104
Instructional Decision Making Session One 2010-11

Instructional Decision Making Session One

  • Upload
    jalena

  • View
    30

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Instructional Decision Making Session One. 2010-11. Who is here today?. • Presenters • School Introductions. Logistics. Facilities Breaks Parking Lot Today will be interactive, ask questions whenever you want Use the parking lot to post questions Contacts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Instructional Decision Making

Session One2010-11

Page 2: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Who is here today?

• Presenters• School Introductions

Page 3: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Logistics

• Facilities• Breaks• Parking Lot

– Today will be interactive, ask questions whenever you want

– Use the parking lot to post questions• Contacts

– Wendy Robinson (1-800-362-2720 Ext. 14548)– Shannon Harken (Cell: 641-891-1651)

[email protected]

Page 4: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Outcomes

Participants will be able to: • Paraphrase a definition of

IDM.• State the purpose of a Building

Leadership Team (BLT).• Describe the roles/functions

on the BLT necessary to support systemic change.

• Identify and describe the 3 phases of IDM

Teams will be able to:

• Compare the guiding principles of IDM to building’s current practice.

• Summarize the benefits of IDM.

• Recognize the commitments necessary for IDM.

Page 5: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Warm-Up

• IDM Prior Knowledge Handout• Complete the first column: What do you

know/understand about IDM at this time?

• Columns 2 and 3 will be completed at the end of the day!

Page 6: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

One Perspective on HistoryOur education system has grown up

through a process of “Disjointed Incrementalism” (Reynolds, 1988)

The currentEducationSystem’sProgrammaticEvolution

K-12 Education

Gifted

Title 1

SPED

Migrant

ELLAt Risk

Page 7: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Unintended Effects

• Conflicting programs• Conflicting funding streams• Redundancy• Lack of coordination across

programs• Nonsensical rules about

program availability for students

• Extreme complexity in administration and implementation of the programs

Page 8: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

In Short: We Need

One Instructional Decision Making System

Page 9: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

The Research Behind IDM

• Effective Schools Research– Nationally = Response to Intervention (RTI)

• Same concepts organized into a systemic approach

• Focus on instruction and student outcomes

Page 10: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Definition of Instructional Decision Making (IDM)

A set of systems and strategies designed to increase the capacity of schools to educate all students and increase student achievement and behavioral success.

Page 11: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

IDM Content Areas

MathReading

Behavior(PBIS

)

IDMIT’S ALL ABOUT

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT!

Page 12: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Instructional Decision Making…

Is Not IsAn instructional program A framework to implement effective

practicesIntended to encourage placement of students

Matching needs and resources

Possible to implement alone A collaborative effort

The same for every school Uniquely designed for each building

A special education, a general education, a Title 1, a Talented and Gifted initiative

An “Every” Education Initiative

Page 13: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

What is the Rationale for Instructional Decision Making?

• We need one process in our schools to make instructional decisions that are:– Efficient– Proactive– Based on early intervention– Used to match resources to needs– Integrated– Focused on student learning

Page 14: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Guiding Principles of IDM

1. ALL students are part of ONE proactive educational system

– Belief that ALL students can learn– Use ALL available resources to teach

ALL students• Proactive approach uses data early to determine student

needs and intervene.• Reactive approach intervenes after students have shown a

history of failure to meet expectations/or when learning “flat lines” due to lack of challenge.

Page 15: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Guiding Principles of IDM

2. Use scientific, research-basedinstruction

• Curriculum and instructional approaches must have a high probability of success for most students.

• Use instructional time efficiently and effectively.

Page 16: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Guiding Principles of IDM

3. Use instructionally relevant assessments• Reliable and valid • Multiple purposes– Screening- Collecting data for the purpose of identifying

low and high performing students at-risk for not having their needs met

– Diagnostic- Gathering information from multiple sources to determine why students are not benefiting from instruction

– Formative- Frequent, ongoing collection of information including both formal and informal data to guide instruction

Page 17: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Guiding Principles of IDM

4. Use a problem-solving method to make decisions based on a continuum of students needs• Provides strong core curriculum, instruction,

assessment (core cycle)• Provides increasing levels of support based on

intensity of student needs.

Page 18: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Continuous

Improvement

Cycle

Needs Assessment

Planning

Implementing

Evaluating

No Fail Model (See handout)

Page 19: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

In The Past

GeneralEducation

Title Reading or

Other Reading Support

Special Education

Some “Fell’”Through

Some “Fell’”Through

Page 20: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

IDM: Full Continuum of Support

GeneralEducation

Title Reading & Reading Support,

Gifted Ed.

