170
Integrated Watershed Management Programme D D e e t t a a i i l l P P r r o o j j e e c c t t R R e e p p o o r r t t Name of Watershed Udaipur – II - Sarada Macro/Micro No. 14/1,2,3,6 &11/8,9, 10,11,12 Geographical Area 5014 Ha. Treated Area 4843 Ha. Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti Sarada, District Udaipur (Raj) Project Manager District Watershed Development Unit, Zila Parishad, Udaipur

Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Integrated Watershed Management Programme

DDeettaaiill PPrroojjeecctt RReeppoorrttName ofWatershed

Udaipur – II -Sarada

Macro/MicroNo.

14/1,2,3,6 &11/8,9,10,11,12

GeographicalArea

5014 Ha.

Treated Area 4843 Ha.

Cost 581.16 Lac

Project Period 2009-10to

2013-14

Assistant EngineerPanchayat Samiti Sarada,

District Udaipur (Raj)

Project ManagerDistrict Watershed Development

Unit, Zila Parishad, Udaipur

Page 2: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Detailed Project Report1 Name of Water Shed Udaipur II-Sarada

2 Sanction Year 2009 - 10

3 Sanctioned Amount 581.16 lacs

4 Area 4843 hac

5 Macro/Micro 14/1,2,3,6 & 11/8,9,10,11,12

6 Date of Commencement ofProject March-10

7 Gram Panchayat Nimboda, Katanwara,Chawand,Sarada, Kejad, Parsad, Kharbar

8 Panchayat Samiti Sarada

9 Distt. Udaipur

10 Project ImplimentationAgency

Assistant Engineer, P.S.Sarada

11 Name of Zila ParishadZila parishad(RD) Udaipur (Raj)

Page 3: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

INDEX

Chap.No. Subject P.No.

1 Introduction

2 Basic Data, Analysis and Scope

3 Proposed Development Plan

4 Activity wise Total Abstract of Cost

5 Annual Action Plan

6 Projects Outcomes

7 Tech.Designs&Estimates for ProposedActyvity

8 Enclosures

Page 4: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti
Page 5: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

CHAPTER – I INTRODUCTION

Location.

UDAIPUR-II SARADA Project is located in Sarada Block, of UDAIPUR district. The project

area is between the latitudes 73040’ to 73052’ & 24008’ to 24015’ longitudes. It is at a

distance of 0 km from its Block head quarters and 50 Kms from the district head quarters.

There are 17 no. of habitations in the Project area and other details are given below.

General features of watershed

S.No. Name of Project(as per GOI) UDAIPUR-II

SARADA

(a) Name of Catchment Kadana

(b) Name of watershed

area(local name)

UDAIPUR-II

SARADA

© Project Area 5014

(d) Net treatable Area 4843

e) Cost of Project 601.68 lcs

f) Cost/hectare 12000.00

g) Year of Sanction 2009-10

h) Watershed Code 130114 , 130111

i) No. of Gram Panchayats in

project area

07

j) No. of villages in projectarea 17

k) Type of Project other

l) Elevation (metres) 696

m) Major streams 01

n) Slope range (%) 5.68

Macro/micro Name of Gram

Panchayat

Name of Villages

Covered

Census code of

villages

Area

11/11,11/12,14/1 Chawand Chawand 03255400 415

11/11,14/1,14/2 Chawand Dekali 03255500 10211/9,11/10 Katanwara Chhani 03255800 606

11/10,11/11 Katanwara Katanwara 03255600 17311/9 Katanwara Kherki 03252900 482

11/11,11/12 Katanwara Mandwa 03255700 29111/8,11/9,11/10 Katanwara Nal Alkar 03255900 743

11/9,11/10 Kharbar Chak (A) Kharbar Chak (A) 03256600 16214/1 Neemach Neemach 03257300 226

Page 6: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

The watershed falls in Agroclimatic Zone-IV B(Sub humid Tropic) .The soil texture is sandy

Loam The average rainfall is 60.7cm . The temperatures in the area are in the range

between 19 - 48 centigrade during summer and 3.2 to 28.90 centigrade during winter. The

major crops in the area are Maize, Blackgram (urd), Cluster beam (gawer),Green gram

(moong),chick pea (channa), Wheat ,Barley ,Rape seed (Mustred),Lin seed(Alsi) 21.53 %

land is under cultivation 23.97% land fallow 37.34 % land is wasteland. 4.25 % land is

irrigated through 3 %.

705 No of households are BPL (53.53% households) 106 are landless

households(8.04% households) and 991 household are small and marginal farmers

(75.24%household) .Average land holding in the area is 0.82 ha. 17.29% area is single

cropped area and 4.25% is double cropped. The main source of irrigation is open well. The

average annual rainfall (5 years) in the area is 607.60 mm. The Major streams in the

Watershed are Gargal, The major festivals in the village are Holi ,Deewali ,Bhawari,

Dashamata & Chotmata. At present these village is having 3332 population with

Communities like Meena , Patel , Bramin ,Mahajan & Muslim .

Climatic and Hydrological information1 Average Annual Rainfall(mm)

Year Average AnnualRainfall(mm)

1 2000 3022 2001 4753 2002 2674 2003 4285 2004 5846 2005 6987 2006 11548 2007 4109 2008 61710 2009 533

2 Average Monthly rainfall (last ten years)Month Rainfall(mm)

i) June 63

14/1 Neemach Kajed 03255200 13211/11,14/2,14/3 Nimboda Dakan Baori 03256900 57

14/3,14/6 Nimboda Nimboda 03257000 8914/3,14/6 Nimboda Pal Neemoda 03256800 293

14/6 Nimboda Pal Sepur 03259100 30711/9 Parsad Parsad 03256000 24814/1 Sarada Sarada 03257200 223

14/2,14/3,14/6 Sepur Sepur 03257100 465

total 5014

Page 7: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

ii) July 190iii) August 285iv) September 953 Maximum rainfall intensity (mm)

Duration rainfallintensity(mm)

i) 15 minute duration 32ii) 30 minute duration 50iii) 60 minute duration 90

4 Temperature (Degree C)Season Max Min

i) Summer Season 48 19ii) Winter Season 28.9 3.20iii) Rainy Season 31.3 15.0

5 Potential Evaporation Transpiration (PET)(mm/day)

Season PETi) Summer 10ii) Winter 2.20iii) Rainy 4.40

6 Runoffi) Peak Rate (cum/hr) 773295

ii) Total run off volume of rainyseason (ha.m.)

1933

iii) Time of return ofmaximum flood

.... .... ....

iv)Periodicity of Drought invillage area

1996 1995 .....

Other Development Schemes in the project area

S.No

Scheme Name ofthedepartment

Key interventions under theScheme

TargetedBeneficiaries

Provisions underthe Scheme

1 Atma Ag.department

To up date culivatorsthrough latest technology.

3332 Total amountsanction by thegov.

2 NREGS Panchyatsamiti

Construction ofW.H.S,Gravelroad,Individual beneficieryswork.

3332 Total amountsanction by thegov.

3 MP LAD Panchyatsamiti

Construction of communityhall,c.c road, H.P, Pipe linefor water supply.

3332 Total amountsanction by thegov.

4 MLALAD

Panchyatsamiti

Construction of communityhall,c.c road, H.P, Pipe linefor water supply.

3332 Total amountsanction by thegov.

5 TSC Panchyatsamiti

Con. of low cost toilet. 3332 1200 Rs./Toiletsubsidy given bythe gov.

6 BRGF Panchyatsamiti

Construction of communityhall,c.c road, H.P, Pipe line

3332 Total amountsanction by the

Page 8: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

for water supply gov.7 SGSY Panchyat

samitiTo streanthen S.H.G byproviding loan from banks &subsidy from gov.

3332 Total amountsanction by thegov.

Details of infrastructure in the project areas

Parameters Status(i) No. of villages connected to the main road by an

all-weather road8

(ii) No. of villages provided with electricity 8(iii) No. of households without access to drinking

waterNIL

(iv) No. of educational institutions : (P)12

(S)2

(HS)3

UPS03Primary(P)/ Secondary(S)/ Higher Secondary(HS)/

vocational institution(VI)(v) No. of villages with access to Primary Health

Centre8

(vi) No. of villages with access to VeterinaryDispensary

2

(vii) No. of villages with access to Post Office 3(viii) No. of villages with access to Banks 3(ix) No. of villages with access to Markets/ mandis 3(x) No. of villages with access to Agro-industries 0(xi) Total quantity of surplus milk 800 Lit(xii) No. of milk collection centres (U)

0(S)6

(PA)0

(O)0(e.g. Union(U)/ Society(S)/ Private agency(PA)/

others (O))(xiii) No. of villages with access to Anganwadi Centre 17(xiv) Any other facilities with no. of villages (please

specify)0

(xv) Nearest KVK 72 KM(xvi) cooperative society 03 (chawand)

(xvii) NGOs 03( Manav,Mateswari,bayaf)

(xviii) Credit institutions(i) Bank 04

(ii) Cooperative Society 03(xix) Agro Service Centre's 0

Page 9: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

titutional arrangements (SLNA,DWDU,PIA,WDT,WC, Secretary)DWDU Details

PIA particulars

WDT Particulars:

1 2 3

S.No Particulars Details of DWDU

1. PM ,DWDU Sh. Madan Chhajed, Project Manager,

2. Address with contact no., website District Watershed Development Unit,Opp. Vishal Filling Station, Pratapnagar

UdaipurMob. 9829494709

3. Telephone 0294-2492622

4. Fax 0294-2492622, 2492759

5. E-mail [email protected],[email protected]

1 2 3

S.No Particulars Details of PIA

6. Name of PIA Hakimuddin Taj

7. Designation Assistant Engineer

8. Address with contact no., website Panchayat Samiti Sarada Disstt.Udaipur

9. Telephone +919414157230

10. Fax 02905-260024

11. E-mail [email protected]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

S.No

Name of WDTmember M/F Age Qualificati

on

Experiencein

watershed(Yrs)

Description ofprofessional

training

Role/Functio

n

1 Vipin Bapna M 39 B.E.(Ag) 10 Yrs C.T.A.E.UDAIPUR

Engg.

2 Parbhu lalLabana

M 34 B.A. 12 Yrs C.T.A.E.UDAIPUR ,

IRMA ANAND

SocialScience

3 Ram narayan M 31 B.Sc.(Ag.) 2 yrs C.T.A.E.UDAIPUR

Ag,Science

4 Motu lal M 43 B.A. &6 MonthDiploma

15 yrs C.T.A.E.UDAIPUR

Vatenary

Page 10: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20Sl. No. Names

of StatesName of

theDistricts

Name ofProjects

Name ofWCs

Date ofRegistration as aSociety(dd/mm/

yy)

Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land-less

UG SHG GP Anyother

Education

Qualification

Function/s

assigned#

President Devilal/sav jimeena

√ √ - √ - - -

Secretary ChaterLal/Premmeena

Member Roopidevi/khemameena

√ √ - √ - - -

Submitted inregistradoffice on/1/11

VI. D. Village Level Institutions:Table-M(IS)8: Details of Watershed Committees (WC) in the country: State-wise*

Udaipur IWMP II Katanwara

Member Roopidevi/khemameena

√ √ - √ - - -

Member Homa/leembameena

√ √ - √ - - -

Member Laxman/kallameena

√ √ - √ - - -

Member Dharma/ramameena

√ √ - √ - - -

Member Champa/somameena

√ √ - √ - - -

Member Basanti/bherumeena

√ √ - - √ - -

Member Haju/basanti lalmeena

√ √ - - √ - -

Member Anitadevi/rameshmeena

√ √ - - √ - -

Submitted inregistradoffice on/1/11

Udaipur IWMP II Katanwara

Page 11: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Member Dhanraj/hurmameena

√ √ - - - √

Member Amra/kura meena

√ √ - - √ - -

Member Vipinbapnaj.en.

√ - - - - √

President Amra/ valji patel

√ - - √ - -

Secretary Tulsiram/dallamegwal

√ √ √

Member Bhagwan/nathupatel

- √ - √ - -

Submitted inregistradoffice on/1/11

Udaipur

Udaipur IWMP II Katanwara

Submitted inregistradoffice on/1/11

SapurIWMP II

Member Bhagwan/nathupatel

- √ - √ - -

Member Jyoti/Haribraman

- √ - - √ - - -

Member Shankar/kubamegwal

√ √ - - √ - - -

Member Kanji/gag gipatel

√ - - √ - - -

Member Pyari/shankar nath

√ √ - - - √ - -

Member Lakma/jeeva patel

√ - - - √ - -

Member Manju/haringkumar

√ - - - √ - -

Member Gyatri/Ganesh lal

√ - - - √ - -

Member Kanta/kahaya lalmeena

√ √ √

Udaipur Submitted inregistradoffice on/1/11

SapurIWMP II

Page 12: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Member Vipinbapnaj.en.

- - - - - √

President Prem/moog jipatel

√ - √ - - -

Secretary Dinesh/dhula ramkalal

√ - - - √

Member Punja/dhul jipatel

√ - √ - - -

Member Kalu /rodji kalal

√ √

Member Nagji/dungarji dangi

√ - √ - - -

Member Bhagwanji/mav jipatel

√ - √ - - -

Udaipur Submitted inregistradoffice on/1/11

Udaipur IWMP II Nimboda Submitted inregistradoffice on/1/11

SapurIWMP II

Member Bhagwanji/mav jipatel

√ - √ - - -

Member Geeta/basantimeena

√ √ - √ - -

Member Haju/jagdishmeena

√ √ - √ - -

Member Mani/bhaverlal meena

√ √ - √ - -

Member Kamla/taji kalal

√ - - √ - -

Member Prabhulal meena

√ √ - - - √

Member Vipinbapnaj.en.

- - - - √

President Prakash/dhulameena

√ √ - √ - - -Chawand Submitted inregistradoffice on/1/11

Udaipur IWMP II Nimboda Submitted inregistradoffice on/1/11

Udaipur IWMP II

Page 13: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Secretary Gopilal/nanarammeena

√ √ - - - - √

Member Bhana/vallameena

√ √ - √ - - -

Member Bhima/kalameena

√ √ - √ - - -

Member Bansi/modameena

√ √ - √ - - -

Member Kasna/punjameena

√ √ - √ - - -

Member Bhuri/vaktamegwal

√ √ - - √ - -

Chawand Submitted inregistradoffice on/1/11

Udaipur IWMP II

Member Bhuri/vaktamegwal

√ √ - - √ - -

Member Shankari/prakeshmeena

√ √ - - √ - -

Member Lali/amrameena

√ √ - - √ - -

Member Kanku/gotammeena

√ √ - - √ - -

Member ramesh/navalrammeena

√ √ - - √ - -

Member Kalumeena

√ √ √

Member Vipinbapnaj.en.

- - - - - √

President Rooplal/dayapatel

√ - √ - - -

Chawand Submitted inregistradoffice on/1/11

Submitted inregistradoffice on/1/11

Udaipur IWMP II

Udaipur IWMP II Kajed

Page 14: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Secretary Prakeshchandra/lalu rampatel

√ - - - - √

Member Bhagwan/govna jipatel

√ - √ - - -

Member Dhul ji/nathu jipatel

√ - √ - - -

Member Kalulal/nathulal patel

√ - √ - - -

Member Mani bai/prem jipatel

√ - √ - - -

Member Bhanilal/dal jipatel

√ - - √ - -

Submitted inregistradoffice on/1/11

Udaipur IWMP II Kajed

Member Bhanilal/dal jipatel

√ - - √ - -

Member Khamraj/dal jipatel

√ - - √ - -

Member Udalal/nathulal patel

√ - - √ - -

Member Durga/Prakeshpatel

√ - - √ - -

Member Vipinbapnaj.en.

- - - - √

A.en & PIAP.S SARADA

Submitted inregistradoffice on/1/11

Udaipur IWMP II Kajed

Page 15: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

1. Problems and scope of improvement in the project areaThe socio economic conditions of the area can be improved through increased production

which can be achieved through expansion in cultivated area and productivity enhancement.

1080 ha land is arable wasteland and 1202 ha is fallow can be brought under cultivation.

213 ha is only irrigated and with efforts this can be increased to 250 Ha . The productivity

gap of major crops in the area as compared with district and with areas in the same agro

climatic zones indicate potential to increase the productivity. The demonstration of improved

package of practices, improved varieties, increased irrigation facilities and soil conservation

measures under the project can bridge this gap. Due to small land holdings in the area focus

of the project would be on diversification in agriculture (horticulture, vegetables, green

houses, Agro forestry, fodder crops)and diversification in Livelihoods(Agriculture, Animal

husbandry, self employment)

6000 Quintal fodder scarcity can be met out through Pasture development .Improved animal

Husbandry practices can increase the productivity of livestock. 320 no of persons migrate

due to Unemployment this migration can be checked through creation of employment

opportunities in the project area through increase in production and diversification in

agriculture and Livelihoods as mentioned above.

Mention specific problem of the area in land degradation, water , Agriculture and inAnimal Husbandry

Due to heavy slope, Area is tend to high soil erosion & Lack of water availability insurface &sub surface zone.Most of farmers are depend on rain for crop & taking single crop.

Animal having Khupaka,moukpaka,deworming .

S.No.

Development Indicators State ProjectArea

1 Per capita income (Rs.) 16260 132502 Poverty ratio 0.22 0.533 Literacy (%) 0.604 0.5774 Sex Ratio 921 9715 infant mortality rate(Per

year)185

6 maternal mortalityratio(Per year)

10

Page 16: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

CHAPTER – II Socio economic Features, Problems and ScopeTable 2.1 Population & Household Details:

Total Population

Male Female Total SC ST1643 1689 3332 74 1885

Household DetailsBPL

household L. LessSmall

FarmerM.

FarmerTotal

householdSC

householdST

household705 116 556 435 1317 31 778

Table 2.2 Development indicatorsThe table indicates poor socio economic conditions.

Table 2.3 Land Use

Land Use Total area in Ha.

Private Panchayat Government Community TotalAgriculture Land 1080 - - - 1080Temporary fallow 120 - - - 120Permanent Fallow 1202 - - - 1202Cultivated Rainfed 867 - - - 867Cultivated irrigated 213 - - - 213

Net Sown Area 1080 - - - 1080Net Area sown more

than once213

- - - 213Forest Land - - 171 - 171Waste Land 1202 - 1872 - 3074

Pastures - 418 - 418Others - - 271 - 271

The project area has 120 ha of cultivable wasteland . 20 ha of fallow land (total 120ha) can

be brought under cultivation if some irrigation source can be provided through Construction

of WHS like Khadin, Tanka, Farm ponds etc. and also through demonstration of rainfed

varieties of crops. Construction of WHS can also increase in area under irrigation which is

only 3%.

202 ha. (23.97% of the project area) is under wastelands and can be brought under

vegetative cover, with reasonable effort . Activities like Earthen check dams, Vegetative filter

strip, V-ditches, staggered trenches ,WHS (Johad) Afforestation of wastelands and Pasture

development will be taken up on these lands

Pasture development the land use table shows that there is 418 hectare pasture land

(8.33%)This emphasizes the need for taking up pastureland development works through

sowing of promising species of grasses and plantation

Table 2.4 .a Agriculture and Horticulture status and fuel availability.

Page 17: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

1 2 3 4 5 6S.

No.Seaso

nCropsown

Variety Rain fed Irrigated Total

Area(ha)

Productio

n(Ton)

Productivity

(kg/ha)

Area

(ha)

Production(Ton)

Productivity

(kg/ha)

Area

(ha)

Production(Ton)

1 Kharif

Maize GANGA 2

606

416.63

6.875 124.25

101.89

8.2 730.25

518.51

JAWAR

CSH18

32 9.56 3.1 2 0.31 0 31 70.94

Urd PU19

32.5

7.48 2.3 25.5

0.64 2.5 58 8.11

Til RT46

21.5

1.87 0.8 18.25

0.16 0.9 39.75

2.14

MOONG

K851

55 91.00

3.5 20 10.00 4 72 99.90

GAWAR

RCG986

120

57.25

4.125 22 1.12 5.1 142 58.37

2 Rabi

Wheat Lok 1 134.75

168.44

12.5 134.75

168.44

Barely RD2552

30.5

28.45 9.33 30.5

28.45

Gram DAHOD

YELLOW

28 14.92 5.33 28 14.92

Mustred

Pusha

bold

19.75

6.68 3.2 19.75

6.68

0 0.00 0 0.003 Zaid moong 16 8.00 5 16 8.00

Total 0 0.00 0 0.00867

583.78

441 340.6 1302

984.47

Table 2.4.b Abstract of croppedArea(ha)

Area under Single crop 867haArea under Double crop 213haArea under Multiple crop 16ha

Page 18: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

S.No

Name ofcrop

Presentvariety

Rec.variety

Reason of Rec. variety.

1 Maize GANGA 2 MahiDhaval

Maturity peroid 75-80 Days(earlymaturity),Production 35-40 q/Ha,Less water reruiredbut tolrent to excess water,market value is good due

to high strach &appreance,tolrent to logging. Thisvariety is most sutaible for this W/S Area.

2 Urd PU 19 RBU-338 Maturity peroid 90 Days(early maturity),Production10-12 q/Ha,Less water reruired,market value isgood due to high strach &appreance,tolrent tologging,resistance to bacterial diseases . This

variety is most sutaible for this W/S Area.3 Til RT 46 TC -25 White seed variety,Maturity peroid 95 Days(early

maturity),Production 6-7 q/Ha,Less waterreruired,market value is good &appreance,tolrent tologging,resistance to bacterial diseases This variety

is most sutaible for this W/S Area.4 MOONG K 851 SML 668 Maturity period 85 days plants are erect

determinate and medium statured 85 cmpossesses bolder green grain s with good yellowmosaic varius cercospora leaf spot and bacterialleaf spot diseases its yield potential 15 -18quintal/hac..This variety is most sutaible for this

W/S Area.5 GAWAR RCG 986 RCG 936 Maturity period 100-105 days,Seeds medium bolt

with buff colour,suitable for growing in dry landagriculture,used for fodder and grain purpose, yield

porential is 14-15 q/Ha. This variety is most sutaiblefor this W/S Area & good market value.

6 Wheat Lok 1 RAJ 3765 Maturity period 110-120 days and plant height is89-95 cm,Heat tolerant and susceptible to dust ,

moderately resistant tokarnal bunt , yield porentialis40-50q/Ha. This variety is most sutaible for this

W/S Area & good market value.7 Barely RD 2552 RD 2508 Maturity period 118-120 days , grain is yellow &

medium bold , Sutiable for rainfed area, variety is 6row barley,medium tall(92-100 cm),resistance to

yellow rust,light, yield porential is 40-45 q/Ha. Thisvariety is most sutaible for this W/S Area .

8 Gram DAHODYELLOW

GNG 469 Maturity period 90-95 days, Sutiable for rainfedarea, resistance to wild disease , yield porential is

20-24 q/Ha.9 Mustred Pusha

boldPUSA JAIKISHAN

Maturity period 100-115 days and plant height isMedium tall. Low logging problem ,Resistant to

white rust, yield porential is 25-30 q/Ha. This varietyis most sutaible for this W/S Area .

Page 19: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Crop Rotation**will vary from project to project

Maize - MustredUrd - WheatMoong - WheatGawar - WheatFallow - GramFallow - MustredFallow - TarameeraTil - Fallow

The table shows that only 213 ha is (4.25%) is double cropped area. Also the crop rotation

shows that fallow lands are there. This indicates that there is scope for change in crop

rotation in fields where there are fallow lands through Soil and Water conservation measures,

crop demonstration and diversification in agriculture.

Soil and Water conservation measures besides putting fallow lands under cultivation

can change the area under single cropping to double and multiple cropping.

Table 2.4.c Productivity Gap Analysis (The table can also be given in bar chart form)

Analysis of the above table indicate that besides national gap there is wide gap in

productivity within state and even within same agro climatic zones.

The reasons for this variation are

The farmers are using varieties Ganga 2 of Maize . whereas the recommended

varieties like Mahi dhaval 35-40 q/Ha yield .

The farmers are using varieties PU19 of Urd .whereas the recommended varieties

like RBU338 provide 10-12 q/Ha yield

The farmers are using varieties K851 of Moong .whereas the recommended varieties

like SML 668 provide 15-18 Q/Ha.yield .

Nameof thecrop

Productivity kg/ha

India

HighestAverage

inRajasthan

HighestAverageof Agroclimatic

zone DistrictProject

Area

Maize 2335 1976 2228 1273 1500JAWAR 730 1634 1056 526 510

Urd 650 620 282 222 350Til 585 663 292 263 250

MOONG 710 699 455 422 500GAWAR 680 1400 1103 692 900Wheat 2802 3422 2614 2107 2700Barely 1985 2838 3061 1722 2200Gram 762 1190 931 931 900

Mustred 1001 1619 1271 818 950

Page 20: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

The farmers are using varieties RT 46 of TIL . whereas the recommended varieties

like TC 25 provide 6-7 q/Ha yield .

The farmers are using varieties RCG 986 of GAWAR. whereas the recommended

varieties like RCG 936 provide 14-15 q/Ha yield .

The farmers are using varieties LOK 1 of WHEAT . whereas the recommended

varieties like RAJ 3765 provide 35-40q/Ha yield .

The farmers are using varieties RD 2552 of BARELY . whereas the recommended

varieties like RD 2508 provide 40-45 q/Ha yield .

The farmers are using varieties DAHOD YELLOW of GRAM . whereas the

recommended varieties like GNG 469 provide 25-30 q/Ha. yield .

The farmers are using varieties PUSHA BOLD of MUSTRED . whereas the

recommended varieties like PUSA JAI KISHAN provide 20-25 q/Ha. yield .

Lack of Availability of good quality seeds of desired crop and variety in adequate

quantities and time to the farmers.

Availability of water for cultivation(4.25 % is irrigated)

The productivity gap and reasons of it indicate potential to increase the productivity through

crop demonstration .Crop demonstrations would be carried out on improved crops/ varieties,

improved agronomic practices. INM, IPM, Mixed cropping, distribution of fodder seed mini kit.

Demonstration of improved methods and economics of fodder crops cultivation and also

distribution foundation seeds of Forage Crops for further multiplication, introduction of fodder

crops in the existing crop rotations.

Table 2.5 Existing area under horticulture/Vegetables/Floriculture (ha)

Activity Area Species Varieties

Recommendedvarieties Production(Kg/ha)

Horticulture 0 0 0 0 0Vegetables

Kharif 32

Tomato Pusharubi Pussa Sankar 1 1500-1800

Ladyfinger Pushasawani Sankar ganga 1200-1600

Bottle gourd Desi Sankarshramgivi 1400-1500

Gawar M43 Pussa navkhar 1500-1700

Rabi 8

Bringal Desi Pussa sankar 1200-1300

Tomato Pusharubi Pussa Sankar 1 1300-1500

Cabbage Desi Sankar greenexpress 1400-1600

Floricuture 0 0 0 0 0Medicinal plants 0 0 0 0 0

Page 21: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Table 2.6 Land holding Pattern in project area

Type ofFarmer

TotalHouseholds

Land holding (ha) irrigationsource wise Land holding (ha)Social group wise

Irrigated(source) Rainfed Total General SC ST OBC BP

L(i)Largefarmer 210 72.5 212 284.5 10 1.5 102 171 43

(ii) Smallfarmer 556 95 379 474 10 15.75 201 246.75 24

(iii) Marginalfarmer 435 45.5 276 321.5 9 5 157.5 150 32

(iv)Landlessperson

116 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

(V)No. ofBPL

households705 10 83 93 2 3 42 46 70

5

75.25% land holdings belong to small and marginal farmers who own 73.65% of total

cultivated area. Horticulture/vegetables could be more economical to Small and marginal

farmers with irrigation source. For large farmers with no irrigation facility

Horticulture/vegetables will be promoted in a part of land with farm pond/Tanka construction.

The following activities will be more beneficial for small land holdings and for diversification

and income for large farmers

Horticulture plantation, Medicinal and Aromatic Crops, floriculture: As discussed earlier

. Horticulture/vegetables could be more economical to Small and marginal farmers with

irrigation source. Also the project area has good potential for medicinal & aromatic crops like

Sonamukhi, Isabgol, Ashwagandha, Khus, Mehandi etc.

Agro forestry plantation: To increase the income of farmers and also for shelter belt

plantation as wind velocity is high in the project area.

Setting of Vermi Compost Units - Keeping in view the side effect of residues of chemicals

and fertilizers on human health the emphasis would be on cultivation of organic produce

through motivating farmers and providing assistance for production of organic input, vermi

compost.

Production and distribution of quality seed – There is need to ensure that good quality

seed is available for cultivators for which adequate seed production would be initiated in

watershed areas with the assistance of private sector and agriculture department

technologies

Sprinklers and pipelines for efficient water management practices emphasis on

demonstration of sprinklers with adequate financial support and convergence/private

partnership.

Page 22: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Establishment of Green House - For growing off season vegetables seedlings and other

horticultural crops under controlled atmospheric conditions of green house.

Establishment of nurseries: Most of the planting material is procured from other parts of

the State/ country. The procurement of planting material from distant places causes damage

to the planting material and often results in untimely supply. Hence nursery development

activity in area.

Innovative hi-tech/ export oriented activities: innovative hi-tech/ export oriented projects

like mushroom cultivation, floriculture, etc which are in negligible existence at present, can be

implemented by individual farmers / private companies.

Drip irrigation Drip irrigation will be promoted in all horticulture plantations, vegetables,

green houses and in nurseries for rational use of irrigation higher yields and quality produce.

Table 2.7 Livestock Status - animals/milk production / average yield.

S.No.

Descriptionof animals

Populationin No.

Yield(milk/mutton/Wool)

Equ. cowunits

Dry matterrequirement peryear in Kg.(7Kg

per animal.)

Totalrequirement in M.T.

1 CowsIndigenous 569 1.5-2.0 569 1453795 1453.79

Hybrid 51 4.0 51 130305 130.302 Buffaloes 712 2.5-3.0 712 1819160 1819.163 Goat 2258 0.4 1129 5769190 2884.594 Sheep 262 0 131 66941 334.705 Camel 0 0 0 0 06 Poultry 0 0 0 0 07 Piggery 0 0 0 0 0

Total 3852 6622.56

In spite of the large number of livestock, production is less hence increase in productivity

across all species, is a major challenge. To reduce production of unproductive cattle and

improve the productivity by improving the breeds by breeding management following

activities will be taken up

Castration Artificial insemination

Distribution of superior Breeding bulls for use in Cattle and Buffalo

Breeding distribution crossbred rams

Besides breed improvement other animal husbandry practices like better health, hygiene and

feeding practices can increase productivity of livestock. Hence Activities like Animal health

camps ,Urea-Molasses treatment demonstration ,demonstration of improved methods of

conservation and utilization of Forage crops are proposed.

Page 23: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Table 2.8 Existing area under fodder (ha)S.No Item Unit Area/Quantity

1 Existing Cultivable area underFodder

Ha 418 Ha

2 Production of Green fodder Tonns/year 10T/Ha

3 Production of Dry fodder Tonns/ Year 1000 T/Year

4 Area under Pastures Ha 418 Ha

5 Production of fodder Tonns/year 836 T/Year

6 Existing area under Fuel wood Ha 100 Ha

7 Supplementary feed Kgs/ day 1 k g/Day

8 Silage Pits No -

9 Availability of fodder quintals 1846 MT

10 Deficiency/excess of fodder quintals 4776.56 MT

The table above shows there is fodder deficiency (Requirement is 6622.56 MT and

availability 1846 MT)

To minimize the large and expanding gap between feed and fodder resource availability and

demand there is need for

Increase in area under fodder crops

Increase in productivity of fodder crops

Development of pastures

And reduction in large number of livestock production through replacement by few

but productive animals

Table 2.9 Agriculture implements

Farm mechanization and seed banks: As discussed earlier 75.25 % land holdings belong

to small and marginal farmers who own only 13% of total cultivated area so owning of big

farm implements by individual farmers is not economical so SHG would be promoted to buy

farm implements and rent to farmer

1 2 3S. No Implements Nos.1 Tractor 252 Sprayers-manual/ power 763 Cultivators/Harrows 94 Seed drill 135 Any Other 0

Page 24: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Table 2.10 NREGA Status - No. of Card Holder, activities taken so far, employmentstatus.

