Integrated Development of the Shtokman Gas 1 introduction 1-1 1.1 this document 1-1 1.2 objectives of the plan 1-1 1.3 contents of the plan 1-2 2 brief description of the project 2-

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world

Integrated Development of the Shtokman Gas – Condensate Field Phase 1 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Stakeholder Engagement and Information Disclosure Plan Shtokman Development AG 19 October 2009

Shtokman Devlopment AG

Integrated Development of the Shtokman Gas – Condensate Field Phase 1 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment

Stakeholder Engagement & Information Disclosure Plan

October 2009 Reference 0099936

Prepared by: Alistair Fulton and Elena Amirkhanova

For and on behalf of Environmental Resources Management Approved by: Don MacIntyre

Position: Partner Date: 19 October 2009

This report has been prepared by Environmental Resources Management the trading name of Environmental Resources Management Limited, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at their own risk.

CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION 1-1

1.1 THIS DOCUMENT 1-1 1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE PLAN 1-1 1.3 CONTENTS OF THE PLAN 1-2

2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 2-4

2.1 SHTOKMAN PROJECT OVERVIEW 2-4 2.2 OFFSHORE PROJECT ELEMENTS 2-4 2.3 PIPELINE SYSTEM ELEMENTS 2-7 2.4 ONSHORE PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY 2-9 2.5 ABOUT SDAG 2-13

3 OVERVIEW OF REQUIREMENTS FOR STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE 3-14

3.1 NATIONAL LEGISLATION REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND

DISCLOSURE 3-14 3.2 PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE EUROPEAN BANK FOR

RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT (EBRD) 3-15

4 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES 4-18

4.1 INTRODUCTION 4-18 4.2 STAKEHOLDER IDENTIFICATION AND MAPPING 4-18 4.3 ENGAGEMENT ACTIONS 4-20

5 PUBLIC GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 5-42

5.1 REPORTING GRIEVANCES 5-42 5.2 PUBLIC GRIEVANCE LEAFLET 5-43 5.3 HOW WILL SDAG ENSURE THAT STAKEHOLDERS CAN REGISTER GRIEVANCES?5-43 5.4 CONFIDENTIALITY 5-44 5.5 STEPS IN THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 5-44 5.6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 5-44 5.7 WORKERS’ GRIEVANCES 5-45 5.8 INDEPENDENT RESOLUTION MECHANISMS & AUDITS 5-45 5.9 CONTACT INFORMATION 5-45

Annex A: Preliminary List of Stakeholders Annex B: Consultations Undertaken – Summary of Discussions Annex C: ERM ESIA Scoping Meeting Presentation

ERM SHTOKMAN DEVELOPMENT AG

1-1 This Plan is subject to further modification which will be released on subsequent version

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 THIS DOCUMENT

This document comprises the Plan for Stakeholder Engagement and Information Disclosure (SE&ID) in connection with Phase 1 Development of the Shtokman Gas-Condensate Field (‘the Project). The SE&ID Plan has been prepared by the proponent of the Project, Shtokman Development AG (SDAG), with assistance from Environmental Resources Management (ERM). It is designed to provide the following:

(i) A review of stakeholder engagement and information disclosure activities carried out to by SDAG and other parties with an interest in the Project to date including:

(ii)

Results of a series of public hearings and consultations (Including the public hearing held by Sevmorneftegaz in June 2007.)

materials published by mass media.

(iii) A plan for future stakeholder engagement and information disclosure activities throughout the lifetime of the Project.

The SE&ID Plan has been prepared in accordance with guidance on information disclosure published by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) (1) and the International Finance Corporation (IFC) (2). The SE&ID Plan will be updated and revised as the need arises throughout the implementation of the Project. The SE&ID Plan is a living document that will be revised and updated as SDAG makes any significant changes in terms of project layout, design and schedule.

1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE PLAN

This SE&ID Plan summarises the measures taken by SDAG to-date in the process of preparatory work (pre-FEED and FEED) (3) for the Phase 1 development of the Shtokman gas-condensate field and presents the framework for development of a detailed action plan aimed at:

(1) The EBRD Environmental and Social Policy 2008 and related Performance Requirements (PRs); in particular PRs 1 and 10. (2) IFC’s Social and Environmental Sustainability Policy 2006 and related Performance Standards (PSs); in particular PS 1. (3) FEED - Front End Engineering Design.



Informing all stakeholders in a timely fashion about the potential impacts of the Project.

Identification of stakeholder concerns. Developing the mechanism for obtaining feedback and recommendations

from stakeholders. Establishing a mechanism for taking stakeholder feedback into account in

the course of preparation of design documentation and sequential implementation (construction and operation) of the Project.

This SE&ID Plan has the following objectives: Identification of the main stakeholders and mechanisms for engagement

with them. Development of a time schedule for consultations with different categories

of stakeholders and at different stages of the implementation of the Project.

Creation of mechanisms for updating this Plan during implementation of

the Project. Identification of the resources (personnel) required for the development

and implementation of this Plan The Plan will be subject to periodic revisions and amendments as new information becomes available in the FEED and Post FID process of the Project development and as a result of consultations with the general public and other stakeholders.

1.3 CONTENTS OF THE PLAN

This Plan covers the following issues:

i) Brief description of the Project.

ii) Review of requirements relating to pubic consultations and information disclosure in conformity with national legislation, relevant international standards and SDAG corporate standards.

iii) Overview of the public consultations and information disclosure about the Project to date.

iv) Consultation plan for construction and operation phases.



v) Identification of resources and organizational requirements for implementation of this Plan.

vi) Development of an efficient mechanism for consideration of complaints (a so-called ‘Grievance Procedure’).



2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

This chapter of the SE&ID Plan sets out the current (September 2009) definition of the Project and will be subjected to ongoing review and revision as the Project evolves.

2.1 SHTOKMAN PROJECT OVERVIEW

The Shtokman gas and condensate field is located 610 km north of Murmansk in the Barents Sea (see Figure 2.1). The water depth is around 340m and the reservoir is situated 2000 m below the surface of the sea bed. The field reserves are estimated to be 3.8 trillion cubic meters (bcm) of gas and 37 million tons of gas condensate (1). The gas reservoir covers a geographical area of approximately 1 400km2, being approximately 48km long by 35km wide.

Figure 2.1 Project Location

The size of the field dictates that it requires a progressive development of reserves. It will therefore be developed in three phases, each with a production capacity of close to 23.7 billion cubic metres of gas per annum (bcmpa). This project covers Phase 1 only and reference to ‘the Project’ refers to this Phase 1 development only.

(1) http://www.total.com/en/press/press_releases/pr-2008/080221-gazprom-statoilhydro-shtokman_14663.htm



Being situated in Arctic conditions, a number of new technologies are required and significant operational constraints imposed. For example the offshore field area can sometimes be covered in ice in the winter, is known for its icebergs and experiences long periods of darkness during the winter months. Facilities will therefore be subjected to very low ambient air temperatures, significant snow and surface ice cover and wind chill; consequently cold weather protection or ‘winterisation’ is a fundamental requirement of design.

2.2 OFFSHORE PROJECT ELEMENTS

2.2.1 Drilling

Approximately 20 wells will be drilled offshore using two drilling vessels working in parallel. The wells will be connected to three ‘drill centres’ on the seabed. Drilling produces cuttings that will also be coated with some residual muds (fluids used during drilling to lubricate the drill equipment and to circulate cuttings to the surface). Cuttings produced during drilling will be stored on the drill vessel/s, shipped to shore where they will be treated. Residue from the treatment will be recycled. An optimal solution on cuttings drilled with sea water will be selected.

2.2.2 Subsea Production and FPU Processing

The gas and condensate will be gathered and processed using an integrated Subsea and Floating Production Unit (FPU) concept. An illustration of the ship-shaped FPU is provided in Figure 2.2.

Figure 2.2 FPU Artistic View



A network of subsea infrastructure will include seabed equipment, flow lines, communications lines and structures on the seabed. This infrastructure will enable the gas and condensate from the wells to be transported to the FPU for processing and for subsea equipment as necessary to be controlled from the FPU. A schematic indication of how this infrastructure could look, and how it is connected to the FPU, is illustrated in Figure 2.3. The FPU will be specially designed for operation in the particularly challenging environmental and climatic conditions at the project location site. These conditions are especially severe during the winter when very low temperatures are combined with high relative humidity, high wind, waves and potentially sea ice. Approximately one winter every three years could be expected to give rise to sea ice conditions. In order to manage such risks, an Ice Management Plan will set out both prevention and protection measures to follow in the event of encountering sea ice and iceberg hazards. Implementation of the Ice Management Plan will play a key role in the safe operation of the FPU during all project phases. Prevention will mainly consist of iceberg and ice monitoring/ surveys during relevant periods of the year. Protection means may include ensuring that ice breaking vessels are on standby if required, appropriate design of the FPU and its mooring lines to withstand foreseeable ice load; that rerouting of the iceberg is implemented if it is identified as being on a threatening towards the FPU; and FPU disconnection if required.

Figure 2.3 Subsea and FPU Layout and Integrated Concept



2.3 PIPELINE SYSTEM ELEMENTS

The pipeline system will transport gas and condensate from the offshore field to the onshore facility. The system will comprise two (36 inch) outer diameter pipelines. The offshore section of the pipelines will be approximately 550 km in length. The onshore sections will be approximately 8 km. Two fibre optic cables will also be laid alongside the pipeline system to carry data and voice traffic between the Onshore Production Facility and the FPU.

Figure 2.4 Nearshore and Coastal Area



Seabed surveys have been conducted and the information produced by the surveys has been used to advise routing of the pipelines, eg so that the pipeline can be routed away from areas of seabed that could cause instability (eg pockmarks, or iceberg scours). Routing onshore has avoided, as far as possible, construction on side slopes and other features that could lead to instability.

2.4 ONSHORE PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY

2.4.1 Overview of the Onshore Facilities

The footprint for the onshore facilities is approximately 663 ha. The main parts of the onshore facilities are shown in Figure 2.5 and include: Phase 1 Process Area (PA1): LNG plant, Power Generation Unit (PGU),

flare areas. Storage and Loading Area (SLA): LNG storage tanks, condensate storage

tanks, product jetties and breakwater in Zavalishina Bay. Operational Support Area (OSA): buildings, offices, warehouses,

laboratories and workshops. Service Harbour Area (SHA): Interim service harbour in Zavalishina Bay,

to the north east of Teriberka village. Construction Camp: comprised initially of a pioneer camp, then

incorporating the site preparation camp and then finally the main camp. Major project components are listed in Table 2.1 and their locations depicted in Figure 2.5.

Table 3.1 Breakdown of Sites, Areas and Territories for the Situation Plan

No. Item Name No. Item Name 1 Pioneer Camp 24 Port Service Fleet Base. Phase 2, 3. 2 Treatment Facilities Site 24.1 Port Service Fleet base (ISH) Phase 1 3 Temporary Materials Storage Site 25 Breakwater 4 Contractors Base 26 Reloading LNG and condensate facilities 6 Soil Disposal Site 27 Flare Systems Unit. Phase 1 7 Soil Disposal Site 28 Telecom Tower I 8 Soil Disposal Site 29 Telecom Tower II 9 Building Offices Area 30 Fire Station and Crisis Management 10 Temporary Industrial Area 31 Water Intake (two variants) 11 Batching plant, Temporary Materials

Storage Site. Phase 1. 32 Solid Domestic and Construction Waste

Disposal site 15 Gate House 33 Water intake II 16 Main Gate House 34 Marine flare 17 LNG Plant. Phase 1 35 Refuelling Oil Plant. Phase 2,3. 18 Power Generation Unit 36 Treatment Facilities of LNG plant. Phase 1. 19 Gas Treatment Plant (GTP) 40 LNG Plant. Phase 2,3. 20 LNG Storage Tank Battery. Phase 1 41 Gas condensate Storage. Phase 2,3. 21 Gas Condensate Storage Tank Battery 42 Flare System Unit. Phase 2,3. 22 Administrative Area 43 Water Intake III. Phase 2,3 23 Helipad 51 Operation Camp Note: Reference Nos in Table 3.1 are cross-referenced to Figure 2.5

Figure 2.5 Location of Onshore Facilities



2.4.2 Site preparation

Extensive site preparation works will be required in advance of construction activities. In order to achieve a level area, depressions will be filled and hills will be levelled, whilst the harbour areas will be upgraded so that they are suitable for material import, site preparation will be optimize to minimize the excavation. The overall philosophy for the site clearance is to achieve a mass balance between the excavated materials and the backfill, so that to the maximum practicable extent all material is reused on site (both onshore and also in the construction of the harbours, jetties and breakwater). Large quantities of rock will excavated by blasting and the blasted rock will be filled in compacted layers to raise the level of depressions in the topography. A system will be installed during the site preparation to manage site drainage and run-off. In addition site and access roads, bridges, culverts and other infrastructure will be constructed during site preparation. Dredging will be required in Zavalishina Bay for the construction activities (port, break water, etc.). The Temporary Service Harbour will be used during site preparation for mooring boats, importing cargo, distribution of fuel and oil products and for storage and security. The site preparation phase is expected to last for two years with a workforce of approximately 2000 personnel (preliminary) housed on a pioneer camp served by dedicated utilities, such as water provision, waste management, power and sewerage.

