25
This is a repository copy of Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/130168/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Dawson, J. orcid.org/0000-0002-9365-8586, Ikyanyon, D. and Johnson, P. (2020) Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria. Employee Relations, 42 (1). pp. 1-16. ISSN 0142-5455 https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2017-0056 © 2020 Emerald Group Publishing. This is an author-produced version of a paper subsequently published in JOURNAL. This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) licence. This licence allows you to remix, tweak, and build upon this work non-commercially, and any new works must also acknowledge the authors and be non-commercial. You don’t have to license any derivative works on the same terms. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.

Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

This is a repository copy of Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria.

White Rose Research Online URL for this paper:http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/130168/

Version: Accepted Version

Article:

Dawson, J. orcid.org/0000-0002-9365-8586, Ikyanyon, D. and Johnson, P. (2020) Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria. Employee Relations, 42 (1). pp. 1-16. ISSN 0142-5455

https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2017-0056

© 2020 Emerald Group Publishing. This is an author-produced version of a paper subsequently published in JOURNAL. This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

[email protected]://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/

Reuse

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) licence. This licence allows you to remix, tweak, and build upon this work non-commercially, and any new works must also acknowledge the authors and be non-commercial. You don’t have to license any derivative works on the same terms. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/

Takedown

If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.

Page 2: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

����������������� �����������������������������

���������

�������� �������������� ��

������ ������ �������������������

������ �������� ������� �!�����

"��#��$�� %�&����� ��� ���&�'���� (���� �)&�' *�� �&�!�(� ����$��� +�����������

��

Employee Relations

Page 3: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

1

Institutional Context and Human Resource Management in Nigeria

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to explore how the institutional context

influences HRM practices in the public and private sector in Nigeria.

Design/methodology/approach – The convergent parallel mixed methods approach

was adopted for this study. Survey data was collected from 122 HR managers across

public and private sector organizations in Nigeria as well as 13 qualitative interviews.

ANCOVA was used to analyse quantitative data whilst thematic analysis was used to

analyse qualitative data in order to understand the influence of institutions on HRM

practices in the public and private sector in Nigeria.

Findings – Findings indicate that formal and informal institutional factors as well as the

socio-economic condition of the country have an effect on HRM practices such as

staffing, training, rewards and employee participation. However, the influence of formal

institutions on HRM practices may be attenuated by the type of organization and the

contextual challenges of HRM.

Originality/value– The study provides an understanding of the institutional context of

HRM in Nigeria by highlighting how varying degrees of pressure from the environment

create internal diversity in HRM practices in the public and private sector.

Page 1 of 23 Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 4: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

2

Introduction

Practitioners and academics alike have come to realize that human resource

management (HRM) is context-dependent (Brewster and Mayrhofer, 2012). Differences

in socio-cultural and institutional environments among countries present organizations

with different approaches to work organization and HRM (Jackson and Schuler, 1995;

Wood et al., 2012). This implies that HRM practices differ from context to context and

the success of HRM practices in a particular country does not guarantee success in other

countries (Budhwar and Debrah, 2001). Thus, the need for researchers to understand

the factors that shape HRM in different contexts, especially in emerging countries is

crucial. This is because whilst globalization has facilitated the transfer of HRM practices

from Anglo-Saxon developed countries to emerging countries (Anakwe, 2002), there are

complexities and challenges associated with HRM in different contexts (Horwitz and

Budhwar, 2015). Consequently, there is renewed interest in the understanding of HRM

in emerging economies (Horwitz and Budhwar, 2015). This interest is spurred by the

fact that many emerging countries have liberalised their economies and opened their

markets to foreign investors. Adding to this is the increased internationalization of

business and increased national and international competition among firms, as well as

the growth of emerging markets themselves (Debrah and Budhwar and Debrah, 2001;

Okpara and Wynn, 2008; Horwitz and Budhwar, 2015). Thus, understanding the nature

of HRM in emerging markets will aid the development of approaches for effective

management of human resources in such contexts and also contribute towards the

development of HRM theories (Horwitz and Budhwar, 2015).

Authors have observed that most writings on HRM in Africa adopt cultural frameworks

that seek to highlight differences in cultural values between Africa and developed

countries (Kamoche et al., 2011; Cooke et al., 2015). Whilst these writings provide

insights on HRM in Africa generally, the preeminent role of institutions in shaping HRM

(Vaiman and Brewster, 2015), coupled with the cultural diversity between and within

African countries (Jackson, 2004; Bischoff and Wood, 2012), have necessitated calls for

researchers to adopt institutional frameworks to provide a better understanding of

HRM in Africa (Cooke et al., 2015; Wood et al., 2011). The present research seeks to

bridge this gap by exploring the role of institutions in shaping HRM practices in Nigeria.

Indeed, an examination of HRM in Nigeria from an institutional perspective is very

important given the generally weak nature of institutions in Nigeria and Africa at large.

Thus, it is expected that the recommendations emanating from the findings of the

current study will be useful in engineering positive institutional change for optimal

performance of organizations, thereby enhancing national prosperity (Bischoff and

Wood, 2012).

Moreover, despite the World Bank and IMF-influenced economic policies that have

resulted in structural adjustments and privatization of previous state owned

enterprises in many African countries (Dibben and Wood, 2013), the public sector

remains the largest formal employer of labour in most African countries (Ellis et al.,

2015). Unfortunately, most writings on HRM in Africa emphasize commercial firms to

the neglect of public sector organizations. Additionally, the differences between public

and private organizations in terms of ownership, sources of funding, and mode of social

Page 2 of 23Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 5: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

3

control (Rainey, 2014) indicate that public and private organizations operate under

different contexts. These differences provide a fertile ground for within-country

comparison of the forces that shape HRM practices in both sectors. It is based on the

forgoing that this study seeks to explore the influence of institutions on HRM practices

within the context of the public and private sector in Nigeria. Our research is however

focused on four HRM practices - staffing, training, rewards, and employee participation -

which represent the key practices that are present in many organizations.