S.no.

Name ofvillage

Total No .of jobcards

EmploymentStatus

Activity taken up so far

1 Chawand 34 30 Gravel road,nadi2 Dekali 78 72 Gravel road,nadi3 Chhani 132 126 Gravel road,nadi4 Katanwara 57 51 Gravel road,nadi5 Kherki 83 74 Gravel road,nadi6 Mandwa 156 142 Gravel road,nadi7 Nal Alkar 193 178 Gravel road,nadi

8KharbarChak (A) 27 24 Gravel road,nadi

9 Neemach 118 107 Gravel road,nadi10 Kajed 40 36 Gravel road,nadi11 Dakan Baori 40 34 Gravel road,nadi12 Nimboda

134 126 Gravel road,nadi13

PalNeemoda

14 Pal Sepur 55 51 Gravel road,nadi15 Parsad 26 23 Gravel road,nadi16 Sarada 45 41 Gravel road,nadi17 Sepur 99 92 Gravel road,nadi

Table 2.11 Migration DetailsName ofvillage

No. ofpersonsmigrating

No. ofdays peryear of

migration

Majorreason(s) for

migrating

Distance ofdestinationof migration

from thevillage (km)

Occupationduring

migration

Incomefrom suchoccupation

(Rs. inlakh)

Chawand 32 21 0 Unemployment 200 Labour work 1168000

Dekali 22 21 0 Unemployment 200 Labour work 803000

Chhani 24 21 0 Unemployment 200 Labour work 876000

Katanwara 25 21 0 Unemployment 200 Labour work 912500

Kherki 16 21 0 Unemployment 200 Labour work 584000

Mandwa 16 21 0 Unemployment 200 Labour work 584000

Nal Alkar 34 21 0 Unemployment 200 Labour work 1241000

KharbarChak (A)

10 21 0 Unemployment 200 Labour work 365000

Neemach 12 21 0 Unemployment 200 Labour work 438000

Kajed 14 21 0 Unemployment 200 Labour work 511000

DakanBaori

4 21 0 Unemployment 200 Labour work 146000

Nimboda 24 21 0 Unemployment 200 Labour work 876000

PalNeemoda

17 21 0 Unemployment 200 Labour work 620500

Pal Sepur 16 21 0 Unemployment 200 Labour work 584000

Parsad 6 21 0 Unemployment 200 Labour work 219000

Sarada 27 21 0 Unemployment 200 Labour work 985500

Sepur 21 21 0 Unemployment 200 Labour work 766500

Page 25: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

The efforts for increase in income through off farm activities willbe made under livelihood component through assistance to SHGor individuals

Table 2.13( a ) Status of Existing SHG

S.No Name of SHG Membe

rsActivityinvolved

Monthlyincome

Fundavailable

Assistanceavailable

Source ofassistance

Trainingreceived

1 Kalkamata 10 Saving 1000 7000 …. …. 22 Pratibha 11 Saving 1000 7000 …. …. 13 Mahalaxmi 12 Saving 1000 7000 …. …. 24 Jai Bhole 12 Saving 1000 8930 …. …. 35 Jay Rishabh 11 Saving 550 4713 …. …. 26 Santoshi ma 11 Saving 550 4950 …. …. 27 Ambamata 10 Saving 500 13000 …. …. 1

8 JayHanuman 10 Saving 500 12000 …. …. 1

9 Kotali Phala 10 Saving 650 6000 …. …. 110 Mahabharat 13 Saving 650 8650 …. …. 211 Jay Laxmi 13 Saving 650 10400 …. …. 212 Jai Sawaria 13 Saving 500 10650 …. …. 113 Ambamata 12 Saving 600 6500 …. …. 214 Dharlmata 12 Saving 650 6100 …. …. 215 Dhamiraj 13 Saving 750 6500 …. …. 216 Gopeswar 10 Saving 500 4600 …. …. 217 Mahadev 10 Saving 500 4750 …. …. 218 Sainath 12 Saving 600 1200 …. …. 1

19 JaiMemermata 10 Saving 500 6500 …. …. 3

20 Jai Hanuman 10 Saving 500 4817 …. …. 121 Aavrimata 11 Saving 550 4550 …. …. 122 Dashamata 13 Saving 650 1250 …. …. 123 Javarmata 10 Saving 500 500 …. …. 124 Modeswary 13 Saving 650 11600 …. …. 2

25 Jai SantoshiMata 13 Saving 650 8950 …. …. 1

26 Kallaji 10 Saving 500 12500 …. …. 127 Khameswarji 10 Saving 500 6000 …. …. 1

Page 26: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

28 Shri Krishan 12 Saving 600 6000 …. …. 1

29 Nahar singhMata 10 Saving 500 1500 …. …. 1

30 Vishvkarma 10 Saving 500 20000 …. …. 131 Mahadev 10 Saving 500 2700 …. …. 132 Kalkamata 10 Saving 500 16309 …. …. 133 Dashamata 10 Saving 500 10560 …. …. 134 Padmavatii 10 Saving 500 5500 …. …. 235 Ambamata 10 Saving 500 5500 …. …. 236 Semarmata 10 Saving 500 5500 …. …. 137 Jai Hanuman 10 Saving 500 6000 …. …. 1

38 Radhekrishan 10 Saving 500 5000 …. …. 1

39 Gatodari 10 Saving 500 75741 …. …. 1

40 JaiBagrangbal 10 Saving 1000 6000 …. …. 1

41 Meera baiSHG 10 Saving 500 3000 …. …. 1

42 Jai KalayanSHG 10 Saving 500 4500 …. …. 1

43 Laxmi SHG 10 Saving 1000 5000 …. …. 144 Jai Ambay 10 Saving 1000 4000 …. …. 145 Jai Neelkanth 10 Saving 1000 4000 …. …. 2

46 Jai JabarMata 10 Saving 1000 4000 …. …. 1

47 Shubhasbosh SHG 10 Saving 500 3500 …. …. 1

The table indicates existence of number of groups in the area also these need to be

strengthened through trainings and financial assistance

Page 27: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

The migration can be check by creation of employment opportunities, enhancing farm

level economy, increases the income of the people engaged in animal husbandry by

dairy, poultry and marketing and value addition. (As discussed earlier) and diversification

in livelihoods .

The existing livelihoods Village are given below

Table 2.12 (a)Major activities (On Farm)Name of activity No of House holds Average annual income from

thecultivators 996 7000Dairying 184 8000Poultry 18 10000Piggery 0 0

Landless Agri.Labourers

105 13000

The efforts for increase in income through off farm activities will be made under livelihoodcomponent through assistance to SHG or individuals

Table 2.13( a ) Status of Existing SHG

S.No

Name ofSHG

Members

Activityinvolved

Monthlyincome

Fundavailable

Assistanceavailable

Source ofassistance

Trainingreceived

1 dkydkekrk 10 Saving 1000 7000 …. …. 22 izfrHkk 11 Saving 1000 7000 …. …. 1

3 egky{eh 12 Saving 1000 7000 …. …. 2

4 t; Hkksys 12 Saving 1000 8930 …. …. 3

5 t; _"kHk 11 Saving 550 4713 …. …. 2

6 lUrks"kh eka 11 Saving 550 4950 …. …. 2

7 vEckekrk 10 Saving 500 13000 …. …. 1

8 t; guqeku 10 Saving 500 12000 …. …. 1

9 dskVMhQyk 10 Saving 650 6000 …. …. 1

Table 2.12(b)Major activities (Off Farm)

Name of activity Households/individuals Average annual income fromthe

Artisans -Carpenter 46 15000Blacksmith 03 18000

Leather Craft 19 10000Porter - 0Mason 177 40000

Others specify (CycleRepair ,STD,Craft

etc)06 10000

Page 28: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

10 egkHkkjr 13 Saving 650 8650 …. …. 2

11 t; y{eh 13 Saving 650 10400 …. …. 2

12 t; lkaofj;k 13 Saving 500 10650 …. …. 1

13 vEckekrk 12 Saving 600 6500 …. …. 2

14 /kjkyekrk 12 Saving 650 6100 …. …. 2

15 /kehjkt 13 Saving 750 6500 …. …. 2

16 xksis'oj 10 Saving 500 4600 …. …. 2

17 egknso 10 Saving 500 4750 …. …. 2

18 lkbZaukFk 12 Saving 600 1200 …. …. 1

19 t; esejekrk 10 Saving 500 6500 …. …. 3

20 t; guqeku 10 Saving 500 4817 …. …. 1

21 vkojhekrk 11 Saving 550 4550 …. …. 1

22 n'kkekrk 13 Saving 650 1250 …. …. 1

23 tkojekrk 10 Saving 500 500 …. …. 1

24 eks<s'ojh 13 Saving 650 11600 …. …. 2

25 t; larks"kh ekrk 13 Saving 650 8950 …. …. 1

26 dYykth 10 Saving 500 12500 …. …. 1

27 [kes'oj 10 Saving 500 6000 …. …. 1

28 Jh d"̀.k 12 Saving 600 6000 …. …. 1

29 ukgjflag ekrk 10 Saving 500 1500 …. …. 1

30 fo'odekZ 10 Saving 500 20000 …. …. 1

31 egknso 10 Saving 500 2700 …. …. 1

32 dkydkekrk 10 Saving 500 16309 …. …. 1

33 n'kkekrk 10 Saving 500 10560 …. …. 1

34 inekorh 10 Saving 500 5500 …. …. 2

35 vEckekrk 10 Saving 500 5500 …. …. 2

36 lsejekrk 10 Saving 500 5500 …. …. 1

37 t; guqeku 10 Saving 500 6000 …. …. 1

38 jk/ks d"̀.k 10 Saving 500 5000 …. …. 1

39 xkrksMth 10 Saving 500 75741 …. …. 1

40 t; ctjax cyh 10 Saving 1000 6000 …. …. 1

41 ehjk ckbZ Lo;algk;rk lewg 10 Saving 500 3000 …. …. 1

42 t; dY;k.k Lo;a 10 Saving 500 4500 …. …. 1

43 y{eh Lo;algk;rk lewg 10 Saving 1000 5000 …. …. 1

44 t; vEcs 10 Saving 1000 4000 …. …. 1

45 t; uhyd.B 10 Saving 1000 4000 …. …. 2

46 t; tkoj ekrk 10 Saving 1000 4000 …. …. 1

47 lqHkk"k cksl Lo;algk;rk 10 Saving 500 3500 …. …. 1

The table indicates existence of number of groups in the area also these need to be

strengthened through trainings and financial assistance

Page 29: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

II. Technical Features

Table 2.14 Ground WaterS.No Source No. Functional

depthDry Area

irrigatedWateravailability(days)

i) Dug wells 220 60 86 148 270ii) Shallow tube wells 37 300 0 37 320iii) Pumping sets 34 0 28 275iv) Deep Tube Wells 0 0 0

Total 213

Table 2.15 Availability of drinking water

S.No

Name ofthe village

Drinkingwater

requirement

Ltrs/day

Presentavailabilit

y ofdrinkingwater

Ltrs/day

No. ofdrinkingwater

sourcesavailable

No.functional

No.requiresrepairs

No.defunct

1 Chawand 5280 2640 22 19 2 12 Dekali 6840 3420

27 25 1 1

3 Chhani 12040 602030 26 2 2

4 Katanwara 6400 3200

42 37 2 3

5 Kherki 7760 388036 32 2 2

6 Mandwa 13840 692022 20 1 1

7 Nal Alkar 18480 924024 22 1 1

8 KharbarChak (A) 2760 1380

19 16 2 1

9 Neemach 9960 498024 21 2 1

10 Kajed 5200 260023 20 2 1

11 DakanBaori 3440 1720

12 11 1 0

12 Nimboda 13880 694011 10 1 0

13 PalNeemoda 0 0

10 10 1 0

14 Pal Sepur 7720 386012 9 2 1

15 Parsad 3160 158012 9 2 1

16 Sarada 6160 30807 5 2 0

17 Sepur 10360 5180 36 32 1 3

Page 30: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Table 2.16 Water Use efficiency

Name of major crop

Area (Hectare)through water

savingdevices(Drip/Spri

nklers)

through waterconservingagronomicpractices#

Any other (pl.specify) Total

Rabi 5 780 300 1080

The tables above indicate need for judicious use of available Water. Encouraging optimum use of water through installation of sprinklers on every operational

wells

Table 2.17 Slope details.Slope of Watershed

S.No. Slope percentage Area in hectares

1 0 to 3% 12572 3 to 8% 37573 8 to 25% -4 > 25% -

As most of the area has slope less than 3% construction of contour bunds can solve the

problem of water erosion in agriculture fields and protect washing of top soil and

manures/fertilisers

Table 2.18Water Budgeting

Table 2.18 a )Total available runoff(cum) use Stranges table

Area Type ofCatchment

Yield of runoff fromcatchment per ha.(cum.)

use Stranges table

Total Runoff

1947 Good 1170 22779901870 Average 876 16381201197 Bad 582 696654

Table 2.18 b) Details of already stored runoff(Surface Water structures

S.No. Name No. Storage Capacity(cum)

Area irrigated(ha)

i) Major Irrigation Project 0 0 0ii) Medium Irrigation Project 01(Kged) 224 MCFT 688 Ha ccaiii) Form Ponds/Tanks 0 0 0iv) Anicuts 0 0 0

Total 01 224 MCFT 688 Ha cca

Page 31: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Table 2.18 c) Balance available runoff (cum)

Total run off

Net tapped

Runoff

Balance

Run off

Available for Harvesting

(0.75*

1 2 3 4

4612764 2164050 2448714 1836536

The water budgeting indicates potential for water harvesting in the area

Table 2.19 Soil details

Soil Profile

S.No. Major Soil Classes Area in hectares

1 Sandy Loam 4946

2 Black Cotton 68

Soil Depth :

B Depth (Cms.) Area in hectares

1 0.00 to 7.50 3777

2 7.50 to 45.00 1237

3 > 45.00 5014

Soil fertility Status Kg/ha Recommended

1 N 23 6

2 P 20 30

3 K 490

4 Micronutrients PPM

A Zinc 0.4 PPM 0.8 PPM

B Fe 0.4 PPM 0.5 PPM

C Cu 0.2 PPM 0.25 PPM

D Mg 0.2 PPM 0.22 PPM

The analysis of table shows need to improve and maintain soil fertility. Soil health card to

every farmer every crop season will be provided, which will include the recommendation for

Application micro nutrient and fertilizers

Page 32: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Table 2.20 Erosion detailsErosion status in project Area

Cause Type

of

erosion

Area

affected

(ha)

Run

off(mm/

year)

Average soil loss

(Tonnes/ ha/ year)

Water erosion

a Sheet 2006 4-10

b Rill 501 10-15

c Gully 2507 15-25

Sub-Total 5014

Wind erosion NIL

Total for project 5014

The need is:

To check land degradation

To reduce excessive biotic pressure by containing the number and increase of livestock

To check cultivation on sloping lands without adequate precautions of soil and water

conservation measures

To discourage cultivation along susceptible nallah beds

To check Faulty agriculture techniques

To check Uncontrolled grazing and developed cattle tracks

To check Deforestation of steep slopes

To check erosive velocity of runoff, store Runoff, to arrest silt carried by runoff and to

recharge Ground Water structures life Earthen check dams, gully plugs, Bank

Stabilisation, Loose stone check Dams, Gabions, Earthen embankment (Nadi) and

Anicuts would be taken up.

Page 33: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

CHAPTER - III Proposed Development Plan: The Activities are indicative addition/deletion in activities will be as per local conditions

A) Preparatory phase activities Capacity Building Trainings and EPA

The IEC activities like Kalajathas, Group meetings, door to door campaign,

slogans and wall writings etc. were carried out in all the habitations of

14/1,14/2,14/3,14/6,11/8 to 11/12 Micro Watershed. A series of meetings were

conducted with GP members, community and discussed about the implementation

of IWMP programme. User groups were also formed.

Grama Sabhas were conducted for approval of EPA (Village), for selecting the

watershed committee and approval of DPR.

S.no Name of the Gram Panchayat Date on which Grama Sabhaapproved EPA

1 Chawand 13.5.09

2 Katanwara 27.9.10

3 Kajed 03.5.10

4 Sarada 18.5.09

5 Nimboda 1.10.10

1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

S.No.

Names ofvillage

Amountearmarked

for EPA

Entry Point Activitiesplanned

Estimatedcost

Expenditureincurred Balance Expected

outcomeActual

outcome

1 Nimboda 124800 Renovation of chunawall anicut 124800 124800 0

Scarcity ofwatermade

availble

Scarcity ofwater madeavailble

2 Sarada52224

H.P(Main poad nayasarada) 52224 52224

0

Drinkingwater will

beprovided

wheredrinkingwater is

presentlynot

available

Drinkingwater will

be providedwhere

drinkingwater is

presentlynot

available

3 Sepur 52224 H.P(Shiv mandir sepur)) 52224 51623 6014 Makodiya

52224H.P(Main poadMakodiya sepur) 52224 51617

607

5 Hakriya52224

H.P(Pama/hira hakriyasepur) 52224 52051

173

6 Dakli52224

H.P(Upli dakli road,dakli) 52224 51623

601

7 Dakli52224

H.P(Near to mata jinichali dakli,dakli) 52224 52224

0

8 Nimach52224

H.P(P.S School,nimach) 52224 51190

1034

9 Nimach52224

H.P(Kajed road,nimach) 52224 48584

3640

10 Nimach52224

H.P(Uba paanaroad,Nimach) 52224 48545

3679

11 Chani52224

H.P(Panduwa falachani) 52224 52224

0

12 152517 Solar light 152517 152517 013 Nal 52224 H.P(Gyana/Khata 52224 52224 0 Drinking Drinking

Page 34: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

meena nal) water willbe

providedwhere

drinkingwater is

presentlynot

available

water willbe provided

wheredrinkingwater is

presentlynot

available

14 Chani52224

H.P(Dadiya maldrichani) 52224 52224

0

15 Sepur 52224 H.P(Kala bav ji sepur) 52224 52224 016 Nal

52224H.P(Shamshan gatkhati bor,nal) 52224 52224

0

17 Nal52224

H.P( Near to Bharu jikhati bor,nal) 52224 52224

0

18 Nal43330

Roof harvesting secschool nal 43330 40730

2600

19 Nimboda175000

Shamshan gat with tinshed Nimboda 175000 155838

19162

Save fuel Save fuel20 Nal175000

Shamshan gat with tinshed nal 175000 168634

6366

21 Mandwa185000

Shamshan gat with tinshed Mandwa 185000 177483

7517

22 Chani52224

H.P(Dula/kanna patelchanni) 52224 40751

11473

Drinkingwater will

beprovided

wheredrinkingwater is

presentlynot

available

Drinkingwater will

be providedwhere

drinkingwater is

presentlynot

available

2352224

H.P(Near to Bhagwan/nathu nal) 52224 44062

8162

24 Chani

52224

H.P(Near toHoma/limba panduafala channi) 52224 44062

8162

25 Kherki52224

H.P(Govind/magla iarifala kherki) 52224 41878

10346

26 Chani52224

H.P(Devla magrachanni) 52224 43698

8526

27 Nal52224

H.P(Amba/har ji mavlifalla nal) 52224 48038

4186

28 Kherki52224

H.P(Shamshan gatkherki) 52224 46836

5388

29 Kherki52224

H.P(Near to prama/ratna kherki) 52224 44684

7540

30 Mandwa52224

H.P(Shamshan gatmandwa) 52224 52224

0

31 Mandwa52224

H.P(Amli wala chorayamandwa) 52224 52224

0

32 Nimboda52224

H.P(Shamshan gatnimboda) 52224 50107

2117

33 Kherki52224

H.P(Amba mata mandirkherki) 52224 42788

9436

34 Nal

52224

H.P(Near to babushankar nichala fallanal) 52224 43482

8742

35 Kherki52224

H.P(Near to ottabhamat falla kherki) 52224 47382

4842

36 Nal52224

H.P(Chawand prasadroad) 52224 0

52224

The PRA exercise was carried out in all the villages on the dates shown below:

S.no Name of thevillage/Habitation

Date on which PRAconducted

1 Chawand 22.3.11

2 Katanwara 16.3.11

3 Kajed 18.3.11

4 Sarada 24.3.11

5 Nimboda 15.3.11

Page 35: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Transact walk were carried out involving the community for Social mapping, Resource

mapping. Detailed discussions and deliberations with all the primary stakeholders were

carried out.

Socio-economic survey was carried out during 1.4.10 to 31.12.10 (dates) period covering

all the households and primary data on demography, Land holdings, Employment status,

Community activities etc. was collected as mentioned in chapter 2.

State remote sensing department was assigned the work of preparing various

thematic layers using Cartosat-1 and LISS-3 imageries for Creation, development and

management of geo-spatial database depicting present conditions of land (terrain), water

and vegetation with respect to watershed under different ownerships at village level

Various thematic layers provided by SRSAC are :

Delineation of Macro/Micro watershed boundaries.

Digitised Khasara maps of the villages falling in project area.

Network of Drainage lines, existing water bodies, falling in the project area.

Base maps (transport network, village/boundaries, and settlements).

Land Use / Land cover map.

Contours at 1 meter interval, slope map

Based on GIS thematic layers, Field visits , PRA and analysis of benchmark data (as

discussed in chapter 2) final Treatment plan on revenue map for implementation has

been framed. Thus each intervention identified has been marked on revenue map

(map enclosed in DPR as annexure------).The GIS based intervention map, PRA based

intervention map are annexed as ------.

.

Page 36: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Macro/Micro No. 14/1,14/2.14/3,14/6,11/8,11/9,11/10,11/11,11/12(TOTAL)(A) Area (Calculated from revenue recoed)1. Good Catchment where runoff is maximum & infiltration is minimum like hillocks, plateanu etc2. Average catchment-cultivated land, forest land with vegetation.3. Bad catchment where runoff is minimum & infiltration is maximum e.g. Sandy soil

(B) AVERAGE ANNUAL RAINFAL DATA (AVAILABLE AT TEHSIL))

(a) Percentage of runoff to rainfall from strange's table.In Good Catchment - 19.50% 600X19.5/10=1170In average catchment - 14.60% 600X14.6/10=876In Bad Catchment- 9.70% 600X9.7/10=582

Type of W/S Area of W/S Factor Cum/ha ExpectedYeild Cum

Good 1947 1170 2277990Average 876 0Bad 1197 582 696654Total 3144 2974644 "A"

WATER BUDGETING

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Propotion of Estimated Runoff of rainfall : To be worked out from strange's Table for sarada tehsilDisstt. Udaipur for 600mm total mansoon rainfall.

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1 Tank/Talab/Nadi 13 2101800

2Anicut/WHS/Khadin 41 62250

3Local DipressionPond etc 0 0Total 54 2164050 "B"

Balance Runoff = Expected yield-Present Storage="A"-"B" ="C" 810594 "C"

75% of balance run-off may be stored by constructing new structures ="C"X0.75 = 0.75C607945.5

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1

GabionStructure/gulleycontrol/LSCD 5109 237850

2 Dugout pond 0 03 Nadi / Talab 52 421204 Anicut(MMS) 17 60700

Total 340670 "D"

"D" to be less than "0.75C"

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Page 37: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Macro/Micro No. 14/1Run off contributed from 14/1,14/2,14/3,14/6(A) Area (Calculated from revenue recoed)1. Good Catchment where runoff is maximum & infiltration is minimum like hillocks, plateanu etc2. Average catchment-cultivated land, forest land with vegetation.3. Bad catchment where runoff is minimum & infiltration is maximum e.g. Sandy soil

(B) AVERAGE ANNUAL RAINFAL DATA (AVAILABLE AT TEHSIL))

(a) Percentage of runoff to rainfall from strange's table.In Good Catchment - 19.50% 600X19.5/10=1170In average catchment - 14.60% 600X14.6/10=876In Bad Catchment- 9.70% 600X9.7/10=582

Type of W/S Area of W/S Factor Cum/ha ExpectedYeild Cum

Good 1170 0Average 796 876 697296Bad 355 582 206610Total 1151 903906 "A"

WATER BUDGETING

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Propotion of Estimated Runoff of rainfall : To be worked out from strange's Table for sarada tehsilDisstt. Udaipur for 600mm total mansoon rainfall.

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1 Tank/Talab/Nadi 7 641986

2Anicut/WHS/Khadin 11 16870

3Local DipressionPond etc 0 0Total 18 658856 "B"

Balance Runoff = Expected yield-Present Storage="A"-"B" ="C" 245050 "C"

75% of balance run-off may be stored by constructing new structures ="C"X0.75 = 0.75C183787.5

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1

GabionStructure/gulleycontrol/LSCD 308 18480

2 Dugout pond 0 03 Nadi / Talab 2 9204 Anicut(MMS) 1 1400

Total 20800 "D"

"D" to be less than "0.75C"

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Page 38: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Macro/Micro No. 14/2Run off contributed from 14/2,14/3,14/6(A) Area (Calculated from revenue recoed)1. Good Catchment where runoff is maximum & infiltration is minimum like hillocks, plateanu etc2. Average catchment-cultivated land, forest land with vegetation.3. Bad catchment where runoff is minimum & infiltration is maximum e.g. Sandy soil

(B) AVERAGE ANNUAL RAINFAL DATA (AVAILABLE AT TEHSIL))

(a) Percentage of runoff to rainfall from strange's table.In Good Catchment - 19.50% 600X19.5/10=1170In average catchment - 14.60% 600X14.6/10=876In Bad Catchment- 9.70% 600X9.7/10=582

Type of W/S Area of W/S Factor Cum/ha ExpectedYeild Cum

Good 1170 0Average 556 876 487056Bad 244 582 142008Total 800 629064 "A"

WATER BUDGETING

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Propotion of Estimated Runoff of rainfall : To be worked out from strange's Table for sarada tehsilDisstt. Udaipur for 600mm total mansoon rainfall.

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1 Tank/Talab/Nadi 5 220786

2Anicut/WHS/Khadin 5 7730

3Local DipressionPond etc 0 0Total 10 228516 "B"

Balance Runoff = Expected yield-Present Storage="A"-"B" ="C" 400548 "C"

75% of balance run-off may be stored by constructing new structures ="C"X0.75 = 0.75C300411

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1

GabionStructure/gulleycontrol/LSCD 278 16680

2 Dugout pond 0 03 Nadi / Talab 1 7504 Anicut(MMS) 1 1400

Total 18830 "D"

"D" to be less than "0.75C"

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Page 39: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Macro/Micro No. 14/3Run off contributed from 14/3(A) Area (Calculated from revenue recoed)1. Good Catchment where runoff is maximum & infiltration is minimum like hillocks, plateanu etc2. Average catchment-cultivated land, forest land with vegetation.3. Bad catchment where runoff is minimum & infiltration is maximum e.g. Sandy soil

(B) AVERAGE ANNUAL RAINFAL DATA (AVAILABLE AT TEHSIL))

(a) Percentage of runoff to rainfall from strange's table.In Good Catchment - 19.50% 600X19.5/10=1170In average catchment - 14.60% 600X14.6/10=876In Bad Catchment- 9.70% 600X9.7/10=582

Type of W/S Area of W/S Factor Cum/ha ExpectedYeild Cum

Good 1170 0Average 110 876 96360Bad 50 582 29100Total 160 125460 "A"

WATER BUDGETING

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Propotion of Estimated Runoff of rainfall : To be worked out from strange's Table for sarada tehsilDisstt. Udaipur for 600mm total mansoon rainfall.

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1 Tank/Talab/Nadi 1 24000

2Anicut/WHS/Khadin 3 4610

3Local DipressionPond etc 0 0Total 4 28610 "B"

Balance Runoff = Expected yield-Present Storage="A"-"B" ="C" 96850 "C"

75% of balance run-off may be stored by constructing new structures ="C"X0.75 = 0.75C72637.5

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1

GabionStructure/gulleycontrol/LSCD 132 7920

2 Dugout pond 0 03 Nadi / Talab 1 11504 Anicut(MMS) 1 1300

Total 10370 "D"

"D" to be less than "0.75C"

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Page 40: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Macro/Micro No. 14/6 Macro/Micro No. 14/6Run off contributed from 14/6(A) Area (Calculated from revenue recoed)1. Good Catchment where runoff is maximum & infiltration is minimum like hillocks, plateanu etc2. Average catchment-cultivated land, forest land with vegetation.3. Bad catchment where runoff is minimum & infiltration is maximum e.g. Sandy soil

(B) AVERAGE ANNUAL RAINFAL DATA (AVAILABLE AT TEHSIL))

(a) Percentage of runoff to rainfall from strange's table.In Good Catchment - 19.50% 600X19.5/10=1170In average catchment - 14.60% 600X14.6/10=876In Bad Catchment- 9.70% 600X9.7/10=582

Type of W/S Area of W/S Factor Cum/ha ExpectedYeild Cum

Good 1170 0Average 198 876 173448Bad 87 582 50634Total 285 224082 "A"

WATER BUDGETING

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Propotion of Estimated Runoff of rainfall : To be worked out from strange's Table for sarada tehsilDisstt. Udaipur for 600mm total mansoon rainfall.

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1 Tank/Talab/Nadi 2 39000

2Anicut/WHS/Khadin 2 3120

3Local DipressionPond etc 0 0Total 4 42120 "B"

Balance Runoff = Expected yield-Present Storage="A"-"B" ="C" 181962 "C"

75% of balance run-off may be stored by constructing new structures ="C"X0.75 = 0.75C136471.5

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1

GabionStructure/gulleycontrol/LSCD 250 15000

2 Dugout pond 0 03 Nadi / Talab 3 31504 Anicut(MMS) 1 1300

Total 19450 "D"

"D" to be less than "0.75C"

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Page 41: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Macro/Micro No. 11/8Run off contributed from 11/8(A) Area (Calculated from revenue recoed)1. Good Catchment where runoff is maximum & infiltration is minimum like hillocks, plateanu etc2. Average catchment-cultivated land, forest land with vegetation.3. Bad catchment where runoff is minimum & infiltration is maximum e.g. Sandy soil

(B) AVERAGE ANNUAL RAINFAL DATA (AVAILABLE AT TEHSIL))

(a) Percentage of runoff to rainfall from strange's table.In Good Catchment - 19.50% 600X19.5/10=1170In average catchment - 14.60% 600X14.6/10=876In Bad Catchment- 9.70% 600X9.7/10=582

Type of W/S Area of W/S Factor Cum/ha ExpectedYeild Cum

Good 1170 0Average 176 876 154176Bad 76 582 44232Total 252 198408 "A"

WATER BUDGETING

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Propotion of Estimated Runoff of rainfall : To be worked out from strange's Table for sarada tehsilDisstt. Udaipur for 600mm total mansoon rainfall.

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1 Tank/Talab/Nadi 1 24480

2Anicut/WHS/Khadin 9 13450

3Local DipressionPond etc 0 0Total 10 37930 "B"

Balance Runoff = Expected yield-Present Storage="A"-"B" ="C" 160478 "C"

75% of balance run-off may be stored by constructing new structures ="C"X0.75 = 0.75C120358.5

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1

GabionStructure/gulleycontrol/LSCD 256 15360

2 Dugout pond 0 03 Nadi / Talab 2 18004 Anicut(MMS) 1 1500

Total 18660 "D"

"D" to be less than "0.75C"

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Page 42: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Macro/Micro No. 11/9Run off contributed from 11/9,11/8(A) Area (Calculated from revenue recoed)1. Good Catchment where runoff is maximum & infiltration is minimum like hillocks, plateanu etc2. Average catchment-cultivated land, forest land with vegetation.3. Bad catchment where runoff is minimum & infiltration is maximum e.g. Sandy soil

(B) AVERAGE ANNUAL RAINFAL DATA (AVAILABLE AT TEHSIL))

(a) Percentage of runoff to rainfall from strange's table.In Good Catchment - 19.50% 600X19.5/10=1170In average catchment - 14.60% 600X14.6/10=876In Bad Catchment- 9.70% 600X9.7/10=582

Type of W/S Area of W/S Factor Cum/ha ExpectedYeild Cum

Good 1170 0Average 581 876 508956Bad 572 582 332904Total 1153 841860 "A"

WATER BUDGETING

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Propotion of Estimated Runoff of rainfall : To be worked out from strange's Table for sarada tehsilDisstt. Udaipur for 600mm total mansoon rainfall.