2.4.3 Construction

Construction work will be minimised onsite due to the severe Arctic conditions and the constraints these will place on the construction window. A large proportion of the equipment will be pre-fabricated and therefore a modularisation approach will be followed. The majority of the construction materials and the modules for the construction of the LNG plant and PGU will arrive by sea to the Construction Jetty in Zavalishna Bay. From here the materials and modules will be unloaded into the lay down areas adjacent to the harbour before being transported to other parts of the site where they will be assembled.

2.4.4 Commissioning

The commissioning period of the LNG plant is anticipated to take approximately 6 to 9 months. During commissioning, the LNG, process equipment and all the pipelines and condensate storage tanks will be hydro



tested using demineralised water. Following testing, this water will be directed to waste-water treatment plant prior to discharge. Drying of the pipelines and process vessels will be achieved using inert Nitrogen. There will be a limited amount of flaring during commissioning which is normal. It is likely that there will also be some venting of the pipeline which is only foreseen in exceptional circumstances.

2.4.5 Operation

Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) Plant

The Onshore operation will begin with the LNG Plant receiving the gas from the offshore field where essentially it will be cooled to its condensing temperature of minus 162°C at atmospheric pressure for storage and transport. The capacity of the LNG train will be 7.5 million tonnes per year and it will operate continuously. One LNG carrier at a time will be allowed to move to and from the loading Jetty for safety reasons. There will be an operational support area in the Teriberka area. This will consist of medical centre, warehouse and workshop buildings, vehicle maintenance garage, fire fighting station and hanger. There will also be a permanent workers’ camp. Emissions and Discharges

The operation of the onshore elements will lead to emissions of pollutants to air, discharges of water and the production of waste. During normal operation, there will be emissions to air from four stacks which form part of the PGU unit, plus another three emission sources which will emit to air during regular discontinuous operation. There will additionally be emissions from flaring activities as well as from the incineration of acid gas which results from the removal of CO2 at the LNG Train. There will be water discharges in the form of uncontaminated drainage and run-off as well as the production of waste (hazardous and non-hazardous) from the Onshore Facilities.

2.4.6 The Project Schedule

Development drilling is expected to commence in the second quarter of 2011 and last for 3 years. Offshore installation will be conducted in parallel with drilling operations. Installation campaigns cannot be performed during the winter season, therefore the installation operating window is limited between May and



October each year (subject to actual environmental conditions). Installation is planned to commence in 2011 and be completed in 2013. Construction of the trunk lines will also be restricted by winter access but will have a longer seasonal window, particularly for the onshore sections. Pipelay is anticipated to commence in 2011 and be completed in 2013. Onshore site preparation works will commence in 2010 after FID. Onshore construction will commence in 2012. The start of pipeline deliveries is expected to commence in 2013 and LNG shipments are slated to commence in 2014. (1) The facilities are designed for a life of 50 years; hence decommissioning is anticipated to take place some time around 2064.

2.5 ABOUT SDAG

Shtokman Development AG (SDAG) will organise, design, finance, construct and operate the Project during 25 years. SDAG comprises Gazprom (51%), Total (25%) and StatoilHydro (24%)

(1)http://www.total.com/en/press/press_releases/pr-2008/080221-gazprom-statoilhydro-shtokman_14663.htm



3 OVERVIEW OF REQUIREMENTS FOR STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE

Actions to be taken within the framework of public consultation and information disclosure will comply with the requirements of: Legislation of the Russian Federation (RF); and Principles and procedures specified by the EBRD and the IFC.

3.1 NATIONAL LEGISLATION REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND

DISCLOSURE

Russian legislation requirements specify that the public should be informed about the project and have the opportunity to comment on information presented in the course of the Project Development. In particular, the public should have access to and be able to comment on the ESIA terms of reference and the draft ESIA. Mechanisms for public participation are prescribed by the legislation and other regulatory and legal acts. The regulation on environmental impact assessment of planned commercial and other activities in the RF was approved by a decree of the State Committee of Ecology of Russia on 16.05.2000 (Decree No.372). Section IV of the Regulation deals with disclosure of information for the public and public participation in the Russian Environment Impact Assessment procedure and emphasizes the following aspects: Provision of information to the public and public participation is expected

at all stages of an environmental impact assessment. Public participation in the development and discussion of the EIA is to be

ensured by the developer as an integral part of the EIA process. Public involvement should be organized by local government bodies or

the relevant State authorities with support from the developer and in accordance with Russian legislation including:

disclosure and discussion of the Terms of Reference for the

development of Russian EIA to the public and consideration of the comments in the course of Russian EIA development;

access to the Russian EIA Terms of Reference should be

provided from the date of their approval and until the end of the EIA process;



disclosure of the Draft Russian EIA in an easy accessible place for public and availability for review and informing the public through mass media about the date of public consultation (so called “public hearings”) not later than 30 days before the public hearings;

public hearings are to be organised by SDAG together with

local authorities with involvement of all key stakeholders;

overview of the draft EIA and an action plan are to be discussed with public in the course of the public hearings;

in preparing for public hearings a document specifying all

issues that need to be discussed should be developed (known as a protocol) and signed by representatives of the executive authorities and local administration, citizens, public organizations and SDAG. The protocol should be included as an annex to the Russian final EIA documentation;

the Draft EIA should be available for further comments during

30 days after the date of the public hearings. All comments should be written and considered in the course of finalisation of Russian EIA documentation.

On July 28, 2007 the then holder of the license for the Shtokman gas field ”Sevmorneftegaz” conducted the first official public meeting for the Project (Declaration of intent on planned investment activities on construction of PTTC in Teriberka). The meeting was held in accordance with Russian requirements in the presence of local residents of Teriberka. The meeting addressed project planning, site location, potential commercial and other activities, and other issues which might affect both the environment and local people, were discussed. In December, 2009 SDAG will conduct public hearings in Teriberka and Kola to disclose the Draft Russian EIA. As part of the public hearing, the Draft Russian EIA and mitigation measures will be discussed with the public; any comments from this meeting will be taken into account during the finalisation of EIA. The feedback collected during the public hearings will also feed in to the broader engagement process undertaken for the international ESIA.

3.2 PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE EUROPEAN BANK FOR

RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT (EBRD)

In accordance with the EBRD’s Environmental and Social Policy 2008, the EBRD considers stakeholder engagement as an essential part of good business practice and corporate citizenship, and a way of improving the quality of projects. In particular, effective community engagement and the disclosure of



Project information are central to the successful management of risks and impacts on communities affected by projects and to achieving enhanced community benefits. The main requirements with respect to relations with stakeholders are described in EBRD’s Performance Requirement (PR) PR1: “Environmental and Social Appraisal and Management” and PR10: “Information Disclosure and Stakeholder Engagement”. Specific objectives of PR 1 and PR 10 are as follows:

Environmental and Social Appraisal and Management (PR 1)

Information Disclosure and Stakeholder Engagement (PR 10)

To identify and assess environmental and social impacts and issues, both adverse and beneficial, associated with the project.

To adopt measures to avoid, or where avoidance is not possible, minimize, mitigate, or offset/compensate for adverse impacts on workers, affected communities and the environment.

To identify and, where feasible, adopt opportunities to improve environmental and social performance.

To promote improved environmental and social performance through a dynamic process of performance monitoring and evaluation.

To identify people or communities that are or could be affected by the project, as well as other interested parties.

To ensure that such stakeholders are appropriately engaged on environmental and social issues that could potentially affect them through a process of information disclosure and meaningful consultation.

To maintain a constructive relationship with stakeholders on an ongoing basis through meaningful engagement during project implementation.

According to PR 10, a SE&ID process has the following components:

1. Engagement during Project Preparation

Stakeholder identification and analysis. The first step in successful stakeholder engagement is for the project proponent to identify the various individuals or groups who (i) are affected or likely to be affected (directly or indirectly) by the project (“affected parties”), or (ii) may have an interest in the project (“other interested parties”). Stakeholder engagement plan The project proponent should develop a plan which sets out how communication with the identified stakeholders will be handled throughout project preparation and implementation, including the type of grievance procedure envisaged. Disclosure and consultation on Category A projects. Projects classified as Category A could result in potentially significant and diverse adverse future environmental and/or social impacts that cannot be readily identified, assessed and mitigated and therefore require a formalised and



participatory assessment process. Disclosure and consultation requirements are built into each stage of this process. Information disclosure. Disclosure of relevant project information helps stakeholders understand the risks, impacts and opportunities of the project.

Meaningful consultation. Where workers and/or affected communities are, or may be, subject to significant risks or adverse impacts from a project, the project proponent will undertake a process of meaningful consultation in a manner that provides the affected parties with opportunities to express their views on project risks, impacts and mitigation measures, and allows the project proponent to consider and respond to them.

2. Engagement during project implementation and external reporting. Throughout the life of the project, the project proponent should provide ongoing information to identified stakeholders, commensurate to the nature of the project and its associated environmental and social impacts, and the level of stakeholder interest.

3. Grievance mechanism. The project proponent needs to be aware of (and respond to) stakeholders’ concerns related to the project in a timely manner. For this purpose, the project proponent should establish a grievance mechanism to receive and facilitate resolution of stakeholders’ concerns and grievances about the environmental and social performance of the Project Proponent and the Project.



4 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES

4.1 INTRODUCTION

Stakeholders are defined as those who are affected, or are likely to be affected by the Project (positively and/or negatively) and/or those who have an interest or are able to influence the project. In order to determine who to engage with and the approach and extent of engagement with stakeholders, SDAG has undertaken a process of stakeholder identification and mapping. The results of this process are summarised in the following sections along with an action plan for engaging the different types of stakeholders identified and examples of the feedback received from stakeholders to date. Stakeholders and the actions determined for engaging different types of stakeholders will be reviewed on a regular basis to ensure the Project maintains an up-to-date picture of who is interested and / or concerned by the Project, and therefore should be included in the engagement process.

4.2 STAKEHOLDER IDENTIFICATION AND MAPPING

Stakeholders were identified on the basis of groups and individuals that will potentially be impacted by the Project, and those that can influence the project. Currently there is limited information available about the Teriberka population that will be directly impacted by the Project. Through the ESIA process SDAG has commissioned social surveys that will improve its understanding of the community and any vulnerable groups that may be differentially impacted by the Project or require special engagement measures. The following stakeholder groups have been identified, a complete listing of the individual organisations included in each group, and their connection to the Project is available in Annex A. 1. National and Regional Authorities (including legislators and executive

authorities at federal, regional, Kola district) and supervisory agencies in charge of approvals, review of design documentation and the issue of permits for air emissions, waste disposal and operation of hazardous industrial facilities.

2. International non-governmental organisations with a presence in Russia;

3. International and national press;

4. Regional level non-governmental organisations with interest in the environment;

5. Regional level Indigenous Peoples Organisations;

6. Murmansk educational services;



7. Murmansk social services;

8. Regional press and television and radio broadcasters;

9. Local communities impacted by the Project, defined at the current time as Teriberka residents and other Teriberka organisations;

10. Local level (Teriberka) regional political and community leaders;

11. Regional companies / potential suppliers;

12. Engineering and other contractors, employment agencies, or companies involved in rendering services, suppliers of equipment and other goods; and

13. Employees of SDAG.

In order to determine appropriate approaches for engaging different stakeholder group, SDAG undertook an exercise to map stakeholders and understand relative levels of impact and influence, illustrated in Figure 4.1. Broadly, those with the greatest impact and influence will be engaged most frequently through face-to-face meetings to ensure adequate disclosure of project information and collection of feedback. The following section outlines SDAG’s objectives and actions for engaging the stakeholder groups identified.