Institutions and HRM

There are different institutional approaches to understanding HRM (see Wood et al.,

2012). Whilst each institutional framework has shortcomings, it is advisable for

researchers to combine different institutional frameworks in order to understand the

nature of institutions from multiple lenses (Burbach and Royle, 2014). For instance,

property rights theorists are concerned with the economic efficiency of nations by

strengthening the rights of owners and weakening employees’ rights (North, 1990;

Botero et al., 2004). Moreover, the sociological new institutionalism emphasizes how

organizations conform to their institutional environments in order to gain legitimacy

(DiMaggio and Powell, 1983). New institutionalism suggests that the behaviour of

organizations is influenced by coercive, mimetic and normative institutional

mechanisms (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983; Paauwe and Boselie, 2007). In HRM terms,

coercive mechanisms may emanate from regulatory pressures, influence of social

pressures such as trade unions, works councils, and government regulation whilst

mimetic mechanisms result from imitation of HRM practices from competitors when

faced with risk and uncertainty. On the other hand, normative mechanisms stem from

employees’ professional groups in the organization (cf. Paauwe and Boselie, 2007).

Whilst property rights theory and new institutionalism are broadly classified as rational

hierarchical models of institutions in that they view institutions as providers of

incentives to firms, namely the protection of private property and the achievement of

legitimacy respectively (Wood et al., 2012), comparative institutional theories are

concerned with how certain institutional features of countries influence the nature of

the relationship between organizations and various stakeholders. Among the theories in

this category are the varieties of capitalism approach (Hall and Soskice, 2001) and

business system theory (Whitley, 1999). Whilst the former divides advanced countries

into liberal and coordinated markets and seeks to understand how the features of these

economies influence people management practice, the latter compares countries based

on the means of ownership, the extent of competition among firms and the nature of the

relationship between managers and employees (cf. Wood et al., 2011).

Extending the literature on business system theory to understand the institutional

contexts of emerging countries of Africa, Wood and Frynas (2006) described the African

institutional landscape as a segmented business system. According to Wood and

Horwitz (2015, p.23), the segmented business system theory “highlights uneven nature

of institutional coverage and great internal variations according to firm type or sector”.

This underscores the weak nature of institutional arrangements in African contexts

thereby resulting in unequal influence of institutions on organizational practices across

Page 3 of 23 Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 6: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

4

organizations. As noted by Wood and Frynas (2011), although labour legislation would

exist in a segmented business system, the poor enforcement of such legislation may

result in the adoption of low-value added HRM practices particularly in small

organizations. At the same time, the desire to reduce labour cost may discourage the

provision of formal training opportunities to employees whilst paternalistic authority

relations between management and workers may inhibit the scope of employee

participation. Indeed, whilst trade unions may exist in large private organizations as

well as in the public sector, they are generally weak (Wood & Frynas, 2006). Thus, in the

absence of formalised HRM practices due to poor enforcement mechanisms,

organizations may turn to informal HRM practices such as recruitment based on social

networks, informal training, and informal staff meetings, among others (Wood et al.,

2011). Empirically, Wood et al. (2011) found support for the segmented business theory

whilst examining the nature of HRM in Mozambique. Although the segmented business

system theory was developed with particular reference to the Eastern African context,

as we shall show in the subsequent section, the literature on HRM in Nigeria as indeed

Africa generally bears a semblance with the literature on segmented business system.

Thus, the segmented business theory provides a framework for understanding the

influence of institutions on HRM practices in African contexts.

HRM in Nigeria

The extant literature on HRM in Nigeria points to the interplay between formal and

informal institutions on one hand, and the effects of context-specific challenges on the

other, in shaping HRM practices across organizations (Ovadje and Ankomah, 2001;

Anakwe, 2002; Okpara and Wynn, 2008; Azolukwam and Perkins, 2009). This literature

suggests that HRM practices such as staffing, training, rewards, and employee

participation among others present in Nigerian organizations may bear a semblance

with HRM activities in the developed world such as the UK and USA (Okpara and Wynn,

2008). Nevertheless, the practice of HRM in Nigeria is affected by unique contextual

challenges such as corruption, tribalism, ethnicity, favouritism, nepotism, government

regulation, political instability, skill shortages, HIV/AIDS, among others (Anakwe, 2002;

Okpara and Wynn, 2008). This suggests that the difference between HRM in Nigeria and

other contexts is as a result of the unique institutional environment in which HRM is

practised in Nigeria. Nevertheless, the degree of institutional variation and how this

affects HRM in Nigeria has not been addressed in previous research. This study

therefore seeks to fill this gap in the literature by drawing from the segmented business

system theory.

The Labour Act and the Nigerian Constitution as well as other sundry labour legislation

provide the regulatory framework for HRM in Nigeria (Ovadje and Ankomah, 2001).

Although these labour laws are aimed at enhancing healthy employment relations, with

the constitution particularly safeguarding the basic human rights of all citizens, the

problem with Nigeria is not in enacting laws but the enforcement of such laws

(Adegbite, 2012). A system of endemic corruption, combined with weak institutional

capacity, results in poor enforcement of labour legislation (Fajana, 2008) whilst massive

Page 4 of 23Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 7: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

5

unemployment and the flagrant abuse of labour legislation inhibit workers from

demanding for their basic rights (Fajana, 2008; Adewumi, 2012). This results in poor

conditions of employment in many Nigerian organizations, particularly in the area of

rewards. Although workers are by law allowed membership of trade unions which are

organised along industry lines, the strength of trade unions as well as union density

may vary from one industry to another (Adewumi, 2012). Moreover, the bargaining

power of trade unions may be weakened as a result of the high level of unemployment

in the country (Fajana, 2008). This weak position of trade unions may be responsible for

the low level of employee participation in many Nigerian organizations (Anakwe, 2002).

Indeed, government policies such as privatization, deregulation, trade liberalization and

similar neo-liberal policies have resulted in massive job losses in both the public and

private sector in Nigeria (Okpara and Wynn, 2008). Due to the competition posed by

foreign multinationals – particularly in high-tech industries such as banking and

telecommunications- as a result of these neo-liberal reforms, indigenous private

organizations are under pressure to imitate the ‘best practices’ introduced by these

companies in order to survive (Ovadje and Ankomah, 2001). Driven by the need to

maximise owners’ wealth, private organizations in Nigeria are more likely to adopt HRM

practices of the neo-liberal variety that are characterised by labour cost cutting, low

employee voice and an emphasis on employee productivity (Okpara and Wynn, 2008).