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1 Tank/Talab/Nadi 3 706080

2Anicut/WHS/Khadin 21 31410

3Local DipressionPond etc 0 0Total 24 737490 "B"

Balance Runoff = Expected yield-Present Storage="A"-"B" ="C" 104370 "C"

75% of balance run-off may be stored by constructing new structures ="C"X0.75 = 0.75C78277.5

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1

GabionStructure/gulleycontrol/LSCD 689 41340

2 Dugout pond 0 03 Nadi / Talab 6 48004 Anicut(MMS) 1 1500

Total 47640 "D"

"D" to be less than "0.75C"

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Page 43: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Macro/Micro No. 11/10Run off contributed from 11/9,11/8,11/10(A) Area (Calculated from revenue recoed)1. Good Catchment where runoff is maximum & infiltration is minimum like hillocks, plateanu etc2. Average catchment-cultivated land, forest land with vegetation.3. Bad catchment where runoff is minimum & infiltration is maximum e.g. Sandy soil

(B) AVERAGE ANNUAL RAINFAL DATA (AVAILABLE AT TEHSIL))

(a) Percentage of runoff to rainfall from strange's table.In Good Catchment - 19.50% 600X19.5/10=1170In average catchment - 14.60% 600X14.6/10=876In Bad Catchment- 9.70% 600X9.7/10=582

Type of W/S Area of W/S Factor Cum/ha ExpectedYeild Cum

Good 1170 0Average 834 876 730584Bad 694 582 403908Total 1528 1134492 "A"

WATER BUDGETING

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Propotion of Estimated Runoff of rainfall : To be worked out from strange's Table for sarada tehsilDisstt. Udaipur for 600mm total mansoon rainfall.

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1 Tank/Talab/Nadi 4 970080

2Anicut/WHS/Khadin 26 39260

3Local DipressionPond etc 0 0Total 30 1009340 "B"

Balance Runoff = Expected yield-Present Storage="A"-"B" ="C" 125152 "C"

75% of balance run-off may be stored by constructing new structures ="C"X0.75 = 0.75C93864

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1

GabionStructure/gulleycontrol/LSCD 370 20280

2 Dugout pond 0 03 Nadi / Talab 3 22504 Anicut(MMS) 1 1300

Total 23830 "D"

"D" to be less than "0.75C"

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Page 44: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Macro/Micro No. 11/11Run off contributed from 11/9,11/8,11/10,11/11(A) Area (Calculated from revenue recoed)1. Good Catchment where runoff is maximum & infiltration is minimum like hillocks, plateanu etc2. Average catchment-cultivated land, forest land with vegetation.3. Bad catchment where runoff is minimum & infiltration is maximum e.g. Sandy soil

(B) AVERAGE ANNUAL RAINFAL DATA (AVAILABLE AT TEHSIL))

(a) Percentage of runoff to rainfall from strange's table.In Good Catchment - 19.50% 600X19.5/10=1170In average catchment - 14.60% 600X14.6/10=876In Bad Catchment- 9.70% 600X9.7/10=582

Type of W/S Area of W/S Factor Cum/ha ExpectedYeild Cum

Good 1170 0Average 1022 876 895272Bad 820 582 477240Total 1842 1372512 "A"

WATER BUDGETING

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Propotion of Estimated Runoff of rainfall : To be worked out from strange's Table for sarada tehsilDisstt. Udaipur for 600mm total mansoon rainfall.

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1 Tank/Talab/Nadi 6 1459814

2Anicut/WHS/Khadin 30 45380

3Local DipressionPond etc 0 0Total 36 1505194 "B"

Balance Runoff = Expected yield-Present Storage="A"-"B" ="C" -132682 "C"

75% of balance run-off may be stored by constructing new structures ="C"X0.75 = 0.75C-99511.5

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1

GabionStructure/gulleycontrol/LSCD 224 13440

2 Dugout pond 0 03 Nadi / Talab 2 17004 Anicut(MMS) 0 0

Total 15140 "D"

"D" to be less than "0.75C"

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Page 45: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Macro/Micro No. 11/12Run off contributed from 11/8,11/9,11/10,11/11,11/12,14/1/14/2,14/3,14/6(A) Area (Calculated from revenue recoed)1. Good Catchment where runoff is maximum & infiltration is minimum like hillocks, plateanu etc2. Average catchment-cultivated land, forest land with vegetation.3. Bad catchment where runoff is minimum & infiltration is maximum e.g. Sandy soil

(B) AVERAGE ANNUAL RAINFAL DATA (AVAILABLE AT TEHSIL))

(a) Percentage of runoff to rainfall from strange's table.In Good Catchment - 19.50% 600X19.5/10=1170In average catchment - 14.60% 600X14.6/10=876In Bad Catchment- 9.70% 600X9.7/10=582

Type of W/S Area of W/S Factor Cum/ha ExpectedYeild Cum

Good 1947 1170 2277990Average 1870 876 1638120Bad 1197 582 696654Total 5014 4612764 "A"

WATER BUDGETING

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Propotion of Estimated Runoff of rainfall : To be worked out from strange's Table for sarada tehsilDisstt. Udaipur for 600mm total mansoon rainfall.

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1 Tank/Talab/Nadi 13 2101800

2Anicut/WHS/Khadin 41 62250

3Local DipressionPond etc 0 0Total 54 2164050 "B"

Balance Runoff = Expected yield-Present Storage="A"-"B" ="C" 2448714 "C"

75% of balance run-off may be stored by constructing new structures ="C"X0.75 = 0.75C1836536

S.No. Name ofStructure No./Area

StorageCapacity(Cum)

1

GabionStructure/gulleycontrol/LSCD 2602 89350

2 Dugout pond 0 03 Nadi / Talab 32 256004 Anicut(MMS) 10 51000

Total 165950 "D"

"D" to be less than "0.75C"

PRESENT STORAGE BY EXISTING RUN OFF MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Page 46: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Final Village Directory Release Census -2001 District - Udaipur (26)

S.no.Name ofGrampanchayat

Name ofvillagecovered Irrigated Un irrigated Forest P.D

Gov. wasteland

Private wasteland Other Total

1 Chawand Chawand 35 60 27 125 130 38 4152 Chawand Dekali 5 36 0 43 11 4 3 102

Total 40 96 0 70 136 134 41 5173 Katanwara Chhani 10 41 0 15 342 179 19 6064 Katanwara Katanwara 16 9 0 1 2 116 29 1735 Katanwara Kherki 2 97 0 45 119 192 27 4826 Katanwara Mandwa 9 47 0 31 38 144 22 2917 Katanwara Nal Alkar 11 94 0 54 473 85 26 743

Land use detail

1 of 1 File Name - Vill0826-Update Print-II

7 Katanwara Nal Alkar 11 94 0 54 473 85 26 7438 Kharbar Chak (A)Kharbar Chak (A) 0 24 0 0 77 52 9 1629 Parsad Parsad 1 7 171 0 35 21 13 248

Total 49 319 171 146 1086 789 145 270510 Neemach Neemach 47 90 0 25 26 34 4 22611 Neemach Kajed 9 16 0 0 33 65 9 132

Total 56 106 0 25 59 99 13 35812 Nimboda Dakan Baori 1 19 0 16 17 2 2 5713 Nimboda Nimboda 10 31 0 0 20 21 7 8914 Nimboda Pal Neemoda 2 17 0 79 174 14 7 29315 Nimboda Pal Sepur 0 61 0 0 174 55 17 307

Total 13 128 0 95 385 92 33 74616 Sarada Sarada 27 59 0 22 44 51 20 22317 Sepur Sepur 28 159 0 60 162 37 19 465

Total 55 218 0 82 206 88 39 688Grant total 213 867 171 418 1872 1202 271 5014Grant total 213 867 171 418 1872 1202 271 5014

1 of 1 File Name - Vill0826-Update Print-II

Page 47: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

PIA (7%) 40.68 40.68WC (3%) 17.43 17.43SLNA (0.2%) 1.16 1.16WCDC (0.2%) 1.16 1.16PIA (0.6%) 3.49 3.49

Evaluation (1%) SLNA (1%) 5.81 5.81EPA (4%) PIA (4%) 23.25 23.25

SLNA (.05%) 0.29 0.29WCDC (1.3%) 7.56 7.56PIA (3.65%) 21.21 21.21

DPR (1%) PIA (1%) 5.81 5.81127.86 127.86

PRT 2 Ha. 0.16439 179 29.43VCB 3 Ha. 0.05551 252 13.99Gully Control 1 No. 0.08146 87 7.09Bank stabilization 25 m 0.03016 360 10.86

Conservation measures for arableland(private land) 5-10% towards WDF

Conservation measures for non arable land

I & CB (5%)

(A) Preparatory phase activities capacitybuilding trainings & EPA (22%)

Total (A)(B) Natural resource management

ABSTRACT SHEETModel

estimate no.Unit Unit Cost Qty. AmountActivity

Admn. (10%)

Monitoring (1%)

Run off management structurenadi 11 No. 0.90500 8 7.24SCT 4 Ha. 0.06014 306 18.40Contour Stone Bund 12 Ha. 0.21065 76 16.01Gully Control non arable 10 No. 0.08843 662 58.54Pasture Development 14 Ha. 1.55908 39 60.80Bank stabilization/Nalla st. 8 m 0.04145 182 7.54

Upper Ridge 6 No. 0.01069 1774 18.96Middle Ridge 7 No. 0.07504 406 30.47Nadi 13 No. 0.74583 16 11.93Anicut(MMS) 16,17,18,19 No. 3.5/2.5/2/5 10 43.50Sub surface st. 24 7.00000 2 14.00

348.76

Local Artisans / Crafts No. 5.81 5.81Dairy & Poultry No. 11.62 11.62

No. 17.43 17.43Nursery Establishment No. 5.81 5.81Dryland Horticulture 15 Ha. 17.46 34 17.46Crop Demonstration 20 No. 11.62 11.62

21,22,23 No. 17.34 17.3487.10

(D) Consolidation (3%) 17.44 17.44581.16

Total (C)

Grand Total

Vermi compost ,Compost pit & Agro Forestry

Animal Husbandry Management

Total (B)( C ) Production System and microProduction measures for arable land 20-40% towards project cost

Drainage line treatmentLSCD

Conservation measures for non arable land

581.16Grand Total

Page 48: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Proposed Development Plan Chapter IV COST (LACS) 275.4 AREA (HA) 2295 COST (LACS) 19.44 AREA (HA) 162

Quantity Total Cost Cost fromProject Fund

ConvergenceFund

BeneficiaryContribution Quantity Total Cost

Cost fromProjectFund

ConvergenceFund

BeneficiaryContribution

PIA (7%) 40.68 19.28 19.28 0.00 0.00 1.36 1.36 0.00 0.00WC (3%) 17.43 8.26 8.26 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.00SLNA (0.2%) 1.16 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00WCDC (0.2%) 1.16 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00PIA (0.6%) 3.49 1.65 1.65 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.00

Evaluation (1%) SLNA (1%) 5.81 2.75 2.75 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00EPA (4%) PIA (4%) 23.25 11.02 11.02 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.78 0.00 0.00

SLNA (.05%) 0.29 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00WCDC (1.3%) 7.56 3.58 3.58 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00PIA (3.65%) 21.21 10.05 10.05 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.71 0.00 0.00

DPR (1%) PIA (1%) 5.81 2.75 2.75 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00Total (A) 127.86 60.59 60.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.28 4.28 0.00 0.00

PRT Ha. 0.16439 78 12.82 12.82 0.00 0.77 5 0.82 0.82 0.00 0.05VCB Ha. 0.05551 75 4.16 4.16 0.00 0.25 10 0.56 0.56 0.00 0.03Gully Control No. 0.08146 40 3.26 3.26 0.00 0.20 8 0.65 0.65 0.00 0.04Bank stabilization Mt. 0.03016 180 5.43 5.43 0.00 0.33 0 0.00 1.00 0.00

(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA (22%)

Activity Unit Unit Cost

KATANWARA KHARBAR

Admn. (10%)

Monitoring (1%)

I & CB (5%)

(B) Natural resource management (60%) Conservation measures for arable land(private land) 5-10% towards WDF

Conservation measures for non arable landBank stabilization Mt. 0.03016 180 5.43 5.43 0.00 0.33 0 0.00 1.00 0.00

Run off management structure No. 0.905 2 1.81 1.81 4.00 0.11 0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00SCT Ha. 0.06014 180 10.83 10.83 0.00 0.65 18 1.08 1.08 0.00 0.06Contour Stone Bund Ha. 0.21065 28 5.90 5.90 0.00 0.35 2 0.42 0.42 0.00 0.03Gully Control non arable No. 0.08843 316 27.94 27.94 5.00 1.68 61 5.39 5.39 0.00 0.32Pasture Development Ha. 1.55908 16 24.95 24.95 54.57 1.50 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Bank stabilization/Nalla st. Mt. 0.04145 182 7.54 7.54 0.45 0.00 0.00

Upper Ridge No. 0.01069 746 7.97 7.97 0.00 0.12 47 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.008Middle Ridge No. 0.07504 235 17.63 17.63 0.00 0.26 20 1.50 1.50 0.00 0.02W.H.S No. 0.74583 8 5.97 5.97 8.26 0.09 1 0.75 0.75 0.00 0.01Minor masonary st.(MMS) No. 3.5/2.5/2/5 5 22.00 22.00 10.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Sub surface st. No. 7.00000 1 7.00 7.00 0.00

Total (B) 165.22 165.22 81.83 6.75 172 11.68 11.68 2.00 0.58

Local Artisans / Crafts No. 5.81 2.75 2.75 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00Dairy & Poultry No. 11.62 5.51 5.51 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.39 0.00Animal Husbandry Management No. 17.43 8.26 8.26 0.30 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.30Nursery Establishment No. 5.81 2.75 2.75 0.00 0.69 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.05Dryland Horticulture Ha. 17.46 16 8.29 8.29 1.00 2.07 1.1 0.57 0.57 0.20 0.14Crop Demonstration No. 11.62 5.51 5.51 1.00 1.38 0.39 0.39 0.20 0.10Vermi compost ,Compost pit & AgroForestry No. 17.34 8.26 8.26 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00

( C ) Production System and micro enterprise(15%)Production measures for arable land 20-40% towards project cost

Conservation measures for non arable land

Drainage line treatmentLSCD

Vermi compost ,Compost pit & AgroForestry No. 17.34 8.26 8.26 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00

Total (C) 41.34 41.34 2.30 4.14 2.90 2.90 0.70 0.29(D) Consolidation (3%) 8.26 8.26 4.60 8.28 0.58 0.58 1.40 0.58

Grand Total 275.40 275.40 88.73 19.16 172 19.44 19.44 4.10 1.44

Page 49: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Proposed Development Plan Chapter IV

PIA (7%) 40.68WC (3%) 17.43SLNA (0.2%) 1.16WCDC (0.2%) 1.16PIA (0.6%) 3.49

Evaluation (1%) SLNA (1%) 5.81EPA (4%) PIA (4%) 23.25

SLNA (.05%) 0.29WCDC (1.3%) 7.56PIA (3.65%) 21.21

DPR (1%) PIA (1%) 5.81Total (A) 127.86

PRT Ha. 0.16439VCB Ha. 0.05551Gully Control No. 0.08146Bank stabilization Mt. 0.03016

(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA (22%)

Activity Unit Unit Cost

Admn. (10%)

Monitoring (1%)

I & CB (5%)

(B) Natural resource management (60%) Conservation measures for arable land(private land) 5-10% towards WDF

Conservation measures for non arable land

COST (LACS) 42.96 AREA (HA) 358 COST (LACS) 89.52 AREA (HA) 746

Quantity Total CostCost from

ProjectFund

ConvergenceFund

BeneficiaryContribution Quantity Total Cost

Cost fromProjectFund

ConvergenceFund

BeneficiaryContribution

3.01 3.01 0.00 0.00 6.27 6.27 0.00 0.001.29 1.29 0.00 0.00 2.69 2.69 0.00 0.000.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.000.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.000.26 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.000.43 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.001.72 1.72 0.00 0.00 3.58 3.58 0.00 0.000.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.000.56 0.56 0.00 0.00 1.16 1.16 0.00 0.001.57 1.57 0.00 0.00 3.27 3.27 0.00 0.000.43 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.00

0.00 9.45 9.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.69 19.69 0.00 0.00

9 1.48 1.48 0.00 0.09 10 1.64 1.64 0.00 0.1025 1.39 1.39 0.00 0.08 22 1.22 1.22 0.00 0.074 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.02 15 1.22 1.22 0.00 0.07

180 5.43 5.43 1.00 0.33

KEJAD

(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA (22%)

NIMBODA

(B) Natural resource management (60%) Conservation measures for arable land(private land) 5-10% towards WDF

Conservation measures for non arable landBank stabilization Mt. 0.03016

Run off management structure No. 0.905SCT Ha. 0.06014Contour Stone Bund Ha. 0.21065Gully Control non arable No. 0.08843Pasture Development Ha. 1.55908Bank stabilization/Nalla st. Mt. 0.04145

Upper Ridge No. 0.01069Middle Ridge No. 0.07504W.H.S No. 0.74583Minor masonary st.(MMS) No. 3.5/2.5/2/5Sub surface st. No. 7.00000

Total (B)

Local Artisans / Crafts No. 5.81Dairy & Poultry No. 11.62Animal Husbandry Management No. 17.43

Nursery Establishment No. 5.81

Dryland Horticulture Ha. 17.46Crop Demonstration No. 11.62Vermi compost ,Compost pit & AgroForestry No. 17.34

( C ) Production System and micro enterprise(15%)Production measures for arable land 20-40% towards project cost

Conservation measures for non arable land

Drainage line treatmentLSCD

180 5.43 5.43 1.00 0.33

1 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.05 3 2.72 2.72 1.00 0.1617 1.02 1.02 0.00 0.06 40 2.41 2.41 0.00 0.144 0.84 0.84 0.00 0.05 29 6.11 6.11 0.00 0.37

40 3.54 3.54 1.00 0.21 75 6.63 6.63 2.00 0.400.00 0.00 7.80 0.00 7 10.91 10.91 23.39 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.00

199 2.13 2.13 0.00 0.03 423 4.52 4.52 0.00 0.0732 2.40 2.40 0.00 0.04 52 3.90 3.90 0.00 0.061 0.75 0.75 0.00 0.01 2 1.49 1.49 0.021 4.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 1 5.50 5.50 5.00 0.001 7.00 7.00 0.20

334 25.77 25.77 10.00 0.65 859 53.71 53.71 33.01 1.79

0.43 0.43 0.00 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.220.86 0.86 0.00 1.79 1.79 0.00 0.451.29 1.29 0.30 2.69 2.69 0.30 0.670.43 0.43 0.00 0.11 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.22

2.5 1.30 1.30 0.20 0.32 5 2.69 2.69 0.20 0.670.86 0.86 0.40 0.21 1.79 1.79 0.40 0.451.29 1.29 0.00 2.69 2.69 0.00 0.67

( C ) Production System and micro enterprise(15%)Production measures for arable land 20-40% towards project cost

Conservation measures for non arable land

Drainage line treatmentLSCD

Vermi compost ,Compost pit & AgroForestry No. 17.34

Total (C)(D) Consolidation (3%)

Grand Total

1.29 1.29 0.00 2.69 2.69 0.00 0.676.45 6.45 0.90 0.65 13.44 13.44 0.90 3.361.29 1.29 1.80 1.29 2.69 2.69

42.96 42.96 12.70 2.59 859 89.52 89.52 33.91 5.15

Page 50: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Proposed Development Plan Chapter IV

PIA (7%) 40.68WC (3%) 17.43SLNA (0.2%) 1.16WCDC (0.2%) 1.16PIA (0.6%) 3.49

Evaluation (1%) SLNA (1%) 5.81EPA (4%) PIA (4%) 23.25

SLNA (.05%) 0.29WCDC (1.3%) 7.56PIA (3.65%) 21.21

DPR (1%) PIA (1%) 5.81Total (A) 127.86

PRT Ha. 0.16439VCB Ha. 0.05551Gully Control No. 0.08146Bank stabilization Mt. 0.03016

(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA (22%)

Activity Unit Unit Cost

Admn. (10%)

Monitoring (1%)

I & CB (5%)

(B) Natural resource management (60%) Conservation measures for arable land(private land) 5-10% towards WDF

Conservation measures for non arable land

COST (LACS) 9.24 AREA (HA) 77 COST (LACS) 62.04 AREA (HA) 517

Quantity Total CostCost from

ProjectFund

ConvergenceFund

BeneficiaryContribution Quantity Total Cost

Cost fromProjectFund

ConvergenceFund

BeneficiaryContribution

0.65 0.65 0.00 0.00 4.34 4.34 0.00 0.000.28 0.28 0.00 0.00 1.86 1.86 0.00 0.000.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.000.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.000.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.000.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.00 0.000.37 0.37 0.00 0.00 2.48 2.48 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.000.12 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.81 0.00 0.000.34 0.34 0.00 0.00 2.26 2.26 0.00 0.000.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.00 0.00

0.00 2.03 2.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.65 13.65 0.00 0.00

2 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.02 35 5.75 5.75 0.00 0.350.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40 2.22 2.22 0.00 0.13

2 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.01 10 0.81 0.81 0.00 0.05

PARSAD

(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA (22%)

CHAWAND

(B) Natural resource management (60%) Conservation measures for arable land(private land) 5-10% towards WDF

Conservation measures for non arable landBank stabilization Mt. 0.03016

Run off management structure No. 0.905SCT Ha. 0.06014Contour Stone Bund Ha. 0.21065Gully Control non arable No. 0.08843Pasture Development Ha. 1.55908Bank stabilization/Nalla st. Mt. 0.04145

Upper Ridge No. 0.01069Middle Ridge No. 0.07504W.H.S No. 0.74583Minor masonary st.(MMS) No. 3.5/2.5/2/5Sub surface st. No. 7.00000

Total (B)

Local Artisans / Crafts No. 5.81Dairy & Poultry No. 11.62Animal Husbandry Management No. 17.43

Nursery Establishment No. 5.81

Dryland Horticulture Ha. 17.46Crop Demonstration No. 11.62Vermi compost ,Compost pit & AgroForestry No. 17.34

( C ) Production System and micro enterprise(15%)Production measures for arable land 20-40% towards project cost

Conservation measures for non arable land

Drainage line treatmentLSCD

0 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.057 0.42 0.42 0.00 0.03 20 1.20 1.20 0.00 0.071 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.01 5 1.05 1.05 0.00 0.06

11 0.97 0.97 0.00 0.06 63 5.57 5.57 1.00 0.330 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 12.47 12.47 38.98

1.00 1.04

17 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.003 68 0.73 0.73 0.00 0.015 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.006 20 1.50 1.50 0.00 0.02

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 1.49 1.49 0.00 0.021 3.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 1 3.50 3.50 5.00 0.00

5.00

46.00 5.65 5.65 2.00 0.13 273.00 37.21 37.21 52.01 1.11

0.09 0.09 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.00 0.000.18 0.18 0.00 1.24 1.24 0.00 0.000.28 0.28 0.30 1.86 1.86 0.30 0.000.09 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.62 0.62 0.00 0.16

0.50 0.26 0.26 0.20 0.06 3.6 1.86 1.86 0.20 0.470.18 0.18 0.40 0.05 1.24 1.24 0.40 0.310.18 0.18 0.00 1.86 1.86 0.00 0.00

( C ) Production System and micro enterprise(15%)Production measures for arable land 20-40% towards project cost

Conservation measures for non arable land

Drainage line treatmentLSCD

Vermi compost ,Compost pit & AgroForestry No. 17.34

Total (C)(D) Consolidation (3%)

Grand Total

0.18 0.18 0.00 1.86 1.86 0.00 0.001.28 1.28 0.90 0.13 9.30 9.30 0.90 0.930.28 0.28 1.87 1.87 1.80 1.869.24 9.24 2.90 0.27 62.04 62.04 54.71 3.90

Page 51: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Proposed Development Plan Chapter IV

PIA (7%) 40.68WC (3%) 17.43SLNA (0.2%) 1.16WCDC (0.2%) 1.16PIA (0.6%) 3.49

Evaluation (1%) SLNA (1%) 5.81EPA (4%) PIA (4%) 23.25

SLNA (.05%) 0.29WCDC (1.3%) 7.56PIA (3.65%) 21.21

DPR (1%) PIA (1%) 5.81Total (A) 127.86

PRT Ha. 0.16439VCB Ha. 0.05551Gully Control No. 0.08146Bank stabilization Mt. 0.03016

(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA (22%)

Activity Unit Unit Cost

Admn. (10%)

Monitoring (1%)

I & CB (5%)

(B) Natural resource management (60%) Conservation measures for arable land(private land) 5-10% towards WDF

Conservation measures for non arable land

COST (LACS) 82.56 AREA (HA) 688 COST (LACS) 581.16 AREA (HA) 4843

Quantity Total CostCost from

ProjectFund

ConvergenceFund

BeneficiaryContribution Quantity Total Cost Cost from

Project FundConvergenc

e FundBeneficiaryContribution

5.78 5.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.68 40.68 0.00 0.002.48 2.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.43 17.43 0.00 0.000.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.16 1.16 0.00 0.000.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.16 1.16 0.00 0.000.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.49 3.49 0.00 0.000.83 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.81 5.81 0.00 0.003.30 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.25 23.25 0.00 0.000.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.001.07 1.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.56 7.56 0.00 0.003.01 3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.21 21.21 0.00 0.000.83 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.81 5.81 0.00 0.00

0.00 18.16 18.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 127.86 127.86 0.00 0.00

40 6.58 6.58 0.00 0.39 179 29.43 29.43 0.00 1.7780 4.44 4.44 0.00 0.27 252 13.99 13.99 0.00 0.848 0.65 0.65 0.00 0.04 87 7.09 7.09 0.00 0.43

0.00 1.00 360 10.86 10.86 3.00 0.65

(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA (22%)

TotalSARADA

(B) Natural resource management (60%) Conservation measures for arable land(private land) 5-10% towards WDF

Conservation measures for non arable landBank stabilization Mt. 0.03016

Run off management structure No. 0.905SCT Ha. 0.06014Contour Stone Bund Ha. 0.21065Gully Control non arable No. 0.08843Pasture Development Ha. 1.55908Bank stabilization/Nalla st. Mt. 0.04145

Upper Ridge No. 0.01069Middle Ridge No. 0.07504W.H.S No. 0.74583Minor masonary st.(MMS) No. 3.5/2.5/2/5Sub surface st. No. 7.00000

Total (B)

Local Artisans / Crafts No. 5.81Dairy & Poultry No. 11.62Animal Husbandry Management No. 17.43

Nursery Establishment No. 5.81

Dryland Horticulture Ha. 17.46Crop Demonstration No. 11.62Vermi compost ,Compost pit & AgroForestry No. 17.34

( C ) Production System and micro enterprise(15%)Production measures for arable land 20-40% towards project cost

Conservation measures for non arable land

Drainage line treatmentLSCD

0.00 1.00 360 10.86 10.86 3.00 0.65

1 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.05 8 7.24 7.24 10.00 0.4324 1.44 1.44 0.00 0.09 306 18.40 18.40 0.00 1.107 1.47 1.47 0.00 0.09 76 16.01 16.01 0.00 0.96

96 8.49 8.49 1.00 0.51 662 58.54 58.54 10.00 3.518 12.47 12.47 38.98 39 60.80 60.80 163.70 1.50

1.04 182 7.54 7.54 3.69 0.45

274 2.93 2.93 0.00 0.04 1774 18.96 18.96 0.00 0.2842 3.15 3.15 0.00 0.05 406 30.47 30.47 0.00 0.462 1.49 1.49 2.89 0.02 16 11.93 11.93 0.00 0.181 5.50 5.50 0.00 0.00 10 43.50 43.50 20.00 0.00

2 14.00 14.00 5.20 0.00583 49.53 49.53 45.90 1.55 4359 348.76 348.76 215.60 12.56

0.83 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.81 5.81 0.00 0.221.65 1.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.62 11.62 0.00 0.452.48 2.48 0.30 0.00 0.00 17.43 17.43 2.10 0.670.83 0.83 0.00 0.21 0.00 5.81 5.81 0.00 1.45

5 2.49 2.49 0.00 0.62 34 17.46 17.46 2.00 4.361.65 1.65 0.20 0.41 0.00 11.62 11.62 3.00 2.912.48 2.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.34 17.34 0.00 0.67

( C ) Production System and micro enterprise(15%)Production measures for arable land 20-40% towards project cost

Conservation measures for non arable land

Drainage line treatmentLSCD

Vermi compost ,Compost pit & AgroForestry No. 17.34

Total (C)(D) Consolidation (3%)

Grand Total

2.48 2.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.34 17.34 0.00 0.6712.39 12.39 0.50 1.24 87.10 87.10 7.10 10.742.48 2.48 1.00 2.48 0 17.44 17.44 10.60 14.49

583 82.56 82.56 47.40 5.27 4359 581.16 581.16 233.30 37.79

Page 52: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Annual Action Plan (Through Convergence)

Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin

PIA (7%) 0.00 0 0.00WC (3%) 0.00 0 0.00SLNA (0.2%) 0.00 0 0.00WCDC (0.2%) 0.00 0 0.00PIA (0.6%) 0.00 0 0.00

Evaluation (1%) SLNA (1%) 0.00 0 0.00EPA (4%) PIA (4%) 0.00

SLNA (.05%) 0.00WCDC (1.3%) 0.00PIA (3.65%) 0.00

DPR (1%) PIA (1%) 0.00Total (A) 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

PRT Ha. 0.00 0 0.00VCB Ha. 0.00 0 0.00Gully Control No. 0.00 0 0.00Bank stabilization mConservation measures for non arable land 0 0.00

UnitCost

3rd year

Admn. (10%)

Monitoring (1%)

I & CB (5%)

Activity5th yearTotal

cost1st year

Unit Quantity4th year2nd year Total

(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA (22%)

(B) Natural resource management (60%) Conservation measures for arable land(private land) 5-10% towards WDF

6th year 7th year

Conservation measures for non arable land 0 0.00Run off management structure nadi No. 10.00 3.50 3.30 3.20 0 10.00SCT Ha. 0.00 0 0.00Contour Stone Bund Ha. 0.00 0 0.00Gully Control non arable No. 10.00 5.00 3.00 2.00 0 10.00Pasture Development Ha. 163.70 16.37 65.48 81.85 0 163.70Bank stabilization/Nalla st. mDrainage line treatment 0 0.00LSCD 0 0.00Upper Ridge No. 0.00 0 0.00Middle Ridge No. 0.00 0 0.00Lower Ridge/Nadi No. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00Anicut No. 20.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 0 20.00Sub surface st. No.