Special Education,Gifted Ed.IIIIIIII

all along the continuum!I =

Page 21: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Guiding Principles of IDM

5. Data are used to guide instructional decisions

• To match curriculum and instruction to assessment data

• To allocate resources • To drive professional development decisions

Page 22: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Guiding Principles of IDM

6. Quality professional development supports effective instruction for all students.• Provide ongoing training and support to

assimilate new knowledge and skills• Anticipate and be willing to meet the newly

emerging needs based on student performance

Page 23: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Guiding Principles of IDM

7. Leadership is vital • Strong administrative support to ensure

commitment and resources• Strong teacher support to share in the common

goal of improving instruction• Building leadership team to build internal

capacity and sustainability over time

Page 24: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Activity 1:Compare IDM Guiding Principles to Current Educational

Philosophy and Practices

• Review the Guiding Principles of IDM

• Individually complete:Compare IDM Guiding Principles to Your Building’s Current Practices sheet

• Share and discuss at your table

Page 25: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

The IDM Conceptual Model-The “Big Picture” Viewpoint

Page 26: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

IDM CYCLES: Core, Supplemental, Intensive

IDM Cycles• Curriculum• Instruction• Assessments

Core

Supplemental

Intensive

Page 27: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

IDM CYCLES

IOWA COREContent

Instruction Assessment

Page 28: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Core Cycle Defined

Iowa Core • intended • taught• assessed

• Strong enough to ensure that at least 80% of the students meet

proficiency with differentiation• Generally received by all students at grade level

• access to general education curriculum• opportunity to demonstrate mastery of it

Page 29: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Iowa Core

Iowa Core– A state-wide effort to improve teaching and

learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum

– Provides a comprehensive picture of effective curriculum that addresses:• 1) content 2) instruction and 3) assessment• Essential Skills and Concepts• Technical Assistance

– Can access through Heartland Website

Page 30: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

The Water…

IC

A

Focus on “the water”- • Curriculum • Instruction • Assessment

Page 31: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Activity 2

• Discuss at your table:Who from your building, is attending

Iowa Core Leadership Training?What is or will be, your building’s plan to

communicate information between those attending Iowa Core Leadership Team training and IDM professional development?

Page 32: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Differentiation Through IDM

MathReading

Behavior(PBIS

)

IDM Differentiation is a belief and a process.Teachers embrace and engage in differentiation to enhance students’ learning by improving the match between learners’ unique characteristics and components of curriculum, instruction, assessment, and environment.

Page 33: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

SupplementalCore

Supplemental

IDM CYCLES

Page 34: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Supplemental Cycle Guidelines

• Must be designed to match identified needs

• Should always be based on student data

• Almost always given in small groups

• On-going data determines need to continue, discontinue, or change curriculum, instruction, and/or assessment

Page 35: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Supplemental Cycle: Guidelines for Students that are Less than Proficient

• Is in addition to and aligns with the district core cycle

• Uses more explicit instruction• Provides more intensity

– Additional modeling and guided feedback

– Immediacy of feedback• Does NOT replace core

Core

S

Page 36: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Established - Benchmark

Emerging - Strategic

Deficit - Intensive

For struggling readers, just making progress isn’t good enough.

Time

Benchmark 1 Benchmark 2 Benchmark 3

Trajectory- “the path a projectile makes under the action of given forces such as thrust, wind and gravity.” --Encarta World English Dictionary

Score

Page 37: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

When curriculum, instruction, and assessments are working together…

Established - Benchmark

Score

Time

Benchmark 1 Benchmark 2 Benchmark 3

Page 38: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Supplemental Cycle: Guidelines for Students who are Highly Proficient

• Enriches core instruction/content

• Accelerates core instruction/content

• Accelerate pace of core• Groups within, across

and/or outside the classroom

• Provides greater complexity and abstraction

Core

S

Page 39: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Students who are Highly Proficient

• Grade level expectations can create too low a ceiling

• An “A” can be a barrier, not a reward

Grade Level Expectations

Page 40: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

IntensiveCore

Supplemental

Intensive

IDM CYCLES

Page 41: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Intensive Cycle Guidelines

• Must be designed to match identified needs • Should always be based on diagnostic student

data• Provided in small groups or individually• On-going data determines need to continue,

discontinue, or change curriculum, instruction, and/or assessment

Page 42: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Intensive Cycle: Students who are Less than Proficient

• In addition to and aligns with the district core cycle• Uses diagnostic data to more precisely target to

student need • Smaller instructional groups• More instructional time• More detailed modeling and demonstration of skill• More extensive opportunities for guided practice• More opportunities for error correction and feedback