Figure 4.1 Stakeholder Mapping

Impact by Project

Influence on Project

1. National and Regional Authorities / Agencies

6. Murmansk/SPb/Apatity Education Services

7. Murmansk Social Services

2. International NGOs

5. Regional Indigenous Peoples Organisations

4. Regional Environmental

NGOs

3. International and National press 8. Regional Television, Radio and Press

10. Local and Regional political / community

leaders

12. Engineering contractors

12. Other contractors

9. Teriberkaresidents incl. IPs*

9. Teriberkabusinesses

9. Teriberkasocial and education services

*Vulnerable groups TBC

13. Employees

11. Regional companies –suppliers



A more detailed mapping of stakeholders in Teriberka, including vulnerable groups, will be undertaken once the results of the social surveys undertaken for the ESIA are available.

4.3 ENGAGEMENT ACTIONS

4.3.1 Overview

SDAG has planned four phases of engagement: Phase 1: Project Inception and Feasibility; Phase 2: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment; Phase 3: Engagement during construction; and Phase 4: Engagement during ongoing project operations. Within each phase a range of engagement activities will be undertaken to address the needs of different stakeholder groups. Table 4.1 summarises planned engagement activities, the objectives of each action and the stakeholders each action is directed at, along with an indication of timing and who is responsible for implementation. Where actions are primarily undertaken to meet Russian requirements, these are indicated in the table.

4.3.2 Action Plan

Table 4.1 provides a summary of SDAG’s Stakeholder Engagement Activities. Actions have been developed on the basis of information currently available. As the Project and the engagement process progresses, the plan will be reviewed on a regular basis to ensure that the engagement activities undertaken remain appropriate and effective. For convenience, discussion of Teriberka, its residents and other relevant stakeholder organisations is assumed to include stakeholders from Lodeynoye. Internal engagement with employees and contractors is not included in the action plan.

Table 4.1 Stakeholder Engagement Actions

Project Phase and Consultation Objectives

Actions Objectives Stakeholders Timing Responsibility

PHASE 1: Project Inception and Feasibility MOSCOW: Meetings with representatives of Government (national and regional level)

Permitting and compliance

National and Regional Authorities and Agencies

Consultation began in Dec 2008 and is ongoing

SDAG Management

Murmansk Quarterly Environmental NGO forum regional level)

To inform the environmental NGOS on the environmental works and surveys conducted by Shtokman project

Establish dialogue

International non-governmental organisations with a presence in Russia

Regional level non-governmental organisations with interest in the environment

May 2008 October 2008 February 2009 April 2009 September 2009

SDAG Senior Management

MURMANSK: Quarterly Regional IPO Meeting

To establish dialogue with the IPO groups and disclose the social development plan

Regional level Indigenous Peoples Organisations

August 2008 October 2008 February 2009 April 2009

SDAG Senior Management

Consult with government and key informant groups

Gauge viability of project

Early identification of issues

Meet Russian Engagement Requirements

TERIBERKA: Public hearing conducted by holder of the licence for Shtokman gas field – Severmorneftegas in 2007 on the stage of Declaration of Intent

Meet RF Requirements for Notification

DISCLOSURE: Introduce potentially directly impacted stakeholders to the Project

Collect preliminary stakeholder feedback on potential impacts

Local residents from Teriberka (Lodeynoye)

28th June 2007 OOO Severmorneftegas



TERIBERKA: Establish Project Office in Teriberka

DISCLOSURE: Provide a location in Teriberka which provides information about the Project on an as needed basis.

Create a local presence and ‘face’ of SDAG in Teriberka

Support implementation of the grievance mechanism

Teriberka residents, including indigenous peoples

Other Teriberka stakeholders

Spring 09 SDAG Senior Management

TERIBERKA: Limited Social questionnaire in the old Teriberka

Limited social survey to identify key social issues

Local residents from Teriberka (Lodeynoye), IPs

October 2008 FRECOM – OVOS consultant

PHASE 2: ESIA Engagement Activities Phase 2A: Scoping – COMPLETED Introduce the

Project to directly affected stakeholders

Generate feedback on the scope, approach, key issues for the ESIA

Identify additional stakeholders to be consulted

Inform the development of mitigation for the Project


TERIBERKA: ESIA Scoping Meeting in Teriberka, Regional authorities, NGOs, IP organisation and Scientific Institutes

DISCLOSURE: Provide stakeholders with: an update of

the Project description;

an overview of the ESIA and OVOS processes

an indication of potential social and environmental impacts

Collect feedback from Teriberka on potential impacts and areas of concern to inform the scoping process

Head of Teriberka Municipal District

Acting Head of Teriberka Administration

Deputy of the town council, pensioner

Representative of local police

Chairlady of the Council of Deputies, Teriberka

Engineer, Fire Brigade 23 Teriberka Head Doctor, Teacher, Kindergarten 23 Chairman of the Board of

Directors, OOO Teriberskiye Sudoremontnye Masterskiye

Teacher, Lodyninskaya school

June 8, 2009 SDAG Senior Management and ESIA contractor ERM



Residents of Teriberka including indigenous peoples

MURMANSK: Meetings with regional environmental experts

Provide update on project information

Collect feedback on scope of ESIA

Collect specific information on fisheries to feed into ESIA process

Polar Research and Development Institute of Marine Fishery and Oceanography (PINRO)

June 2009 SDAG Sustainable Development Manager ERM – ESIA consultant

OVOS

MURMANSK: Meetings with Murmansk Educational Services

Introduce Project to Murmansk Education Services

Understand skills base in Murmansk Oblast

Understand regional training capacity

Murmansk State Technical University (MGTU)

June 2009 SDAG Sustainable Development Manager ERM – ESIA consultant

Project Information flyer

Provide project information to Teriberka residents and other stakeholders, that were not able to attend the scoping meeting

Teriberka residents (includes Lodeynoye)

June 2009 SDAG Teriberka Representative

Publication of Scoping Report (English) and Executive Summary (Russian and English)

DISCLOSURE: Public disclosure of results of scoping phase

Teriberka stakeholders (includes Lodeynoye)

Regional Stakeholders International stakeholders General public

September 09 SDAG HSE Management

Establish SDAG website

Mechanism for public disclosure of information

Regional stakeholders National stakeholders International stakeholders General public

Temporary Web Site established

SDAG HSE Management



Press conference Update press on Project progress

Media stakeholders General Public

8th June 2009 SDAG External Affairs Department

Phase 2B: Main ESIA Phase TERIBERKA: Social questionnaire Survey

Obtain quantitative information about Teriberka and Lodeynoye

Identify issues and concerns related to the Project

502 residents and visitors of Teriberka and Lodeynoye

August 1-7, 2009 ERM – ESIA Consultant

TERIBERKA: Meetings with key informants

Obtain qualitative information about Teriberka and Lodeynoye


Discussion potential mitigation measures

Approximately 50 interviews with local representatives including IPs, local business, administration

August 1-14, 2009 ERM – ESIA Consultant

TERIBERKA, KOLA DESCTRICT, MURMANSK

Obtain official information about Teriberka and Lodeynoye


Official data requests, meetings and telephone interviews with authorities (about 40)

July 8 – September 4, 2009

ERM – ESIA Consultant

Provide updated Project Information to stakeholders

Collect Social Baseline information

Enable affected communities to input into the Project design and ESAP management plans.


TERIBERKA: Public Hearing for OVOS

Meet RF Requirements for disclosure of EIA and consultation on mitigation measures

Collect feedback on environmental impacts and potential mitigation measures

Local residents from Teriberka (Lodeynoye), IPs

December 2009 SDAG Senior Management, HSE Management, OVOS and ESIA consultants



for international ESIA

TERIBERKA: Public hearings conducted by SDAG together with survey contractor on marine survey

SDAG to confirm Meet RF requirements

for disclosure of the EIA required for the marine surveys

Local residents from

Teriberka (Lodeynoye) Scientific institutes

involved in the surveys

September 15th, 2009

SDAG HSE Management Sustainable Development Manager

KOLA: Public hearings conducted by SDAG together with survey contractor on marine survey

SDAG to confirm Meet RF

requirements for disclosure of the EIA required for the marine surveys

KOLA Residents and

administration Scientific institutes

involved in the surveys

September 16th, 2009

SDAG HSE Management Sustainable Development Manager

Meeting with Murmansk Social Services

Provide information about the Project

Understand how Project is likely to impact Regional services

Identify and discuss impacts and issues

Murmansk Oblast Hospital Planned November 09

SDAG HSE Management

Meetings with permitting authorities

Present project information

Identification and discussion of any issues or concerns

National and Regional Authorities including: Ministry of Natural

Resources Federal and State

departments for management of natural resources

Federal Agency for water use

Ongoing SDAG Murmansk Representatives



Dvina Pechora basin water management authority

Meetings with regional business representatives

Understand regional business capacity

Discuss options for maximising local content in the Project

Regional businesses and suppliers

Ongoing SDAG Logistics Department

Meetings with NGOs and IPs

Provide updated project information

Collect feedback on issues of concern and discuss potential mitigation measures

Regional and International Environmental NGOs

Regional IPOs

Ongoing throughout life of project

SDAG Management

Establishment of centre for reception and correspondence related to the Project

Provide a consistent place / contact details for stakeholders to submit, comments and queries

Ensure comments and queries are responded to

Support grievance mechanism.

All stakeholders Ongoing SDAG Murmansk Teriberka and Moscow offices



PHASE 2C: ESIA Finalisation and Disclosure

TERIBERKA: ESIA and ESAP Community Meeting in Teriberka

Present the findings of the ESIA and proposed mitigation measures

Gain feedback on ESIA and mitigation measures

Teriberka authorities Teriberka residents

(includes Lodeynoye)

TBD SDAG HSE Management

MURMANSK: ESIA and ESAP Disclosure Meeting in Murmansk

Present the findings of the ESIA and proposed mitigation measures

Gain feedback on ESIA and mitigation measures

Murmansk City and Oblast Authorities

Research organisations Regional

Environmental NGOs Regional IPOs

TBD SDAG HSE Management

Press conference for media

Update press on progress of the Project

Media stakeholders General public

TBD SDAG External Affairs

Disclosure of Project ESAP

Collection of feedback from directly affected communities and other stakeholders on mitigation measures

Finalise ESIA and ESAP

Publication of ESIA ESAP and ESIA Executive Summary in hardcopy at offices and on website

DISCLOSURE: Provide avenue for

Teriberka residents not able to attend the community meeting to access the ESIA and ESAP and comment

Make publicly available the results of the ESIA and proposed mitigation measures

Teriberka residents Regional stakeholders National stakeholders International

stakeholders General public

March 2010 SDAG HSE Management/Senior Management



Meetings with national and regional authorities

Discuss results of the ESIA Collect feedback on proposed mitigation measures






Feb 2010 SDAG Senior Management

PHASE 3: Ongoing Engagement Activities for Construction Focus Groups Help evaluate the

effectiveness of mitigation measures during the early stages of construction

Identify emerging issues

Teriberka residents – appropriate focus groups to be confirmed

6 weeks after commencement of construction

SDAG Sustainable Development Manager SDAG Site Manager

Maintain stakeholder relationships;

Provide regular information on the Project;

Monitor mitigation measures and achievement of mitigation objectives;

Receive feedback on the effectiveness of the implementation of mitigation measures.

