Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Filip Cernik, CTU Prague
Integrated 1D Simulation for a Large Low-Speed 2-Stroke Marine Engine
2
Injector Model
OUTLINE
Combustion Routine
Exhaust Valve Drive Model
Integrated Simulation
Summary
Introduction
© WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation
Introduction
Injector Model
Combustion Routine
Exhaust Valve Drive Model
Integrated Simulation
Summary
3 © WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation
Motivation
Develop an integrated standalone model including the engine, fuel injector and exhaust valve drive for a large, low-speed 2-stroke marine engine application
Engine Characteristics
Large low-speed 2-stroke uniflow-scavenged turbocharged diesel or DF engine
Variable exhaust valve with hydraulic actuation
Common rail injection system for both MDO/HFO
Fuel Actuated Sacless Injectors (FAST)
ICC for optimum engine performance
Both Diesel & DF versions IMO Tier3 compliant
INTRODUCTION
4 © WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation
Engine Power [kW] 21‘660
Number of cylinders 6
Bore [mm] 720
Stroke [mm] 3086
Engine speed [rpm] 84.0
Piston speed [m/s] 8.6
Compression Ratio [-] 18.8
Boost pressure, ISO [barg] 3.6
Fuel rail pressure [bar] 950
Number of injectors per cylinder 3
dimensions in [m]
W6X
72 E
ngin
e Sp
ecifi
catio
n (C
MC
R) INTRODUCTION
5 © WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation
EXHAUST VALVE ENGINE INJECTOR
EV lift profile
p-cyl p-exh
p-servo EVO/EVC
injection rate
p-cyl p-rail
IT load
user combustion model
caburn00a, dwi1,dmascomb
INTRODUCTION
6 © WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation
Injector Model
Introduction
Combustion Routine
Exhaust Valve Drive Model
Integrated Simulation
Summary
© WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation 7
Flow Fuse
© WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation 8
INJECTOR MODEL
p_Inj1_2
Control Valve
Inj Valve Spring
Needle
InjNozzConn
Nee
dle
Lift
Inj V
eloc
ity
Mas
s Fl
ow
Pre
ssur
e D
rop
INJECTOR MODEL
Simulation at 100,75,50,25% load at constant p-rail
Very good match for injection pressure at all load points
Pressure drop at SOI & oscillation frequency after EOI well captured
Lower pulsation peaks since only single injector simulated (3 injectors measured)
Unfortunately, no needle lift measurements available for further validation
9 © WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation
measured data in blue!
Pres
sure
(100
%)
Pres
sure
(50%
)
Pres
sure
(75%
) Pr
essu
re (2
5%)
Combustion Routine
Introduction
Injector Model
Exhaust Valve Drive Model
Integrated Simulation
Summary
© WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation 10
-2.0°CA SOI 2.8°CA 4.6 °CA 6.4°CA 8.2 °CA 10.4 °CA 13.6°CA 17.2°CA 20.0°CA
EOI
COMBUSTION ROUTINE
20.3bar MEP, 950bar, 1/230x real time
Time scale combustion model
Simplified TKE solution validated against CFD
Spray penetration/angle correlation derived from experimental investigations in SCC
Burn rate dependency on injection rate profile & spray interactions
Implementation into GT-Suite by means of user routine
𝑑𝑑𝑓,𝑏,𝑑𝑑𝑓𝑓
𝑑𝑑= 𝐶
1𝜏𝑑𝑑𝑓𝑓
𝑑𝑓,𝑢𝑢
© WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation 11
Exhaust Valve Drive Model
Introduction
Injector Model
Combustion Routine
Integrated Simulation
Summary
© WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation 12
p_VCUaftRod2
p_VCUin2
p_AirSp2
p_EVin2
p_EVDamp2 (no signal)
p_EV1Pist2
Spool lift
EV lift
VALV
E C
ON
TRO
L U
NIT
(VC
U)
HYD
RAU
LIC EX
HAU
ST VALVE DR
IVE
Detailed hydraulic exhaust valve drive model
Calibration & validation done against measurements
gas force
EXHAUST VALVE DRIVE
© WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation 13
EXHAUST VALVE DRIVE
© WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation 14
Simulation results compared against measured signals for hydraulic circuit as well as for air spring pressure and EV lift
Good level of model predictivity
Fine tuning of restrictive parts (orifice, subvolume) in order to maximize ∆t
Optimum between run time and model sensitivity has been found
EXHAUST VALVE DRIVE
p-servo oil variation engine load sweep
© WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation 15
EV lift simulation in agreement with measurements over the entire engine load range
Correct response on servo-oil pressure variations reflected in the opening velocity response
Valv
e Li
ft
Valv
e Li
ft
Integrated Simulation
Introduction
Injector Model
Combustion Routine
Exhaust Valve Drive Model
Summary
© WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation 16
Integrated simulation performed for a typical 2-s marine engine load sweep on the propeller curve
Results validated against experimental engine data
Cylinder pressure traces fit well the test data for both compression and firing peaks
INTEGRATED SIMULATION
© WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation 17
In order to minimize the CPU time following measures were applied: Reduction of the detailed engine into a single cylinder engine (SCE) model
GT circuit solution - each flow and mechanical circuit takes its own ∆t
Flow circuits: engine, EV and injector
ODE (mechanical) circuits: crankshaft, EV mechanics (implicit integrator), Injector mechanics
Sensitivity study on components that limit ∆t the most, such as small volumes/pipes
Cycle skipping of hydro-mechanical circuits
‘InjNozzConn’ (injector nozzle holes) allows injector calculation to shutoff, saving CPU time
EV flow circuit linked to the injector circuit by zero-orifice to enable EV cycle skipping
© WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation 18
INTEGRATED SIMULATION
CPU time for 100% load case
Detailed engine model basis 63 min SCE model w/ inj skip 23 min SCE model w/inj skip optimized 11 min Use skip improvements in v2016 3 min
© WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation 19
INTEGRATED SIMULATION zoom-in all circuits
∆t constrained mainly for the injector flow circuit
EV hydraulics present limitation especially during the scavenging period
Engine flow & mechanics allow large ∆t
Summary
Introduction
Injector Model
Combustion Routine
Exhaust Valve Drive Model
Integrated Simulation
© WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation 20
SUMMARY
Integrated simulation model for a large diesel 2-stroke marine engine derived & validated
Individual models as well as the integrated runs in good agreement with measurements
Model reduction and optimization reduces CPU time considerably
Integrated simulation eliminates multiple SW license costs and omits time consuming iterations for individual engine components
Present approach enhances system level analysis and accelerates development process
Potential for further run time reduction (v2016, Injection Rate Map)
© WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation 21
Shawn Harnish Gamma Technologies
prof. Jan Macek CTU Prague
Sebastian Hensel Christoph Dahnz Yongfeng Jia winGD
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
© WinGD, 26-Oct-2015 - GT User’s Conference Frankfurt / Integrated 1D Simulation 22
23
Thank you for your attention!