In the public sector, government reforms have been targeted at improving the efficient

delivery of public services with implications on the management of human resources in

the sector. Nevertheless, some HRM practices in the public sector such as the quota

system of employment in the public sector are aimed at promoting national unity and

cohesion (Mustapha, 2009). The latter reflects a classic example of complementarities

that are aimed at compensating for systemic failures (cf. Lane and Wood, 2009).

However, the spread of neo-liberal agenda through the World Bank and IMF has placed

public organizations in Nigeria under immense pressure to jettison some of these long

cherished practices in order to be ‘efficient’ (Adewumi, 2012). At the same time, the

adoption of neo-liberal policies has resulted in a reduction in government spending in

critical areas of the economy such as education and health which are incidental to the

development of a vibrant human resource base for the country. Thus, whilst Nigeria

boasts of abundant human resources, the availability of skilled manpower is rather low,

which constitutes a major challenge for organizations. This further places a burden on

organizations in Nigeria as they have to invest huge resources in training workers for

effective productivity.

Perhaps due to the exposure of local firms to foreign competition, organizations in

Nigeria are increasingly aware of the strategic role of HRM (Ovadje and Ankomah,

2001). As a result, many organizations – particularly large organizations – have

continuously engaged the services of HRM professionals to oversee the management of

people in their organizations (Ovadje and Ankomah, 2001; Okpara and Wynn, 2008). As

professionals perform the role of HRM in organizations, their professional training as

well as professional norms are bound to rub off on the way HRM practised in their

organizations. Indeed, professional bodies provide a channel for the dissemination of

best practices across organizations (cf. Paauwe and Boselie, 2007). Moreover, Nigeria is

Page 5 of 23 Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 8: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

6

signatory to statutes of international organizations such as the International Labour

Organization (ILO) whose statutes prescribe best practice HRM for organizations.

However, Ovadje and Ankomah (2001) note that such statutes are rarely adhered to

across organizations in Nigeria. This may reflect the weak institutional context of

Nigeria that is characterised by poor enforcement mechanisms.

An equally important institutional feature that influences HRM practices in Nigeria is

the role of informal institutions. Indeed, the role of informal institutions on HRM is

profound, given the weak nature of formal institutions in Nigeria (Ovadje and Ankomah,

2001; Anakwe, 2002). These informal institutional features are reflective of the cultural

norms and values of kinship, deference to authority, communitarianism among others

which are not only embedded in the Nigerian society but are also reminiscent of the

informal institutional features that influence HRM practices in other African contexts

(Ellis et al., 2015). It has been argued that the passive nature of informal institutional

structures may potentially restrain the adoption of new management approaches

(Huang and Gamble, 2011). For instance, whilst an informal institution such as kinship

and social networks may influence the staffing activity in organizations, particularly due

to the high level of unemployment in Nigeria, deference to authority may diminish the

level of direct employee participation in organizations. Hence, despite the pervasiveness

of Western HRM models of the Anglo-Saxon variety, HRM practices in Nigeria as indeed

many African contexts connote a hybrid between Western practices that seek to drive

efficiency and productivity on one hand and local practices that are rooted in cultural

norms and values on the other (Azolukwam and Perkins, 2009).

Conceptual Framework

Based on the literature on HRM in Nigeria presented above, and taking cognisance of

the segmented business system theory which highlights internal diversity in the

influence of institutions on organizational practices on the basis of sector, industry and

size of the organization, we present our conceptual framework in figure 1 below. The

conceptual framework indicates that both formal and informal institutions have an

impact on HRM practices such as staffing, training, rewards and employee participation.

However, as the framework suggests, the link between institutions and HRM practices

may be attenuated by the type of organization as well as the contextual challenges of

HRM. Indeed, our conceptual framework is dynamic in the sense that it can be adapted

to accommodate other HRM practices.

Insert figure 1 here.

Methodology

The convergent parallel mixed methods approach (Creswell, 2014) was adopted for this

study wherein quantitative and qualitative data were collected from the respondents at

the same time. The participants of the study comprised of HR managers drawn across

public and private sector organizations in Nigeria. A stratified sampling technique based

Page 6 of 23Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 9: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

7

on the size of the organization, location, industry and sector was adopted in order to

collect data from the participants. The study was limited to organizations employing at

least 50 employees since such organizations were more likely to have formal HRM

practices (Ovadje and Ankomah, 2001). In terms of location, the research focused on

organizations located in 11 major cities in Nigeria namely, Abeokuta, Abuja, Asaba,

Enugu, Gusau, Jos, Kano, Lagos, Makurdi, Owerri and Port Harcourt. These cities are

linked with transportation network which helped in reducing the logistical problems

associated with conducting research in Nigeria (Okpara and Wynn, 2008). Moreover,

the cities are spread across the geo-political zones in Nigeria except for the North-East

zone that is largely unstable due to terrorist attacks. Due to the geographical spread of

the organizations, the expectation is that the findings of the study will better reflect the

Nigerian context (Okpara and Wynn, 2008).

The next stage in the sampling process was to identify the industries that would

participate in the research. Thus, key industries in Nigeria which include,

banking/financial services, education, health, manufacturing, ICT/media, hotels,

transport, as well as government ministries, departments and agencies (MDAs) were

the focus of the research whilst in terms of sector, the focus was on indigenous private

organizations and federal government owned public sector organizations. Indeed,

subsidiaries of multinational companies were excluded from the research since HRM in

subsidiaries of MNCs may be influenced by the institutional context of the parent-

company (Kostova and Roth, 2002). After the sampling criteria were determined, a

national telephone directory of organizations containing telephone numbers of public

and private sector organizations in Nigeria was used to obtain contact details of

organizations that met the criteria for inclusion with a view to inviting them to

participate in the research. Out of 344 organizations invited to participate in the

research, 228 accepted to participate in the study, representing an acceptance rate of

66.3%.

Data Collection

Questionnaire and interview methods were used to collect data from HR managers who

provided responses on behalf of their organizations. Using the drop-off and pick-up

method of questionnaire administration (Steele, 2001), a self-completion questionnaire

was administered to HR managers in each organization participating in the research.