Manage grievances

Project Environmental and Social Report

Present Project progress on implementation of mitigation measures

Present relevant monitoring data on mitigation measures



Annual to be confirmed SDAG Sustainable Development Department Consultation and Communications Team Leader SDAG Site Manager



Teriberka Community Committee

Collect feedback on effectiveness of mitigation measures


Discuss updates to ESAP

Provide up-to-date information about Project progress and activities

Teriberka residents Monthly To be confirmed

SDAG Sustainable Development Manager SDAG Site Manager

Ongoing engagement with national and regional authorities

Identify and discuss any Project issues

Collect feedback on mitigation measures






SDAG Murmansk Office

Ongoing engagement with NGOs

Identify and discuss any Project issues

Collect feedback on mitigation measures

Throughout project TBD SDAG Management

Grievance Mechanism and continuation of Project response centre



Support grievance mechanism



TBD SDAG Site Manager and Sustainable Development Department

Media campaigns Continued disclosure of project information through mass media

Regional stakeholders National stakeholders International


To be confirmed SDAG external Affairs Dept



Update SDAG website Continued disclosure of Project information, including reports, on website

General public To be confirmed SDAG External Affairs Dept

Phase 4: Ongoing Engagement for Operations Project Environmental and Social Report

Present Project progress on implementation of mitigation measures

Present relevant monitoring data on mitigation measures



Annual to be confirmed SDAG Sustainable Development Department Consultation and Communications Team Leader

Teriberka Community Committee

Collect feedback on effectiveness of mitigation measures


Provide up-to-date information about Project progress and activities

Teriberka residents Monthly To be confirmed

SDAG Sustinable Development Manager

Grievance Mechanism and continuation of Project response centre



Support grievance mechanism



To be confirmed SDAG Sustainable Development Department and SDAG Site Manager

As needed engagement with national and regional authorities

To be confirmed To be confirmed To be confirmed To be confirmed

Maintain stakeholder relationships;

Provide regular information on the Project;

Monitor mitigation measures and achievement of mitigation objectives;

Receive feedback on the effectiveness of the implementation of mitigation measures.

Manage grievances

As needed engagement with NGOs

To be confirmed To be confirmed To be confirmed To be confirmed



Update SDAG website Continued disclosure of Project information, including reports, on website

General public To be confirmed To be confirmed



4.3.3 Disclosure of Project Information

As the engagement process progresses, it is anticipated that SDAG will use each engagement activity to disclose information about the Project and discuss its potential risks and benefits and potential mitigation measures as appropriate. In addition there are a number of key documents that will be formally disclosed to the public. Table 4.2 provides a brief description of these documents and the mechanisms available for reviewing them. It should be noted that where affected communities are concerned, it is intended that disclosure of documentation will be complemented by face-to-face meetings that will discuss the contents of the documents listed, see Table 4.1 for details on additional engagement actions. This table will be updated as engagement progresses and additional disclosure documentation and /or mechanisms are identified.

Table 4.2 Planned Documents for Disclosure

Purpose Documents Description Disclosure Mechanism

Disclosure of Project Information to general public

Media articles see Annex E for full details

Press Releases Industry Journals

Disclosure of Project Information to affected communities

Shtokman Project Leaflet

Non-technical Project Information Leaflet in English and Russian

Distributed at Scoping Community Meeting

Copies available from SDAG Teriberka office

Disclosure of Stakeholder Engagement Plan to general public

Stakeholder Engagement Plan

Provides overview and objectives for SDAG’s stakeholder engagement process. Available in Russian and English

Internet – www.shtokman.ru Hard copies available in Shtokman offices in: Teriberka; Murmansk and Moscow

Disclosure of Scoping for ESIA to general public and affected communities

Scoping report Provides a non-technical overview of the scoping process, potential environmental and social risks of the Project and the resulting scope of the ESIA. Available in Russian and English




Purpose Documents Description Disclosure Mechanism

Executive Summary of ESIA and Draft Environmental and Social Action Plan (ESAP)

Provides a non-technical summary of the results of the ESIA and a draft Social and Environmental Action Plan which will summarise proposed mitigation measures. Available in English and Russian


Disclosure of ESIA and proposed ESAP to general public and affected communities

Full ESIA Provides detailed description of the impact assessment process, analysis and data. And will also include the draft ESAP. Available in English

Internet – www.shtokman.ru Hard copies available in Shtokman offices in: Teriberka; Murmank and Moscow

Disclosure of progress on implementation and effectiveness of Action Plan to general public and affected communities

Shtokman Environmental and Social Report

Will provide an overview of the environmental and social performance of the Project. Available in Russian and English

Internet – www.shtokman.ru Hard copies available in Shtokman offices in: Teriberka; Murmank and Moscow

A notification on the availability of these reports will be posted in Teriberka (on official notification board) and in the newspaper “Murmansk Vesti” and a Moscow newspaper Rossiskaya Gazetta). The notification will inform the availability of the plans for review and comments and provide address and contact details of SDAG representatives. In line with Russian requirements relevant documentation will be disclosed 30 days prior to public hearings, and stakeholders will be able to comment on documentation for 30 days following consultation. Outside the public hearings, comments may be submitted directly in any SDAG office (Teriberka, Murmansk, or Moscow), through the SDAG website, or to the SDAG representative named in notifications.

4.3.4 Resourcing and Organisation

During the public consultations relating to the ESIA, a team responsible for stakeholder engagement team will be set up within SDAG to keep records of comments, analyze them, monitor responses to the comments and record the replies by other divisions of the Company. During the ESIA phase, it is anticipated that the personnel to be used will be members of SDAG’s Sustainable Development Team, i.e.:



SDAG Corporate HSE Management

Sustainable Development Manager The team will report to the Company’s Deputy CEO. Final resourcing and organisation for stakeholder engagement for the construction period and ongoing operations have yet to be defined.

4.3.5 Feedback from Stakeholders

SDAG has kept minutes of each meeting with stakeholders a summary of key issues raised during meetings is provided in Annex B. All stakeholder feedback has been analysed and the ESIA process and scope has been adapted to ensure that the assessment is able to address all relevant concerns identified during the engagement process. This includes the decision by SDAG in July 2009 to commission a comprehensive socioeconomic baseline survey of Teriberka households and local organisations in August 2009 to supplement the social baseline for the ESIA. Table 4.3 provides detail of the feedback received during the scoping community meeting in Teriberka in June 2009. Details of attendees to the meeting are available in Annex D.

Table 4.3 Teriberka Community Scoping Meeting

Summary of presentations

Speaker: Yuri Komarov, SDAG (opening speech): Introduction of the 2007 public hearings; consent of Teriberka residents to the selected

site; Information about the current status of the project; Brief description of on-going surveys; Investment in surveys – RUR 4 bln, which were spent for the baseline studies; Design documents are being prepared to be submitted to the State Environmental

Expert Review for the final investment decision to be made in March 2010; Sources of financing of the project will include international lenders, some of which

require an environmental and social impact assessment

‘We can not resolve all existing social issues in one go, but you can see how the situation changed with similar projects (Norway, the Snow White project) developed’;

Presentation of invited attendees (including a short speech by Frederick Giovanetti about EBRD’s role as an advisor and observer; EBRD did not confirm yet its participation in project financing, but is very interested in the project implementation);

Description of the meeting schedules. Speaker: Marat Sharifullin, deputy head of the HSE department, SDAG (brief description of the project)

Description of the Stockman field location; SDAG is responsible for Stage 1 implementation; List of key facilities (onshore and offshore); Description of the production system and the platform; The gas is being prepared on the platform to be transported onshore, then it is

conveyed through a pipeline which landfalls near the Opasova bay. The onshore pipeline then transports the gas to the Zavalishina Bay, where the LNG plant will be located. Part of the gas is separated, part is liquefied and is removed in special carriers;

Description of the plant (picture); Description of the port and vessels (picture);



Summary of presentations

Speaker: Elena Amirkhanova, ERM: Purpose of the meeting. Main goal is to obtain information from the interested parties

(Teriberka residents firstly). Description of an OVOS; Two concurrent processes – OVOS and ESIA. Both processes are based on the same

input data including information received from the interested parties; An impact assessment starts with a baseline study; Our understanding of the marine environment condition; Our understanding of the condition of the onshore environment which will

accommodate infrastructure facilities; Our understanding of the social environment condition (Teriberka and Murmansk).

Teriberka does not have many opportunities for social and economic development. The crisis has affected the whole region;

Major environmental and social issues addressed during the impact assessment; Description of benefits and positive developments related to the project

implementation; We are in the beginning of the impact assessment process; Development of impact prevention measures.

Stakeholder Feedback and Project Responses

Question/comment Feedback Victor Petrov, Deputy Chairman of the Kola Centre for Wildlife Protection: We maintain quarterly feedback sessions, and we have a suggestion for the compensation of adverse effects by creating a special protected natural area and monitoring the environment until essential habitats are restored. The lands surrounding Teriberka are intact, and it is the last large bay along the White Sea coast. Any construction scenario affects or destroys essential habitats (including habitats of species listed in the Russian Red Book). A special protected natural area was designed, but the project was never implemented. There are other proposals registered in the Murmansk Oblast development plan (map).

Herve Madeo, Deputy CEO, SDAG: We have a consistent approach. The surveys are carried out by the best specialists. Habitats and other aspects will be determined following the surveys, and we are ready to share the findings with you. The solutions to preserve the environment will be discussed and implemented. We’ll write down your question and get back to it at the next meeting.

Vadim Krasnopolsky, WWF: The proposal to include the bottom of the Russian part of the Barents sea in the impact assessment has not been studied well enough, and it is proposed to explore the bottom not only at the field development site, but also along the pipeline route. The bottom along the route will be destroyed. I realise that those are expensive surveys, but they need to be done.

Marat Sharifullin, Deputy Head of the EHS Department, SDAG: We have completed four expeditions over the four seasons. The surveys were conducted by highly qualified experts, and the survey covered the pipeline route including the whole impact area which is much wider than the route.

Lyudmila Gavrilova, deputy of the town council, a pensioner: Based on the scale of activities last years, we are concerned about tracked vehicles. How do you control it? It seems that you’re not based on what we see this year and the year before.

Marat Sharifullin, Deputy Head of the EHS Department, SDAG: This is not SDAG responsibility in the project, and we can not be held accountable for other people’s actions. Alexander Selin, Director of Murmansk and Teriberka branches, SDAG: We understand your concern, that you do not want us to add new roads additionally to the existing ones as part archaeological and other surveys.



Stakeholder Feedback and Project Responses Oleg Titov, Director of Science, PINRO: The offshore part of the project and the pipeline area were explored well. We lost the spring season during the surveys in Teriberka. This spring we completed two expeditions which cover the gaps. We have a proposal to take the finding into consideration while conducting the international part of the impact assessment.

Marat Sharifullin, Deputy Head of the EHS Department, SDAG: OK, thank you.

Alexandra Mishina, Sustainable Development Manager, SDAG: Please let’s get stick to the format of the meeting. You can ask further questions and make comments regarding what we should address during the impact assessment. Alexandra Artiyeva, the Murmansk Regional Public Chamber: Will the pipeline cross deer pastures?

Alexander Selin, Director of Murmansk and Teriberka branches, SDAG: The pipeline lies between the Opasova and Zavalishina Bays, and it does not cross deer pastures. The other pipeline which goes all the way to the Karelia border is not part of our project and is not our competence.

Elena Kozhina, Chairlady of the Council of Deputies, Teriberka: What will happen to the lakes in the Opasova bay (the Titov Lakes, the cascade)?

Yuri Komarov, CEO, SDAG / Marat Sharifullin, Deputy Head of the EHS Department, SDAG: The answer is that nothing will happen to the lakes. We are not planning to affect the Titov Lakes. Originally, we intended to relocate Orlovka river, but later "Shtokman Development AG"abandoned the idea. The project was relocated to Zavalishina Bay

Anna Fateyeva, Teacher from Kindergarten 23: I am speaking on behalf of parents. You provided assistance to out children and we really appreciate your help. In particular, thank you for preparatory courses for those who want to become students of the Moscow State Technical University, and for the trilateral agreement. I would like our children to come back to their native village after their studies, and to be able to get a job here. The school also needs help; we are in a remote location, and we lack teachers like for example English teachers. We want our children to possess a sufficient knowledge base to be able to continue their education.

Yuri Komarov, CEO, SDAG: The project is implemented in stages, and the final decision will be made next year. However, training and employment of Teriberka residents is our priority. It is important both for you and for us.

Natalya Solomakhina, Teriberka resident, representative of the Lapps: We have no full information about Shtokman, and there is a problem with information access in general. We would like to have some regional sources of information, like regional TV.

Yuri Komarov, CEO, SDAG / Alexander Selin, Director of Murmansk and Teriberka branches, SDAG: Thank you, we shall consider your proposal.

Lyudmila Gavrilova, deputy of the town council, a pensioner: Are you planning to construct a waste processing plant?

Yuri Komarov, CEO, SDAG: We will develop a waste processing and storage landfill.



Stakeholder Feedback and Project Responses Tatyana Kichigina, Engineer from Fire Brigade 23: The population here will increase, and we have only one district police officer. Will the police staff be increased? Will the number of medical personnel be increased?. The same thing applies to the road police and to fire protection services. How do you plan to handle these problems?