Page 43: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Supplemental vs. Intensive Cycle for Students who are Less than Proficient

• More in-depth diagnostic assessment• Amount of instructional time• Length of time presumed to remediate the student’s

skill problems• Intensity of materials/instruction• Frequency of monitoring • Group size

Page 44: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

When curriculum, instruction, and assessments are working together…

Established - Benchmark

Score

Time

Benchmark 1 Benchmark 2 Benchmark 3

Page 45: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Intensive Cycle for Students that are Highly Proficient

• Falls within the Iowa Core

• May be:–advanced levels of curriculum–enrichment–acceleration

Page 46: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Supplemental vs Intensive Cycle: Students who are Highly Proficient

• Higher levels of prior knowledge• More rapid pace of learning• Deeper level of conceptual of

understanding• Greater capacity for complexity and

abstraction• Greater capacity to make connections

within and across disciplines

Page 47: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Cycles in Implementing IDM

IDM instructional groups are flexible and frequently changingbased on the data.

Core

Supplemental

Intensive

Page 48: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Activity 3

Brainstorm possible benefits of IDM with the person next to you.

Page 49: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Benefits Of IDM

IDM will help you to: – Know immediately, “Is what we are doing

working?” – Know which students need more/different– Know what each student needs– Provide structures to deliver what students

need– Raise student achievement

Page 50: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Video of Lynnville Sully

Page 51: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

3-2-1 Activity

3 connections between the video and what you heard this morning

2 things you think would work in your context

1 question

Page 52: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

How Does it Fit Together?IDM At A Glance

Addl.Diagnostic

AssessmentInstruction Results

Monitoring

IndividualDiagnostic

IndividualizedIntensive

All Students at a grade level

Fall Winter Spring

UniversalScreening

None ContinueWithCore

Instruction

GradesClassroom

AssessmentsYearly ITBS/ITED

GroupDiagnostic

SmallGroupDifferentiatedBy Skill

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4

CS

I1-5%

80-90%

5-10%

weekly

2 times/month

Page 53: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

“Beyond Islands of Excellence”

Page 54: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Activity 4: IDM Conceptual Model & Benefits

• Take out “Beyond Islands of Excellence” article• Get in groups of Seven• Number off from one to seven• Everyone read pages 1 to 3 of “Beyond Islands

of Excellence”• Each person read corresponding numbered

finding (persons number 1, read finding 1, etc…)• Make notes on the key points from your section

Page 55: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Activity 4: IDM Conceptual Model & Benefits

As a group• Begin with #1, briefly share the major points

each section 1-7• Discussion Question:

Given the findings from this study, what are the similarities/differences between the findings and IDM? Record on Note Sheet

Page 56: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Activity 5: Situational Role Play

After your meeting today, your IDM Leadership team returns to your building.Two teachers, who were not at the IDM training, stop you in the hallway. They are very interested in the “large binders” you are carrying and start asking you the following questions:

1) What is this “IDM” thing?2) What are those circles?3) Why would someone “do IDM?”

As a team, brainstorm some possible responses.Share with a person from another table.

Page 57: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

The IDM Operational Model-Moving IDM from Theory to Practice

Page 58: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Three Phases

Three Phases• Consensus Building (Commitment)• Infrastructure Development• Implementation

Page 59: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

CONSENSUS

Page 60: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Consensus Building

• Explanation of ‘why’– Provides the foundation for all work– Increases sustainability– Is a combination of vision and support

• Intended benefits– Increases personal investment

• Validation of concerns– Provides information to decrease anxiety and

support change

Page 61: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

IDM Consensus Building Phase

• Explanation of ‘why’-– Provides one process in our schools to drive instructional decisions.

• Intended benefits– IDM (Academic) Raise student achievement– PBIS (Behavior Decrease problem behaviors and increase

school safety and academic performance• Validation of concerns

– CHANGE=CONCERNS– Leadership teams will validate and work through concerns, based

on knowledge and data. Everyone will be “learning and working together.”

Page 62: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Consensus Building is Integral

CONSENSUS

Page 63: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Infrastructure Development PhaseMajor structures necessary to support the implementation and sustainability of IDM: -Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment in Core, Supplemental, and Intensive Cycles- Leadership Team- Professional Development- Resources (time, people, money)- District/Building policy and procedures- Communication plan- Action plan across all 3 phases

Page 64: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Infrastructure Development

• The infrastructure can be built by answering a series of questions.

• These questions become the framework.

• The questions guide the work.• The process is continuous.