Total (B) 203.70 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 29.87 0 81.78 0 92.05 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 203.70

Local Artisans / Crafts No. 0.00 0 0.00Dairy & Poultry No. 0.00 0 0.00Animal Husbandry Management No. 2.10 0.70 0.70 0.70 0 2.10Nursery Establish No. 0.00 0 0.00Dry Horticulture Ha. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00Crop Demonstration No. 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 3.00Vermi compost ,Compost pit & AgroForestry No. 0.00 0 0.00

Total (C) 5.10 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.70 0 1.70 0 1.70 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 5.10(D) Consolidation (3%) 10.60 0 0.00

( C ) Production System and micro enterprise(15%)Production measures for arable land 20-40% towards project cost

(D) Consolidation (3%) 10.60 0 0.00Grand Total 219.40 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 31.57 0 83.48 0 93.75 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 208.80% Targets NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Page 53: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Through Project Fund Yearwise Total

Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin

PIA (7%) 40.68 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 0.00 8.14 40.68WC (3%) 17.43 3.49 3.49 3.49 3.49 0.00 3.49 17.43SLNA (0.2%) 1.16 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.23 1.16WCDC (0.2%) 1.16 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.23 1.16PIA (0.6%) 3.49 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.70 3.49

Evaluation (1%) SLNA (1%) 5.81 0.00 0.00 2.91 0.00 0.00 2.91 5.81EPA (4%) PIA (4%) 23.25 0.00 23.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.25

SLNA (.05%) 0.29 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.12 0.29WCDC (1.3%) 7.56 0.00 1.51 1.51 1.51 0.00 3.02 7.56PIA (3.65%) 21.21 0.00 4.24 4.24 4.24 0.00 8.49 21.21

DPR (1%) PIA (1%) 5.81 4.65 1.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.81Total (A) 127.86 17.43 43.00 21.50 18.60 0.00 27.32 127.86

PRT Ha. 179 0.16439 29.43 95 15.62 81 13.31 3 0.49 179 29.43VCB Ha. 252 0.05551 13.99 125 6.94 89 4.94 38 2.11 252 13.99Gully Control No. 87 0.08146 7.09 38 3.10 28 2.84 21 1.16 87 7.09Bank stabilization m 360 0.03016 10.86 61 100 3.02 260 7.84 0 0.00 360 10.86Conservation measures for non arable land

I & CB (5%)

Conservation measures for arable land(private land) 5-10% towards WDF

Admn. (10%)

5th year TotalActivity Unit Quantity

Monitoring (1%)

Annual Action Plan : The project period can vary from 4 to 7 years and accordingly the table given below be prepared. Also the activities mentioned below are indicative and can vary from project to project. Also this if PIA feels necessary to make it GP W

CHAPTER – V

(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA (22%)

(B) Natural resource management (60%)

UnitCost Total cost

1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year

Conservation measures for non arable landRun off management structurenadi No. 8 0.905 7.24 5 4.53 3 2.72 0 0.00 8 7.24SCT Ha. 306 0.06014 18.40 110 6.62 125 7.52 71 4.27 306 18.40Contour Stone Bund Ha. 76 0.21065 16.01 25 5.27 37 7.79 14 2.95 76 16.01Gully Control non arable No. 662 0.08843 58.54 136 12.03 67 5.92 459 40.59 662 58.54Pasture Development Ha. 39 1.55908 60.80 19 29.62 13 20.27 7 10.91 39 60.80Bank stabilization/Nalla st. m 182 0.04145 7.54 169 0 0.00 100 4.15 82 3.40 182 7.54Drainage line treatment 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00LSCD 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Upper Ridge No. 1774 0.01069 18.96 340 3.63 312 3.34 1122 11.99 1774 18.96Middle Ridge No. 406 0.07504 30.47 340 7.20 93 6.98 217 16.28 406 30.47Lower Ridge/Nadi 16 0.74583 11.93 5 3.73 7 5.22 4 2.98 16 11.93Anicut 10 3.5/2.5/2/5 43.50 3 8.00 6 20.25 1 15.25 10 43.50Sub surface st. No. 2 7 14.00 0 0.00 2 14.00 0 0.00 2 14.00

Total (B) 0 348.76 91.14 107.32 112.39 348.76

Local Artisans / Crafts No. 5.81 1.93 1.94 1.93 5.81Dairy & Poultry No. 11.62 3.87 3.88 3.87 11.62

Animal Husbandry Management No. 17.43 4.40 8.82 4.22 17.43Nursery Establish No. 5.81 4.65 1.16 0.00 5.81Dry Horticulture Ha. 34 0.51801 17.46 14.3 7.38 13.1 6.76 6.4 3.32 33.7 17.46Crop Demonstration No. 11.62 3.87 3.88 3.87 11.62Vermi compost ,Compost pit &Agro Forestry No. 17.34 5.78 5.78 5.79 17.34

Total (C) 33.7 87.10 31.88 32.22 23.00 87.10(D) Consolidation (3%) 17.44 0.00 0.00 17.44 17.44

Grand Total 581.16 17.43 43.00 144.52 158.14 180.16 581.16

( C ) Production System and micro enterprise(15%)Production measures for arable land 20-40% towards project cost

(D) Consolidation (3%) 17.44 0.00 0.00 17.44 17.44Grand Total 581.16 17.43 43.00 144.52 158.14 180.16 581.16% Targets NA NA NA NA NA NA

Page 54: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Through Project Fund G.P.- Katanwara AREA(HA) 2295 COST (LACS) 275.4

Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin

PIA (7%) 19.28 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.86 19.28WC (3%) 8.26 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 8.26SLNA (0.2%) 0.55 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.55WCDC (0.2%) 0.55 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.55PIA (0.6%) 1.65 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.65

Evaluation (1%) SLNA (1%) 2.75 0.00 0.00 1.38 0.00 1.38 2.75EPA (4%) PIA (4%) 11.02 0.00 11.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.02

SLNA (.05%) 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.14WCDC (1.3%) 3.58 0.00 0.71 0.72 0.72 1.43 3.58PIA (3.65%) 10.05 0.00 2.01 2.01 2.01 4.02 10.05

DPR (1%) PIA (1%) 2.75 2.20 0.55 0.00 2.7560.59 8.26 20.38 10.19 8.81 12.95 60.59

PRT Ha. 78 0.16439 12.82 39 6.41 39 6.41 0 0.00 78 12.82VCB Ha. 75 0.05551 4.16 25 1.39 25 1.39 25 1.39 75 4.16Gully Control No. 40 0.08146 3.26 20 1.63 10 1.37 10 0.26 40 3.26Bank stabilization m 180 0.03016 5.43 100 3.02 80 2.41 0 0.00 180 5.43Conservation measures for non arable land

Annual Action Plan : The project period can vary from 4 to 7 years and accordingly the table given below be prepared. Also the activities mentioned below are indicative and can vary from project to project. Also this if PIA feels necessary to make it GP W

Admn. (10%)

Monitoring (1%)

I & CB (5%)

TotalUnit Quantity

CHAPTER – V

Total (A)(B) Natural resource management (60%) Conservation measures for arable land(private land) 5-10% towards WDF

(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA (22%)

UnitCost Total cost

1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th yearActivity

Conservation measures for non arable landRun off managementstructure nadi No. 2 0.905 1.81 1 0.91 1 0.91 0 0.00 2 1.81SCT Ha. 180 0.06014 10.83 50 3.01 60 3.61 70 4.21 180 10.83Contour Stone Bund Ha. 28 0.21065 5.90 9 1.90 19 4.00 0 0.00 28 5.90Gully Control non arable No. 316 0.08843 27.94 100 8.84 30 2.65 186 16.45 316 27.94Pasture Development Ha. 16 1.55908 24.95 5 7.80 5 7.80 6 9.35 16 24.95

Bank stabilization/Nalla st. m 182 0.04145 7.54 100 4.15 82 3.40 182 7.54Drainage line treatmentLSCDUpper Ridge No. 746 0.01069 7.97 150 1.60 150 1.60 446 4.77 746 7.97Middle Ridge No. 235 0.07504 17.63 40 3.00 40 3.00 155 11.63 235 17.63W.H.S 8 0.74583 5.97 2 1.49 2 1.49 4 2.98 8 5.97Minor masonary st.(MMS) No. 5 3.5/2.5/2/5 22.00 2 5.50 3 8.25 0 8.25 5 22.00Sub surface st. 1 7 7.00 1 7.00 0 0.00 1 7.00

Total (B) 165.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 543.00 46.49 565.00 56.04 984.00 62.69 2092.00 165.22

Local Artisans / Crafts No. 2.75 0.92 0.92 0.92 2.75Dairy & Poultry No. 5.51 1.83 1.84 1.83 5.51

No. 8.26 2.06 4.13 2.07 8.26Nursery Establish No. 2.75 2.20 0.55 0.00 2.75Dry Horticulture Ha. 16 0.51801 8.29 6 3.11 5 2.59 5 2.59 16 8.29Crop Demonstration No. 5.51 1.83 1.84 1.83 5.51

No. 8.26 2.75 2.75 2.76 8.26Total (C) 16 41.34 0.00 0.00 14.71 14.62 12.01 41.34

Vermi compost ,Compost pit & Agro Forestry

Animal Husbandry Management

( C ) Production System and micro enterprise(15%)Production measures for arable land 20-40% towards project cost

Total (C) 16 41.34 0.00 0.00 14.71 14.62 12.01 41.34(D) Consolidation (3%) 8.26 8.26 0 8.26

Grand Total 275.40 8.26 20.38 71.39 79.47 95.91 275.40% Targets NA NA NA NA NA NA

Page 55: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Through Project Fund G.P.- Kharbar AREA(HA) 162 COST (LACS) 19.44

Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin

PIA (7%) 1.36 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 1.36WC (3%) 0.58 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.58SLNA (0.2%) 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04WCDC (0.2%) 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04PIA (0.6%) 0.12 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.12

Evaluation (1%) SLNA (1%) 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.19EPA (4%) PIA (4%) 0.78 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.78

SLNA (.05%) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01WCDC (1.3%) 0.25 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.25PIA (3.65%) 0.71 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.28 0.71

DPR (1%) PIA (1%) 0.19 0.16 0.04 0.00 0.190 4.28 0.58 1.44 0.72 0.62 0.91 4.28

PRT Ha. 5 0.16439 0.82 2 0.33 3 0.49 0 0.00 5 0.82VCB Ha. 10 0.05551 0.56 3 0.17 3 0.17 4 0.22 10 0.56Gully Control No. 8 0.08146 0.65 4 0.33 4 0.33 0 0.00 8 0.65

Total (A)(B) Natural resource management (60%) Conservation measures for arable land(private land) 5-10% towards WDF

CHAPTER – V

(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA (22%)

UnitCost

Totalcost

1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year

Admn. (10%)

Monitoring (1%)

I & CB (5%)

Annual Action Plan : The project period can vary from 4 to 7 years and accordingly the table given below be prepared. Also the activities mentioned below are indicative and can vary from project to project. Also this if PIA feels necessary to make it GP W

TotalActivity Unit Quantity

Gully Control No. 8 0.08146 0.65 4 0.33 4 0.33 0 0.00 8 0.65Bank stabilization m 0 0.03016 0.00Conservation measures for non arable landRun off managementstructure nadi No. 0 0.905 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00SCT Ha. 18 0.06014 1.08 10 0.60 8 0.48 0 0.00 18 1.08Contour Stone Bund Ha. 2 0.21065 0.42 1 0.21 1 0.21 0 0.00 2 0.42Gully Control non arable No. 61 0.08843 5.39 15 1.33 15 1.33 31 2.74 61 5.39Pasture Development Ha. 0 1.55908 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Bank stabilization/Nalla st. mDrainage line treatmentLSCDUpper Ridge No. 47 0.01069 0.50 12 0.13 12 0.13 23 0.25 47 0.50Middle Ridge No. 20 0.07504 1.50 5 0.38 7 0.53 8 0.60 20 1.50W.H.S 1 0.74583 0.75 0.00 1 0.75 0 0.00 1 0.75Minor masonary st.(MMS) No. 0 3.5/2.5/2/5 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Sub surface st. 0 7 0.00

Total (B) 0 11.68 0.00 0.00 3.46 4.40 3.81 11.68

Local Artisans / Crafts No. 0.19 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.19Dairy & Poultry No. 0.39 0.13 0.13 0.13 0 0.39

No. 0.58 0.19 0.39 0.00 0 0.58Nursery Establish No. 0.19 0.16 0.04 0.00 0 0.19Dry Horticulture Ha. 1.1 0.51801 0.57 1 0.52 0.1 0.05 0 0.00 1.1 0.57Crop Demonstration No. 0.39 0.13 0.13 0.13 0 0.39

No. 0.58 0.194 0.194 0.19 0 0.58Total (C) 1.1 2.90 0.00 0.00 1.39 1.00 0.52 2.90

(D) Consolidation (3%) 0.58 0.58 0 0.58

Vermi compost ,Compost pit & Agro Forestry

Animal Husbandry Management

( C ) Production System and micro enterprise(15%)Production measures for arable land 20-40% towards project cost

(D) Consolidation (3%) 0.58 0.58 0 0.58Grand Total 19.44 0.58 1.44 5.57 6.02 5.82 19.44% Targets NA NA NA NA NA NA

Page 56: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Through Project Fund G.P.- Kejad AREA(HA) 358 COST (LACS) 42.96

Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin

PIA (7%) 3.01 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 3.01WC (3%) 1.29 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 1.29SLNA (0.2%) 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.09WCDC (0.2%) 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.09PIA (0.6%) 0.26 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.26

Evaluation (1%) SLNA (1%) 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.43EPA (4%) PIA (4%) 1.72 0.00 1.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.72

SLNA (.05%) 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02WCDC (1.3%) 0.56 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.22 0.56PIA (3.65%) 1.57 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.63 1.57

DPR (1%) PIA (1%) 0.43 0.34 0.09 0.00 0.439.45 1.29 3.18 1.59 1.37 2.02 9.45

PRT Ha. 9 0.16439 1.48 5 0.82 4 0.66 0 0.000 9 1.48VCB Ha. 25 0.05551 1.39 12 0.67 12 0.67 1 0.056 25 1.39Gully Control No. 4 0.08146 0.33 2 0.16 2 0.16 0 0.000 4 0.33

Annual Action Plan : The project period can vary from 4 to 7 years and accordingly the table given below be prepared. Also the activities mentioned below are indicative and can vary from project to project. Also this if PIA feels necessary to make it GP W

Admn. (10%)

Monitoring (1%)

I & CB (5%)

TotalUnit Quantity

CHAPTER – V

Total (A)(B) Natural resource management (60%) Conservation measures for arable land(private land) 5-10% towards WDF

(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA (22%)

UnitCost

Totalcost

1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th yearActivity

Gully Control No. 4 0.08146 0.33 2 0.16 2 0.16 0 0.000 4 0.33Bank stabilization m 0 0.03016 0.00Conservation measures for non arable landRun off management structurenadi No. 1 0.905 0.91 1 0.91 0 0.00 0 0.000 1 0.91SCT Ha. 17 0.06014 1.02 9 0.54 8 0.48 0 0.000 17 1.02Contour Stone Bund Ha. 4 0.21065 0.84 2 0.42 2 0.42 0 0.000 4 0.84Gully Control non arable No. 40 0.08843 3.54 2 0.18 2 0.18 36 3.183 40 3.54Pasture Development Ha. 0 1.55908 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.000 0 0.00Bank stabilization/Nalla st. m 0 0.04145 0.00Drainage line treatmentLSCDUpper Ridge No. 199 0.01069 2.13 60 0.64 58 0.62 81 0.866 199 2.13Middle Ridge No. 32 0.07504 2.40 10 0.75 10 0.75 12 0.900 32 2.40W.H.S 1 0.74583 0.75 0 0.00 1 0.75 0 0.000 1 0.75Minor masonary st.(MMS) No. 1 3.5/2.5/2/5 4.00 0 0.00 1 3.50 0 0.500 1 4.00Sub surface st. 1 7 7.00 1 7.00 1 7.00

Total (B) 0 25.77 0.00 0.00 5.09 8.18 12.505 25.77

Local Artisans / Crafts No. 0.43 0.14 0.14 0.143 0 0.43Dairy & Poultry No. 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.286 0 0.86

No. 1.29 0.32 0.64 0.323 0 1.29Nursery Establish No. 0.43 0.34 0.09 0.000 0 0.43Dry Horticulture Ha. 2.5 0.51801 1.30 1.25 0.65 1.25 0.65 0 0.000 2.5 1.30Crop Demonstration No. 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.286 0 0.86

No. 1.29 0.43 0.43 0.430 0 1.29Total (C) 2.5 6.45 0.00 0.00 2.46 2.52 1.469 2.5 6.45

Vermi compost ,Compost pit & Agro Forestry

Animal Husbandry Management

( C ) Production System and micro enterprise(15%)Production measures for arable land 20-40% towards project cost

Total (C) 2.5 6.45 0.00 0.00 2.46 2.52 1.469 2.5 6.45(D) Consolidation (3%) 1.29 1.29 0 1.29

Grand Total 42.96 1.29 3.18 9.13 12.08 17.28 42.96% Targets NA NA NA NA NA NA

Page 57: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Through Project Fund G.P.- Nimboda AREA(HA) 746 COST (LACS) 89.52

Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin

PIA (7%) 6.27 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 6.27WC (3%) 2.69 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 2.69SLNA (0.2%) 0.18 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.18WCDC (0.2%) 0.18 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.18PIA (0.6%) 0.54 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.54

Evaluation (1%) SLNA (1%) 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.45 0.90EPA (4%) PIA (4%) 3.58 0.00 3.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.58

SLNA (.05%) 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04WCDC (1.3%) 1.16 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.47 1.16PIA (3.65%) 3.27 0.65 0.65 0.65 1.31 3.27

DPR (1%) PIA (1%) 0.90 0.72 0.18 0.00 0.90Total (A) 19.69 2.69 6.62 3.31 2.86 4.21 19.69

PRT Ha. 10 0.16439 1.64 5 0.82 5 0.82 0 0.00 10 1.64VCB Ha. 22 0.05551 1.22 15 0.83 6 0.33 1 0.06 22 1.22Gully Control No. 15 0.08146 1.22 2 0.16 2 0.16 11 0.90 15 1.22Bank stabilization m 180 0.03016 5.43 180 5.43 180 5.43

(B) Natural resource management (60%)

UnitCost

Totalcost

4th year

Monitoring (1%)

I & CB (5%)

Conservation measures for arable land(private land) 5-10% towards WDF

CHAPTER – V

(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA (22%)

5th year TotalActivity

1st year 3rd yearUnit Quantity

2nd year

Annual Action Plan : The project period can vary from 4 to 7 years and accordingly the table given below be prepared. Also the activities mentioned below are indicative and can vary from project to project. Also this if PIA feels necessary to make it GP W

Admn. (10%)

Bank stabilization m 180 0.03016 5.43 180 5.43 180 5.43Conservation measures for non arable landRun off management structurenadi No. 3 0.905 2.72 2 1.81 1 0.91 0 0.00 3 2.72SCT Ha. 40 0.06014 2.41 15 0.90 25 1.50 0 0.00 40 2.41Contour Stone Bund Ha. 29 0.21065 6.11 8 1.69 7 1.47 14 2.95 29 6.11Gully Control non arable No. 75 0.08843 6.63 5 0.44 5 0.44 65 5.75 75 6.63Pasture Development Ha. 7 1.55908 10.91 4 6.24 3 4.68 0 0.00 7 10.91Bank stabilization/Nalla st. m 0 0.04145 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Drainage line treatmentLSCDUpper Ridge No. 423 0.01069 4.52 65 0.69 38 0.41 320 3.42 423 4.52Middle Ridge No. 52 0.07504 3.90 20 1.50 10 0.75 22 1.65 52 3.90W.H.S 2 0.74583 1.49 1 0.75 1 0.75 0 0.00 2 1.49

No. 1 3.5/2.5/2/5 5.50 1 2.50 3.00 0 0.00 1 5.50Sub surface st. 0 7 0.00

Total (B) 53.71 0.00 0.00 18.33 20.65 14.72 53.71

No. 0.90 0.30 0.30 0.30 0 0.90Dairy & Poultry No. 1.79 0.60 0.60 0.60 0 1.79

No. 2.69 0.67 1.34 0.67 0 2.69Nursery Establish No. 0.90 0.72 0.18 0.00 0 0.90Dry Horticulture Ha. 5 0.51801 2.69 2.5 1.30 2.7 1.40 0 0.00 5.2 2.69Crop Demonstration No. 1.79 0.60 0.60 0.60 0 1.79

No. 2.69 0.89 0.89 0.90 0 2.69Total (C) 5.2 13.44 0.00 0.00 5.07 5.31 3.06 13.44

(D) Consolidation (3%) 2.69 2.69 0 2.69

Local Artisans / Crafts

Minor masonary st.(MMS)

Vermi compost ,Compost pit & Agro Forestry

Animal Husbandry Management

( C ) Production System and micro enterprise(15%)Production measures for arable land 20-40% towards project cost

(D) Consolidation (3%) 2.69 2.69 0 2.69Grand Total 89.52 0 2.69 0 6.62 26.71 28.83 24.68 89.52% Targets NA NA NA NA NA NA

Page 58: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Through Project Fund G.P.- Parsad AREA(HA) 77 COST (LACS) 9.24

Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin

PIA (7%) 0.65 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.65WC (3%) 0.28 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.28SLNA (0.2%) 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02WCDC (0.2%) 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02PIA (0.6%) 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.06

Evaluation (1%) SLNA (1%) 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.09EPA (4%) PIA (4%) 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37

SLNA (.05%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00WCDC (1.3%) 0.12 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.12PIA (3.65%) 0.34 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.14 0.34

DPR (1%) PIA (1%) 0.09 0.07 0.02 0.00 0.090 2.03 0.28 0.68 0.34 0.30 0.43 2.03

PRT Ha. 2 0.16439 0.33 2 0.33 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.33VCB Ha. 0 0.05551 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Gully Control No. 2 0.08146 0.16 1 0.08 1 0.08 0 0.00 2 0.16

Annual Action Plan : The project period can vary from 4 to 7 years and accordingly the table given below be prepared. Also the activities mentioned below are indicative and can vary from project to project. Also this if PIA feels necessary to make it GP W

Admn. (10%)

Monitoring (1%)

I & CB (5%)

TotalUnit Quantity

CHAPTER – V

Total (A)(B) Natural resource management (60%) Conservation measures for arable land(private land) 5-10% towards WDF

(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA (22%)

UnitCost

Totalcost

1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th yearActivity

Gully Control No. 2 0.08146 0.16 1 0.08 1 0.08 0 0.00 2 0.16Bank stabilization m 0 0.03016 0.00Conservation measures for non arable landRun off management structurenadi No. 0 0.905 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00SCT Ha. 7 0.06014 0.42 3 0.18 3 0.18 1 0.06 7 0.42Contour Stone Bund Ha. 1 0.21065 0.21 0 0.00 1 0.21 0 0.00 1 0.21Gully Control non arable No. 11 0.08843 0.97 2 0.18 2 0.18 7 0.62 11 0.97Pasture Development Ha. 0 1.55908 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Bank stabilization/Nalla st. mDrainage line treatmentLSCDUpper Ridge No. 17 0.01069 0.18 8 0.09 9 0.10 0 0.00 17 0.18Middle Ridge No. 5 0.07504 0.38 3 0.23 2 0.15 0 0.00 5 0.38W.H.S 0 0.74583 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Minor masonary st.(MMS) No. 1 3.5/2.5/2/5 3.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 3.00 1 3.00Sub surface st. 0 7 0.00

Total (B) 0 5.65 0.00 0.00 1.08 0.90 3.68 5.65

Local Artisans / Crafts No. 0.09 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.09Dairy & Poultry No. 0.18 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.18

No. 0.28 0.07 0.14 0.07 0 0.28Nursery Establish No. 0.09 0.07 0.02 0.00 0 0.09Dry Horticulture Ha. 0.5 0.51801 0.26 0.5 0.26 0.00 0 0.00 0.5 0.26Crop Demonstration No. 0.18 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.18

No. 0.18 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.18Total (C) 0.5 1.28 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.37 0.29 1.28

Vermi compost ,Compost pit & Agro Forestry

Animal Husbandry Management

( C ) Production System and micro enterprise(15%)Production measures for arable land 20-40% towards project cost

Total (C) 0.5 1.28 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.37 0.29 1.28(D) Consolidation (3%) 0.28 0.28 0 0.28

Grand Total 9.24 0 0.28 0 0.68 2.04 1.56 4.68 9.24% Targets NA NA NA NA NA NA

Page 59: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Through Project Fund G.P.- Chawand AREA(HA) 517 COST (LACS) 62.04

Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin

PIA (7%) 4.34 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 4.34WC (3%) 1.86 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 1.86SLNA (0.2%) 0.12 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.12WCDC (0.2%) 0.12 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.12PIA (0.6%) 0.37 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.37

Evaluation (1%) SLNA (1%) 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.31 0.62EPA (4%) PIA (4%) 2.48 0.00 2.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.48

SLNA (.05%) 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03WCDC (1.3%) 0.81 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.32 0.81PIA (3.65%) 2.26 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.91 2.26

DPR (1%) PIA (1%) 0.62 0.50 0.12 0.00 0.620 0 13.65 1.86 4.59 2.30 1.99 2.92 13.65

PRT Ha. 35 0.16439 5.75 17 2.79 18 2.96 0 0.00 35 5.75VCB Ha. 40 0.05551 2.22 25 1.39 14 0.78 1 0.06 40 2.22Gully Control No. 10 0.08146 0.81 5 0.41 5 0.41 0 0.00 10 0.81Bank stabilization m 0 0.03016 0.00

2nd year 4th year 5th year

Total (A)

Conservation measures for arable land(private land) 5-10% towards WDF(B) Natural resource management (60%)

I & CB (5%)

(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA (22%)

UnitCost

Totalcost

Admn. (10%)

Monitoring (1%)

1st year 3rd year

CHAPTER – VAnnual Action Plan : The project period can vary from 4 to 7 years and accordingly the table given below be prepared. Also the activities mentioned below are indicative and can vary from project to project. Also this if PIA feels necessary to make it GP W

TotalActivity Unit Quantity

Bank stabilization m 0 0.03016 0.00Conservation measures for non arable landRun off managementstructure nadi No. 1 0.905 0.91 1 0.91 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.91SCT Ha. 20 0.06014 1.20 12 0.72 8 0.48 0 0.00 20 1.20Contour Stone Bund Ha. 5 0.21065 1.05 3 0.63 2 0.42 0 0.00 5 1.05Gully Control non arable No. 63 0.08843 5.57 5 0.44 5 0.44 53 4.69 63 5.57Pasture Development Ha. 8 1.55908 12.47 6 9.35 2 3.12 0 0.00 8 12.47

Bank stabilization/Nalla st. mDrainage line treatmentLSCDUpper Ridge No. 68 0.01069 0.73 15 0.16 15 0.16 38 0.41 68 0.73Middle Ridge No. 20 0.07504 1.50 8 0.60 10 0.75 2 0.15 20 1.50W.H.S 2 0.74583 1.49 1 0.75 1 0.75 0 0.00 2 1.49

Minor masonary st.(MMS) No. 1 3.5/2.5/2/5 3.50 0 0.00 1 2.50 0 1.00 1 3.50Sub surface st. 0 7 0.00

Total (B) 273 0 37.21 0.00 0.00 37.21 37.21

Local Artisans / Crafts No. 0.62 0.20 0.21 0.20 0 0.62Dairy & Poultry No. 1.24 0.41 0.41 0.41 0 1.24

No. 1.86 0.46 0.93 0.47 0 1.86Nursery Establish No. 0.62 0.50 0.12 0.00 0 0.62Dry Horticulture Ha. 3.6 0.51801 1.86 1 0.52 2 1.04 0.6 0.31 3.6 1.86Crop Demonstration No. 1.24 0.41 0.41 0.41 0 1.24

No. 1.86 0.62 0.62 0.62 0 1.86Total (C) 3.6 9.30 0.00 0.00 3.13 3.75 2.43 9.30

(D) Consolidation (3%) 1.87 1.87 0 1.87Grand Total 62.04 0 1.86 0 4.59 5.43 5.73 44.43 62.04% Targets NA NA NA NA NA NA

Vermi compost ,Compost pit & Agro Forestry

Animal Husbandry Management

( C ) Production System and micro enterprise(15%)Production measures for arable land 20-40% towards project cost

% Targets NA NA NA NA NA NA

Page 60: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Through Project Fund G.P.- Sarada AREA(HA) 688 COST (LACS) 82.56

Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin

PIA (7%) 5.78 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16 5.78WC (3%) 2.48 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.48SLNA (0.2%) 0.17 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.17WCDC (0.2%) 0.17 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.17PIA (0.6%) 0.50 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.50

Evaluation (1%) SLNA (1%) 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.41 0.83EPA (4%) PIA (4%) 3.30 0.00 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.30

SLNA (.05%) 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04WCDC (1.3%) 1.07 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.43 1.07PIA (3.65%) 3.01 0.60 0.60 0.60 1.21 3.01

DPR (1%) PIA (1%) 0.83 0.66 0.17 0.00 0.830 0 18.16 0 2.48 0 6.11 0 3.05 0 2.64 0 3.88 0 18.16

PRT Ha. 40 0.16439 6.58 25 4.11 12 1.97 3 0.49 40 6.58VCB Ha. 80 0.05551 4.44 45 2.50 29 1.61 6 0.33 80 4.44Gully Control No. 8 0.08146 0.65 4 0.33 4 0.33 0 0.00 8 0.65Bank stabilization m 0 0.03016 0.00

Annual Action Plan : The project period can vary from 4 to 7 years and accordingly the table given below be prepared. Also the activities mentioned below are indicative and can vary from project to project. Also this if PIA feels necessary to make it GP W

Admn. (10%)

Monitoring (1%)

I & CB (5%)

TotalUnit Quantity

CHAPTER – V

Total (A)(B) Natural resource management (60%) Conservation measures for arable land(private land) 5-10% towards WDF

(A) Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA (22%)

UnitCost

Totalcost

1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th yearActivity

Gully Control No. 8 0.08146 0.65 4 0.33 4 0.33 0 0.00 8 0.65Bank stabilization m 0 0.03016 0.00Conservation measures for non arable landRun off managementstructure nadi No. 1 0.905 0.91 0 0.00 1 0.91 0 0.00 1 0.91SCT Ha. 24 0.06014 1.44 11 0.66 13 0.78 0 0.00 24 1.44Contour Stone Bund Ha. 7 0.21065 1.47 2 0.42 5 1.05 0 0.00 7 1.47Gully Control non arable No. 96 0.08843 8.49 7 0.62 8 0.71 81 7.16 96 8.49Pasture Development Ha. 8 1.55908 12.47 4 6.24 3 4.68 1 1.56 8 12.47

Bank stabilization/Nalla st. mDrainage line treatmentLSCDUpper Ridge No. 274 0.01069 2.93 30 0.32 30 0.32 214 2.29 274 2.93Middle Ridge No. 42 0.07504 3.15 10 0.75 14 1.05 18 1.35 42 3.15W.H.S 2 0.74583 1.49 1 0.75 1 0.75 0 0.00 2 1.49Minor masonary st.(MMS) No. 1 3.5/2.5/2/5 5.50 0 0.00 1 3.00 0 2.50 1 5.50Sub surface st. 0 7 0.00

Total (B) 0 49.5 0 0.00 0 0.00 16.69 17.15 15.69 49.53

Local Artisans / Crafts No. 0.83 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.83Dairy & Poultry No. 1.65 0.55 0.55 0.55 1.65

No. 2.48 0.62 1.24 0.62 2.48Nursery Establish No. 0.83 0.66 0.17 0.00 0.83Dry Horticulture Ha. 4.8 0.51801 2.49 2 1.04 2 1.04 0.8 0.41 4.8 2.49Crop Demonstration No. 1.65 0.55 0.55 0.55 1.65

No. 2.48 0.82 0.82 0.83 2.48Total (C) 4.8 12.39 0.00 0.00 4.51 4.64 3.24 12.39

Vermi compost ,Compost pit & Agro Forestry

Animal Husbandry Management

( C ) Production System and micro enterprise(15%)Production measures for arable land 20-40% towards project cost

Total (C) 4.8 12.39 0.00 0.00 4.51 4.64 3.24 12.39(D) Consolidation (3%) 2.48 2.48 0 2.48

Grand Total 82.56 2.48 6.11 24.26 24.44 25.28 82.56% Targets NA NA NA NA NA NA

Page 61: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

1 2 3 4 5 6

S.No. Item

Unit ofMeasuerme

ntPre project

Status

ExpectedPost project

Status Remarks

1Status of water table (Depth to Groundwater level) Metres 40-45 35-40

2Ground water structure repaired /rejuvenated No.

