22
Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds [email protected] Rail Reform - British experience

Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

Institute for Transport StudiesFACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT

Chris Nash

Institute for Transport Studies

University of Leeds

[email protected]

Rail Reform - British experience

Page 2: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

Outline

1.Introduction

2.Passenger franchising

3.Problems of cost control

4.Freight

5.Conclusions

Page 3: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

British approach to rail reform

•No remaining state owned operator – all operations privatised

•All passenger services franchised, mainly by national government (DfT)(Services in Wales, Scotland, Greater London and Merseyside devolved)

•20 franchises

•Freight privatised with open access (DB Schenker and Freightliner main operators)

•Strong independent regulator (ORR)

•Separation of infrastructure from operations in 1994; Railtrack privatised

Page 4: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

PASSENGER FRANCHISING

Page 5: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

Nature of passenger franchise

•Net cost contract (good incentives, especially re more commercial services?), but problem of risk so revenue risk shared (also payments indexed to inflation and government bears risk re track access charges)

•Length currently normally7+3 years (government did decide on longer franchises but abandoned this after problems)

•Franchisee usually responsible for providing rolling stock, usually from leasing companies (but may lead to high prices unless government bears residual risk, and also lack of innovation)

Recent major procurements led by government:

-Inter city Express Passenger

-Thameslink

-Crossrail

Page 6: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

Franchisees

Group Owners Nature of Company Nationality

National Express National Express Private, bus and rail British

Firstgroup Firstgroup Private, bus and rail British

Arriva DB Public, bus and rail Germany

Stagecoach Stagecoach Private, bus and rail British

Virgin Virgin Private, rail and air British

MTR MTR Public rail Hong Kong

Go ahead Go ahead Private, bus and rail British

Via rail SNCF Public rail France

SERCO Serco Private, utility British

ABELLIO NS Public rail Netherlands

Deutsche Bahn DBAG Public rail Germany

Page 7: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

Rail passenger km in Great Britain 1996-2014

Page 8: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

Reasons for passenger growth?

•Economic growth? But scarcely affected by recession

•Reduced competition from road

-Slow growth of car ownership

-Congestion worsening road journey times

-Rising petrol costs

•Reduced rail fares, improved rail services and better marketing

Page 9: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

PROBLEMS OF COST CONTROL

Page 10: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

Passenger railway costs per train km (2011/2 prices) (£b)

1996/7 2005/6 2011/2

• Total 20.2 27.0 25.4

• Infrastructure 9.2 14.4 13.9

• Operations. 11.0 12.6 11.5

See Smith and Nash (2014)

Page 11: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

Infrastructure costs: Rail regulator benchmarking

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Sco

re a

ga

inst

fro

nti

er

Profile of Network Rail Efficiency Scores: Flexible Cuesta00 Model

Page 12: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

Infrastructure manager developments

•After the Hatfield accident in 2000, high levels of spending on the infrastructure and compensation to train operators led to Railtrack becoming insolvent

•Successor, Network Rail, a not for dividend private company with members, not shareholders, but with debt guaranteed by the government

•In 2014, reclassified as a public sector company

Page 13: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

British Train Operating Company Costs

•Evidence that British franchises are typically too big

Wheat and Smith (2015)

•Problems in managing franchise failure

•Some costs such as fuel cost, insurance and policing have risen a lot

•Big rise in staff costs partly due to competition for scarce skilled staff?

•Lack of alignment of incentives between infrastructure and operations (McNulty)

Page 14: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

McNulty report 2011 recommendations

•Should achieve a 30% reduction in costs by 2018/9

•Rail Delivery group to oversee

•Decentralisation of Network Rail, with regional concessions and closer links with train operators (Leasing of infrastructure to operators?)

•Longer (at least 15 year) less highly specified franchises carrying more risk re revenue and infrastructure costs

•Increased local involvement in specification and funding

Page 15: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

Possible solution – growth of on track competition

•Competition and Markets Authority Report 2015.

Might produce more on track competition by

-Removing constraints on entry

-Splitting franchises in two

-More overlapping franchises

-BUT

-Lack of track capacity

-Lack of integrated timetables

-Loss of economies of density

Page 16: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

Possible solution - reform of franchising

• Long franchises necessary whenever franchisee responsible for service development, procuring rolling stock, influencing infrastructure investment (at least 20 years)

Chiltern 20 year franchise the model

• Short gross cost franchises may make sense where the franchising authority is responsible for asset procurement, marketing, influencing working practices etc.

London Overground 7 year franchise the model

• Alliances with Network Rail crucial – ideally complete sharing of changes in revenue and cost

SW Trains the model.

Page 17: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

FREIGHT

Page 18: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

Rail and road freight traffic Great Britain. billion tonne km

Year Rail Road

1975 21 92

1995 13 150

2000 18 159

2005 22 163

2010 19 151

Source: TSGB 2014

Page 19: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

Rail freight traffic 2014/5 b tonne km

Coal 6.50

Metals 1.82

Construction 3.93

Oil 1.21

International 0.60

Domestic intermodal 6.49

Other 1.67

Total 22.21

Page 20: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

Was freight privatisation a success?

•Gave customers choice

•Traffic growth- but entirely coal and containers.

•Productivity of labour and rolling stock (doubling of mean train loads, big rise in labour productivity)

•Re entering some markets – e.g. food for supermarkets, post

Page 21: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

Conclusions

•Reforms successful in boosting passenger and freight traffic, although not the main cause of the spectacular growth

•Complete separation of infrastructure from operations problematic – alliances with main operators may be a solution

•Franchising has not achieved the expected cost reductions, but reforming franchising more likely to achieve objectives than extension of open access.

•Freight competition a limited success.

Page 22: Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds C.A.Nash@its.leeds.ac.uk

References

•McNulty, Sir R (2011) Realising the potential of GB Rail: final independent report of the Rail Value for Money study. Department for Transport and Office of Rail Regulation, London.

http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/report-of-the-rail-vfm-study/realising-the-potential-of- gb-rail.pdf

•Smith, A S J, Nash C A and Wheat P (2009), Passenger rail franchising in Britain: has it been a success? International Journal of Transport Economics 36(1) 33-62.

•Andrew Smith and Chris Nash (2014) Rail Efficiency: cost research and its implications for policy. Discussion paper, International Transport Forum

• Y. Crozet et al (2014) Development of rail freight in Europe: What regulation can and cannot do

CERRE Discussion Paper, Brussels