These questionnaires were administered through experienced and well trained

research assistants (RAs) that were recruited to assist in data collection for the research

project. The questionnaires were administered to the respondents at their respective

workplaces. One of the authors was in Nigeria to monitor the data collection process

and was on hand to coordinate the activities of the RAs. The first part of the

questionnaire sought information on the industry, sector and size of the organization

whilst the second part required respondents to indicate the extent to which

institutional factors such as ‘national labour laws’, ‘trade unions’, ‘educational system’

‘professional bodies’, ‘international institutions’ and ‘government policy’ influenced a

Page 7 of 23 Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 10: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

8

bundle of HRM practices – staffing, training, rewards and employee participation – in

their organizations. These institutional factors were drawn from the literature on

institutional influence on HRM in developing countries generally (Budhwar and Debrah,

2001) and Nigeria in particular (Ovadje and Ankomah, 2001). The responses to these

questions were measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 – not at all to 5 –

extremely influential.

The questionnaire however focused on the formal institutional factors because we

envisaged that informal institutional factors which are subject to cultural

interpretations can be better understood through qualitative approaches. Thus, in order

to have deeper insights on the influence of institutions on HRM practices in the public

and private sector in Nigeria, interviews were also conducted with some HR managers

that responded to the questionnaires. This approach enabled us to understand how

formal and informal institutional factors influence HRM practices. The scope of

participation in the qualitative interviews was however limited to some HR managers in

public and private sector banks and hospitals that responded to the questionnaire.

These industries are considered important to the economic development of Nigeria by

mobilising funds for industrial development and catering for the health needs of the

teeming population of Nigeria respectively. Theoretically, banks and hospitals operate

in industries that are considered highly institutionalised (Scott, 2008) therefore, it was

expected that any differences in the influence of institutions on HRM among them

should be largely as a result of their public or private sector status rather than the

industry in which they operate. Therefore, studying banks and hospitals presented an

opportunity to focus on like-for-like public and private sector organizations in Nigeria.

Three banks were selected each in the public and private sector with each of the

selected banks providing both retail and investment banking services that served both

private and institutional customers. In order to be comparable with their public sector

counterparts, the selection of the private sector banks was based on stability and

longevity. In terms of hospitals, it was ensured that the participating hospitals in both

the public and private sector were comparable in terms of structure. Thus, federal

medical centres constituted the public sector hospitals selected for the study. These

type of public hospitals provide services in all areas of healthcare and can be better

comparable to the private sector hospitals (Polsa et al., 2011). Therefore, 3 federal

medical centres that served the healthcare needs of different states in Nigeria were

selected for the interviews. Meanwhile, 4 private hospitals that operated a decentralized

structure as is the case of the public sector hospitals and whose staff strength was up to

200 employees were selected to participate in the interviews. Altogether, the number of

participating organizations for the interviews were 13 with the senior HR manager in

each organization responding to interview questions on behalf of their organization.

The qualitative interviews which were semi-structured revolved around formal and

informal institutional factors and their influence on the four HRM practices that were of

interest to this study. Example of interview questions include: ‘how do labour laws

Page 8 of 23Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 11: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

9

affect HRM practices such as staffing, training, rewards and employee participation in

your organization?’; ‘do trade unions have an influence on the nature of HRM practices

implemented in your organization?’; ‘how does the educational system in Nigeria affect

HRM practices in your organization?’; and ‘do you think informal institutions such as

kinship have an effect on HRM practices in your organization?’. These interviews, which

lasted for an average duration of one hour, were tape-recorded and later transcribed.

The analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data will be the focus of the next

section.

Data Analysis

Out of a total of 228 questionnaires administered to HR managers across public and

private sector organizations in Nigeria, 126 questionnaires were completed and

returned, representing a 55.3% response rate. However, in the course of collating the

responses, it was discovered that 4 respondents failed to state their sector, which is the

main variable in the analysis. Hence, these 4 responses without sector were excluded

from the analysis, which means that the analysis was based on 122 valid responses. A

breakdown of these valid responses shows that 58.2% were from the private sector

whilst 41.8% were from the public sector. Government MDAs (20.5%) and

manufacturing (18.9%) had the highest response rate whilst only 9.0% were from the

hotel industry. In a reflection of the dominance of small and medium organizations in

Nigeria, majority of the organizations had 100-249 employees (35.2%) whilst only

15.6% of the participating organizations had above 500 employees.

Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to examine the influence of institutions on

HRM, based on industry, sector and size of the organization, with results presented in

table 1.

Insert Table 1 here.

The analysis of qualitative data followed the thematic analysis procedure suggested by

Braun and Clarke (2006) with the Nvivo 11 software used for data reduction. Through

open coding (Corbin and Strauss, 2008), concepts reflecting institutional factors such as

‘influence of trade unions’, compliance with minimum wage law’, ‘maintaining

professional norms’ ‘requirements of regulatory bodies’ ‘standard of education’ among

others were searched and coded, whilst axial codes enabled us to establish some

linkages among the initial codes by relating the concepts of institutional factors and

HRM practices (staffing, training, rewards and employee participation) to each other.

The main advantage of using qualitative interviews in this study is that unlike the

quantitative part of the study, we were able to link these institutional factors to specific

HRM practices through the analysis of qualitative data. Indeed, our knowledge of a

priori theory provided us directions in which to look (Johnson and Duberley, 2015).

Thus, the codes were sorted whilst latent themes were created that reflected both

existing and emerging themes.

Page 9 of 23 Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 12: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

10

Findings and Discussion

Findings from the survey data presented in table 1 indicate that all the institutional

variables (national labour laws, trade unions, professional bodies, educational system,

international institutions, and government policy) were likely to influence HRM

decisions in organizations in Nigeria based on the views of HR managers. However,

findings suggest that the extent of the influence of these institutional variables on HRM

practices varies according to the industry, sector and size of the organization. For

instance, managers indicated that trade unions (β=4.601) had the highest influence on

HRM in their organizations whilst international institutions (β = 2.165) had the lowest

influence. Nevertheless, the influence of trade unions was more likely to be encountered

in government MDAs than in the manufacturing industry whilst in terms of sector, the

influence of trade unions was more likely to be encountered in the public sector than in

the private sector. This indicates the anti-union stance of private sector organizations

based on the dictates of neo-liberalism (Adewumi, 2012).