3 Quality of drinking water Description with Floride

4 Availability of drinking water Description4 lit /Day /

person8 lit /Day /

person5 Change in irrigated Area Ha. 213 250

6 Change in cropping / land use pattern DescriptionSingle

croppingMixed

cropping

7 Area under agriculturel crop1 Area under single crop Ha. 867 9502 Area under doublele crop Ha. 213 2503 Area under multiple crop Ha. 16 17

CHAPTER - VI EXPECTED OUT COMES

3 Area under multiple crop Ha. 16 178 Change in cultivated area Ha. 1080 12009 Yield of Bajara q/ha. 0 0

10 Yield of Wheat q/ha. 12.-16 16-2011 Yield of Gram q/ha. 5.-7 7.-912 Yield of Mustard q/ha. 4.-6 6.-813 Production of Bajara ton 0 014 Production of Wheat ton 168.44 18515 Production of Gram ton 14.92 1716 Production of Mustard ton 6.68 817 Area under vegetation Ha. 40 5018 Area under horticulture Ha. 0 3019 Area under fuel Ha. 100 12020 Area under fodder Ha. 418 50021 Fodder production Q. 1840022 Milk production Lit./day 1.5-2.0 2.0-2.523 SHGs Activities No. 47 6524 No. of livelihoods No. 251 41025 Income Rs. In lac 0.21 0.326 Migration No. 320 20027 SHG Federations formed No. 0 2

Page 62: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Name of work :- Construction of Gully control structures in Arable Land

Type ofStr.

Dimension No. ofstr. Lth./St

Total Lth.

Vol. OfWork

Vol. ForFoundati

onType -A 2/3X 5x1.1+0.45/2x0.6 1.55 Cum. 1 5 5 1.55 0.825Type -B 2/3X 8x1.4+0.50/2x0.9 4.56 Cum. 1 8 8 4.56 1.68

Total 2 13 6.11 2.505

S.No. ITEM No. L B H QTY. RATE Unit Amount

1

Dag belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm.deep (GKN-07Cp.Gen. soilwork Item No. 3-A P,No. 38+Labour escalation) 2 13 26 0.402 Rm 10.45

2.505 75 Cum 187.88

MODEL ESTIMATE No. 1

Qty./ Str.

Excavation in hard soil dry ormoist including dressing &disposal of excavatedmaterialwith initial leadof 30 mt.& lift of 1.50mt.m.(GKN-11 ItemN0.-2-B page No.1)2

3

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada19.9.12.xls

2.505 75 Cum 187.88Dry stone Masonary upto 3mheight (GKN-11 Item N0.-21(b)page No.3)

(a) For Foundation (as per -2) 2.505 816 Cum 2044.08(b) For Super structure 6.11 816 Cum 4985.76

4

c:c (1:2:4) top of the surfaceBSR-2011 Chap.E(irrigation)item-123 P.N. 18

1 5 0.45 0.05 0.111 8 0.5 0.05 0.20

0.31 2552 Cum 797.508025.67

Contingency 3% 240.77Total 8266.44

Say Total 16292Labour Component = 11275Material Component = 4776Contingency 3% 241 Estimated Amount = 16292Cost per structure = 8146

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

A . En . . W . D . & S . C .

J. En .

Excavation in hard soil dry ormoist including dressing &disposal of excavatedmaterialwith initial leadof 30 mt.& lift of 1.50mt.m.(GKN-11 ItemN0.-2-B page No.1)2

3

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada19.9.12.xls

Page 63: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Name of work :- Construction of pureto rico Terrace ( P . R . T . ) on sloping arable land

Area 1Length per Ha 110

Considerations(I) Length of PRTs 110 RM(ii) Cross section of PRT = 0.45x0.45 m. 0.2025

S.No. ITEM No. L B H QTY. RATE AMOUNT

1

Dag belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm. deep(GKN-07Cp.Gen. soil work ItemNo. 3-A P,No. 38+ Labourescalation) 2 110 220 0.402 88.44

MODEL ESTIMATE No. 2

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada19.9.12.xls

2 Dry stone masonary upto 3mheight .(GKN-11 Item N0.-111-cpage No.17) 1 110 0.2025 22.275 357.4 7961.09

3Rehandling of stones by head loadlead upto 200 m. beyond the initiallead ( for 80% of Stone).(GKN-10Item N0.-111C page No.16)

0.8 22.275 17.82 89.5 1594.89

4

c:c (1:2:4) top of the surface BSR-2011 Chap.E(irrigation) item-123P.N. 18 1 110 0.45 0.05 2.475 2552 6316.20Total 15960.62

Contingency 3% 478.8216439.43

16439Labour = 10408Material = 5553Contingency 3% 478.82Total 16439

Total =Cost / RM 149.45Cost /Ha 16439

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

A . En . . W . D . & S . C .

16439

J. En .

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada19.9.12.xls

Page 64: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Name of Work :- Construction of Vegetative Contour Bund on Arable Land

Considerations

Proposed Area :- 1 Ha. Length of V. C. B per Ha 190 mt.1.Total Length of V. C. B. 190 mt.

2. Cross section of the bund 1.13x0.30=0.34 Sqm.

3. Stylo Hemata / Dhaman is used as vegetative barrier

S.No.

ITEM No. L B H Quantity Unit Rate/unit Amount

(A) ADVANCE WORK

1

Dag belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm. deep(GKN-07Cp.Gen. soil work Item No.3-A P,No. 38+ Labour escalation) 2 190 380 mt 0.402 152.76

MODEL ESTIMATE No. 3

Excavation in hard soil dry or moistincluding dressing & disposal ofexcavated materialwith initial leadof30 mt. & lift of 1.50mt.(GKN-11 ItemN0.-2-B page No.1)

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada19.9.12.xls ]

1

Dag belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm. deep(GKN-07Cp.Gen. soil work Item No.3-A P,No. 38+ Labour escalation) 2 190 380 mt 0.402 152.76

2

1 190 0.34 64.6 cum 75 4845

(B)VEGETATIVE WORK3 Supply of Stylo/ Dhaman seed

Dhaman 1.9 Kg 40 76Stylo 1.9 Kg 48 91.2

4

Sowing of Stylo / Dhaman seed onbunds in two rows (GKN,10 itemno.114, page no. 17)

2 190 380 mt 0.59 224.2

Total 5389.16Contingency 3% 161.67

5550.835551

Labour Component =Material Component =Contingency 3%Estimated AmountCost per Ha. =

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

J.En. A . En W . D . & S . C .

Excavation in hard soil dry or moistincluding dressing & disposal ofexcavated materialwith initial leadof30 mt. & lift of 1.50mt.(GKN-11 ItemN0.-2-B page No.1)

5551

5222167

5551162

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada19.9.12.xls ]

Page 65: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Name of Work :-Construction of Staggered Trenches in Non arable area(Pasture)Consideration :- 1. Area - 1 ha. 2. Cross section of trench- 0.30X0.30 = 0.09 sq.m 3. No. of Trenches 125 Nos. 4. Length of Trenches 4 M

S. No. ITEM No. L B H Quantity Rate/ Unit Amount(A) ADVANCE WORK

1 Layout of contour lines 1 4 125 500 0.1005 50.25

2

Dag belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm.deep (GKN-07Cp.Gen. soilwork Item No. 3-A P,No.38+ Labour escalation) 2 4 125 1000 0.402 402.00

3

E/W in excavation (GKN-11 Item N0.-2-B page No.1)

Hard Soil 0.10 500 0.3 0.3 4.5 75 337.50ordinary murrum 0.60 500 0.3 0.3 27 92 2484.00Compacted murrum 0.30 500 0.3 0.3 13.5 134 1809.00

( B ) VEGETATIVE WORK4 Supply of Seed Dhaman 5 40 200.00

Stylohemata 5 48 240.001 Overseeding of grasses in

between two furrowsincluding seed treatment &pallet making etc. complete@ 8 Kg./ha. For0.20ha.(GKN07,Vanaspatic karya(vanikiva udyaniki) a. Seedlingand plantation,item no.4(a)+Labour escalation 0.2 1 8 1.6 13.07 20.91

MODEL ESTIMATE No. 4

1 Overseeding of grasses inbetween two furrowsincluding seed treatment &pallet making etc. complete@ 8 Kg./ha. For0.20ha.(GKN07,Vanaspatic karya(vanikiva udyaniki) a. Seedlingand plantation,item no.4(a)+Labour escalation 0.2 1 8 1.6 13.07 20.91

2 Sowing of seed stylohameta on ridge ofstaggared trenches length-125 x 4=500 m/Hac.(GKN-11 Item No.114 P.No.17 1 125 4 500 0.59 295.00

Total 5838.7Contingency 3% 175.2

6013.86014

Labour Component =Material Component =Contingency 3% Estimated Amount = Rs.Cost per Ha. =.

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

J.En. A . En W . D . & S . C .

6014

5399440

6014175.2

W . D . & S . C .

Page 66: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Name of work :- Construction of stone wall fencing in Mud Mortar

Area 1 HacLength 110 mt.Cross- section 0.45 x 1.5

0.675 Sqm.Foundation 0.6x0.3 = 0.18 Sqm

S.No.

ITEM No. L B H Quantity Rate/UnitLabour

Rate/UnitTotal

AmountLabour Amount Total

1 Dag belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm. deep 2 110 220 0.402 0.402 88.44 88.44

Mud mortar stone massonary (GKN-11 (building Cons.)Item N0.-21page No.3)(a) Foundation 1 110 0.6 0.3 19.8(b) Super structure 1 110 0.45 1.5 74.25

94.05 384.3 970 36143.42 91228.50

4c:c (1:2:4) top of the surface BSR-2011 Chap.E(irrigation) item-123P.N. 18

1 110 0.45 0.05 2.475 308.3 2552 763.04 6316.20

MODEL ESTIMATE No. 5

0.6

Excavation in hard soil dry or moistincluding dressing & disposal ofexcavated materialwith initial leadof 30 mt. & lift of 1.50mt.forfoundation (GKN-11 Item N0.-2-Bpage No.1)

148575 1485

3

2 19.8 751 110

Total

0.3

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada 19.9.12.xls

94.05 384.3 970 36143.42 91228.50

4c:c (1:2:4) top of the surface BSR-2011 Chap.E(irrigation) item-123P.N. 18

1 110 0.45 0.05 2.475 308.3 2552 763.04 6316.20

5

Raising pointing in cement sandmortar 1:3 with curing BSR-2011Chap.E(building const.) item-70-AP.N. 10

2 110 1.5 330 35.8 45.5 11814.00 15015.00

Total 48720.46 112559.703376.791

Total 115936.49Say 115936

Labour Component =Material Component =Contingency 3% Estimated Amount = Rs.Cost per RM =Cost per Ha =

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

J.En. A . En W . D . & S . C .

Contingency 3%

1159361054

48720.4663839.24

1159363376.79

3

Total

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada 19.9.12.xls

Page 67: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Name of work :- Construction of loose stone check dams TYPE-A

Considerations

Dimension of structure 2/3x5x1.0+0..40/2x0.60No. of str. 1 No.Lth./Str 5 mtVol. Of Work 1.40 Cum / Str.

S.No. ITEM No. L B H QTY. RATE AMOUNT

1 Dag belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm. deep 2 5 10 0.402 4.02

2 1 5 1.2 0.15 0.9 75 67.50Excavation in hard soil dry or moistincluding dressing & disposal ofexcavated materialwith initial lead of 30mt. & lift of 1.50mt.for foundation (GKN-11 Item N0.-2-B page No.1)

MODEL ESTIMATE No. 6

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada19.9.12.xls ]

3Dry stone Masonary upto 3m height(GKN-11 Item N0.-111-c page No.17)(a) For Foundation (as per -2) 1 5 1.2 0.15 0.9(b) For Super structure 1 2/3x5x1.0+0.40/2x0.60 1.4

TOTAL 2.3 357.4 822.024

70.0% 2.3 1.61 89.5 144.10

5 Total 1037.64

Contingency 3% 31.131068.76

1069

Labour Component = Rs. 1038Material Component =Rs. 0Contingency 3% 31 Estimated Amount = Rs. 1069Cost per Structure 1069

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

J.En. A . En W . D . & S . C .

Excavation in hard soil dry or moistincluding dressing & disposal ofexcavated materialwith initial lead of 30mt. & lift of 1.50mt.for foundation (GKN-11 Item N0.-2-B page No.1)

Rehandling of stones by head loadlead upto 200m. beyond the initiallead(70% of stone) (GKN-11 Item N0.-111C page No.17)

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada19.9.12.xls ]

Page 68: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Name of work :- Construction of loose stone check dams TYPE-B

Considerations

Dimension of structure 2/3x10x(1.4+0.40)/2x1No. of str. 1 No.Lth./Str 10 mtVol. Of Work 6.00 Cum

S.No. ITEM No. L B H QTY. RATE AMOUNT

1 Dag belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm. deep 2 10 20 0.402 8.04

2 1 10 1.4 0.15 2.1 75 157.50

3Dry stone Masonary upto 3m height(GKN-11 Item N0.-21(b) page No.3)

Excavation in hard soil dry or moistincluding dressing & disposal ofexcavated materialwith initial lead of30 mt. & lift of 1.50mt.for foundation(GKN-11 Item N0.-2-B page No.1)

MODEL ESTIMATE No. 7

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada19.9.12.xls

3Dry stone Masonary upto 3m height(GKN-11 Item N0.-21(b) page No.3)(a) For Foundation (as per -2) 1 10 1.4 0.15 2.1(b) For Super structure 1 2/3x10x1.4+0.40/2x1.00 6

TOTAL 8.1 816 6609.60

5

c:c (1:2:4) top of the surface BSR-2011 Chap.E(irrigation) item-123P.N. 18 1 10 0.4 0.05 0.2 2552 510.40 Total 7285.54

Contingency 3% 218.577504.11

Labour Component = Rs. 2795Material Component =Rs. 4491Contingency 3% 219 Estimated Amount = Rs. 7504Cost of Structure 7504

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

J.En. A . En W . D . & S . C .

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada19.9.12.xls

Page 69: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Name of work :- Construction of bank stabilization(Non arable)

Length 100 mt.Cross- section .75 x 2.5

0.675 Sqm.Foundation 0.6x0.3 = 0.18 Sqm

S.No.

ITEM No. L B H Quantity Rate/UnitLabour

Rate/UnitTotal

AmountLabour Amount Total

1 Dag belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm. deep 2 100 200 0.402 0.402 80.4 80.40

Mud mortar stone massonary (GKN-11 (building Cons.)Item N0.-21page No.3)(a) Foundation 1 100 1.5 0.6 90(b) Super structure 1 100 1.05 2.5 262.5

352.5 384.3 970 135465.75 341925.00

4c:c (1:2:4) top of the surface BSR-2011 Chap.E(irrigation) item-123P.N. 18

1 100 0.9 0.05 4.5 308.3 2552 1387.35 11484.00

MODEL ESTIMATE No.8

1.5

Excavation in hard soil dry or moistincluding dressing & disposal ofexcavated materialwith initial leadof 30 mt. & lift of 1.50mt.forfoundation (GKN-11 Item N0.-2-Bpage No.1)

675075 6750

3

2 90 751 100

Total

0.6

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada 19.9.12.xls

4c:c (1:2:4) top of the surface BSR-2011 Chap.E(irrigation) item-123P.N. 18

1 100 0.9 0.05 4.5 308.3 2552 1387.35 11484.00

520 m.m plaster on new surface incement sand mortar in(1:4) 2 100 2.5 500 38.1 98 19050.00 49000.00

Total 155903.1 402409.0012072.27

Total 414481.27Say 414481

Labour Component =Material Component =Contingency 3% Estimated Amount = Rs.Cost per RM =

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

J.En. A . En W . D . & S . C .

Contingency 3%

4145

155903246506

41448112072

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada 19.9.12.xls

Page 70: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Name of work :- Plantation on Govt. Land / Pasture landConsideration :-1. Area of Pasture land 1 Ha1.Cross section of the pit, 0.45X0.45X0.45 = 0.09 cum2. Average lead ( from Nursery to Planting site). 5 Km3. No. of Plants : - 1000 no.4.Gap filling :- 20 %

S.No. ITEM No. L B H Quantity Rate/Unit Amount1 Digging of pits for plants in Ordinary murrum 1000 0.45 0.45 0.45 91.13 99.00 9021.38

3Transportation of plants from nursery to camp siteupto 5 Km (GKN,07 vanaspatik samagri parivahanitem No. 11(A) -d)

1000 1000 0.194 194.00

4loading and unloading of plants (GKN,10 Cons. OfForest-W Annex.-4,Plantation work Item No.-2,4P.N. 9)

1000 1000 0.31 310.00

5

Rehandling of plants from camp site to actualplanting site up to 1Km. (GKN,10 Cons. Of Forest-W Annex.-4,Plantation work Item No.-2,1 P.N. 9) 1000 1000 0.52 520.00

6Cost of fertiliser & insecticides Incl. application(GKN,10 Cons. Of Forest-W Annex.-4,Plantationwork Item No.-8&9, P.N. 10)

1000 1000 0.71 710.00

7Making of thawala 15 cm depth, 45 cmradius(patharili)(GKN,11 samajik, vaniki Itemno.117(a) P.N. 17

1000 1000 2.40 2400.00

MODEL ESTIMATE No.9

1000 3.00 3000.002

Plants saplings for plantation in Govt. pasturearea,sapling not less than 30 cm. height GKN-11 Annexure-2,supply of veg. material, ItemNo.(K)4a

1000

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada19.9.12.xls

7Making of thawala 15 cm depth, 45 cmradius(patharili)(GKN,11 samajik, vaniki Itemno.117(a) P.N. 17

1000 1000 2.40 2400.00

8

Planting of forest sapling including soaking inwater, cutting & removal of polythene bags, mixingand treatment of soil , backfilling, planting andcompaction of soil around the plants (GKN,11samajik, vaniki Item no.113(a) P.N. 17

1000 1000 3.60 3600.00

9 Weeding and Hoeing two times (Twice in a year)(GKN,11, Chapter -samajik vaniki 116) P.N.17 1 1000 1000 1.20 1200.00

10 Watering for plantation twice a year for two years(GKN,11, Chapter -samajik vaniki 115) P.N. 17 1 1000 1000 1.80 1800.00

22755.3811 Gapfilling 20% over ItemNo.1 to 10 22755.38 0.2 4551.08

Total 27306.45Contingency 3% 819.19

28125.64Labour Component = 23402Material Component = 3904

819Estimated Amount = Rs.Cost per Plant. = 28Cost per Ha. = 28126

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

J.En. A . En W . D . & S . C .

28126

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada19.9.12.xls

Page 71: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Type ofStr.

Dimension No. ofstr. Lth./St

Total Lth.

Vol. OfWork

Vol. ForFoundati

onType -A 2/3X 5x1.1+0.45/2x0.6 1.55 Cum. 1 5 5 1.55 0.825Type -B 2/3X 8x1.4+0.50/2x0.9 4.56 Cum. 1 8 8 4.56 1.68Type -C 2/3x15x1.8+0.6/2x1.2 14.4 Cum. 1 15 15 14.4 4.05

Total 3 28 20.51 6.555

S.No. ITEM No. L B H QTY. RATE Unit Amount

1

Dag belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm.deep (GKN-07Cp.Gen. soilwork Item No. 3-A P,No.38+ Labour escalation) 2 28 56 0.402 Rm 22.51

3

Dry stone Masonary upto 3mheight (GKN-11 Item N0.-21(b) page No.3)(a) For Foundation (as per -2) 6.555 816 Cum 5348.88

Name of work :- Construction of Gully control structures in Non- Arable Land

2 Cum

MODEL ESTIMATE No. 10

6.555 75

Qty./ Str.

E/W in excavation (GKN-11Item N0.-2-B page No.1) 491.63

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada19.9.12.xls

3

Dry stone Masonary upto 3mheight (GKN-11 Item N0.-21(b) page No.3)(a) For Foundation (as per -2) 6.555 816 Cum 5348.88(b) For Super structure 20.51 816 Cum 16736.16

4

27.07 0.5 13.53 89.5 Cum 1211.16

5

c:c (1:2:4) top of the surfaceBSR-2011 Chap.E(irrigation)item-123 P.N. 18

1 5 0.45 0.05 0.111 8 0.5 0.05 0.201 15 0.6 0.05 0.45

0.76 2552 Cum 1945.90

Total 25756.24Contingency 3% 772.69Total 26528.92

Say 26529Labour Component =Material Component =Contingency 3% Estimated Amount =Cost per structure =

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

A . En . . W . D . & S . C .

J. En .

26529

1075115005

8843

Rehandling of stones byhead load lead upto 200m.beyond the initial lead(50%of stone) (GKN-10 Item N0.-111C page No.17) P.N. 17

773

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada19.9.12.xls

Page 72: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Name of work :- Construction of Runoff management dugout structure

Name of watershed :- micro watershed

No. of structure 1Dimension of StructureLength of structure 14.00 mt

LSCDEarthenBund Pond Length Breadth

top width 0.60 mt top width 0.60 mt Top Suface 10.00 10.00bottom width 2.60 mt bot. width 4.60 mt bot. width 7.00 7.00height 2.00 mt height 2.00 mt Height 1foundation 0.30 0.30

S.No. ITEM No. L B H QTY. RATE Unit Amount

1

Dag belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm. deep(GKN-07Cp.Gen. soil work ItemNo. 3-A P,No. 38+ Labourescalation)For Lscd & Earthen Structure 2 14.00 28For Dugout pond 4 10.00 40

Total 68 0.402 mt 27.34

2

Excavation in Ordinary murrum dryor moist including dressing &disposal of excavated materialwithinitial lead of 30 mt. & lift of1.50mt.(GKN-11 Item N0.-2-B pageNo.1) for foundation 1 14.00 7.20 0.30 30.24

Top sur.AreaBottomsur.Area

MODEL ESTIMATE No. 11

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada 19.9.12.xls

for foundation 1 14.00 7.20 0.30 30.24

Top sur.AreaBottomsur.Area

For DOP 1 100 49 1 74.5Total 104.74 92 Cum 9636.08

3

Mud mortar stone massonary (GKN-11 (building Cons.)Item N0.-21page No.3)(a) For Foundation (as per -2) 1 14.00 7.20 0.30 30.24(b) For Super structure 1 14.00 1.6 2.00 44.8

Total 75.04 970 Cum 72788.80

5

Rehandling of stones by head loadlead upto 200m. beyond the initiallead(80% of stone) (GKN-11 ItemN0.-111C page No.17) 0.8 75.04 60.032 89.5 Cum 5372.86

Total Amt 87825.08Contingency 3% 2634.75

Total 90459.83Say 90460

Labour Component 90460Material Component 0Contingency 3% 2634.75 Estimated Amount 90460

Cost per structure = 90460No. of Structure 1

Total cost 90460

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

J.En. A . En W . D . & S . C .

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada 19.9.12.xls

Page 73: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Name of work :- Construction of Runoff management dugout structure

0.60 0.60

2.00

1.5:1

10.00

1.5:12.60 4.60

7.00

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada 19.9.12.xlsC:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada 19.9.12.xls

Page 74: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Name of work :- Construction of Contour Stone Bund (CSB) on sloping Non arable land land

Area 1Length per Ha 200

Considerations(I) Length of CSBs 200 RM(ii) Cross section of PRT =( 0.3+0.75)/2x0.45 m. 0.2363

S.No. ITEM No. L B H QTY. RATE AMOUNT

1

Dag belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm. deep(GKN-07Cp.Gen. soil work ItemNo. 3-A P,No. 38+ Labourescalation) 2 200 400 0.402 160.80

2 Layout of contour lines 1 200 200 0.1005 20.10

3 Dry stone masonary upto 3mheight .(GKN-11 Item N0.-111-cpage No.17) 1 200 0.2363 47.25 357.4 16887.15

MODEL ESTIMATE No. 12

height .(GKN-11 Item N0.-111-cpage No.17) 1 200 0.2363 47.25 357.4 16887.15

4Rehandling of stones by head loadlead upto 200 m. beyond the initiallead ( for 80% of Stone).(GKN-11Item N0.-111C page No.17)

0.8 47.25 37.8 89.5 3383.10

Total 20451.15Contingency 3% 613.53

21064.68

Labour = 20451Material = 0Contingency 3% 613.53Total 21065

Total =Cost / RM 105.32Cost / Ha 21065

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

A . En . . W . D . & S . C .

21065

J. En .

Page 75: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

0.45

0.30.75

45

Page 76: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Leangth of Structure :- 10

S.No. Particulars No. L B H Qty.

Rate/UnitLabour

Rate/UnitTotal

AmountLabour

AmountTotal

1 Dag belling 2.5 to 5 cm deep 4 10 40 0.402 0.40 16.08 16.08

1 10 1.6 0.6 9.6

Total 16.8 75.00 75 1260 1260

R.R stone masonary in cement sandmortar(1:6)with curing( BSR-2011Chap.E(irrigation) item-123 P.N. 18)a) For Fondation 1 10 1.2 0.6 7.20 For Fondation 1 10 1.6 0.6 9.60b) For Super Structure 1 10 1 1.5 15.00 For Super Structure 1 10 0.9 1.5 13.50

total 45.30 327.00 1403 14813.1 63555.90

4Providind and layingof dry stonekharanja( BSR-2011 Chap.E(Building)item-54 P.N. 7)

1 10 2 0.2 4.00 123.00 510.50 492 1968

1.2 0.6 7.210

3

2

E/W Excavation in hard soil or moistincluding dressing and disposal ofexcavated material within initial lead of30m and lift of 1.5m( BSR-2011Chap.E(Building) item-2-A P.N. 1)

MODEL ESTIMATE No. 13W.H.S

Detailes of Estimate & Abstract of Cost

1

4Providind and layingof dry stonekharanja( BSR-2011 Chap.E(Building)item-54 P.N. 7)

1 10 2 0.2 4.00 123.00 510.50 492 1968

5

Providind and laying of cementconcrete well mixed in cement mortar(1:5:10)with curing( BSR-2011Chap.E(Building) item-11-A P.N. 2)

1 10 2 0.15 3.00 315.10 1561 945.3 2835.90

6c:c (1:2:4) top of the surface( BSR-2011 Chap.E(irrigation) item-123 P.N.18)

1 10 3 0.1 3.00 308.30 2552 924.9 2774.70

1 10 1.5 15

1 10 1.92 19.2

total 34.2 38.10 82 1303.02 44563.28

Total 18451.38 72410.583% Contingency & Supervision Contingency 2172.32

74582.90Say Rs 74583

Labour 18451Material 53959Contingency 2172Total 74583

Prepared byJ.En

WD&SC WD&SC

7

20 m.m thick plastering on newsurface in cement mortar (1:4)

Submmitted byA.En.

Page 77: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

0.6 0.4 0.15 RRSM

E/W0.2 DRY stone Kharanja

0.4:1 .0.8:11.50 RRSM

0.6

1.2 1.6

2.00

4.2

Page 78: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Name of work :- Pasture Development

Consideration :-

S.No. ITEM Unit Rate / Ha Amount

1 Construction of StaggeredTrenches in Non arablearea(Pasture) Model EstimateNo. 4

1

6014.00 6014.002 Construction of stone wall

fencing Model Estimate No. 5 1 115936.00 115936.00

4 Plantation on Govt. Land /Pasture land Model Estimate No8

128126 28126.00

1. Broadcasting of grass seeds like Stylo hemata & Dhaman is proposedin between the two furrows and on ridge of trenches @ 8 Kg./ ha.

MODEL ESTIMATE No. 14

4 Plantation on Govt. Land /Pasture land Model Estimate No8

128126 28126.00

5 Watch & ward for three year onechowkidar for at least 25 haArea (135X30X36/25)

15832 5832.00

Total 155908.00

Estimated AmountCost per Ha. . 155908.00

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

J.En. A . En W . D . & S . C .

Page 79: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Name of work :- Plantation of Horticulture PlantsConsideration :-1. Area of Pasture land 1 Ha1.Cross section of the pit, 1mX1mX1m = 1.00 cum2. Average lead ( from Nursery to Planting site). 5 Km3.Plant spacing 8mX5m3. No. of Plants : - 400 no.4.Gap filling :- 20 %

S.No. ITEM No. L B H Quantity Rate/Unit Amount1 Digging of pits for plants in Ordinary murrum 400 1 1 1 400.00 75.00 30000.00

5

Rehandling of plants from camp site to actualplanting site up to 1Km. (GKN,10 Cons. Of Forest-W Annex.-4,Plantation work Item No.-2,1 P.N. 9) 400 400 0.52 208.00

6Application of fertiliser & insecticides (GKN,10Cons. Of Forest-W Annex.-4,Plantation work ItemNo.-8&9, P.N. 10)

400 400 0.71 284.00

Cost of fertiliser & insecticides as per market rate 400 400 3.50 1400.00

7Making of thawala 15 cm depth, 45 cmradius(patharili)(GKN,11 samajik, vaniki Itemno.117(a) P.N. 17

400 400 2.40 960.00

400

MODEL ESTIMATE No. 15

40.00 16000.002

Plants saplings for plantation in Govt. pasturearea,sapling not less than 30 cm. height As peraverage market rate 400

7Making of thawala 15 cm depth, 45 cmradius(patharili)(GKN,11 samajik, vaniki Itemno.117(a) P.N. 17

400 400 2.40 960.00

8

Planting of forest sapling including soaking inwater, cutting & removal of polythene bags, mixingand treatment of soil , backfilling, planting andcompaction of soil around the plants (GKN,11samajik, vaniki Item no.113(a) P.N. 17

400 400 3.60 1440.00

Total 50292.00Contingency 3% 1508.76

Say Total 51801Labour Component = 32892Material Component = 17400

1509Estimated Amount = Rs.Cost per Plant. = 130Cost per Ha. = 51801

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

J.En. A . En W . D . & S . C .

51801

Page 80: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Demostration area 1 Ha

S.No. Rate Total amount1 Seed 125 Kg 20/Kg. 2500

DAP-75 kg 14/Kg. 1050UREA-125 kg 6/Kg. 750

3 Seed treatment Chloropyriphose-1.25 l 350 /Lit 437.54 Control of Weed 2,4-D 1.25 Lt 500/Lt. 625

Total 5362.5

Demostration area 1 Ha

S.No. Rate. Total amount1 Seed 20 Kg 80/Kg. 16002 Fertiliger(DAP) 75 kg 14/Kg. 1050

3Insecticide-Monocrotophose 1.25 l 600 /Lit 750

Material name & Qty.

Material name & Qty.

URAD(BLACK GRAM)

Model Estimate No. 20WHEAT(Triticum estivum)

Fertiliger2

3Insecticide-Monocrotophose 1.25 l 600 /Lit 750

4 P.S.B. Culture 1 Packate 10/No 105 Rhizobium Culture 1 Packate 10/No 10

Total 3420

Demostration area 1 Ha

S.No. Rate Total amount1 Seed 20 Kg 80/Kg. 16002 Fertiliger(DAP) 75 kg 14/Kg. 1050

3Insecticide-Monocrotophose 1.25 l 600 /Lit 750

4 P.S.B. Culture 1 Packate 10/No 105 Rhizobium Culture 1 Packate 10/No 10

Total 3420

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

J.En. A . En W . D . & S . C .

MOONG(GREEN GRAM)

Material name & Qty.

