN OF DRILLINGDESIGN OF DRILLINGFLUIDSFLUIDSDr. Samuel T. Ariaratnam, Ph.D.,

    P.Eng

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    59/74

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    60/74

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    61/74

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    62/74

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    63/74

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    64/74

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    65/74

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    66/74

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    67/74

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    68/74

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    69/74

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    70/74

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    71/74

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    72/74

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    73/74

  • 7/28/2019 Installation of Underground

    74/74