In terms of the size of the organization, large organizations were more likely to indicate

that HRM decisions in their organizations were influenced by institutions than small

organizations. On the other hand, and expectedly, industries with professionalized

employee groups like the health industry were more likely to indicate the influence of

professional bodies on HRM practices. Meanwhile, government policy had a higher

influence in banks than in manufacturing industry, but the influence was higher in

manufacturing industry than in hotel industry. This diversity in the influence of

institutions on HRM based on size, industry and sector resonates with the literature on

segmented business system theory (Wood and Frynas, 2006). The findings from the

survey data were corroborated by findings from the qualitative interviews, although the

latter provided deeper insights on how institutions influenced HRM practices in both

sectors. The presentation and discussion of these findings is the focus of subsequent

sections.

Formal Institutions

This finding relates to the way formal institutional factors such as national labour laws,

trade unions, educational system, government policy, and consultants influence HRM

practices in the public and private sector in Nigeria. The discussion of each of these sub-

themes shall form the basis of the subsequent sections.

National Labour Laws

Generally, all interviewees indicated that their organizations abide by labour laws when

considering HRM practices. However, when asked particularly about the minimum

wage law, we found that not all organizations abided by the provisions of the minimum

wage law. In the public sector, all the interviewees indicated that the minimum wage

law significantly influenced the decision of compensation of workers whilst this was not

the case in some private hospitals as could be seen from the quote below:

Page 10 of 23Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 13: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

11

I think the minimum wage is purely the business of government. If we say we must pay all our staff up to

the minimum wage, we might fold up because we cannot afford it. We try to review their (workers) pay

when the government increases the pay of its workers but that does not mean it has to be up to what the

government stipulates as minimum wage [Private Hospital 2].

The lack of compliance with some aspects of labour legislation in some private

organizations is reflective of the uneven coverage of institutions highlighted by

segmented business system theorists and is typical of many African contexts (Wood and

Frynas, 2006; Bischoff and Wood, 2012). Indeed, where labour enforcement agencies

are weak and competition is fierce, employers who are not responsible are bound to

take advantage of workers (Webster and Wood, 2005). What is more, the high level of

unemployment in many African contexts confers undue advantage to employers when

dealing with employees (Wood et al., 2011). In such contexts, workers are compelled to

put up with poor conditions of employment due to the shortage or lack of alternative

jobs (Wood et al., 2011). In the particular case of Nigeria, the presence of corruption

may hamper the strict enforcement of labour laws (Okpara and Wynn, 2008).

Notwithstanding, the evidence suggests that HRM in the public sector is more likely to

be influenced by labour laws than HRM in the private sector. This may suggest, as

others have pointed out (Dibben and Wood, 2013), that the public sector plays an

exemplary role in providing better conditions of employment.

Trade Unions

Trade unions play an important role in influencing HRM practices in Nigerian

organizations particularly in the areas of employee participation and rewards. Thus, it

has been argued that decent work and pay as well as national development could be

achieved in developing countries through trade unionism (Fajana, 2008). However, in

contrast to the public sector where trade unions have a relatively strong influence on

HRM practices such as employee participation and rewards’, trade unionism in the

private sector in Nigeria is weak across many industries. The informants in the public

sector allude to the importance of trade unions and the need to consult unions in

workplace decisions in order to maintain industry harmony. Some of their responses

are shown below:

Unions are always consulted on major issues affecting workers. It is also their right to engage in collective

bargaining so the bank provides them the platform to exercise this right. Because of this, there is harmony

between management and unions [Public Bank 2].

We do not undermine staff unions at all. We know what they can do when they feel aggrieved so we try as

much as possible to have peace with them [Public Hospital 2].

Surprisingly, all the private sector organizations that participated in the qualitative

interviews were not unionised. Moreover, findings from the interview data demonstrate

the anti-union stance of HR managers in these private sector organizations.

Page 11 of 23 Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 14: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

12

I completely disagree that workers have to join trade unions before their needs can be met. I can

guarantee you that employees of this bank are treated far better than those in companies where

employees have strong unions [Private Bank 3].

Trade unions can create problems and we cannot afford that here. We want workers who can provide the

best service to our clients not those who would antagonise the hospital management [Private Hospital 4].

Despite the claims of freedom of association as a fundamental human right in modern

democracies, such rights are not respected in many private organizations when it comes

to workers’ rights to belong to trade unions (Adewumi, 2012). Even where there is

union presence, the high level of unemployment may weaken the capacity of trade

unions to demand for improved conditions of work (Fajana, 2008; Adewumi, 2012).

Educational System

The poor standard of education in Nigeria affects not only the staffing needs of

organizations but also their investment in training as organizations invest substantially

in updating the skills of employees who are a product of a weak educational system

(Ovadje and Ankomah, 2001). The effect of the educational system has an impact on

staffing and training practices as could be seen in the responses below:

So for instance, the graduate trainee programme of the bank has been overhauled such that our trainees

now spend up to 3 months or in training before the actual posting is done. We also insist on candidates

with at least a second class upper in their first degrees…. But let me tell you, even at this, some of them

are still laid off after the one year probation period because they simply can’t cope! [Private Bank 3].

I think the key is to constantly train the workers as we do here… If you fail to do so, where will you get the

quality? So one way is to make quality out of what you have [Private Hospital 2].

Government Policy

The policies of government also determine how organizations tailor their human

resources practices. Since organizations do not operate in a vacuum, government

policies may set the tone for the way both public and private institutions operate,

particularly if such policies directly or indirectly affect the management of human

resources. In Nigeria, government policies such as privatization, liberalization,

monetization among others have an impact on HRM practices (Okpara and Wynn,

2008). Below are the responses indicating how HR managers perceive the influence of

government policies on HRM practices in their organizations:

It is not easy to compete with these well-established banks... You see, one bank in South Africa is bigger

than perhaps five or more banks in Nigeria… so how do you compete with them? I think if we got some

kind of incentives from the government, we can invest more in the welfare of our employees and this will

benefit the economy as a whole [Private Bank 2].

Whenever there is any policy of government that affects us, whether it is an issue of HR or any other

issue, we receive communication via circulars and the policy is implemented forthwith [Public Hospital

3].