Page 81: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Demostration area 1 HaS.No. Rate Total amount

1 Seed 25 Kg 50/Kg. 1250DAP-75 kg 14/Kg. 1050UREA-125 kg 6/Kg. 750

3 Insecticide Methyal parathian 25 kg 20/Kg. 500P.S.B. 1 Packate 10/No. 10Azotobactar 1 Packate 6/No. 6Total 3566

Demostration area 1 HaS.No. Rate Total amount

1 Seed 5 Kg 50/Kg. 250DAP-75 kg 14/Kg. 1050UREA-125 kg 6/Kg. 750GYPSUM 250 Kg 0.7/Kg. 175Methyal parathian 25 kg 20/Kg. 500Dimethoate-1.25 Lt 400 /lit 500Total 3225

Seed treatment4

Material name & Qty.

MAIZE(ZEA MAIZE)

Fertiliger2

MUSTARD

Material name & Qty.

2 Fertiliger

3 Insecticide

Total 3225

Demostration area 1 Ha

S.No. Rate Total amount1 Seed 80 Kg 40/Kg. 32002 Fertiliger DAP-75 kg 14/Kg. 1050

Methyal parathian 25 kg 20/Kg. 500Monocrotophose-1.25 L 600/ lit 750

4 Seed treatment Trichoderma 500 gm 150/Kg. 75Total 5575

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

J.En. A . En W . D . & S . C .

GRAM(CHICK PEA)

Material name & Qty.

3 Insecticide

Page 82: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

S.No. ParticularsRate Amount

Nos. L W D Qty UnitExcavation work in all kinds of soil(Page 1, item no. 2(B))Providing & laying R.R. stone kharanjain cement mortar 1:6 in one course 23cm thick(Page 14, item no.100(B))Cement Concrete in M 10 gradenominal mix with graded stoneaggregate 20 mm(Page 18, item no.123)

2 5.00 0.23 0.45 1.042 0.74 0.23 0.45 0.151 0.74 0.1 0.45 0.03

(Page 3, item no.16(B)) 1.22 cum 2263 2764.21

2 5 0.23 0.025 0.06

2 0.74 0.23 0.025 0.011 0.74 0.1 0.025 0.0019

(Page 18, item no.123) 0.07 cum 2552 173.18Cement Plaster in ratio of 1:4 of 20 mm(Page 9, item no.67(B))

6

0.53

2 1 5.10 1.30 6.63

5.10 1.30 0.08

5

Cement coping on brick walls in M 10grade nominal mix with graded stone

aggregate 20 mm

4Brick masonry in ration 1:6

3 1

cum 92 182.99

cum 2552 1353.58

sqm 241 1597.83

Model Estimate No. 21Estimate of Construction of Vermi Composting Unit

Size of Unit- 5*1.2*0.45

Dimension

1 1 5.10 1.30 0.3 1.99

(Page 18, item no.123) 0.07 cum 2552 173.18Cement Plaster in ratio of 1:4 of 20 mm(Page 9, item no.67(B))outer side 2 5 0.45 4.5

2 1.2 0.45 1.08Inner side 4 1.77 0.45 3.186

4 0.74 0.45 1.33210.10 sqm 95 959.31

Sub-Total (A) 7031.10

7Add 10% for transportation of smallquantity material, water and otherequipment at the site. (Page G-59) 703.11

Sub-Total (B) 7734.21

8Shed of bamboo or local materialavailable in the area with 10 polesincluding fitting at the site. 1800.00

9 Cost of Earth worms - 12 kg 12 100 1200.0010 Cost of equipment (Punja ) 85.0011 Cost of Water can (Jharra ) 350.0012 Hand Glooves 125.0013 Shieve (Chalna ) 500.00

Sub-Total (C) 11794.2114 add 3 % contigency 353.83

Grand Total 12148.03The above rates are based on GKN'11 ZP Udaipur Prepared by Checked & submitted by

J.En. A . En W . D . & S . C .

6

5

W . D . & S . C .

Page 83: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

S.No. ParticularsRate Amount

Nos. L W D Qty UnitExcavation work in all kinds of soil(Page 1, item no. 2(B))

Sub-Total (C) 552.002 add 3 % contigency 16.56

Grand Total 568.56

The above rates are based on GKN'11 ZP Udaipur

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

J.En. A . En W . D . & S . C .

Estimate of Construction of Compost pit UnitSize of Unit- 3*2*1

Dimension

1 1 3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 cum 92 552.00

Model Estimate No. 22

Page 84: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

S.No. ParticularsRate Amount

Nos. L W D Qty UnitCement Concrete in M 12 grade nominalmix with graded stone aggregate 12 mm(1:2:4)(Page 18, item no.123)

2 2.00 0.45 1.802 1.00 0.45 0.90

(Page 3, item no.18(A)) Total 2.70 Sq.m 306 826.20Cement Plaster in ratio of 1:6 of 20 mm(Page 9, item no.68(B))outer side 2 2.00 0.45 1.80Inner side 2 1.80 0.45 1.62outer side 2 1.00 0.45 0.90Inner side 2 0.80 0.45 0.72

Total 5.04 sqm 82 413.28Sub-Total (A) 1627.38

add 3 % contigency 48.82Grand Total 1676.21

Say 1676The above rates are based on GKN'11 ZP Udaipur

Size of Unit-2*1*0.45

Dimension

cum 2552 387.900.076

Model Estimate No. 23

3

0.152.00 1.00

2Brick masonry in ratio 1:6 with 112 m.m

thick wall

1 1

Estimate of Construction of manger unit

The above rates are based on GKN'11 ZP Udaipur

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

J.En. A . En W . D . & S . C .

Page 85: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

10.estimate sarada 19.9.12.xls Ashu Como

NAME OF WORK Con. Of sub surface barrier

Name of Village

Name of Scheme I.W.M.P

General features of anicut-:Height of crest= 1.0 M.Length of Crest 50 M.Depth of foundation for H.W. = 4.3 M.Bottom width of H.W. = 1.30 M.Top of H.W = 0.75 M.Width of Apron = 1.6 M.

S.No. No L B H

1

H.W. 1 X 50 X 1.60 X 4.3 = 340.00 Cum.Apron 1 X 50 X 1.60 X 0.75 = 60.00 Cum.

Total 400.00 Cum.

1 80% 320.00 Cum.2 15% 40.00 Cum.3 10% 40.00 Cum.2 70% of total soil 40.00 Cum3

Item

Execavation in Hard soil

Extra Lift of execavcated soil from

DETAILED ESTIMATE OF sub surface barrier(estimate no.24)

Quantity

Earth work excavation for foundation indry or moist soil including ramming ofbottom scrapping of sides dipodal of soil

Execavation in ordinary murramExecavation in compacted murram

Providing and laying of cement concretewell mixed in cement mortar 1:3:6 layingin position complete excluding curing withmaxmium size of aggregate up to 50 mm.

sub surface 19.9

H.W. 1 X 50.0 X 1.60 X 0.3 = 24.00 Cum.Apron 1 X 50.0 X 1.60 X 0.15 = 12.00 Cum.

Total 36.00 Cum.4

H.W. 1 X 50.0 X 1.40 X 4.0 = 276.50 Cum.Total 276.50 Cum.

5

H.W. 1 X 50.0 X 1.075 X 1 = 53.75 Cum.Total 53.75 Cum.

6

Apron 1 X 50.0 X 1.60 X 0.60 48.00 Cum.Total 48.00 Cum.

7

H.W. 1 X 50.0 X 0.75 X 0.05 = 1.88 Cum.Apron 1 X 50.0 X 1.60 X 0.05 = 4.00 Cum.

Total 5.88 Cum.8

H.W. 2 X 50.0 X 1 = 100.00 Sqm.Total = 100.00 Sqm.

20 m.m thick plastering on new surface incement mortar (1:4)

Providing and laying of cement concretewell mixed in cement mortar 1:3:6 layingin position complete excluding curing withmaxmium size of aggregate up to 50 mm.

Stone Kharanja in cement mortar 1:6 forbed and floor including cpaction etc.complete apron

Providing and laying of cement concretewell mixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 layingin position complete excluding curing withmaxmium size of aggregate up to 20 mm.

I n Foundation Stone masonary cementsand mortar(1:6) for above 30 cm. Thickwall

In super structure Stone masonary above30 cm. Thick in cement sand mortar(1:6)

sub surface 19.9

Page 86: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

NAME OF WORK Con. Of sub surface barrierName of VillageName of Scheme I.W.M.P

S.No.1

400.00 Cum. 0320.00 Cum. 75 24000 75.00 24000.00

40.00 Cum. 92 3680 92.00 3680.0040.00 Cum. 134 5360 134.00 5360.00

240.00 Cum. 11.0 440 11.00 440.00

3

36.00 Cum. 315 11340 2163.0 77868.004

276.50 Cum. 327 90415.5 1453.00 401754.505 53.75 Cum. 451.5 24268.125 1577.50 84790.63

AmountRate

Providing and laying of cementconcrete well mixed in cementmortar 1:3:6 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing withI n Foundation Stone masonary

cement sand mortar(1:6) for

Extra Lift of execavcated soil fromfoundation abiove 1.5 M.

Abstract of Cost of Sub surface barrier

Item Quatity Unit Lab.rate L.Amount

Earth work excavation forfoundation in dry or moist soilincluding ramming of bottomExecavation in Hard soilExecavation in ordinary murramExecavation in compacted murram

In super structure Stonemasonary above 30 cm. Thick incement sand mortar(1:6)

Stone Kharanja in cement mortar1:6 for bed and floor includingcpaction etc. complete apron

6

53.75 Cum. 327 17576.25 1453.0 78098.757

5.88 Cum. 308.2 1810.675 2668.0 15674.508

100.00 Sqm. 38.1 3810 98.00 9800182700.55 Total 701466.38

TOTAL 701466

Contingency %Say total Cost 700000

700000

Prepared By Recommonded By

J.En. A.En.

Providing and laying of cementconcrete well mixed in cementmortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with20 m.m thick plastering on newsurface in cement mortar (1:4)

In super structure Stonemasonary above 30 cm. Thick incement sand mortar(1:6)

Stone Kharanja in cement mortar1:6 for bed and floor includingcpaction etc. complete apron

Page 87: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Name of work :- Construction of bank stabilization

Length 100 mt.Cross- section .75 x 2.5

0.675 Sqm.Foundation 0.6x0.3 = 0.18 Sqm

S.No.

ITEM No. L B H Quantity Rate/UnitLabour

Rate/UnitTotal

AmountLabour Amount Total

1 Dag belling 2.5 to 5.00 cm. deep 2 100 200 0.402 0.402 80.4 80.40

Mud mortar stone massonary (GKN-11 (building Cons.)Item N0.-21page No.3)(a) Foundation 1 100 0.9 0.6 54(b) Super structure 1 100 0.75 2.5 187.5

241.5 384.3 970 92808.45 234255.00

4c:c (1:2:4) top of the surface BSR-2011 Chap.E(irrigation) item-123P.N. 18

1 100 0.75 0.05 3.75 308.3 2552 1156.13 9570.00

3

2 54 751 100

Total

0.6

MODEL ESTIMATE No.25

0.9

Excavation in hard soil dry or moistincluding dressing & disposal ofexcavated materialwith initial leadof 30 mt. & lift of 1.50mt.forfoundation (GKN-11 Item N0.-2-Bpage No.1)

405075 4050

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada 19.9.12.xls

4c:c (1:2:4) top of the surface BSR-2011 Chap.E(irrigation) item-123P.N. 18

1 100 0.75 0.05 3.75 308.3 2552 1156.13 9570.00

520 m.m plaster on new surface incement sand mortar in(1:4) 2 100 2.5 500 38.1 98 19050.00 49000.00

Total 113014.6 292825.008784.75

Total 301609.75Say 301610

Labour Component =Material Component =Contingency 3% Estimated Amount = Rs.Cost per RM =

Prepared by Checked & submitted by

J.En. A . En W . D . & S . C .

Contingency 3%

3016

113015179810

3016108785

C:\Documents and Settings\vikas\Desktop\corr dpr 1.10.12\dpr english 8.8.11 final\10.estimate sarada 19.9.12.xls

Page 88: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

11.iwmp 22.xls Ashu Comp

Model estimate no 16

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.SDistrict UdaipurName of Scheme I.W.M.PPanchayat Samiti Sarada

This project is taken in I.W.M.P Scheme.The proposed anicut will not only reducevelocity of the runoff but also prevent the gullies from furthure soil erosion at thesame time it will be very much fruitful in recharging of downstream wells as well asit will increase the moisture content of the soil . So an it improve its productivity theretain water behind the structure can also be used for irrigation , and drinikingwater for anmimals . The cross section and L-section have been surveyed by dumpy level and catchment area has been taken from G.T. sheet / Revenue map.

Basic Data of Project

TECHNICAL REPORT

TN 51-52

Basic Data of Project=

1 Catch ment Area = 802 Maxmium Rain fall intencity = 33 General nature of catchment Area

a. Agricultural land = 20b. Pasture Land = 60

4 Height of crest above G.L. = 1.55 Flood lift = 0.66 Free board = 0.27 Top width of Head wall = 0.88 Bottom width of Head wall = 2.409 Width of concrete Bed = 2.70

10 Length of crest = 1011 Percentage slope of land = 5.7112 No. of well benifited =13 No of farmer benifited =

a. S.C. =b. S.T. =c. Others =

Total =14 Area to be benifited =

a. S.C. =

TN 51-52

Page 89: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

11.iwmp 22.xls Ashu Comp

b. S.T. =c. Others =

Total =15 =

a. a)Raito of concrete at bed = ( Cement : Sand :Aggregate)(1:4:8) =

b. b) Raito of Masonary fondation & Super structure =Cement Mortar(1:6) =

c. c) Raito of plastering and flush pointing of 25 mm. =Cement Mortar(1:6) =

d Raito of Kharanja in cement mortar =16 Cost of Project = 200000.00

a. Labour component = 52541

b. Material component = 141644

c. Contingency = 5815

Rates are as per GKN 2011 Udaipur wef 1.4.2011The Estimate are here with submitted for technical approvel an necessary action

TN 51-52

Preapared By Recommended By

J.En. A.En.

TN 51-52

Page 90: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

11.iwmp 22.xls Ashu Comp

AName of work-: Construction of M.M.S

I Available crest length 10 Mii Total catchment Area 80 Ha. As per G.T.Sheetiii Peak Runoff Ratea) By Rational Method Use when catchment is <1300Ha.

Qp = 0.0276 CIA Q=Run off in m3/sec.C= Coefficient of runoff

K = L3/2/H1/2 I= Intensity of rain fall in cm/hr.K = 8784.9 A= Catchment Area in Ha.Tc = 0.0195K0.77 L=Maxmium length of travel by runoff water in m.Tc = 21.22 H= Difference in elevation between most remote

point and and outlet point in meterQp= 0.0276 0.50 X 3 X 80

Qp = 3.31

b) By weir formula

Desgin calculation of M.M.S

Desgin 53-54

Q = 1.71Lh3/2

3.31 = 1.71 10 h3/2

h 0.33

Say h= 0.6

3 Free Board hw= Wave height in meter

Fb= 1.5hw Df= Fetch length in meter 120 Meter.

1.5X0.014(Df)1/2

Fb= 0.23

Say Fb= 0.2

(B) STRUCTURAL DESGIN

1 Head wall

a) Height of Head wall H= 1.5

b) Top width( Tw) = h P= Sp.ht. Of masonary 2.3

(P-1)1/2

Tw= 0.53

Top width= 0.8

© Bottom width Bw Tw+0.8H

Bw= 2.00

So Bottom Width= 2.40 Meter

2 Head wall extension

Desgin 53-54

Page 91: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

11.iwmp 22.xls Ashu Comp

a) Length= H+h+1+Fb

1.5 + 0.6 + 1 + = 3.10 Meter

say Length of Right side wall = 4 Meter

say Length of left side wall = 6.0 Meter

b) Height of Head Extensionwall = H+h+Fb

1.5 + 0.6 + 0.2 = 2.3 Meter

c) Top width 0.6 Meter

d) Bottom Width= 0.5(H+h) = 0.5( 1.5 + 0.6 )= 1.05 Meter

3 Side wall

a) Length= 1.75H+0.75h+0.45 = 3.53

But as per site condition= 2.7 Meter

b) Height:

At H.W.End= H+h+Fb 1.5 + 0.6 + 0.2 = 2.3 Meter

At W.W.End= h+fb = 0.6 + 0.2 = 0.8 Meter

c) Top width= 0.6 Meter

d) Bottom width=

At H.W.End= 0.6+0.4(H+h) 1.4 Meter

At W.W.End= 0.6+0.4(1.5h) 1.0 Meter

But taken as= 1.0 Meter

4 Wing wall

a) Height h+Fb 0.6 + 0.2 = 0.8 Meter

Desgin 53-54

a) Height h+Fb 0.6 + 0.2 = 0.8 Meter

b) Length= 2.25h 2.25 X 0.6 = 1.35 Meter Say 2.00

c) Top width 0.6 Meter

Bottom width of wing wall 0.6 Meter

5 Apron

a) Length= 10 Meter

b) Width= H+h+Fb 1.5 + 0.6 + 0.2 2.3 Meter

c) Thickness 0.6 Meter

6 Toe wall

a) Length= 10 Meter

b) Width= 0.3 Meter

c) Height= 0.3 Meter

Preapared By Recommended By

J.En. A.En.

Desgin 53-54

Page 92: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

11.iwmp 22.xls Ashu Comp

FREE BODY DIAGRAM

a= 0.8

b= 2.40

H= 1.5

h= 0.6

a

H

X

W1W2

fa

H/3

fbH/3

FBD 55-56

b

b/3 2b/3

cw(H+H)

Specific Wt. Of masonary P= 2.3 T/m3

Specific Wt. of water w= 1 T/m3

Cofficient of uplift pressure c= 0.6cofficient of friction atbed surface and creep length = 0.75Weight of Dam-:Weight of Dam-:

W1= aHPW1= T 2.76 T

b-a 2.76 T2

W(H+h)

HP=W2=

U

FBD 55-56

Page 93: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

11.iwmp 22.xls Ashu Comp

W= W1+W2= 2.76 + 2.76 = 5.52 T

Water pressureAt Depth h= P1 = wh = 1 X 0.6 = 0.6 T/m

2

At Depth H+h= P2 = w(H+h) =1( 1.50 + 0.6 ) = 2.1 T/m

2

Force aching due to water pressure I.e. Net horizontal

Water force P1+ P22 = 2.025 T/m

2

Horizontal water pressure at depth h =Fa= wHh= = 0.9 TAt depth H+h = Fb= P2-P1 = 1.125 T

2Force due to water column at crest F3 = wha= = 0.48 T

Up lift pressure U = 1/2 cwb (H+h) = 1.512 T

Preapared By Recommended By

H

H=P=

FBD 55-56

J.En. A.En.

FBD 55-56

Page 94: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

11.iwmp 22.xls Ashu Comp

1 Safety against over turning

Over turning moment Mo = H H 2

2 3 3

1.5 1.5 2

2 3 3

Mo= 3.657

Restoring Moment Mr = W1 (b-a/2) + W2 (b-a)2/3 + F3 (b-a/2)

Mr=

Mr= 5.52 + 2.944 + 0.960 = 9.42

Mr 9.424

Mo 3.657

Structure is safe against over turning

2 Safety against Rupture from tension

STABILITY CHECKS

Factor of safety = 2.577

u

+ 1.51

>1.5 Hence

2.400.90 1.125+

bFa + Fb +

SC 57-58

2 Safety against Rupture from tension

Net Vertical Pressure V = W1+W2+F3-U

2.76 + 2.76 + 0.48 - 1.512 = 4.488

Position of resultant where it cut the base

Excess moment(Mr-Mo) 9.424 - 3.657

4.488

TRUE

3 Safety against crusing

Eccentricity e = b/2-X

-0.09

Crusting stress at the toe of theHead wall

Pc= V (1+_6e/b)

b

Pc= 1.47

Pc<<20 Hence it is safe

1.29X=Net vertical force

= =

SC 57-58

Page 95: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

11.iwmp 22.xls Ashu Comp

4 Safety against sliding

Net vertical Force V= 4.488 T

Restorin force = uV = 0.70 X 4.488 (u=0.65 to 0.75)

3.14 T

Sliding force Net horizontal force= Fa+Fb

0.9 + 1.125 = 2.025 T

Factor of safety = Restoring force 3.142

Sliding force 2.025

Hence it is safe

== 1.55 >1.3 Hence

SC 57-58

Preapared By Recommended By

J.En. A.En.

SC 57-58

Page 96: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

11.iwmp 22.xls Ashu Como

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.S

Name of Scheme I.W.M.P

General features of anicut-:

Height of crest above G.L. 1.5 M.

Length of Crest 10 M.

Depth of foundation for H.W. = 1.2 M. Length of wing wall= 0.0 M.

Bottom width of H.W. = 2.4 M. Height of Wing wall= 0.8 M.

Top of H.W = 0.8 M. Bopttom width of Wing wall= 0.6 M.

Length of H.W.Ext = 4.0 M. Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 0.9 M.

Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 2.3 M. Height of Toewall= 0.30 M.

Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M. Top & Bopttom width of Toe wall= 0.30 M.

Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 1.1 M. Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.9 M.

Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 1.0 M. Thickness of Apron= 0.6 M.

Length of side wall= 2.7 M. Width of Apron = 2.3 M.

Bottom Width of S.W. 1.00 M. Berm for H.W Ext. 2.0 M.

Height of side wall at W.W.End= 0.80 M.

Depth of foundation for side wall = 1.0 M.S.No. No L B H

DETAILED ESTIMATE OF M.M.S

QuantityDag belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As peritem no. page of W.D.& S.C. BSR ofJodhpur circle

Item

D E 61-64

S.No. No L B H

1

Total

2

0 X 0.0 = 0 Sqm.

3

Total Cum.

4

Total Cum

5Earth work excavation for foundation indry or moist soil including ramming ofbottom scrapping of sides dipodal of soilintial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to 30M.

QuantityDag belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As peritem no. page of W.D.& S.C. BSR ofJodhpur circle

Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungleincludling bushes shrubs and disposal asper instructrion of engineer incharge

Item

Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund for bundcanal dressing etc. all components

Earth work excavation for bund in harddry or moist soil including laying in layerof 15cm. Breaking of clods dressing torequire profile with manual compactionincluding intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead upto 30M.

D E 61-64

Page 97: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

11.iwmp 22.xls Ashu Como

S.No. No L B H QuantityItem

H.W. 1 X 10 X 2.7 X 1.2 = 32.40 Cum.H.W.ExtLeft 1 X 4.0 X 1.1 X 3.0 = 12.60 Cum.H.W.ExtRight 1 X 6.0 X 1.1 X 1.0 = 6.30 Cum.

S.W. 2 X 2.7 X 1.00 X 3.0 = 15.90 Cum.

W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.6 X 0.90 = 0.00 Cum.

Apron 1 X 10 X 2.3 X 0.60 = 13.80 Cum.

T.W. 1 X 10 X 0.30 X 0.9 = 2.70 Cum.

Total 83.70 Cum.

1 30% 25.11 Cum.

2 40% 25.11 Cum.

Earth work excavation for foundation indry or moist soil including ramming ofbottom scrapping of sides dipodal of soilintial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to 30M.

Execavation in ordinary murram

Execavation in compacted murram

Execavation in Hard soil

D E 61-64

2 40% 25.11 Cum.

3 30% 33.48 Cum.

70% of total soil58.59 Cum

6

H.W. 1 X 10.0 X 2.7 X 0.3 = 8.10 Cum.

H.W.Ext 1 X 4 X 1.1 X 0.3 = 1.26 Cum.

1 X 6 X 1.1 X 0.3 = 1.89 Cum.

S.W. 2 X 2.65 X 1.05 X 0.3 = 1.67 Cum.

W.W. 2 X 0 X 0.6 X 0.3 = 0.00 Cum.

Apron 1 X 10.0 X 2.3 X 0.3 = 6.90 Cum.

T.W. 1 X 10.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 = 0.90 Cum.

Total 20.72 Cum.

7

Execavation in ordinary murram

Execavation in compacted murram

Providing and laying of cement concretewell mixed in cement mortar 1:3:6 layingin position complete excluding curing withmaxmium size of aggregate up to 50 mm.etc. completeusing

I n Foundation Stone masonary cementsand mortar(1:6) for above 30 cm. Thickwall

Extra Lift of execavcated soil fromfoundation abiove 1.5 M.

D E 61-64

Page 98: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

11.iwmp 22.xls Ashu Como

S.No. No L B H QuantityItem

H.W. 1 X 10.0 X 2.4 X 0.9 = 21.60 Cum.

H.W.Ext 1 X 4.0 X 1.1 X 0.7 = 2.94 Cum.

H.W.Ext 1 X 6.0 X 1.1 X 0.7 = 4.41 Cum.

S.W. 2 X 2.7 X 1.05 X 0.7 = 3.90 Cum.

W.W. 4 X 0.0 X 0.6 X 0.6 = 0.00 Cum.

T.W. 1 X 10.0 X 0.15 X 0.6 = 0.90 Cum.

Total 33.75 Cum.

8

H.W. 1 X 10.0 X 1.6 X 1.5 = 24.00 Cum.

H.W.Ext 1 X 4.0 X 0.83 X 2.3 = 7.59 Cum.

H.W.Ext 1 X 6.0 X 0.83 X 2.3 = 11.39 Cum.

S.W. 2 X 2.7 X 0.8 X 1.55 = 6.57 Cum.

W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.6 X 0.8 = 0.00 Cum.

T.W. 1 X 10.0 X 0.30 X 0.30 = 0.90 Cum.

In super structure Stone masonary above30 cm. Thick in cement sand mortar(1:6)

D E 61-64

T.W. 1 X 10.0 X 0.30 X 0.30 = 0.90 Cum.

Total 50.45 Cum.

9

Apron 1 X 10.0 X 2.3 X 0.30 6.90 Cum.

Total 6.90 Cum.

10

H.W. 1 X 10.0 X 0.8 X 0.05 = 0.40 Cum.

H.W.Ext 1 X 4.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.12 Cum.

1 X 6.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.18 Cum.

S.W. 2 X 2.7 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.16 Cum.

W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.00 Cum.

T.W. 1 X 10.0 X 0.30 X 0.05 = 0.15 Cum.

Apron 1 X 10.0 X 2.30 X 0.1 = 2.30 Cum.

Total 3.31 Cum.

11

Stone Kharanja in cement mortar 1:6 forbed and floor including cpaction etc.complete apron

Providing and laying of cement concretewell mixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 layingin position complete excluding curing withmaxmium size of aggregate up to 20 mm.etc. complete

Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)

D E 61-64

Page 99: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

11.iwmp 22.xls Ashu Como

S.No. No L B H QuantityItem

H.W. 1 X 10.0 X 2.19 = 21.93 Sqm.

Total 21.93 Sqm.

12

H.W. 1 X 10.0 X 1.5 = 15.00 Sqm.

H.W.Ext. 1 X 4.0 X 2.3 = 9.20 Sqm.

H.W.Ext. 1 X 6.0 X 2.3 = 13.80 Sqm.

S.S 2 X 2.7 X 2.3 = 12.19 Sqm.

W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.8 = 0.00 Sqm.

T.W. 2 X 10.0 X 0.3 = 6.00 Sqm.

Total = 56.19 Sqm.

13

10.0 X 0.00 X 0.23 0.00 Cum

Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressedwitch packing of voids of small stoneincluding all lifts in require profile (23 cmdepth)

20 m.m thick plastering on new surface incement mortar (1:4)

D E 61-64D E 61-64

Page 100: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.SName of Scheme I.W.M.P

S.No.1

0.00 Cum. 0.38 0

2

0 Sqm. 0.40 03

0 Cum. 04

0 Cum. 46.00 05

83.70 Cum. 025.11 Cum. 92.00 2310 92.00 2310.1225.11 Cum. 134.0 3365 134.00 3364.74

Amount

Benching of the base anddepositing the execavatedmaterial for bund for bund canalEarth work excavation for bund inhard dry or moist soil includinglaying in layer of 15cm. BreakingEarth work excavation forfoundation in dry or moist soilincluding ramming of bottomExecavation in Hard soilExecavation in ordinary murramExecavation in compacted murram

Abstract of Cost of M.M.S

Cutting and clearing of ordinaryjungle includling bushes shrubsand disposal as per instructrion of

Dag belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep(As per item no. page of W.D.&

Item Quatity Unit Lab.rate L.Amount Rate

25.11 Cum. 134.0 3365 134.00 3364.7433.48 Cum. 178.0 5959 178.00 5959.44

658.59 Cum. 11.00 644.5 11.00 644.49

7

20.72 Cum. 315.1 6529 1881.0 38973.388

33.75 Cum. 327 11035 1403.00 47344.9379 50.45 Cum. 327 16496 1403.00 70777.141

10

6.90 Cum. 327 2256 1403.0 9680.711

3.31 Cum. 308.3 1020 2552.0 8444.568

12 21.93 Sqm. 35.8 785.2 45.50 997.8929113

56.19 Sqm. 38.1 2141 95.00 5338.0514

Providing and laying of cementconcrete well mixed in cementmortar 1:3:6 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing withI n Foundation Stone masonary

cement sand mortar(1:6) for

Extra Lift of execavcated soil fromfoundation abiove 1.5 M.

Execavation in ordinary murramExecavation in compacted murram

Stone Kharanja in cement mortar1:6 for bed and floor includingcpaction etc. complete apronProviding and laying of cementconcrete well mixed in cementmortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with

20 m.m thick plastering on newsurface in cement mortar (1:4)Dry stone pitching of Hammerdressed witch packing of voids ofsmall stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)

Flush pointing in cement motar(1:3)

In super structure Stonemasonary above 30 cm. Thick incement sand mortar(1:6)

Page 101: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

0.00 Cum. 86 328.00 052541 Total 193835.46

TOTAL 193835

Contingency % 5815Say total Cost 199651

200000.00

Prepared By Recommonded By

J.En. A.En.

Dry stone pitching of Hammerdressed witch packing of voids ofsmall stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)

Page 102: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

11.iwmp 22.xls Ashu-comp

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.S

Name of Scheme I.W.M.P

S.No. ITEM Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Begs Cum Cum Cum

1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 20.72 66.30 9.32 18.65_

2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 56.19 9.53 1.35_ _

3 Massonary in Cement sand mortar 1:6 84.19 117.45 25.26 _ 92.614 Pointing in Cement 21.93 0.90 0.09 _ _

5 Stone Kharanja in cement mortar (1:6) 6.90 9.6255 2.07 _ 7.596 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 3.31 20.32 1.36 2.717 Dry Stone Pitching 0.00 _ _ _ 0.00

TOTAL 224.13 39.45 21.36 100.20

Material Statement

Material 67

7 Dry Stone Pitching 0.00 _ _ _ 0.00TOTAL 224.13 39.45 21.36 100.20Say Bags 225

or 11.25 MT.

1 Cement 11.25 MT.

2 Sand 39.45 Cum.

3 Stones 100.20 Cum.

4 Aggregates 21.36 Cum.

Prepared By Recommonded By

J.En. A.En.

Material 67

Page 103: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.S

Name of Scheme I.W.M.P Ac

5 10.0 5

H.W.Ext.H.W. 0.8

1.4c

S.W.0.6

B 2.7 B

APRON 2.3

1.0T.W. 0.3

TYPICAL PLAN AND SECTION OF M.M.S

0.6

1.60

T.W. 0.3

W.W .W

.W

PLAN2A

Preapared By Recommended By

A.En.J.En.

PLAN

Page 104: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

0.8

0.8

1.5

0.8

0.32.4

1.20.3

SECTION ON A-A'

0.6

2.3

BED LEVEL

0.6

2.3

B.L.1

1

C-C' SECTION ON H.W.Ext.B-B' SECTION OF S.W.

