31
1 Integrating Planning, Integrating Planning, Execution, and Execution, and Monitoring Monitoring ( ( IPEM) IPEM) Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM) Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

  • Upload
    happy

  • View
    29

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM) Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel. IPEM Framework. Set of plan transformations which remove flaws for the current plan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

11

Integrating Planning, Integrating Planning, Execution, and MonitoringExecution, and Monitoring

((IPEM) IPEM) Abrose-Ingerson and Sam SteelAbrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

Page 2: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

22

IPEM FrameworkIPEM Framework Set of plan transformations which Set of plan transformations which

remove flaws for the current planremove flaws for the current plan

at each point in execution try to at each point in execution try to transform the current plan into a viable transform the current plan into a viable one (e.g., one that applies in the current one (e.g., one that applies in the current situation to achieve desired goals)situation to achieve desired goals)

Page 3: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

33

AssumptionsAssumptions

Current world description (CWD)Current world description (CWD)– can changecan change

actions can fail to achieve purported effectsactions can fail to achieve purported effects actions can have delayed effects (but told when actions can have delayed effects (but told when

actions over “time out”)actions over “time out”)

– CWD may be missing true facts (e.g., sound CWD may be missing true facts (e.g., sound but not complete)but not complete)

Page 4: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

44

Chapman TerminologyChapman Terminology

Current plan is incomplete, partialCurrent plan is incomplete, partial– partial commitment on codesignation (assignment partial commitment on codesignation (assignment

of variables to constants)of variables to constants)– partial commitment on ordering of actions partial commitment on ordering of actions

(precedence relations may not cause total order)(precedence relations may not cause total order)– completion of a partial plan P satisfies every completion of a partial plan P satisfies every

constraint in Pconstraint in P

Partial plan P Partial plan P necessarilynecessarily satisfies S if S satisfies S if S holds in every completionholds in every completion

P P possiblypossibly satisfies S if S holds in at least one satisfies S if S holds in at least one completioncompletion

Page 5: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

55

A Plan isA Plan is…… BEGIN actionBEGIN action

– postconditions are CWDpostconditions are CWD

END actionEND action– preconditions are desired goalspreconditions are desired goals

set of protections (ranges, causal links)set of protections (ranges, causal links)– connects postondition (supplier) with precondition connects postondition (supplier) with precondition

(user)(user) postcondition and precondition must codesignate (unify)postcondition and precondition must codesignate (unify) supplier necessarily before usersupplier necessarily before user

set of actions (suppliers and users)set of actions (suppliers and users)

Page 6: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

66

Sample ProblemSample Problem

Begin

…clear Cclear AA on B

End

A on C

CB

A

D

t.1 t.2 t.3

Page 7: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

77

Plan GenerationPlan Generation

Also used in modification (incremental Also used in modification (incremental modifications on a partial plan)modifications on a partial plan)– unsupported preconditionunsupported precondition– unresolved conflictunresolved conflict– unexpanded actionunexpanded action

Page 8: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

88

Plan Modifications - ReducePlan Modifications - Reduce Unsupported precondition; action A has Unsupported precondition; action A has

precondition P with no range)precondition P with no range)(i.e., no supplier yet)(i.e., no supplier yet)

use an action S already in plan such that S use an action S already in plan such that S possiblypossibly before A and with effect E that before A and with effect E that possiblypossibly codesignates with P codesignates with P– make S necc. before Amake S necc. before A– make E necc. codes. with Pmake E necc. codes. with P

add action to plan that satisfies aboveadd action to plan that satisfies above

Page 9: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

99

Sample PlanSample Plan

Begin

…clear Cclear AA on B

Move A from B to C

End

clear zclear xx on y

~clear zclear y~(x on y)x on z A on C

clear Cclear AA on B

~clear Cclear B~(A on B)A on C

Unsupported preconditionadd action

Unsupported preconditionuse exist. act.

Page 10: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

1010

Unresolved Conflict - Unresolved Conflict - LinearizeLinearize

IfIf– plan has range R that protects P such thatplan has range R that protects P such that– there is an action A andthere is an action A and

A is possibly after producer of RA is possibly after producer of R A is possibly before consumer of RA is possibly before consumer of R A has an effect which asserts ~P (possibly codes with ~P)A has an effect which asserts ~P (possibly codes with ~P)

– resolve byresolve by A necessarily after consumer of R; orA necessarily after consumer of R; or A necessarily before producer of RA necessarily before producer of R