The above responses indicate that the policies of government can directly or indirectly

impact on HRM practices in both the public and private sector in Nigeria.

Consultants

Page 12 of 23Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 15: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

13

Organizations often make use of consultants to provide expert advice on different

aspects of HRM. As the responses below indicate, the use of consultants may have an

impact on the nature of HRM practices such as staffing and training:

Consultants are involved in the recruitment and selection process of the bank. This is done in order to

avoid bias in the process and to get the most talented employees [Public Bank 1].

The hospital often gets them (consultants) to provide the best training to staff on the latest issues in the

health sector [Public Hospital 1].

It is also common for organizations to hire management consultants when faced with

uncertainty (Paauwe and Boselie, 2007). For instance, most banks in Nigeria have

embarked on massive downsizing in recent times in a bid to reduce cost. In such times

of uncertainty, organizations rely on the ‘expert’ advice of consultants. Making reference

to why the bank downsized, the HRM manger in private bank 1 had this to say:

I think the bank has regretted losing some of its best staff through downsizing. In hindsight, maybe we

should have handled the issue differently but that seemed to be the best advice we got from consultants

at that time. Considering that other banks also took that route, we couldn’t do otherwise [Private Bank 1].

Indeed, whilst consultants can recommend HRM solutions to organizations, Sturdy

(2011) emphasized the need for organizations to be cautious when seeking managerial

solutions from consultants since most of the recommendations from consultants are

aimed at instigating neo-liberal reforms in organizations. Thus, in some cases,

management consultants may act as agents for promoting neo-liberal ideologies across

different contexts (Sturdy, 2011; Dardot and Laval, 2013).

Informal Institutions

This results from informal influence on HRM practices from members of the host

community in which the organization operates. Due to the shortage of employment

opportunities in many African contexts, it is common for individuals to secure

employment through informal networks (Mellahi and Wood, 2003; Webster and Wood,

2005). Thus, the host community may prevail on the organization to consider the

interests of members of the community when filling job vacancies. This could be seen

from the responses below:

We have a deliberate policy of employing members of the community to certain positions so that we can

maintain a healthy relationship with our hosts [Private Hospital 3].

They [host community] often have complaints but as soon as the hospital employs one of their own, those

complaints suddenly disappear [Private Hospital 4].

Socio-economic Pressures

Findings from the qualitative interviews also suggest that economic pressures influence

the nature of HRM across organizations in Nigeria since organizations are not insulated

from the economic environment in which they operate. As the literature on comparative

HRM suggests, the economic conditions of countries will influence the way

organizations relate with employees (Brewster and Mayrhofer, 2012). In the case of

Page 13 of 23 Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 16: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

14

Nigeria, employees are often faced with poor economic conditions for which they rely

on employers to develop policies that will enable them cope with economic challenges

(Ovadje and Ankomah, 2001).

As a result of the high cost of rent in major cities in the country, we have housing estates where

accommodation is provided to staff at a subsidized rate [Public Bank 3].

The hospital goes the extra mile to give support to workers during hard times. Like during the fuel crisis,

the hospital took it upon itself to make available buses to transport our staff [Private Hospital 1].

Due to the poor state of infrastructure in Nigeria, responsible employers may provide

transport or housing facilities to employees to enable them cope better with work.

Although not supported by the data presented above, we assert that private sector

organizations may provide relatively less of such employee benefits due to their

emphasis on labour cost-reduction. Thus, such economic pressures may influence HRM

in both the public and private sector, particularly when it comes to providing employee

benefits.

HRM Challenges

The literature on HRM in Nigeria indicates that HR managers in Nigeria face challenges

in the performance of their duties which include ethnicity, changes in technology,

corruption, changes in government policy, HIV/AIDS, shortage of skilled manpower,

poverty, brain drain among others (Ovadje and Ankomah, 2001; Anakwe, 2002; Okpara

and Wynn, 2008; Azolukwam and Perkins, 2009). However, when asked to identify one

main challenge they faced, HR managers in the public sector were more likely to identify

changes in government policy as the major challenge of HRM as could be seen from the

responses below:

I think it (the major challenge of HRM) should be the sudden change in government policy… Every

government institution is under obligation to implement the policies of government but in a situation

whereby these policies keep changing and sometimes even conflicting is very frustrating [Public Bank 2].

Sometimes you may not even have the luck to implement one policy before another circular comes in. To

some extent, each administration wants to bring something new. For example, you have a policy today

that says all trainings should be done locally to save cost and by tomorrow another person comes in and

says foreign training is the best… Can you see that? [Public Hospital 1].

In contrast, HR mangers in the private sector identified the shortage of skilled

manpower as the most difficult challenge they faced in managing human resources.

Below are some of their responses:

…Lack of skilled workforce is by far the most difficult challenge we face and I believe others too are

grappling with this challenge because we source for talent in the same labour market… Not only is it

difficult to get the right talent, it takes a lot of money and time to train those who are available [Private

Hospital 1].

You know you cannot talk of HRM without workers and getting the right people to fit in is a very big

problem… To compound the whole situation, after spending so much to train them, some of them end up

switching to other banks to take a pay increase… it’s quite challenging [Private Bank 2].

Page 14 of 23Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 17: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

15

This indicates that although organizations in Nigeria may face similar challenges in

managing their human resources, some challenges may be more pronounced in the

private sector whilst other challenges may be felt more in the public sector.

Conclusion

The aim of this research was to explore the influence of institutions on HRM practices in

the public and private sector in Nigeria. Based on the findings from the research, it is

concluded that HRM practices such as staffing, training, rewards and employee

participation in Nigeria may be influenced by both formal and informal institutions as

well as the socio-economic conditions of the country. Moreover, these practices may

also be influenced by the organizational context as well as the context-specific

challenges of HRM. In particular, formal institutional factors such as labour laws and

trade unions are more likely to influence HRM practices in the public sector than in the

private sector as well as in large than in small organizations. Moreover, the influence of

formal institutions on HRM practices is more likely to be stronger in industries with

professionalized employee groups such as the health industry. The diversity in the

influence of formal institutions on HRM practices may stem from the weak institutional

context of Nigeria which is characterised by poor enforcement of labour legislation and

the presence of corruption, as well as the tendency of some private sector organizations

in particular to adopt neo-liberal approaches of HRM depicted by negative attitudes

towards trade unionism.