Page 65: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

1. Is our core cycle sufficient?2. If the core is not sufficient, why not?3. How will needs identified in core be addressed?4. How will the sufficiency and effectiveness of the core cycle

be monitored over time?5. Have improvements to the core been effective?6. For which students is the core cycle sufficient and not

sufficient, and why?7. What specific supplemental and intensive

instruction/curriculum is needed?8. How will specific supplemental and intensive cycles be

implemented?9. How will the effectiveness of supplemental and intensive

cycles be monitored?10. Which students need to move to a different cycle?

Framework Questions

Page 66: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Action Plan

Action plan addresses all 3 phases of the IDM Operational Model

– Ensures mindful planning for consensus building

– Captures the infrastructure development steps– Is the “Road Map” for Implementation

Page 67: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Implementation Phase

This is where all of the planning pays off!

The process of bringing the action plan to life…

– Revisit the supports designed during the infrastructure phase

– Revisit consensus building

Page 68: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term

CONSENSUS

Page 69: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Activity 6:Explaining the Operational Model

Scenario practice – Complete independently– Find a partner

Take turns describing why you chose the answer you did

Page 70: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Commitment for This Year -What Does it Take?

• 6 planned professional development days• Structured work days (optional onsite)• Establish a leadership team• Frequent team meetings (minimum of one time per

month outside of planned professional development)

• Active administrative participation and support• Action Plan development and follow through• IDM outcomes evaluation

Page 71: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Purpose of Outcomes Evaluation (PESA) of IDM

• Primary purpose:– To help schools (and AEA) answer: “Is

what we are doing working?”• Secondary purpose:

– To create a profile of performance and need

We are asking for your cooperation in helping us to evaluate this work.

Page 72: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Outcomes Evaluationof IDM

• Schedule times for site visit• Obtain written consent to collect

student outcome data• Organization system will be

necessary• Results of evaluation will be shared in

a report

Page 73: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Leadership and Learning

Page 74: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Basic Assumptions that Link Leadership and Learning

• The opportunity to lead is inherently self-motivating.• Everyone is capable of developing and exercising

leadership.• Leadership is expressed in a variety of ways. • There are many domains within leadership that can

be exercised.• A school’s culture either supports or diminishes the

ability to develop shared leadership.

National Institute for Urban School Improvement www.urbanschools.org

Page 75: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

IDM: Guiding Principle #7

• #7 Leadership is vital– Strong administrative support to ensure

commitment and resources– Strong teacher support to share in the

common goal of improving instruction– Leadership team to build internal capacity

and sustainability over time

Page 76: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

The Building Leadership Team (BLT)

The Building Leadership Team is a group of people, representing the larger school community, who collaborate through a structure of shared leadership in order to increase student learning and achievement.

National Institute for Urban School Improvement www.urbanschools.org

Page 77: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Why Building Leadership Teams?

1. Research shows that schools with strong collaborative leadership are the most successful in supporting student achievement.

2. Experience tells us that those closest to the students are most capable of making the best, most meaningful educational decisions.

National Institute for Urban School Improvement www.urbanschools.org

Page 78: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Why Building Leadership Teams?

3. Shared leadership and decision making enables the school to increase its leadership capacity in order to manage change.

4. Broad involvement helps foster ownership; a commitment to the systems change on the part of the entire school community.

National Institute for Urban School Improvement www.urbanschools.org

Page 79: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Why Building Leadership Teams?

5. Organizing a small group makes it easier to move the process forward in

an efficient fashion.

National Institute for Urban School Improvement www.urbanschools.org

Page 80: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Why Building Leadership Teams?

6. Team structures ensure effective communication in planning for improvement of school programs.

7. Team leadership helps to facilitate rapid and sustained change.

National Institute for Urban School Improvement www.urbanschools.org

Page 81: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Purpose of the Building Leadership Team in IDM

Purposes:• Participate in planning and contribute to decisions

regarding implementation of IDM• Communicate with other staff and stakeholders

– Staff: minimum of 3 times a year– Stakeholders: minimum of 1 time a year

• Participate in data analysis and decision-making within IDM framework once established

• Adapt core features of IDM to local context• Coordinate efforts school-wide to improve student

learning and achievement

Page 82: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Effective Team Skills to Increase Likelihood of Success

1. Communication

2. Decision-making

3. Conflict management

4. Use of data

5. Cohesiveness The Handbook for Smart School Teams

Page 83: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Teaming Skills - Communication

Four types of communication are Important in teamwork:

1. Sharing

2. Discussion

3. Dialogue

4. Active listening

Page 84: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Sharing Ways to build communication into your team’s everyday work:• Maintain accurate records of meetings• Check in with team members between

meetings• Share information with people not on the

team• Invite feedback as a normal course of

interaction on the team

Page 85: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Discussion

Personal: – express ideas clearly

Team: – techniques to stimulate thinking– techniques to guide discussion in

productive ways.