Page 11: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

1111

Example Conflict ResolutionExample Conflict Resolution

Act1:Move D

from C to E

…clear C

act2: Move A

from B to C

Act3:Move C

from F to H

clear C

move act2 after act3

Move act2 before act1

clear Cclear AA on B

~clear Cclear B~(A on B)A on C

Protect clear C from Act1 to Act3

Page 12: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

1212

Unexpanded Action - ExpandUnexpanded Action - Expand

A plan has an action A which is not A plan has an action A which is not primitiveprimitive– resolve by replacing action with its expansion resolve by replacing action with its expansion

(network of activities)(network of activities)

Page 13: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

1313

Plan Monitoring & ExecutionPlan Monitoring & Execution

unsupported rangeunsupported range unexecuted actionunexecuted action timed out actiontimed out action unextended rangeunextended range redundant actionredundant action

Page 14: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

1414

Unsupported RangeUnsupported Range

Plan has a range (causal link) R which Plan has a range (causal link) R which protects a proposition not in CWDprotects a proposition not in CWD

fixed by removing the rangefixed by removing the range– immediately creates an unsupported immediately creates an unsupported

precondition on consumer (R)precondition on consumer (R)– resolve as in plan generationresolve as in plan generation

Page 15: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

1515

Sample PlansSample Plans

Begin

…clear Cclear AA on B

Move A from B to C

End

clear zclear xx on y

~clear zclear y~(x on y)x on z A on C

clear Cclear AA on B

~clear Cclear B~(A on B)A on C

Suppose we execute this plan but then somehow mistakenly A gets moved from B to D

Page 16: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

1616

Sample PlansSample Plans

Begin

…clear Cclear AA on B

Move A from B to D!

End

clear zclear xx on y

~clear zclear y~(x on y)x on z A on C

clear Cclear AA on B

~clear Dclear B~(A on B) A on D

unsupported rangeremove it!

Page 17: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

1717

Unexecuted Action: ExecuteUnexecuted Action: Execute Action A ready for execution if:Action A ready for execution if:

– A is primitive and is not ENDA is primitive and is not END– all preconditions supported and produced all preconditions supported and produced

by BEGINby BEGIN– it is immediately after an executed actionit is immediately after an executed action– it is not involved in an unresolved conflictit is not involved in an unresolved conflict– there is no “live” action B (i.e., not timed there is no “live” action B (i.e., not timed

out) before A that expects a postcondition out) before A that expects a postcondition that can clobber (threat) any of A’s that can clobber (threat) any of A’s postconditionspostconditions

Page 18: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

1818

Executing an Action AExecuting an Action A

Make all parallel actions necessarily after Make all parallel actions necessarily after AA– what about currently executing actions?what about currently executing actions?

Calling associated procedure Calling associated procedure – (actual work)(actual work)

list postconditions as expected list postconditions as expected (monitoring)(monitoring)

recording action as executedrecording action as executed

Page 19: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

1919

Unextended Range: ExtendUnextended Range: Extend Can remove a range R and replace it with Can remove a range R and replace it with

R’ whereR’ where R and R’ have the same consumerR and R’ have the same consumer producer of R’ is necessarily before producer of Rproducer of R’ is necessarily before producer of R R’ does not create an unresolved conflict flawR’ does not create an unresolved conflict flaw

special case when activity A executes, special case when activity A executes, achieves desired effect E, range moves achieves desired effect E, range moves from producer=A to producer=BEGINfrom producer=A to producer=BEGIN

seems like an optimizationseems like an optimization

Page 20: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

2020

Timed Out Action: Excise ActionTimed Out Action: Excise Action

When an action is terminated and no When an action is terminated and no further effects occurfurther effects occur

presumes that such a time can be presumes that such a time can be specified and that actions can be specified and that actions can be terminatedterminated

remove action and all its ranges from planremove action and all its ranges from plan

Page 21: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

2121

Redundant action: Excise ActionRedundant action: Excise Action

An action not producing for any range has a An action not producing for any range has a redundant action flaw and is excisedredundant action flaw and is excised

Excising a redundant action can result in Excising a redundant action can result in further action redundanciesfurther action redundancies

Page 22: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

2222

Control: The SchedulerControl: The Scheduler

IPEM maintains an agenda of tasks IPEM maintains an agenda of tasks – each agenda item is a flaweach agenda item is a flaw– with the possible fixeswith the possible fixes

IPEM orders flawsIPEM orders flawsFlaw ordering heuristic•unsupported range•unextended range•timed-out action•unresolved conflict•unsupported precondition•unexpanded action•unexecuted action

Within Flaw Class• select the flaw with fewest options (corresponds to CSP value ordering heuristic)

Page 23: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

2323

Example: ReplanningExample: Replanning

Begin

…clear Cclear AA on B

u.2 on t.5clear u.2clear r.1clear r.2...