Page 105: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

12.iwmp 3.xls Ashu Comp

MODEL ESTIMATE NO. 17

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.SDistrict UdaipurName of Scheme I.W.M.PPanchayat Samiti Sarada

This project is taken in I.W.M.P Scheme.The proposed M.M.S will not only reducevelocity of the runoff but also prevent the gullies from furthure soil erosion at thesame time it will be very much fruitful in recharging of downstream wells as well asit will increase the moisture content of the soil . So an it improve its productivity theretain water behind the structure can also be used for irrigation , and drinikingwater for anmimals . The cross section and L-section have been surveyed by dumpy level and catchment area has been taken from G.T. sheet / Revenue map.

Basic Data of Project=

1 Catch ment Area = 320

TECHNICAL REPORT

TN 51-52

1 Catch ment Area = 3202 Maxmium Rain fall intencity = 33 General nature of catchment Area

a. Agricultural land = 80b. Pasture Land = 240

4 Height of crest above G.L. = 25 Flood lift = 0.66 Free board = 0.27 Top width of Head wall = 0.88 Bottom width of Head wall = 2.409 Width of concrete Bed = 2.70

10 Length of crest = 1411 Percentage slope of land = 2.2912 No. of well benifited =13 No of farmer benifited =

a. S.C. =b. S.T. =c. Others =

Total =

TN 51-52

Page 106: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

12.iwmp 3.xls Ashu Comp

14 Area to be benifited =a. S.C. =b. S.T. =c. Others =

Total =15 =

a. a)Raito of concrete at bed = ( Cement : Sand :Aggregate)(1:4:8) =

b. b) Raito of Masonary fondation & Super structure =Cement Mortar(1:6) =

c. c) Raito of plastering and flush pointing of 25 mm. =Cement Mortar(1:6) =

d Raito of Kharanja in cement mortar =16 Cost of Project = 300000.00

a. Labour component = 78645

b. Material component = 212593

c. Contingency = 8762

Rates are as per GKN 2011 Udaipur wef 1.4.2011The Estimate are here with submitted for technical approvel an necessary action

TN 51-52

Preapared By Recommended By

J.En. A.En.

TN 51-52

Page 107: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

12.iwmp 3.xls Ashu Comp

Ha.

TECHNICAL REPORT

TN 51-52

Ha.Cm./hr.

Ha.Ha.M.M.M.M.M.M.M.

TN 51-52

Page 108: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

12.iwmp 3.xls Ashu Comp

TN 51-52

Recommended By

TN 51-52

Page 109: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

12.iwmp 3.xls Ashu Comp

AName of work-: Construction of M.M.S

I Available crest length 14 Mii Total catchment Area 320 Ha. As per G.T.Sheetiii Peak Runoff Ratea) By Rational Method Use when catchment is <1300Ha.

Qp = 0.0276 CIA Q=Run off in m3/sec.C= Coefficient of runoff

K = L3/2/H1/2 I= Intensity of rain fall in cm/hr.K = 23150.3 A= Catchment Area in Ha.Tc = 0.0195K0.77 L=Maxmium length of travel by runoff water in m.Tc = 44.74 H= Difference in elevation between most remote

point and and outlet point in meterQp= 0.0276 0.50 X 3 X

Qp = 13.25

b) By weir formula

Q = 1.71Lh3/2

Desgin calculation of M.M.S

Desgin 53-54

Q = 1.71Lh3/2

13.25 = 1.71 14 h3/2

h 0.67

Say h= 0.6

3 Free Board hw= Wave height in meter

Fb= 1.5hw Df= Fetch length in meter

1.5X0.014(Df)1/2

Fb= 0.23

Say Fb= 0.2

(B) STRUCTURAL DESGIN

1 Head wall

a) Height of Head wall H= 2

b) Top width( Tw) = h P= Sp.ht. Of masonary

(P-1)1/2

Tw= 0.53

Top width= 0.8

© Bottom width Bw Tw+0.8H

Bw= 2.40

So Bottom Width= 2.40 Meter

2 Head wall extension

a) Length= H+h+1+Fb

2 + 0.6 + 1 +

say Length of Right side wall = 3 Meter

Desgin 53-54

Page 110: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

12.iwmp 3.xls Ashu Comp

say Length of left side wall = 5.0 Meter

b) Height of Head Extensionwall = H+h+Fb

2 + 0.6 + 0.2

c) Top width

d) Bottom Width= 0.5(H+h) = 0.5( 2 + 0.6

3 Side wall

a) Length= 1.75H+0.75h+0.45 =

But as per site condition=

b) Height:

At H.W.End= H+h+Fb 2 + 0.6 + 0.2

At W.W.End= h+fb = 0.6 + 0.2 =

c) Top width=

d) Bottom width=

At H.W.End= 0.6+0.4(H+h)

At W.W.End= 0.6+0.4(1.5h)

But taken as=

4 Wing wall

a) Height h+Fb 0.6 + 0.2 =

b) Length= 2.25h 2.25 X 0.6

c) Top width

Bottom width of wing wall

5 Apron

Desgin 53-54

5 Apron

a) Length=

b) Width= H+h+Fb 2 + 0.6 + 0.2

c) Thickness

6 Toe wall

a) Length=

b) Width=

c) Height=

Preapared By Recommended By

J.En. A.En.

Desgin 53-54

Page 111: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

12.iwmp 3.xls Ashu Comp

FREE BODY DIAGRAM

a=b=H=h=

a

H

X

W1W2

fa

H/3

fbH/3

FBD 55-56

b

b/3 2b/3

cw(H+H)

Specific Wt. Of masonary P= 2.3 T/m3

Specific Wt. of water w= 1 T/m3

Cofficient of uplift pressure c= 0.6cofficient of friction atbed surface and creep length = 0.75Weight of Dam-:Weight of Dam-:

W1= aHPW1= T 3.68 T

b-a 3.68 T2

W(H+h)

HP=W2=

U

FBD 55-56

Page 112: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

12.iwmp 3.xls Ashu Comp

W= W1+W2= 3.68 + 3.68 = 7.36

Water pressureAt Depth h= P1 = wh = 1 X 0.6 = 0.6

At Depth H+h= P2 = w(H+h) =1( 2.00 + 0.6 ) = 2.6

Force aching due to water pressure I.e. Net horizontal

Water force P1+ P22 = 3.2

Horizontal water pressure at depth h =Fa= wHh= = 1.2At depth H+h = Fb= P2-P1 = 2

2Force due to water column at crest F3 = wha= = 0.48

Up lift pressure U = 1/2 cwb (H+h) = 1.872

Preapared By Recommended By

H

H=P=

FBD 55-56

J.En. A.En.

FBD 55-56

Page 113: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

12.iwmp 3.xls Ashu Comp

1 Safety against over turning

Over turning moment Mo = H H

2 3

2 2

2 3

Mo= 5.529

Restoring Moment Mr = W1 (b-a/2) + W2 (b-a)2/3

Mr=

Mr= 7.36 + 3.925 + 0.960

Mr 12.25

Mo 5.529

Structure is safe against over turning

2 Safety against Rupture from tension

STABILITY CHECKS

Factor of safety = 2.215 >1.5 Hence

Fa + Fb

1.20 2.000+

SC 57-58

2 Safety against Rupture from tension

Net Vertical Pressure V = W1+W2+F3-U

3.68 + 3.68 + 0.48 -

Position of resultant where it cut the base

Excess moment(Mr-Mo) 12.25 - 5.529

5.968

TRUE

3 Safety against crusing

Eccentricity e = b/2-X

0.075

Crusting stress at the toe of theHead wall

Pc= V (1+_6e/b)

b

Pc= 2.95

Pc<<20 Hence it is safe

X=Net vertical force

=

SC 57-58

Page 114: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

12.iwmp 3.xls Ashu Comp

4 Safety against sliding

Net vertical Force V= 5.968 T

Restorin force = uV = 0.70 X 5.968 (u=0.65 to 0.75)

4.1776 T

Sliding force Net horizontal force= Fa+Fb

1.2 + 2 = 3.2

Factor of safety = Restoring force 4.178

Sliding force 3.2

Hence it is safe

== 1.306

SC 57-58

Preapared By Recommended By

J.En. A.En.

SC 57-58

Page 115: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

12.iwmp 3.xls Ashu Como

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.S

Name of Scheme I.W.M.P

General features of anicut-:

Height of crest above G.L. 2 M.

Length of Crest 14 M.

Depth of foundation for H.W. = 1.4 M. Length of wing wall= 0.0 M.

Bottom width of H.W. = 2.4 M. Height of Wing wall= 0.8 M.

Top of H.W = 0.8 M. Bopttom width of Wing wall= 0.6 M.

Length of H.W.Ext = 3.0 M. Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 0.9 M.

Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 2.8 M. Height of Toewall= 0.30 M.

Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M. Top & Bopttom width of Toe wall= 0.30 M.

Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 1.3 M. Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.9 M.

Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 1.2 M. Thickness of Apron= 0.6 M.

Length of side wall= 2.7 M. Width of Apron = 2.8 M.

Bottom Width of S.W. 1.00 M. Berm for H.W Ext. 2.0 M.

Height of side wall at W.W.End= 0.80 M.

Depth of foundation for side wall = 1.2 M.

DETAILED ESTIMATE OF M.M.S

QuantityItem

D E 61-64

Depth of foundation for side wall = 1.2 M.S.No. No L B H

1

Total

2

0 X 0.0 = 0 Sqm.

3

Total Cum.

4

Total Cum

QuantityDag belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( Asper item no. page of W.D.& S.C.BSR of Jodhpur circle

Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungleincludling bushes shrubs and disposalas per instructrion of engineerincharge

Item

Benching of the base and depositingthe execavated material for bund forbund canal dressing etc. allcomponents

Earth work excavation for bund in harddry or moist soil including laying inlayer of 15cm. Breaking of clodsdressing to require profile with manualcompaction including intial lift up to1.5 m and lead up to 30M.

D E 61-64

Page 116: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

12.iwmp 3.xls Ashu Como

S.No. No L B H QuantityItem

5

H.W. 1 X 14 X 2.7 X 1.4 = 52.92 Cum.H.W.Ext Left 1 X 3.0 X 1.3 X 3.2 = 12.48 Cum.H.W.Ext Right 1 X 5.0 X 1.3 X 1.2 = 7.80 Cum.

S.W. 2 X 2.7 X 1.20 X 3.2 = 20.35 Cum.

W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.6 X 0.90 = 0.00 Cum.

Apron 1 X 14 X 2.8 X 0.60 = 23.52 Cum.

T.W. 1 X 14 X 0.30 X 0.9 = 3.78 Cum.

Total 120.85 Cum.

Earth work excavation for foundationin dry or moist soil including rammingof bottom scrapping of sides dipodal ofsoil intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead upto 30M.

D E 61-64

Total 120.85 Cum.

1 30% 36.26 Cum.

2 40% 36.26 Cum.

3 30% 48.34 Cum.

70% of total soil84.60 Cum

6

H.W. 1 X 14.0 X 2.7 X 0.3 = 11.34 Cum.

H.W.Ext 1 X 3 X 1.3 X 0.3 = 1.17 Cum.

1 X 5 X 1.3 X 0.3 = 1.95 Cum.

S.W. 2 X 2.65 X 1.30 X 0.3 = 2.07 Cum.

W.W. 2 X 0 X 0.6 X 0.3 = 0.00 Cum.

Apron 1 X 14.0 X 2.8 X 0.3 = 11.76 Cum.

T.W. 1 X 14.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 = 1.26 Cum.

Extra Lift of execavcated soil fromfoundation abiove 1.5 M.

Execavation in ordinary murram

Execavation in compacted murram

Providing and laying of cementconcrete well mixed in cement mortar1:3:6 laying in position completeexcluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 50 mm.etc. completeusing

Execavation in Hard soil

D E 61-64

Page 117: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

12.iwmp 3.xls Ashu Como

S.No. No L B H QuantityItem

Total 29.55 Cum.

7

H.W. 1 X 14.0 X 2.4 X 1.1 = 36.96 Cum.

H.W.Ext 1 X 3.0 X 1.3 X 0.9 = 3.51 Cum.

H.W.Ext 1 X 5.0 X 1.3 X 0.9 = 5.85 Cum.

S.W. 2 X 2.7 X 1.30 X 0.9 = 6.20 Cum.

W.W. 4 X 0.0 X 0.6 X 0.6 = 0.00 Cum.

T.W. 1 X 14.0 X 0.15 X 0.6 = 1.26 Cum.

Total 53.78 Cum.

8

H.W. 1 X 14.0 X 1.6 X 2 = 44.80 Cum.

I n Foundation Stone masonarycement sand mortar(1:6) for above 30cm. Thick wall

In super structure Stone masonaryabove 30 cm. Thick in cement sandmortar(1:6)

D E 61-64

H.W. 1 X 14.0 X 1.6 X 2 = 44.80 Cum.

H.W.Ext 1 X 3.0 X 0.95 X 2.8 = 7.98 Cum.

H.W.Ext 1 X 5.0 X 0.95 X 2.8 = 13.30 Cum.

S.W. 2 X 2.7 X 0.8 X 1.80 = 7.63 Cum.

W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.6 X 0.8 = 0.00 Cum.

T.W. 1 X 14.0 X 0.30 X 0.30 = 1.26 Cum.

Total 74.97 Cum.

9

Apron 1 X 14.0 X 2.8 X 0.30 11.76 Cum.

Total 11.76 Cum.

10

H.W. 1 X 14.0 X 0.8 X 0.05 = 0.56 Cum.

H.W.Ext 1 X 3.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.09 Cum.

1 X 5.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.15 Cum.

Stone Kharanja in cement mortar 1:6for bed and floor including cpactionetc. complete apron

Providing and laying of cementconcrete well mixed in cement mortar1:2:4 laying in position completeexcluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 20 mm.etc. complete

D E 61-64

Page 118: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

12.iwmp 3.xls Ashu Como

S.No. No L B H QuantityItem

S.W. 2 X 2.7 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.16 Cum.

W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.00 Cum.

T.W. 1 X 14.0 X 0.30 X 0.05 = 0.21 Cum.

Apron 1 X 14.0 X 2.80 X 0.1 = 3.92 Cum.

Total 5.09 Cum.

11

H.W. 1 X 14.0 X 2.5612 = 35.86 Sqm.

Total 35.86 Sqm.

12

H.W. 1 X 14.0 X 2 = 28.00 Sqm.

H.W.Ext. 1 X 3.0 X 2.8 = 8.40 Sqm.

H.W.Ext. 1 X 5.0 X 2.8 = 14.00 Sqm.

S.S 2 X 2.7 X 2.8 = 14.84 Sqm.

W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.8 = 0.00 Sqm.

Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)

20 m.m thick plastering on newsurface in cement mortar (1:4)

D E 61-64

W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.8 = 0.00 Sqm.

T.W. 2 X 14.0 X 0.3 = 8.40 Sqm.

Total = 73.64 Sqm.

13

14.0 X 0.00 X 0.23 0.00 Cum

Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressedwitch packing of voids of small stoneincluding all lifts in require profile (23cm depth)

D E 61-64

Page 119: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.SName of Scheme I.W.M.P

S.No.

10.00 Cum. 0.38 0

2

0 Sqm. 0.40 03

0 Cum. 04

0 Cum. 46.00 05

120.85 Cum. 036.26 Cum. 92.00 3335.5152 92.00 3335.515236.26 Cum. 134.0 4858.2504 134.00 4858.250448.34 Cum. 178.0 8604.6624 178.00 8604.6624

684.60 Cum. 11.00 930.5604 11.00 930.5604

7

Amount

Providing and laying of cementconcrete well mixed in cementmortar 1:3:6 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing withmaxmium size of aggregate up to

Extra Lift of execavcated soil fromfoundation abiove 1.5 M.

Benching of the base anddepositing the execavatedmaterial for bund for bund canalEarth work excavation for bund inhard dry or moist soil includinglaying in layer of 15cm. BreakingEarth work excavation forfoundation in dry or moist soilincluding ramming of bottomExecavation in Hard soilExecavation in ordinary murramExecavation in compacted murram

Abstract of Cost of M.M.S

Cutting and clearing of ordinaryjungle includling bushes shrubsand disposal as per instructrion of

Dag belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep(As per item no. page of W.D.&

Item Quatity Unit Lab.rate L.Amount Rate

29.55 Cum. 315.1 9310.2597 1881.0 55577.9078

53.78 Cum. 327 17586.387 1403.00 75454.7439 74.97 Cum. 327 24515.844 1403.00 105185.72

10

11.76 Cum. 327 3845.52 1403.0 16499.2811

5.09 Cum. 308.3 1568.9387 2552.0 12987.128

12 35.86 Sqm. 35.8 1283.698347 45.50 1631.516113

73.64 Sqm. 38.1 2805.684 95.00 6995.814

0.00 Cum. 86 328.00 078645.32015 Total 292061.08

TOTAL 292061

Contingency % 8762Say total Cost 300823

300000.00

Prepared By Recommonded By

Providing and laying of cementconcrete well mixed in cementmortar 1:3:6 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing withmaxmium size of aggregate up toI n Foundation Stone masonarycement sand mortar(1:6) for

Stone Kharanja in cement mortar1:6 for bed and floor includingcpaction etc. complete apronProviding and laying of cementconcrete well mixed in cementmortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing withmaxmium size of aggregate up to

20 m.m thick plastering on newsurface in cement mortar (1:4)Dry stone pitching of Hammerdressed witch packing of voids ofsmall stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)

Flush pointing in cement motar(1:3)

In super structure Stonemasonary above 30 cm. Thick incement sand mortar(1:6)

Page 120: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

12.iwmp 3.xls Ashu-comp

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.S

Name of Scheme I.W.M.P

S.No. ITEM Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Begs Cum Cum Cum

1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 29.55 94.55 13.30 26.59_

2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 73.64 12.49 1.77_ _

3 Massonary in Cement sand mortar 1:6 128.75 179.61 38.63 _ 141.634 Pointing in Cement 35.86 1.48 0.15 _ _

5 Stone Kharanja in cement mortar (1:6) 11.76 16.4052 3.528 _ 12.9366 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 5.09 31.25 2.09 4.177 Dry Stone Pitching 0.00 _ _ _ 0.00

TOTAL 335.78 59.45 30.77 154.56

Material Statement

Material 67

7 Dry Stone Pitching 0.00 _ _ _ 0.00TOTAL 335.78 59.45 30.77 154.56Say Bags 336

or 16.80 MT.

1 Cement 16.8 MT.

2 Sand 59.45 Cum.

3 Stones 154.56 Cum.

4 Aggregates 30.77 Cum.

Prepared By Recommonded By

J.En. A.En.

Material 67

Page 121: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.S

Name of Scheme I.W.M.P Ac

5 14.0

H.W.Ext.H.W.

1.6c

0.6

TYPICAL PLAN AND SECTION OF M.M.S

0.6

APRON

1.0T.W.

W.W .PLAN2

Preapared By

J.En.

PLAN

Page 122: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

0.8

0.8

2

2.4

1.42.8

1.40.3

SECTION ON A-A'

0.6

2.8

B.L.1

1.2

C-C' SECTION ON H.W.Ext.B-B' SECTION OF S.W.

Page 123: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

13 iwmp 25.xls Ashu Comp

MODEL ESTIMATE NO. 18

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.SDistrict UdaipurName of Scheme I.W.M.PPanchayat Samiti Sarada

This project is taken in I.W.M.P Scheme.The proposed M.M.S will not only reducevelocity of the runoff but also prevent the gullies from furthure soil erosion at thesame time it will be very much fruitful in recharging of downstream wells as well asit will increase the moisture content of the soil . So an it improve its productivity theretain water behind the structure can also be used for irrigation , and drinikingwater for anmimals . The cross section and L-section have been surveyed by dumpy level and catchment area has been taken from G.T. sheet / Revenue map.

Basic Data of Project=

1 Catch ment Area = 200

TECHNICAL REPORT

TN 51-52

1 Catch ment Area = 2002 Maxmium Rain fall intencity = 33 General nature of catchment Area

a. Agricultural land = 40b. Pasture Land = 160

4 Height of crest above G.L. = 1.55 Flood lift = 0.66 Free board = 0.27 Top width of Head wall = 0.88 Bottom width of Head wall = 2.409 Width of concrete Bed = 2.70

10 Length of crest = 1311 Percentage slope of land = 5.7112 No. of well benifited =13 No of farmer benifited =

a. S.C. =b. S.T. =c. Others =

Total =

TN 51-52

Page 124: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

13 iwmp 25.xls Ashu Comp

14 Area to be benifited =a. S.C. =b. S.T. =c. Others =

Total =15 =

a. a)Raito of concrete at bed = ( Cement : Sand :Aggregate)(1:4:8) =

b. b) Raito of Masonary fondation & Super structure =Cement Mortar(1:6) =

c. c) Raito of plastering and flush pointing of 25 mm. =Cement Mortar(1:6) =

d Raito of Kharanja in cement mortar =16 Cost of Project = 250000.00

a. Labour component = 66838

b. Material component = 175841

c. Contingency = 7320

Rates are as per GKN 2011 Udaipur wef 1.4.2011The Estimate are here with submitted for technical approvel an necessary action

TN 51-52

Preapared By Recommended By

J.En. A.En.

TN 51-52

Page 125: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

13 iwmp 25.xls Ashu Comp

AName of work-: Construction of M.M.S

I Available crest length 13 Mii Total catchment Area 200 Ha. As per G.T.Sheetiii Peak Runoff Ratea) By Rational Method Use when catchment is <1300Ha.

Qp = 0.0276 CIA Q=Run off in m3/sec.C= Coefficient of runoff

K = L3/2/H1/2 I= Intensity of rain fall in cm/hr.K = 8784.9 A= Catchment Area in Ha.Tc = 0.0195K0.77 L=Maxmium length of travel by runoff water in m.Tc = 21.22 H= Difference in elevation between most remote

point and and outlet point in meterQp= 0.0276 0.50 X 3 X 200

Qp = 8.28

b) By weir formula

Desgin calculation of M.M.S

Desgin 53-54

Q = 1.71Lh3/2

8.28 = 1.71 13 h3/2

h 0.52

Say h= 0.6

3 Free Board hw= Wave height in meter

Fb= 1.5hw Df= Fetch length in meter 120 Meter.

1.5X0.014(Df)1/2

Fb= 0.23

Say Fb= 0.2

(B) STRUCTURAL DESGIN

1 Head wall

a) Height of Head wall H= 1.5

b) Top width( Tw) = h P= Sp.ht. Of masonary 2.3

(P-1)1/2

Tw= 0.53

Top width= 0.8

© Bottom width Bw Tw+0.8H

Bw= 2.00

So Bottom Width= 2.40 Meter

2 Head wall extension

Desgin 53-54

Page 126: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

13 iwmp 25.xls Ashu Comp

a) Length= H+h+1+Fb

1.5 + 0.6 + 1 + = 3.10 Meter

say Length of Right side wall = 4 Meter

say Length of left side wall = 6.0 Meter

b) Height of Head Extensionwall = H+h+Fb

1.5 + 0.6 + 0.2 = 2.3 Meter

c) Top width 0.6 Meter

d) Bottom Width= 0.5(H+h) = 0.5( 1.5 + 0.6 )= 1.05 Meter

3 Side wall

a) Length= 1.75H+0.75h+0.45 = 3.53

But as per site condition= 2.7 Meter

b) Height:

At H.W.End= H+h+Fb 1.5 + 0.6 + 0.2 = 2.3 Meter

At W.W.End= h+fb = 0.6 + 0.2 = 0.8 Meter

c) Top width= 0.6 Meter

d) Bottom width=

At H.W.End= 0.6+0.4(H+h) 1.4 Meter

At W.W.End= 0.6+0.4(1.5h) 1.0 Meter

But taken as= 1.0 Meter

4 Wing wall

a) Height h+Fb 0.6 + 0.2 = 0.8 Meter

Desgin 53-54

a) Height h+Fb 0.6 + 0.2 = 0.8 Meter

b) Length= 2.25h 2.25 X 0.6 = 1.35 Meter Say 2.00

c) Top width 0.6 Meter

Bottom width of wing wall 0.6 Meter

5 Apron

a) Length= 13 Meter

b) Width= H+h+Fb 1.5 + 0.6 + 0.2 2.3 Meter

c) Thickness 0.6 Meter

6 Toe wall

a) Length= 13 Meter

b) Width= 0.3 Meter

c) Height= 0.3 Meter

J.En. A.En.

Desgin 53-54

Page 127: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

13 iwmp 25.xls Ashu Comp

FREE BODY DIAGRAM

a= 0.8

b= 2.40

H= 1.5

h= 0.6

a

H

X

W1W2

fa

H/3

fbH/3

FBD 55-56

b

b/3 2b/3

cw(H+H)

Specific Wt. Of masonary P= 2.3 T/m3

Specific Wt. of water w= 1 T/m3

Cofficient of uplift pressure c= 0.6cofficient of friction atbed surface and creep length = 0.75Weight of Dam-:Weight of Dam-:

W1= aHPW1= T 2.76 T

b-a 2.76 T2

W(H+h)

HP=W2=

U

FBD 55-56

Page 128: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

13 iwmp 25.xls Ashu Comp

W= W1+W2= 2.76 + 2.76 = 5.52 T

Water pressureAt Depth h= P1 = wh = 1 X 0.6 = 0.6 T/m

2

At Depth H+h= P2 = w(H+h) =1( 1.50 + 0.6 ) = 2.1 T/m

2

Force aching due to water pressure I.e. Net horizontal

Water force P1+ P22 = 2.025 T/m

2

Horizontal water pressure at depth h =Fa= wHh= = 0.9 TAt depth H+h = Fb= P2-P1 = 1.125 T

2Force due to water column at crest F3 = wha= = 0.48 T

Up lift pressure U = 1/2 cwb (H+h) = 1.512 T

Preapared By Recommended By

H

H=P=

FBD 55-56

J.En. A.En.

FBD 55-56

Page 129: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

13 iwmp 25.xls Ashu Comp

1 Safety against over turning

Over turning moment Mo = H H 2

2 3 3

1.5 1.5 2

2 3 3

Mo= 3.657

Restoring Moment Mr = W1 (b-a/2) + W2 (b-a)2/3 + F3 (b-a/2)

Mr=

Mr= 5.52 + 2.944 + 0.960 = 9.42

Mr 9.424

Mo 3.657

Structure is safe against over turning

2 Safety against Rupture from tension

STABILITY CHECKS

Factor of safety = 2.577

u

+ 1.51

>1.5 Hence

bFa + Fb +

2.400.90 1.125+

SC 57-58

2 Safety against Rupture from tension

Net Vertical Pressure V = W1+W2+F3-U

2.76 + 2.76 + 0.48 - 1.512 = 4.488

Position of resultant where it cut the base

Excess moment(Mr-Mo) 9.424 - 3.657

4.488

TRUE

3 Safety against crusing

Eccentricity e = b/2-X

-0.09

Crusting stress at the toe of theHead wall

Pc= V (1+_6e/b)

b

Pc= 1.47

Pc<<20 Hence it is safe

1.29X=Net vertical force

= =

SC 57-58

Page 130: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

13 iwmp 25.xls Ashu Comp

4 Safety against sliding

Net vertical Force V= 4.488 T

Restorin force = uV = 0.70 X 4.488 (u=0.65 to 0.75)

3.14 T

Sliding force Net horizontal force= Fa+Fb

0.9 + 1.125 = 2.025 T

Factor of safety = Restoring force 3.142

Sliding force 2.025

Hence it is safe

== 1.55 >1.3 Hence

SC 57-58

Preapared By Recommended By

J.En. A.En.

SC 57-58

Page 131: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

13 iwmp 25.xls Ashu Como

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.S

Name of Scheme I.W.M.P

General features of anicut-:

Height of crest above G.L. 1.5 M.

Length of Crest 13 M.

Depth of foundation for H.W. = 1.3 M. Length of wing wall= 0.0

Bottom width of H.W. = 2.4 M. Height of Wing wall= 0.8

Top of H.W = 0.8 M. Bopttom width of Wing wall= 0.6

Length of H.W.Ext = 4.0 M. Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 0.9

Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 2.3 M. Height of Toewall= 0.30

Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M. Top & Bopttom width of Toe wall= 0.30

Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 1.1 M. Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.9

Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 1.3 M. Thickness of Apron= 0.6

Length of side wall= 2.7 M. Width of Apron = 2.3

Bottom Width of S.W. 1.00 M. Berm for H.W Ext. 2.0

Height of side wall at W.W.End= 0.80 M.

DETAILED ESTIMATE OF M.M.S

D E 61-64

Height of side wall at W.W.End= 0.80 M.

Depth of foundation for side wall = 1.3 M.S.No. No L B H

1

Total

2

0 X 0.0 =

3

Total

4

Dag belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As peritem no. page of W.D.& S.C. BSR ofJodhpur circle

Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungleincludling bushes shrubs and disposal asper instructrion of engineer incharge

Item

Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund for bundcanal dressing etc. all components

Earth work excavation for bund in harddry or moist soil including laying in layer of15cm. Breaking of clods dressing torequire profile with manual compactionincluding intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead upto 30M.

D E 61-64

Page 132: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

13 iwmp 25.xls Ashu Como

S.No. No L B HItem

Total

5

H.W. 1 X 13 X 2.7 X 1.3 =

H.W.ExtLeft 1 X 4.0 X 1.1 X 3.3 =

H.W.ExtRight 1 X 6.0 X 1.1 X 1.3 =

S.W. 2 X 2.7 X 1.30 X 3.3 =

W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.6 X 0.90 =

Apron 1 X 13 X 2.3 X 0.60 =

Earth work excavation for foundation indry or moist soil including ramming ofbottom scrapping of sides dipodal of soilintial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to 30M.

D E 61-64

Apron 1 X 13 X 2.3 X 0.60 =

T.W. 1 X 13 X 0.30 X 0.9 =

Total

1 30%

2 40%

3 30%

70% of total soil

6

H.W. 1 X 13.0 X 2.7 X 0.3 =

H.W.Ext 1 X 4 X 1.1 X 0.3 =

1 X 6 X 1.1 X 0.3 =

S.W. 2 X 2.65 X 1.05 X 0.3 =

W.W. 2 X 0 X 0.6 X 0.3 =

Execavation in ordinary murram

Execavation in compacted murram

Providing and laying of cement concretewell mixed in cement mortar 1:3:6 layingin position complete excluding curing withmaxmium size of aggregate up to 50 mm.etc. completeusing

Execavation in Hard soil

Extra Lift of execavcated soil fromfoundation abiove 1.5 M.