Alexander Selin, Director of Murmansk and Teriberka branches, SDAG: We maintain permanent contact with the Department of Internal Affairs, we will take measures required. When a new settlement is built, the law stipulates establishment of emergency services including a fire protection service. The medical aspect, it is the question to regional authorities.

Lyudmila Gavrilova, deputy of the town council, a pensioner: We heard that the inpatient hospital will be closed and that it will only have outpatients. This may be a big problem here where life conditions are pretty rough.

Yuri Komarov, CEO, SDAG: We will develop medical facilities, and local population will be able to use them. Marat Sharifullin, Deputy Head of the EHS Department, SDAG: The ESIA addresses all the issues you raised.

Lyudmila Gavrilova, deputy of the town council, a pensioner: Will the project be implemented in principle?

Yuri Komarov, CEO, SDAG: It is a very complicated project. We are responsible for Stage 1, and we are confident that from the technical standpoint the project can be implemented. We hope that the decision to start construction will be made in March, and we’ll commence construction activities. The construction project will go together with infrastructure development. We would like the project to be implemented, and we would like to potential of the Murmansk and Arkhangelsk regions to be utilised, too. Public hearings are scheduled for October. By March, we expect to spend 30 billion roubles. We can not give 100% guarantees, but we are working. We promised you that if you supported us we would select Teriberka as the implementation site. We kept our promise. We are considering the expedition to Hammerfest – we would like to see 5-6 respected representatives of Teriberka to visit Hammerfest..

Tatyana Kichigina, Engineer from Fire Brigade 23: Our youth do nothing. They have nowhere to go.

The proposal is for you consider options for cultural development of the young people

Alicia Ryazhskikh, Deputy Warden, Teacher, Lodyninskaya school: For example, a person is willing to work for the Project, but he does not have the necessary education. Can you look into this matter?

Yuri Komarov, CEO, SDAG: We are considering training and retraining options for any person notwithstanding the level of education.



Stakeholder Feedback and Project Responses Ivan Lysenko, Head Doctor, Teriberka resident: In Teriberka, there are two doctors serving 1022 persons. You are training young kids, but I don’t see a single doctor in training. Young people don’t come here these days. I'm 68, and I’m going to work for another 5-7 years. What will happen then? We have to deal with it together.

Alexandra Mishina, Sustainable Development Manager, SDAG: We will study the issue of specialist’s availability, their education, and will inform you which measures we consider as appropriate (for example, educational grant for he specialist (dentist, for example) who will wish to come to live and work in Teriberka). Yuri Komarov, CEO, SDAG: We came, and then contractors came, so life’s changing. Of course, we will arrange medical treatment for our employees. We will try to make it possible for Teriberka residents to use our medical facilities

Lyudmila Gavrilova, deputy of the town council, a pensioner: There are three big problems: smoking, drinking and drugs. Lyudmila Gavrilova, deputy of the town council, a pensioner: Our young people envy the visiting specialists, because the latter are different; they are hot-eyed.

Alexandra Mishina, Sustainable Development Manager, SDAG: We will address this issue t. Yuri Komarov, CEO, SDAG: I believe that when they have jobs, they will have leisure options, and the problem can be solved. Just like they did it at Gazprom. As soon as you a financial motivation, things change.

Tatyana Kichigina, Engineer from Fire Brigade 23: 1) Is it possible for the specialists to come, at least for a couple of days 2) Will there be an asphalt road leading to Teriberka? 3) Can it happen that you will be well-off and separate from us, while we will have the same things we have now or even worse? 4) We are part of the Severomorsk and Murmansk areas, and so our taxes go there. Will the taxes be spent on our place?

Yuri Komarov, CEO, SDAG: We can not assume full control over the social function. We have registered a tax payer in Teriberka. This was done to have the taxes allocated to the local budget, as well. Of course, there will be social projects. We will give opportunities to work fairly, but please don’t give us that dependant’s attitude. Alexander Selin, Director of Murmansk and Teriberka branches, SDAG: We will defend before the regional authorities the position for a fair distribution of taxes, with a significant portion allocated to the local budget.



Stakeholder Feedback and Project Responses Nadezhda Konick, Deputy Chairperson, Murman: I have a question about the cows which feed in the Zavalishina Bay. Where should they pasture?

Alexander Selin, Director of Murmansk and Teriberka branches, SDAG: There will be a plant in the area of Zavalishina bay, so the cows will have to find other places to graze on. Marat Sharifullin, Deputy Head of the HSE Department, SDAG: We will look into this matter as part of the impact assessment.

Oleg Titov, Director of Science, PINRO: The impacts on local trades should be accessed, in particular, fishing. We have studied the marine situation (at the request of SDAG), but we need to assess the situation in Teriberka for example be means of an opinion poll.

Marat Sharifullin, Deputy Head of the EHS Department, SDAG and Elena Amirkhanova, Principal Consultant, ERM: Thank you, this is exactly what we wanted to hear from you; we’ll see into it.

Sergey Khronenko, Acting Chairman, Murman:. I was at Hammerfest, and they have a well developed infrastructure. The quality in Norwegian camps is much higher. But this can not be addressed by a single company. During my latest trip to Hammerfest I saw the plant. If we have something like that in Teriberka, then I believe that Teriberka will catch up. However, it’s not going to be like miracle - Gazprom coming in and making everything for us. And now we have to ask questions here, to tell them as much as possible.

Marat Sharifullin, Deputy Head of the EHS Department, SDAG: Thank you.

Natalia Solomakhina, Teriberka resident, representative of the Lapps: The catch quota was 500 kg, then 400 kg per person! And now it’s zero.

Elena Amirkhanova, Principal Consultant, ERM: Thank you for the information, we got it all written down.

Roman Antipin, activist, Nature and Youth: We would like information to be public and published promptly rather than us having to ask for it. I mean EIA and other surveys.

Elena Amirkhanova, Principal Consultant, ERM: Thank you. It is part of our job. The first report to be published is the preliminary assessment, and the company plans to publish it on the web site.

Vadim Krasnopolsky, WWF: We officially requested SDAG, in particular, Herve, to provide the schedule of activities. It especially concerns OVOS and the expert review. We are yet to receive a response. We are ready to take part in the development of Terms of Reference to make it a comprehensive assessment.

Marat Sharifullin, Deputy Head of the EHS Department, SDAG: We have commenced this work. When we develop the OVOS schedule and scope, we will provide this information.



Stakeholder Feedback and Project Responses Roman Antipin, activist, Nature and Youth: We would appreciate if you could provide all the primary data you receive.

Herve Madeo, Deputy CEO, SDAG:. We will tell you how and when you can obtain that information after we know it is reliable and verified. We can not provide information in portions or data which can not be disclosed according to the Russian legislation. We promise you that we will be open and transparent about our work. Answering your question, we had a meeting with your representative in Moscow, and we will continue to be the same transparent company.

Yuri Komarov, CEO, SDAG: Local population is our main concern today. We have by far more frequent meetings with NGOs than we have with the residents. So please let Teriberka residents ask their questions first, and NGOs can do the same after that. Tatyana Kichigina, Engineer from Fire Brigade 23: We do not really understand what needs to be asked now. We will have more questions at the construction stage. I hope that small vessels will be able to access the sea.

Presidium: We will not prohibit that.

Valery Yarantsev, Head of Teriberka Municipal District: How come no one is asking about the cemetery? It is a legal registered cemetery, but we still protect it.

Yuri Komarov, CEO, SDAG: We will not touch the cemetery. We are also conducting archaeological surveys.

Ivan Matryokhin, Chairman of the Murmansk regional public organisation of the Samii people: I believe it is important to ensure that the agreement with Teriberka residents and the indigenous population is permanent and long-term, for the whole gas recovery period.

Yuri Komarov, CEO, SDAG: This project is not a one-time event for us. It covers at least 50 years. We assume responsibility to be open, and we understand that unless we achieve a social consensus, that it will be practically impossible to implement the project. We have a serious tax base to enable the people of Teriberka to complete training and be hired by the project.. We have this meeting today, and we listened to your comments, but that does not mean that everything has been said and that we don’t need any more meetings. We have a special log where you record you questions and comments. We will be covering the log entries on a regular basis.

Roman Antipin, activist, Nature and Youth: We need to know what will happen after the plant is closed.

Yuri Komarov, CEO, SDAG: As long as there’s gas here, you will have the opportunity to work. No one ever abandons infrastructure. Alexander Selin, Director of Murmansk and Teriberka branches, SDAG: There are other fields near Shtokman.

Tatyana Kichigina, Engineer from Fire Brigade 23: Thank you for getting us together and asking our opinion.

Presidium: We would like to meet more often.



Stakeholder Feedback and Project Responses Lyudmila Gavrilova, deputy of the town council, a pensioner: Thanks for giving us hope.

Yuri Komarov, CEO, SDAG / Marat Sharifullin, Deputy Head of the EHS Department, SDAG: I would like to thank you for coming and telling and asking us a lot of things. The leaflets here have an e-mail address for further queries, and don’t forget the feedback log. We are looking forward to your contribution. Thank you.



5 PUBLIC GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

5.1 REPORTING GRIEVANCES

A grievance can be defined as an actual or perceived problem that might give grounds for complaint. As a general policy, SDAG will work pro-actively towards the prevention of grievances through the implementation of impact mitigation measures and community liaison activities that enable SDAG to anticipate and address potential issues before they become grievances. Nevertheless, should grievances emerge, SDAG is committed to addressing these in a timely and effective manner in accordance with Russian Federation Law, international best practice and the Company's Internal Grievance Procedure. The Company has a Public Grievance Leaflet, which advises those with a grievance on how they can lodge a grievance relating to SDAG Project activities. The Public Grievance Leaflet was revised in the summer of 2009 to reflect recent updates in the process and allow for easier tracking of grievances. The revised Public Grievance Leaflet is presented below, including the form that should be completed should anyone wish to lodge a grievance (1) . This Form is available at SDAG’s offices in Moscow, Murmansk and Teriberka, in both Russian and English. Community Liaison Officers (CLOs) will be appointed and made responsible for distributing Russian versions of this leaflet at appropriate locations within the community in which they work (be it a library or other public building or at SDAG office, or both), and will ensure copies are also made available at public meetings related to the Project. Advertising of the Grievance Procedure is one of the integral parts of SDAG’s community engagement programme. There will a number of activities aimed at distributing information on the Grievance Procedure among communities and encouraging people to use it. These will include: Posters (at the Project affected communities and project locations,

including SDAG’s offices in Moscow, Murmansk and Teriberka, and construction camps);

Newspaper announcements (both at regional and local levels); A dedicated slide presentation in the Project affected communities and

locations.

(1) This does not apply to SDAG employees, who shall have a separate internal grievance procedure.



5.2 PUBLIC GRIEVANCE LEAFLET

This leaflet informs stakeholders as to how they can communicate with SDAG regarding a grievance. It also sets out the steps that will be taken by SDAG to address grievances. Examples of this include: Negative impacts on yourself or community, e.g. financial loss, physical

harm, nuisance from traffic or dust. Dangers to Health & Safety or the Environment. Failure to comply with standards or legal obligations. Harassment of any nature. Criminal activity. Improper conduct or unethical behaviour. Financial malpractice or impropriety or fraud. Attempts to conceal any of these. We will look into all grievances that we receive. Sometimes we may find that a grievance is not connected to our activity or that we are working within the applicable Russian and international standards (e.g. noise standards). In these cases we will explain this in writing to you. In all other cases we will investigate whether we have failed to work to our intended standard and, if we have, identify measures which might be taken to protect against the incident occurring again.

5.3 HOW WILL SDAG ENSURE THAT STAKEHOLDERS CAN REGISTER GRIEVANCES?

There are several ways that a grievance will be able to be registered: By sending a completed Grievance Form; By contacting your local Community Liaison Officers (CLO); By sending an email to the following address [email protected] By calling SDAG; By reporting your concerns via a confidential website

www.SDAGconfidential.com.



5.4 CONFIDENTIALITY

Some grievances may be raised in confidence under this procedure. Grievances will not be disclosed without the consent of the stakeholder. Details of submissions and allegations will remain secure within the SDAG team responsible for managing the grievance procedure.