Equally influential on HRM practices in the public and private sector in Nigeria are

informal institutions such as the host community which exert some influence on hiring

practices of organizations. Moreover, the economic condition of the country arising

from poor infrastructure and high level of poverty compel some responsible

organizations to intervene by enacting practices to enable employees cope with

economic hardships. Although the extant literature on HRM in Nigeria has identified

numerous contextual challenges of HRM in Nigeria such as ethnicity, favouritism,

corruption, shortage of skilled manpower, changes in government policy, and changes

in technology among others, the major challenges confronting HRM in the public and

private sector in Nigeria were identified as changes in government policy and skilled

labour shortages respectively. This indicates that whilst organizations may be exposed

to similar HRM challenges, some of these challenges may be more profound in some

sectors than in others.

Theoretically, this study indicates that the nature of the influence of institutions on HRM

practices in Nigeria is in line with the literature on segmented business system theory

which accentuates differences in the influence of institutions on organizational

practices based on industries, sectors and size of the organization (Frynas and Wood,

2006). This research therefore adds to the literature on institutional diversity (Lane and

Wood, 2009) based on findings from an African context by showing that within a

particular national context, the influence of institutions on HRM practices may depend

Page 15 of 23 Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 18: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

16

in part on the nature of the organization. In terms of the practical implications of the

study, we recommend that policy makers in Nigeria should ensure that institutions

responsible for the enforcement of labour legislation are strengthened to function

effectively. In this way, there will be more institutional coverage across organizations in

Nigeria which will result in improved conditions of employment and will in turn result

in positive benefits to the society at large. Moreover, policy makers in Nigeria must

develop the political will to resist neo-liberal policies such as the negative attitude

towards trade unionism in the private sector imposed on the country by Bretton Woods

institutions. Although this anti-union policy have been strongly resisted in the public

sector in Nigeria, with the increased pressure from the World Bank and the IMF on the

public sector to move fully towards neo-liberal approaches, it might be a matter of time

before such approaches are embraced in future, given Nigeria’s reliance on these

supranational institutions for financial and technical assistance.

This study examined the influence of institutions on HRM in Nigeria by drawing from

the segmented business system theory. Researchers interested in African HRM should

adopt a similar framework to understand the institutional context of HRM in other

African countries. This will provide insights on whether there is a similarity or some

divergence in the segmented business system of other African contexts.

Page 16 of 23Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 19: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

17

Page 17 of 23 Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 20: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

18

References

Adegbite, E. (2012), “Corporate governance regulation in Nigeria”, The International

Journal of Business in Society, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 257-276.

Adewumi, F. (2012), “The global economy, trade unions and the protection of workers’

rights in Nigeria”, The Journal Labour and Society, Vol. 15, pp. 529-547.

Anakwe, U.P. (2002), “Human resource management practices in Nigeria: Challenges

and insights” International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 13 No. 7,

pp. 1042-1059.

Azolukwam, V.A. and Perkins, S.J. (2009), “Managerial perspectives on HRM in Nigeria:

evolving hybridization?” Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, Vol.

16 No. 1, pp. 62-82.

Botero, J., Djankov, S., La Porta, R., and Lopez-de-Silanes, F. (2004), ‘’The regulation of

labor’’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 119, No. 4, pp. 1339-1382.

Braun, V. and Clarke V. (2006), "Using thematic analysis in psychology", Qualitative

Research in Psychology, Vol. 3 No. 2 pp.77-101.

Brewster, C. and Mayrhofer, W. (2012), “Comparative human resource management: an

introduction”, in Brewster, C. and Mayrhofer, W. (Eds), Handbook of Research on

Comparative Human Resource Management, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 1-

23.

Budhwar, P.S. and Debrah, Y.A. (2001), “Introduction”, Human Resource Management in

Development Countries, Routledge, London.

Burbach, R. and Royle, T. (2014),"Institutional determinants of e-HRM diffusion

success", Employee Relations, Vol. 36 Iss 4 pp. 354 – 375.

Cooke, F.L., Wood, G. and Horwitz, F. (2015), “Multinational firms from emerging

economies in Africa: implications for research and practice in human resource

management”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 26 No.

21, pp. 2653-2675.

Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2008), Basics of qualitative research: techniques and

procedures for developing grounded theory, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Creswell, J. (2014), Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods

approaches, 4th ed., SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Dardot, P. and Laval, C. (2013), The new way of the world: on neoliberal society, Verso,

London.

Dibben, P. and Wood, G. (2013), “Privatization and employment relations in Africa”, in

Newenham-Kahindi, A., Kamoche, K., Chizema, A., and Mellahi, K. (Eds), Effective

people management in Africa, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, GB, pp. 72-94.

Page 18 of 23Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 21: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

19

DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W.W. (1983), “The iron cage revisited: institutional

isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American

Sociological Review, Vol. 48, pp. 147-60.

Ellis, F.Y.A., Nyuur, R.B. and Debrah, Y.A. (2015), Human resource management in Africa.

In F. Horwitz and P. Budhwar, eds., Handbook of Human Resource Management in

Emerging Markets, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 393–425.

Fajana, S. (2008),"The Nigerian informal economy: instigating decent work and pay, and

national development through unionisation", Employee Relations, Vol. 30 Iss 4 pp.

372 – 390.

Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (2001), ‘’An introduction to varieties of capitalism’’, in Hall, P.

and Soskice, D. (Eds), Varieties of capitalism: the institutional basis for competitive

advantage, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Horwitz, F. and Budhwar, P. (2015), “Human resource management in emerging

markets: an introduction, in Horwitz, F. and Budhwar, P. (Eds), Handbook of

Human Resource Management in Emerging Markets, Edward Elgar Publishing,

Cheltenham, UK, pp. 1-16.

Huang, Q. and Gamble J. (2011), “Informal institutional constraints and their impact on

HRM and employee satisfaction: evidence from China’s retail sector”, International

Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 22 No.15, pp. 3168-3186.

Jackson, S.E. and Schuler, R.S. (1995), “Understanding human resource management in

the context of organizations and their environments”, Annual Review of Psychology,

Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 237-264.