D E 61-64

Page 133: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

13 iwmp 25.xls Ashu Como

S.No. No L B HItem

Apron 1 X 13.0 X 2.3 X 0.3 =

T.W. 1 X 13.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 =

Total

7

H.W. 1 X 13.0 X 2.4 X 1.0 =

H.W.Ext 1 X 4.0 X 1.1 X 1.0 =

H.W.Ext 1 X 6.0 X 1.1 X 1.0 =

S.W. 2 X 2.7 X 1.05 X 1.0 =

W.W. 4 X 0.0 X 0.6 X 0.6 =

T.W. 1 X 13.0 X 0.15 X 0.6 =

8

I n Foundation Stone masonary cementsand mortar(1:6) for above 30 cm. Thickwall

In super structure Stone masonary above30 cm. Thick in cement sand mortar(1:6)

D E 61-64

H.W. 1 X 13.0 X 1.6 X 1.5 =

H.W.Ext 1 X 4.0 X 0.83 X 2.3 =

H.W.Ext 1 X 6.0 X 0.83 X 2.3 =

S.W. 2 X 2.7 X 0.8 X 1.55 =

W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.6 X 0.8 =

T.W. 1 X 13.0 X 0.30 X 0.30 =

Total

9

Apron 1 X 13.0 X 2.3 X 0.30

Total

10

Stone Kharanja in cement mortar 1:6 forbed and floor including cpaction etc.complete apron

Providing and laying of cement concretewell mixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 layingin position complete excluding curing withmaxmium size of aggregate up to 20 mm.etc. complete

In super structure Stone masonary above30 cm. Thick in cement sand mortar(1:6)

D E 61-64

Page 134: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

13 iwmp 25.xls Ashu Como

S.No. No L B HItem

H.W. 1 X 13.0 X 0.8 X 0.05 =

H.W.Ext 1 X 4.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 =

1 X 6.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 =

S.W. 2 X 2.7 X 0.6 X 0.05 =

W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 =

T.W. 1 X 13.0 X 0.30 X 0.05 =

Apron 1 X 13.0 X 2.30 X 0.1 =

Total

11

H.W. 1 X 13.0 X 2.19 =

Total

12

H.W. 1 X 13.0 X 1.5 =

20 m.m thick plastering on new surface incement mortar (1:4)

Providing and laying of cement concretewell mixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 layingin position complete excluding curing withmaxmium size of aggregate up to 20 mm.etc. complete

Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)

D E 61-64

H.W. 1 X 13.0 X 1.5 =

H.W.Ext. 1 X 4.0 X 2.3 =

H.W.Ext. 1 X 6.0 X 2.3 =

S.S 2 X 2.7 X 2.3 =

W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.8 =

T.W. 2 X 13.0 X 0.3 =

Total =

13

13.0 X 0.00 X 0.23

Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressedwitch packing of voids of small stoneincluding all lifts in require profile (23 cmdepth)

20 m.m thick plastering on new surface incement mortar (1:4)

D E 61-64

Page 135: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.SName of Scheme I.W.M.P

S.No.1

0.00 Cum. 0.38 0

2

0 Sqm. 0.40 03

0 Cum. 04

0 Cum. 46.00 05

111.87 Cum. 033.56 Cum. 92.00 3088 92.00 3087.529233.56 Cum. 134.0 4497 134.00 4497.0534

Amount

Benching of the base anddepositing the execavatedmaterial for bund for bund canalEarth work excavation for bund inhard dry or moist soil includinglaying in layer of 15cm. BreakingEarth work excavation forfoundation in dry or moist soilincluding ramming of bottomExecavation in Hard soilExecavation in ordinary murramExecavation in compacted murram

Abstract of Cost of M.M.S

Cutting and clearing of ordinaryjungle includling bushes shrubsand disposal as per instructrion of

Dag belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep(As per item no. page of W.D.&

Item Quatity Unit Lab.rate L.Amount Rate

33.56 Cum. 134.0 4497 134.00 4497.053444.75 Cum. 178.0 7965 178.00 7964.9304

678.31 Cum. 11.00 861.4 11.00 861.3759

7

25.49 Cum. 315.1 8032 1881.0 47945.758

48.44 Cum. 327 15838 1403.00 67954.3059 57.92 Cum. 327 18939 1403.00 81257.551

Providing and laying of cementconcrete well mixed in cementmortar 1:3:6 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing withI n Foundation Stone masonary

cement sand mortar(1:6) for

Extra Lift of execavcated soil fromfoundation abiove 1.5 M.

Execavation in ordinary murramExecavation in compacted murram

In super structure Stonemasonary above 30 cm. Thick incement sand mortar(1:6)

Page 136: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

10

8.97 Cum. 327 2933 1403.0 12584.9111

4.16 Cum. 308.3 1284 2552.0 10626.528

12 28.51 Sqm. 35.8 1021 45.50 1297.260813

62.49 Sqm. 38.1 2381 95.00 5936.5514

0.00 Cum. 86 328.00 066838 Total 244013.74

TOTAL 244014

Contingency % 7320Say total Cost 251334

Stone Kharanja in cement mortar1:6 for bed and floor includingcpaction etc. complete apronProviding and laying of cementconcrete well mixed in cementmortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with

20 m.m thick plastering on newsurface in cement mortar (1:4)Dry stone pitching of Hammerdressed witch packing of voids ofsmall stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)

Flush pointing in cement motar(1:3)

Say total Cost 251334250000.00

Prepared By Recommonded By

J.En. A.En.

Page 137: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

13 iwmp 25.xls Ashu-comp

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.S

Name of Scheme I.W.M.P

S.No. ITEM Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Begs Cum Cum Cum

1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 25.49 81.57 11.47 22.94_

2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 62.49 10.60 1.50_ _

3 Massonary in Cement sand mortar 1:6 106.35 148.36 31.91 _ 116.994 Pointing in Cement 28.51 1.17 0.12 _ _

5 Stone Kharanja in cement mortar (1:6) 8.97 12.51315 2.691 _ 9.8676 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 4.16 25.57 1.71 3.417 Dry Stone Pitching 0.00 _ _ _ 0.00

TOTAL 279.78 49.39 26.36 126.85

Material Statement

Material 67

7 Dry Stone Pitching 0.00 _ _ _ 0.00TOTAL 279.78 49.39 26.36 126.85Say Bags 280

or 14.00 MT.

1 Cement 14 MT.

2 Sand 49.39 Cum.

3 Stones 126.85 Cum.

4 Aggregates 26.36 Cum.

Prepared By Recommonded By

J.En. A.En.

Material 67

Page 138: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.S

Name of Scheme I.W.M.P Ac

5 13.0 5

H.W.Ext.H.W. 0.8

1.4c

S.W.0.6

B 2.7 B

APRON 2.3

TYPICAL PLAN AND SECTION OF M.M.S

0.6

1.60

1.0T.W. 0.3

W.W. W

.W

PLAN2A

Preapared By Recommended By

A.En.J.En.

PLAN

Page 139: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

0.8

0.8

1.5

0.8

0.32.4

2.3

BED LEVEL

1.30.3

SECTION ON A-A'

0.6

2.3

B.L.1

1.3

C-C' SECTION ON H.W.Ext.B-B' SECTION OF S.W.

2.3

Page 140: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

14.iwmp 55.xls Ashu Comp

MODEL ESTIMATE NO. 19

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.SDistrict UdaipurName of Scheme I.W.M.PPanchayat Samiti Sarada

This project is taken in I.W.M.P Scheme.The proposed anicut will not only reducevelocity of the runoff but also prevent the gullies from furthure soil erosion at thesame time it will be very much fruitful in recharging of downstream wells as well asit will increase the moisture content of the soil . So an it improve its productivity theretain water behind the structure can also be used for irrigation , and drinikingwater for anmimals . The cross section and L-section have been surveyed by dumpy level and catchment area has been taken from G.T. sheet / Revenue map.

Basic Data of Project=

TECHNICAL REPORT

TN 51-52

=1 Catch ment Area = 320 Ha.2 Maxmium Rain fall intencity = 3 Cm./hr.3 General nature of catchment Area

a. Agricultural land = 100 Ha.b. Pasture Land = 220 Ha.

4 Height of crest above G.L. = 2 M.5 Flood lift = 0.6 M.6 Free board = 0.2 M.7 Top width of Head wall = 0.8 M.8 Bottom width of Head wall = 2.40 M.9 Width of concrete Bed = 2.70 M.

10 Length of crest = 22 M.11 Percentage slope of land = 1.9012 No. of well benifited =13 No of farmer benifited =

a. S.C. =b. S.T. =c. Others =

Total =

TN 51-52

Page 141: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

14.iwmp 55.xls Ashu Comp

14 Area to be benifited =a. S.C. =b. S.T. =c. Others =

Total =15 =

a. a)Raito of concrete at bed = ( Cement : Sand :Aggregate)(1:4:8) =

b. b) Raito of Masonary fondation & Super structure =Cement Mortar(1:6) =

c. c) Raito of plastering and flush pointing of 25 mm. =Cement Mortar(1:6) =

d Raito of Kharanja in cement mortar =16 Cost of Project = 500000.00

a. Labour component = 133739

b. Material component = 351659

c. Contingency = 14602

Rates are as per GKN 2011 Udaipur wef 1.4.2011The Estimate are here with submitted for technical approvel an necessary action

TN 51-52

Preapared By Recommended By

J.En. A.En.

TN 51-52

Page 142: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

14.iwmp 55.xls Ashu Comp

AName of work-: Construction of M.M.S

I Available crest length 22 Mii Total catchment Area 320 Ha. As per G.T.Sheetiii Peak Runoff Ratea) By Rational Method Use when catchment is <1300Ha.

Qp = 0.0276 CIA Q=Run off in m3/sec.C= Coefficient of runoff

K = L3/2/H1/2 I= Intensity of rain fall in cm/hr.K = 30431.9 A= Catchment Area in Ha.Tc = 0.0195K0.77 L=Maxmium length of travel by runoff water in m.Tc = 55.23 H= Difference in elevation between most remote

point and and outlet point in meterQp= 0.0276 0.50 X 3 X 320

Qp = 13.25

b) By weir formula

Desgin calculation of M.M.S

Desgin 53-54

Q = 1.71Lh3/2

13.25 = 1.71 22 h3/2

h 0.50

Say h= 0.6

3 Free Board hw= Wave height in meter

Fb= 1.5hw Df= Fetch length in meter 120 Meter.

1.5X0.014(Df)1/2

Fb= 0.23

Say Fb= 0.2

(B) STRUCTURAL DESGIN

1 Head wall

a) Height of Head wall H= 2

b) Top width( Tw) = h P= Sp.ht. Of masonary 2.3

(P-1)1/2

Tw= 0.53

Top width= 0.8

© Bottom width Bw Tw+0.8H

Bw= 2.40

Desgin 53-54

Page 143: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

14.iwmp 55.xls Ashu Comp

So Bottom Width= 2.40 Meter

2 Head wall extension

a) Length= H+h+1+Fb

2 + 0.6 + 1 + = 3.60 Meter

say Length of Right side wall = 5 Meter

say Length of left side wall = 6.0 Meter

b) Height of Head Extensionwall = H+h+Fb

2 + 0.6 + 0.2 = 2.8 Meter

c) Top width 0.6 Meter

d) Bottom Width= 0.5(H+h) = 0.5( 2 + 0.6 )= 1.30 Meter

3 Side wall

a) Length= 1.75H+0.75h+0.45 = 4.4

But as per site condition= 2.7 Meter

b) Height:

At H.W.End= H+h+Fb 2 + 0.6 + 0.2 = 2.8 Meter

At W.W.End= h+fb = 0.6 + 0.2 = 0.8 Meter

c) Top width= 0.6 Meter

d) Bottom width=

At H.W.End= 0.6+0.4(H+h) 1.6 Meter

At W.W.End= 0.6+0.4(1.5h) 1.0 Meter

Desgin 53-54

At W.W.End= 0.6+0.4(1.5h) 1.0 Meter

But taken as= 1.0 Meter

4 Wing wall

a) Height h+Fb 0.6 + 0.2 = 0.8 Meter

b) Length= 2.25h 2.25 X 0.6 = 1.35 Meter Say 2.00

c) Top width 0.6 Meter

Bottom width of wing wall 0.6 Meter

5 Apron

a) Length= 22 Meter

b) Width= H+h+Fb 2 + 0.6 + 0.2 2.8 Meter

c) Thickness 0.6 Meter

6 Toe wall

a) Length= 22 Meter

b) Width= 0.3 Meter

c) Height= 0.3 Meter

Preapared By Recommended By

J.En. A.En.

Desgin 53-54

Page 144: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

14.iwmp 55.xls Ashu Comp

FREE BODY DIAGRAM

a= 0.8

b= 2.40

H= 2

h= 0.6

a

H

X

W1W2

fa

H/3

fbH/3

FBD 55-56

b

b/3 2b/3

cw(H+H)

Specific Wt. Of masonary P= 2.3 T/m3

Specific Wt. of water w= 1 T/m3

Cofficient of uplift pressure c= 0.6cofficient of friction atbed surface and creep length = 0.75Weight of Dam-:Weight of Dam-:

W1= aHPW1= T 3.68 T

b-a 3.68 T2

W(H+h)

HP=W2=

U

H/3

FBD 55-56

Page 145: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

14.iwmp 55.xls Ashu Comp

W= W1+W2= 3.68 + 3.68 = 7.36 T

Water pressureAt Depth h= P1 = wh = 1 X 0.6 = 0.6 T/m2

At Depth H+h= P2 = w(H+h) =1( 2.00 + 0.6 ) = 2.6 T/m2

Force aching due to water pressure I.e. Net horizontal

Water force P1+ P22 = 3.2 T/m2

Horizontal water pressure at depth h =Fa= wHh= = 1.2 TAt depth H+h = Fb= P2-P1 = 2 T

2Force due to water column at crest F3 = wha= = 0.48 T

Up lift pressure U = 1/2 cwb (H+h) = 1.872 T

Preapared By Recommended By

H

H=P=

FBD 55-56

Preapared By Recommended By

J.En. A.En.

FBD 55-56

Page 146: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

14.iwmp 55.xls Ashu Comp

1 Safety against over turning

Over turning moment Mo = H H 2

2 3 3

2 2 2

2 3 3

Mo= 5.529

Restoring Moment Mr = W1 (b-a/2) + W2 (b-a)2/3 + F3 (b-a/2)

Mr=

Mr= 7.36 + 3.925 + 0.960 = 12.2

Mr 12.25

Mo 5.529

Structure is safe against over turning

2.401.20 2.000+

bFa + Fb +

Factor of safety = 2.215

u

+ 1.87

>1.5 Hence

STABILITY CHECKS

SC 57-58

Structure is safe against over turning

2 Safety against Rupture from tension

Net Vertical Pressure V = W1+W2+F3-U

3.68 + 3.68 + 0.48 - 1.872 = 5.968

Position of resultant where it cut the base

Excess moment(Mr-Mo) 12.25 - 5.529

5.968

TRUE

3 Safety against crusing

Eccentricity e = b/2-X

0.075

Crusting stress at the toe of theHead wall

Pc= V (1+_6e/b)

b

Pc= 2.95

Pc<<20 Hence it is safe

4 Safety against sliding

1.13X=Net vertical force

= =

SC 57-58

Page 147: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

14.iwmp 55.xls Ashu Comp

Net vertical Force V= 5.968 T

Restorin force = uV = 0.70 X 5.968 (u=0.65 to 0.75)

4.1776 T

Sliding force Net horizontal force= Fa+Fb

1.2 + 2 = 3.2 T

Factor of safety = Restoring force 4.178

Sliding force 3.2

Hence it is safe

Preapared By Recommended By

== 1.306 >1.3 Hence

SC 57-58

Preapared By Recommended By

J.En. A.En.

SC 57-58

Page 148: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

14.iwmp 55.xls Ashu Como

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.S

Name of Scheme I.W.M.P

General features of anicut-:

Length of Crest 22 M.

Depth of foundation for H.W. = 2.0 M. Length of wing wall= 0.0

Bottom width of H.W. = 2.4 M. Height of Wing wall= 0.8

Top of H.W = 0.8 M. Bopttom width of Wing wall= 0.6

Length of H.W.Ext = 4.0 M. Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 0.9

Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 2.8 M. Height of Toewall= 0.30

Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M. Top & Bopttom width of Toe wall= 0.30

Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 1.3 M. Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.9

Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 1.3 M. Thickness of Apron= 0.6

Length of side wall= 2.7 M. Width of Apron = 2.8

Bottom Width of S.W. 1.00 M. Berm for H.W Ext. 2.0

Height of side wall at W.W.End= 0.80 M.

DETAILED ESTIMATE OF M.M.S

D E 61-64

Height of side wall at W.W.End= 0.80 M.

Depth of foundation for side wall = 2.0 M.S.No. No L B H

1

Total

2

0 X 0.0 =

3

Total

4

Dag belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As peritem no. page of W.D.& S.C. BSR ofJodhpur circle

Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungleincludling bushes shrubs and disposal asper instructrion of engineer incharge

Item

Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund for bundcanal dressing etc. all components

Earth work excavation for bund in harddry or moist soil including laying in layer of15cm. Breaking of clods dressing torequire profile with manual compactionincluding intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead upto 30M.

D E 61-64

Page 149: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

14.iwmp 55.xls Ashu Como

S.No. No L B HItem

Total

5

H.W. 1 X 22 X 2.7 X 2.0 =

H.W.ExtLeft 1 X 4.0 X 1.3 X 3.3 =

H.W.ExtRight 1 X 6.0 X 1.3 X 2.0 =

S.W. 2 X 2.7 X 1.30 X 4.0 =

W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.6 X 0.90 =

Apron 1 X 22 X 2.8 X 0.60 =

Earth work excavation for foundation indry or moist soil including ramming ofbottom scrapping of sides dipodal of soilintial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to 30M.

D E 61-64

Apron 1 X 22 X 2.8 X 0.60 =

T.W. 1 X 22 X 0.30 X 0.9 =

Total

1 30%

2 40%

3 30%

70% of total soil

6

H.W. 1 X 22.0 X 2.7 X 0.3 =

H.W.Ext 1 X 4 X 1.3 X 0.3 =

1 X 6 X 1.3 X 0.3 =

S.W. 2 X 2.65 X 1.30 X 0.3 =

W.W. 2 X 0 X 0.6 X 0.3 =

Execavation in Hard soil

Extra Lift of execavcated soil fromfoundation abiove 1.5 M.

Execavation in ordinary murram

Execavation in compacted murram

Providing and laying of cement concretewell mixed in cement mortar 1:3:6 layingin position complete excluding curing withmaxmium size of aggregate up to 50 mm.etc. completeusing

D E 61-64

Page 150: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

14.iwmp 55.xls Ashu Como

S.No. No L B HItem

Apron 1 X 22.0 X 2.8 X 0.3 =

T.W. 1 X 22.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 =

Total

7

H.W. 1 X 22.0 X 2.4 X 1.7 =

H.W.Ext 1 X 4.0 X 1.3 X 1.0 =

H.W.Ext 1 X 6.0 X 1.3 X 1.0 =

S.W. 2 X 2.7 X 1.30 X 1.7 =

W.W. 4 X 0.0 X 0.6 X 0.6 =

T.W. 1 X 22.0 X 0.15 X 0.6 =

Total

8In super structure Stone masonary above30 cm. Thick in cement sand mortar(1:6)

I n Foundation Stone masonary cementsand mortar(1:6) for above 30 cm. Thickwall

D E 61-64

8

H.W. 1 X 22.0 X 1.6 X 2 =

H.W.Ext 1 X 4.0 X 0.95 X 2.8 =

H.W.Ext 1 X 6.0 X 0.95 X 2.8 =

S.W. 2 X 2.7 X 0.8 X 1.80 =

W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.6 X 0.8 =

T.W. 1 X 22.0 X 0.30 X 0.30 =

Total

9

Apron 1 X 22.0 X 2.8 X 0.30

Total

10

In super structure Stone masonary above30 cm. Thick in cement sand mortar(1:6)

Stone Kharanja in cement mortar 1:6 forbed and floor including cpaction etc.complete apron

Providing and laying of cement concretewell mixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 layingin position complete excluding curing withmaxmium size of aggregate up to 20 mm.etc. complete

D E 61-64

Page 151: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

14.iwmp 55.xls Ashu Como

S.No. No L B HItem

H.W. 1 X 22.0 X 0.8 X 0.05 =

H.W.Ext 1 X 4.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 =

1 X 6.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 =

S.W. 2 X 2.7 X 0.6 X 0.05 =

W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 =

T.W. 1 X 22.0 X 0.30 X 0.05 =

Apron 1 X 22.0 X 2.80 X 0.1 =

Total

11

H.W. 1 X 22.0 X 2.56 =

Total

1220 m.m thick plastering on new surface incement mortar (1:4)

Providing and laying of cement concretewell mixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 layingin position complete excluding curing withmaxmium size of aggregate up to 20 mm.etc. complete

Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)

D E 61-64

H.W. 1 X 22.0 X 2 =

H.W.Ext. 1 X 4.0 X 2.8 =

H.W.Ext. 1 X 6.0 X 2.8 =

S.S 2 X 2.7 X 2.8 =

W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.8 =

T.W. 2 X 22.0 X 0.3 =

Total =

13

22.0 X 0.00 X 0.23

Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressedwitch packing of voids of small stoneincluding all lifts in require profile (23 cmdepth)

20 m.m thick plastering on new surface incement mortar (1:4)

D E 61-64

Page 152: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.SName of Scheme I.W.M.P

S.No.1

0.00 Cum. 0.38 0

2

0 Sqm. 0.40 03

0 Cum. 04

0 Cum. 46.00 05

222.02 Cum. 066.61 Cum. 92.00 6127.8 92.00 6127.75266.61 Cum. 134.0 8925.2 134.00 8925.20488.81 Cum. 178.0 15808 178.00 15807.824

Abstract of Cost of M.M.S

Cutting and clearing of ordinaryjungle includling bushes shrubsand disposal as per instructrion of

Dag belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep(As per item no. page of W.D.&

Item Quatity Unit Lab.rate L.Amount Rate

Execavation in compacted murram

Amount

Extra Lift of execavcated soil fromfoundation abiove 1.5 M.

Benching of the base anddepositing the execavatedmaterial for bund for bund canalEarth work excavation for bund inhard dry or moist soil includinglaying in layer of 15cm. BreakingEarth work excavation forfoundation in dry or moist soilincluding ramming of bottomExecavation in Hard soilExecavation in ordinary murram

88.81 Cum. 178.0 15808 178.00 15807.824

6155.41 Cum. 11.00 1709.6 11.00 1709.554

7

44.25 Cum. 315.1 13942 1881.0 83228.6078

116.45 Cum. 327 38080 1403.00 163383.569 106.61 Cum. 327 34862 1403.00 149576.64

10

18.48 Cum. 327 6043 1403.0 25927.4411

7.83 Cum. 308.3 2413.7 2552.0 19979.608

12 56.32 Sqm. 35.8 2016.3 45.50 2562.5613

100.04 Sqm. 38.1 3811.5 95.00 9503.814

Execavation in compacted murram

Stone Kharanja in cement mortar1:6 for bed and floor includingcpaction etc. complete apronProviding and laying of cementconcrete well mixed in cementmortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with

20 m.m thick plastering on newsurface in cement mortar (1:4)Dry stone pitching of Hammerdressed witch packing of voids ofsmall stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)

Flush pointing in cement motar(1:3)

In super structure Stonemasonary above 30 cm. Thick incement sand mortar(1:6)

Providing and laying of cementconcrete well mixed in cementmortar 1:3:6 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing withI n Foundation Stone masonary

cement sand mortar(1:6) for

Extra Lift of execavcated soil fromfoundation abiove 1.5 M.

Page 153: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

0.00 Cum. 86 328.00 0133739 Total 486732.54

TOTAL 486733

Contingency % 14602Say total Cost 501335

500000.00

Prepared By Recommonded By

J.En. A.En.

Dry stone pitching of Hammerdressed witch packing of voids ofsmall stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)

Page 154: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

14.iwmp 55.xls Ashu-comp

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.S

Name of Scheme I.W.M.P

S.No. ITEM Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Begs Cum Cum Cum

1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 44.25 141.59 19.91 39.82_

2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 100.04 16.97 2.40_ _

3 Massonary in Cement sand mortar 1:6 223.07 311.18 66.92 _ 245.374 Pointing in Cement 56.32 2.32 0.24 _ _

5 Stone Kharanja in cement mortar (1:6) 18.48 25.7796 5.544 _ 20.3286 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 7.83 48.07 3.21 6.42

Material Statement

Material 67

6 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 7.83 48.07 3.21 6.427 Dry Stone Pitching 0.00 _ _ _ 0.00

TOTAL 545.90 98.22 46.24 265.70Say Bags 546

or 27.30 MT.

1 Cement 27.3 MT.

2 Sand 98.22 Cum.

3 Stones 265.70 Cum.

4 Aggregates 46.24 Cum.

Prepared By Recommonded By

J.En. A.En.J.En. A.En.

Material 67

Page 155: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

NAME OF WORK Construction of M.M.S

Name of Scheme I.W.M.P Ac

5 22.0 5

H.W.Ext.H.W. 0.8

1.6c

S.W.0.6

B 2.7 B

APRON 2.8

0.6

1.60

TYPICAL PLAN AND SECTION OF M.M.D

1.0T.W. 0.3

W.W. W

.W

PLAN2A

Preapared By Recommended By

A.En.J.En.

PLAN

Page 156: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

0.8

0.8

2

0.8

0.32.4

20.3

2.8

BED LEVEL

SECTION ON A-A'

0.6

2.8

B.L.1

2

C-C' SECTION ON H.W.Ext.B-B' SECTION OF S.W.

Page 157: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti
Page 158: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti
Page 159: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti
Page 160: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti
Page 161: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti
Page 162: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

dqy {kS=Qy 48437 dqy xkao 17

Lohd`r jkf'k 581-16

Ø-l-i'kqvksa dh ekSleh

chekjhizfr'kr

1 xyxksVw 302 [kqjidk 35

dqy xzke iapk;rLohd`r o"kZ 2009&10

P.R.A. Activity

tyxzg.k {kS= es vkus okys {kS= es i'kqvksa dh ekSleh chekjh dk ekufp=

tyxzg.k {ks= & vkbZMCY;w,eih & f}rh; ¼ljkM+k½

10%

5%

100%100%100%

2 [kqjidk 353 ikifM+;k 204 QMfd;k 105 xys es lqtu 5 30%

35%

20%

10%

100%100%100% 100%100%100%

Page 163: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

dqy {kS=Qy 48437 dqy xkao 17

Lohd`r jkf'k 581-16

Ø-l- Hkwfe dk fooj.k {kS=Qy gSDVj izfr'kr

P.R.A. Activity

tyxzg.k {kS= es vkus okys {kS= ds Hkwfe fooj.k dk ekufp=

tyxzg.k {ks= & vkbZMCY;w,eih & f}rh; ¼ljkM+k½dqy xzke iapk;rLohd`r o"kZ 2009&10

100%100%

Ø-l- Hkwfe dk fooj.k {kS=Qy gSDVj izfr'kr

1 flafpr Hkwfe 213 4.252 vflafpr Hkwfe 867 17.293 ou Hkwfe 171 3.414 pkjkxkg 418 8.345 jktdh; vd`f"k 1872 37.346 futh vd`f"k 1202 23.977 vU; 271 5.40

;ksx 5014 100

4%

17%

4%8%

37%

24%

6%

100%100%

Page 164: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

dqy {kS=Qy 48437 dqy xkao 17

Lohd`r jkf'k 581-16

Ø-l-tula[;k dkfooj.k

tula[;k izfr'kr

1 iq:"k 1643 25.17

P.R.A. Activity

tyxzg.k {kS= es vkus okys {kS= es tula[;k dk ekufp=

tyxzg.k {ks= & vkbZMCY;w,eih & f}rh; ¼ljkM+k½dqy xzke iapk;rLohd`r o"kZ 2009&10

50% 100%100%

1 iq:"k 1643 25.172 efgyk 1689 25.873 cPps 3196 48.96

;ksx 6528 100

50% 100%100%

25%

26%

49%

Page 165: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

dqy {kS=Qy 48437 dqy xkao 17

Lohd`r jkf'k 581-16

Ø-l- fooj.k izfr'kr1 lk{kj 502 vui<+ 35

P.R.A. Activity

tyxzg.k {ks= & vkbZMCY;w,eih & f}rh; ¼ljkM+k½dqy xzke iapk;rLohd`r o"kZ 2009&10

tyxzg.k {kS= es vkus okys {kS= dk lk{kjrk ekufp=

1%

100%100%100%

2 vui<+ 353 10oh rd 44 1 ls 8oh rd 105 1 Lrkud 1

50%

35%

4%10%

100%100%100%

Page 166: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti
Page 167: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Chani

Sarada

Sepur

Naal Alankar

Parsad

Kherki

Chavand

Pal Nimboda

Katanwara

Khejad

50

Pal Sepur

Pal Mandva

Neemach

Kharwad chak

Nimboda

Dakan Bawri

Sarara

Chavand

Sepur

Katanwara

Nimbada

Chavand

Nimach

Mandva

kachhota

Kherala

UV11/09

UV11/10

UV14/01

UV14/06

UV14/02

UV11/08

UV11/11

UV14/03

UV11/12

STATE REMOTE SENSING APPLICATION CENTREDepartment of Science & Technology

JODHPUR

µ1:12,000

LEGENDROAD

SETTLEMENT

DRAINAGEVILLAGE

WATERSHED BOUNDARY

WATERBODY / RIVER

BASE MAP

DISTRICT- UDAIPUR

WATERSHED - SARADA (IWMP-IV)PANCHAYAT SAMITI - SARADA

Page 168: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti
Page 169: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

Table :- Existing Waterbodies Before ProjectS.No.

Name of Structure Village Beneficiary

1 Hanuman Anicut Chani All Villagers.2 Vedadhara Talab Chani All Villagers.3 DibyaDhara Anicut Chani All Villagers.4 GuiaDhara Anicut Chani All Villagers.5 GuiaDhara Talab Chani All Villagers.6 Vavni Anicut Chani All Villagers.7 DabanaDhara Anicut Mandwa All Villagers.8 Dak Bagle Ke Pas

AnicutMandwa All Villagers.

9 Dharm Talai Anicut(Kuba/Magwa ke pas)

Mandwa All Villagers.

10 DhavadiaAnicut(Hurma ke pas)

Mandwa All Villagers.

11 Bhagadi Talab Mandwa All Villagers.12 Hamera Talab Mandwa All Villagers.13 Lamdi Anicut (Near

Thavra/Nathu)Mandwa All Villagers.

14 Motadara Anicut Kherki All Villagers.15 Aaba Thaba Anicut Kherki All Villagers.16 Nirbada Dara

AnicutKherki All Villagers.

17 Jegia Dara Talab Kherki All Villagers.18 Baniadara Anicut Kherki All Villagers.19 Mahudiwala Anicut Kherki All Villagers.20 Akhaiwala Anicut Kherki All Villagers.21 Rapat pana Anicut Kherki All Villagers.22 Thur Ghati Anicut Kherki All Villagers.23 Kabita wala Anicut Nal Halkar All Villagers.24 Vodra kundi wala

AnicutNal Halkar All Villagers.

25 Mahadev Anicut Nal Halkar All Villagers.26 Bharav Anicut Nal Halkar All Villagers.27 Hanuman Anicut Nal Halkar All Villagers.28 Khani dhana Anicut Nal Halkar All Villagers.29 Satiya wala Anicut Nal Halkar All Villagers.30 Katarwa Anicut Chawand All Villagers.31 Sigudi Anicut Chawand All Villagers.32 Shril Talab Chawand All Villagers.

Page 170: Integrated Watershed Management Programme …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...Cost 581.16 Lac Project Period 2009-10 to 2013-14 Assistant Engineer Panchayat Samiti

33 Daglaya Anicut Chawand All Villagers.34 Megdi Anicut Chawand All Villagers.35 Vavdi Anicut Chawand All Villagers.36 Meyra Anicut Sarada All Villagers.37 Indra sagar Talab Sarada All Villagers.38 Nekana Talab Sepur All Villagers.39 Kadpal Anicut Sepur All Villagers.40 Nahela pal Anicut Sepur All Villagers.41 Dharm Talai Anicut Sepur All Villagers.42 Shravalia Anicut Sepur All Villagers.43 Darilawa Anicut Sepur All Villagers.44 Khajuria Anicut Sepur All Villagers.45 Hasulan Talab Sepur All Villagers.46 Kalia Aamba Anicut Nimboda All Villagers.47 Thappicha wala Talab

AnicutNimboda All Villagers.

48 Nurariya Anicut Nimboda All Villagers.49 Kalighati Anicut Nimboda All Villagers.50 Padual Anicut Nimboda All Villagers.51 Bhatiwala Talab

AnicutNimboda All Villagers.52 Makodia Anicut Pal Sepur All Villagers.

53 Butewala Anicut Pal Sepur All Villagers.54 Uplaphala Anicut Nal All Villagers.55 Aakaliwala Anicut Sepur All Villagers.56 Pagara Talab Pal Sepur All Villagers.57 Pratapsagar Talab Kejed All Villagers.