5.5 STEPS IN THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

5.5.1 Receive Complaint

Once we receive a completed grievance form is received or a grievance is notified, SDAG will assign someone to be responsible for that grievance.

5.6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

SDAG will acknowledge receipt of grievances by letter within 10 days. The acknowledgement will specify a contact person, their reference indicator and an anticipated target date for resolution of the grievance working days of having received the grievance.

5.6.1 Investigation

SDAG will carry out work to understand the cause of your grievance. SDAG may contact the originator of the grievance during this time.

5.6.2 Resolution

Once the grievance has been investigated SDAG will write to the stakeholder with the results of the investigation and a proposed course of action should any be necessary.

If the grievance is considered to be satisfactorily resolved SDAG will ask

the originator of the grievance to sign a Statement of Satisfaction. If the grievance remains unresolved it will be reassessed and SDAG will

have further dialogue with the originator to discuss if there are any further steps which may be taken.

5.6.3 Follow Up

SDAG may contact originators of grievances at a later stage in the Project to ensure that its activities continue to pose no further problems.

All grievances will be monitored by SDAG’s Sustainable Development Department Compliance Team, responsible for ensuring that a plan is developed and internally approved by SDAG senior management (and if appropriate discussed with the originator of the grievance) as soon as reasonably practicable for any unresolved grievances. The plan's



objective will be to bring unresolved grievances to a swift and fair resolution.

5.7 WORKERS’ GRIEVANCES

A separate workers' grievance mechanism will be established for SDAG employees. Workers will be given the possibility to lodge grievances both through workers representatives and independently, personally, regardless of the matter of the complaint. The details of this type of grievance mechanism will be established 3 month prior construction works.

5.8 INDEPENDENT RESOLUTION MECHANISMS & AUDITS

A second level of grievance management or an appeal mechanism will be defined and put in place allowing for independent involvement in reviewing and deciding upon grievance outcomes. It is planned that internal audits of the grievance mechanism will be undertaken periodically to assess the effectiveness of the system. Periodic external audits of the grievance management system will be undertaken by independent organizations to ensure the effective operation of the system.

5.9 CONTACT INFORMATION

For more information about the Shtokman Project, please visit http://www.shtokman.ru/. SDAG can also be contacted by email at [email protected] and [email protected] fax to the Sustainable Development Manager at + 7 (495) 777 0668; letter to the Sustainable Development Manager: SDAG 3, Malaya Pirogovskaya St., Moscow, 119435 Russian Federation telephone in Murmansk +7 (8152) 596130 (Russian and English); telephone in Moscow +7 (495) 777 0699 (Russian and English); This chapter of the SE&ID Plan sets out the current (September 2009) definition of the Project and will be subjected to ongoing review and revision as the Project evolves.

Annex A

Preliminary List of Stakeholders

ANNEX A. PRELIMINARY LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS

Authorities at the National Level Name of Organisation Role/Function Ministry of Natural Resources Russian Federation

Main environmental enforcing body

Rosprirodnadzor- Central Management of the Federal Service for Supervision of Natural Resources

Environmental enforcing body. Deliver permits (environmental review of project documentation, TEO)

Rostechnadzor Federal Service for the Supervision of Technology and Nuclear Management

Permitting

Federal Service for Hydrometeorology and environmental monitoring (Roshydromet)

Approves monitoring program

Federal Agency for Water Resources Water use permits Federal Agency for Fisheries Fisheries calculation damage Federal Service for Supervision of Mass Media, communications and protection of cultural heritage

Supervisory authority for cultural objects

Murmansk- Regional and Local Committees/Ministries and State Agencies Name Function Department of supervision of Environment and technology of the federal service for supervision of environment, technology and nuclear management (Rostechnadzor)

Regional Environmental enforcing body

State Department for the federal service for management of natural resources in North Western Federal district

Regional environmental enforcing body

North West Territorial Department for the Federal service of hydrometeorology and environmental monitoring

Ensures compliance of monitoring program and oversees the results

Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment

Regional environmental enforcing body

Dvina Pechora Basin water management authority

Approvals, resolutions and permits related to water use

Murmansk Oblast Department of Federal Services for veterinary and phyto sanitary supervision (Rosselkhnadzor)

Approves the transfer of agricultural land for industrial purposes

Barents Belomor Territorial Department of the Federal Agency for fisheries

Approvals, resolutions and permits related to usage and damage of fisheries resources

Federal Agency for Cadastre Land allocation Murmansk Oblast Government Department of relations with non-governmental organisations

Supervision of NGOs

Murmansk Oblast Ministries and Committees: Public Health Industry Economic Development State Committee of Culture and Arts Social Development Labour department

Public health, property, economic & social development, employment

Murmansk Social and Education Services Name Function Murmansk state Engineering University Main technological education institute in

Murmansk oblast Murmansk Oblast Hospital Main hospital in Murmansk oblast

Environmental NGOs Name Function and interests World Wildlife Fund (WWF) Environmental issues, biodiversity, onshore

and marine fauna and flora Bellona- Murmansk Environmental issues, global warming,

nuclear energy and waste, renewable forms of energy (wind)

Nature and Youth Biodiversity, red data book species, ecological education for children

Kola Environmental Steering Centre “GAEA” Ecological issues for Murmansk Oblast, protection of red data book species and establish nature protection zones

Northern Coalition association of environmentalists

Coordinates all environmental NGOs in Kola Peninsula

Kola Center for wildlife protection Environmental surveys, protection of red data book species.

Indigenous People’s Organisations Name Function and Interests Murmansk Regional Social Organisation “Indigenous People Associaltion” (Kolsky Saami)

Ensures the legacy and continuation of traditional Saami cultural values (arts, crafts, traditional way of life), publish saami language books

Organisation of the SAAMI people (Lovozero settlement)

Establish forums for discussion on issues of indigenous people

State regional institution “Murmansk Regional Center of Indigenous People of the North”

State organisation. Intermediary between indigenous people and government organisations

Murmansk Oblast Council of Saami authorised representatives

Represents interest of indigenous people in state council

Saamski Fond Priroda Newly founded organisation with the goal to associate ecology and indigenous people way of life.

Teriberka Educational and Social Services – Name Facilities Teriberka School system

2 schools, 2 kindergardens and 1 musical school

Teriberka Public Library Library has 16000 books and 6 specialists Teriberka Recreation club Club for youth Teriberka Clinic Only health facility in Teriberka. Primary care

only.

Teriberka Private Enterprises (employers) Name Activity Teriberka SRM Utilities supplier (utilities supply was

privatised in Teriberka) SPK RK “Murman” Privately owned dairy farm (over 30 cows) and

owns fishing boats

Serebrianskie Cascade Manages the hydroelectric plant LLC “Sea Food Rus” Fish canning company. Processes and cans fish

product SKhPK “Tundra” Reindeer breeders that pasture reindeer 50 km

from Teriberka and Zavalishina/Opasova Bay.

Mass Media Newspapers Name Function Artic Star Business informational newspaper on

Murmansk Enterprise Delovoy Sever Newspaper founded by the association of fish

industrialists and business men of Murmansk Oblast

Murmansk Vestnik Main Murmansk Newspaper daily publication, social and political issues

TV Name Function Murman TV station covering local news and broadcasts TV-XX1 North Western Broadcasting covers both Kola

peninsula and Karelia regions

Radio Murman Local radio station Russian Radio Murmansk Regional radio station

Murmansk Web Sites Kola Steering Environmental Center GAEA www.//gaia.artic.org.ru Nature territories under special protection in Murmansk Oblast

www://biodiversity.ru/kola/

Nature and Youth http://pim-murmansk.narod.ru Green club http://idc.cis.lead.org/murmansk/ Barents Observer www.barentsobserver.com

Main Russian Contractors for Shtokman Development (FEED stage) Name Activity Amige Geotechnical surveys Frecom Environmental survey and impact assessment Petergaz Geophysical surveys Giprospetzgaz Main design institute for Shtokman

Development Phase 1 VNIIGAZ Geosciences PINRO Ichtyological surveys and industrial fisheries

expertise VNIIBT Design institute for drilling project Institute of historical and material culture under Russian Academy of Sciences

Archaeological surveys and evaluation

Annex B

Consultations Undertaken – Summary of Discussions

ANNEX B. CONSULTATIONS UNDERTAKEN – SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS

SER No

Date of consultations Group of stakeholders

Names of stakeholders’ representatives

Official position (where given)

Summary of main inquiries, proposals and concerned presented by stakeholders

Regular consultations with NGOs 1 27.05.2008 NGOs (Belona-

Murmansk; WWW-Russia; Geaya; Northern Coalition; Nature& Young People)

1. А.Кireeva 2. N.Leshkina 3. А.Pokotorenco 4. S.Zhavorobkyn 5. О.Sutkaitne 6. V.Krasnopolskii 7. А.Zaicev 8. Y.Ivanov 9. G. Horeva 10. Е. Кruglova 11. О. Petrova 12.V. Petrov 13.V.Servetnik

1. «Belona-Murmansk» 2. «Belona-Murmansk» 3. «Belona-Murmansk» 4. ANO Centre of Clean Production 5. «WWW-Russia» 6. «WWW-Russia» 7. Geaya 8. Geaya 9. Geaya 10. Geaya 11. Secretary of Nord Coalition 12.KTSODP 13. «Nature & Young People»

First meeting with NGO, Shtokman Project presentation, making up a “dialogue”, questions & answers.

Hold regular meetings with NGOs once in 3-4 months.

NGOs will address their letters to SDAG Management.

Set-up a SDAG committee to deal with NGOs with one representative from Project partners to be assigned.

Review the Document ” NGOs joint ecology requirements to O&G majors”.

2 17.10.2008 NGOs (Belona-Murmansk; WWW-Russia; Geaya; Secretary of North Coalition; Nature& Young People)

1. А.Кireeva 2. N.Leshkina 3. А.Ponomorenco 4. S.Zhavorobkyn 5. О.Sutkaitne 6. V.Krasnopolskii 7. А.Zaicev 8. Y.Ivanov 9. О. Petrova 10.V.Servetnik, 11. T. Kulibakina,

1.«Belona-Murmansk» 2. «Belona-Murmansk» 3. «Belona-Murmansk» 4. «WWW-Russia» 5. «WWW-Russia» 6. «WWW-Russia» 7. Geaya 8. Geaya 9. Secretary of North Coalition 10. Nature & Young People 11. Nature & Young People

The next meeting is fixed to discuss SDAG HSE policy

Company “Belona-Murmansk” will submit the copy of the document on wind power engineering project realization for 2 years signed by Administration of Murmansk Region.

Bellona asked some clarification about CO2 capture and storage and would appreciate to know what Sdag is doing for this issue. It was replied that that SDag will make a presentation on this topic for next meeting.

SER No





3 13.02.2009

NGOs (Belona-Murmansk; WWW-Russia; Geaya; Secretary of Nord Coalition; Nature& Young People)

1. О. Petrova 2. T. Bayeva 3. S. Zhavoronkin 4. N. Lesikhina 5. А.Kireeva 6. Y. Sergeev » 7. A.Ponomarenko 8. M.Rizhov 9. Y.Ivanov 10. Е. Кruglikova 11. R. Antipin

1. Secretary of North Coalition 2. «WWF-Russia» 3. «WWF-Russia» 4. «Bellona-Murmansk» 5. А.Kireeva 6. «Bellona-Murmansk» 7. «Bellona-Murmansk» 8. Geaya 9. Geaya 10. Geaya 11. «Nature & Young People»

• Shtokman Project Phase 1, Work Progress Update, Presentation.

• Presentation of Shtokman project CO2 assessment..

• Review the program for preservation of protected types of flora & fauna in the project area and compensation measures.

• Review the possibility of presenting the results of Risk Assessment to NGO, in compliance with Information Disclosure Plan.