Page 86: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

DialoguePurpose

– to create mutual understanding

Advocacy – making one’s point of view known

Inquiry – asking others to make their thinking or

point of view visible

Page 87: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Active Listening• Purpose

– where you really hear and understand what someone else is saying

• Three strategies for active listening1. Paraphrasing2. Perception checking3. Probing

Page 88: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Establishing a Building Leadership Team

Team is representative of staff. Administrator is active member of team.

• Grade level teams• Principal• Guidance • Specials• Diverse Learner Teacher:

• Title• Special Education• Reading Recovery • Gifted and Talented• English Language Learners

Page 89: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Building Leadership Teams

• Keeping the school staff and parents informed about the decisions and activities of the BLT is critical to maintaining and enhancing a leadership team.

• It is important to develop a communication process that keeps stakeholders informed.

Page 90: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Building Leadership Teams

Determine constituents – Each BLT member has a number of people or groups who

are their constituents BLT members

– Communicate the work and decisions of the BLT to constituents.

– Gather input from constituents to inform decisions– Develop culture through small group structured dialogue

and providing differentiated individual support – Provide order through designing predictable routines and

procedures

Page 91: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Activity 7 Determining Constituents

1. Make a list of possible constituents.

2. Determine how communication will occur.

3. Record on constituent sheet.

Page 92: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Roles/Skills

• There are more skills required to do this work than any one person alone can provide.

• As a team you will fill the needed roles/skills.

• It is helpful to talk about them and understand who is going to do what.

• One person may fill multiple roles. • Roles may be filled by multiple people.

Page 93: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Building Leadership Teams

Roles• Administrator• Data Coach• Content Coach• Internal Coach - School team member• AEA Support Person

Page 94: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Administrator • Provide instructional leadership• Secure resources and master schedule• Alert external coach of building needs• Identify support needed by leadership

team• Facilitate communication with all staff• Attend all IDM sessions

Page 95: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Data Coach

• Coordinate data management • Work with District or AEA support

person to determine school data needs• Generate visual displays of data to

provide teacher• Attend all sessions where PD around

data collection is conducted

Page 96: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Content Coach• Has in-depth knowledge of content

area to be addressed (reading, math, behavior)

• Knows best practice research• Has good curriculum knowledge• Knows effective instructional

practices.• Facilitate others’ learning of content

Page 97: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Internal Coach• Ensures BLT: – meetings are scheduled – times and place are communicated to others– agendas are created – group remains focused on agenda and necessary tasks• Monitors effectiveness of the IDM process• Contacts AEA support person with building

needs

Page 98: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

AEA SUPPORT

• Provides support as needed• Includes:

– PLLCs to provide support with professional development– Content Consultants– Assessment Consultants– For certain cases, School Psychologist & Consultants– Media Support– Technology Support– Etc.

Page 99: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Activity 8: Role Assignments

1. Determine area of strength and interest on the team.

2. Assign role/function.

3. Record on Role Sheet

4. Set monthly BLT meetings and record.

Page 100: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Home Play

• Complete sheet with team role assignments, meeting schedule, and date for overview.

• Conduct an overview of IDM for the building.

• At the next session– Be prepared to share– Turn in ONE copy of sheet

Page 101: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Return to Warm-Up

• IDM Prior Knowledge Handout• Review your answers in the first

column: What do you know/understand about IDM at this time?

• Mark Column 2 OR 3 • Share with your neighbor.

Page 102: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Quote of the Day

Even if you are on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there.

Will Rogers

Page 103: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Heartland AEA Contact for IDM - Academic

• Regional - Professional Learning and Leadership Consultant, Partnership Director– NW, Regions 1,2, 4, and 5 -Jenny Sumner, Suzanne,

Holmes-Bunde, and Alicia Pauley – NE, Regions 6, 7, 8, and 14- Mary Jo Brown, Kathy

Scebold, and Stephanie VerHelst– SW, Regions 3, 10, and 11- Tiffanie Almeida, Mary

Montgomery, and Kristin Orton– SE, Regions 9, 12, 14, Sheila Fay and Pam Childers

Page 104: Instructional  Decision Making Session One

Agency Wide Contacts

• Agency-wide – Wendy Robinson (1-800-362-2720 Ext. 14548)– Shannon Harken (641-891-1651) Cell