Move A from B to C

Move u.2from t.5

to r.1

End

clear zclear xx on y

~clear zclear y~(x on y)x on z

x on yclear xclear z

x on z~(x on y)clear y~clear z

A on C

u.m on r.n

Initial plan

CBA

Dt.1 t.2 t.3 t.4 t.5 t.6

u.2u.1

r.1

r.2

m=2n=1

x=u.2y=t.5z=r.1

x=Ay=Bz=C

Page 24: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

2424

Example: ReplanningExample: Replanning

Begin

…clear Cclear AA on B

u.2 on t.5clear u.2clear r.1clear r.2...

Move A from B to C

Move u.2from t.5

to r.1

End

clear zclear xx on y

~clear zclear y~(x on y)x on z

x on yclear xclear z

x on z~(x on y)clear y~clear z

A on C

u.m on r.n

CBA

D

t.1 t.2 t.3 t.4 t.5 t.6u.2u.1

r.1

r.2

Baby moves d from t.3 to r.1x=Ay=Bz=C

m=2n=1

x=u.2y=t.5z=r.1

Page 25: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

2525

Example: ReplanningExample: Replanning

Begin

…clear Cclear AA on B

u.2 on t.5clear u.2clear r.1clear r.2...

Move1 A from B to C

Move2 u.2from t.5

to r.2

End

clear zclear xx on y

~clear zclear y~(x on y)x on z

x on yclear xclear z

x on z~(x on y)clear y~clear z

A on C

u.m on r.n

CBA

D

t.1 t.2 t.3 t.4 t.5 t.6u.2u.1

r.1

r.2

Reassign end.n=2 Move2.z=r.2 x=A

y=Bz=C

m=2n=2

x=u.2y=t.5z=r.2

Page 26: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

2626

Example: ReplanningExample: Replanning

Begin

clear Bclear Cclear AA on BA on u.2

u.2 on t.5clear u.2clear r.1clear r.2...

Move1 A from B to C

Move2 u.2from t.5

to r.2

End

clear zclear xx on y

~clear zclear y~(x on y)x on z

x on yclear xclear z

x on z~(x on y)clear y~clear z

A on C

u.m on r.n

CBA

D

t.1 t.2 t.3 t.4 t.5 t.6u.2u.1

r.1

r.2

Baby moves A from B to u.2x=Ay=Bz=C

m=2n=2

x=u.2y=t.5z=r.2

Page 27: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

2727

Example: ReplanningExample: Replanning

Begin

clear Bclear Cclear AA on BA on u.2

u.2 on t.5clear u.2clear r.1clear r.2...

Move1 A from B to C

Move2 u.2from t.5

to r.2

End

clear zclear xx on y

~clear zclear y~(x on y)x on z

x on yclear xclear z

x on z~(x on y)clear y~clear z

x on z

u.m on r.n

CBA

D

t.1 t.2 t.3 t.4 t.5 t.6u.2u.1

r.1

r.2

Fix lower flawx=Ay=Bz=C

m=2n=2

x=By=t.5z=r.2

Page 28: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

2828

Example: ReplanningExample: Replanning

Begin

clear Bclear Cclear AA on BA on u.2

u.2 on t.5clear u.2clear r.1clear r.2...

Move1 A from B to C

Move2 u.2from t.5

to r.2

End

clear zclear xx on y

~clear zclear y~(x on y)x on z

x on yclear xclear z

x on z~(x on y)clear y~clear z

x on z

u.m on r.n

CBA

D

t.1 t.2 t.3 t.4 t.5 t.6u.2u.1

r.1

r.2

Fix upper flawx=Ay=u.2z=C

m=2n=2

x=By=t.5z=r.2

Page 29: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

2929

Interleaving Planning and ExecutionInterleaving Planning and Execution

BEGINASK

GET meal

END

personlikesthing guest

likesmeal

havemeal

dinnerwith

Sandy

DINE

havemeal

dinnerwithguest

Page 30: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

3030

Interleaving Planning and ExecutionInterleaving Planning and Execution

Begin ASK GET meal END

personlikesthing

guestlikesmeal

havemeal

dinnerwith

Sandy

DINE

havemeal

dinnerwithguest

…Sandylikesfondue

Page 31: Integrating Planning, Execution, and Monitoring ( IPEM)  Abrose-Ingerson and Sam Steel

3131

DiscussionDiscussion

Enables replanning for “classical Enables replanning for “classical planning”planning”

atomic actions (but parallel execution)atomic actions (but parallel execution) does not enable reasoning about does not enable reasoning about

resources, metric timeresources, metric time