4 28.09.2009 NGOs (North Coalition, Bellona-Murmansk; WWW-Russia; Geaya; Geya; Nature& Young People)

1. V. Petrov 2. S. Zhavoronkin 3. V.Krasnopolsky 4. N. Lesikhina 5. А.Kireeva 6. M. Rizhov 7. Е. Кruglikova 8. V. Servetnik

1. North Coalition 2. «WWF-Russia» 3. «WWF-Russia» 4. «Bellona-Murmansk» 5. «Bellona-Murmansk» 6. “Geaya” 7. “Geaya”

8. «Nature & Young People»

• Shtokman Presentation on Environmental Survey Results and Red Book Species

• NGO Presentation on Red Book Species

• Review establishment of the Compensatory Territory and obligations of the company

• Prepare Presentation for NGO on Conclusions of Frecom’s Final Report

Regular consultations with Indigenous People Organizations (Government and Non-Governmental)

1 19.08.2008 Indigenous People Organizations (Government and Non-Governmental) (Association Kolsky Saami; Saami Murmansk Region)

1. Nina Eliseevna Afanaseva, 2. Ivan Yakovlevich Matrekhin 3.Andrey Alekseevich Ageev,

1.President of Murmansk Region Social Organization “ Indigenous People Association (Kolsky Saami)” 2. Chairman of Board of Social Organization Saami Murmansk Region (SOSMR) 3. Head of State Organization

First gathering and familiarity with organizations, establishing interaction, questions and answers.

Hold regular meetings with Indigenous People Organizations once in 3-4 months.

SER No





“Centre IP” (Administration of Murmansk Region)

2 17.10.2008 Indigenous People Organizations (Government and Non-Governmental) (Association Kolsky Saami; Saami Murmansk Region; Centre IP Administration of Murmansk Region)

1. Nina Eliseevna Afanaseva, 2. Ivan Yakovlevich Matrekhin 3.Andrey Alekseevich Ageev,

1.President of Murmansk Region Social Organization “ Indigenous People Association (Kolsky Saami)” 2. Chairman of Board of Social Organization Saami Murmansk Region (SOSMR). 3. Head of State Organization “Centre IP” (Administration of Murmansk Region)

SDAG will present its training program and how to gain employment in the project following training.

3 13.02.2009

Indigenous People Organizations (Government and Non-Governmental) (Association Kolsky Saami; Saami Murmansk Region; Centre IP Administration of Murmansk Region)

1. Nina Afanaseva 2. Alexandra Artieva, 3. Valentina Sovkina 4. Andrey Ageev

1. President of Murmansk Region Social Organization “Indigenous People Association” (Kolsky Saami) 2. Member of Board of Social Organization Saami, Murmansk Region (SOSMR) 3. Member of Board of Saami Representatives, Murmansk Region 4. Director, State Regional Institution “Murmansk Regional Center of IP of the North”

• Presentation of Shtokman Indigenous People (IP) Strategy, focusing on IP employment issues.

• Shtokman Development AG asked State Organization “Centre IP” (Murmansk Region) and local IP organizations to provide a list of IP candidates potentially interested in summer/fall 09 works done by Shtokman Development in Teriberka area

4 16.04.2009 Indigenous People Organizations (Government and Non-Governmental) (Association Kolsky Saami; Saami Murmansk Region; Centre IP

1.Nina Afanaseva 2. Valentina Sovkina 3.Andrey Ageev

1. President of Murmansk Region Social Organization “Indigenous People Association” (Kolsky Saami) (AKS) 2.Chairman of Board of Saami Representatives, Murmansk Region 3. Director, State Regional Institution “Murmansk Regional

Presentation of Saami Language Study Book “Polar Lights” prepared by Saami authors, and discussion of the possibility of publishing financing by Shtokman.

Presentation of the Report and results of Social Economic Studies including IP Chapter , completed on SDAG’s request

SER No





Administration of Murmansk Region and str.)

4.Lubov Vatonina 5.Julia Chuprova, Secretary of IP Council, of the Government of Murmansk Region 6.Alexander Kobelev, 7.Zinaida Loskutova, 8. Vitaly Krut, Chairman of IP community “Voavshess”

Center of IP of the North” 4. Chairman of IP Council, of the Government of Murmansk Region 5. Secretary of IP Council, of the Government of Murmansk Region 6. Deputy Chairman, OOSMO 7. member of Indigenous People Association” (Kolsky Saami) (AKS), Olenegorsk 8.Chairman of IP community “Voavshess

Presentation on IP employment. Shtokman Development AG asked

State Organization “Centre IP” (Murmansk Region) and local IP organizations to provide confirmed List of IP candidates potentially interested in participation in Works in summer –fall this year and other similar assignments.

5 28.09.2009 Indigenous People Organizations (Government and Non-Governmental) (Association Kolsky Saami; Saami Murmansk Region Centre IP Administration of Murmansk Region, OOSMO, “Saami Nurash”)

1. Nina Afanaseva

2. Valentina Sovkina

3. Andrey Ageev

4. Anna Afanaseva

5. Tatiana Matrekhina

6. Sergey Zakharov

7. Andrey Ivanov

1. President of Murmansk Regional Social Organization “Indigenous People Association” (Kolsky Saami) (AKS) 2. Chairman of Council of Saami Representatives, Murmansk Region 3. Director of the “Saami Nature Fund” 4. “Saami Nurash” Representative 5. OOSMO Representative 6. Representative of the Murmansk Regional Social Organization “Indigenous People Association” (Kolsky Saami) (AKS) 7. “999” Print Shop Director

Presentation of the Social Economic Studies Report , including IP Chapter , completed by ERM on SDAG’s request

Response to the Questions of the Council of Saami Representatives, Murmansk Region, asked during the Public Hearings in Teriberka, on September 15. 2009

Presentation of the Saami Language Study Book prepared by Saami authors

Shtokman Development AG will elaborate on the conclusion of a Memorandum of Understanding with the Saami non-governmental organizations, including Council of Saami Representatives, and will inform IP NGOs about the decision at the next

SER No





meeting. Presentation of the Saami language book, sponsored by SDAG, will take place at the International Economic Forum in Murmansk. OOSMO Representative Tatiana Matrekhina will submit a report on participation in the Conference of the Finno-Ugric peoples in Saransk, sponsored by SDAG, by the next meeting. SDAG Sustainable Development Manager will plan a working meeting with the head of Council of Saami Representatives, AKS and OOSMO to identify the criteria for selection of promising candidates (1-3) for Shtokman Scholarship among gifted Saami of the Murmansk region.

ESIA Scoping Consultation June 2009

1 08.06.2009 Teriberka representatives

1. Valery Yarantsev 2. Alexander Trubilin 3. Lyudmila Gavrilova 4. Vladimir Yeremeyev

1. Head of Teriberka Municipal District 2. Acting Head of Teriberka Administration 3. Deputy of the town council, pensioner 4. Inspector, the Murman Agricultural and Fishery Cooperative Society , trade union delegate 5. Acting Chairman, the Murman Agricultural and Fishery

Introduction of the 2007 public hearings; consent of Teriberka residents to the selected site;

Information about the current status of the project;

Brief description of on-going surveys; Description of the Stockman field

location; SDAG is responsible for Stage 1

implementation; Environment degradation concerns

(tracked vehicles control, pipeline

SER No





5. Sergey Khronenko 6. Nadezhda Konick 7. Alicia Ryazhskikh 8. Sergey Shatashavili 9. Elena Kozhina 10. Tatyana Kichigina 11. Anna Fateyeva 12. Ivan Lysenko 13. Alexander Fedoseyev 14. Valentina Kasnauskene 15. Galina Yeremeyeva 16. Natalya Solomakhina 17. Nina Afanasyeva 18. Ivan Matryokhin 19. Anna Kireyeva 20. Vadim Krasnopolsky 21. Roman Antipin 22. Victor Petrov 23. Mikhail Ryzhov

Cooperative Society 6. Deputy Chairperson, the Murman Agricultural and Fishery Cooperative Society (‘Murman’) 7. Deputy Warden, teacher, Lodyninskaya school 8. Chairman of the Board of Directors, OOO Teriberskiye Sudoremontnye Masterskiye (shipyard) 9. Chairlady of the Council of Deputies, Teriberka 10. Engineer, Fire Brigade 23 11. Teacher, Kindergarten 23 12. Head Doctor, Teriberka resident 13. Teriberka resident (fisherman) 14. Teriberka resident (Lodeynoye), pensioner 15. Teriberka resident, pensioner 16. Teriberka resident (Lapp) 17. President, Association of the Kola Lapps 18. Chairman, Murmansk regional public organisation of the Lapps 19. Representative, Bellona-Murmansk 20. Representative, WWF 21. Activist, Nature and Youth 22. Deputy Chairman, Kola Centre for Wildlife Protection 23. Representative, the Gea Kola Coordination Environmental Centre (‘Gea’) 24. Representative, Murmansk Regional Public Chamber

crossing deer pastures, lakes conditions in the Opasova bay etc.);

Lack of full information about Shtockman;

Employment interest; Lack of information about the

schedule of activities.

SER No





24. Alexandra Artiyeva 25. Natalya Vershinina 26. Oleg Titov 27. Andrey Ageyev

25. Head of State Environmental Expert Review, Ministry of Nature and Environment, Murmansk Oblast 26. Director of Science, the Polar Research and Development Institute of Marine Fishery and Oceanography (‘PINRO’) 27. Head of the Murmansk Regional Centre of the Northern Indigenous Minorities

Public Hearings in Kola on “ Work Program of Engineering Survey( Geotechnical Works )

for PTTK TEO ( Feasibility Study), in Teriberka area (Orlovka, Zavalishina, Korabelnaya and Opasova bay)» 1 16.09.2009

Murmansk Region Kolsky District Administration

Murmansk Region Nature Resources and Environmental Committee

ОАО «АМIGE»

Polar Research and Development Institute of Marine Fishery and Oceanography (‘PINRO’)

MMBI KNTS RAN Mining Institute KNTS RAN

1. Alexey Akuiarvi

2. Pavel Bogdanov

3. Yuri Potapkin

4.Konstantin Sokolov

5. Mikhail Novikov

6. Pavel Makarevich

7. Sergei Ivanov

8. Pavel Vashenko

9. Andrey Demahin

10. Andrey Diakov

11 Valery Tichonhuk

12 Natalia Kalinina

13. Irina Egorova

1. Murmansk Region Kolsky District Administration, Foreign Affairs Specialist

2. Murmansk Region Nature Resources and Environmental Committee, Chief Specialist

3. ОАО «АМIGE», GDO Chief

4. Polar Research and Development Institute of Marine Fishery and Oceanography (‘PINRO’), Chief of Lab

5. Polar Research and Development Institute of Marine Fishery and Oceanography (‘PINRO’), Sr. Scientist

FRECOM’s Representative acquainted the participants with the companies involved in the project; spoke about marine engineering surveys, their scope and duration, provided information on environmental studies conducted by FRECOM and PINRO in 2008. Conclusions: - Consider public hearings accomplished - Approve the implementation of planned activities taking into account suggestions and comments of experts and the public and compliance with all regulations and legal requirements, including environmental and industrial requirements.

SER No





Fishing Entrepreneurs of the North Union

BBTU

«Nature & Young

People»

Kola Centre for Wildlife Protection

Geya

Council of Saami Representatives, Murmansk Region (SUPS)

Murmansk Region Social Organization “Indigenous People Association” (Kolsky Saami) (AKS)

Bellona Murmansk

Kolsky Association of Female Lawyers

14. Vitaly Servetnik

15. Viktor Petrov

16. Elena Kruglikova


18. Nina Afanaseeva

19. Nina Lesikhina

20. Irina Paikacheva

6. MMBI KNTS RAN , Deputy General Director

7. MMBI KNTS RAN, Deputy Lab Chief

8. MMBI KNTS RAN Engineer

9. Mining Institute KNTS RAN Engineer

10. Mining Institute KNTS RAN Junior Scientist

11. Fishing Entrepreneurs of the North Union, 1st Deputy Director General

12. BBTU, Head of Department

13. BBTU, Chief Specialist

14. «Nature & Young People» Chairman

15. «Nature & Young People» Deputy Chairman

16. Geya, Project Coordinator

17. Council of Saami Representatives, Murmansk Region (SUPS) Chairman

18. Murmansk Region Social Organization “Indigenous People Association” (Kolsky Saami) (AKS) President

19. Bellona Murmansk, Coordinator

SER No





20. Kolsky Association of Female Lawyers, Director

Public Hearings in Teriberka on “ Work Program of Engineering Survey( Geotechnical Works ) for PTTK TEO ( Feasibility Study), in Teriberka area (Orlovka, Zavalishina, Korabelnaya and Opasova bay)»

2 15.09.2009 Murmansk Region Kolsky District Administration

Murmansk Region Nature Resources and Environmental Committee

ОАО «АМIGE»

Polar Research and Development Institute of Marine Fishery and Oceanography ‘PINRO’ Council of Saami Representatives, Murmansk Region (SUPS)

Murmansk Region Social Organization “Indigenous People Association” (Kolsky Saami) (AKS)

Bellona Murmansk

Kolsky Association of

1. Alexey Akuiarvi

2. Pavel Bogdanov

3. Yuri Potapkin

4. Pavel Bogdanov

5. Mikhail Novikov


7. Nina Afanaseva

8. Nina Lesihina

9. Irina Paikacheva

10. Valery Yarantsev

11. Elena Kozhina

12. Ludmila Shukshina

13. Sergey Zhavoronkin

14. Ludmila Umnova 15. Aleksandra Artieva 16. Nadezhda Chuprova

1. Murmansk Region Kolsky District Administration, Foreign Affairs Specialist.

2. Murmansk Region Nature Resources and Environmental Committee, Chief Specialist

3. ОАО «АМIGE», GDO Chief

4. Polar Research and Development Institute of Marine Fishery and Oceanography (‘PINRO’), Chief of Lab

5. Polar Research and Development Institute of Marine Fishery and Oceanography (‘PINRO’), Sr. Scientist

6. Council of Saami Representatives, Murmansk Region (SUPS) Chairman

7. Murmansk Region Social Organization “Indigenous People Association” (Kolsky Saami) (AKS) President

FRECOM’s Representative acquainted the participants with the companies involved in the project; spoke about marine engineering surveys, their scope and duration, provided information on environmental studies conducted by FRECOM and PINRO in 2008. Conclusions: - Consider public hearings accomplished - Approve the implementation of planned activities taking into account suggestions and comments of experts and the public and compliance with all regulations and legal requirements, including environmental and industrial requirements.