Jackson, T. (2004), Management and Change in Africa: a Cross-cultural Perspective,

Routledge, London.

Johnson, P. and Duberley, J. (2015), ‘’Inductive praxis and management research:

towards a reflexive framework’’, British Journal of Management, vol. 26, pp. 760-

776.

Kostova, T. and Roth, K. (2002), “Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries

of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects”, Academy of

Management Journal, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 215-233.

Lane, C. and Wood, G. (2009). ‘’Capitalist diversity and diversity within capitalism’’,

Economy and Society, vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 531-551.

Miles, M.B. and Huberman, M.A. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis, SAGE, Thousand Oaks,

CA.

Page 19 of 23 Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 22: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

20

Mustapha (2009), “Institutionalising ethnic representation: how effective is affirmative

action in Nigeria?”, Journal of International Development, Vol. 21, pp. 561-576.

Okpara, J.O. and Wynn, P. (2008), “Human resource management practices in a

transition economy: challenges and prospects”, Management Research News Vol.

31 No. 1, pp. 57-76.

Ovadje, F. and Ankomah, A. (2001), ‘’Human resource management in Nigeria”, in

Budhwar, A. and Debrah, Y. (Eds.), Human resource management in developing

countries, Routledge, London, pp. 174-190.

Paauwe, J. and Boselie, P. (2007), “HRM and societal embeddedness”, in Boxall, P.,

Purcell, and Wright, P. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of HRM, Oxford University

Press, New York, pp. 166-184.

Polsa, P., Spens, K., Soneye, A. and Antai, I. (2011), "Comparing the perceived quality of

private and public health services in Nigeria", Journal of Management Policy and

Practice, Vol. 12 No. 7, pp.18–26.

Rainey, H.G. (2014), Understanding and managing public organizations, Jossey-Bass, San

Francisco, CA.

Scott, W.R. (2008), “Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory”,

Theory and Society, Vol. 37, pp. 427-442.

Steele, J., Bourke, L., Luloff, A.E., Liao, P-E., Theodori, G.L. & Krannich, R.S. (2001), "The

drop-off/pick-up method for household survey research", Journal of Community

Development Society, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp.238–250.

Sturdy, A. (2011), "Consultancy’s consequences? a critical assessment of management

consultancy’s impact on management", British Journal of Management, Vol. 22 No.

3, pp.517–530.

Vaiman, V. and Brewster, C. (2015), "How far do cultural differences explain the

differences between nations? Implications for HRM", The International Journal of

Human Resource Management, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp.151–164.

Webster, E. and Wood, G. (2005), "Human resource management practice and

institutional constraints: The case of Mozambique", Employee Relations, Vol. 27 No.

4, pp.369–385.

Whitley, R. (1999), Divergent capitalisms: the social structuring and change of business

systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Wood, G. and Frynas, G. (2006). “The institutional basis of economic failure: anatomy of

the segmented business system”, Socio-Economic Review, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp.239-

277.

Wood, G. and Horwitz, F. (2015), “Theories and institutional approaches to HRM and

employment relations in selected emerging markets”, in Horwitz, F. and Budhwar,

Page 20 of 23Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 23: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

21

P. (Eds), Handbook of Human Resource Management in Emerging Markets, Edward

Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 19-41.

Wood, G., Dibben, P., Stride, C. and Webster, E. (2011), ‘’HRM in Mozambique:

homogenization, path dependence or segmented business system?’’ Journal of

World Business, Vol. 46, pp. 31-41.

Wood, G., Psychogios, A., Szamosi, L.T. and Collings, D. (2012), “Institutional approaches

to comparative HRM”, in Brewster, C. and Mayrhofer, W. (Eds), Handbook of

Research on Comparative Human Resource Management, Edward Elgar,

Cheltenham, UK, pp. 27-50.

Page 21 of 23 Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 24: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

c

Figure 1: The Conceptual Framework

Institutional Factors

National Labour Laws (e.g.

Labour act; the constitution;

minimum wage act)

Trade Unions

Government Policy (e.g.

Privatization and liberalization)

Educational system (Quality of

education; skill availability)

Professional Bodies

(professional norms and

socialization)

International institutions (e.g.

Donors)

Informal institutions (Social

networks; kinship; societal

norms etc.)

HRM Practices

Staffing

Training

Rewards

Employee Participation

Organizational Context

Sector (Public, private, non-

profit sectors)

Industry (e.g. banking, health,

manufacturing, ICT etc)

Size of organization (in terms

of number of employees

HRM Challenges

Corruption

Ethnicity, nepotism & favouritism

Technological changes

Political instability

Skill shortages

HIV/AIDS, etc

Page 22 of 23Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

Page 25: Institutional context and human resource management in Nigeria

Employee Relations

Table 1: ANCOVA predicting the influence of institutions on HRM from industry, sector and size

Predictor variables Dependent variables measuring the influence of institutions

National

labour

laws

Trade

unions

Professional

bodies

Education

system

International

institutions

Government

policy

B B B B B B

Intercept 3.219** 4.601** 3.545** 2.569** 2.165** 3.087**

Industry dummy: Banking/Finance (vs

Manufacturing)

0.295 -1.831** -0.085 0.198 0.327 0.733*

Industry dummy: Education (vs

Manufacturing)

0.632 -1.440** -0.471 -0.095 -0.123 0.132

Industry dummy: Hospitals (vs

Manufacturing)

0.166 -1.195** 1.093** 0.040 0.032 0.324

Industry dummy: Hotels (vs

Manufacturing)

0.229 -1.152** -0.193 -0.475 -0.266 -1.202**

Industry dummy: Government MDAs (vs

Manufacturing)

0.806** 1.397** -0.018 0.069 0.432 0.544

Industry dummy: ICT/Media (vs

Manufacturing)

0.464 -1.484** 0.252 -0.123 0.523 -0.056

Industry dummy: Tport (vs

Manufacturing)

0.053 -1.009* 0.358 -0.299 -0.007 -0.751

Sector: Private (vs Public) -0.144 -2.683** -0.606 -0.527 -0.399 -0.832*

Size (No. of employees) 0.216** 0.161 -0.018 0.026 0.095 -0.003

N=122 **p<0.01 *p<0.05. Tport = Transport

Page 23 of 23 Employee Relations

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60