SER No





Female Lawyers

8. Bellona Murmansk, Coordinator

9. Kolsky Association of Female Lawyers, Director

10. Teriberka Administration, Mayor

11. Teriberka Administration, Village Committee Chairman

12. Teriberka Administration, Specialist

13. WWF , Expert

14. Nature & Young People» Representative

15. OOSMO Representative

16. State IP Organization, Chairman

Annex C

ERM ESIA Scoping Meeting Presentation

ANNEX C. ERM ESIA SCOPING MEETING PRESENTATION JUNE 8, 2009 TERIBERKA

Annex D

Attendees of ESIA Scoping (public) Meeting Held in Teriberka 8 June 2009

ANNEX D. ATTENDEES OF ESIA SCOPING (PUBLIC) MEETING HELD IN TERIBERKA 8 JUNE 2009

GENERAL INFORMATION

(1) Venue Teriberka, Murmansk Region (2) Date

08 June 2009

ATTENDEES Name Position

Yuri Komarov CEO, SDAG Herve Madeo Deputy CEO, SDAG Alexander Selin Director of Murmansk and Teriberka branches, SDAG Kirsten Macallan Environment Protection Manager, SDAG Marat Sharifullin Deputy Head of EHS Department, SDAG Marina Kashirina Environment Protection Coordinator, SDAG Alexandra Mishina Sustainable Development Manager, SDAG Yuri Akhremenko SDAG Vyacheslav Seleznyov SDAG Tatiana Nareyko Specialist, SDAG Ian Buicknan H&S Manager, Onshore Project, SDAG Alistair Fullton Partner, ERM Elena Amirkhanova Principal Consultant, ERM Shakhila Perumalpillay Principal Social Consultant, ERM Margarita Saft Consultant, ERM Frederick Giovanetti Senior Adviser, EBRD Valery Yarantsev Head of Teriberka Municipal District Alexander Trubilin Acting Head of Teriberka Administration Lyudmila Gavrilova Deputy of the town council, pensioner Vladimir Yeremeyev Inspector, the Murman Agricultural and Fishery Cooperative

Society , trade union delegate Sergey Khronenko Acting Chairman, the Murman Agricultural and Fishery

Cooperative Society Nadezhda Konick Deputy Chairperson, the Murman Agricultural and Fishery

Cooperative Society (‘Murman’) Alicia Ryazhskikh Deputy Warden, teacher, Lodyninskaya school Sergey Shatashavili Chairman of the Board of Directors, OOO Teriberskiye

Sudoremontnye Masterskiye (shipyard) Elena Kozhina Chairlady of the Council of Deputies, Teriberka Tatyana Kichigina Engineer, Fire Brigade 23 Anna Fateyeva Teacher, Kindergarten 23 Ivan Lysenko Head Doctor, Teriberka resident Alexander Fedoseyev Teriberka resident (fisherman) Valentina Kasnauskene Teriberka resident (Lodeynoye), pensioner Galina Yeremeyeva Teriberka resident, pensioner Natalya Solomakhina Teriberka resident (Lapp) Nina Afanasyeva President, Association of the Kola Lapps Ivan Matryokhin Chairman, Murmansk regional public organisation of the

Lapps Anna Kireyeva Representative, Bellona-Murmansk Vadim Krasnopolsky Representative, WWF Roman Antipin Activist, Nature and Youth Victor Petrov Deputy Chairman, Kola Centre for Wildlife Protection

Mikhail Ryzhov Representative, the Gea Kola Coordination Environmental Centre (‘Gea’)

Alexandra Artiyeva Representative, Murmansk Regional Public Chamber Natalya Vershinina Head of State Environmental Expert Review, Ministry of

Nature and Environment, Murmansk Oblast Oleg Titov Director of Science, the Polar Research and Development

Institute of Marine Fishery and Oceanography (‘PINRO’) Andrey Ageyev Head of the Murmansk Regional Centre of the Northern

Indigenous Minorities

Annex E

Key Items of Project Information Disclosure

ANNEX E KEY ITEMS OF PROJECT INFORMATION DISCLOSURE

"Russia's Gazprom ups Shtokman reserves to 3.8 tcm". Reuters. 2007-11-15. http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSL1589543420071115. Retrieved on 2008-01-06.

"Investment risky in Russia as politics affects profits". Oil & Gas Journal. 2007-07-16. http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/Investment-in-Russia.pdf. Retrieved on 2009-01-31.

Nadejda Makarova Victor (January 2008). Gazprom: Gas Giant Under Strain. Working Paper #71. Stanford University. http://pesd.stanford.edu/publications/gazprom_gas_giant_under_strain/. Retrieved on 2009-01-31.

Gazprom (2005-09-16). Gazprom Decides on Short-list of Companies – Poptential Partners in Shtokman Gas Condensate Field Development. Press release. http://www.gazprom.ru/eng/news/2005/09/17938.shtml. Retrieved on 2009-01-31.

"Gazprom Rejects Foreign Partners for Shtokman". Rigzone. 2006-10-09. http://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=36922. Retrieved on 2009-01-31.

"Gazprom and Total sign a Framework Agreement For Cooperation in the First Phase of Shtokman Development". OilVoice. 2007-07-13. http://www.oilvoice.com/Gazprom_and_Total_sign_a_Framework_Agreement_For_Cooperation/10154.htm. Retrieved on 2007-07-18.

"Total signs on Shtokman dotted line". Upstream online. 2007-07-13. http://www.upstreamonline.com/incoming/article137232.ece. Retrieved on 2007-07-13.

Gazprom (2007-10-25). Gazprom and StatoilHydro sign agreement on main condition for cooperation in phase 1 of Shtokman field development. Press release. http://www.gazprom.com/eng/news/2007/10/25719.shtmll. Retrieved on 2007-10-26.

"Shtokman project". Gazprom. http://www.gazprom.com/eng/articles/article21712.shtml. Retrieved on 2007-07-18.

"Shtokman won't be on stream until 2035". Upstream Online. 2007-04-17. http://www.upstreamonline.com/live/article150559.ece. Retrieved on 2007-10-26.

"'Iceberg threat' looms over Shtokman". Upstream online. 2007-04-27. http://www.upstreamonline.com/incoming/article132282.ece. Retrieved on 2007-10-26.

"Floating removable platforms for Shtokman field". Barents Observer. 2008-01-31. http://www.barentsobserver.com/floating-removable-platforms-for-shtokman-field.4454290-16149.html. Retrieved on 2008-03-15.

"Shtokman costs cut to US $12 Bn.". Oil and gas net. 2007-11-15. http://www.oil-and-gas.net/index.php?page_id=13091. Retrieved on 2007-11-24.

"Russia prepares for LNG export from Murmansk". Barents Observer. 2005-12-14. http://www.barentsobserver.com/index.php?id=290893&cat=16149&xforceredir=1&noredir=1. Retrieved on 2007-10-26.

Jorn Madslien (2006-10-09). "Shock as Russia goes solo on gas field". BBC New. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6035811.stm1. Retrieved on 2007-10-26.

"Scientists oppose projected Shtokman pipeline". Barents Observer. 2006-09-13. http://www.barentsobserver.com/index.php?id=348732&cat=16176&xforceredir=1&noredir=1. Retrieved on 2007-10-26.

"Gazprom changed site for planned Shtokman LNG plant". Barents Observer. 2006-08-14. http://www.barentsobserver.com/index.php?id=527709&cat=16149&xforceredir=1&noredir=1. Retrieved on 2007-08-18.

"Technip 'tucks in to Shtokman FEED'". Upstream Online. 2008-03-14. http://www.upstreamonline.com/live/article150559.ece. Retrieved on 2008-03-14.

"Trio set to feast on Shtokman FEED". Upstream Online. 2008-03-18. http://www.upstreamonline.com/live/article150844.ece. Retrieved on 2008-04-20.

"JP Kenny has Shtokman gig in the bag". Upstream Online. 2008-03-25. http://www.upstreamonline.com/live/article151103.ece. Retrieved on 2008-04-20.

"Gazprom paid 1,7 billion USD for control in the Barents Sea". Barentsinfo. 2005-08-08. http://www.barentsinfo.org/?newsid=5563&deptid=13875&showmodul=20&languageid=4&news=1. Retrieved on 2007-07-18.

"Gazprom Sub and Hydro Begin Drilling Shtokman Field Well". OilVoice. 2006-07-25. http://www.oilvoice.com/Gazprom_Sub_and_Hydro_Begin_Drilling_Shtokman_Field_Well_/6929.htm. Retrieved on 2007-07-18.

"Gazprom confirms Shtokman LNG export start in 2014". Reuters. 2008-02-21. http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKL2182220920080221. Retrieved on 2008-02-21.

Gazprom (2007-07-12). Gazprom chooses French Total as partner for initial phase of Shtokman field development. Press release. http://www.gazprom.com/eng/news/2007/07/24558.shtml. Retrieved on 2007-07-12.

"The Kremlin-controlled gas monopoly has chosen France's Total as its partner in the giant Shtokman gas field". The Times. 2007-07-12. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article2064457.ece. Retrieved on 2007-07-12.

"Shtokman start-up hinges on credit". Upstream Online. 2008-12-08. http://www.upstreamonline.com/live/article167902.ece. Retrieved on 2007-11-24.

"Green fury at Shtokman nuke plans". Upstream Online. 2007-11-23. http://www.upstreamonline.com/live/article144833.ece. Retrieved on 2007-11-24.

Annex F

Example Public Grievance Log

ANNEX F KEY ITEMS OF PROJECT INFORMATION DISCLOSURE

Example of Public Grievance Log

Порядковый номер

Регист-рацио-нный индекс

Дата поступлен

ия

ФИО заявите

ля

Адрес заявител

я

Краткое содержание существа обращения

ФИО лица, рассматривающ

его письмо

ФИО исполните

ля, которому поручена проверка

Отметка о принятом решении и

сообщении о результатах заявителю

Отметки об осуществлении контроля

за разрешением

письма

Number Coding Date Applicant's Name

Applicant's

AddressClaim Summary

Name of the person in charge,

responsible for Claim review and

Controller's Name

Decision made, Applicant

informed - check mark

Controller's check mark

ERM has 145 offices across the following countries worldwide

Argentina The Netherlands Australia New Zealand Belgium Panama Brazil Peru Canada Poland Chile Portugal China Puerto Rico Colombia Romania France Russia Germany Singapore Hong Kong South Africa Hungary Spain India Sweden Indonesia Taiwan Ireland Thailand Italy United Arab Emirates Japan UK Kazakhstan US Korea Venezuela Malaysia Vietnam Mexico

ERM’s Oxford Office Eaton House Wallbrook Court North Hinskey Lane Oxford OX2 0QS T: 01865 384800 F: 01865 384932

www.erm.com